EP3102992A1 - Improved dynamics gas blending system and process for producing mixtures with minimal variation within tolerance limits and increased gas utilization - Google Patents
Improved dynamics gas blending system and process for producing mixtures with minimal variation within tolerance limits and increased gas utilizationInfo
- Publication number
- EP3102992A1 EP3102992A1 EP15704668.1A EP15704668A EP3102992A1 EP 3102992 A1 EP3102992 A1 EP 3102992A1 EP 15704668 A EP15704668 A EP 15704668A EP 3102992 A1 EP3102992 A1 EP 3102992A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- gas
- mixture
- blended
- flow rate
- pressure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D11/00—Control of flow ratio
- G05D11/02—Controlling ratio of two or more flows of fluid or fluent material
- G05D11/13—Controlling ratio of two or more flows of fluid or fluent material characterised by the use of electric means
- G05D11/135—Controlling ratio of two or more flows of fluid or fluent material characterised by the use of electric means by sensing at least one property of the mixture
- G05D11/138—Controlling ratio of two or more flows of fluid or fluent material characterised by the use of electric means by sensing at least one property of the mixture by sensing the concentration of the mixture, e.g. measuring pH value
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01F—MIXING, e.g. DISSOLVING, EMULSIFYING OR DISPERSING
- B01F35/00—Accessories for mixers; Auxiliary operations or auxiliary devices; Parts or details of general application
- B01F35/80—Forming a predetermined ratio of the substances to be mixed
- B01F35/88—Forming a predetermined ratio of the substances to be mixed by feeding the materials batchwise
- B01F35/883—Forming a predetermined ratio of the substances to be mixed by feeding the materials batchwise using flow rate controls for feeding the substances
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D11/00—Control of flow ratio
- G05D11/02—Controlling ratio of two or more flows of fluid or fluent material
- G05D11/13—Controlling ratio of two or more flows of fluid or fluent material characterised by the use of electric means
- G05D11/131—Controlling ratio of two or more flows of fluid or fluent material characterised by the use of electric means by measuring the values related to the quantity of the individual components
- G05D11/132—Controlling ratio of two or more flows of fluid or fluent material characterised by the use of electric means by measuring the values related to the quantity of the individual components by controlling the flow of the individual components
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D16/00—Control of fluid pressure
- G05D16/20—Control of fluid pressure characterised by the use of electric means
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D7/00—Control of flow
- G05D7/06—Control of flow characterised by the use of electric means
Definitions
- This invention relates to a system and process for dynamically blending gases with minimal tolerance variation, in combination with no waste gas generation and increased gas utilization.
- homogeneous gaseous mixture is fundamental to many industrial processes.
- the solar and LCD industries currently rely on the use of dilute dopant gas mixtures for doping semiconductor materials, and the like.
- product gas mixtures used in the semiconductor industry also require a target composition controlled within a very tight tolerance limit to be suitable for advanced semiconductor manufacturing.
- acceptable compositional tolerance limits within the semiconductor industry are narrow and are getting narrower.
- the allowable variation in each gas component in the product gas can be as low as plus or minus 0.1% of the target concentration with the specific tolerance limits being dependent on the active gas component that is being blended.
- dopant gas mixtures used in advanced semiconductor manufacturing are filled into, stored in and delivered using gas cylinders.
- the pressure-based method uses pressure changes in the cylinder as each component is added to determine when the correct amount of each component has been added to the cylinder.
- the setup for the pressure-based method is very simple and easy to implement.
- the mixing precision of the method is very low because it depends on the accuracy of pressure and temperature measurements on the system that is generally not precise due to heating that occurs as the gases are compressed into the cylinder as well as due to other potential sources of system temperature change not accounted for during pressure change.
- gravimetric-based methods can produce mixes with tighter tolerance limits and is used widely in the gas industry.
- the gravimetric-based method involves adding a specific mass of each component to the cylinder using a weigh-scale. Because weight measurements are temperature insensitive, this method provides a more accurate means of component addition than pressure-based methods.
- One limitation of gravimetric systems is the requirement for the added weight of each component of a mixture to be high enough relative to the absolute error of the weight measurement. This limitation of gravimetric systems means that as mixture concentrations decrease, the precision required by the weigh-scale used to prepare the mixture, becomes higher for a given mix tolerance target.
