EP3806127B1 - Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit - Google Patents
Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3806127B1 EP3806127B1 EP19382882.9A EP19382882A EP3806127B1 EP 3806127 B1 EP3806127 B1 EP 3806127B1 EP 19382882 A EP19382882 A EP 19382882A EP 3806127 B1 EP3806127 B1 EP 3806127B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- voltage
- output voltage
- power circuit
- power supply
- fbk
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 15
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 54
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012804 iterative process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01H—ELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
- H01H47/00—Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current
- H01H47/02—Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current for modifying the operation of the relay
- H01H47/04—Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current for modifying the operation of the relay for holding armature in attracted position, e.g. when initial energising circuit is interrupted; for maintaining armature in attracted position, e.g. with reduced energising current
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05F—SYSTEMS FOR REGULATING ELECTRIC OR MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G05F1/00—Automatic systems in which deviations of an electric quantity from one or more predetermined values are detected at the output of the system and fed back to a device within the system to restore the detected quantity to its predetermined value or values, i.e. retroactive systems
- G05F1/10—Regulating voltage or current
- G05F1/625—Regulating voltage or current wherein it is irrelevant whether the variable actually regulated is ac or dc
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01H—ELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
- H01H47/00—Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current
- H01H47/22—Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current for supplying energising current for relay coil
- H01H47/32—Energising current supplied by semiconductor device
- H01H47/325—Energising current supplied by semiconductor device by switching regulator
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01H—ELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
- H01H47/00—Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current
- H01H2047/009—Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the relay and designed to obtain desired operating characteristics or to provide energising current with self learning features, e.g. measuring the attracting current for a relay and memorising it
Definitions
- the invention relates to a control system and a method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit which results in a reduction in power consumption in the coils of said electromechanical contactor.
- Electromechanical contactors are used in many applications, for instance, in electric vehicles.
- electromechanical contactors are typically used. Such electromechanical contactors comprise two parts, a contact and a coil.
- the contact can be moved to one direction that produces the connection (ON) of the power circuit or it can be moved in an opposite direction to produce the disconnection (OFF) of the power circuit.
- the coil is a kind of electromagnet that produces a mechanical force to move the contact.
- the mechanical coupling between the coil and the contact is provided by an internal shaft and a spring.
- the coil In the disconnected (OFF) state, the coil is not energized, and the shaft is moved or maintained in the disconnection position due to the spring force. In the connected (ON) state, the coil is energized, and the applied force overcomes the force of the spring that moves the contact to the connected position.
- the contactor when the contactor is in the ON state, i.e., connected to the power circuit, the coil requires power to be applied.
- Energy saving is especially relevant when contactors must remain in an ON state for a long period of time as, for example, in electric vehicle applications.
- the magnetic circuit In the OFF state, the magnetic circuit is open.
- a strong force named as "pick-up” force, must be applied to start the shaft movement. After displacement, the magnetic circuit remains closed and it is no longer necessary to apply such a strong force to keep the contact in the closed position, named as "holding" force.
- a power supply is used to provide the energy to the contactor coils.
- a low voltage (i.e. 12 Vdc) power supply is used in many applications.
- the low voltage power supply is often implemented by a kind of DC power converter (i.e. buck, boost, sepic, or other topologies) providing a fixed, stabilized constant voltage in order to drive the contactor coils to prevent possible voltage fluctuations from closing the contactor when it should not.
- a kind of DC power converter i.e. buck, boost, sepic, or other topologies
- the contactor is built with two internal coils, one optimized for the "pick-up” conditions, and, another optimized for the "holding” conditions.
- An electronic circuit switches the coils when necessary to economize. This solution is expensive due to the dual coil and the switching circuit.
- resistor voltage dividers As can be seen in figure 1 .
- some resistors (10) are electrically connected in series with the coil (2).
- the resistors (10) are by-passed with a switching circuit (11).
- Resistors (10) are power resistors in order to stand to be in series with the coil (2) and to resist the intensity that would circulate through them.
- part of the power dissipation is transferred to the resistors (10), decreasing the efficiency of the economization.
- this type of resistors (10) dissipate heat to the surrounding electronics, which is not convenient, and they also need space to be located.
- Pulse Width Modulation PWM
- the coil (2) is driven at 100% of the voltage, thus applying high power.
