EP3806127B1 - Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit - Google Patents

Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3806127B1
EP3806127B1 EP19382882.9A EP19382882A EP3806127B1 EP 3806127 B1 EP3806127 B1 EP 3806127B1 EP 19382882 A EP19382882 A EP 19382882A EP 3806127 B1 EP3806127 B1 EP 3806127B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
voltage
output voltage
power circuit
power supply
fbk
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP19382882.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3806127A1 (en
Inventor
Enric SALA MASIP
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Fico Triad SA
Original Assignee
Fico Triad SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Fico Triad SA filed Critical Fico Triad SA
Priority to EP19382882.9A priority Critical patent/EP3806127B1/en
Priority to CN202011071984.4A priority patent/CN112631362A/en
Publication of EP3806127A1 publication Critical patent/EP3806127A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3806127B1 publication Critical patent/EP3806127B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H47/00Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current
    • H01H47/02Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current for modifying the operation of the relay
    • H01H47/04Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current for modifying the operation of the relay for holding armature in attracted position, e.g. when initial energising circuit is interrupted; for maintaining armature in attracted position, e.g. with reduced energising current
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05FSYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G05F1/00Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
    • G05F1/10Regulating voltage or current
    • G05F1/625Regulating voltage or current wherein it is irrelevant whether the variable actually regulated is ac or dc
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H47/00Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current
    • H01H47/22Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current for supplying energising current for relay coil
    • H01H47/32Energising current supplied by semiconductor device
    • H01H47/325Energising current supplied by semiconductor device by switching regulator
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H47/00Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current
    • H01H2047/009Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current with self learning features, e.g. measuring the attracting current for a relay and memorising it

