EP3760343A1 - Iron powder for powder metallurgy - Google Patents

Iron powder for powder metallurgy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3760343A1
EP3760343A1 EP19761704.6A EP19761704A EP3760343A1 EP 3760343 A1 EP3760343 A1 EP 3760343A1 EP 19761704 A EP19761704 A EP 19761704A EP 3760343 A1 EP3760343 A1 EP 3760343A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
mass
equal
powder
iron powder
less
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP19761704.6A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3760343B1 (en
EP3760343A4 (en
Inventor
Yuji Taniguchi
Hirofumi Hojo
Satoshi Nishida
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Publication of EP3760343A1 publication Critical patent/EP3760343A1/en
Publication of EP3760343A4 publication Critical patent/EP3760343A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3760343B1 publication Critical patent/EP3760343B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/58Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with more than 1.5% by weight of manganese
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F1/00Metallic powder; Treatment of metallic powder, e.g. to facilitate working or to improve properties
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F1/00Metallic powder; Treatment of metallic powder, e.g. to facilitate working or to improve properties
    • B22F1/05Metallic powder characterised by the size or surface area of the particles
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F9/00Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof
    • B22F9/02Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes
    • B22F9/06Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material
    • B22F9/08Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying
    • B22F9/082Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • C22C33/0257Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements
    • C22C33/0264Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy characterised by the range of the alloying elements the maximum content of each alloying element not exceeding 5%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/002Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing In, Mg, or other elements not provided for in one single group C22C38/001 - C22C38/60
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/004Very low carbon steels, i.e. having a carbon content of less than 0,01%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/08Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing nickel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/12Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing tungsten, tantalum, molybdenum, vanadium, or niobium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F9/00Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof
    • B22F9/02Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes
    • B22F9/06Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material
    • B22F9/08Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying
    • B22F9/082Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid
    • B22F2009/0824Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid with a specific atomising fluid
    • B22F2009/0828Making metallic powder or suspensions thereof using physical processes starting from liquid material by casting, e.g. through sieves or in water, by atomising or spraying atomising using a fluid with a specific atomising fluid with water
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2301/00Metallic composition of the powder or its coating
    • B22F2301/35Iron
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2998/00Supplementary information concerning processes or compositions relating to powder metallurgy
    • B22F2998/10Processes characterised by the sequence of their steps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2999/00Aspects linked to processes or compositions used in powder metallurgy

