EP3526359A1 - Steel substrate for painted parts - Google Patents

Steel substrate for painted parts

Info

Publication number
EP3526359A1
EP3526359A1 EP17780780.7A EP17780780A EP3526359A1 EP 3526359 A1 EP3526359 A1 EP 3526359A1 EP 17780780 A EP17780780 A EP 17780780A EP 3526359 A1 EP3526359 A1 EP 3526359A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
μιη
roughness
strip
μπι
sheet
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP17780780.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Maxim Peter AARNTS
Job Anthonius Van Der Hoeven
Edgar Matthijs TOOSE
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tata Steel Ijmuiden BV
Original Assignee
Tata Steel Ijmuiden BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tata Steel Ijmuiden BV filed Critical Tata Steel Ijmuiden BV
Publication of EP3526359A1 publication Critical patent/EP3526359A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/14Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing titanium or zirconium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/02Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips
    • C21D8/0221Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips characterised by the working steps
    • C21D8/0226Hot rolling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/02Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips
    • C21D8/0221Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips characterised by the working steps
    • C21D8/0236Cold rolling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/02Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips
    • C21D8/0247Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips characterised by the heat treatment
    • C21D8/0263Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips characterised by the heat treatment following hot rolling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/02Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips
    • C21D8/04Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips to produce plates or strips for deep-drawing
    • C21D8/0421Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips to produce plates or strips for deep-drawing characterised by the working steps
    • C21D8/0426Hot rolling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/02Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips
    • C21D8/04Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips to produce plates or strips for deep-drawing
    • C21D8/0421Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips to produce plates or strips for deep-drawing characterised by the working steps
    • C21D8/0436Cold rolling
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/001Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/004Very low carbon steels, i.e. having a carbon content of less than 0,01%
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/008Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing tin
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/06Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/08Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing nickel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/12Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing tungsten, tantalum, molybdenum, vanadium, or niobium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/20Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with copper
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/22Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/24Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with vanadium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/30Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with cobalt
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/32Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with boron

