EP3630930A1 - Moist detergent wipe - Google Patents

Moist detergent wipe

Info

Publication number
EP3630930A1
EP3630930A1 EP18728784.2A EP18728784A EP3630930A1 EP 3630930 A1 EP3630930 A1 EP 3630930A1 EP 18728784 A EP18728784 A EP 18728784A EP 3630930 A1 EP3630930 A1 EP 3630930A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
wipe
detergent solution
detergent
wipe according
wipes
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP18728784.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3630930B1 (en
Inventor
Jean Noel BERTHO
Mathieu SAUTY
Ga tan RAUWEL
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ecolab USA Inc
Original Assignee
Ecolab USA Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ecolab USA Inc filed Critical Ecolab USA Inc
Publication of EP3630930A1 publication Critical patent/EP3630930A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3630930B1 publication Critical patent/EP3630930B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/04Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties combined with or containing other objects
    • C11D17/049Cleaning or scouring pads; Wipes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/386Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase
    • C11D3/38618Protease or amylase in liquid compositions only
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/386Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase
    • C11D3/38627Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase containing lipase
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/48Medical, disinfecting agents, disinfecting, antibacterial, germicidal or antimicrobial compositions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to moist detergent wipes impregnated with an enzymatic detergent solution. These wipes are particularly applicable in the field of cleaning and disinfecting in the hospital and medical field, particularly of hard surfaces as well as medical equipment and instruments, such as endoscopes, for example.
  • Moist detergent wipes are currently widely used in the medical and hospital field for simple and fast cleaning of hard surfaces such as work surfaces and medical equipment and instruments, for example.
  • these wipes are impregnated with a detergent solution containing one or more surfactant(s) and possibly an anti-microbial agent such as a quarternary ammonium salt, for example.
  • a detergent solution containing one or more surfactant(s) and possibly an anti-microbial agent such as a quarternary ammonium salt, for example.
  • Such wipes are marketed by the Applicant under the name WIP'ANIOSĀ®, for example.
  • Patent application WO 00/37602 Al discloses an enzymatic detergent composition
  • These enzymatic activity stabilizers cited in the patent application are calcium salts, linear or branched alcohols, such as ethanol or isopropanol, alkanolamines such as triethanolamine, acids, particularly organic acids, and petroleum distillates.
  • the enzymatic detergent composition can be incorporated in individually packaged wipes.
  • the patent application does not disclose any tangible embodiment of a wipe impregnated with the enzymatic detergent composition. It simply refers to patent US 4998984, which recommends the use of a biodegradable wipe.
  • glycols and other polyols allow enzymatic detergent compositions to be stabilized.
  • these have the disadvantage of generating greasy marks on the treated surfaces.
  • the Applicant has observed that the selection of the material for the wipe significantly influenced the stability and particularly the enzymatic activity of the detergent solution.
  • the Applicant is to be credited with having developed, as a result of extensive research, a moist detergent wipe impregnated with a detergent solution comprising at least one protease, at least one amylase and at least one lipase, which remains stable over time, in which the enzymatic activity of the various enzymes is preserved and which does not leave greasy marks on the treated surfaces.
  • an object of the invention is a moist detergent wipe composed of a non- woven support impregnated with a detergent solution, the detergent solution comprising a protease, a lipase and an amylase, characterized in that the non-woven support comprises polyester fibers
  • the wipe is composed of polyester fibers, preferably polyethylene terephthalate fibers.
  • Preserving the enzymatic activity by virtue of the presence of polyester fibers means that a person skilled in the art can dispense with the addition of glycols or other polyols, particularly glycerine, for these purposes and thus avoids the greasy marks on the treated surfaces.
  • the detergent solution is thus glycol and/or glycerine free.
  • the wipe can be non-woven or woven.
  • a non-woven wipe will be used.
  • the wipe is a non-woven polyethylene terephthalate wipe, i.e. composed of polyethylene terephthalate fibers.
  • this type of wipe not only allows homogenous and stable impregnation of the detergent solution but also allows the enzymatic activity of the detergent solution to be preserved over time.
  • the rate of impregnation of the wipes with the detergent solution advantageously is from 100 % to 500 % by weight, preferably from 200 % to 400 % by weight and more preferably approximately 300 % by weight relative to the dry weight of the wipes.
  • the detergent solution with which the wipe is impregnated comprises at least one protease, at least one lipase and at least one amylase.
