EP3318973B1 - Electronic device - Google Patents

Electronic device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3318973B1
EP3318973B1 EP16791513.1A EP16791513A EP3318973B1 EP 3318973 B1 EP3318973 B1 EP 3318973B1 EP 16791513 A EP16791513 A EP 16791513A EP 3318973 B1 EP3318973 B1 EP 3318973B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
user
program
installed program
folder
administrator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP16791513.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3318973A4 (en
EP3318973A1 (en
Inventor
Kentaro Okamoto
Kyota Mitsuyama
Koji Ikawa
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc
Original Assignee
Kyocera Document Solutions Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kyocera Document Solutions Inc filed Critical Kyocera Document Solutions Inc
Publication of EP3318973A1 publication Critical patent/EP3318973A1/en
Publication of EP3318973A4 publication Critical patent/EP3318973A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3318973B1 publication Critical patent/EP3318973B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/60Software deployment
    • G06F8/61Installation
    • G06F8/62Uninstallation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/60Software deployment
    • G06F8/61Installation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an electronic apparatus that is capable of installation of an application program, and a program that runs on a CPU included in the electronic apparatus.
  • Patent Literature 1 discloses an apparatus that classifies users into classes and determines a usable application for each class.
  • installation of an extension application preferably can be performed according to a user's own request.
  • undesired extension applications may accumulate to strain the capacity of an HDD (hard disk drive).
  • Patent Literature 2 discloses a data processing apparatus that deletes unexecuted firmware from a RAM (random access memory). Even when the firmware is deleted from the RAM, the firmware can be reloaded from an HDD. Thus, the data processing apparatus dynamically manages the RAM capacity.
  • Non- Patent Literature 1 discloses a system that deletes data files, not application programs, based on elapsed days from last update dates or last access dates.
  • Patent Literature 3 discloses an image forming apparatus including a program storing unit, a function introducing unit to obtain a program licensed to an individual user and license information about the program from an external source and to store the program in the program storing unit, a user information storing unit to store user information that includes the license information about the program that is stored by the function introducing unit, the license information being associated with a user ID of the individual user in the user information, a removal timing receiving unit to receive a setting of a removal timing at which the program stored by the function introducing unit is removed from the program storing unit, and a removal unit to remove the program stored by the function introducing unit from the program storing unit upon arrival of the removal timing received by the removal timing receiving unit.
  • Patent Literature 2 or Non-Patent Literature 1 does not perform uninstallation so as to delete an application program from the HDD. Deletion of an application program from the HDD has a great impact on the user, so that finer control is required.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide an electronic apparatus that is able to delete an unused application program from an HDD without deleting an essential application program, and a program that runs on a CPU included in the electronic apparatus.
  • An electronic apparatus includes a control portion and a storage portion.
  • the storage portion stores an installed program that is an installed application program.
  • the control portion includes: an installation portion that installs the application program based on an instruction from a user; and a program use control portion that controls a usable installed program for each user.
  • the installation portion associates the user who performs installation with the installed program.
  • the program use control portion permits all users to use a first installed program associated with a first user, and permits a second user and a third user who attempts to install a second installed program associated with the second user, to use the second installed program.
  • the first user is a user who is an administrator, and the second user and the third user are users other than the administrator.
  • the electronic apparatus of the present invention it is possible to provide an electronic apparatus that is able to delete an unused application program from an HDD without deleting an essential application program.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the functional configuration of an image forming apparatus as one form of the electronic apparatus of the present invention.
  • the image forming apparatus includes a control portion 1 and a storage portion 2.
  • the image forming apparatus also includes a printer, a scanner, a FAX, an input portion for user operations, and other components for an image forming apparatus, but the description of those components is omitted since those components are not relevant to the present invention.
  • the control portion 1 includes an installation portion 11, a use monitoring portion 12, an automatic uninstallation portion 13, a storage program determination portion 14, an unused program warning portion 15, an uninstallation portion 16, and a program use control portion 17.
  • the image forming apparatus 1 includes a CPU, and the control portion 1 is implemented as a program that runs on the CPU.
  • the installation portion 11 installs an application program. The details thereof will be described later.
  • the use monitoring portion 12 monitors use of an application program and converts the use status into data.
  • the automatic uninstallation portion automatically uninstalls an application program based on its use status, etc. The details thereof will be described later.
  • the storage program determination portion 14 determines an application program that is excluded from targets of automatic uninstallation, based on its use status. The details thereof will be described later.
  • the unused program warning portion 15 issues a warning for an application program that is excluded from targets of automatic uninstallation, based on its use status. The details thereof will be described later.
  • the uninstallation portion 16 responds to an uninstallation instruction from a user.
  • the uninstallation portion 16 actually performs uninstallation in some cases, and does not perform uninstallation in other cases. The details thereof will be described later.
  • the program use control portion 17 controls use, by each user, of an installed application program. The details thereof will be described later.
  • the storage portion 12 has log data 21 stored therein.
  • the storage portion 12 includes an administrator folder 22 and a user folder 23 as folders for installing an extension application program as one form of an application program, and an individual user folder 24 for each user (in the present embodiment, two individual user folders 24, that is, an individual user folder 24a for a user A and an individual user folder 24b for a user B) in which a shortcut to an installed program is located.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the log data.
  • the log data 21 has an application 21a, an installing person 21b, an installation date 21c, and a use status 21d.
  • the application 21a is associated with an installing person (a user who performs installation) by the installing person 21b.
  • the installation date 21c and the use status 21d indicate dates. In the present embodiment, only dates in 2015 are indicated, and January 4th, 2015 is indicated simply as "1/4" in the drawing.
