EP3533005A1 - Procédé et système de surveillance de la santé d'hélicoptères - Google Patents

Procédé et système de surveillance de la santé d'hélicoptères

Info

Publication number
EP3533005A1
EP3533005A1 EP17797391.4A EP17797391A EP3533005A1 EP 3533005 A1 EP3533005 A1 EP 3533005A1 EP 17797391 A EP17797391 A EP 17797391A EP 3533005 A1 EP3533005 A1 EP 3533005A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
flight
helicopter
mission
data
severity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP17797391.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Sébastien Philippe RAZAKARIVONY
François GOUDET
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Safran Helicopter Engines SAS
Safran SA
Original Assignee
Safran Helicopter Engines SAS
Safran SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Safran Helicopter Engines SAS, Safran SA filed Critical Safran Helicopter Engines SAS
Publication of EP3533005A1 publication Critical patent/EP3533005A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64FGROUND OR AIRCRAFT-CARRIER-DECK INSTALLATIONS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH AIRCRAFT; DESIGNING, MANUFACTURING, ASSEMBLING, CLEANING, MAINTAINING OR REPAIRING AIRCRAFT, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; HANDLING, TRANSPORTING, TESTING OR INSPECTING AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B64F5/00Designing, manufacturing, assembling, cleaning, maintaining or repairing aircraft, not otherwise provided for; Handling, transporting, testing or inspecting aircraft components, not otherwise provided for
    • B64F5/60Testing or inspecting aircraft components or systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/20Administration of product repair or maintenance
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64DEQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D45/00Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C27/00Rotorcraft; Rotors peculiar thereto
    • B64C27/04Helicopters
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/02Registering or indicating driving, working, idle, or waiting time only
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/08Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
    • G07C5/0841Registering performance data
    • G07C5/085Registering performance data using electronic data carriers
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64DEQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLIGHT SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
    • B64D45/00Aircraft indicators or protectors not otherwise provided for
    • B64D2045/0085Devices for aircraft health monitoring, e.g. monitoring flutter or vibration