  • it has a protease content from 0.001 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.01 % to 0.1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.03 % to 0.07 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, even more preferably approximately 0.05 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • the lipase content advantageously is from 0.001 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.01 % to 0.1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.3 % to 0.07 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, even more preferably approximately 0.05 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • the amylase content advantageously is from 0.001 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.01 % to 0.1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.03 % to 0.07 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, even more preferably approximately 0.05 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • the tri-enzymatic cocktail of the concentrated aqueous detergent composition of the invention will simultaneously hydrolyze the three targets and thus facilitate detergency.
  • the detergent solution can also comprise a mannanase.
  • the detergent solution can also comprise one or more surfactant(s).
  • surfactants are preferably selected from non-ion surfactants, amphoteric surfactants and their mixtures.
  • non-ionic surfactants comprise alkylpolyglucosides, alkylpolypentosides, aminoxides, polyglycosides, glucamides, polyalkoxylated fatty alcohols, particularly polyethoxylated, and ethoxylated fatty acid esters.
  • Non-limiting examples of amphoteric surfactants comprise cocamidopropyl betaines.
  • the one or more surfactant(s) is/are selected from non-ionic surfactants, more preferably from fatty polyalkoxylated alcohols, particularly polyethoxylated, and aminoxides, particularly alkyl aminoxides, such as lauryldimethylamine oxide.
  • the one or more surfactant(s) is/are advantageously contained in the detergent solution in a quantity from 0.001 % to 2%, preferably from 0.001 % to 1 % and even more preferably from 0.025 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • the detergent solution can also contain a chelating agent, particularly a biodegradable chelating agent.
  • the biodegradable chelating agent is preferably selected from methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA) and an iminodisuccinate (IDS), particularly tetrasodium iminodisuccinate. Even more preferably, the biodegradable chelating agent is methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA).
  • the chelating agent implemented in the present invention is not only used for softening water but also for particularly efficiently complexing bivalent and trivalent metal ions, particularly Ca 2+ , Fe + , Fe 2+ et Cu 2+ , contained in the proteinaceous residues typically found on surgical and/or medical instruments. It would appear that these chelating agents sequester these metal ions, which destabilises the tertiary structure of the proteins and renders them more easily hydrolysable.
  • the composition used according to the invention advantageously has a chelating agent content from 0.001 % to 2 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.01 % to 1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.1 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, even more preferably approximately 0.27 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • the concentrated aqueous detergent composition advantageously is free of any nonbiodegradable chelating agent, particularly ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTP A), phosphates and polyphosphates.
  • EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
  • DTP A diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid
  • phosphates and polyphosphates phosphates and polyphosphates.
  • the concentrated aqueous detergent composition is also free of any reprotoxic classified chelating agent, such as nitrilotriacetic acid (NT A) and its sodium salt.
  • the concentrated aqueous detergent composition is also free of alkali and alkaline-earth hydroxides.
  • the detergent solution is an aqueous solution.
  • Its water content advantageously is from 90.0 % to 99.997 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 95.0 % to 99.9 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 97.0 % to 99.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition and even more preferably from 98.0 % to 99.0 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • the detergent solution can also comprise one or more disinfectant agent(s). In this case, the wipe is no longer only a detergent but also a disinfectant.
  • antimicrobial agents used for the present invention comprise, without being limited thereto, quarternary ammonium salts, amines supporting at least one C8 to C20 alkyl group, chlorhexidine digluconate, polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) or one of its salts.
  • quarternary ammonium salts amines supporting at least one C8 to C20 alkyl group
  • chlorhexidine digluconate chlorhexidine digluconate
  • PHMB polyhexamethylene biguanide
  • the one or more anti-microbial agent(s) is/are selected from didecyldimethylammonium salts, didecylmethylpolyoxyethyl ammonium salts, benzalkonium salts, benzethonium salts, methylbenzethonium salts, cetalkonium salts, cetylpyridinium salts, cetrimonium salts, laurylamine, N-(3-aminopropyl)-N- dodecylpropane- 1 ,3 -diamine and N-alkyl(C 12-C 14)-l ,3-diaminopropane, more preferably from didecyldimethylammonium chloride, didecyldimethyl ammonium carbonate, didecylmethylpolyoxyethyl ammonium propionate, benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, methylbenzethonium chloride, cetalkonium chloride
  • the one or more anti-microbial agent(s) is/are selected from didecyldimethylammonium chloride, didecyldimethyl ammonium carbonate, N-(3- aminopropyl)-N-dodecylpropane-l,3-diamine and N-alkyl(C 12-C 14)-l ,3-diaminopropane.
  • the quantity of disinfectant agent will be easily adapted by a person skilled in the art as a function of the one or more disinfectant agent(s) implemented.
  • the quantity thereof in the detergent solution advantageously is from 0.01 % to 2 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.1 % to 1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.2 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • the detergent solution can also comprise a preservative.
