EP3801045A1 - Process for improving wheat straw degradation - Google Patents
Process for improving wheat straw degradationInfo
- Publication number
- EP3801045A1 EP3801045A1 EP19737839.1A EP19737839A EP3801045A1 EP 3801045 A1 EP3801045 A1 EP 3801045A1 EP 19737839 A EP19737839 A EP 19737839A EP 3801045 A1 EP3801045 A1 EP 3801045A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- straw
- enzymatic
- units
- additive
- wheat straw
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 239000010902 straw Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 182
- 241000209140 Triticum Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 105
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 105
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 48
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 80
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 71
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 71
- 210000004767 rumen Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 241000282849 Ruminantia Species 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 54
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 claims description 35
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 claims description 35
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 16
- 101710121765 Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase Proteins 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 108010087427 Endo-1,3(4)-beta-Glucanase Proteins 0.000 claims description 5
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 241000282817 Bovidae Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 108090000371 Esterases Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[K+] KWYUFKZDYYNOTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 4
- 108010085318 carboxymethylcellulase Proteins 0.000 claims description 4
- VHUUQVKOLVNVRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonium hydroxide Chemical compound [NH4+].[OH-] VHUUQVKOLVNVRT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 24
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 13
- 235000019621 digestibility Nutrition 0.000 description 12
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 12
- CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Carbonate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=O CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 10
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 10
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 7
- 239000012670 alkaline solution Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 7
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000002195 synergetic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-IOVATXLUSA-N D-xylopyranose Chemical compound O[C@@H]1COC(O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-IOVATXLUSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000002775 capsule Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 4
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 4
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008034 disappearance Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000004459 forage Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000283707 Capra Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 2
- 229920001503 Glucan Polymers 0.000 description 2
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 240000005979 Hordeum vulgare Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000007340 Hordeum vulgare Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 241000499912 Trichoderma reesei Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000019728 animal nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- PYMYPHUHKUWMLA-UHFFFAOYSA-N arabinose Natural products OCC(O)C(O)C(O)C=O PYMYPHUHKUWMLA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-UHFFFAOYSA-N beta-D-Pyranose-Lyxose Natural products OC1COC(O)C(O)C1O SRBFZHDQGSBBOR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- -1 bolus Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000037406 food intake Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920001221 xylan Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 150000004823 xylans Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 101710130006 Beta-glucanase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108030002503 EC nomenclature Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000007458 EC nomenclature Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000393496 Electra Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000736262 Microbiota Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001494479 Pecora Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004480 active ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007853 buffer solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011260 co-administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002301 combined effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000001461 cytolytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013365 dairy product Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000037213 diet Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013325 dietary fiber Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000001079 digestive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007598 dipping method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010419 fine particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000011389 fruit/vegetable juice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000001035 gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004898 kneading Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020786 mineral supplement Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001936 parietal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008092 positive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004460 silage Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008961 swelling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000019195 vitamin supplement Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K10/10—Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes
- A23K10/14—Pretreatment of feeding-stuffs with enzymes
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K10/30—Animal feeding-stuffs from material of plant origin, e.g. roots, seeds or hay; from material of fungal origin, e.g. mushrooms
- A23K10/32—Animal feeding-stuffs from material of plant origin, e.g. roots, seeds or hay; from material of fungal origin, e.g. mushrooms from hydrolysates of wood or straw
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K40/00—Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K50/00—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
- A23K50/10—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for ruminants
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N9/00—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
- C12N9/14—Hydrolases (3)
- C12N9/24—Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2)
- C12N9/2402—Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2) hydrolysing O- and S- glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
- C12N9/2405—Glucanases
- C12N9/2434—Glucanases acting on beta-1,4-glucosidic bonds
- C12N9/244—Endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase (3.2.1.6)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N9/00—Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
- C12N9/14—Hydrolases (3)
- C12N9/24—Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2)
- C12N9/2402—Hydrolases (3) acting on glycosyl compounds (3.2) hydrolysing O- and S- glycosyl compounds (3.2.1)
- C12N9/2477—Hemicellulases not provided in a preceding group
- C12N9/248—Xylanases
- C12N9/2482—Endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (3.2.1.8)
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P60/00—Technologies relating to agriculture, livestock or agroalimentary industries
- Y02P60/80—Food processing, e.g. use of renewable energies or variable speed drives in handling, conveying or stacking
- Y02P60/87—Re-use of by-products of food processing for fodder production
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the agricultural field of animal nutrition and relates to a method of improving forage degradation.