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a control system and a method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit which results in a reduction in power consumption in the coils of said electromechanical contactor.
  • Electromechanical contactors are used in many applications, for instance, in electric vehicles.
  • electromechanical contactors are typically used. Such electromechanical contactors comprise two parts, a contact and a coil.
  • the contact can be moved to one direction that produces the connection (ON) of the power circuit or it can be moved in an opposite direction to produce the disconnection (OFF) of the power circuit.
  • the coil is a kind of electromagnet that produces a mechanical force to move the contact.
  • the mechanical coupling between the coil and the contact is provided by an internal shaft and a spring.
  • the coil In the disconnected (OFF) state, the coil is not energized, and the shaft is moved or maintained in the disconnection position due to the spring force. In the connected (ON) state, the coil is energized, and the applied force overcomes the force of the spring that moves the contact to the connected position.
  • the contactor when the contactor is in the ON state, i.e., connected to the power circuit, the coil requires power to be applied.
  • Energy saving is especially relevant when contactors must remain in an ON state for a long period of time as, for example, in electric vehicle applications.
  • the magnetic circuit In the OFF state, the magnetic circuit is open.
  • a strong force named as "pick-up” force, must be applied to start the shaft movement. After displacement, the magnetic circuit remains closed and it is no longer necessary to apply such a strong force to keep the contact in the closed position, named as "holding" force.
  • a power supply is used to provide the energy to the contactor coils.
  • a low voltage (i.e. 12 Vdc) power supply is used in many applications.
  • the low voltage power supply is often implemented by a kind of DC power converter (i.e. buck, boost, sepic, or other topologies) providing a fixed, stabilized constant voltage in order to drive the contactor coils to prevent possible voltage fluctuations from closing the contactor when it should not.
  • a kind of DC power converter i.e. buck, boost, sepic, or other topologies
  • the contactor is built with two internal coils, one optimized for the "pick-up” conditions, and, another optimized for the "holding” conditions.
  • An electronic circuit switches the coils when necessary to economize. This solution is expensive due to the dual coil and the switching circuit.
  • resistor voltage dividers As can be seen in figure 1 .
  • some resistors (10) are electrically connected in series with the coil (2).
  • the resistors (10) are by-passed with a switching circuit (11).
  • Resistors (10) are power resistors in order to stand to be in series with the coil (2) and to resist the intensity that would circulate through them.
  • part of the power dissipation is transferred to the resistors (10), decreasing the efficiency of the economization.
  • this type of resistors (10) dissipate heat to the surrounding electronics, which is not convenient, and they also need space to be located.
  • Pulse Width Modulation PWM
  • the coil (2) is driven at 100% of the voltage, thus applying high power.
  • the coil (2) is driven to a reduced duty cycle (i.e. 50%) to reduce to average energy applied to the coil (2). This is implemented by the PWM, driving ON and OFF at high speed.
  • EMC electromagnetic interference
  • EP1009006 A1 disclosing a command mechanism for opening or closing of a circuit breaker having a microprocessor controlling a switch in series with a coil.
  • the microprocessor compares the command level against thresholds.
  • a first voltage is compared with a first and second level, distinct from a lower level controlling the coil during the command phase for a predetermined time.
  • the present invention is a control system and a method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit that reduces power consumption, thus economizing energy.
  • the invention is based on a voltage regulated power supply.
  • known electromechanical contactors of a power circuit comprise:
  • the control system also comprises a regulated power supply.
  • the regulated power supply is connectable to the coil and is configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage V OUT to the coil.
  • the regulated power supply is configured to modify the provided output voltage V OUT when the feedback voltage V FBK received by the power supply differs from a reference voltage V REF .
  • the control system further comprises a controller adapted to be connected to the regulated power supply.
  • the controller is configured to vary the relationship k between the output voltage V OUT and the feedback voltage V FBK from at least a first relationship k 1 to a second relationship k 2 , being k 2 > k 1 . Accordingly, the regulated power supply varies the provided output voltage V OUT between at least a first output voltage V OUT1 and a second lower output voltage V OUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil.
  • the feedback voltage V FBK received by the regulated power supply also varies from a first feedback voltage V FBK1 to a second feedback voltage V FBK2 . Said variation occurs while the output voltage V OUT remains the same, as it is not varied, being the first initial output voltage V OUT1 for both feedbacks voltages.