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a steel strip, sheet or blank used for painted parts, e.g. for automotive purposes.
  • the invention also relates to a method for producing such a strip, sheet or blank.
  • Painted steel parts e.g. for the outer panels of automobiles, such as the hood and the doors, are subject to stringent requirements by the producers thereof. One of these requirements relates to the paint appearance of the painted part.
  • the steel substrate for producing the painted parts is usually coated with a metal coating, e.g. zinc based coating.
  • a manufacturer forms the (coated) substrate in a press into the desired shape for a panel. After pressing, the panels are usually painted using one or more layers of paint.
  • Outer panels with a very good paint appearance are highly valued, i.e. when the panels have a mirror-like surface that reflects light without distortion leading to sharp reflected images.
  • the paint appearance is influenced by the quality of the paint, but also by the surface of the (coated) substrate. This surface consists of in-plane structures of variable size and amplitude. The smaller structures are captured by the surface roughness, whereas the larger structures are captured by the so-called surface waviness.
  • the larger surface structures e.g. the surface waviness
  • the waviness of the surface of the (coated) substrate is to a certain extent still present at the surface of the outer paint layer.
  • the paint appearance of the painted part can be measured and is expressed by different measured values, e.g. Long Waviness LW in case it is measured using a BYK Waves can Dual. Due to the transmission effect the Long Waviness, or a similar value, of the painted part is related to the surface waviness of the non-painted formed part.
  • the surface waviness of a formed part is the result of the surface waviness of the undeformed, e.g. flat part, and the waviness increase introduced by the forming step.
  • the difference between the waviness of the formed part and the waviness of the undeformed part is referred to as the delta waviness, e.g. AWsa.
  • the delta waviness e.g. AWsa.
  • An implication of this observation is that the delta waviness is higher in the rolling direction than in other directions. This directional effect is strongly present in the paint appearance values as well and therefore it is of importance that delta waviness in the rolling direction should is as much as possible.
  • a steel strip, sheet or blank used for painted parts, which strip, sheet or blank is optionally metallic coated, is provided of which the steel is an Ultra Low Carbon (ULC) steel type having a composition of (in weight%):
  • ULC Ultra Low Carbon
  • AWsa defined as Wsa(Formed) minus Wsa(Flat), in which Wsa(Formed) is the Wsa value of the optionally metallic coated substrate surface after the forming and Wsa(Flat) is the Wsa value of the optionally metallic coated substrate surface before the forming.
  • Ultra Low Carbon steels are necessary for producing a part having a low delta Waviness AWsa, in particular a AWsa ⁇ 0,12 ⁇ .
  • ULC steels are often meant for applications demanding high formability.
  • Carbon in Ultra Low Carbon steels should be kept low because for deep drawing any Carbon in solid solution has a deleterious effect on the preferred recrystallisation texture.
  • IF (interstitial free) steel which is a special type of ULC steel
  • all Carbon is precipitated to avoid any Carbon in solid solution.
  • BH (bake hardenable) steel which is also a special type of ULC steel
  • a limited level of Carbon is kept in solid solution to benefit from a strength increase during baking, and the remaining Carbon should also be precipitated.
  • the total level of Carbon should not be more than 0.007 wt% otherwise the amount and size of formed precipitates will hamper formability.
  • Manganese is a solid solution strengthening element and can therefore be added to increase the strength but it has a negative effect on deep drawability. For this reason the Mn level should be kept to max 1.2 wt %. Furthermore, the formation of MnS might hamper the formation of the preferred T.4C2S2 precipitates. For the latter reason, and to not compromise formability too much, it is preferred to have max 1.0 wt% Mn, or even more preferred to have max 0.8 wt% Mn.
  • Silicon is also a solid solution strengthening element and can therefore be added to increase the strength.
  • the Si level is too high the coating adhesion might deteriorate due to the forming of Mn2Si04 spinel type oxides, and/or Si02.
  • the maximum Si level is 0.5 wt%, more preferred max 0.2S wt%.
  • Phosphorus is a very potent solution strengthening element but high levels of P might increase the Ductile-to-Brittle-Transition-Temperature (DBTT) too much, in particular in IF steels. Adding Boron can counteract this, nevertheless the P level should be maximum 0.15 wt%. Furthermore, high levels of P will increase the change to the formation of Fe-Ti-P precipitates which are not desired. For this reason it is preferred to keep maximum P level at 0.10 wt%.
  • DBTT Ductile-to-Brittle-Transition-Temperature
  • Aluminium is mainly added to bind any remaining Oxygen, but it can also be used to precipitate with Nitrogen.
  • a minimum Aluminium level of 0.01 wt% is preferred.
  • the risk for clogging during casting also increases. For this reason the maximum level of Al is set at 0.1 wt%.
  • Nitrogen in solid solution is present as an interstitial element which hampers . formability. It should therefore be fully precipitated.
  • Ti, Al or B are added to make sure all N has precipitated. Nevertheless the N level should not exceed 0.01 wt% and the amount of N should preferably be not more than 0.006 wt%.
  • Titanium, Niobium and Molybdenum are strong grain refiners and the presence of at least one of these elements is essential for the current invention.
  • Nb and Mo are even more potent as grain refiners than Ti; based on the observations by the inventors, Nb and Mo are about 2 times more effective (when given in wt%).
  • Ti and Nb are both present, they enhance each other such that their combined presence is about 4x more effective as grain refiner compared to only Ti.
  • These elements work because they precipitate with N and/or C and the precipitates formed hinder recrystallisation and grain growth; Nb is also known to hinder recrystallisation and grain growth when in solid solution. Vanadium might also work, but Vanadium precipitates can dissolve at the temperatures used for annealing after cold rolling which renders these precipitates less effective.
  • the amount of Carbon in solid solution is important and needs to be controlled. Because Ti, Nb Mo and V precipitate with Carbon they are also important to control the amount of C in solid solution.
  • the balance between C, N, Ti, Mo, V and Nb needs to be tuned with care. In IF steels some excess Ti or Nb can be allowed. This limits Ti between 0.06 and 0.60 wt%, or Nb between 0.03 and 0.30 wt% or Mo between 0.03 and 0.30 wt%; combinations of these three elements are also possible in which case 4x(Ti+Nb)+2xMo should be from 0.06 to 0.6 wt%.
  • the amount of Ti, Nb and Mo is especially important.
  • the amount of Ti or 2 x Nb or 2 x Mo must be at least 0.06 wt%, or when these elements are combined the amount of 4x(Ti+Nb)+2xMo must be at least 0.06 wt%.
  • the ULC steel will not result in a steel part having the right AWsa.
  • Copper is allowed up to 0.10 wt%. It can lead to the formation of CuS which with the right dimensions might hinder recrystallisation and grain growth but it is also in competition with the more desirable Ti4C2S2. Therefore, a maximum level of 0.04 wt% is more preferred.
  • Chromium and Nickel are basically impurities but a maximum of 0.06 and 0.08 wt% respectively does not harm. Nevertheless, a maximum of 0.04 wt% for each is more preferred.
  • Boron is an interstitial element so Boron in solid solution should be kept as low as possible, restricting B to maximum 0.0015 wt%. Boron can be added to reduce the chance for a too high DBTT, in particular in P alloyed IF steels. It can also be added to make sure all N is precipitated. On the other hand more than 0.0008 wt% B might lead to surface defects, so the more preferred range is 0.0005-0.0008 wt% B. Cobalt and Tin are basically impurities but maximum 0.04 wt% for both can be allowed.
  • Calcium is sometimes added up to 0.005 wt% in steels for deoxidation and/or desulphurisation. A level up to 0.01 wt% can be allowed without deteriorating the properties.
  • the amounts of Ti, Nb and Mo are as follows (in weight%):
  • the upper limit for the formula for the combination of Ti, Nb and Mo is 0.30, because it is unusual that these elements are needed in such high amounts.
  • the more preferred upper level is 0.1 wt%.
  • Bake Hardenable ultra low carbon steel strip, sheet or blank wherein the amount of Ti, Nb and Mo are tuned with respect to the C, N and S levels as follows (all in wt%):
  • Csol free carbon
  • the steel has grains with an essentially equi-axed median grain size smaller than 11,0 micrometer.
  • the inventors have found that the grain size is an important determining factor for waviness, and especially for determining AWsa.
  • the grain size and the AWsa of numerous steel samples the inventors have been able to determine a relationship between grain size and AWsa, with essentially equi-axed grains with median grain size smaller than 11,0 micrometer results in a AWsa ⁇ 0,12 ⁇ of the surface of the strip, sheet or blank.
  • Wsa is defined in standard SEP 1941.
  • the relationship between grain size and AWsa makes it possible to produce steel strips, sheets and blanks having a desired AWsa ⁇ 0,12 ⁇ when the grain size of the steel substrate is controlled.
