EP3390908A1 - Method of cleaning heat transfer surfaces of a powerhouse - Google Patents

Method of cleaning heat transfer surfaces of a powerhouse

Info

Publication number
EP3390908A1
EP3390908A1 EP16874973.7A EP16874973A EP3390908A1 EP 3390908 A1 EP3390908 A1 EP 3390908A1 EP 16874973 A EP16874973 A EP 16874973A EP 3390908 A1 EP3390908 A1 EP 3390908A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
slag
particles
cleaned
blasting
metal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP16874973.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3390908B1 (en
EP3390908A4 (en
Inventor
Hannu LAITOMAA
Juuso LAITOMAA
Janne LAITOMAA
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Clean Steel International Oy
Original Assignee
Clean Steel Pori Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=59055950&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP3390908(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Clean Steel Pori Oy filed Critical Clean Steel Pori Oy
Priority to PL16874973T priority Critical patent/PL3390908T3/en
Publication of EP3390908A1 publication Critical patent/EP3390908A1/en
Publication of EP3390908A4 publication Critical patent/EP3390908A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3390908B1 publication Critical patent/EP3390908B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J3/00Removing solid residues from passages or chambers beyond the fire, e.g. from flues by soot blowers
    • F23J3/02Cleaning furnace tubes; Cleaning flues or chimneys
    • F23J3/023Cleaning furnace tubes; Cleaning flues or chimneys cleaning the fireside of watertubes in boilers
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F28HEAT EXCHANGE IN GENERAL
    • F28GCLEANING OF INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL SURFACES OF HEAT-EXCHANGE OR HEAT-TRANSFER CONDUITS, e.g. WATER TUBES OR BOILERS
    • F28G1/00Non-rotary, e.g. reciprocated, appliances
    • F28G1/16Non-rotary, e.g. reciprocated, appliances using jets of fluid for removing debris
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24CABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C1/00Methods for use of abrasive blasting for producing particular effects; Use of auxiliary equipment in connection with such methods
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24CABRASIVE OR RELATED BLASTING WITH PARTICULATE MATERIAL
    • B24C11/00Selection of abrasive materials or additives for abrasive blasts
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F28HEAT EXCHANGE IN GENERAL
    • F28GCLEANING OF INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL SURFACES OF HEAT-EXCHANGE OR HEAT-TRANSFER CONDUITS, e.g. WATER TUBES OR BOILERS
    • F28G1/00Non-rotary, e.g. reciprocated, appliances
    • F28G1/12Fluid-propelled scrapers, bullets, or like solid bodies
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F28HEAT EXCHANGE IN GENERAL
    • F28GCLEANING OF INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL SURFACES OF HEAT-EXCHANGE OR HEAT-TRANSFER CONDUITS, e.g. WATER TUBES OR BOILERS
    • F28G1/00Non-rotary, e.g. reciprocated, appliances
    • F28G1/16Non-rotary, e.g. reciprocated, appliances using jets of fluid for removing debris
    • F28G1/166Non-rotary, e.g. reciprocated, appliances using jets of fluid for removing debris from external surfaces of heat exchange conduits
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F22STEAM GENERATION
    • F22BMETHODS OF STEAM GENERATION; STEAM BOILERS
    • F22B37/00Component parts or details of steam boilers
    • F22B37/02Component parts or details of steam boilers applicable to more than one kind or type of steam boiler

