EP3433388A1 - Process and facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore - Google Patents

Process and facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore

Info

Publication number
EP3433388A1
EP3433388A1 EP17715066.1A EP17715066A EP3433388A1 EP 3433388 A1 EP3433388 A1 EP 3433388A1 EP 17715066 A EP17715066 A EP 17715066A EP 3433388 A1 EP3433388 A1 EP 3433388A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gas
reactor
ore
sulfur
recycling
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP17715066.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3433388B1 (en
Inventor
Hannes Storch
Karl-Heinz Daum
Jörg HAMMERSCHMIDT
Stefan BRÄUNER
Alexandros Charitos
Jochen Güntner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Outotec Finland Oy
Original Assignee
Outotec Finland Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Outotec Finland Oy filed Critical Outotec Finland Oy
Priority to RS20201332A priority Critical patent/RS61023B1/en
Publication of EP3433388A1 publication Critical patent/EP3433388A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3433388B1 publication Critical patent/EP3433388B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/02Roasting processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B11/00Obtaining noble metals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B15/00Obtaining copper
    • C22B15/0002Preliminary treatment
    • C22B15/001Preliminary treatment with modification of the copper constituent
    • C22B15/0013Preliminary treatment with modification of the copper constituent by roasting
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B23/00Obtaining nickel or cobalt
    • C22B23/005Preliminary treatment of ores, e.g. by roasting or by the Krupp-Renn process