  • the grain size is the size of the grains after continuous annealing and optionally metallic coating.
  • the grain size should be smaller than 11,0 micrometer when combined with Ultra Low Carbon steel types, which are mainly used for painted parts such as outer panels of automobiles, such that providing grains with the right size - that is an average size of less than 11,0 micrometer as essentially equi-axed grains - is combined when the composition of the steel is as indicated above.
  • equi-axed means that, in a cross section (RD/ND plane), the number of grain boundaries intersecting with a straight line parallel to RD, divided by the number of grain boundaries intersecting with a straight line of equal length in ND is at least 0.66; the straight line should be long enough to yield at least 200 intersects in RD as well as in ND, or the procedure is repeated with several equally distributed lines such that the sum of all intersects in RD as well as in ND is at least 200. hi the latter case the number of intersects in RD and ND is totalled over the lines before they are divided.
  • RD/ND plane In a cross section (RD/ND plane) the number of grain boundaries intersecting with 10 straight lines, equally distributed over ND (normal direction) and parallel to RD (rolling direction) were measured. Also the numbers of grain boundaries intersecting with 10 straight lines, equally distributed over RD, and parallel to ND were measured.
  • the lines in RD and ND were of equal length and long enough to yield at least 20 grain boundary intersects per line. The total number of intersects over all lines in RD was divided by the total number of intersects over all lines in ND, and in all cases this number was > 0.66.
  • the essentially equi-axed grains have a median size smaller than
  • the undeformed steel surface of the strip, sheet or blank has a waviness Wsa ⁇ 0,35 ⁇ where Wsa is measured in the rolling direction, preferably a waviness Wsa ⁇ 0,32 ⁇ , even more preferably Wsa ⁇ 0.29 um and even more preferably Wsa ⁇ 0.26 ⁇ .
  • the waviness of the undeformed steel surface in combination with AWsa determined the Wsa of the formed part.
  • the strip, sheet or blank is coated with a zinc based coating, a Zn-Al- Mg based coating, or an aluminium based coating.
  • the zinc based coating consists of 0.1 - 1.2 wt% aluminium and up to 0.3 wt% of other elements, the remainder being unavoidable impurities and zinc
  • the Zn-Al-Mg based coating preferably consists of 0.2 - 3.0 wt% aluminium and 0.2 - 3.0 wt% magnesium, up to 0.3 wt% of other elements, the remainder being unavoidable impurities and zinc
  • the aluminium based coating preferably consists of 0.2 - 13 wt% silicon, up to 0.3 wt% of other elements, the remainder being unavoidable impurities and aluminium.
  • These coating are used in the automotive industry and are therefore preferably used to coat the steel strip, sheet or blank.
  • the other elements mentioned can be Si, Sn, Bi, Sb, Ln, Ce, Ti, Sc, Sr and/or B.
  • a method for producing a steel strip according to the first or second aspect of the invention wherein the steel strip is hot rolled and cold rolled, and wherein the last stand or the only stand for the cold rolling contains work rolls having a roughness Ra between 0.5 ⁇ and 7.0 ⁇ .
  • the roughness Ra of the work rolls in the last stand or the only stand is between 0.55 ⁇ and 5.0 ⁇ , more preferably between 0.6 ⁇ and 4.0um, most preferably between 0.6 ⁇ and 2.0 ⁇ .
  • the inventors have found that work rolls with a roughness between these limits provide good results.
  • the work rolls should have a roughness Ra between 0.5 ⁇ and 7.0 ⁇ .
  • the work rolls of the first stand should have a roughness Ra between 0.6 ⁇ and 3.0 ⁇
  • the work rolls of the last stand should have a roughness Ra between 0.5 ⁇ and 7.0 ⁇ .
  • the work rolls of the first stand should have a roughness Ra between 0.6 ⁇ and 3.0 ⁇
  • the work rolls of the intermediate stands should have a roughness Ra between 0.3 ⁇ and 0.8 ⁇
  • the work rolls of the last stand should have a roughness Ra between 0.5 um and 7.0 ⁇ .
  • the work rolls used before the strip leaves the cold rolling mill always should have a roughness Ra between 0.5 ⁇ and 7.0 ⁇ .
  • the roughness thereof should be between 0.6 ⁇ and 3.0 ⁇ . If intermediate stands are present, these should have a low roughness: between 0.3 ⁇ and 0.8 ⁇ .
  • the cold rolled strip is skin passed, preferably after applying a metallic coating, using temper rolls having a roughness between 0.5 and 4.0 ⁇ , preferably a roughness ⁇ 2.8 ⁇ .
  • the roughness of the skin pass rolls is transferred on the strip, sheet of blank that is formed, and thereby has a strong influence on the waviness of the flat product.
  • a strip produced with the method according to the third aspect of the invention is produced, wherein the surface of the strip has a roughness Ra lower than 2.0 ⁇ and a waviness Wsa lower than 0.6 ⁇ in rolling direction of the strip for a strip coated with an aluminium based coating having a coating thickness between 4 and 12 ⁇ .
  • the strip has a roughness Ra between 0.7 and 1.6 ⁇ and a waviness Wsa between 0.15 and 0.35 um in rolling direction of the strip.
  • the grain size was determined as well as the waviness Wsa before and after cupping.
  • RD-ND sections of the samples were mounted in conductive resin (so called polyfast) and mechanically polished to 1 um. Care was taken to remove any surface deformation caused by the previous grinding and polishing steps. To obtain a fully deformation free surface, the final polishing step was conducted with colloidal silica.
  • the microstructure analysis was performed using a FEG-SEM (Field Emission Gun scanning electron microscope, Zeiss Ultra SS FEG-SEM) equipped with an EDAX PEGASUS XM 4 HIKARI EBSD system.
  • EBSD Electro Backscatter Diffraction
  • the EBSD scans were collected on the RD-ND plane of the samples.
  • the samples were placed under a 70° angle in the SEM.
  • the acceleration voltage was lSkV, the high current option was on, the 120 um aperture was used and typically the working distance was 17 mm during scanning.
  • the dynamic focus correction was used during scanning.
  • the EBSD scans were captured using software from firm EDAX (TSL OIM Data Collection version 7.0.1. (8-27-13)). Typically the following data collection settings were used: Hikari camera at 6x6 binning combined with standard background subtraction. The scan area was in all cases at most the sample thickness, and care was taken not to include non metallic inclusions in the scan area.
  • EBSD Scan size SOOxSOOum, step size O.Sum. scan rate ca. 80 frames per second, phase included during scanning: Fe(a).
  • the Hough settings used during data collections were: Binned pattern size -96; theta set size: 1; rho fraction «90; max peak count: 13; min peak count: 5; Hough type: classic; Hough resolution: low; butterfly convolution mask: 9x9; peak symmetry: 0.S; min peak magnitude: 5 max peak distance: IS.
  • the EBSD scans were evaluated with TSL OIM Analysis software version 7.1.0x64 (30-14-14). Typically, the data sets were 90° rotated over RD to get the scans in the proper orientation with respect to the measurement orientation. A standard grain dilation clean up was performed (GTA 5, minimum grain size 5 and grain must contain multiple rows single iteration).
  • Cups were produced by pressing a blank of 145 mm x 145 mm in a press with a hollow punch with diameter 75 mm and a blankholder force such that any material movement of the (coated) substrate between the blankholder and die is completely suppressed.
  • the deformation of the cup is such that the thickness strain in the bottom is 9% +/- 0.3%.
  • the thickness strain is defined as (t(original) - t(deformed))/t(original) x 100%, with unoriginal) the undeformed thickness and t(deformed) the thickness after deformation,
  • the results are shown in table 2.
  • the table indicates that in order to increase the chance for AWsa ⁇ 0.12 um, the grain size of the material needs to be smaller than 11.0 ⁇ m.
  • delta Wsa > 0.12 is presented by ' ⁇ ' and delta Wsa ⁇ 0.12 is presented by V "effectiveness of Ti/Nb/Mo" is:
  • Alloy 4A has a grain size ⁇ 11 ,0 um which does lead to AWsa ⁇ 0.12 although the "effectiveness of Ti/Nb/Mo" ⁇ 0,06. This indicates that even when the "effectiveness of Ti/Nb/Mo" is too low, good products are possible but good results are not usual.
  • AWsa is indeed very much dependent on the median equi-axed grain size, both in regard to the upper limit as in regard to the lower limit of AWsa.
  • Figure 1 shows that the roughness of the last stand of the cold mill can have a significant influence on the AWsa that is obtained.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
  • Metal Rolling (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)
  • Coating With Molten Metal (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a steel strip, sheet or blank used for painted parts, wherein the steel strip, sheet or blank is optionally metallic coated. According to the invention the steel is an Ultra Low Carbon (ULC) steel type having a composition of (in weight%): C: max 0.007; Mn: max 1.2; Si: max 0.5; Al: max 0.1; P: max 0.15; S: 0.003-0.045; N: max 0.01; Ti, Nb, Mo: if Ti ≥ 0.005 and Nb ≥ 0.005: 0.06 ≤ 4Ti + 4Nb + 2Mo ≤ 0.60; otherwise 0.06 ≤ Ti+2Nb + 2Mo ≤ 0.60; and one or more of the optional elements: Cu: max 0.10; Cr: max 0.06; Ni: max 0.08; B: max 0.0015; V: max 0.01; Ca: max 0.01; Co: max 0.01; Sn: max 0.01; resulting in a delta Waviness ΔWsa ≤ 0,12 μm of the surface after the forming of the strip, sheet or blank.