  • the use status 21d indicates a list of dates when the application 21a is used. When a plurality of times of use are present at the same date, a plurality of data are present (see an application Y).
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing processing of the installation portion.
  • the installation portion 11 is activated according to an installation request from a user.
  • the installation portion 11 identifies an installing person.
  • the identification may be performed, for example, by reading a card of the user in a user authentication device (not shown) of the image forming apparatus.
  • the identification may be performed, for example, by requesting log-in of the user.
  • the installation portion 11 determines whether the identified installing person is an administrator (step 11a). When the identified installing person is the administrator, the installation portion 11 performs installation into the administrator folder 22 (step 11b).
  • the installation portion 11 determines whether an application of which installation is requested is an already-installed application (step 11c). When the application is not an already-installed application, the installation portion 11 installs the application into the user folder 23 (step 11d). Even when the application is an already-installed application, the application has been similarly installed in the user folder 23, or has been installed in the administrator folder 22.
  • the installation portion 11 adds, to the individual user folder 24, a shortcut to the application that is installed (or has been installed) (step 11e).
  • the addition of the shortcut is performed only for the individual user folder 24 for the installing person (e.g., the individual user folder 24a when the installing person is the user A), and is not performed for the other individual user folder 24.
  • the installation portion 11 updates the log data 21. Specifically, when the installation portion 11 performs installation into the administrator folder 22 or the user folder 23, the installation portion 11 adds one row in the drawing of the log data 21, and writes the application 21a, the installing person 21b, and the installation date 21c. When the installation portion 11 has not performed installation (in the case of a branch of Yes in step 11c), since the application 21a is present in the log data 21, the installation portion 11 adds the present installing person to the installing person 21b associated with this application 21a.
  • An application program installed into the administrator folder 22 is a "first installed program”
  • an application program installed into the user folder 23 is a "second installed program”.
  • each solid-line circle indicates an execution file of an installed application
  • each dotted-line circle indicates a shortcut to an execution file connected thereto by an arrow.
  • the program use control portion 17 limits a right of access of each user to the above folders, to the administrator folder 22 and the own individual user folder 24 (the individual user folder 24a in the case of the user A, the individual user folder 24b in the case of the user B).
  • the user A is allowed to use the applications M1, M2, and X
  • the user B is allowed to use the applications M1, M2, and Y.
  • the program use control portion 17 determines a usable program for each user, based on the right of access to the folders, but this is possible by another method. For example, since users whose use is possible are stored in the installing person 21b of the log data 221 (use by all the users is possible in the case of being stored as "administrator"), if a user uses the image forming apparatus through authentication, the program use control portion 17 can determine a usable program for the user identified through authentication, based on the log data 221. This method is also possible. The method for determining a usable program for each user based on a folder structure is simple, and the same result is obtained even by the other method. Thus, hereinafter, a description will be given with the method based on the folder structure.
  • the use monitoring portion 12 detects use of a program and adds the detected use to the log data 21 (the use history 21d associated with the used application 21a).
  • the use of the program involves access to an execution file, and thus can be detected by a publicly known method, for example, as performed also in Non-Patent Literature 1.
  • the automatic uninstallation portion 13 is activated at an appropriate time (e.g., 2 A.M. daily), refers to the log data 21, and calculates a first use rate of each application 21a.
  • an appropriate time e.g., 2 A.M. daily
  • the installing person 21b is not the administrator and the first use rate is equal to or less than a first value
  • the application and the shortcut to the application are deleted (automatically uninstalled).
  • the first use rate is defined as the number of times of use in the last one month, the first value is set to zero
  • the automatic uninstallation portion 13 is activated at 2 A.M. of August 1st, 2015.
  • the application X is automatically uninstalled.
  • the application M2 is not automatically uninstalled, since the installing person for the application M2 is the administrator.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing processing of the automatic uninstallation portion. The processing shifts from the left side (the same as FIG. 1 ) of the drawing to the right side of the drawing. That is, the application X and the shortcut to the application X are deleted.
  • the storage program determination portion 14 is activated at an appropriate time (e.g., 2 A.M. daily), refers to the log data 21, and calculates a second use rate of each application 21a.
  • an appropriate time e.g., 2 A.M. daily
  • the second use rate is defined as the number of times of use in the last one month
  • the second value is set to 30
  • the storage program determination portion 14 is activated at 2 A.M. of August 1st, 2015.
  • the application Y is moved to the administrator folder 22 and the shortcut in the individual user folder 24b is deleted. Since the user B has a right of access to the administrator folder 22, the user B continues to be allowed to use the application Y, even though the shortcut is deleted. In addition, the user A becomes allowed to use the application Y.
  • the operation of the storage program determination portion 14 moving the application Y to the administrator folder 22 is performed by movement of the file.
  • the application Y only needs to be uninstalled and then be installed into the administrator folder 22.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing processing of the storage program determination portion.
  • the processing shifts from the left side (the same as FIG. 1 ) of the drawing to the right side of the drawing. That is, the application Y is moved to the administrator folder 22, and the shortcut to the application Y is deleted. In other words, the application Y is changed from a "second installed program" to a "first installed program".
  • the unused program warning portion 15 is activated at an appropriate time (e.g., 2 A.M. daily), refers to the log data 21, and calculates a third use rate of the application 21a for which the installing person 21b is the administrator.
  • the third use rate is equal to or greater than a third value
  • the unused program warning portion 15 sends a notification to the administrator.
  • the third use rate is defined as the number of times of use in the last six months, the third value is set to zero, and the unused program warning portion 15 is activated at 2 A.M. of August 1st, 2015.
  • a notification about the application M2 is sent to the administrator.
  • a mail describing the name of the application that is a warning target may be sent to a mail address of the administrator.
  • the notification is possible by other various methods.
  • the administrator who has received the notification considers whether to uninstall the application M2, and can uninstall the application M2 if necessary.
  • the uninstallation portion 16 is activated according to an uninstallation request from a user.
