EP3694364A1 - Structure de soutien déformable - Google Patents

Structure de soutien déformable

Info

Publication number
EP3694364A1
EP3694364A1 EP18795722.0A EP18795722A EP3694364A1 EP 3694364 A1 EP3694364 A1 EP 3694364A1 EP 18795722 A EP18795722 A EP 18795722A EP 3694364 A1 EP3694364 A1 EP 3694364A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
support structure
resilient
resilient members
structure according
members
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP18795722.0A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Panagiotis CHATZISTERGOS
Roozbeh NAEMI
Nachiappan CHOCKALINGAM
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Staffordshire University
Original Assignee
Staffordshire University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Staffordshire University filed Critical Staffordshire University
Publication of EP3694364A1 publication Critical patent/EP3694364A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B7/00—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements
    • A43B7/14—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B7/00—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements
    • A43B7/14—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts
    • A43B7/1405—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts with pads or holes on one or more locations, or having an anatomical or curved form
    • A43B7/1455—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts with pads or holes on one or more locations, or having an anatomical or curved form with special properties
    • A43B7/1464—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts with pads or holes on one or more locations, or having an anatomical or curved form with special properties with adjustable pads to allow custom fit
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/18—Resilient soles
    • A43B13/181—Resiliency achieved by the structure of the sole
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
    • A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
    • A43B13/18—Resilient soles
    • A43B13/181—Resiliency achieved by the structure of the sole
    • A43B13/184—Resiliency achieved by the structure of the sole the structure protruding from the outsole
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B17/00—Insoles for insertion, e.g. footbeds or inlays, for attachment to the shoe after the upper has been joined
    • A43B17/003—Insoles for insertion, e.g. footbeds or inlays, for attachment to the shoe after the upper has been joined characterised by the material
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B17/00—Insoles for insertion, e.g. footbeds or inlays, for attachment to the shoe after the upper has been joined
    • A43B17/02—Insoles for insertion, e.g. footbeds or inlays, for attachment to the shoe after the upper has been joined wedge-like or resilient
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B17/00—Insoles for insertion, e.g. footbeds or inlays, for attachment to the shoe after the upper has been joined
    • A43B17/14—Insoles for insertion, e.g. footbeds or inlays, for attachment to the shoe after the upper has been joined made of sponge, rubber, or plastic materials
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B7/00—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements
    • A43B7/14—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts
    • A43B7/1405—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts with pads or holes on one or more locations, or having an anatomical or curved form
    • A43B7/1475—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with foot-supporting parts with pads or holes on one or more locations, or having an anatomical or curved form characterised by the type of support
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B6/00—Mats or the like for absorbing shocks for jumping, gymnastics or the like