Description

STEEL SUBSTRATE FOR PAINTED PARTS
The invention relates to a steel strip, sheet or blank used for painted parts, e.g. for automotive purposes. The invention also relates to a method for producing such a strip, sheet or blank.
Painted steel parts, e.g. for the outer panels of automobiles, such as the hood and the doors, are subject to stringent requirements by the producers thereof. One of these requirements relates to the paint appearance of the painted part.
The steel substrate for producing the painted parts is usually coated with a metal coating, e.g. zinc based coating. A manufacturer forms the (coated) substrate in a press into the desired shape for a panel. After pressing, the panels are usually painted using one or more layers of paint.
Outer panels with a very good paint appearance are highly valued, i.e. when the panels have a mirror-like surface that reflects light without distortion leading to sharp reflected images. The paint appearance is influenced by the quality of the paint, but also by the surface of the (coated) substrate. This surface consists of in-plane structures of variable size and amplitude. The smaller structures are captured by the surface roughness, whereas the larger structures are captured by the so-called surface waviness.
It is known to the person skilled in the art that the larger surface structures, e.g. the surface waviness, are transmitted through the different paint layers. As such the waviness of the surface of the (coated) substrate is to a certain extent still present at the surface of the outer paint layer. The paint appearance of the painted part can be measured and is expressed by different measured values, e.g. Long Waviness LW in case it is measured using a BYK Waves can Dual. Due to the transmission effect the Long Waviness, or a similar value, of the painted part is related to the surface waviness of the non-painted formed part. A typical relation between LW and the waviness of the (coated) substrate surface is for instance given in the Cannes Conference: Lightweight Design: New High Performance Steel with Optimized Paint Appearance for New Car Bodies, Matthijs Toose, 28th International Conference on Automotive Body Finishing "Surcar", June 18-19 2015, Cannes, or the Bad Nauheim conference: Car Body Painting 2015, 32nd Workshop of the 1st German Automotive Circle, 9-10 November 2015, Bad Nauheim. It is important to realize the surface waviness should be measured after pressing or forming has been applied.
It is known to the person skilled in the art that the surface waviness of a formed part is the result of the surface waviness of the undeformed, e.g. flat part, and the waviness increase introduced by the forming step. The difference between the waviness of the formed part and the waviness of the undeformed part is referred to as the delta waviness, e.g. AWsa. Due to the specific nature of the production process for strip products the formed surface shows a line like pattern, in which the lines are perpendicular to the rolling direction. An implication of this observation is that the delta waviness is higher in the rolling direction than in other directions. This directional effect is strongly present in the paint appearance values as well and therefore it is of importance that delta waviness in the rolling direction should is as much as possible.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a steel strip, sheet or blank meant for painted parts, having a waviness that provides a good paint appearance.
It is another object of the invention to provide a method by which a steel strip can be produced with a waviness that provides a good paint appearance.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a steel strip, sheet or blank of which the delta waviness can be controlled.
According to the invention, a steel strip, sheet or blank used for painted parts, which strip, sheet or blank is optionally metallic coated, is provided of which the steel is an Ultra Low Carbon (ULC) steel type having a composition of (in weight%):
and one or more of the optional elements:
the remainder being iron and unavoidable impurities,
resulting in a delta Waviness AWsa < 0,12 μιη of the surface due to the forming of the strip, sheet or blank, AWsa defined as Wsa(Formed) minus Wsa(Flat), in which Wsa(Formed) is the Wsa value of the optionally metallic coated substrate surface after the forming and Wsa(Flat) is the Wsa value of the optionally metallic coated substrate surface before the forming.
The inventors have found that Ultra Low Carbon steels are necessary for producing a part having a low delta Waviness AWsa, in particular a AWsa < 0,12 μιη.
ULC steels are often meant for applications demanding high formability. Carbon in Ultra Low Carbon steels should be kept low because for deep drawing any Carbon in solid solution has a deleterious effect on the preferred recrystallisation texture. In IF (interstitial free) steel, which is a special type of ULC steel, all Carbon is precipitated to avoid any Carbon in solid solution. In BH (bake hardenable) steel, which is also a special type of ULC steel, a limited level of Carbon is kept in solid solution to benefit from a strength increase during baking, and the remaining Carbon should also be precipitated. In both cases the total level of Carbon should not be more than 0.007 wt% otherwise the amount and size of formed precipitates will hamper formability. To further improve formability, it is preferred to have not more than 0.005 wt% Carbon in the alloy of the current invention.
Manganese is a solid solution strengthening element and can therefore be added to increase the strength but it has a negative effect on deep drawability. For this reason the Mn level should be kept to max 1.2 wt %. Furthermore, the formation of MnS might hamper the formation of the preferred T.4C2S2 precipitates. For the latter reason, and to not compromise formability too much, it is preferred to have max 1.0 wt% Mn, or even more preferred to have max 0.8 wt% Mn.
Silicon is also a solid solution strengthening element and can therefore be added to increase the strength. However, if the Si level is too high the coating adhesion might deteriorate due to the forming of Mn2Si04 spinel type oxides, and/or Si02. For this reason the maximum Si level is 0.5 wt%, more preferred max 0.2S wt%.
Phosphorus is a very potent solution strengthening element but high levels of P might increase the Ductile-to-Brittle-Transition-Temperature (DBTT) too much, in particular in IF steels. Adding Boron can counteract this, nevertheless the P level should be maximum 0.15 wt%. Furthermore, high levels of P will increase the change to the formation of Fe-Ti-P precipitates which are not desired. For this reason it is preferred to keep maximum P level at 0.10 wt%.
Sulphur is necessary to make sure the preferred T.4C2S2 precipitate is formed. However, if the level of S is too high the formation of TiC is suppressed during hot rolling, which will lead to fast recrystallisation followed by grain growth. It is therefore important for the current invention to limit the S to maximum 0.045 wt%, more preferably maximum 0.02 wt%.
Aluminium is mainly added to bind any remaining Oxygen, but it can also be used to precipitate with Nitrogen. To bind Oxygen a minimum Aluminium level of 0.01 wt% is preferred. With increasing Aluminium level, the risk for clogging during casting also increases. For this reason the maximum level of Al is set at 0.1 wt%.
Nitrogen in solid solution is present as an interstitial element which hampers . formability. It should therefore be fully precipitated. Usually Ti, Al or B are added to make sure all N has precipitated. Nevertheless the N level should not exceed 0.01 wt% and the amount of N should preferably be not more than 0.006 wt%.
Titanium, Niobium and Molybdenum are strong grain refiners and the presence of at least one of these elements is essential for the current invention. Nb and Mo are even more potent as grain refiners than Ti; based on the observations by the inventors, Nb and Mo are about 2 times more effective (when given in wt%). Furthermore, when Ti and Nb are both present, they enhance each other such that their combined presence is about 4x more effective as grain refiner compared to only Ti. These elements work because they precipitate with N and/or C and the precipitates formed hinder recrystallisation and grain growth; Nb is also known to hinder recrystallisation and grain growth when in solid solution. Vanadium might also work, but Vanadium precipitates can dissolve at the temperatures used for annealing after cold rolling which renders these precipitates less effective.
