EP3148809B1 - Multi-format printer - Google Patents
Multi-format printer Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3148809B1 EP3148809B1 EP15727915.9A EP15727915A EP3148809B1 EP 3148809 B1 EP3148809 B1 EP 3148809B1 EP 15727915 A EP15727915 A EP 15727915A EP 3148809 B1 EP3148809 B1 EP 3148809B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- format
- maintenance
- print head
- instructions
- maintenance operation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims description 98
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010926 purge Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41J—TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
- B41J2/00—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
- B41J2/005—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
- B41J2/01—Ink jet
- B41J2/135—Nozzles
- B41J2/165—Prevention or detection of nozzle clogging, e.g. cleaning, capping or moistening for nozzles
- B41J2/16585—Prevention or detection of nozzle clogging, e.g. cleaning, capping or moistening for nozzles for paper-width or non-reciprocating print heads
- B41J2/16588—Print heads movable towards the cleaning unit
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41J—TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
- B41J11/00—Devices or arrangementsĀ of selective printing mechanisms, e.g. ink-jet printers or thermal printers, for supporting or handling copy material in sheet or web form
- B41J11/0025—Handling copy materials differing in width
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41J—TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
- B41J2/00—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
- B41J2/005—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
- B41J2/01—Ink jet
- B41J2/135—Nozzles
- B41J2/165—Prevention or detection of nozzle clogging, e.g. cleaning, capping or moistening for nozzles
- B41J2/16517—Cleaning of print head nozzles
- B41J2002/1657—Cleaning of only nozzles or print head parts being selected
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41J—TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
- B41J2/00—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
- B41J2/005—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
- B41J2/01—Ink jet
- B41J2/135—Nozzles
- B41J2/165—Prevention or detection of nozzle clogging, e.g. cleaning, capping or moistening for nozzles
- B41J2/16585—Prevention or detection of nozzle clogging, e.g. cleaning, capping or moistening for nozzles for paper-width or non-reciprocating print heads
- B41J2002/16591—Prevention or detection of nozzle clogging, e.g. cleaning, capping or moistening for nozzles for paper-width or non-reciprocating print heads for line print heads above an endless belt
Definitions
- the invention relates to a printer comprising:
- US 7 036 897 B2 discloses a printer, more specifically an ink jet printer in which the printing elements are formed by nozzles and actuators associated therewith for expelling ink droplets from the nozzles.
- the nozzles are not active, the ink in the nozzle orifices starts to dry out, so that the nozzle orifice is contaminated and eventually clogged with dried ink, which disturbs the drop generation process and may eventually lead to a complete failure of the nozzle.
- a maintenance operation is performed at the start of a new print job.
- the maintenance operation consists in activating the nozzle for several hundreds of times so as to purge the nozzle orifice with liquid ink, thereby to remove any contaminants and to clear the nozzle orifice.
- this maintenance operation would be performed for all the nozzles of the print head, a considerable amount of ink would be wasted for the maintenance operation. For this reason, it is proposed in the cited document to perform the maintenance operation only for those nozzles that will actually be needed for printing in the print job.
- printers especially ink jet printers which are capable of processing print media sheets in different formats in random succession.
- the print head As long as the format of the sheets does not change, it is possible to control the print head such that all nozzles that are located within the width range of the sheets are activated so frequently that the time in which an individual nozzle has been idle, the so-called nozzle open time, is kept below a certain limit which, when exceeded, would necessitate a maintenance operation.
- the print process may involve nozzles that have not been actuated for a considerable time period, larger than the admissible nozzle open time, because these nozzles were located outside of the width range of the sheets that have been processed previously, so that the droplets ejected by these nozzles would not have hit the recording medium but would have stained the conveyer. It has therefore been common practice to perform a maintenance operation each time when such a format change occurs.
- the maintenance operation is performed for the entire print head which, to this end, is lifted off from the conveyer and moved aside into a maintenance station where the maintenance operations are performed.
- the maintenance operations may comprise purging the nozzles and wiping the surface in which the nozzle orifices are formed.
- the invention provides a printer of the type indicated above, wherein the maintenance manager is adapted to decide on a maintenance operation on the basis of whether or not the actuation instructions for the dot printing elements located outside of the width range of the narrow format but inside the width range of the wider format specify that at least one of these dot printing elements is needed for printing a part of the image.
- the invention is based on the consideration that, when the format of the sheets changes from a narrower format to a wider format, this does not necessarily mean that a maintenance operation is actually needed. For example, there may be cases in which the nozzles that are located outside of the width range of the narrower format that has been processed previously are not needed for printing an image on the sheets of the wider format, neither. For this reason, the invention involves an analysis of the actuation instructions for the printing elements, which permits to decide whether the nozzles located outside of the width range of the previous format will actually be needed.
- the invention permits to avoid unnecessary but time-consuming maintenance operations, so that the productivity of the printer can be increased and less ink, to the extent needed by the maintenance operations, will be spoiled.
- the actuation instructions for all printing elements on the entire width of this format include spitting instructions assuring that all nozzles will be actuated in time intervals smaller than the admissible nozzle open time.