- the coil (2) is driven to a reduced duty cycle (i.e. 50%) to reduce to average energy applied to the coil (2). This is implemented by the PWM, driving ON and OFF at high speed.
- EMC electromagnetic interference
- EP1009006 A1 disclosing a command mechanism for opening or closing of a circuit breaker having a microprocessor controlling a switch in series with a coil.
- the microprocessor compares the command level against thresholds.
- a first voltage is compared with a first and second level, distinct from a lower level controlling the coil during the command phase for a predetermined time.
- the present invention is a control system and a method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit that reduces power consumption, thus economizing energy.
- the invention is based on a voltage regulated power supply.
- known electromechanical contactors of a power circuit comprise:
- the control system also comprises a regulated power supply.
- the regulated power supply is connectable to the coil and is configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage V OUT to the coil.
- the regulated power supply is configured to modify the provided output voltage V OUT when the feedback voltage V FBK received by the power supply differs from a reference voltage V REF .
- the control system further comprises a controller adapted to be connected to the regulated power supply.
- the controller is configured to vary the relationship k between the output voltage V OUT and the feedback voltage V FBK from at least a first relationship k 1 to a second relationship k 2 , being k 2 > k 1 . Accordingly, the regulated power supply varies the provided output voltage V OUT between at least a first output voltage V OUT1 and a second lower output voltage V OUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil.
- the feedback voltage V FBK received by the regulated power supply also varies from a first feedback voltage V FBK1 to a second feedback voltage V FBK2 . Said variation occurs while the output voltage V OUT remains the same, as it is not varied, being the first initial output voltage V OUT1 for both feedbacks voltages.
- the second feedback voltage V FBK2 is greater than V FBK1 . Said second feedback voltage V FBK2 differs from the reference voltage V REF and an error exists.
- the regulated power supply receives for the first initial output voltage V OUT1 a second feedback voltage V FBK2 different from the reference voltage V REF Therefore, the regulated power supply initiates a regulation iterative process modifying the output voltage V OUT until the received feedback voltage V FBK is equal to the reference voltage V REF and thus the error is zero.
- V REF V FBK
- V OUT has been modified to a second out voltage V OUT2 , according to the relationship k 1 /k 2 .
- the control system of the invention makes use of the existing power supply, specifically a regulated power supply adapted to provide a constant output voltage V OUT .
- the control system is therefore able to make the power supply to switch between, for instance, two different voltage settings, a first and a second output voltages V OUT by providing the power supply with a different relationship k between the output voltage V OUT and the feedback voltage V FBK .
- the regulation cycle is performed by the regulated power supply itself and therefore it has the advantage that the invention can be applied on an existing regulated power supply.
- the controller is configured to provide:
- the power supply comprises a voltage regulator configured to make the power supply to provide the constant output voltage V OUT to the coil.
- the voltage regulator comprises:
- the control method comprising the step of providing a regulated power supply connectable to the coil.
- the method additionally comprises the step of providing a controller, the controller varying the relationship k between the output voltage V OUT and the feedback voltage V FBK from at least a first relationship k 1 to a second relationship k 2 , being k 2 > k 1 , such that the regulated power supply varies the provided output voltage V OUT from at least a first output voltage V OUT1 to a second lower output voltage V OUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil.
- the feedback voltage V FBK received by the regulated power supply also varies from a first feedback voltage V FBK1 to a second feedback voltage V FBK2 .
- said variation occurs while the output voltage V OUT remains the same, as it is not varied, being the first initial output voltage V OUT1 for both feedbacks voltages.
- the second feedback voltage V FBK2 will be greater than V FBK1 .
- Said second feedback voltage V FBK2 differs from the reference voltage V REF and an error exists and, therefore, the regulated power supply initiates an iterative process to provide a constant output voltage V OUT .
- FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a control system of an electromechanical contactor according to an embodiment of the invention.
- the control system comprises:
- the controller (4) is configured to act over the relationship k, in turn, this modifying the feedback voltage V FBK value.
- the controller (4) is configured to switch between the first relationship k 1 and the second relationship k 2 after a fixed period of time.
- the controller (4) will provide a first relationship k 1 during the pick-up stage and a second relationship k 2 during the holding stage.
- the output voltage V OUT can be modified by applying different values to the relationship k.
- the regulated power supply (3) will provide a different voltage if the feedback voltage V FBK received differs from the reference voltage V REF .