  • the uninstallation portion 16 identifies the uninstalling person.
  • the identification may be performed, for example, by reading a card of the user in the user authentication device (not shown) of the image forming apparatus.
  • the identification may be performed, for example, by requesting log-in of the user.
  • the installation portion 11 refers to the log data 21 and determines whether the installing person for the program to be uninstalled is only the uninstalling person.
  • the installation portion 11 uninstalls the application and deletes the shortcut to the application.
  • the installation portion 11 does not uninstall the application and deletes the shortcut, to the application, in the individual user folder 24 associated with the uninstalling person.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the processing of the installation portion and the uninstallation portion.
  • the processing shifts from the left side (the same as FIG. 1 ) of the drawing to the upper right of the drawing.
  • the installation portion 11 the application Y is not doubly installed and a shortcut is added to the individual user folder 24a for the user A.
  • an image forming apparatus that is able to delete an unused application program from an HDD without deleting an essential application program is provided.
  • the essential application When the user who is the administrator installs an essential application, the essential application is not deleted.
  • the other applications are administered and uninstalled based on use rates thereof.
  • the use rate thereof if the use rate thereof is low, a notification about this application can be sent and this application can be reviewed.
  • the electronic apparatus of the present invention includes a control portion and a storage portion, wherein the storage portion stores an installed program that is an installed application program, and stores log data representing a use status of the installed program, the control portion includes:
  • an extension application program that should not be uninstalled can be installed by the user who is the administrator to be excluded from targets of automatic uninstallation.
  • an extension application program that is installed by a user who is not the administrator it is possible to prevent double installation of this extension application program.
  • control portion includes an uninstallation portion that deletes the installed program based on an instruction from the user, and when the second user attempts to uninstall the second installed program, if the use control portion permits another user to use the second installed program, the uninstallation portion does not delete the second installed program and cause the use control portion not to permit the second user to use the second installed program.
  • the uninstallation portion when the third user attempts to uninstall the second installed program, if the use control portion permits another user to use the second installed program, the uninstallation portion does not delete the second installed program and causes the use control portion not to permit the third user to use the second installed program.
  • the uninstallation portion deletes the second installed program.
  • the installed program when a user whose use is permitted is not present, the installed program can be deleted, and when a user whose use is permitted is present, the installed program can be prevented from being deleted.
  • the storage portion includes an administrator folder and a user folder as folders for installing the application program, and an individual user folder, for each user other than the administrator, each user other than the administrator having a right of access to the administrator folder (22), the program use control portion (17) limits a right of access to the individual user folder (24a, 24b), to a user corresponding to the individual user folder (24a, 24b), in a case with an instruction from the first user, the installation portion installs the application program into the administrator folder, in a case with an instruction from the user other than the administrator, if the application program has not been installed in the user folder, the installation portion installs the application program into the user folder and creates a shortcut to the installed program, in the individual user folder for the user who gives the instruction.
  • the installation portion in a case with an instruction from the user other than the administrator, if the application program has been installed in the user folder, the installation portion does not perform installation and creates a shortcut to the installed program, in the individual user folder for the user who gives the instruction.
  • the uninstallation portion deletes the installed program, in a case with an instruction from the user other than the administrator, the uninstallation portion deletes a shortcut, to the installed program, in the individual user folder for the user who gives the instruction, and deletes the installed program if the shortcut to the installed program is not present in the individual user folder for another user, and when a second use rate of the second installed program obtained from the log data (21) is equal to or greater than a second value, the storage program determination portion (14) moves the second installed program to the administrator folder (22), makes the second installed program into the first installed program, and deletes a shortcut, to the second installed program, in the individual user folder (24a, 24b).
  • the first installed program and the second installed program can be easily distinguished from each other based on whether each program is installed in the administrator folder or the user folder.
  • the shortcut in the individual user folder the user is allowed to use the installed program without being aware of a distinction between the first installed program and the second installed program.
  • control portion includes:
  • the first use rate is a number of times of use in a last specific period, and the first value is zero.
  • the first predetermined period may be, for example, one month.
  • the second installed program that is used with high frequency can be excluded from targets of automatic uninstallation.
  • the second use rate is a value greater than the first use rate.
  • the second installed program that has been frequently used in a last predetermined period can be excluded from targets of uninstallation.
  • the second predetermined period may be, for example, one month.
  • a value other than 20 can be used as the second predetermined value. In order to be determined to be used with high frequency, the second predetermined value is preferably equal to or greater than 20.
  • control portion includes an unused program warning portion that sends a notification to the first user when a third use rate of the first installed program obtained from the log data is equal to or less than a third value.
  • the third use rate is a number of times of use in a last specific period, and the third value is zero.
  • a notification about an extension application program that has not been used in a last third predetermined period is sent to the user who is the administrator.
  • the program of the present invention is a program that implements functions of an installation portion, a use monitoring portion, an automatic uninstallation portion, a storage program determination portion, a unused program warning portion, an uninstallation portion, and a program use control portion.
  • the functions of the above-described electronic apparatus can be implemented by a program.
  • An electronic apparatus that is able to delete an unused application program from an HDD without deleting an essential application program, and a program that runs on a CPU included in the electronic apparatus, are provided. Use of the electronic apparatus and the program in many companies is conceivable.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Stored Programmes (AREA)