- Wheat straw represents an inexpensive resource that could contribute to strengthening the forage and food autonomy of certain farms.
- fodder represents a qualitatively very important resource that could advantageously be valued in animal nutrition.
- wheat straw is limited in ruminants with a high production level, such as cattle. Indeed, despite its high fiber content, wheat straw has a low nutritional value due to poor digestion by ruminants. Indeed, from a chemical point of view, the presence of bonds between the constituents of the plant wall leads to a more or less strong resistance to the attack of the digestive microbiota rumen. This resistance results in a low degradation of the feed in the animal.
- the publication by Y. Wang et al shows the effects of alkaline pretreatment on the efficiency of exogenous enzymes to increase the digestibility of wheat straw.
- the wheat straw is pretreated with an alkaline solution and then with an enzyme solution by spraying.
- the results thus show that the combination of alkaline chemical pretreatment and enzymatic treatment improves the digestibility of wheat straw.
- the enzymatic treatment used is applied to the wheat straw upstream of the feed of the animal in order to respect a sufficient incubation time and to allow an effect on the digestibility.
- the enzymatic treatment can therefore be qualified as pretreatment in that it is a preliminary treatment of the straw. wheat so that the latter, once the incubation time is respected, can be used later in animal feed and that the digestion is improved.
- a first subject of the invention relates to a method for improving the ruminal degradation of wheat straw in a ruminant comprising the following steps:
- step b) feeding the ruminant with the wheat straw pretreated chemically in step b),
- said method being characterized in that it further comprises a step d) of direct administration to the ruminant of an enzymatic rumen additive, which means that said enzymatic additive is not used in pretreatment on the straw.
- a second subject of the invention relates to the direct use in a ruminant of an enzymatic rumen additive, before, during or after feeding said ruminant with wheat straw having undergone chemical pretreatment.
- the "direct" use in a ruminant means that the enzymatic additive is administered directly to the ruminant, in particular by the oral route, without going through a pretreatment of the wheat straw with the enzymatic additive.
- a first subject of the invention relates to a method for improving the ruminal degradation of wheat straw in a ruminant comprising the following steps:
- step b) feeding the ruminant with the wheat straw pretreated chemically in step b),
- said method being characterized in that it further comprises a step d) of direct administration to the ruminant of an enzymatic rumen additive, which means that said enzymatic additive is not used in pretreatment on wheat straw.
- Degradation is defined as the degradation of food by the action of reticulo-rumen microorganisms.
- pretreatment denotes a treatment carried out on wheat straw upstream of the administration to the animal, said treatment being carried out by placing a chemical solution in contact with the wheat straw.
- the process according to the invention thus makes it possible to improve the degradation of wheat straw when it is used to feed a ruminant.
- the process developed makes it possible to make the parietal constituents of wheat straw more accessible to the degradation enzymes of the rumen microorganisms and to improve their degradation.
- Digestibility is a criterion that defines the degree to which an organic matter is digested by an animal. The higher the digestibility, the better the digestion.
- the process according to the invention also makes it more suitable for animal feed because at present it is underutilized because of the difficulties animals have in digesting it. compared to other foods.
- the first step of the process according to the invention therefore consists of providing wheat straw.
- Wheat straw is the agricultural product represented by the part of the stalk or stubble of wheat.
- the wheat straw provided is that conventionally used by those skilled in the animal feed industry and can be in various forms, both in the form of straw bales and in bulk form.
- the straw may first undergo a mechanical treatment step whose objective is to reduce the size of the strands and to allow both a better accessibility of the fibers to subsequent treatments and better degradation.
- the wheat straw may previously be minced, lacerated or defibrated, or a grinding.
- the second step of the process according to the invention consists in carrying out a chemical pretreatment of the wheat straw.
- the chemical pretreatment used in the process of the invention is a pretreatment carried out by an alkaline solution as conventionally used by those skilled in the art.
- the chemical pretreatment can be carried out with a solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium hydroxide, lime, potassium hydroxide (KOH), anhydrous ammonia (NH 3 ), aqueous ammonia (NH 4 OH), urea or a mixture of these compounds.
- the chemical pretreatment carried out in step b) is carried out with a solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH).
- the chemical pretreatment can be carried out in different ways according to the techniques known to those skilled in the art, whether industrial or not.
- the chemical pretreatment can be carried out wet, semi-wet, semi-dry, or dry.
- the pretreatment when carried out wet or semi-wet, it can be applied by spraying or by dipping.