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an iron powder for powder metallurgy.
  • Powder metallurgy in which a metal powder is compacted and then sintered to form a metal part, has become widely employed.
  • increasing a green density i.e., reducing a green porosity
  • a resultant metal sintered body to have higher mechanical strength.
  • an increase in green strength enables dimensional accuracy of the metal sintered body to be improved and yield to be increased.
  • Patent Document 1 According to Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. H04-173901 (Patent Document 1), by relatively increasing an apparent density of an iron powder for powder metallurgy, i.e. a bulk specific gravity of the iron powder in a stationary state, a green density can be increased. However, Patent Document 1 also discloses that when the apparent density is increased to a certain degree or more, green strength becomes insufficient. However, as a result of verification, the present inventors have found that in a limit region in which a decrease in green strength begins to become problematic, a magnitude relation between apparent densities of iron powders for powder metallurgy having an identical composition often becomes an inversion of a magnitude relation between green densities.
  • Patent Document 1 Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. H04-173901
  • An iron powder for powder metallurgy made to solve the aforementioned problems comprises: C: less than or equal to 0.005% by mass; Si: less than or equal to 0.030% by mass; P: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; S: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; O: less than or equal to 0.15% by mass; Mn, Ni, Mo, and Cr: less than or equal to 3.0% by mass in total; and a balance being Fe and inevitable impurities, wherein a tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is greater than or equal to 3.90 g/cm 3 and less than or equal to 4.20 g/cm 3 .
  • the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy falling within the above range iron powder particles can be easily rearranged in a close-packed state; therefore, the iron powder for powder metallurgy has superior compressibility at a time of compacting, and strength of a sintered body finally obtained is high.
  • a content of particles which pass through a plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 ⁇ m is preferably greater than or equal to 10% by mass and less than or equal to 20% by mass. This enables both a compact of the iron powder for powder metallurgy and a sintered body thereof to have sufficient strength.
  • Tap density as referred to herein means a value measured in accordance with JIS-Z2512 (2012).
  • the iron powder for powder metallurgy enables a compact with a high density, and a sintered body with high strength to be obtained.
  • the iron powder for powder metallurgy comprises: C: less than or equal to 0.005% by mass; Si: less than or equal to 0.030% by mass; P: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; S: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; O: less than or equal to 0.15% by mass; Mn, Ni, Mo, and Cr: less than or equal to 3.0% by mass in total; and a balance being Fe and inevitable impurities, wherein a tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is greater than or equal to 3.90 g/cm 3 and less than or equal to 4.20 g/cm 3 .
  • Carbon (C) is an element that hardens particles of the iron powder for powder metallurgy (iron powder particles). Furthermore, C also hardens the iron powder particles by being coupled with another impurity to form a fine carbide. When the iron powder particles harden, deformation is less likely to occur in compacting, which degrades formability and reduces a green density.
  • the upper limit of a content of C in the iron powder for powder metallurgy is 0.005% by mass, preferably 0.003% by mass, and more preferably 0.002% by mass.
  • Silicon (Si) is an element that is likely to be coupled with oxygen and forms an oxide film on a particle surface of the iron powder for powder metallurgy.
  • the oxide film of Si is difficult to reduce, thereby decreasing strength of a sintered body to be obtained.
  • Si has an effect of hardening the iron powder particles, thereby degrading compressibility (the green density and green strength) of the iron powder for powder metallurgy.
  • the upper limit of a content of Si is 0.030% by mass, preferably 0.020% by mass, and more preferably 0.015% by mass.
  • Phosphorus (P) is an element that hardens the iron powder particles and degrades the compressibility.
  • the upper limit of a content of P is 0.020% by mass, preferably 0.017% by mass, and more preferably 0.015% by mass.
  • S Sulfur
  • S is an element that hardens the iron powder particles and degrades the compressibility.
  • the upper limit of a content of S is 0.020% by mass, preferably 0.015% by mass, and more preferably 0.010% by mass.
  • Oxygen (O) is an element that hardens the iron powder particles and degrades the compressibility.
  • the upper limit of a content of O is 0.15% by mass, preferably 0.12% by mass, and more preferably 0.10% by mass.
  • Manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), molybdenum (Mo), and chromium (Cr) are elements that are added to increase the strength of the sintered body to be obtained by compacting and sintering the iron powder for powder metallurgy. It is to be noted that when contents of these elements are too high, the iron powder particles may become too hard for sufficient compressibility to be obtained.
  • the upper limit of a total content of Mn, Ni, Mo, and Cr is 3.0% by mass, preferably 2.5% by mass, and more preferably 2.0% by mass.
  • the tap density is an indicator of the ease of rearrangement of the iron powder particles. Assuming that an absolute specific gravity is constant, a larger value of the tap density allows the iron powder particles to be easily rearranged more tightly in a packed state with lower porosity. Accordingly, a higher tap density grants higher compressibility, facilitates compacting, and enables a compact with a higher density (green density) to be obtained with relatively low pressure. Meanwhile, when the tap density is too high, adhesiveness between the iron powder particles may be insufficient, and the strength of the compact (green strength) obtained may be insufficient.
  • the lower limit of the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is 3.90 g/cm 3 , preferably 3.95 g/cm 3 , and more preferably 3.97 g/cm 3 .
  • the upper limit of the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is 4.20 g/cm 3 , preferably 4.15 g/cm 3 , and more preferably 4.10 g/cm 3 .
  • the lower limit of a content of particles which pass through a plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 ⁇ m is preferably 10% by mass, and more preferably 12% by mass.
  • the upper limit of the content of the particles which pass through the plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 ⁇ m is preferably 20% by mass, and more preferably 18% by mass. In a case in which in the iron powder for powder metallurgy, the content of the particles which pass through the plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 ⁇ m is less than the lower limit, the strength of the sintered body of the iron powder for powder metallurgy may be insufficient.
  • the lower limit of a density of a compact (green density) obtained by adding 0.75% by mass zinc stearate to the iron powder for powder metallurgy and forming at a forming pressure of 7 tf/cm 2 is preferably 7.20 g/cm 3 , and more preferably 7.22 g/cm 3 .
  • strength of a sintered body finally obtained may be insufficient.
  • the upper limit of a rattler value which is an indicator of the strength of the compact (green strength), obtained by adding 0.75% by mass zinc stearate to the iron powder for powder metallurgy and forming at a forming pressure of 7 tf/cm 2 is preferably 0.75%, and more preferably 0.70%.
  • the rattler value of the compact is greater than the upper limit, the green strength may be insufficient, and dimensional accuracy and/or yield of the sintered body may be insufficient.
  • "rattler value” as referred to herein means a value measured in accordance with JSPM Standard 4-69.
  • the iron powder for powder metallurgy can be produced by a method comprising: atomizing molten iron by spraying water, the molten iron having been prepared to have the above composition (a water-atomizing step); reducing a powder obtained in the water-atomizing step by heating in a reducing gas atmosphere (a reducing step); and pulverizing an iron powder solidified in the reducing step (a pulverizing step).
  • a fine iron powder is obtained by spraying water onto the molten iron flowing from a furnace.
  • the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy to be obtained is controlled so as to fall within the above range. Specifically, the higher the water pressure is, the lower the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy to be obtained.
  • the iron powder oxidized in the water-atomizing step is reduced by heating in a reducing gas environment.
  • a hydrogen gas, an ammonia gas, or a butane gas may be used as the reducing gas.
  • the iron powder solidified into a cake shape by a reducing treatment described above is pulverized using a mill.
  • a particle diameter distribution of the iron powder for powder metallurgy to be obtained is made to conform with a particle diameter distribution of the iron powder obtained in the water-atomizing step, ensuring a desired tap density.
  • a hammer mill, a feather mill, or the like may be used as the mill used in the pulverizing step.
  • the iron powder after the pulverizing is sorted through a wire mesh, and large particles are put into the mill again.
  • the iron powder particles Due to the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy falling within the above range, the iron powder particles can be easily rearranged to result in a high apparent density; thus, the iron powder for powder metallurgy is superior in compressibility at a time of compacting, and a compact with sufficient strength (green strength) can be obtained. Accordingly, by using the iron powder for powder metallurgy, a sintered body with high strength can be efficiently produced.
  • Molten iron was prepared using an electric furnace, and the molten iron allowed to flow from the electric furnace was atomized by a water atomization method in which water was sprayed onto the molten iron.
  • a pressure of the water sprayed was selected from within three types of ranges: a low pressure of 30 kgf/cm 2 to 60 kgf/cm 2 , a middle pressure of 60 kgf/cm 2 to 90 kgf/cm 2 , and a high pressure of 90 kgf/cm 2 to 120 kgf/cm 2 .
  • an iron powder obtained was dehydrated and dried, a coarse powder was removed using a wire mesh with an opening size of 425 ⁇ m, and then a reducing treatment was performed in a decomposed ammonia gas atmosphere within a temperature range of 880 °C to 980 °C for 30 min to 60 min. Then, the iron powder solidified into a cake shape by the reducing treatment was pulverized using a hammer mill and a feather mill, and sieving was performed using wire meshes with respective opening sizes of 425 ⁇ m, 250 ⁇ m, and 180 ⁇ m; thus, samples No. 1 to No. 9 of iron powders for powder metallurgy were obtained.
  • compositions of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy thus obtained were analyzed. Contents of C and S were measured with "CS-244", a carbon/sulfur analyzer available from LECO. A content of O was measured with "TC-400”, an oxygen/nitrogen analyzer available from LECO. Contents of elements other than C, S, and O were measured with "ICPV-5500", an ICP emission spectrometer available from SHIMADZU CORPORATION. Analysis results of the compositions of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Sample No.
  • particle diameter distributions and tap densities of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy were measured. It is to be noted that the particle diameter distributions were measured by a sieving test in accordance with JIS-Z8815 (1994). The tap densities were measured in accordance with JIS-Z2512 (2012).
  • Powders obtained by adding and mixing as a lubricant 0.75% by mass zinc stearate to each of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy were compacted at a forming pressure of 7 tf/cm 2 , whereby compacts each having a cylindrical shape with a diameter of 11.28 mm and a height of 10 mm were formed. Green densities and rattler values of the compacts obtained were measured. The green densities were measured in accordance with JIS-Z2501 (2000). Furthermore, the rattler values of the compacts were measured in accordance with JSPM Standard 4-69.
  • Fig. 1 shows a relation between the tap densities and green densities of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy
  • Fig. 2 shows a relation between the tap densities of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy and the rattler values of the compacts thereof.
  • both the density and the rattler value of the compact were substantially proportional to the tap density. More specifically, it was able to be confirmed that in order to set the green density to be greater than or equal to 7.20 g/cm 3 , at which sufficient strength could be obtained after sintering, and to set the rattler value of the compact to be less than or equal to 0.75%, at which a degree of a crack and/or a chip fell within a permissible range, the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy should be set to be greater than or equal to 3.90 g/cm 3 and less than or equal to 4.20 g/cm 3 .
  • the iron powder for powder metallurgy according to an embodiment of the present invention can be suitably used, for example, for production of mechanical parts such as a gear and the like.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Metal Powder And Suspensions Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

An iron powder for powder metallurgy according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises: C: less than or equal to 0.005% by mass; Si: less than or equal to 0.030% by mass; P: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; S: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; O: less than or equal to 0.15% by mass; Mn, Ni, Mo, and Cr: less than or equal to 3.0% by mass in total; and a balance being Fe and inevitable impurities, wherein a tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is greater than or equal to 3.90 g/cm<sup>3</sup> and less than or equal to 4.20 g/cm<sup>3</sup>.

Description

    [TECHNICAL FIELD]
  • The present invention relates to an iron powder for powder metallurgy.
  • [BACKGROUND ART]
  • Powder metallurgy, in which a metal powder is compacted and then sintered to form a metal part, has become widely employed. In general powder metallurgy, increasing a green density, i.e., reducing a green porosity, enables a resultant metal sintered body to have higher mechanical strength. Furthermore, in the powder metallurgy, an increase in green strength enables dimensional accuracy of the metal sintered body to be improved and yield to be increased.
  • According to Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. H04-173901 (Patent Document 1), by relatively increasing an apparent density of an iron powder for powder metallurgy, i.e. a bulk specific gravity of the iron powder in a stationary state, a green density can be increased. However, Patent Document 1 also discloses that when the apparent density is increased to a certain degree or more, green strength becomes insufficient. However, as a result of verification, the present inventors have found that in a limit region in which a decrease in green strength begins to become problematic, a magnitude relation between apparent densities of iron powders for powder metallurgy having an identical composition often becomes an inversion of a magnitude relation between green densities.
  • When a forming pressure at a time of compacting is increased, the green density and the green strength increase. However, the increase in the forming pressure leads to disadvantages of a shorter lifetime of a die, and the like, degrading production efficiency of metal parts.
  • [PRIOR ART DOCUMENTS] [PATENT DOCUMENTS]
  • Patent Document 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. H04-173901
  • [SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION] [PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED BY THE INVENTION]
  • In view of the foregoing disadvantages, it is an object of the present invention to provide an iron powder for powder metallurgy from which a sintered body with high strength can be obtained.
  • [MEANS FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEMS]
  • An iron powder for powder metallurgy according to an embodiment of the present invention made to solve the aforementioned problems comprises: C: less than or equal to 0.005% by mass; Si: less than or equal to 0.030% by mass; P: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; S: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; O: less than or equal to 0.15% by mass; Mn, Ni, Mo, and Cr: less than or equal to 3.0% by mass in total; and a balance being Fe and inevitable impurities, wherein a tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is greater than or equal to 3.90 g/cm3 and less than or equal to 4.20 g/cm3.
  • Due to the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy falling within the above range, iron powder particles can be easily rearranged in a close-packed state; therefore, the iron powder for powder metallurgy has superior compressibility at a time of compacting, and strength of a sintered body finally obtained is high.
  • In the iron powder for powder metallurgy, a content of particles which pass through a plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 µm is preferably greater than or equal to 10% by mass and less than or equal to 20% by mass. This enables both a compact of the iron powder for powder metallurgy and a sintered body thereof to have sufficient strength.
  • "Tap density" as referred to herein means a value measured in accordance with JIS-Z2512 (2012).
  • [EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION]
  • As set forth above, the iron powder for powder metallurgy according to an embodiment of the present invention enables a compact with a high density, and a sintered body with high strength to be obtained.
  • [BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS]
    • Fig. 1 is a graph showing a relation between tap densities and green densities of iron powders for powder metallurgy.
    • Fig. 2 is a graph showing a relation between the tap densities of the iron powders for powder metallurgy and rattler values of compacts thereof.
    [DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS]
  • Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings as appropriate.
  • Iron Powder for Powder Metallurgy
  • The iron powder for powder metallurgy according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises: C: less than or equal to 0.005% by mass; Si: less than or equal to 0.030% by mass; P: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; S: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass; O: less than or equal to 0.15% by mass; Mn, Ni, Mo, and Cr: less than or equal to 3.0% by mass in total; and a balance being Fe and inevitable impurities, wherein a tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is greater than or equal to 3.90 g/cm3 and less than or equal to 4.20 g/cm3.
  • Carbon (C)
  • Carbon (C) is an element that hardens particles of the iron powder for powder metallurgy (iron powder particles). Furthermore, C also hardens the iron powder particles by being coupled with another impurity to form a fine carbide. When the iron powder particles harden, deformation is less likely to occur in compacting, which degrades formability and reduces a green density. Hence, the upper limit of a content of C in the iron powder for powder metallurgy is 0.005% by mass, preferably 0.003% by mass, and more preferably 0.002% by mass.
  • Silicon (Si)
  • Silicon (Si) is an element that is likely to be coupled with oxygen and forms an oxide film on a particle surface of the iron powder for powder metallurgy. The oxide film of Si is difficult to reduce, thereby decreasing strength of a sintered body to be obtained. Furthermore, Si has an effect of hardening the iron powder particles, thereby degrading compressibility (the green density and green strength) of the iron powder for powder metallurgy. Hence, the upper limit of a content of Si is 0.030% by mass, preferably 0.020% by mass, and more preferably 0.015% by mass.
  • Phosphorus (P)
  • Phosphorus (P) is an element that hardens the iron powder particles and degrades the compressibility. Hence, the upper limit of a content of P is 0.020% by mass, preferably 0.017% by mass, and more preferably 0.015% by mass.
  • Sulfur (S)
  • Sulfur (S) is an element that hardens the iron powder particles and degrades the compressibility. Hence, the upper limit of a content of S is 0.020% by mass, preferably 0.015% by mass, and more preferably 0.010% by mass.
  • Oxygen (O)
  • Oxygen (O) is an element that hardens the iron powder particles and degrades the compressibility. Hence, the upper limit of a content of O is 0.15% by mass, preferably 0.12% by mass, and more preferably 0.10% by mass.
  • Manganese (Mn), Nickel (Ni), Molybdenum (Mo), and Chromium (Cr)
  • Manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), molybdenum (Mo), and chromium (Cr) are elements that are added to increase the strength of the sintered body to be obtained by compacting and sintering the iron powder for powder metallurgy. It is to be noted that when contents of these elements are too high, the iron powder particles may become too hard for sufficient compressibility to be obtained. Hence, the upper limit of a total content of Mn, Ni, Mo, and Cr is 3.0% by mass, preferably 2.5% by mass, and more preferably 2.0% by mass.
  • Tap Density
  • The tap density is an indicator of the ease of rearrangement of the iron powder particles. Assuming that an absolute specific gravity is constant, a larger value of the tap density allows the iron powder particles to be easily rearranged more tightly in a packed state with lower porosity. Accordingly, a higher tap density grants higher compressibility, facilitates compacting, and enables a compact with a higher density (green density) to be obtained with relatively low pressure. Meanwhile, when the tap density is too high, adhesiveness between the iron powder particles may be insufficient, and the strength of the compact (green strength) obtained may be insufficient. Hence, the lower limit of the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is 3.90 g/cm3, preferably 3.95 g/cm3, and more preferably 3.97 g/cm3. Meanwhile, the upper limit of the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is 4.20 g/cm3, preferably 4.15 g/cm3, and more preferably 4.10 g/cm3.
  • Particle Diameter Distribution
  • In the iron powder for powder metallurgy, the lower limit of a content of particles which pass through a plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 µm is preferably 10% by mass, and more preferably 12% by mass. Meanwhile, in the iron powder for powder metallurgy, the upper limit of the content of the particles which pass through the plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 µm is preferably 20% by mass, and more preferably 18% by mass. In a case in which in the iron powder for powder metallurgy, the content of the particles which pass through the plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 µm is less than the lower limit, the strength of the sintered body of the iron powder for powder metallurgy may be insufficient. Conversely, in a case in which in the iron powder for powder metallurgy, the content of the particles which pass through the plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 µm is greater than the upper limit, strength of a compact (green strength) finally obtained may be insufficient.
  • Green Density
  • The lower limit of a density of a compact (green density) obtained by adding 0.75% by mass zinc stearate to the iron powder for powder metallurgy and forming at a forming pressure of 7 tf/cm2 is preferably 7.20 g/cm3, and more preferably 7.22 g/cm3. In a case in which the green density is less than the lower limit, strength of a sintered body finally obtained may be insufficient.
  • Green Strength
  • The upper limit of a rattler value, which is an indicator of the strength of the compact (green strength), obtained by adding 0.75% by mass zinc stearate to the iron powder for powder metallurgy and forming at a forming pressure of 7 tf/cm2 is preferably 0.75%, and more preferably 0.70%. In a case in which the rattler value of the compact is greater than the upper limit, the green strength may be insufficient, and dimensional accuracy and/or yield of the sintered body may be insufficient. It is to be noted that "rattler value" as referred to herein means a value measured in accordance with JSPM Standard 4-69.
  • Production Method
  • The iron powder for powder metallurgy can be produced by a method comprising: atomizing molten iron by spraying water, the molten iron having been prepared to have the above composition (a water-atomizing step); reducing a powder obtained in the water-atomizing step by heating in a reducing gas atmosphere (a reducing step); and pulverizing an iron powder solidified in the reducing step (a pulverizing step).
  • Water-Atomizing Step
  • In the water-atomizing step, a fine iron powder is obtained by spraying water onto the molten iron flowing from a furnace. In the water-atomizing step, by controlling a water pressure of the water sprayed, the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy to be obtained is controlled so as to fall within the above range. Specifically, the higher the water pressure is, the lower the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy to be obtained.
  • Reducing Step
  • In the reducing step, the iron powder oxidized in the water-atomizing step is reduced by heating in a reducing gas environment.
  • As the reducing gas, for example, a hydrogen gas, an ammonia gas, or a butane gas may be used.
  • Pulverizing Step
  • In the pulverizing step, the iron powder solidified into a cake shape by a reducing treatment described above is pulverized using a mill. By sufficiently pulverizing the iron powder, a particle diameter distribution of the iron powder for powder metallurgy to be obtained is made to conform with a particle diameter distribution of the iron powder obtained in the water-atomizing step, ensuring a desired tap density.
  • As the mill used in the pulverizing step, for example, a hammer mill, a feather mill, or the like may be used.
  • Furthermore, in the pulverizing step, it is preferable that the iron powder after the pulverizing is sorted through a wire mesh, and large particles are put into the mill again.
  • Advantages