- the maintenance manager may therefore preferably perform an analysis of the actuation instructions, including the spitting instructions, for a number of sheets that have been processed earlier, in order to determine the nozzle open times.
- the maintenance operations may include different types of operations which differ in their cleaning efficiency, and the maintenance manager may decide on the basis of the nozzle open times not only whether a maintenance operation is to be performed at all, but also which of the available maintenance operations shall be performed.
- the printer shown in Fig. 1 comprises a conveyer 10 arranged to convey print media sheets 1 - 9 one after another in a conveying direction X, and a print head 12 disposed at the conveyer 10 and having an array 14 of dot printing elements, the array extending in a direction Z normal to the conveying direction.
- the print head is arranged to print images 16, 18 onto the media sheets 1 - 9 in accordance with actuation instructions 20 sent to the print head.
- the printer further includes an electronic controller 22 which controls the overall operation of the printer.
- the controller 22 receives print instructions 24 from a print job file that is transmitted to the controller 22 via a network or has been temporarily stored on a storage medium that is connected to the controller 22.
- the controller 22 On the basis of the print instructions 24, the controller 22 generates the actuation instructions 20 for the print head 12.
- the print instructions 24 may further include format instructions specifying a format of the sheets 1 - 9 on which the pages of the print job shall be printed.
- a feeder 26 is disposed at an upstream end of the conveyer 10 and arranged to receive instructions from the controller 22 so as to withdraw cut sheets with the required format from one of a plurality of bins (not shown) and to feed these sheets in the desired sequence to the conveyer 10.
- the print instructions 24 may further comprise instructions specifying whether the images 16, 18 are to be printed only on one side of each sheet (simplex printing) or on both sides (duplex printing).
- duplex printing the sheets with a first image printed on one side thereof are re-circulated via a duplex loop 28 back to the feeder 26, and they are fed to the conveyer 10 in reverse orientation, so that another image will then be printed on the second side of the sheet.
- the print head 12 is disposed above the conveyer 10 in a position in which the array 14 of printing elements extends over the entire width of the conveyer 10.
- the printer is an ink jet printer, and the printing elements are constituted by nozzles from which ink droplets are expelled onto the media sheets 1 - 9 in accordance with the actuation instructions 20.
- each nozzle is associated with an actuator, e.g. a piezoelectric actuator that generates a pressure wave in the liquid ink, such that the pressure wave may propagate to the nozzle to cause a droplet to be formed and expelled.
- the ink in the nozzle orifice may dry out, so that a certain amount of dried ink is deposited in the nozzle orifice and will disturb the subsequent droplet generation or will clog the nozzle orifice completely, causing the nozzle to fail. In such a case, a maintenance operation is required for cleaning the nozzle again.
- the print head 12 is disposed on a manipulator 30 that is arranged to lift the entire print head 12 off from the conveyer 10 and to move it laterally to a maintenance station 32 where all the nozzles of the print head are purged with either ink or a specific cleaning liquid.
- the maintenance operation may further include a wiping step in which a surface of the print head 12 that includes the nozzle orifices is wiped, e.g. with a wet sheet, so as to remove any remnants of dried ink.
- the manipulator 30 moves the print head 12 back to the operative position shown in Fig. 1 .
- the maintenance station 32 and the manipulator 30 are controlled by a maintenance manager 34 which is capable of analysing the print instructions 24 as well as the actuation instructions 20 being generating in the controller.
- the controller 22 - including the maintenance manager 34 - is arranged to schedule all operations of the printer in advance for a certain number of pages, e.g. 200 pages to be printed in accordance with the print instructions 24.
- the time interval for which an individual nozzle has not been active since the last actuation is called the nozzle open time.
- the maintenance manager 34 is capable of monitoring the nozzle open times of each individual nozzle and to compare these nozzle open times to certain limits which indicate the necessity of a maintenance operation.
- the printer is capable of performing different types of maintenance operations, and each of these types of maintenance operations is associated with a specific limit.
- a maintenance operation will be performed when the nozzle open time exceeds the associated limit but does not exceed a higher limit that is associated with another (more intense or efficient) maintenance operation.
- a maintenance operation with a relative low open time limit is a so-called pre-fire operation which can be performed by the print head 12 itself without using the maintenance station 32.
- the actuators for the pertinent nozzles of the print head are energized to cause vibrations in the liquid ink in the nozzle orifice with an amplitude that is not sufficient for expelling an ink droplet.
- these vibrations will help to remove or dissolve possible contaminations in the form of dried ink in the nozzle orifice, especially, when the ink is just about to dry out and has not yet dried completely.
- the ink droplet will be "spit" onto a portion of the sheet which should remain white according to the print instructions.
- the spitting process does not degrade the quality of the printed image but nevertheless helps to keep the nozzle open times low.
- the nozzle that performs the spitting operation is located within the contour of the sheet, because otherwise the ink droplet would be spit onto the surface of the conveyer 10 and would stain the conveyer (and consequently the back sides of the sheets and the images printed thereon in the duplex mode).
- the spitting instructions are generated in the controller 22 on the basis of the monitored nozzle open times and can be considered as a specific type of actuation instructions.