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a process and a plant for thermal treatment of a sulfur- containing ore in which the ore is calcined at temperatures of between 600 and 1200 °C in the presence of oxygen in a reactor so that between 1 and 90 % by weight of the sulfur contained in the ore is burned to sulfur dioxide and impurities contained are driven off in gaseous form, in which exhaust gas being produced and containing the sulfur dioxide is fed into a gas purification comprising at least one component and/or in which the calcined ore is fed into at least one further process stage.
  • the ore is heated at a temperature of between 600 and 1200 °C, preferably 600 to 900 °C.
  • This operation is also referred to as calcining.
  • sulfur contained in the ore is burned to sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), by which again heat is produced. Therefore, preferably, this process, after ignition with externally fed fuel, can be conducted in an autothermic manner.
  • the energy demand of this process increases with the amounts of impurities in the ore. So the sulfur contained is either no longer capable of allowing an autothermic process control or a very large proportion of the sulfur contained is already consumed during this calcining process, so that into the later melt of the ore more fuel has to be fed from outside.
  • a sulfur-containing ore is fed into an autothermal operated reactor and there it is thermally treated at a temperature of between 600 and 1200 °C, pref- erably 600 and 900 °C, particularly preferably 650 and 750 °C in the presence of oxygen.
  • So 1 to 90 % by weight, preferably 10 to 60 % by weight of the sulfur contained in the ore is burned to sulfur dioxide and impurities contained are driven off in gaseous form.
  • Such a process is referred to as partial calcination.
  • a typical ore is characterized by the following composition:
  • Table 1 typical composition of ore.
  • an exhaust gas from one component of the gas purification and/or an exhaust gas from the further process stage are fed into the reactor as recycling gas.
  • a gas used for cooling before, during and/or after the gas purification and/or a gas used for cooling before, during and/or after a process stage is also possible to use a gas used for cooling before, during and/or after the gas purification and/or a gas used for cooling before, during and/or after a process stage as recycling gas or, in an even more preferred embodiment, to use coils in the reactor for a heat transfer medium.
  • the recycling gas must have a temperature of higher than 100 °C and thus reduce the energy demand for operating in the given temperature range by feeding it into the reactor.
  • the energy demand in the reactor is reduced so that a lower amount of sulfur being contained in the ore has to be burned. So also ores being characterized by lower contents of sulfur can be calcined more easily.
  • the procedure according to the present invention is also preferable, because so the calcined ore is characterized by a higher content of sulfur which in turn can act as an internal energy supplier in downstream processing stages.
  • the reactor is operated in an autothermic manner, i.e. that during steady operation no fuel has to be fed in or the reactor has to be cooled. This considerably reduces the effort in connection with the required equipment, because in this manner no fuel has to be fed into the reactor.
  • the autothermic operation is realized by burning a sufficient amount of sulfur which is also contained in the ore to SO2:
  • the temperature in the reactor is controlled by the amount of oxygen which is fed in, because the amount of sulfur which can be burned depends on the oxygen being available.
  • the driven off impurities contain arsenic and/or antimony in amounts of between 0.1 and 10 % by weight, preferably 0.5 and 5 % by weight, based on the composition of the ore being fed into the reactor.
  • Arsenic and antimony are compounds which in particularly at temperatures of between 650 and 750 °C evaporate and thus can be discharged in gaseous form. At the same time, arse- nic and antimony are highly toxic and thus have to be removed from the ore as early as possible.
  • the ore contains in addition at least 20 % by weight of copper, cobalt, gold and/or nickel, whereby the conduction of the process according to the present invention is particularly cost-effective.
  • the recycling gas has a temperature of between 200 and 500 °C, particularly preferably between 300 and 450 °C, because in this manner as much as possible heat is introduced into the reactor.
  • the temperature of the gas is not so high that the required equipment would be subjected to temperatures which are too high and thus correspondingly would be more cost-intensive to purchase.
  • the recycling gas has a proportion of oxygen of between 3 and 20 % by weight. When the reaction procedure is conducted according to the present invention, then such a proportion of oxygen is sufficient for operating the reactor at the required temperatures in an autothermic manner.
  • a further advantage of the invention is that due to the fact that now a lower amount of sulfur has to be burned for achieving the required temperatures also the amount of oxygen which has to be provided for the reaction is lower. However, by a decrease of the oxygen content it is possible to reliably avoid the formation of arsenic and/or antimony oxides, which cannot be removed from the ore in gaseous state any longer and thus remain in it and reduce the quality thereof.
  • the recycling gas is a mixture of several exhaust gases and/or gases which are used for cooling.
  • a mixture in which the oxygen content is adjusted in a targeted man- ner to the desired temperature in the reactor due to the burning of sulfur is a mixture which is of advantage.
  • the ore is fed into a process stage being designed as a melt and gases from this melt and/or from a downstream cooling are returned back into the reactor as recycling gas or constituent of the recycling gas.
  • the advantage is that the melt is realized at very high temperatures (> 1200 °C) so that also cooling and/or exhaust gases from the melt are characterized by correspondingly high temperatures and a total gas flow which is smaller has to be returned back, since it is already characterized by a very high content of energy.
  • a preferable design of the invention is characterized by a gas purification which comprises a process for producing sulfuric acid from sulfur dioxide being contained in the exhaust gas.
  • a gas purification which comprises a process for producing sulfuric acid from sulfur dioxide being contained in the exhaust gas.
  • Such a process for producing sulfuric acid is, for example, described in DE 10 2005 008109 A1 .
  • Such a process releases relatively much energy, so that it is of advantage to reuse this energy for calcination in the form of the recycling gas.
  • the source of oxygen is air.
  • a gas which is poor in oxygen results, wherein poor in oxygen in the sense of the invention means a proportion of oxygen which is lower than 21 % by volume, preferably lower than 18 % by volume.
  • This gas which is poor in oxygen can then be re- turned back into the reactor as recycling gas or as constituent of the recycling gas, so that here the provision of oxygen is minimized and therefore the risk of forming arsenic and/or antimony oxides is considerably reduced.
  • the gas purification comprises a process for producing sulfuric acid from SO2
  • the SO3 is absorbed with sulfuric acid in at least two stages and that between two adjacent stages the sulfuric acid is guided through a heat exchanger.
  • a recovery process is also described in DE 10 2005 008109 A1 .
  • the heat exchanger uses air or another gas, preferably with an oxygen content of ⁇ 20 % by volume, so that the cooling gas of the heat exchanger is returned back into the reactor as recycling gas or constituent of the recycling gas.
