EP3390599B1 - Structured liquid detergent composition - Google Patents

Structured liquid detergent composition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3390599B1
EP3390599B1 EP16810388.5A EP16810388A EP3390599B1 EP 3390599 B1 EP3390599 B1 EP 3390599B1 EP 16810388 A EP16810388 A EP 16810388A EP 3390599 B1 EP3390599 B1 EP 3390599B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
detergent composition
acid
alkyl
composition according
builder
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP16810388.5A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3390599A1 (en
Inventor
John O'donnell
Brendon REIDY
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Henkel AG and Co KGaA
Original Assignee
Henkel AG and Co KGaA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Henkel AG and Co KGaA filed Critical Henkel AG and Co KGaA
Publication of EP3390599A1 publication Critical patent/EP3390599A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3390599B1 publication Critical patent/EP3390599B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0008Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties aqueous liquid non soap compositions
    • C11D17/0026Structured liquid compositions, e.g. liquid crystalline phases or network containing non-Newtonian phase
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • C11D1/12Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof
    • C11D1/29Sulfates of polyoxyalkylene ethers
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/83Mixtures of non-ionic with anionic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/04Water-soluble compounds
    • C11D3/10Carbonates ; Bicarbonates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/20Organic compounds containing oxygen
    • C11D3/2075Carboxylic acids-salts thereof
    • C11D3/2086Hydroxy carboxylic acids-salts thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/26Organic compounds containing nitrogen
    • C11D3/33Amino carboxylic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • C11D1/12Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof
    • C11D1/22Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof derived from aromatic compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/72Ethers of polyoxyalkylene glycols
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D2111/00Cleaning compositions characterised by the objects to be cleaned; Cleaning compositions characterised by non-standard cleaning or washing processes
    • C11D2111/10Objects to be cleaned
    • C11D2111/12Soft surfaces, e.g. textile