For BH alloys, the amount of Carbon in solid solution is important and needs to be controlled. Because Ti, Nb Mo and V precipitate with Carbon they are also important to control the amount of C in solid solution. For BH steels, the balance between C, N, Ti, Mo, V and Nb needs to be tuned with care. In IF steels some excess Ti or Nb can be allowed. This limits Ti between 0.06 and 0.60 wt%, or Nb between 0.03 and 0.30 wt% or Mo between 0.03 and 0.30 wt%; combinations of these three elements are also possible in which case 4x(Ti+Nb)+2xMo should be from 0.06 to 0.6 wt%.
It has been found by the inventors that the amount of Ti, Nb and Mo is especially important. The amount of Ti or 2 x Nb or 2 x Mo must be at least 0.06 wt%, or when these elements are combined the amount of 4x(Ti+Nb)+2xMo must be at least 0.06 wt%. At a lower level of Ti or Nb or Mo or the combination, the ULC steel will not result in a steel part having the right AWsa. When more than 0.60 wt% Ti or more than 0.30wt% Nb or more than 0.30wt% Mo is used, or when these elements are combined an amount of 4x(Ti+Nb)+2Mo (all in wt%) being more than 0.6 is used, the ULC steel will not improve or the steel might even be worse in performance.
Copper is allowed up to 0.10 wt%. It can lead to the formation of CuS which with the right dimensions might hinder recrystallisation and grain growth but it is also in competition with the more desirable Ti4C2S2. Therefore, a maximum level of 0.04 wt% is more preferred.
Chromium and Nickel are basically impurities but a maximum of 0.06 and 0.08 wt% respectively does not harm. Nevertheless, a maximum of 0.04 wt% for each is more preferred.
Boron is an interstitial element so Boron in solid solution should be kept as low as possible, restricting B to maximum 0.0015 wt%. Boron can be added to reduce the chance for a too high DBTT, in particular in P alloyed IF steels. It can also be added to make sure all N is precipitated. On the other hand more than 0.0008 wt% B might lead to surface defects, so the more preferred range is 0.0005-0.0008 wt% B. Cobalt and Tin are basically impurities but maximum 0.04 wt% for both can be allowed.
Calcium is sometimes added up to 0.005 wt% in steels for deoxidation and/or desulphurisation. A level up to 0.01 wt% can be allowed without deteriorating the properties.
Preferably, in the above composition of ULC steel the amounts of Ti, Nb and Mo are as follows (in weight%):
Preferably, the upper limit for the formula for the combination of Ti, Nb and Mo is 0.30, because it is unusual that these elements are needed in such high amounts. For the same reason, in case Ti and/or Nb < 0.005 the more preferred upper level is 0.1 wt%.
According to a preferred embodiment Bake Hardenable ultra low carbon steel strip, sheet or blank is used, wherein the amount of Ti, Nb and Mo are tuned with respect to the C, N and S levels as follows (all in wt%):
and furthermore if Ti and Nb are both > 0.005 wt%
For a BH steel (Bake Hardenable steel) some free carbon (Csol) is essential for the bake hardening response, hence the lower limit on Csol; a too high level of Csol can lead to fast natural ageing instead of a bake hardening effect, hence the upper limit of Csol.
According to a second aspect of the invention the steel has grains with an essentially equi-axed median grain size smaller than 11,0 micrometer.
The inventors have found that the grain size is an important determining factor for waviness, and especially for determining AWsa. By determining the grain size and the AWsa of numerous steel samples the inventors have been able to determine a relationship between grain size and AWsa, with essentially equi-axed grains with median grain size smaller than 11,0 micrometer results in a AWsa < 0,12 μιη of the surface of the strip, sheet or blank. Wsa is defined in standard SEP 1941. The relationship between grain size and AWsa makes it possible to produce steel strips, sheets and blanks having a desired AWsa < 0,12 μιη when the grain size of the steel substrate is controlled. The grain size is the size of the grains after continuous annealing and optionally metallic coating. The inventors have found that the grain size should be smaller than 11,0 micrometer when combined with Ultra Low Carbon steel types, which are mainly used for painted parts such as outer panels of automobiles, such that providing grains with the right size - that is an average size of less than 11,0 micrometer as essentially equi-axed grains - is combined when the composition of the steel is as indicated above.
Essentially equi-axed means that, in a cross section (RD/ND plane), the number of grain boundaries intersecting with a straight line parallel to RD, divided by the number of grain boundaries intersecting with a straight line of equal length in ND is at least 0.66; the straight line should be long enough to yield at least 200 intersects in RD as well as in ND, or the procedure is repeated with several equally distributed lines such that the sum of all intersects in RD as well as in ND is at least 200. hi the latter case the number of intersects in RD and ND is totalled over the lines before they are divided. The inventors used the following procedure:
In a cross section (RD/ND plane) the number of grain boundaries intersecting with 10 straight lines, equally distributed over ND (normal direction) and parallel to RD (rolling direction) were measured. Also the numbers of grain boundaries intersecting with 10 straight lines, equally distributed over RD, and parallel to ND were measured. The lines in RD and ND were of equal length and long enough to yield at least 20 grain boundary intersects per line. The total number of intersects over all lines in RD was divided by the total number of intersects over all lines in ND, and in all cases this number was > 0.66.
Having essentially equi-axed grains with median grain size smaller than 11,0 micrometer is an important condition but other conditions are important as well to get the best results. The roughness at the last stand of the cold mill, as well as the roughness of the temper mill, and the reductions given at the last stand of the cold mill and at the temper mill are parameters that need to be controlled; this is known for the person skilled in the art.
Preferably the essentially equi-axed grains have a median size smaller than
10,0 micrometer. The smaller the grain size, the lower AWsa will be. A small median grain size can result in a AWsa of 0,10 or even smaller.
According to a preferred embodiment, the undeformed steel surface of the strip, sheet or blank has a waviness Wsa < 0,35 μιη where Wsa is measured in the rolling direction, preferably a waviness Wsa < 0,32 μπι, even more preferably Wsa < 0.29 um and even more preferably Wsa < 0.26 μιη. The waviness of the undeformed steel surface in combination with AWsa determined the Wsa of the formed part.
Preferably the strip, sheet or blank is coated with a zinc based coating, a Zn-Al- Mg based coating, or an aluminium based coating. Preferably the zinc based coating consists of 0.1 - 1.2 wt% aluminium and up to 0.3 wt% of other elements, the remainder being unavoidable impurities and zinc, or the Zn-Al-Mg based coating preferably consists of 0.2 - 3.0 wt% aluminium and 0.2 - 3.0 wt% magnesium, up to 0.3 wt% of other elements, the remainder being unavoidable impurities and zinc, or the aluminium based coating preferably consists of 0.2 - 13 wt% silicon, up to 0.3 wt% of other elements, the remainder being unavoidable impurities and aluminium.
These coating are used in the automotive industry and are therefore preferably used to coat the steel strip, sheet or blank. The other elements mentioned can be Si, Sn, Bi, Sb, Ln, Ce, Ti, Sc, Sr and/or B.
According to a third aspect of the invention a method for producing a steel strip according to the first or second aspect of the invention is provided, wherein the steel strip is hot rolled and cold rolled, and wherein the last stand or the only stand for the cold rolling contains work rolls having a roughness Ra between 0.5 μιη and 7.0 μιη.
The inventors found that work rolls in the last stand of the cold mill having a roughness Ra between 0.5 μπι and 7.0 μιη can be used, when the grain size of the steel strip is fine enough, as indicated for the first aspect of the invention. It is known to a person skilled in the art that lowering the last stand cold mill roughness would be beneficial to reduce the Wsa value after forming even further. However, the inventors have found that it is not required to use work rolls in the last stand of the cold mill having a roughness Ra lower than 0.5 μιη. To use work rolls that have a roughness Ra lower than 0.5 μιη has disadvantages since they will need very special grinding operations to be prepared.
