EP3361702A1 - Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit - Google Patents

Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3361702A1
EP3361702A1 EP18163194.6A EP18163194A EP3361702A1 EP 3361702 A1 EP3361702 A1 EP 3361702A1 EP 18163194 A EP18163194 A EP 18163194A EP 3361702 A1 EP3361702 A1 EP 3361702A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
user
service
microservice
idcs
identity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP18163194.6A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3361702B1 (de
Inventor
Vadim Lander
Damien CARRU
Gary P COLE
Ajay Sondhi
Gregg Wilson
Tomas Knappek
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Oracle International Corp
Original Assignee
Oracle International Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=61387621&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP3361702(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from US15/450,512 external-priority patent/US9838376B1/en
Priority claimed from US15/450,550 external-priority patent/US9838377B1/en
Priority claimed from US15/469,718 external-priority patent/US10341410B2/en
Priority claimed from US15/485,532 external-priority patent/US9781122B1/en
Application filed by Oracle International Corp filed Critical Oracle International Corp
Priority claimed from PCT/US2017/031649 external-priority patent/WO2017196774A1/en
Publication of EP3361702A1 publication Critical patent/EP3361702A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3361702B1 publication Critical patent/EP3361702B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/0807—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities using tickets, e.g. Kerberos
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/0815—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities providing single-sign-on or federations
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/08—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities
    • H04L63/0876—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for authentication of entities based on the identity of the terminal or configuration, e.g. MAC address, hardware or software configuration or device fingerprint
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/02—Protocols based on web technology, e.g. hypertext transfer protocol [HTTP]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/06—Authentication
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/06—Authentication
    • H04W12/068—Authentication using credential vaults, e.g. password manager applications or one time password [OTP] applications
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/06—Authentication
    • H04W12/069—Authentication using certificates or pre-shared keys
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W12/00—Security arrangements; Authentication; Protecting privacy or anonymity
    • H04W12/08—Access security
    • H04W12/084—Access security using delegated authorisation, e.g. open authorisation [OAuth] protocol