  • the sulfur dioxide is at first reacted to sulfur trioxide and subsequently the sulfur trioxide is absorbed in sulfuric acid.
  • the gas which is poor in oxygen from the heterogeneous reaction of SO2 to SO3 and also the heated air from the at least one heat exchanger between both absorbers in the absorption stage are mixed with air so that a specific oxygen content of between 3 and 20 % by weight is adjusted, whereby the temperature in the reactor can be regulated or controlled by regulating or controlling the amount of sulfur to be burned and thus the additional energy amount through the oxygen content.
  • the invention also comprises a facility with the features of patent claim 13.
  • a plant is designed for conducting a process with the features of patent claims 1 to 12.
  • Such a facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore comprises an autothermal reactor in which the ore is calcined at temperatures of between 600 and 1200 °C, preferably 600 and 900 °C, particularly preferably 650 to 750 °C in the presence of oxygen. Furthermore, such a facility comprises at least one component of a gas purification and/or a further process stage for treating the ore. Furthermore, according to the present invention, the facility comprises a return line from at least one component of the gas purification and/or the further process stage and/or a return line from a cooling within the gas purification and/or a cooling for the further process stage.
  • So heated gas as recycling gas can be returned back into the reactor for calcining, whereby, in addition to the burning of sulfur, the required energy input is reduced.
  • the oxygen content in the calcining reactor can be reduced which decreases the risk of forming oxides which can be removed only with high effort, and, on the other hand, so a lower amount of sulfur has to be burned. Therefore, it is possible to process ore with a sulfur content which is not sufficient for achieving the required temperature at all, or the sulfur content of the calcined ore remains higher so that the ore in downstream process stages can be processed better due to the inherent energy content. It is particularly preferable, when the reactor is designed as a fluidized bed reactor, because such a fluidized bed reactor results in very homogenous conditions throughout the whole fluidized bed.
  • cooling coils are foreseen. This is particular preferred for a fluidized bed reactor wherein the coils at least partly are immersed into the fluidized bed during operation, but it is not restricted to this reactor type. With these cooling coils, instable process conditions as well as start-up and shut down of the plant can be handled.
  • Fig. 1 shows a procedure according to the present invention in a schematic manner.
  • Table 2 composition of the introduced ore.
  • reactor 1 the ore is thermally treated in a so-called calcining process at temperatures of between 550 and 1000 °C, preferably 680 and 720 °C under auto- thermal conditions.
  • sulfur contained in the ore is burned so that SO2 and heat are formed.
  • impurities in particularly arsenic and/or antimony, are evaporated which is an energy consuming process.
  • Exhaust gases consisting of the introduced air, the produced SO2 and gaseous impurities are subsequently drawn off via line 1 1 and are fed into a cyclone 20.
  • the gas purification 22 preferably, comprises a hot filtration and/or a quench, preferably with water, and/or a wet filtration and/or a mercury removal and/or a gas drying, particularly preferably in this arrangement.
  • Exhaust gases which are produced so and/or a gas which is used for cooling of one of the mentioned gas components or between the mentioned gas purification components can then be returned back into the reactor 10 via lines 23, 41 and 40 as recycling gas, wherein this recycling gas has a temperature of higher than 100 °C, preferably 300 to 450 °C.
  • the gas from the gas purification facility 22 or also directly from line 21 is fed into a sulfur trioxide reactor 30 via line 23 for reacting SO2 to SO3 in a heterogeneously catalyzed reaction.
  • the oxygen required for this reaction is introduced via line 31 .
  • lines 22 or 23 also an introduction into lines 22 or 23 would be imaginable.
  • the exhaust gas which is produced and which is oxygen- depleted, since oxygen from air has been used for the reaction of SO2 to SO3 is fed as recycling gas into reactor 10 via line 42 and line 40.
  • the absorption is characterized by a design of at least two stages so that line 35 does not immediately withdraw the end product, but does it fed into a second absorption stage 36 from which then the end product is drawn off via line 37.
  • a heat exchanger 39 is located which also uses a gas, preferably air, as a heat carrier medium. So the air fed via line 38 into the heat exchanger 39 can be heated and it can be fed into recycling line 40 via line 44, 43. Similarly, also the use of a process gas which is poor in oxygen instead of air would be imaginable.
  • gas which is poor in oxygen thus gas with an oxygen content of between 5 and 20 % by weight, preferably 8 to 14 % by weight is drawn off from the sulfur trioxide reactor 30 via line 42.
  • This step of drawing off can also be realized via a chimney (not shown), thus after passing both absorption stages.
  • the oxygen content in lines 43, 40 optionally also by further admixing via line 41 , can be controlled or regulated.
  • a definition of the oxygen content also results in the stoichiometrically possible conversion of sulfur in reactor 10, whereby in this manner also the amount of heat generated by the burning of sulfur and thus finally the temperature in reactor 10 can be controlled.
  • the ore is drawn off from reactor 10 via line 12.
  • the particles and fine dusts separated in cyclone 20 are fed by means of line 24.
  • the ore can be used elsewhere or it can be directly further processed in a cluster of production plants.
  • the ore is fed into a melting furnace 50 via line 51 in which the ore is further purified.
  • Exhaust gases which are produced here and originate either directly from the melting furnace 50 or also from a cooling downstream of the melting furnace 50 (not shown) can be fed into reactor 10 via a recycling gas line 60.
  • stages for further processing the ore are imaginable from which either directly gas and/or cooling gas used in a corresponding cooling can be used as recycling gas or as constituent of the recycling gas.
  • the melting furnace is cooled and via the same recycling gas line in its function as a heat carrier medium also heated gas is returned back into reactor 10.
  • it is also imaginable to mix the recycling gas from recycling gas line 60 independently from its origin with the recycling gas from line 40.
  • reactor 10 is designed as a fluidized bed reactor so that the recycling gas is used completely or partially as fluidization gas.
  • a stationary fluidized bed and also a circulating fluid bed are possible.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Inorganic Compounds Of Heavy Metals (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a process for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore in which the ore is calcined at temperatures of between 600 and 1200 °C in the presence of oxygen in a reactor so that between 1 and 90 % by weight of sulfur contained in the ore is burned to sulfur dioxide and impurities contained are driven off in gaseous form. The exhaust gas being produced and containing the sulfur dioxide is fed into a gas purification comprising at least one component and/or the calcined ore is fed into at least one further process stage. An exhaust gas from the gas purification and/or the process stage and/or a gas used for cooling within the gas purification or for cooling within a further process stage is at least partially returned back into the reactor as recycling gas having a temperature of > 100 °C.

