EP3194121B1 - Adaptive u-bolt joint stabilization process and apparatus - Google Patents
Adaptive u-bolt joint stabilization process and apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3194121B1 EP3194121B1 EP15775304.7A EP15775304A EP3194121B1 EP 3194121 B1 EP3194121 B1 EP 3194121B1 EP 15775304 A EP15775304 A EP 15775304A EP 3194121 B1 EP3194121 B1 EP 3194121B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- curve
- predetermined
- fastener
- limit value
- clampload
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 65
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 title claims description 10
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 title description 7
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 title description 7
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000005055 memory storage Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims 6
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000005482 strain hardening Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 2
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011253 protective coating Substances 0.000 description 2
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- MJUVRTYWUMPBTR-MRXNPFEDSA-N 1-(2,2-difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-n-[1-[(2r)-2,3-dihydroxypropyl]-6-fluoro-2-(1-hydroxy-2-methylpropan-2-yl)indol-5-yl]cyclopropane-1-carboxamide Chemical compound FC=1C=C2N(C[C@@H](O)CO)C(C(C)(CO)C)=CC2=CC=1NC(=O)C1(C=2C=C3OC(F)(F)OC3=CC=2)CC1 MJUVRTYWUMPBTR-MRXNPFEDSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005489 elastic deformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000002045 lasting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007787 long-term memory Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000314 lubricant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006403 short-term memory Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007514 turning Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25B—TOOLS OR BENCH DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, FOR FASTENING, CONNECTING, DISENGAGING OR HOLDING
- B25B23/00—Details of, or accessories for, spanners, wrenches, screwdrivers
- B25B23/14—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers
- B25B23/145—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers specially adapted for fluid operated wrenches or screwdrivers
- B25B23/1456—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers specially adapted for fluid operated wrenches or screwdrivers having electrical components
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23P—METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; COMBINED OPERATIONS; UNIVERSAL MACHINE TOOLS
- B23P19/00—Machines for simply fitting together or separating metal parts or objects, or metal and non-metal parts, whether or not involving some deformation; Tools or devices therefor so far as not provided for in other classes
- B23P19/04—Machines for simply fitting together or separating metal parts or objects, or metal and non-metal parts, whether or not involving some deformation; Tools or devices therefor so far as not provided for in other classes for assembling or disassembling parts
- B23P19/06—Screw or nut setting or loosening machines
- B23P19/065—Arrangements for torque limiters or torque indicators in screw or nut setting machines
- B23P19/066—Arrangements for torque limiters or torque indicators in screw or nut setting machines by electrical means
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23P—METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; COMBINED OPERATIONS; UNIVERSAL MACHINE TOOLS
- B23P19/00—Machines for simply fitting together or separating metal parts or objects, or metal and non-metal parts, whether or not involving some deformation; Tools or devices therefor so far as not provided for in other classes
- B23P19/04—Machines for simply fitting together or separating metal parts or objects, or metal and non-metal parts, whether or not involving some deformation; Tools or devices therefor so far as not provided for in other classes for assembling or disassembling parts
- B23P19/06—Screw or nut setting or loosening machines
- B23P19/069—Multi-spindle machines
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25B—TOOLS OR BENCH DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, FOR FASTENING, CONNECTING, DISENGAGING OR HOLDING
- B25B17/00—Hand-driven gear-operated wrenches or screwdrivers
- B25B17/02—Hand-driven gear-operated wrenches or screwdrivers providing for torque amplification
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25B—TOOLS OR BENCH DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, FOR FASTENING, CONNECTING, DISENGAGING OR HOLDING
- B25B23/00—Details of, or accessories for, spanners, wrenches, screwdrivers
- B25B23/14—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers
- B25B23/147—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers specially adapted for electrically operated wrenches or screwdrivers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25B—TOOLS OR BENCH DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, FOR FASTENING, CONNECTING, DISENGAGING OR HOLDING
- B25B23/00—Details of, or accessories for, spanners, wrenches, screwdrivers
- B25B23/14—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25B—TOOLS OR BENCH DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, FOR FASTENING, CONNECTING, DISENGAGING OR HOLDING
- B25B23/00—Details of, or accessories for, spanners, wrenches, screwdrivers
- B25B23/14—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers
- B25B23/142—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers specially adapted for hand operated wrenches or screwdrivers
- B25B23/1422—Arrangement of torque limiters or torque indicators in wrenches or screwdrivers specially adapted for hand operated wrenches or screwdrivers torque indicators or adjustable torque limiters
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25D—PERCUSSIVE TOOLS
- B25D2250/00—General details of portable percussive tools; Components used in portable percussive tools
- B25D2250/195—Regulation means
- B25D2250/205—Regulation means for torque
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T29/00—Metal working
- Y10T29/49—Method of mechanical manufacture
- Y10T29/49764—Method of mechanical manufacture with testing or indicating
- Y10T29/49766—Method of mechanical manufacture with testing or indicating torquing threaded assemblage or determining torque herein
Definitions
- the invention generally relates to the field of mechanical fastening.
- the invention is particularly useful in fastening and stabilizing joints using U-shaped bolts commonly referred to as U-bolts.
- the invention is particularly, but not exclusively, useful in securing large truck wheel axles to leaf spring suspension components.
- FIG. 1 an example of a multi-component U-bolt joint for a large truck is shown.
- a highly useful application of the adaptive inventive process is to secure a heavy-duty truck axle to the truck suspension leaf spring.
- the axle is shown inverted 180 degrees which is a common orientation to assemble these vehicle components.
- a U-bolt joint 20 including a pair of U-shaped bolts (referred hereinafter as U-bolt or U-bolts) 24 are used to secure truck axle 30 to a leaf spring stack 36 as generally shown.
- Each U-bolt 24 includes a long shaft or leg 40 defining an axis 50 having threaded portions 54 on the respective ends of the legs.
- the joint 20 may further have a mounting plate 70 (shown integral with the axle in the example) and one or more spacers or risers 80 between the leaf springs and axle.
- the spacers 80 may be small/thin or six (6) or more inches (15,24 cm) in height.
- a fastener nut 60 is threaded on each threaded portion 54 and tightened to apply a compressive force on the joint 20 to secure the axle 30 to the leaf spring 36. This is typically done at each wheel.
- Examples of U-bolts for heavy-duty truck axles mounts are 3/4 or 7/8 inches (1,91 or 2,22 cm) in diameter and may range for 6 inches (15,24 cm) to more than 24 inches (60,96 cm) in length from crown 44 to leg end. Shims 48 may be used between the crown 44 and leaf spring stack 36 as generally shown.
- Common target torque values for each nut may range from around 300 foot-pounds (ft-lbs) to 450 foot-pounds or more what corresponds to around 407 Nm to 610 Nm depending on the size of the U-bolts and application.
- U-joint subcomponents and sizes of U-bolts 24 may be used. It is further contemplated that application of the inventive adaptive stabilization process 10 may be used on fastening bolts or studs other than U-bolts, and in different sizes, lengths and fastener configurations as described and illustrated herein as known by those skilled in the art.
- axle joints 20 are problematic in the vehicle assembly process due to the relatively non-precision nature of such large, heavy components often made from rough cast or forged steel or iron. Where precision is required, localized machining may be employed. However, due to the unprotected, exterior vehicular environment and heavy-duty use, even precision surfaces are often coated with thick rust and corrosion resistant protectants and exterior lubricants, such as heavy greases. The protective coatings and other imprecise features of each component prevent precision alignment or stack-up in any orthogonal direction. As the wheel axles support the wheels and the entire weight of the vehicle, it is important that these joints form stable, secure connections of the axle to the truck suspension.
- a spindle device 82 includes four independently monitored and controlled nut drivers 94 as generally shown. Each driver includes a socket 96 suitable for engaging a nut, for example U-bolt nut 60 shown in Fig. 1 .
- Spindle devices 82 are rotatably connected to electric motors in electronic communication with programmable controllers 98 which raise and lower the drivers and precisely control the rotational movement of each nut driver 94.
- exemplary spindle device 82 is connected to a larger control unit 84 including, for example, one or more computer processors 86, controllers 88, short and/or long term memory storage devices 90 , and communication hardware 91 in electrical and data communication with one another to store, send and receive instructions to operate spindle device 82 through communication link 92 as generally shown.
- Monitoring instruments and associated hardware and software (not shown) to operate and guide spindle devices 82 allow for real time measurement, recordation and processing of many different metrics, for example rotational torque, angular rotation, yield, amperage and time for each individual nut driver 94. These metrics and data can be stored, analyzed and visuals presented for use by technicians for applications such as process 10 as more fully described below.
- One example of an industrial nut driver is QST90-1000CT model number 8435 6090 10 manufactured by Atlas Copco. Information on the example can be found at www.atlascopco.com /Atlas Copco Industrial Power Tools Catalog.