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and system for monitoring the health of helicopters.
  • the invention relates to a helicopter surveillance comprising a method and a system for determining the severity of flight missions to build types of flight missions and to associate a severity with each of these types of missions. flight.
  • helicopters are designed and used for different types of missions.
  • Each type of mission has a different influence on the condition of the helicopter and its components.
  • the types of mission are currently determined during the design of each helicopter, based on theoretical profiles determined by the manufacturer by consulting customers. For example, the types of missions are grouped into large families such as medical emergency services, utility, tourism, VIP, maritime, police, etc.
  • these types of missions are chosen according to the client's field of activity, which is not necessarily identical to the real uses.
  • a helicopter engaged in tourism may have a different use depending on the rate used (at the time or destination).
  • the aim of the invention is to overcome at least some of the disadvantages of the processes and systems for determining the severity of known helicopter flight missions.
  • the invention aims to provide, in at least one embodiment of the invention, a method and a system for automating the identification of the types of missions actually performed.
  • the invention also aims to provide, in at least one embodiment, a method and a system for automating the association of a severity with each type of mission identified.
  • the invention also aims to provide, in at least one embodiment, a method and a system for improving the design, maintenance and supply of helicopter replacement parts or any system or sub-system. -system constituting it.
  • the invention relates to a method for monitoring the health of helicopters comprising determining the severity of a plurality of flight missions of a plurality of helicopters, said determination comprising:
  • a step of acquiring and storing flight data of the helicopter flight missions said flight data comprising for each flight of a helicopter the physical data recorded by at least one sensor of the helicopter,
  • a step of acquiring and storing maintenance data of the plurality of helicopters said maintenance data comprising at least information relating to component failures of each helicopter and components changed in each helicopter as a result of the flight missions,
  • a mission type construction step comprising:
  • a step of interpretation of the severity of the types of mission including:
  • each severity model defining an aging estimate of helicopter components according to the types of mission
  • a method according to the invention thus makes it possible to determine types of mission according to flight missions already carried out by several helicopters and thus to determine the types of missions according to real uses rather than supposed uses.
  • helicopter means in the application as a whole a helicopter or any system or subsystem constituting it (including the engine or engines of the helicopter).
  • the association of mission types with a severity makes it possible, for example, to improve the design of the helicopters, in particular by adjusting or designing the engines according to the use that will be made by the customer, to improve the maintenance by making it possible to know in advance the estimated lifetimes of components and suggest controls or replacement to the customer at an appropriate time, and improve the management of the supply of replacement parts for helicopter components.
  • the estimate of the severity makes it possible to estimate the aging of the components of the helicopter (in particular of the helicopter engine), and thus to be able to program maintenance operations (wear control, part replacement, etc.).
  • the physical flight data are for example data of temperature, pressure, angles, etc.
  • Each physical datum includes a number of values recorded by associated sensors.
  • the severity models can be, for example, statistical models of future failures, modeling of the evolution of business indicators (like performance margins), or even ad hoc indicators learned from the data collected.
  • descriptors makes it possible to gather these values to form for each physical datum a single descriptor representative of the distribution of these values for each physical datum.
  • descriptors all having the same dimension makes it possible to process together physical data having different ranges and numbers of values.
  • the information relating to component / replacement failures is for example data comprising an identifier of the part (serial number or registration number for example) or the function of the part (compressor, dynamic seal, disk and turbine blade, combustion chamber, bearing, injector, etc.) and the date of failure or the date of replacement of this part.
  • the mission type construction step comprises a sub-step of selecting physical data from the flight data, prior to the descriptor construction sub-step, by deleting the recorded physical data relating to to the health of the engine of the helicopter and conservation of the physical data relating to the use of the engine.
  • this selection of data makes it possible to retain only the data relating to the use of the engine, which corresponds to all the mechanical demands made by the pilot of a helicopter through the control organs, which are representative of the actual use of helicopters, and to suppress engine health data, which are evaluated through the dynamic behavior of the parameters over time and / or balances between parameters that may be normal (ie corresponding to an expected value, therefore representative of 'good health'), or abnormal (moving away from normal values, thus representative of poor health).
  • This deletion consists of removing variables, but also deleting some record parts of other variables.
  • the mission type construction step comprises a sub-step of reducing the dimension of the descriptors prior to the assignment sub-step of the mission types, by a multivariate data analysis of the descriptors. .