Description

Process and facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore
The invention relates to a process and a plant for thermal treatment of a sulfur- containing ore in which the ore is calcined at temperatures of between 600 and 1200 °C in the presence of oxygen in a reactor so that between 1 and 90 % by weight of the sulfur contained in the ore is burned to sulfur dioxide and impurities contained are driven off in gaseous form, in which exhaust gas being produced and containing the sulfur dioxide is fed into a gas purification comprising at least one component and/or in which the calcined ore is fed into at least one further process stage.
With the increasing demand for raw materials metallic resources, in particularly also copper-, cobalt-, gold- and nickel-containing ores, are exploited more and more. This results in the fact that resources which can be exploited without large effort or which provide highly pure raw materials meanwhile are nearly exhausted. So today exploited resources of ores are characterized by a higher proportion of impurities, in particularly it is known that copper-, cobalt- and/or nickel- containing ores also comprise arsenic and antimony. Before melting the ore, the content of these impurities has to be reduced strongly.
For that, normally, the ore is heated at a temperature of between 600 and 1200 °C, preferably 600 to 900 °C. This operation is also referred to as calcining. By this heating also sulfur contained in the ore is burned to sulfur dioxide (SO2), by which again heat is produced. Therefore, preferably, this process, after ignition with externally fed fuel, can be conducted in an autothermic manner.
Due to the higher amounts of impurities in the ore used and, connected there- with, the requirement of evaporating higher proportions, the energy demand of this process increases with the amounts of impurities in the ore. So the sulfur contained is either no longer capable of allowing an autothermic process control or a very large proportion of the sulfur contained is already consumed during this calcining process, so that into the later melt of the ore more fuel has to be fed from outside.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a process with which the energy demand for the removal of impurities during the calcining step can be reduced.
This object is solved by a process with the features of patent claim 1 .
For that a sulfur-containing ore is fed into an autothermal operated reactor and there it is thermally treated at a temperature of between 600 and 1200 °C, pref- erably 600 and 900 °C, particularly preferably 650 and 750 °C in the presence of oxygen. So 1 to 90 % by weight, preferably 10 to 60 % by weight of the sulfur contained in the ore is burned to sulfur dioxide and impurities contained are driven off in gaseous form. Such a process is referred to as partial calcination. In such a case, a typical ore is characterized by the following composition:
Table 1 : typical composition of ore.
Element Range in % by weight Preferable range in % by weight
Copper 20 - 45 25 - 35
Cobalt 0 - 5 0 - 2
Sulfur 20 - 35 25 - 30
Arsenic 1 - 15 2 - 5
antimony 0 - 2 0.5 - 1
Iron 5 - 25 10 - 20 By the thermal treatment an exhaust gas is produced which contains both, the sulfur dioxide and also gaseous impurities, and which is fed into a gas purification comprising at least one component. In an alternative or in addition, it is possible to feed the calcined ore into at least one further process stage.
For autothermal conditions the energy demand in this process, either an exhaust gas from one component of the gas purification and/or an exhaust gas from the further process stage are fed into the reactor as recycling gas. During unstable process conditions, it is also possible to use a gas used for cooling before, during and/or after the gas purification and/or a gas used for cooling before, during and/or after a process stage as recycling gas or, in an even more preferred embodiment, to use coils in the reactor for a heat transfer medium. But in any case, the recycling gas must have a temperature of higher than 100 °C and thus reduce the energy demand for operating in the given temperature range by feeding it into the reactor.
Using a gas with high inlet temperature, the energy demand in the reactor is reduced so that a lower amount of sulfur being contained in the ore has to be burned. So also ores being characterized by lower contents of sulfur can be calcined more easily. When the ore in deed has a sufficient sulfur demand for the calcination, then the procedure according to the present invention is also preferable, because so the calcined ore is characterized by a higher content of sulfur which in turn can act as an internal energy supplier in downstream processing stages.
However, it is essential that the reactor is operated in an autothermic manner, i.e. that during steady operation no fuel has to be fed in or the reactor has to be cooled. This considerably reduces the effort in connection with the required equipment, because in this manner no fuel has to be fed into the reactor. The autothermic operation is realized by burning a sufficient amount of sulfur which is also contained in the ore to SO2:
S + O2— > S02> ΔΗΚ = - 297.03 kJ.
Preferably, in this case the temperature in the reactor is controlled by the amount of oxygen which is fed in, because the amount of sulfur which can be burned depends on the oxygen being available. Preferably, the driven off impurities contain arsenic and/or antimony in amounts of between 0.1 and 10 % by weight, preferably 0.5 and 5 % by weight, based on the composition of the ore being fed into the reactor. Arsenic and antimony are compounds which in particularly at temperatures of between 650 and 750 °C evaporate and thus can be discharged in gaseous form. At the same time, arse- nic and antimony are highly toxic and thus have to be removed from the ore as early as possible.
Preferably, the ore contains in addition at least 20 % by weight of copper, cobalt, gold and/or nickel, whereby the conduction of the process according to the present invention is particularly cost-effective.
Furthermore, it was shown to be advantageous, when the reactor is operated as a fluid bed reactor. In this case it is particularly favorable, when the recycling gas is fed into the fluid bed as fluidization gas. On the one hand, so the gas amount for the fluid bed is created in advance, and on the other hand, the problem that the reactor is cooled down by cold fluidization air does not exist.