- the maintenance monitor 34 checks whether or not a maintenance operation is necessary and, if yes, which maintenance operation should be performed. The decision is taken on the basis of the actuation instructions 20, including the spitting instructions, for the pertinent nozzles. Among others, the maintenance manager 34 will derive from the actuation instructions, at least for those nozzles that will be required for printing the next sheet, the nozzle open times that will have elapsed when the nozzle is actuated for printing on the next wide format sheet as scheduled.
- Fig. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating the operations that the maintenance manager 34 will perform for each sheet that is being scheduled for printing.
- step S1 it is decided whether the sheet (sheet n) that is being scheduled for printing has a width, i.e. a dimension in the direction Z, which is smaller than or equal to the width of the last sheet (n-1) that has been scheduled before. If that condition is fulfilled (Y), then the sheet n is scheduled for printing in step S2, which means that no maintenance operation shall be performed immediately before that sheet n reaches the print head 12.
- step S1 If the condition specified in step S1 is not fulfilled (N), then the maintenance manager 34 checks the nozzle open times for all nozzles that will be used for sheet n but were not used for sheet n-1.
- the "nozzles that will be used for sheet n" include only those nozzles that are actually needed for printing the desired image, but not the nozzles that will only be scheduled for spitting.
- the nozzles that were "not used for sheet n-1" will include the nozzles that have been used neither for printing the desired image nor for spitting. Consequently, all the nozzles of the print head 12 that are located in the width range w1 of the narrow format sheets (sheets 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8 in Fig. 1 ) may be excluded from consideration in step S3 because these nozzles will have been used at least for spitting.
- the nozzle open times to be checked in step S3 for each of the remaining nozzles is counted from the last instant when the nozzle has been used either for printing an image dot (firing) or for spitting until the time instant when the nozzle is scheduled for being actuated again, either for printing actual image information or for spitting.
- a nozzle may be scheduled for spitting as soon as the leading edge of a sheet has reached the X position of the nozzle.
- a nozzle may be scheduled for spitting as soon as the leading edge of a sheet has reached the X position of the nozzle.
- there may be a large number of nozzles that need spitting at that time so that a faint line would be printed on the leading edge of the sheet.
- step S4 the maintenance manager 34 checks for each of the nozzles which have not been used for sheet n-1, whether the nozzle open time is larger than a first limit T1 that is associated with the purge and wipe maintenance operation to be performed in the maintenance station 32. If that is the case (Y), this maintenance operation is performed in step S5. This means that the print production process has to be interrupted for the duration of the maintenance operation. Subsequently sheet n is planned in step S8.
- step S6 When the limit T1 has not been exceeded in step S4 (N), it is checked in step S6 whether the nozzle open time for at least one of the nozzles that will be needed for the sheet N exceeds a lower second limit T2. If that is the case (Y), the maintenance manager schedules, in step S7, a pre-fire maintenance operation which is less efficient than the purge and wipe maintenance operation performed in step S5 but is sufficient if the nozzle open time was not too long.
- the pre-fire maintenance operation has the advantage that it may be performed with the print head 12 remaining "in-situ", i.e. in the operative position shown in Fig. 1 .
- the sheet In continuation from step S7 the sheet is planned in step S8.
- step S6 If it is found in step S6 that the nozzle open time for the nozzles in consideration does not even exceed the lower limit T2 (N), then the sheet n is scheduled for printing without any maintenance operation at all, so that even the less time-consuming maintenance operation in step S7 can be spared.
- step S6 is left out from the method and from step S4 (N) the method continues with step S7.
- the format changes from the narrow format of the sheet 2 to the wide-format of the sheet 3 and, consequently the maintenance manager 34 decides on a maintenance operation.
- the maintenance manager my find in step S6 that the nozzle open times for the nozzles, even in the above-mentioned image parts near the edges of sheet 3, exceed only the smaller limit T2 but not the larger limit T1. Consequently, the maintenance manager will decide to perform a pre-fire maintenance operation before printing the sheet 3.
- the nozzle open time will again exceed the higher limit T1, and then a decision on a maintenance operation has to be made for the next wide format sheet 9.
- the image 16 to be printed on the sheet 9 overlaps the margin areas 36, so that nozzles will be needed for which the limit T1 has been exceeded. Consequently, the maintenance manager 34 will in this case decide in step S4 that the time-consuming purge and wipe maintenance operation in the maintenance station 32 cannot be avoided.
- the sheets 1 - 9 shown in Fig. 1 are to be printed in the duplex mode, the sheets will be re-circulated through the duplex loop 28 and back to the feeder 26.
- the time required for re-circulating the sheets through the duplex loop is larger than the time needed for printing the sheets 1 - 9 on the first side, there may be a time gap in the printing sequence, and this gap will add to the nozzle open times that are checked in step S3.
- the nozzle open time should be checked for all the nozzles of the print head including those within the width range w1 of the narrow format, because there is actually no sheet that immediately precedes the sheet to be scheduled (no sheet n-1), and consequently no nozzles have been used at all.
- the purge and wipe maintenance operation in step S5 may of course be scheduled for a time so early that the time gap in the print sequence may be utilized for performing at least a part of the maintenance operation, thereby to enhance productivity.
Landscapes
- Ink Jet (AREA)
Description
- The invention relates to a printer comprising:
- a conveyer arranged to convey print media sheets one after another in a conveying direction;
- a print head disposed at the conveyer and having an array of dot printing elements, the array extending in a direction Z normal to the conveying direction, the print head being arranged to print images onto the media sheets in accordance with actuation instructions sent to the print head; and
- a maintenance manager adapted to analyze the actuation instructions and to decide on a maintenance operation for the print head on the basis of the actuation instructions and
- a controller adapted to convert print instructions that specify images to be printed onto the media sheets into the actuation instructions for the print head,
- wherein the conveyer is arranged to convey sheets with different formats which differ in their dimension in the direction Z, and the maintenance manager is adapted to decide on the maintenance operation, whenever the format of the sheets to be conveyed to the print head changes from a narrower format to a wider format with a dimension in Z direction larger than that of the narrower format, on the basis of actuation instructions for printing elements located within the width range of the wider format but outside of the width range of the narrower format.
- Printers of this type are disclosed in
US 2007/132799 A1 andUS 2009/122106 A1 . -
US 7 036 897 B2 discloses a printer, more specifically an ink jet printer in which the printing elements are formed by nozzles and actuators associated therewith for expelling ink droplets from the nozzles. When the nozzles are not active, the ink in the nozzle orifices starts to dry out, so that the nozzle orifice is contaminated and eventually clogged with dried ink, which disturbs the drop generation process and may eventually lead to a complete failure of the nozzle. - In the known printer, a maintenance operation is performed at the start of a new print job. The maintenance operation consists in activating the nozzle for several hundreds of times so as to purge the nozzle orifice with liquid ink, thereby to remove any contaminants and to clear the nozzle orifice. Conceivably, when this maintenance operation would be performed for all the nozzles of the print head, a considerable amount of ink would be wasted for the maintenance operation. For this reason, it is proposed in the cited document to perform the maintenance operation only for those nozzles that will actually be needed for printing in the print job.
- On the other hand, printers, especially ink jet printers are known which are capable of processing print media sheets in different formats in random succession. As long as the format of the sheets does not change, it is possible to control the print head such that all nozzles that are located within the width range of the sheets are activated so frequently that the time in which an individual nozzle has been idle, the so-called nozzle open time, is kept below a certain limit which, when exceeded, would necessitate a maintenance operation. However, when the format of the sheet changes from a narrow format with a certain dimension in the direction Z to a wider format, in which the dimension of the sheet in the direction Z is larger, then the print process may involve nozzles that have not been actuated for a considerable time period, larger than the admissible nozzle open time, because these nozzles were located outside of the width range of the sheets that have been processed previously, so that the droplets ejected by these nozzles would not have hit the recording medium but would have stained the conveyer. It has therefore been common practice to perform a maintenance operation each time when such a format change occurs.
- In a known printer, the maintenance operation is performed for the entire print head which, to this end, is lifted off from the conveyer and moved aside into a maintenance station where the maintenance operations are performed. For example, the maintenance operations may comprise purging the nozzles and wiping the surface in which the nozzle orifices are formed.
- It is an object of the invention to provide a multi-format printer which permits a higher productivity.
- In order to achieve this object, the invention provides a printer of the type indicated above, wherein the maintenance manager is adapted to decide on a maintenance operation on the basis of whether or not the actuation instructions for the dot printing elements located outside of the width range of the narrow format but inside the width range of the wider format specify that at least one of these dot printing elements is needed for printing a part of the image.
- The invention is based on the consideration that, when the format of the sheets changes from a narrower format to a wider format, this does not necessarily mean that a maintenance operation is actually needed. For example, there may be cases in which the nozzles that are located outside of the width range of the narrower format that has been processed previously are not needed for printing an image on the sheets of the wider format, neither. For this reason, the invention involves an analysis of the actuation instructions for the printing elements, which permits to decide whether the nozzles located outside of the width range of the previous format will actually be needed.
- As a consequence, the invention permits to avoid unnecessary but time-consuming maintenance operations, so that the productivity of the printer can be increased and less ink, to the extent needed by the maintenance operations, will be spoiled.
- This is especially the case for printers in which a maintenance operation is performed for the entire print head and/or involves a movement of the print head from an operative position to a maintenance station and then back into the operative position.
- More specific optional features of the invention are indicated in the dependent claims.
- As long as wide format sheets are being processed, the actuation instructions for all printing elements on the entire width of this format include spitting instructions assuring that all nozzles will be actuated in time intervals smaller than the admissible nozzle open time. The maintenance manager may therefore preferably perform an analysis of the actuation instructions, including the spitting instructions, for a number of sheets that have been processed earlier, in order to determine the nozzle open times.
- Further, the maintenance operations may include different types of operations which differ in their cleaning efficiency, and the maintenance manager may decide on the basis of the nozzle open times not only whether a maintenance operation is to be performed at all, but also which of the available maintenance operations shall be performed.
- An embodiment example will now be described in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:
-
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a printer according to the invention; and -
Fig. 2 is a flow diagram of a printing method according to the invention. - The printer shown in
Fig. 1 comprises aconveyer 10 arranged to convey print media sheets 1 - 9 one after another in a conveying direction X, and aprint head 12 disposed at theconveyer 10 and having anarray 14 of dot printing elements, the array extending in a direction Z normal to the conveying direction. The print head is arranged to printimages actuation instructions 20 sent to the print head. - The printer further includes an
electronic controller 22 which controls the overall operation of the printer. Among others, thecontroller 22 receivesprint instructions 24 from a print job file that is transmitted to thecontroller 22 via a network or has been temporarily stored on a storage medium that is connected to thecontroller 22. On the basis of theprint instructions 24, thecontroller 22 generates theactuation instructions 20 for theprint head 12. - The
print instructions 24 may further include format instructions specifying a format of the sheets 1 - 9 on which the pages of the print job shall be printed. Afeeder 26 is disposed at an upstream end of theconveyer 10 and arranged to receive instructions from thecontroller 22 so as to withdraw cut sheets with the required format from one of a plurality of bins (not shown) and to feed these sheets in the desired sequence to theconveyer 10. - The
print instructions 24 may further comprise instructions specifying whether theimages duplex loop 28 back to thefeeder 26, and they are fed to theconveyer 10 in reverse orientation, so that another image will then be printed on the second side of the sheet. - The
print head 12 is disposed above theconveyer 10 in a position in which thearray 14 of printing elements extends over the entire width of theconveyer 10. In the example shown, the printer is an ink jet printer, and the printing elements are constituted by nozzles from which ink droplets are expelled onto the media sheets 1 - 9 in accordance with theactuation instructions 20. To create the droplets, each nozzle is associated with an actuator, e.g. a piezoelectric actuator that generates a pressure wave in the liquid ink, such that the pressure wave may propagate to the nozzle to cause a droplet to be formed and expelled. - When a nozzle is not actuated for more than a specified time period, e.g. 40 s, the ink in the nozzle orifice may dry out, so that a certain amount of dried ink is deposited in the nozzle orifice and will disturb the subsequent droplet generation or will clog the nozzle orifice completely, causing the nozzle to fail. In such a case, a maintenance operation is required for cleaning the nozzle again.
- For that purpose, the
print head 12 is disposed on amanipulator 30 that is arranged to lift theentire print head 12 off from theconveyer 10 and to move it laterally to amaintenance station 32 where all the nozzles of the print head are purged with either ink or a specific cleaning liquid. The maintenance operation may further include a wiping step in which a surface of theprint head 12 that includes the nozzle orifices is wiped, e.g. with a wet sheet, so as to remove any remnants of dried ink. When the cleaning process has been completed, themanipulator 30 moves theprint head 12 back to the operative position shown inFig. 1 . - The
maintenance station 32 and themanipulator 30 are controlled by amaintenance manager 34 which is capable of analysing theprint instructions 24 as well as theactuation instructions 20 being generating in the controller. The controller 22 - including the maintenance manager 34 - is arranged to schedule all operations of the printer in advance for a certain number of pages, e.g. 200 pages to be printed in accordance with theprint instructions 24. - The time interval for which an individual nozzle has not been active since the last actuation is called the nozzle open time. Based on the
actuation instructions 20 that are generated in thecontroller 22, themaintenance manager 34 is capable of monitoring the nozzle open times of each individual nozzle and to compare these nozzle open times to certain limits which indicate the necessity of a maintenance operation. - The printer is capable of performing different types of maintenance operations, and each of these types of maintenance operations is associated with a specific limit. A maintenance operation will be performed when the nozzle open time exceeds the associated limit but does not exceed a higher limit that is associated with another (more intense or efficient) maintenance operation.
- For example, a maintenance operation with a relative low open time limit is a so-called pre-fire operation which can be performed by the
print head 12 itself without using themaintenance station 32. In this pre-fire operation, the actuators for the pertinent nozzles of the print head are energized to cause vibrations in the liquid ink in the nozzle orifice with an amplitude that is not sufficient for expelling an ink droplet. Yet, these vibrations will help to remove or dissolve possible contaminations in the form of dried ink in the nozzle orifice, especially, when the ink is just about to dry out and has not yet dried completely. - Only when the nozzle open time has been so long that it exceeds a higher second limit will it be necessary to perform the purge and wipe maintenance operation in the
maintenance station 32. - As long as the sheets to be supplied to the
print head 10 have all the same format, it can be assumed that most nozzles of theprint head 12 will be actuated frequently in order to print the desiredimages print instructions 24 do not command a dot to be printed in the pertinent position on the sheet. Consequently, the ink droplet will be "spit" onto a portion of the sheet which should remain white according to the print instructions. However, since a single ink dot is so small that it is not or hardly visible with the human eye, the spitting process does not degrade the quality of the printed image but nevertheless helps to keep the nozzle open times low. - It is prerequisite for the spitting operation, however, that the nozzle that performs the spitting operation is located within the contour of the sheet, because otherwise the ink droplet would be spit onto the surface of the
conveyer 10 and would stain the conveyer (and consequently the back sides of the sheets and the images printed thereon in the duplex mode). - The spitting instructions are generated in the
controller 22 on the basis of the monitored nozzle open times and can be considered as a specific type of actuation instructions. - Thanks to the spitting mechanism described above, it can be taken for granted that none of the nozzles that are located within the width range of the sheets to be printed will exceed an open time limit as long as the format of the sheets is not changed. However, when the sheet format changes from a narrow format with a width range w1, such as that of the
sheets Fig. 1 , to a wider format with a width range w2, such as that of thesheets Fig. 1 , there may be nozzles that are located in amargin area 36 of the wide format sheets (shown for thesheet 6 inFig. 1 ) which is outside of the width range w1 of the narrow format sheets. Since no spitting process was possible for these nozzles when printing the previous sheet or sheets in the narrower format, an open time limit may be exceeded. Nevertheless, it is possible that these nozzles will now be needed for printing animage 16 on the next wide format sheet. - For this reason, whenever such a format change occurs, the
maintenance monitor 34 checks whether or not a maintenance operation is necessary and, if yes, which maintenance operation should be performed. The decision is taken on the basis of theactuation instructions 20, including the spitting instructions, for the pertinent nozzles. Among others, themaintenance manager 34 will derive from the actuation instructions, at least for those nozzles that will be required for printing the next sheet, the nozzle open times that will have elapsed when the nozzle is actuated for printing on the next wide format sheet as scheduled. -
Fig. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating the operations that themaintenance manager 34 will perform for each sheet that is being scheduled for printing. - In step S1, it is decided whether the sheet (sheet n) that is being scheduled for printing has a width, i.e. a dimension in the direction Z, which is smaller than or equal to the width of the last sheet (n-1) that has been scheduled before. If that condition is fulfilled (Y), then the sheet n is scheduled for printing in step S2, which means that no maintenance operation shall be performed immediately before that sheet n reaches the
print head 12. - If the condition specified in step S1 is not fulfilled (N), then the
maintenance manager 34 checks the nozzle open times for all nozzles that will be used for sheet n but were not used for sheet n-1. In this step, the "nozzles that will be used for sheet n" include only those nozzles that are actually needed for printing the desired image, but not the nozzles that will only be scheduled for spitting. On the other hand, the nozzles that were "not used for sheet n-1" will include the nozzles that have been used neither for printing the desired image nor for spitting. Consequently, all the nozzles of theprint head 12 that are located in the width range w1 of the narrow format sheets (sheets Fig. 1 ) may be excluded from consideration in step S3 because these nozzles will have been used at least for spitting. - The nozzle open times to be checked in step S3 for each of the remaining nozzles is counted from the last instant when the nozzle has been used either for printing an image dot (firing) or for spitting until the time instant when the nozzle is scheduled for being actuated again, either for printing actual image information or for spitting.
- It should be observed that a nozzle may be scheduled for spitting as soon as the leading edge of a sheet has reached the X position of the nozzle. However, there may be a large number of nozzles that need spitting at that time, so that a faint line would be printed on the leading edge of the sheet. In order to avoid this, it is preferred to distribute the spitting operations over a certain time period, even though this means that the nozzle open times for certain nozzles will be somewhat extended.
- In step S4, the
maintenance manager 34 checks for each of the nozzles which have not been used for sheet n-1, whether the nozzle open time is larger than a first limit T1 that is associated with the purge and wipe maintenance operation to be performed in themaintenance station 32. If that is the case (Y), this maintenance operation is performed in step S5. This means that the print production process has to be interrupted for the duration of the maintenance operation. Subsequently sheet n is planned in step S8. - When the limit T1 has not been exceeded in step S4 (N), it is checked in step S6 whether the nozzle open time for at least one of the nozzles that will be needed for the sheet N exceeds a lower second limit T2. If that is the case (Y), the maintenance manager schedules, in step S7, a pre-fire maintenance operation which is less efficient than the purge and wipe maintenance operation performed in step S5 but is sufficient if the nozzle open time was not too long. The pre-fire maintenance operation has the advantage that it may be performed with the
print head 12 remaining "in-situ", i.e. in the operative position shown inFig. 1 . In continuation from step S7 the sheet is planned in step S8. - As a consequence, the time consuming purge and wipe maintenance operation can be avoided under this condition, so that the productivity of the print process is increased.
- If it is found in step S6 that the nozzle open time for the nozzles in consideration does not even exceed the lower limit T2 (N), then the sheet n is scheduled for printing without any maintenance operation at all, so that even the less time-consuming maintenance operation in step S7 can be spared.
- In an alternative embodiment step S6 is left out from the method and from step S4 (N) the method continues with step S7.
- In the example shown in
Fig. 1 , the sheet 1 (n=1) is a wide-format sheet. The next sheet 2 (n=2) is a narrow format sheet, which means that some nozzles of theprint head 12, i.e. those located outside the range w1, cannot be used for printing and cannot be actuated for spitting, neither. - The next sheet 3 (n=3) is again a wide-format sheet, and the
image 16 to be printed thereon includes image parts near the left and right edges, so that, for printing these image parts, nozzles are needed that have not been actuated during the time when thesheet 2 was printed. When thissheet 3 reaches theprint head 12, the format changes from the narrow format of thesheet 2 to the wide-format of thesheet 3 and, consequently themaintenance manager 34 decides on a maintenance operation. In this case, depending upon the length of thesheet 2, the maintenance manager my find in step S6 that the nozzle open times for the nozzles, even in the above-mentioned image parts near the edges ofsheet 3, exceed only the smaller limit T2 but not the larger limit T1. Consequently, the maintenance manager will decide to perform a pre-fire maintenance operation before printing thesheet 3. - Next, when the
sheets array 14 are idle again. This time, the nozzle open time exceeds the larger limit T1 because the number of narrow format sheets to be printed was larger. Then, when sheet 6 (n=6) reaches the print head and themaintenance manager 34 has to decide again whether a maintenance operation is necessary, it is found in step S3 that the nozzles for which the limit T1 would be exceeded are not needed for printing thesheet 6 because theimage 18 to be printed on that sheet is so narrow that it does not overlap with themargin areas 36 of the sheet. Consequently, the answers in both, steps S4 and S6 will be "No" (N) and thesheet 6 will be scheduled for printing in step S8 without any maintenance operation being performed. - It would be possible to perform spitting operations for the nozzles in the
margin areas 36 of thesheet 6. However, since a satisfactory condition and reliable operation of these nozzles cannot be relied upon (because of the large nozzle open time), the spitting operations would not make sense and will therefore preferably be omitted. - When printing the next
narrow format sheets wide format sheet 9. This time, however, theimage 16 to be printed on thesheet 9 overlaps themargin areas 36, so that nozzles will be needed for which the limit T1 has been exceeded. Consequently, themaintenance manager 34 will in this case decide in step S4 that the time-consuming purge and wipe maintenance operation in themaintenance station 32 cannot be avoided. - If the sheets 1 - 9 shown in
Fig. 1 are to be printed in the duplex mode, the sheets will be re-circulated through theduplex loop 28 and back to thefeeder 26. In this case, if the time required for re-circulating the sheets through the duplex loop is larger than the time needed for printing the sheets 1 - 9 on the first side, there may be a time gap in the printing sequence, and this gap will add to the nozzle open times that are checked in step S3. Moreover, when the first sheet after the gap is being scheduled, the nozzle open time should be checked for all the nozzles of the print head including those within the width range w1 of the narrow format, because there is actually no sheet that immediately precedes the sheet to be scheduled (no sheet n-1), and consequently no nozzles have been used at all. - When the nozzle open times exceed T1, the purge and wipe maintenance operation in step S5 may of course be scheduled for a time so early that the time gap in the print sequence may be utilized for performing at least a part of the maintenance operation, thereby to enhance productivity.
- On the other hand, when the gap in the print sequence that is caused by sheets being returned through the duplex loop is larger than the time required for performing the purge and wipe maintenance operation, then it may be preferable to perform such maintenance operation in any case, irrespective of the result of the check of the nozzle open times, because no extra time will be needed for the maintenance operation, anyway.
Claims (9)
- A printer comprising:- a conveyer (10) arranged to convey print media sheets (1 - 9) one after another in a conveying direction (X);- a print head (12) disposed at the conveyer (10) and having an array (14) of dot printing elements, the array extending in a direction Z normal to the conveying direction, the print head (12) being arranged to print images (16, 18) onto the media sheets (1 - 9) in accordance with actuation instructions (20) sent to the print head; and- a maintenance manager (34) adapted to analyze the actuation instructions (20) and to decide on a maintenance operation for the print head (12) on the basis of the actuation instructions (20), and- a controller (22) adapted to convert print instructions (24) that specify images (16, 18) to be printed onto the media sheets (1 - 9) into the actuation instructions (20) for the print head (12),- wherein the conveyer (10) is arranged to convey sheets (1 - 9) with different formats which differ in their dimension in the direction Z, and the maintenance manager (34) is adapted to decide on the maintenance operation, whenever the format of the sheets to be conveyed to the print head (12) changes from a narrower format to a wider format with a dimension in Z direction larger than that of the narrower format, on the basis of actuation instructions (20) for printing elements located within the width range (w2) of the wider format but outside of the width range (w1) of the narrower format, characterized in that the maintenance manager (34) is adapted to decide on a maintenance operation on the basis of whether or not the actuation instructions (20) for the dot printing elements located outside of the width range (w1) of the narrow format but inside the width range (w2) of the wider format specify that at least one of these dot printing elements is needed for printing a part of the image.
- The printer according to claim 1, adapted to perform a maintenance operation for the entire print head (12).
- The printer according to claim 2, comprising a maintenance station (32) and a manipulator (30) for moving the print head (12) between the maintenance station (32) and an operative position at the conveyer (10).
- The printer according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the controller (22) is adapted to generate actuation instructions (20) which constitute spitting instructions for printing dots that do not form part of an image as specified by the print instructions (24).
- The printer according to claim 4, wherein the maintenance manager (34) is adapted to decide on a maintenance operation on the basis of nozzle open times that are counted from the time for which the dot printing element was scheduled to be actuated last time until the time at which the dot printing elementis to be actuated next time, for each of the dot printing elements located outside of the width range (w1) of the narrow format and inside the width range (w2) of the wider format.