  • the dimensions of the descriptors are too large for processing in a reasonable time, the dimensions are reduced by a size reduction method.
  • the sub-step of reducing the dimension of the descriptors is carried out by a method chosen from one of the following methods:
  • Multidimensional Scaling (or Multi Dimensional Scaling)
  • Linear Local Embedding method also called Locally Linear Embedding.
  • the mission type construction step comprises a substep of descriptor normalization prior to the partitioning substep of the descriptors.
  • the standardization of the descriptors makes it possible to prepare the partitioning by using a standard (or distance) for the partitioning more adapted to the structure of the descriptors (vectors representing density values).
  • the descriptor normalization sub-step performs a standardization chosen according to one of the following standardization methods:
  • these standards are more suitable than a Euclidean distance for the descriptors of the invention. According to other variants of the invention, other methods having similar advantages are used.
  • the partitioning sub-step performs a partitioning chosen according to one of the following partitioning methods:
  • these different methods of automatic partitioning make it possible to obtain coherent subsets to form the types of missions.
  • the types of missions obtained are more representative than the types of missions based on the economic activity defined in the prior art.
  • the method of average offsets is better known as the Mean shift method in English.
  • the sub-step of constructing relative descriptors comprises the creation for each type of physical data of a histogram comprising a predetermined number n of classes, the descriptor forming a vector of dimension n whose each component is equal to to the number of data in a class of the histogram, on a range of data previously selected in the sub-step of selecting physical data.
  • histograms allows a simple way of reducing the physical flight data having different order of magnitude values (order of magnitude 100 for temperature, 10000 for pressure, etc.). ) or different property (cyclic for angles) in vectors of identical dimensions forming the descriptors.
  • Each histogram class corresponds to a range of values (for example temperature between 80 ° C and 90 ° C, pressure between 100hPa and HOhPa, angle between 0 ° and 30 ° ⁇ 360 °, etc.).
  • Another descriptor can also be the concatenation of the time spent under certain particular physical conditions (for example the time before take-off), or the particular maneuvers counters.
  • the invention also relates to a maintenance method, characterized in that it comprises a step of determination of severity according to a severity determination method according to the invention, and a step of determining the type of mission carried out by the helicopter to from the helicopter flight data and the mission type model, and a maintenance operations programming step according to the severity model associated with said determined mission type, and a maintenance step according to said scheduling of operations. maintenance operations.
  • a maintenance programming method allows the programming of a maintenance adapted to the severity of the types of mission performed by the helicopter, and thus to prepare maintenance operations such as wear control operations. a component or operation to replace a component. Advance scheduling of these maintenance operations also allows preparation of the component supply chain.
  • the invention also relates to a helicopter health monitoring system comprising a device for determining the severity of a plurality of flight missions of a plurality of helicopters, characterized in that said device a flight database of the helicopter flight missions, said flight data comprising for each flight of a helicopter the physical data recorded by at least one sensor of the helicopter,
  • said maintenance data including at least information relating to component failures of each helicopter and components changed in each helicopter as a result of the flight missions
  • a mission type construction module comprising:
  • a module for interpreting the severity of mission types including:
  • each severity model defining an aging estimate of the helicopter components according to the types of mission, means of association of a severity model for each mission type determined by the building module of the types of mission.
  • module denotes a software element, a subset of a software program that can be compiled separately, either for independent use, or to be assembled with other modules of a program, or a hardware element, or a combination of a hardware element and a software subprogram.
  • a hardware element may include an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or a programmable logic circuit (FPGA) for the English name Field- Programmable Gâte Array) or a specialized microprocessor circuit (better known by the acronym DSP for the English name Digital Signal Processor) or any equivalent hardware.
  • ASIC application-specific integrated circuit
  • FPGA programmable logic circuit
  • DSP Digital Signal Processor
  • the severity determination system is adapted to implement the severity determination method according to the invention.
  • the severity determination method is adapted to be implemented by the severity determination system according to the invention.
  • the invention also relates to a method and a severity determination system and a maintenance programming method characterized in combination by all or some of the features mentioned above or below.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a mission type construction step of a severity determination method according to an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a step of interpreting the severity of the mission types of a severity determination method according to one embodiment of the invention
