EP3033760A1 - Verfahren, vorrichtung und computerprogramm zum steuern eines mechatronischen schutzschalters - Google Patents

Verfahren, vorrichtung und computerprogramm zum steuern eines mechatronischen schutzschalters

Info

Publication number
EP3033760A1
EP3033760A1 EP14750466.6A EP14750466A EP3033760A1 EP 3033760 A1 EP3033760 A1 EP 3033760A1 EP 14750466 A EP14750466 A EP 14750466A EP 3033760 A1 EP3033760 A1 EP 3033760A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
circuit breaker
derivative
threshold
current
absolute value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP14750466.6A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3033760B1 (de
Inventor
Jean-Pierre Dupraz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Technology GmbH
Original Assignee
General Electric Technology GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Technology GmbH filed Critical General Electric Technology GmbH
Publication of EP3033760A1 publication Critical patent/EP3033760A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3033760B1 publication Critical patent/EP3033760B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H33/00High-tension or heavy-current switches with arc-extinguishing or arc-preventing means
    • H01H33/02Details
    • H01H33/59Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the switch and not otherwise provided for, e.g. for ensuring operation of the switch at a predetermined point in the ac cycle
    • H01H33/596Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the switch and not otherwise provided for, e.g. for ensuring operation of the switch at a predetermined point in the ac cycle for interrupting dc
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01HELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
    • H01H9/00Details of switching devices, not covered by groups H01H1/00 - H01H7/00
    • H01H9/54Circuit arrangements not adapted to a particular application of the switching device and for which no provision exists elsewhere

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of mechatronic circuit breaker devices and their tripping.
  • the main application of the mechatronic circuit breaker devices is the high current DC cutoff in a transmission and / or distribution line, at voltage levels typically greater than 50kVDC, up to 800kVDC and beyond.
  • the field of high voltage direct current is also commonly referred to as HVDC (High Voltage Direct Current).
  • the invention can also be applied to the breaking of DC currents at voltages of lesser value, typically in the range from 1kVDC to 50kVDC or alternatively to the breaking of AC currents.
  • Mechatronic circuit breakers are known for their ability to cut power in high voltage direct current (HDVC) transmission and / or distribution networks.
  • HDVC high voltage direct current
  • the current can grow very rapidly, for example at a speed of 10 ⁇ / ⁇ , with no other limitation than the destruction of material. It is therefore essential to diagnose in a very short time the appearance of a defect in order to react and trip the circuit breaker before the current reaches very high values.
  • An additional difficulty is that in the world of electrical protection, it is generally preferred not to cut a fault, knowing that there are backup levels, rather than triggering a breaker on false fault detection.
  • the invention aims to solve the problems of the prior art by providing in its first aspect a method of controlling a mechatronic circuit breaker for cutting an electric current flowing through a means for transmitting electrical energy. , characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
  • the invention is based on the analysis of transient regimes, which allows rapid diagnosis and reaction.
  • the steps of the method according to the invention are implemented by computer program instructions.
  • the invention also relates to a computer program on an information medium, this program being capable of being implemented in a computer, this program comprising instructions adapted to the implementation of the steps of a process as described above.
  • This program can use any programming language, and be in the form of source code, object code, or intermediate code between source code and object code, such as in a partially compiled form, or in any other form desirable shape.
  • the invention is also directed to a computer readable information medium having computer program instructions.
  • the information carrier may be any entity or device capable of storing the program.
  • the medium may comprise storage means, such as a ROM, for example a CD ROM or a microelectronic circuit ROM, or a magnetic recording means, for example a diskette or a hard disk.
  • the information medium may be a transmissible medium such as an electrical or optical signal, which may be conveyed via an electrical or optical cable, by radio or by other means.
  • the program according to the invention can be downloaded in particular on an Internet type network.
  • the information carrier may be an integrated circuit in which the program is incorporated, the circuit being adapted to execute or to be used in carrying out the method according to the invention.
  • FIG. 1 represents a device for controlling a mechatronic circuit breaker according to the invention
  • FIG. 2 represents a method of controlling a mechatronic circuit breaker according to a first embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 3 represents a method of controlling a mechatronic circuit breaker according to a second embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 4 represents a method of controlling a mechatronic circuit breaker according to a third embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 5 represents a method of controlling a mechatronic circuit breaker according to a fourth embodiment of the invention
  • Figures 6a, 6b, 6c, 7a, 7b and 7c show current-derived currents and current derivative integrals.
  • a mechatronic circuit breaker 1 is integrated on an electrical line in a high-power high-voltage direct current electricity transmission network.
  • the circuit breaker is for example of the type described in the publication WO 2013/092873 A1 mentioned above and will not be detailed here.
  • a measurement chain of the current derivative comprises a sensor 20 of the derivative of the current. This is the input current I e (t) of the circuit breaker, existing on the power line upstream of the circuit breaker.
  • the sensor 20 is for example a Rogowski coil placed around the power line.
  • the sensor 20 has an output connected to an input of a low-pass filter 21.
  • the sensor 20 provides a measurement d1 e (t) / dt of the derivative of the current to the filter 21, which performs low-pass filtering to eliminate possible high frequency components that would disturb the measurement chain.
  • the filter 21 has an output connected to an input of an analog-digital converter 22.
  • the filter 21 provides the filtered derivative measurement to the converter 22 which performs an analog-to-digital conversion of the received signal.
  • the analog-digital converter 22 has an output connected to an input of a transponder 23 an output of which is connected to one end of a fiber optic cable.
  • the transponder 23 transforms the electrical signal that it receives from the converter 22 into an optical signal.
  • the other end of the fiber optic cable is connected to a relay 3 which uses the signals it receives as explained below.
  • a measurement chain of the derivative of the output current I s (t) of the circuit breaker 1 can be provided.
  • This measurement chain has elements similar to those of the corresponding upstream measurement chain.
  • a sensor 40 of the derivative of the output current is for example a Rogowski coil placed around the power line.
  • the sensor 40 has an output connected to an input of a low-pass filter 41.
  • the sensor 40 provides a measurement d1 s (t) / dt of the derivative of the current to the filter 41, which carries out a low-pass filtering to eliminate possible high frequency components that would disturb the measurement chain.
  • the filter 41 has an output connected to an input of an analog-to-digital converter 42.
  • the filter 41 provides the filtered derivative measurement to the converter 42 which performs an analog-to-digital conversion of the received signal.
  • the analog-digital converter 42 has an output connected to an input of a transponder 43 an output of which is connected to one end of a fiber optic cable.
  • the transponder 43 transforms the electrical signal that it receives from the converter 42 into an optical signal.
  • the other end of the fiber optic cable is connected to the relay 3 which receives the optical signal and operates as shown below.
  • the measurement chain of the derivative of the output current can also be implemented in different ways.
  • the device according to the invention may comprise one or more of the measurement chains which will be described in FIG. the following.
  • a circuit for measuring the input current I e (t) of the circuit breaker 1 can be provided.
  • This measurement chain comprises a sensor 50 of the input current I e (t). This is for example a resistive shunt. This measurement chain then comprises elements similar to those of the measurement chain of the derivative of the input current.
  • the sensor 50 has an output connected to an input of a low-pass filter 51.
  • the sensor 50 provides a measurement of the input current to the filter 51, which performs a low-pass filtering to eliminate any high-frequency components that disrupt the measurement chain.
  • the filter 51 has an output connected to an input of an analog-digital converter 52.
  • the filter 51 provides the measurement of the filtered input current to the converter 52 which performs an analog-to-digital conversion of the received signal.
  • the analog-digital converter 52 has an output connected to an input of a transponder 53, an output of which is connected to one end of an optical fiber cable.
  • the transponder 53 transforms the electrical signal that it receives from the converter 52 into an optical signal.
  • the other end of the fiber optic cable is connected to the relay 3 which receives the optical signal and operates as shown below.
  • the measurement chain of the input current can also be implemented in different ways.
  • a measurement circuit of the output current I s (t) of the circuit breaker 1 can be provided.
  • This measurement chain has elements similar to those of the corresponding upstream measurement chain.
  • a sensor 60 of the output current I s (t) is for example a resistive shunt.
  • the sensor 60 has an output connected to an input of a low-pass filter 61.
  • the sensor 60 provides a measurement of the current to the filter 61, which carries out a low-pass filtering to eliminate any high-frequency components which would disturb the chain. measurement.
  • the filter 61 has an output connected to an input of an analog-digital converter 62.
  • the filter 61 provides the measurement of the output current filtered to the converter 62 which performs an analog-to-digital conversion of the received signal.
  • the analog-to-digital converter 62 has an output connected to an input of a transponder 63, an output of which is connected to an end of a fiber optic cable.
  • the transponder 63 transforms the electrical signal that it receives from the converter 62 into an optical signal.
  • the other end of the fiber optic cable is connected to the relay 3 which receives the optical signal and operates as shown below.
  • the measurement chain of the output current can also be implemented in different ways.
  • the invention can also take into account voltage measurements, or voltage derivative, both upstream and downstream of the circuit breaker.