- the system is stable with the following conditions:
- the electromechanical contactor has an actuation time to close the contact (1), for instance 50 ms, the controller (4) waits for a longer time, for instance 300 ms, to provide a different relationship k.
- the controller (4) provides a relationship k 2 > k 1 .
- the controller (4) drives the switch (5), but the energy applied to the contactor-coil (1, 2) would be reduced.
- the output voltage V OUT will be half the voltage of V REF , i.e., 6 Vdc.
- the feedback voltage V FBK is considered to be between 0 V and 1 V.
- FIG 4 an embodiment of the implementation of an electric circuit of the electromechanical contactor of the invention is depicted in which how the relationship k is implemented is shown.
- control system comprises a voltage divider connected to the output of the regulated power supply (3) comprising a set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in series.
- the set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in parallel with the coil (2).
- the controller (4) is configured to switch on and off one of the resistors, resistor R3, so that the relationship between the feedback voltage V FBK and the output voltage V OUT , i.e., k, can be varied by the controller (4).
- the voltage of (R4 + R3) / (R5 + R4 +R3) x V OUT is the feedback voltage V FBK provided to the regulated power supply (3), wherein R3 could be 0 or R3.
- figure 4 discloses an implementation of the claimed system.
- the output voltage V OUT is measured by a combination of resistors R3, R4, R5 acting as voltage dividers and the measurement is sent to the voltage regulator (6) of the power supply (3) through the feedback connection.
- two stable output voltages may be provided, one depending on R4/(R4+R5) and another depending on (R3+R4)/(R3+R4+R5).
- Said resistors are therefore outside the main circuit of the coil (2) activation, and are small polarization resistors, negligible in cost and they do not produce additional heat and need little space.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Relay Circuits (AREA)
Description
- The invention relates to a control system and a method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit which results in a reduction in power consumption in the coils of said electromechanical contactor. Electromechanical contactors are used in many applications, for instance, in electric vehicles.
- For the connection and disconnection of power circuits, electromechanical contactors are typically used. Such electromechanical contactors comprise two parts, a contact and a coil.
- The contact can be moved to one direction that produces the connection (ON) of the power circuit or it can be moved in an opposite direction to produce the disconnection (OFF) of the power circuit.
- The coil is a kind of electromagnet that produces a mechanical force to move the contact. The mechanical coupling between the coil and the contact is provided by an internal shaft and a spring.
- In the disconnected (OFF) state, the coil is not energized, and the shaft is moved or maintained in the disconnection position due to the spring force. In the connected (ON) state, the coil is energized, and the applied force overcomes the force of the spring that moves the contact to the connected position.
- Therefore, when the contactor is in the ON state, i.e., connected to the power circuit, the coil requires power to be applied.
- Energy saving is especially relevant when contactors must remain in an ON state for a long period of time as, for example, in electric vehicle applications.
- In the OFF state, the magnetic circuit is open. When the contactor is to be closed, a strong force, named as "pick-up" force, must be applied to start the shaft movement. After displacement, the magnetic circuit remains closed and it is no longer necessary to apply such a strong force to keep the contact in the closed position, named as "holding" force.
- Accordingly, during the "pick-up" stage, a relatively strong electrical power must be applied to the electromagnetic coil but, later, during the "holding" stage, it is not necessary to maintain such a high power applied to the coil.
- In a typical application, a power supply is used to provide the energy to the contactor coils. A low voltage (i.e. 12 Vdc) power supply is used in many applications.
- The low voltage power supply is often implemented by a kind of DC power converter (i.e. buck, boost, sepic, or other topologies) providing a fixed, stabilized constant voltage in order to drive the contactor coils to prevent possible voltage fluctuations from closing the contactor when it should not.
- In order to reduce the electric power consumption in the coil during the "holding" state, some techniques have been used.
- It is known to use dual coil contactors. In this case, the contactor is built with two internal coils, one optimized for the "pick-up" conditions, and, another optimized for the "holding" conditions. An electronic circuit switches the coils when necessary to economize. This solution is expensive due to the dual coil and the switching circuit.
- It is also known to use resistor voltage dividers as can be seen in
figure 1 . During the "holding" stage, in order to reduce the current through the coil (2), some resistors (10) are electrically connected in series with the coil (2). During the "pick-up" state, the resistors (10) are by-passed with a switching circuit (11). This solution is expensive due to the use of resistors (10) connected in series with the coil (2) and the required switching circuit (11). Resistors (10) are power resistors in order to stand to be in series with the coil (2) and to resist the intensity that would circulate through them. In addition, part of the power dissipation is transferred to the resistors (10), decreasing the efficiency of the economization. Moreover, this type of resistors (10) dissipate heat to the surrounding electronics, which is not convenient, and they also need space to be located. - Finally, it is also known to use Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) techniques as shown in
figure 2 . During the "pick-up" stage, the coil (2) is driven at 100% of the voltage, thus applying high power. During the "holding" stage the coil (2) is driven to a reduced duty cycle (i.e. 50%) to reduce to average energy applied to the coil (2). This is implemented by the PWM, driving ON and OFF at high speed. - Due to the high frequency applied to the contactor and the high quantity of switch ON and switch OFF cycles, this solution produces electromagnetic interference (EMC) into the surrounding circuits and is not recommended in a safe environment.
- It is known document
EP1009006 A1 disclosing a command mechanism for opening or closing of a circuit breaker having a microprocessor controlling a switch in series with a coil. The microprocessor compares the command level against thresholds. A first voltage is compared with a first and second level, distinct from a lower level controlling the coil during the command phase for a predetermined time. - The present invention is a control system and a method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit that reduces power consumption, thus economizing energy. The invention is based on a voltage regulated power supply.
- As previously stated, known electromechanical contactors of a power circuit comprise:
- a contact, movable between two positions:
- an open position in which the contact produces the disconnection of the power circuit, and
- a closed position in which the contact produces the connection of the power circuit,
- a coil, in mechanical connection with the contact and configured to drive the contact between the above open and closed positions.
- The control system also comprises a regulated power supply. The regulated power supply is connectable to the coil and is configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil. The regulated power supply is also configured to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a k relationship with the output voltage VOUT, VFBK = VOUT * k. The regulated power supply is configured to modify the provided output voltage VOUT when the feedback voltage VFBK received by the power supply differs from a reference voltage VREF.
- The control system further comprises a controller adapted to be connected to the regulated power supply. The controller is configured to vary the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK from at least a first relationship k1 to a second relationship k2, being k2 > k1. Accordingly, the regulated power supply varies the provided output voltage VOUT between at least a first output voltage VOUT1 and a second lower output voltage VOUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil.
- Therefore, as the relationship k is varied from k1 to k2, the feedback voltage VFBK received by the regulated power supply also varies from a first feedback voltage VFBK1 to a second feedback voltage VFBK2. Said variation occurs while the output voltage VOUT remains the same, as it is not varied, being the first initial output voltage VOUT1 for both feedbacks voltages. The second feedback voltage VFBK2 is greater than VFBK1. Said second feedback voltage VFBK2 differs from the reference voltage VREF and an error exists.
- Thus, the regulated power supply receives for the first initial output voltage VOUT1 a second feedback voltage VFBK2 different from the reference voltage VREF Therefore, the regulated power supply initiates a regulation iterative process modifying the output voltage VOUT until the received feedback voltage VFBK is equal to the reference voltage VREF and thus the error is zero. When a stable position is reached again, i.e., VREF = VFBK, VOUT has been modified to a second out voltage VOUT2, according to the relationship k1/k2.
- As the second output voltage VOUT2 is lower than the first output voltage VOUT1, a reduction in the power consumption of the coil is achieved by controlling the provided output voltages.
- Therefore, the control system of the invention makes use of the existing power supply, specifically a regulated power supply adapted to provide a constant output voltage VOUT. The control system is therefore able to make the power supply to switch between, for instance, two different voltage settings, a first and a second output voltages VOUT by providing the power supply with a different relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK.
- According to the regular operation of a regulated power supply, it compares the received second feedback voltage VFBK2 with the fixed reference voltage VREF and any difference is used to modify the output voltage VOUT of the power supply in such a way as to reduce the voltage error and to receive the settled feedback voltage VFBK.
- Thus, the controller "deceives" the regulated power supply, by manipulating the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK, i.e., VFBK = VOUT * k, so that the regulated power supply receives a modified feedback signal, such that the regulator "believes" that the regulated power supply is out of its working point and reacts looking for another output voltage value.