  • the preservative can be selected from commonly used preservatives, such as, for example, 5-chloro-5-methyl-4- isothiazolin-3-one, 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin3-one, p-hydroxybenzoic acid and its methyl esters, sodium 2-pyridinethiol-l -oxide, 5-bromo-5-nitro-l,3-dioxane and salicylic acid, benzyl alcohol and sodium benzoate. These preservatives allow microbial and fungal contamination to be avoided by providing a bacteriostatic and fungistatic effect.
  • the detergent solution also can comprise other additives, such as, for example, stabilising agents, such as anti-oxidant agents and/or anti-UV agents and/or dispersing agents and/or defoaming agents.
  • stabilising agents such as anti-oxidant agents and/or anti-UV agents and/or dispersing agents and/or defoaming agents.
  • the dispersing agents can be homopolymer, copolymer or terpolymer acids, for example, based on acrylic acid or alkali metal salts thereof (polyacrylates).
  • the wipe according to the invention is particularly advantageous for cleaning and/or disinfecting objects with a hard surface, such as medical instruments and devices, as well as work surfaces.
  • the medical instruments and devices within the scope of the present invention particularly comprise endoscopes without an internal channel, such as nasofibroscopes and transoesophageal probes, hemodialysis generators, ultrasound probes and electronic thermometers.
  • a second object of the invention is the use of the aforementioned wipe for cleaning and/or disinfecting objects with a hard surface, such as medical instruments and devices and work surfaces.
  • the invention also relates to a method for cleaning and/or disinfecting an object with a hard surface, such as medical instruments and devices and work surfaces, comprising the following steps: a) supplying a wipe as defined above;
  • the present invention provides an enzymatic detergent and/or disinfectant wipe that allows the use of stabilising agent of the glycol or polyol type, particularly glycerine, to be dispensed with.
  • stabilising agent of the glycol or polyol type particularly glycerine
  • these stabilising agents are no longer necessary for preserving the enzymatic activity and thus the cleaning power of the detergent solution in relation to organic stains.
  • Example 1 preparation of enzymatic detergent solutions
  • the detergent and disinfectant solutions SI to S 6 the formulae (as % weight relative to the total weight of the solution) of which are provided in table 1, were prepared by mixing ingredients in the following order.
  • SI to S5 demineralized water, Trilon M, Genamin LAP 100, Mergital D8, Carboquat HE, Lutropur MSA, enzymes.
  • the ingredients are added one after the other subject to slow stirring, stirring is maintained for a contact period of 30 minutes after the addition of the final ingredient.
  • Example 2 stability of the enzymatic detergent solutions
  • Electrophoresis on a polyacrylamide gel allows peptides or proteins to be detected.
  • the proteins after being negatively charged by a solution of SDS, are deposited onto the polyacrylamide gel placed in an electrolytic environment then subjected to a difference in potential (DDP).
  • DDP difference in potential
  • TLC Thin-layer chromatography
  • TLC comprises two phases: - the mobile phase (eluent) is a solvent or a mixture of solvents that progresses along the stationary phase;
  • the stationary phase is composed of a silica gel evenly spread as a thin layer over a semi-rigid sheet.
  • the principle is as follows: the molecules separate by differential migration. Each molecule is subject to two antagonistic effects: a stimulus effect exerted by the mobile phase and a retention effect exerted by the stationary phase; the components of the mixture move at different speeds and are separated.
  • the compounds After migration, the compounds are revealed by colored reactions according to the active principles. Identification is possible by virtue of indicators deposited under the same conditions as the unknown active principles.
  • Each active principle is characterized by its Rf ratio of the migration distance of the spot to the migration distance of the front of the solvent.
  • glycogen amylase activity
  • triglyceride lipase activity
  • PET polyethylene terephthalate
  • the polypropylene wipes could not be impregnated. The remaining four types of wipes were impregnated with all the solutions.
  • the mannanase is stable irrespective of the protease after impregnation on PET wipes. A degradation of the viscose/cellulose/PES wipes and the viscose/polyester wipes is suspected. The best results were obtained with 100 % PET wipes.
  • the various wipes were impregnated at 300 % with each solution S I and S5.
  • the wipes were then pressed by means of a 50 ml capacity syringe (one wipe per syringe) in order to recover the impregnation fluid and to measure the proteolytic activity of the solutions, with the solution that was used for the impregnation being used as a reference.
  • the best resolution rate is obtained on a PET wipe irrespective of the formula.
  • the biocide activity of the desorbed S6 solutions was determined according to standards EN 13727 and EN 16615 for the bactericidal activity and EN 13624 and EN 16615 for the levuricidal activity. The results are shown in table 5 below.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Cleaning Implements For Floors, Carpets, Furniture, Walls, And The Like (AREA)
  • Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a moist detergent wipe composed of a non-woven support impregnated with a detergent solution, the detergent solution comprising a protease, a lipase and an amylase, characterized in that the non-woven support comprises polyester fibers.