  • the second feedback voltage V FBK2 is greater than V FBK1 . Said second feedback voltage V FBK2 differs from the reference voltage V REF and an error exists.
  • the regulated power supply receives for the first initial output voltage V OUT1 a second feedback voltage V FBK2 different from the reference voltage V REF Therefore, the regulated power supply initiates a regulation iterative process modifying the output voltage V OUT until the received feedback voltage V FBK is equal to the reference voltage V REF and thus the error is zero.
  • V REF V FBK
  • V OUT has been modified to a second out voltage V OUT2 , according to the relationship k 1 /k 2 .
  • the control system of the invention makes use of the existing power supply, specifically a regulated power supply adapted to provide a constant output voltage V OUT .
  • the control system is therefore able to make the power supply to switch between, for instance, two different voltage settings, a first and a second output voltages V OUT by providing the power supply with a different relationship k between the output voltage V OUT and the feedback voltage V FBK .
  • the regulation cycle is performed by the regulated power supply itself and therefore it has the advantage that the invention can be applied on an existing regulated power supply.
  • the controller is configured to provide:
  • the power supply comprises a voltage regulator configured to make the power supply to provide the constant output voltage V OUT to the coil.
  • the voltage regulator comprises:
  • the control method comprising the step of providing a regulated power supply connectable to the coil.
  • the method additionally comprises the step of providing a controller, the controller varying the relationship k between the output voltage V OUT and the feedback voltage V FBK from at least a first relationship k 1 to a second relationship k 2 , being k 2 > k 1 , such that the regulated power supply varies the provided output voltage V OUT from at least a first output voltage V OUT1 to a second lower output voltage V OUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil.
  • the feedback voltage V FBK received by the regulated power supply also varies from a first feedback voltage V FBK1 to a second feedback voltage V FBK2 .
  • said variation occurs while the output voltage V OUT remains the same, as it is not varied, being the first initial output voltage V OUT1 for both feedbacks voltages.
  • the second feedback voltage V FBK2 will be greater than V FBK1 .
  • Said second feedback voltage V FBK2 differs from the reference voltage V REF and an error exists and, therefore, the regulated power supply initiates an iterative process to provide a constant output voltage V OUT .
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a control system of an electromechanical contactor according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the control system comprises:
  • the controller (4) is configured to act over the relationship k, in turn, this modifying the feedback voltage V FBK value.
  • the controller (4) is configured to switch between the first relationship k 1 and the second relationship k 2 after a fixed period of time.
  • the controller (4) will provide a first relationship k 1 during the pick-up stage and a second relationship k 2 during the holding stage.
  • the output voltage V OUT can be modified by applying different values to the relationship k.
  • the regulated power supply (3) will provide a different voltage if the feedback voltage V FBK received differs from the reference voltage V REF .
  • the system is stable with the following conditions:
  • the electromechanical contactor has an actuation time to close the contact (1), for instance 50 ms, the controller (4) waits for a longer time, for instance 300 ms, to provide a different relationship k.
  • the controller (4) provides a relationship k 2 > k 1 .
  • the controller (4) drives the switch (5), but the energy applied to the contactor-coil (1, 2) would be reduced.
  • the output voltage V OUT will be half the voltage of V REF , i.e., 6 Vdc.
  • the feedback voltage V FBK is considered to be between 0 V and 1 V.
  • FIG 4 an embodiment of the implementation of an electric circuit of the electromechanical contactor of the invention is depicted in which how the relationship k is implemented is shown.
  • control system comprises a voltage divider connected to the output of the regulated power supply (3) comprising a set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in series.
  • the set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in parallel with the coil (2).
  • the controller (4) is configured to switch on and off one of the resistors, resistor R3, so that the relationship between the feedback voltage V FBK and the output voltage V OUT , i.e., k, can be varied by the controller (4).
  • the voltage of (R4 + R3) / (R5 + R4 +R3) x V OUT is the feedback voltage V FBK provided to the regulated power supply (3), wherein R3 could be 0 or R3.
  • figure 4 discloses an implementation of the claimed system.
  • the output voltage V OUT is measured by a combination of resistors R3, R4, R5 acting as voltage dividers and the measurement is sent to the voltage regulator (6) of the power supply (3) through the feedback connection.
  • two stable output voltages may be provided, one depending on R4/(R4+R5) and another depending on (R3+R4)/(R3+R4+R5).
  • Said resistors are therefore outside the main circuit of the coil (2) activation, and are small polarization resistors, negligible in cost and they do not produce additional heat and need little space.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Relay Circuits (AREA)

Description

    Field of the invention
  • The invention relates to a control system and a method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit which results in a reduction in power consumption in the coils of said electromechanical contactor. Electromechanical contactors are used in many applications, for instance, in electric vehicles.
  • Background of the invention
  • For the connection and disconnection of power circuits, electromechanical contactors are typically used. Such electromechanical contactors comprise two parts, a contact and a coil.
  • The contact can be moved to one direction that produces the connection (ON) of the power circuit or it can be moved in an opposite direction to produce the disconnection (OFF) of the power circuit.
  • The coil is a kind of electromagnet that produces a mechanical force to move the contact. The mechanical coupling between the coil and the contact is provided by an internal shaft and a spring.
  • In the disconnected (OFF) state, the coil is not energized, and the shaft is moved or maintained in the disconnection position due to the spring force. In the connected (ON) state, the coil is energized, and the applied force overcomes the force of the spring that moves the contact to the connected position.
  • Therefore, when the contactor is in the ON state, i.e., connected to the power circuit, the coil requires power to be applied.
  • Energy saving is especially relevant when contactors must remain in an ON state for a long period of time as, for example, in electric vehicle applications.
  • In the OFF state, the magnetic circuit is open. When the contactor is to be closed, a strong force, named as "pick-up" force, must be applied to start the shaft movement. After displacement, the magnetic circuit remains closed and it is no longer necessary to apply such a strong force to keep the contact in the closed position, named as "holding" force.
  • Accordingly, during the "pick-up" stage, a relatively strong electrical power must be applied to the electromagnetic coil but, later, during the "holding" stage, it is not necessary to maintain such a high power applied to the coil.
  • In a typical application, a power supply is used to provide the energy to the contactor coils. A low voltage (i.e. 12 Vdc) power supply is used in many applications.
  • The low voltage power supply is often implemented by a kind of DC power converter (i.e. buck, boost, sepic, or other topologies) providing a fixed, stabilized constant voltage in order to drive the contactor coils to prevent possible voltage fluctuations from closing the contactor when it should not.
  • In order to reduce the electric power consumption in the coil during the "holding" state, some techniques have been used.
  • It is known to use dual coil contactors. In this case, the contactor is built with two internal coils, one optimized for the "pick-up" conditions, and, another optimized for the "holding" conditions. An electronic circuit switches the coils when necessary to economize. This solution is expensive due to the dual coil and the switching circuit.
  • It is also known to use resistor voltage dividers as can be seen in figure 1. During the "holding" stage, in order to reduce the current through the coil (2), some resistors (10) are electrically connected in series with the coil (2). During the "pick-up" state, the resistors (10) are by-passed with a switching circuit (11). This solution is expensive due to the use of resistors (10) connected in series with the coil (2) and the required switching circuit (11). Resistors (10) are power resistors in order to stand to be in series with the coil (2) and to resist the intensity that would circulate through them. In addition, part of the power dissipation is transferred to the resistors (10), decreasing the efficiency of the economization. Moreover, this type of resistors (10) dissipate heat to the surrounding electronics, which is not convenient, and they also need space to be located.
  • Finally, it is also known to use Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) techniques as shown in figure 2. During the "pick-up" stage, the coil (2) is driven at 100% of the voltage, thus applying high power. During the "holding" stage the coil (2) is driven to a reduced duty cycle (i.e. 50%) to reduce to average energy applied to the coil (2). This is implemented by the PWM, driving ON and OFF at high speed.
  • Due to the high frequency applied to the contactor and the high quantity of switch ON and switch OFF cycles, this solution produces electromagnetic interference (EMC) into the surrounding circuits and is not recommended in a safe environment.
  • It is known document EP1009006 A1 disclosing a command mechanism for opening or closing of a circuit breaker having a microprocessor controlling a switch in series with a coil. The microprocessor compares the command level against thresholds. A first voltage is compared with a first and second level, distinct from a lower level controlling the coil during the command phase for a predetermined time.
  • Summary of the invention
  • The present invention is a control system and a method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit that reduces power consumption, thus economizing energy. The invention is based on a voltage regulated power supply.
  • As previously stated, known electromechanical contactors of a power circuit comprise:
    • a contact, movable between two positions:
      • an open position in which the contact produces the disconnection of the power circuit, and
      • a closed position in which the contact produces the connection of the power circuit,
    • a coil, in mechanical connection with the contact and configured to drive the contact between the above open and closed positions.
  • The control system also comprises a regulated power supply. The regulated power supply is connectable to the coil and is configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil. The regulated power supply is also configured to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a k relationship with the output voltage VOUT, VFBK = VOUT * k. The regulated power supply is configured to modify the provided output voltage VOUT when the feedback voltage VFBK received by the power supply differs from a reference voltage VREF.
  • The control system further comprises a controller adapted to be connected to the regulated power supply. The controller is configured to vary the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK from at least a first relationship k1 to a second relationship k2, being k2 > k1. Accordingly, the regulated power supply varies the provided output voltage VOUT between at least a first output voltage VOUT1 and a second lower output voltage VOUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil.