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method according to the preamble of claim 1 of cleaning the heat-transfer surface which is in connection to the masonry structure of a combustion boiler.
  • the surface is cleaned by blasting solid particles onto it.
  • the present invention also relates to the use according to Claim 15.
  • the heat-transfer surfaces of power plants are typically cleaned by using sandblasting.
  • sand typically screened sand
  • water is used to bind the fines, in order to prevent dusting caused by the sand particles.
  • This wet blasting method has proven to be problematic in several respects.
  • the masonries absorb moisture.
  • the heating phase of the startup stage is extended because the masonries must be "dried". In such cases, it is quite possible that the masonries will fail.
  • various alternatives are described for using sand in the blasting.
  • Such materials include steel grains and steel sand, copper slag, glass beads, metal pellets, dry ice, corundum and even ground coconut shells and corn grains.
  • CN Patent Application Publication No. 102313288 describes a solution in which heat- transfer surfaces are cleaned using smooth-surface particles.
  • the particles described in the publication are metal or non-metal particles or composite particles having a density of 2-8 g/cm 3 .
  • DE Patent Application Publication No. 19723389 describes cleaning of the inner part of the boiler plants where the combustion gases are by using spherical steel particles.
  • JP Patent Application Publication No. 2002098323 describes the use of granulated slag grains to remove, by using blast cleaning, the metal residues which are adhered to the exhaust pipe of an electric furnace.
  • the metal is generated when melting, in an electric furnace, the burning residues which are generated from burning of municipal waste.
  • alkali metal carbonates provide efficient cleaning of surfaces, without formation of dust or damaging the surfaces.
  • Suitable materials mentioned in the publication are in particular natural carbonates, such as calcium carbonate and dolomite. These may be used, for example, to remove paint, foodstuff and drug residues from the inner
  • the heat-transfer surface of the combustion boiler is cleaned by blasting onto it, in water-free conditions, metal slag particles having a particle size of approximately 0.3-3.0 mm, and by using a blasting pressure of 8-12 bar.
  • the present invention also comprises the use of metal slag particles for cleaning of the heat-transfer surface which is in connection to a masonry structure, by using blasting treatment.
  • the method according to the present invention is mainly characterised by what is stated in the preamble of Claim 1.
  • the use according to the present invention is characterised by what is stated in Claim 15.
  • the copper and nickel slag particles are particularly well suited for the cleaning of steel heat-transfer surfaces, because the nickel and copper slag do not comprise significant amounts of ferrite compounds. This, in turn, means that when cleaning steel surfaces with nickel or copper slag, no corrosion problems appear, which is not the case when blasting with metal slags that comprise ferrite compounds, or when blasting with for example steel particles that also comprise ferrite compounds.
  • heat-transfer surfaces of a power plant in dry conditions, are cleaned using a fine fraction of a waste product generated in a metallurgical process.
  • the surface to be cleaned comprises sulphur or silicate-bearing compounds which are generated when burning wood or fossil fuels or mixtures thereof, and possibly ash, coke or slag which comprise organic compounds (such as tar-like compounds).
  • deposits and similar dirt layers which are generated during the combustion process are removed from the metal surfaces without substantially damaging these.
  • the operation is carried out in essentially "water-free
  • the surface to be cleaned is a heat-transfer surface.
  • the method can also be used to clean other surfaces of a power plant boiler structure, which surfaces comprise impurities, including ash, coke and/or slag deposits which are generated from the combustion.
  • the structure to be cleaned is part of a power boiler, such as a heat boiler, or part of a recovery boiler, such as a kiln for reburning lime sludge or a soda recovery unit.
  • a power boiler such as a heat boiler
  • a recovery boiler such as a kiln for reburning lime sludge or a soda recovery unit.
  • the heat-transfer surface may be a metal surface, typically it is a steel surface.
  • the steel may be, for example, a ferritic or an austenitic steel alloy which meets ASTM standards A213 or A213M, respectively. It is also possible to use other types of metal alloys.
  • the surfaces may be of a material other than metal, for example a ceramic.
  • Examples of surfaces to be cleaned are, in particular, the heat-transfer surface which forms part of a heat boiler, such as the eco- and the superheater packages of grate-fired boilers or fluidised bed boilers.