Definitions

  • This disclosure concerns support structures for supporting a human or animal body.
  • the disclosure concerns deformable and/or cushioning support structures, typically for pressure relief, and may, for example, encompass orthoses.
  • One technical field in which it is desirable to provide bespoke support structures is for footwear. It is generally known that the thickness and stiffness of cushioning material that is used as a shoe midsole/insole can be varied over its area to provide optimum cushioning. Whilst this approach is generally accepted for bespoke orthoses that are tailored to specific individual's needs providing this level of performance optimisation is less practical for mass-produced, standard shoe designs..
  • Conventional cushioning materials such as polyuerethane foams and the like, have predetermined material properties over the area of the sole and thus, when new, provide a predetermined response to applied pressure. That is to say, the resistance to applied pressure will increase in a predictable manner as the foam material compresses down to a fully compressed condition, at which point minimal further cushioning effect is provided.
  • the manner in which the cushioning effect is tailored is thus by changing the foam material or increasing/decreasing its thickness/depth rather than changing the nature of the material's response to applied load.
  • CAD Computer Aided Design
  • a support structure for a human or animal body comprising a support layer and an array of resilient upstanding members arranged over an area of the support layer, the resilient members depending from the support layer and being formed such that the resilient members resist an applied load on the support layer by reversibly collapsing in a direction towards the support layer, wherein the resilient members soften upon repeated collapsing of the resilient members in response to cyclic loading.
  • the resilient members may undergo mechanical softening in response to repeated loading/unloading of the support layer.
  • the resilient members may permanently or irreversibly soften, e.g. through repeated collapse.
  • the support structure may be arranged to undergo non-uniform loading over the area of the support layer.
  • the non-uniform loading may be defined by a nonuniform pressure/loading profile or distribution, e.g. a two-dimensional profile over the support layer area.
  • the pressure/loading profile or distribution may be predetermined.
  • the support structure may comprise a common/standard design, which adapts to an applied pressure profile through use.
  • the array of resilient members may be customised, e.g. upon manufacture, according to an
  • the resilient members may still adapt to the applied pressure profile in use.
  • the resilient members may each comprise a proximal end at the support layer and may extend form the support layer to a distal end or edge spaced from the support layer.
  • the distal end/edge may be a free end/edge.
  • the resilient member may comprise discrete resilient members. Each resilient member may be spaced from one or more adjacent member, e.g. by a gap. Each said resilient member may have a plurality of adjacent, e.g. surrounding, resilient members. The plurality of adjacent members may be spaced from said resilient member. Each resilient member may be spaced, e.g. laterally, from every adjacent or surrounding resilient member. The ability of one resilient member to deform independently of its adjacent resilient members may be beneficial in the adaptive tuning of the resilient members through use.
  • the resilient members may resist an applied load in two modes, a first mode comprising resilient/elastic compression up to a first loading threshold and a second mode comprising reversible collapse of the resilient members beyond the first load threshold.
  • the first mode may be considered to provide resilience to deformation primarily according to the material properties of the resilient members, e.g. elastically.
  • the resilient members may undergo gross deformation according to its mechanical and/or structural properties.
  • the third mode of operation may comprise resilient compression of the collapsed resilient members.
  • the first threshold may comprise a pressure and/or strain threshold.
  • the second threshold may comprise a pressure and/or strain threshold.
  • any or any combination of the material properties of the resilient members e.g. stiffness, resilience and/or elasticity, geometric properties (e.g. area, wall thickness, height, length and/or breadth) and/or arrangement within the network (e.g. number of neighbouring/adjacent members and/or density or spacing of resilient members) may be tailored to achieve a desired mechanical behaviour in response to an applied load or load distribution.
  • material properties of the resilient members e.g. stiffness, resilience and/or elasticity
  • geometric properties e.g. area, wall thickness, height, length and/or breadth
  • arrangement within the network e.g. number of neighbouring/adjacent members and/or density or spacing of resilient members
  • any or any combination of said material and/or geometric properties may be uniform or equal for some or all of the resilient members of the array.
  • the reversible collapse of the resilient members may comprise buckling or crushing thereof. It has been found that the yielding of the resilient members in this manner can provide a beneficial additional cushioning effect for a number of applications. Furthermore it has been found that repetition of this yielding/collapse behaviour, e.g. in a cyclic/ongoing manner, causes resulting changes in the mechanical behaviour of resilient members. Unlike a conventional foam