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to an electronic apparatus that is capable of installation of an application program, and a program that runs on a CPU included in the electronic apparatus.
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • The functions of electronic apparatuses such as an image forming apparatus have been diversified. In the case where many users share one electronic apparatus, it is not easy to select and provide a function suitable for each user. In this respect, Patent Literature 1 discloses an apparatus that classifies users into classes and determines a usable application for each class.
  • However, in recent years when functions have been diversified, providing functions desired by all users as standard equipment has been difficult due to a storage capacity and other factors. Thus, a form in which only basic functions are mounted as standard equipment and an extension application program is installed as necessary is the recent mainstream.
  • Here, installation of an extension application preferably can be performed according to a user's own request. However, in the case where a user is permitted to freely install an extension application, undesired extension applications may accumulate to strain the capacity of an HDD (hard disk drive).
  • Patent Literature 2 discloses a data processing apparatus that deletes unexecuted firmware from a RAM (random access memory). Even when the firmware is deleted from the RAM, the firmware can be reloaded from an HDD. Thus, the data processing apparatus dynamically manages the RAM capacity.
  • Moreover, Non- Patent Literature 1 discloses a system that deletes data files, not application programs, based on elapsed days from last update dates or last access dates. Patent Literature 3 discloses an image forming apparatus including a program storing unit, a function introducing unit to obtain a program licensed to an individual user and license information about the program from an external source and to store the program in the program storing unit, a user information storing unit to store user information that includes the license information about the program that is stored by the function introducing unit, the license information being associated with a user ID of the individual user in the user information, a removal timing receiving unit to receive a setting of a removal timing at which the program stored by the function introducing unit is removed from the program storing unit, and a removal unit to remove the program stored by the function introducing unit from the program storing unit upon arrival of the removal timing received by the removal timing receiving unit.
  • CITATION LIST [PATENT LITERATURE]
    • [PTL 1] Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2005-024594
    • [PTL 2] Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication No. 2015-035098
    • [PTL 3] US 8 640 102 B2
    [NON-PATENT LITERATURE]
  • [NPTL 1] JustSystems Corporation, GDMS, http://just-enterprise.com/product/gdms/
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED BY THE INVENTION
  • The system disclosed in Patent Literature 2 or Non-Patent Literature 1 does not perform uninstallation so as to delete an application program from the HDD. Deletion of an application program from the HDD has a great impact on the user, so that finer control is required.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide an electronic apparatus that is able to delete an unused application program from an HDD without deleting an essential application program, and a program that runs on a CPU included in the electronic apparatus.
  • SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEMS
  • An electronic apparatus according to an aspect of the present invention includes a control portion and a storage portion. The storage portion stores an installed program that is an installed application program. The control portion includes: an installation portion that installs the application program based on an instruction from a user; and a program use control portion that controls a usable installed program for each user. The installation portion associates the user who performs installation with the installed program. The program use control portion permits all users to use a first installed program associated with a first user, and permits a second user and a third user who attempts to install a second installed program associated with the second user, to use the second installed program. The first user is a user who is an administrator, and the second user and the third user are users other than the administrator. When the third user attempts to install an application program that the third user is not permitted to use, if the application program is the second installed program, the installation portion does not perform installation and causes the use control portion to permit the third user to use the second installed program.
  • ADVANTAGEOUS EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION
  • According to the electronic apparatus of the present invention, it is possible to provide an electronic apparatus that is able to delete an unused application program from an HDD without deleting an essential application program.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    • [FIG. 1] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the functional configuration of an image forming apparatus.
    • [FIG. 2] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of log data.
    • [FIG. 3] FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing processing of an installation portion.
    • [FIG. 4] FIG. 4 is a diagram showing processing of an automatic uninstallation portion.
    • [FIG. 5] FIG. 5 is a diagram showing processing of a storage program determination portion.
    • [FIG. 6] FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the processing of the installation portion and the uninstallation portion.
    DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the functional configuration of an image forming apparatus as one form of the electronic apparatus of the present invention. The image forming apparatus includes a control portion 1 and a storage portion 2. The image forming apparatus also includes a printer, a scanner, a FAX, an input portion for user operations, and other components for an image forming apparatus, but the description of those components is omitted since those components are not relevant to the present invention.
  • The control portion 1 includes an installation portion 11, a use monitoring portion 12, an automatic uninstallation portion 13, a storage program determination portion 14, an unused program warning portion 15, an uninstallation portion 16, and a program use control portion 17.
  • The image forming apparatus 1 includes a CPU, and the control portion 1 is implemented as a program that runs on the CPU.
  • The installation portion 11 installs an application program. The details thereof will be described later.
  • The use monitoring portion 12 monitors use of an application program and converts the use status into data.
  • The automatic uninstallation portion automatically uninstalls an application program based on its use status, etc. The details thereof will be described later.
  • The storage program determination portion 14 determines an application program that is excluded from targets of automatic uninstallation, based on its use status. The details thereof will be described later.
  • The unused program warning portion 15 issues a warning for an application program that is excluded from targets of automatic uninstallation, based on its use status. The details thereof will be described later.
  • The uninstallation portion 16 responds to an uninstallation instruction from a user. The uninstallation portion 16 actually performs uninstallation in some cases, and does not perform uninstallation in other cases. The details thereof will be described later.
  • The program use control portion 17 controls use, by each user, of an installed application program. The details thereof will be described later.
  • The storage portion 12 has log data 21 stored therein. In addition, the storage portion 12 includes an administrator folder 22 and a user folder 23 as folders for installing an extension application program as one form of an application program, and an individual user folder 24 for each user (in the present embodiment, two individual user folders 24, that is, an individual user folder 24a for a user A and an individual user folder 24b for a user B) in which a shortcut to an installed program is located.
  • In the drawing, input and output of the log data 21 by each portion included in the installation portion 11 are shown by arrows.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the log data. The log data 21 has an application 21a, an installing person 21b, an installation date 21c, and a use status 21d.
  • The application 21a is associated with an installing person (a user who performs installation) by the installing person 21b.
  • The installation date 21c and the use status 21d indicate dates. In the present embodiment, only dates in 2015 are indicated, and January 4th, 2015 is indicated simply as "1/4" in the drawing. The use status 21d indicates a list of dates when the application 21a is used. When a plurality of times of use are present at the same date, a plurality of data are present (see an application Y).
  • Hereinafter, the function of each portion included in the control portion will be described.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing processing of the installation portion. The installation portion 11 is activated according to an installation request from a user. The installation portion 11 identifies an installing person. When installation is operated in the image forming apparatus (e.g., using a USB stick), the identification may be performed, for example, by reading a card of the user in a user authentication device (not shown) of the image forming apparatus. When installation is operated via a network, the identification may be performed, for example, by requesting log-in of the user. The installation portion 11 determines whether the identified installing person is an administrator (step 11a). When the identified installing person is the administrator, the installation portion 11 performs installation into the administrator folder 22 (step 11b).