Preferably, the recycling gas has a temperature of between 200 and 500 °C, particularly preferably between 300 and 450 °C, because in this manner as much as possible heat is introduced into the reactor. At the same time, the temperature of the gas is not so high that the required equipment would be subjected to temperatures which are too high and thus correspondingly would be more cost-intensive to purchase. Furthermore, it was shown to be advantageous, when the recycling gas has a proportion of oxygen of between 3 and 20 % by weight. When the reaction procedure is conducted according to the present invention, then such a proportion of oxygen is sufficient for operating the reactor at the required temperatures in an autothermic manner. A further advantage of the invention is that due to the fact that now a lower amount of sulfur has to be burned for achieving the required temperatures also the amount of oxygen which has to be provided for the reaction is lower. However, by a decrease of the oxygen content it is possible to reliably avoid the formation of arsenic and/or antimony oxides, which cannot be removed from the ore in gaseous state any longer and thus remain in it and reduce the quality thereof.
Furthermore, it was shown to be advantageous, when the recycling gas is a mixture of several exhaust gases and/or gases which are used for cooling. In particular a mixture in which the oxygen content is adjusted in a targeted man- ner to the desired temperature in the reactor due to the burning of sulfur is a mixture which is of advantage.
In addition, it was shown to be favorable, when after the reactor the ore is fed into a process stage being designed as a melt and gases from this melt and/or from a downstream cooling are returned back into the reactor as recycling gas or constituent of the recycling gas. In particular, the advantage is that the melt is realized at very high temperatures (> 1200 °C) so that also cooling and/or exhaust gases from the melt are characterized by correspondingly high temperatures and a total gas flow which is smaller has to be returned back, since it is already characterized by a very high content of energy. Here it is also imagina- ble that small amounts of very hot cooling and/or exhaust gases from the melt are fed in before the reactor and there are mixed with fresh air so that the temperature of the gas is not an unnecessary burden for the parts of the plant, but the returned gas flow is smaller and thus the design of the required equipment may be characterized by smaller dimensions.
A preferable design of the invention is characterized by a gas purification which comprises a process for producing sulfuric acid from sulfur dioxide being contained in the exhaust gas. Such a process for producing sulfuric acid is, for example, described in DE 10 2005 008109 A1 . Such a process releases relatively much energy, so that it is of advantage to reuse this energy for calcination in the form of the recycling gas.
Preferably, in such a process under heterogeneous catalysis with addition of air at first SO2 is reacted to SO3. In this case, the source of oxygen is air. Besides SO3, from this reaction also a gas which is poor in oxygen results, wherein poor in oxygen in the sense of the invention means a proportion of oxygen which is lower than 21 % by volume, preferably lower than 18 % by volume. This gas which is poor in oxygen, according to the present invention, can then be re- turned back into the reactor as recycling gas or as constituent of the recycling gas, so that here the provision of oxygen is minimized and therefore the risk of forming arsenic and/or antimony oxides is considerably reduced.
When the gas purification comprises a process for producing sulfuric acid from SO2, then, furthermore, it was shown to be favorable that the SO3 is absorbed with sulfuric acid in at least two stages and that between two adjacent stages the sulfuric acid is guided through a heat exchanger. Such a recovery process is also described in DE 10 2005 008109 A1 . According to the present invention, the heat exchanger uses air or another gas, preferably with an oxygen content of < 20 % by volume, so that the cooling gas of the heat exchanger is returned back into the reactor as recycling gas or constituent of the recycling gas.
According to the present invention, it is particularly preferable, when the sulfur dioxide is at first reacted to sulfur trioxide and subsequently the sulfur trioxide is absorbed in sulfuric acid. In this case, both, the gas which is poor in oxygen from the heterogeneous reaction of SO2 to SO3 and also the heated air from the at least one heat exchanger between both absorbers in the absorption stage are mixed with air so that a specific oxygen content of between 3 and 20 % by weight is adjusted, whereby the temperature in the reactor can be regulated or controlled by regulating or controlling the amount of sulfur to be burned and thus the additional energy amount through the oxygen content.
In addition, it is also imaginable to burn sulfur yet in addition during the produc- tion of sulfuric acid. The heat resulting from this burning can also be used for the partial calcination, either directly in the form of the exhaust gas or indirectly as vapor.
Furthermore, the invention also comprises a facility with the features of patent claim 13. Preferably, such a plant is designed for conducting a process with the features of patent claims 1 to 12.
Such a facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore comprises an autothermal reactor in which the ore is calcined at temperatures of between 600 and 1200 °C, preferably 600 and 900 °C, particularly preferably 650 to 750 °C in the presence of oxygen. Furthermore, such a facility comprises at least one component of a gas purification and/or a further process stage for treating the ore. Furthermore, according to the present invention, the facility comprises a return line from at least one component of the gas purification and/or the further process stage and/or a return line from a cooling within the gas purification and/or a cooling for the further process stage. So heated gas as recycling gas can be returned back into the reactor for calcining, whereby, in addition to the burning of sulfur, the required energy input is reduced. So, on the one hand, the oxygen content in the calcining reactor can be reduced which decreases the risk of forming oxides which can be removed only with high effort, and, on the other hand, so a lower amount of sulfur has to be burned. Therefore, it is possible to process ore with a sulfur content which is not sufficient for achieving the required temperature at all, or the sulfur content of the calcined ore remains higher so that the ore in downstream process stages can be processed better due to the inherent energy content. It is particularly preferable, when the reactor is designed as a fluidized bed reactor, because such a fluidized bed reactor results in very homogenous conditions throughout the whole fluidized bed.