  • the upstanding resilient members will still adhere to a collapsing/yielding behaviour over extended use, but will soften and thereby adapt to the loading profile applied thereto over the area of the support surface.
  • the array of resilient members may be tuned for predetermined loading profile, such that only some of the resilient members will undergo collapse or buckling (e.g. in the second mode of response) whereas others will not (e.g. in the first mode of resilient response).
  • the resilient members may undergo softening in response to the action of collapsing (e.g. in the second mode of response).
  • the resilient members may soften according to the number of times they have undergone collapse. Thus, for a repeated loading profile in which some resilient member will collapse but others will not, the mechanical properties of the resilient members will vary over the array with ongoing use.
  • the array of resilient members may comprise a regular, uniform and/or evenly- spaced array, e.g. over the entire area of the support layer.
  • the density of resilient members may vary over the support layer area, e.g. according a predetermined loading profile.
  • the resilient members may each extend in a direction or along an axis that is substantially orthogonal to a plane of the support layer.
  • Each resilient member may comprise a hollow, walled structure.
  • Each resilient member may be circular or polygonal in section or plan.
  • Each resilient member may be open-ended, e.g. at its distal end.
  • Each resilient member may comprise a void or recess, e.g. an internal or central recess. The recess may extend in an axial direction with the resilient member.
  • the resilient members may or may not be of substantially common cross-sectional area or profile for the height of the resilient members.
  • Each resilient member in the array may be of common shape, e.g. in section or plan and/or a common three-dimensional shape.
  • Each resilient member may be of the same height.
  • Each resilient member may be annular or tubular in form.
  • the resilient members may have three, four, five, six or more sides.
  • Each resilient member may be straight-sided, e.g. when at rest or undeformed.
  • the resilient members may comprise one or more kink, corner, fold and/or crease when collapsed.
  • the resilient members may be deformed out of the plane in which they extend in the first mode.
  • the array of resilient members may comprise a regular and/or repeating pattern over the support layer area.
  • the width of the resilient members in the array may be equal or may vary over the array, e.g. according to a predicted pressure distribution over the support structure in use.
  • the density of resilient members may be relatively greater, and/or the resilient member width/area relatively reduced, for regions where the applied load is expected to be higher.
  • a length dimension of each of said edges of the resilient members may be uniform or may vary over the area of the support layer/structure.
  • the support structure may comprise tens or hundreds of resilient members.
  • the array may comprise greater than 40, 60, 80 or 100 resilient members.
  • the wall thickness of the resilient members may be constant or may vary over the area of the support structure, for example according to the intended applied pressure distribution in use.
  • the resilient members typically comprise a resilient polymer material.
  • the upstanding partitions may comprise an elastomer material.
  • the support structure may comprise an orthosis and/or article of clothing/footwear.
  • the support structure may comprise a sole component of a shoe, such as an insole or mid sole.
  • a method of producing a support structure comprising obtaining a pressure distribution for a body to be supported in use, determining one or more material property for a support structure according to the first aspect of the invention based upon said pressure distribution and forming the support structure such that only some of the array of resilient members will collapse upon application of the pressure
  • the support structure may be manufactured by an additive manufacturing process.
  • the support structure may adapt to its intended use.
  • the pressure distribution may be an anatomical pressure/weight distribution for a user.
  • a method of customising a user support structure for an end user comprising forming a support structure according to the first or second aspect and providing the support structure to the end user for use, whereby use of the support structure to support the user's weight causes one or more mechanical property of at least some of the resilient members to be permanently modified in response to said use.
  • a pressure distribution sensor comprising the support structure of the first aspect. Any of the optional features described in relation to any one aspect may be applied to any other aspect of the invention, where practicable.
  • Fig. 1 shows a three-dimensional view of a support structure according to an example of the present invention
  • Fig. 2 shows a plan view of the support structure of Fig. 1 ;
  • Figs. 3A and 3B show respective side and three-dimensional views of a resilient member for use in an example of the invention
  • Fig. 4 shows a three-dimensional view of a support structure according to a further example of the present invention
  • Fig. 5 shows an example of a plot of stress against strain for a support structure according to the invention
  • Fig. 6 shows a plantar pressure distribution for to be accommodated using a support structure in accordance with an example of the invention
  • Figs. 7 to 9 show plots of stress against strain showing mechanical response for upstanding members that have been exposed to respective low, medium and high pressure loading over time.
