EP3488030B1 - Method for polishing conductive metal surfaces - Google Patents

Method for polishing conductive metal surfaces Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3488030B1
EP3488030B1 EP17734749.9A EP17734749A EP3488030B1 EP 3488030 B1 EP3488030 B1 EP 3488030B1 EP 17734749 A EP17734749 A EP 17734749A EP 3488030 B1 EP3488030 B1 EP 3488030B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
electrolyte
conductive metal
electrical voltage
metal surface
voltage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP17734749.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3488030A1 (en
Inventor
Martin Polak
Klaus-Dieter Weltmann
Roland IHRKE
Maik Fröhlich
Antje Quade
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Leibniz Institut fuer Plasmaforschung und Technologie eV
Original Assignee
Leibniz Institut fuer Plasmaforschung und Technologie eV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Leibniz Institut fuer Plasmaforschung und Technologie eV filed Critical Leibniz Institut fuer Plasmaforschung und Technologie eV
Publication of EP3488030A1 publication Critical patent/EP3488030A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3488030B1 publication Critical patent/EP3488030B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25FPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC REMOVAL OF MATERIALS FROM OBJECTS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25F3/00Electrolytic etching or polishing
    • C25F3/16Polishing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25FPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC REMOVAL OF MATERIALS FROM OBJECTS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25F5/00Electrolytic stripping of metallic layers or coatings
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25FPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC REMOVAL OF MATERIALS FROM OBJECTS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25F7/00Constructional parts, or assemblies thereof, of cells for electrolytic removal of material from objects; Servicing or operating