Preferably the roughness Ra of the work rolls in the last stand or the only stand is between 0.55 μιη and 5.0 μτη, more preferably between 0.6 μηα and 4.0um, most preferably between 0.6 μιη and 2.0 μπι. The inventors have found that work rolls with a roughness between these limits provide good results.
When the cold rolling mill contains one stand, the work rolls should have a roughness Ra between 0.5 μιη and 7.0 μπι.
When the cold rolling mill contains two stands, the work rolls of the first stand should have a roughness Ra between 0.6 μιη and 3.0 μτη, and the work rolls of the last stand should have a roughness Ra between 0.5 μηι and 7.0 μπι.
When the cold rolling mill contains three or more stands, the work rolls of the first stand should have a roughness Ra between 0.6 μιη and 3.0 μιη, the work rolls of the intermediate stands should have a roughness Ra between 0.3 μιη and 0.8 μιη and the work rolls of the last stand should have a roughness Ra between 0.5 um and 7.0 μπι.
The above shows that that the inventors have found that the work rolls used before the strip leaves the cold rolling mill always should have a roughness Ra between 0.5 μιη and 7.0 μηι. When a separate first stand is used, the roughness thereof should be between 0.6 μιη and 3.0 μπι. If intermediate stands are present, these should have a low roughness: between 0.3 μιη and 0.8 μπι.
When in the above cases a roughness Ra between 0.5 um and 7.0 μιη is indicated, it should be understood that also the more limited ranges can apply.
Preferably the cold rolled strip is skin passed, preferably after applying a metallic coating, using temper rolls having a roughness between 0.5 and 4.0 μηι, preferably a roughness < 2.8 μιη. The roughness of the skin pass rolls is transferred on the strip, sheet of blank that is formed, and thereby has a strong influence on the waviness of the flat product.
According to a fourth aspect of the invention a strip produced with the method according to the third aspect of the invention is produced, wherein the surface of the strip has a roughness Ra lower than 2.0 μιη and a waviness Wsa lower than 0.6 μτη in rolling direction of the strip for a strip coated with an aluminium based coating having a coating thickness between 4 and 12 μπι.
Preferably, the strip has a roughness Ra between 0.7 and 1.6 μιη and a waviness Wsa between 0.15 and 0.35 um in rolling direction of the strip.
Examples
For several BH and IF alloys the grain size was determined as well as the waviness Wsa before and after cupping.
All samples came from coils that were cold rolled on a 5 stand cold mill. The first stand had a ground roughness with Ra 1.2 ± 0.2 μπι; the second, third and fourth stand had a ground roughness with Ra 0.6 ± 0.2 μιη. The last stand had an EDT roughness with Ra 4.5 ± 0.2 μιη. After cold rolling, the coils were continuously annealed, top temperature 810 ± 20 °C, and hot dip galvanised at 470 ± 10°C. Air knives were used to adjust the coating thickness, and cooling was applied immediately after the air knives to solidify the coating. Finally, the strip was temper rolled. The roughness of the temper mill was EDT 1.9 ± 0.1 μm.
The chemistries of these alloys is given in table 1. Grain size was determined as follows:
Sample preparation
RD-ND sections of the samples were mounted in conductive resin (so called polyfast) and mechanically polished to 1 um. Care was taken to remove any surface deformation caused by the previous grinding and polishing steps. To obtain a fully deformation free surface, the final polishing step was conducted with colloidal silica.
SEM
The microstructure analysis was performed using a FEG-SEM (Field Emission Gun scanning electron microscope, Zeiss Ultra SS FEG-SEM) equipped with an EDAX PEGASUS XM 4 HIKARI EBSD system. EBSD (Electron Backscatter Diffraction) scans of reported samples were performed using typically the following SEM settings:
The EBSD scans were collected on the RD-ND plane of the samples. The samples were placed under a 70° angle in the SEM. The acceleration voltage was lSkV, the high current option was on, the 120 um aperture was used and typically the working distance was 17 mm during scanning. To compensate for the 70° tilt angle of the sample the dynamic focus correction was used during scanning.
EBSD data collection
The EBSD scans were captured using software from firm EDAX (TSL OIM Data Collection version 7.0.1. (8-27-13)). Typically the following data collection settings were used: Hikari camera at 6x6 binning combined with standard background subtraction. The scan area was in all cases at most the sample thickness, and care was taken not to include non metallic inclusions in the scan area.
EBSD Scan size: SOOxSOOum, step size O.Sum. scan rate ca. 80 frames per second, phase included during scanning: Fe(a). The Hough settings used during data collections were: Binned pattern size -96; theta set size: 1; rho fraction «90; max peak count: 13; min peak count: 5; Hough type: classic; Hough resolution: low; butterfly convolution mask: 9x9; peak symmetry: 0.S; min peak magnitude: 5 max peak distance: IS.
EBSD data evaluation
The EBSD scans were evaluated with TSL OIM Analysis software version 7.1.0x64 (30-14-14). Typically, the data sets were 90° rotated over RD to get the scans in the proper orientation with respect to the measurement orientation. A standard grain dilation clean up was performed (GTA 5, minimum grain size 5 and grain must contain multiple rows single iteration).
Surface profiles were measured by using skidless stylus device with a tip radius of 2 μπι. Per sample five tracks of 70 mm length and a point density of 1000 points / mm were made. Wsa was calculated according to SEP 1941 whereas the roughness was calculated according the ISO 4287 in which a cut-off of 2.5 mm was used. Per sample the arithmetic mean of the five tracks was determined to give the specific value under consideration, i.e. roughness or waviness.
Cups were produced by pressing a blank of 145 mm x 145 mm in a press with a hollow punch with diameter 75 mm and a blankholder force such that any material movement of the (coated) substrate between the blankholder and die is completely suppressed. The deformation of the cup is such that the thickness strain in the bottom is 9% +/- 0.3%. Here the thickness strain is defined as (t(original) - t(deformed))/t(original) x 100%, with unoriginal) the undeformed thickness and t(deformed) the thickness after deformation,
The results are shown in table 2. The table indicates that in order to increase the chance for AWsa≤ 0.12 um, the grain size of the material needs to be smaller than 11.0 μm.
Table 2: measured grain size, delta Wsa and "effectiveness of T
delta Wsa > 0.12 is presented by 'χ' and delta Wsa < 0.12 is presented by V "effectiveness of Ti/Nb/Mo" is:
if Ti and Nb are both ( )
otherwise
Alloy 4A has a grain size < 11 ,0 um which does lead to AWsa < 0.12 although the "effectiveness of Ti/Nb/Mo" < 0,06. This indicates that even when the "effectiveness of Ti/Nb/Mo" is too low, good products are possible but good results are not usual.
The inventors have found that the AWsa is indeed very much dependent on the median equi-axed grain size, both in regard to the upper limit as in regard to the lower limit of AWsa.
After the example described above, some further experiments were performed. In these experiments, the roughness of the rolls in the last stand of the cold mill was varied. All other parameters of the method used in the example above remained the same. The alloy used was a BH type, typical values for the chemistry are given in below, all elements in wt%.:
Apart from the roughness of the last stand of the cold mill, processing was performed as described above for the samples given in table 1. For the roughness of the rolls in the last stand of the cold mill, a roughness with four different values was used. The roughness Ra of the rolls obtained by EDT technique was 1.5, 3.0, 4.S and 6.0 um, respectively. Figure 1 shows the AWsa that was obtained in these four experiments; Ra values of the samples before cupping were between 1.05 and 1.2 μιη, and the Rpc of the samples before cupping was between 80 and 105 cm'1. (Rpc is the peak count, that is the number of roughness peaks per given length).
Figure 1 shows that the roughness of the last stand of the cold mill can have a significant influence on the AWsa that is obtained.

