EP3571062A1 - Document de sécurité pourvu d'une fenêtre et d'une structure réfractive - Google Patents

Document de sécurité pourvu d'une fenêtre et d'une structure réfractive

Info

Publication number
EP3571062A1
EP3571062A1 EP17718802.6A EP17718802A EP3571062A1 EP 3571062 A1 EP3571062 A1 EP 3571062A1 EP 17718802 A EP17718802 A EP 17718802A EP 3571062 A1 EP3571062 A1 EP 3571062A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
document
window
motif
visible
security
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP17718802.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3571062B1 (fr
Inventor
Sylvain Chosson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Orell Fuessli AG
Original Assignee
Orell Fuessli Sicherheitsdruck AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Orell Fuessli Sicherheitsdruck AG filed Critical Orell Fuessli Sicherheitsdruck AG
Priority to PL17718802T priority Critical patent/PL3571062T3/pl
Publication of EP3571062A1 publication Critical patent/EP3571062A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3571062B1 publication Critical patent/EP3571062B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
    • B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
    • B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
    • B42D25/30—Identification or security features, e.g. for preventing forgery
    • B42D25/324—Reliefs
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B42—BOOKBINDING; ALBUMS; FILES; SPECIAL PRINTED MATTER
    • B42D—BOOKS; BOOK COVERS; LOOSE LEAVES; PRINTED MATTER CHARACTERISED BY IDENTIFICATION OR SECURITY FEATURES; PRINTED MATTER OF SPECIAL FORMAT OR STYLE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; DEVICES FOR USE THEREWITH AND NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; MOVABLE-STRIP WRITING OR READING APPARATUS
    • B42D25/00—Information-bearing cards or sheet-like structures characterised by identification or security features; Manufacture thereof
    • B42D25/30—Identification or security features, e.g. for preventing forgery
    • B42D25/351—Translucent or partly translucent parts, e.g. windows