- the nut drivers 94 continue to rotate the nuts 60 and apply torque, the nut on the U-bolt leg with reduced exposed or available threads 54 extending above the mounting plate 70 reaches a predetermined torque value sooner than the other leg which keeps rotating that nut until the specified torque is reached. Once the torque value is reached a driver 94 will stop so as to not over-torque the nut and either strip the nut threads or facture the U-bolt leg 40. If one nut hits the predetermined torque value limit well prior to the other leg, the joint is further subject to geometric distortion and increased stresses on the U-bolt which can lead to bolt fracture and joint failure at assembly.
- the nut torque or resistive force to further compression is at least in part generated by lateral bending or work hardening, elastic and/or plastic deformation, of the U-bolt legs and not from elastic (recoverable) axial elongation of the U-bolt legs 40 which is required of a mechanical fastener for proper residual torque on the nut and lasting compression of a stabilized joint.
- FIG. 4 An example of a torque versus degree of angular rotation data tracing of a conventional truck axle U-bolt joint tightening process is shown in Fig. 4 .
- two U-bolts each including two shafts 40 and each shaft 40 requiring a nut 60 (four (4) legs and four (4) nuts total 102, 110, 114 and 120).
- a spindle driver similar to 82 toward a target torque 130 value (in the example, 372.85 Nm or 275 ft-lbs).
- the exemplary test tracing shows a common phenomenon for tightening U-bolt joints.
- the first nut 102 reaches the target torque 130 at point 134 at about 350 degrees of rotation and the nut driver stops.
- the third nut achieves the target torque 130 in about 460 degrees of rotation at 138.
- the second nut 110 achieves the target torqueafter about 825 degrees at 140.
- the fourth nut 120 achieves that target torque 130 at over a 1000 degrees of rotation.
- one or more checks of the nut torques must be manually made by technicians to ensure the nuts are to the specification torque values. If any of the torque values are too low, the nuts have to be manually re-torqued to specification values by a technician in the assembly plant or out in the field, for example prior to new truck delivery and before the truck is placed into service. Due at least in part to the difficulties in conventional initial assembly as described and nature of the joint, manufacturers recommend additional U-bolt nut torque checks at regular intervals of service. The manual checking and re-torquing is manually intensive and in difficult areas on the underside of the vehicle.
- the inventive method according to claim 1 is an adaptive process to secure and stabilize mechanical fastener joints.
- the process is particularly, although not exclusively, effective for use in mechanical joints using large U-bolts, for example in securing large truck axles to suspension leaf springs.
- the invention independently monitors pre-selected metrics against predetermined limits values or ranges for each U-bolt leg fastening nut during simultaneous torqueing of the nuts.
- the joint is allowed to dissipate some elevated temperature and stresses built up on the initial run-up to the predetermined torque specification or limit value.
- a second clampload cycle is automatically run as described above.
- all of the nuts (or other engaged joint fasteners) are all automatically loosened to a lower torque and then simultaneously run-up again and re-torqued to the predetermined target or limit value and a second determination made if the targeted torque (or other preselected metric) is reached within the predetermined or acceptable range for the selected metric. This process is repeated until all of the nuts reach the targeted torque value within an acceptable range for the chosen metric.
- the predetermined and monitored first and second metrics are plotted in a 2-dimensional graph forming a curve or tracing having an area below the curve.
- the area below the curve represents work expended to drive the fastener to the target or limit value.
- the area under the curve is compared to a predetermined or acceptable area limit value and a determination is made whether the plotted (or otherwise measured) curve area is within the acceptable range. If the plotted curve area is outside the acceptable value or range, a second clampload cycle is initiated. The clampload cycles repeat until each of the fasteners curve area (or other monitored metrics or measurements) fall within acceptable values or ranges, or are otherwise stopped through predetermined limits.
- the exemplary multiple clampload cycles of torqueing to the target value has the effect of separating clampload cycles which involve significant lateral bending or work hardening of the exemplary U-bolt fasteners and a final tightening clampload cycle which promotes and/or ensures proper elongation of each of the U-bolt shafts.
- This separation of work hardening from final campload cycles allows the lateral bending or work hardening of the U-bolt and shifting of the subcomponents to occur prior to the final torqueing effectively stabilizing the joint prior to the final torqueing clampload cycle in the process.
- the final clampload torqueing cycle then focuses the compressive forces on the stabilized joint components and elongates the U-bolt legs for proper fastening and residual torque on the nuts to maintain joint compression.
- the invention is further disclosed in independent device claim 12.
- FIGs. 5-9 examples of an adaptive U-bolt joint stabilization process 10 is-and device are illustrated and explained hereafter.
- a preferred, but not exclusive, application of the process and device 10 and exemplary device 12 is for mounting a heavy-duty truck axle to suspension leaf springs as generally showed in Fig. 1 . It is understood that the inventive process 10 and device 12 can be used on other mechanical joints, fastening systems and fasteners without deviating from the present invention. It is further understood that process 10 and device 12 may be used for other mechanical fastening applications known by those skilled in the art.
- a U-bolt joint 20 including a pair of U-bolts 24 having elongate shafts or legs 40, each with a threaded end 54 defining an axis 50as previously described.
- Joint 20 would typically be loosely assembled and a nut threaded on a respective U-bolt leg 40 by hand. Alternately, the joint 20 would be loosely assembled, but the nuts would be positioned or preloaded in a driver's 94 sockets 96 generally illustrated in Fig. 3 or other automated equipment as known by those skilled in the art.
- a spindle device 82 having four independently controlled and rotatable drivers 94 as previously described may be used in the manner described below.
- Spindle device 82 includes programmable controllers and precisions sensors (not shown) and other known hardware to carefully monitor and control several metrics including, but not limited to, vertical position, angular rotation, yield, amperage, torque, and/or torque rate deviation per unit time applied by or to each driver 94.
- device 12 would further include one or more processors 86, controllers 88 and/or data memory storage devices 90 for permanently or temporarily storing preprogrammed software, instructions, sensor metric target values, torque and other limit values as well as data collected during the process (not shown).
- the processors, controllers, sensors and memory storage devices are in electronic communication, directly through communication cables 92 and those internal to control unit 84 or through wireless communication technologies and protocols, with each other to send, receive, process and/or store electronic communications, instructions, signals and/or data between the respective hardware and software as generally described herein and as known by those skilled in the art.
- One or more monitoring display devices may be used to provide visual and/or audible displays for technicians for quality control or other purposes.
- Other equipment, hardware and software known by those skilled in the art may be used with the device 12 for the process 10 as known by those skilled in the art.
- process 10 in the exemplary process 10 shown in Fig. 5 in an exemplary application shown in Figs. 1, 2 and 9 , components to be assembled are positioned and or secured in holding fixtures in an assembly station 14, for example along an assembly line in an assembly facility (not shown).
- a truck axle 30 is placed in an inverted position atop suspension leaf springs 36 with loosely assembled U-bolts 24 and nuts 50 as generally shown. It is understood that process 10 may be used with other types of mechanical joints and for other assembly or fastener applications as known by those skilled in the art.
- a nut driver for example one or more spindles 82 shown in Figure 3 and 9 , is moved into proximity to axle joint 20 and each nut driver 94 is simultaneously placed into engagement with a respective nut 60 as generally shown in the example in Figs. 1-3
- nut or fastener driver device(s) which include a plurality of sensors for measuring, monitoring and communicating torque (ft-lbs, Nm) , rotational angle (degrees), time (seconds) and other metrics or data known by those skilled in the art, may be used as well as other devices known by those skilled in the art.
- fastener drivers other than nut drivers, for example common standard driver bits, straight, phillips, Torx®, allen and other drivers known by those skilled in the art may be used.
- Fig. 6 is an example data tracing which shows an example of the present inventive process 10 on a U-bolt, vehicle axle to leaf suspension joint, where four (4) nut 60 tightening or torqueing cycles were used to achieve a predetermined nut torque and improved stabilized joint described in detail below.
- the process 10 generates a curve according to the predetermined metrics, in Fig, 6 first metric torque and second metric time and generates or plots a curve from data received from sensors in the spindle device 82 or control unit 84.
- the drivers 94 are simultaneously rotated in a clockwise direction to begin a first clampload cycle by tightening the four nuts 60 and compress the joint 20 (first clampload cycle shown on the far left of Fig. 6 ).
- the nuts 60 are continuously and simultaneously tightened toward a predetermined target torque or limit value 315, in the example 610.12 Nm (450 ft-lbs or ft-lbf).
- Device 12 through spindle driver 82 and control unit 84 continuously and independently through sensors (not shown) monitors the torque applied by each driver 94 to the respective nut 60.
- spindle device 82 may, in addition or alternately, further continuously and independently monitor other metrics, for example, angular rotation of each spindle, amperage or other metrics known by those skilled in the art.
- the nuts 60 may initially tighten to a low torque limit value to ensure that nut driver sockets 96 are engaged with a nut 60.