  • the surface to be cleaned especially a metal surface, typically a steel surface, forms at least part of a superheater or at least part of an Economizer or a Luvo unit.
  • the surface to be cleaned is in the vicinity of the masonry or at least partly on top of it.
  • the distance to the nearest masonry i.e. the masonry surface, is at maximum approximately 250 cm, usually at maximum approximately 150 cm, especially at maximum approximately 100 cm, for example at maximum 50 cm.
  • the masonry surface may be in direct contact with the surface to be cleaned.
  • metal slag means the by-product which is generated in the production or cleaning of the metal in question, i.e. in general "material", which typically is primarily silicate- based.
  • the silicate material is, for example, iron silicate, and it comprises, besides the main component, also for example metals which are derived from the metal raw material, and alkaline earth metals, and their compounds, such as oxides, sulphates, sulphides and silicates.
  • metal slag is used which is essentially free of ferritic compounds.
  • metal slag is used, such as nickel or copper slag, the particles of which are non-spherical shaped.
  • the weight of the slag used comprises at least 90 % iron silicate (Fe 2 Si0 4 ) and 1-5 % magnetite (Fe 3 0 4 ).
  • it may comprise Al, Ca, Mg and Cr-oxides and - silicates (approximately 0.5-5 %), and minor amounts, typically less than 1 %, in particular less than 0.5 % of, for example, one or more of the following metals: Ni, Cu, Pb, Sn, Sb, Bi, and Cd.
  • nickel slag is used. This is a waste product which is generated in association with the recovering of nickel.
  • the material used in the blasting is copper slag (copper grit).
  • the particle material of the metal slag used must have, besides a particle size which is suitable for the blasting, also a sufficient hardness and weight. Typically, the hardness of the metal slag particles must be greater than
  • the hardness can be over 8° on the Mohs scale, but usually a hardness of approximately 8° ( ⁇ 0.5°) is sufficient to carry out the cleaning.
  • the particles must have a suitable shape.
  • the value of the bulk density of the particles is in particular greater than 45 %, for example greater than approximately 50 %, or greater than 60 % of the specific gravity of the particles.
  • the bulk density is greater than 1.8 g/cm 3 , especially 1.85 g/cm 3 or greater.
  • the particle size of the slag is within a pre-selected range.
  • the particle size of the metal slag used (that is, the "grain size”) is approximately 0.3-3 mm. This means that the maximum dimension of at least 80 %, especially at least 90 %, usually at least 95 % of the particles is within the range in question.
  • the present particles may be individual particles or agglomerates (granules) which are formed of several particles.
  • the average particle size of the nickel slag is within the range of 0.3-2.5 mm, for example 0.5-2.2 mm. Typically, this means that the maximum dimension of least 90 % of the particles, most suitably at least approximately 95 % (by weight) is within the said range.
  • typically at least 90 %, especially at least 95 %, (by weight) of the copper slag particles have a particle size within the range of 0.4-2.8 mm, for example 0.425-2.5 mm (largest dimension).
  • the particle size typically means the screened particle size (that is, grain-size).
  • the blast nozzle used can be either small or large.
  • the nozzle diameter may be, for example, 0.5-25 mm, usually approximately 1-15 mm, typically approximately 12 mm. These nozzle sizes are particularly suitable for the application described above, in which the metal slag particles have a narrow distribution of particle size.
  • the blasting is carried out by using a blasting pressure of 8-12 bar. More preferably, the pressure used is 9-11 bar. At this pressure, an efficient cleaning of the dirt layers is achieved and, at the same time, damage to the surface is avoided.
  • the consumption of air varies with the nozzle size, but is generally approximately 50-2500 1/min, most suitably approximately 70-1500 1/min, for example approximately 150-1000 1/min.
  • the blasting can be carried out by using a nozzle which is straight, curved or bent at 45 degrees.
  • the shape of the nozzle is selected according to the object to be cleaned.
  • the surface does not corrode as easily as after treatment in which sand is used.
  • the surface is not prone to become dirty.
  • nickel slag forms a chromium oxide compound on the metal surface, which compound protects the metal from corrosion, and which, on the other hand, also slows down the adhesion of new dirt to the metal surface.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Cleaning In General (AREA)
  • Polishing Bodies And Polishing Tools (AREA)
  • Curing Cements, Concrete, And Artificial Stone (AREA)
  • Cleaning By Liquid Or Steam (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)