Description

MOIST DETERGENT WIPE
The present invention relates to moist detergent wipes impregnated with an enzymatic detergent solution. These wipes are particularly applicable in the field of cleaning and disinfecting in the hospital and medical field, particularly of hard surfaces as well as medical equipment and instruments, such as endoscopes, for example.
Moist detergent wipes are currently widely used in the medical and hospital field for simple and fast cleaning of hard surfaces such as work surfaces and medical equipment and instruments, for example. In general, these wipes are impregnated with a detergent solution containing one or more surfactant(s) and possibly an anti-microbial agent such as a quarternary ammonium salt, for example. Such wipes are marketed by the Applicant under the name WIP'ANIOSĀ®, for example.
Patent application WO 00/37602 Al discloses an enzymatic detergent composition comprising a non-ionic surfactant or a mixture of non-ionic and anionic surfactants, a protease, an amylase and possibly a lipase, as well as a system stabilising the enzymatic activity for cleaning blood stains and other organic stains. These enzymatic activity stabilizers cited in the patent application are calcium salts, linear or branched alcohols, such as ethanol or isopropanol, alkanolamines such as triethanolamine, acids, particularly organic acids, and petroleum distillates. The enzymatic detergent composition can be incorporated in individually packaged wipes. However, the patent application does not disclose any tangible embodiment of a wipe impregnated with the enzymatic detergent composition. It simply refers to patent US 4998984, which recommends the use of a biodegradable wipe.
It is also known that glycols and other polyols, particularly glycerine, allow enzymatic detergent compositions to be stabilized. However, these have the disadvantage of generating greasy marks on the treated surfaces. During its research, the Applicant has observed that the selection of the material for the wipe significantly influenced the stability and particularly the enzymatic activity of the detergent solution. Thus, the Applicant is to be credited with having developed, as a result of extensive research, a moist detergent wipe impregnated with a detergent solution comprising at least one protease, at least one amylase and at least one lipase, which remains stable over time, in which the enzymatic activity of the various enzymes is preserved and which does not leave greasy marks on the treated surfaces.
Therefore, an object of the invention is a moist detergent wipe composed of a non- woven support impregnated with a detergent solution, the detergent solution comprising a protease, a lipase and an amylase, characterized in that the non-woven support comprises polyester fibers
Contrary to all expectations, the selection of a non-woven support comprising polyester fibers, particularly polyethylene terephthalate, allows, on the one hand, good impregnation with the detergent solution and, on the other hand, the preservation of good enzymatic activity over time. In a particularly advantageous embodiment, the wipe is composed of polyester fibers, preferably polyethylene terephthalate fibers. Preserving the enzymatic activity by virtue of the presence of polyester fibers means that a person skilled in the art can dispense with the addition of glycols or other polyols, particularly glycerine, for these purposes and thus avoids the greasy marks on the treated surfaces. In one embodiment, the detergent solution is thus glycol and/or glycerine free.
The wipe can be non-woven or woven. Preferably, a non-woven wipe will be used. Thus, in a particularly preferred embodiment, the wipe is a non-woven polyethylene terephthalate wipe, i.e. composed of polyethylene terephthalate fibers. Indeed, this type of wipe not only allows homogenous and stable impregnation of the detergent solution but also allows the enzymatic activity of the detergent solution to be preserved over time.
The rate of impregnation of the wipes with the detergent solution advantageously is from 100 % to 500 % by weight, preferably from 200 % to 400 % by weight and more preferably approximately 300 % by weight relative to the dry weight of the wipes.
The detergent solution with which the wipe is impregnated comprises at least one protease, at least one lipase and at least one amylase. Advantageously, it has a protease content from 0.001 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.01 % to 0.1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.03 % to 0.07 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, even more preferably approximately 0.05 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition. The lipase content advantageously is from 0.001 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.01 % to 0.1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.3 % to 0.07 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, even more preferably approximately 0.05 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition. The amylase content advantageously is from 0.001 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.01 % to 0.1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.03 % to 0.07 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, even more preferably approximately 0.05 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
Given that the main components of the biological tissues that form the prominent stains in the hospital and medical field are proteins, lipides (triglycerides) and carbohydrate polymers (glycogen), the tri-enzymatic cocktail of the concentrated aqueous detergent composition of the invention will simultaneously hydrolyze the three targets and thus facilitate detergency. In addition to these three types of enzymes, the detergent solution can also comprise a mannanase.
The detergent solution can also comprise one or more surfactant(s). These surfactants are preferably selected from non-ion surfactants, amphoteric surfactants and their mixtures. Non-limiting examples of non-ionic surfactants comprise alkylpolyglucosides, alkylpolypentosides, aminoxides, polyglycosides, glucamides, polyalkoxylated fatty alcohols, particularly polyethoxylated, and ethoxylated fatty acid esters. Non-limiting examples of amphoteric surfactants comprise cocamidopropyl betaines. Preferably, the one or more surfactant(s) is/are selected from non-ionic surfactants, more preferably from fatty polyalkoxylated alcohols, particularly polyethoxylated, and aminoxides, particularly alkyl aminoxides, such as lauryldimethylamine oxide.
The one or more surfactant(s) is/are advantageously contained in the detergent solution in a quantity from 0.001 % to 2%, preferably from 0.001 % to 1 % and even more preferably from 0.025 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