  • FIGs 1 and 2 there is shown a structure 10 spanning an area having length and width dimensions that are substantially greater than the depth of the structure.
  • the structure takes the form of a mat, bed, pad or similar.
  • the support structure is shaped in the form of an insole for footwear, although the support structure could be used for a number of different applications as will be described below. Examples of the invention designed for footwear may be referred to as 'foot beds'. In footwear, amongst other examples of the invention, the structure may be more generally referred to as a cushioning material.
  • the support structure 10 of Figure 1 is comprised of multiple upstanding resilient members 12 of the kind shown in the enlarged section 14.
  • the members 12 comprise a hollow interior having a perimeter defined by one or more upstanding wall formation, which in this example takes the form of a tubular wall.
  • the wall is curved in section. Oval or elliptical sectional profiles could be considered in place of a circular profile.
  • the wall of the resilient member is annular so as to completely enclose the hollow interior of the member when viewed in plan/section.
  • the support structure 12 has a support layer 14, shown in Figure 2, from which the resilient members 12 depend.
  • the support layer 14 is a continuous layer used to hold the members 12 in a predetermined array.
  • the support layer may comprise a simple single layer of material, which may be the same material used to form the upstanding resilient formations.
  • the support layer 14 and resilient members 12 are formed as a single, unitary structure, e.g. by a common manufacturing method.
  • the support layer could comprise a harder material so as to provide a support or platform, on which the resilient members can be disposed.
  • the support layer 14 may comprise a multi-layer structure or laminate, whereby the support layer could provide both a support for the resilient members 12 and also additional cushioning properties of itself.
  • the support structure 10 has a peripheral wall 16 extending around the perimeter of the support layer 14.
  • the peripheral wall is upstanding on the support layer 14 and forms a complete wall around the edge of the support structure 10.
  • the resilient members 12 are thus enclosed by the peripheral wall 16.
  • the peripheral wall may be formed of the same material as the resilient members 12 and/or may be formed by a common manufacturing process.
  • the peripheral wall, support layer and resilient members 12 may comprise a unitary, e.g. homogeneous, structure.
  • the peripheral wall 16 serves to constrain the resilient members 12 in use.
  • the peripheral wall 16 may deform in a collapsible manner, e.g. in a manner similar to the resilient members 12 upon loading of the support structure 10 in use.
  • the peripheral wall 16 is of a height similar to, or the same as, the height of the resilient members 12.
  • the members 12 in Figures 1 and 2 are shown as being open, i.e. open-ended. Whilst the support structure may be formed as shown in Figure 1 , practical embodiments, may have a further base and/or top layer from which the upstanding members 12 may depend.
  • the resilient members 12 and/or peripheral wall 16 may be sandwiched between suitable base later and the support layer 14.
  • a base and/or top layer may comprise a complete layer, e.g. as opposed to the open cells 12 of the support structure.
  • the resilient members can be formed as closed cells, i.e.
  • the support structure 10 is formed of a resiliently deformable polymer, such as a thermoplastic elastomer. The hardness of the material will be selected according to the specific weight/impact bearing properties required.
  • the free ends/edges 18 of the upstanding walls 16 collectively define a support surface of the support structure, which can resist an applied load in use in a manner which distributes the applied load across some or all of the members 12.
  • the structure 10 is typically oriented with the free/distal ends 18 of the members 12 facing the ground, floor or other surface (i.e. downwards) on which a body is to be supported in use.
  • the layer 14 thus provides a continuous surface or platform on which the weight of the body can be applied in use.
  • the members 12 are described as being air-filled, it is not intended that the members are air tight, that is to say, it is the mechanical behaviour of the members 12 that provides the desired cushioning behaviour in response to an applied load, rather than air trapped therein.
  • the upstanding members 12 extend in a direction substantially orthogonal to the plane of the support layer 14. Each member extends in a generally parallel direction when in an at-rest or undeformed condition as shown.
  • the upstanding members are arranged in a regular two-dimensional array, in which upstanding members are all equidistantly arranged.
  • the upstanding members are arranged in a series of, e.g. equally spaced, rows and columns. In this example at least eight or nine rows and/or columns are provided.
  • At least 80 or 100 members 12 may be provided to accommodate the variation in pressure distribution over the area of the foot bed in use.
  • the example structures of the present disclosure comprise an array or discrete/individual member/cells that can deform individually in response to an applied load.
  • Figs. 3A and 3B there is shown an isolated resilient member 12.
  • the resilient member is formed by a three-dimensional printing (i.e. additive manufacturing) method in which successive layers 20 of material are laid down and fused to the previous layer in a conventional manner.
  • three-dimensional printing techniques are described in the art and will not be described again here, save to say that a layer deposition process is used in this example.