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an aqueous, phosphate-free, structured liquid detergent composition, in particular a heavy duty liquid detergent (HDL) that comprises a surfactant system comprising an alkyl ether sulfate, a builder system and water, wherein the detergent composition has a viscosity of between 1.000 and 10.000 mPas and is free of stabilizing and rheology modifying acrylate-containing polymers.
  • HDL heavy duty liquid detergent
  • the invention further relates to methods for washing of textiles using the detergents of the invention.
  • Liquid detergent compositions are well-known in the art and widely used. Over recent years, the have become more and more popular with the consumers because they offer a number of advantages over solid compositions, including, for example, the ease of dosing, dispensing and dissolving into a laundering liquor. In addition, they are perceived to be safer and less harsh to the textiles and environment compared to solid compositions. In particular for laundering colored fabrics they have gained popularity ever since their introduction on the market.
  • Aqueous, structured liquid detergent compositions for laundering fabrics not according to the invention are known from the following documents of the prior art: EP 0530708 A2 and EP 2770044 A1 .
  • liquid detergent compositions in particular phosphate-free heavy duty liquid (HDL) detergents suffer from physical and chemical instability, such as phase separation, sedimentation, degradation of components and the like, and viscosity problems. This is particularly problematic for highly concentrated formulations.
  • HDL detergents have been introduced as early as the 1970's, the known stable formulations rely on the use of phosphates, in particular sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP), to form structured liquids containing high levels of builders and surfactants.
  • STPP sodium tripolyphosphate
  • multilayered vesicles are formed that stabilize the formulation and prevent precipitation of the anionic surfactants by the builder components.
  • STPP was particularly suited to formation of vesicles with sodium alkylbenzene sulfonate (sodium LAS).
  • STPP was well established as a builder in detergent powders and acts as a chelating agent, inhibits soil re-deposition during the wash and boosts overall detergency.
  • the result of the use of STPP was the development of high performance and low cost HDL.
  • environmental concerns over the use of phosphates, including STPP, in laundry detergents have resulted in phosphate use being banned in some countries and a negative public image in most developed markets.
  • phosphate-free, structured HDL detergents that overcome at least some of the known issues. Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to meet this need by providing an aqueous, phosphate-free, structured liquid detergent composition, in particular a HDL detergent that exhibits the desired stability and viscosity.
  • this object can be met by a composition that is free of known stabilizing and rheology modifying polymers and comprises a specific surfactant system, builder system and water. It has been demonstrated that such a detergent is stable over a period of 90 days at a temperature of 10-40Ā°C, >12 months when stored between 15Ā° and 30Ā°C. Low temperature stability, for example at about 5Ā°C, can be improved by modifying the system to include a nonionic surfactant.
  • the present invention therefore relates to an aqueous, structured liquid detergent composition
  • a surfactant system a builder system and water, as defined by claim 1.
  • the invention relates to methods for cleaning textiles, wherein a washing liquor containing the liquid detergent composition of the present invention contacts the textile in at least one method step.
  • At least one relates to one or more, i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or more. If used in combination with a compound, the term does not relate to the absolute number of molecules but rather to the number of different types of said compound. "At least one alkyl ether sulfateā€ thus means that at least one type but that also 2 or more different alkyl ether sulfate types can be present.
  • Free of means that the referenced composition does not contain more than 0.5 wt.%, preferably no more than 0.1 wt.%, more preferably no more than 0.05 wt.% of said component relative to the total weight of the composition. Most preferably, said component is not contained at all.
  • the detergent compositions of the present invention can be used as detergents for textiles, carpets or natural fibers.
  • the detergents disclosed herein are heavy duty liquid (HDL) detergents.
  • the present invention is based on the inventors' surprising finding, that by use of a surfactant system comprising at least one alkyl ether sulfate in a certain amount structured liquid detergent compositions may be formed that have the desired viscosity and stability without the need for stabilizing or rheology modifying polymers.
  • Structured liquids are widely used in the field of detergents. They can either be internally structured by one or more of the primary ingredients, such as the surfactants, and/or by using secondary additives, such as certain salts, polymers and/or silicates. Structuring is used to endow the composition with properties such as a turbid appearance or certain flow properties. Such structured liquids may also contain suspended solids. While structured liquids provide more formulation flexibility compared to isotropic liquids, they often suffer from stability and viscosity problems. The presently disclosed formulations, however, overcome these stability and viscosity problems and provide for compositions that have the desired viscosities while at the same time showing good stability.
  • the liquid detergent compositions of the invention are internally structured in that the surfactant system leads to formation of multilayered vesicles.
  • Structured as used herein, therefore means that the compositions are preferably internally structured by formation of multilayered vesicles.
  • Multilayered vesicles preferably relates to essentially spherical vesicles that have a multilayered, typically double-layered, shell formed of molecules comprising hydrophobic moieties, with said hydrophobic moieties arranged such that they face each other while the more hydrophilic parts of the molecules face outwards. Said shell can form a vesicle lumen.
  • the detergent compositions of the current invention comprise sodium lauryl ether sulfate with 2 EO, as it is advantageous for achieving the desired viscosity ranges.
  • the level of ethoxylation is an average value and can, for a specific compound, be an integer or fractional number.
  • the sodium lauryl ether sulfate with 2 EO is contained in the compositions of the invention in an amount of 3.2 to 7.0 wt.% relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably 4.0 to 7.0 wt.%, more preferably 4.5 to 7.0 wt.%, most preferably 5.0 to 6.0 wt.%.
  • the surfactant system further comprises at least one additional anionic surfactant, preferably an alkyl benzene sulfonate.
  • Exemplary alkyl benzene sulfonates include, but are not limited to linear and branched alkyl benzene sulfonates, preferably linear alkyl benzene sulfonates.
  • Exemplary compounds are those of formula (III) wherein R' and R" are independently H or alkyl and combined comprise 9 to 19, preferably 9 to 15 and more preferably 9 to 13 carbon atoms. Particularly preferred are dodecyl and tridecyl benzene sulfonates, in particular the sodium salts thereof.
  • Preferred contents range from 6.8 to 19.0 wt.%, preferably 9.0 to 17.0 wt.%, more preferably 10.0 to 15.0 wt.% relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • compositions of the invention may further comprise one or more nonionic surfactants.
  • Preferred nonionic surfactants are those of formula (IV) R 2 -O-(AO) m -H (IV), wherein R 2 represents a linear or branched substituted or unsubstituted alkyl moiety, AO represents an ethylene oxide (EO) or propylene oxide (PO) group and m is an integer from 1 to 50.
  • R 2 preferably represents a linear or branched, substituted or unsubstited alkyl group, preferably a linear, unsubstituted alkyl group, particularly preferred a fatty alcohol group.
  • R 2 are selected from decyl, undecyl, dodecyl, tridecyl, tetradecyl, pentadecyl, hexadecyl, heptadecyl, octadecyl, nonadecyl, eicosyl groups and combinations thereof, wherein those groups with an even number of carbon atoms are preferred.
  • Particularly preferred are R 2 groups derived from C 12 -C 18 fatty alcohols, such as coconut oil alcohol, tallow oil alcohol, lauryl, myristyl, cetyl or stearyl alcohol or from C 10 -C 20 oxoalcohols.
  • AO represents an ethyleneoxide (EO) or propyleneoxide (PO) group, preferably an ethyleneoxide group.
  • the index m represents an integer from 1 to 50, preferably from 1 to 20 and more preferably from 1 to 6. Particularly preferably, m is 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, most preferably 3-5, as higher degrees of ethoxylation may negatively influence viscosity and stability.
  • nonionic alkyl ethers may be contained in the formulation in amounts of 0.0 to 10 wt.%, preferably 0.5 to 8.0 wt.%, more preferably 2.0 to 6.0 wt.%. It has been found that the addition of such nonionic alkyl ether surfactants positively influences physical stability of the composition at low temperatures, i.e. temperatures around or below 10Ā°C, particularly below 4Ā°C, in that they prevent formation of solid particles or crystals in the liquid composition.
  • the detergents may further include other nonionic surfactants, such as alkyl glucosides of the general formula RO(G) x , where R is a primary linear or 2-methyl-branched aliphatic radical containing 8 to 22 and preferably 12 to 18 carbon atoms and G stands for a glucose unit.
  • R is a primary linear or 2-methyl-branched aliphatic radical containing 8 to 22 and preferably 12 to 18 carbon atoms and G stands for a glucose unit.
  • the degree of oligomerization x which indicates the distribution of monoglucosides and oligoglucosides, is a number of 1 to 10 and preferably a number of 1.2 to 1.4. However, in preferred embodiments, the compositions do not include such alkyl glucosides.
  • the surfactant system therefore comprises at least two anionic surfactants, namely the at least one alkyl ether sulfate and preferably at least one alkyl benzene sulfonate, and optionally at least one alkyl ether.
  • compositions may preferably comprise 15.0 to 20.0 wt.% of the surfactant system.
  • Said surfactant system preferably comprise 9.0 to 17.0 wt.%, more preferably 10.0 to 15.0 wt.% of a linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, preferably dodecyl or tridecyl benzene sulfonate, and (3) 0.0 to 10 wt.%, preferably 0.5 to 8.0 wt.%, more preferably 2.0 to 6.0 wt.% C 12-18 alkyl ethers with 1-6 EO, preferably C 12-14 alkyl ethers having 1-5 EO, most preferably lauryl ether with 5 EO. All afore-mentioned percentages relate to the total weight of the composition. To avoid formation of solid particles at low temperatures, as described above, it may be advantageous to include the above-described alkyl ethers.
  • the compositions of the invention have a conductivity of ā‡ 15mS, preferably ā‡ 11 mS, more preferably ā‡ 10 mS.
  • Conductivity can, for example, be measured by using an Oakton CON700 Conductivity meter, preferably standardized using a 12.88 milli-Siemens reference standard. Conductivity measurements can be carried out according to the EN ISO 7888:1985 standard. It has been found that compositions having a low conductivity are more stable and less prone to a viscosity decrease over extended periods of storage. Accordingly, ā€œstableā€ or ā€œstabilityā€ in the sense of the present invention refers to the property of a detergent composition to substantially maintain its viscosity, i.e. a viscosity decrease of no more than 10%, over extended periods of storage, for example more than 60 days at temperatures of about 20Ā°C. In addition, said term means that the composition remains homogeneous, i.e. without any visible phase separation over the same period.
  • said stability can be achieved without the presence of any stabilizing or rheology modifying (thickening) polymers.
  • said polymers adversely affect stability of the liquid compositions disclosed herein in that such compositions are much more susceptible to loss of viscosity over extended periods of storage.
  • Said polymers include all polymers known and used for said purposes in the art, in particular polyacrylates and polyacrylic acids as well as all homo- and copolymers including monomeric units derived from acrylates and/or acrylic acid.
  • acrylates or "acrylic acidā€ and derivatives thereof, said terms include ā€œmethacrylatesā€ and ā€œmethacrylic acidā€ as well as the various acrylic acid esters known in the art, such as methyl(meth)acrylate, ethyl(meth)acrylate, etc..
  • compositions of the invention further comprise a builder system as defined in claim 1.
  • the builder system is a phosphate-free builder system, as the composition is free of phosphates.
  • the composition may comprise phosphonates. Accordingly, the term "phosphate-freeā€, as used herein does not refer to phosphonates.
  • the compositions are phosphate- and phosphonate-free.
  • the phosphonates are preferably hydroxyalkane and/or amino alkane phosphonates, such as 1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonate (HEDP), ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonate (EDTMP), diethylenetriamine pentamethylene phosphonate (DTPMP), and lysine tetramethylene phosphonate (LTMP).
  • HEDP 1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonate
  • ETMP ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonate
  • DTPMP diethylenetriamine pentamethylene phosphonate
  • LTMP lysine tetramethylene phosphonate
  • phosphonates are used in amounts of 0.1 to 10.0 wt.%, preferably 0.5 to 8.0 Gew.-%, more preferably 0.1 to 1.5 wt.%.
  • the total phosphorus content of the detergents is preferably less than 0.5% by weight.
  • Suitable builders include, without limitation, inorganic builders, such as silicates, aluminosilicates (particularly zeolite), and carbonates, as well as organic builders, such as organic di- and polycarboxylic acids, aminocarboxylic acids and combinations thereof.
  • inorganic builders such as silicates, aluminosilicates (particularly zeolite), and carbonates
  • organic builders such as organic di- and polycarboxylic acids, aminocarboxylic acids and combinations thereof.
  • Preferred in the liquid compositions of the invention are carbonates, di- and polycarboxylic acids and aminocarboxylic acids.
  • alkali metal hydroxides in particular sodium hydroxide, but these are, besides their use for pH control, not preferred.
  • Suitable carbonates include alkali metal carbonates, hydrogen carbonates and sesquicarbonates, with alkali metal carbonates, in particular sodium carbonate being preferred.
  • inorganic builders in particular water-soluble inorganic builders, preferably carbonates, are used in amounts of up to 5 wt.% relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • carbonate preferably sodium carbonate
  • carbonate is used in amounts of 1.0 to 5.0 wt.%, preferably 2.0 to 4.0 wt.%. It has been found that amounts higher than 5 wt.% adversely affect the stability of the composition.
  • Suitable organic builders include polycarboxylic acids which can be used as free acids or in form of their salts, including, but not limited to, citric acid, adipic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, malic acid, tartric acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, and sugar acids.
  • the free acids can also be used for pH control.
  • Preferred are citric acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid and gluconic acid, and combinations thereof.
  • citric acid and their salts i.e. citrates.
  • the polycarboxylic acids in particular citric acid/citrate, are contained in the compositions of the invention in amounts of 3.5 to 25.0 wt.%, preferably 4.0 to 10.0 wt.%.
  • the compositions preferably also include aminocarboxylic acids or salts thereof, i.e. aminocarboxylates.
  • the aminocarboxylic acids/aminocarboxylates are selected from the group consisting of L-glutamic acid N,N-diacetic acid (GLDA), methyl glycine diacetic acid (MGDA), imino disuccinic acid (IDS), ethylenediamine N,N'-disuccinic acid (EDDS), diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), beta-alanine N,N-diacetic acid, hydroxyethylenediamine triacetic acid (HEDTA), and alkali metal salts thereof as well as combinations of any one of more of the afore-mentioned, preferably GLDA tetrasodium salt.
  • GLDA L-glutamic acid N,N-diacetic acid
  • MGDA methyl glycine diacetic acid
  • IDS imino disuccinic
  • the aminocarboxylates are preferably used in amounts of 0.5 to 5.0 wt.%, preferably 1.0 to 4.0 wt.%.
  • the detergent compositions comprise a builder system comprising relative to the total weight of the composition:
  • compositions include polymeric polycarboxylates, polyacetals, dextrins and others. It is however preferred that the compositions are free of these other types of organic builders. It is particularly preferred that the compositions are free of polymeric organic builders, in particular (meth)acrylate-containing builders.
  • the builder system is comprised in the compositions in an amount of 5.0 to 25.0 wt.%, preferably 10.0 to 15.0 wt.%.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention are aqueous liquid compositions and as such comprise 50.0 to 85 wt.% water, preferably 65.0 to 75.0 wt.%.
  • the pH value of the detergents according to the invention is generally in the range of from 7 to 12, preferably in the range from 7 to 10.5. Relatively high pH values, for example above 9, may be adjusted by the use of small quantities of sodium hydroxide or alkaline salts, such as sodium carbonate.
  • the liquid detergents are typically opaque, are flowable, and may be poured under the sole effect of gravity without any need for other shear forces to be applied.
  • Their viscosity is generally greater than 1,000 mPas (Brookfield viscosimeter, spindle 3, 12 rpm, 25Ā° C), namely in the range of between 1,000 and 10,000 mPas, preferably between 2,000 and 6,000 mPas.
  • the detergents may commonly contain at least one, preferably two or more other substances selected from the group consisting of soaps, pH adjusting agents, perfumes, fluorescing agents (optical brighteners), dyes, colorants, antimicrobial active substances, germicides, fungicides, antioxidants, preservatives, and softening compounds.
  • ingredients include silicone oils, anti-redeposition agents, anti-greying agents, shrinkage preventers, wrinkle protection agents, dye transfer inhibitors, corrosion inhibitors, antistatic agents, bittering agents, ironing adjuvants, proofing and impregnation agents, swelling and anti-slip agents, complexing agents and UV absorbers.
  • bleaching agents may be bleaching agents, bleach activators, bleach catalysts, and enzymes, however, in various embodiments, the compositions are free of those.
  • the detergent compositions further comprise relative to their total weight 0.25 to 15 wt.%, preferably 0.5 to 12.5 wt.%, more preferably 1.0 to 10.0 wt.%, even more preferably 1.5 to 7.5 wt.% and most preferably 2.0 to 6.0 wt.% soaps.
  • ingredients that are commonly used include colorants, perfumes and optical brighteners, as well as pH adjusting agents. All of these ingredients are well-known in the art and readily available.
  • the present invention further relates to methods for cleaning textiles, wherein a washing liquor containing the liquid detergent composition of the present invention contacts the textile in at least one method step.
  • the methods are preferably carried out in an automatic washing machine.
  • Methods for cleaning of textiles are generally characterized by the fact that in several different process steps various cleaning-active substances are applied to the textiles and after the contact time said cleaning-active substances are washed off, or that the textiles are treated in any other way with a detergent or a solution of said substance.
  • Microscopy was carried out using a Nikon Eclipse Ci-L optical microscope with polarizing light filter. A sample was placed on a glass slide and spread to a thin layer and observed under 40X magnification.
  • MinitabĀ® statistical software was used to design a set of experiments to identify the optimum formula in terms of stability and viscosity.
  • a series of laboratory batches were prepared with varying levels of sodium carbonate, SLES and a polymeric thickener (AcusolĀ® 810A). The results of this study were:
  • formula 13-397 was found to be stable. Based on the success further laboratory batches were prepared with a variety of fragrances as well as an unfragranced variant. All showed excellent stability. Manufacture of 13-397 was scaled up to 200kg.
  • Formulations 13-154C and 13-154H were the most stable formulations found that contain polymeric builders and stabilizers (AcusolĀ® 420N and AlcosperseĀ® 325) as well as polxmeric thickeners (AcusolĀ® 810A) to increase viscosity.
  • Formula 13-397 does not contain said polymers and is as described in Table 2. The data shows that formula 13-397 has a stable conductivity and viscosity over time, while reference formulations with polymer increase in conductivity and decrease in viscosity.
  • a further enhancement was to include a nonionic surfactant to improve stability with respect to phase separation and solid particle agglomeration, particularly with respect to the optical brightener at low temperatures ( ā‡ 4Ā°C).
  • a nonionic surfactant to improve stability with respect to phase separation and solid particle agglomeration, particularly with respect to the optical brightener at low temperatures ( ā‡ 4Ā°C).
  • Table 3 Example Formulation with Nonionic Surfactant Ingredient wt.% Water 65.583 Optical Brightener 0.124 Sodium LAS 11.000 Silicone Antifoam 0.100 Tetrasodium GLDA 3.100 Sodium Hydroxide 3.160 Citric Acid 5.500 Sodium Cabronate 3.900 Laureth-5 2.500 Dye 0.003 Sodium Laureth-2 Sulfate 4.560 Fragrance 0.470

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Emergency Medicine (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to an aqueous, phosphate-free, structured liquid detergent composition, in particular a heavy duty liquid detergent (HDL) that comprises a surfactant system comprising an alkyl ether sulfate, a builder system and water, wherein the detergent composition has a viscosity of between 1.000 and 10.000 mPas and is free of stabilizing and rheology modifying acrylate-containing polymers. The invention further relates to methods for washing of textiles using the detergents of the invention.
  • Liquid detergent compositions are well-known in the art and widely used. Over recent years, the have become more and more popular with the consumers because they offer a number of advantages over solid compositions, including, for example, the ease of dosing, dispensing and dissolving into a laundering liquor. In addition, they are perceived to be safer and less harsh to the textiles and environment compared to solid compositions. In particular for laundering colored fabrics they have gained popularity ever since their introduction on the market. Aqueous, structured liquid detergent compositions for laundering fabrics not according to the invention are known from the following documents of the prior art: EP 0530708 A2 and EP 2770044 A1 .
  • Recently, for environmental and regulatory reasons the demand for phosphate-free liquid detergents has increased. However, liquid detergent compositions, in particular phosphate-free heavy duty liquid (HDL) detergents suffer from physical and chemical instability, such as phase separation, sedimentation, degradation of components and the like, and viscosity problems. This is particularly problematic for highly concentrated formulations. While HDL detergents have been introduced as early as the 1970's, the known stable formulations rely on the use of phosphates, in particular sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP), to form structured liquids containing high levels of builders and surfactants. In these built HDLs multilayered vesicles are formed that stabilize the formulation and prevent precipitation of the anionic surfactants by the builder components. These structures are stable and can be characterized by microscopic examination under polarized light and conductivity measurements. STPP was particularly suited to formation of vesicles with sodium alkylbenzene sulfonate (sodium LAS). In addition, STPP was well established as a builder in detergent powders and acts as a chelating agent, inhibits soil re-deposition during the wash and boosts overall detergency. The result of the use of STPP was the development of high performance and low cost HDL. However, as mentioned above, environmental concerns over the use of phosphates, including STPP, in laundry detergents have resulted in phosphate use being banned in some countries and a negative public image in most developed markets. While alternatives to STPP, such as zeolite, sodium citrate, and sodium carbonate, are known, these show poor performance relative to phosphate built HDL. In addition, these formulations suffer from stability problems and require the use of stabilizing and/or rheology modifying polymers, typically acrylates, that are undesirable for cost reasons and may still not suffice to ensure long term stability and the desired viscosity.
  • Therefore, there is still need in the art for phosphate-free, structured HDL detergents that overcome at least some of the known issues. Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to meet this need by providing an aqueous, phosphate-free, structured liquid detergent composition, in particular a HDL detergent that exhibits the desired stability and viscosity.
  • It has surprisingly been found by the inventors that this object can be met by a composition that is free of known stabilizing and rheology modifying polymers and comprises a specific surfactant system, builder system and water. It has been demonstrated that such a detergent is stable over a period of 90 days at a temperature of 10-40Ā°C, >12 months when stored between 15Ā° and 30Ā°C. Low temperature stability, for example at about 5Ā°C, can be improved by modifying the system to include a nonionic surfactant.
  • In a first aspect, the present invention therefore relates to an aqueous, structured liquid detergent composition comprising a surfactant system, a builder system and water, as defined by claim 1.
  • In a further aspect, the invention relates to methods for cleaning textiles, wherein a washing liquor containing the liquid detergent composition of the present invention contacts the textile in at least one method step.
  • "At least one", as used herein, relates to one or more, i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or more. If used in combination with a compound, the term does not relate to the absolute number of molecules but rather to the number of different types of said compound. "At least one alkyl ether sulfate" thus means that at least one type but that also 2 or more different alkyl ether sulfate types can be present.
  • If not indicated otherwise, all viscosities referred to herein are viscosities measured at 25Ā°C by a Brookfield LVT, Spindle No. 3 at 12 rpm.
  • If not indicated otherwise, all percentages are by weight relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • "Free of", as used herein in relation to a specific type of component, means that the referenced composition does not contain more than 0.5 wt.%, preferably no more than 0.1 wt.%, more preferably no more than 0.05 wt.% of said component relative to the total weight of the composition. Most preferably, said component is not contained at all.
  • The detergent compositions of the present invention can be used as detergents for textiles, carpets or natural fibers. In preferred embodiments, the detergents disclosed herein are heavy duty liquid (HDL) detergents.
  • The present invention is based on the inventors' surprising finding, that by use of a surfactant system comprising at least one alkyl ether sulfate in a certain amount structured liquid detergent compositions may be formed that have the desired viscosity and stability without the need for stabilizing or rheology modifying polymers.
  • Structured liquids are widely used in the field of detergents. They can either be internally structured by one or more of the primary ingredients, such as the surfactants, and/or by using secondary additives, such as certain salts, polymers and/or silicates. Structuring is used to endow the composition with properties such as a turbid appearance or certain flow properties. Such structured liquids may also contain suspended solids. While structured liquids provide more formulation flexibility compared to isotropic liquids, they often suffer from stability and viscosity problems. The presently disclosed formulations, however, overcome these stability and viscosity problems and provide for compositions that have the desired viscosities while at the same time showing good stability.
  • In various embodiments, the liquid detergent compositions of the invention are internally structured in that the surfactant system leads to formation of multilayered vesicles. "Structured", as used herein, therefore means that the compositions are preferably internally structured by formation of multilayered vesicles. "Multilayered vesicles" preferably relates to essentially spherical vesicles that have a multilayered, typically double-layered, shell formed of molecules comprising hydrophobic moieties, with said hydrophobic moieties arranged such that they face each other while the more hydrophilic parts of the molecules face outwards. Said shell can form a vesicle lumen.
  • The detergent compositions of the current invention comprise sodium lauryl ether sulfate with 2 EO, as it is advantageous for achieving the desired viscosity ranges.
  • The level of ethoxylation is an average value and can, for a specific compound, be an integer or fractional number.
  • The sodium lauryl ether sulfate with 2 EO is contained in the compositions of the invention in an amount of 3.2 to 7.0 wt.% relative to the total weight of the composition, preferably 4.0 to 7.0 wt.%, more preferably 4.5 to 7.0 wt.%, most preferably 5.0 to 6.0 wt.%.
  • In various embodiments, the surfactant system further comprises at least one additional anionic surfactant, preferably an alkyl benzene sulfonate.
  • Exemplary alkyl benzene sulfonates include, but are not limited to linear and branched alkyl benzene sulfonates, preferably linear alkyl benzene sulfonates. Exemplary compounds are those of formula (III)
    Figure imgb0001
    wherein R' and R" are independently H or alkyl and combined comprise 9 to 19, preferably 9 to 15 and more preferably 9 to 13 carbon atoms. Particularly preferred are dodecyl and tridecyl benzene sulfonates, in particular the sodium salts thereof. Preferred contents range from 6.8 to 19.0 wt.%, preferably 9.0 to 17.0 wt.%, more preferably 10.0 to 15.0 wt.% relative to the total weight of the composition.
  • In addition, the compositions of the invention may further comprise one or more nonionic surfactants. Preferred nonionic surfactants are those of formula (IV)

    ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒR2-O-(AO)m-Hā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒ(IV),

    wherein R2 represents a linear or branched substituted or unsubstituted alkyl moiety, AO represents an ethylene oxide (EO) or propylene oxide (PO) group and m is an integer from 1 to 50. In formula (IV) R2 preferably represents a linear or branched, substituted or unsubstited alkyl group, preferably a linear, unsubstituted alkyl group, particularly preferred a fatty alcohol group. Preferred groups are R2 are selected from decyl, undecyl, dodecyl, tridecyl, tetradecyl, pentadecyl, hexadecyl, heptadecyl, octadecyl, nonadecyl, eicosyl groups and combinations thereof, wherein those groups with an even number of carbon atoms are preferred. Particularly preferred are R2 groups derived from C12-C18 fatty alcohols, such as coconut oil alcohol, tallow oil alcohol, lauryl, myristyl, cetyl or stearyl alcohol or from C10-C20 oxoalcohols.
  • AO represents an ethyleneoxide (EO) or propyleneoxide (PO) group, preferably an ethyleneoxide group. The index m represents an integer from 1 to 50, preferably from 1 to 20 and more preferably from 1 to 6. Particularly preferably, m is 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, most preferably 3-5, as higher degrees of ethoxylation may negatively influence viscosity and stability.
  • In various preferred embodiments, the detergent compositions comprise an alkyl ether selected from fatty alcohol ethers of formula (V)
    Figure imgb0002
    wherein k = 11 to 19, m = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8. Preferred are C12-18 fatty alcohols with 1-6 EO (k = 11-17, m = 1-5 in formula (V)). More preferred are C12-14 alcohols having 1-5 EO, most preferred are C12-14 alkyl ethers with 3-5 EO, in particular lauryl ether with 5 EO.
  • Such nonionic alkyl ethers may be contained in the formulation in amounts of 0.0 to 10 wt.%, preferably 0.5 to 8.0 wt.%, more preferably 2.0 to 6.0 wt.%. It has been found that the addition of such nonionic alkyl ether surfactants positively influences physical stability of the composition at low temperatures, i.e. temperatures around or below 10Ā°C, particularly below 4Ā°C, in that they prevent formation of solid particles or crystals in the liquid composition.
  • The detergents may further include other nonionic surfactants, such as alkyl glucosides of the general formula RO(G)x, where R is a primary linear or 2-methyl-branched aliphatic radical containing 8 to 22 and preferably 12 to 18 carbon atoms and G stands for a glucose unit. The degree of oligomerization x, which indicates the distribution of monoglucosides and oligoglucosides, is a number of 1 to 10 and preferably a number of 1.2 to 1.4. However, in preferred embodiments, the compositions do not include such alkyl glucosides.
  • In various embodiments, the surfactant system therefore comprises at least two anionic surfactants, namely the at least one alkyl ether sulfate and preferably at least one alkyl benzene sulfonate, and optionally at least one alkyl ether.
  • The compositions may preferably comprise 15.0 to 20.0 wt.% of the surfactant system. Said surfactant system preferably comprise 9.0 to 17.0 wt.%, more preferably 10.0 to 15.0 wt.% of a linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, preferably dodecyl or tridecyl benzene sulfonate, and (3) 0.0 to 10 wt.%, preferably 0.5 to 8.0 wt.%, more preferably 2.0 to 6.0 wt.% C12-18 alkyl ethers with 1-6 EO, preferably C12-14 alkyl ethers having 1-5 EO, most preferably lauryl ether with 5 EO. All afore-mentioned percentages relate to the total weight of the composition. To avoid formation of solid particles at low temperatures, as described above, it may be advantageous to include the above-described alkyl ethers.
  • In various embodiments, the compositions of the invention have a conductivity of ā‰¤15mS, preferably ā‰¤11 mS, more preferably ā‰¤10 mS. Conductivity can, for example, be measured by using an Oakton CON700 Conductivity meter, preferably standardized using a 12.88 milli-Siemens reference standard. Conductivity measurements can be carried out according to the EN ISO 7888:1985 standard. It has been found that compositions having a low conductivity are more stable and less prone to a viscosity decrease over extended periods of storage. Accordingly, "stable" or "stability" in the sense of the present invention refers to the property of a detergent composition to substantially maintain its viscosity, i.e. a viscosity decrease of no more than 10%, over extended periods of storage, for example more than 60 days at temperatures of about 20Ā°C. In addition, said term means that the composition remains homogeneous, i.e. without any visible phase separation over the same period.
  • It has surprisingly been found that said stability can be achieved without the presence of any stabilizing or rheology modifying (thickening) polymers. To the contrary, it has been found that said polymers adversely affect stability of the liquid compositions disclosed herein in that such compositions are much more susceptible to loss of viscosity over extended periods of storage. Said polymers include all polymers known and used for said purposes in the art, in particular polyacrylates and polyacrylic acids as well as all homo- and copolymers including monomeric units derived from acrylates and/or acrylic acid. If reference is herein made to "acrylates" or "acrylic acid" and derivatives thereof, said terms include "methacrylates" and "methacrylic acid" as well as the various acrylic acid esters known in the art, such as methyl(meth)acrylate, ethyl(meth)acrylate, etc.. Examples of such acrylate polymers that are not contained in the liquid detergent compositions comprise, but are not limited to, polymers of the AcusolĀ® series (Dow Chemicals, Midland, USA), AlcosperseĀ® series, AquatreatĀ® series (both Akzo Nobel, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Good-riteĀ® series (Emerald Performance Materials, Cuyahoga Falls, USA), JunlonĀ® series, JurymerĀ® series, RheogicĀ® series, AronĀ® series (all Toagosei Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), GlascolĀ® series (BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany), AqualicĀ® series (Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), CarbopolĀ® series and CarbosetĀ® series (both The Lubrizol Corporation, Wickliffe, USA).
  • The compositions of the invention further comprise a builder system as defined in claim 1. The builder system is a phosphate-free builder system, as the composition is free of phosphates. However, although not preferred, the composition may comprise phosphonates. Accordingly, the term "phosphate-free", as used herein does not refer to phosphonates. In preferred embodiments, the compositions are phosphate- and phosphonate-free.
  • If the compositions comprise phosphonates, the phosphonates are preferably hydroxyalkane and/or amino alkane phosphonates, such as 1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diphosphonate (HEDP), ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonate (EDTMP), diethylenetriamine pentamethylene phosphonate (DTPMP), and lysine tetramethylene phosphonate (LTMP). If present, phosphonates are used in amounts of 0.1 to 10.0 wt.%, preferably 0.5 to 8.0 Gew.-%, more preferably 0.1 to 1.5 wt.%. The total phosphorus content of the detergents is preferably less than 0.5% by weight.
  • Suitable builders include, without limitation, inorganic builders, such as silicates, aluminosilicates (particularly zeolite), and carbonates, as well as organic builders, such as organic di- and polycarboxylic acids, aminocarboxylic acids and combinations thereof. Preferred in the liquid compositions of the invention are carbonates, di- and polycarboxylic acids and aminocarboxylic acids. Also suitable are alkali metal hydroxides, in particular sodium hydroxide, but these are, besides their use for pH control, not preferred.
  • Suitable carbonates include alkali metal carbonates, hydrogen carbonates and sesquicarbonates, with alkali metal carbonates, in particular sodium carbonate being preferred.
  • In the current invention, inorganic builders, in particular water-soluble inorganic builders, preferably carbonates, are used in amounts of up to 5 wt.% relative to the total weight of the composition. In preferred embodiments, carbonate, preferably sodium carbonate, is used in amounts of 1.0 to 5.0 wt.%, preferably 2.0 to 4.0 wt.%. It has been found that amounts higher than 5 wt.% adversely affect the stability of the composition.
  • Suitable organic builders include polycarboxylic acids which can be used as free acids or in form of their salts, including, but not limited to, citric acid, adipic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, malic acid, tartric acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, and sugar acids. In addition to their builder properties, the free acids can also be used for pH control. Preferred are citric acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid and gluconic acid, and combinations thereof.
  • Particularly preferred are citric acid and their salts, i.e. citrates. In various embodiments, the polycarboxylic acids, in particular citric acid/citrate, are contained in the compositions of the invention in amounts of 3.5 to 25.0 wt.%, preferably 4.0 to 10.0 wt.%.
  • In addition to the afore-mentioned builders, the compositions preferably also include aminocarboxylic acids or salts thereof, i.e. aminocarboxylates. In various embodiments, the aminocarboxylic acids/aminocarboxylates are selected from the group consisting of L-glutamic acid N,N-diacetic acid (GLDA), methyl glycine diacetic acid (MGDA), imino disuccinic acid (IDS), ethylenediamine N,N'-disuccinic acid (EDDS), diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), beta-alanine N,N-diacetic acid, hydroxyethylenediamine triacetic acid (HEDTA), and alkali metal salts thereof as well as combinations of any one of more of the afore-mentioned, preferably GLDA tetrasodium salt.
  • The aminocarboxylates are preferably used in amounts of 0.5 to 5.0 wt.%, preferably 1.0 to 4.0 wt.%.
  • In various embodiments, the detergent compositions comprise a builder system comprising relative to the total weight of the composition:
    1. (1) 0.5 to 5.0 wt.-%, preferably 1.0 to 4.0 wt.-% of an aminocarboxylate, preferably GLDA tetrasodium salt;
    2. (2) 1.0 to 5.0 wt.-%, preferably 2.0 to 4.0 wt.-% carbonate, preferably sodium carbonate; and
    3. (3) 3.5 to 25.0 wt.-%, preferably 4 to 10 wt.-% citrate, preferably sodium citrate.
  • Further organic builders include polymeric polycarboxylates, polyacetals, dextrins and others. It is however preferred that the compositions are free of these other types of organic builders. It is particularly preferred that the compositions are free of polymeric organic builders, in particular (meth)acrylate-containing builders.
  • In the current invention, the builder system is comprised in the compositions in an amount of 5.0 to 25.0 wt.%, preferably 10.0 to 15.0 wt.%.
  • The detergent compositions of the invention are aqueous liquid compositions and as such comprise 50.0 to 85 wt.% water, preferably 65.0 to 75.0 wt.%.
  • The pH value of the detergents according to the invention is generally in the range of from 7 to 12, preferably in the range from 7 to 10.5. Relatively high pH values, for example above 9, may be adjusted by the use of small quantities of sodium hydroxide or alkaline salts, such as sodium carbonate. The liquid detergents are typically opaque, are flowable, and may be poured under the sole effect of gravity without any need for other shear forces to be applied. Their viscosity is generally greater than 1,000 mPas (Brookfield viscosimeter, spindle 3, 12 rpm, 25Ā° C), namely in the range of between 1,000 and 10,000 mPas, preferably between 2,000 and 6,000 mPas.
  • In addition to the ingredients mentioned above, however, the detergents may commonly contain at least one, preferably two or more other substances selected from the group consisting of soaps, pH adjusting agents, perfumes, fluorescing agents (optical brighteners), dyes, colorants, antimicrobial active substances, germicides, fungicides, antioxidants, preservatives, and softening compounds.
  • Further possible ingredients include silicone oils, anti-redeposition agents, anti-greying agents, shrinkage preventers, wrinkle protection agents, dye transfer inhibitors, corrosion inhibitors, antistatic agents, bittering agents, ironing adjuvants, proofing and impregnation agents, swelling and anti-slip agents, complexing agents and UV absorbers.
  • Also included may be bleaching agents, bleach activators, bleach catalysts, and enzymes, however, in various embodiments, the compositions are free of those.
  • For cold wash properties, it can be beneficial to additionally include soaps. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the detergent compositions further comprise relative to their total weight 0.25 to 15 wt.%, preferably 0.5 to 12.5 wt.%, more preferably 1.0 to 10.0 wt.%, even more preferably 1.5 to 7.5 wt.% and most preferably 2.0 to 6.0 wt.% soaps. Preferred are soaps from C12-C18 fatty acids, i.e. the salts of lauric acid, myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, or mixtures derived from natural fatty acids, for example coconut, palm kernel, olive oil, or tallow fatty acids.
  • Further ingredients that are commonly used include colorants, perfumes and optical brighteners, as well as pH adjusting agents. All of these ingredients are well-known in the art and readily available.
  • The present invention further relates to methods for cleaning textiles, wherein a washing liquor containing the liquid detergent composition of the present invention contacts the textile in at least one method step. The methods are preferably carried out in an automatic washing machine.
  • Methods for cleaning of textiles are generally characterized by the fact that in several different process steps various cleaning-active substances are applied to the textiles and after the contact time said cleaning-active substances are washed off, or that the textiles are treated in any other way with a detergent or a solution of said substance.
  • All embodiments described herein in relation to the compositions of the invention are similarly applicable to the methods of the invention and vice versa.
  • Examples Example 1:
  • The following formulations were made: Table 1: 35ml Dose and 45ml Dose Formulations (not according to the invention)
    Ingredient grams per wash 35mL Dose Formula (wt.%) 45mL Dose Formula (wt.%) Addition Order Oberservations during manufacture
    Deionised Water 24.127 58.420% 67.990% 1 Clear liquid
    Optical brightener 0.074 0.180% 0.140% 2 Clear vellow liquid
    Sodium LAS 6.608 16.000% 12.440% 3 Clear vellow liquid
    Citric Acid 3.098 7.500% 5.540% 4 Grainy suspension
    Sodium Hydroxide 0.516 1.250% 0.935% 5 Grainy suspension
    Tetrasodium GLDA 1.652 4.000% 3.110% 6 Grainy suspension
    Sodium Carbonate 2.065 5.000% 3.890% 7 Grainy suspension
    Sodium Laureth-2 Sulfate 1.652 4.000% 3.110% 8 Grainy suspension
    Fragrance 0.372 0.900% 0.700% 9 Grainy suspension
    Colorant 0.002 0.006% 0.006% 10 Grainy suspension
    Polymeric builder (polyacrylate) 0.537 1.300% 1.040% 11 Smoother but grainy
    Polymeric stabilizer (polyacrylate) 0.083 0.200% 0.160% 12 Smooth and stable
  • In the market context, historical dosage of laundry liquids was approximately 100 mLs. Thus a 3X concentrate formula would have a dosage range of 30 to 35mLs while a 2X concentrate would have a dosage of 45 to 55mLs. Initial work was to develop a 3X Concentrate formula which equated to a 35mL dose. A 45mL dose formula was then prepared by dilution of the 35mL dose formula with water to achieve the same grams/wash of ingredients. It was observed that the diluted formula had a very low viscosity <1000 mPas (Brookfield LVT No 3 spindle, 12 rpm measured at 25Ā°C) which was below the desired range of 2000 to 6000 mPas. Despite the low viscosity, the formula was still stable. These formulations demonstrate the need to include a polymeric stabilizer to achieve stable formulations.
  • In order to increase viscosity, the concentration of SLES was increased from 3.2 wt.-% to wt.-% 6.1%. The resultant viscosity was >10,000 mPas. This viscosity was unacceptably high. While the batch was very thick there was a surprising observation that after SLES was added the appearance changed from a grainy suspension to very smooth and stable formula.
  • To investigate the structure and stability of the formulations, a polarizing light microscope and conductivity meter were used.
  • Microscopy was carried out using a Nikon Eclipse Ci-L optical microscope with polarizing light filter. A sample was placed on a glass slide and spread to a thin layer and observed under 40X magnification.
  • MinitabĀ® statistical software was used to design a set of experiments to identify the optimum formula in terms of stability and viscosity. A series of laboratory batches were prepared with varying levels of sodium carbonate, SLES and a polymeric thickener (AcusolĀ® 810A). The results of this study were:
    • conductivity >11 milli-Siemens leads to instability with respect to maintenance of the desired viscosity; Conductivity was measured using an Oakton CON700 Conductivity meter. The meter was standardized daily using a 12.88 milli-Siemens reference standard.
    • >5 wt.-% soda ash causes instability (crystal formation) below 10Ā°C;
    • all variations showed viscosity decrease over time; and
    • all variations showed conductivity increase over time.
  • There was a clear trend that samples without polymers, in particular acrylates, had conductivities <10 and displayed higher viscosity stability over time. Accordingly, the following batch was made: Table 2: Formulations with and without polymers (formulations 13-154C and 13-154H are not according to the invention)
    Ingredient 13-154C 13-154H 13-397
    Deionised Water 67.564% 67.294% 66.104%
    Optical brightener 0.140% 0.140% 0.140%
    Sodium LAS 12.440% 12.440% 12.440%
    Citric Acid 5.540% 5.540% 5.540%
    Sodium Hydroxide 2.400% 2.400% 2.400%
    Tetrasodium GLDA 3.110% 3.110% 3.110%
    Sodium Carbonate 3.890% 3.890% 3.890%
    Fragrance 0.470% 0.470% 0.470%
    Colorant 0.006% 0.006% 0.006%
    Sodium Laureth-2 Sulfate 3.110% 3.110% 5.900%
    Polymeric builder (polyacrylate) 1.040% 1.040% 0.000%
    Polymeric stabilizer (polyacrylate) 0.200% 0.200% 0.000%
    Acusol 810A 0.090% 0.360% 0.000%
    All % are wt.%.
  • Surprisingly, formula 13-397 was found to be stable. Based on the success further laboratory batches were prepared with a variety of fragrances as well as an unfragranced variant. All showed excellent stability. Manufacture of 13-397 was scaled up to 200kg.
  • Data comparing conductivity and viscosity changes over time are presented in Figures 1 and 2. Formulations 13-154C and 13-154H were the most stable formulations found that contain polymeric builders and stabilizers (AcusolĀ® 420N and AlcosperseĀ® 325) as well as polxmeric thickeners (AcusolĀ® 810A) to increase viscosity. Formula 13-397 does not contain said polymers and is as described in Table 2. The data shows that formula 13-397 has a stable conductivity and viscosity over time, while reference formulations with polymer increase in conductivity and decrease in viscosity.
  • A further enhancement was to include a nonionic surfactant to improve stability with respect to phase separation and solid particle agglomeration, particularly with respect to the optical brightener at low temperatures (<4Ā°C). Refer to Table 3. Table 3 - Example Formulation with Nonionic Surfactant
    Ingredient wt.%
    Water 65.583
    Optical Brightener 0.124
    Sodium LAS 11.000
    Silicone Antifoam 0.100
    Tetrasodium GLDA 3.100
    Sodium Hydroxide 3.160
    Citric Acid 5.500
    Sodium Cabronate 3.900
    Laureth-5 2.500
    Dye 0.003
    Sodium Laureth-2 Sulfate 4.560
    Fragrance 0.470

Claims (8)

  1. Aqueous, structured liquid detergent composition comprising a surfactant system, a builder system and water and not more than 0.5 wt.% phosphate, wherein
    - the composition comprises relative to the total weight of the composition
    (a) 10.0 to 25.0 wt.-%. preferably 15.0 to 20.0 wt.-% of the surfactant system,
    (b) 5.0 to 25.0 wt.-%. preferably 10.0 to 15.0 wt.-% of the builder system,
    (c) 50.0 to 85.0 wt.-%. preferably 65.0 to 75.0 wt.-% water
    - wherein the builder system comprises
    (1) at least two organic builders, preferably selected from aminocarboxylates, citrate and combinations thereof; and
    (2) at least one inorganic builder, preferably water-soluble inorganic builder, more preferably carbonate;
    wherein the amount of inorganic builder is ā‰¤5 wt.-% relative to the total weight of the composition.
    - and wherein
    (A) the surfactant system comprises sodium lauryl ether sulfate with 2 EO in an amount of between 3.2 and 7.0 wt.-% relative to the total weight of the composition;
    (B) the composition has a viscosity of between 1,000 and 10,000 mPas at 25Ā°C (Brookfield LVT, Spindle No. 3, 12 rpm), preferably 2,000 to 6,000 mPas; and
    (C) the composition is free of acrylate-containing polymers.
  2. The detergent composition according to claim 1, wherein the conductivity of the composition is ā‰¤15 mS, preferably ā‰¤11 mS, more preferably ā‰¤10 mS.
  3. The detergent composition according to claim 1 or 2, wherein
    (2) the surfactant system further comprises an alkyl benzene sulfonate, preferably a linear alkyl benzene sulfonate (LAS), more preferably a C9-13 alkyl benzene sulfonate, most preferably a linear C12-13 alkyl benzene sulfonate; and/or
    (3) the surfactant system further comprises a nonionic surfactant, preferably a C12-18 alkyl ether with 1-6 EO, more preferably a C12-14 alkyl ether with 3-5 EO, most preferably a C12 alkyl ether with 5 EO.
  4. The detergent composition according to claim 1, wherein the aminocarboxylate is selected from the group consisting of L-glutamic acid N,N-diacetic acid (GLDA), methyl glycine diacetic acid (MGDA), imino disuccinic acid (IDS), ethylenediamine N,N'-disuccinic acid (EDDS), diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), beta-alanine N,N-diacetic acid, hydroxyethylenediamine triacetic acid (HEDTA), and alkali metal salts thereof, preferably GLDA tetrasodium salt.
  5. The detergent composition according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the surfactant system comprises relative to the total weight of the detergent composition:
    (a1) 3.2 to 7.0 wt.%, preferably 4.5 to 7.0 wt.% C10-16 alkyl ether sulfates with 1 to 7 EO, preferably C12-14 fatty alcohol ether sulfates with 1-3 EO, more preferably lauryl ether sulfate with 2 EO;
    (a2) 6.8 to 19.0, preferably 9.0 to 17.0 wt.%, more preferably 10.0 to 15.0 wt.% of a linear C9-13 alkyl benzene sulfonate, preferably dodecyl or tridecyl benzene sulfonate; and
    (a3) 0.0 to 10 wt.%, preferably 0.5 to 8.0 wt.%, more preferably 2.0 to 6.0 wt.% C12-18 alkyl ethers with 1-6 EO, preferably C12-14 alkyl ethers having 3-5 EO, most preferably lauryl ether with 5 EO.
  6. The detergent composition according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the builder system comprises relative to the total weight of the detergent composition:
    (b1) 0.5 to 5.0 wt.-%, preferably 1.0 to 4.0 wt.-% of an aminocarboxylate, preferably GLDA tetrasodium salt;
    (b2) 1.0 to 5.0 wt.-%, preferably 2.0 to 4.0 wt.-% carbonate, preferably sodium carbonate; and
    (b3) 3.5 to 25.0 wt.-%, preferably 4 to 10 wt.-% citrate, preferably sodium citrate.
  7. The detergent composition according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the detergent composition further comprises at least one, preferably two or more other substances selected from the group consisting of soaps, pH adjusting agents, perfumes, fluorescing agents (optical brighteners), dyes, colorants, antimicrobial active substances, germicides, fungicides, antioxidants, preservatives, and softening compounds.
  8. Method for cleaning textiles, wherein a washing liquor containing the detergent composition according to any one of claims 1 to 7 contacts the textile in at least one method step.
EP16810388.5A 2015-12-18 2016-12-14 Structured liquid detergent composition Active EP3390599B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102015225981 2015-12-18
PCT/EP2016/081045 WO2017102866A1 (en) 2015-12-18 2016-12-14 Structured liquid detergent composition

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3390599A1 EP3390599A1 (en) 2018-10-24
EP3390599B1 true EP3390599B1 (en) 2020-02-26

Family

ID=57544459

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16810388.5A Active EP3390599B1 (en) 2015-12-18 2016-12-14 Structured liquid detergent composition

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3390599B1 (en)
AU (1) AU2016372350B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2017102866A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, ā€  Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022122480A1 (en) * 2020-12-07 2022-06-16 Unilever Ip Holdings B.V. Detergent compositions
DE102022113400A1 (en) 2022-05-27 2023-11-30 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Flowable detergents and cleaning agents with improved properties
DE102022113403A1 (en) 2022-05-27 2023-11-30 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Flowable detergents and cleaning agents with improved properties II

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, ā€  Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT201900000502A1 (en) * 2019-01-11 2020-07-11 Deco Ind S Coop P A ANTI-LIMESCALE COMPOSITION FOR WASHING MACHINES
US11248192B2 (en) 2019-01-22 2022-02-15 Ecolab Usa Inc. Polymer blend to stabilize highly alkaline laundry detergent
CN116583584A (en) * 2020-12-07 2023-08-11 č”åˆåˆ©åŽēŸ„čƆäŗ§ęƒęŽ§č‚”ęœ‰é™å…¬åø Detergent composition

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, ā€  Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IN185580B (en) * 1991-08-30 2001-03-03 Albright & Wilson Uk Ltd
US9157049B2 (en) * 2012-11-28 2015-10-13 Ecolab Usa Inc. Viscoelastic surfactant based cleaning compositions
EP2770044A1 (en) * 2013-02-20 2014-08-27 Unilever PLC Lamellar gel with amine oxide

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, ā€  Cited by third party
Title
None *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, ā€  Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2022122480A1 (en) * 2020-12-07 2022-06-16 Unilever Ip Holdings B.V. Detergent compositions
DE102022113400A1 (en) 2022-05-27 2023-11-30 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Flowable detergents and cleaning agents with improved properties
DE102022113403A1 (en) 2022-05-27 2023-11-30 Henkel Ag & Co. Kgaa Flowable detergents and cleaning agents with improved properties II

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2016372350B2 (en) 2020-09-17
AU2016372350A1 (en) 2018-05-24
WO2017102866A1 (en) 2017-06-22
EP3390599A1 (en) 2018-10-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3390599B1 (en) Structured liquid detergent composition
AU2016372352B2 (en) Penta-built liquid detergent composition
US7985725B2 (en) Ultra concentrated liquid laundry detergent
KR102017917B1 (en) Structured detergent or cleaning agent having a flow limit ii
EP2134826B1 (en) Anti-grey detergent
AU2010237830B2 (en) Liquid detergent composition
EP2379689B1 (en) Highly viscous detergent emulsion
WO2018028933A1 (en) Stable liquid detergent comprising soil release polymer
EP2176392B1 (en) Color-safe detergent or cleaning agent having optical brightener
WO2018028936A1 (en) Stable liquid detergent comprising soil release polymer
WO2018028935A1 (en) Stable liquid detergent comprising soil release polymer
WO2017174358A1 (en) Liquid detergent composition containing dye transfer inhibitors and optical brighteners
EP2245131B1 (en) Low-concentration liquid detergents or cleaners containing perfume
WO2018028934A1 (en) Stable liquid detergent comprising soil release polymer
WO2017102874A1 (en) Liquid detergent composition
WO2014053365A1 (en) Performance-enhanced detergents or cleaning agents comprising complexing agents i
EP3272850A1 (en) Easy ironing/anti-wrinkle/less crease benefit of fabric treatment compositions with the help of soil release polymers
US20240209285A1 (en) Ether sulfates based on isomeric tridecyl alcohol mixtures
WO2014053367A1 (en) Performance-enhanced detergents or cleaning agents comprising complexing agents ii
DE102007016382A1 (en) Detergent, preferably aqueous liquid detergent useful in the washing of textile products, comprises surfactant and ingredients of washing- and cleaning- agent comprising (1,3)-dioxolan-2-one compound or (1,3)-diazepan-2-one compound
DE102007023872A1 (en) Detergent, useful to improve the graying-inhibiting action during washing of textile products, comprises anti-grey polycarbonate, polyurethane and polyurea-polyorganosiloxane compound and a surfactant
DE102006054894A1 (en) Detergents or cleaning agents with stable viscosity
JP2011026430A (en) Liquid detergent composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180508

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C11D 1/29 20060101AFI20190722BHEP

Ipc: C11D 11/00 20060101ALI20190722BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/72 20060101ALN20190722BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/20 20060101ALI20190722BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/10 20060101ALI20190722BHEP

Ipc: C11D 17/00 20060101ALI20190722BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/22 20060101ALN20190722BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/83 20060101ALI20190722BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/33 20060101ALI20190722BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C11D 1/22 20060101ALN20190906BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/10 20060101ALI20190906BHEP

Ipc: C11D 11/00 20060101ALI20190906BHEP

Ipc: C11D 17/00 20060101ALI20190906BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/29 20060101AFI20190906BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/33 20060101ALI20190906BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/72 20060101ALN20190906BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/83 20060101ALI20190906BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/20 20060101ALI20190906BHEP

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C11D 3/10 20060101ALI20190913BHEP

Ipc: C11D 17/00 20060101ALI20190913BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/72 20060101ALN20190913BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/20 20060101ALI20190913BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/29 20060101AFI20190913BHEP

Ipc: C11D 11/00 20060101ALI20190913BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/33 20060101ALI20190913BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/22 20060101ALN20190913BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/83 20060101ALI20190913BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20191002

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1237621

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016030725

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200526

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200526

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200527

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200626

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200719

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1237621

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016030725

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20201223

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20201211

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20201223

Year of fee payment: 5

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20201127

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20201231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201214

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602016030725

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201231

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20211214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211214

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211231