The detergent solution can also contain a chelating agent, particularly a biodegradable chelating agent. The biodegradable chelating agent is preferably selected from methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA) and an iminodisuccinate (IDS), particularly tetrasodium iminodisuccinate. Even more preferably, the biodegradable chelating agent is methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA). Without desiring to be bound by any particular theory, the inventors believe that the chelating agent implemented in the present invention is not only used for softening water but also for particularly efficiently complexing bivalent and trivalent metal ions, particularly Ca2+, Fe +, Fe2+ et Cu2+, contained in the proteinaceous residues typically found on surgical and/or medical instruments. It would appear that these chelating agents sequester these metal ions, which destabilises the tertiary structure of the proteins and renders them more easily hydrolysable. The composition used according to the invention advantageously has a chelating agent content from 0.001 % to 2 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.01 % to 1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.1 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, even more preferably approximately 0.27 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
The concentrated aqueous detergent composition advantageously is free of any nonbiodegradable chelating agent, particularly ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTP A), phosphates and polyphosphates. Advantageously, the concentrated aqueous detergent composition is also free of any reprotoxic classified chelating agent, such as nitrilotriacetic acid (NT A) and its sodium salt.
In one embodiment, the concentrated aqueous detergent composition is also free of alkali and alkaline-earth hydroxides.
Preferably, the detergent solution is an aqueous solution. Its water content advantageously is from 90.0 % to 99.997 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 95.0 % to 99.9 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 97.0 % to 99.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition and even more preferably from 98.0 % to 99.0 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition. The detergent solution can also comprise one or more disinfectant agent(s). In this case, the wipe is no longer only a detergent but also a disinfectant. Examples of antimicrobial agents used for the present invention comprise, without being limited thereto, quarternary ammonium salts, amines supporting at least one C8 to C20 alkyl group, chlorhexidine digluconate, polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) or one of its salts. Preferably, the one or more anti-microbial agent(s) is/are selected from didecyldimethylammonium salts, didecylmethylpolyoxyethyl ammonium salts, benzalkonium salts, benzethonium salts, methylbenzethonium salts, cetalkonium salts, cetylpyridinium salts, cetrimonium salts, laurylamine, N-(3-aminopropyl)-N- dodecylpropane- 1 ,3 -diamine and N-alkyl(C 12-C 14)-l ,3-diaminopropane, more preferably from didecyldimethylammonium chloride, didecyldimethyl ammonium carbonate, didecylmethylpolyoxyethyl ammonium propionate, benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride, methylbenzethonium chloride, cetalkonium chloride, cetylpyridinium chloride, cetrimonium chloride, laurylamine, N-(3-aminopropyl)-N-dodecylpropane-l,3-diamine and N-alkyl(C 12-C 14)-l,3-diaminopropane, and even more preferably from didecyldimethylammonium chloride, didecyldimethyl ammonium carbonate, didecylmethylpolyoxyethyl ammonium propionate, laurylamine, N-(3-aminopropyl)-N- dodecylpropane- 1 ,3 -diamine and N-alkyl(C 12-C 14)-l,3-diaminopropane. In a particular embodiment, the one or more anti-microbial agent(s) is/are selected from didecyldimethylammonium chloride, didecyldimethyl ammonium carbonate, N-(3- aminopropyl)-N-dodecylpropane-l,3-diamine and N-alkyl(C 12-C 14)-l ,3-diaminopropane.
The quantity of disinfectant agent will be easily adapted by a person skilled in the art as a function of the one or more disinfectant agent(s) implemented. In the case of a quarternary ammonium salt, the quantity thereof in the detergent solution advantageously is from 0.01 % to 2 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably from 0.1 % to 1 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition, more preferably from 0.2 % to 0.5 % by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
The detergent solution can also comprise a preservative. The preservative can be selected from commonly used preservatives, such as, for example, 5-chloro-5-methyl-4- isothiazolin-3-one, 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin3-one, p-hydroxybenzoic acid and its methyl esters, sodium 2-pyridinethiol-l -oxide, 5-bromo-5-nitro-l,3-dioxane and salicylic acid, benzyl alcohol and sodium benzoate. These preservatives allow microbial and fungal contamination to be avoided by providing a bacteriostatic and fungistatic effect.
The detergent solution also can comprise other additives, such as, for example, stabilising agents, such as anti-oxidant agents and/or anti-UV agents and/or dispersing agents and/or defoaming agents. The dispersing agents can be homopolymer, copolymer or terpolymer acids, for example, based on acrylic acid or alkali metal salts thereof (polyacrylates).
The wipe according to the invention is particularly advantageous for cleaning and/or disinfecting objects with a hard surface, such as medical instruments and devices, as well as work surfaces. The medical instruments and devices within the scope of the present invention particularly comprise endoscopes without an internal channel, such as nasofibroscopes and transoesophageal probes, hemodialysis generators, ultrasound probes and electronic thermometers.
Thus, a second object of the invention is the use of the aforementioned wipe for cleaning and/or disinfecting objects with a hard surface, such as medical instruments and devices and work surfaces.
The invention also relates to a method for cleaning and/or disinfecting an object with a hard surface, such as medical instruments and devices and work surfaces, comprising the following steps: a) supplying a wipe as defined above;
b) wiping the hard surface of said obj ect with said wipe; and
c) possibly rinsing the hard surface with water, preferably with demineralized water.
To summarize, the present invention provides an enzymatic detergent and/or disinfectant wipe that allows the use of stabilising agent of the glycol or polyol type, particularly glycerine, to be dispensed with. By virtue of the use of a non-woven support comprising polyester fibers, particularly polyethylene terephthalate, these stabilising agents are no longer necessary for preserving the enzymatic activity and thus the cleaning power of the detergent solution in relation to organic stains.