Claims

2. Steel strip, sheet or blank according to claim 1, wherein the amounts of Ti, Nb and Mo are as follows (in weight%):
3. Bake Hardenable ultra low carbon steel strip, sheet or blank according to claim
1 or 2, wherein the amount of Ti, Nb and Mo are tuned with respect to the C, N and S levels as follows (all in wt%):
and furthermore if Ti and Nb are both > 0.005 wt%
4. Steel strip, sheet or blank according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the steel has grains with an essentially equi-axed median grain size smaller than 11 ,0 micrometer.
5. Steel strip, sheet or blank according to claim 4, wherein the essentially equi- axed grains have a median size smaller than 10,0 micrometer.
6. Steel strip, sheet or blank according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the undeformed steel surface of the strip, sheet or blank has a waviness Wsa < 0.35 um where Wsa is measured in the rolling direction, preferably a waviness Wsa < 0,32. μηα, more preferably Wsa < 0.29 μπι and even more preferably Wsa < 0.26 μιη.
7. Steel strip, sheet or blank according to any one of preceding claims, wherein the strip, sheet or blank is coated with a zinc based coating, a Zn-Al-Mg based coating, or an aluminium based coating, the zinc based coating preferably consists of 0.1 - 1.2 wt% aluminium and up to 0.3 wt% of other elements, the remainder being unavoidable impurities and zinc, or the Zn-Al-Mg based coating preferably consists of 0.2 - 3.0 wt% aluminium and 0.2 - 3.0 wt% magnesium, up to 0.3 wt% of other elements, the remainder being unavoidable impurities and zinc, or the aluminium based coating preferably consists of 0.2 - 13 wt% silicon, up to 0.3 wt% of other elements, the remainder being unavoidable impurities and aluminium.
8. Method for producing a steel strip according to any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the steel strip is hot rolled and cold rolled, and in that the last stand or the only stand of the cold rolling mill contains work rolls having a roughness Ra between 0.S μιη and 7.0 μιη.
9. Method according to claim 8, wherein the roughness Ra of the work rolls in the last stand or the only stand is between 0.SS μιη and S.O μπι, preferably between 0.6 μιη and 4.0um, more preferably between 0.6 μπι and 2.0 μιη.
10. Method according to claim 8 or 9, wherein the cold rolling mill contains one stand, with work rolls having a roughness Ra between 0.5 μπι and 7.0 μιη, preferably between 0.55 μπι and S.O μηι, more preferably between 0.6 μιη and 4.0μιη, most preferably between 0.6 μιη and 2.0 μπι.
11. Method according to claim 8 or 9, wherein the cold rolling mill contains two stands, the work rolls of the first stand having a roughness Ra between 0.6 μιη and 3.0 μιη, and the work rolls of the last stand having a roughness Ra between 0.5 μιη and 7.0 μιη, preferably between 0.55 μπι and 5.0 μπι, more preferably between 0.6 μιη and 4.0 μιη, most preferably between 0.6 μιη and 2.0 μιη.
12. Method according to claim 8 or 9, wherein the cold rolling mill contains three or more stands, the work rolls of the first stand having a roughness Ra between 0.6 μηι and 3.0 urn, the work rolls of the intermediate stands having a roughness Ra between 0.3 um and 0.8 μιη and the work rolls of the last stand having a roughness Ra between 0.5 μιη and 7.0 um, preferably between 0.SS um and 5.0 um, more preferably between 0.6 um and 4.0um, most preferably between 0.6 um and 2.0 um.
13. Method according to any one of claims 8 to 12, wherein the cold rolled strip is skin passed, preferably after applying a metallic coating, using temper rolls having a roughness between 0.5 and 4.0 μιη, preferably a roughness≤ 2.8 um.
14. Strip produced with the method according to any one of claims 8 - 13, wherein the surface of the strip has a roughness Ra lower than 2.0 μιη and a waviness Wsa lower than 0.6 μπι in rolling direction of the strip for a strip coated with an aluminium based coating having a coating thickness between 4 and 12 μιη.
EP17780780.7A 2016-10-17 2017-10-13 Steel substrate for painted parts Pending EP3526359A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP16194227 2016-10-17
PCT/EP2017/076184 WO2018073117A1 (en) 2016-10-17 2017-10-13 Steel substrate for painted parts

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3526359A1 true EP3526359A1 (en) 2019-08-21

Family

ID=57189802

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17780780.7A Pending EP3526359A1 (en) 2016-10-17 2017-10-13 Steel substrate for painted parts

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (2) US20200087761A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3526359A1 (en)
JP (1) JP7066698B2 (en)
KR (1) KR102439914B1 (en)
CN (1) CN109844158B (en)
BR (1) BR112019007262B1 (en)
CA (1) CA3039083A1 (en)
DE (1) DE202017007170U1 (en)
MX (1) MX2019004458A (en)
WO (1) WO2018073117A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010130883A1 (en) 2009-05-14 2010-11-18 Arcelormittal Investigacion Y Desarrollo Sl Method for producing a coated metal band having an improved appearance
CN109844159B (en) 2016-10-17 2021-09-07 塔塔钢铁艾默伊登有限责任公司 Steel for painted parts
KR102426248B1 (en) * 2020-11-05 2022-07-28 주식회사 포스코 Method for manufacturing hot-dip galvanized high strength steel sheet having excellent distinctness of image after painting
KR102468036B1 (en) * 2020-11-12 2022-11-17 주식회사 포스코 High-strength hot-dip galvanized steel sheet with excellent formability and process for producing same
KR102484992B1 (en) * 2020-11-18 2023-01-05 주식회사 포스코 Plated steel sheet having excellent strength, formability and surface property and method for manufacturing the same
CN117178065A (en) * 2021-04-21 2023-12-05 塔塔钢铁艾默伊登有限责任公司 Steel strip or sheet and method for producing same
KR20240041338A (en) * 2021-07-28 2024-03-29 타타 스틸 이즈무이덴 베.뷔. Hot rolled steel sheet and manufacturing method thereof
DE102021121303A1 (en) 2021-08-17 2023-02-23 Thyssenkrupp Steel Europe Ag Process for producing a laser-textured skin-pass roll, process for skin-passing a steel sheet and correspondingly skin-passed steel sheet
EP4394070A4 (en) * 2021-08-27 2024-09-11 Nippon Steel Corp Steel plate and press-molded article
WO2024023552A1 (en) * 2022-07-28 2024-02-01 Arcelormittal Method for manufacturing a coated press hardened steel part having an improved appearance and corresponding steel part
WO2024023553A1 (en) * 2022-07-28 2024-02-01 Arcelormittal Method for manufacturing a coated press hardened steel part having an improved appearance and corresponding steel part
CN115125454B (en) * 2022-08-15 2023-08-15 马鞍山钢铁股份有限公司 Cold-rolled automobile outer plate with low waviness after forming and production method thereof