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a security document, such as a banknote or an identification document, having a window and a structure printed onto the window.
  • the invention also relates to a method for manufacturing such a document and to a method for testing the authenticity of the document.
  • the problem to be solved by the present in- vention is to enhance the security for documents of this type.
  • the security document comprises:
  • the substrate is the carrier of the security document. It can e.g. be of plastics or a laminated structure of plastic and non-plastic layers.
  • a window arranged in the substrate This is a region of the substrate that is transparent. It can e.g. be formed by a transparent plastic layer. A defini- tion of the term “window” is provided in the section “Definitions” below.
  • a transparent refractive structure printed onto the window This is a refractive structure printed with a transparent ink. The terms “refractive structure” and “transparent structure” are again defined below.
  • the refractive structure is not visible or hardly visible.
  • the structure becomes visible or more apparent and thus provides an easy-to-verify secu- rity feature.
  • the structure is refractive, and not diffractive, it does not need a high spatial resolution and can therefore be applied using conventional security printing techniques.
  • the invention also relates to a method for testing the authenticity of such a security document. It comprises the step of visually checking for the presence of the refractive structure.
  • the structure represents a first motif, such as a portrait, writing or a geometrical figure, while the document com- prises an image printed in visible ink showing a second motif.
  • the two motifs can be used to interact in various ways in order to render the testing of the document eas- ier.
  • the first and the second motif can be equal, i.e. the can both show the same thing, such as the same portrait or the same writing. This makes it possible to compare the two.
  • first and the second motif can be adjacent to each other or overlapping each other. This allows the user to e.g. check the two motives for their mutual register or for a third motif that they generate under conditions where they are both visible.
  • the first and second motif can form a first edge and a second edge, respectively.
  • These edges can be placed to be contiguous, i.e. they are on the same line (or curve) and at least one of the edges continues where the other ends. This makes it particu- larly easy to test the register of the two motifs.
  • the first and the second motif can form a first and a second periodic pattern, re- spectively.
  • the two patterns have periodicities that dif- fer in a range of 1% to 20%, in particular of 2% to 10%, which gives rise to a visually perceptive interference (moire-) effect between the two.
  • the structure can comprise a luminescent dye, which provides a further way to test the document's authenticity while allowing the structure to remain transparent.
  • the invention also relates to a method for manufacturing this document.
  • This method comprises the step of printing the refractive structure onto the win- dow.
  • offset printing, intaglio printing, screen-printing or inkjet printing can be used for apply ⁇ ing the structure.
  • the security document is advantageously a banknote or an identification document, such as a pass- port.
  • Fig. 1 is an example of a security document
  • Fig. 2 is a sectional view of the window of the security document in a first example (A) and a second example (B) ,
  • Fig. 3 illustrates a first viewing geometry
  • Fig. 4 illustrates a second viewing geometry B
  • Fig. 5 shows a first example of the security element
  • Fig. 6 shows a second example of the security element
  • Fig. 7 shows a third example of the security element
  • Fig. 8 shows a fourth example of the security element
  • Fig. 9 shows a fifth example of the security element
  • Fig. 10 is an example where the transparent refractive structure comprises a halftone image
  • Fig. 11 is an identification document. Modes for Carrying Out the Invention
  • Refraction is understood to designate the change of direction of light passing through media having different refractive indices.
  • refraction is understood to include processes where light is re- fracted on structures having sizes larger than 2 ⁇ , and/or where light is scattered on finer, but non-peri- odic structures. Processes including diffraction (defini- tion see below) are not understood to be refraction, though. In other words, “refraction” is understood as a “non-diffractive refraction”.
  • a “refractive structure” is a structure that changes the direction of light due to refraction, i.e. it is understood as a “non-diffractive, refractive struc- ture” .
  • Diffraction and "diffractive" are under- stood to designate a coherent scattering effect of light passing through a periodic structure of varying refrac- tive index when the structure is periodic and has a peri- odicity between a few tenth of the wavelength of the light and a few times the wavelength of the light.
  • holographic effects and scattering of light at diffractive gratings are understood to be diffraction processes.
  • diffraction is not un- derstood as a refractive process.
  • a "window" in a security document is under- stood to designate a region of the security document hav- ing, for perpendicularly incident light, a wavelength-av- eraged transparency of at least 50%, in particular of at least 80% for visible light.
  • a refractive structure is considered to be "transparent” if it has a wavelength-averaged transpar- ency of at least 50%, in particular of at least 80%, again in the sense of above equation (1) .
  • Macroscopic is used to the describe fea- tures with a sufficiently large size to make them visible to the naked eye.
  • such features have a size of at least 100 ⁇ m, in particular of at least 1 mm.
  • Fig. 1 shows a banknote as an example for a security document 1. It comprises a substrate 2, which can e.g. be a paper substrate (where "paper” is to in- clude cotton-based paper) , a plastic substrate or a lami- nate of plastic and paper layers.
  • a substrate 2 can e.g. be a paper substrate (where "paper” is to in- clude cotton-based paper) , a plastic substrate or a lami- nate of plastic and paper layers.
  • Substrate 2 carries various printed insignia, such as a denomination 3, printed security features 4, and a unique serial number 5.
  • substrate 2 comprises one or more windows 6.
  • substrate 2 is non-transpar- ent outside the window (s) 6.
  • a transparent, refractive structure is printed onto window 7.
  • security docu- ment 1 can e.g. an identification document, such as a passport or an ID card, or it can e.g. be a credit card, a check, a coupon, a brand certificate, or any other type of document that should be hard to copy.
  • an identification document such as a passport or an ID card
  • security docu- ment 1 can e.g. be a credit card, a check, a coupon, a brand certificate, or any other type of document that should be hard to copy.
  • Fig. 2 shows an enlarged sectional view through window 6.
  • window 6 carries not only the transparent refractive structure 7 printed thereon, but also an image 8 printed with visible ink.
  • Transparent refractive structure 7 can be of an invisible ink, such as a lacquer, a primer, a lumines- cent ink or any other type of ink that is transparent in the visual spectral range of 400 - 700 nm.
  • transparent refractive struc- ture 7 is of a material different from window 6 such that it can be optimized for printing.