The invention now will be described with reference to non-limiting embodiments of the invention.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: preparation of enzymatic detergent solutions
The detergent and disinfectant solutions SI to S 6, the formulae (as % weight relative to the total weight of the solution) of which are provided in table 1, were prepared by mixing ingredients in the following order.
SI to S5: demineralized water, Trilon M, Genamin LAP 100, Mergital D8, Carboquat HE, Lutropur MSA, enzymes.
S6: demineralized water, Bardac 22/40, Genamin LAP 100, Ammonyx LO, Bar, Lutropur MSA, enzymes.
To prepare samples, the ingredients are added one after the other subject to slow stirring, stirring is maintained for a contact period of 30 minutes after the addition of the final ingredient.
Table 1
Savinase Evity
16XL - - - - 0.05 0.05
Savinase Ultra 16
XL - - - 0.05 - -
Savinase Ultra 16 L - - 0.05 - - -
Lipex Evity 100L - - - - - 0.05
Bardac 22/50 - - - - -
Ammonyx LO - - - - - 0.4
Demineralized
qsp qsp qsp qsp qsp qsp water
Example 2: stability of the enzymatic detergent solutions
For the study of the stability of the detergent solutions, only solutions SI and S2 (Example 1) and wipes impregnated with these solutions (one detergent solution per batch of wipes) were placed at 30 °C for 8 weeks and the enzymatic stabilities were monitored during this period. The stability of the proteases is carried out by electrophoresis and that of the other enzymes by thin-layer chromatography.
Electrophoresis on a polyacrylamide gel allows peptides or proteins to be detected. The proteins, after being negatively charged by a solution of SDS, are deposited onto the polyacrylamide gel placed in an electrolytic environment then subjected to a difference in potential (DDP). The molecules are then subject to 2 antagonistic effects:
- the greater the molecular mass of the protein or peptide the more the molecule negatively charges, the large molecules are therefore more sensitive to the applied DDP;
- the bigger the molecules the harder it will be for them to migrate within the gel matrix.
After migration, the proteins and peptides are revealed through exposure in a coloring solution following by decolorization.
After bringing an albumine solution in contact with the enzymatic solution and completing electrophoresis, the presence of small modules confirms proteasic activity.
Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) is based on ion adsorption, sharing and/or exchange phenomena.
TLC comprises two phases: - the mobile phase (eluent) is a solvent or a mixture of solvents that progresses along the stationary phase;
- the stationary phase is composed of a silica gel evenly spread as a thin layer over a semi-rigid sheet. The principle is as follows: the molecules separate by differential migration. Each molecule is subject to two antagonistic effects: a stimulus effect exerted by the mobile phase and a retention effect exerted by the stationary phase; the components of the mixture move at different speeds and are separated.
After migration, the compounds are revealed by colored reactions according to the active principles. Identification is possible by virtue of indicators deposited under the same conditions as the unknown active principles.
Each active principle is characterized by its Rf ratio of the migration distance of the spot to the migration distance of the front of the solvent.
After bringing a glycogen (amylase activity) or triglyceride (lipase activity) solution into contact with the enzymatic solution and completing thin-layer chromatography, the presence of molecules originating from the hydrolysis of the glycogen and the triglyceride respectively confirm amylase and lipase activity.
The following commercially available wipes were selected for the study:
- 100% viscose;
- 100% PET (polyethylene terephthalate);
-Viscose / cellulose / PES acrylic binder;
- 70 % viscose / 30 % polyester;
- 100% polypropylene.
The polypropylene wipes could not be impregnated. The remaining four types of wipes were impregnated with all the solutions.
The enzymatic stabilities of each formula were regularly monitored: -on impregnation solutions placed at 30 °C;
-on the desorbed solutions of wipes placed at 30 °C after impregnation. The results are listed in tables 2 (solution SI) and 3 (solution S2) below.
Table 2
good stability; -/+ = partial stability; - = insufficient stability
Table 3
good stability; -/+ = partial stability; - = insufficient stability After desorption of the solutions soaked on the wipes containing viscose, the presence of substances extracted from the wipes was observed in the desorbed solution. These substances caused interference when highlighting enzymatic activities and the results could not be interpreted. With respect to the four other types of wipe, good stability of the amylases was observed irrespective of the nature of the proteases after impregnation on PET or viscose/cellulose/PES wipes. The lipase is not stable in solution but the impregnation on the PET or viscose/cellulose/PES wipes allows the behavior to be improved. Finally, the mannanase is stable irrespective of the protease after impregnation on PET wipes. A degradation of the viscose/cellulose/PES wipes and the viscose/polyester wipes is suspected. The best results were obtained with 100 % PET wipes.
Example 3: resolution capacity of the wipes
The resolution capacity of the impregnation solution of PET (100 %), viscose/cellulose/PES (acrylic based binder) and polyester/viscose (70/30) wipes was determined as follows.
The various wipes were impregnated at 300 % with each solution S I and S5. The wipes were then pressed by means of a 50 ml capacity syringe (one wipe per syringe) in order to recover the impregnation fluid and to measure the proteolytic activity of the solutions, with the solution that was used for the impregnation being used as a reference. The best resolution rate is obtained on a PET wipe irrespective of the formula.
Example 4: enzymatic stability and biocide activity of detergent and disinfectant solution S6
100 % PET wipes were impregnated with 300 % by weight of detergent and disinfectant solution S6. The study of the enzymatic stability was performed on the desorbed solutions (desorption using a syringe as described in example 3) of wipes having previously undergone accelerated ageing of 8 weeks at 30 °C.
The stability of the enzymes is described in table 4 below: Table 4
The study of the biocide activity was carried out on the desorbed solutions (desorption using a syringe as described in example 3) of the wipes.
The biocide activity of the desorbed S6 solutions was determined according to standards EN 13727 and EN 16615 for the bactericidal activity and EN 13624 and EN 16615 for the levuricidal activity. The results are shown in table 5 below.
Table 5

