EP3102475A1 - Replacement resource for a defective computer channel of a rail vehicle - Google Patents
Replacement resource for a defective computer channel of a rail vehicleInfo
- Publication number
- EP3102475A1 EP3102475A1 EP15715176.2A EP15715176A EP3102475A1 EP 3102475 A1 EP3102475 A1 EP 3102475A1 EP 15715176 A EP15715176 A EP 15715176A EP 3102475 A1 EP3102475 A1 EP 3102475A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- computer
- channel
- defective
- channels
- replacement
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 46
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003137 locomotive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0063—Multiple on-board control systems, e.g. "2 out of 3"-systems
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0081—On-board diagnosis or maintenance
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
- B61L27/30—Trackside multiple control systems, e.g. switch-over between different systems
- B61L27/33—Backup systems, e.g. switching when failures occur
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0018—Communication with or on the vehicle or train
- B61L15/0027—Radio-based, e.g. using GSM-R
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0018—Communication with or on the vehicle or train
- B61L15/0036—Conductor-based, e.g. using CAN-Bus, train-line or optical fibres
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
- B61L27/30—Trackside multiple control systems, e.g. switch-over between different systems
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for providing a replacement resource for a defective computer channel of a rail vehicle, a corresponding device and a corresponding rail vehicle.
- multi-channel computer cores also referred to as computers
- monitoring involves an exchange of synchronization information as well as a comparison of output data.
- the computer channels operate synchronously, so that a deviation between computer channels or between the provided by the computer channels results, can be determined.
- 2-of-3 system also referred to as 2v3 system
- three computer channels are used, so that a failure of a single computer channel can be tolerated: it can be determined by means of a majority decision regarding the results provided by the computer channels, which the three computer channels is defective.
- the two remaining computer channels which still provide the same results, then still represent a redundant functional system that meets the safety requirements specified in railway technology.
- the operation of a rail vehicle can be continued with two out of three functioning computer channels.
- 2-of-2 system also referred to as 2v2 system
- 2v2 systems are less expensive than 2v3 systems, but if one of the two computer channels fails, manual on-site intervention is required, for example by maintenance personnel. In particular, it may be necessary to replace the failed computer channel or the computer with both computer channels. Until the intervention of the vehicle computer and thus the rail vehicle can be used only to a limited extent (for example, at a greatly reduced speed), which can lead to significant operational restrictions.
- the object of the invention is to avoid the abovementioned disadvantages and in particular to provide an efficient solution for flexibly providing a redundant resource for a computer of a rail vehicle.
- a method for providing a replacement resource for a defective computer channel of a rail vehicle
- two computer channels of a computer is defective, - in which for the defective computer channel the replacement resource is provided via a communication link.
- the replacement resource can be both hardware and software.
- a combination of hardware and software is possible.
- An advantage of the solution presented here is that the availability of, for example, a 2v2 system can be raised to the level of a 2v3 system without requiring each system (eg, each computer) a third computer channel. This reduces effort and costs for each computer.
- a rail vehicle (also referred to as a "train”) has at least one car, wherein the car may be a traction vehicle, a travel car, a freight car or a combination of such compartments or functions.
- the traction vehicle has a driver's cab (also referred to as operator station) and can be designed with or without drive.
- the traction vehicle may in particular be a locomotive. In particular, it may be at the
- Rail vehicle around a Metro Eisenbahn (for example S- or U-Bahn) act, at least partially underground in tunnels.
- the rail vehicle may be a vehicle driver or a driverless rail vehicle.
- the traction unit may have an emergency operating console, which is arranged, for example, in the passenger compartment behind a closable flap.
- the replacement resource is a replacement computer channel that is connected to the computer via a network.
- the network may be an Ethernet.
- a communication connection is used, which enables fast and secure data transmission.
- the replacement resource is a computing resource in a computer or a computer channel that is connected to the computer via a network.
- the replacement resource is a resource in another computer of the
- Rail vehicle is. It is also a development that the communication link has a wired and / or wireless connection.
- the at least two computer channels transmit at least part of their memory contents to a control computer
- Memory contents determines which of the computer channels is defective.
- control computer causes a reset of the at least one computer channel, so that the computer channel performs so-called switch-on.
- the old memory content e.g., previously communicated to the control computer
- control computer makes contact between the spare resource and the non-defective computer channel.
- a still active or remaining computer channel can continue to be used if it passes the test.
- control computer could send a command to the at least one computer channel and check the response delivered by the at least one computer channel.
- the command may be, for example, the request to perform an operation, e.g. an arithmetic operation, act. On the basis of this check, the control computer can determine which computer channel is defective and which computer channel is still functional.