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an electrochemical polishing process for conductive metal surfaces.
  • Metal surfaces that have a certain degree of surface roughness tend to appear as dull. Polishing of such surfaces reduces the surface roughness by smoothing microscopic peaks in the metal, thereby creating a smooth surface that does not scatter reflexions and therefore appears shiny.
  • Polishing of metal surfaces is required in various situations ranging from smoothing sharp edges on sheets of steel after cutting, defined removal of surface coatings, polishing pieces of jewellery, reduction of friction and reduction of surface areas to minimize corrosion. These applications all have in common that a smooth and shiny surface is to be achieved, with a defined removal of material. A shiny appearance and a limited, defined removal of material is particularly advantageous in the case of polishing jewellery.
  • Methods for polishing metal surfaces known in the state of the art are mechanical polishing, electropolishing, laser polishing, magneto rheological finishing or plasma polishing.
  • polishing is performed with rotating polishing wheels usually made of leather, wood, canvas, felt, paper or wool and the use of a polishing agent.
  • the polishing agent contains a carrier such as oil and an abrasive to perform the polishing, depending on the material to be polished.
  • the electrical current is applied to the object which needs polishing and the object is subsequently immersed in an electrolyte solution.
  • the electrical current in combination with the electrolyte removes tiny amounts of the metal surfaces preferably at areas with microscopic peaks of metal, thereby achieving a smoothing process.
  • the metal surfaces are smooth and shiny as a result of this process.
  • the mean profile roughness (R a ) of metal surfaces can, depending on the R a of the starting material, be reduced by 50% to around 0.2 ⁇ m by electropolishing.
  • Plasma polishing is related to electropolishing, but uses a significantly higher voltage, thereby creating a plasma surrounding the object to be polished, separating it from the electrolyte solution.
  • Plasma polishing commonly uses non-hazardous salt solutions as electrolyte in contrast to electropolishing, where hazardous chemicals such as anorganic acids and/or concentrated salt solutions are commonly used.
  • the mean profile roughness (R a ) of metal surfaces can be reduced by up to 85% to around 0.12 ⁇ m by plasma polishing as disclosed in DE10207632 B4 .
  • WO 82/02407 A1 discloses a plasma polishing method for metals that uses two different voltages applied to the metal, wherein the voltages are in the range of 5V to 30V.
  • electropolishing is suitable for polishing structured surfaces and it leads to less loss of material than mechanical polishing, the use of hazardous chemicals increases the cost and environmental impact of this method.
  • Plasma polishing is, like electropolishing, suitable for the polishing of structured surfaces, is associated with little loss of material and does not require hazardous chemicals, but requires the use of significantly higher voltages to create plasma. This increases potential hazards for personnel and requires suitable measures of protection, increasing attendant costs. Furthermore, the use of higher voltages also results in a significant increase in the power required for this method compared to electropolishing or mechanical polishing. This adds to the costs of this method.
  • the problem underlying the present invention is to provide a method for polishing conductive metal surfaces, achieving a low mean profile roughness (R a ) without the need of hazardous chemicals, with low power consumption and a short processing time. This problem is solved by the subject-matter of the independent claims.
  • This novel polishing method combines the advantages of electropolishing (no need for power consuming plasma generation) and plasmapolishing (use of non-hazardous chemicals; better reduction of surface roughness, lower processing times). Furthermore, the parameters of the method can be adjusted to specific metals and metal alloys and is therefore suitable for a range of applications from polishing of precious metal surfaces to the defined removal of surface coatings.
  • the method of the invention is suitable for the polishing of structured and complexly shaped metal surfaces, is associated with little loss of material, a short processing time and does not use hazardous chemicals.
  • the method of the invention therefore provides the means to polish metal surfaces without issues of safety or environmental impact and thereby decreases the costs of polishing.
  • the metal surfaces polished with the method of the invention have exceptionally shiny and smooth surfaces compared to surfaces prepared by mechanical polishing.
  • a method for polishing conductive metal surfaces comprises the following steps:
  • the method provided is an electro-chemical polishing method, wherein a conductive metal surface is used as an anode.
  • a second electrode cathode
  • a first electrical voltage is applied between the first and the second electrode either before or after immersion of the anode into the electrolyte.
  • a second electrical voltage is applied between the first and the second electrode without interruption of the flow of an electrical current. Any significant interruption of the flow of an electrical current could negatively affect the outcome of the polishing procedure.
  • the second electrical voltage is below the threshold for the generation of plasma. The generation of plasma at this point prevents the method of the invention to be exercised and it is therefore essential to choose conditions, in particular the second electrical voltage, that prevent the generation of a plasma at this point.
  • a DC voltage between 80 V and 350 V is suitable to exercise the invention.
  • the electric field intensity is higher in the peak areas of the metal surface. This results in a higher removal of material in these areas than in non-peak areas, and thereby creates a smooth surface.
  • chemical compounds such as nitrosyl chloride and chloride are generated from the electrolyte, in particular within the gas phase, which contribute to the polishing process.
  • metal also includes metal alloys, whereby an alloy is in the context of the present specification a mixture of two or more elements in which at least one component is a metal.
  • the method provided is an electro-chemical polishing method, wherein the conductive metal surface is used as an anode and is immersed in the electrolyte.
  • the second electrode (cathode) is immersed in or conductively connected to the electrolyte.
  • a gas phase surrounding the conductive metal surface may be generated by applying the first electrical voltage. Once the gas phase is established the second electrical voltage is applied without interruption of the flow of an electrical current. Any significant interruption of the flow of an electrical current would diminish or even completely remove the gas phase.
  • the second electrical voltage is below the threshold for the generation of plasma. The generation of plasma at this point prevents the method of the invention to be exercised and it is therefore essential to choose conditions, in particular the second electrical voltage, that prevent the generation of a plasma at this point.
  • the electric field intensity is higher in the peak areas of the metal surface. This results in a higher removal of material in these areas than in non-peak areas, and thereby creates a smooth surface.
  • chemical compounds such as nitrosyl chloride and chloride are generated from the electrolyte, in particular within the gas phase, which contribute to the polishing process.
  • the first voltage step precedes the immersion step.
  • the first voltage is essentially the same as the second voltage.