Claims

1. Moist detergent wipe composed of a non-woven support impregnated with a detergent solution, the detergent solution comprising a protease, a lipase and an amylase, characterized in that the non-woven support comprises polyester fibers.
2. Wipe according to claim 1, characterized in that the detergent solution is glycol and/or glycerine free.
3. Wipe according to either claim 1 or claim 2, characterized in that the detergent solution further comprises a mannanase.
4. Wipe according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the detergent solution further comprises one or more surfactant(s).
5. Wipe according to claim 4, characterized in that the one or more surfactant(s) is/are selected from non-ionic surfactants, particularly from polyalkoxilated fatty alcohols and aminoxides.
6. Wipe according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the detergent solution further comprises one or more chelating agent(s).
7. Wipe according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the detergent solution further comprises one or more anti-microbial agent(s).
8. Wipe according to claim 7, characterized in that the one or more anti-microbial agent(s) are selected from quaternary ammonium salts, the amines supporting at least one C8 to C20 alkyl group, polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) or one of its salts and polyaminopropyl biguanide (PAPB).
9. Use of a wipe according to any of claims 1 to 8 for cleaning and/or disinfecting objects with a hard surface.
10. Method for cleaning and/or disinfecting an object with a hard surface, such as medical instruments and devices and work surfaces, comprising the following steps: a) supplying a wipe according to any of claims 1 to 8;
b) wiping the hard surface of said object with said wipe; and
c) possibly rinsing the hard surface with water, preferably with demineralized water.
EP18728784.2A 2017-05-22 2018-05-22 Moist detergent wipe Active EP3630930B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1754506A FR3066376B1 (en) 2017-05-22 2017-05-22 WET DETERGENT WIPE
PCT/US2018/033843 WO2018217714A1 (en) 2017-05-22 2018-05-22 Moist detergent wipe