Definitions

  • One embodiment is directed generally to identity management, and in particular, to identity management in a cloud system.
  • cloud-based applications e.g., enterprise public cloud applications, third-party cloud applications, etc.
  • devices e.g., desktop and mobile devices
  • users e.g., employees, partners, customers, etc.
  • identity management and access security to become a central concern.
  • Typical security concerns in a cloud environment are unauthorized access, account hijacking, malicious insiders, etc. Accordingly, there is a need for secure access to cloud-based applications, or applications located anywhere, regardless of from what device type or by what user type the applications are accessed.
  • One embodiment is a system that provides cloud-based identity and access management.
  • the system receives a request from a client for an identity management service, authenticates the request, and accesses a microservice based on the request.
  • the system determines, based on the request, a tenancy of the client, a tenancy of a user, and a tenancy of a resource.
  • the system retrieves data from the determined tenancies as required to process the request, where the data is retrieved by the microservice using a connection pool that provides connections to the database.
  • the system then performs the identity management service by the appropriate microservice responsible for processing the received request.
  • Embodiments provide an identity cloud service that implements a microservices based architecture and provides multi-tenant identity and data security management and secure access to cloud-based applications.
  • Embodiments support secure access for hybrid cloud deployments (i.e., cloud deployments which include a combination of a public cloud and a private cloud).
  • Embodiments protect applications and data both in the cloud and on-premise.
  • Embodiments support multi-channel access via web, mobile, and application programming interfaces ("APIs").
  • Embodiments manage access for different users, such as customers, partners, and employees.
  • Embodiments manage, control, and audit access across the cloud as well as on-premise.
  • Embodiments integrate with new and existing applications and identities. Embodiments are horizontally scalable.
  • One embodiment is a system that implements a number of microservices in a stateless middle tier environment to provide cloud-based multi-tenant identity and access management services.
  • each requested identity management service is broken into real-time and near-real-time tasks.
  • the real-time tasks are handled by a microservice in the middle tier, while the near-real-time tasks are offloaded to a message queue.
  • Embodiments implement access tokens that are consumed by a routing tier and a middle tier to enforce a security model for accessing the microservices.
  • embodiments provide a cloud-scale Identity and Access Management ("IAM”) platform based on a multi-tenant, microservices architecture.
  • IAM Infrastructure and Access Management
  • the identity cloud service provides a number of core services, each of which solving a unique challenge faced by many enterprises.
  • the identity cloud service supports administrators in, for example, initial on-boarding/importing of users, importing groups with user members, creating/updating/disabling/enabling/deleting users, assigning/un-assigning users into/from groups, creating/updating/deleting groups, resetting passwords, managing policies, sending activation, etc.
  • the identity cloud service also supports end users in, for example, modifying profiles, setting primary/recovery emails, verifying emails, unlocking their accounts, changing passwords, recovering passwords in case of forgotten password, etc.
  • One embodiment protects applications and data in a cloud environment as well as in an on-premise environment.
  • the embodiment secures access to any application from any device by anyone.
  • the embodiment provides protection across both environments since inconsistencies in security between the two environments may result in higher risks. For example, such inconsistencies may cause a sales person to continue having access to their Customer Relationship Management ("CRM") account even after they have defected to the competition.
  • CRM Customer Relationship Management
  • embodiments extend the security controls provisioned in the on-premise environment into the cloud environment. For example, if a person leaves a company, embodiments ensure that their accounts are disabled both on-premise and in the cloud.
  • users may access applications and/or data through many different channels such as web browsers, desktops, mobile phones, tablets, smart watches, other wearables, etc. Accordingly, one embodiment provides secured access across all these channels. For example, a user may use their mobile phone to complete a transaction they started on their desktop.
  • One embodiment further manages access for various users such as customers, partners, employees, etc.
  • applications and/or data may be accessed not just by employees but by customers or third parties.
  • many known systems take security measures when onboarding employees, they generally do not take the same level of security measures when giving access to customers, third parties, partners, etc., resulting in the possibility of security breaches by parties that are not properly managed.
  • embodiments ensure that sufficient security measures are provided for access of each type of user and not just employees.
  • Embodiments provide an Identity Cloud Service (“IDCS”) that is a multi-tenant, cloud-scale, IAM platform.
  • IDCS provides authentication, authorization, auditing, and federation.
  • IDCS manages access to custom applications and services running on the public cloud, and on-premise systems.
  • IDCS may also manage access to public cloud services.
  • IDCS can be used to provide Single Sign On (“SSO”) functionality across such variety of services/applications/systems.
  • SSO Single Sign On
  • Embodiments are based on a multi-tenant, microservices architecture for designing, building, and delivering cloud-scale software services.
  • Multi-tenancy refers to having one physical implementation of a service securely supporting multiple customers buying that service.
  • a service is a software functionality or a set of software functionalities (such as the retrieval of specified information or the execution of a set of operations) that can be reused by different clients for different purposes, together with the policies that control its usage (e.g., based on the identity of the client requesting the service).
  • a service is a mechanism to enable access to one or more capabilities, where the access is provided using a prescribed interface and is exercised consistent with constraints and policies as specified by the service description.
  • a microservice is an independently deployable service.
  • the term microservice contemplates a software architecture design pattern in which complex applications are composed of small, independent processes communicating with each other using language-agnostic APIs.
  • microservices are small, highly decoupled services and each may focus on doing a small task.
  • the microservice architectural style is an approach to developing a single application as a suite of small services, each running in its own process and communicating with lightweight mechanisms (e.g., an HTTP resource API).
  • microservices are easier to replace relative to a monolithic service that performs all or many of the same functions.
  • each of the microservices may be updated without adversely affecting the other microservices.
  • microservices may be beneficially organized around their capabilities.
  • the startup time for each of a collection of microservices is much less than the startup time for a single application that collectively performs all the services of those microservices.
  • the startup time for each of such microservices is about one second or less, while the startup time of such single application may be about a minute, several minutes, or longer.
  • microservices architecture refers to a specialization (i.e., separation of tasks within a system) and implementation approach for service oriented architectures ("SOAs") to build flexible, independently deployable software systems.
  • Services in a microservices architecture are processes that communicate with each other over a network in order to fulfill a goal.
  • these services use technology-agnostic protocols.
  • the services have a small granularity and use lightweight protocols.
  • the services are independently deployable. By distributing functionalities of a system into different small services, the cohesion of the system is enhanced and the coupling of the system is decreased. This makes it easier to change the system and add functions and qualities to the system at any time. It also allows the architecture of an individual service to emerge through continuous refactoring, and hence reduces the need for a big up-front design and allows for releasing software early and continuously.
  • an application in the microservices architecture, is developed as a collection of services, and each service runs a respective process and uses a lightweight protocol to communicate (e.g., a unique API for each microservice).
  • decomposition of a software into individual services/capabilities can be performed at different levels of granularity depending on the service to be provided.
  • a service is a runtime component/process.
  • Each microservice is a self-contained module that can talk to other modules/microservices.
  • Each microservice has an unnamed universal port that can be contacted by others.
  • the unnamed universal port of a microservice is a standard communication channel that the microservice exposes by convention (e.g., as a conventional Hypertext Transfer Protocol ("HTTP") port) and that allows any other module/microservice within the same service to talk to it.
  • HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
  • a microservice or any other self-contained functional module can be generically referred to as a "service”.
  • Embodiments provide multi-tenant identity management services. Embodiments are based on open standards to ensure ease of integration with various applications, delivering IAM capabilities through standards-based services.
  • Embodiments manage the lifecycle of user identities which entails the determination and enforcement of what an identity can access, who can be given such access, who can manage such access, etc.
  • Embodiments run the identity management workload in the cloud and support security functionality for applications that are not necessarily in the cloud.
  • the identity management services provided by the embodiments may be purchased from the cloud. For example, an enterprise may purchase such services from the cloud to manage their employees' access to their applications.
  • Embodiments provide system security, massive scalability, end user usability, and application interoperability.
  • Embodiments address the growth of the cloud and the use of identity services by customers.
  • the microservices based foundation addresses horizontal scalability requirements, while careful orchestration of the services addresses the functional requirements. Achieving both goals requires decomposition (wherever possible) of the business logic to achieve statelessness with eventual consistency, while much of the operational logic not subject to real-time processing is shifted to near-real-time by offloading to a highly scalable asynchronous event management system with guaranteed delivery and processing.
  • Embodiments are fully multi-tenant from the web tier to the data tier in order to realize cost efficiencies and ease of system administration.
  • Embodiments are based on industry standards (e.g., OpenID Connect, OAuth2, Security Assertion Markup Language 2 ("SAML2”), System for Cross-domain Identity Management (“SCIM”), Representational State Transfer (“REST”), etc.) for ease of integration with various applications.
  • SAML2 Security Assertion Markup Language 2
  • SCIM System for Cross-domain Identity Management
  • REST Representational State Transfer
  • One embodiment provides a cloud-scale API platform and implements horizontally scalable microservices for elastic scalability.
  • the embodiment leverages cloud principles and provides a multi-tenant architecture with per-tenant data separation.
  • the embodiment further provides per-tenant customization via tenant self-service.
  • the embodiment is available via APIs for on-demand integration with other identity services, and provides continuous feature release.
  • One embodiment provides interoperability and leverages investments in identity management (“IDM”) functionality in the cloud and on-premise.
  • the embodiment provides automated identity synchronization from on-premise Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (“LDAP”) data to cloud data and vice versa.
  • LDAP Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
  • the embodiment provides a SCIM identity bus between the cloud and the enterprise, and allows for different options for hybrid cloud deployments (e.g., identity federation and/or synchronization, SSO agents, user provisioning connectors, etc.).
  • one embodiment is a system that implements a number of microservices in a stateless middle tier to provide cloud-based multi-tenant identity and access management services.
  • each requested identity management service is broken into real-time and near-real-time tasks.
  • the real-time tasks are handled by a microservice in the middle tier, while the near-real-time tasks are offloaded to a message queue.
  • Embodiments implement tokens that are consumed by a routing tier to enforce a security model for accessing the microservices. Accordingly, embodiments provide a cloud-scale IAM platform based on a multi-tenant, microservices architecture.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram 100 of an example embodiment with IDCS 118, providing a unified identity platform 126 for onboarding users and applications. The embodiment provides seamless user experience across various applications such as enterprise cloud applications 102, partner cloud applications 104, third-party cloud applications 110, and customer applications 112.
  • Applications 102, 104, 110, 112 may be accessed through different channels, for example, by a mobile phone user 108 via a mobile phone 106, by a desktop computer user 116 via a browser 114, etc.
  • a web browser (commonly referred to as a browser) is a software application for retrieving, presenting, and traversing information resources on the World Wide Web. Examples of web browsers are Mozilla Firefox®, Google Chrome®, Microsoft Internet Explorer®, and Apple Safari®.
  • IDCS 118 provides a unified view 124 of a user's applications, a unified secure credential across devices and applications (via identity platform 126), and a unified way of administration (via an admin console 122). IDCS services may be obtained by calling IDCS APIs 142.
  • Such services may include, for example, login/SSO services 128 (e.g., OpenID Connect), federation services 130 (e.g., SAML), token services 132 (e.g., OAuth), directory services 134 (e.g., SCIM), provisioning services 136 (e.g., SCIM or Any Transport over Multiprotocol (“AToM”)), event services 138 (e.g., REST), and role-based access control (“RBAC”) services 140 (e.g., SCIM).
  • IDCS 118 may further provide reports and dashboards 120 related to the offered services.
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram 200 of an example embodiment with IDCS 202 in a cloud environment 208, providing integration with an AD 204 that is on-premise 206.
  • the embodiment provides seamless user experience across all applications including on-premise and third-party applications, for example, on-premise applications 218 and various applications/services in cloud 208 such as cloud services 210, cloud applications 212, partner applications 214, and customer applications 216.
  • Cloud applications 212 may include, for example, Human Capital Management ("HCM"), CRM, talent acquisition (e.g., Oracle Taleo cloud service from Oracle Corp.), Configure Price and Quote (“CPQ”), etc.
  • Cloud services 210 may include, for example, Platform as a Service (“PaaS”), Java, database, business intelligence ("BI”), documents, etc.
  • PaaS Platform as a Service
  • BI business intelligence
  • Applications 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, may be accessed through different channels, for example, by a mobile phone user 220 via a mobile phone 222, by a desktop computer user 224 via a browser 226, etc.
  • the embodiment provides automated identity synchronization from on-premise AD data to cloud data via a SCIM identity bus 234 between cloud 208 and the enterprise 206.
  • the embodiment further provides a SAML bus 228 for federating authentication from cloud 208 to on-premise AD 204 (e.g., using passwords 232).
  • an identity bus is a service bus for identity related services.
  • a service bus provides a platform for communicating messages from one system to another system. It is a controlled mechanism for exchanging information between trusted systems, for example, in a service oriented architecture ("SOA").
  • An identity bus is a logical bus built according to standard HTTP based mechanisms such as web service, web server proxies, etc. The communication in an identity bus may be performed according to a respective protocol (e.g., SCIM, SAML, OpenID Connect, etc.).
  • SCIM Service oriented architecture
  • Fig. 2 implements an identity (“ID”) bridge 230 that is a small binary (e.g., 1 MB in size) that can be downloaded and installed on-premise 206 alongside a customer's AD 204.
  • ID Bridge 230 listens to users and groups (e.g., groups of users) from the organizational units ("OUs") chosen by the customer and synchronizes those users to cloud 208. In one embodiment, users' passwords 232 are not synchronized to cloud 208.
  • Users can manage application access for users by mapping IDCS users' groups to cloud applications managed in IDCS 208. Whenever the users' group membership is changed on-premise 206, their corresponding cloud application access changes automatically.
  • an employee moving from engineering to sales can get near instantaneous access to the sales cloud and lose access to the developer cloud.
  • cloud application access change is accomplished in near-real-time.
  • access to cloud applications managed in IDCS 208 is revoked for users leaving the company.
  • customers may set up SSO between on-premise AD 204 and IDCS 208 through, e.g., AD federation service ("AD/FS", or some other mechanism that implements SAML federation) so that end users can get access to cloud applications 210, 212, 214, 216, and on-premise applications 218 with a single corporate password 332.
  • AD/FS AD federation service
  • Fig. 3 is a block diagram 300 of an example embodiment that includes the same components 202, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, 226, 228, 234 as in Fig. 2 .
  • IDCS 202 provides integration with an on-premise IDM 304 such as Oracle IDM.
  • Oracle IDM 304 is a software suite from Oracle Corp. for providing IAM functionality.
  • the embodiment provides seamless user experience across all applications including on-premise and third-party applications.
  • the embodiment provisions user identities from on-premise IDM 304 to IDCS 208 via SCIM identity bus 234 between cloud 202 and enterprise 206.
  • the embodiment further provides SAML bus 228 (or an OpenID Connect bus) for federating authentication from cloud 208 to on-premise 206.
  • SAML bus 228 or an OpenID Connect bus
  • an Oracle Identity Manager (“OIM”) Connector 302 from Oracle Corp. and an Oracle Access Manager (“OAM”) federation module 306 from Oracle Corp., are implemented as extension modules of Oracle IDM 304.
  • a connector is a module that has physical awareness about how to talk to a system.
  • OIM is an application configured to manage user identities (e.g., manage user accounts in different systems based on what a user should and should not have access to).
  • OAM is a security application that provides access management functionality such as web SSO; identity context, authentication and authorization; policy administration; testing; logging; auditing; etc.
  • OAM has built-in support for SAML. If a user has an account in IDCS 202, OIM connector 302 and OAM federation 306 can be used with Oracle IDM 304 to create/delete that account and manage access from that account.
  • Fig. 4 is a block diagram 400 of an example embodiment that includes the same components 202, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, 226, 234 as in Figs. 2 and 3 .
  • IDCS 202 provides functionality to extend cloud identities to on-premise applications 218. The embodiment provides seamless view of the identity across all applications including on-premise and third-party applications.
  • SCIM identity bus 234 is used to synchronize data in IDCS 202 with on-premise LDAP data called "Cloud Cache" 402. Cloud Cache 402 is disclosed in more detail below.
  • an application that is configured to communicate based on LDAP needs an LDAP connection.
  • An LDAP connection may not be established by such application through a URL (unlike, e.g., "www.google.com” that makes a connection to Google) since the LDAP needs to be on a local network.
  • an LDAP-based application 218 makes a connection to Cloud Cache 402
  • Cloud Cache 402 establishes a connection to IDCS 202 and then pulls data from IDCS 202 as it is being requested.
  • the communication between IDCS 202 and Cloud Cache 402 may be implemented according to the SCIM protocol.
  • Cloud Cache 402 may use SCIM bus 234 to send a SCIM request to IDCS 202 and receive corresponding data in return.
  • fully implementing an application includes building a consumer portal, running marketing campaigns on the external user population, supporting web and mobile channels, and dealing with user authentication, sessions, user profiles, user groups, application roles, password policies, self-service/registration, social integration, identity federation, etc.
  • application developers are not identity/security experts. Therefore, on-demand identity management services are desired.
  • Fig. 5 is a block diagram 500 of an example embodiment that includes the same components 202, 220, 222, 224, 226, 234, 402, as in Figs. 2-4 .
  • IDCS 202 provides secure identity management on demand.
  • the embodiment provides on demand integration with identity services of IDCS 202 (e.g., based on standards such as OpenID Connect, OAuth2, SAML2, or SCIM).
  • Applications 505 (which may be on-premise, in a public cloud, or in a private cloud) may call identity service APIs 504 in IDCS 202.
  • the services provided by IDCS 202 may include, for example, self-service registration 506, password management 508, user profile management 510, user authentication 512, token management 514, social integration 516, etc.
  • SCIM identity bus 234 is used to synchronize data in IDCS 202 with data in on-premise LDAP Cloud Cache 402.
  • a "Cloud Gate” 502 running on a web server/proxy (e.g., NGINX, Apache, etc.) may be used by applications 505 to obtain user web SSO and REST API security from IDCS 202.
  • Cloud Gate 502 is a component that secures access to multi-tenant IDCS microservices by ensuring that client applications provide valid access tokens, and/or users successfully authenticate in order to establish SSO sessions. Cloud Gate 502 is further disclosed below.
  • Cloud Gate 502 (enforcement point similar to webgate/webagent) enables applications running behind supported web servers to participate in SSO.
  • SSO SSO and cloud SSO functionality.
  • a general point of entry for both on-premise IAM and IDCS in many organizations is SSO.
  • Cloud SSO enables users to access multiple cloud resources with a single user sign-in. Often, organizations will want to federate their on-premise identities. Accordingly, embodiments utilize open standards to allow for integration with existing SSO to preserve and extend investment (e.g., until a complete, eventual transition to an identity cloud service approach is made).
  • embodiments may further provide:
  • One embodiment provides adaptive authentication and MFA.
  • passwords and challenge questions have been seen as inadequate and susceptible to common attacks such as phishing.
  • Most business entities today are looking at some form of MFA to reduce risk.
  • solutions need to be easily provisioned, maintained, and understood by the end user, as end users usually resist anything that interferes with their digital experience.
  • Companies are looking for ways to securely incorporate bring your own device ("BYOD"), social identities, remote users, customers, and contractors, while making MFA an almost transparent component of a seamless user access experience.
  • BYOD bring your own device
  • OAuth and OpenID Connect are essential to ensure integration of existing multifactor solutions and the incorporation of newer, adaptive authentication technology.
  • embodiments define dynamic (or adaptive) authentication as the evaluation of available information (i.e., IP address, location, time of day, and biometrics) to prove an identity after a user session has been initiated.
  • available information i.e., IP address, location, time of day, and biometrics
  • embodiments provide MFA solutions that can be adopted, upgraded, and integrated easily within an IT organization as part of an end-to-end secure IAM deployment.
  • OATH open authentication
  • FIDO fast identity online
  • One embodiment provides user provisioning and certification.
  • the fundamental function of an IAM solution is to enable and support the entire user provisioning life cycle. This includes providing users with the application access appropriate for their identity and role within the organization, certifying that they have the correct ongoing access permissions (e.g., as their role or the tasks or applications used within their role change over time), and promptly de-provisioning them as their departure from the organization may require. This is important not only for meeting various compliance requirements but also because inappropriate insider access is a major source of security breaches and attacks.
  • An automated user provisioning capability within an identity cloud solution can be important not only in its own right but also as part of a hybrid IAM solution whereby IDCS provisioning may provide greater flexibility than an on-premise solution for transitions as a company downsizes, upsizes, merges, or looks to integrate existing systems with laaS/PaaS/SaaS environments.
  • An IDCS approach can save time and effort in one-off upgrades and ensure appropriate integration among necessary departments, divisions, and systems. The need to scale this technology often sneaks up on corporations, and the ability to deliver a scalable IDCS capability immediately across the enterprise can provide benefits in flexibility, cost, and control.
  • an employee is granted additional privileges (i.e., "privilege creep") over the years as her/his job changes.
  • Companies that are lightly regulated generally lack an "attestation" process that requires managers to regularly audit their employees' privileges (e.g., access to networks, servers, applications, and data) to halt or slow the privilege creep that results in over-privileged accounts.
  • one embodiment may provide a regularly conducted (at least once a year) attestation process.
  • the need for these tools and services increases exponentially as users are on SaaS systems, on-premise, span different departments, and/or are being de-provisioned or re-allocated. The move to cloud can further confuse this situation, and things can quickly escalate beyond existing, often manually managed, certification methods. Accordingly, one embodiment automates these functions and applies sophisticated analytics to user profiles, access history, provisioning/de-provisioning, and fine-grained entitlements.
  • One embodiment provides identity analytics.
  • identity analytics Generally, the ability to integrate identity analytics with the IAM engine for comprehensive certification and attestation can be critical to securing an organization's risk profile. Properly deployed identity analytics can demand total internal policy enforcement.
  • Identity analytics that provide a unified single management view across cloud and on-premise are much needed in a proactive governance, risk, and compliance ("GRC") enterprise environment, and can aid in providing a closed-loop process for reducing risk and meeting compliance regulations.
  • GOC proactive governance, risk, and compliance
  • one embodiment provides identity analytics that are easily customizable by the client to accommodate specific industry demands and government regulations for reports and analysis required by managers, executives, and auditors.
  • One embodiment provides self-service and access request functionality to improve the experience and efficiency of the end user and to reduce costs from help desk calls.
  • a number of companies deploy on-premise self-service access request for their employees, many have not extended these systems adequately outside the formal corporate walls. Beyond employee use, a positive digital customer experience increases business credibility and ultimately contributes to revenue increase, and companies not only save on customer help desk calls and costs but also improve customer satisfaction.
  • one embodiment provides an identity cloud service environment that is based on open standards and seamlessly integrates with existing access control software and MFA mechanisms when necessary. The SaaS delivery model saves time and effort formerly devoted to systems upgrades and maintenance, freeing professional IT staff to focus on more core business applications.
  • PAM privileged account management
  • Every organization whether using SaaS, PaaS, laaS, or on-premise applications, is vulnerable to unauthorized privileged account abuse by insiders with super-user access credentials such as system administrators, executives, HR officers, contractors, systems integrators, etc.
  • outside threats typically first breach a low-level user account to eventually reach and exploit privileged user access controls within the enterprise system.
  • PAM privileged account management
  • the main component of a PAM solution is a password vault which may be delivered in various ways, e.g., as software to be installed on an enterprise server, as a virtual appliance also on an enterprise server, as a packaged hardware/software appliance, or as part of a cloud service.
  • PAM functionality is similar to a physical safe used to store passwords kept in an envelope and changed periodically, with a manifest for signing them in and out.
  • One embodiment allows for a password checkout as well as setting time limits, forcing periodic changes, automatically tracking checkout, and reporting on all activities.
  • One embodiment provides a way to connect directly through to a requested resource without the user ever knowing the password. This capability also paves the way for session management and additional functionality.
  • Embodiments provide an API platform that exposes a collection of capabilities as services.
  • the APIs are aggregated into microservices, and each microservice provides one or more capabilities by exposing one or more APIs. That is, each microservice may expose different types of APIs.
  • each microservice communicates only through its APIs.
  • each API may be a microservice.
  • multiple APIs are aggregated into a service based on a target capability to be provided by that service (e.g., OAuth, SAML, Admin, etc.). As a result, similar APIs are not exposed as separate runtime processes.
  • the APIs are what is made available to a service consumer to use the services provided by IDCS.
  • a URL includes three parts: a host, a microservice, and a resource (e.g., host/ microservice/resource).
  • the microservice is characterized by having a specific URL prefix, e.g., "host/oauth/v1" where the actual microservice is “oauth/v1", and under “oauth/v1" there are multiple APIs, e.g., an API to request tokens: “host/oauth/v1/token", an API to authenticate a user: “host/oauth/v1/authorize”, etc. That is, the URL implements a microservice, and the resource portion of the URL implements an API.
  • each request includes a call to an API that identifies an identity management service (e.g., request a token, authenticate a user, etc.) and a microservice (e.g., OAuth) configured to perform the identity management service.
  • an identity management service e.g., request a token, authenticate a user, etc.
  • a microservice e.g., OAuth
  • the host portion of the URL identifies a tenant (e.g., https://tenant3.identity.oraclecloud.com:/oauth/v1/token"). In one embodiment, the host portion of the URL identifies a tenancy of a resource related to the request.
  • IDCS Configuration which includes IDCS, SAML, SCIM, OAuth, and OpenID Connect configuration, at e.g., ⁇ IDCS-URL>/.well-known/idcs-configuration
  • OpenID Connect Configuration at, e.g., ⁇ IDCS-URL>/.well-known/openid-configuration
  • Applications can retrieve discovery documents by being configured with a single IDCS URL.
  • Fig. 6 is a block diagram providing a system view 600 of IDCS in one embodiment.
  • any one of a variety of applications/services 602 may make HTTP calls to IDCS APIs to use IDCS services.
  • Examples of such applications/services 602 are web applications, native applications (e.g., applications that are built to run on a specific operating system, such as Windows applications, iOS applications, Android applications, etc.), web services, customer applications, partner applications, or any services provided by a public cloud, such as Software as a Service (“SaaS”), PaaS, and Infrastructure as a Service (“laaS").
  • SaaS Software as a Service
  • PaaS PaaS
  • laaS Infrastructure as a Service
  • the HTTP requests of applications/services 602 that require IDCS services go through an Oracle Public Cloud BIG-IP appliance 604 and an IDCS BIG-IP appliance 606 (or similar technologies such as a Load Balancer, or a component called a Cloud Load Balancer as a Service (“LBaaS”) that implements appropriate security rules to protect the traffic).
  • the requests can be received in any manner.
  • IDCS BIG-IP appliance 606 (or, as applicable, a similar technology such as a Load Balancer or a Cloud LBaaS), a cloud provisioning engine 608 performs tenant and service orchestration.
  • cloud provisioning engine 608 manages internal security artifacts associated with a new tenant being on-boarded into the cloud or a new service instance purchased by a customer.
  • IDCS web routing tier 610 that implements a security gate (i.e., Cloud Gate) and provides service routing and microservices registration and discovery 612. Depending on the service requested, the HTTP request is forwarded to an IDCS microservice in the IDCS middle tier 614.
  • IDCS microservices process external and internal HTTP requests.
  • IDCS microservices implement platform services and infrastructure services.
  • IDCS platform services are separately deployed Java-based runtime services implementing the business of IDCS.
  • IDCS infrastructure services are separately deployed runtime services providing infrastructure support for IDCS.
  • IDCS further includes infrastructure libraries that are common code packaged as shared libraries used by IDCS services and shared libraries. Infrastructure services and libraries provide supporting capabilities as required by platform services for implementing their functionality.
  • IDCS supports standard authentication protocols, hence IDCS microservices include platform services such as OpenID Connect, OAuth, SAML2, System for Cross-domain Identity Management++ (“SCIM++”), etc.
  • the OpenID Connect platform service implements standard OpenID Connect Login/Logout flows.
  • Interactive web-based and native applications leverage standard browser-based OpenID Connect flow to request user authentication, receiving standard identity tokens that are JavaScript Object Notation ("JSON") Web Tokens (“JWTs”) conveying the user's authenticated identity.
  • JSON JavaScript Object Notation
  • JWTs Web Tokens
  • the runtime authentication model is stateless, maintaining the user's authentication/session state in the form of a host HTTP cookie (including the JWT identity token).
  • the authentication interaction initiated via the OpenID Connect protocol is delegated to a trusted SSO service that implements the user login/logout ceremonies for local and federated logins. Further details of this functionality are disclosed below with reference to Figs. 10 and 11 .
  • OpenID Connect functionality is implemented according to, for example, OpenID Foundation standards.
  • the OAuth2 platform service provides token authorization services. It provides a rich API infrastructure for creating and validating access tokens conveying user rights to make API calls. It supports a range of useful token grant types, enabling customers to securely connect clients to their services. It implements standard 2-legged and 3-legged OAuth2 token grant types. Support for OpenID Connect (“OIDC”) enables compliant applications (OIDC relaying parties (“RP"s)) to integrate with IDCS as the identity provider (OIDC OpenID provider ("OP”)). Similarly, the integration of IDCS as OIDC RP with social OIDC OP (e.g., Facebook, Google, etc.) enables customers to allow social identities policy-based access to applications. In one embodiment, OAuth functionality is implemented according to, for example, Internet Engineering Task Force ("IETF”), Request for Comments (“RFC”) 6749.
  • IETF Internet Engineering Task Force
  • RRC Request for Comments
  • the SAML2 platform service provides identity federation services. It enables customers to set up federation agreements with their partners based on SAML identity provider ("IDP") and SAML service provider ("SP”) relationship models.
  • the SAML2 platform service implements standard SAML2 Browser POST Login and Logout Profiles.
  • SAML functionality is implemented according to, for example, IETF, RFC 7522.
  • SCIM is an open standard for automating the exchange of user identity information between identity domains or information technology ("IT") systems, as provided by, e.g., IETF, RFCs 7642, 7643, 7644.
  • the SCIM++ platform service provides identity administration services and enables customers to access IDP features of IDCS.
  • the administration services expose a set of stateless REST interfaces (i.e., APIs) that cover identity lifecycle, password management, group management, etc., exposing such artifacts as web-accessible resources.
  • IDCS configuration artifacts are resources, and the APIs of the administration services allow for managing IDCS resources (e.g., users, roles, password policies, applications, SAML/OIDC identity providers, SAML service providers, keys, certifications, notification templates, etc.).
  • Administration services leverage and extend the SCIM standard to implement schema-based REST APIs for Create, Read, Update, Delete, and Query ("CRUDQ") operations on all IDCS resources.
  • CRUDQ Create, Read, Update, Delete, and Query
  • SCIM-based REST APIs for Create, Read, Update, Delete, and Query
  • the SCIM standard is implemented to manage the users and groups resources as defined by the SCIM specifications, while SCIM++ is configured to support additional IDCS internal resources (e.g., password policies, roles, settings, etc.) using the language defined by the SCIM standard.
  • SCIM++ is configured to support additional IDCS internal resources (e.g., password policies, roles, settings, etc.) using the language defined by the SCIM standard.
  • the Administration service supports the SCIM 2.0 standard endpoints with the standard SCIM 2.0 core schemas and schema extensions where needed.
  • the Administration service supports several SCIM 2.0 compliant endpoint extensions to manage other IDCS resources, for example, Users, Groups, Applications, Settings, etc.
  • the Administration service also supports a set of remote procedure call-style ("RPC-style") REST interfaces that do not perform CRUDQ operations but instead provide a functional service, for example, "UserPasswordGenerator,” “UserPasswordValidator,” etc.
  • RPC-style remote procedure call-style
  • IDCS Administration APIs use the OAuth2 protocol for authentication and authorization.
  • IDCS supports common OAuth2 scenarios such as scenarios for web server, mobile, and JavaScript applications. Access to IDCS APIs is protected by access tokens.
  • an application needs to be registered as an OAuth2 client or an IDCS Application (in which case the OAuth2 client is created automatically) through the IDCS Administration console and be granted desired IDCS Administration Roles.
  • IDCS Administration API calls the application first requests an access token from the IDCS OAuth2 Service. After acquiring the token, the application sends the access token to the IDCS API by including it in the HTTP authorization header.
  • Applications can use IDCS Administration REST APIs directly, or use an IDCS Java Client API Library.
  • the IDCS infrastructure services support the functionality of IDCS platform services. These runtime services include an event processing service (for asynchronously processing user notifications, application subscriptions, and auditing to database); a job scheduler service (for scheduling and executing jobs, e.g., executing immediately or at a configured time long-running tasks that do not require user intervention); a cache management service; a storage management service (for integrating with a public cloud storage service); a reports service (for generating reports and dashboards); an SSO service (for managing internal user authentication and SSO); a user interface ("UI") service (for hosting different types of UI clients); and a service manager service.
  • Service manager is an internal interface between the Oracle Public Cloud and IDCS.
  • Service manager manages commands issued by the Oracle Public Cloud, where the commands need to be implemented by IDCS. For example, when a customer signs up for an account in a cloud store before they can buy something, the cloud sends a request to IDCS asking to create a tenant. In this case, service manager implements the cloud specific operations that the cloud expects IDCS to support.
  • An IDCS microservice may call another IDCS microservice through a network interface (i.e., an HTTP request).
  • a network interface i.e., an HTTP request
  • IDCS may also provide a schema service (or a persistence service) that allows for using a database schema.
  • a schema service allows for delegating the responsibility of managing database schemas to IDCS. Accordingly, a user of IDCS does not need to manage a database since there is an IDCS service that provides that functionality. For example, the user may use the database to persist schemas on a per tenant basis, and when there is no more space in the database, the schema service will manage the functionality of obtaining another database and growing the space so that the users do not have to manage the database themselves.
  • IDCS further includes data stores which are data repositories required/generated by IDCS, including an identity store 618 (storing users, groups, etc.), a global database 620 (storing configuration data used by IDCS to configure itself), an operational schema 622 (providing per tenant schema separation and storing customer data on a per customer basis), an audit schema 624 (storing audit data), a caching cluster 626 (storing cached objects to speed up performance), etc.
  • All internal and external IDCS consumers integrate with the identity services over standards-based protocols. This enables use of a domain name system (“DNS”) to resolve where to route requests, and decouples consuming applications from understanding the internal implementation of identity services.
  • DNS domain name system
  • IDCS separates the tasks of a requested service into synchronous real-time and asynchronous near-real-time tasks, where real-time tasks include only the operations that are needed for the user to proceed.
  • a real-time task is a task that is performed with minimal delay
  • a near-real-time task is a task that is performed in the background without the user having to wait for it.
  • a real-time task is a task that is performed with substantially no delay or with negligible delay, and appears to a user as being performed almost instantaneously.
  • the real-time tasks perform the main business functionality of a specific identity service. For example, when requesting a login service, an application sends a message to authenticate a user's credentials and get a session cookie in return. What the user experiences is logging into the system. However, several other tasks may be performed in connection with the user's logging in, such as validating who the user is, auditing, sending notifications, etc.
  • validating the credentials is a task that is performed in real-time so that the user is given an HTTP cookie to start a session, but the tasks related to notifications (e.g., sending an email to notify the creation of an account), audits (e.g., tracking/recording), etc., are near-real-time tasks that can be performed asynchronously so that the user can proceed with least delay.
  • notifications e.g., sending an email to notify the creation of an account
  • audits e.g., tracking/recording
  • the corresponding real-time tasks are performed by the microservice in the middle tier, and the remaining near-real-time tasks such as operational logic/events that are not necessarily subject to real-time processing are offloaded to message queues 628 that support a highly scalable asynchronous event management system 630 with guaranteed delivery and processing. Accordingly, certain behaviors are pushed from the front end to the backend to enable IDCS to provide high level service to the customers by reducing latencies in response times. For example, a login process may include validation of credentials, submission of a log report, updating of the last login time, etc., but these tasks can be offloaded to a message queue and performed in near-real-time as opposed to real-time.
  • a system may need to register or create a new user.
  • the system calls an IDCS SCIM API to create a user.
  • IDCS receives a request to register or create a new user
  • the corresponding microservice looks at configuration data in the operational database (located in global database 620 in Fig. 6 ) and determines that the "create user" operation is marked with a "create user” event which is identified in the configuration data as an asynchronous operation.
  • the microservice returns to the client and indicates that the creation of the user is done successfully, but the actual sending of the notification email is postponed and pushed to the backend.
  • the microservice uses a messaging API 616 to queue the message in queue 628 which is a store.
  • a messaging microservice which is an infrastructure microservice, continually runs in the background and scans queue 628 looking for events in queue 628.
  • the events in queue 628 are processed by event subscribers 630 such as audit, user notification, application subscriptions, data analytics, etc.
  • event subscribers 630 may communicate with, for example, audit schema 624, a user notification service 634, an identity event subscriber 632, etc.
  • the messaging microservice finds the "create user" event in queue 628, it executes the corresponding notification logic and sends the corresponding email to the user.
  • queue 628 queues operational events published by microservices 614 as well as resource events published by APIs 616 that manage IDCS resources.
  • IDCS uses a real-time caching structure to enhance system performance and user experience.
  • the cache itself may also be provided as a microservice.
  • IDCS implements an elastic cache cluster 626 that grows as the number of customers supported by IDCS scales.
  • Cache cluster 626 may be implemented with a distributed data grid which is disclosed in more detail below.
  • write-only resources bypass cache.
  • IDCS runtime components publish health and operational metrics to a public cloud monitoring module 636 that collects such metrics of a public cloud such as Oracle Public Cloud from Oracle Corp.
  • IDCS may be used to create a user.
  • a client application 602 may issue a REST API call to create a user.
  • Admin service a platform service in 6114
  • a user manager an infrastructure library/service in 614
  • the user manager audits the operation to the audit table in audit schema 624, and publishes an "identity.user.create.success” event to message queue 628.
  • Identity subscriber 632 picks up the event and sends a "Welcome” email to the newly created user, including newly created login details.
  • IDCS may be used to grant a role to a user, resulting in a user provisioning action.
  • a client application 602 may issue a REST API call to grant a user a role.
  • Admin service a platform service in 6114
  • role manager an infrastructure library/service in 614
  • the role manager audits the operations to the audit table in audit schema 624, and publishes an "identity.user.role.grant.success" event to message queue 628.
  • Identity subscriber 632 picks up the event and evaluates the provisioning grant policy.
  • a provisioning subscriber performs some validation, initiates account creation, calls out the target system, creates an account on the target system, and marks the account creation as successful.
  • Each of these functionalities may result in publishing of corresponding events, such as "prov.account.create.initiate”, “prov.target.create.initiate”, “prov.target.create.success”, or "prov.account.create.success”.
  • These events may have their own business metrics aggregating number of accounts created in the target system over the last N days.
  • IDCS may be used for a user to log in.
  • a client application 602 may use one of the supported authentication flows to request a login for a user.
  • IDCS authenticates the user, and upon success, audits the operation to the audit table in audit schema 624.
  • IDCS audits the failure in audit schema 624, and publishes "login.user.login.failure" event in message queue 628.
  • a login subscriber picks up the event, updates its metrics for the user, and determines if additional analytics on the user's access history need to be performed.
  • embodiments enable additional event queues and subscribers to be added dynamically to test new features on a small user sample before deploying to broader user base, or to process specific events for specific internal or external customers.
  • IDCS microservices are stateless, meaning the microservices themselves do not maintain state.
  • State refers to the data that an application uses in order to perform its capabilities. IDCS provides multi-tenant functionality by persisting all state into tenant specific repositories in the IDCS data tier. The middle tier (i.e., the code that processes the requests) does not have data stored in the same location as the application code. Accordingly, IDCS is highly scalable, both horizontally and vertically.
  • To scale vertically means to add resources to (or remove resources from) a single node in a system, typically involving the addition of CPUs or memory to a single computer.
  • Vertical scalability allows an application to scale up to the limits of its hardware.
  • To scale horizontally means to add more nodes to (or remove nodes from) a system, such as adding a new computer to a distributed software application.
  • Horizontal scalability allows an application to scale almost infinitely, bound only by the amount of bandwidth provided by the network.
  • Stateless-ness of the middle tier of IDCS makes it horizontally scalable just by adding more CPUs, and the IDCS components that perform the work of the application do not need to have a designated physical infrastructure where a particular application is running. Stateless-ness of the IDCS middle tier makes IDCS highly available, even when providing identity services to a very large number of customers/tenants. Each pass through an IDCS application/service is focused on CPU usage only to perform the application transaction itself but not use hardware to store data. Scaling is accomplished by adding more slices when the application is running, while data for the transaction is stored at a persistence layer where more copies can be added when needed.
  • the IDCS web tier, middle tier, and data tier can each scale independently and separately.
  • the web tier can be scaled to handle more HTTP requests.
  • the middle tier can be scaled to support more service functionality.
  • the data tier can be scaled to support more tenants.
  • Fig. 6A is an example block diagram 600b of a functional view of IDCS in one embodiment.
  • the IDCS functional stack includes services, shared libraries, and data stores.
  • the services include IDCS platform services 640b, IDCS premium services 650b, and IDCS infrastructure services 662b.
  • IDCS platform services 640b and IDCS premium services 650b are separately deployed Java-based runtime services implementing the business of IDCS
  • IDCS infrastructure services 662b are separately deployed runtime services providing infrastructure support for IDCS.
  • the shared libraries include IDCS infrastructure libraries 680b which are common code packaged as shared libraries used by IDCS services and shared libraries.
  • the data stores are data repositories required/generated by IDCS, including identity store 698b, global configuration 700b, message store 702b, global tenant 704b, personalization settings 706b, resources 708b, user transient data 710b, system transient data 712b, per-tenant schemas (managed ExaData) 714b, operational store (not shown), caching store (not shown), etc.
  • IDCS platform services 640b include, for example, OpenID Connect service 642b, OAuth2 service 644b, SAML2 service 646b, and SCIM++ service 648b.
  • IDCS premium services include, for example, cloud SSO and governance 652b, enterprise governance 654b, AuthN broker 656b, federation broker 658b, and private account management 660b.
  • IDCS infrastructure services 662b and IDCS infrastructure libraries 680b provide supporting capabilities as required by IDCS platform services 640b to do their work.
  • IDCS infrastructure services 662b include job scheduler 664b, UI 666b, SSO 668b, reports 670b, cache 672b, storage 674b, service manager 676b (public cloud control), and event processor 678b (user notifications, app subscriptions, auditing, data analytics).
  • IDCS infrastructure libraries 680b include data manager APIs 682b, event APIs 684b, storage APIs 686b, authentication APIs 688b, authorization APIs 690b, cookie APIs 692b, keys APIs 694b, and credentials APIs 696b.
  • cloud compute service 602b (internal Nimbula) supports the function of IDCS infrastructure services 662b and IDCS infrastructure libraries 680b.
  • IDCS provides various Uls 602b for a consumer of IDCS services, such as customer end user UI 604b, customer admin UI 606b, DevOps admin UI 608b, and login UI 610b.
  • IDCS allows for integration 612b of applications (e.g., customer apps 614b, partner apps 616b, and cloud apps 618b) and firmware integration 620b.
  • applications e.g., customer apps 614b, partner apps 616b, and cloud apps 618b
  • firmware integration 620b e.g., firmware integration 620b.
  • various environments may integrate with IDCS to support their access control needs. Such integration may be provided by, for example, identity bridge 622b (providing AD integration, WNA, and SCIM connector), Apache agent 624b, or MSFT agent 626b.
  • IDCS integrated with the identity services of IDCS over standards-based protocols 628b, such as OpenID Connect 630b, OAuth2 632b, SAML2 634b, SCIM 636b, and REST/HTTP 638b.
  • standards-based protocols 628b such as OpenID Connect 630b, OAuth2 632b, SAML2 634b, SCIM 636b, and REST/HTTP 638b.
  • DNS domain name system
  • the IDCS functional view in Fig. 6A further includes public cloud infrastructure services that provide common functionality that IDCS depends on for user notifications (cloud notification service 718b), file storage (cloud storage service 716b), and metrics/alerting for DevOps (cloud monitoring service (EM) 722b and cloud metrics service (Graphite) 720b).
  • cloud notification service 718b file storage
  • EM cloud monitoring service
  • Graphite cloud metrics service
  • IDCS implements a "Cloud Gate” in the web tier.
  • Cloud Gate is a web server plugin that enables web applications to externalize user SSO to an identity management system (e.g., IDCS), similar to WebGate or WebAgent technologies that work with enterprise IDM stacks. Cloud Gate acts as a security gatekeeper that secures access to IDCS APIs.
  • Cloud Gate is implemented by a web/proxy server plugin that provides a web Policy Enforcement Point ("PEP") for protecting HTTP resources based on OAuth.
  • PEP web Policy Enforcement Point
  • Fig. 7 is a block diagram 700 of an embodiment that implements a Cloud Gate 702 running in a web server 712 and acting as a Policy Enforcement Point ("PEP") configured to integrate with IDCS Policy Decision Point (“PDP") using open standards (e.g., OAuth2, OpenID Connect, etc.) while securing access to web browser and REST API resources 714 of an application.
  • PDP Policy Enforcement Point
  • the PDP is implemented at OAuth and/or OpenID Connect microservices 704.
  • a user browser 706 sends a request to IDCS for a login of a user 710
  • IDCS PDP validates the credentials and then decides whether the credentials are sufficient (e.g., whether to request for further credentials such as a second password).
  • Cloud Gate 702 may act both as the PEP and as the PDP since it has a local policy.
  • Cloud Gate 702 is registered with IDCS as an OAuth2 client, enabling it to request OIDC and OAuth2 operations against IDCS. Thereafter, it maintains configuration information about an application's protected and unprotected resources, subject to request matching rules (how to match URLs, e.g., with wild cards, regular expressions, etc.). Cloud Gate 702 can be deployed to protect different applications having different security policies, and the protected applications can be multi-tenant.
  • Cloud Gate 702 acts as an OIDC RP 718 initiating a user authentication flow. If user 710 has no valid local user session, Cloud Gate 702 re-directs the user to the SSO microservice and participates in the OIDC "Authorization Code" flow with the SSO microservice. The flow concludes with the delivery of a JWT as an identity token. Cloud Gate 708 validates the JWT (e.g., looks at signature, expiration, destination/audience, etc.) and issues a local session cookie for user 710. It acts as a session manager 716 securing web browser access to protected resources and issuing, updating, and validating the local session cookie. It also provides a logout URL for removal of its local session cookie.
  • JWT e.g., looks at signature, expiration, destination/audience, etc.
  • Cloud Gate 702 also acts as an HTTP Basic Auth authenticator, validating HTTP Basic Auth credentials against IDCS. This behavior is supported in both session-less and session-based (local session cookie) modes. No server-side IDCS session is created in this case.
  • Cloud Gate 702 may act as an OAuth2 resource server/filter 720 for an application's protected REST APIs 714. It checks for the presence of a request with an authorization header and an access token.
  • client 708 e.g., mobile, web apps, JavaScript, etc.
  • Cloud Gate 702 validates the access token before allowing access to the API (e.g., signature, expiration, audience, etc.). The original access token is passed along unmodified.
  • OAuth is used to generate either a client identity propagation token (e.g., indicating who the client is) or a user identity propagation token (e.g., indicating who the user is).
  • client identity propagation token e.g., indicating who the client is
  • user identity propagation token e.g., indicating who the user is
  • the implementation of OAuth in Cloud Gate is based on a JWT which defines a format for web tokens, as provided by, e.g., IETF, RFC 7519.
  • IDCS When a user logs in, a JWT is issued.
  • the JWT is signed by IDCS and supports multi-tenant functionality in IDCS.
  • Cloud Gate validates the JWT issued by IDCS to allow for multi-tenant functionality in IDCS. Accordingly, IDCS provides multi-tenancy in the physical structure as well as in the logical business process that underpins the security model.
  • IDCS specifies three types of tenancies: customer tenancy, client tenancy, and user tenancy.
  • Customer or resource tenancy specifies who the customer of IDCS is (i.e., for whom is the work being performed).
  • Client tenancy specifies which client application is trying to access data (i.e., what application is doing the work).
  • User tenancy specifies which user is using the application to access data (i.e., by whom is the work being performed). For example, when a professional services company provides system integration functionality for a warehouse club and uses IDCS for providing identity management for the warehouse club systems, user tenancy corresponds to the professional services company, client tenancy is the application that is used to provide system integration functionality, and customer tenancy is the warehouse club.
  • Decoupling user, client, and resource tenancies provides substantial business advantages for the users of the services provided by IDCS. For example, it allows a service provider that understands the needs of a business (e.g., a healthcare business) and their identity management problems to buy services provided by IDCS, develop their own backend application that consumes the services of IDCS, and provide the backend applications to the target businesses. Accordingly, the service provider may extend the services of IDCS to provide their desired capabilities and offer those to certain target businesses. The service provider does not have to build and run software to provide identity services but can instead extend and customize the services of IDCS to suit the needs of the target businesses.
  • a service provider that understands the needs of a business (e.g., a healthcare business) and their identity management problems to buy services provided by IDCS, develop their own backend application that consumes the services of IDCS, and provide the backend applications to the target businesses.
  • the service provider may extend the services of IDCS to provide their desired capabilities and offer those to certain target businesses.
  • the service provider does not have
  • Some known systems only account for a single tenancy which is customer tenancy. However, such systems are inadequate when dealing with access by a combination of users such as customer users, customer's partners, customer's clients, clients themselves, or clients that customer has delegated access to. Defining and enforcing multiple tenancies in the embodiments facilitates the identity management functionality over such variety of users.
  • one entity of IDCS does not belong to multiple tenants at the same time; it belongs to only one tenant, and a "tenancy" is where artifacts live.
  • a "tenancy" is where artifacts live.
  • infrastructure needs to act on behalf of tenants, it interacts with an entity service on behalf of the tenant. In that case, infrastructure itself has its own tenancy and customer has its own tenancy.
  • a request is submitted, there can be multiple tenancies involved in the request.
  • a client that belongs to "tenant 1" may execute a request to get a token for "tenant 2" specifying a user in "tenant 3.”
  • a user living in “tenant 1” may need to perform an action in an application owned by "tenant 2”.
  • the user needs to go to the resource namespace of "tenant 2” and request a token for themselves.
  • delegation of authority is accomplished by identifying "who” can do “what” to "whom.”
  • a first user working for a first organization (“tenant 1") may allow a second user working for a second organization (“tenant 2") to have access to a document hosted by a third organization (“tenant 3").
  • a client in "tenant 1" may request an access token for a user in “tenant 2" to access an application in "tenant 3".
  • the client may do so by invoking an OAuth request for the token by going to "http://tenant3/oauth/token”.
  • the client identifies itself as a client that lives in "tenant 1” by including a "client assertion” in the request.
  • the client assertion includes a client ID (e.g., "client 1”) and the client tenancy "tenant 1".
  • client 1 in “tenant 1”
  • the client has the right to invoke a request for a token on "tenant 3"
  • a "user assertion” is also passed as part of the same HTTP request to identify "tenant 2" as the tenancy of the user, and a header of the request identifies "tenant 3" as the tenancy of the resource/application.
  • the request identifies the tenancy of the client, the tenancy of the user, and the tenancy of the resource.
  • the access token that is generated will be issued in the context of the target tenancy which is the application tenancy ("tenant 3") and will include the user tenancy ("tenant 2"). Accordingly, the access token identifies the tenancy of the resource/application and the tenancy of the user.
  • each tenant is implemented as a separate stripe.
  • artifacts live in a tenant.
  • a service knows how to work with different tenants, and the multiple tenancies are different dimensions in the business function of a service.
  • Fig. 8 illustrates an example system 800 implementing multiple tenancies in an embodiment.
  • System 800 includes a client 802 that requests a service provided by a microservice 804 that understands how to work with data in a database 806.
  • Database 806 includes multiple tenants 808 and each tenant includes the artifacts of the corresponding tenancy.
  • microservice 804 is an OAuth microservice requested through https://tenant3/oauth/token by a client in "tenant 1" for getting a token for a user in "tenant 2" to access an application in "tenant 3", and database 806 stores data of the tenancy of the client ("tenant 1"), the tenancy of the user ("tenant 2"), and the tenancy of the resource/application ("tenant 3").
  • the function of the OAuth microservice is performed in microservice 804 using data from database 806 to verify that the request of client 802 is legitimate, and if it is legitimate, use the data from different tenancies 808 to construct the token.
  • system 800 is multi-tenant in that it can work in a cross-tenant environment by not only supporting services coming into each tenancy, but also supporting services that can act on behalf of different tenants.
  • System 800 is advantageous since microservice 804 is physically decoupled from the data in database 806, and by replicating the data across locations that are closer to the client, microservice 804 can be provided as a local service to the clients and system 800 can manage the availability of the service and provide it globally.
  • microservice 804 is stateless, meaning that the machine that runs microservice 804 does not maintain any markers pointing the service to any specific tenants. Instead, a tenancy may be marked, for example, on the host portion of a URL of a request that comes in. That tenancy points to one of tenants 808 in database 806.
  • microservice 804 cannot have the same number of connections to database 806, but instead uses a connection pool 810 which provides the actual physical connections to database 806 in the context of a database user.
  • connection string includes a set of key-value pairs, dictated by the data access interface of the data provider.
  • a connection pool is a cache of database connections maintained so that the connections can be reused when future requests to a database are required.
  • connection pooling After a connection is created, it is placed in the pool and it is used again so that a new connection does not have to be established. For example, when there needs to be ten connections between microservice 804 and database 808, there will be ten open connections in connection pool 810, all in the context of a database user (e.g., in association with a specific database user, e.g., who is the owner of that connection, whose credentials are being validated, is it a database user, is it a system credential, etc.).
  • a database user e.g., in association with a specific database user, e.g., who is the owner of that connection, whose credentials are being validated, is it a database user, is it a system credential, etc.
  • connection pool 810 The connections in connection pool 810 are created for a system user that can access anything. Therefore, in order to correctly handle auditing and privileges by microservice 804 processing requests on behalf of a tenant, the database operation is performed in the context of a "proxy user" 812 associated with the schema owner assigned to the specific tenant. This schema owner can access only the tenancy that the schema was created for, and the value of the tenancy is the value of the schema owner.
  • microservice 804 uses the connections in connection pool 810 to provide that data.
  • multi-tenancy is achieved by having stateless, elastic middle tier services process incoming requests in the context of (e.g., in association with) the tenant-specific data store binding established on a per request basis on top of the data connection created in the context of (e.g., in association with) the data store proxy user associated with the resource tenancy, and the database can scale independently of the services.
  • proxy user 812 The following provides an example functionality for implementing proxy user 812:
  • one table may include all tenants' data mixed together.
  • one embodiment provides a tenant-driven data tier.
  • the embodiment does not stripe the same database for different tenants, but instead provides a different physical database per tenant.
  • multi-tenancy may be implemented by using a pluggable database (e.g., Oracle Database 12c from Oracle Corp.) where each tenant is allocated a separate partition.
  • a resource manager processes the request and then asks for the data source for the request (separate from metadata).
  • the embodiment performs runtime switch to a respective data source/store per request. By isolating each tenant's data from the other tenants, the embodiment provides improved data security.
  • a URL token may identify the tenancy of the application that requests a service.
  • An identity token may codify the identity of a user that is to be authenticated.
  • An access token may identify multiple tenancies. For example, an access token may codify the tenancy that is the target of such access (e.g., an application tenancy) as well as the user tenancy of the user that is given access.
  • a client assertion token may identify a client ID and the client tenancy.
  • a user assertion token may identify the user and the user tenancy.
  • an identity token includes at least a "claim” [as used by one of ordinary skill in the security field] indicating the user tenant name (i.e., where the user lives).
  • a "claim" in connection with authorization tokens is a statement that one subject makes about itself or another subject. The statement can be about a name, identity, key, group, privilege, or capability, for example. Claims are issued by a provider, and they are given one or more values and then packaged in security tokens that are issued by an issuer, commonly known as a security token service (“STS").
  • STS security token service
  • an access token includes at least a claim/statement indicating the resource tenant name at the time the request for the access token was made (e.g., the customer), a claim/statement indicating the user tenant name, a claim indicating the name of the OAuth client making the request, and a claim/statement indicating the client tenant name.
  • an access token may be implemented according to the following JSON functionality:
  • a client assertion token includes at least a claim/statement indicating the client tenant name, and a claim/statement indicating the name of the OAuth client making the request.
  • the tokens and/or multiple tenancies described herein may be implemented in any multi-tenant cloud-based service other than IDCS.
  • the tokens and/or multiple tenancies described herein may be implemented in SaaS or Enterprise Resource Planning ("ERP") services.
  • ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
  • Fig. 9 is a block diagram of a network view 900 of IDCS in one embodiment.
  • Fig. 9 illustrates network interactions that are performed in one embodiment between application "zones" 904.
  • Applications are broken into zones based on the required level of protection and the implementation of connections to various other systems (e.g., SSL zone, no SSL zone, etc.).
  • Some application zones provide services that require access from the inside of IDCS, while some application zones provide services that require access from the outside of IDCS, and some are open access. Accordingly, a respective level of protection is enforced for each zone.
  • IDCS uses the access tokens described herein not only to provide services but also to secure access to and within IDCS itself.
  • IDCS microservices are exposed through RESTful interfaces and secured by the tokens described herein.
  • any one of a variety of applications/services 902 may make HTTP calls to IDCS APIs to use IDCS services.
  • the HTTP requests of applications/services 902 go through an Oracle Public Cloud Load Balancing External Virtual IP address ("VIP") 906 (or other similar technologies), a public cloud web routing tier 908, and an IDCS Load Balancing Internal VIP appliance 910 (or other similar technologies), to be received by IDCS web routing tier 912.
  • IDCS web routing tier 912 receives the requests coming in from the outside or from the inside of IDCS and routes them across either an IDCS platform services tier 914 or an IDCS infrastructure services tier 916.
  • IDCS platform services tier 914 includes IDCS microservices that are invoked from the outside of IDCS, such as OpenID Connect, OAuth, SAML, SCIM, etc.
  • IDCS infrastructure services tier 916 includes supporting microservices that are invoked from the inside of IDCS to support the functionality of other IDCS microservices. Examples of IDCS infrastructure microservices are UI, SSO, reports, cache, job scheduler, service manager, functionality for making keys, etc.
  • An IDCS cache tier 926 supports caching functionality for IDCS platform services tier 914 and IDCS infrastructure services tier 916.
  • IDCS By enforcing security both for outside access to IDCS and within IDCS, customers of IDCS can be provided with outstanding security compliance for the applications they run.
  • OAuth protocol is used to protect the communication among IDCS components (e.g., microservices) within IDCS, and the same tokens that are used for securing access from the outside of IDCS are also used for security within IDCS. That is, web routing tier 912 uses the same tokens and protocols for processing the requests it receives regardless of whether a request is received from the outside of IDCS or from the inside of IDCS. Accordingly, IDCS provides a single consistent security model for protecting the entire system, thereby allowing for outstanding security compliance since the fewer security models implemented in a system, the more secure the system is.
  • the network call may be based on an applicable network protocol such as HTTP, Transmission Control Protocol (“TCP”), User Datagram Protocol (“UDP”), etc.
  • TCP Transmission Control Protocol
  • UDP User Datagram Protocol
  • an application “X” may communicate with an application “Y” based on HTTP by exposing application “Y” as an HTTP Uniform Resource Locator (“URL”).
  • URL Uniform Resource Locator
  • "Y” is an IDCS microservice that exposes a number of resources each corresponding to a capability.
  • IDCS implements discovery functionality (implemented by an API of OAuth service) to determine where each application is running so that there is no need for the availability of static routing information.
  • an enterprise manager (“EM”) 922 provides a "single pane of glass” that extends on-premise and cloud-based management to IDCS.
  • a " chefs" server 924 which is a configuration management tool from Chef Software, Inc., provides configuration management functionality for various IDCS tiers.
  • a service deployment infrastructure and/or a persistent stored module 928 may send OAuth2 HTTP messages to IDCS web routing tier 912 for tenant lifecycle management operations, public cloud lifecycle management operations, or other operations.
  • IDCS infrastructure services tier 916 may send ID/password HTTP messages to a public cloud notification service 930 or a public cloud storage service 932.
  • One embodiment supports lightweight cloud standards for implementing a cloud scale SSO service.
  • lightweight cloud standards are HTTP, REST, and any standard that provides access through a browser (since a web browser is lightweight).
  • SOAP is an example of a heavy cloud standard which requires more management, configuration, and tooling to build a client with.
  • the embodiment uses OpenID Connect semantics for applications to request user authentication against IDCS.
  • the embodiment uses lightweight HTTP cookie-based user session tracking to track user's active sessions at IDCS without statefull server-side session support.
  • the embodiment uses JWT-based identity tokens for applications to use in mapping an authenticated identity back to their own local session.
  • the embodiment supports integration with federated identity management systems, and exposes SAML IDP support for enterprise deployments to request user authentication against IDCS.
  • Fig. 10 is a block diagram 1000 of a system architecture view of SSO functionality in IDCS in one embodiment.
  • the embodiment enables client applications to leverage standards-based web protocols to initiate user authentication flows.
  • Applications requiring SSO integration with a cloud system may be located in enterprise data centers, in remote partner data centers, or even operated by a customer on-premise.
  • different IDCS platform services implement the business of SSO, such as OpenID Connect for processing login/logout requests from connected native applications (i.e., applications utilizing OpenID Connect to integrate with IDCS); SAML IDP service for processing browser-based login/logout requests from connected applications; SAML SP service for orchestrating user authentication against an external SAML IDP; and an internal IDCS SSO service for orchestrating end user login ceremony including local or federated login flows, and for managing IDCS host session cookie.
  • SSO Secure Socket Transfer Protocol
  • HTTP works either with a form or without a form. When it works with a form, the form is seen within a browser. When it works without a form, it functions as a client to server communication.
  • IDCS OpenID Connect
  • SAML require the ability to render a form, which may be accomplished by presence of a browser or virtually performed by an application that acts as if there is a browser.
  • an application client implementing user authentication/SSO through IDCS needs to be registered in IDCS as an OAuth2 client and needs to obtain client identifier and credentials (e.g., ID/password, ID/certificate, etc.).
  • the example embodiment of Fig. 10 includes three components/microservices that collectively provide login capabilities, including two platform microservices: OAuth2 1004 and SAML2 1006, and one infrastructure microservice: SSO 1008.
  • IDCS provides an "Identity Metasystem" in which SSO services 1008 are provided over different types of applications, such as browser based web or native applications 1010 requiring 3-legged OAuth flow and acting as an OpenID Connect relaying party ("RP," an application that outsources its user authentication function to an IDP), native applications 1011 requiring 2-legged OAuth flow and acting as an OpenID Connect RP, and web applications 1012 acting as a SAML SP.
  • RP OpenID Connect relaying party
  • an Identity Metasystem is an interoperable architecture for digital identity, allowing for employing a collection of digital identities based on multiple underlying technologies, implementations, and providers.
  • LDAP, SAML, and OAuth are examples of different security standards that provide identity capability and can be the basis for building applications, and an Identity Metasystem may be configured to provide a unified security system over such applications.
  • the LDAP security model specifies a specific mechanism for handling identity, and all passes through the system are to be strictly protected.
  • SAML was developed to allow one set of applications securely exchange information with another set of applications that belong to a different organization in a different security domain. Since there is no trust between the two applications, SAML was developed to allow for one application to authenticate another application that does not belong to the same organization.
  • OAuth provides OpenID Connect that is a lightweight protocol for performing web based authentication.
  • an OpenID application 1010 connects to an OpenID server in IDCS
  • its "channels” request SSO service.
  • a SAML application 1012 connects to a SAML server in IDCS
  • its "channels” also request SSO service.
  • a respective microservice e.g., an OpenID microservice 1004 and a SAML microservice 1006
  • This architecture can be expanded to support any number of other security protocols by adding a microservice for each protocol and then using SSO microservice 1008 for SSO capability.
  • SSO microservice 1008 issues the sessions (i.e., an SSO cookie 1014 is provided) and is the only system in the architecture that has the authority to issue a session.
  • An IDCS session is realized through the use of SSO cookie 1014 by browser 1002.
  • Browser 1002 also uses a local session cookie 1016 to manage its local session.
  • a user may use a first application based on SAML and get logged in, and later use a second application built with a different protocol such as OAuth.
  • the user is provided with SSO on the second application within the same browser. Accordingly, the browser is the state or user agent and maintains the cookies.
  • SSO microservice 1008 provides login ceremony 1018, ID/password recovery 1020, first time login flow 1022, an authentication manager 1024, an HTTP cookie manager 1026, and an event manager 1028.
  • Login ceremony 1018 implements SSO functionality based on customer settings and/or application context, and may be configured according to a local form (i.e., basic Auth), an external SAML IDP, an external OIDC IDP, etc.
  • ID/password recovery 1020 is used to recover a user's ID and/or password.
  • First time login flow 1022 is implemented when a user logs in for the first time (i.e., an SSO session does not yet exist).
  • Authentication manager 1024 issues authentication tokens upon successful authentication.
  • HTTP cookie manager 1026 saves the authentication token in an SSO cookie.
  • Event manager 1028 publishes events related to SSO functionality.
  • interactions between OAuth microservice 1004 and SSO microservice 1008 are based on browser redirects so that SSO microservice 1008 challenges the user using an HTML form, validates credentials, and issues a session cookie.
  • OAuth microservice 1004 may receive an authorization request from browser 1002 to authenticate a user of an application according to 3-legged OAuth flow.
  • OAuth microservice 1004 then acts as an OIDC provider 1030, redirects browser 1002 to SSO microservice 1008, and passes along application context.
  • SSO microservice 1008 either validates the existing session or performs a login ceremony.
  • SSO microservice 1008 returns authentication context to OAuth microservice 1004.
  • OAuth microservice 1004 redirects browser 1002 to a callback URL with an authorization ("AZ") code. Browser 1002 sends the AZ code to OAuth microservice 1004 to request the required tokens 1032.
  • AZ authorization
  • Browser 1002 also includes its client credentials (obtained when registering in IDCS as an OAuth2 client) in the HTTP authorization header.
  • OAuth microservice 1004 in return provides the required tokens 1032 to browser 1002.
  • tokens 1032 provided to browser 1002 include JW identity and access tokens signed by the IDCS OAuth2 server. Further details of this functionality are disclosed below with reference to Fig. 11 .
  • OAuth microservice 1004 may receive an authorization request from a native application 1011 to authenticate a user according to a 2-legged OAuth flow.
  • an authentication manager 1034 in OAuth microservice 1004 performs the corresponding authentication (e.g., based on ID/password received from a client 1011) and a token manager 1036 issues a corresponding access token upon successful authentication.
  • SAML microservice 1006 may receive an SSO POST request from a browser to authenticate a user of a web application 1012 that acts as a SAML SP.
  • SAML microservice 1006 then acts as a SAML IDP 1038, redirects browser 1002 to SSO microservice 1008, and passes along application context.
  • SSO microservice 1008 either validates the existing session or performs a login ceremony.
  • SSO microservice 1008 returns authentication context to SAML microservice 1006.
  • SAML microservice redirects to the SP with required tokens.
  • SAML microservice 1006 may act as a SAML SP 1040 and go to a remote SAML IDP 1042 (e.g., an active directory federation service ("ADFS")).
  • a remote SAML IDP 1042 e.g., an active directory federation service ("ADFS")
  • ADFS active directory federation service
  • One embodiment implements the standard SAML/AD flows.
  • interactions between SAML microservice 1006 and SSO microservice 1008 are based on browser redirects so that SSO microservice 1008 challenges the user using an HTML form, validates credentials, and issues a session cookie.
  • the interactions between a component within IDCS (e.g., 1004, 1006, 1008) and a component outside IDCS (e.g., 1002, 1011, 1042) are performed through firewalls 1044.
  • Fig. 11 is a message sequence flow 1100 of SSO functionality provided by IDCS in one embodiment.
  • a user uses a browser 1102 to access a client 1106 (e.g., a browser-based application or a mobile/native application)
  • OAuth2 microservice 1110 constructs the application context (i.e., metadata that describes the application, e.g., identity of the connecting application, client ID, configuration, what the application can do, etc.), and redirects browser 1102 to SSO microservice 1112 to log in.
  • application context i.e., metadata that describes the application, e.g., identity of the connecting application, client ID, configuration, what the application can do, etc.
  • SSO microservice 1112 validates the existing session without starting a login ceremony. If the user does not have a valid SSO session (i.e., no session cookie exists), the SSO microservice 1112 initiates the user login ceremony in accordance with customer's login preferences (e.g., displaying a branded login page). In order to do so, the SSO microservice 1112 redirects browser 1102 to a login application service 1114 implemented in JavaScript. Login application service 1114 provides a login page in browser 1102. Browser 1102 sends a REST POST to the SSO microservice 1112 including login credentials. The SSO microservice 1112 generates an access token and sends it to Cloud Gate 1104 in a REST POST. Cloud Gate 1104 sends the authentication information to Admin SCIM microservice 1116 to validate the user's password. Admin SCIM microservice 1116 determines successful authentication and sends a corresponding message to SSO microservice 1112.
  • the login page does not display a consent page, as "login" operation requires no further consent. Instead, a privacy policy is stated on the login page, informing the user about certain profile attributes being exposed to applications.
  • the SSO microservice 1112 respects customer's IDP preferences, and if configured, redirects to the IDP for authentication against the configured IDP.
  • SSO microservice 1112 redirects browser 1102 back to OAuth2 microservice 1110 with the newly created/updated SSO host HTTP cookie (e.g., the cookie that is created in the context of the host indicated by "HOSTURL") containing the user's authentication token.
  • OAuth2 microservice 1110 returns AZ Code (e.g., an OAuth concept) back to browser 1102 and redirects to Cloud Gate 1104.
  • Browser 1102 sends AZ Code to Cloud Gate 1104, and Cloud Gate 1104 sends a REST POST to OAuth2 microservice 1110 to request the access token and the identity token. Both tokens are scoped to OAuth microservice 1110 (indicated by the audience token claim).
  • Cloud Gate 1104 receives the tokens from OAuth2 microservice 1110.
  • Cloud Gate 1104 uses the identity token to map the user's authenticated identity to its internal account representation, and it may save this mapping in its own HTTP cookie. Cloud Gate 1104 then redirects browser 1102 to client 1106. Browser 1102 then reaches client 1106 and receives a corresponding response from client 1106. From this point on, browser 1102 can access the application (i.e., client 1106) seamlessly for as long as the application's local cookie is valid. Once the local cookie becomes invalid, the authentication process is repeated.
  • application i.e., client 1106
  • Cloud Gate 1104 further uses the access token received in a request to obtain "userinfo” from OAuth2 microservice 1110 or the SCIM microservice.
  • the access token is sufficient to access the "userinfo” resource for the attributes allowed by the “profile” scope. It is also sufficient to access “/me” resources via the SCIM microservice.
  • the received access token is only good for user profile attributes that are allowed under the "profile” scope. Access to other profile attributes is authorized based on additional (optional) scopes submitted in the AZ grant login request issued by Cloud Gate 1104.
  • the SSO integration architecture uses a similar OpenID Connect user authentication flow for browser-based user logouts.
  • a user with an existing application session accesses Cloud Gate 1104 to initiate a logout.
  • the user may have initiated the logout on the IDCS side.
  • Cloud Gate 1104 terminates the application-specific user session, and initiates OAuth2 OpenID Provider ("OP") logout request against OAuth2 microservice 1110.
  • OAuth2 microservice 1110 redirects to SSO microservice 1112 that kills the user's host SSO cookie.
  • SSO microservice 1112 initiates a set of redirects (OAuth2 OP and SAML IDP) against known logout endpoints as tracked in user's SSO cookie.
  • Cloud Gate 1104 uses SAML protocol to request user authentication (e.g., login)
  • user authentication e.g., login
  • Cloud Cache is provided in IDCS to support communication with applications that are LDAP based (e.g., email servers, calendar servers, some business applications, etc.) since IDCS does not communicate according to LDAP while such applications are configured to communicate only based on LDAP.
  • applications that are LDAP based (e.g., email servers, calendar servers, some business applications, etc.) since IDCS does not communicate according to LDAP while such applications are configured to communicate only based on LDAP.
  • cloud directories are exposed via REST APIs and do not communicate according to the LDAP protocol.
  • managing LDAP connections across corporate firewalls requires special configurations that are difficult to set up and manage.
  • Cloud Cache translates LDAP communications to a protocol suitable for communication with a cloud system.
  • an LDAP based application uses a database via LDAP.
  • An application may be alternatively configured to use a database via a different protocol such as SQL.
  • SQL a protocol suitable for communication with a cloud system.
  • LDAP provides a hierarchical representation of resources in tree structures, while SQL represents data as tables and fields. Accordingly, LDAP may be more desirable for searching functionality, while SQL may be more desirable for transactional functionality.
  • services provided by IDCS may be used in an LDAP based application to, for example, authenticate a user of the applications (i.e., an identity service) or enforce a security policy for the application (i.e., a security service).
  • the interface with IDCS is through a firewall and based on HTTP (e.g., REST).
  • HTTP e.g., REST
  • corporate firewalls do not allow access to internal LDAP communication even if the communication implements Secure Sockets Layer (“SSL”), and do not allow a TCP port to be exposed through the firewall.
  • SSL Secure Sockets Layer
  • Cloud Cache translates between LDAP and HTTP to allow LDAP based applications reach services provided by IDCS, and the firewall will be open for HTTP.
  • an LDAP directory may be used in a line of business such as marketing and development, and defines users, groups, works, etc.
  • a marketing and development business may have different targeted customers, and for each customer, may have their own applications, users, groups, works, etc.
  • Another example of a line of business that may run an LDAP cache directory is a wireless service provider.
  • each call made by a user of the wireless service provider authenticates the user's device against the LDAP directory, and some of the corresponding information in the LDAP directory may be synchronized with a billing system.
  • LDAP provides functionality to physically segregate content that is being searched at runtime.
  • a wireless service provider may handle its own identity management services for their core business (e.g., regular calls), while using services provided by IDCS in support of a short term marketing campaign.
  • Cloud Cache "flattens" LDAP when it has a single set of users and a single set of groups that it runs against the cloud.
  • any number of Cloud Caches may be implemented in IDCS.
  • the cache cluster in IDCS is implemented based on a distributed data grid, as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2016/0092540 , the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
  • a distributed data grid is a system in which a collection of computer servers work together in one or more clusters to manage information and related operations, such as computations, within a distributed or clustered environment.
  • a distributed data grid can be used to manage application objects and data that are shared across the servers.
  • a distributed data grid provides low response time, high throughput, predictable scalability, continuous availability, and information reliability.
  • distributed data grids such as, e.g., the Oracle Coherence data grid from Oracle Corp., store information in-memory to achieve higher performance, and employ redundancy in keeping copies of that information synchronized across multiple servers, thus ensuring resiliency of the system and continued availability of the data in the event of failure of a server.
  • IDCS implements a distributed data grid such as Coherence so that every microservice can request access to shared cache objects without getting blocked.
  • Coherence is a proprietary Java-based in-memory data grid, designed to have better reliability, scalability, and performance than traditional relational database management systems.
  • Coherence provides a peer to peer (i.e., with no central manager), in-memory, distributed cache.
  • Fig. 12 illustrates an example of a distributed data grid 1200 which stores data and provides data access to clients 1250 and implements embodiments of the invention.
  • a "data grid cluster”, or “distributed data grid” is a system comprising a plurality of computer servers (e.g., 1220a, 1220b, 1220c, and 1220d) which work together in one or more clusters (e.g., 1200a, 1200b, 1200c) to store and manage information and related operations, such as computations, within a distributed or clustered environment.
  • distributed data grid 1200 is illustrated as comprising four servers 1220a, 1220b, 1220c, 1220d, with five data nodes 1230a, 1230b, 1230c, 1230d, and 1230e in a cluster 1200a
  • the distributed data grid 1200 may comprise any number of clusters and any number of servers and/or nodes in each cluster.
  • distributed data grid 1200 implements the present invention.
  • a distributed data grid provides data storage and management capabilities by distributing data over a number of servers (e.g., 1220a, 1220b, 1220c, and 1220d) working together.
  • Each server of the data grid cluster may be a conventional computer system such as, for example, a "commodity x86" server hardware platform with one to two processor sockets and two to four CPU cores per processor socket.
  • Each server e.g., 1220a, 1220b, 1220c, and 1220d
  • NIC Network Interface Cards
  • memory including, for example, a minimum of 4 GB of RAM up to 64 GB of RAM or more.
  • Server 1220a is illustrated as having CPU 1222a, Memory 1224a, and NIC 1226a (these elements are also present but not shown in the other Servers 1220b, 1220c, 1220d).
  • each server may also be provided with flash memory (e.g., SSD 1228a) to provide spillover storage capacity.
  • the SSD capacity is preferably ten times the size of the RAM.
  • the servers (e.g., 1220a, 1220b, 1220c, 1220d) in a data grid cluster 1200a are connected using high bandwidth NICs (e.g., PCI-X or PCIe) to a high-performance network switch 1220 (for example, gigabit Ethernet or better).
  • NICs e.g., PCI-X or PCIe
  • a cluster 1200a preferably contains a minimum of four physical servers to avoid the possibility of data loss during a failure, but a typical installation has many more servers. Failover and failback are more efficient the more servers that are present in each cluster and the impact of a server failure on a cluster is lessened.
  • each data grid cluster is ideally confined to a single switch 1202 which provides single hop communication between servers.
  • a cluster may thus be limited by the number of ports on the switch 1202.
  • a typical cluster will therefore include between 4 and 96 physical servers.
  • each data center in the WAN has independent, but interconnected, data grid clusters (e.g., 1200a, 1200b, and 1200c).
  • a WAN may, for example, include many more clusters than shown in Fig. 12 .
  • the distributed data grid can secure data and service to clients 1250 against simultaneous loss of all servers in one cluster caused by a natural disaster, fire, flooding, extended power loss, and the like.
  • One or more nodes operate on each server (e.g., 1220a, 1220b, 1220c, 1220d) of a cluster 1200a.
  • the nodes may be, for example, software applications, virtual machines, or the like, and the servers may comprise an operating system, hypervisor, or the like (not shown) on which the node operates.
  • each node is a Java virtual machine ("JVM").
  • JVMs/nodes may be provided on each server depending on the CPU processing power and memory available on the server. JVMs/nodes may be added, started, stopped, and deleted as required by the distributed data grid. JVMs that run Oracle Coherence automatically join and cluster when started. JVMs/nodes that join a cluster are called cluster members or cluster nodes.
  • Each client or server includes a bus or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a processor coupled to bus for processing information.
  • the processor may be any type of general or specific purpose processor.
  • Each client or server may further include a memory for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor.
  • the memory can be comprised of any combination of random access memory (“RAM”), read only memory (“ROM”), static storage such as a magnetic or optical disk, or any other type of computer readable media.
  • Each client or server may further include a communication device, such as a network interface card, to provide access to a network. Therefore, a user may interface with each client or server directly, or remotely through a network, or any other method.
  • Computer readable media may be any available media that can be accessed by processor and includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media, and communication media.
  • Communication media may include computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery media.
  • the processor may further be coupled via bus to a display, such as a Liquid Crystal Display ("LCD").
  • LCD Liquid Crystal Display
  • a keyboard and a cursor control device, such as a computer mouse, may be further coupled to bus to enable a user to interface with each client or server.
  • the memory stores software modules that provide functionality when executed by the processor.
  • the modules include an operating system that provides operating system functionality each client or server.
  • the modules may further include a cloud identity management module for providing cloud identity management functionality, and all other functionality disclosed herein.
  • the clients may access a web service such as a cloud service.
  • the web service may be implemented on a WebLogic Server from Oracle Corp. in one embodiment. In other embodiments, other implementations of a web service can be used.
  • the web service accesses a database which stores cloud data.
  • embodiments implement a microservices based architecture to provide cloud-based multi-tenant IAM services.
  • each requested identity management service is broken into real-time tasks that are handled by a microservice in the middle tier, and near-real-time tasks that are offloaded to a message queue. Accordingly, embodiments provide a cloud-scale IAM platform.
  • Fig. 13 is a flow diagram 1300 of IAM functionality in accordance with an embodiment.
  • the functionality of the flow diagram of Fig. 13 is implemented by software stored in memory or other computer readable or tangible medium, and executed by a processor.
  • the functionality may be performed by hardware (e.g., through the use of an application specific integrated circuit ("ASIC"), a programmable gate array (“PGA”), a field programmable gate array (“FPGA”), etc.), or any combination of hardware and software.
  • ASIC application specific integrated circuit
  • PGA programmable gate array
  • FPGA field programmable gate array
  • a request is received from a client for an identity management service, at 1304 the request is authenticated, and at 1306 a microservice is accessed based on the request.
  • a variety of applications/services 602 may make HTTP calls to IDCS APIs to use IDCS microservices 614 as illustrated in Fig. 6 .
  • a microservice is a self-contained module that can communicate with other modules/microservices, and each microservice has an unnamed universal port that can be contacted by others.
  • the request is authenticated by a security gate such as Cloud Gate as described herein.
  • the request is authenticated, for example, with reference to web routing tier 610 in Fig. 6 and/or cloud gate 702 in Fig. 7 .
  • a tenancy of the client, a tenancy of a user related to the request, and a tenancy of a resource related to the request are determined based on the request, for example, as described herein with reference to "Tenancy Types".
  • the request includes a client assertion token identifying the tenancy of the client.
  • the request includes a user assertion token identifying the tenancy of the user.
  • a header of the request indicates the tenancy of the resource.
  • the resource is an application or data residing in the resource tenancy and owned by the corresponding resource tenant.
  • the client is a browser used by the user. In one embodiment, at least two of the tenancy of the client, the tenancy of the user, and the tenancy of the resource are the same tenancy.
  • a client in "tenant 1" may request an access token for a user in “tenant 2" to access an application in "tenant 3".
  • the client may do so by invoking an OAuth request for the token by going to "http://tenant3/oauth/token”.
  • the client identifies itself as a client that lives in "tenant 1” by including a "client assertion” in the request.
  • the client assertion includes a client ID (e.g., "client 1”) and the client tenancy "tenant 1".
  • client 1 in “tenant 1”
  • the client has the right to invoke a request for a token on "tenant 3"
  • a "user assertion” is also passed as part of the same HTTP request.
  • the access token that is generated will be issued in the context of the target tenancy which is the application tenancy ("tenant 3") and will include the user tenancy ("tenant 2").
  • data is retrieved from at least one of the tenancy of the client, the tenancy of the user, or the tenancy of the resource in a database, as described herein, for example, with reference to data retrieval from database 806 in Fig. 8 .
  • microservice 804 retrieves the data by using connection pool 810 that provides connections to database 806 as described herein with reference to data retrieval from database 806 in Fig. 8 .
  • the tenancy of the client, the tenancy of the user, and the tenancy of the resource may be the same or different tenancies.
  • the client may reside in a first tenant, and the user may reside in a second tenant different than the first tenant.
  • the client may reside in a first tenant, and the resource may reside in a second tenant different than the first tenant.
  • the user may reside in a first tenant, and the resource may reside in a second tenant different than the first tenant.
  • the client may reside in a first tenant, the user may reside in a second tenant different than the first tenant, and the resource may reside in the third tenant different than the first and second tenant.
  • an identity management task is performed by the service using the data, for example, as described herein with reference to the IDCS "API platform" and accessing microservices in IDCS middle tier 614 in Fig. 6 .
  • the identity management task includes obtaining an access token for the user to access the resource. In one embodiment, that access token identifies the tenancy of the resource and the tenancy of the user.
  • the identity management task includes authentication of the user. In one embodiment, the authentication may be based on the OAuth standard, using a 3-legged or 2-legged flow.
  • the service is stateless.
  • microservice 804 uses proxy user 812 to connect to a respective connection in connection pool 810.
  • proxy user 812 represents a tenant 808 in database 806.
  • database 806 and microservice 804 are configured to scale independently of one another.
  • database 806 includes a distributed data grid.
  • Fig. 14 is a flow diagram 1400 of IAM functionality in accordance with an embodiment.
  • the functionality of the flow diagram of Fig. 14 is implemented by software stored in memory or other computer readable or tangible medium, and executed by a processor.
  • the functionality may be performed by hardware (e.g., through the use of an application specific integrated circuit ("ASIC"), a programmable gate array (“PGA”), a field programmable gate array (“FPGA”), etc.), or any combination of hardware and software.
  • ASIC application specific integrated circuit
  • PGA programmable gate array
  • FPGA field programmable gate array
  • a request is received from a client for obtaining an access token for a user to access a resource.
  • the request is an HTTP request.
  • a variety of applications/services 602 may make HTTP calls to IDCS APIs to use IDCS microservices 614 as illustrated in Fig. 6 .
  • the request indicates an authorization standard for authenticating the user and obtaining the access token.
  • the authorization standard is OAuth.
  • the client is an OAuth client.
  • the token is a JWT.
  • the resource is an application or data residing in the tenancy of the resource and owned by the corresponding tenant.
  • the client is a browser used by the user.
  • the request is authenticated by a security gate such as Cloud Gate as described herein, for example, with reference to web routing tier 610 in Fig. 6 and/or cloud gate 702 in Fig. 7 .
  • a tenancy of the client, a tenancy of the user, and a tenancy of the resource are determined based on the request.
  • the request includes a client assertion token identifying the tenancy of the client.
  • the request includes a user assertion token identifying the tenancy of the user.
  • a header of the request indicates the tenancy of the resource.
  • a client in "tenant 1" may request an access token for a user in "tenant 2" to access an application in "tenant 3". The client may do so by invoking an OAuth request for the token by going to "http://tenant3/oauth/token".
  • the client identifies itself as a client that lives in "tenant 1" by including a "client assertion” in the request.
  • the client assertion includes a client ID (e.g., "client 1") and the client tenancy "tenant 1".
  • client 1 in “tenant 1”
  • the client has the right to invoke a request for a token on "tenant 3”
  • the client wants the token for a user in "tenant 2”.
  • a "user assertion” is also passed as part of the same HTTP request.
  • the access token that is generated will be issued in the context of the target tenancy which is the application tenancy ("tenant 3") and will include the user tenancy ("tenant 2").
  • the tenancy of the client, the tenancy of the user, and the tenancy of the resource may be the same or different tenancies. In one embodiment, at least two of the tenancy of the client, the tenancy of the user, and the tenancy of the resource are the same tenancy. In one embodiment, at least two of the tenancy of the client, the tenancy of the user, and the tenancy of the resource are different tenancies.
  • the client may reside in a first tenant, and the user may reside in a second tenant different than the first tenant.
  • the client may reside in a first tenant, and the resource may reside in a second tenant different than the first tenant.
  • the user may reside in a first tenant, and the resource may reside in a second tenant different than the first tenant.
  • the client may reside in a first tenant, the user may reside in a second tenant different than the first tenant, and the resource may reside in the third tenant different than the first and second tenant.
  • a microservice is accessed based on the request.
  • a microservice is a self-contained module that can talk to other modules/microservices, and each microservice has an unnamed universal port that can be contacted by others.
  • a microservice is accessed, for example, as described herein with reference to the IDCS "API platform" and accessing microservices in IDCS middle tier 614 in Fig. 6 .
  • an identity management service is performed by the microservice based on the request.
  • the identity management service includes generating the access token that identifies the tenancy of the resource and the tenancy of the user.
  • an access token includes at least a claim indicating the resource tenant name at the time the request for the access token was made (e.g., the customer), a claim indicating the user tenant name, a claim indicating the name of the OAuth client making the request, and a claim indicating the client tenant name.
  • an access token may be implemented according to the following JSON functionality:
  • the identity management service includes authentication of the user.
  • the authentication may be based on the OAuth standard, using a 3-legged or 2-legged flow, as described herein, for example, with reference to Fig. 10 .
  • the request is authenticated by a security gate such as Cloud Gate as described herein.
  • data of the tenancy of the client, the tenancy of the user, and the tenancy of the resource are stored in a database.
  • the database and the microservice are configured to scale independently of one another.
  • the database includes a distributed data grid.
  • Fig. 15 is a flow diagram 1500 of IAM functionality in accordance with an embodiment.
  • the functionality of the flow diagram of Fig. 15 is implemented by software stored in memory or other computer readable or tangible medium, and executed by a processor.
  • the functionality may be performed by hardware (e.g., through the use of an application specific integrated circuit ("ASIC"), a programmable gate array (“PGA”), a field programmable gate array (“FPGA”), etc.), or any combination of hardware and software.
  • ASIC application specific integrated circuit
  • PGA programmable gate array
  • FPGA field programmable gate array
  • a request is received for performing an identity management service.
  • the request includes a call to an API that identifies the identity management service and a microservice configured to perform the identity management service.
  • the microservice is a self-contained module that can communicate with other modules/microservices, and each microservice has an unnamed universal port that can be contacted by others.
  • applications/services 602 may make HTTP calls to IDCS APIs to use IDCS microservices 614 as illustrated in Fig. 6 .
  • a microservice is a runtime component/process.
  • the request includes a URL.
  • the microservice is identified in a prefix of the URL.
  • a resource portion of the URL identifies the API.
  • a host portion of the URL identifies a tenancy of a resource related to the request.
  • a microservice in the web environment of IDCS, a microservice is characterized by having a specific URL prefix, e.g., "host/oauth/v1" where the actual microservice is “oauth/v1", and under “oauth/v1" there are multiple APIs, e.g., an API to request tokens: “host/oauth/v1/token", an API to authenticate a user: “host/oauth/v1/authorize”, etc. That is, the URL implements a microservice, and the resource portion of the URL implements an API. Accordingly, multiple APIs are aggregated under the same microservice.
  • the host portion of the URL identifies a tenant (e.g., https://tenant3.identity.oraclecloud.com:/oauth/v1/token").
  • the request is authenticated.
  • the request is authenticated by a security gate such as Cloud Gate as described herein, for example, with reference to web routing tier 610 in Fig. 6 and/or cloud gate 702 in Fig. 7 .
  • the microservice is accessed based on the API, for example, as described herein with reference to the IDCS "API platform" and accessing microservices in IDCS middle tier 614 in Fig. 6 .
  • communicating with the microservice is configured through an unnamed universal port of the microservice.
  • the unnamed universal port of a microservice is a standard communication channel that the microservice exposes by convention (e.g., as a conventional HTTP port) and that allows any other module/microservice within the same service to talk to it.
  • the microservice provides one or more capabilities by exposing one or more APIs.
  • communication with the microservice is implemented only through the one or more APIs.
  • the microservice can be reached/contacted only by making calls to such APIs.
  • communication with the microservice is configured according to a lightweight protocol.
  • the lightweight protocol includes HTTP and REST.
  • the request includes a call to a RESTful HTTP API.
  • dispatching functionality Each HTTP request includes a URI and a verb. The embodiment parses the endpoint (host/service/resource) from the URI and combines it with the HTTP verb (e.g., POST, PUT, PATCH, or DELETE) to dispatch (or invoke) the appropriate method of the appropriate module. This pattern is common to REST and is supported by various packages (e.g., Jersey).
  • the identity management service is performed by the microservice, for example, as described herein with reference to the IDCS "API platform" and accessing microservices in IDCS middle tier 614 in Fig. 6 .
  • the microservice is stateless, horizontally scalable, and independently deployable.
  • each physical implementation of the microservice is configured to securely support multiple tenants.
  • the identity management service includes a login service, an SSO service, a federation service, a token service, a directory service, a provisioning service, or an RBAC service.
  • the microservice performs the identity management service based on tenant data stored in a database.
  • the database and the microservice are configured to scale independently of one another.
  • the database includes a distributed data grid.
  • Fig. 16 is a flow diagram 1600 of IAM functionality in accordance with an embodiment.
  • the functionality of the flow diagram of Fig. 16 is implemented by software stored in memory or other computer readable or tangible medium, and executed by a processor.
  • the functionality may be performed by hardware (e.g., through the use of an application specific integrated circuit ("ASIC"), a programmable gate array (“PGA”), a field programmable gate array (“FPGA”), etc.), or any combination of hardware and software.
  • ASIC application specific integrated circuit
  • PGA programmable gate array
  • FPGA field programmable gate array
  • a request is received for performing an identity management service, and at 1604 a microservice is accessed based on the identity management service.
  • a microservice is a self-contained module that can communicate with other modules/microservices, and each microservice has an unnamed universal port that can be contacted by others.
  • applications/services 602 may make HTTP calls to IDCS APIs to use IDCS microservices 614 as illustrated in Fig. 6 .
  • the service is a login service, an SSO service, a federation service, a token service, a directory service, a provisioning service, or an RBAC service.
  • one or more real-time tasks and one or more near-real-time tasks that are required to be executed to complete the identity management service are determined, for example, as described herein with reference to "Real-Time and Near-Real-Time Tasks".
  • the identity management service includes authenticating the user, and the one or more real-time tasks include validating credentials of the user and starting a corresponding session.
  • the one or more near-real-time tasks include at least one of auditing or notifications.
  • the request is authenticated by a security gate such as Cloud Gate as described herein, for example, with reference to web routing tier 610 in Fig. 6 and/or cloud gate 702 in Fig. 7 .
  • the one or more real-time tasks are synchronously executed by the microservice (microservices 614 in Fig. 6 ), and at 1610 the one or more near-real-time tasks are sent to a queue (e.g., message queue 628 in Fig. 6 ) to be asynchronously executed.
  • executing a task synchronously refers to waiting for the execution of the task to finish before starting the execution of another task.
  • executing a task asynchronously refers to allowing for the execution of another task to start before the former task has finished executing (e.g., while the former task is executing in a thread, starting another task or process on another thread).
  • the queue is a message queue (e.g., message queue 628 in Fig. 6 ) that implements a highly scalable asynchronous event management system with guaranteed delivery and processing.
  • the identity management task is requested to allow a user to proceed with accessing a resource.
  • the user is allowed to proceed with accessing the resource when the first set of subtasks are completed and before the second set of subtasks are completed.
  • the decision as to which tasks will execute synchronously as part of the request and which tasks will be executed asynchronously is made at design-time, not at run-time.
  • the embodiment at run-time executes a code with specific values (e.g., to create a specific user or to emit events that record creation of a specific User), but does not decide at run-time whether a particular task will be synchronous or asynchronous.
  • the corresponding microservice looks at configuration data in the operational database (located in global database 620 in Fig. 6 ) and determines that the "create user" operation is marked with a "create user" event which is identified in the configuration data as an asynchronous operation.
  • the microservice returns to the client and indicates that the creation of the user is done successfully, but the actual sending of the notification email is postponed and pushed to the backend. In order to do so, the microservice uses a messaging API 616 to queue the message in queue 628 which is a store.
  • the microservice is stateless. In one embodiment, the microservice performs the identity management service based on tenant data stored in a database. In one embodiment, the database and the microservice are configured to scale independently of one another. In one embodiment, the database includes a distributed data grid.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Storage Device Security (AREA)
  • Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
EP18163194.6A 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit Active EP3361702B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (13)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201662334645P 2016-05-11 2016-05-11
US201662371336P 2016-08-05 2016-08-05
US201662376069P 2016-08-17 2016-08-17
US201662395501P 2016-09-16 2016-09-16
US201662395463P 2016-09-16 2016-09-16
US201662395479P 2016-09-16 2016-09-16
US201662434501P 2016-12-15 2016-12-15
US15/450,512 US9838376B1 (en) 2016-05-11 2017-03-06 Microservices based multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
US15/450,550 US9838377B1 (en) 2016-05-11 2017-03-06 Task segregation in a multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
US15/469,718 US10341410B2 (en) 2016-05-11 2017-03-27 Security tokens for a multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
US15/485,532 US9781122B1 (en) 2016-05-11 2017-04-12 Multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
PCT/US2017/031649 WO2017196774A1 (en) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
EP17724697.2A EP3311548B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17724697.2A Division EP3311548B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit
EP17724697.2A Division-Into EP3311548B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3361702A1 true EP3361702A1 (de) 2018-08-15
EP3361702B1 EP3361702B1 (de) 2019-10-23

Family

ID=61387621

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17724697.2A Active EP3311548B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit
EP18163194.6A Active EP3361702B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit
EP18163192.0A Active EP3361701B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit
EP18163186.2A Active EP3361700B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17724697.2A Active EP3311548B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18163192.0A Active EP3361701B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit
EP18163186.2A Active EP3361700B1 (de) 2016-05-11 2017-05-09 Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (4) EP3311548B1 (de)
JP (4) JP6491796B2 (de)
KR (4) KR101873941B1 (de)
CN (4) CN107852417B (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11924220B2 (en) 2021-11-12 2024-03-05 Netskope, Inc. User directory deployment based on user and group policies

Families Citing this family (87)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10484382B2 (en) 2016-08-31 2019-11-19 Oracle International Corporation Data management for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US10846390B2 (en) 2016-09-14 2020-11-24 Oracle International Corporation Single sign-on functionality for a multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
US10511589B2 (en) 2016-09-14 2019-12-17 Oracle International Corporation Single logout functionality for a multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
US10594684B2 (en) 2016-09-14 2020-03-17 Oracle International Corporation Generating derived credentials for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US10445395B2 (en) 2016-09-16 2019-10-15 Oracle International Corporation Cookie based state propagation for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US10484243B2 (en) 2016-09-16 2019-11-19 Oracle International Corporation Application management for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
EP3513542B1 (de) 2016-09-16 2021-05-19 Oracle International Corporation Mandanten- und dienstverwaltung für mandantenfähigen cloud-dienst zur identitäts- und datensicherheitsverwaltung
US10904074B2 (en) 2016-09-17 2021-01-26 Oracle International Corporation Composite event handler for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
CN108416679B (zh) * 2017-06-07 2022-02-08 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 多保险产品出单的装置、方法及计算机可读存储介质
US11308132B2 (en) 2017-09-27 2022-04-19 Oracle International Corporation Reference attributes for related stored objects in a multi-tenant cloud service
US10705823B2 (en) 2017-09-29 2020-07-07 Oracle International Corporation Application templates and upgrade framework for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US10715564B2 (en) 2018-01-29 2020-07-14 Oracle International Corporation Dynamic client registration for an identity cloud service
US10931656B2 (en) * 2018-03-27 2021-02-23 Oracle International Corporation Cross-region trust for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US11165634B2 (en) 2018-04-02 2021-11-02 Oracle International Corporation Data replication conflict detection and resolution for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US10798165B2 (en) 2018-04-02 2020-10-06 Oracle International Corporation Tenant data comparison for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US11258775B2 (en) * 2018-04-04 2022-02-22 Oracle International Corporation Local write for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
KR102164040B1 (ko) * 2018-04-16 2020-10-12 (주) 영림원소프트랩 클라우드 기반 전사적 자원 관리 시스템과 외부 시스템 간의 양방향 연동을 위한 마이크로 서비스 아키텍처 기반 open api 허브 시스템
KR102093145B1 (ko) * 2018-06-07 2020-03-25 한밭대학교 산학협력단 생체정보 인식 기반의 데이터 최적화를 위한 오브젝트 스토리지 클라우드 시스템
CN110647575B (zh) * 2018-06-08 2022-03-11 成都信息工程大学 基于分布式的异构处理框架构建方法及系统
US20210342907A1 (en) * 2018-06-15 2021-11-04 Paypal, Inc. Multi-Tenant Dispute Services
US11030329B2 (en) * 2018-06-15 2021-06-08 Paypal, Inc. Unified identity services for multi-tenant architectures
US11012444B2 (en) * 2018-06-25 2021-05-18 Oracle International Corporation Declarative third party identity provider integration for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US10764273B2 (en) 2018-06-28 2020-09-01 Oracle International Corporation Session synchronization across multiple devices in an identity cloud service
CN109033805B (zh) * 2018-09-30 2023-05-19 山东电工电气集团新能科技有限公司 带微服务授权认证功能的智能配电终端及授权认证方法
CN113039745B (zh) * 2018-10-10 2023-04-14 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 文件系统服务器、应用于其中的方法、计算机可读介质
US11321187B2 (en) 2018-10-19 2022-05-03 Oracle International Corporation Assured lazy rollback for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
CN109495559B (zh) * 2018-11-06 2022-02-22 用友网络科技股份有限公司 微服务客户端的服务注册及调用方法、注册及调用系统
WO2020104839A1 (en) * 2018-11-23 2020-05-28 Pratik Sharma Data triggers in microservices architecture
CN109344206B (zh) * 2018-12-03 2021-07-16 天津电气科学研究院有限公司 一种基于查询推理的olap元数据冲突的自动修复方法
US11057434B2 (en) * 2018-12-05 2021-07-06 International Business Machines Corporation High performance access control
CN109714319A (zh) * 2018-12-06 2019-05-03 深圳市中农网有限公司 微服务的管理系统、方法、装置、计算机设备及存储介质
US10963324B2 (en) * 2018-12-12 2021-03-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Predictive microservice systems and methods
CN113228091A (zh) * 2018-12-28 2021-08-06 贝宝公司 多租户争议服务
KR102050188B1 (ko) * 2019-02-08 2019-11-28 아콘소프트 주식회사 마이크로서비스 시스템 및 방법
US11061929B2 (en) 2019-02-08 2021-07-13 Oracle International Corporation Replication of resource type and schema metadata for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
KR102027749B1 (ko) * 2019-02-08 2019-10-02 아콘소프트 주식회사 마이크로서비스 시스템 및 방법
US11321343B2 (en) 2019-02-19 2022-05-03 Oracle International Corporation Tenant replication bootstrap for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US11669321B2 (en) 2019-02-20 2023-06-06 Oracle International Corporation Automated database upgrade for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US11423111B2 (en) 2019-02-25 2022-08-23 Oracle International Corporation Client API for rest based endpoints for a multi-tenant identify cloud service
US11792226B2 (en) 2019-02-25 2023-10-17 Oracle International Corporation Automatic api document generation from scim metadata
US10796276B1 (en) * 2019-04-11 2020-10-06 Caastle, Inc. Systems and methods for electronic platform for transactions of wearable items
CN113853774A (zh) * 2019-05-09 2021-12-28 吉奥奎斯特系统公司 具有原生云特征的客户端隔离
KR20220060525A (ko) * 2019-06-11 2022-05-11 넷-썬더, 엘엘씨 보안성 향상된, 자동적으로 배치되는 정보 기술(it) 시스템 및 방법
US10764244B1 (en) * 2019-06-12 2020-09-01 Cisco Technology, Inc. Systems and methods providing a multi-cloud microservices gateway using a sidecar proxy
US11516254B2 (en) * 2019-06-20 2022-11-29 Juniper Networks, Inc. Controlling access to microservices within a multi-tenancy framework
CN110535851A (zh) * 2019-08-27 2019-12-03 浪潮云信息技术有限公司 一种基于oauth2协议的用户认证系统
US11748206B2 (en) * 2019-08-28 2023-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Data recovery modification based on performance data exhibited by a network of data centers and data recovery requirement
US11687378B2 (en) 2019-09-13 2023-06-27 Oracle International Corporation Multi-tenant identity cloud service with on-premise authentication integration and bridge high availability
US11870770B2 (en) 2019-09-13 2024-01-09 Oracle International Corporation Multi-tenant identity cloud service with on-premise authentication integration
CN110581897A (zh) * 2019-09-30 2019-12-17 山东浪潮通软信息科技有限公司 一种单向网络环境下实现两个系统之间数据交互的方法
JP7426636B2 (ja) * 2019-10-26 2024-02-02 ミミック・テクノロジー・インコーポレイテッド 分散型エッジクラウドコンピューティングのための方法およびシステム
US10628244B1 (en) * 2019-10-29 2020-04-21 Snowflake Inc. Calling external functions from a data warehouse
KR102432807B1 (ko) * 2019-11-18 2022-08-16 한국전자통신연구원 마이크로서비스 구조 재구성 방법 및 장치
CN111008015B (zh) * 2019-11-22 2023-07-04 广联达科技股份有限公司 一种基于前端技术实现的微前端应用框架
US11507627B2 (en) * 2019-12-19 2022-11-22 Sap Se Analytics content network for content delivery embedding
CN113127821A (zh) * 2019-12-31 2021-07-16 远景智能国际私人投资有限公司 身份验证方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
CN111241504B (zh) * 2020-01-16 2024-01-05 远景智能国际私人投资有限公司 身份验证方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
US11501010B2 (en) * 2020-05-20 2022-11-15 Snowflake Inc. Application-provisioning framework for database platforms
CN111610987B (zh) * 2020-05-25 2021-11-05 北京邮电大学 一种基于微服务的数据处理系统和方法
CN111741079A (zh) * 2020-06-01 2020-10-02 广西电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 一种基于微服务架构的接口处理方法及系统
CN111694857B (zh) * 2020-06-12 2023-11-07 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 存储资源数据的方法、装置、电子设备及计算机可读介质
CN111831874B (zh) * 2020-07-16 2022-08-19 深圳赛安特技术服务有限公司 网页数据信息获取方法、装置、计算机设备及存储介质
CN111953562B (zh) * 2020-07-29 2022-05-24 新华三信息安全技术有限公司 一种设备状态监控方法及装置
US11470159B2 (en) 2020-08-28 2022-10-11 Cisco Technology, Inc. API key security posture scoring for microservices to determine microservice security risks
CN112087520B (zh) * 2020-09-14 2023-08-22 深圳市欣视景科技股份有限公司 数据处理方法、装置、设备及计算机可读存储介质
CN112149079A (zh) * 2020-10-22 2020-12-29 国网冀北电力有限公司经济技术研究院 基于微服务架构的规划评审管理平台及用户访问授权方法
CN112699411B (zh) * 2021-01-04 2024-04-09 北京金山云网络技术有限公司 操作审计信息的存储方法、装置和计算机可读存储介质
CN112769947A (zh) * 2021-01-20 2021-05-07 浪潮云信息技术股份公司 一种基于租户侧容器集群管理微服务引擎实例的方法
US11757645B2 (en) * 2021-01-26 2023-09-12 Sap Se Single-use authorization codes in self-contained format
CN113014847B (zh) * 2021-01-27 2023-06-06 广州佰锐网络科技有限公司 一种基于混合云架构实现音视频通信的方法及系统
CN113254146A (zh) * 2021-04-25 2021-08-13 西安电子科技大学 云平台服务信任值计算、任务调度与负载均衡系统、方法
CN113296798B (zh) * 2021-05-31 2022-04-15 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 一种服务部署方法、装置及可读存储介质
CN113542238B (zh) * 2021-06-29 2023-06-16 上海派拉软件股份有限公司 一种基于零信任的风险判定方法及系统
CN113467891B (zh) * 2021-07-12 2022-03-15 腾讯科技（深圳）有限公司 服务处理方法、装置及存储介质
KR102606911B1 (ko) * 2021-09-13 2023-11-29 주식회사 위버스컴퍼니 Api 서버로 인입되는 트래픽을 조절하는 방법 및 시스템
US11785082B2 (en) 2021-09-30 2023-10-10 Oracle International Corporation Domain replication across regions
CN116028938A (zh) * 2021-10-27 2023-04-28 中移(苏州)软件技术有限公司 提供安全服务的方法及装置、电子设备及计算机存储介质
CN114024751B (zh) * 2021-11-05 2023-05-23 抖音视界有限公司 一种应用访问控制方法、装置、计算机设备及存储介质
CN114124571A (zh) * 2021-12-09 2022-03-01 上海甄云信息科技有限公司 一种多路对接的单点登录方法及系统
CN114338682A (zh) * 2021-12-24 2022-04-12 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 流量身份标识传递方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质
CN114499977B (zh) * 2021-12-28 2023-08-08 天翼云科技有限公司 一种认证方法及装置
WO2023141506A1 (en) * 2022-01-19 2023-07-27 Commscope Technologies Llc System and method of cloud based congestion control for virtualized base station
CN114721845A (zh) * 2022-04-14 2022-07-08 广州有信科技有限公司 一种多租户RestfulAPI接口管理方法及装置
WO2023219773A1 (en) * 2022-05-09 2023-11-16 Oracle International Corporation Remote cloud function invocation service
US20240045980A1 (en) * 2022-08-04 2024-02-08 Getac Technology Corporation Maintaining data security in a multi-tenant microservice environment
KR102640624B1 (ko) * 2023-05-26 2024-02-23 박만성 자금세탁방지(AML) 서비스를 제공하기 위한 클라우드 기반 SaaS형 자금세탁방지 시스템
CN117176379B (zh) * 2023-06-25 2024-02-09 广东电网有限责任公司佛山供电局 一种基于微服务架构的非结构化数据共享方法及装置