- said solution can be concentrated from 1.6 to 5% and then mixed at a rate of 1 to 3 L / kg of wheat straw.
- the wheat straw can then be distributed to the animals 24 to 48 hours after mixing.
- the sodium hydroxide solution is concentrated between the semi-wet and dry channels at 12% and then mixed in the machine with the straw at a rate of 0.4 L / kg of straw.
- the action time of soda is about 8 days.
- the straw can be dried in the open air.
- the soda solution is more concentrated (16%).
- the solution is then mixed with the chopped straw at a rate of about 0.3 L / kg of wheat straw.
- the latter is then passed through a die press.
- the improving action of the soda is very fast (from 20 seconds to about one minute) thanks to the high temperature and pressure prevailing in the die.
- the chemical pretreatment is carried out semi-wet way.
- the method according to the invention comprises a step of feeding an animal with the straw which has been pretreated chemically.
- This feeding step is a conventional step well known to those skilled in the breeding industry.
- the animals are then fed with the pretreated wheat straw.
- the animals are ruminants, such as, for example, cows or cattle.
- the administration step consists in administering the ruminant enzymatic additive to the ruminant so that the ruminant is found in the reticulo-rumen of said ruminant.
- An example of administration of the enzymatic additive is the oral route.
- This administration step can be performed before, simultaneously with, or after the feeding step of the ruminant with the chemically pre-treated wheat straw.
- the feeding step means a maximum of 24 hours before.
- the enzyme additive will never be administered more than 24 hours before the administration of the chemically pre-treated wheat straw.
- the enzymatic rumen additive will be administered from 2 hours to 8 hours prior to administration of the chemically pretreated wheat straw.
- the feeding step means at most 24 hours later.
- the enzyme additive will never be administered more than 24 hours after the administration of the chemically pre-treated wheat straw.
- the enzymatic rumen additive will be administered from 2 hours to 8 hours after administration of the chemically pre-treated wheat straw.
- the administration step is performed simultaneously with the feeding step.
- a step of direct administration in the ruminant, in particular orally, of an enzymatic ruminate additive made it possible to significantly improve the degradation, or even , to create a synergy on the degradation with the chemical pretreatment of wheat straw.
- the method according to the invention can be applied on a large scale on the whole of a farm and inexpensive way since the enzyme is not used in pretreatment on straw but is administered directly to the animal as an enzyme additive.
- the ruminant enzymatic additive is directly administered to the ruminant before, during feeding or after feeding with chemically pre-treated wheat straw, and it is no longer necessary to spray it on the whole stock of straw. wheat or wheat straw to eat soon.
- the process according to the invention makes it possible to dispense with the incubation times normally required to allow the enzyme to act when it is used in pretreatment of wheat straw.
- the enzymatic rumen additive is a mixture comprising at least two enzymes. Enzymes used in the enzymatic rumen additive may be glucanases, xylanases, esterases, or carboxymethylcellulases.
- the enzymatic rumen additive is a mixture of glucanase and xylanase, and in particular endo-1,3 (4) -beta-glucanase and endo-beta-1,4-xylanase. .
- the endo-1, 3 (4) -3-glucanase enzyme is a highly concentrated preparation of ⁇ -glucanase, obtained by submerged fermentation of a selected strain of Trichoderma reesei.
- the endo-b-1, 4-xylanase enzyme is a highly concentrated xylanase preparation obtained by submerged fermentation of a selected strain of Trichoderma reesei. According to the EC nomenclature of Enzymes Commission number:
- the endo-1, 3 (4) - glucanase enzyme has the EC code 3.2.1.6,
- the endo-1,4-xylanase enzyme has the EC code 3.2.1.8.
- the dose of glucanase can be between 200 units / g of straw and 7000 units / g of straw, preferably 4000 units / g of straw at 6000 units / g of straw, for example about 4670 units / g of straw.
- the xylanase dose may be from 200 units / g of straw to 7000 units / g of straw, preferably from 4000 units / g of straw to 6000 units / g of straw, for example about 4670 units / g of straw.
- the enzymatic units correspond to the amount of enzyme necessary for:
- the glucanase may be an endo-1,3 (4) -glucanase and the xylanase may be an endo-1, 4-xylanase.
- the glucanase / xylanase ratio is at least 0.5, preferably at least 0.75, and most preferably about 1.
- the enzymatic rumen additive is in a form suitable for animal administration.
- the enzymatic rumen additive can be in the form of capsules, bolus, powder, granules or liquid, such as in ampoules.