  • Therefore, as the relationship k is varied from k1 to k2, the feedback voltage VFBK received by the regulated power supply also varies from a first feedback voltage VFBK1 to a second feedback voltage VFBK2. Said variation occurs while the output voltage VOUT remains the same, as it is not varied, being the first initial output voltage VOUT1 for both feedbacks voltages. The second feedback voltage VFBK2 is greater than VFBK1. Said second feedback voltage VFBK2 differs from the reference voltage VREF and an error exists.
  • Thus, the regulated power supply receives for the first initial output voltage VOUT1 a second feedback voltage VFBK2 different from the reference voltage VREF Therefore, the regulated power supply initiates a regulation iterative process modifying the output voltage VOUT until the received feedback voltage VFBK is equal to the reference voltage VREF and thus the error is zero. When a stable position is reached again, i.e., VREF = VFBK, VOUT has been modified to a second out voltage VOUT2, according to the relationship k1/k2.
  • As the second output voltage VOUT2 is lower than the first output voltage VOUT1, a reduction in the power consumption of the coil is achieved by controlling the provided output voltages.
  • Therefore, the control system of the invention makes use of the existing power supply, specifically a regulated power supply adapted to provide a constant output voltage VOUT. The control system is therefore able to make the power supply to switch between, for instance, two different voltage settings, a first and a second output voltages VOUT by providing the power supply with a different relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK.
  • According to the regular operation of a regulated power supply, it compares the received second feedback voltage VFBK2 with the fixed reference voltage VREF and any difference is used to modify the output voltage VOUT of the power supply in such a way as to reduce the voltage error and to receive the settled feedback voltage VFBK.
  • Thus, the controller "deceives" the regulated power supply, by manipulating the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK, i.e., VFBK = VOUT * k, so that the regulated power supply receives a modified feedback signal, such that the regulator "believes" that the regulated power supply is out of its working point and reacts looking for another output voltage value.
  • Thus, the regulation cycle is performed by the regulated power supply itself and therefore it has the advantage that the invention can be applied on an existing regulated power supply.
  • More specifically, as the closed position of the contact comprises two stages, a first pick-up stage and a second holding stage, the controller is configured to provide:
    • the first relationship k1 in the pick-up stage of the contact so that the regulated power supply is configured to provide the first output voltage VOUT1, and
    • the second relationship k2 in the holding stage of the contact so that the regulated power supply is configured to provide the second lower output voltage VOUT2. Said second relationship k2 may be provided at the beginning of the holding stage or after a period of time from the beginning.
  • In an embodiment, the power supply comprises a voltage regulator configured to make the power supply to provide the constant output voltage VOUT to the coil. The voltage regulator comprises:
    • means for receiving a feedback voltage VFBK,
    • means for comparing the received feedback voltage VFBK with the reference voltage VREF,
    • means for making the regulated power supply to vary the provided output voltage VOUT if the received feedback voltage VFBK differs from the reference voltage VREF in order to provide a constant output voltage VOUT to the coil (2).
  • It is also an object of the invention a control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, the electromechanical contactor comprising:
    • a contact, movable between two positions:
      • an open position in which contact produces the disconnection of the power circuit, and
      • a closed position in which the contact produces the connection of the power circuit,
    • a coil, in mechanical connection with the contact, and configured to drive the contact between the open and the closed positions.
  • The control method comprising the step of providing a regulated power supply connectable to the coil. The regulated power supply configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil and to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a k relationship with the output voltage VOUT, VFBK = VOUT * k. According to the regulated nature of the power supply, it will modify the provided output voltage VOUT when the feedback voltage VFBK received by the power supply differs from a reference voltage VREF and therefore an error exists.
  • The method additionally comprises the step of providing a controller, the controller varying the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK from at least a first relationship k1 to a second relationship k2, being k2 > k1, such that the regulated power supply varies the provided output voltage VOUT from at least a first output voltage VOUT1 to a second lower output voltage VOUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil.
  • Therefore, as the relationship k is varied from k1 to k2, the feedback voltage VFBK received by the regulated power supply also varies from a first feedback voltage VFBK1 to a second feedback voltage VFBK2. As previously stated, said variation occurs while the output voltage VOUT remains the same, as it is not varied, being the first initial output voltage VOUT1 for both feedbacks voltages. The second feedback voltage VFBK2 will be greater than VFBK1. Said second feedback voltage VFBK2 differs from the reference voltage VREF and an error exists and, therefore, the regulated power supply initiates an iterative process to provide a constant output voltage VOUT.
  • Description of the figures
  • To complete the description and in order to provide for a better understanding of the invention, drawings are provided. Said drawings form an integral part of the description and illustrate a preferred embodiment of the invention. The drawings comprise the following figures.
    • Figure 1 shows a known electric circuit of an electromechanical contactor comprising a system configured to reduce power consumption according to the state of the art.
    • Figure 2 shows a known electric circuit of an electromechanical contactor comprising a system configured to reduce power consumption according to the state of the art.