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS63111156A (en) * 1986-10-30 1988-05-16 Kawasaki Steel Corp Cold rolled steel sheet having excellent press formability and vividness after painting and its production
JPH0814015B2 (en) * 1990-01-16 1996-02-14 日本鋼管株式会社 Non-oriented electrical steel sheet having excellent magnetic properties and surface properties and method for producing the same
FR2740061B1 (en) * 1995-10-19 1997-11-28 Ugine Sa PROCESS FOR THE CONTINUOUS DEVELOPMENT OF A STRIP OF LAMINATED SHEET OF STAINLESS STEEL HAVING AN IMPROVED SURFACE CONDITION
US5853903A (en) * 1996-05-07 1998-12-29 Nkk Corporation Steel sheet for excellent panel appearance and dent resistance after panel-forming
JP3882263B2 (en) * 1996-05-07 2007-02-14 Jfeスチール株式会社 Steel plate with excellent panel appearance and dent resistance after panel processing
JP3433619B2 (en) * 1996-09-09 2003-08-04 Jfeスチール株式会社 Manufacturing method of electrogalvanized steel sheet with excellent surface appearance and workability
JP4177478B2 (en) * 1998-04-27 2008-11-05 Jfeスチール株式会社 Cold-rolled steel sheet, hot-dip galvanized steel sheet excellent in formability, panel shape, and dent resistance, and methods for producing them
JP3538318B2 (en) * 1998-06-04 2004-06-14 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Steel plate with excellent adhesion to cement
JP2001073074A (en) * 1999-08-31 2001-03-21 Nkk Corp Soft cold rolled steel sheet excellent in flattening degree and its production
JP2001288549A (en) * 2000-03-31 2001-10-19 Kawasaki Steel Corp Manufacturing method of cold rolled steel plate excellent in press forming property and plated steel plate
EP1233079B1 (en) * 2001-02-16 2012-04-11 Tata Steel IJmuiden BV Cold reduced enamelling steel sheet and an enamelled structure comprising a component of such a steel sheet
JP3931640B2 (en) * 2001-11-27 2007-06-20 住友金属工業株式会社 Seamless steel pipe and its manufacturing method
JP3779941B2 (en) * 2002-01-09 2006-05-31 新日本製鐵株式会社 Galvanized steel sheet with excellent post-painting corrosion resistance and paint clarity
KR20050095537A (en) * 2004-03-25 2005-09-29 주식회사 포스코 Cold rolled steel sheet and hot dipped steel sheet with superior strength and bake hardenability and method for manufacturing the steel sheets
EP1735474B1 (en) * 2004-03-25 2015-10-21 Posco Cold rolled steel sheet and hot dipped steel sheet with superior strength and bake hardenability and method for manufacturing the steel sheets
KR100685037B1 (en) * 2005-09-23 2007-02-20 주식회사 포스코 Bake-hardenable cold rolled steel sheet with superior strength and aging resistance, galvannealed steel sheet using the cold rolled steel sheet and method for manufacturing the cold rolled steel sheet
JP5478804B2 (en) * 2006-12-28 2014-04-23 新日鐵住金株式会社 Alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet with excellent surface appearance and plating adhesion
WO2011012242A1 (en) * 2009-07-30 2011-02-03 Corus Staal Bv Process for producing an ultra-low-carbon steel slab, strip or sheet
WO2012048841A1 (en) * 2010-10-12 2012-04-19 Tata Steel Ijmuiden B.V. Method of hot forming a steel blank and the hot formed part
WO2012073538A1 (en) * 2010-11-29 2012-06-07 新日本製鐵株式会社 High-strength bake-hardening cold-rolled steel sheet and method for manufacturing same
WO2014135753A1 (en) * 2013-03-06 2014-09-12 Arcelormittal Investigacion Y Desarrollo, S.L. A method for manufacturing a metal sheet with a znal coating and with optimised drying, corresponding metal sheet, part and vehicle
CN109844159B (en) * 2016-10-17 2021-09-07 塔塔钢铁艾默伊登有限责任公司 Steel for painted parts

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019534949A (en) 2019-12-05
CN109844158B (en) 2021-09-07
BR112019007262B1 (en) 2022-12-06
US20200087761A1 (en) 2020-03-19
JP7066698B2 (en) 2022-05-13
MX2019004458A (en) 2019-06-17
BR112019007262A2 (en) 2019-07-09
CN109844158A (en) 2019-06-04
KR20190070336A (en) 2019-06-20
DE202017007170U1 (en) 2019-11-15
WO2018073117A1 (en) 2018-04-26
CA3039083A1 (en) 2018-04-26
US20220064765A1 (en) 2022-03-03
KR102439914B1 (en) 2022-09-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20220064765A1 (en) Steel substrate for painted parts
US11174530B2 (en) Steel for painted parts
CN109715838B (en) Method for producing a flat steel product and flat steel product
EP3354359B1 (en) Method for manufacturing plated steel sheet having excellent clarity of image after coating
KR102533809B1 (en) Steel sheet for cans and method of producing same
KR20210123372A (en) Steel plate and its manufacturing method
WO2018073116A2 (en) Method for producing a steel strip for painted parts
WO2021149810A1 (en) Panel
WO2023149002A1 (en) Steel sheet
KR102426248B1 (en) Method for manufacturing hot-dip galvanized high strength steel sheet having excellent distinctness of image after painting
JP6809619B2 (en) Steel sheet for cans and its manufacturing method
KR102587650B1 (en) Steel sheet for cans and method of producing same
US12129535B2 (en) Steel sheet for cans and method of producing same
JP2017210661A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet and manufacturing method therefor
CN118574944A (en) Hot rolled high strength steel strip
KR20220068310A (en) Plated steel sheet having excellent strength, formability and surface property and method for manufacturing the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190517

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20200430

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20201021

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210423

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20211028

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)