- the enzymatic rumen additive is in powder or liquid form, preferably in the form of a powder.
- a capsule or capsule is a solid preparation, consisting of a hard or soft envelope of varying shape and capacity.
- a tablet or bolus is a solid preparation containing a unit for taking one or more active ingredients (or preparation). They are obtained by compression of a constant volume of particles. Destined for cattle, they become bigger and they are called boluses.
- said enzymatic ruminate additive when the enzymatic rumen additive is administered simultaneously with the chemically pretreated wheat straw, said enzymatic ruminate additive may be in the form of a powder which will be mixed with the pretreated wheat straw. chemically. The mixture is then used to feed the ruminant.
- the ruminant belongs to the family Bovidae.
- the family Bovidae includes several sub-families, including cattle (including cattle) and goats (including sheep and goats).
- the improvement in the degradation of wheat straw can be determined by the techniques known to those skilled in the art, for example by measuring the loss of dry matter by incubation in ruminal liquid. The details of the measurements are presented in the example section below.
- the process according to the invention is particularly advantageous because it surprisingly allows a synergistic action between the enzymatic rumen additive and the chemical pretreatment of the wheat straw on the degradation of the wheat straw.
- the effect on ruminal degradation is greater than the sum of the combined effects of chemical pretreatment and enzymatic ruminate additive alone.
- the wheat straw is better valued and it is simpler for the farms to tend towards food self-sufficiency without generating significant additional cost.
- a second subject of the invention relates to the direct use in a ruminant of an enzymatic rumen additive before, after or simultaneously with feeding said ruminant with wheat straw having previously undergone alkaline pretreatment, and preferably simultaneously with feeding said ruminant, which means that said enzymatic additive is not used in pretreatment on wheat straw.
- the enzymatic rumen additive is an enzyme mixture comprising at least two enzymes. Enzymes used in the enzymatic rumen additive may be glucanases, xylanases, esterases, or carboxymethylcellulases.
- the enzymatic rumen additive is a mixture of glucanase and xylanase and in particular endo-1,3 (4) -beta-glucanase and endo-beta-1,4-xylanase.
- the dose of endo-1, 3 (4) -3-glucanase can be between 200 units / g of straw and 7000 units / g of straw, preferably of 4000 units / g of straw at 6000 units / g of straw, for example about 4670 units / g of straw.
- the dose of endo-3-1, 4-xylanase can be between 200 units / g of straw and 7000 units / g of straw, preferably of 4000 units / g of straw to 6000 units / g of straw as for example about 4670 units / g of straw.
- the ratio endo-1, 3 (4) -3-glucanase / endo-3-1, 4-xylanase is at least 0.5, preferably at least 0.75, and especially about 1.
- the enzymatic rumen additive is in a form suitable for animal administration.
- the enzymatic rumen additive can be in the form of capsules, bolus, powder, granules or liquid, such as in ampoules.
- the enzymatic rumen additive is in the form of powder or liquid, preferably in powder form.
- the use according to the invention is particularly advantageous because it makes it possible to improve the degradation of wheat straw by animals.
- the simultaneous use makes it possible to create a synergistic effect on the degradation of wheat straw.
- FIG. 1 Comparison of the effect of an aqueous pretreatment alone (H 2 0) or alkaline alone (NaOH 5%), of the use of an enzymatic ruminate additive alone (represented hereinafter by (GP + XP) x10) or the combination of an alkaline pretreatment and an enzymatic ruminate additive (hereinafter represented by (5% + NaOH + (GP + XP) x10)) on the degradation of the dry matter of wheat straw ( percentage of disappearance / degradation of the dry matter of wheat straw).
- the two dashed lines respectively represent the value of the disappearance / degradation of the dry matter of wheat straw pretreated with soda (5% NaOH) (upper line) and not pretreated (control (C)) (lower line).
- Wheat straw is milled on a 2 cm mesh (Electra) and then the fine particles are removed through a sieve of 1. 18 mm (Penn State Separator).
- Pretreatment is applied semi-wet for 24 hours on straw before incubation with rumen juice. Two types of pretreatment are applied. Pretreatment with water (control) and chemical pretreatment.
- Pretreatment with water is a negative control. Indeed, the pre-treatment is made by a soda solution in water.
- a negative control pre-treated with water only and (ii) a negative control without pre-treatment, and then dissociating the water pre-treatment effect and soda, and therefore to be able to conclude specifically about the effect of soda as a pre-treatment.