  • Due to the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy falling within the above range, the iron powder particles can be easily rearranged to result in a high apparent density; thus, the iron powder for powder metallurgy is superior in compressibility at a time of compacting, and a compact with sufficient strength (green strength) can be obtained. Accordingly, by using the iron powder for powder metallurgy, a sintered body with high strength can be efficiently produced.
  • Other Embodiments
  • The above-described embodiment does not limit the configuration of the present invention. Therefore, in the above-described embodiment, the components of each part of the above-described embodiment can be omitted, replaced, or added based on the description in the present specification and general technical knowledge, and such omission, replacement, or addition should be construed as falling within the scope of the present invention.
  • [EXAMPLES]
  • Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail by way of Examples; the present invention should not be construed as being limited to description in the Examples.
  • Molten iron was prepared using an electric furnace, and the molten iron allowed to flow from the electric furnace was atomized by a water atomization method in which water was sprayed onto the molten iron. At this time, a pressure of the water sprayed was selected from within three types of ranges: a low pressure of 30 kgf/cm2 to 60 kgf/cm2, a middle pressure of 60 kgf/cm2 to 90 kgf/cm2, and a high pressure of 90 kgf/cm2 to 120 kgf/cm2. Next, an iron powder obtained was dehydrated and dried, a coarse powder was removed using a wire mesh with an opening size of 425 µm, and then a reducing treatment was performed in a decomposed ammonia gas atmosphere within a temperature range of 880 °C to 980 °C for 30 min to 60 min. Then, the iron powder solidified into a cake shape by the reducing treatment was pulverized using a hammer mill and a feather mill, and sieving was performed using wire meshes with respective opening sizes of 425 µm, 250 µm, and 180 µm; thus, samples No. 1 to No. 9 of iron powders for powder metallurgy were obtained.
  • Compositions of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy thus obtained were analyzed. Contents of C and S were measured with "CS-244", a carbon/sulfur analyzer available from LECO. A content of O was measured with "TC-400", an oxygen/nitrogen analyzer available from LECO. Contents of elements other than C, S, and O were measured with "ICPV-5500", an ICP emission spectrometer available from SHIMADZU CORPORATION. Analysis results of the compositions of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 are shown in Table 1. Table 1
    Sample No. Composition (% by mass)
    C Si P S Mn Ni Mo Cr O
    1 0.001 0.007 0.014 0.006 0.19 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.13
    2 0.001 0.009 0.017 0.006 0.18 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.13
    3 0.001 0.013 0.006 0.004 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.07
    4 0.001 0.007 0.007 0.005 0.09 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.05
    5 0.002 0.014 0.007 0.007 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.05
    6 0.001 0.014 0.010 0.004 0.17 0.58 0.64 0.04 0.09
    7 0.001 0.010 0.009 0.004 0.19 0.58 0.60 0.04 0.08
    8 0.001 0.008 0.016 0.006 0.17 0.56 1.08 0.03 0.07
    9 0.001 0.011 0.015 0.005 0.12 0.54 1.04 0.03 0.07
  • In addition, particle diameter distributions and tap densities of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy were measured. It is to be noted that the particle diameter distributions were measured by a sieving test in accordance with JIS-Z8815 (1994). The tap densities were measured in accordance with JIS-Z2512 (2012).
  • Powders obtained by adding and mixing as a lubricant 0.75% by mass zinc stearate to each of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy were compacted at a forming pressure of 7 tf/cm2, whereby compacts each having a cylindrical shape with a diameter of 11.28 mm and a height of 10 mm were formed. Green densities and rattler values of the compacts obtained were measured. The green densities were measured in accordance with JIS-Z2501 (2000). Furthermore, the rattler values of the compacts were measured in accordance with JSPM Standard 4-69.
  • The particle diameter distributions and the tap densities of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy as well as the green densities and the rattler values of the compacts of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy are shown together in Table 2. Table 2
    Sample No. Water pressure Particle size distribution (% by mass) Tap density (g/cm3) Green density (g/cm3) Rattler value (%)
    +250 µm +180 µm +150 µm +106 µm +75 µm +63 µm +45 µm -45 µm
    1 High 1.9 6.0 4.2 12.8 16.0 12.2 17.4 29.5 3.71 7.13 0.44
    2 High 0.0 0.0 2.7 15.0 23.2 12.7 20.6 25.8 3.85 7.18 0.56
    3 Middle 0.0 0.0 2.6 19.8 27.3 15.6 18.3 16.4 3.98 7.29 0.74
    4 Middle 0.0 4.4 8.6 18.4 22.7 11.3 16.8 17.8 4.05 7.28 0.68
    5 Low 17.1 21.8 11.2 21.1 14.8 4.6 5.5 3.9 4.39 7.31 1.13
    6 High 0.0 0.0 3.7 17.9 20.4 12.7 18.0 27.3 3.84 7.18 0.51
    7 Middle 0.0 5.2 6.7 21.4 22.2 11.7 16.0 16.8 3.92 7.23 0.58
    8 High 0.0 5.5 5.8 18.5 21.0 10.7 17.1 21.4 3.87 7.19 0.51
    9 Middle 0.0 6.2 8.8 24.3 21.9 10.9 13.9 14.0 3.98 7.24 0.65
  • In addition, Fig. 1 shows a relation between the tap densities and green densities of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy, and Fig. 2 shows a relation between the tap densities of the samples No. 1 to No. 9 of the iron powders for powder metallurgy and the rattler values of the compacts thereof.
  • As shown in the drawings, it was confirmed that both the density and the rattler value of the compact were substantially proportional to the tap density. More specifically, it was able to be confirmed that in order to set the green density to be greater than or equal to 7.20 g/cm3, at which sufficient strength could be obtained after sintering, and to set the rattler value of the compact to be less than or equal to 0.75%, at which a degree of a crack and/or a chip fell within a permissible range, the tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy should be set to be greater than or equal to 3.90 g/cm3 and less than or equal to 4.20 g/cm3.
  • [INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY]
  • The iron powder for powder metallurgy according to an embodiment of the present invention can be suitably used, for example, for production of mechanical parts such as a gear and the like.