  • 2 to 10 weight percent (wt%), particularly 3 to 8 wt% of the electrolyte is a mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride in aqueous solution. Weight percent given are in relation to the total weight of the electrolyte (including the water in case of aqueous solutions).
  • the treatment time is between 1 second and 1200 seconds, in particular 10 seconds to 600 seconds, more particular 30 seconds to 120 seconds.
  • Treatment time refers to the period of time that the conductive material remains submerged in the electrolyte with the electrical current being applied.
  • the steps c) to f) are repeated at least once.
  • Long treatment times may lead to discolouring or spotting of the treated material. In these cases it is advantageous to increase the number of (shorter) treatments instead of longer treatment times.
  • the mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride used in the electrolyte is characterized by a ratio of the weight of ammonium nitrate to the weight of ammonium chloride between 1:1 to 1:5, in particular 1:3.
  • the mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride used in the electrolyte is characterized by a ratio of ammonium nitrate to ammonium chloride of 1:1. In certain embodiments, the mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride used in the electrolyte is characterized by a ratio of ammonium nitrate to ammonium chloride of 1:3. In certain embodiments, the mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride used in the electrolyte is characterized by a ratio of ammonium nitrate to ammonium chloride of 1:5.
  • a mixture with a ratio of X:Y refers to the relation of the weights of two substances in a mixture, whereby the first substance makes up X parts of the mixture and the second substances makes up Y parts of the mixture and the mixture comprises in total X+Y parts.
  • a mixture of 1:3 refers to 1 part of the first substance and 3 parts of the second substance yielding a mixture with 4 parts.
  • 20g of a 1:3 mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride contain 5g of ammonium nitrate and 15g of ammonium chloride.
  • the conductive metal surface is a precious metal surface, in particular gold and platinum.
  • gold also includes alloys of gold such as coloured gold.
  • Common gold alloys are white gold (gold alloyed with nickel, manganese or palladium), red gold (gold alloyed with copper) and yellow gold (gold alloyed with copper and silver).
  • platinum also includes alloys of platinum.
  • Common platinum alloys comprise in addition to platinum one or more of the following elements; Rhodium, Iridium, Palladium, Ruthenium, Gold, Silver, Copper, Nickel, Cobalt, Tungsten, Titanium or Molybdenum.
  • the conductive metal surface is a surface coating comprising or essentially consisting of titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN) or aluminium chromium nitride (AlCrN).
  • the conductive metal surface is copper or a copper alloy, in particular brass or bronze.
  • copper alloy refers to metal alloys, wherein copper is the principal component.
  • bronze refers to certain copper alloys comprising primarily copper.
  • Non-limiting examples of bronze are the following copper alloys that comprise primarily copper and the indicated element(s): tin bronze (up to 25% tin), aluminium bronze (up to 10% aluminium), lead bronze (up to 26% lead), manganese bronze (up to 12% manganese), silicon bronze (1% to 4% silicon), beryllium bronze (up to 3% beryllium), phosphor bronze (up to 0.5% phosphorus) and red brass (5% tin, 5% zinc and 5% lead).
  • brass is used in its meaning known in the art of metallurgy. It refers to copper alloys comprising mainly copper and zinc.
  • An example of brass is CuZn42, which comprises 58% copper and 42% zinc.
  • the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is dependent on the material of the conductive metal surface.
  • the conductive metal surface is:
  • the conductive metal surface is gold and the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is between 80 V and 150 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 100 V.
  • the conductive metal surface is platinum and the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is between 250 V and 350 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 300 V.
  • the conductive metal surface is titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN) and the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is between 300 V and 340 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 320 V.
  • TiAIN titanium aluminium nitride
  • the conductive metal surface is aluminium chromium nitride
  • the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is between 300 V and 340 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 320 V.
  • the conductive metal surface is conditioned to the same temperature as the electrolyte, prior to contacting the conductive metal surface with the electrolyte.
  • the gas phase surrounding the conductive metal surface is essential for the success of the present invention. Therefore, in case of the first voltage step preceding the immersion step, the speed of lowering the conductive metal surface into the electrolyte is limited in order not to disturb the integrity of the gas phase surrounding the metal surface immersed in the electrolyte.
  • the generation of the gas phase is also dependent on the temperature of the material that is to be treated. By pre-warming the conductive metal surface, the speed of lowering the conductive metal surface into the electrolyte can be increased without disturbing the integrity of the gas phase.
  • the speed of lowering the conductive metal surface into the electrolyte is in the range of 0.5 cm/s to 2 cm/s.
  • the mean profile roughness (R a ) of the conductive metal surface is reduced below 0.03 ⁇ m, in particular below 0.02 ⁇ m, more particular below 0.01 ⁇ m.
  • Methods for measuring R a known in the art include, without being limited to, atomic force microscopy or a profilometry.
  • mean profile roughness refers to a profile roughness parameter.
  • R a is the arithmetic average of absolute roughness values from a raw profile data of a given surface. It therefore provides the average distance of a point on a surface to the average of the heights and recesses of a surface.
  • the pH of the electrolyte is between 4.5 to 7.5, in particular 5.5 to 7, more particular 6 to 6.5, most particular 6.1.
  • the electrical current flowing from the first electrode through the conductive metal surface and the electrolyte to the second electrode by applying the second electrical voltage is between 0.05 A/cm 2 and 2 A/cm 2 , in particular between 0.1 A/cm 2 and 1.5 A/cm 2 .
  • the temperature of the electrolyte is adjusted to a temperature of 40°C to 95°C, in particular to 50°C to 70°C, more particular to 55°C to 65°C.
  • the metal surface is a precious metal surface and the temperature of the electrolyte is adjusted to a temperature of 50°C to 80°C, in particular 50°C to 60°C.
  • the metal surface is a titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN) surface and the temperature of the electrolyte is adjusted to a temperature of 80°C to 95°C.
  • TiAIN titanium aluminium nitride
  • the metal surface is an aluminium chromium nitride surface and the temperature of the electrolyte is adjusted to a temperature of 80°C to 95°C.
  • the electrolyte is circulated throughout the duration of the method to avoid localized changes in electrolyte concentration, in particular in the vicinity of the electrodes.
  • the concentration of the electrolyte is monitored by measuring the conductivity of the electrolyte.
  • concentrated electrolyte solution is added during one of the steps of the method of the invention to maintain a constant electrolyte concentration.
  • the method of the present invention can be used to polish the conductive surface of various metals, metal alloys and conductive surface coatings.
  • the method of the present invention can be used to polish the surface of precious metals such as gold.