    • Figure 3 shows a block diagram of the regulation system according to an embodiment of the invention.
    • Figure 4 shows an implementation of an electric circuit of the electromechanical contactor of the invention.
    • Figure 5 shows a voltage-time diagram, a power-time diagram and switch-time and coefficient or factor-time diagrams for the embodiment of figure 4.
    Detailed description of the invention
  • Figure 3 shows a block diagram of a control system of an electromechanical contactor according to an embodiment of the invention. The control system comprises:
    • a contact (1), movable between the open and closed positions,
    • a coil (2), in mechanical connection with the contact (1) and configured to drive the contact (1) between the open and the closed positions,
    • a regulated power supply (3), connectable to the coil (2), the regulated power supply (3) configured to provide an output voltage VOUT to the coil (2).
  • As previously stated, the regulated power supply (3) is configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil (2) and to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a relationship k with the output voltage VFBK = VOUT * k. According to the regulated nature of the power supply (3), it is configured to modify the provided output voltage VOUT when the feedback voltage VFBK received by the power supply (3) differs from the reference voltage VREF.
  • In the shown embodiment of figure 3, the feedback voltage VFBK received by the power supply (3) is VFBK = VOUT * k being the value of the relationship k controlled by the controller (4). Thus, the controller (4) is configured to act over the relationship k, in turn, this modifying the feedback voltage VFBK value.
  • In an embodiment, the controller (4) is configured to switch between the first relationship k1 and the second relationship k2 after a fixed period of time.
  • Considering an embodiment in which the regulated power supply is settled with a relationship k between VOUT and VFBK equal to 1. The controller (4) will provide a first relationship k1 during the pick-up stage and a second relationship k2 during the holding stage.
  • According to this, in said embodiment and with the following default conditions:
    • VREF=12 Vdc
    • VERR=0 in stable conditions
    • VREF = VFBK as expected in stable operation of the electromechanical contactor, with an error voltage VERR=0.
    • VFBK = VOUT * k which is the feedback voltage received by the voltage regulator (6),
    • VOUT = VFBK / k which is the output voltage that will be provided by the regulated power supply, but as VREF = VFBK, in a stable operation, thus V OUT = V REF / k .
      Figure imgb0001
  • Accordingly, with a stable voltage reference VREF, the output voltage VOUT can be modified by applying different values to the relationship k.
  • In stable conditions, it has to be considered that the error voltage VERR must be equal to 0. According to the above, the regulated power supply (3) will provide a different voltage if the feedback voltage VFBK received differs from the reference voltage VREF.
  • Pick-up state:
  • The system is stable with the following conditions:
    • VREF = 12 Vdc
    • VOUT = 12 Vdc
    • k1 = 1
    • VFBK = 12 Vdc
    • VERR = 0
  • With the "pick-up" conditions the controller (4) can drive the switch (5) with the maximum voltage/energy applied to the contactor-coil (1, 2). Furthermore, applying a relationship k1 = 1, the output voltage VOUT will be the same as VREF, in this example 12 Vdc.
  • Holding State:
  • In an embodiment, the electromechanical contactor has an actuation time to close the contact (1), for instance 50 ms, the controller (4) waits for a longer time, for instance 300 ms, to provide a different relationship k.
  • Thus, after a short time, the controller (4) provides a relationship k2 > k1.
  • In the following embodiment a relationship k2 which is double of k1 is provided so that the output voltage VOUT is reduced to the half in stable conditions.
    • VREF = 12 Vdc
    • VOUT2 = 6 Vdc (when the stable conditions are reached)
    • k2 = 2
    • VFBK = 12 Vdc (when the stable conditions are reached again)
    • VERR = 0
  • With the "holding" conditions, the controller (4) drives the switch (5), but the energy applied to the contactor-coil (1, 2) would be reduced. In this embodiment, applying a relationship k2 of 2, the output voltage VOUT will be half the voltage of VREF, i.e., 6 Vdc.
  • It is possible to implement other values of the relationship k to adjust the output voltage VOUT, according to the particular "holding" conditions of different contactors with different "holding" requirements. For instance, under normal conditions, for the output voltage VOUT of the power supply, the feedback voltage VFBK is considered to be between 0 V and 1 V.
  • In figure 4, an embodiment of the implementation of an electric circuit of the electromechanical contactor of the invention is depicted in which how the relationship k is implemented is shown.
  • Specifically, the control system comprises a voltage divider connected to the output of the regulated power supply (3) comprising a set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in series. The set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in parallel with the coil (2). The controller (4) is configured to switch on and off one of the resistors, resistor R3, so that the relationship between the feedback voltage VFBK and the output voltage VOUT, i.e., k, can be varied by the controller (4).
  • In this embodiment, the voltage of (R4 + R3) / (R5 + R4 +R3) x VOUT is the feedback voltage VFBK provided to the regulated power supply (3), wherein R3 could be 0 or R3.
  • As previously stated, figure 4 discloses an implementation of the claimed system. The output voltage VOUT is measured by a combination of resistors R3, R4, R5 acting as voltage dividers and the measurement is sent to the voltage regulator (6) of the power supply (3) through the feedback connection.
  • When a NOT_ECONOMIZE output is activated, a transistor Q2 overrides resistor R3 and the feedback signal changes accordingly.
  • When the power supply (3) see other value in VFBK than the real VREF, it tries to compensate the voltage through its internal regulation, modifying the output voltage VOUT, until the VFBK signal is equal to VREF, arriving to the desired VOUT for the holding stage.
  • In this embodiment, depending on the values of the resistors R3, R4, R5, two stable output voltages may be provided, one depending on R4/(R4+R5) and another depending on (R3+R4)/(R3+R4+R5).
  • Said resistors are therefore outside the main circuit of the coil (2) activation, and are small polarization resistors, negligible in cost and they do not produce additional heat and need little space.