Claims (2)

  1. An iron powder for powder metallurgy comprising:
    C: less than or equal to 0.005% by mass;
    Si: less than or equal to 0.030% by mass;
    P: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass;
    S: less than or equal to 0.020% by mass;
    O: less than or equal to 0.15% by mass;
    Mn, Ni, Mo, and Cr: less than or equal to 3.0% by mass in total; and
    a balance being Fe and inevitable impurities,
    wherein a tap density of the iron powder for powder metallurgy is greater than or equal to 3.90 g/cm3 and less than or equal to 4.20 g/cm3.
  2. The iron powder for powder metallurgy according to claim 1, wherein a content of particles which pass through a plain-woven wire mesh with an average opening size of 45 µm is greater than or equal to 10% by mass and less than or equal to 20% by mass.
EP19761704.6A 2018-02-28 2019-02-19 Iron powder for powder metallurgy Active EP3760343B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018034209A JP7057156B2 (en) 2018-02-28 2018-02-28 Iron powder for powder metallurgy
PCT/JP2019/006090 WO2019167722A1 (en) 2018-02-28 2019-02-19 Iron powder for powder metallurgy

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3760343A1 true EP3760343A1 (en) 2021-01-06
EP3760343A4 EP3760343A4 (en) 2021-11-24
EP3760343B1 EP3760343B1 (en) 2025-07-23

Family

ID=67808900

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19761704.6A Active EP3760343B1 (en) 2018-02-28 2019-02-19 Iron powder for powder metallurgy

