EP3142990A1 - Sulfur fertilizer - Google Patents

Sulfur fertilizer

Info

Publication number
EP3142990A1
EP3142990A1 EP15725542.3A EP15725542A EP3142990A1 EP 3142990 A1 EP3142990 A1 EP 3142990A1 EP 15725542 A EP15725542 A EP 15725542A EP 3142990 A1 EP3142990 A1 EP 3142990A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
composition according
fertilizer composition
sulfur
fertilizer
manufacturing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP15725542.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Gerhard Auer
Winfried GRUNDMANN
Jakob MAASSEN
Maurits Van Den Berg
Johann Adam VAN DER MAREL
Diedrich Steffens
Martin VERFÜRDEN
Johannes Pfeifer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Venator Germany GmbH
Venator Uerdingen GmbH
Original Assignee
Huntsman P&A Uerdingen GmbH
Huntsman P&A Germany GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Huntsman P&A Uerdingen GmbH, Huntsman P&A Germany GmbH filed Critical Huntsman P&A Uerdingen GmbH
Publication of EP3142990A1 publication Critical patent/EP3142990A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C05FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
    • C05DINORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C; FERTILISERS PRODUCING CARBON DIOXIDE
    • C05D3/00Calcareous fertilisers
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C05FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
    • C05DINORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C; FERTILISERS PRODUCING CARBON DIOXIDE
    • C05D5/00Fertilisers containing magnesium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C05FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
    • C05DINORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C; FERTILISERS PRODUCING CARBON DIOXIDE
    • C05D9/00Other inorganic fertilisers
    • C05D9/02Other inorganic fertilisers containing trace elements
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C05FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
    • C05FORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C, e.g. FERTILISERS FROM WASTE OR REFUSE
    • C05F7/00Fertilisers from waste water, sewage sludge, sea slime, ooze or similar masses
    • C05F7/005Waste water from industrial processing material neither of agricultural nor of animal origin
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C05FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
    • C05GMIXTURES OF FERTILISERS COVERED INDIVIDUALLY BY DIFFERENT SUBCLASSES OF CLASS C05; MIXTURES OF ONE OR MORE FERTILISERS WITH MATERIALS NOT HAVING A SPECIFIC FERTILISING ACTIVITY, e.g. PESTICIDES, SOIL-CONDITIONERS, WETTING AGENTS; FERTILISERS CHARACTERISED BY THEIR FORM
    • C05G3/00Mixtures of one or more fertilisers with additives not having a specially fertilising activity
    • C05G3/80Soil conditioners

Definitions

  • the present invention refers to a sulfur fertilizer composition, the process for preparing the same and its use.
  • S Sulfur
  • N nitrogen
  • K potassium
  • P P
  • Sulfur is an important component of several essential amino acids and thus, sulfur is important for both protein quality and quantity. It is also involved in nitrogen metabolism, photosynthesis, synthesis of oils in oilseed crops such as canola, and in synthesis and function of enzymes, amino acids and other organic compounds.
  • Sulfur deficiencies can have a major impact on crop yield and quality. Sulfur deficiencies mainly arise on acid sandy soils where sulfate has been leached, especially in such areas with high winter rainfall. Naturally, deficiencies of sulfur mainly occur for cultures with high demand for sulfur, like alfalfa, canola (rapeseed), cotton, clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats and triticale, furthermore cruciferous plants like brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like onion, leek and garlic.
  • Fertilizing with sulfur may overcome those problems. Fertilizing with sulfur may not only affect sulfur content of plants but also positively affect the storability of the products (e.g. garlic).
  • sulfur fertilizers are: Ammonium sulfate, potassium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, gypsum or elemental sulfur.
  • Elemental sulfur and ammonium sulfate result in acidification of soil and therefore, they can be used without negative impact on soils with high pH only.
  • NH 3 volatilization can be a problem with ammonium sulfate in case of high pH of soil.
  • Ammonium sulfate, potassium sulfate, magnesium sulfate have very high solubilities and sulfate may be washed out in case of strong rainfall. Elemental sulfur has a very low solubility. Elemental sulfur applied during winter is ineffective for overcoming sulfur deficiency because the S is oxidized too slowly by soil microorganisms. Gypsum exhibits a useful solubility, but usually is not available in form of stable granulates and does not raise soil pH.
  • ferrous sulfate obtained as by-product from ⁇ 2 production. So far, the use of ferrous sulfate is known for waste water treatment, for iron oxide pigments, or as chromate reducing agent.
  • iron sulfate has not been mentioned or suggested as sulfur fertilizer. Some applications mention iron sulfate as moss killer or as Fe source in case of Fe deficiency (chlorosis) or as phosphorus and heavy metal absorber in polluted soils. However, the use of iron sulfate results in acidification of soil.
  • GB 1 473 403 discloses a method for preparing compositions useful as soil modifiers or fertilizers by thoroughly mixing ferrous sulfate heptahydrate
  • DE 42 19 351 discloses an additive for agriculture obtained from ferrous sulfate (not ferrous sulfate heptahydrate!) obtained as by-product from titanium dioxide manufacture optionally blended with earth alkaline compounds and an organic material. Use of this material is for treating Fe, Mn and Zn deficiencies. No application as sulfur fertilizer is disclosed in DE 42 19 351 .
  • EP 0 093 204 discloses a process for granulating Fe containing fertilizing mixtures comprising ferrous sulfate and fertilizing agents by use of hydrophilic additives. Also admixing of other fertilizing agents like ammonium sulfate, NPK compounds, micronutrients or natural fertilizers is disclosed. No application as sulfur fertilizer is disclosed in EP 0 093 204.
  • EP 2 165 976 discloses a method for pressure compacting of compositions based on ferrous sulfate heptahydrate. Use of this material is as Fe source for
  • the inventors have considered the disadvantages of the prior art compositions and came to the inventive solution by providing a sulfur fertilizer without detrimental impact on soil pH and plant nutrition, preferably in form of stable granulates, without expensive additives or processes for granulation, and a process for preparing the same as well as its use as fertilizer.
  • the present invention is directed to a process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition comprising S, Fe and one or more earth alkaline elements, including Ca and/or Mg, being suitable for administration onto a sulfur deficient soil wherein a material, comprising Fe and sulfate ions, in form of a solid salt, filter cake, paste, slurry, or solution, is blended with at least one component being chosen from or comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of the earth alkaline elements including at least one of Ca and Mg, preferably CaCO3, MgCO3, dolomite (Ca,Mg)CO 3 , MgO, burnt dolomite (Ca,Mg)O, CaO, semi-hydrated dolomite
  • Blending and converting into an administration form may be carried out
  • the inventive process can be carried out in an apparatus which can also serve for compaction, granulation and/or pelletizing the reaction product
  • Blending and/or converting may be carried out in the presence of any of water, dilute sulfuric acid, preferably diluted, CaSO 4 , elemental sulfur or other S
  • micronutrients preferably a boron compound, binder or granulation aids, or mixtures thereof, also assisting in obtaining the required form of the product.
  • the material comprising Fe and sulfate ions may preferably be FeSO 4 which may contain crystal water, such as Fe(ll)SO 4
  • heptahydrate preferably obtained from the titanium dioxide production process.
  • the at least one component comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of earth alkaline elements which is generally used for neutralizing any acid such as any adhering sulfuric acid and also for increasing the pH-value may preferably be limestone, limestone, which is a natural material without critical contents of harmful substances with respect to agricultural applications.
  • the limestone may consist of fine particles 95 % ⁇ 0,09 mm, and comprise >95 % CaCO 3 .
  • the component comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of earth alkaline elements can also be a slag from steel manufacturing or a reaction product from such a slag.
  • the slag has a high basicity and is more reactive than CaCO3.
  • the component comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of earth alkaline elements can be burnt lime or burnt dolomite or hydrated lime, providing a higher neutralization potential and higher reactivity than CaCO3 and slag.
  • the neutralizing value of said at least one component being chosen from or comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of the earth alkaline elements according to DIN EN 12945:2014-07 standard may be 1 to 55% (as CaO), preferably 20 to 55%, most preferably 33 to 48%.
  • At least one of starch, magnesium sulfates, citric acid, clay, mortar binder, cellulose glue, glucosidic binder such as starch, molasses, lignosulfonate, water, hydrated lime, water glass, bentonite, cellulose fibres, stearates, urea or combinations of these materials may be used as binder or granulation aid in a weight ratio of 0.1 to 10 weight-%, preferably 0.3 to 5 weight-%, most preferably 0.8 to 3 weight-%, related to the total mass of the composition comprising Fe and sulfate ions and the at least one component being chosen from or comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of the earth alkaline elements Ca and Mg.
  • the inventive process is carried out by blending:
  • a material comprising carbonates of the earth alkaline elements Ca and/or Mg, preferably CaCO3, MgCO3, or dolomite, and
  • the present invention is also directed to a fertilizer composition
  • a fertilizer composition comprising S, Fe and at least one earth alkaline element including at least one of Ca and/or Mg, wherein the molar ratio of (Ca+Mg)/Fe is in the range of 2 to 200, preferably 2.5 to 25, most preferably 10 to 25.
  • the molar ratio of Fe to S in the inventive fertilizer composition may be 0.3 to 6, preferably 0.5 to 2, most preferably 0.8 to 1 .2.
  • compositions are calcium sulfate, iron hydroxide and unreacted earth alkaline compounds.
  • the iron hydroxide obtained has two important functions: The first function is an effective and efficient binder for granulates; and the second function is partial retention of sulfate and trace element ions by adsorption. Therefore, a sulfur fertilizer comprising iron hydroxide (or reaction products of iron sulfate with alkaline compounds) has improved properties compared to a material without iron hydroxide as the sulfate is not washed out of the soil so easily.
  • calcium sulfate may also be added additionally.
  • iron sulfate has been converted mainly or completely into earth alkaline sulfates in the composition.
  • crystal structures generally are determined by x-ray diffraction (XRD) and quantitative relation of XRD peaks with actual relation of crystal structures can be somewhat ambiguous, the ratio of XRD signals are compared rather than ratio of crystal structures for analyzing and defining the inventive fertilizer composition.
  • XRD x-ray diffraction
  • the invention also concerns a process for fertilizing S and one or more earth alkaline elements, preferably Ca and/or Mg wherein the above inventive fertilizer composition is applied, preferably in form of granulates, onto a sulfur deficient soil used for agriculture, preferably for fertilizing sulfur to plants supplying amino acids, proteins and/or oil, in particular cultures of alfalfa, canola (rapeseed), cotton, clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats, triticale, cruciferous plants like brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like onion, leek and garlic.
  • Advantage of this process is that fertilizing S and fertilizing Ca (and optionally Mg), and raising the soil pH is achieved at the same time with one single step.
  • Another advantage is that part of Ca (and optionally Mg) is available in soluble form (as CaSO4), whereas Ca (and optionally Mg) from conventional limestone or dolomite fertilizers is not soluble but has to get leached by contact with an acidic environment.
  • a fertilizer composition offering both Ca (and optionally Mg) solubility and at the same time considerable alkaline character has a clear advantage over conventional fertilizer types. Even more, the content of soluble sulfur (as sulfate), valuable trace elements like Mn and Zn (and optionally B) and the low content of unwanted elements (e.g. As, Hg, Cd, Pb) and toxic organic compounds results in a highly valuable fertilizer type.
  • said application on fields used for agriculture is made for base fertilization between summer and winter time, i.e. between August and December for areas north of the equator or between February and June for areas south of the equator, respectively, before the growth phase of the plants start.
  • the ratio of the (acidic) Fe(ll)sulfate and the (alkaline) Ca and/or Mg compound may vary depending on soil pH:
  • a molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/S of >2 may be appropriate, whereas for more acidic soils a molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/S of »2 may be appropriate.
  • Ca/S 7.5 - 15.
  • the pH of the soil may be raised to above 5.8, preferably above >6.0, most preferably >6.2.
  • sulfur in the inventive fertilizer is available in the form of sulfate, but for calculation purpose sulfur virtually is expressed as S.
  • the present invention also provides the use of a solution comprising iron sulfate or the use of crystalline iron sulfate with more than 3 molecules of crystal water, preferably iron(ll)sulfate heptahydrate, more preferably copperas as obtained as by-product from titanium dioxide manufacturing, for preparing a sulfur fertilizing composition and/or for moistening and/or granulating of powderous fertilizer materials.
  • - Preferred is a granular free flowing and dust free form of the fertilizer.
  • iron hydroxide due to its high capability for absorption of trace elements is able to avoid the micronut ents present in the inventive fertilizer (Mn, Zn) to be washed out.
  • the inventive fertilizer additionally comprises valuable plant nutrients and
  • micronutrients e.g. Mg, Mn, Zn.
  • the product is free of Hg, Cd, As, Pb, Cr.
  • the inventive composition can be used for all cultures, preferably those with high sulfur demand, e.g. alfalfa, canola (rapeseed), cotton, clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, lucerne, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats and triticale; furthermore cruciferous plants like Brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like onion, leek and garlic, especially suitable for canola and rapeseed and most preferably during winter time.
  • canola canola
  • cotton clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, lucerne, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats and triticale
  • cruciferous plants like Brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like
  • the pH of the fertilizer can be 5.5 to 13, for most applications preferably 6.0 to 1 1 , most preferably 6.5 to 8.5.
  • the pH of the fertilizer is preferably 8.5 to 13.
  • the present invention also concerns:
  • An inventive composition wherein it contains Zn with mass ratio of Zn/Fe 0.0001 to 0.003, preferably 0.0002 to 0.0015, and/or Mn with the mass ratio of Mn/Fe 0.00001 to 0.01 , preferably 0.00001 to 0.001 ; these elements are valuable micronutrients and therefore no separate application of Zn and Mn is necessary.
  • Said inventive composition wherein the pH according to ISO standard is 5.5 to 13, for most application preferably 6.0 to 1 1 , most preferably 6.5 to 8.5, but preferably 8.5 to 13 for compositions comprising calcium oxide or calcium dihydroxide.
  • the pH is determined according to DIN EN ISO 787 part 3, whereby the pH measurement is made no earlier than 5 days after preparation of the sample and whereby the sample is ground prior to pH measurement.
  • Said inventive composition wherein the neutralizing value according to DIN EN 12945:2014-07 standard is 1 to 55% (as CaO), preferably 20 to 55%, most preferably 33 to 48%.
  • Said inventive composition wherein the fertilizer is granulated with volume based average granule size is 1 - 8 mm, preferably 2 - 6, most preferably 2 - 4 mm;
  • Said inventive composition wherein it is granulated in a pan granulator, or a granulation drum, or an intensive mixer.
  • Said inventive composition wherein it is granulated in a pan granulator, or a granulation drum, or an intensive mixer, without the addition of water to aid granulation.
  • Said inventive composition wherein it is granulated in a combination of an intensive mixer and a granulator such as a pan granulator or a granulation drum.
  • Ca and/or Mg compound preferably CaCO 3 or dolomite (Ca,Mg)CO 3 o iron sulfate, preferably Fe(ll)SO 4 heptahydrate,
  • the fertilizer comprises iron sulfate and/or products obtained from neutralization of iron sulfate and at least one calcium and/or magnesium compound and/or the reaction products of iron sulfate and calcium and/or magnesium compounds; o Use of the composition as a sulfur fertilizer for alfalfa, canola
  • composition between summer and winter time, i.e. between
  • composition as a calcium-sulfur fertilizer in such way that he pH of the soil is raised to >5.8, preferably >6.0, most preferably >6.2;
  • trace element nutrients like boron, copper, molybdenum
  • the calcium and/or magnesium compound has a pH >8, e.g. slag from steel manufacturing, burnt or hydrated lime / dolomite
  • the present invention is further illustrated by the following Examples.
  • Example 1 a - Preparation of compacted Ca-S-fertilizer with 2.4% S and
  • the granules had a residual moisture content determined by drying at 105 ° C of 21 .6 wt.%. From this fraction, 10 fresh granules were arbitrarily taken out and crushed by applying a pressing force. The average crushing strength was 0.3 kg. Granules with a high residual moisture exhibit low crushing strength.
  • Example 2d Preparation of granulated Ca-S-fertilizer with 2% S and
  • the alkaline content of the inventive fertilizer is determined by an acid-base titration.
  • an acid-base titration For this analytical method, about 1 g of a representative sample of the product is reacted in a beaker with 25 ml of a hydrochloric acid solution of a concentration of 1 mol per liter. The reaction of the calcium carbonate and hydrochloric acid produces carbon dioxide. The sample is left overnight in order for the reaction to complete and the bulk of the carbon dioxide to be emitted from the beaker. The next day, the beaker is briefly heated to just below the boiling point of water to emit any remaining carbon dioxide. Subsequently, the excess
  • hydrochloric acid is back-titrated with a solution of sodium hydroxide of a concentration of 1 mol per liter. The extent of the titration is monitored by measuring the pH of the liquid, for example potentiometrically, and determining the consumption of sodium hydroxide solution at the equivalence point. The amount of alkaline substance is then expressed as equivalent percentage of CaCO3. 1 .501 g of a fertilizer sample is reacted with 25 ml of 1 M hydrochloric acid with a titer of 0.9921 in a beaker.
  • the soil pH was measured in a suspension of 1 part soil with 2.5 parts of a solution of 0.01 M CaCI 2
  • the effect of the limestone / FeSO4 preparations on pH is stronger than the effect of pure limestone!