  • the treatment of gold surfaces leads to a significant reduction in the roughness of the surface and in consequence to a shiny appearance as exemplified in the following example.
  • the roughness of the gold surface was measured by atomic force microscopy before start of the treatment.
  • the mean profile roughness (R a ) before treatment was 221 nm and the root mean squared roughness (R q ) was 282 nm.
  • Surface roughness was quantified with a scanning probe microscope diCP-II (Veeco) in the "non-contact mode" using a cantilever MPP-11123-10 (Veeco). The surface area measured was 5x5 ⁇ m.
  • An aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3 was used as electrolyte and pre-warmed to a temperature of 58.8°C prior to the procedure.
  • a first electrode was connected to the gold material, being the anode, and a second electrode being conductively connected to the first electrode was immersed in the electrolyte.
  • a voltage of 100 V DC was applied and the anode (gold material) was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte.
  • Upon contact of the gold material with the electrolyte a vapour phase surrounding the gold material was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors.
  • the gold material was fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set at 60 seconds. On the end of the treatment time, power was switched off and the gold material was recovered from the electrolyte and cleaned with water.
  • the mean profile roughness (R a ) of the gold material was reduced to 12 nm and the root mean squared roughness (R q ) was reduced to 14 nm.
  • Surface roughness was quantified with a scanning probe microscope diCP-II (Veeco) in the "non-contact mode" using a cantilever MPP-11123-10 (Veeco). The surface area measured was 5x5 ⁇ m.
  • the electrolyte used was in all examples an aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3.
  • the electrolyte was pre-warmed to the temperature indicated.
  • the voltage and current applied as well as the duration of the treatment is provided in table 1.
  • the electrolyte used for all tested gold alloys was an aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3. The method was performed at different temperatures and the electrolyte was pre-warmed to the according temperature provided in tables 2 and 3.
  • the respective gold alloy material was connected to the first electrode and a voltage between 100 V and 300 V DC was applied with the gold alloy being the anode and the cathode being in contact with the electrolyte.
  • the gold alloy material was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte.
  • a vapour phase surrounding the gold alloy material was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors.
  • the gold alloy material was then fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set as indicated in tables 2 and 3. On the end of the treatment time, power was switched off, the gold alloy material was recovered from the electrolyte, cleaned with water and the polishing effect was graded as indicated in tables 2 and 3.
  • Table 2 Polishing of gold alloys (red gold) Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [+++ polished and shiny; ++ polished; + weakly polished; - not polished 60 300 3 60s - [not suitable] 57 100 18 40 +++ 57 100 16 60 +++ 70 100 9 60 ++ 75 100 9 60 + 76 100 25 5 + Table 3: Polishing of gold alloys (white gold) Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [+++ polished and shiny; ++ polished; + weakly polished; - not polished 57 100 5 30 +++ 57 100 5 4x 30 +++ 56 100 18 30 +++ 57 100 6 300 +++++
  • the platinum material was conductively connected to the first electrode and a voltage between 100 V and 350 V DC was applied with the platinum material being the anode and the cathode (second electrode) being in contact with the electrolyte.
  • the platinum surface was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte and upon contact with the electrolyte a vapour phase surrounding the anode was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors.
  • the platinum material was fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set as indicated in table 4. On the end of the treatment time, power was switched off, the platinum material was recovered from the electrolyte, cleaned with water and the polishing effect was graded as indicated in table 4.
  • the method of the invention can also be used to remove surface coatings, in particular surface coatings of tools.
  • the advantage of the present invention in this context is that the surface coating can be specifically removed without material loss of the tool underneath the coating.
  • TiAIN titanium aluminium nitride
  • AlCrN aluminium chromium nitride
  • the electrolyte used in this experiment for polishing surface coatings of twist drill bits was an aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3. The electrolyte was pre-warmed to the temperature indicated in tables 5 and 6.
  • the twist drill bit was connected to the first electrode and a voltage of 320 V DC was applied with the surface coating of the twist drill bit to be polished being the anode and the cathode (second electrode) being in contact with the electrolyte. The material was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte. Upon contact of the anode with the electrolyte a vapour phase surrounding the twist drill bit was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors. The twist drill bit was fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set as indicated in tables 5 and 6.
  • the method of the invention can be used for deburring edges and spikes from all of the above mentioned materials.
  • the advantage of the present invention is that only a minimal and defined amount of material is removed and the surface topology almost remains, apart from the removed sharp edges and spikes that are artefacts of the production process, intact.
  • the electrolyte used for deburring edges and spikes of a workpiece was an aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3.
  • the electrolyte was pre-warmed to the temperature indicated in table 7.
  • the workpiece was connected to the first electrode and a voltage of 320 V DC was applied with the workpiece being the anode and the cathode (second electrode) being in contact with the electrolyte.
  • the workpiece was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte and upon contact with the electrolyte a vapour phase surrounding the material was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors.
  • the workpiece was fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set as indicated in table 7. On the end of the treatment time, the power was switched off and the workpiece was recovered from the electrolyte and cleaned with water. The efficiency of deburring was graded as shown in table 7.
  • Table 7 Deburring of edges and spikes Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [++ edges and spikes removed entirely; + edges and spikes removed n parts; - not deburred 87 320 0.6 1 - 90 320 0.4 3 - 90 320 1,6 5 + 90 320 1.6 10 + 90 320 1.6 10 ++ 90 320 1.6 10 ++
  • a method for polishing a conductive metal surface comprises the steps of a) providing an electrolyte comprising ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride, b) connecting a first electrode to the conductive metal surface and connecting a second electrode to the electrolyte, wherein said conductive metal surface is the anode. Then, a gas phase surrounding the conductive metal surface is generated.
  • This step comprises in no particular order a first voltage step and an immersion step.
  • the first voltage step comprises applying a first electrical voltage to the first and second electrode, wherein this first electrical voltage is suitable for generating the gas phase.
  • the immersion step comprises contacting the conductive metal surface with the electrolyte. Then, a second electrical voltage is applied and maintained for a period of at least 1 second.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electrical Discharge Machining, Electrochemical Machining, And Combined Machining (AREA)