- the particular driver 94 when it is determined through monitoring described above that a particular driver 94 and engaged nut 60 achieve the targeted torque limit value at 315 (or other predetermined metric or value), the particular driver 94 ceases rotation at step 330.
- the driver 94 preferably maintains engagement with the respective nut 60 and maintains its angular position, but the applied torque through the driver socket 94 falls to zero (0 ft-lbs, 0 Nm) as shown.
- the other drivers 94 continue rotating until the target torque level at 315 is achieved. Due to the speed or rotation, a predetermined limit range above and below the target torque 315 may stop the driver 94 once exceeded.
- the target torques for all four 102, 110, 114 and 120 nuts occurred within about 6 seconds.
- the torque targets at 315 that typically ended the automated joint tightening process and required several manual checks and often re-torqueing the nuts to the target specification torque to achieve a stabilized joint 20 with acceptable residual torque and compression.
- the first clampload cycle curve (far left) that the shapes and areas under the respective curves vary, particularly for nut 120. As described in the Background section, this may be due to many reasons, for example, misalignment and shifting of the U-bolt 24 or the joint subassembly components, which may have resulted in lateral bending or work hardening of U-bolt leg 40 and little or no loading or elastic extension of the U-bolt leg 40 along the longitudinal axis 50 as desired.
- the monitored metrics for example torque versus time in Figs. 6 and 7 , when presented in terms of rates will generate a curve that represents work performed.
- torque versus angular rotation (degrees) or amperage (amps) versus time (seconds) when plotted (or otherwise generated or internally calculated in control unit 84), present an area under the curve that can be used to calculate the work performed or energy applied.
- degrees angular rotation
- amperage amperage
- time seconds
- the work performed in order to achieve the target torque limit value at 315 is too high or beyond a predetermined value or range for a particular joint design, this suggests undesirable lateral deformation or work hardening of the U-bolt and not desired elongation of the U-bolt legs for a secure and stabilized joint.
- the recorded areas under the respective tracing curves for each of nuts 102, 110, 114 and 120 are compared to predetermined target area limit values, for example stored in memory device 90.
- the predetermined area limit value or values are established prior to step 300 for the particular joint 20 based on design factors and the metrics used. For example, if the metrics monitored are torque versus angular rotation, for example in Fig. 8 , the required angular rotation of the nuts 60 needed to achieve a desired compressive force or clampload on the joint 20 can be calculated/predetermined and thereafter serve as the target or limit value 315 for use by process 10.
- Calculation of the predetermined targets for specific joint designs and fasteners used, as well as the choice of other metrics to be used for the targets, known by those skilled in the art may be used.
- the process 10 calculation and comparison of the areas under the tracing curves at step 340 can be made by commercially available software known by those skilled in the art.
- suitable software is Atlas Copco PowerMACS Tools Talk. It is understood that calculation and comparison of other metrics, areas or data against the predetermined target limits or values, for example 315, known by those skilled in the art may be used.
- the curve areas of the respective nuts are compared to each other versus a predetermined area limit value or range.
- the comparison between respective curve areas may be done in addition to the comparison of the respective curve areas to a predetermined area limit value. If is further understood that comparisons of the monitored preselected metrics, generated curves and/or curve area data other than to predetermined limits or limit area values known by those skilled in the art may be made.
- nut 120 trace shape is not consistent with the other nut trace curves and therefore may have achieved the target torque by not elongating the U-bolt leg 24 along the axis 50 as desired.
- step 350 if the area under the selected metric tracing or curve is not within a predetermined acceptable limit value or range, then a subsequent torqueing sequence or clampload cycle is initiated to work harden the U-bolt and/or further stabilize the joint 20 subassembly components.
- an exemplary time delay is used in order to allow the joint to "relax.” That is, a predetermined time of inactivity is set to allow at least some of the heat generated in the joint from the rapid run-up of the nuts 60 to the torque target 315 in the first clampload cycle and/or allow some generated stresses to be relieved in joint 20.
- the predetermined time delay 360 may be a short period or an extended period based on the design of the joint and the assembly process. For example, if a high target torque limit value is set, that will generate more friction and heat in the joint, so a longer period may be needed to reduce the temperature and relieve at least some internal stresses that built up in the first torque clampload sequence.
- step 370 following expiration of the exemplary time delay 360, nut drivers 94 are reversed in a counterclockwise direction to untighten the nuts 60 and decrease the amount of torque on the nuts 60 and compressive force in the joint 20.
- the torque on the nuts 60 may, for example, be lessened to 67.791 Nm (50 ft.-lbs).
- the predetermined lesser torque achieved in step 370 is halted when the value is achieved and the drivers' counterclockwise rotation stops and the torque rises to about zero (0 ft-lbs, 0 Nm). It is understood that the above time delay in step 360 and/or reversal of the nuts in step 370 may vary or may be eliminated depending on the joint design and performance specifications.
- the s process beginning at step 320 is repeated in a second clampload cycle.
- nut drivers 94 are driven in a clockwise direction to run-up the nuts 60 to the target torque (or other predetermined metric) 315 as described above and illustrated in Fig. 5 as 320A.
- the respective drivers 94 are halted as described above and at step 340A, the areas under this second set of second clampload cycle curves are evaluated against the previously discussed predetermined area limit value or range to determine whether the joint is stabilized or whether continued work hardening of the U-bolt or shifting or undesired compression of portions of the joint subassembly components is occurring.
- the joint may be experiencing uneven compression or dislocation of an excess amount of rust protective coating on a subassembly component etc.
- a U-bolt leg 40 may be yielding under lateral forces in order to partially conform to the subassembly components.
- second nut 110 took several seconds longer to reach the target torque 315 than the other nuts advising that the joint has not stabilized and proper axial elongation of U-bolt let 40 engaged with nut 110 may not have occurred potentially leading to low residual torque.
- the drivers 94 are, for example, reversed at 370A and then stopped resulting in zero (0 ft-lbs, 0 Nm) applied torque imparted by the drivers 94.
- process 10 then for a third time initiates a third clampload cycle 320B run-up of all of the nuts 60 through steps 320 - 340 as described above and illustrated in Fig. 1 .
- the third clampload cycle tracings curve (third set of peaks from the left in Fig. 6 )
- second nut 110 continues to deviate from the other three curves.
- the other three nuts 102, 114 and 120 curves are almost in substantially the same curve shapes and areas under the curves advising that no further undesired lateral bending of the U-bolt or uneven shifting or compression of the subassembly of adjacent components is taking place affecting these three shafts 40.
- Such uniformity in curve shape and area advises the torqueing of these nuts is resulting in the desired elongation of the three U-bolt legs needed for a stabilized joint and proper residual torque on completion of the assembly process.
- steps 360 - 340 i.e. 360, 370, 320, 330 and 340 in Fig. 5 .
- the drivers 94 are disengaged from the nuts 60 completing the stabilization and tightening of joint 20.
- Fig. 8 shows four separate clampload or torqueing cycles as Figs. 6 and 7 .
- All four nuts 102, 110, 114 and 120 are engaged by drivers 94 and simultaneous rotated in step 320 until a target torque or limit at 315 is achieved.
- Each driver 94 is stopped on achieving the target torque value 315 reducing the applied torque to zero (0 ft-lbs, 0 Nm)
- exemplary clampload cycle steps 360 - 340 i.e. 360, 370, 320, 330 and 340 in Fig. 5
- the respective amount of rotation needed to achieve the target or limit value torque 315 generally decreases for each run-up (steps 360 - 340). This, again, is due to the gradual work hardening of the U-bolts 24 to conform to the subassembly of components and settling of any shifting of subassembly components and uneven compression due to, for example, excess corrosion coating between components.
- the curve farthest to the right for each of the respective nuts 102, 110, 114 and 120 is approximately 300 - 400 degrees of rotation advising of a stabilized joint and elastic elongation of U-bolt legs 40 desired for high residual torque and reduced variance of torque between the nuts.
- clampload cycles or torque run-up sequences of steps 320 - 370 are used, it is understood that fewer or a greater number of clampload cycles or torqueing (or other metric) sequences may be used depending on the joint design and other factors mentioned, for example the number of subassembly components or corrosion coatings applied etc.
- the inventive process 10 and device 12 is adaptive and effectively separates the conventional one "run and done” torque sequence into two separate processes.
- the first clampload cycle or sequence serves to stabilize the joint through necessary yielding or plastic deformation of the U-bolt to conform or adjust to the surrounding subassembly components and orientation.
- These first clampload process cycle further serves to settle or normalize the other factors of irregularity or imprecisions of the joint mentioned above.
- the inventive process 10 and device 12 is adaptive in the sense that although several target limit values are predetermined based on the design of the mechanical joint, fasteners used and subassembly components in the joint, the number of clampload run-up torque (or other metric) sequences 320 - 390 are preferably automatically varied in number until the predetermined limit values are achieved, and imperfections are resolved or stabilized, so the joint is placed in a condition for a final clampload cycle torque run-up to properly elongate the bolts for proper mechanical fastening leading to a more robust and durable joint. Studies have shown higher residual torque values, improvements as high as 46% versus conventional processes, and less variation in residual torque between nuts of the same joint. Studies have shown that due to the higher residual torques and less variation, fewer, if any manual checks of the U-bolt joints and re-torqueing of the nuts to the targeted specifications are needed greatly reducing subsequent, manually-intensive processes after assembly.