- compositional variation of mix used to fill a given set of cylinders is very low.
- the present invention relates in part to a system and process for dynamically blending gases as needed with a narrow tolerance in a closed control loop in a manner that reduces waste, can eliminate venting and improve mixing precision and accuracy.
- a method for reducing mixing variation during a dynamic blending process involves regulating a flow rate of active gas using a first control device; and regulating a flow rate of balance gas using a second flow control device. Blending the active gas with the balance gas occurs to produce a blended gas mixture. Next, the blended gas mixture is measured to obtain a concentration of the blended gas mixture with an in-line analyzer situated downstream of the mixer when each of the (i) pressure across the analyzer, (ii) the flow rate of the active gas; and (iii) the flow rate of the balance gas has stabilized to their corresponding target values to generate a measured concentration of the blended gas mixture.
- Variation is minimized between the measured concentration of the blended gas mixture and the target concentration of the blended mixture by dynamically fine-tuning the flow rate of the active gas and/or the flow rate of the balance gas in response to the measured concentration.
- the fine-tuning occurs in the absence of any recycling of the blended gas mixture.
- a method for reducing variation during dynamic blending occurring on an intermittent basis to produce a target concentration of a gas mixture is provided.
- An active gas is ramped up to a first predetermined flow rate at a first preset rate based on a previous blending run.
- a balance gas is ramped up to a second predetermined flow rate at a second preset rate based on the previous blending run so as to maintain a substantially constant flow ratio of the active gas to the balance gas.
- An in-line analyzer is activated when the pressure across the analyzer, the flow rate of the active gas and the flow rate of the balance gas each has stabilized to their corresponding target values.
- the active gas is blended with the balance gas to produce a blended gas mixture.
- a concentration of the blended gas mixture is measured with the in-line analyzer that is situated downstream of the mixer to generate a measured concentration of the blended gas mixture.
- the variation between the measured concentration of the blended gas mixture and the target concentration is minimized by dynamically fine-tuning the flow rate of the active gas and/or the flow rate of the balance gas in response to the measured concentration of the blended gas mixture.
- the in-line analyzer is deactivated followed by ramping down the flow rate of the active gas and ramping down the flow rate of the balance gas at the substantially constant flow ratio until the flow rate of the active gas and the balance gas each reaches substantially zero.
- a method for analyzing a gas mixture in a surge vessel without generating waste gas is provided.
- a pressure of the gas from the surge vessel is regulated using a pressure control device.
- a flow rate of the gas mixture is regulated from the surge vessel using a flow control device.
- a predetermined quantity of the gas mixture is sent to a secondary analyzer for measurement of the concentration of the gas mixture.
- the predetermined quantity of the gas mixture from the secondary analyzer is discharged into a sample collection vessel at a fill pressure that is lower than a fill pressure of the surge vessel.
- the gas mixture is supplied from the sample collection vessel to a downstream user at a supply pressure that is greater than or at least equal to a supply pressure of the gas mixture in the surge vessel.
- the supplying of the gas mixture to the downstream user occurs in the absence of pressurizing the mixture.
- a system for reducing mixing variation in a dynamic blending process comprises an active gas source having a first control valve connected to a first flow controller configured for regulating a predetermined flow rate of the active gas.
- a balance gas source is also provided having a second control valve connected to a second flow controller configured for regulating a predetermined flow rate of the balance gas.
- a mixer is configured to receive the predetermined flow of the balance gas and the predetermined flow of the active gas and thereafter discharge a blended gas mixture from the mixer.
- An in-line analyzer is provided that is situated downstream of the mixer and configured to measure the concentration of the blended gas mixture when the pressure across the analyzer, the flow rate of the active gas and the flow rate of the balance gas each has stabilized to their corresponding predetermined values.
- the inline analyzer thereafter is configured to generate measurement signals referable to concentration levels of the blended gas mixture.
- a first back pressure control device located downstream of the in-line analyzer is provided for maintaining a substantially constant pressure across the in-line analyzer.
- a controller is also provided that is in communication with the in-line analyzer and the first control valve and the second control valve.
- the controller is responsive to the measurement signals and configured to minimize variation between the measured concentration of the blended gas mixture and a target concentration of the mixture by dynamically fine-tuning the flow rate of the active gas and/or the flow rate of the balance gas in response to the measured concentration of the blended gas mixture.