Description

    Field of the invention
  • The present invention relates to an electrochemical polishing process for conductive metal surfaces.
  • Background of the invention
  • Metal surfaces that have a certain degree of surface roughness tend to appear as dull. Polishing of such surfaces reduces the surface roughness by smoothing microscopic peaks in the metal, thereby creating a smooth surface that does not scatter reflexions and therefore appears shiny.
  • Polishing of metal surfaces is required in various situations ranging from smoothing sharp edges on sheets of steel after cutting, defined removal of surface coatings, polishing pieces of jewellery, reduction of friction and reduction of surface areas to minimize corrosion. These applications all have in common that a smooth and shiny surface is to be achieved, with a defined removal of material. A shiny appearance and a limited, defined removal of material is particularly advantageous in the case of polishing jewellery.
  • Methods for polishing metal surfaces known in the state of the art are mechanical polishing, electropolishing, laser polishing, magneto rheological finishing or plasma polishing.
  • Mechanical polishing is performed with rotating polishing wheels usually made of leather, wood, canvas, felt, paper or wool and the use of a polishing agent. The polishing agent contains a carrier such as oil and an abrasive to perform the polishing, depending on the material to be polished.
  • For electropolishing an electrical current is applied to the object which needs polishing and the object is subsequently immersed in an electrolyte solution. The electrical current in combination with the electrolyte removes tiny amounts of the metal surfaces preferably at areas with microscopic peaks of metal, thereby achieving a smoothing process. The metal surfaces are smooth and shiny as a result of this process. The mean profile roughness (Ra) of metal surfaces can, depending on the Ra of the starting material, be reduced by 50% to around 0.2 µm by electropolishing.
  • Plasma polishing is related to electropolishing, but uses a significantly higher voltage, thereby creating a plasma surrounding the object to be polished, separating it from the electrolyte solution. Plasma polishing commonly uses non-hazardous salt solutions as electrolyte in contrast to electropolishing, where hazardous chemicals such as anorganic acids and/or concentrated salt solutions are commonly used. The mean profile roughness (Ra) of metal surfaces can be reduced by up to 85% to around 0.12 µm by plasma polishing as disclosed in DE10207632 B4 .
  • WO 82/02407 A1 discloses a plasma polishing method for metals that uses two different voltages applied to the metal, wherein the voltages are in the range of 5V to 30V.
  • All of the above mentioned methods of polishing have drawbacks. Mechanical polishing is difficult to use for structured metal surfaces or areas with limited accessibility as is common in pieces of jewellery. In addition, this method of polishing is very time-consuming, especially with structured surfaces, and in consequence costly. Furthermore, the loss of material is higher with mechanical polishing as compared to other methods. The latter is especially disadvantageous if metal surfaces of precious metals are polished or surface coatings are to be removed.
  • Although electropolishing is suitable for polishing structured surfaces and it leads to less loss of material than mechanical polishing, the use of hazardous chemicals increases the cost and environmental impact of this method.
  • Plasma polishing is, like electropolishing, suitable for the polishing of structured surfaces, is associated with little loss of material and does not require hazardous chemicals, but requires the use of significantly higher voltages to create plasma. This increases potential hazards for personnel and requires suitable measures of protection, increasing attendant costs. Furthermore, the use of higher voltages also results in a significant increase in the power required for this method compared to electropolishing or mechanical polishing. This adds to the costs of this method.
  • The problem underlying the present invention is to provide a method for polishing conductive metal surfaces, achieving a low mean profile roughness (Ra) without the need of hazardous chemicals, with low power consumption and a short processing time. This problem is solved by the subject-matter of the independent claims.
  • Description of the invention
  • The inventors surprisingly found that the use of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride in high dilution as electrolyte in an electrolytic polishing procedure with a voltage below the threshold for generation of plasma is suitable for solving the problem underlying the present invention. This novel polishing method combines the advantages of electropolishing (no need for power consuming plasma generation) and plasmapolishing (use of non-hazardous chemicals; better reduction of surface roughness, lower processing times). Furthermore, the parameters of the method can be adjusted to specific metals and metal alloys and is therefore suitable for a range of applications from polishing of precious metal surfaces to the defined removal of surface coatings.
  • The method of the invention is suitable for the polishing of structured and complexly shaped metal surfaces, is associated with little loss of material, a short processing time and does not use hazardous chemicals. The method of the invention therefore provides the means to polish metal surfaces without issues of safety or environmental impact and thereby decreases the costs of polishing. Furthermore, the metal surfaces polished with the method of the invention have exceptionally shiny and smooth surfaces compared to surfaces prepared by mechanical polishing.
  • According to a first aspect of the invention a method for polishing conductive metal surfaces is provided. The method comprises the following steps:
    1. a) providing an electrolyte comprising ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride, wherein the electrolyte is an aqueous solution comprising 1 to 20 weight percent (wt%) of a mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride,
    2. b) connecting a first electrode to said conductive metal surface and connecting a second electrode to said electrolyte, wherein said conductive metal surface is the anode, then
    3. c) applying a first electrical voltage to said first electrode and said second electrode in a first voltage step, then
    4. d) contacting said conductive metal surface with said electrolyte, in an immersion step, then
    5. e) applying without interruption a second electrical voltage, wherein the first voltage is essentially the same as the second voltage, wherein said second electrical voltage is below the threshold for generating a plasma and between 80 V and 350 V, and
    6. f) maintaining said second electrical voltage for a period of at least 1 second.
  • In other words, the method provided is an electro-chemical polishing method, wherein a conductive metal surface is used as an anode. A second electrode (cathode) is immersed in or conductively connected to the electrolyte. A first electrical voltage is applied between the first and the second electrode either before or after immersion of the anode into the electrolyte. A second electrical voltage is applied between the first and the second electrode without interruption of the flow of an electrical current. Any significant interruption of the flow of an electrical current could negatively affect the outcome of the polishing procedure. The second electrical voltage is below the threshold for the generation of plasma. The generation of plasma at this point prevents the method of the invention to be exercised and it is therefore essential to choose conditions, in particular the second electrical voltage, that prevent the generation of a plasma at this point. A DC voltage between 80 V and 350 V is suitable to exercise the invention. The electric field intensity is higher in the peak areas of the metal surface. This results in a higher removal of material in these areas than in non-peak areas, and thereby creates a smooth surface. Without wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors believe that chemical compounds such as nitrosyl chloride and chloride are generated from the electrolyte, in particular within the gas phase, which contribute to the polishing process.
  • In the context of the present specification, the term metal also includes metal alloys, whereby an alloy is in the context of the present specification a mixture of two or more elements in which at least one component is a metal.
  • According to another embodiment of the invention the method for polishing conductive metal surfaces comprises the additional steps of:
    1. a) The conductive metal surface is the anode. The second electrode is the cathode. The cathode is electrically connected to or immersed in the electrolyte.
    2. b) A gas phase surrounding the conductive metal surface is generated comprising the following steps:
      • A first voltage step. This step comprises applying a first electrical DC voltage to the first and the second electrode suitable for the generation of a gas phase followed by an
      • An immersion step. This step comprises contacting the conductive metal surface with the electrolyte.
  • In other words, the method provided is an electro-chemical polishing method, wherein the conductive metal surface is used as an anode and is immersed in the electrolyte. The second electrode (cathode) is immersed in or conductively connected to the electrolyte. A gas phase surrounding the conductive metal surface may be generated by applying the first electrical voltage. Once the gas phase is established the second electrical voltage is applied without interruption of the flow of an electrical current. Any significant interruption of the flow of an electrical current would diminish or even completely remove the gas phase. The second electrical voltage is below the threshold for the generation of plasma. The generation of plasma at this point prevents the method of the invention to be exercised and it is therefore essential to choose conditions, in particular the second electrical voltage, that prevent the generation of a plasma at this point. The electric field intensity is higher in the peak areas of the metal surface. This results in a higher removal of material in these areas than in non-peak areas, and thereby creates a smooth surface. Without wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors believe that chemical compounds such as nitrosyl chloride and chloride are generated from the electrolyte, in particular within the gas phase, which contribute to the polishing process.