  • Image 8 is advantageously also a printed structure, but it consists of visible ink, i.e. an ink that is visible at least in part of the spectral range of 400 - 700 nm. Image 8 can be printed either on the same side as image 7 (as shown in image (A) of Fig. 2) but also on the other side in register (as shown in image (B) of Fig. 2) .
  • Figs. 3 and 4 show a user 10 viewing window 6 along a viewing axis 12.
  • a light source 14 (or a bright background) is arranged on or close to viewing axis 12 but on a side of document 1 op- posite to user 10 such that it is visible for user 10 through window 6.
  • light source 14 is still located on the side of security docu- ment 1 that is opposite to user 10, but it is positioned at such a distance away from viewing axis 12 that it is not directly visible for user 10 in window 6.
  • the light 16 passing through structure 7 without being strongly refracted does not enter the user's eye. Only a small percentage of the light will be refracted (as shown under 18) in a direction where it can enter the user's eye.
  • the contrast between strongly and weakly refractive regions of structure 7 can be much larger. This is particularly true if the user places security document 1 such that the background visi- ble through window 6 is much darker than light source 14.
  • the user views the window along viewing axis 12 from a first side of document 1 while light source 14 is arranged off (i.e. away from) viewing axis 12 such that it is not visible through the window. He can then check for the presence of light from light source 14 that has been refracted from structure 7 .
  • the viewing step is carried out such that the background visible through window 7 is much darker (in particular at least ten times darker) than light source 14.
  • Refractive structure 7 should refract enough light for it to become visible in viewing geometry B. Even more advantageously, though, it should not refract too much light to prevent it from becoming visible in viewing geometry A.
  • structure 7 illumi- nated by a white light beam perpendicular to the surface of window 6 refracts at least 1%, in particular at least 5%, of the transmitted light into directions that have an angle of less than 80° to the window's surface (i.e. into off-axis directions) .
  • This allows the structure to be seen in situations where the light source is not visible in the window.
  • the structure 7 illuminated by a white light beam perpendicular to the window's surface refracts no more than 20%, in particular no more than 10%, of the transmitted light into direc- tions that have an angle of less than 80° to the window's surface. This prevents the structure from being easily seen in viewing geometry A.
  • transpar- ent refractive structure 7 A representation of transpar- ent refractive structure 7.
  • the dark areas represent regions where the refraction caused by struc- ture 7 is low, i.e. where structure 7 is less dense, ho- mogenous, or absent, while the bright areas represent re- gions where the refraction caused by structure 7 is high, i.e. where structure is denser and inhomogeneous .
  • the secu- rity element comprises no visible image 8, and structure 7 represents a portrait 20.
  • the security element comprises a visible image showing a portrait 22, and structure 7 also represents a portrait 20, advanta- geously the same portrait.
  • portrait 20 is nearly or completely invisible.
  • portrait 22 is visible.
  • the motifs represented by structure 7 as well as by the visible printed image 8 are equal. The user can compare them in viewing geometry B when checking the document for authenticity.
  • the visible printed image shows a part 24 of a portrait
  • struc- ture 7 represents a complementary part 26 of the same portrait .
  • both parts 24, 26 are visible and complement each other to represent the full portrait.
  • the first motif 26 represented by structure 7 and the second motif 24 repre- sented by visible image 8 are complementary parts of a common motif.
  • the first motif 30 represented by structure 7 is a first set of lines
  • the second motif 32 represented by the visi- ble printed image 8 is a second set of lines.
  • both motives 30, 32 are visible and generate continuous lines extending through both motives.
  • the motif 30 has a first edge and the second motif 32 has a second edge (in this case the edges of the lines), wherein said first and second edges are contiguous.
  • the first motif formed by structure 7 forms a first periodic pattern 34.
  • the second motif formed by printed image 8 forms a second periodic pattern 36.
  • the two periodic patterns differ slightly in their periodicities.
  • both periodic patterns 34, 36 are visible. Since their periodicities differ only slightly, a Moire effect becomes visible.
  • the direction of the two pe- riodic patterns differ by less than 10°, in particular by less than 5°.
  • Halftone rendering As mentioned, the refraction of structure 7 is strong in those regions where it is highly homogeneous while it is weak in those regions where it is weakly ho- mogeneous .
  • structure 7 in a region that is to appear bright in viewing geometry B, structure 7 needs to be highly in- homogeneous in order to cause strong refraction. In a re- gion that is to appear dark, structure 7 should be weakly inhomogeneous and, advantageously, mostly absent.
  • Fig. 10 shows the desired appearance (when viewed in viewing geometry B) under reference number 40.
  • desired ap- pearance 40 is a grayscale run from bright (top) to dark (bottom) .
  • Image 42 shows a possible design of structure 7 to achieve this effect (with the black parts showing where the invisible ink of structure 7 has been applied) .
  • Structure 7 can be unique to the security document, i.e. it can differ between different security documents .
  • Fig. 11 shows a document of identification 50, which carries the bearer's portrait 52 in visible ink.
  • structure 7 also represents the bearer's portrait in window 6.
  • structure 7 can represent some other unique feature of the security document.
  • the document has a serial number (such as the se- rial number of a banknote)
  • it can be a motif derived from this serial number, such as a numeric of alphanu- meric representing the serial number.
  • structure 7 is applied to window 6 using invisible ink, i.e. ink that is transparent.
  • structure 7 is applied by offset printing, intaglio printing, screen-printing or inkjet printing.
  • inkjet printing is particularly advan- tageous for individualized security documents where structure 7 should be unique to the security document .
  • Printed image 8 can be printed prior or after applying structure 7.
  • Printed image 8 can be on the same side of the window 6 as structure 7 or its opposite side.
  • Transparent, refractive structure 7 is advan- tageously macroscopically inhomogeneous, i.e. it com- prises inhomogeneities that is visible by the naked human eye, which makes the security feature easy to observe.
  • transparent re- fractive structure 7 does not cover all of window 6 but leaves macroscopic regions non-covered, which also makes the feature easier to observe.
  • structure 7 can comprise a lu- minescent dye, which allows checking for its presence by yet a further method, thereby providing a redundancy of the security check.
  • structure 7 comprises a dye that emits visible light when being exposed to UV radia- tion.
  • a suitable ink is e.g. the ink 990660 (red-luminescent) by Sicpa S.A., Prilly, Switzerland. While there are shown and described presently preferred embodiments of the invention, it is to be dis- tinctly understood that the invention is not limited thereto but may be otherwise variously embodied and prac- ticed within the scope of the following claims.