- The printer according to claim 5, adapted to perform different types of maintenance operation, wherein the maintenance manager (34) is adapted to decide on the basis of the nozzle open times, which type of maintenance operation is to be performed, if a maintenance operation is to be performed at all.
- The printer according to claim 6, wherein the types of maintenance operations comprise a pre-fire maintenance operation.
- The printer according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the maintenance manager (34) is adapted to analyse the actuation instructions in advance for a plurality of pages to be printed after a page that is currently being fed to the print head (12).
- A printing method comprising:- conveying a plurality of print media sheets (1 - 9) one after another in a conveying direction (X), said conveying sheets having different formats which differ in their dimension in a direction Z normal to the conveying direction (X),- processing print instructions (24) for a plurality of pages to be printed on the media sheets (1 - 9) and converting them into actuation instructions (20) for dot printing elements of a print head (12), the dot printing elements being arranged in an array (14) that extends in said direction Z;- whenever the format of a sheet to be conveyed to the print head (12) changes from a narrow format to a wider format with a dimension in the direction Z larger than that of the narrow format, deciding, on the basis of whether or not the actuation instructions (20) for the dot printing elements located outside of the width range (w1) of the narrow format but inside the width range (w2) of the wider format specify that at least one of these dot printing elements is needed for printing a part of the image, on a maintenance operation to be performed immediately before the wider format sheet reaches the print head (12).
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14170197 | 2014-05-28 | ||
PCT/EP2015/061693 WO2015181228A1 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2015-05-27 | Multi-format printer |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3148809A1 EP3148809A1 (en) | 2017-04-05 |
EP3148809B1 true EP3148809B1 (en) | 2020-11-18 |
Family
ID=50979522
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP15727915.9A Active EP3148809B1 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2015-05-27 | Multi-format printer |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3148809B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015181228A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102019104931A1 (en) * | 2019-02-27 | 2020-08-27 | Canon Production Printing Holding B.V. | Method and device for controlling an actuator of an inkjet printing system |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2005349660A (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-22 | Canon Inc | Recorder and method of recording |
JP2007152885A (en) * | 2005-12-08 | 2007-06-21 | Fujifilm Corp | Image recorder |
US8087746B2 (en) * | 2007-11-09 | 2012-01-03 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Movable fluid receiver |
JP5050939B2 (en) * | 2008-03-10 | 2012-10-17 | ć»ć¤ć³ć¼ćØćć½ć³ę Ŗå¼ä¼ē¤¾ | Liquid ejecting apparatus and flushing method |
-
2015
- 2015-05-27 WO PCT/EP2015/061693 patent/WO2015181228A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-05-27 EP EP15727915.9A patent/EP3148809B1/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2015181228A1 (en) | 2015-12-03 |
EP3148809A1 (en) | 2017-04-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP5059683B2 (en) | Inkjet printhead with movable nozzle array | |
US7628466B2 (en) | Method for increasing printhead reliability | |
JP5570042B2 (en) | Inkjet printing apparatus with enhanced printhead maintenance | |
US9039114B2 (en) | Inkjet recording apparatus | |
CN108472956B (en) | Method and printer for ink jet nozzle ejection | |
US20180056650A1 (en) | Method for controlling actuators of an ink printing system | |
JP2008188839A (en) | Ink-jet recorder and ink-jet recording method | |
US20050062792A1 (en) | Inkjet recording apparatus and preliminary discharge control method | |
JP4003755B2 (en) | Image forming apparatus and nozzle recovery method | |
EP3148809B1 (en) | Multi-format printer | |
JP2004167852A (en) | Ink-jet printer | |
JP2015016623A (en) | Ink jet recorder | |
US9505218B2 (en) | Inkjet image forming apparatus and cleaning method for inkjet image forming apparatus | |
US20190126625A1 (en) | Control method for liquid ejecting apparatus | |
JP3823991B2 (en) | Ink jet recording apparatus and preliminary discharge control method | |
JP2021016969A (en) | Ink jet printer and control method for ink jet printer | |
JP5271102B2 (en) | Recording apparatus and recording method | |
JP2007083720A (en) | Improvement in printing speed by eliminating ordering control of nozzle discharge | |
JP7009745B2 (en) | Image forming system and image forming device | |
US20050219297A1 (en) | Droplet discharge control method and liquid discharge apparatus | |
US20120268786A1 (en) | Recording device, method of controlling a recording device, and storage medium storing a program run by a control unit that controls a recording device | |
CN113771519B (en) | Printing method of ink-jet printer and ink-jet printer | |
WO2024057939A1 (en) | Inkjet printer and method for controlling jetting head | |
JP2012106405A (en) | Inkjet recording apparatus and method for controlling inkjet recording apparatus | |
US10766249B2 (en) | Method and controller to prevent ink leakage from a print head |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20170102 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING NETHERLANDS B.V. |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20200618 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: CANON PRODUCTION PRINTING NETHERLANDS B.V. |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602015062138 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1335316 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1335316 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201118 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210219 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210218 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210318 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210318 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210218 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20210520 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602015062138 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20210819 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20210422 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20210527 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210527 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210531 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20210531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210527 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210527 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210318 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602015062138 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20220601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20150527 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221201 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220601 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201118 |