Description
- The invention generally relates to the field of mechanical fastening. The invention is particularly useful in fastening and stabilizing joints using U-shaped bolts commonly referred to as U-bolts. The invention is particularly, but not exclusively, useful in securing large truck wheel axles to leaf spring suspension components.
- It is a longstanding problem in the field of securing large, multi-component vehicle joints through the use of U-bolts. An example of such joints occurs in the attachment of wheel axles for large commercial trucks.
- Referring to
Figure 1 , an example of a multi-component U-bolt joint for a large truck is shown. A highly useful application of the adaptive inventive process is to secure a heavy-duty truck axle to the truck suspension leaf spring. The axle is shown inverted 180 degrees which is a common orientation to assemble these vehicle components. In the example, aU-bolt joint 20 including a pair of U-shaped bolts (referred hereinafter as U-bolt or U-bolts) 24 are used to securetruck axle 30 to aleaf spring stack 36 as generally shown. EachU-bolt 24 includes a long shaft orleg 40 defining anaxis 50 having threadedportions 54 on the respective ends of the legs. Depending on the design of the truck, thejoint 20 may further have a mounting plate 70 (shown integral with the axle in the example) and one or more spacers orrisers 80 between the leaf springs and axle. Depending on the vehicle and/or joint design, thespacers 80 may be small/thin or six (6) or more inches (15,24 cm) in height. - A
fastener nut 60 is threaded on each threadedportion 54 and tightened to apply a compressive force on thejoint 20 to secure theaxle 30 to theleaf spring 36. This is typically done at each wheel. Examples of U-bolts for heavy-duty truck axles mounts are 3/4 or 7/8 inches (1,91 or 2,22 cm) in diameter and may range for 6 inches (15,24 cm) to more than 24 inches (60,96 cm) in length fromcrown 44 to leg end.Shims 48 may be used between thecrown 44 andleaf spring stack 36 as generally shown. Common target torque values for each nut may range from around 300 foot-pounds (ft-lbs) to 450 foot-pounds or more what corresponds to around 407 Nm to 610 Nm depending on the size of the U-bolts and application. - Applications other than on heavy trucks and having different U-joint subcomponents and sizes of
U-bolts 24 known by those skilled in the art may be used. It is further contemplated that application of the inventiveadaptive stabilization process 10 may be used on fastening bolts or studs other than U-bolts, and in different sizes, lengths and fastener configurations as described and illustrated herein as known by those skilled in the art. - These
axle joints 20 are problematic in the vehicle assembly process due to the relatively non-precision nature of such large, heavy components often made from rough cast or forged steel or iron. Where precision is required, localized machining may be employed. However, due to the unprotected, exterior vehicular environment and heavy-duty use, even precision surfaces are often coated with thick rust and corrosion resistant protectants and exterior lubricants, such as heavy greases. The protective coatings and other imprecise features of each component prevent precision alignment or stack-up in any orthogonal direction. As the wheel axles support the wheels and the entire weight of the vehicle, it is important that these joints form stable, secure connections of the axle to the truck suspension. - Conventional techniques to torque the
U-bolt nuts 60 to proper specifications have historically been problematic and inefficient both in initial assembly and during the initial stages of truck usage. In order to reduce the time to assemble large trucks and amount of manual labor, automated nut driving devices have been employed to simultaneously tighten thenuts 60. In the example shown inFig. 3 , aspindle device 82 includes four independently monitored and controllednut drivers 94 as generally shown. Each driver includes asocket 96 suitable for engaging a nut, forexample U-bolt nut 60 shown inFig. 1 . -
Spindle devices 82 are rotatably connected to electric motors in electronic communication withprogrammable controllers 98 which raise and lower the drivers and precisely control the rotational movement of eachnut driver 94. As schematically shown inFig. 9 ,exemplary spindle device 82 is connected to alarger control unit 84 including, for example, one ormore computer processors 86, controllers 88, short and/or long termmemory storage devices 90 , andcommunication hardware 91 in electrical and data communication with one another to store, send and receive instructions to operatespindle device 82 throughcommunication link 92 as generally shown. Monitoring instruments and associated hardware and software (not shown) to operate and guide spindle devices 82 (only one shown) allow for real time measurement, recordation and processing of many different metrics, for example rotational torque, angular rotation, yield, amperage and time for eachindividual nut driver 94. These metrics and data can be stored, analyzed and visuals presented for use by technicians for applications such asprocess 10 as more fully described below. One example of an industrial nut driver is QST90-1000CT model number 8435 6090 10 manufactured by Atlas Copco. Information on the example can be found at www.atlascopco.com /Atlas Copco Industrial Power Tools Catalog. - Even sophisticated prior fastener and nut driving devices suffered disadvantages in securing the imprecise
axle U-bolt joints 20. For example, even under synchronized and simultaneous turning of the fourU-bolt nuts 60, the several joint components may shift relative to one another and skew the initial geometric stack thereby forcing theU-bolts 24 to skew or cock. On this occurrence, often oneleg 40 of aU-bolt 24 may shift relative to the mounting plate leaving less threads for the nut to engage and lengthening the exposed threads on the other leg for the respective U-bolt nut to engage. - As the
nut drivers 94 continue to rotate thenuts 60 and apply torque, the nut on the U-bolt leg with reduced exposed oravailable threads 54 extending above themounting plate 70 reaches a predetermined torque value sooner than the other leg which keeps rotating that nut until the specified torque is reached. Once the torque value is reached adriver 94 will stop so as to not over-torque the nut and either strip the nut threads or facture theU-bolt leg 40. If one nut hits the predetermined torque value limit well prior to the other leg, the joint is further subject to geometric distortion and increased stresses on the U-bolt which can lead to bolt fracture and joint failure at assembly. - It is also common due to the long length of the U-bolt legs and relatively lower lateral strength of the U-bolts compared to the heavy-duty joint sub-components, that the U-bolts will laterally yield or permanently bend to accommodate shifting of the subcomponents on the high compressive forces imparted by torqueing the nuts. It has been discovered that when a U-bolt joint assembly becomes skewed or misaligned during assembly using conventional compression techniques, the nut torque or resistive force to further compression is at least in part generated by lateral bending or work hardening, elastic and/or plastic deformation, of the U-bolt legs and not from elastic (recoverable) axial elongation of the
U-bolt legs 40 which is required of a mechanical fastener for proper residual torque on the nut and lasting compression of a stabilized joint. - An example of a torque versus degree of angular rotation data tracing of a conventional truck axle U-bolt joint tightening process is shown in
Fig. 4 . In the example, two U-bolts each including twoshafts 40 and eachshaft 40 requiring a nut 60 (four (4) legs and four (4) nuts total 102, 110, 114 and 120). At angle zero (0) tightening of all fournuts first nut 102 reaches the target torque 130 atpoint 134 at about 350 degrees of rotation and the nut driver stops. The third nut achieves the target torque 130 in about 460 degrees of rotation at 138. Thesecond nut 110 achieves the target torqueafter about 825 degrees at 140. Thefourth nut 120 achieves that target torque 130 at over a 1000 degrees of rotation. - It is well documented that such U-bolt joints suffer from poor residual torque, i.e. a subsequently measured nut torque following an initial torqueing after a joint's residual stresses and temperature ease and the joint "relaxes." Due to the above-described problems, there is also large variation in the residual torques from nut-to-nut and joint-to-joint.
- In order to cure the deficiencies in the conventional initial torquing process, one or more checks of the nut torques must be manually made by technicians to ensure the nuts are to the specification torque values. If any of the torque values are too low, the nuts have to be manually re-torqued to specification values by a technician in the assembly plant or out in the field, for example prior to new truck delivery and before the truck is placed into service. Due at least in part to the difficulties in conventional initial assembly as described and nature of the joint, manufacturers recommend additional U-bolt nut torque checks at regular intervals of service. The manual checking and re-torquing is manually intensive and in difficult areas on the underside of the vehicle.
- Therefore, there is a need to improve upon these assembly deficiencies and produce a more efficient assembly process forming more robust U-bolt joints requiring fewer subsequent manual processes. Method and systems for applying a clampload in a mechanical joint are known from
US 5 837 907 A ,WO 2009/135201 A2 ,DE 40 24 577 A1EP 0 264 034 A2 - The inventive method according to
claim 1 is an adaptive process to secure and stabilize mechanical fastener joints. The process is particularly, although not exclusively, effective for use in mechanical joints using large U-bolts, for example in securing large truck axles to suspension leaf springs. - The invention independently monitors pre-selected metrics against predetermined limits values or ranges for each U-bolt leg fastening nut during simultaneous torqueing of the nuts. In one example, on a first clampload cycle of initially torqueing the nuts (or other fastener) to a predetermined target torque value or predetermined limit value, the joint is allowed to dissipate some elevated temperature and stresses built up on the initial run-up to the predetermined torque specification or limit value.