Abstract

A method of cleaning a heat-transfer surface which is connected to a masonry structure of a combustion boiler, in which method the surface is cleaned by blasting solid particles onto it. According to the present invention, the blasting is carried out at a pressure of 8-12 bar, in essentially water-free conditions, using particles of metal slag, the particle size of which is approximately 0.3-3.0 mm. In particular, nickel or copper slag is used, in which case, in dry conditions, it is possible to remove dirt from the metal surfaces of objects that are difficult to clean, without damaging the surface. At the same time, it is possible to avoid the damaging effect of the water which flows from the surface to be cleaned onto the structures which are in contact with the surface or are near the surface.

Description

Method of cleaning heat transfer surfaces of a powerhouse
The present invention relates to a method according to the preamble of claim 1 of cleaning the heat-transfer surface which is in connection to the masonry structure of a combustion boiler.
In such a method, the surface is cleaned by blasting solid particles onto it. The present invention also relates to the use according to Claim 15.
The heat-transfer surfaces of power plants are typically cleaned by using sandblasting. In this case, sand (typically screened sand) is used in the sandblasting, and water is used to bind the fines, in order to prevent dusting caused by the sand particles. This wet blasting method has proven to be problematic in several respects.
When burning wood or fossil fuels, also sulphur and organic compounds which are derived from the combustion, are generated in the boiler. By providing water to the ashes which remain on the fire surfaces, various acids and weak acids start to form in the boiler.
However, it is not possible to clean the boiler completely with water. Instead, the residual ash remains wet and acidic. The acids and the weak acids begin to corrode the steel.
Moisture can also reach the inner part and the gaps of the masonry, and at same time, cause corrosion.
When damp ash dries, it becomes almost as hard as concrete. Repeated washes with water gradually accumulate more and more hard surface in the pipes, which reduces the efficiency of the heat production and reduces the flow of gases. Removing the hardened ash from inside the eco- and the superheater packages is very difficult and laborious, in some structural solutions even impossible and, as a result, the only possibility may be to replace part of or all of the structure.
It should also be noted that the masonries absorb moisture. The heating phase of the startup stage is extended because the masonries must be "dried". In such cases, it is quite possible that the masonries will fail. In the prior art, various alternatives are described for using sand in the blasting.
Such materials include steel grains and steel sand, copper slag, glass beads, metal pellets, dry ice, corundum and even ground coconut shells and corn grains. CN Patent Application Publication No. 102313288 describes a solution in which heat- transfer surfaces are cleaned using smooth-surface particles. In particular, the particles described in the publication are metal or non-metal particles or composite particles having a density of 2-8 g/cm3. DE Patent Application Publication No. 19723389 describes cleaning of the inner part of the boiler plants where the combustion gases are by using spherical steel particles.
International Application Publication WO 0138815 suggests blast cleaning of the heat- transfer surfaces by using coarse ash which is generated from the incineration of sludge.
JP Patent Application Publication No. 2002098323 describes the use of granulated slag grains to remove, by using blast cleaning, the metal residues which are adhered to the exhaust pipe of an electric furnace. The metal is generated when melting, in an electric furnace, the burning residues which are generated from burning of municipal waste.
Furthermore, the known technology is disclosed in US Patent Specifications Nos.
4 348 340 and 4 666 083.
Also previously known are dry blasting methods. An example of such a method is the solution which is described in the EP Patent Application Publication No. 2 113 339, in which alkali metal carbonates are used for blast cleaning of solid surfaces. According to the publication, alkali metal carbonates provide efficient cleaning of surfaces, without formation of dust or damaging the surfaces. Suitable materials mentioned in the publication are in particular natural carbonates, such as calcium carbonate and dolomite. These may be used, for example, to remove paint, foodstuff and drug residues from the inner
As described above, to date, no solutions have been proposed with which it would be possible to remove stubborn deposits, which are generated at temperatures that are typical for combustion boilers, without damaging the surfaces and without the formation of dust, which is characteristic of sand.
In the present invention, we have unexpectedly discovered that the above objective can be achieved by using, for the blasting, nickel slag or copper grit particles or similar metal slag particles, in essentially dry conditions.
Thus, according to the present invention, the heat-transfer surface of the combustion boiler, especially the heat-transfer surface which is in connection to a masonry structure, is cleaned by blasting onto it, in water-free conditions, metal slag particles having a particle size of approximately 0.3-3.0 mm, and by using a blasting pressure of 8-12 bar.
Thus, the present invention also comprises the use of metal slag particles for cleaning of the heat-transfer surface which is in connection to a masonry structure, by using blasting treatment.
More specifically, the method according to the present invention is mainly characterised by what is stated in the preamble of Claim 1. The use according to the present invention, in turn, is characterised by what is stated in Claim 15.