  • Figure 3 is a schematic view of a severity determination system according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG 1 schematically shows a mission type construction step 10 of a method according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • the mission type construction step 10 includes a substep 12 of selecting physical data from physical flight data 100 by deleting the recorded physical health data of the helicopter and storing the physical data relating to the aircraft. use of the helicopter. This sub-step sorts through the data so that only data physically related to the use of the helicopter is retained, so that the types of missions built are independent of the health of the helicopters and depend solely on their use. .
  • the data related to the use of the engine may be the engine torque during flight phases, which is related to the demands of the pilot of the helicopter, to change altitude, direction, etc.
  • the number of take-offs per flight or hour of flight is used. The data of the engine torque and the number of takeoff are therefore relative to the use of the engine.
  • the data relating to engine health are for example the engine / torque ratio, because to reach the same torque desired by the use, an engine will not have the same temperature according to its health (plus the engine is in poor health, the more this temperature increases).
  • the engine start time is an example of helicopter health data. If he starts more or less quickly, it can be an indicator that a component works abnormally. This helicopter health data is suppressed in this selection sub-step 12, but will be used in the severity interpretation step, which requires engine health data.
  • the mission type construction step 10 then comprises a substep
  • Relative descriptors construction in which the physical flight data are each reduced to a predetermined dimension vector forming a descriptor, all descriptors having the same dimension.
  • This descriptor construction makes it possible to reduce the dimension of each physical datum (temperature, pressure, angles, etc.) to the same dimension.
  • One method for carrying out this construction is for example the histogram formation for each physical datum, the values of the physical data being distributed in each class of the histogram so as to be able to create a vector having as many components as there are classes of the histogram, each component being representative of the number of values in a class of the histogram.
  • the descriptors thus represent a density of the values of the physical data.
  • the mission type construction step 10 includes an optional substep 16 of descriptor size reduction prior to the mission type assignment sub-step.
  • This sub-step is carried out in particular by a multivariate analysis of the descriptors, but any other dimension reduction algorithm can be used using a metric corresponding to the specificity of the descriptors, namely vectors representing characteristic densities.
  • the mission type construction step 10 then comprises a sub-step 18 for partitioning the descriptors, adapted to partition the descriptors into subsets forming the types of missions.
  • the partitioning methods used are for example the K-means (or K-means in English), DBSCAN method, or the Mean Shift method.
  • the standards used can be: the norm (or distance) L1, of formula:
  • the mission type construction step 10 finally comprises a sub-step 20 of assigning a mission type 22 to each flight by association of the descriptor of said flight and the subset in which this descriptor is located, and of creation of a mission type model 24 associating each type of mission with physical flight data.
  • the method according to the invention comprises, following the mission type construction step 10, a step of interpretation of the severity of the mission types.
  • FIG. 2 represents such a step of interpreting the severity of the mission types of a method according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the step 30 of interpretation of the severity of the mission types comprises a sub-step 32 of estimation of the severity models, from the flight data 100 and the maintenance data 102, each severity model defining an estimate of aging of helicopter components according to mission types.
  • This sub-step can also use data 104 of business rules, such as statistics of cycles counting on a rotational speed of the engine for example.
  • a business rule is a rule from the user experience. In this example, a business rule may be to look at the statistics of the regimes reached during the flight and to turn it into a meter. The meter being connected to the notion of severity, for example, a piece is considered worn if it exceeds a counter value of 1000 for example.
  • the step 30 of interpretation of the severity of the types of mission then comprises a sub-step 34 of association of a severity model with each type of mission determined in the step of construction of the types of mission.
  • the step returns types 36 of severities and model 38 of severity.
  • FIG. 3 schematically represents a system for determining the severity of a plurality of flight missions of a plurality of helicopters adapted to implement the severity determination method described above.
  • the system includes a base 100 of flight data and a base
  • Flight data of the flight data base 100 is used by a mission type construction module 110, comprising means for implementing the substeps of the mission type construction step described above with reference. with Figure 1, to provide a set of mission types 22 and a mission template 24.
  • the same flight data of the flight data base 100 and the maintenance data of the maintenance data base 102 are used by a module 130 for interpreting the severity of the mission types, comprising means of implementation. sub-steps of the step of interpreting the severity of mission types described above with reference to FIG. 2, so as to provide a set of types 36 of severity and a model 38 of severity.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Alarm Systems (AREA)
EP17797391.4A 2016-10-25 2017-10-18 Procédé et système de surveillance de la santé d'hélicoptères Pending EP3533005A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1660356A FR3057971B1 (fr) 2016-10-25 2016-10-25 Procede et systeme de surveillance de la sante d'helicopteres
PCT/FR2017/052864 WO2018078245A1 (fr) 2016-10-25 2017-10-18 Procédé et système de surveillance de la santé d'hélicoptères