- Based on the chosen monitoring metrics, for example a first metric of torque (Nm) versus a second metric of time (seconds) or torque versus angular rotation of a nut (degrees), a determination is made whether each of the nuts has reached the predetermined target torque or limit value within an acceptable range, for example seconds of time or angle of rotation of the nut. If one or more nuts is determined to have reached the monitored metrics outside of the predetermined acceptable value limit range, this indicates potential lateral bending or work hardening of the U-bolt legs and not the desired axial extension of the U-bolt legs for proper clampload, residual torque and stabilization of the joint.
- In an example, on one or more monitored torque (or other preselected metric) values falling outside the predetermined range or limit, a second clampload cycle is automatically run as described above. In one example of a clampload cycle, all of the nuts (or other engaged joint fasteners) are all automatically loosened to a lower torque and then simultaneously run-up again and re-torqued to the predetermined target or limit value and a second determination made if the targeted torque (or other preselected metric) is reached within the predetermined or acceptable range for the selected metric. This process is repeated until all of the nuts reach the targeted torque value within an acceptable range for the chosen metric.
- In a preferred example, the predetermined and monitored first and second metrics are plotted in a 2-dimensional graph forming a curve or tracing having an area below the curve. The area below the curve represents work expended to drive the fastener to the target or limit value. The area under the curve is compared to a predetermined or acceptable area limit value and a determination is made whether the plotted (or otherwise measured) curve area is within the acceptable range. If the plotted curve area is outside the acceptable value or range, a second clampload cycle is initiated. The clampload cycles repeat until each of the fasteners curve area (or other monitored metrics or measurements) fall within acceptable values or ranges, or are otherwise stopped through predetermined limits.
- The exemplary multiple clampload cycles of torqueing to the target value has the effect of separating clampload cycles which involve significant lateral bending or work hardening of the exemplary U-bolt fasteners and a final tightening clampload cycle which promotes and/or ensures proper elongation of each of the U-bolt shafts. This separation of work hardening from final campload cycles allows the lateral bending or work hardening of the U-bolt and shifting of the subcomponents to occur prior to the final torqueing effectively stabilizing the joint prior to the final torqueing clampload cycle in the process. The final clampload torqueing cycle then focuses the compressive forces on the stabilized joint components and elongates the U-bolt legs for proper fastening and residual torque on the nuts to maintain joint compression. The invention is further disclosed in
independent device claim 12. - Studies have shown the present invention achieves higher residual torques in the stabilized U-bolt joints with less variation in residual torque in a joint. This reduces or eliminates subsequent manual processes of checking the residual torque in the assembly plant or in the field creating more robust joints and large reductions in labor.
- The description herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views, and wherein:
-
Fig. 1 is an perspective view of an example of a conventional U-bolt joint for a heavy duty truck axle; -
Fig. 2 is a top view of the U-bolt joint shown inFig. 1 ; -
Fig. 3 is an example of an automated industrial nut driver with four nut spindles; -
Fig. 4 is a torque versus rotation angle data line trace for a conventional one-run U-bolt joint nut tightening process; -
Fig. 5 is a schematic example of an adaptive U-bolt joint stabilization process of the present invention; -
Fig. 6 is a torque versus time data line trace for one example of the invention used on a two U-bolt large truck axle joint; -
Fig. 7 is an enlarged portion "A" shown inFig. 6 ; -
Fig. 8 is an alternate torque versus nut angle of rotation data line trace for one example of the invention for the two U-bolt large truck axle used in the alternate tracing inFig. 6 ; And -
Fig. 9 is a schematic of an example of adevice 12 for executing the inventive U-boltjoint stabilization process 10. - Referring to
Figs. 5-9 examples of an adaptive U-boltjoint stabilization process 10 is-and device are illustrated and explained hereafter. A preferred, but not exclusive, application of the process anddevice 10 andexemplary device 12 is for mounting a heavy-duty truck axle to suspension leaf springs as generally showed inFig. 1 . It is understood that theinventive process 10 anddevice 12 can be used on other mechanical joints, fastening systems and fasteners without deviating from the present invention. It is further understood thatprocess 10 anddevice 12 may be used for other mechanical fastening applications known by those skilled in the art. - In the example shown in
Fig. 1 process 10 anddevice 12 may be used on a U-bolt joint 20 including a pair of U-bolts 24 having elongate shafts orlegs 40, each with a threadedend 54 defining an axis 50as previously described. Joint 20 would typically be loosely assembled and a nut threaded on a respectiveU-bolt leg 40 by hand. Alternately, the joint 20 would be loosely assembled, but the nuts would be positioned or preloaded in a driver's 94sockets 96 generally illustrated inFig. 3 or other automated equipment as known by those skilled in the art. An exemplary application for the U-bolts for a heavy duty truck axle assembled in anassembly area 14 along an assembly line in an assembly plant (not shown). Other applications and manufacturing and assembly facilities known by those skilled in the art may be used without deviating from the invention. - Referring to
Figs. 3 and9 , aspindle device 82 having four independently controlled androtatable drivers 94 as previously described may be used in the manner described below.Spindle device 82 includes programmable controllers and precisions sensors (not shown) and other known hardware to carefully monitor and control several metrics including, but not limited to, vertical position, angular rotation, yield, amperage, torque, and/or torque rate deviation per unit time applied by or to eachdriver 94. - In a preferred example,
device 12 would further include one ormore processors 86, controllers 88 and/or datamemory storage devices 90 for permanently or temporarily storing preprogrammed software, instructions, sensor metric target values, torque and other limit values as well as data collected during the process (not shown). The processors, controllers, sensors and memory storage devices are in electronic communication, directly throughcommunication cables 92 and those internal to controlunit 84 or through wireless communication technologies and protocols, with each other to send, receive, process and/or store electronic communications, instructions, signals and/or data between the respective hardware and software as generally described herein and as known by those skilled in the art. One or more monitoring display devices (not shown) may be used to provide visual and/or audible displays for technicians for quality control or other purposes. Other equipment, hardware and software known by those skilled in the art may be used with thedevice 12 for theprocess 10 as known by those skilled in the art. - In the
exemplary process 10 shown inFig. 5 in an exemplary application shown inFigs. 1, 2 and9 , components to be assembled are positioned and or secured in holding fixtures in anassembly station 14, for example along an assembly line in an assembly facility (not shown). In a preferred example best shown inFig. 1 , atruck axle 30 is placed in an inverted position atopsuspension leaf springs 36 with loosely assembled U-bolts 24 andnuts 50 as generally shown. It is understood thatprocess 10 may be used with other types of mechanical joints and for other assembly or fastener applications as known by those skilled in the art. - In
exemplary step 300 shown inFig. 5 andpoint 300 inFigure 6 , a nut driver, for example one ormore spindles 82 shown inFigure 3 and9 , is moved into proximity to axle joint 20 and eachnut driver 94 is simultaneously placed into engagement with arespective nut 60 as generally shown in the example inFigs. 1-3 It is understood that other nut or fastener driver device(s) which include a plurality of sensors for measuring, monitoring and communicating torque (ft-lbs, Nm) , rotational angle (degrees), time (seconds) and other metrics or data known by those skilled in the art, may be used as well as other devices known by those skilled in the art. It is further understood that other fastener drivers other than nut drivers, for example common standard driver bits, straight, phillips, Torx®, allen and other drivers known by those skilled in the art may be used. - Referring to
Fig. 6, Fig. 6 is an example data tracing which shows an example of the presentinventive process 10 on a U-bolt, vehicle axle to leaf suspension joint, where four (4)nut 60 tightening or torqueing cycles were used to achieve a predetermined nut torque and improved stabilized joint described in detail below. In the illustrated example, theprocess 10 generates a curve according to the predetermined metrics, inFig, 6 first metric torque and second metric time and generates or plots a curve from data received from sensors in thespindle device 82 orcontrol unit 84. - Referring to
Figs. 5 ,6 and7 , atstep 320, thedrivers 94 are simultaneously rotated in a clockwise direction to begin a first clampload cycle by tightening the fournuts 60 and compress the joint 20 (first clampload cycle shown on the far left ofFig. 6 ). In a preferred example, the nuts 60 are continuously and simultaneously tightened toward a predetermined target torque orlimit value 315, in the example 610.12 Nm (450 ft-lbs or ft-lbf).Device 12 throughspindle driver 82 andcontrol unit 84 continuously and independently through sensors (not shown) monitors the torque applied by eachdriver 94 to therespective nut 60. It is also understood thatspindle device 82 may, in addition or alternately, further continuously and independently monitor other metrics, for example, angular rotation of each spindle, amperage or other metrics known by those skilled in the art. - In an
optional step 310, the nuts 60 may initially tighten to a low torque limit value to ensure thatnut driver sockets 96 are engaged with anut 60. - As shown on he left portion of the
Fig. 6 and enlarged portion inFig. 7 , when it is determined through monitoring described above that aparticular driver 94 and engagednut 60 achieve the targeted torque limit value at 315 (or other predetermined metric or value), theparticular driver 94 ceases rotation atstep 330. Thedriver 94 preferably maintains engagement with therespective nut 60 and maintains its angular position, but the applied torque through thedriver socket 94 falls to zero (0 ft-lbs, 0 Nm) as shown. In a preferred example, theother drivers 94 continue rotating until the target torque level at 315 is achieved. Due to the speed or rotation, a predetermined limit range above and below thetarget torque 315 may stop thedriver 94 once exceeded. In the example shown in the first far left curving inFigs. 6 and7 , the target torques for all four 102, 110, 114 and 120 nuts occurred within about 6 seconds. As noted, in conventional processes, once the torque targets at 315 were achieved, that typically ended the automated joint tightening process and required several manual checks and often re-torqueing the nuts to the target specification torque to achieve a stabilized joint 20 with acceptable residual torque and compression. - It is noted in