- Thus, the regulation cycle is performed by the regulated power supply itself and therefore it has the advantage that the invention can be applied on an existing regulated power supply.
- More specifically, as the closed position of the contact comprises two stages, a first pick-up stage and a second holding stage, the controller is configured to provide:
- the first relationship k1 in the pick-up stage of the contact so that the regulated power supply is configured to provide the first output voltage VOUT1, and
- the second relationship k2 in the holding stage of the contact so that the regulated power supply is configured to provide the second lower output voltage VOUT2. Said second relationship k2 may be provided at the beginning of the holding stage or after a period of time from the beginning.
- In an embodiment, the power supply comprises a voltage regulator configured to make the power supply to provide the constant output voltage VOUT to the coil. The voltage regulator comprises:
- means for receiving a feedback voltage VFBK,
- means for comparing the received feedback voltage VFBK with the reference voltage VREF,
- means for making the regulated power supply to vary the provided output voltage VOUT if the received feedback voltage VFBK differs from the reference voltage VREF in order to provide a constant output voltage VOUT to the coil (2).
- It is also an object of the invention a control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, the electromechanical contactor comprising:
- a contact, movable between two positions:
- an open position in which contact produces the disconnection of the power circuit, and
- a closed position in which the contact produces the connection of the power circuit,
- a coil, in mechanical connection with the contact, and configured to drive the contact between the open and the closed positions.
- The control method comprising the step of providing a regulated power supply connectable to the coil. The regulated power supply configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil and to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a k relationship with the output voltage VOUT, VFBK = VOUT * k. According to the regulated nature of the power supply, it will modify the provided output voltage VOUT when the feedback voltage VFBK received by the power supply differs from a reference voltage VREF and therefore an error exists.
- The method additionally comprises the step of providing a controller, the controller varying the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK from at least a first relationship k1 to a second relationship k2, being k2 > k1, such that the regulated power supply varies the provided output voltage VOUT from at least a first output voltage VOUT1 to a second lower output voltage VOUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil.
- Therefore, as the relationship k is varied from k1 to k2, the feedback voltage VFBK received by the regulated power supply also varies from a first feedback voltage VFBK1 to a second feedback voltage VFBK2. As previously stated, said variation occurs while the output voltage VOUT remains the same, as it is not varied, being the first initial output voltage VOUT1 for both feedbacks voltages. The second feedback voltage VFBK2 will be greater than VFBK1. Said second feedback voltage VFBK2 differs from the reference voltage VREF and an error exists and, therefore, the regulated power supply initiates an iterative process to provide a constant output voltage VOUT.
- To complete the description and in order to provide for a better understanding of the invention, drawings are provided. Said drawings form an integral part of the description and illustrate a preferred embodiment of the invention. The drawings comprise the following figures.
-
Figure 1 shows a known electric circuit of an electromechanical contactor comprising a system configured to reduce power consumption according to the state of the art. -
Figure 2 shows a known electric circuit of an electromechanical contactor comprising a system configured to reduce power consumption according to the state of the art. -
Figure 3 shows a block diagram of the regulation system according to an embodiment of the invention. -
Figure 4 shows an implementation of an electric circuit of the electromechanical contactor of the invention. -
Figure 5 shows a voltage-time diagram, a power-time diagram and switch-time and coefficient or factor-time diagrams for the embodiment offigure 4 . -
Figure 3 shows a block diagram of a control system of an electromechanical contactor according to an embodiment of the invention. The control system comprises: - a contact (1), movable between the open and closed positions,
- a coil (2), in mechanical connection with the contact (1) and configured to drive the contact (1) between the open and the closed positions,
- a regulated power supply (3), connectable to the coil (2), the regulated power supply (3) configured to provide an output voltage VOUT to the coil (2).
- As previously stated, the regulated power supply (3) is configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil (2) and to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a relationship k with the output voltage VFBK = VOUT * k. According to the regulated nature of the power supply (3), it is configured to modify the provided output voltage VOUT when the feedback voltage VFBK received by the power supply (3) differs from the reference voltage VREF.
- In the shown embodiment of
figure 3 , the feedback voltage VFBK received by the power supply (3) is VFBK = VOUT * k being the value of the relationship k controlled by the controller (4). Thus, the controller (4) is configured to act over the relationship k, in turn, this modifying the feedback voltage VFBK value. - In an embodiment, the controller (4) is configured to switch between the first relationship k1 and the second relationship k2 after a fixed period of time.