Claims (14)

  1. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, the electromechanical contactor comprising:
    • a contact (1), movable between two positions:
    - an open position in which the contact (1) produces the disconnection of the power circuit, and
    - a closed position in which the contact (1) produces the connection of the power circuit,
    • a coil (2), in mechanical connection with the contact (1) and configured to drive the contact (1) between the open and the closed positions,
    characterised in that the control system comprises a regulated power supply (3) connectable to the coil (2), the regulated power supply (3) configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil (2) and to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a k relationship with the output voltage VOUT, VFBK = VOUT * k,
    the control system further comprises a controller (4), the controller (4) being configured to vary the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK from at least a first relationship k1 to a second relationship k2, being k2 > k1, such that, the regulated power supply (3) varies the provided output voltage VOUT from at least a first output voltage VOUT1 to a second lower output voltage VOUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil (2).
  2. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 1, wherein the closed position of the contact (1) comprises two stages, a first pick-up stage in which the contact (1) starts to move to close the power circuit and a second holding stage in which the contact (1) is closed with the power circuit connected, the controller (4) being configured to provide:
    - the first relationship k1 in the pick-up stage of the contact (1) so that the regulated power supply (3) is configured to provide the first output voltage VOUT1, and
    - the second relationship k2 in the holding stage of the contact (1) so that the regulated power supply (3) is configured to provide the second lower output voltage VOUT2.
  3. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to any preceding claim, wherein the regulated power supply (3) comprises a voltage regulator (6) configured to make the regulated power supply (3) to provide the constant output voltage VOUT to the coil (2).
  4. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 3, wherein the voltage regulator (6) comprises:
    - means for receiving the feedback voltage VFBK,
    - means for comparing the received feedback voltage VFBK with the reference voltage VREF,
    - means for making the regulated power supply (3) to vary the provided output voltage VOUT if the received feedback voltage VFBK differs from the reference voltage VREF such that a constant output voltage VOUT is provided to the coil (2).
  5. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to any preceding claim, wherein the control system comprises a voltage divider connected to the output of the regulated power supply (3) providing a feedback to it (3).
  6. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 5, wherein the voltage divider comprises a set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in series, the set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in parallel with the coil (2), the controller (4) being configured to switch on and off at least one of the resistors R3 for varying the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK.
  7. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 6, wherein the control system further comprises a transistor Q2 configured to be connected with one of the resistors (R3) and with the controller (4), being the controller (4) configured to override said resistor (R3) through the transistor Q2.
  8. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the voltage of resistor R3 and R4 is the feedback voltage VFBK provided to the regulated power supply (3).
  9. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to any preceding claim, wherein the controller (4) is configured to switch between the first k1 and the second k2 relationship after a fixed period of time from the connection of the power circuit.
  10. Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to any preceding claim, wherein the voltage regulator is a DC power converter.
  11. Control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, the electromechanical contactor comprising:
    • a contact (1), movable between two positions:
    - an open position in which contact (1) produces the disconnection of the power circuit, and
    - a closed position in which the contact (1) produces the connection of the power circuit,
    • a coil (2), in mechanical connection with the contact (1), and configured to drive the contact (1) between the open and the closed positions,
    characterised in that the control method comprises the step of providing a regulated power supply (3) connectable to the coil (2), the regulated power supply (3) configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil (2) and to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a k relationship with the output voltage VOUT, VFBK = VOUT * k,
    the method comprises the step of providing a controller (4) the controller (4) varying the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK, from at least a first relationship k1 to a second relationship k2, being k2 > k1, such that the regulated power supply (3) varies the provided output voltage VOUT from at least a first output voltage VOUT1 to a second lower output voltage VOUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil (2).
  12. Control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 11, wherein it comprises the step of adding a voltage divider connected to the output of the regulated power supply (3) and providing a feedback to it (3).
  13. Control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 12, wherein the voltage divider comprises a set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in series, the set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in parallel with the coil (2), the controller (4) switching on and off at least one of the resistors R3 for varying the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK.
  14. Control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 13, wherein further comprises the step of adding a transistor Q2 connected with one of the resistors (R3) and with the controller (4), the control method comprising the step of the controller (4) overriding said resistor (R3) through the transistor Q2.
EP19382882.9A 2019-10-08 2019-10-08 Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit Active EP3806127B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19382882.9A EP3806127B1 (en) 2019-10-08 2019-10-08 Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit
CN202011071984.4A CN112631362A (en) 2019-10-08 2020-10-09 Control system and control method for electromechanical contactor of power circuit