Figs. 6 and7 that the first clampload cycle curve (far left) that the shapes and areas under the respective curves vary, particularly fornut 120. As described in the Background section, this may be due to many reasons, for example, misalignment and shifting of the U-bolt 24 or the joint subassembly components, which may have resulted in lateral bending or work hardening ofU-bolt leg 40 and little or no loading or elastic extension of theU-bolt leg 40 along thelongitudinal axis 50 as desired. The monitored metrics, for example torque versus time inFigs. 6 and7 , when presented in terms of rates will generate a curve that represents work performed. For example, torque versus angular rotation (degrees) or amperage (amps) versus time (seconds), when plotted (or otherwise generated or internally calculated in control unit 84), present an area under the curve that can be used to calculate the work performed or energy applied. As further explained, if the work performed in order to achieve the target torque limit value at 315 is too high or beyond a predetermined value or range for a particular joint design, this suggests undesirable lateral deformation or work hardening of the U-bolt and not desired elongation of the U-bolt legs for a secure and stabilized joint. - At
exemplary step 340, the recorded areas under the respective tracing curves for each ofnuts memory device 90. The predetermined area limit value or values are established prior to step 300 for the particular joint 20 based on design factors and the metrics used. For example, if the metrics monitored are torque versus angular rotation, for example inFig. 8 , the required angular rotation of the nuts 60 needed to achieve a desired compressive force or clampload on the joint 20 can be calculated/predetermined and thereafter serve as the target orlimit value 315 for use byprocess 10. Calculation of the predetermined targets for specific joint designs and fasteners used, as well as the choice of other metrics to be used for the targets, known by those skilled in the art may be used. Theprocess 10 calculation and comparison of the areas under the tracing curves atstep 340 can be made by commercially available software known by those skilled in the art. One example of suitable software is Atlas Copco PowerMACS Tools Talk. It is understood that calculation and comparison of other metrics, areas or data against the predetermined target limits or values, for example 315, known by those skilled in the art may be used. In an alternate example not shown, the curve areas of the respective nuts are compared to each other versus a predetermined area limit value or range. Alternately, the comparison between respective curve areas may be done in addition to the comparison of the respective curve areas to a predetermined area limit value. If is further understood that comparisons of the monitored preselected metrics, generated curves and/or curve area data other than to predetermined limits or limit area values known by those skilled in the art may be made. - Looking at the example in
Figs. 6 and7 , using torque versus time as the sensor metrics, it is observed thatnut 120 trace shape is not consistent with the other nut trace curves and therefore may have achieved the target torque by not elongating theU-bolt leg 24 along theaxis 50 as desired. Alternately, due to the imprecision and known problems with stabilizing U-bolt joints, it may always be desired to run another torque sequence to ensure that any lateral bending or work hardening of the U-bolt 24, or shifting and/or compression of the joint 20 subassembly components has occurred, which if a second torque run-up sequence is not conducted, may result in a non-stabilized joint, low residual torque and high variation of residual torques as described in conventional processes. - In the
example process 10, instep 350, if the area under the selected metric tracing or curve is not within a predetermined acceptable limit value or range, then a subsequent torqueing sequence or clampload cycle is initiated to work harden the U-bolt and/or further stabilize the joint 20 subassembly components. - In
exemplary step 360, an exemplary time delay is used in order to allow the joint to "relax." That is, a predetermined time of inactivity is set to allow at least some of the heat generated in the joint from the rapid run-up of the nuts 60 to thetorque target 315 in the first clampload cycle and/or allow some generated stresses to be relieved in joint 20. Thepredetermined time delay 360 may be a short period or an extended period based on the design of the joint and the assembly process. For example, if a high target torque limit value is set, that will generate more friction and heat in the joint, so a longer period may be needed to reduce the temperature and relieve at least some internal stresses that built up in the first torque clampload sequence. - In an example shown in
step 370, following expiration of theexemplary time delay 360,nut drivers 94 are reversed in a counterclockwise direction to untighten the nuts 60 and decrease the amount of torque on the nuts 60 and compressive force in the joint 20. The torque on the nuts 60 may, for example, be lessened to 67.791 Nm (50 ft.-lbs). The predetermined lesser torque achieved instep 370 is halted when the value is achieved and the drivers' counterclockwise rotation stops and the torque rises to about zero (0 ft-lbs, 0 Nm). It is understood that the above time delay instep 360 and/or reversal of the nuts instep 370 may vary or may be eliminated depending on the joint design and performance specifications. - In the preferred example shown, either instantaneously or after a brief delay, the s process beginning at
step 320 is repeated in a second clampload cycle. For example,nut drivers 94 are driven in a clockwise direction to run-up the nuts 60 to the target torque (or other predetermined metric) 315 as described above and illustrated inFig. 5 as 320A. When the nuts respectively achieve the targettorque limit value 315 atpoint 330A, therespective drivers 94 are halted as described above and atstep 340A, the areas under this second set of second clampload cycle curves are evaluated against the previously discussed predetermined area limit value or range to determine whether the joint is stabilized or whether continued work hardening of the U-bolt or shifting or undesired compression of portions of the joint subassembly components is occurring. As described above, the joint may be experiencing uneven compression or dislocation of an excess amount of rust protective coating on a subassembly component etc. Alternately, aU-bolt leg 40 may be yielding under lateral forces in order to partially conform to the subassembly components. - As can be seen from the second
Fig. 6 clampload cycle curve set (second set of peaks from the left),second nut 110 took several seconds longer to reach thetarget torque 315 than the other nuts advising that the joint has not stabilized and proper axial elongation of U-bolt let 40 engaged withnut 110 may not have occurred potentially leading to low residual torque. - Since at least
nut 110 has not conformed or met the target curve area limit or range, atime delay 360A occurs, thedrivers 94 are, for example, reversed at 370A and then stopped resulting in zero (0 ft-lbs, 0 Nm) applied torque imparted by thedrivers 94. - In the example,
process 10 then for a third time initiates athird clampload cycle 320B run-up of all of the nuts 60 through steps 320 - 340 as described above and illustrated inFig. 1 . As can be seen in the third clampload cycle tracings curve (third set of peaks from the left inFig. 6 ),second nut 110 continues to deviate from the other three curves. Notably, the other threenuts shafts 40. Such uniformity in curve shape and area advises the torqueing of these nuts is resulting in the desired elongation of the three U-bolt legs needed for a stabilized joint and proper residual torque on completion of the assembly process. - All four nuts not having achieved the target area under the torque versus time tracing curves, steps 360 - 340 (i.e. 360, 370, 320, 330 and 340 in
Fig. 5 ) in an exemplary fourth clampload cycle are again repeated as described above. - Referring to the far right curve in
Fig. 6 illustrating the fourth clampload cycle, it is observed that the torque versus time curves are substantially identical in shape and areas under the curves and all took about 7-8 seconds to achieve the targeted torque orlimit value 315. Atexemplary step 380, it is recognized and acknowledged byprocess 10 anddevice 12 either through automatic means in the pre-programmed controls inspindle device 82, orcontrol unit 84, or alternately, through manual approval by a technician, that the curves/tracings are within a predetermined and acceptable range for proper joint compression. - At
exemplary step 390 thedrivers 94 are disengaged from the nuts 60 completing the stabilization and tightening of joint 20. - In an alternate example shown in
Fig. 8 , the first metrics of torque (ft-lbs) versus a second metric of angle of rotation (degrees) are used instead of theFigs. 6 - 7 of torque versus time.Fig. 8 also shows four separate clampload or torqueing cycles asFigs. 6 and7 . For this example, the process and steps as described forFigs. 6 and7 are substantially the same. All fournuts drivers 94 and simultaneous rotated instep 320 until a target torque or limit at 315 is achieved. Eachdriver 94 is stopped on achieving thetarget torque value 315 reducing the applied torque to zero (0 ft-lbs, 0 Nm) - The common phenomenon of varying amounts of rotation of each nut is shown indicating an unstabilized joint due to one or more of the conditions described above. The areas under the torque versus rotation angle are checked against a predetermined design value in
step 340. - As described above, if the selected metrics curves or areas under the curves of any of the four
nuts 60 fall outside of an acceptable predetermined limit range of the predetermined target value atstep 350, exemplary clampload cycle steps 360 - 340 (i.e. 360, 370, 320, 330 and 340 inFig. 5 ) are initiated again through rotation of all four nuts to thetarget torque 315 as described above. As can be sees as the curves trend to the right inFig. 8 , particularly fornuts limit value torque 315 generally decreases for each run-up (steps 360 - 340). This, again, is due to the gradual work hardening of the U-bolts 24 to conform to the subassembly of components and settling of any shifting of subassembly components and uneven compression due to, for example, excess corrosion coating between components. - As can be seen in
Fig. 8 , the curve farthest to the right for each of therespective nuts U-bolt legs 40 desired for high residual torque and reduced variance of torque between the nuts. - Although two examples using torque and different metrics of time or rotation angle are illustrated and described, it is understood that different metrics other than torque versus time or rotation angle may be used as known by those skilled in the art. It is further understood that variation in the steps and sequence while achieving the described objectives and performance characteristics as described above known by those skilled in the art may be used. For example, a particular joint design may not generate significant heat, so the time delay in
step 360 may be greatly reduced in duration or eliminated altogether.Process 10, although described as particularly useful on U-bolt joints for heavy truck axles, may be applied to other threaded fasteners and mechanical joints which include similar assembly disadvantages and challenges. - Further, although four total clampload cycles or torque run-up sequences of steps 320 - 370 are used, it is understood that fewer or a greater number of clampload cycles or torqueing (or other metric) sequences may be used depending on the joint design and other factors mentioned, for example the number of subassembly components or corrosion coatings applied etc.
- The
inventive process 10 anddevice 12 is adaptive and effectively separates the conventional one "run and done" torque sequence into two separate processes. The first clampload cycle or sequence serves to stabilize the joint through necessary yielding or plastic deformation of the U-bolt to conform or adjust to the surrounding subassembly components and orientation. These first clampload process cycle further serves to settle or normalize the other factors of irregularity or imprecisions of the joint mentioned above. Through repeated clampload torque run-up cycles of exemplary steps 320 -370, these joint imprecisions or imperfections are stabilized or resolved leading to the second process - a final run-up clampload cycle 320 - 340 and 380 - 390 which focuses the torque (or other selected metric) on axial, elastic deformation of theU-bolt legs 40 alongaxis 50 to achieve a proper residual torque for a robust, stabilized mechanical joint. - The
inventive process 10 anddevice 12 is adaptive in the sense that although several target limit values are predetermined based on the design of the mechanical joint, fasteners used and subassembly components in the joint, the number of clampload run-up torque (or other metric) sequences 320 - 390 are preferably automatically varied in number until the predetermined limit values are achieved, and imperfections are resolved or stabilized, so the joint is placed in a condition for a final clampload cycle torque run-up to properly elongate the bolts for proper mechanical fastening leading to a more robust and durable joint. Studies have shown higher residual torque values, improvements as high as 46% versus conventional processes, and less variation in residual torque between nuts of the same joint. Studies have shown that due to the higher residual torques and less variation, fewer, if any manual checks of the U-bolt joints and re-torqueing of the nuts to the targeted specifications are needed greatly reducing subsequent, manually-intensive processes after assembly. - The invention is defined by the appended claims.
Claims (15)
- An adaptive method (10) for applying a clampload in a mechanical joint (20) having at least one threaded fastener, the method comprising the steps of:engaging a removable threaded fastener with a fastener driver (12);initiating a first clampload cycle further comprising the steps of:tightening rotation of the fastener to a predetermined limit value;monitoring a predetermined first metric and a predetermined second metric during the tightening rotation;generating a first curve of the work expended in tightening rotation of the fastener to the predetermined limit value based on the predetermined first metric and the predetermined second metric forming a first area under the first curve;comparing the first area under the first curve to a predetermined area limit value;determining whether the first curve area is within the predetermined area limit value,
wherein if the generated first area is greater or lesser than the predetermined area limit value, initiating at least a subsequent second clampload cycle including the steps of the first clampload cycle; anddisengaging the fastener driver (12) from the threaded fastener when the last initiated clampload cycle generated curve area is within the predetermined area limit value. - The method of claim 1, wherein the threaded fastener comprises a first U-bolt (24) having first shaft (40), a second shaft (40) and a first nut (60) and a second nut (60) threadably engageable with the respective first and the second shaft, wherein the step of tightening rotation of the fastener further comprises:simultaneously tightening rotation of the first nut (60) on the first U-bolt shaft (40) and the second nut (60) on the second U-bolt shaft (40); andwherein the step of monitoring the first and second metric further comprises:independently monitoring the first and second metric for each of the first and the second U-bolt shafts (40); andwherein the step of generating a first curve further comprises:independently generating a first curve for the first shaft (40) and a second curve for the second shaft (40); andwherein the steps of comparing the first area under the first curve further comprises:independently comparing the first curve and the second curve against the predetermined area limit value; andwherein the step of determining whether the first curve area is greater or lesser further comprises:
independently determining whether the first curve area and the second curve area is within the predetermined area limit, wherein if either of the first curve area or the second curve area is greater or lesser than the predetermined area limit value, initiating the second clampload cycle for the first and the second U-bolt shafts (40). - The method of claim 2 wherein the threaded fastener further comprises a second U-bolt (24) having a third (40) and a fourth shaft (40) and a third (60) and a fourth nut (60) threadably engageable with the respective third (40) and fourth shaft (40), the method further comprising:simultaneously tightening rotation of the first, second, third and fourth nut (60) on the respective U-bolt first, second, third and fourth shaft (40);independently monitoring the first and second metric for each of the first, second, third and fourth U-bolt shafts;independently generating a first, second, third and fourth curve for the respective first, second, third and fourth shaft; andindependently comparing each of the first, second, third and fourth curve against the predetermined area limit value; andindependently determining whether the first, second, third and fourth curve areas are within the predetermined area limit value, wherein if one of the first, second, third or fourth curve area is greater or lesser than the predetermined area limit value, initiating the second clampload cycle for the first, second, third and fourth U-bolt shafts (40).
- The method of any of claims 1 through 3 wherein the step of generating a curve comprises the step of 2-dimensionally plotting the curve.
- The method of any of claims 1 through 3 wherein the first predetermined metric is torque and the second predetermined metric is one of time or angle of rotation about a fastener rotational axis (50).
- The method of any of the claims 1 through 3 further comprising the step of:
delaying initiation of the second clampload cycle for a predetermined period of time to allow a reduction of heat and residual stress in the mechanical joint (20). - The method of claim 6 further comprising the step of:
untightening rotation of the fastener (24, 60) to below the predetermined limit value for a first period of time prior to initiation of the second clampload cycle. - The method of any of claims 1 through 3 wherein the predetermined limit value and
predetermined area limit value are ranges of values. - The method of any of claims 1 through 3 wherein the step of monitoring the first and second metrics comprising;
sensing through a plurality of sensors in communication with the fastener driver at least two of torque, time, fastener rotation about a fastener axis and amperage. - The method of claim 9 wherein the step of engaging a fastener driver (12) further comprises engaging a programmable fastener driver (12) having a plurality of independently controllable nut drivers (94).
- The method of any of claims 1 through 3 wherein the mechanical joint (20) is a vehicle axle leaf spring joint.
- An adaptive fastener driving device (12) for use in engaging a fastener to apply a clampload in a mechanical joint (20), the device comprising:a control unit (84) including a processor (86), a controller (88), a memory storage device (90) and a data communication device (91) in electronic data communication with each other, the memory device (90) operable to store preprogrammed instructions;a spindle (82) in data communication with the control unit (84), the spindle (82) including a drive motor connected to at least one rotatable driver (94) for removable and rotational engagement with a mechanical joint fastener in a tightening rotation to a predetermined limit value according to the preprogrammed instructions; anda plurality of sensors in data communication with the spindle (82) and the control unit (84), the sensors operable to monitor at least a first and a second predetermined metric in a first clampload cycle, the control unit being operable for the first clampload cycle to generate a first curve of work expended in the tightening rotation of the joint fastener to the predetermined limit value based on the first and the second predetermined metric forming a first area under the first curve, the control unit further operable to compare the first area under the first curve to a predetermined area limit value and determine whether the first curve area is within the predetermined area limit value, wherein if the generated first curve area is greater or lesser than the predetermined area limit value, the control unit operable to initiate a subsequent second clampload cycle including the steps of the first clampload cycle.