Considerable advantages are achieved with the present invention. By replacing sand in the blasting cleaning with nickel slag or copper grit particles or similar metal slag particles in dry conditions, it is possible to remove the dirt on the metal surface in objects which are difficult to clean without damaging the surface. At the same time, it is possible to avoid the damaging effect of the water flowing from the surface to be cleaned onto the masonry structures which are in contact with the surface or are near the surface. Furthermore, it has been found that dusting is considerably lower than in sandblasting, even though the operation is carried out in water-free conditions, which contributes to the work performance. The slag particles, which represent the waste fraction, and which otherwise cannot be used in any significant application, form an economically and technically advantageous material which, if needed, can be ground and graded in order to achieve a fraction of a desired fineness.
The copper and nickel slag particles are particularly well suited for the cleaning of steel heat-transfer surfaces, because the nickel and copper slag do not comprise significant amounts of ferrite compounds. This, in turn, means that when cleaning steel surfaces with nickel or copper slag, no corrosion problems appear, which is not the case when blasting with metal slags that comprise ferrite compounds, or when blasting with for example steel particles that also comprise ferrite compounds.
In the following, embodiments will be examined more closely with the aid of the accompanying detailed description.
In the application of the present technology, heat-transfer surfaces of a power plant, in dry conditions, are cleaned using a fine fraction of a waste product generated in a metallurgical process. In one embodiment, especially the heat-transfer surfaces that are connected to the structures of a combustion boiler, in particular the masonry structures of a combustion boiler, are cleaned.
Typically, the surface to be cleaned comprises sulphur or silicate-bearing compounds which are generated when burning wood or fossil fuels or mixtures thereof, and possibly ash, coke or slag which comprise organic compounds (such as tar-like compounds).
Especially, in an embodiment, deposits and similar dirt layers which are generated during the combustion process are removed from the metal surfaces without substantially damaging these. In the present technology, the operation is carried out in essentially "water-free
conditions". In practice, this means that water or aqueous solutions are not fed, either together with or separately from the blasted particles, onto the object to be cleaned.
Typically, no water or aqueous solutions at all are fed. However, if together with the particles, moisture ends up in the object to be cleaned, operating in water-free conditions means that, due to the effect of particle blasting, condensed water does not flow from the surface to be cleaned into the adjacent structure, which, for example, is masonry.
Typically, the surface to be cleaned is a heat-transfer surface. However, the method can also be used to clean other surfaces of a power plant boiler structure, which surfaces comprise impurities, including ash, coke and/or slag deposits which are generated from the combustion.
In one embodiment, the structure to be cleaned is part of a power boiler, such as a heat boiler, or part of a recovery boiler, such as a kiln for reburning lime sludge or a soda recovery unit.
The heat-transfer surface may be a metal surface, typically it is a steel surface. The steel may be, for example, a ferritic or an austenitic steel alloy which meets ASTM standards A213 or A213M, respectively. It is also possible to use other types of metal alloys.
However, the surfaces may be of a material other than metal, for example a ceramic.
Examples of surfaces to be cleaned are, in particular, the heat-transfer surface which forms part of a heat boiler, such as the eco- and the superheater packages of grate-fired boilers or fluidised bed boilers.
In one embodiment, the surface to be cleaned, especially a metal surface, typically a steel surface, forms at least part of a superheater or at least part of an Economizer or a Luvo unit.
Preferably, the surface to be cleaned is in the vicinity of the masonry or at least partly on top of it. Typically, the distance to the nearest masonry, i.e. the masonry surface, is at maximum approximately 250 cm, usually at maximum approximately 150 cm, especially at maximum approximately 100 cm, for example at maximum 50 cm. The masonry surface may be in direct contact with the surface to be cleaned.
It is well known that those parts of the wall structures of boilers that are designed for burning moist fuels, and which parts maintain a temperature suitable for the drying and the pyrolysis phases, should be uncooled. An uncooled surface is achieved, for example, by using masonries. For example, ceramic bricks can be used for the masonry. At the fuel layer points, in turn, the furnace walls are cooled, which can reduce the problems that arise when the fuel burns too quickly at the edges of the grate. Most suitably, the blasting is carried out with metal slag, which is in particle form, in which case the particle size of the metal slag is approximately 0.3-3.0 mm.
Here, "metal slag" means the by-product which is generated in the production or cleaning of the metal in question, i.e. in general "material", which typically is primarily silicate- based. The silicate material is, for example, iron silicate, and it comprises, besides the main component, also for example metals which are derived from the metal raw material, and alkaline earth metals, and their compounds, such as oxides, sulphates, sulphides and silicates. According to a preferred embodiment, metal slag is used which is essentially free of ferritic compounds.
According to a preferred embodiment, metal slag is used, such as nickel or copper slag, the particles of which are non-spherical shaped.
Preferably, the weight of the slag used comprises at least 90 % iron silicate (Fe2Si04) and 1-5 % magnetite (Fe304). In addition, it may comprise Al, Ca, Mg and Cr-oxides and - silicates (approximately 0.5-5 %), and minor amounts, typically less than 1 %, in particular less than 0.5 % of, for example, one or more of the following metals: Ni, Cu, Pb, Sn, Sb, Bi, and Cd. According to a preferred embodiment, nickel slag is used. This is a waste product which is generated in association with the recovering of nickel. In another embodiment, the material used in the blasting is copper slag (copper grit).
Experiments have demonstrated that the particle material of the metal slag used must have, besides a particle size which is suitable for the blasting, also a sufficient hardness and weight. Typically, the hardness of the metal slag particles must be greater than
approximately 6°, most suitably even approximately 8°, on the Mohs scale of hardness, and the density must be greater than approximately 3.0 g/cm3, for example approximately 3.1- 4.2 g/cm3, most suitably approximately 3.3-3.9 g/cm3, or 3.5-3.8 g/cm3. The hardness can be over 8° on the Mohs scale, but usually a hardness of approximately 8° (± 0.5°) is sufficient to carry out the cleaning.
Besides a sufficient specific gravity, the particles must have a suitable shape. Thus, the value of the bulk density of the particles is in particular greater than 45 %, for example greater than approximately 50 %, or greater than 60 % of the specific gravity of the particles. In one embodiment, the bulk density is greater than 1.8 g/cm3, especially 1.85 g/cm3 or greater. When the hardness, shape, and weight of the material used are within the ranges described above, the dirt can be removed from the object to be cleaned. With excessively light or chip-like slag, the result will not be as desired.
In addition, in preferred applications, the particle size of the slag is within a pre-selected range.
Typically, the particle size of the metal slag used (that is, the "grain size") is approximately 0.3-3 mm. This means that the maximum dimension of at least 80 %, especially at least 90 %, usually at least 95 % of the particles is within the range in question.
The present particles may be individual particles or agglomerates (granules) which are formed of several particles.
More preferably, the average particle size of the nickel slag is within the range of 0.3-2.5 mm, for example 0.5-2.2 mm. Typically, this means that the maximum dimension of least 90 % of the particles, most suitably at least approximately 95 % (by weight) is within the said range.
Similarly, more preferably, typically at least 90 %, especially at least 95 %, (by weight) of the copper slag particles have a particle size within the range of 0.4-2.8 mm, for example 0.425-2.5 mm (largest dimension).
In one embodiment, the size of the copper grit particles ("particle size") is 95 % = 0.425- 2.8 mm. That is, 95 % by weight of the particles are, by their size, within said region. Here, the particle size typically means the screened particle size (that is, grain-size).
It has been found that, with a narrow distribution of particle size, in which at least 90 %, especially at least 95 % of the particles (by weight) have the particle size defined above, in particular with regard to the largest dimension, it is possible to maintain a predetermined pressure in the blasting stream, in which case a uniform effect over the surface is obtained. Typically, the pressure range is 8-12 bar, see below. It has been discovered that the nickel and copper slag particles are not spherical, but they have an irregular shape. This also means that, when the blasted nickel or copper slag particles hit the surface, both the surface pressure generated and the interaction between the particles and the surface are different from the case where spherical particles are used. The width of the contact area of individual slag particles varies depending on which part of the particle hits the surface. Thus, by using slag particles, the ash layer remaining on the surface can be loosened more efficiently than with steel balls, without damaging the steel surface.
In the present invention, typically the blast nozzle used can be either small or large. The nozzle diameter may be, for example, 0.5-25 mm, usually approximately 1-15 mm, typically approximately 12 mm. These nozzle sizes are particularly suitable for the application described above, in which the metal slag particles have a narrow distribution of particle size. The blasting is carried out by using a blasting pressure of 8-12 bar. More preferably, the pressure used is 9-11 bar. At this pressure, an efficient cleaning of the dirt layers is achieved and, at the same time, damage to the surface is avoided. The consumption of air varies with the nozzle size, but is generally approximately 50-2500 1/min, most suitably approximately 70-1500 1/min, for example approximately 150-1000 1/min.
The blasting can be carried out by using a nozzle which is straight, curved or bent at 45 degrees. The shape of the nozzle is selected according to the object to be cleaned. In connection with the present invention, we have found that after cleaning carried out using the slag particles described, the surface does not corrode as easily as after treatment in which sand is used. In addition, after the present treatment, the surface is not prone to become dirty. One of the reasons for this seems to be that for example nickel slag forms a chromium oxide compound on the metal surface, which compound protects the metal from corrosion, and which, on the other hand, also slows down the adhesion of new dirt to the metal surface.
Citation List
Patent literature
CN 102313288
DE 19723389
WO 0138815
JP 2002098323
EP 2 113 339
US 4 348 340
US 4 666 083

Claims

Claims:
1. A method of cleaning a heat-transfer surface connected to a masonry structure of a combustion boiler, in which method the surface is cleaned by blasting solid particles onto it, characterised in that the blasting is carried out at a pressure of 8-12 bar, in essentially water-free conditions, using particles of metal slag, the particle size of which is approximately 0.3— 3.0 mm.
2. The method according to Claim 1, characterised in that a metal surface, in particular steel surface, is cleaned.
3. A method according to Claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the heat-transfer surface to be cleaned forms part of the surface of a heat exchanger of a boiler, forms at least part of a superheater or forms at least part of an Economizer or a Luvo unit.
4. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that the surface to be cleaned comprises ash that includes sulphur or organic compounds which are generated when wood or fossil fuels have been burned.
5. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that a metal slag is used, which is essentially free from ferritic compounds.
6. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that a metal slag is used, such as nickel or copper slag, the particles of which are non-spherical shaped.
7. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that a metal slag is used, in particular nickel or copper slag, the particles of which have
- a hardness of greater than 6° on the Mohs scale of hardness, especially greater than 6° and at maximum approximately 8° on the Mohs scale,
- a density of 3.1-4.2 g/cm3, most suitably 3.3-3.9 g/cm3, for example 3.5-3.8 g/cm3, and
- a bulk density which is greater than 1.8 g/cm3, especially 1.85 g/cm3 or greater.
8. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that a nickel slag or copper slag is used, in which case the particle size used is 0.3-2.5 mm in the nickel slag, and 0.425-2.8 mm in the copper slag, respectively.
9. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that the pressure used is 9-11 bar.
10. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that the blasting is carried out using a 12 mm nozzle, which is straight, curved or bent at 45 degrees.
11. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that the structure to be cleaned is part of a power boiler, such as a heat boiler, or part of a recovery boiler, such as a kiln for reburning lime sludge or a soda recovery unit.
12. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that the surface to be cleaned is in the vicinity of the masonry or at least partly on top of it.
13. A method according to any of the preceding claims, characterised in that particles of metal slag are used, which have a narrow distribution of particle size, in order to achieve a uniform effect over the surface to be cleaned, the pressure being 8-12 bar in the stream used in the blasting .
14. The method according to Claim 13, characterised in that the blasting is carried out using a nozzle, the diameter of which is 0.5-25 mm, generally approximately 1-15 mm, especially approximately 12 mm.
15. Use of particles of metal slag, in particular nickel or copper slag particles which are free from ferritic compounds, for cleaning of a structure which is connected to a masonry structure, by using a blasting treatment.
EP16874973.7A 2015-12-18 2016-12-19 Method of cleaning heat transfer surfaces of a powerhouse Active EP3390908B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL16874973T PL3390908T3 (en) 2015-12-18 2016-12-19 Method of cleaning heat transfer surfaces of a powerhouse

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI20155970A FI128181B (en) 2015-12-18 2015-12-18 Method for cleaning heat transfer surfaces in a combustion boiler
PCT/FI2016/050897 WO2017103345A1 (en) 2015-12-18 2016-12-19 Method of cleaning heat transfer surfaces of a powerhouse

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3390908A1 true EP3390908A1 (en) 2018-10-24
EP3390908A4 EP3390908A4 (en) 2019-06-26
EP3390908B1 EP3390908B1 (en) 2021-08-18

Family

ID=59055950

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16874973.7A Active EP3390908B1 (en) 2015-12-18 2016-12-19 Method of cleaning heat transfer surfaces of a powerhouse

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3390908B1 (en)
BR (1) BR112018012229B1 (en)
DK (1) DK3390908T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2898784T3 (en)
FI (1) FI128181B (en)
PL (1) PL3390908T3 (en)
PT (1) PT3390908T (en)
WO (1) WO2017103345A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FI20175844A1 (en) 2017-09-22 2019-03-23 Clean Steel Int Oy Method and apparatus for cleaning internal surfaces of boilers and a boiler comprising such apparatus