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3533005A1 true EP3533005A1 (fr) 2019-09-04

Family

ID=58162732

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17797391.4A Pending EP3533005A1 (fr) 2016-10-25 2017-10-18 Procédé et système de surveillance de la santé d'hélicoptères

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US10513345B2 (pt)
EP (1) EP3533005A1 (pt)
JP (1) JP2019532868A (pt)
KR (1) KR20190073397A (pt)
CN (1) CN109863515B (pt)
BR (1) BR112019008107A8 (pt)
CA (1) CA3041415A1 (pt)
FR (1) FR3057971B1 (pt)
RU (1) RU2741453C2 (pt)
WO (1) WO2018078245A1 (pt)

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7313467B2 (en) * 2000-09-08 2007-12-25 Automotive Technologies International Inc. System and method for in-vehicle communications
JP2001206297A (ja) * 2000-01-21 2001-07-31 Japan Aircraft Mfg Co Ltd 航空機運航・整備情報管理システム
US7668632B2 (en) * 2004-11-22 2010-02-23 The Boeing Company System, method and computer program product for real-time event identification and course of action interpretation
CN100465834C (zh) * 2007-02-01 2009-03-04 北京航空航天大学 空地一体化飞行设备维修支援系统及方法
US7904282B2 (en) * 2007-03-22 2011-03-08 General Electric Company Method and system for fault accommodation of machines
FR2939924B1 (fr) * 2008-12-15 2012-10-12 Snecma Identification de defaillances dans un moteur d'aeronef
US8200442B2 (en) * 2009-03-16 2012-06-12 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Usage monitor reliability factor using an advanced fatigue reliability assessment model
CN102163236B (zh) * 2011-04-22 2012-12-19 北京航空航天大学 一种飞行数据异常模式相似性查询方法
US8774988B2 (en) * 2012-08-21 2014-07-08 Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. Aircraft environmental sensors and system
EP2932197A1 (en) * 2012-12-12 2015-10-21 University Of North Dakota Analyzing flight data using predictive models
US9310222B1 (en) * 2014-06-16 2016-04-12 Sean Patrick Suiter Flight assistant with automatic configuration and landing site selection method and apparatus
EP3048501A1 (en) * 2015-01-20 2016-07-27 BAE Systems PLC Determination of vehicle capabilities
CN105928695A (zh) * 2016-05-11 2016-09-07 中国矿业大学 一种小型无人直升机机械零部件故障诊断系统及故障诊断方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20190073397A (ko) 2019-06-26
RU2019113147A3 (pt) 2020-12-01
US20190337636A1 (en) 2019-11-07
JP2019532868A (ja) 2019-11-14
WO2018078245A1 (fr) 2018-05-03
FR3057971A1 (fr) 2018-04-27
RU2741453C2 (ru) 2021-01-26
CA3041415A1 (fr) 2018-05-03
CN109863515A (zh) 2019-06-07
FR3057971B1 (fr) 2018-10-26
BR112019008107A8 (pt) 2023-04-25
RU2019113147A (ru) 2020-11-27
US10513345B2 (en) 2019-12-24
BR112019008107A2 (pt) 2018-05-03
CN109863515B (zh) 2020-10-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3039497B1 (fr) Surveillance d'un moteur d'aéronef pour anticiper les opérations de maintenance
CA2746537C (fr) Standardisation de donnees utilisees pour la surveillance d'un moteur d'aeronef
WO2020115440A1 (fr) Système d'environnement informatique pour la surveillance de moteurs d'aéronefs
WO2016075409A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance d'un moteur d'aéronef en fonctionnement dans un environnement donné
CA2826608A1 (fr) Surveillance d'un moteur d'aeronef pour anticiper les operations de maintenance
CA2852367A1 (fr) Procede, programme d'ordinateur et dispositif d'allocation de ressources informatiques d'un cluster pour l'execution d'un travail soumis audit cluster
CA2914819A1 (fr) Procedes de creation d'une base de donnees et d'elaboration d'une carte d'etats de fonctionnement d'aeronefs, et un procede de surveillance du fonctionnement d'un aeronef associe
CA2888716A1 (fr) Systeme de surveillance d'un ensemble de composants d'un equipement
EP3019957A1 (fr) Procede d'optimisation de traitement parallele de donnees sur une plateforme materielle
WO2020217004A1 (fr) Système et procédé de surveillance d'un moteur d'aéronef
EP3443425B1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle d'intégrité de l'avionique d'un aéronef, dispositif et produit programme d'ordinateur associés
EP3533005A1 (fr) Procédé et système de surveillance de la santé d'hélicoptères
FR3060778A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif d'ajustement de variables de performance d'un aeronef.
WO2016087770A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance du fonctionnement d'une turbomachine
EP3387501B1 (fr) Procédé de détection d'un comportement atypique de paramètres de télémesure, produit programme d'ordinateur et dispositif associés
FR3028978A1 (fr) Simulation aerodynamique cellule-moteur utilisant un plan de melange subdivise en secteurs angulaires
WO2023187287A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance de l'état de santé de turbomachine d'aéronef
FR3096031A1 (fr) Recalage de modèle par segment ou plan dans une turbomachine
EP3969967A1 (fr) Recalage de modèle dans une turbomachine
FR3133884A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance de l’état de santé de turbomachine d’aéronef
FR3096137A1 (fr) Recalage de modèle PS3 dans une turbomachine
EP4345686A1 (fr) Procédé de génération automatique d'un algorithme d'aide à une prise de décision ; produit programme d'ordinateur et dispositif informatique associés
FR3061574A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif d'extraction de donnees pertinentes dans l'execution d'un processus
WO2013175095A1 (fr) Procédé, programme d'ordinateur et dispositif de gestion du refroidissement d'un cluster

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190515

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20200310

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

APBK Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNE

APBN Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E

APBR Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E

APAF Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE