EP3186961A1 - Improved perceived image depth for autostereoscopic video displays - Google Patents

Improved perceived image depth for autostereoscopic video displays

Info

Publication number
EP3186961A1
EP3186961A1 EP14777947.4A EP14777947A EP3186961A1 EP 3186961 A1 EP3186961 A1 EP 3186961A1 EP 14777947 A EP14777947 A EP 14777947A EP 3186961 A1 EP3186961 A1 EP 3186961A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
autostereoscopic display
views
lenticles
width
focal length
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP14777947.4A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Richard A. Muller
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Soliddd Corp
Original Assignee
Soliddd Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Soliddd Corp filed Critical Soliddd Corp
Publication of EP3186961A1 publication Critical patent/EP3186961A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N13/00—Stereoscopic video systems; Multi-view video systems; Details thereof
    • H04N13/30—Image reproducers
    • H04N13/302—Image reproducers for viewing without the aid of special glasses, i.e. using autostereoscopic displays
    • H04N13/305—Image reproducers for viewing without the aid of special glasses, i.e. using autostereoscopic displays using lenticular lenses, e.g. arrangements of cylindrical lenses

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to autostercoscopic displays, and, more particularly, to a video a tosiercoseopie display with signi ficantly improved depth of " projection.
  • One of the major difficulties in projecting a greater depth of perception is that of optical artifacts in the lenticular array often used to select a different field to be visible to each eye of the human viewer.
  • One such effect is that a given portion of the image can be visible in two or more places, such as in two or more lenticles of a lenticular array.
  • Other effects include optical aberrations that are typically not noticeable with very short projected distances, such as just a few centimeters.
  • an autostereoscopic display provides an extremely deep projection area, for example appearing to have a depth of a meter or more, by observing a relationship between a desired depth of projection and an autostereoscopic display design that includes a focal length of lenticles of a lenticular array and a number of views.
  • the focal length is the distance between the parallax barrier and the underlying display having multiple views.
  • the relationship specifies a projected depth at which lenticular crossover can occur for a given autostereoscopic with the specific lenticular focal length and number of views. In some configurations, approximations can be used to simplify the relationship such that the projected depth is directly related to a product of the focal length and the number of views.
  • the autostereoscopic display configuration often specifies a view selector (such as a lenticular array) with a focal length much greater than typical focal lengths seen in conventional autostereoscopic display view selectors.
  • a view selector such as a lenticular array
  • One of the challenges with such long focal lengths in lenticles of a lenticular array is that a number of optical aberrations become noticeable and problematic.
  • lenticles of the lenticular array include meniscus-cylinder lenses, to provide a more flat field of view.
  • the result is an autostereoscopic display with depths of projection well beyond what conventional autostereoscopic displays are capable of, while still avoiding effects such as lenticular crossover and curved fields of view.
  • Figure 1 shows an autostereoscopic display according to the present invention in conjunction with a human viewer and showing, in plan view, a three- dimensional area into which the autostereoscopic display can project elements shown in the display.
  • Figure 2 shows the autostereoscopic display and viewer of Figure 1 and shows the projection of a picture element behind the display.
  • Figure 3 shows the autostereoscopic display and viewer of Figure 1 and shows the projection of a picture element before the display.
  • Figure 4 shows the autostereoscopic display and viewer of Figure 1 and shows the reduced curvature of field achieved in accordance with the present invention.
  • Figure 5, 6, and 7 are each a cross-section view of a lenticle of a respective embodiment of the lenticular array of Figure 1 in accordance with the present invention.
  • a depth 130 ( Figure 1) of a projection area 120 in which parts of an autostereoscopic display that includes a lenticular array 100 and a display 1 10 is dramatically improved - e.g., to a meter or more, 20-30 times what is seen in conventional autostereoscopic displays - by determining a relationship between depth 130 and an autostereoscopic display configuration at which a portion of display 110 can be visible at multiple locations (lenticular crosstalk). This relationship establishes a limiting configuration within which lenticular crosstalk is minimized. Once this relationship is determined for a desired depth 130, the autostereoscopic display is constructed to meet or exceed the autostereoscopic display configuration to ensure that lenticular crosstalk is only possible at depths of projection beyond depth 130.
  • the autostereoscopic includes a focal length of individual lenticles of lenticular array 100 and a number of views represented in display 1 10. Choosing a relatively deep projection area 120 produces a very long focal length for lenticular array 100 and a large number of views for display 1 10.
  • a view is used herein to refer to a subset of an image presented to a viewer from a particular angle of view.
  • a view is used herein to refer to a subset of an image presented to a viewer from a particular angle of view.
  • one eye of the human viewer can see every odd-numbered column of pixels and the other eye of the viewer can see every even- numbered column of pixels.
  • the odd-numbered columns of pixels would collectively represent one view, and the even-numbered columns of pixels would collectively represent another view.
  • most autostereoscopic displays have many more than just two views and that this very simple example is merely to illustrate how "view" is used herein.
  • lenticular array 100 includes a number of vertical lenticles that makes one of a number of view elements visible depending upon the angle of perspective of an eye of viewer 10.
  • each lenticle of lenticular array 100 covers a portion of that view, sometimes referred to herein as a view element, and makes that view element visible from a given angle of perspective.
  • display 110 is an electronic display, such as an LCD for example
  • view elements are collections of pixels.
  • display 1 10 is a static image such as a poster
  • view elements can be tall, thin slivers of one of a number of views printed or otherwise represented visually in display 1 10.
  • Design of lenticular 100 and display 1 10 begins with selecting a designed depth 130 of projection area 120.
  • depth 130 is selected to be one meter, much, much deeper than any currently available autostereoscopic displays.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a circumstance to be avoided that therefore sets a limit on high-quality autostereoscopic display with a projected area 120 having depth 130.
  • the left eye of viewer 10 sees a portion of display 1 10 through lenticle 500A and that portion of display 1 10 appears to be at point 202 as a result of the focal length of lenticle 500 A.
  • the same portion of display 1 10 can also be seen through lenticle 500B and every lenticle between lenticle 500A and lenticle 500B.
  • lenticular crosstalk This phenomenon of a single portion of display 110 being visible to viewer 10 through multiple lenticles of lenticular array 100 is sometimes referred to herein as lenticular crosstalk.
  • Lenticular array 100 and display 1 10 are designed to provide a projection area 120 of depth 130 with minimum lenticular crosstalk.
  • Equation (2) S is the spacing of lenticles of lenticular array 100, i.e., the width of a single lenticle.
  • N is the offset of lenticle 500B from lenticle 500 A in terms of a number of lenticles.
  • NS is the ! offset of lenticle 500B from lenticle 500A as a measured distance.
  • d is projection depth 220, i.e, the distance from lenticular array 110 that point 202 is projected. The last portion of equation (2) estimates the arctangent function using small angle approximation, which is appropriate in most practical implementations of lenticular array 100 and display
  • Equation (3) D is distance 210, i.e, the distance from lenticular array 110 to the eye of viewer 10.
  • the last portion of equation (3) estimates the arctangent function using small angle approximation, which is appropriate in most practical implementations of lenticular array 100 and display 1 10.
  • Angle ⁇ depends on the size ( ⁇ ) of the portion of display 1 10 to be shown through a single lenticle as a part of a single view and on the distance ( ) of that portion from lenticle 500B. Equation (4) shows angle ⁇ in terms of ⁇ and / and the index of refraction, no, of lenticular array 1 10.
  • equation (1) can be rewritten as follows: [0029] Small angle approximation of arctangent values should not be used in equation (5) when such introduces appreciable error.
  • the number of views ( «,,) represented by display 110 relates to the size ( ⁇ ) of the portion of display 1 10 and lenticular size (S) as follows:
  • N is chosen to be one (1) to identify a configuration at which lenticular crosstalk between adjacent lenticles is possible.
  • equation (6) setting N to 1 , and applying some algebra yields the following relationship between configuration of lenticular array 100 and display 1 10 and a maximum projection depth d at which lenticular crosstalk begins between adjacent lenticle r a viewer a distance, D, away:
  • d distance 320 ( Figure 3), which is chosen to be the same as distance 210 ( Figure 2) in this illustrative embodiment,
  • Equation (10) provides guidance in designing lenticular array 100 and display 1 10 to provide a desired depth 130 of projection area 120 within which lenticular crosstalk is avoided.
  • the focal length of the lenticles of lenticular array 100 and the number of views provided by display 1 10 are chosen such that four (4) times their product is at least the desired depth.
  • equation (10) is as follows:
  • equation (11) is approximated by equation (10).
  • equation (10) As an illustrative example using equation (10), consider that depth 130 of projection area 120 is to be one meter. To achieve this, the product of the number of views of display 1 10 and the focal length of lenticles of lenticular array 100 should be at least one-quarter of a meter, or 25 centimeters. A typical conventional design would include eight views and a focal length of 1 millimeter, providing a projection area having a maximum depth of about 3.2cm while still avoiding lenticular crosstalk. However, lenticular array 100 and display 1 10 require dimensions way beyond those to achieve the desired depth of projection.
  • projection area 120 would have a maximum depth 130 of one meter with little or no lenticular crosstalk.
  • lenticles with focal lengths significantly greater than the width of the lenticles can provide very dramatic improvements in the perceived depth of an autostereoscopic display without introducing lenticular crosstalk.
  • the lenticles have a focal length that is ten (10) times their width and provide an apparent depth without lenticular crosstalk that is thirty (30) times that of a comparable conventional autostereoscopic display.
  • Lenticles that have a focal length that is merely five (5), or even just three (3), times their width still provide dramatic results.
  • the subpixel remapping taught by the ⁇ 83 Application teaches how to triple the horizontal resolution of a video display.
  • the "(*3)” note indicates use of this technology alone.
  • the time multiplexing taught by the '552 Application teaches how to double the apparent horizontal resolution of a video display one or more times, thereby scaling the apparent horizontal resolution by an integer power of two.
  • the "(x8)” indicates use of three (3) doubling layers to produce an eight-fold increase in the apparent horizontal resolution of the display.
  • the "(x6)” and “(*12)” notes indicate a combination of the tripling of apparent horizontal resolution described in the ⁇ 83 Application with a single-layer doubling and a double-layer quadrupling, respectively, of the apparent horizontal resolution described in the '552 Application.
  • equations (10) and ( 1 1) illustrate the value of dramatically increasing the focal length of the lenticles. Accordingly, the ratio of lenticle focal length (f) to lenticle width (S) in autostereoscopic displays designed according to the present invention are significantly greater. This ratio is sometimes referred to herein as a lenticular aspect ratio. As shown in Table A above, lenticular aspect ratios are generally at least 2.5: 1 , more commonly 3 : 1 , 4: 1, 5: 1 , 6: 1 , and even greater than 10: 1 in some displays. The result is that a one-inch-wide bookmark can have an error-free perceived depth of about 12.8 inches.
  • a 46" HDTV can have an error-free perceived depth of about one meter.
  • Autostereoscopic smart phones displays can have an error-free perceived depth of over five (5) inches
  • autostereoscopic tablet computer displays can have an error-free perceived depth of over six (6) inches.
  • Large, billboard-sized displays can have error-free perceived depth of over 20 feet, even as much 48 feet. [0048] These maximum error-free perceived depths are far beyond what any prior autostereoscopic displays have been able to achieve. Exemplary minimum ratios of maximum error-free perceived depths to display widths are summarized in Table C below.
  • Figure 10 is illustrative.
  • the width 1010 of a viewing "sweet spot" at viewing distance 1008 is given by the following equation:
  • W is width 1010 of the viewing sweet spot
  • D is viewing distance 1008.
  • the sweet spot is defined as a position in which both eyes of viewer 10 see a view corresponding to the same lenticle, e.g., lenticle 1002. If width 1010 is not at least the intraocular distance 1012 of viewer 10, viewer 10 will not be able to see both left and right views through the same lenticle and the
  • Wss is the amount by which viewer 10 can move his head side-to-side and still see the autostereographic image properly
  • E is the intraocular distance 1012 of viewer 10.
  • a typical intraocular distance for adult viewers is about 2.4 inches.
  • the amount by which viewer 10 can move his head side-to-side and still see the autostereographic image properly is sometimes referred to as a practical viewing sweet spot.
  • the practical viewing sweet spots Wss for the various types of displays in Table A above at various viewing distances are shown in Table C below.
  • hand-held devices that are typically viewed from about two (2) feet away have lenticular aspect ratios of about 2.5 to 6.6 and corresponding practical viewing sweet spots of about 7.2 down to 1.24 inches.
  • Handheld displays can be easily tilted by viewer 10 to find the practical sweet spot, so a practical sweet spot of only 1.24 inches isn't particularly worrisome for a hand-held display.
  • the largest hand-held device display measures about 17 inches diagonally.
  • viewer 10 can move his head within a space that is 7.6 inches wide.
  • Televisions and other large displays are commonly viewed from up to ' about twenty (20) feet away, ie., from across a large room. These types of display have lenticular aspect ratios of about 2.16 to 12 and corresponding practical viewing sweet spots of about 108.6 down to 17.6 inches, providing ample room for viewer 10 to move his head to view the autostereoscopic display properly.
  • FIG. 4 One of the challenges in making a lenticular array with such a long focal length is that optical aberrations become significant and detrimental to the viewer's three-dimensional viewing experience.
  • One such aberration is illustrated in Figure 4 and is generally known as curvature of field.
  • Lenticles of conventional lenticular arrays focus along a curved field of view 404.
  • This aberration hardly noticeable to viewers at most angles of view.
  • Simply modifying conventional lenticular arrays to have ten (10) times the focal length as described above would render this aberration very noticeable at most angles of view.
  • Lenticular array 100 is designed to provide a much more flat field of view than conventional lenticular arrays.
  • Such flattening is analogous to flattening that is accomplished in spherical lenses by applying the "Petzval condition", a known equation that is typically applied to spherical lenses rather than the cylindrical, lenticular lenses described here.
  • Figure 5 shows a single lenticle 500 of lenticular array 100 ( Figure 1) in cross section.
  • Lenticle 500 ( Figure 5) includes a meniscus-cylinder lens 502.
  • a "cylinder” is not limited to cylinders with circular cross-sections.
  • Meniscus-cylinder lens 502 includes a proximal surface 502P and a distal surface 502D, a width 508, and a thickness 514.
  • Proximal surface 502P is convex
  • distal surface 502D is concave.
  • width 508 and thickness 514 are one (1) millimeter (mm) each.
  • the radius of curvatures of proximal surface 502P and distal surface 502D are 1.29mm
  • meniscus- cylinder lens 502 is separated from display 1 10 by a transparent layer 506 of glass or plastic whose thickness 510 is 9mm.
  • transparent layer 506 is ordinary air, nitrogen, or some other gas.
  • Figure 8 shows a lenticular array 800 in which transparent layer 806 is air.
  • transparent layer 806 is sealed from ambient air.
  • transparent layer 806 is connected to a bladder 804 such that air of ' transparent layer 806 can freely move into and out of bladder 804.
  • air pressure within transparent layer 806 is therefore in equilibrium with air pressure outside of transparent layer 806, avoiding any warping of lenticular array 800.
  • Bladder 804 is shown significantly enlarged for illustration purposes. In general, bladder 804 should be designed to be as small and unobtrusive as possible while still accepting and releasing an amount of air to accommodate the greatest and least expected ambient air pressures without appreciably affecting the air pressure or restricting air flow.
  • One of the advantages of a transparent layer of air between a lenticular array and a multi-view display such as display 1 10 is that convex surfaces of the lenticular array can be positioned toward display 1 10 as shown in Figure 9. Such allows a flat surface of lenticular array 900 to be easily cleaned while the convex surfaces of lenticles of lenticular array 900 simply fit into the air space of a transparent layer 906.
  • a meniscus-cylinder lens dramatically flattens the field of view of lenticle 500 having such a long focal length, ten (10) times thickness 514 in this illustrative embodiment.
  • lenticle 500 also reduce other aberrations, such as coma and circular aberration.
  • Coma is well-known and is not described further herein.
  • Lenticles which have a circular-cylindrical proximal surfaces have aberrations (sometimes referred to herein as "circular aberrations") that are two-dimensional analogs to spherical aberrations, which are also well-known and are not described further herein.
  • One embodiment that further flattens the field of view from even more extreme angles and reduces other aberrations has a radius of curvature of 1.894mm on proximal surface 502P and a radius of curvature of 2.131mm on distal surface 502D.
  • proximal surface 502P and distal surface 502D can reduce circular aberrations by being made non-circular, e.g., parabolic, in cross-section.
  • lenticle 500 is shown in cross-section as lenticle 600 ( Figure 6).
  • Figure 6 An alternative embodiment of lenticle 500 is shown in cross-section as lenticle 600 ( Figure 6).
  • lenticle 600 includes a plano-convex lens 604 with a proximal surface 604P having a radius of curvature of 9.302mm.
  • Lenticle 600 includes the same transparent layer as does lenticle 500 ( Figure 5).
  • Lenticle 700 includes a proximal meniscus-cylinder lens 702 and a distal meniscus- cylinder lens 704.
  • Proximal meniscus-cylinder lens 702 is directly analogous to meniscus-cylinder lens 502 ( Figure 5).
  • Distal meniscus-cylinder lens 704 is reversed, having a proximal surface 704P that is concave and a distal surface that is convex.
  • distal meniscus-cylinder lens 704 is of the same dimensions as proximal meniscus-cylinder lens 702, aside from having convex and concave surfaces reversed.
  • optical aberrations resulting from lenticles with unusually long focal lengths are reduced in a manner described in U.S. Patent Application 12/969,552 filed December, 15 2010 by Dr. Richard A. Muller for "Improved Resolution For Autostereoscopic Video Displays" at Figures 5-7 and accompanying text in the Application. That description is incorporated herein by reference.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Testing, Inspecting, Measuring Of Stereoscopic Televisions And Televisions (AREA)

Abstract

A single pixel of a video display can display respective individual pixels of multiple views. In other words, a video display can include more views for an autostereoscopic image than the physical pixels of the video display would ordinarily support. The physical pixel is time-multiplexed in that the physical pixel displays a pixel of one view for a given time interval and a view multiplexer deflects the light from the physical pixel by a predetermined angle to make the pixel appear in a location corresponding to the pixel of the view. In another time interval, the physical pixel displays a pixel of a different view and the view multiplexer deflects light from the physical pixel by a different predetermined angle to make the pixel appear in a location corresponding to the pixel of the different view.

Description

IM PROVED PERCHI VHD IMAGE DEPTH FOR AUTOSTHR EOSCOPnC
VIDRO DISPLAYS
Ι-Ί Η D
[000 ! I The present invention relates generally to autostercoscopic displays, and, more particularly, to a video a tosiercoseopie display with signi ficantly improved depth of" projection.
I'j AC KG ROUN
[00021 Conventional auiostcrcoscopic displays use arrays of lciiscs or parallax harriers or other view selectors to make a number of pixels of the display visible, to one eye of a viewing person and lo make a number o f ther pixels of the display visible to the other eye of the viewing person, Uy isolating the pixels of the display visible to each eye, the two fields of a stereoscopic image can be presented on the display. The presentation of separate fields to each eye is often used to cause the viewer to perceive a three-dimensional image.
[00031 Current stereoscopic displays project a perceived depth of about a few centimeters. In other words, most autostercoscopic displays project portions of an image no more than about 1 -2 centimeters in front o f, and no more than about 1 -2 centimeters behind, (he display. Some autostercoscopic displays a purported to project a perceived depth of up to one foot, i.e., about 30cm. However, such displays suffer from optical aberrations such a poor focus except for items projected near the surface of the display.
[0004] One of the major difficulties in projecting a greater depth of perception is that of optical artifacts in the lenticular array often used to select a different field to be visible to each eye of the human viewer. One such effect is that a given portion of the image can be visible in two or more places, such as in two or more lenticles of a lenticular array. Other effects include optical aberrations that are typically not noticeable with very short projected distances, such as just a few centimeters.
[0005] What is needed is an autostereoscopic display in which significantly greater projected depths of perception can be achieved without undesirable artifacts.
BRIEF SUMMARY
[0006] In accordance with the present invention, an autostereoscopic display provides an extremely deep projection area, for example appearing to have a depth of a meter or more, by observing a relationship between a desired depth of projection and an autostereoscopic display design that includes a focal length of lenticles of a lenticular array and a number of views. For parallax barrier autostereoscopic displays, the focal length is the distance between the parallax barrier and the underlying display having multiple views. [0007] The relationship specifies a projected depth at which lenticular crossover can occur for a given autostereoscopic with the specific lenticular focal length and number of views. In some configurations, approximations can be used to simplify the relationship such that the projected depth is directly related to a product of the focal length and the number of views.
[0008] The autostereoscopic display configuration often specifies a view selector (such as a lenticular array) with a focal length much greater than typical focal lengths seen in conventional autostereoscopic display view selectors. One of the challenges with such long focal lengths in lenticles of a lenticular array is that a number of optical aberrations become noticeable and problematic.
[0009] To reduce these optical aberrations, lenticles of the lenticular array include meniscus-cylinder lenses, to provide a more flat field of view.
[0010] The result is an autostereoscopic display with depths of projection well beyond what conventional autostereoscopic displays are capable of, while still avoiding effects such as lenticular crossover and curved fields of view.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
[001 1] Figure 1 shows an autostereoscopic display according to the present invention in conjunction with a human viewer and showing, in plan view, a three- dimensional area into which the autostereoscopic display can project elements shown in the display.
[0012] Figure 2 shows the autostereoscopic display and viewer of Figure 1 and shows the projection of a picture element behind the display.
[0013] Figure 3 shows the autostereoscopic display and viewer of Figure 1 and shows the projection of a picture element before the display.
[0014] Figure 4 shows the autostereoscopic display and viewer of Figure 1 and shows the reduced curvature of field achieved in accordance with the present invention.
[0015] Figure 5, 6, and 7 are each a cross-section view of a lenticle of a respective embodiment of the lenticular array of Figure 1 in accordance with the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0016] In accordance with the present invention, a depth 130 (Figure 1) of a projection area 120 in which parts of an autostereoscopic display that includes a lenticular array 100 and a display 1 10 is dramatically improved - e.g., to a meter or more, 20-30 times what is seen in conventional autostereoscopic displays - by determining a relationship between depth 130 and an autostereoscopic display configuration at which a portion of display 110 can be visible at multiple locations (lenticular crosstalk). This relationship establishes a limiting configuration within which lenticular crosstalk is minimized. Once this relationship is determined for a desired depth 130, the autostereoscopic display is constructed to meet or exceed the autostereoscopic display configuration to ensure that lenticular crosstalk is only possible at depths of projection beyond depth 130.
[0017] The autostereoscopic includes a focal length of individual lenticles of lenticular array 100 and a number of views represented in display 1 10. Choosing a relatively deep projection area 120 produces a very long focal length for lenticular array 100 and a large number of views for display 1 10.
[0018] "A view" is used herein to refer to a subset of an image presented to a viewer from a particular angle of view. As an example, it is helpful to consider a simple autostereoscopic display in which one eye of the human viewer can see every odd-numbered column of pixels and the other eye of the viewer can see every even- numbered column of pixels. The odd-numbered columns of pixels would collectively represent one view, and the even-numbered columns of pixels would collectively represent another view. It should be appreciated that most autostereoscopic displays have many more than just two views and that this very simple example is merely to illustrate how "view" is used herein.
[0019] In this illustrative embodiment, lenticular array 100 includes a number of vertical lenticles that makes one of a number of view elements visible depending upon the angle of perspective of an eye of viewer 10. In other words, for each of the views that can be visible through lenticular array 100, each lenticle of lenticular array 100 covers a portion of that view, sometimes referred to herein as a view element, and makes that view element visible from a given angle of perspective. In embodiments in which display 110 is an electronic display, such as an LCD for example, view elements are collections of pixels. In embodiments in which display 1 10 is a static image such as a poster, view elements can be tall, thin slivers of one of a number of views printed or otherwise represented visually in display 1 10.
[0020] Design of lenticular 100 and display 1 10 begins with selecting a designed depth 130 of projection area 120. In this illustrative embodiment, depth 130 is selected to be one meter, much, much deeper than any currently available autostereoscopic displays. [0021] Figure 2 illustrates a circumstance to be avoided that therefore sets a limit on high-quality autostereoscopic display with a projected area 120 having depth 130. The left eye of viewer 10 sees a portion of display 1 10 through lenticle 500A and that portion of display 1 10 appears to be at point 202 as a result of the focal length of lenticle 500 A. The same portion of display 1 10 can also be seen through lenticle 500B and every lenticle between lenticle 500A and lenticle 500B. Light travels from point 202 at an angle Θ and is bent by lenticle 500B at an angle φ to the left eye of viewer 100. This phenomenon of a single portion of display 110 being visible to viewer 10 through multiple lenticles of lenticular array 100 is sometimes referred to herein as lenticular crosstalk.
[0022] Lenticular array 100 and display 1 10 are designed to provide a projection area 120 of depth 130 with minimum lenticular crosstalk.
[0023] The angles of Figure 2 are related to one another as follows:
Θ + Ά ~ (1)
[0024] These angles can be rewritten in terms of dimensions of lenticular array 100, display 110, and projection area 120.
[0025] In equation (2), S is the spacing of lenticles of lenticular array 100, i.e., the width of a single lenticle. N is the offset of lenticle 500B from lenticle 500 A in terms of a number of lenticles. Thus, NS is the!offset of lenticle 500B from lenticle 500A as a measured distance. In equation (2), d is projection depth 220, i.e, the distance from lenticular array 110 that point 202 is projected. The last portion of equation (2) estimates the arctangent function using small angle approximation, which is appropriate in most practical implementations of lenticular array 100 and display
[0026] In equation (3), D is distance 210, i.e, the distance from lenticular array 110 to the eye of viewer 10. The last portion of equation (3) estimates the arctangent function using small angle approximation, which is appropriate in most practical implementations of lenticular array 100 and display 1 10.
[0027] Angle φ depends on the size (δ) of the portion of display 1 10 to be shown through a single lenticle as a part of a single view and on the distance ( ) of that portion from lenticle 500B. Equation (4) shows angle φ in terms of δ and / and the index of refraction, no, of lenticular array 1 10.
[0028] Using equations (2), (3), and (4), equation (1) can be rewritten as follows: [0029] Small angle approximation of arctangent values should not be used in equation (5) when such introduces appreciable error.
[0030] The number of views («,,) represented by display 110 relates to the size (δ) of the portion of display 1 10 and lenticular size (S) as follows:
[0031] To minimize lenticular crosstalk, N is chosen to be one (1) to identify a configuration at which lenticular crosstalk between adjacent lenticles is possible. Using the relationship of equation (6), setting N to 1 , and applying some algebra yields the following relationship between configuration of lenticular array 100 and display 1 10 and a maximum projection depth d at which lenticular crosstalk begins between adjacent lenticle r a viewer a distance, D, away:
[0032] A similar relationship is observed for parts of display 1 10 projected toward viewer 10 as shown in Fi re 3, and this relationship is as follows:
[0033] In situations in which D is much greater than d, l/D can be approximated by zero. The result is that equations (7) and (8) can then both be expressed as:
2 n = d (9) [0034] In equation (8), d represents distance 320 (Figure 3), which is chosen to be the same as distance 210 (Figure 2) in this illustrative embodiment,
[0035] The particular measure of depth 130 of projection area 120 at which lenticular crosstalk can happen between adjacent lenticles is given by 2d:
2 d = 4 "*f (10)
[0036] Equation (10) provides guidance in designing lenticular array 100 and display 1 10 to provide a desired depth 130 of projection area 120 within which lenticular crosstalk is avoided. In particular, the focal length of the lenticles of lenticular array 100 and the number of views provided by display 1 10 are chosen such that four (4) times their product is at least the desired depth.
[0037] If more precision is required in designing a depth of a projection area, the approximations used in equations (1)-(10) above can be excluded. The resulting, exact version of equation (10) is as follows:
2 d ~ D- 2 n O D
[0038] It should be observed that as D gets very large relative to other values in equation ( 1 1), equation (11) is approximated by equation (10). [0039] As an illustrative example using equation (10), consider that depth 130 of projection area 120 is to be one meter. To achieve this, the product of the number of views of display 1 10 and the focal length of lenticles of lenticular array 100 should be at least one-quarter of a meter, or 25 centimeters. A typical conventional design would include eight views and a focal length of 1 millimeter, providing a projection area having a maximum depth of about 3.2cm while still avoiding lenticular crosstalk. However, lenticular array 100 and display 1 10 require dimensions way beyond those to achieve the desired depth of projection. For example, if lenticular array 100 is designed to include lenticles whose focal lengths are one centimeter and display 110 is designed to include 25 views, projection area 120 would have a maximum depth 130 of one meter with little or no lenticular crosstalk.
[0040] Without the benefit of equations (10) and (1 1), the trend is to make autostereocopic displays, both static images and dynamic monitors, thinner and to have a greater apparent resolution. Such is directly contrary to extending the focal length of lenticles of a lenticular array to dramatically improve the perceived depth of the autostereoscopic display as suggested by equation (10). In the example above, increasing the focal length of a conventional lenticle by 1,000% (from 1mm to 1cm) and increasing the number of views to twenty-five (25) improves the apparent depth by 3,000% (from 3.2cm to lm). [0041] At the expense of thinness of the lenticular array, lenticles with focal lengths significantly greater than the width of the lenticles can provide very dramatic improvements in the perceived depth of an autostereoscopic display without introducing lenticular crosstalk. In the example above, the lenticles have a focal length that is ten (10) times their width and provide an apparent depth without lenticular crosstalk that is thirty (30) times that of a comparable conventional autostereoscopic display. Lenticles that have a focal length that is merely five (5), or even just three (3), times their width still provide dramatic results.
[0042] The following Table provides a number of examples of crosstalk-free apparent depths of autostereoscopic displays according to equation (10) above.
[0043] As used herein, the "(χ3)", "(χ6)", Μ(χ8)", and "(* 12)" notes in the horizontal resolution (ppi) column above indicate application of one or more of the following technologies: (i) the subpixel remapping described in US Patent Application 12/868,038 filed August 25, 2010 by Dr. Richard A. Muller for "Improved Resolution for Autostereoscopic Video Displays" (hereinafter the '038 Application) and (ii) the pixel time multiplexing described in US Patent Application 12/969,552 filed December, 15 2010 by Dr. Richard A. Muller for "Improved Resolution For Autostereoscopic Video Displays" (hereinafter the '552 Application). Both of those descriptions are incorporated herein by reference.
[0044] The subpixel remapping taught by the Ό83 Application teaches how to triple the horizontal resolution of a video display. The "(*3)" note indicates use of this technology alone. The time multiplexing taught by the '552 Application teaches how to double the apparent horizontal resolution of a video display one or more times, thereby scaling the apparent horizontal resolution by an integer power of two. The "(x8)" indicates use of three (3) doubling layers to produce an eight-fold increase in the apparent horizontal resolution of the display. The "(x6)" and "(*12)" notes indicate a combination of the tripling of apparent horizontal resolution described in the Ό83 Application with a single-layer doubling and a double-layer quadrupling, respectively, of the apparent horizontal resolution described in the '552 Application.
[0045] It should also be appreciated that the horizontal resolutions specified in Table A are in pixels per inch (ppi), not dots per inch (dpi). In addition, resolutions for smart phones and tablet computers take into consideration resolutions of iPhone and iPad products using Retina displays available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California, which are purported to provide 326 pixels per inch.
[0046] Traditionally, and without the benefit of equations (10) and (1 1), the trends in autostereoscopic displays has been to minimize thickness. There has generally been a perceived trade-off in autostereoscopic display quality between greater apparent horizontal resolution and the number of views. To avoid loss of views, lenticles have generally been kept relatively shallow (short focal lengths) and broad. Shallowness of lenticles maintains the thinness of the autostereoscopic display but limits the focal length of the lenticles. Lenticle breadth allows more views behind each lenticle. Accordingly, the ratio of lenticle focal length ( ) to lenticle width (S) is low in conventional autostereoscopic displays - typically no greater than about 1 :1.
[0047] However, equations (10) and ( 1 1) illustrate the value of dramatically increasing the focal length of the lenticles. Accordingly, the ratio of lenticle focal length (f) to lenticle width (S) in autostereoscopic displays designed according to the present invention are significantly greater. This ratio is sometimes referred to herein as a lenticular aspect ratio. As shown in Table A above, lenticular aspect ratios are generally at least 2.5: 1 , more commonly 3 : 1 , 4: 1, 5: 1 , 6: 1 , and even greater than 10: 1 in some displays. The result is that a one-inch-wide bookmark can have an error-free perceived depth of about 12.8 inches. Similarly, a 46" HDTV can have an error-free perceived depth of about one meter. Autostereoscopic smart phones displays can have an error-free perceived depth of over five (5) inches, and autostereoscopic tablet computer displays can have an error-free perceived depth of over six (6) inches. Large, billboard-sized displays can have error-free perceived depth of over 20 feet, even as much 48 feet. [0048] These maximum error-free perceived depths are far beyond what any prior autostereoscopic displays have been able to achieve. Exemplary minimum ratios of maximum error-free perceived depths to display widths are summarized in Table C below.
[0049] There is a practical limit to how great the lenticular aspect ratio can be in autostereoscopic displays. Figure 10 is illustrative. [0050] Given a lenticle 1002 having a focal length 1004 ( ) and a width 1006 (5), the width 1010 of a viewing "sweet spot" at viewing distance 1008 is given by the following equation:
w S D
W=~T w
[0051] In equation (12), W is width 1010 of the viewing sweet spot, and D is viewing distance 1008. The sweet spot is defined as a position in which both eyes of viewer 10 see a view corresponding to the same lenticle, e.g., lenticle 1002. If width 1010 is not at least the intraocular distance 1012 of viewer 10, viewer 10 will not be able to see both left and right views through the same lenticle and the
autostereoscopic image will not be clearly visible. In addition, the amount by which viewer 10 can move his head side-to-side and still see the autostereographic image properly is given by the following eauation:
Wss =— - E (i 3)
[0052] In equation ( 13), Wss is the amount by which viewer 10 can move his head side-to-side and still see the autostereographic image properly, and E is the intraocular distance 1012 of viewer 10. A typical intraocular distance for adult viewers is about 2.4 inches. Herein, the amount by which viewer 10 can move his head side-to-side and still see the autostereographic image properly is sometimes referred to as a practical viewing sweet spot. [0053] The practical viewing sweet spots Wss for the various types of displays in Table A above at various viewing distances are shown in Table C below.
Table C
[0054] As can be seen in Table B, hand-held devices that are typically viewed from about two (2) feet away have lenticular aspect ratios of about 2.5 to 6.6 and corresponding practical viewing sweet spots of about 7.2 down to 1.24 inches. Handheld displays can be easily tilted by viewer 10 to find the practical sweet spot, so a practical sweet spot of only 1.24 inches isn't particularly worrisome for a hand-held display. Generally, the largest hand-held device display measures about 17 inches diagonally. Thus, as long as the lenticular aspect ratio of such a display is below 7, viewer 10 should be able to properly perceive the autostereoscopic display.
[0055] Larger displays, such as televisions and posters and sometimes digital picture frames and tablet computers (when used as a digital picture frame), are more typically viewed from up to about eight (8) feet away. These types of display have lenticular aspect ratios of about 4 to 9.6 and corresponding practical viewing sweet spots of about 21.6 down to 7.6 inches, providing ample room for viewer 10 to move his head to view the autostereoscopic display properly.
[0056] While a practical viewing sweet spot of only 7.6 inches may sound like at most a single viewer can see the autostereoscopic display properly or perhaps two viewers with their heads pressed uncomfortably close together, it should be appreciated that there are many 7.6-inch-wide practical viewing sweet spots. In particular, the viewing sweet spot (10 inches in this example), repeat contiguously through the range of visibility of an autostereoscopic display. Only when the eyes of viewer 10 straddle a boundary between adjacent viewing sweet spots that the eyes see views behind two distinct lenticles and the autostereoscopic view is improper. In such a situtation, viewer 10 needs only to move his head up to 1.2 inches in either direction to position both eyes in a single viewing sweet spot. Within that viewing sweet spot, viewer 10 can move his head within a space that is 7.6 inches wide. [0057] Televisions and other large displays are commonly viewed from up to ' about twenty (20) feet away, ie., from across a large room. These types of display have lenticular aspect ratios of about 2.16 to 12 and corresponding practical viewing sweet spots of about 108.6 down to 17.6 inches, providing ample room for viewer 10 to move his head to view the autostereoscopic display properly.
[0058] As viewing distances become large, width of the practical viewing sweet spot becomes much less of a limitation. In very large displays, such as billboards and large posters, it is common for the display to be viewed from 100 feet away. These types of display have lenticular aspect ratios of about 3.33 to 25 and corresponding practical viewing sweet spots of about 357.6 down to 45.6 inches - roughly 30 down to four (4) feet, providing ample room for viewer 10 to move his head to view the autostereoscopic display properly.
[0059] One of the challenges in making a lenticular array with such a long focal length is that optical aberrations become significant and detrimental to the viewer's three-dimensional viewing experience. One such aberration is illustrated in Figure 4 and is generally known as curvature of field. Lenticles of conventional lenticular arrays focus along a curved field of view 404. However, at such small focal lengths used in conventional lenticular lenses render this aberration hardly noticeable to viewers at most angles of view. Simply modifying conventional lenticular arrays to have ten (10) times the focal length as described above would render this aberration very noticeable at most angles of view. Lenticular array 100 is designed to provide a much more flat field of view than conventional lenticular arrays. Such flattening is analogous to flattening that is accomplished in spherical lenses by applying the "Petzval condition", a known equation that is typically applied to spherical lenses rather than the cylindrical, lenticular lenses described here.
[0060] Figure 5 shows a single lenticle 500 of lenticular array 100 (Figure 1) in cross section. Lenticle 500 (Figure 5) includes a meniscus-cylinder lens 502. As used herein, a "cylinder" is not limited to cylinders with circular cross-sections. Meniscus-cylinder lens 502 includes a proximal surface 502P and a distal surface 502D, a width 508, and a thickness 514. Proximal surface 502P is convex, and distal surface 502D is concave. In this illustrative embodiment, width 508 and thickness 514 are one (1) millimeter (mm) each. In one embodiment, the radius of curvatures of proximal surface 502P and distal surface 502D are 1.29mm, In addition, meniscus- cylinder lens 502 is separated from display 1 10 by a transparent layer 506 of glass or plastic whose thickness 510 is 9mm.
[0061] In an alternative embodiment, transparent layer 506 is ordinary air, nitrogen, or some other gas. Figure 8 shows a lenticular array 800 in which transparent layer 806 is air. To prevent moisture or anything that might fog or otherwise reduce transparency of transparent layer 806, transparent layer 806 is sealed from ambient air. To prevent warping of lenticular array 800 by changes in ambient air pressure, transparent layer 806 is connected to a bladder 804 such that air of ' transparent layer 806 can freely move into and out of bladder 804. As a result, air pressure within transparent layer 806 is therefore in equilibrium with air pressure outside of transparent layer 806, avoiding any warping of lenticular array 800.
Bladder 804 is shown significantly enlarged for illustration purposes. In general, bladder 804 should be designed to be as small and unobtrusive as possible while still accepting and releasing an amount of air to accommodate the greatest and least expected ambient air pressures without appreciably affecting the air pressure or restricting air flow.
[0062] One of the advantages of a transparent layer of air between a lenticular array and a multi-view display such as display 1 10 is that convex surfaces of the lenticular array can be positioned toward display 1 10 as shown in Figure 9. Such allows a flat surface of lenticular array 900 to be easily cleaned while the convex surfaces of lenticles of lenticular array 900 simply fit into the air space of a transparent layer 906.
[0063] Returning to Figure 5, a meniscus-cylinder lens dramatically flattens the field of view of lenticle 500 having such a long focal length, ten (10) times thickness 514 in this illustrative embodiment.
[0064] Other designs of lenticle 500 also reduce other aberrations, such as coma and circular aberration. Coma is well-known and is not described further herein. Lenticles which have a circular-cylindrical proximal surfaces have aberrations (sometimes referred to herein as "circular aberrations") that are two-dimensional analogs to spherical aberrations, which are also well-known and are not described further herein.
[0065] One embodiment that further flattens the field of view from even more extreme angles and reduces other aberrations has a radius of curvature of 1.894mm on proximal surface 502P and a radius of curvature of 2.131mm on distal surface 502D. In addition, proximal surface 502P and distal surface 502D can reduce circular aberrations by being made non-circular, e.g., parabolic, in cross-section.
[0066] An alternative embodiment of lenticle 500 is shown in cross-section as lenticle 600 (Figure 6). In addition to a meniscus-cylinder lens 602 having a proximal surface 602P with a radius of curvature of 1.894mm and a distal surface 602D with a radius of curvature of 2.131mm and a thickness 614 of 0.5mm. In addition, lenticle 600 includes a plano-convex lens 604 with a proximal surface 604P having a radius of curvature of 9.302mm. Lenticle 600 includes the same transparent layer as does lenticle 500 (Figure 5).
[0067] Another alternative to lenticles 500 and 600 is lenticle 700 (Figure 7). Lenticle 700 includes a proximal meniscus-cylinder lens 702 and a distal meniscus- cylinder lens 704. Proximal meniscus-cylinder lens 702 is directly analogous to meniscus-cylinder lens 502 (Figure 5). Distal meniscus-cylinder lens 704 is reversed, having a proximal surface 704P that is concave and a distal surface that is convex. In this illustrative embodiment, distal meniscus-cylinder lens 704 is of the same dimensions as proximal meniscus-cylinder lens 702, aside from having convex and concave surfaces reversed.
[0068] In some embodiments, optical aberrations resulting from lenticles with unusually long focal lengths are reduced in a manner described in U.S. Patent Application 12/969,552 filed December, 15 2010 by Dr. Richard A. Muller for "Improved Resolution For Autostereoscopic Video Displays" at Figures 5-7 and accompanying text in the Application. That description is incorporated herein by reference.
[0069] The above description is illustrative only and is not limiting. The present invention is defined solely by the claims which follow and their full range of equivalents. It is intended that the following appended claims be interpreted as including all such alterations, modifications, permutations, and substitute equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. An autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operatively coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein the autostereoscopic display has a width of from 2.5 to 18 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.4: 1.
2. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 1 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.6: 1.
3. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 1 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.9: 1.
4. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 1 wherein the autostereoscopic display is an electrically controlled dynamic display; wherein the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 6 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.5: 1.
5. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 4 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
6. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 4 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1.2: 1.
7. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 1 wherein the autostereoscopic display is an electrically controlled dynamic display; wherein the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 4 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.5: 1.
8. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 7 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
9. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 7 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1.2: 1.
10. An electronically controlled dymanic autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operative ly coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein the autostereoscopic display has a width of from 5 to 18 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.25: 1.
11. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 10 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.4:1.
12. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 10 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
13. An electronically controlled dymanic autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operatively coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein the autostereoscopic display has a width of from 17 to 35 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length bf the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.25: 1.
14. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 13 wherein the autostereoscopic display displays video content having a 1080p display format.
15. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 14 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.8: 1.
16. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 14 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
17. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 13 wherein the autostereoscopic display displays video content having a WQXGA display format; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
18. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 17 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1.5: 1.
19. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 17 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 2: 1.
20. An electronically controlled dymanic autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operative ly coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein the autostereoscopic display has a width of at least 40 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.8: 1.
21. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 20 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.9: 1.
22. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 20 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
23. An electronically controlled dymanic autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operative ly coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein vie ing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein the autostereoscopic display has a width of at least 74 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.2:1.
26. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 23 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.4:1.
25. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 23 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.8:1.
26. A static autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operatively coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein the autostereoscopic display has a width of at least 28 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.6: 1.
27. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 26 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.8: 1.
28. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 26 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
29. A static autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operatively coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein the autostereoscopic display has a width of at least 56 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.3: 1.
30. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 29 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.5: 1.
31. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 29 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.8: 1.
32. A static autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operatively coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein the autostereoscopic display has a width of at least 120 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.1 : 1.
33. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 32 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.2: 1.
34. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 32 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.3 : 1.
35. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 32 wherein the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 576 inches.
36. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 35 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.25: 1.
37. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 35 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.4: 1.
38. A static autostereoscopic display comprising: 1 an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operatively coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein the autostereoscopic display has a width of at least 100 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.15: 1.
39. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 38 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.2:1.
40. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 38 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is. at least 0.3 : 1.
41. An autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operatively coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; and an air gap interposed between the view selector and the image; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles simultaneously results in perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area,
42. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 41 wherein the air gap is filled with nitrogen gas.
43. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 41 further comprising: a bladder that is in communication with the air gap in such a manner as to maintain a constant pressure in the air gap despite changes in ambient air pressure when the air gap is sealed.
44. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 41 wherein the lenticles have convex surfaces adjacent to the air gap.
45. An autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operatively coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles corresponding to an intraocular distance of 2.4 inches simultaneously results in clear perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three- dimensional projection area from a viewing distance of at least 12 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.25: 1.
46. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 45 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereosco ic display is at least 0.4: 1.
47. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 45 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.6: 1.
48. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 45 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.9:1.
49. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 45 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
50. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 46 wherein the autostereoscopic display is an electrically controlled dynamic display.
51. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 50 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.4: 1.
52. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 50 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.6: 1.
53. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 50 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.9: 1.
54. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 50 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
55. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 50 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1.2: 1.
56. An autostereoscopic display comprising: an image that contains a number of views; and a lenticular array that includes at least two lenticles and that is operatively coupled to the image and that makes only one of the views of the image visible from each viewing angle throughout a perceived three-dimensional projection area; wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles corresponding to an intraocular distance of 2.4 inches simultaneously results in clear perception of a three-dimensional image in the perceived three- dimensional projection area from a viewing distance of at least 48 inches; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.1 :1 .
57. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 56 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.2:1.
58. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 56 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.3 : 1.
59. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 56 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.5:1.
60. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 56 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0,6: 1.
61. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 56 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.8 :1.
62. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 56 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
63. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 56 wherein the autostereoscopic display is an electrically controlled dynamic display; and wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.25: 1.
64. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 63 wherein the autostereoscopic display displays video content having a 1080p display format.
65. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 63 wherein the autostereoscopic display displays video content having a WQXGA display format.
66. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 63 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.8: 1.
67. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 66 wherein the autostereoscopic display displays video content having a 1080p display format.
68. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 66 wherein the autostereoscopic display displays video content having a WQXGA display format.
69. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 63 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.9: 1.
70. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 63 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 1 : 1.
71. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 70 wherein the autostereoscopic display displays video content having a 1080p display format.
72. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 70 wherein the autostereoscopic display displays video content having a WQXGA display format.
73. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 57 wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles corresponding to an intraocular distance of 2.4 inches simultaneously results in clear perception of a three- dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area from a viewing distance of at least 60 inches.
74. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 73 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.4: 1.
75. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 73 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.8:1.
76. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 56 wherein viewing the image through the lenticular array from two different viewing angles corresponding to an intraocular distance of 2.4 inches simultaneously results in clear perception of a three- dimensional image in the perceived three-dimensional projection area from a viewing distance of at least 96 inches.
77. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 76 wherein the autostereoscopic display is a static display.
78. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 76 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.15: 1.
79. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 76 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.2: 1.
80. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 76 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.25: 1.
81. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 80 wherein the autostereoscopic display is a static display.
82. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 76 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.3:1.
83. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 76 wherein the ratio of (i) four times the product of a focal length of the lenticles and the number of views to (ii) the width of the autostereoscopic display is at least 0.4: 1.
84. The autostereoscopic display of Claim 81 wherein the autostereoscopic display is a static display.
EP14777947.4A 2014-08-25 2014-08-25 Improved perceived image depth for autostereoscopic video displays Withdrawn EP3186961A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2014/052506 WO2016032424A1 (en) 2014-08-25 2014-08-25 Improved perceived image depth for autostereoscopic video displays

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3186961A1 true EP3186961A1 (en) 2017-07-05

Family

ID=51656046

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14777947.4A Withdrawn EP3186961A1 (en) 2014-08-25 2014-08-25 Improved perceived image depth for autostereoscopic video displays

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3186961A1 (en)
KR (1) KR20170045276A (en)
CN (1) CN107079146A (en)
WO (1) WO2016032424A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110927986B (en) * 2019-12-11 2021-10-01 成都工业学院 Stereoscopic display device based on pixel pair

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4002875B2 (en) * 2003-09-16 2007-11-07 株式会社東芝 Stereoscopic image display device
US7077523B2 (en) * 2004-02-13 2006-07-18 Angstorm Inc. Three-dimensional display using variable focusing lens
JP4227076B2 (en) * 2004-05-24 2009-02-18 株式会社東芝 Display device for displaying stereoscopic image and display method for displaying stereoscopic image
US7944465B2 (en) * 2006-01-13 2011-05-17 Zecotek Display Systems Pte. Ltd. Apparatus and system for reproducing 3-dimensional images
JP4403162B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2010-01-20 株式会社東芝 Stereoscopic image display device and method for producing stereoscopic image
BRPI0814892A2 (en) * 2007-07-30 2015-06-16 Magnetic Media Holdings Inc Multi-steroscopic visualization apparatus.
JP5514115B2 (en) * 2007-11-02 2014-06-04 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェ Autostereoscopic display device
US8817082B2 (en) * 2008-12-18 2014-08-26 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Autostereoscopic display device
US20140078274A1 (en) * 2011-05-30 2014-03-20 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Autostereoscopic display device
KR20140089860A (en) * 2013-01-07 2014-07-16 삼성전자주식회사 Display apparatus and display method thereof
JP5846148B2 (en) * 2013-03-27 2016-01-20 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Lens array and lens array manufacturing method
CN103869484B (en) * 2014-03-07 2016-01-13 南开大学 The defining method of imaging depth in the large imaging depth three-dimensional display system of Optical processing system

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *
See also references of WO2016032424A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107079146A (en) 2017-08-18
WO2016032424A1 (en) 2016-03-03
KR20170045276A (en) 2017-04-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10705350B2 (en) Perceived image depth for autostereoscopic displays
US10298916B2 (en) Autostereoscopic image output device
JP4637863B2 (en) Improvement of image quality of 3D image display device
CN108776388B (en) Double-view 3D display device and method based on gradient slit grating
TWI446007B (en) Three - dimensional image display device and three - dimensional image display method
CN105282539A (en) Curved multi-view image display apparatus and control method thereof
US20100033813A1 (en) 3-D Display Requiring No Special Eyewear
US20120092339A1 (en) Multi-view autostereoscopic display device
TW201030375A (en) Autostereoscopic display device
US20080259157A1 (en) Lenticular Design By Applying Light Blocking Feature
JP2013045087A (en) Three-dimensional image display apparatus
CN103513311B (en) A kind of 3 D grating and bore hole 3D display device
JP2005099787A (en) Display and reflector
CN108761824A (en) Without crosstalk and high-resolution double vision 3D display device and method
JP2009510537A (en) 3D display with improved pixel structure (pixel division)
CN102981196A (en) Cylindrical lens grating, grating parallax barrier type stereoscopic display device and parallax barrier
TW201541172A (en) Electrophoretic display apparatus
CN108761816A (en) Non-uniform resolution and wide viewing angle double vision 3D display device and method
CN105892080B (en) A kind of display panel assembly and display device
CN208459701U (en) With vision area without crosstalk and non-uniform resolution double vision 3D display device
CN208459700U (en) Without crosstalk and high-resolution double vision 3D display device
EP3186961A1 (en) Improved perceived image depth for autostereoscopic video displays
US20100321776A1 (en) Lens Structure and Method of Producing and Displaying a Three Dimensional Image
WO2012026128A1 (en) Glasses-free 3d display device
US9971165B2 (en) 3D display apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170320

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20180821

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Effective date: 20200828