- the system also includes one or more surge vessels located downstream of the in-line analyzer to accumulate the blended gas mixture and thereafter direct said mixture as a product stream to an end-user or as an alternative direct said mixture to a secondary analyzer.
- Figure 1 shows a process flow diagram incorporating the principles of the inventive blending protocol.
- Figure 2 shows an alternative sampling flow diagram incorporating the principles of the inventive blending protocol.
- Figure 3 graphically depicts the tight tolerance of l%GeH4 mix achieved from Example 1.
- Figure 4 graphically depicts the tight tolerance of l%GeH4 mix achieved from Example 2.
- Figure 1 shows a process flow diagram of an on-site dynamic blending system in accordance with the principles of the present invention. As will be explained, the system and process of Figure 1 is designed to dynamically blend gas mixtures with the capability to achieve higher mix precision at reduced tolerance limits with increased gas utilization.
- the supply gas sources for the active gas and the balance gas are designated as active gas source 100 and balance gas source 200, respectively.
- Each of the two gas sources 100 and 200 may be contained in a variety of different vessels such as, by way of example, ISO containers, drums, ton containers, tubes, or cylinders.
- H 2 or other inert gases may be used as the balance gas contained in balance gas source 200.
- active gas sources as known in the art may be utilized, such as, for example, phosphine (PH 3 ), arsine (AsH 3 ), trimethylboron
- the delivery pressures of the active gas source 100 and the balance gas source 200 may be controlled by corresponding pressure regulators 101 and 201, respectively. Downstream of the pressure regulators 101 and 201 are gas flow controlling devices 107 and 207 which control the flow rates of the active and balance gases, respectively, through the process piping.
- gas flow control devices as known in the art may be used, such as, for example, mass flow meters, orifices, and adjustable valves.
- the gas flow metering devices are mass flow controllers ("MFC's").
- the blending system includes a mixer 109, into which active gas and balance gas are dynamically blended.
- mixer refers to any type of mixing device known in the art for use in blending gaseous components.
- Possible mixing devices include, but are not limited to, mixing manifolds, mixing chambers with impellers, and conduits with baffles. As active gas and balance gas flow at their predetermined flow rates through the mixer, the gases are blended. It should be understood that the terms “mixer” and “dynamic blender” and “blender” will be used interchangeably with each other throughout the specification.
- the blended gas stream exits the mixer 109 and is then sampled by gas analyzer 111.
- a back pressure control device 114 is used to keep the pressure of the gas through the analyzer 111 substantially constant which ensures accurate measurement.
- the gas mixture entering the gas analyzer 111 is preferably of uniform composition.
- Gas analyzer 111 measures the concentration of the blended gas stream and then sends a signal to the controller 112 which then sends a signal to mass flow controller 107 and/or 207 to make appropriate adjustments to the flow rates of active gas and/or balance from their respective gas sources 100 and 200 in order to increase mixing precision and reduce variation of the mixture concentration within the tolerance limits.
- the present invention utilizes fine-tuning to improve the mix precision.
- “Fine-tuning” as used herein refers to the adjustment of flow rates of the active gas and/or the balance gas to produce an in-spec blended gas mixture that is based on concentrations measured by the in-line blending analyzer 111.
- “In-spec” as used herein refers to the concentration of the blended mixture that meets applicable product specification and is within a predetermined tolerance.
- “Off-spec” as used herein refers to the concentration of a blended mixture produced by a specific blending run or operation that does not meet applicable product specification and is outside of a predetermined tolerance.
- “In-line analyzer” as used herein refers to the entire blended gas mixture produced by mixer 109 being analyzed by the analyzer 111.
- the flow rates of the active gas and the balance gas are regulated to be in a range in which the blending of the active gas with the balance gas produces a blended gas mixture having a concentration of active gas that meets a pre-determined specification during operation, and through fine tuning can incrementally minimize the in-spec variation of the blended mixture such that there is reduced variation within the tolerance limits.
- the blending protocol is designed to not substantially alter the blending flow rates but yet have the ability to increase mixing precision by reducing error during the process that is caused, at least in part, by variation of gas flow rates and concentration measurement error.
- a feedback control loop procedure can be repeated throughout the gas blending process to monitor the gas mixture produced from blending in the mixer 109 and in response thereto, incremental adjustments to the mass flow controllers 107 and/or 207 are performed, if required, to ensure that the gas concentration of the active source is within the acceptable tolerance of the target concentration and that the blended mixture exhibits reduced variation within the tolerance limits such that high precision mixtures are consistently produced.
- the present invention does not produce off-spec gas and therefore does not include a recycle loop.
- no waste product is generated that must be vented or discarded by other suitable means.
- the mass flow controllers 107 and/or 207 are dynamically adjusted with a closed- loop feedback controller 112 that is capable of controlling blend accuracy and precision of the active gas and balance gas in real-time.
- the system of the present invention as part of the control loop methodology includes a controller in communication with the in-line analyzers 111 and 131 and control valves for the active gas source 100 and balance gas source 200.
- the controller is responsive to the measurement signals and configured to minimize variation between the measured concentration of the blended gas mixture and a target concentration of the mixture by dynamically fine-tuning the flow rate of the active gas and/or the flow rate of the balance gas in response to the measured concentration of the blended gas mixture.
- the present invention recognizes a potential exists for the dynamic blender to start and stop frequently, especially when the blending occurs on a user's site.
- the frequent starting and stopping of the blender can occur at irregular intervals (i.e., "intermittent basis") and therefore has the potential to produce large variations in mixture concentration due to the variations in flow rate invariably occurring during start and stop.
- the measurement errors from the in-line analyzer 11 lean be large due to unstable flow rates and system pressures which would generate even higher variations in mixture concentration if the concentration result from the in-line analyzer is used to control mixing.
- the blending protocol in accordance with the present invention ramps up flow rates of both the active gas and balance gas at a preset ramping rate to pre-determined flow rates that are based on earlier mixing runs at the same relative ramping rate; once the flow rates reach the pre-determined value and gas pressure becomes stabilized, the in-line analyzer 111 then becomes active and is used to control the mixture concentration throughout the remainder of the blending process prior to stopping of the flow. Analyzer control occurs by slightly or incrementally adjusting one or more mass flow controllers based on the mix concentration measured by the in-line analyzer 111.
- the blending protocol of the present invention does not significantly vary the blending flow rates of active gas or balance gas over a wide range. After one or more of the flow rates are incrementally adjusted, a specified amount of time is required for the mix to reach the in-line analyzer 111 and be measured, e.g., preferably a few seconds depending, at least in part, upon flow rates and piping length. Therefore, the blending protocol is designed to not conduct another flow rate adjustment until the mix reaches in-line analyzer 111.
- the present invention eliminates the potential for the blending protocol to pre-maturely adjust the one or more flow rates (and, therefore potentially over compensate or over-adjust) by virtue of the in-line analyzer 111 taking a measurement prior to the adjusted blended gas mix reaching the in-line analyzer 111.
- the control system stops analyzer control first and then ramps down each of the flow rates of both the active gas and balance gas to 0 at the same preset ramping rate so that the flow ratio of active to balance gas source is maintained while the flow rates decrease.
- the mixture is then directed to surge vessels 118 and/or 119.
- the surge vessels 118 and/or 119 acts as a storage reservoir which absorbs process variations, such as, for example, mixture concentration, pressure, and flow rate.
- the use of surge vessel 118 and/or 119 allows the blending in mixer 109 to occur at a substantially constant blending flow rate which further enhances the mixing precision of the present invention.
- surge vessel 118 and/or 119 can be used to avoid gas feed supply pressure variation to an optional compressor if used.
- the dynamic gas blending process and system may include one or multiple surge vessels, depending at least in part on the usage and downstream process requirements.
- two surge vessels 118 and 119 may be utilized as shown in Figure 1.
- the surge vessels 118 and 119 may be configured to continuously supply product gas mixtures to an end-user located downstream of the vessels 118 and 119.
- the system and process of the present invention is designed to be preferably configured to switch from the surge vessel with low pressure to another vessel automatically and to continue to supply the product gas mixture downstream without supply interruption.
- the surge vessel 118 or 119 with low pressure can then be filled.
- the surge vessels 118 and 119 are arranged so that one of the surge vessels 118 or 119 is always filled and on-line while the other vessel 1 18 or 119 can be under fill, analysis or be ready to supply the gas mix as a product stream to an end-user located downstream.
- the gas may be supplied to the downstream user directly from the surge vessel 118 or 119 through a regulator 126 as mentioned above.
- An optional secondary analyzer 131 may be equipped to further analyze the gas mixture concentration within the filled surge vessel 118 or 119.
- the setup of an optional secondary analyzer 131 further assures and provides an integrity check to the upstream blending process that the active gas concentration of the product mixture to be delivered downstream is within acceptable tolerance limits before the product gas is used in the downstream process.
- the analytical result obtained from the product gas in the surge vessel 118 or 119 can be used to determine the mixing concentration target for the next fill.
- the measured concentration in the surge vessel 118 or 119 is preferably measured by the secondary analyzer 131.
- the measured concentration is thereafter preferably utilized to determine the appropriate target mixing concentration for performing the next mixing or blending operation. Additionally, the concentration as measured in each of the in-line analyzer 111 and the secondary analyzer 131 is calibrated to take into account the effects of temperature, pressure and/or flow rate or any combination thereof. The present invention therefore has the ability to fine-tune successive mixes to produce high precision blends.
- the mix concentration as measured in the surge vessel 118 and/or 119 allows for fine tuning in each of the successive mixes and fills, thereby allowing the present invention to have the ability to further tighten the concentration of the in-spec blended mixes to be within the tolerance of the mixtures accumulating in surge vessels 118 and/or 119.
- high precision mixes are consistently produced by the present invention with significantly reduced variation within the tolerance limits.
- the product gas mixture can be supplied from the blending system directly to the user or from one or multiple surge vessels 118 and 119 in which the concentration of the product gas in each surge vessel 118 and 119 is verified
- the system and process of the present invention allows for the incremental addition of surge vessels without supply interruption.
- the embodiment shown in Figure 1 is equipped with two surge vessels 118 and 119.
- the product gas mixture may be supplied directly to the process from the blending system without the use of surge vessels.
- the mixture may be blended as needed and the surge vessels used only as a pass-through for the blended mixture from the blending system to the downstream user.
- the surge vessels may be used as a backup source in the event that the blending system is off-line for maintenance, gas re- supply, and/or other reasons that are apparent one of ordinary skill in the art.
- the blending system of the present invention may also be configured and used to fill cylinders or containers, which can then be transported to the user's location and used.
- Figure 1 shows that the pressure and flow rate of sample gas from the filled surge vessel 118 or 119 are controlled using regulator 128 and flow control device 129, respectively.
- a back pressure regulator 133 is used to keep the pressure of sample gas through in-line analyzer 131 substantially constant.
- the sample gas from in-line analyzer 131 is then stored temporarily in a sample collection vessel 136.
- the gas mixture in sample collection vessel 136 is directed as a product mixture to be supplied downstream through a regulator 139 for use by the downstream user.
- the use of a bypass sample loop as shown in Figure 1 can allow better control and stability of the flow rate and pressure of sample gas through the in-line analyzer 131.
- the flow rate and pressure of the sample gas through the in-line analyzer 131 are kept substantially constant, which ensures reduced error and therefore more accurate measurement.
- fewer analyzers may be equipped, e.g., in-line analyzer 109 alone may be used to analyze all the gas mixture streams by equipping sample lines from surge vessels 118 and 119 to analyzer 109.
- the pressure set on regulator 139 is greater than or at least equal to the pressure set on regulator 126 so that the gas in sample collection vessel 136 can be utilized by downstream user.
- sample collection vessel 136 is then isolated from the supply downstream and is ready to collect sample gas for the next analysis.
- the sample collection vessel 136 is designed so that the pressure in the collection vessel is sufficiently low enough that sample gas can be collected therewithin from the surge vessel 118 and/or 119 after the surge vessel 118 and/or 119 is filled and the pressure in the vessel 136 is high enough after the analysis by secondary analyzer 131 so that the gas mixture in the collection vessel 136 can be directed and utilized by a downstream user with no need for venting and without the need for pressurization by an external device such as a pump.
- the process allows the product gas in the surge vessel 118/119 to be analyzed; the sample gas to be routed to the supply loop; and increased gas utilization to be achieved without generating any waste gas.
- 100% gas utilization is obtained such that no waste gas is generated; none of the gas mixture is required to be vented; and increased pressurization of the mixture is not required as the sampled gas is discharged downstream to an end-user.
- Table 1 below shows an example of pressure settings that may be used to sample the mixture in the surge vessels 118/119 so that no venting of the blended gas mixture is required.
- the sample collection vessel 136 may be sized based on the requirement of sampling time and flow rate. For example, assuming a sampling flow rate is 0.5 standard liter per minute (SLM), for a 20 minute sampling time, the total sample volume is 10SL. If the max fill pressure and drain down pressure of sample collection vessel are 75psig and 65psig, respectively, then the volume of the sample collection vessel needs to be >15Liter.
- SLM standard liter per minute
- the pressures set forth in Tablel are intended to merely illustrate the protocol and wide applicability of the blending protocol to various process scenarios. Modifications are contemplated by the present invention. Table 1
- sampling gas from the secondary analyzer 131 may flow freely from sample collection vessel 136 to a downstream user without using regulator 139.
- both the sample collection vessel 136 and its corresponding regulator 139 may not be needed to practice the dynamic blending of the present invention.
- the sampling gas may flow freely from secondary analyzer 131 through back pressure regulator 133 and then directly to the downstream piping.
- FIG. 2 An alternative set-up to sampling the product gas mixture from the surge vessel 118/119 is shown in Figure 2.
- the supply pressure of the sample gas mixture from the filled surge vessel 118/119 is regulated using regulator 128.
- a flow control device 129 located downstream of secondary analyzer 131 not only controls the flow rate of the sample gas mixture through the analyzer 131, but also prevents the pressure of the sample gas through analyzer 131 from being significantly affected by pressure changes in the sample collection vessel 136, which can further ensure that the pressure of gas across the in-line analyzer remains substantially constant.
- the setup of Figure 2 does not require a back pressure regulator as described in Figure 1. Additionally, it should be understood that the sampling system of Figure 2 may be equipped with or without a sample collection vessel 136 and a pressure regulator 139.
- any range of flow rates and concentrations can be incorporated into the blending protocol.
- inventive blending protocol as described may consist of controlling with a mass flow controller or other flow control device a single gas stream, two or more gas streams or all gas streams.
- examples above illustrate blending a balance gas with a single active gas component, blending of two or more active gas components to respective target concentrations is also contemplated.
- a high precision back pressure regulator (Model No: EB1LF2) produced by Equilibar, LLC (Fletcher, New York) was used to keep the gas pressure through the analyzer constant.
- a mixture of 10% GeH 4 was used as the active source gas and then further blended with balance gas H 2 to produce 1% GeH 4 and balance H 2 .
- the flow rates of GeH 4 active gas mix were regulated using a 0 to 1 standard liter per minute (slpm) GeH 4 mass flow controller, and the flow rates of H 2 balance gas were regulated with a 0 to 10 slpm H 2 mass flow controller.
- the delivery pressure of 10% GeH 4 balance H 2 and H 2 from source cylinders was controlled at 110 psig and total mixture flow rate was approximately 5 slpm.
- the blending pressure was controlled at approximately 95psig by a back pressure regulator. Two 49Liter cylinders were used as surge vessels.
- a customized labview control program was developed by the inventors to control the blending process in a closed loop.
- Example 1 blending precision with venting
- Example 1 The objective of this Example 1 was to demonstrate the ability to produce high precision mixtures at l%GeH 4 /H2 mixture having a tolerance of ⁇ 5ppm.
- the system vented gas.
- Surge vessels were first vacuumed to ⁇ ltorr before being filled. After the blender started and before the mixture concentration stabilized, the mixture was vented to a scrubber. The blender was then switched to fill surge vessel only after the flow rates of source gas, blending pressure and mixture concentration became stabilized. Approximately 5min tol5min before the mixture concentration became stabilized after the blender started. During the fill process, the measured result from the analyzer was used to automatically adjust the flow rate of 10% GeH 4 balance H 2 to further refine and control the mixture concentration. Once the pressure in surge vessel reached 85psig, the mixture was switched from filling surge vessel to venting before the blending was stopped. Two surge vessels were filled in succession one at a time.
- Example 2 blending precision with 100% gas utilization
- a blender was operated as would be used on a user's site to make gas mixtures as needed. In this case, the system was expected to start and stop very frequently on an intermittent basis and not vent gas. Accordingly, fills were performed utilizing the process of the present invention.
- the two surge vessels filled in example 1 were vented to 70 psig and used as surge vessels in this example.
- the target blending mixture concentration for each fill was pre-determined based on the measured concentration in the two surge vessels as well as the final target of 1% GeH 4 balance H 2 in the surge vessels.
- the initial flow rates for both 10% GeH 4 balance H 2 and balance H 2 were pre-determined based on expected flow rates of both source gases needed to achieve a 1% GeH 4 balance H 2 mix.
- the analyzer control was deactivated and the flow rates of both source gases were ramped down to 0 over 30 seconds at the same ramping rate to maintain a constant flow ratio of both the active and the balance gas.
- the surge vessel was then isolated from the blending system and the fill to the vessel was completed. In this example, all the mixture made from the blending system was collected in surge vessel even during the start and stop period without any venting. It took approximately 12 minutes to fill each surge vessel from 70psig to 90psig.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
- Accessories For Mixers (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201461936512P | 2014-02-06 | 2014-02-06 | |
PCT/US2015/014302 WO2015119966A1 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2015-02-03 | Improved dynamics gas blending system and process for producing mixtures with minimal variation within tolerance limits and increased gas utilization |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3102992A1 true EP3102992A1 (en) | 2016-12-14 |
EP3102992B1 EP3102992B1 (en) | 2019-11-27 |
Family
ID=53754031
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP15704668.1A Active EP3102992B1 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2015-02-03 | Improved dynamics gas blending system and process for producing mixtures with minimal variation within tolerance limits and increased gas utilization |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US10409297B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3102992B1 (en) |
KR (1) | KR20160119088A (en) |
CN (1) | CN105960615A (en) |
SG (2) | SG11201605053QA (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015119966A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102016003875A1 (en) * | 2016-03-31 | 2017-10-05 | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | Volumetric and gravimetric level for the production of gas mixtures |
CN109237304A (en) * | 2018-06-04 | 2019-01-18 | 国网安徽省电力有限公司电力科学研究院 | Electrical equipment mix insulation gas prepares filling system |
CN112780947A (en) * | 2019-11-06 | 2021-05-11 | 信纮科技股份有限公司 | Gas mixing output system and method |
WO2021108739A1 (en) | 2019-11-27 | 2021-06-03 | Diversified Fluid Solutions, Llc | On-demand in-line-blending and supply of chemicals |
CN111249932B (en) * | 2020-02-15 | 2020-11-13 | 北京知天地环境科技有限公司 | Gas dynamic dilution and distribution method and device |
CN114950172A (en) * | 2022-05-26 | 2022-08-30 | 北京市燃气集团有限责任公司 | Control system, method and device for dynamically adjusting hydrogen-doped mixed gas uniformity |
CN116736817B (en) * | 2023-08-11 | 2023-11-03 | 西安启银致远企业管理有限公司 | Intelligent control method for hydrophilic silver fiber dressing production and processing |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3721253A (en) * | 1971-09-24 | 1973-03-20 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Controlling apparatus and method |
US3856033A (en) | 1973-02-22 | 1974-12-24 | Scott Environmental Tech | Dynamic gas blending |
US5537914A (en) * | 1989-10-04 | 1996-07-23 | Micro-Blend, Inc. | Beverage blending and proportioning |
US5586051A (en) * | 1995-02-24 | 1996-12-17 | Phillips Petroleum Company | Chemical reactor feed control |
US6772781B2 (en) * | 2000-02-04 | 2004-08-10 | Air Liquide America, L.P. | Apparatus and method for mixing gases |
JP3987312B2 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2007-10-10 | 株式会社東芝 | Semiconductor device manufacturing apparatus and manufacturing method, and semiconductor manufacturing apparatus cleaning method |
US20030199649A1 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2003-10-23 | Orbison David Robert | Method and apparatus for the controlled dilution of organometallic compounds |
US7063097B2 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2006-06-20 | Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. | In-situ gas blending and dilution system for delivery of dilute gas at a predetermined concentration |
US20100224264A1 (en) | 2005-06-22 | 2010-09-09 | Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. | Apparatus and process for integrated gas blending |
US20070047384A1 (en) * | 2005-09-01 | 2007-03-01 | Mclaughlin Jon K | Control system for and method of combining materials |
US8240908B2 (en) * | 2005-09-01 | 2012-08-14 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Control system for and method of combining materials |
US7328726B2 (en) * | 2006-01-20 | 2008-02-12 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Ramp rate blender |
JP4642115B2 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2011-03-02 | 株式会社堀場エステック | Flow rate ratio controller |
FR2940624A1 (en) | 2008-12-30 | 2010-07-02 | Akhea | DEVICE MIXING AT LEAST TWO GASEOUS CONSTITUENTS |
CA2758779C (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2016-01-05 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Determining concentrations of components of a mixture |