  • When the identified installing person is not the administrator, the installation portion 11 determines whether an application of which installation is requested is an already-installed application (step 11c). When the application is not an already-installed application, the installation portion 11 installs the application into the user folder 23 (step 11d). Even when the application is an already-installed application, the application has been similarly installed in the user folder 23, or has been installed in the administrator folder 22.
  • The installation portion 11 adds, to the individual user folder 24, a shortcut to the application that is installed (or has been installed) (step 11e). The addition of the shortcut is performed only for the individual user folder 24 for the installing person (e.g., the individual user folder 24a when the installing person is the user A), and is not performed for the other individual user folder 24.
  • The installation portion 11 updates the log data 21. Specifically, when the installation portion 11 performs installation into the administrator folder 22 or the user folder 23, the installation portion 11 adds one row in the drawing of the log data 21, and writes the application 21a, the installing person 21b, and the installation date 21c. When the installation portion 11 has not performed installation (in the case of a branch of Yes in step 11c), since the application 21a is present in the log data 21, the installation portion 11 adds the present installing person to the installing person 21b associated with this application 21a.
  • An application program installed into the administrator folder 22 is a "first installed program", and an application program installed into the user folder 23 is a "second installed program".
  • The situation of the administrator folder 22, the user folder 23, the individual user folder 24a, and the individual user folder 24b in the case where applications M1 and M2 are installed by the administrator, an application X is installed by the user A who is not the administrator, and the application Y is installed by the user B who is not the administrator, is shown in FIG. 1. In the drawing, each solid-line circle indicates an execution file of an installed application, and each dotted-line circle indicates a shortcut to an execution file connected thereto by an arrow.
  • The program use control portion 17 limits a right of access of each user to the above folders, to the administrator folder 22 and the own individual user folder 24 (the individual user folder 24a in the case of the user A, the individual user folder 24b in the case of the user B). In the situation shown in FIG. 1, the user A is allowed to use the applications M1, M2, and X, and the user B is allowed to use the applications M1, M2, and Y.
  • The example has been described above in which the program use control portion 17 determines a usable program for each user, based on the right of access to the folders, but this is possible by another method. For example, since users whose use is possible are stored in the installing person 21b of the log data 221 (use by all the users is possible in the case of being stored as "administrator"), if a user uses the image forming apparatus through authentication, the program use control portion 17 can determine a usable program for the user identified through authentication, based on the log data 221. This method is also possible. The method for determining a usable program for each user based on a folder structure is simple, and the same result is obtained even by the other method. Thus, hereinafter, a description will be given with the method based on the folder structure.
  • The use monitoring portion 12 detects use of a program and adds the detected use to the log data 21 (the use history 21d associated with the used application 21a). Here, the use of the program involves access to an execution file, and thus can be detected by a publicly known method, for example, as performed also in Non-Patent Literature 1.
  • The automatic uninstallation portion 13 is activated at an appropriate time (e.g., 2 A.M. daily), refers to the log data 21, and calculates a first use rate of each application 21a. When the installing person 21b is not the administrator and the first use rate is equal to or less than a first value, the application and the shortcut to the application are deleted (automatically uninstalled). In the present embodiment, the first use rate is defined as the number of times of use in the last one month, the first value is set to zero, and the automatic uninstallation portion 13 is activated at 2 A.M. of August 1st, 2015. The application X is automatically uninstalled. The application M2 is not automatically uninstalled, since the installing person for the application M2 is the administrator.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing processing of the automatic uninstallation portion. The processing shifts from the left side (the same as FIG. 1) of the drawing to the right side of the drawing. That is, the application X and the shortcut to the application X are deleted.
  • The storage program determination portion 14 is activated at an appropriate time (e.g., 2 A.M. daily), refers to the log data 21, and calculates a second use rate of each application 21a. When the installing person 21b is not the administrator and the second use rate is equal to or greater than a second value, (the execution file) of the application is moved to the administrator folder 22, and the shortcut to the application is deleted. In the present embodiment, the second use rate is defined as the number of times of use in the last one month, the second value is set to 30, and the storage program determination portion 14 is activated at 2 A.M. of August 1st, 2015. The application Y is moved to the administrator folder 22 and the shortcut in the individual user folder 24b is deleted. Since the user B has a right of access to the administrator folder 22, the user B continues to be allowed to use the application Y, even though the shortcut is deleted. In addition, the user A becomes allowed to use the application Y.
  • The operation of the storage program determination portion 14 moving the application Y to the administrator folder 22 is performed by movement of the file. When simple movement of the file has a problem, the application Y only needs to be uninstalled and then be installed into the administrator folder 22.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing processing of the storage program determination portion. The processing shifts from the left side (the same as FIG. 1) of the drawing to the right side of the drawing. That is, the application Y is moved to the administrator folder 22, and the shortcut to the application Y is deleted. In other words, the application Y is changed from a "second installed program" to a "first installed program".
  • The unused program warning portion 15 is activated at an appropriate time (e.g., 2 A.M. daily), refers to the log data 21, and calculates a third use rate of the application 21a for which the installing person 21b is the administrator. When the third use rate is equal to or greater than a third value, the unused program warning portion 15 sends a notification to the administrator. In the present embodiment, the third use rate is defined as the number of times of use in the last six months, the third value is set to zero, and the unused program warning portion 15 is activated at 2 A.M. of August 1st, 2015. A notification about the application M2 is sent to the administrator. As the notification, a mail describing the name of the application that is a warning target may be sent to a mail address of the administrator. The notification is possible by other various methods.
  • The administrator who has received the notification considers whether to uninstall the application M2, and can uninstall the application M2 if necessary.
  • The uninstallation portion 16 is activated according to an uninstallation request from a user. The uninstallation portion 16 identifies the uninstalling person. When uninstallation is operated in the image forming apparatus, the identification may be performed, for example, by reading a card of the user in the user authentication device (not shown) of the image forming apparatus. When installation is operated via a network, the identification may be performed, for example, by requesting log-in of the user. The installation portion 11 refers to the log data 21 and determines whether the installing person for the program to be uninstalled is only the uninstalling person. When the installing person is only the uninstalling person, the installation portion 11 uninstalls the application and deletes the shortcut to the application. When the installing person is not only the uninstalling person, the installation portion 11 does not uninstall the application and deletes the shortcut, to the application, in the individual user folder 24 associated with the uninstalling person.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the processing of the installation portion and the uninstallation portion. When the user A attempts to install the application Y, the processing shifts from the left side (the same as FIG. 1) of the drawing to the upper right of the drawing. By the installation portion 11, the application Y is not doubly installed and a shortcut is added to the individual user folder 24a for the user A.
  • Thereafter, when the user B attempts to uninstall the application Y, the processing shifts to the lower right of the drawing. By the uninstallation portion 16, the application Y is not uninstalled and the shortcut in the individual user folder 24b for the user B is deleted. The user A continues to be allowed to use the application Y.
  • As described in detail above, according to the image processing apparatus of the present embodiment, an image forming apparatus that is able to delete an unused application program from an HDD without deleting an essential application program is provided.