Landscapes

  • Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
  • Printing Methods (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un document de sécurité comprenant une fenêtre (6) pourvue d'une structure non diffractive, réfractive imprimée et invisible (7), imprimée sur ladite fenêtre. En outre, elle peut comporter une image imprimée visible (8). Lorsque la fenêtre est observée sur fond sombre, la structure devient visible et permet ainsi de vérifier l'authenticité du document.
EP17718802.6A 2017-04-18 2017-04-18 Document de sécurité pourvu d'une fenêtre et d'une structure réfractive Active EP3571062B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL17718802T PL3571062T3 (pl) 2017-04-18 2017-04-18 Dokument zabezpieczony mający okno i strukturę refrakcyjną

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CH2017/000035 WO2018191827A1 (fr) 2017-04-18 2017-04-18 Document de sécurité pourvu d'une fenêtre et d'une structure réfractive

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3571062A1 true EP3571062A1 (fr) 2019-11-27
EP3571062B1 EP3571062B1 (fr) 2020-09-09

Family

ID=58609325

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17718802.6A Active EP3571062B1 (fr) 2017-04-18 2017-04-18 Document de sécurité pourvu d'une fenêtre et d'une structure réfractive

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3571062B1 (fr)
PL (1) PL3571062T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2018191827A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA3141658A1 (fr) * 2019-05-24 2020-12-03 Orell Fussli Ag Document securise comportant des images en demi-teinte et son procede de fabrication

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19729918B4 (de) * 1997-07-04 2010-07-01 Securency International Pty Ltd., Craigieburn Sicherheits- und/oder Wertdokument
EP2167317B1 (fr) * 2007-07-09 2014-09-17 3D Ag Dispositif d'impression
WO2015085439A1 (fr) * 2013-12-09 2015-06-18 Orell Füssli Sicherheitsdruck Ag Document de sécurité ayant un marquage invisible
GB201413473D0 (en) * 2014-07-30 2014-09-10 Rue De Int Ltd Security device and method of manufacture thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3571062B1 (fr) 2020-09-09
WO2018191827A1 (fr) 2018-10-25
PL3571062T3 (pl) 2021-02-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2011232310B2 (en) Security document with integrated security device and method of manufacture
US10766293B2 (en) Methods of manufacturing a security device
EP3356153B1 (fr) Supports d'impression de sécurité et procédé de fabrication associé
US20100270379A1 (en) Security Devices
US20190176507A1 (en) Security device and method of manufacture
AU2016330005C1 (en) Security print media and method of manufacture thereof
EP2437946A1 (fr) Ameliorations apportees a des substrats de securite
WO2022053830A2 (fr) Documents de sécurité et leurs procédés de fabrication
EP1718475B2 (fr) Element de securite a gaufrage et son procede de fabrication
JP5272438B2 (ja) 表示体及びラベル付き物品
GB2542784A (en) Security print media and method of manufacture thereof
EP3571062B1 (fr) Document de sécurité pourvu d'une fenêtre et d'une structure réfractive
EP3356154B1 (fr) Dispositif d'impression de sécurité et son procédé de fabrication
KR20180005655A (ko) 0차 이미지를 포함하는 광학 디바이스
DE102022115901A1 (de) Sicherheitsdokument, System zur Herstellung eines Sicherheitsdokuments und Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Sicherheitsdokuments

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190821

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200508

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: ORELL FUESSLI AG

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1311113

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200915

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: E. BLUM AND CO. AG PATENT- UND MARKENANWAELTE , CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602017023282

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201210

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201209

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1311113

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200909

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210111

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210109

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602017023282

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210610

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210418

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210109

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210430

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230321

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200923

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20170418

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200909

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Payment date: 20240325

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240419

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240418

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240501

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240425

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20240404

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20240418

Year of fee payment: 8