However, in principle, it is also imaginable to conduct the reaction in a rotary kiln or a multiple-hearth furnace.
In a preferred embodiment, cooling coils are foreseen. This is particular preferred for a fluidized bed reactor wherein the coils at least partly are immersed into the fluidized bed during operation, but it is not restricted to this reactor type. With these cooling coils, instable process conditions as well as start-up and shut down of the plant can be handled.
In the following, the invention is explained in more detail by means of a figure. Here, all described and/or depicted features form on its own or in arbitrary com- bination the subject matter of the invention, independently from their summary in the patent claims or their back reference.
Fig. 1 shows a procedure according to the present invention in a schematic manner.
In Fig. 1 via line 1 an ore is introduced into the reactor 10 which has the following composition:
Table 2: composition of the introduced ore.
But similarly the described process is also possible for each ore composition mentioned in table 1 .
In reactor 1 the ore is thermally treated in a so-called calcining process at temperatures of between 550 and 1000 °C, preferably 680 and 720 °C under auto- thermal conditions. Here, on the one hand, sulfur contained in the ore is burned so that SO2 and heat are formed. On the other hand, at the prevailing reaction temperatures impurities, in particularly arsenic and/or antimony, are evaporated which is an energy consuming process. Exhaust gases consisting of the introduced air, the produced SO2 and gaseous impurities are subsequently drawn off via line 1 1 and are fed into a cyclone 20.
In this cyclone 20 the particles entrained by the exhaust gas flow are separated from the gas flow. The so purified gas from which dusts and small particles (< 20 μιτι) have been removed is then fed into a gas purification 22. The gas purification 22, preferably, comprises a hot filtration and/or a quench, preferably with water, and/or a wet filtration and/or a mercury removal and/or a gas drying, particularly preferably in this arrangement. Exhaust gases which are produced so and/or a gas which is used for cooling of one of the mentioned gas components or between the mentioned gas purification components can then be returned back into the reactor 10 via lines 23, 41 and 40 as recycling gas, wherein this recycling gas has a temperature of higher than 100 °C, preferably 300 to 450 °C.
Furthermore, the gas from the gas purification facility 22 or also directly from line 21 is fed into a sulfur trioxide reactor 30 via line 23 for reacting SO2 to SO3 in a heterogeneously catalyzed reaction. The oxygen required for this reaction is introduced via line 31 . Similarly, also an introduction into lines 22 or 23 would be imaginable. The exhaust gas which is produced and which is oxygen- depleted, since oxygen from air has been used for the reaction of SO2 to SO3, is fed as recycling gas into reactor 10 via line 42 and line 40.
Via line 32 the produced SO3 is fed into at least one absorption stage 33. Into this absorption stage 33 via line 34 sulfuric acid is introduced and via line 35 drawn off again. In the sulfuric acid SO3 and H2SO4 form disulfuric acid H2S2O7 which in contact with water decomposes into two molecules of sulfuric acid. This product is drawn off via line 35.
Preferably, as shown, the absorption is characterized by a design of at least two stages so that line 35 does not immediately withdraw the end product, but does it fed into a second absorption stage 36 from which then the end product is drawn off via line 37. In line 35 a heat exchanger 39 is located which also uses a gas, preferably air, as a heat carrier medium. So the air fed via line 38 into the heat exchanger 39 can be heated and it can be fed into recycling line 40 via line 44, 43. Similarly, also the use of a process gas which is poor in oxygen instead of air would be imaginable.
Preferably, gas which is poor in oxygen, thus gas with an oxygen content of between 5 and 20 % by weight, preferably 8 to 14 % by weight is drawn off from the sulfur trioxide reactor 30 via line 42. This step of drawing off can also be realized via a chimney (not shown), thus after passing both absorption stages. By mixing the gases in lines 42 and 44 the oxygen content in lines 43, 40, optionally also by further admixing via line 41 , can be controlled or regulated. A definition of the oxygen content also results in the stoichiometrically possible conversion of sulfur in reactor 10, whereby in this manner also the amount of heat generated by the burning of sulfur and thus finally the temperature in reactor 10 can be controlled.
The ore is drawn off from reactor 10 via line 12. Preferably, into it the particles and fine dusts separated in cyclone 20 are fed by means of line 24. Then, the ore can be used elsewhere or it can be directly further processed in a cluster of production plants.
In an alternative or in addition to the described recycling gas guidance from the gas purification, when the further processing is conducted on-site, it is possible to recover recycling gas also in a downstream ore processing stage. Preferably, in this case, the ore is fed into a melting furnace 50 via line 51 in which the ore is further purified. Exhaust gases which are produced here and originate either directly from the melting furnace 50 or also from a cooling downstream of the melting furnace 50 (not shown) can be fed into reactor 10 via a recycling gas line 60.
Similarly, also other stages for further processing the ore are imaginable from which either directly gas and/or cooling gas used in a corresponding cooling can be used as recycling gas or as constituent of the recycling gas. In the shown process, at the same time, the melting furnace is cooled and via the same recycling gas line in its function as a heat carrier medium also heated gas is returned back into reactor 10. Furthermore, generally, it is also imaginable to mix the recycling gas from recycling gas line 60 independently from its origin with the recycling gas from line 40.
Preferably, reactor 10 is designed as a fluidized bed reactor so that the recycling gas is used completely or partially as fluidization gas. In this case, both, a stationary fluidized bed and also a circulating fluid bed are possible.
List of reference signs
1 line
10 reactor
1 1 , 12 line
20 cyclone
21 line
22 gas purification stage
23 line
30 sulfur trioxide reactor
31 , 32 line
33 absorption stage
34, 35 line
36 absorption stage
37, 38 line
39 heat exchanger
40-44 line
50 melting furnace
51 line
60 line