  • When the user who is the administrator installs an essential application, the essential application is not deleted. The other applications are administered and uninstalled based on use rates thereof. In addition, even for an application that is installed by the administrator, if the use rate thereof is low, a notification about this application can be sent and this application can be reviewed.
  • Moreover, also when a plurality of individual users attempt to install/uninstall the same application, support with consistency is provided.
  • The electronic apparatus of the present invention includes
    a control portion and a storage portion, wherein
    the storage portion stores an installed program that is an installed application program, and stores log data representing a use status of the installed program,
    the control portion includes:
    • an installation portion that installs the application program based on an instruction from a user;
    • a program use control portion that controls a usable installed program for each user;
    • a use monitoring portion (12) configured to update the log data (21) on the basis of use of the installed program; and
    • a storage program determination portion (14)
    the installation portion associates the user who performs installation with the installed program,
    the program use control portion permits all users to use a first installed program associated with a first user, and permits a second user and a third user who attempts to install a second installed program associated with the second user, to use the second installed program,
    the first user is a user who is an administrator and the second user and the third user are users other than the administrator, and
    when the third user attempts to install an application program that the third user is not permitted to use, if the application program is the second installed program, the installation portion does not perform installation and causes the use control portion to permit the third user to use the second installed program.
  • According to this feature, an extension application program that should not be uninstalled can be installed by the user who is the administrator to be excluded from targets of automatic uninstallation. Regarding an extension application program that is installed by a user who is not the administrator, it is possible to prevent double installation of this extension application program.
  • In the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    the control portion includes an uninstallation portion that deletes the installed program based on an instruction from the user, and
    when the second user attempts to uninstall the second installed program, if the use control portion permits another user to use the second installed program, the uninstallation portion does not delete the second installed program and cause the use control portion not to permit the second user to use the second installed program.
  • Moreover, in the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    when the third user attempts to uninstall the second installed program, if the use control portion permits another user to use the second installed program, the uninstallation portion does not delete the second installed program and causes the use control portion not to permit the third user to use the second installed program.
  • Moreover, in the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    when the user other than the administrator attempts to uninstall the second installed program, if the use control portion does not permit another user to use the second installed program, the uninstallation portion deletes the second installed program.
  • According to these features, when a user whose use is permitted is not present, the installed program can be deleted, and when a user whose use is permitted is present, the installed program can be prevented from being deleted.
  • In the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    the storage portion includes an administrator folder and a user folder as folders for installing the application program, and an individual user folder, for each user other than the administrator, each user other than the administrator having a right of access to the administrator folder (22),
    the program use control portion (17) limits a right of access to the individual user folder (24a, 24b), to a user corresponding to the individual user folder (24a, 24b), in a case with an instruction from the first user, the installation portion installs the application program into the administrator folder,
    in a case with an instruction from the user other than the administrator, if the application program has not been installed in the user folder, the installation portion installs the application program into the user folder and creates a shortcut to the installed program, in the individual user folder for the user who gives the instruction.
  • Moreover, in the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    in a case with an instruction from the user other than the administrator, if the application program has been installed in the user folder, the installation portion does not perform installation and creates a shortcut to the installed program, in the individual user folder for the user who gives the instruction.
  • Moreover, in the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    in a case with an instruction from the first user, the uninstallation portion deletes the installed program,
    in a case with an instruction from the user other than the administrator, the uninstallation portion deletes a shortcut, to the installed program, in the individual user folder for the user who gives the instruction, and deletes the installed program if the shortcut to the installed program is not present in the individual user folder for another user, and when a second use rate of the second installed program obtained from the log data (21) is equal to or greater than a second value, the storage program determination portion (14) moves the second installed program to the administrator folder (22), makes the second installed program into the first installed program, and deletes a shortcut, to the second installed program, in the individual user folder (24a, 24b).
  • According to these features, the first installed program and the second installed program can be easily distinguished from each other based on whether each program is installed in the administrator folder or the user folder. In addition, owing to the shortcut in the individual user folder, the user is allowed to use the installed program without being aware of a distinction between the first installed program and the second installed program.
  • In the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    the control portion includes:
    • an automatic uninstallation portion that deletes the installed program based on the log data, and
    • the automatic uninstallation portion does not delete the first installed program, and deletes the installed program associated with the user other than the administrator when a first use rate of the installed program obtained from the log data is equal to or less than a first value.
  • According to this feature, it is made possible to delete the second installed program based on a use rate thereof while the first installed program is prevented from being deleted.
  • In the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    the first use rate is a number of times of use in a last specific period, and the first value is zero.
  • According to this feature, only an extension application program that has not been used in a last first predetermined period can be uninstalled. The first predetermined period may be, for example, one month.
  • According to this feature, the second installed program that is used with high frequency can be excluded from targets of automatic uninstallation.
  • In the electronic apparatus of the present invention, the second use rate is a value greater than the first use rate.
  • According to this feature, only the second installed program that has been frequently used in a last predetermined period can be excluded from targets of uninstallation. The second predetermined period may be, for example, one month. In addition, as the second predetermined value, a value other than 20 can be used. In order to be determined to be used with high frequency, the second predetermined value is preferably equal to or greater than 20.
  • In the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    the control portion includes an unused program warning portion that sends a notification to the first user when a third use rate of the first installed program obtained from the log data is equal to or less than a third value.
  • According to this feature, even for the first installed program, a notification of the first installed program that has been used very little is sent to the user who is the administrator. The user who is the administrator can uninstall, as necessary, an extension application program about which a notification is sent.
  • In the electronic apparatus of the present invention,
    the third use rate is a number of times of use in a last specific period, and the third value is zero.
  • According to this feature, a notification about an extension application program that has not been used in a last third predetermined period is sent to the user who is the administrator.
  • The program of the present invention is a program that implements functions of an installation portion, a use monitoring portion, an automatic uninstallation portion, a storage program determination portion, a unused program warning portion, an uninstallation portion, and a program use control portion.
  • According to this feature, the functions of the above-described electronic apparatus can be implemented by a program.
  • INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
  • An electronic apparatus that is able to delete an unused application program from an HDD without deleting an essential application program, and a program that runs on a CPU included in the electronic apparatus, are provided. Use of the electronic apparatus and the program in many companies is conceivable.