- Considering an embodiment in which the regulated power supply is settled with a relationship k between VOUT and VFBK equal to 1. The controller (4) will provide a first relationship k1 during the pick-up stage and a second relationship k2 during the holding stage.
- According to this, in said embodiment and with the following default conditions:
- VREF=12 Vdc
- VERR=0 in stable conditions
- VREF = VFBK as expected in stable operation of the electromechanical contactor, with an error voltage VERR=0.
- VFBK = VOUT * k which is the feedback voltage received by the voltage regulator (6),
- VOUT = VFBK / k which is the output voltage that will be provided by the regulated power supply, but as VREF = VFBK, in a stable operation, thus
- Accordingly, with a stable voltage reference VREF, the output voltage VOUT can be modified by applying different values to the relationship k.
- In stable conditions, it has to be considered that the error voltage VERR must be equal to 0. According to the above, the regulated power supply (3) will provide a different voltage if the feedback voltage VFBK received differs from the reference voltage VREF.
- The system is stable with the following conditions:
- VREF = 12 Vdc
- VOUT = 12 Vdc
- k1 = 1
- VFBK = 12 Vdc
- VERR = 0
- With the "pick-up" conditions the controller (4) can drive the switch (5) with the maximum voltage/energy applied to the contactor-coil (1, 2). Furthermore, applying a relationship k1 = 1, the output voltage VOUT will be the same as VREF, in this example 12 Vdc.
- In an embodiment, the electromechanical contactor has an actuation time to close the contact (1), for instance 50 ms, the controller (4) waits for a longer time, for instance 300 ms, to provide a different relationship k.
- Thus, after a short time, the controller (4) provides a relationship k2 > k1.
- In the following embodiment a relationship k2 which is double of k1 is provided so that the output voltage VOUT is reduced to the half in stable conditions.
- VREF = 12 Vdc
- VOUT2 = 6 Vdc (when the stable conditions are reached)
- k2 = 2
- VFBK = 12 Vdc (when the stable conditions are reached again)
- VERR = 0
- With the "holding" conditions, the controller (4) drives the switch (5), but the energy applied to the contactor-coil (1, 2) would be reduced. In this embodiment, applying a relationship k2 of 2, the output voltage VOUT will be half the voltage of VREF, i.e., 6 Vdc.
- It is possible to implement other values of the relationship k to adjust the output voltage VOUT, according to the particular "holding" conditions of different contactors with different "holding" requirements. For instance, under normal conditions, for the output voltage VOUT of the power supply, the feedback voltage VFBK is considered to be between 0 V and 1 V.
- In
figure 4 , an embodiment of the implementation of an electric circuit of the electromechanical contactor of the invention is depicted in which how the relationship k is implemented is shown. - Specifically, the control system comprises a voltage divider connected to the output of the regulated power supply (3) comprising a set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in series. The set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in parallel with the coil (2). The controller (4) is configured to switch on and off one of the resistors, resistor R3, so that the relationship between the feedback voltage VFBK and the output voltage VOUT, i.e., k, can be varied by the controller (4).
- In this embodiment, the voltage of (R4 + R3) / (R5 + R4 +R3) x VOUT is the feedback voltage VFBK provided to the regulated power supply (3), wherein R3 could be 0 or R3.
- As previously stated,
figure 4 discloses an implementation of the claimed system. The output voltage VOUT is measured by a combination of resistors R3, R4, R5 acting as voltage dividers and the measurement is sent to the voltage regulator (6) of the power supply (3) through the feedback connection. - When a NOT_ECONOMIZE output is activated, a transistor Q2 overrides resistor R3 and the feedback signal changes accordingly.
- When the power supply (3) see other value in VFBK than the real VREF, it tries to compensate the voltage through its internal regulation, modifying the output voltage VOUT, until the VFBK signal is equal to VREF, arriving to the desired VOUT for the holding stage.
- In this embodiment, depending on the values of the resistors R3, R4, R5, two stable output voltages may be provided, one depending on R4/(R4+R5) and another depending on (R3+R4)/(R3+R4+R5).
- Said resistors are therefore outside the main circuit of the coil (2) activation, and are small polarization resistors, negligible in cost and they do not produce additional heat and need little space.