US20120227816A1 (en) | 2011-03-10 | 2012-09-13 | Xuemei Song | Dynamic gas blending |
-
2015
- 2015-02-03 SG SG11201605053QA patent/SG11201605053QA/en unknown
- 2015-02-03 KR KR1020167021233A patent/KR20160119088A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2015-02-03 WO PCT/US2015/014302 patent/WO2015119966A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-02-03 CN CN201580007501.5A patent/CN105960615A/en active Pending
- 2015-02-03 EP EP15704668.1A patent/EP3102992B1/en active Active
- 2015-02-03 SG SG10201806690YA patent/SG10201806690YA/en unknown
- 2015-02-03 US US14/613,088 patent/US10409297B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2019
- 2019-07-31 US US16/527,418 patent/US20190354122A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US10409297B2 (en) | 2019-09-10 |
WO2015119966A1 (en) | 2015-08-13 |
SG11201605053QA (en) | 2016-08-30 |
EP3102992B1 (en) | 2019-11-27 |
KR20160119088A (en) | 2016-10-12 |
SG10201806690YA (en) | 2018-09-27 |
US20190354122A1 (en) | 2019-11-21 |
CN105960615A (en) | 2016-09-21 |
US20150217245A1 (en) | 2015-08-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20190354122A1 (en) | Dynamic gas blending system and process for producing mixtures with minimal variation within tolerance limits and increased gas utilization | |
US20120227816A1 (en) | Dynamic gas blending | |
US5826632A (en) | Dynamic gas cylinder filling process | |
KR100944962B1 (en) | Mass flow ratio system and method | |
CN101479682B (en) | Flow controller delivery of a specified quantity of a fluid | |
US10317269B2 (en) | Flow rate verification unit | |
US8172545B2 (en) | Method for controlling ground meat flow rates | |
CN111690909A (en) | Concentration control device, raw material consumption estimation method, and program storage medium | |
CN105559130A (en) | Feeding system and method for tobaccos with different incoming moistures | |
CN115585401A (en) | Method and system for controlling natural gas hydrogen-loading concentration of gas pipeline | |
JP2023528067A (en) | Plant and method for delivering gas mixtures | |
KR20140034280A (en) | Compensating concentration uncertainity | |
KR100601028B1 (en) | Gas mixing system and packaging apparatus using the same | |
JP2012219343A (en) | Weighed value correction method, pulverized coal injection amount estimating method and pulverized coal injection amount estimating device | |
CN220044900U (en) | Charging system of sugar material | |
US20230285911A1 (en) | Facility and method for distributing a gas mixture for doping silicon wafers | |
JP2000235952A (en) | Gas mixing and feeding method and its device | |
JPH1043572A (en) | Raw material mixing device and production of mixed raw material | |
JP6008688B2 (en) | Method for supplying hydrogen selenide mixed gas for solar cell | |
CN116439394A (en) | Cut tobacco blending and perfuming control method | |
CN117244459A (en) | On-line preparation and addition method of foaming agent solution based on feedback adjustment | |
JPH06108876A (en) | Feeding gas pressure controlling method of combined cycle power plant |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20160906 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20181001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 602015042447 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G05D0011130000 Ipc: B01F0015040000 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B01F 15/04 20060101AFI20190520BHEP Ipc: G05D 11/13 20060101ALI20190520BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20190613 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC. |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1206069 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20191215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602015042447 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20191127 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200227 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200227 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200228 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20200121 Year of fee payment: 6 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20200121 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200327 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20200124 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20200122 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200419 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602015042447 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1206069 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20191127 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20200227 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200203 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20200828 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200229 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200227 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200203 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602015042447 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20210228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210901 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210203 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191127 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210228 |