Claims (9)

  1. An electronic apparatus comprising
    a control portion (1) and a storage portion (2), wherein
    the storage portion (2) stores an installed program that is an installed application program, and stores log data (21) representing a use status of the installed program,
    the control portion (1) includes:
    an installation portion (11) that installs the application program based on an instruction from a user;
    a program use control portion (17) that controls a usable installed program for each user;
    a use monitoring portion (12) configured to update the log data (21) on the basis of use of the installed program; and
    a storage program determination portion (14),
    the installation portion (11) associates the user who performs installation with the installed program,
    the program use control portion (17) permits all users to use a first installed program associated with a first user, and permits a second user and a third user who attempt to install a second installed program associated with the second user, to use the second installed program,
    the first user is a user who is an administrator and the second user and the third user are users other than the administrator, and
    when the third user attempts to install an application program that the third user is not permitted to use, if the application program is the second installed program, the installation portion (11) does not perform installation and causes the use control portion (17) to permit the third user to use the second installed program, wherein
    the control portion (1) includes an uninstallation portion (16) that deletes the installed program based on an instruction from the user, and
    when the second user attempts to uninstall the second installed program, if the use control portion (17) permits another user to use the second installed program, the uninstallation portion (16) does not delete the second installed program and causes the use control portion (17) not to permit the second user to use the second installed program, and wherein
    the storage portion (2) includes an administrator folder (22) and a user folder (23) as folders for installing the application program, and an individual user folder (24a, 24b) for each user other than the administrator, each user other than the administrator having a right of access to the administrator folder (22),
    the program use control portion (17) limits a right of access to the individual user folder (24a, 24b), to a user corresponding to the individual user folder (24a, 24b),
    in a case with an instruction from the first user, the installation portion (11) installs the application program into the administrator folder (22),
    in a case with an instruction from the user other than the administrator, if the application program has not been installed in the user folder (23), the installation portion (11) installs the application program into the user folder (23) and creates a shortcut to the installed program, in the individual user folder (24a, 24b) for the user who gives the instruction, and wherein
    in a case with an instruction from the first user, the uninstallation portion (16) deletes the installed program,
    in a case with an instruction from the user other than the administrator, the uninstallation portion (16) deletes a shortcut, to the installed program, in the individual user folder (24a, 24b) for the user who gives the instruction, and deletes the installed program if the shortcut to the installed program is not present in the individual user folder for another user, and characterized in that
    when a second use rate of the second installed program obtained from the log data (21) is equal to or greater than a second value, the storage program determination portion (14) changes the second installed program into the first installed program by moving the second installed program to the administrator folder (22), and deleting a shortcut, to the second installed program, in the individual user folder (24a, 24b).
  2. The electronic apparatus according to claim 1, wherein, when the third user attempts to uninstall the second installed program, if the use control portion (17) permits another user to use the second installed program, the uninstallation portion (16) does not delete the second installed program and causes the use control portion (17) not to permit the third user to use the second installed program.
  3. The electronic apparatus according to claim 1, wherein, when the user other than the administrator attempts to uninstall the second installed program, if the use control portion (17) does not permit another user to use the second installed program, the uninstallation portion (16) deletes the second installed program.
  4. The electronic apparatus according to claim 1, wherein, in a case with an instruction from the user other than the administrator, if the application program has been installed in the user folder (23), the installation portion (11) does not perform installation and creates a shortcut to the installed program, in the individual user folder (24a, 24b) for the user who gives the instruction.
  5. The electronic apparatus according to claim 1, wherein
    the control portion (1) includes:
    an automatic uninstallation portion (13) that deletes the installed program based on the log data (21), and
    the automatic uninstallation portion (13) does not delete the first installed program, and deletes the second installed program when a first use rate of the second installed program obtained from the log data (21) is equal to or less than a first value.
  6. The electronic apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the first use rate is a number of times of use in a last specific period, and the first value is zero.
  7. The electronic apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the second use rate is a value greater than the first use rate.
  8. The electronic apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the control portion (1) includes an unused program warning portion (15) that sends a notification to the first user when a third use rate of the first installed program obtained from the log data (21) is equal to or less than a third value.
  9. The electronic apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the third use rate is a number of times of use in a last specific period, and the third value is zero.
EP16791513.1A 2015-06-30 2016-05-02 Electronic device Active EP3318973B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2015132052 2015-06-30
PCT/JP2016/063567 WO2017002446A1 (en) 2015-06-30 2016-05-02 Electronic device