Claims (14)
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, the electromechanical contactor comprising:• a contact (1), movable between two positions:- an open position in which the contact (1) produces the disconnection of the power circuit, and- a closed position in which the contact (1) produces the connection of the power circuit,• a coil (2), in mechanical connection with the contact (1) and configured to drive the contact (1) between the open and the closed positions,characterised in that the control system comprises a regulated power supply (3) connectable to the coil (2), the regulated power supply (3) configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil (2) and to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a k relationship with the output voltage VOUT, VFBK = VOUT * k,the control system further comprises a controller (4), the controller (4) being configured to vary the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK from at least a first relationship k1 to a second relationship k2, being k2 > k1, such that, the regulated power supply (3) varies the provided output voltage VOUT from at least a first output voltage VOUT1 to a second lower output voltage VOUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil (2).
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 1, wherein the closed position of the contact (1) comprises two stages, a first pick-up stage in which the contact (1) starts to move to close the power circuit and a second holding stage in which the contact (1) is closed with the power circuit connected, the controller (4) being configured to provide:- the first relationship k1 in the pick-up stage of the contact (1) so that the regulated power supply (3) is configured to provide the first output voltage VOUT1, and- the second relationship k2 in the holding stage of the contact (1) so that the regulated power supply (3) is configured to provide the second lower output voltage VOUT2.
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to any preceding claim, wherein the regulated power supply (3) comprises a voltage regulator (6) configured to make the regulated power supply (3) to provide the constant output voltage VOUT to the coil (2).
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 3, wherein the voltage regulator (6) comprises:- means for receiving the feedback voltage VFBK,- means for comparing the received feedback voltage VFBK with the reference voltage VREF,- means for making the regulated power supply (3) to vary the provided output voltage VOUT if the received feedback voltage VFBK differs from the reference voltage VREF such that a constant output voltage VOUT is provided to the coil (2).
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to any preceding claim, wherein the control system comprises a voltage divider connected to the output of the regulated power supply (3) providing a feedback to it (3).
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 5, wherein the voltage divider comprises a set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in series, the set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in parallel with the coil (2), the controller (4) being configured to switch on and off at least one of the resistors R3 for varying the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK.
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 6, wherein the control system further comprises a transistor Q2 configured to be connected with one of the resistors (R3) and with the controller (4), being the controller (4) configured to override said resistor (R3) through the transistor Q2.
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the voltage of resistor R3 and R4 is the feedback voltage VFBK provided to the regulated power supply (3).
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to any preceding claim, wherein the controller (4) is configured to switch between the first k1 and the second k2 relationship after a fixed period of time from the connection of the power circuit.
- Control system for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to any preceding claim, wherein the voltage regulator is a DC power converter.
- Control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, the electromechanical contactor comprising:• a contact (1), movable between two positions:- an open position in which contact (1) produces the disconnection of the power circuit, and- a closed position in which the contact (1) produces the connection of the power circuit,• a coil (2), in mechanical connection with the contact (1), and configured to drive the contact (1) between the open and the closed positions,characterised in that the control method comprises the step of providing a regulated power supply (3) connectable to the coil (2), the regulated power supply (3) configured to provide a constant regulated output voltage VOUT to the coil (2) and to receive a feedback voltage VFBK having a k relationship with the output voltage VOUT, VFBK = VOUT * k,the method comprises the step of providing a controller (4) the controller (4) varying the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK, from at least a first relationship k1 to a second relationship k2, being k2 > k1, such that the regulated power supply (3) varies the provided output voltage VOUT from at least a first output voltage VOUT1 to a second lower output voltage VOUT2 for reducing power consumption of the coil (2).
- Control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 11, wherein it comprises the step of adding a voltage divider connected to the output of the regulated power supply (3) and providing a feedback to it (3).
- Control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 12, wherein the voltage divider comprises a set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in series, the set of resistors (R3, R4, R5) located in parallel with the coil (2), the controller (4) switching on and off at least one of the resistors R3 for varying the relationship k between the output voltage VOUT and the feedback voltage VFBK.