- the mechanism employed here may be e.g. depend on a given level of security, i. a probability of a safety-threatening misconduct.
- control computer is executed externally to the computer.
- control computer is not part of the rail vehicle.
- control computer can also be located in the rail vehicle.
- control computer has the replacement resource.
- the replacement resource is implemented separately from the rail vehicle and separately from the control computer, wherein the replacement resource has a communication connection to the control computer.
- the replacement resource can have a direct communication connection to the control computer or, for example, be coupled to the control computer via the network.
- the replacement resource can be provided via the communication link.
- a further development consists in that the replacement resource is arranged in the rail vehicle or separately from the rail vehicle.
- the processing unit is designed separately from the rail vehicle, wherein the Connection to the processing unit comprises a wired and / or wireless connection.
- the processing unit mentioned here may in particular be embodied as a processor unit and / or an at least partially hard-wired or logical circuit arrangement, which is set up, for example, in such a way that the method can be carried out as described herein.
- Said processing unit may be or include any type of processor or computer or computer with correspondingly necessary peripherals (memory, input / output interfaces, input / output devices, etc.).
- the processing unit may be part of a control unit of the rail vehicle.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram with two computers, each of which represents a 2v2 system and can be arranged in a rail vehicle, wherein in the event of a failure of one of the computer channels of the computer, a replacement computer channel or a corresponding resource is provided by a control computer ;
- Fig. 2 is an exemplary flowchart illustrating the use of another computer channel which is connected via the communication link.
- a failed computer channel with a computer channel (referred to here as a replacement channel).
- Computer channel at least partially (in particular completely) to replace, the failed computer channel and the replacement computer channel are connected to each other via a communication link.
- the replacement computer channel can be a resource which can be provided in hardware and / or software and which can be connected or attached via the communication connection.
- the failed computer channel can be part of a computer with multiple computer channels.
- the computer is a computer that is used in a web component, e.g. used in a rail vehicle.
- the failed computer channel can be one of several computer channels of a computer, wherein the plurality of computer channels are designed to be redundant.
- the redundant computer channels may operate synchronously, and the results provided synchronously by the computer channels may be e.g. be checked at predetermined times. It is also possible that different computer channels perform similar or identical operations, which should each produce the same results. As soon as a deviation is found in the results, at least one of the computer channels can be deduced.
- the spare computer channel may be part of another computer, for example, the other computer is connected to the computer in which the failed computer channel is implemented via the communication link.
- the communication connection can be, for example, an Ethernet connection or include such.
- the communication connection can be wired and / or wireless. Also combinations of a wired and a wireless connection as a communication connection are possible.
- the approach is particularly advantageous if a multiplicity of identical or almost identical computer channels are present in different computers, which are interconnected, for example, via a network. The failure of a computer channel in a computer can thus be compensated via a computer channel of another computer (ie the spare computer channel) to which the communication link exists.
- the replacement computer channel it is possible for the replacement computer channel to take over all or part of the functions of the failed computer channel. Also, it is an option that such a spare computer channel be used for a predetermined period of time (e.g., temporarily), for example, until the defective hardware can be replaced.
- the spare computer channel can be held by a computer on the network.
- a computer may provide one or more computer channels for potential failures.
- a replacement computer channel may be implemented in hardware and / or software.
- the spare computer channel it is possible for the spare computer channel to provide resources on a hardware unit that partially or completely takes over the function of the failed computer channel. Such a resource can also be kept in the form of software.
- the spare computer channel is preferably supplied with necessary data (eg RAM contents) before it can take over the function of the failed computer channel.
- necessary data eg RAM contents
- the same or similar mechanisms can be used as in the addition of a third computer channel to two already running computer channels.
- a defective computer channel may be determined in a 2v2 system using the replacement computer channel and / or a separately executed control computer.
- the replacement computer channel and / or the control computer evaluates information provided by the two computer channels of the 2v2 system and, as a result, determines which of the two computer channels of the 2v2 system is defective.
- a central office can be provided, with which a communication connection exists (at least temporarily).
- This assessment may be performed by a replacement computer channel or by the central office (eg in the form of the control computer).
- the control computer can, for example, assess the functionality of the computer channels of the 2v2 system and, as a result, initialize the replacement computer channel.
- the control computer and the replacement computer channel can be implemented on a common hardware or on a distributed hardware. Such distributed hardware may also be coupled via a communication link, eg via a network. Also, the computer channel found to be defective could be switched off by the control computer or switched inactive.
- control computer could be designed by the standards of railway technology as safe.