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013071087A1 (en) * 2011-11-09 2013-05-16 Unisys Corporation Single sign on for cloud
US20140090037A1 (en) * 2012-09-21 2014-03-27 Intuit Inc. Single sign-on in multi-tenant environments
US20160092540A1 (en) 2014-09-25 2016-03-31 Oracle International Corporation System and method for supporting data grid snapshot and federation
US20160124742A1 (en) * 2014-10-30 2016-05-05 Equinix, Inc. Microservice-based application development framework

Family Cites Families (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004302534A (ja) * 2003-03-28 2004-10-28 Nri & Ncc Co Ltd ＷｅｂサービスシステムとＷｅｂサービスシステムのデータ送信処理方法
US20070112574A1 (en) * 2003-08-05 2007-05-17 Greene William S System and method for use of mobile policy agents and local services, within a geographically distributed service grid, to provide greater security via local intelligence and life-cycle management for RFlD tagged items
JP2008027043A (ja) * 2006-07-19 2008-02-07 Gaiax Co Ltd ウェブサイト管理システム、ウェブサイト管理方法、ウェブサイト管理プログラムおよび該プログラムを記録した記録媒体
JP5176301B2 (ja) * 2006-09-25 2013-04-03 大日本印刷株式会社 Ｗｅｂアプリケーション接続管理システム、Ｗｅｂサーバ、Ｗｅｂアプリケーション接続管理方法、プログラム、及び記録媒体
JP5018886B2 (ja) * 2007-08-23 2012-09-05 富士通株式会社 生体認証システムおよび生体認証プログラム
CN101399813B (zh) * 2007-09-24 2011-08-17 中国移动通信集团公司 身份联合方法
US8417723B1 (en) 2008-09-12 2013-04-09 Salesforce.Com, Inc. System, method and computer program product for enabling access to a resource of a multi-tenant on-demand database service utilizing a token
US8271536B2 (en) 2008-11-14 2012-09-18 Microsoft Corporation Multi-tenancy using suite of authorization manager components
JP5085605B2 (ja) * 2009-05-08 2012-11-28 ヤフー株式会社 ログインを管理するサーバ、方法、およびプログラム
US8392969B1 (en) 2009-06-17 2013-03-05 Intuit Inc. Method and apparatus for hosting multiple tenants in the same database securely and with a variety of access modes
JP2011141785A (ja) * 2010-01-08 2011-07-21 Girunetto Kk 携帯端末を用いた会員登録システム及び認証システム
EP2583211B1 (de) * 2010-06-15 2020-04-15 Oracle International Corporation Virtuelle berechnungsinfrastruktur
JP2012234354A (ja) * 2011-04-28 2012-11-29 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> データベース増設方法、及びデータベース減設方法
JP5930847B2 (ja) 2011-06-29 2016-06-08 キヤノン株式会社 サーバーシステムおよび制御方法およびプログラム
JP5744656B2 (ja) * 2011-07-15 2015-07-08 キヤノン株式会社 シングルサインオンを提供するシステムおよびその制御方法、サービス提供装置、中継装置、並びにプログラム
US9374356B2 (en) 2011-09-29 2016-06-21 Oracle International Corporation Mobile oauth service
US9087322B1 (en) 2011-12-22 2015-07-21 Emc Corporation Adapting service provider products for multi-tenancy using tenant-specific service composition functions
JP5773910B2 (ja) * 2012-02-29 2015-09-02 三菱電機株式会社 アクセス制御装置及びアクセス制御方法及びプログラム
US9148429B2 (en) 2012-04-23 2015-09-29 Google Inc. Controlling access by web applications to resources on servers
US9621435B2 (en) * 2012-09-07 2017-04-11 Oracle International Corporation Declarative and extensible model for provisioning of cloud based services
CN104620558B (zh) * 2012-09-07 2018-02-16 甲骨文国际公司 用于支持分布式数据网格集群中的消息预处理的系统和方法
US9542546B2 (en) 2012-09-28 2017-01-10 Volusion, Inc. System and method for implicitly resolving query scope in a multi-client and multi-tenant datastore
CN103780635B (zh) * 2012-10-17 2017-08-18 百度在线网络技术（北京）有限公司 云环境中的分布式异步任务队列执行系统和方法
EP2765529B1 (de) 2013-02-12 2021-11-17 Canon Europa N.V. Verfahren zur Authentifizierung eines Benutzers einer Peripherievorrichtung, eine Peripherievorrichtung und ein System zur Authentifizierung eines Benutzers einer Peripherievorrichtung
US9251178B2 (en) * 2013-04-26 2016-02-02 Oracle International Corporation System and method for connection labeling for use with connection pools
US9411973B2 (en) 2013-05-02 2016-08-09 International Business Machines Corporation Secure isolation of tenant resources in a multi-tenant storage system using a security gateway
JP6245949B2 (ja) 2013-11-11 2017-12-13 キヤノン株式会社 認可サーバーシステム、その制御方法、およびそのプログラム。
US10218703B2 (en) 2014-01-20 2019-02-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Determining a permission of a first tenant with respect to a second tenant
JP2016009299A (ja) * 2014-06-24 2016-01-18 キヤノン株式会社 シングルサインオンシステム、端末装置、制御方法およびコンピュータプログラム
US9749428B2 (en) 2014-10-21 2017-08-29 Twilio, Inc. System and method for providing a network discovery service platform
JP2016085641A (ja) 2014-10-27 2016-05-19 キヤノン株式会社 権限移譲システム、権限移譲システムにて実行される方法、およびそのプログラム
CN105515759B (zh) * 2015-11-27 2018-11-09 国网信息通信产业集团有限公司 一种微服务注册方法及系统
CN105577665B (zh) * 2015-12-24 2019-06-18 西安电子科技大学 一种云环境下的身份和访问控制管理系统及方法

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013071087A1 (en) * 2011-11-09 2013-05-16 Unisys Corporation Single sign on for cloud
US20140090037A1 (en) * 2012-09-21 2014-03-27 Intuit Inc. Single sign-on in multi-tenant environments
US20160092540A1 (en) 2014-09-25 2016-03-31 Oracle International Corporation System and method for supporting data grid snapshot and federation
US20160124742A1 (en) * 2014-10-30 2016-05-05 Equinix, Inc. Microservice-based application development framework

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11924220B2 (en) 2021-11-12 2024-03-05 Netskope, Inc. User directory deployment based on user and group policies

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6491796B2 (ja) 2019-03-27
KR20180028520A (ko) 2018-03-16
KR101874384B1 (ko) 2018-07-04
CN108337260B (zh) 2019-04-23
KR101873941B1 (ko) 2018-07-03
JP2018142333A (ja) 2018-09-13
CN108322471A (zh) 2018-07-24
CN108322472A (zh) 2018-07-24
JP6491381B2 (ja) 2019-03-27
KR20180029073A (ko) 2018-03-19
EP3361702B1 (de) 2019-10-23
EP3311548B1 (de) 2019-04-10
JP6917331B2 (ja) 2021-08-11
KR20180016731A (ko) 2018-02-19
CN108322472B (zh) 2019-06-25
KR20180027597A (ko) 2018-03-14
KR101871902B1 (ko) 2018-06-27
EP3361700A1 (de) 2018-08-15
CN108337260A (zh) 2018-07-27
KR102041941B1 (ko) 2019-11-07
EP3311548A1 (de) 2018-04-25
EP3361701B1 (de) 2021-09-01
CN107852417B (zh) 2021-04-20
JP2018142332A (ja) 2018-09-13
JP2018534653A (ja) 2018-11-22
JP6491774B2 (ja) 2019-03-27
CN108322471B (zh) 2019-04-23
CN107852417A (zh) 2018-03-27
JP2018156658A (ja) 2018-10-04
EP3361700B1 (de) 2021-08-04
EP3361701A1 (de) 2018-08-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11463488B2 (en) Dynamic client registration for an identity cloud service
EP3566419B1 (de) Mandantenfähiger identitäts-cloud-dienst für den zugriff eines clients auf ressourcen in einer entfernten region nach empfang eines tokens aus einer heimregion
EP3361702B1 (de) Cloud-dienst zur verwaltung von mandantenfähiger identität und datensicherheit
US10848543B2 (en) Security tokens for a multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
EP3577885B1 (de) Mandantendatenvergleich für einen mandantenfähigen identitäts-cloud-dienst
US11012444B2 (en) Declarative third party identity provider integration for a multi-tenant identity cloud service
US10200358B2 (en) Microservices based multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
EP3513542B1 (de) Mandanten- und dienstverwaltung für mandantenfähigen cloud-dienst zur identitäts- und datensicherheitsverwaltung
US10218705B2 (en) Multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
US10693861B2 (en) Task segregation in a multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
US20180041491A1 (en) Caching framework for a multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
EP3841726A1 (de) Mandantenfähiger cloud-identitätsdienst mit integrierter authentifizierung vor ort
WO2017196774A1 (en) Multi-tenant identity and data security management cloud service
WO2021050306A1 (en) Multi-tenant identity cloud service with on-premise authentication integration and bridge high availability

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 3311548

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190211

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 29/08 20060101ALI20190409BHEP

Ipc: H04W 12/06 20090101ALI20190409BHEP

Ipc: H04L 29/06 20060101AFI20190409BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190514

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 3311548

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602017008108

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1194958

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20191115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20191023

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200124

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200123

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200123

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200224

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200224

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602017008108

Country of ref document: DE

PG2D Information on lapse in contracting state deleted

Ref country code: IS

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200223

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1194958

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20191023

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200531

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200531

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200509

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200509

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602017008108

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H04L0029060000

Ipc: H04L0065000000

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191023

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230330

Year of fee payment: 7

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230522

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230331

Year of fee payment: 7