- Control method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit, according to claim 13, wherein further comprises the step of adding a transistor Q2 connected with one of the resistors (R3) and with the controller (4), the control method comprising the step of the controller (4) overriding said resistor (R3) through the transistor Q2.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP19382882.9A EP3806127B1 (en) | 2019-10-08 | 2019-10-08 | Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit |
CN202011071984.4A CN112631362A (en) | 2019-10-08 | 2020-10-09 | Control system and control method for electromechanical contactor of power circuit |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP19382882.9A EP3806127B1 (en) | 2019-10-08 | 2019-10-08 | Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3806127A1 EP3806127A1 (en) | 2021-04-14 |
EP3806127B1 true EP3806127B1 (en) | 2023-06-14 |
Family
ID=68342875
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19382882.9A Active EP3806127B1 (en) | 2019-10-08 | 2019-10-08 | Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3806127B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN112631362A (en) |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3047488A1 (en) * | 1980-12-17 | 1982-07-22 | Brown, Boveri & Cie Ag, 6800 Mannheim | ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT FOR AN ELECTROMAGNETIC SWITCHGEAR |
FR2786920B1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2001-01-12 | Schneider Electric Ind Sa | STANDARD CONTROL DEVICE OF AN ELECTROMAGNET FOR OPENING OR CLOSING A CIRCUIT BREAKER |
CN2893904Y (en) * | 2005-12-01 | 2007-04-25 | 华为技术有限公司 | Energy-saving relay drive circuit device |
EP3147923B1 (en) * | 2014-05-23 | 2019-05-01 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Electromagnet drive device |
CN106952781B (en) * | 2017-04-18 | 2019-03-12 | 福州大学 | A kind of intelligent contactor control module using double feedback factor control strategies |
CN107768196B (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2019-08-20 | 惠州市蓝微新源技术有限公司 | A kind of control system reducing relay power consumption |
CN209232673U (en) * | 2019-02-28 | 2019-08-09 | 杭州萤石软件有限公司 | Relay control circuit |
-
2019
- 2019-10-08 EP EP19382882.9A patent/EP3806127B1/en active Active
-
2020
- 2020-10-09 CN CN202011071984.4A patent/CN112631362A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN112631362A (en) | 2021-04-09 |
EP3806127A1 (en) | 2021-04-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6934140B1 (en) | Frequency-controlled load driver for an electromechanical system | |
US10755881B2 (en) | Circuit arrangement for operating electromagnetic drive systems | |
CN114342034B (en) | Coil driving device | |
EP0187224B1 (en) | Current controlled motor drive circuit | |
EP3550708B1 (en) | Bipolar current control drive circuit for inductive load | |
TW201725848A (en) | Circuit arrangement | |
EP3806127B1 (en) | Control system and method for an electromechanical contactor of a power circuit | |
CA2727467A1 (en) | Minimum temperature control for electromechanical actuator | |
EP2212494B1 (en) | Solenoid controller for electromechanical lock | |
US20200044587A1 (en) | Adaptive hold current for electric motors | |
US6586899B2 (en) | Method and circuit arrangement for switching on a power output stage | |
CN108292900B (en) | Method for regulating current of inductive load | |
CA1215105A (en) | Voltage adaptive solenoid control apparatus | |
CN107208615B (en) | Method for operating a piston pump, actuating device for a piston pump, and piston pump | |
CN110580997B (en) | Pulse width modulation control of solenoid valve | |
JP2925537B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for improving response time of electromagnetic actuator | |
US5260645A (en) | Power supplies | |
US11888425B2 (en) | Method for controlling operation of an electrical machine | |
EP3591240B1 (en) | Variable dither control system for a fluid actuator | |
CN111480296B (en) | Method, control device and apparatus for controlling semiconductor bridge of electrically operable motor | |
US11722083B2 (en) | Motor controller | |
US7271560B2 (en) | Assembly for moving a barrier and method of controlling the same | |
EP3848952A1 (en) | Relay drive with power supply economizer | |
JP4937691B2 (en) | Current sensorless power amplifier | |
SU1070679A1 (en) | Non-reversible thyratron d.c.motor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20211014 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20230127 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H01H 47/32 20060101ALI20230113BHEP Ipc: H01H 47/04 20060101AFI20230113BHEP |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602019030970 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1579838 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20230715 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20230614 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230914 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1579838 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20230614 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230915 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20231014 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20231016 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20231014 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231020 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602019030970 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20240315 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20230614 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20231031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231008 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20231008 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231008 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231008 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231008 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231031 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231008 |