  • According to the invention, the first voltage step precedes the immersion step.
  • According to the invention, the first voltage is essentially the same as the second voltage.
  • In certain embodiments, 2 to 10 weight percent (wt%), particularly 3 to 8 wt% of the electrolyte is a mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride in aqueous solution. Weight percent given are in relation to the total weight of the electrolyte (including the water in case of aqueous solutions).
  • In certain embodiments, the treatment time is between 1 second and 1200 seconds, in particular 10 seconds to 600 seconds, more particular 30 seconds to 120 seconds. Treatment time refers to the period of time that the conductive material remains submerged in the electrolyte with the electrical current being applied.
  • In certain embodiments, the steps c) to f) are repeated at least once. Long treatment times (> 300 sec) may lead to discolouring or spotting of the treated material. In these cases it is advantageous to increase the number of (shorter) treatments instead of longer treatment times.
  • In certain embodiments, the mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride used in the electrolyte is characterized by a ratio of the weight of ammonium nitrate to the weight of ammonium chloride between 1:1 to 1:5, in particular 1:3.
  • In certain embodiments, the mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride used in the electrolyte is characterized by a ratio of ammonium nitrate to ammonium chloride of 1:1. In certain embodiments, the mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride used in the electrolyte is characterized by a ratio of ammonium nitrate to ammonium chloride of 1:3. In certain embodiments, the mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride used in the electrolyte is characterized by a ratio of ammonium nitrate to ammonium chloride of 1:5. In the context of the present specification, the term a mixture with a ratio of X:Y refers to the relation of the weights of two substances in a mixture, whereby the first substance makes up X parts of the mixture and the second substances makes up Y parts of the mixture and the mixture comprises in total X+Y parts. In other words, a mixture of 1:3 refers to 1 part of the first substance and 3 parts of the second substance yielding a mixture with 4 parts. For example: 20g of a 1:3 mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride contain 5g of ammonium nitrate and 15g of ammonium chloride.
  • In certain embodiments, the conductive metal surface is a precious metal surface, in particular gold and platinum.
  • In the context of the present specification, the term gold also includes alloys of gold such as coloured gold. Common gold alloys are white gold (gold alloyed with nickel, manganese or palladium), red gold (gold alloyed with copper) and yellow gold (gold alloyed with copper and silver).
  • In the context of the present specification, the term platinum also includes alloys of platinum. Common platinum alloys comprise in addition to platinum one or more of the following elements; Rhodium, Iridium, Palladium, Ruthenium, Gold, Silver, Copper, Nickel, Cobalt, Tungsten, Titanium or Molybdenum.
  • In certain embodiments, the conductive metal surface is a surface coating comprising or essentially consisting of titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN) or aluminium chromium nitride (AlCrN).
  • In certain embodiments, the conductive metal surface is copper or a copper alloy, in particular brass or bronze.
  • In the context of the present specification, the term copper alloy refers to metal alloys, wherein copper is the principal component.
  • In the context of the present specification, the term bronze refers to certain copper alloys comprising primarily copper. Non-limiting examples of bronze are the following copper alloys that comprise primarily copper and the indicated element(s): tin bronze (up to 25% tin), aluminium bronze (up to 10% aluminium), lead bronze (up to 26% lead), manganese bronze (up to 12% manganese), silicon bronze (1% to 4% silicon), beryllium bronze (up to 3% beryllium), phosphor bronze (up to 0.5% phosphorus) and red brass (5% tin, 5% zinc and 5% lead).
  • In the context of the present specification, the term brass is used in its meaning known in the art of metallurgy. It refers to copper alloys comprising mainly copper and zinc. An example of brass is CuZn42, which comprises 58% copper and 42% zinc.
  • In certain embodiments, the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is dependent on the material of the conductive metal surface. In certain embodiments, the conductive metal surface is:
    • gold, and the second electrical voltage is between 80 V and 150 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 100 V,
    • platinum, and the second electrical voltage between 250 V and 350 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 300 V,
    • titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN), and the second electrical voltage is between 270 V and 350 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 320 V, or
    • aluminium chromium nitride (AlCrN), and the second electrical voltage is between 270 V and 350 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 320 V.
  • In certain embodiments, the conductive metal surface is gold and the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is between 80 V and 150 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 100 V.
  • In certain embodiments, the conductive metal surface is platinum and the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is between 250 V and 350 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 300 V.
  • In certain embodiments, the conductive metal surface is titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN) and the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is between 300 V and 340 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 320 V.
  • In certain embodiments, the conductive metal surface is aluminium chromium nitride the second electrical voltage applied to the first and the second electrode is between 300 V and 340 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 320 V.
  • In certain embodiments, the conductive metal surface is conditioned to the same temperature as the electrolyte, prior to contacting the conductive metal surface with the electrolyte. Without wishing to be bound by theory the inventors believe that the gas phase surrounding the conductive metal surface is essential for the success of the present invention. Therefore, in case of the first voltage step preceding the immersion step, the speed of lowering the conductive metal surface into the electrolyte is limited in order not to disturb the integrity of the gas phase surrounding the metal surface immersed in the electrolyte. The generation of the gas phase is also dependent on the temperature of the material that is to be treated. By pre-warming the conductive metal surface, the speed of lowering the conductive metal surface into the electrolyte can be increased without disturbing the integrity of the gas phase. By using a low speed for lowering the conductive metal surface, an uneven loss of material can occur due to differences in treatment time for different parts of the conductive metal surface. Another factor influencing the speed of lowering the conductive metal surface into the electrolyte is the shape of the conductive metal surface.
  • In certain embodiments, the speed of lowering the conductive metal surface into the electrolyte is in the range of 0.5 cm/s to 2 cm/s.
  • In certain embodiments, the mean profile roughness (Ra) of the conductive metal surface is reduced below 0.03 µm, in particular below 0.02 µm, more particular below 0.01 µm. Methods for measuring Ra known in the art include, without being limited to, atomic force microscopy or a profilometry.
  • In the context of the present specification, the term mean profile roughness (Ra) refers to a profile roughness parameter. Ra is the arithmetic average of absolute roughness values from a raw profile data of a given surface. It therefore provides the average distance of a point on a surface to the average of the heights and recesses of a surface.
  • In certain embodiments, the pH of the electrolyte is between 4.5 to 7.5, in particular 5.5 to 7, more particular 6 to 6.5, most particular 6.1.
  • In certain embodiments, the electrical current flowing from the first electrode through the conductive metal surface and the electrolyte to the second electrode by applying the second electrical voltage is between 0.05 A/cm2 and 2 A/cm2, in particular between 0.1 A/cm2 and 1.5 A/cm2.
  • In certain embodiments, the temperature of the electrolyte is adjusted to a temperature of 40°C to 95°C, in particular to 50°C to 70°C, more particular to 55°C to 65°C.
  • In certain embodiments, the metal surface is a precious metal surface and the temperature of the electrolyte is adjusted to a temperature of 50°C to 80°C, in particular 50°C to 60°C.
  • In certain embodiments, the metal surface is a titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN) surface and the temperature of the electrolyte is adjusted to a temperature of 80°C to 95°C.
  • In certain embodiments, the metal surface is an aluminium chromium nitride surface and the temperature of the electrolyte is adjusted to a temperature of 80°C to 95°C.
  • In certain embodiments, the electrolyte is circulated throughout the duration of the method to avoid localized changes in electrolyte concentration, in particular in the vicinity of the electrodes.
  • In certain embodiments, the concentration of the electrolyte is monitored by measuring the conductivity of the electrolyte. In certain embodiments, concentrated electrolyte solution is added during one of the steps of the method of the invention to maintain a constant electrolyte concentration.
  • The invention is further illustrated by the following examples, from which further embodiments and advantages can be drawn. These examples are meant to demonstrate the invention, but not to limit its scope.
  • Examples
  • The method of the present invention can be used to polish the conductive surface of various metals, metal alloys and conductive surface coatings.
  • Polishing of yellow gold surfaces