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19382882.9A EP3806127B1 (en) 2019-10-08 2019-10-08 Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3806127A1 EP3806127A1 (en) 2021-04-14
EP3806127B1 true EP3806127B1 (en) 2023-06-14

Family

ID=68342875

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19382882.9A Active EP3806127B1 (en) 2019-10-08 2019-10-08 Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3806127B1 (en)
CN (1) CN112631362A (en)

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3047488A1 (en) * 1980-12-17 1982-07-22 Brown, Boveri & Cie Ag, 6800 Mannheim ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT FOR AN ELECTROMAGNETIC SWITCHGEAR
FR2786920B1 (en) * 1998-12-07 2001-01-12 Schneider Electric Ind Sa STANDARD CONTROL DEVICE OF AN ELECTROMAGNET FOR OPENING OR CLOSING A CIRCUIT BREAKER
CN2893904Y (en) * 2005-12-01 2007-04-25 华为技术有限公司 Energy-saving relay drive circuit device
EP3147923B1 (en) * 2014-05-23 2019-05-01 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Electromagnet drive device
CN106952781B (en) * 2017-04-18 2019-03-12 福州大学 A kind of intelligent contactor control module using double feedback factor control strategies
CN107768196B (en) * 2017-11-30 2019-08-20 惠州市蓝微新源技术有限公司 A kind of control system reducing relay power consumption
CN209232673U (en) * 2019-02-28 2019-08-09 杭州萤石软件有限公司 Relay control circuit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112631362A (en) 2021-04-09
EP3806127A1 (en) 2021-04-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6934140B1 (en) Frequency-controlled load driver for an electromechanical system
US10755881B2 (en) Circuit arrangement for operating electromagnetic drive systems
CN114342034B (en) Coil driving device
EP0187224B1 (en) Current controlled motor drive circuit
EP3550708B1 (en) Bipolar current control drive circuit for inductive load
TW201725848A (en) Circuit arrangement
EP3806127B1 (en) Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit
CA2727467A1 (en) Minimum temperature control for electromechanical actuator
EP2212494B1 (en) Solenoid controller for electromechanical lock
US20200044587A1 (en) Adaptive hold current for electric motors
US6586899B2 (en) Method and circuit arrangement for switching on a power output stage
CN108292900B (en) Method for regulating current of inductive load
CA1215105A (en) Voltage adaptive solenoid control apparatus
CN107208615B (en) Method for operating a piston pump, actuating device for a piston pump, and piston pump
CN110580997B (en) Pulse width modulation control of solenoid valve
JP2925537B2 (en) Apparatus and method for improving response time of electromagnetic actuator
US5260645A (en) Power supplies
US11888425B2 (en) Method for controlling operation of an electrical machine
EP3591240B1 (en) Variable dither control system for a fluid actuator
CN111480296B (en) Method, control device and apparatus for controlling semiconductor bridge of electrically operable motor
US11722083B2 (en) Motor controller
US7271560B2 (en) Assembly for moving a barrier and method of controlling the same
EP3848952A1 (en) Relay drive with power supply economizer
JP4937691B2 (en) Current sensorless power amplifier
SU1070679A1 (en) Non-reversible thyratron d.c.motor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20211014

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20230127

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H01H 47/32 20060101ALI20230113BHEP

Ipc: H01H 47/04 20060101AFI20230113BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602019030970

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1579838

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20230715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20230614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230914

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1579838

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20230614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230915

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231014

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231016

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20231014

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231020

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602019030970

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20240315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20230614

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20231031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231008

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20231008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231008

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231031

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231008