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2482872A1 (en) * 1980-05-20 1981-11-27 Gagneraud Francis PRODUCTION OF SPHEROIDAL GRANULES OR BALLS FROM FUSION MINERAL MATERIALS
US4666083A (en) * 1985-11-21 1987-05-19 Fluidyne Corporation Process and apparatus for generating particulate containing fluid jets
EP0663863B1 (en) * 1992-10-08 1997-09-17 CSABAI, Julius Stephen The use of specular hematite as an impact material
DE19723389A1 (en) * 1997-06-04 1998-12-10 Anton Dipl Ing Thes Boiler cleaning process
EP2113339A1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2009-11-04 Omya Development AG Alkaline earth carbonate containing mineral for surface cleaning

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3390908B1 (en) 2021-08-18
EP3390908A4 (en) 2019-06-26
BR112018012229B1 (en) 2022-08-16
FI128181B (en) 2019-11-29
DK3390908T3 (en) 2021-11-22
WO2017103345A1 (en) 2017-06-22
PT3390908T (en) 2021-11-19
BR112018012229A2 (en) 2018-11-27
ES2898784T3 (en) 2022-03-08
FI20155970A (en) 2017-06-19
PL3390908T3 (en) 2022-01-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106367600B (en) A kind of method that high-Zinc and Ferric dust is handled using rotary kiln
US20180208865A1 (en) Low sulfur coal additive for improved furnace operation
KR930011074B1 (en) Method for controlling generation of clinker ash form exhaust gas dust coal
US4616574A (en) Process for treating combustion systems with pressure-hydrated dolomitic lime
CN102899121B (en) Decoking agent
JP5990196B2 (en) A method for operating a furnace using bituminous coal and a method for reducing slag formation thereby
CN110819929A (en) Spraying material for heating surface of boiler tube of garbage incinerator and construction process of spraying material
EP3390908B1 (en) Method of cleaning heat transfer surfaces of a powerhouse
JP5219256B2 (en) Granular additive and method for producing the same
JP3549843B2 (en) Method and apparatus for removing deposits on a fluidized bed
CN106196115A (en) A kind of controlled erosion system and method for cleaning boiler heating surface
JP2013117316A (en) Coal-fired boiler plant
JP2011052916A (en) Method and system for improving combustion efficiency of pulverized coal burning boiler
JP3780951B2 (en) How to prevent dirt on the heat transfer tube surface
CN206073106U (en) A kind of controllable erosion system for cleaning boiler heating surface
JP5560815B2 (en) Clinker adhesion inhibitor and clinker adhesion prevention method
WO2019058031A1 (en) Method and apparatus for cleaning internal surfaces of boilers and a boiler comprising such apparatus
KR100682234B1 (en) The boiler tube of coal fired boiler on which Fe-B-Cr-Ni-Mn-Si-Mo metamorphic alloy was coated by thermal spray process.
CN211644665U (en) Strong brine evaporation system based on direct heat transfer of particle heat carrier
KR101735621B1 (en) Protective structures of guide vane for semi-dry reactor
US5007970A (en) Process for the cleaning of steam generator heating surfaces
Livingston Biomass ash deposition, erosion and corrosion processes.
JPH0118026B2 (en)
CN116273782A (en) Manufacturing process of membrane water-cooled wall high-temperature nano protection layer of pulverized coal boiler
JP2017119587A (en) Extraction device and extraction method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180703

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20190527

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B24C 11/00 20060101ALI20190521BHEP

Ipc: F28G 1/16 20060101ALI20190521BHEP

Ipc: B24C 1/00 20060101ALI20190521BHEP

Ipc: F23J 3/02 20060101AFI20190521BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20200702

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRCL

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210303

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CLEAN STEEL INTERNATIONAL OY

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016062541

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1421969

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210915

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FI

Ref legal event code: FGE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Ref document number: 3390908

Country of ref document: PT

Date of ref document: 20211119

Kind code of ref document: T

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20211115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20211116

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211118

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211118

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: T3

Ref document number: E 38900

Country of ref document: SK

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211119

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2898784

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20220308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016062541

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220519

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211219

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: UEP

Ref document number: 1421969

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210818

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20161219

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Payment date: 20231218

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20231218

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231228

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231222

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20231212

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20231227

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20231218

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20231221

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20231219

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240129

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210818

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240101

Year of fee payment: 8