  • The method of the present invention can be used to polish the surface of precious metals such as gold. The treatment of gold surfaces leads to a significant reduction in the roughness of the surface and in consequence to a shiny appearance as exemplified in the following example.
  • The roughness of the gold surface was measured by atomic force microscopy before start of the treatment. The mean profile roughness (Ra) before treatment was 221 nm and the root mean squared roughness (Rq) was 282 nm. Surface roughness was quantified with a scanning probe microscope diCP-II (Veeco) in the "non-contact mode" using a cantilever MPP-11123-10 (Veeco). The surface area measured was 5x5µm.
  • An aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3 was used as electrolyte and pre-warmed to a temperature of 58.8°C prior to the procedure. A first electrode was connected to the gold material, being the anode, and a second electrode being conductively connected to the first electrode was immersed in the electrolyte. A voltage of 100 V DC was applied and the anode (gold material) was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte. Upon contact of the gold material with the electrolyte a vapour phase surrounding the gold material was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors. The gold material was fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set at 60 seconds. On the end of the treatment time, power was switched off and the gold material was recovered from the electrolyte and cleaned with water.
  • As a result of the polishing method of the present invention the mean profile roughness (Ra) of the gold material was reduced to 12 nm and the root mean squared roughness (Rq) was reduced to 14 nm. Surface roughness was quantified with a scanning probe microscope diCP-II (Veeco) in the "non-contact mode" using a cantilever MPP-11123-10 (Veeco). The surface area measured was 5x5µm.
  • Further conditions suitable for the method of the present invention are provided in table 1. The electrolyte used was in all examples an aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3. The electrolyte was pre-warmed to the temperature indicated. The voltage and current applied as well as the duration of the treatment is provided in table 1. Table 1: Polishing of yellow gold
    Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [+++ polished and shiny; ++ polished; + weakly polished; - not polished]
    85 450 0,6 240 - [plasma visible; not suitable]
    85 300 1,8 240 - [not suitable]
    57 300 4,2 60 - [not suitable]
    72 200 10 120 +
    70 150 13 120 ++
    90 150 4 60 ++
    52,4 100 22 120 +++
    58,8 100 15 60 +++
    62,1 100 33 120 +++
    70,5 100 10 120 +++
    82 100 4 120 +++
  • Polishing of other gold alloy surfaces
  • Further gold alloys have been tested in addition to the above mentioned example for the conductive metal surface being yellow gold. The electrolyte used for all tested gold alloys was an aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3. The method was performed at different temperatures and the electrolyte was pre-warmed to the according temperature provided in tables 2 and 3.
  • The respective gold alloy material was connected to the first electrode and a voltage between 100 V and 300 V DC was applied with the gold alloy being the anode and the cathode being in contact with the electrolyte. The gold alloy material was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte. Upon contact of the gold alloy material with the electrolyte a vapour phase surrounding the gold alloy material was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors. The gold alloy material was then fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set as indicated in tables 2 and 3. On the end of the treatment time, power was switched off, the gold alloy material was recovered from the electrolyte, cleaned with water and the polishing effect was graded as indicated in tables 2 and 3. Table 2: Polishing of gold alloys (red gold)
    Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [+++ polished and shiny; ++ polished; + weakly polished; - not polished
    60 300 3 60s - [not suitable]
    57 100 18 40 +++
    57 100 16 60 +++
    70 100 9 60 ++
    75 100 9 60 +
    76 100 25 5 +
    Table 3: Polishing of gold alloys (white gold)
    Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [+++ polished and shiny; ++ polished; + weakly polished; - not polished
    57 100 5 30 +++
    57 100 5 4x 30 +++
    56 100 18 30 +++
    57 100 6 300 +++
  • Polishing of platinum surfaces
  • In order to verify the suitability of the method of the present invention for polishing of platinum surfaces an aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3 was used. Different temperatures for this method were tested and the electrolyte was pre-warmed to the according temperatures provided in table 4.
  • The platinum material was conductively connected to the first electrode and a voltage between 100 V and 350 V DC was applied with the platinum material being the anode and the cathode (second electrode) being in contact with the electrolyte. The platinum surface was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte and upon contact with the electrolyte a vapour phase surrounding the anode was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors. The platinum material was fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set as indicated in table 4. On the end of the treatment time, power was switched off, the platinum material was recovered from the electrolyte, cleaned with water and the polishing effect was graded as indicated in table 4. Table 4: Polishing of platinum
    Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [+++ polished and shiny; ++ polished; + weakly polished; - not polished
    57 350 3 60 +
    60 300 3 300 +++
    62 300 3 600 +++
    62 300 3 2x600 +++
    58 250 3 300 ++
    59 150 4 60 +
    59 100 6 60 +
  • Removal of surface coatings
  • In addition to the above mentioned materials the method of the invention can also be used to remove surface coatings, in particular surface coatings of tools. The advantage of the present invention in this context is that the surface coating can be specifically removed without material loss of the tool underneath the coating. As a proof of concept two commonly used types of surface coatings, titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN) and aluminium chromium nitride (AlCrN), were removed from twist drill bits.
  • The electrolyte used in this experiment for polishing surface coatings of twist drill bits was an aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3. The electrolyte was pre-warmed to the temperature indicated in tables 5 and 6.
  • The twist drill bit was connected to the first electrode and a voltage of 320 V DC was applied with the surface coating of the twist drill bit to be polished being the anode and the cathode (second electrode) being in contact with the electrolyte. The material was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte. Upon contact of the anode with the electrolyte a vapour phase surrounding the twist drill bit was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors. The twist drill bit was fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set as indicated in tables 5 and 6. On the end of the treatment time, power was switched off, the twist drill bit was recovered from the electrolyte, cleaned with water and the polishing effect was graded as indicated in tables 5 and 6. Table 5: Polishing of surface coatings (TiAlN)
    Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [++ coating removed entirely; + coating removed n parts; - not polished
    87 320 0.6 30 ++
    90 320 0.6 300 ++
    90 320 1.9 600 ++
    90 320 0.6 600 ++
    Table 6: Polishing of surface coatings (AlCrN)
    Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [++ coating removed entirely; + coating removed n parts; - not polished
    87 320 0.6 30 -
    90 320 0.4 30 -
    90 320 0.6 300 -
    90 320 0.6 600 -
    90 320 1.6 30 + 600 +
    90 320 1.6 30 + 600 + 600 ++
  • Deburring of edges and spikes
  • Furthermore, the method of the invention can be used for deburring edges and spikes from all of the above mentioned materials. The advantage of the present invention is that only a minimal and defined amount of material is removed and the surface topology almost remains, apart from the removed sharp edges and spikes that are artefacts of the production process, intact.
  • The electrolyte used for deburring edges and spikes of a workpiece was an aqueous solution with 4 wt% of an ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride mixture with a ratio of 1:3. The electrolyte was pre-warmed to the temperature indicated in table 7.
  • The workpiece was connected to the first electrode and a voltage of 320 V DC was applied with the workpiece being the anode and the cathode (second electrode) being in contact with the electrolyte. The workpiece was lowered into the pre-warmed electrolyte and upon contact with the electrolyte a vapour phase surrounding the material was established without occurrence of plasma in the gas phase. The absence of plasma was visually verified by the inventors. The workpiece was fully submerged in the electrolyte and the duration of treatment was set as indicated in table 7. On the end of the treatment time, the power was switched off and the workpiece was recovered from the electrolyte and cleaned with water. The efficiency of deburring was graded as shown in table 7. Table 7: Deburring of edges and spikes
    Temperature [°C] Voltage [V] Current [A] Duration [s] Result [++ edges and spikes removed entirely; + edges and spikes removed n parts; - not deburred
    87 320 0.6 1 -
    90 320 0.4 3 -
    90 320 1,6 5 +
    90 320 1.6 10 +
    90 320 1.6 10 ++
    90 320 1.6 10 ++
  • Summary
  • A method for polishing a conductive metal surface is provided. The method comprises the steps of a) providing an electrolyte comprising ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride, b) connecting a first electrode to the conductive metal surface and connecting a second electrode to the electrolyte, wherein said conductive metal surface is the anode. Then, a gas phase surrounding the conductive metal surface is generated. This step comprises in no particular order a first voltage step and an immersion step. The first voltage step comprises applying a first electrical voltage to the first and second electrode, wherein this first electrical voltage is suitable for generating the gas phase. The immersion step comprises contacting the conductive metal surface with the electrolyte. Then, a second electrical voltage is applied and maintained for a period of at least 1 second.