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3760343B1 (en)
JP (1) JP7057156B2 (en)
KR (1) KR102507938B1 (en)
CN (1) CN111741822B (en)
WO (1) WO2019167722A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5410935B2 (en) * 1972-12-06 1979-05-10
JPS5959810A (en) * 1982-09-30 1984-04-05 Kobe Steel Ltd Steel powder for powder metallurgy and its manufacture
JP2608178B2 (en) 1990-11-07 1997-05-07 川崎製鉄株式会社 Iron powder for powder metallurgy
JPH06256802A (en) * 1993-03-02 1994-09-13 Kawasaki Steel Corp Atomization method of molten metal by iron and steel powder for powder metallurgy and liquid jet
JP3957331B2 (en) * 1993-05-18 2007-08-15 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for producing water atomized iron powder for powder metallurgy
CN1104570A (en) * 1993-05-18 1995-07-05 川崎制铁株式会社 Atomised iron powder for powder metallurgy
JP3938944B2 (en) * 1993-11-04 2007-06-27 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for producing water atomized iron powder for powder metallurgy
US5501747A (en) * 1995-05-12 1996-03-26 Crs Holdings, Inc. High strength iron-cobalt-vanadium alloy article
US7217328B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2007-05-15 Neomax Co., Ltd. Compound for rare-earth bonded magnet and bonded magnet using the compound
JP4069727B2 (en) 2001-11-20 2008-04-02 日立金属株式会社 Rare earth based bonded magnet compound and bonded magnet using the same
CN1410208B (en) * 2002-11-25 2011-01-19 莱芜钢铁集团粉末冶金有限公司 Manufacturing method of alloy steel powder by spraying
JP2007092162A (en) 2005-02-03 2007-04-12 Jfe Steel Kk Highly compressible iron powder, and iron powder and dust core for dust core using the same
JP5617529B2 (en) * 2010-10-28 2014-11-05 Jfeスチール株式会社 Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
JP5926011B2 (en) 2011-07-19 2016-05-25 太陽誘電株式会社 Magnetic material and coil component using the same
JP2013204075A (en) 2012-03-28 2013-10-07 Taiwan Powder Technologies Co Ltd Method for producing fine reduced iron powder

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019147997A (en) 2019-09-05
EP3760343B1 (en) 2025-07-23
KR20200121858A (en) 2020-10-26
JP7057156B2 (en) 2022-04-19
CN111741822A (en) 2020-10-02
EP3760343A4 (en) 2021-11-24
KR102507938B1 (en) 2023-03-08
CN111741822B (en) 2022-06-03
WO2019167722A1 (en) 2019-09-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2947670B1 (en) Method for manufacturing powder magnetic core, powder magnetic core, and coil component
EP2108472A1 (en) High-compressibility iron powder, iron powder comprising the same for dust core, and dust core
KR20160006769A (en) Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and method of producing iron-based sintered body
KR20160045825A (en) Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and method of producing iron-based sintered body
JP5999285B1 (en) Iron-base alloy powder for powder metallurgy and sintered forged parts
EP3505493B1 (en) Tungsten carbide powder
EP3760343B1 (en) Iron powder for powder metallurgy
CN118103158A (en) Molybdenum powder
KR102316651B1 (en) Alloyed steel powder
CN111432958B (en) Partially diffused alloyed steel powder
JPH08921B2 (en) Pure iron powder for powder metallurgy with excellent compressibility and magnetic properties
JP2005325373A (en) Casting method of iron powder for magnetic materials
JP4715358B2 (en) Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy
JPH04173901A (en) Iron powder for powder metallurgy
CN115704076B (en) Hard granular powder for sintered bodies
JP2579171B2 (en) Manufacturing method of sintered material
JP2007169736A (en) Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy
CN101163809A (en) Iron-based sintered alloy
JPS5950154A (en) Manufacturing method for high-density iron-based sintered parts
JPH075921B2 (en) Method for producing composite alloy steel powder with excellent compressibility
CN116844813A (en) Neodymium iron boron magnetic material design method based on magnetic expansion rate, magnetic material and bonded magnet
JP2007100115A (en) Alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy
JPH0790301A (en) Iron-based granulated powder for powder metallurgy and method for producing the same
JP2020132902A (en) Pre-alloyed steel powder for sintered member, powder for sintered member, and sintered member
JP2021001381A (en) Alloy steel powder for sintered member, iron based mixed powder for sintered member, and sintered member

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20200903

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20211025

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C22C 38/44 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/18 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/12 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/08 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/04 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/02 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: C22C 33/02 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/58 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/00 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: B22F 9/08 20060101ALI20211019BHEP

Ipc: B22F 1/00 20060101AFI20211019BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C22C 38/44 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/18 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/12 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/08 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/04 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/02 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: C22C 33/02 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/58 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/00 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: B22F 9/08 20060101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: B22F 1/05 20220101ALI20250318BHEP

Ipc: B22F 1/00 20060101AFI20250318BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20250402

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: NISHIDA, SATOSHI

Inventor name: HOJO, HIROFUMI

Inventor name: TANIGUCHI, YUJI

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Free format text: CASE NUMBER: APP_25147/2025

Effective date: 20250527

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602019072920

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20251124

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1815920

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20251123

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20251023

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20251024

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20251023

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20260203

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20250723