- the chemical pretreatment is applied by contacting the wheat straw with a 5% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution. 9 ml of solution are used for 3 g of wheat straw.
- NaOH sodium hydroxide
- the additive is added in the modules at the time of incubation with the ruminal liquid.
- Enzyme ruminate additive is a mixture of two enzymes in a 1: 1 ratio:
- an endo-1,3 (4) -beta-glucanase hereinafter GP, having an activity of 70000 units / g and an endo beta 1-4 xylanase, hereinafter XP, having an activity of 70000 units / g.
- the enzymatic units correspond to the amount of enzyme necessary for:
- Ten doses of the enzymatic mixture corresponds to 0.4 g of the enzyme mixture for 3 g of straw, ie 0.2 g of GP and 0.2 g of XP for 3 g of straw, or 4670 units (rounded to the tens) of GP and XP for 1 g of straw. 4.
- Ruminai content is collected approximately 2 hours post-meal in dry dairy cows, carrying a ruminal cannula and fed with a ration based on wheat straw, corn silage and a mineral and vitamin supplement.
- the ruminai content is filtered through a 1.6 mm mesh metal screen to obtain rumen fluid.
- the latter is bubbled with C0 2 oxygen-free.
- Test 2 Unpretreated wheat straw and enzymatic rumen additive (see point 3. above).
- Trial 3 duplicate of Trial 2 to validate and confirm the results.
- Test 4 Pretreated wheat straw (see point 2.) and enzymatic rumen additive (see point 3.)
- the untreated straw corresponds to pretreated straw according to the same protocol as point 2. but replacing the alkaline solution with water.
- 3 white modules are made. They contain only incubation medium as described in point 4 of this example.
- the incubation flasks receive 200 ml of incubation medium each and then are saturated with oxygen-free CO 2 .
- the quantity of straw, pretreated or not, within each module is 3 grams.
- the flasks are incubated at 39 ° C for 96 hours to allow fermentation.
- the modules After 96 hours of incubation, the modules are placed in the ice to stop the fermentation. The amount of non-degraded dry matter is then measured by filtering and drying the incubation residue at 60 ° C for 4 days (hereinafter referred to as residue).
- the incubated substrate corresponds to pretreated or unpretreated wheat straw.
- the dry matter degradation results were subjected to an analysis of variance using the linear general univariate model of the statistical data processing software SPSS® (IBM®, SPSS®, version 22).
- the model integrates the effects of the covariate and the products, the covariate being the degradation of the control dry matter (in percentage%).
- An Iog10 transformation of the percent values was performed for the analysis.
- FIG. 1 shows a significant effect on the ruminal degradation of the dry matter by the use of an enzymatic rumen additive on wheat straw pretreated with sodium hydroxide (5% NaOH + (GP + XP) x10 ).
- the results show that pretreatment with sodium hydroxide (5%) improves the ruminal degradation of straw with respect to (i) no pre-treatment and (ii) pre-treatment with water.
- Pretreatment with sodium hydroxide makes it possible to improve rumen degradation of the dry matter by 22.3 points compared with untreated wheat straw (control).
- the synergistic effect is understood to mean that ruminal degradation in animals of chemically pretreated wheat straw and in the presence of enzymatic rumen additive is greater than the ruminal degradation achieved by chemical pretreatment alone, by the administration. of the enzymatic additive alone or by the two combined but working independently.
- the process according to the invention is therefore particularly advantageous in that it makes it possible to significantly improve the ruminal degradation of wheat straw when the latter is chemically pretreated.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Birds (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Mycology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Fodder In General (AREA)
- Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR1854868A FR3081682B1 (en) | 2018-06-05 | 2018-06-05 | PROCESS FOR IMPROVING THE DEGRADATION OF WHEAT STRAW |
PCT/FR2019/051325 WO2019234347A1 (en) | 2018-06-05 | 2019-06-04 | Process for improving wheat straw degradation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3801045A1 true EP3801045A1 (en) | 2021-04-14 |
Family
ID=63557607
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19737839.1A Pending EP3801045A1 (en) | 2018-06-05 | 2019-06-04 | Process for improving wheat straw degradation |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20210307360A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3801045A1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN112272521A (en) |
AR (1) | AR115483A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2019281142A1 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112020024781A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3101868A1 (en) |
FR (1) | FR3081682B1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX2020013246A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2019234347A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114503957B (en) * | 2021-11-30 | 2024-02-13 | 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所 | Method for cooperatively disposing straws by utilizing insects and minerals |
CN116815527A (en) * | 2023-01-10 | 2023-09-29 | 合肥学院 | Straw pretreatment method |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2008037757A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Novozymes A/S | Xylanases for animal feed |
FR3016768B1 (en) * | 2014-01-27 | 2016-02-26 | J Soufflet Ets | USE OF AN ENZYMA COMPOSITION IN THE FEEDING OF RUMINANTS |
-
2018
- 2018-06-05 FR FR1854868A patent/FR3081682B1/en active Active
-
2019
- 2019-06-04 CA CA3101868A patent/CA3101868A1/en active Pending
- 2019-06-04 WO PCT/FR2019/051325 patent/WO2019234347A1/en unknown
- 2019-06-04 US US16/972,216 patent/US20210307360A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2019-06-04 CN CN201980037921.6A patent/CN112272521A/en active Pending
- 2019-06-04 MX MX2020013246A patent/MX2020013246A/en unknown
- 2019-06-04 EP EP19737839.1A patent/EP3801045A1/en active Pending
- 2019-06-04 AU AU2019281142A patent/AU2019281142A1/en active Pending
- 2019-06-04 BR BR112020024781-2A patent/BR112020024781A2/en unknown
- 2019-06-05 AR ARP190101532A patent/AR115483A1/en active IP Right Grant
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
FR3081682A1 (en) | 2019-12-06 |
WO2019234347A1 (en) | 2019-12-12 |
FR3081682B1 (en) | 2021-06-25 |
CN112272521A (en) | 2021-01-26 |
CA3101868A1 (en) | 2019-12-12 |
AU2019281142A1 (en) | 2021-01-07 |
AR115483A1 (en) | 2021-01-27 |
BR112020024781A2 (en) | 2021-03-02 |
US20210307360A1 (en) | 2021-10-07 |
MX2020013246A (en) | 2021-02-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3099182B1 (en) | Use of an enzymatic composition in the feed of ruminants | |
JP2721676B2 (en) | Animal feed and production method thereof | |
JP3037437B2 (en) | Enzyme additives for ruminant feed | |
CN104768391A (en) | Processes and compositions for increasing the digestibility of cellulosic materials | |
JP2018085995A (en) | Materials of animal feed composition | |
CN105472994A (en) | Method of preparing feed additive | |
WO2019234347A1 (en) | Process for improving wheat straw degradation | |
Taye et al. | Review on improving nutritive value of forage by applying exogenous enzymes | |
EP2178390A2 (en) | Heat-resistant composition for animals, comprising an enzymatic mixture | |
Pimentel et al. | How can nutritional additives modify ruminant nutrition? | |
US20160249643A1 (en) | Use of Enzymes to Condition Ruminant Feedstocks | |
Thakur et al. | Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes supplementation on growth and nutrient utilization in Murrah buffalo calves | |
FR3081681A1 (en) | PROCESS FOR IMPROVING RUMINAL DEGRADATION OF WHEAT STRAW | |
Giraldo et al. | In vitro ruminal fermentation of low-quality forages as influenced by the treatment with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes | |
JPH08332032A (en) | Peroral enzyme preparation for animal and its use | |
Patel et al. | Effect of feeding solid-state fermentation biomass on nutrients intake, digestibility and microbial protein synthesis in lactating buffaloes | |
RU2787035C2 (en) | Method for improvement of degradation of wheat straw | |
EP3375297A1 (en) | Extruded food supplement in kibble form, in particular an extruded food supplement in kibble form for a ruminant | |
Hussain et al. | Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes on ruminant performance | |
Elghandour et al. | Fungi as a Source of Exogenous Enzymes in Ruminant Feeding | |
BE1024511B1 (en) | Method of manufacturing an extruded complementary food in the form of a kibble, in particular a method of manufacturing a complementary feed extruded in the form of a kibble for ruminants | |
Herliatika et al. | Evaluation of feed supplementation using legume leaf meal and spent substrate fermented by Eupenicillium javanicum as a potential feed for ruminants: an in vitro study | |
Grigorova et al. | Effects of exogenous enzyme preparations on protozoan population and cellulolytic activity in the rumen of yearling rams | |
Vaithiyanathan et al. | Effect of feeding chemically treated mustard (Brassica campestris) straw on rumen fibre degrading enzymes in sheep | |
EP4000411A1 (en) | Method and food composition for reducing the production of methane in ruminants |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20201229 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: JULIEN, CHRISTINE Inventor name: MARDEN, JEAN-PHILIPPE |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20240531 |