Claims (11)

  1. A method for polishing a conductive metal surface comprising the steps of
    a) providing an electrolyte comprising ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride, wherein the electrolyte is an aqueous solution comprising 1 to 20 weight percent (wt%) of a mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride,
    b) connecting a first electrode to said conductive metal surface and connecting a second electrode to said electrolyte, wherein said conductive metal surface is the anode, then
    c) applying a first electrical voltage to said first electrode and said second electrode in a first voltage step, then
    d) contacting said conductive metal surface with said electrolyte, in an immersion step, then
    e) applying without interruption a second electrical voltage, wherein the first voltage is essentially the same as the second voltage, wherein said second electrical voltage is below the threshold for generating a plasma and between 80 V and 350 V, and
    f) maintaining said second electrical voltage for a period of at least 1 second.
  2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the electrolyte comprises 2 to 10 wt% of a mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride.
  3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the electrolyte comprises 3 to 8 wt% of a mixture of ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride.
  4. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride used in the electrolyte is a mixture characterized by a ratio of the weight of ammonium nitrate to the weight of ammonium chloride between 1:1 to 1:5, in particular 1:3.
  5. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the conductive metal surface is selected from:
    - a precious metal surface, in particular selected from gold and platinum, or
    - a surface coating comprising or consisting of titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN) or aluminium chromium nitride (AlCrN), or
    - copper or a copper alloy.
  6. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein said conductive metal surface is:
    - gold, and the second electrical voltage is between 80 V and 150 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 100 V,
    - platinum, and the second electrical voltage is between 250 V and 350 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 300 V,
    - titanium aluminium nitride (TiAIN), and the second electrical voltage is between 270 V and 350 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 320 V, or
    - aluminium chromium nitride (AlCrN), and the second electrical voltage is between 270 V and 350 V, in particular the second electrical voltage is 320 V.
  7. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the electrolyte has a temperature of 40°C to 95°C.
  8. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein a mean profile roughness (Ra) of said conductive metal surfaces is reduced below 0.03 µm, in particular below 0.02 µm, more particular below 0.01 µm.
  9. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein a pH of the electrolyte is between 4.5 to 7.5, particular wherein the pH is 6.1.
  10. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein an electrical current by applying the second electrical voltage is between 0.05 A/cm2 and 2 A/cm2, in particular between 0.1 A/cm2 and 1.5 A/cm2.
  11. The method according to claim 7, wherein the conductive metal surface is conditioned to the temperature of said electrolyte, prior to contacting said conductive metal surface with said electrolyte.
EP17734749.9A 2016-07-25 2017-07-05 Method for polishing conductive metal surfaces Active EP3488030B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP16181110 2016-07-25
PCT/EP2017/066768 WO2018019532A1 (en) 2016-07-25 2017-07-05 Method for polishing conductive metal surfaces

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3488030A1 EP3488030A1 (en) 2019-05-29
EP3488030B1 true EP3488030B1 (en) 2020-12-16

Family

ID=56551223

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17734749.9A Active EP3488030B1 (en) 2016-07-25 2017-07-05 Method for polishing conductive metal surfaces

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3488030B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2018019532A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102021000850B3 (en) 2021-02-18 2022-03-03 AMtopus GmbH & Co. KG Electrolyte and method for plasma polishing precious metals

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE425102B (en) * 1981-01-15 1982-08-30 Blomsterberg Karl Ingemar PROCEDURAL KIT AND BATH FOR ANODIC DEGRADATION OF FORMS OF STEEL OR ALUMINUM ALLOYS
DE69821044T2 (en) * 1997-04-25 2004-06-17 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., Minami-Ashigara Process for producing an aluminum support for lithographic printing plates
US6627064B1 (en) * 2000-10-23 2003-09-30 Unaxis Balzers Aktiengesellschaft Method for removing the hard material coating applied on a hard metal workpiece and a holding device for at least one workpiece
DE10207632B4 (en) 2002-02-22 2006-04-06 Lingath, Klaus, Dipl.-Ing. Process for plasma polishing of articles of metal and metal alloys
CN103946429A (en) * 2011-06-15 2014-07-23 泰坦股份有限公司 Non-cyanide based electro chemical polishing
CN103088399B (en) * 2011-10-31 2016-01-06 通用电气公司 Multi-step electrochemical metal coat removal method
RU2537346C1 (en) * 2013-06-28 2015-01-10 Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Национальный исследовательский технологический университет "МИСиС" Method of electrolite-plasma processing of metal surface

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3488030A1 (en) 2019-05-29
WO2018019532A1 (en) 2018-02-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Hasçalık et al. A comparative study of surface integrity of Ti–6Al–4V alloy machined by EDM and AECG
US8357287B2 (en) Electrolyte solution and electropolishing methods
DE10207632B4 (en) Process for plasma polishing of articles of metal and metal alloys
EP3488030B1 (en) Method for polishing conductive metal surfaces
RU2631575C2 (en) Electrolyte solution and electrochemical methods for surface modification
US11873572B2 (en) Electropolishing method
US20170051428A1 (en) Electrolyte solution and electrochemical surface modification methods
Ramasawmy et al. Investigation of the effect of electrochemical polishing on EDM surfaces
Meng et al. Experimental investigation on simultaneous machining of EDM and ECM with different electrode materials
JP4678612B2 (en) Surface-modified stainless steel and processing method for surface-modified stainless steel
Ruszaj et al. of article:“Abrasive machining process supported by electrochemical dissolution and electrical discharges–state of
JP6219991B2 (en) Electrolyte solution and electrochemical surface modification method
Madhva et al. Electro-Chemical Machining
Vopát et al. Advanced approach of forming cutting edge radii on cemented carbide cutting tools using plasma discharges in electrolyte
JP2762203B2 (en) Chemical remover and method for removing titanium coating film on cemented carbide surface
JP2005255770A (en) Machining coolant and method for machining metallic material
CA3155973A1 (en) Electroplating systems and methods for wear-resistant coatings
JP2003145355A (en) Titanium pipe with insulating resin coating and its manufacturing method
CN112091339A (en) Integrated spiral tool electrode and multi-potential electrolytic milling and grinding method thereof
JPH02250720A (en) Electric corrosive grinding of abrasive

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190225

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20190618

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200706

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602017029630

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1345690

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210317

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210316

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1345690

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20201216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20201216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210316

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210416

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602017029630

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210416

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210917

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602017029630

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20210705

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210731

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210705

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220201

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210416

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210705

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210705

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20170705

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201216