- the communication connection is also preferably made using a secure communication protocol, e.g. a protocol (such as UDP, IP or Ethernet) that complies with the EN 50159 standard.
- a protocol such as UDP, IP or Ethernet
- Fig.l shows a schematic diagram with two computers 101 and 102, each representing a 2v2 system and can be arranged in a rail vehicle.
- the computers 101 and 102 may be arranged in different cars of the same rail vehicle.
- Each of the computers 101 and 102 has here by way of example two computer channels.
- the computers 101 and 102 are interconnected via a network 103 as an exemplary communication link.
- a control computer 104 is connected, which optionally has a replacement computer channel 105.
- the control computer 104 can determine which of the two computer channels is defective and for this purpose provide the replacement computer channel 105.
- the spare computer channel 105 may be part of the control computer 104.
- the spare computer channel 105 may be executable separate hardware of the control computer 104 or on the hardware of the control computer 104 (e.g., in the form of software).
- a replacement computer channel 106 could be maintained, which has a direct communication link 107 with the control computer 104 and is administered by the computer to take over the function of the failed computer channel.
- the spare computer channel 106 is coupled to the network 103 and could also communicate with the controller through this coupling (e.g., instead of the direct communications link 107).
- the replacement computer channel 106 could be part of a computer that provides resources for a plurality of spare computer channels that may be activated by the control computer 104 to take over functions of failed or defective computer channels.
- a computer channel is used as a replacement computer channel, which can be omitted temporarily. If, for example, the computers 101 and 102 each have two computer channels and, for example, one of them falls in the rail vehicle two computer channels in the computer 101, so the function of the failed computer channel could be at least partially (or completely) of one (or both) computer channels of the computer 102 mitübernommen. As described, the administration can take place via the control computer 104, which sets the resources of the computer channels of the computer 102 instead of the replacement computer channel 105 or the replacement computer channel 106.
- This scenario may be advantageous if, for example, the computer 102 is required only to a limited extent in a certain operating mode and / or if the computer 102 has sufficient computing resources that the functionality of the defective computer channel can be taken over without any loss of its own functionality.
- Another advantage could be that the communication link between two computers of the same rail vehicle has a higher performance than a communication link to a spare computer channel 105 or 106 outside the rail vehicle.
- An advantage of the solution presented here is that the availability of a 2v2 system can be raised to the level of a 2v3 system without requiring each system (eg, each computer) a third computer channel. This reduces effort and costs for each computer.
- FIG. 2 shows an example flowchart illustrating the use of another computer channel connected via the communication link.
- a step 201 two computer channels of a 2v2 system diverge, ie there are different results in the two computer channels, which should actually deliver the same results in the case of proper operation. In this case, it is initially not clear which of the two computer channels is defective.
- the two computer channels (or only one of the two computer channels, because the other can no longer perform transmission due to a hardware failure) transfer their RAM contents (or portions of their RAM contents) to the control computer, checking their functionality, and requesting them Success of the control computer a replacement computer channel.
- control computer decides, e.g.
- the computer channel not affected by the failure will, for example, contact the control computer and a replacement computer channel for this computer channel is made available.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Hardware Redundancy (AREA)
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Safety Devices In Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102014206078.8A DE102014206078A1 (en) | 2014-03-31 | 2014-03-31 | Replacement resource for a defective computer channel of a rail vehicle |
PCT/EP2015/055606 WO2015150070A1 (en) | 2014-03-31 | 2015-03-18 | Replacement resource for a defective computer channel of a rail vehicle |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3102475A1 true EP3102475A1 (en) | 2016-12-14 |
EP3102475B1 EP3102475B1 (en) | 2019-08-07 |
Family
ID=52823601
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP15715176.2A Not-in-force EP3102475B1 (en) | 2014-03-31 | 2015-03-18 | Spare ressource for the faulty channel of a rail vehicle |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3102475B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102014206078A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2754178T3 (en) |
HU (1) | HUE046712T2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015150070A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107187465B (en) * | 2017-06-09 | 2020-06-02 | 湖南中车时代通信信号有限公司 | ATO system architecture of unit-level hot standby redundancy |
DE102017214992A1 (en) * | 2017-08-28 | 2019-02-28 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Signal-technically safe system |
DE102020204095A1 (en) * | 2020-03-30 | 2021-09-30 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Method and system for data management in a means of transport |
CN111516728A (en) * | 2020-05-08 | 2020-08-11 | 湖南中车时代通信信号有限公司 | Vehicle-mounted control system of train |
CN112550382B (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2022-08-23 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | Method for realizing redundancy switching of wireless communication channel for ground equipment |
CN116055315B (en) * | 2023-03-31 | 2023-06-02 | 北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司 | MVB communication configuration method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3742118A1 (en) * | 1987-12-11 | 1989-06-22 | Siemens Ag | Data transmission device with secure signalling |
DE19833867C5 (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 2006-10-12 | Alcatel | Method for secure single-channel transmission of data between the computer nodes of a computer network and computer network and computer node |