  • the detailed view B in Fig. 3A shows the edge of successive layers 20 in further detail, where it can be seen that the successive layers of the resilient member form a non-smooth or textured surface/edge profile.
  • the edge of each layer may be rounded thereby forming a discontinuity, trough or recess at the interface between adjoining layers.
  • the layers 20 are shaped according to a desired cross sectional profile and stacked on a common axis so as to form the desired height of the upstanding member.
  • the resilient members may be elongate in form.
  • Fig. 4 shows a further example of support structure in which the resilient members 12A are polygonal, rather than circular in plan/section.
  • the resilient members 12A are hexagonal in plan/section in this example.
  • a regular hexagonal shape has been used, although other regular or irregular polygonal shapes could be used.
  • the members 12 or 12A Upon application of a load/pressure onto the support surface of the structure 10, the members 12 or 12A exhibit mechanical behaviour that can be divided into three distinct modes or zones, (i), (ii) and (iii) as shown in the schematic
  • FIG. 5 shows a stress/strain graph
  • a similarly shaped plot i.e. a similar response
  • any of the below description of Figures 5 and/or 7-9 may also apply to such a graph.
  • the support structure 10 behaves like many other resiliently deformable materials, such that the support structure undergoes elastic compression, wherein the internal stress within the material resists the force applied thereto, e.g. in a generally linear manner. The gradient of this portion of the graph is thus due to the Young's Modulus of the support structure material.
  • zone (ii) the stress/strain or force/displacement relationship changes.
  • zone (ii) the behaviour can be described as strain softening. That is to say, beyond a predetermined value of strain, i.e. beyond a corresponding value of applied load, the upstanding members 12 will buckle or collapse so as to cause a second type or mode of mechanical response. The members 12 will thus yield under compressive stress and will deform out of the plane of the wall structure when at rest. This causes the height of the walls to reduce more rapidly than the compression that occurs in zone (i).
  • critical load/pressure The pressure/loading magnitude that triggers the aforementioned sudden and drastic change in geometry (i.e. collapse) and the associated instantaneous change mechanical behaviour will be referred to simply as critical load/pressure.
  • the members 12 When the applied pressure is released, the members 12 typically revert back to their upstanding condition very quickly, e.g. akin to 'snapping' back to an un- deformed condition. This can occur more quickly than a conventional foam material which will typically expand more slowly as it approaches its un-deformed condition.
  • the upstanding wall structure can maintains the initial gradient for longer in zone (i), e.g. closer to a linear stress/strain relationship, than the foam material.
  • zone (i) e.g. closer to a linear stress/strain relationship
  • the support structure 10 will resist small loads to a greater degree and will provide a relatively firm support prior to collapse in zone (ii).
  • the support structure according to the present invention can significantly alter the response to different loading conditions, whereby applied pressure can be offloaded in an effective manner.
  • the support structure can be tuned in advance and various properties of the support structure may be modified to suit a particular application, such as any or any combination of the following parameters:
  • triangular, quad, etc for example including variations of regular or irregular shapes and/or a mixture of different shapes within different portions of a common support structure
  • FIG. 6 there is shown an example plantar pressure distribution 22 for a single foot of an individual.
  • the plantar pressure distribution 22 indicates different pressure applied to different plantar regions and is non-uniform, indicating regions 24 of higher loading in contrast to other regions 26 of lower or minimal loading.
  • Such a pressure distribution could be obtained from a static/standing condition but will more typically be obtained by analysis of transient pressure distribution during movement (i.e. walking, jogging and/or running). Individual pressure distributions taken at different times during movement can be
  • a support structure can be provided as a foot bed in which some, but typically not all, upstanding members will collapse according to zone (ii) of Fig. 5 when loaded under the pressure profile.
  • a foot bed can be provided that is approximately correct and then allowed to adapt further to the user over time by wearing/use of the foot bed. This may alleviate the need for accurate biomechanical measurements for a subject in order to provide a suitable foot bed. This may be important when it is considered that obtaining detailed biomechanical measurements is usually costly and time consuming processes.
  • the invention may allow a foot bed to be prescribed based on a very simple plantar pressure measurement and/or based on other information such as the subject's body weight (BW), shoe size, level of physical activity etc.
  • BW body weight
  • Figures 7-9 show some representative results of tests of sample support structures 10.
  • the initial mechanical behaviour of the samples and their critical load was assessed under compression.
  • the mechanical aging on the quasi-static mechanical response of samples having an infill density of 10% was assessed.
  • the samples were subjected to 100,000 cycles of mechanical aging (e.g.
  • 3D printing is not the only manufacturing technique that could lead to the desired effects. For example, staking, laying down of thin sheets of material that are cut to the cross-sectional shape of the array or individual upstanding members. Other examples of applying successive layers could be considered. Discontinuities or lines of weakness could be provided in the upstanding member in other ways if desired, e.g. by pre-forming the upstanding members 12 of a suitably texture/profiled material and applying them to the support layer.
  • the layered structure of the upstanding members described above has been particularly apt for the self-customising of mechanical behaviour over time, it is possible that other structures, textures and or mechanical features of the upstanding members could result in a similar effect.
  • forming of the upstanding formations with a profile that varies in a macroscopic scale, e.g. by virtue of a corner, indent, line(s) of weakness or similar may achieve the same repeatability in mechanical aging. This may allow non-layered structures and associated manufacturing methods, e.g. conventional moulding methods, to be used for manufacture of the support structures.
  • Mass production of a range of support structures could thus be enabled instead of bespoke individual structures using 3D printing.
  • a support structure with upstanding members each having one or more geometric feature to promote a stress concentration during collapse, e.g. and thereby cause predictable mechanical aging of the upstanding members in a desirable manner.
  • the upstanding members under collapse will 'snap' back to their original height once the load is removed and would thus look generally undeformed after repeated use but would soften based on the mechanical aging process described herein.
  • the upstanding members are not affected or minimally affected by bending, such that the upstanding members are deformed predominantly, or entirely, in compression.
  • the upstanding members may have low or minimal bending stiffness.
  • a foot bed with mechanical properties and critical load that is tailored for specific applications and/or individuals.
  • areas of high loading will age differently compared to areas where loading is medium or low.
  • Regions of the foot bed that undergo high loading will become softer enhancing the uniform distribution of plantar loads and the reduction of plantar pressure.
  • the same foot bed product will adapt differently to optimise performance on an individual basis when given to two different individuals provided that some or all of the upstanding members are consistently/repeatedly loaded to above their critical loading condition in use.
  • the support structure can be used as a device to assess plantar loading during activities of daily living without the need for complicated or intrusive electronic sensors.
  • a foot bed insert/insole is given to a patient and can be fitted within their normal shoes. The patient returns to their daily activities and uses the shoes with the footbed for a predefined period of time. Assessing changes in the mechanical properties of the insert will enable identification of the areas of the foot that are most heavily loaded during the patient's actual daily activities. This can provide some useful real-life information that may differ from information obtained by asking the same patient to undertake constrained biomechanical assessment, e.g. by walking in a straight line in a gait lab. This information can enhance prescription and ultimately the clinical management of certain conditions, including diabetic foot disease.
  • the support structures disclosed herein can have applications in performance as well as safety footwear.
  • the support structures could be used for other footwear components, such as midsoles, arch plugs, metatarsal beams/pads, heel plugs, or shoe uppers, e.g. for protective footwear.
  • the support structures are not only limited to foot bed applications but can be applied to any cushioning or supporting surface for clinical or commercial applications, e.g. for other support structures for the human or animal body.
  • Types of orthoses include, by way of example only, hand orthoses, or parts of a neck brace, or a knee brace, or other types of lower limb orthotic, such as night splints, or surgical shoe components.
  • shock-absorbing or pressure- distributing applications for which the present invention may be well suited, including cushioned and/or padded garments.
  • Other examples include helmets, body armour, seat covers, saddles, mats (including floor mats or yoga mats), grips and the like which are designed to relieve pressure or distribute impact or weight.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Physical Education & Sports Medicine (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Orthopedics, Nursing, And Contraception (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne une structure de soutien pour un corps humain ou animal. La structure de soutien présente une couche de support et un réseau d'éléments élastiques verticaux disposés sur une zone de la couche de support. Les éléments élastiques dépendent de la couche de support et sont formés de sorte que les éléments élastiques résistent à une charge appliquée sur la couche de support en s'affaissant de manière réversible dans une direction orientée vers la couche de support. Les éléments élastiques se ramollissent lors de l'affaissement répété des éléments élastiques en réponse à une charge cyclique. Chaque élément élastique peut s'affaisser indépendamment des autres éléments élastiques du réseau.
EP18795722.0A 2017-10-12 2018-10-12 Structure de soutien déformable Pending EP3694364A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1716746.1A GB2567461B (en) 2017-10-12 2017-10-12 Deformable support structure
PCT/GB2018/052944 WO2019073261A1 (fr) 2017-10-12 2018-10-12 Structure de soutien déformable

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3694364A1 true EP3694364A1 (fr) 2020-08-19

Family

ID=60419335

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18795722.0A Pending EP3694364A1 (fr) 2017-10-12 2018-10-12 Structure de soutien déformable

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3694364A1 (fr)
GB (1) GB2567461B (fr)
WO (1) WO2019073261A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9925440B2 (en) 2014-05-13 2018-03-27 Bauer Hockey, Llc Sporting goods including microlattice structures
CA3157206A1 (fr) 2019-05-21 2020-11-26 Bauer Hockey Ltd. Casques comprenant des composants fabriques de maniere additive

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4535553A (en) * 1983-09-12 1985-08-20 Nike, Inc. Shock absorbing sole layer
US5233767A (en) * 1990-02-09 1993-08-10 Hy Kramer Article of footwear having improved midsole
KR200274123Y1 (ko) * 2002-01-30 2002-05-03 허준 신발용 양면깔창
US7575795B2 (en) * 2002-04-02 2009-08-18 Seamless Alteratory Technologies, Inc (Satech) Impact absorbing safety matting system with elastomeric sub-surface structure
CN2896958Y (zh) * 2006-05-18 2007-05-09 孙志飞 弹力鞋底
WO2011038306A2 (fr) * 2009-09-25 2011-03-31 Sorbashock, Llc Dispositifs et systèmes de revêtement de sol pour une meilleure réduction des forces d'impact au cours d'une chute
US9144264B2 (en) * 2010-09-24 2015-09-29 Reebok International Limited Sole with projections and article of footwear
US9480298B2 (en) * 2013-08-01 2016-11-01 Nike, Inc. Article of footwear with support assembly having primary and secondary members

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB201716746D0 (en) 2017-11-29
GB2567461A (en) 2019-04-17
WO2019073261A1 (fr) 2019-04-18
GB2567461B (en) 2023-05-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3558046B1 (fr) Structures de rembourrage d'un article chaussant pour un corps humain ou animal
US20200329815A1 (en) Footwear and apparatus and method for making same
US11432617B2 (en) Methods for customizing cushioning sole systems for articles of footwear
EP3261477B1 (fr) Article chaussant avec structure de semelle à treillis
EP3852568B1 (fr) Structure de semelle pour article chaussant
US20220240622A1 (en) Particulate foam stacked casings
JP6683813B2 (ja) 履物のソール構造
CN107529852B (zh) 包括具有几何图案的鞋底构件的鞋类物品
CA2349272C (fr) Semelle pleine longueur pour personnes arthritiques et/ou diabetiques
US10448699B2 (en) Article of footwear with a tactile feedback system
CN110650644B (zh) 用于鞋类物品的柔性鞋底
US11771174B2 (en) Insole
EP3302143A1 (fr) Article chaussant comprenant un élément semelle comportant des ouvertures
EP3694364A1 (fr) Structure de soutien déformable
CN213154354U (zh) 鞋中底及鞋类制品
Melia et al. Insoles of uniform softer material reduced plantar pressure compared to dual-material insoles during regular and loaded gait
CN113303549A (zh) 鞋中底、鞋类制品、三维数据处理方法、3d打印方法
Jonnala et al. Design and development of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed Orthotic Insole by using gyroid structure
US20220142297A1 (en) Shoe midsole with variable dimension helical spring made by additive manufacturing process
KR101913104B1 (ko) 인체 감응형 압력 분산 인솔 및 그의 제조방법
WO2019241693A1 (fr) Élément d'amortissement
Baritz RESEARCHES ON USING ABS COMPOSITE AND SILICONE TO BUILD INSOLES BY 3D PRINTING
Gnagne et al. Load Distribution in Barefoot Running Shoes
Leung et al. Numerical Simulation of Pressure Distribution for Structural Design of Diabetic Footwear Insoles

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20200318

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20230706