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3318973A1 EP3318973A1 (en) 2018-05-09
EP3318973A4 EP3318973A4 (en) 2018-06-20
EP3318973B1 true EP3318973B1 (en) 2021-08-04

Family

ID=57608448

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16791513.1A Active EP3318973B1 (en) 2015-06-30 2016-05-02 Electronic device

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US9940121B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3318973B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6091731B1 (en)
CN (1) CN107924303B (en)
WO (1) WO2017002446A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6874405B2 (en) * 2017-02-07 2021-05-19 株式会社リコー Information processing equipment, programs, systems
JP2019049773A (en) * 2017-09-07 2019-03-28 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing apparatus, information display method and program
JP7163613B2 (en) * 2018-04-27 2022-11-01 富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 Information processing device and program

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3692715B2 (en) * 1997-06-30 2005-09-07 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Software installation method
JP4357887B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2009-11-04 株式会社リコー Network-compatible peripheral device and its control method and program
US20130047150A1 (en) * 2006-08-29 2013-02-21 Adobe Systems Incorporated Software installation and process management support
US8601539B1 (en) * 2006-09-06 2013-12-03 Dell Software Inc. Systems and methods for managing user permissions
JP4749380B2 (en) * 2007-04-23 2011-08-17 Sky株式会社 Installation management method, installation management program, and installation management apparatus
US8412754B2 (en) * 2010-04-21 2013-04-02 International Business Machines Corporation Virtual system administration environment for non-root user
JP5585257B2 (en) * 2010-07-16 2014-09-10 株式会社リコー Image forming apparatus, device system, program management method, program
JP5323115B2 (en) * 2011-03-25 2013-10-23 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ Terminal, application management method, and application management program
JP2013061760A (en) * 2011-09-13 2013-04-04 Konica Minolta Business Technologies Inc Program and information processor
JP2013186572A (en) * 2012-03-06 2013-09-19 Sharp Corp Information processing apparatus
US20140082611A1 (en) * 2012-09-20 2014-03-20 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Apparatus and method for monitoring application permissions
WO2014119867A1 (en) * 2013-01-31 2014-08-07 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method of and device for managing applications
CN104021031A (en) * 2013-02-28 2014-09-03 富泰华工业(深圳)有限公司 Application program management system and method
JP6171710B2 (en) 2013-08-08 2017-08-02 コニカミノルタ株式会社 Image forming apparatus, program installation method, and program installation program
CN103605538B (en) * 2013-11-08 2017-04-05 北京奇虎科技有限公司 A kind of method and apparatus for installing software

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107924303B (en) 2021-08-13
EP3318973A4 (en) 2018-06-20
CN107924303A (en) 2018-04-17
WO2017002446A1 (en) 2017-01-05
US9940121B2 (en) 2018-04-10
US20170212744A1 (en) 2017-07-27
JP6091731B1 (en) 2017-03-08
JPWO2017002446A1 (en) 2017-07-06
EP3318973A1 (en) 2018-05-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101781447B1 (en) System reset
US8930906B2 (en) Selectively allowing changes to a system
US20150220245A1 (en) Branded computer devices and apparatus to connect user and enterprise
US20160004523A1 (en) Software signature discovery
CN102216905A (en) Application restore points
EP3318973B1 (en) Electronic device
CN104049968A (en) Metadata-driven version management service in pervasive environment
US9424113B2 (en) Virtual appliance deployment
US20180144108A1 (en) License management system and license management method
US9086938B2 (en) Information processing apparatus, control method thereof, and storage medium
EP3115917B1 (en) Information processing apparatus, method, and program
EP2953023B1 (en) Information processing apparatus, application management method, and program
US9513928B2 (en) Method of operating multiple operating systems and the electronic device thereof
EP2746937A1 (en) Application synchronization method and program
US20170235711A1 (en) Version control with accept only designations
US20110088025A1 (en) Use of software update policies
US20120005677A1 (en) Computing Machine and Method for Controlling Computing Machine
US20150081968A1 (en) Decommissioning virtual appliances
US20150089490A1 (en) Information processing system, information processing apparatus, device, software installation method, and storage medium
US10216505B2 (en) Using machine learning to optimize minimal sets of an application
US9753775B2 (en) Resource management apparatus and resource management method
JP2009134610A (en) Peripheral equipment controller, program installation method and program
JP7322446B2 (en) Information processing device and program
JP6196848B2 (en) Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
JP5585565B2 (en) File management apparatus, file management apparatus control method, and program thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20161117

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20180523

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G06F 8/61 20180101ALI20180516BHEP

Ipc: G06F 9/445 20180101AFI20180516BHEP

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20190215

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210222

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1417668

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016061655

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20210804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1417668

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211104

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211206

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211104

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016061655

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220506

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20220329

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220531

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20220502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220502

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220502

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220502

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220531

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230420

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602016061655

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20160502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231201

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210804