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3630930A1 true EP3630930A1 (en) 2020-04-08
EP3630930B1 EP3630930B1 (en) 2021-03-17

Family

ID=59153184

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18728784.2A Active EP3630930B1 (en) 2017-05-22 2018-05-22 Moist detergent wipe

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3630930B1 (en)
AR (1) AR111879A1 (en)
FR (1) FR3066376B1 (en)
TW (1) TWI686470B (en)
WO (1) WO2018217714A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4998984A (en) 1989-11-15 1991-03-12 Mcclendon Evelyn Premoistened prepackaged disposable disinfectant wiper
FR2741355B1 (en) * 1995-11-17 1998-12-31 Anios Lab Sarl COMPOSITION FOR THE TREATMENT OF OBJECTS TO BE CLEANED AND / OR DISINFECTED
US6753306B2 (en) * 1998-12-23 2004-06-22 Joseph J. Simpson Germicidal and disinfectant composition
US6420332B1 (en) 1998-12-23 2002-07-16 Joseph J. Simpson Blood and organic stain remover
AU2003901917A0 (en) * 2003-04-22 2003-05-08 Novapharm Research (Australia) Pty Ltd Endoscope cleaning pad
WO2011131585A1 (en) * 2010-04-20 2011-10-27 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Laundry article having cleaning properties
CN105838509B (en) * 2015-01-16 2018-04-24 3Måˆ›ę–°ęœ‰é™å…¬åø Enzyme solutions, non-woven fabrics containing enzyme and its preparation method and application

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR3066376A1 (en) 2018-11-23
TW201900861A (en) 2019-01-01
WO2018217714A1 (en) 2018-11-29
TWI686470B (en) 2020-03-01
FR3066376B1 (en) 2020-08-14
EP3630930B1 (en) 2021-03-17
AR111879A1 (en) 2019-08-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0904343B2 (en) Germicidal acidic hard surface cleaning compositions
EP0977825B1 (en) Liquid enzyme preparation and the use thereof
EP2250246B1 (en) Multiple enzyme cleaner for surgical instruments and endoscopes
JPH08508521A (en) Multi-surface cleaning composition and method of using the same
RU2003108747A (en) CLEANER
CN110903918A (en) Antibacterial fabric detergent composition
JP2019104793A (en) Liquid detergent composition
KR102001696B1 (en) Liquid cleaning compositions with improved enzyme compatibility and/or stability
CN105907483A (en) Oxygen-containing multifunctional detergent composition
EP3630930B1 (en) Moist detergent wipe
JP7013233B2 (en) Hard surface treatment agent composition
JP6887991B2 (en) Liquid concentrate for cosmetic preservation
JPH07505182A (en) Cleaning compositions for hard surfaces, especially glass
EP4214300B1 (en) A hard surface cleaning composition
KR102264144B1 (en) Liquid detergent composition for washing dishes by hands
JP5154067B2 (en) Liquid detergent composition for automatic dishwashers
CN106867711A (en) A kind of solidifying pearl of degerming laundry and preparation method and application
US12618023B2 (en) Hard surface cleaning composition
EP3433349B1 (en) Enzymatic detergent compositions for the automatic cleaning of surgical and/or medical instruments and/or devices
JP2002034558A (en) Stabilized protease and use thereof
JP2018511664A (en) Cleaning agent for medical equipment
DE102011000889A1 (en) Detergent, useful for dishwashing, and for the machine cleaning of dishes comprises enzymes comprising e.g. amylases, borax, a phosphoric acid ester, a complexing agent, a solubilizer, nonionic surfactants, propylene glycol and water
KR20010084055A (en) liquid detergent composition
DE202011000420U1 (en) Detergents for dishwashers
AU2005100226A4 (en) Biocidal protection system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20191115

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20201012

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602018014104

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1372263

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210415

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210617

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210618

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210617

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1372263

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210317

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20210317

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210717

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210719

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602018014104

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210522

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210531

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210531

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210531

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20211220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210522

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210531

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20220522

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220522

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20180522

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20250401

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317