Claims

Patent claims
1 . A process for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore in which the ore is calcined at temperatures of between 600 and 1200 °C in the presence of oxygen in a reactor so that between 1 and 90 % by weight of the sulfur contained in the ore is burned to sulfur dioxide and impurities contained are driven off in gaseous form, in which exhaust gas being produced and containing the sulfur dioxide is fed into a gas purification comprising at least one component and/or in which the calcined ore is fed into at least one further process stage, characterized in that an exhaust gas from the gas purification and/or the process stage and/or a gas used for cooling within the gas purification or for cooling within a further process stage is at least partially returned back into the reactor as recycling gas having a temperature of > 100 °C and that the reactor is operated in an autothermic manner.
2. The process according to claim 1 , characterized in that the driven off impurities arsenic and/or antimony are contained in amounts of between 1 and 10 % by weight, based on their content in the sulfur-containing ore used, and/or that the ore contains at least 70 % by weight of copper, cobalt, gold and/or nickel.
3. The process according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the oxygen content of the recycling gas is used as command or control variable for controlling or regulating the temperature in the reactor.
4. The process according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the recycling gas is used as fluidization gas in the reactor being designed as a fluid bed reactor or as combustion air in the reactor being designed as a rotary kiln.
5. The process according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the recycling gas has a temperature of between 100 and 600 °C.
6. The process according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the recycling gas has a proportion of oxygen of between 3 and 20 % by weight.
7. The process according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the recycling gas is a mixture of several exhaust gases and/or gases which are used for cooling.
8. The process according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the ore after the reactor is fed into a melt and exhaust gas from this melt and/or a gas from a cooling downstream of it is returned back into the reactor as recycling gas or constituent of the recycling gas.
9. The process according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the gas purification comprises a process for producing sulfuric acid from the sulfur dioxide contained in the exhaust gas and from this process gas is returned back into the reactor as recycling gas or constituent of the recycling gas.
10. The process according to claim 9, characterized in that the SO2 with addition of air is reacted to SO3 and a gas which is poor in oxygen and that the gas which is poor in oxygen is returned back into the reactor as recycling gas or constituent of the recycling gas.
1 1 . The process according to claim 10, characterized in that the SO3 is absorbed with sulfuric acid in at least two stages, that the sulfuric acid between two series-connected stages is guided through at least one heat exchanger, that in this heat exchanger air is used as heat transport medium and that this air is returned back into the reactor as recycling gas or constituent of the recycling gas.
12. The process according to claim 1 1 , characterized in that gas which is poor in oxygen from the reaction of SO2 to SO3 and heated air from the at least one heat exchanging between both absorption stages are mixed such that a specific oxygen content of between 3 and 20 % by weight is adjusted with which the temperature in the reactor is controlled or regulated.
13. A facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore, comprising a reactor (10) in which the ore is calcined at temperatures of between 600 and 1200 °C in the presence of oxygen, so that from sulfur contained in the ore SO2 is formed, further comprising a gas purification (22, 30, 33, 36) comprising at least one component and/or at least one further process stage (50) treating the ore, characterized in that a return line (40, 41 , 42, 43, 60) for an exhaust gas from the gas purification (22, 30, 33, 36) and/or the further process stage (50) into the reactor (10) and/or a return line (40, 44) for gas which is used in a cooling (39) within a gas purification (22, 30, 33, 36) and/or in a cooling within a further process stage (50) into the reactor (10) is provided and that the reactor (10) is an autothermal reactor.
14. The facility according to claim 13, characterized in that the reactor (10) is designed as a fluidized bed reactor.
15. The facility according to claim 13 or 14, characterized in that the reactor (10) features coils for a gaseous or liquid cooling medium.
EP17715066.1A 2016-03-24 2017-03-24 Process and facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore Active EP3433388B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
RS20201332A RS61023B1 (en) 2016-03-24 2017-03-24 Process and facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102016105574.3A DE102016105574A1 (en) 2016-03-24 2016-03-24 Method and device for the thermal treatment of a sulphurous ore
PCT/EP2017/057087 WO2017162857A1 (en) 2016-03-24 2017-03-24 Process and facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3433388A1 true EP3433388A1 (en) 2019-01-30
EP3433388B1 EP3433388B1 (en) 2020-08-19

Family

ID=58464512

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17715066.1A Active EP3433388B1 (en) 2016-03-24 2017-03-24 Process and facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (1) US20190017143A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3433388B1 (en)
CN (1) CN108884514A (en)
CA (1) CA3018017C (en)
CL (1) CL2018002651A1 (en)
DE (1) DE102016105574A1 (en)
EA (1) EA201891921A1 (en)
PL (1) PL3433388T3 (en)
RS (1) RS61023B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2017162857A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
HRP20230238T1 (en) * 2020-06-30 2023-04-14 Aura Technologie Gmbh Method and device for recycling waste containing valuable metals