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Soil Sciences (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fertilizers (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention refers to a sulfur fertilizer composition, the process for preparing the same and its use.

Description

SULFUR FERTILIZER
The present invention refers to a sulfur fertilizer composition, the process for preparing the same and its use.
Sulfur (S) is an important plant nutrient. It is required by plants in amounts similar to phosphorus (P), thus it is grouped with nitrogen (N), potassium (K) and P as the fourth major plant nutrient. Sulfur is an important component of several essential amino acids and thus, sulfur is important for both protein quality and quantity. It is also involved in nitrogen metabolism, photosynthesis, synthesis of oils in oilseed crops such as canola, and in synthesis and function of enzymes, amino acids and other organic compounds.
Due to increasing removal of sulfur compounds from flue gas, especially of power plants, waste and biomass incineration plants, in the last three decades the intake of sulfur compounds into soil has decreased significantly in many regions. In Germany for example the SO2 emissions have come down from ca. 5 million tons per year to ca. 0.5 million tons per year. Accordingly, the average intake of S into the soil has changed from ca. 500 kg S / (ha * a) to less than 50 kg S / (ha * a).
Sulfur deficiencies can have a major impact on crop yield and quality. Sulfur deficiencies mainly arise on acid sandy soils where sulfate has been leached, especially in such areas with high winter rainfall. Naturally, deficiencies of sulfur mainly occur for cultures with high demand for sulfur, like alfalfa, canola (rapeseed), cotton, clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats and triticale, furthermore cruciferous plants like brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like onion, leek and garlic.
Deficiencies of sulfur result in lower yield and worse quality of cultures. Fertilizing with sulfur may overcome those problems. Fertilizing with sulfur may not only affect sulfur content of plants but also positively affect the storability of the products (e.g. garlic).
In the state of art commonly used sulfur fertilizers are: Ammonium sulfate, potassium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, gypsum or elemental sulfur.
Elemental sulfur and ammonium sulfate result in acidification of soil and therefore, they can be used without negative impact on soils with high pH only. On the other hand, NH3 volatilization can be a problem with ammonium sulfate in case of high pH of soil.
Ammonium sulfate, potassium sulfate, magnesium sulfate have very high solubilities and sulfate may be washed out in case of strong rainfall. Elemental sulfur has a very low solubility. Elemental sulfur applied during winter is ineffective for overcoming sulfur deficiency because the S is oxidized too slowly by soil microorganisms. Gypsum exhibits a useful solubility, but usually is not available in form of stable granulates and does not raise soil pH.
Other source of sulfur might be ferrous sulfate obtained as by-product from ΤΊΟ2 production. So far, the use of ferrous sulfate is known for waste water treatment, for iron oxide pigments, or as chromate reducing agent.
In the state of art, iron sulfate has not been mentioned or suggested as sulfur fertilizer. Some applications mention iron sulfate as moss killer or as Fe source in case of Fe deficiency (chlorosis) or as phosphorus and heavy metal absorber in polluted soils. However, the use of iron sulfate results in acidification of soil.
In several patent applications, agricultural uses of iron sulfate are described.
GB 1 473 403 discloses a method for preparing compositions useful as soil modifiers or fertilizers by thoroughly mixing ferrous sulfate heptahydrate
(copperas) with compounds chosen from oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of alkaline or earth alkaline elements thereby obtaining reaction products consisting of alkaline or earth alkaline sulfates and ferrous hydroxide. Subsequently, the ferrous hydroxide is converted into ferric hydroxide by oxidation with oxygen or air. No application as sulfur fertilizer is disclosed in GB 1 473 403.
DE 42 19 351 discloses an additive for agriculture obtained from ferrous sulfate (not ferrous sulfate heptahydrate!) obtained as by-product from titanium dioxide manufacture optionally blended with earth alkaline compounds and an organic material. Use of this material is for treating Fe, Mn and Zn deficiencies. No application as sulfur fertilizer is disclosed in DE 42 19 351 . EP 0 093 204 discloses a process for granulating Fe containing fertilizing mixtures comprising ferrous sulfate and fertilizing agents by use of hydrophilic additives. Also admixing of other fertilizing agents like ammonium sulfate, NPK compounds, micronutrients or natural fertilizers is disclosed. No application as sulfur fertilizer is disclosed in EP 0 093 204.
EP 2 165 976 discloses a method for pressure compacting of compositions based on ferrous sulfate heptahydrate. Use of this material is as Fe source for
agriculture. No application as sulfur fertilizer is disclosed in EP 2 165 976. In the state of art, there is still the need for an improved sulfur fertilizer composition which provides sufficient sulfur to the soil upon application of the composition to the soil.
For solving the problem of the invention, the inventors have considered the disadvantages of the prior art compositions and came to the inventive solution by providing a sulfur fertilizer without detrimental impact on soil pH and plant nutrition, preferably in form of stable granulates, without expensive additives or processes for granulation, and a process for preparing the same as well as its use as fertilizer.
Therefore, the present invention is directed to a process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition comprising S, Fe and one or more earth alkaline elements, including Ca and/or Mg, being suitable for administration onto a sulfur deficient soil wherein a material, comprising Fe and sulfate ions, in form of a solid salt, filter cake, paste, slurry, or solution, is blended with at least one component being chosen from or comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of the earth alkaline elements including at least one of Ca and Mg, preferably CaCO3, MgCO3, dolomite (Ca,Mg)CO3, MgO, burnt dolomite (Ca,Mg)O, CaO, semi-hydrated dolomite
Ca(OH)2MgO, or Ca(OH)2 or mixtures thereof in molar ratio of (Ca+Mg)/Fe = 2 to 200, preferably 2.5 to 25, more preferably 10 to 25, and the blend is converted into an administration form. Blending and converting into an administration form may be carried out
simultaneously or subsequently, leading to a reaction mixture in a granulated, pelletized or powderous form depending on the ratio of the used components. Thus, the inventive process can be carried out in an apparatus which can also serve for compaction, granulation and/or pelletizing the reaction product
Blending and/or converting may be carried out in the presence of any of water, dilute sulfuric acid, preferably diluted, CaSO4, elemental sulfur or other S
containing compounds, other compounds useful for a fertilizer, such as
micronutrients, preferably a boron compound, binder or granulation aids, or mixtures thereof, also assisting in obtaining the required form of the product.
In the inventive process, the material comprising Fe and sulfate ions may preferably be FeSO4 which may contain crystal water, such as Fe(ll)SO4
heptahydrate, preferably obtained from the titanium dioxide production process.
The at least one component comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of earth alkaline elements which is generally used for neutralizing any acid such as any adhering sulfuric acid and also for increasing the pH-value may preferably be limestone, limestone, which is a natural material without critical contents of harmful substances with respect to agricultural applications. To provide suitable reactivity against FeSO4 in blending process as well as suitable reactivity and effect in soil, the limestone may consist of fine particles 95 % < 0,09 mm, and comprise >95 % CaCO3. The component comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of earth alkaline elements can also be a slag from steel manufacturing or a reaction product from such a slag. The slag has a high basicity and is more reactive than CaCO3.
For application on more acidic soils or if faster effects are required, the component comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of earth alkaline elements can be burnt lime or burnt dolomite or hydrated lime, providing a higher neutralization potential and higher reactivity than CaCO3 and slag.
The neutralizing value of said at least one component being chosen from or comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of the earth alkaline elements according to DIN EN 12945:2014-07 standard may be 1 to 55% (as CaO), preferably 20 to 55%, most preferably 33 to 48%.
In addition, at least one of starch, magnesium sulfates, citric acid, clay, mortar binder, cellulose glue, glucosidic binder such as starch, molasses, lignosulfonate, water, hydrated lime, water glass, bentonite, cellulose fibres, stearates, urea or combinations of these materials may be used as binder or granulation aid in a weight ratio of 0.1 to 10 weight-%, preferably 0.3 to 5 weight-%, most preferably 0.8 to 3 weight-%, related to the total mass of the composition comprising Fe and sulfate ions and the at least one component being chosen from or comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of the earth alkaline elements Ca and Mg. In an embodiment, the inventive process is carried out by blending:
- a material comprising Fe and sulfate ions,
- a material comprising carbonates of the earth alkaline elements Ca and/or Mg, preferably CaCO3, MgCO3, or dolomite, and
- a material comprising oxides or hydroxides of earth alkaline elements,
preferably MgO, CaO, Mg(OH)2, or Ca(OH)2,
in the form of powder without any addition of water, with the reaction of these materials while being mixed and granulated in the same apparatus, thus leading to a granulated composition. The present invention is also directed to a fertilizer composition comprising S, Fe and at least one earth alkaline element including at least one of Ca and/or Mg, wherein the molar ratio of (Ca+Mg)/Fe is in the range of 2 to 200, preferably 2.5 to 25, most preferably 10 to 25.
In the inventive fertilizer composition, the molar ratio of Fe to S in the inventive fertilizer composition may be 0.3 to 6, preferably 0.5 to 2, most preferably 0.8 to 1 .2.
The main reaction products of the inventive process or in the inventive
composition are calcium sulfate, iron hydroxide and unreacted earth alkaline compounds. The iron hydroxide obtained has two important functions: The first function is an effective and efficient binder for granulates; and the second function is partial retention of sulfate and trace element ions by adsorption. Therefore, a sulfur fertilizer comprising iron hydroxide (or reaction products of iron sulfate with alkaline compounds) has improved properties compared to a material without iron hydroxide as the sulfate is not washed out of the soil so easily. Besides of calcium sulfate being a reaction product during mixing, calcium sulfate may also be added additionally.
As stated, iron sulfate has been converted mainly or completely into earth alkaline sulfates in the composition. As crystal structures generally are determined by x-ray diffraction (XRD) and quantitative relation of XRD peaks with actual relation of crystal structures can be somewhat ambiguous, the ratio of XRD signals are compared rather than ratio of crystal structures for analyzing and defining the inventive fertilizer composition. Therefore, the ratio of (P*Q) / (PJ) > 8, preferably more than 5, most preferred more than 2, with P being the integral area of the x- ray diffraction peaks between 2 Θ = 20.0 and 21 .5°, Q the integral area of the XRD peaks between 2 Θ = 29.0 and 30.5°, I the integral area of the XRD peaks between 2 Θ = 16.0, and 20.0° and J the integral area of the XRD peaks between 2 Θ = 23.4 and 28.0 (measured using Cu-Ka-radiation diffraction peaks). Alternatively, the inventive fertilizer composition may have the ratio A B > 1 , preferably >5, most preferably >10, with A being the integral area of the x-ray diffraction peaks between 2 Θ = 20.2 and 21 .5° and B being the integral area of the x-ray diffraction peaks between 2 Θ = 25.0 and 28.0.
The invention also concerns a process for fertilizing S and one or more earth alkaline elements, preferably Ca and/or Mg wherein the above inventive fertilizer composition is applied, preferably in form of granulates, onto a sulfur deficient soil used for agriculture, preferably for fertilizing sulfur to plants supplying amino acids, proteins and/or oil, in particular cultures of alfalfa, canola (rapeseed), cotton, clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats, triticale, cruciferous plants like brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like onion, leek and garlic. Advantage of this process is that fertilizing S and fertilizing Ca (and optionally Mg), and raising the soil pH is achieved at the same time with one single step.
Therefore, costs and efforts for separate fertilizing steps can be avoided.
Another advantage is that part of Ca (and optionally Mg) is available in soluble form (as CaSO4), whereas Ca (and optionally Mg) from conventional limestone or dolomite fertilizers is not soluble but has to get leached by contact with an acidic environment. A fertilizer composition offering both Ca (and optionally Mg) solubility and at the same time considerable alkaline character has a clear advantage over conventional fertilizer types. Even more, the content of soluble sulfur (as sulfate), valuable trace elements like Mn and Zn (and optionally B) and the low content of unwanted elements (e.g. As, Hg, Cd, Pb) and toxic organic compounds results in a highly valuable fertilizer type.
Preferably, said application on fields used for agriculture is made for base fertilization between summer and winter time, i.e. between August and December for areas north of the equator or between February and June for areas south of the equator, respectively, before the growth phase of the plants start. Generally; the ratio of the (acidic) Fe(ll)sulfate and the (alkaline) Ca and/or Mg compound may vary depending on soil pH:
For slightly acidic soils, a molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/S of >2 may be appropriate, whereas for more acidic soils a molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/S of »2 may be appropriate. With typical data of 300 - 600 kg Ca / (ha * a) for refreshing fertilizing with Ca and 30 kg S / (ha * a) => molar ratio Ca/S = 7.5 - 15.
By applying the inventive fertilizer composition, the pH of the soil may be raised to above 5.8, preferably above >6.0, most preferably >6.2.
Generally, sulfur in the inventive fertilizer is available in the form of sulfate, but for calculation purpose sulfur virtually is expressed as S. The present invention also provides the use of a solution comprising iron sulfate or the use of crystalline iron sulfate with more than 3 molecules of crystal water, preferably iron(ll)sulfate heptahydrate, more preferably copperas as obtained as by-product from titanium dioxide manufacturing, for preparing a sulfur fertilizing composition and/or for moistening and/or granulating of powderous fertilizer materials.
Advantages of the inventive products and processes are:
- Supply of bio-available soluble sulfur in large quantities and for low cost.
- The inventive compounds or the products of the inventive process exhibit
optimum solubility of sulfur: Not too high and not too low.
=> long-term supply of sulfur and calcium / magnesium improves soil structure and porosity.
- High alkalinity => useful also for neutralization of acidic soils. This leads to
improved bio-availability of other applied fertilizing substances.
- Preferred is a granular free flowing and dust free form of the fertilizer.
- Iron hydroxide exhibits excellent stabilizing properties for the granules
obtained. Also iron hydroxide due to its high capability for absorption of trace elements is able to avoid the micronut ents present in the inventive fertilizer (Mn, Zn) to be washed out.
If the iron sulfate is taken from the by-product of the titanium dioxide process, the inventive fertilizer additionally comprises valuable plant nutrients and
micronutrients, e.g. Mg, Mn, Zn. At the same time the product is free of Hg, Cd, As, Pb, Cr. The inventive composition can be used for all cultures, preferably those with high sulfur demand, e.g. alfalfa, canola (rapeseed), cotton, clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, lucerne, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats and triticale; furthermore cruciferous plants like Brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like onion, leek and garlic, especially suitable for canola and rapeseed and most preferably during winter time.
The pH of the fertilizer can be 5.5 to 13, for most applications preferably 6.0 to 1 1 , most preferably 6.5 to 8.5. When comprising calcium oxide or calcium dihydroxide for stronger and faster neutralizing effects, the pH of the fertilizer is preferably 8.5 to 13. As a consequence, no acidification of soil can be observed; jointly fertilizing with both S and Ca; iron sulfate is completely or nearly completely reacted and good stability of granulates is given.
The present invention also concerns:
An inventive composition , wherein it contains Zn with mass ratio of Zn/Fe 0.0001 to 0.003, preferably 0.0002 to 0.0015, and/or Mn with the mass ratio of Mn/Fe 0.00001 to 0.01 , preferably 0.00001 to 0.001 ; these elements are valuable micronutrients and therefore no separate application of Zn and Mn is necessary.
Said inventive composition, wherein the mass ratio of Cr/Fe is 0.0000001 - 0.0001 , preferably 0.0000001 - 0.00005, most preferably 0.1 - 0.00002; this concentration of Cr is sufficiently low to avoid detrimental effects.
- Said inventive composition, wherein mass ratio of Ti/Fe is 0.001 - 0.03,
preferably 0.002 - 0.02, most preferably 0.003 - 0.015;
Said inventive composition, wherein the pH according to ISO standard is 5.5 to 13, for most application preferably 6.0 to 1 1 , most preferably 6.5 to 8.5, but preferably 8.5 to 13 for compositions comprising calcium oxide or calcium dihydroxide. Hereby the pH is determined according to DIN EN ISO 787 part 3, whereby the pH measurement is made no earlier than 5 days after preparation of the sample and whereby the sample is ground prior to pH measurement.
Said inventive composition, wherein the neutralizing value according to DIN EN 12945:2014-07 standard is 1 to 55% (as CaO), preferably 20 to 55%, most preferably 33 to 48%.
Said inventive composition, wherein the fertilizer is granulated with volume based average granule size is 1 - 8 mm, preferably 2 - 6, most preferably 2 - 4 mm;
Said inventive composition, wherein it is granulated in a pan granulator, or a granulation drum, or an intensive mixer.
Said inventive composition, wherein it is granulated in a pan granulator, or a granulation drum, or an intensive mixer, without the addition of water to aid granulation.
Said inventive composition, wherein it is granulated in a combination of an intensive mixer and a granulator such as a pan granulator or a granulation drum.
Said inventive composition, wherein the fertilizer composition is obtainable by blending
o Ca and/or Mg compound, preferably CaCO3 or dolomite (Ca,Mg)CO3 o iron sulfate, preferably Fe(ll)SO4 heptahydrate,
o optionally CaSO4;
o optionally CaO, (Ca,Mg)O or Ca(OH)2
o optionally an iron sulfate monohydrate,
o optionally an iron sulfate monohydrate obtained from ΤΊΟ2
manufacturing, which has been reacted beforehand with lime or limestone or slaked lime or burnt lime to yield a reaction product with a typical pH of about 4;
o Said inventive composition, wherein the fertilizer comprises iron sulfate and/or products obtained from neutralization of iron sulfate and at least one calcium and/or magnesium compound and/or the reaction products of iron sulfate and calcium and/or magnesium compounds; o Use of the composition as a sulfur fertilizer for alfalfa, canola
(rapeseed), cotton, clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats and triticale; furthermore cruciferous plants like Brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like onion, leek and garlic,
o Use of the composition between summer and winter time, i.e. between
August and December for areas north of the equator or between February and June for areas south of the equator, respectively;
o Use of the composition as a calcium-sulfur fertilizer in such way that he pH of the soil is raised to >5.8, preferably >6.0, most preferably >6.2;
Further modifications of the invention can include:
- Adding other elements suitable for fertilizing purposes, e.g. trace element nutrients like boron, copper, molybdenum
- Additional elemental sulfur may be used; the presence of alkaline compounds can avoid acidification of soil.
- Preferably the calcium and/or magnesium compound has a pH >8, e.g. slag from steel manufacturing, burnt or hydrated lime / dolomite
- Low content of Sr or As.
- Passivation of the granule surface during granulation with limestone.
- Passivation of the granule surface during granulation with an iron sulfate
monohydrate which has been reacted beforehand with limestone, or lime, or slaked lime or burnt lime
- Thermal treatment / drying.
- Compacting with roller mill or pelletizer.
The present invention is further illustrated by the following Examples.
Example 1 a - Preparation of compacted Ca-S-fertilizer with 2.4% S and
neutralization value of 45% CaO equivalents and with low crushing strength Two batches, each consisting of 2 kg copperas from the titanium dioxide production by the sulfate process, and 8 kg of powdered limestone were brought together and mixed in a ploughshare mixer for about 2 minutes. The molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/Fe was 12. These mixtures were fed at room temperature over a hopper with a screw conveyor onto a pair of rollers of a roller compactor and compressed into scabs. The contact pressure during densification was about 9.5 N/mm2. The scabs attained a density of about 2070 kg / m3, measured in paraffin oil, according to the Archimedes principle. The scabs were crushed, and of the resulting pellets a sieve fraction between 2 to 5 mm was collected. The granules had a residual moisture content determined by drying at 105 °C of 8.2 wt.%.
From this fraction, 10 fresh granules were arbitrarily taken out and crushed by applying a pressing force. The average crushing strength was 1 .6 kg. The test was repeated in exactly the same way with fresh batches of copperas and limestone flour. The crushing strength of the fresh granules was 1 .3 kg. After drying 10 granules at 105 °C overnight, the crushing strength was found to be 1 .5 kg.
Example 1 b - Preparation of compacted Ca-S-fertilizer with 2.4% S and
neutralization value of 45% CaO equivalents and with low crushing strength
Two batches, each consisting of 2 kg copperas from the titanium dioxide production by the sulfate process, and 8 kg of powdered limestone, which had been mixed by hand and aged for 1 week by occasional mixing by hand and with a molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/Fe of 12 were fed at room temperature over a hopper with a screw conveyor onto a pair of rollers of a roller compactor and compressed into scabs. The contact pressure during densification was about 8.0 N/mm2. The scabs attained a density of about 2320 kg / m3, measured in paraffin oil, according to the Archimedes principle. The scabs were crushed, and of the resulting pellets a sieve fraction between 2 to 5 mm was collected. The granules had a residual moisture content determined by drying at 105 ° C of 8.5 wt.%.
From this fraction, 10 fresh granules were arbitrarily taken out and crushed by applying a pressing force. The average crushing strength was 2.2 kg. Ageing of the mixture prior to compacting results in moderate improved crushing strength. Example 1 c - Preparation of compacted Ca-S-fertilizer with 6% S and
neutralization value of 22% CaO equivalents and with low crushing strength
Two batches, each consisting of 5 kg copperas from the titanium dioxide production by the sulfate process, and 5 kg of powdered limestone were brought together and mixed in a ploughshare mixer for about 2 minutes. The molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/Fe was 3. These mixtures were fed at room temperature over a hopper with a screw conveyor onto a pair of rollers of a roller compactor and compressed into scabs. The specific force during densification was about 9.0 N/mm2. The scabs attained a density of about 1840 kg / m3, measured in paraffin oil, according to the Archimedes principle. The scabs were crushed, and of the resulting pellets a sieve fraction between 2 to 5 mm was collected. The granules had a residual moisture content determined by drying at 105 ° C of 21 .6 wt.%. From this fraction, 10 fresh granules were arbitrarily taken out and crushed by applying a pressing force. The average crushing strength was 0.3 kg. Granules with a high residual moisture exhibit low crushing strength.
Example 1 d - Preparation of compacted Ca-S-fertilizer with 6% S and
neutralization value of 22% CaO equivalents and with high crushing strength
Two batches, each consisting of 5 kg copperas from the titanium dioxide production by the sulfate process, and 5 kg of powdered limestone, which had been mixed by hand and aged for 1 week by occasional mixing by hand and with a molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/Fe of 3 were fed at room temperature over a hopper with a screw conveyor onto a pair of rollers of a roller compactor and compressed into scabs. The contact pressure during densification was about 8.0 N/mm2. The scabs attained a density of about 2220 kg / m3, measured in paraffin oil, according to the Archimedes principle. The scabs were crushed, and of the resulting pellets a sieve fraction between 2 to 5 mm was collected. The granules had a residual moisture content determined by drying at 105 ° C of 7.9 wt.%.
From this fraction, 10 fresh granules were arbitrarily taken out and crushed by applying a pressing force. The average crushing strength was 3.5 kg. After drying 10 granules at 105 °C overnight, the crushing strength was found to be 8.9 kg. Ageing of the mixture prior to compacting results in improved crushing strength.
Example 2a - Preparation of granulated Ca-S-fertilizer with 5% S and
neutralization value of 28% CaO equivalents and with high crushing strength
In a rotating and inclined (30°) mixing tank with a capacity of 150 liters and with eccentrically arranged, high-speed mixing tool and fixed wall scraper, 50 kg limestone powder, 50 kg copperas from the titanium dioxide production by the sulphate process and 6 kg of water were thoroughly mixed for 2 minutes in the co- current mode. The rotational speed of the mixing tool was 16.5 m/s, and the container was rotating at 1 m / s. This mixing process resulted in micro-granules that were granulated on a rotating and inclined pan granulator (diameter 1 m) with fixed deflector and rotating scraper. During granulation, about about 20 kg of limestone was added for drying purposes. The final composition had a molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/Fe of 4. The resulting granules were round. Of the granules about 80% by volume were between 2-6 mm.
From the volume fraction from 3.15 to 5 mm, 10 granules were arbitrarily taken out, dried overnight at 40 °C and crushed by applying a pressing force. The average crushing strength was 7.4 kg. Granulation with subsequent slow drying results in good crushing strength.
Example 2b - Preparation of granulated Ca-S-fertilizer with 5% S and
neutralization value of 28% CaO equivalents and with high crushing strength
In a rotating and inclined (30°) mixing tank with a capacity of 150 liters and with eccentrically arranged, high-speed mixing tool and fixed wall scraper, 50 kg limestone powder, 50 kg copperas from the titanium dioxide production by the sulphate process, 1 kg of lignosulfonate and 4.5 kg of water were thoroughly mixed for 1 .5 minutes in the co-current mode. The rotational speed of the mixing tool was 16.5 m/s, and the container was rotating at 1 m / s. This mixing process resulted in micro-granules that were granulated on a rotating and inclined pan granulator (diameter 1 m) with fixed deflector and rotating scraper. During granulation, about about 17.5 kg of lime was added for drying purposes. The final composition had a molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/Fe of 4. The resulting granules were round. Of the granules about 90% by volume were between 2-6 mm.
From the volume fraction from 3.15 to 5 mm, 10 granules were arbitrarily taken out, dried overnight at 40 °C and crushed by applying a pressing force. The average crushing strength was 3.0 kg.
Use of lignosulfonate resulted in lower water demand for granulation.
Example 2c
With the same setup as in example 2b 50 kg limestone powder, 50 kg copperas from the titanium dioxide production by the sulphate process and 5 kg of water were thoroughly mixed.
It was not possible to granulate this mixture on the pan granulator of example 2b as the water content was too low for generation of a granulation effect. Example 2d - Preparation of granulated Ca-S-fertilizer with 2% S and
neutralization value of 46% CaO equivalents
In a rotating and inclined (30°) mixing tank with a capacity of 150 liters and with eccentrically arranged, high-speed mixing tool and fixed wall scraper, 80 kg limestone powder, 20 kg copperas from the titanium dioxide production by the sulphate process and 8 kg of water were thoroughly mixed for 2 minutes in the co- current mode. The rotational speed of the mixing tool was 16.5 m/s, and the container was rotating at 1 m / s. This mixing process resulted in micro-granules that were granulated on a rotating and inclined pan granulator (diameter 1 m) with fixed deflector and rotating scraper. During granulation, about about 20 kg of lime was added for drying purposes. The final composition had a molar ratio
(Ca+Mg)/Fe of 15. The resulting granules were round. Of the granules about 80% by volume were between 2-6 mm.
From the volume fraction from 3.15 to 5 mm, 10 granules were arbitrarily taken out, dried overnight at 40 °C and crushed by applying a pressing force. The average crushing strength was 5.3 kg. Granulation with subsequent slow drying results in good crushing strength. Example 2e - Preparation of granulated Ca-S-fertilizer with 6% S and neutralization value of 22% CaO equivalents
In a rotating and inclined (30°) mixing tank with a capacity of 150 liters and with eccentrically arranged, high-speed mixing tool and fixed wall scraper, 45 kg limestone powder, 5 kg burnt lime and 50 kg copperas from the titanium dioxide production by the sulphate process were thoroughly mixed for 30 minutes in the co-current flow mode. The molar ratio (Ca+Mg)/Fe was 3. The rotational speed of the mixing tool was 4 m/s, and the container was rotating at 1 m / s. During the mixing process the chemical reaction of the components resulted in a temperature increase to about 50°C.
This mixing process resulted in a black granular product with good handling properties. The resulting granules were round. Example 3 - Determination of the alkaline content of a fertilizer
The alkaline content of the inventive fertilizer is determined by an acid-base titration. For this analytical method, about 1 g of a representative sample of the product is reacted in a beaker with 25 ml of a hydrochloric acid solution of a concentration of 1 mol per liter. The reaction of the calcium carbonate and hydrochloric acid produces carbon dioxide. The sample is left overnight in order for the reaction to complete and the bulk of the carbon dioxide to be emitted from the beaker. The next day, the beaker is briefly heated to just below the boiling point of water to emit any remaining carbon dioxide. Subsequently, the excess
hydrochloric acid is back-titrated with a solution of sodium hydroxide of a concentration of 1 mol per liter. The extent of the titration is monitored by measuring the pH of the liquid, for example potentiometrically, and determining the consumption of sodium hydroxide solution at the equivalence point. The amount of alkaline substance is then expressed as equivalent percentage of CaCO3. 1 .501 g of a fertilizer sample is reacted with 25 ml of 1 M hydrochloric acid with a titer of 0.9921 in a beaker. The reaction mixture is left overnight, after which the excess hydrochloric acid is titrated with 12.8726 ml of 1 M NaOH with a titer of 1 .0031 until a pH of 7.454. This sample contained 39.6 wt.-% CaCO3. Calculated is as follows: 100%*{[(25 ml HCI * 0.9921 )-(12.8726 ml NaOH *
1 .0031 )] * 0.001 L/ml * 100.087 g/mol CaCO3 * 0.5 mol H+/mol CaCO3 }/[1 .501 g]
= 39.6 wt.-% CaCO3.
39.6 wt.-% of CaCO3 corresponds to 22.2 wt.-% of CaO.
Example 4 - Elution tests of soil samples impregnated with sulfur fertilizer
In two soil incubation experiments the effect of limestone/FeSO4 mixtures on the pH of two soils was analyzed. Application of limestone and of limestone/ FeSO4 preparations result in an increase of pH in both soils one week after fertilization, see table 1 with pH data.
Table 1 - Effect of a fertilization of limestone and limestone/FeSO4 mixtures on the pH of two soils
The soil pH was measured in a suspension of 1 part soil with 2.5 parts of a solution of 0.01 M CaCI2 The effect of the limestone / FeSO4 preparations on pH is stronger than the effect of pure limestone!
Example 5 - Plant nutrition tests using sulfur fertilizer (pot experiments)
The effects of limestone/FeSO mixtures on the growth of plants was investigated with summer rape and alfalfa under natural conditions in pot experiments in small Mitscherlich pots with 6 kg soil per pot. The experimental soil was a subsoil (0.4 - 0.8 m depth) from a luvisol derived from loess with a total S concentration of 0.027%. Summer rape (Brassica napus L, cv. Belinda) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L, ) were cultivated in a treatment without lime and sulfur fertilization
(control), in a treatment with lime and without sulfur application and in treatments with various limestone/FeSO mixture applications with 50 mg S kg"1 soil (= 0.3 g S / pot). Each treatment contained four replications for rape and alfalfa each. The soil in the pots was treated with nitrogen (1 g N / pot as NH NOs), phosphorus and potassium (0.6 g P and 1 .6 g K / pot as K2HPO4 & KCI), magnesium (0.3 g Mg / pot as Mg(NO3)2, boron (3 mg B / pot as H3BO3), copper (30 mg Cu / pot as
CuCI2), manganese (120 mg Mn / pot as MnCI2), molybdenum (0.6 mg Mo / pot as NH molybdate) and zinc (60 mg Zn / pot as ZnCI2). After mixing the fertilizers with the soil and an incubation period of one week at 60% of the water holding capacity, rape and alfalfa were sown. The seeds of alfalfa were inoculated with Rhizobium melilotii. After germination rape plants were thinned on three plants / pot and alfalfa on 20 plants / pot. Then rape plants were fertilized with 0.5 g / pot in liquid form as NH NO3. In contrast to summer rape, alfalfa was not further applied with mineral nitrogen in order to analyze effect of a S fertilization in form of the new products on the N2 fixation.
Three months after sowing, summer rape plants were harvested and alfalfa was cut three times during the vegetation period. After the 1 st and 2nd harvest alfalfa was fertilized with 0.5 g K / pot in liquid form as K2HPO . In the following tables, the effects of sulfur fertilization in form of gypsum and various limestone/FeSO4 mixtures on the yields of summer rape are presented.
Application of sulfur in form of limestone/FeSO mixtures resulted in an increase of the growth of summer rape. In the treatments without S fertilization rape plants showed the typical S deficiency symptoms at the older leaves. Such symptoms were not visible at the leaves in the treatments with sulfur fertilization with lime/FeSO fertilization. The sulfur deficiency was so strong that summer rape did not produce any seeds in the control without sulfur treatment, as it can be seen from Table 2 and Figure 1 . Table 2 - Effect of a sulfur fertilization (0.3 g S / pot) in form of various
limestone/FeSO4 mixtures on the seed and straw yield of summer rape
The here presented results of the effect of lime/FeSO4 mixtures show that the inventive products are suitable as mineral sulfur and lime fertilizers for agricultural plants.
In a further experiment we have tested the effects of S fertilization in form of the various limestone/FeSO4 mixtures on the yield of alfalfa. In contrast to summer rape S fertilization did not result to an initial significant yield increase. The soil had enough sulfur for a first growth of alfalfa. However, an increasing part of CaCO3 resulted to a decrease of the shoot biomass at the first harvest, s. Table 3.
This is due to the sensitivity of alfalfa to "free lime" in the soil solution which may have result to a OH" ion toxicity. At the 2nd and 3rd harvest, however, there was found a clear positive effect for the limestone/FeSO mixtures. The highest cumulative shoots biomass was produced in the treatment with basic slag lime /FeSO4 mixture. Table 3: Effect of a sulfur fertilization (0.3 g S / pot) in form of various limestone/FeSO mixtures on the soil pH before sowing of alfalfa and on the shoot yields of alfalfa
Conclusion: The here presented results of the effect of limestone/FeSO4 mixtures show that the products are suitable as mineral sulfur and limestone fertilizers for agricultural plants. Limestone/FeSO4 mixtures should not applied to legumes in a ratio greater than 1 :1 .

Claims

Claims:
1 . Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition comprising S, Fe and one or more earth alkaline elements, including Ca and/or Mg, being suitable for administration onto a sulfur deficient soil wherein a material, comprising Fe and sulfate ions, in form of a solid salt, filter cake, paste, slurry, or solution, is blended with at least one component being chosen from or comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of the earth alkaline elements including at least one of Ca and Mg, preferably CaCO3, MgCO3, dolomite (Ca,Mg)CO3, MgO, burnt dolomite (Ca,Mg)O, CaO, semi-hydrated dolomite Ca(OH)2MgO, or Ca(OH)2 or mixtures thereof in molar ratio of (Ca+Mg)/Fe = 2 to 200, preferably 2.5 to 25, more preferably 10 to 25, and the blend is converted into an administration form.
2. Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to claim 1
wherein blending and converting is carried out simultaneously.
3. Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to any of claims 1 or 2 wherein blending and/or converting is carried out in the presence of any of water, dilute sulfuric acid, preferably diluted, CaSO4, elemental sulfur or other S containing compounds, other compounds useful for a fertilizer, such as micronutrients, preferably a boron compound, binder or granulation aids, or mixtures thereof.
4. Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the material comprising Fe and sulfate ions is FeSO which may contain crystal water.
5. Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to claim 4,
wherein FeSO is Fe(ll)SO heptahydrate, preferably obtained from the titanium dioxide production process.
6. Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to any of claims 1 to 5, wherein the at least one component comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of earth alkaline elements is limestone, consisting of fine particles 95 % < 0,09 mm and comprising >95 % CaCO3.
7. Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to any of claims 1 to 5, wherein the at least one component comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of earth alkaline elements is burnt lime, burnt dolomite or hydrated lime.
8. Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to any of claims 1 to 5, wherein the at least one component comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of earth alkaline elements is a slag from steel manufacturing or a reaction product from such a slag.
9. Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to any of claims 1 to 8, wherein at least one of starch, magnesium sulfates, citric acid, clay, mortar binder, cellulose glue, glucosidic binder such as starch, molasses, lignosulfonate, water, hydrated lime, water glass, bentonite, cellulose fibres, stearates, urea or combinations of these materials is used as binder or granulation aid in a weight ratio of 0.1 to 10 weight-%, preferably 0.3 to 5 weight-%, most preferably 0.8 to 3 weight-%, related to the total mass of the composition comprising Fe and sulfate ions and the at least one component being chosen from or comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of the earth alkaline elements Ca and Mg.
10. Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to any of claims 1 to 9, wherein the process is carried out in an apparatus which can also serve for compaction, granulation and/or pelletizing the reaction product.
1 1 . Process for manufacturing a fertilizer composition according to claim 10, wherein the granulation is carried out by blending:
a. a material comprising Fe and sulfate ions, b. a material comprising carbonates of the earth alkaline elements Ca and/or Mg, preferably CaCO3, MgCO3, or dolomite, and
c. a material comprising oxides or hydroxides of earth alkaline elements, preferably MgO, CaO, Mg(OH)2, or Ca(OH)2,
in the form of powder without any addition of water, with the reaction of these materials while being mixed and granulated in the same apparatus.
12. Process according to any of claims 1 to 1 1 , wherein the neutralizing value of the at least one component being chosen from or comprising oxides, hydroxides or carbonates of the earth alkaline elements according to DIN EN 12945:2014-07 standard is 1 to 55% (as CaO), preferably 20 to 55%, most preferably 33 to 48%.
13. Fertilizer composition comprising S, Fe and at least one earth alkaline
element including at least one of Ca and/or Mg, wherein the molar ratio of (Ca+Mg)/Fe is in the range of 2 to 200, preferably 2.5 to 25, most preferably 10 to 25.
14. Fertilizer composition according to claim 13, wherein the molar ratio of Fe to S is 0.3 to 6, preferably 0.5 to 2, most preferably 0.8 to 1 .2.
15. Fertilizer composition according to any of claims 13 and 14, wherein the ratio of the peak areas P, Q, I and J in the XRD spectrum (P*Q) / (l*J) is more than 8, preferably more than 5, more preferably more than 2, with P being the integral area of the x-ray diffraction peaks between 2 Θ =20.0 and 21 .5°, with Q being the integral area of the XRD peaks between 2 Θ =29.0 and 30.5°, with I being the integral area of the XRD peaks between 2 Θ =16.0, and 20.0° and with J being the integral area of the XRD peaks between 2 Θ =23.4 and 28.0.
16. Fertilizer composition according to any of claims 13 to 15, wherein the ratio of the peak areas A/B is more than 1 , preferably more than 5, more preferably more than 10, with A being the integral area of the x-ray diffraction peaks between 2 Θ =20.2 and 21 .5° and with B being the integral area of the x-ray diffraction peaks between 2 Θ =25.0 and 28.0.
17. Fertilizer composition according to any of claims 13 to 16, wherein it contains Zn with mass ratio of Zn/Fe from 0.0001 to 0.003, preferably from 0.0002 to 0.0015, and/or Mn with the mass ratio of Mn/Fe from 0.00001 to 0.01 , preferably from 0.00001 to 0.001 .
18. Fertilizer composition according to any of claims 13 to 17, wherein the
fertilizer is in a granulated form with volume based average granule size in the range from 1 to 8 mm, preferably 2 to 7, most preferably 3 to 6 mm.
19. Fertilizer composition, in particular according to any of claims 13 to 18, which is obtainable according to the process of any of claims 1 to 12.
20. Process for fertilizing S and one or more earth alkaline elements, preferably Ca and/or Mg wherein a fertilizer composition according to claim 19 is applied, preferably in form of granulates, onto a sulfur deficient soil used for agriculture, preferably for fertilizing sulfur to plants supplying amino acids, proteins and/or oil, in particular cultures of alfalfa, canola (rapeseed), cotton, clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats, triticale, cruciferous plants like brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like onion, leek and garlic.
21 . Process according to claim 20, wherein the application onto a sulfur deficient soil is made for base fertilization between summer and winter time.
22. Process according to claim 20 or 21 , wherein the fertilizer composition
according to claim 19 is applied onto the sulfur deficient soil in an amount that the pH of the soil is raised to above 5.8, preferably above >6.0, most preferably >6.2.
23. Use of a composition according to claim 19 as a sulfur fertilizer for fertilizing sulfur to plants supplying amino acids, proteins and/or oil, in particular to alfalfa, canola (rapeseed), cotton, clovers, phalaris, barrel medic, wheat, barley, maize, sunflowers, soybean, navy beans, sorghum, oats and triticale, cruciferous plants like brassicas, radish, rocket and allium crops like onion, leek and garlic.
24. Use of iron sulfate, preferably iron(ll)sulfate heptahydrate, more preferably copperas as obtained as by-product from titanium dioxide manufacturing, for preparing a sulfur fertilizing composition.
25. Use of a solution comprising iron sulfate or use of crystalline iron sulfate with more than 3 molecules of crystal water, preferably iron(ll)sulfate
heptahydrate, more preferably copperas as obtained as by-product from titanium dioxide manufacturing, as aid for moistening and/or granulating powderous fertilizer materials.
EP15725542.3A 2014-05-16 2015-05-15 Sulfur fertilizer Withdrawn EP3142990A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102014106980 2014-05-16
PCT/EP2015/060769 WO2015173396A1 (en) 2014-05-16 2015-05-15 Sulfur fertilizer

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3142990A1 true EP3142990A1 (en) 2017-03-22

Family

ID=53274507

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15725542.3A Withdrawn EP3142990A1 (en) 2014-05-16 2015-05-15 Sulfur fertilizer

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3142990A1 (en)
CN (1) CN106536453A (en)
BR (1) BR112016026684A2 (en)
TW (1) TWI555721B (en)
WO (1) WO2015173396A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015119480A1 (en) 2015-11-11 2017-05-11 Fels-Werke Gmbh Fertilizer mixture and process for its preparation
CN108440185A (en) * 2018-04-20 2018-08-24 浙江省农业科学院 A kind of biological nutrition type water-retaining agent and preparation method thereof
TWI783312B (en) * 2020-12-01 2022-11-11 國立屏東科技大學 Sulfide-contained organic fertilizer material and manufacturing method thereof

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB356195A (en) * 1929-06-01 1931-08-31 Eduard Dedolph Composition serving as a fertilizer and agricultural pest destroyer
IT995512B (en) * 1973-09-26 1975-11-20 Sir Soc Italiana Resine Spa COMPOSITIONS SUITABLE FOR THEM USED IN AGRICULTURE AS SOIL MODIFIERS AND AS FERTILIZERS
US4264570A (en) * 1979-02-27 1981-04-28 Sokolov Igor D Method of producing magnesium sulphate
EP0093204B1 (en) 1982-04-29 1985-08-21 Norddeutsche Affinerie Ag Process for granulating mixtures of fertilizers containing iron (ii) sulfate
US4455161A (en) * 1982-09-13 1984-06-19 The O.M. Scott & Sons Company Trace element fertilizer composition
ES2049127B1 (en) 1991-06-13 1994-10-01 Tioxide Espa A S A CORRECTOR OF MICROELEMENTS LAWS FOR AGRICULTURAL SOILS AND PROCEDURE FOR ITS PREPARATION.
ES2036949B1 (en) * 1991-11-21 1994-02-01 Tioxide Europ MAGNESIUM SULPHATE AND IRON MICRO-ELEMENTS DEFICIENCY CORRECTOR FOR AGRICULTURAL SOILS AND PROCEDURE FOR ITS PREPARATION.
ES2111458B1 (en) * 1995-05-22 1999-07-01 Turol Trading S L PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER WITH SULFUR AND TRACE ELEMENTS FOR ITS AGRICULTURAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE AND PROCEDURE FOR ITS PREPARATION.
CN1434004A (en) * 2003-03-11 2003-08-06 赵鹏 Biological organic-inorganic compound fertilizer and productive method thereof
EP1892219B1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-03-12 Kemira Pigments Oy Method of treating a precipitate comprising iron(II)sulphate monohydrate, a plant, granular material and its uses
WO2008000887A1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-01-03 Sachtleben Pigments Oy Method of treating a precipitate comprising iron (ii) sulphate monohydrate, a plant, granular material and its uses
EP2165976B8 (en) * 2007-07-02 2018-02-14 Fertinagro Biotech, S.L. Method of compactation of compositions based on ferrous sulphate heptahydrate and product obtained therefrom
WO2010058425A2 (en) * 2008-11-20 2010-05-27 Chetan Navnithlal Shah Soil conditioner
CA2806253C (en) * 2010-08-10 2018-09-11 Chandrika Varadachari Polyphosphate fertilizer combinations

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *
See also references of WO2015173396A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2015173396A1 (en) 2015-11-19
BR112016026684A2 (en) 2017-08-15
TW201609609A (en) 2016-03-16
CN106536453A (en) 2017-03-22
TWI555721B (en) 2016-11-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10934225B2 (en) Compaction of polyhalite and potash mixture
KR100914763B1 (en) Quality of soil improvement material and manufacturing method for the same
KR101127029B1 (en) quality of soil improvement material and manufacturing method for the same
CN107827599A (en) Flyash saline land greening tree planting soil conditioner
EP3883908A1 (en) Polyhalite and potash granules
CN107880897A (en) Gangue saline land greening tree planting soil conditioner
CN109485523A (en) Microelement bio-feritlizer and preparation method in a kind of high activity organic multicomponent
EP3142990A1 (en) Sulfur fertilizer
RU2629215C1 (en) Fertiliser and method of its obtaining
CN107828423A (en) Zeolite salt-soda soil greening and afforestation soil conditioner
Logan et al. The alkaline stabilization with accelerated drying process (N‐Viro): An advanced technology to convert sewage sludge into a soil product
Prakash et al. Effect of slag-based gypsum (SBG) and commercial gypsum (CG) on nutrient availability, uptake and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in two different soils
CN107955623A (en) Rock phosphate in powder tailing saline land greening tree planting soil conditioner
KR20020056373A (en) Non-fermented compost, organic manure and a preparation method thereof
CN107903117A (en) Concave convex rod saline land greening tree planting soil conditioner
CN111849498A (en) Soil conditioner and preparation method thereof
CN107739619A (en) Diatomite mine tailing saline land greening tree planting soil conditioner
RU2078068C1 (en) Multiphase conditioner of soil
KR20010002046A (en) Method of soil reclamation pellet for rice crop of saline soil using gypsum and organics sludge
CN106365833A (en) Chitosan-coated controlled release fertilizer for saline-alkaline soil
RU2756500C1 (en) Method for obtaining natural organomineral fertilizer based on glauconite-containing tailings of phosphorite benefication
CA3112312A1 (en) Method for obtaining a granulated phosphate fertiliser and phosphate fertiliser obtained
CN107986904A (en) Volcanic ash saline land greening tree planting soil conditioner
CN107879855A (en) Building waste saline land greening tree planting soil conditioner
CN107760315A (en) Concave convex rod mine tailing saline land greening tree planting soil conditioner

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20161115

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20190409

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20190820