- The device of claim 12 wherein the at least one rotatable driver (94) comprises a plurality of independently operable drivers (94), each driver removably engageable with a respective mechanical joint fastener, and wherein the spindle drive motor comprises a plurality of drive motors, each drive motor in communication with the control unit (84) and operable to independently rotate a respective engaged joint fastener according to the preprogrammed instructions.
- The device of any of claims 12 through 13 wherein the preprogrammed instructions further comprise:first and second metrics for use in monitoring driving of the joint fastener;predetermined fastener limit values;predetermined first and second metric area limit values; andat least the first and the subsequent second clampload cycles.
- The device of any of claims 12 - 14, wherein the threaded fastener is a U-Bolt (24) and the mechanical joint (20) is a vehicle axle leaf spring joint.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201462051996P | 2014-09-18 | 2014-09-18 | |
PCT/US2015/050887 WO2016044699A1 (en) | 2014-09-18 | 2015-09-18 | Adaptive u-bolt joint stabilization process and apparatus |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3194121A1 EP3194121A1 (en) | 2017-07-26 |
EP3194121B1 true EP3194121B1 (en) | 2021-11-03 |
Family
ID=54252387
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP15775304.7A Active EP3194121B1 (en) | 2014-09-18 | 2015-09-18 | Adaptive u-bolt joint stabilization process and apparatus |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US10513018B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3194121B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2016044699A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR3043351B1 (en) * | 2015-11-09 | 2017-12-22 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CHECKING THE CLAMPING OF AN ASSEMBLY BY A THREADED FIXATION |
CN113102985B (en) * | 2021-04-30 | 2022-12-13 | 新昌县新明实业有限公司 | Electric power splicing fitting production and assembly method |
CN115008168A (en) * | 2022-05-16 | 2022-09-06 | 中国电子科技集团公司第十四研究所 | Rotary automatic assembly method and device for assembly joint |
Family Cites Families (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1024577B (en) | 1957-03-23 | 1958-02-20 | Telefonbau & Normalzeit Gmbh | Marking circuit |
US3965778A (en) | 1974-09-19 | 1976-06-29 | Standard Pressed Steel Co. | Multi-stage tightening system |
US4163311A (en) * | 1977-02-28 | 1979-08-07 | Sps Technologies, Inc. | Tightening system for blind fasteners |
US4274188A (en) * | 1978-06-02 | 1981-06-23 | Rockwell International Corporation | Tension control of fasteners |
US4344216A (en) * | 1979-12-10 | 1982-08-17 | Sps Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for tightening an assembly |
US4375123A (en) * | 1980-04-07 | 1983-03-01 | Sps Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for tightening threaded fastener assemblies |
US4633564A (en) | 1984-03-29 | 1987-01-06 | Sauber Charles J | Torsion bar stabilizer for a vehicle and method for mounting the stabilizer on the vehicle frame |
DE3634895A1 (en) | 1986-10-14 | 1988-04-21 | Egm Entwicklung Montage | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR TIGHTENING A SCREW CONNECTION |
US4790703A (en) | 1987-04-24 | 1988-12-13 | Wing George S | Prevailing torque fastener assembly |
JPH01171777A (en) | 1987-12-23 | 1989-07-06 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Method and device for controlling nut runner |
JP2511094B2 (en) | 1988-02-04 | 1996-06-26 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Screw tightening device with rotation angle control |
US4995145A (en) | 1990-01-08 | 1991-02-26 | Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. | Reduction of relaxation induced tension scatter in fasteners |
DE4024577C2 (en) * | 1990-08-02 | 1999-08-26 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Method for controlling a preload in a screw connection |
US5409339A (en) | 1993-11-01 | 1995-04-25 | Rosser; Richard H. | U-bolt clamping mechanism |
SE9503243D0 (en) * | 1995-09-19 | 1995-09-19 | Atlas Copco Tools Ab | Method for simultaneous tightening of two or more screw joints |
JP4009760B2 (en) | 1995-11-24 | 2007-11-21 | 忠弘 大見 | Screw member tightening method |
US5668328A (en) | 1996-07-17 | 1997-09-16 | Applied Power Inc. | Method and apparatus for hydraulically tightening threaded fasteners |
US6467355B1 (en) * | 2001-04-16 | 2002-10-22 | Irving Leong | Most accurate method of tensioning threaded fasteners in assembled units |
DE10145847C2 (en) | 2001-09-17 | 2003-09-18 | Joerg Hohmann | Hydraulic threaded bolt chuck and method for tightening large screws using the hydraulic threaded bolt chuck |
US6941634B2 (en) | 2002-03-01 | 2005-09-13 | Textron Inc. | Method for attaching axles to a leaf springs on hydraulic disc brake vehicles |
US7503108B2 (en) * | 2003-07-09 | 2009-03-17 | Ford Motor Company | Multi-spindle positioning apparatus |
BRPI0402362A (en) | 2004-06-18 | 2006-01-31 | Metalac Sps Ind E Com Ltda | System and method for automated execution of bolted joints |
US20090115156A1 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2009-05-07 | Shingo Tsujihama | Method of mounting axle module |
US20060185146A1 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2006-08-24 | Lawrence Piggins | Pulse synchronized load stabilization for fastening torque recovery |
BRPI0504490A (en) * | 2005-09-05 | 2007-06-12 | Rubens Cioto | method applied to automatic or manual screwdrivers capable of monitoring, in real time, the torque and displacement angle associated with the twisting angles during the initial pre-tightening, loosening and re-tightening operation in the elastic zone of threaded fasteners, aiming at obtain parameters that make it possible to tighten each threaded fastener with its predetermined tensioning force by controlling torque in the elastic zone or angle in the plastic or elastic zone |
US7530153B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2009-05-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Attaching components of a carrier head |
US8020626B2 (en) | 2008-05-02 | 2011-09-20 | Dale Francis | Torque wrench system having multiple torque stations |
EP2437950B1 (en) | 2009-06-01 | 2016-04-27 | Volvo Lastvagnar AB | A support means, a device for attaching a first vehicle member to a second vehicle member and a vehicle suspension arrangement |
CN101832320B (en) | 2010-05-27 | 2012-03-28 | 北汽福田汽车股份有限公司 | U-shaped bolts and automobile with same |
-
2015
- 2015-09-18 EP EP15775304.7A patent/EP3194121B1/en active Active
- 2015-09-18 WO PCT/US2015/050887 patent/WO2016044699A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-09-18 US US15/456,707 patent/US10513018B2/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3194121A1 (en) | 2017-07-26 |
US10513018B2 (en) | 2019-12-24 |
US20170203420A1 (en) | 2017-07-20 |
WO2016044699A1 (en) | 2016-03-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3194121B1 (en) | Adaptive u-bolt joint stabilization process and apparatus | |
US20200156194A1 (en) | Method of Torque Control and Apparatus Thereof | |
EP2988908B1 (en) | Apparatus for tightening threaded fasteners | |
CN204186722U (en) | A kind of fastening system | |
US20080143173A1 (en) | Axle nut | |
US20170355226A1 (en) | Connecting Structure Mounting Wheel To Half Shaft | |
US10107331B1 (en) | Systems and methods for preloading a bearing and aligning a lock nut | |
CN107571183B (en) | Bolt screwing device | |
EP3083148A1 (en) | A power tool for tightening a fastener and a method | |
US20060185146A1 (en) | Pulse synchronized load stabilization for fastening torque recovery | |
JP6793121B2 (en) | Position control type power tool | |
US9651078B2 (en) | Torque limiting fastener | |
CN103998185B (en) | For tightening the equipment of threaded fastener | |
US7702493B2 (en) | Method for quality assurance of screw joint tightening | |
JP7108332B1 (en) | Bolt clamp force sensor for bolt lock operation | |
US10391534B1 (en) | Method and device for straightening wheel | |
EP3511581B1 (en) | Hybrid three-point drive fastener | |
AU2018250310B2 (en) | Systems and methods for preloading a bearing and aligning a lock nut | |
US10974544B2 (en) | Systems and methods for preloading a bearing and aligning a lock nut | |
CN218558954U (en) | Device for automatically correcting bolt assembly form and position tolerance of steering knuckle and steering knuckle | |
CA2966700C (en) | Stuffing box loosening device and method | |
CN216098648U (en) | Electric torque wrench | |
US10407497B2 (en) | Stuffing box loosening device and method | |
RU106167U1 (en) | DYNAMETRIC KEY | |
US20210237233A1 (en) | Wrench for lug nuts and method of making |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20170405 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20200402 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20201218 |
|
GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ATLAS COPCO INDUSTRIAL TECHNIQUE AB |
|
INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20210709 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1443549 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20211115 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602015074701 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20211103 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1443549 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20211103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220203 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220303 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220303 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220203 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220204 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602015074701 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20220804 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20220930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20211103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220918 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230526 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220930 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220918 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220930 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20230927 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20230927 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230925 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230927 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20150918 |