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1974886A (en) * 1931-12-15 1934-09-25 Ici Ltd Roasting of sulphide ores
US2910348A (en) * 1952-08-18 1959-10-27 Duisburger Kupferhuette Working up of sulfide iron ores
US3351462A (en) * 1965-01-29 1967-11-07 Anaconda Co Electric furnace smelting of copper concentrates
GB1366712A (en) * 1972-02-03 1974-09-11 Simon Eng Dudley Ltd Extraction of metals from ores
DE2515464C2 (en) * 1975-04-09 1977-03-31 Kloeckner Humboldt Deutz Ag METHOD AND DEVICE FOR THE PREVENTION OF SULFIDIC COPPER ORE CONCENTRATES
SE8303184L (en) * 1983-06-06 1984-12-07 Boliden Ab PROCEDURE FOR THE PREPARATION OF COPPER MELT MATERIALS AND SIMILAR MATERIALS CONTAINING HIGH CONTAINERS ARSENIK AND / OR ANTIMON
DE69225993T2 (en) * 1991-04-12 1998-12-10 Metallgesellschaft Ag Process for treating ore with recoverable metal materials, including arsenic-containing components
DE19609284A1 (en) * 1996-03-09 1997-09-11 Metallgesellschaft Ag Treating granular sulphidic ores containing gold and/or silver
US5993514A (en) * 1997-10-24 1999-11-30 Dynatec Corporation Process for upgrading copper sulphide residues containing nickel and iron
DE10260735B4 (en) * 2002-12-23 2005-07-14 Outokumpu Oyj Process and plant for heat treatment of sulfide ores
DE102004009176B4 (en) * 2004-02-25 2006-04-20 Outokumpu Oyj Process for the reduction of copper-containing solids in a fluidized bed
DE102005008109A1 (en) 2005-02-21 2006-08-24 Outokumpu Technology Oy Process and plant for the production of sulfuric acid
DE102008033558A1 (en) * 2008-07-11 2010-01-14 Outotec Oyj Process and plant for the production of calcine products

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2017162857A1 (en) 2017-09-28
CA3018017A1 (en) 2017-09-28
CN108884514A (en) 2018-11-23
DE102016105574A1 (en) 2017-09-28
RS61023B1 (en) 2020-12-31
EA201891921A1 (en) 2019-03-29
EP3433388B1 (en) 2020-08-19
CL2018002651A1 (en) 2018-12-14
US20190017143A1 (en) 2019-01-17
PL3433388T3 (en) 2021-02-22
CA3018017C (en) 2024-04-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2016119720A1 (en) System and method for highly effective chlorination and vanadium extraction from vanadium slag
US20080145290A1 (en) Process And Plant For Producing Sulfuric Acid From Gases Rich In Sulfur Dioxide
US10099939B2 (en) System and method for producing high-purity vanadium pentoxide powder
US9051215B2 (en) Method and device for removing mercury during the production of cement clinker
WO2016119718A1 (en) Vanadium pentoxide purifying system and method
DK2330075T3 (en) METHOD OF PRODUCING SULFURIC ACID
CN104555946A (en) Method for jointly producing sulphuric acid and cement clinker by using sulphur gas to reduce gypsum
US20110236291A1 (en) System for producing silicon with improved resource utilization
CN109110813B (en) Method for preparing multi-valence vanadium oxide by dynamic calcination
JPS6296305A (en) Method and apparatus for manufacturing sulfuric acid
CN107055611A (en) A kind of method of link production vanadic anhydride and vanadium trioxide
CA3018017C (en) Process and facility for thermal treatment of a sulfur-containing ore
US3948639A (en) Process and device for flash smelting sulphide ores and concentrates
JP2005524739A (en) Carbon black pellet drying
CN109502555A (en) The system and technique of calcium sulfate Recovered sulphur and calcium oxide are decomposed in a kind of charcoal sulphur collaboration
US2128107A (en) Process for the conversion of metal sulphides
US3127237A (en) Conversion of potassium sulphate to potassium carbonate
CN108014723A (en) Utilize SO in active coke desulphurizing regeneration gas2The moving bed device and method of Recovered sulphur
US4133865A (en) Process for preparing metallic sulphates
CN1882499B (en) Process for the recovery of sulphur from gaseous streams containing hydrogen sulphide and apparatus for its embodiment
WO2021249628A1 (en) Plant and process for producing sulfuric acid from an off-gas with low sulfur dioxide content
US4437884A (en) Ore roasting with recycle of gases
JPH01308811A (en) Recovery of sulfur from supply gas containing ammonia
CN216808148U (en) Apparatus for the thermal treatment of solid materials
RU2190022C2 (en) Method and device for production of iron by direct reduction

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180920

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200421

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602017021927

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1304008

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200915

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FI

Ref legal event code: FGE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200819

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201120

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201119

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201221

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1304008

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200819

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20201219

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602017021927

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602017021927

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20210324

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210324

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210324

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210331

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211001

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210331

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210324

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20170324

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200819

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: BG

Payment date: 20240321

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: RS

Payment date: 20240315

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20240315

Year of fee payment: 8