DE10319904B4 (en) * | 2003-04-29 | 2007-04-05 | Siemens Ag | communication system |
US8645010B2 (en) * | 2009-10-22 | 2014-02-04 | General Electric Company | System and method for locomotive inter-consist equipment sparing and redundancy |
US9956974B2 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2018-05-01 | General Electric Company | Vehicle consist configuration control |
US20110046859A1 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2011-02-24 | Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahrzeuge Gmbh | Transmission actuator device and method of operating the transmission actuator device |
US20100256843A1 (en) * | 2009-04-02 | 2010-10-07 | Lookheed Martin Corporation | System for Vital Brake Interface with Real-Time Integrity Monitoring |
-
2014
- 2014-03-31 DE DE102014206078.8A patent/DE102014206078A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2015
- 2015-03-18 WO PCT/EP2015/055606 patent/WO2015150070A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-03-18 HU HUE15715176A patent/HUE046712T2/en unknown
- 2015-03-18 ES ES15715176T patent/ES2754178T3/en active Active
- 2015-03-18 EP EP15715176.2A patent/EP3102475B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102014206078A1 (en) | 2015-10-01 |
HUE046712T2 (en) | 2020-03-30 |
ES2754178T3 (en) | 2020-04-16 |
WO2015150070A1 (en) | 2015-10-08 |
EP3102475B1 (en) | 2019-08-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3102475B1 (en) | Spare ressource for the faulty channel of a rail vehicle | |
EP1374052B1 (en) | Method for operating a distributed computer system | |
DE602004005143T2 (en) | Double redundant brake system architecture with two computers and associated method | |
EP2874857B1 (en) | Operating a rail vehicle by means of an etcs device, railvehicle and apparatus | |
EP2555959B1 (en) | Method and device for determining the train length of a plurality of coupled railway traction vehicles | |
EP3046817B1 (en) | Rail vehicle combination | |
DE2701925C3 (en) | Vehicle control with two on-board computers | |
DE102018220605B4 (en) | Motor vehicle network and method for operating a motor vehicle network | |
DE102017208888A1 (en) | Method for safely carrying out a batch baptism | |
DE102015211587A1 (en) | Control arrangement for a vehicle | |
DE102012216391A1 (en) | Communication between cars of a rail vehicle | |
DE102020121244A1 (en) | Fail-operational system for a vehicle with at least one independent redundant pair of components for controlling a vehicle function, vehicle and method | |
EP2133255A2 (en) | Rail vehicle control with two different data transmission systems | |
DE102020203419A1 (en) | Method and device for operating an automated vehicle | |
DE602004007130T2 (en) | ERROR IDENTIFICATION AND SUPPRESSION IN A TDMA-BASED NETWORK NODE | |
DE102015218906B4 (en) | Method for operating a data transmission system and data transmission system | |
WO2021233675A1 (en) | Vehicle control system with interface between data processing paths | |
EP1843929B1 (en) | Control system for controlling and/or monitoring an object | |
WO2018158039A1 (en) | Switchover between element controllers in railway operation | |
DE102017203220A1 (en) | Switching between element controllers in railway operation | |
WO2018162161A1 (en) | Method and devices for the transfer of information without feedback | |
DE102006042131B4 (en) | computer system | |
WO2018033438A1 (en) | Ethernet network for security-related applications | |
WO2016016003A2 (en) | Method and device for operating a railway safety system | |
DE102023200912A1 (en) | Device for controlling a traffic system, adjustable element of a traffic system, traffic system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20160909 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20180108 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20190403 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1163404 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20190815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502015009891 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: T2 Effective date: 20190807 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20190807 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191107 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191209 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191207 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191108 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HU Ref legal event code: AG4A Ref document number: E046712 Country of ref document: HU |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2754178 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20200416 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200224 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502015009891 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG2D | Information on lapse in contracting state deleted |
Ref country code: IS |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20200603 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200318 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200318 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20210315 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: NO Payment date: 20210304 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20210208 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20210319 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20210519 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20210406 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: HU Payment date: 20210516 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20210602 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20210615 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190807 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502015009891 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: MMEP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 1163404 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20220318 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20220318 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20220331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220331 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220331 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220319 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220318 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220331 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221001 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220331 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220318 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20230504 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220319 |