  • electrical equipment is integrated in the network, on both sides of the circuit breaker and in series therewith.
  • a switchgear is mounted in series with the circuit breaker, upstream and downstream thereof.
  • a resistance insertion device is connected in series between each switchgear and the circuit breaker.
  • Voltage or voltage derivative sensors can therefore be provided upstream and / or downstream. switching devices, not shown in Figure 1.
  • a measurement chain can be provided respectively for the upstream voltage, the derivative of the upstream voltage, the downstream voltage and the derivative of the downstream voltage.
  • the upstream voltage measurement chain comprises a sensor 70, a low-pass filter 71, an analog-digital converter 72 and a transponder 73. These elements are connected in series and the transponder is connected to the relay 3 via an optical fiber .
  • Relay 3 receives the upstream voltage measurement.
  • the downstream voltage measurement chain comprises a sensor 80, a low-pass filter 81, an analog-to-digital converter 82 and a transponder 83. These elements are connected in series and the transponder is connected to the relay 3 via a optical fiber.
  • the relay 3 receives the downstream voltage measurement.
  • the upstream voltage derivative measuring chain comprises a sensor 90, a low-pass filter 91, an analog-digital converter 92 and a transponder 93. These elements are connected in series and the transponder is connected to the relay 3 via an optical fiber. .
  • Relay 3 receives the upstream voltage derivative measurement.
  • the downstream voltage derivative measuring chain comprises a sensor 100, a low-pass filter 101, an analog-to-digital converter 102 and a transponder 103. These elements are connected in series and the transponder is connected to the relay 3 via an optical fiber.
  • the relay 3 receives the downstream voltage derivative measurement.
  • the relay 3 may furthermore comprise inputs for receiving remote programming data TP, such as data relating to the context of the network, or RS settings of different thresholds used according to the invention.
  • the remote programming data TP make it possible to adapt the decisions taken according to the invention to the topology of the network by distinguishing "normal" transient modes and "abnormal" transient regimes, the latter requiring tripping of the circuit breaker.
  • Relay 3 thus comprises a unit for acquiring measurements of the current derivative at the input of the circuit breaker and the other optional measurements, a computer processing unit notably configured to process the measurements acquired, and a circuit breaker tripping control unit. function of the result of the processing of the acquired measures.
  • FIG. 2 represents a first embodiment of the method according to the invention, in the form of a flowchart comprising steps E1 to E7.
  • Step E1 is the acquisition of the measurement of the derivative dl e (t) / dt of the input current I e (t) of the circuit breaker 1.
  • the next step E2 is the calculation of the absolute value of the derivative measured in the preceding step, and the comparison of the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker with a first predetermined threshold S i.
  • Step E2 is then followed by step E1 of acquiring the measurement of the derivative d1 e (t) / dt of the input current of circuit breaker 1.
  • step E2 is followed by step E3 at which the threshold exceeding is stored.
  • a timer is started during a first pass through step E3, that is to say when the timer is not already in progress.
  • step E4 is a test to determine if the timer is complete. As long as it is not completed, step E4 is followed by step E1 of measuring the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker. When the delay is complete and the absolute value of the derivative is always greater than the threshold S i, this means that the transient phenomenon that has been detected is sufficiently durable to warrant a circuit breaker tripping order to be given. Step E4 is then followed by step E5 which is the sending by relay 3 of a tripping command of the circuit breaker.
  • the tripping control of the circuit breaker is sent when the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker is greater than the threshold S i a predetermined number of successive times.
  • the timer is then replaced by a number of successive iterations to which the response is positive to the test of step E2.
  • the predetermined number of successive times is equal to one.
  • the tripping command of the circuit breaker is sent as soon as the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker is detected as being greater than the threshold S i.
  • a first additional condition relates to the integral of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker.
  • the step E1 of measuring the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker is further followed by the step E6 which is the calculation of the integral of the derivative previously measured.
  • the result of this calculation corresponds to the variable part of the input current of the circuit breaker.
  • the next step E7 is the comparison of the calculated integral with a second predetermined threshold S 2 .
  • the second threshold S2 preferably depends on the average value of the current measured in a sliding time window and preceding the crossing of the first threshold Si by the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker.
  • Step E7 is then followed by step E1 of measuring the derivative of the input current.
  • the calculated integral is greater than the second threshold S 2 , it means that the input current varies sufficiently so that the transient regime is considered abnormal.
  • step E7 is followed by step E5 previously described.
  • step E5 of sending a trip command of the circuit breaker is performed only if the two following conditions are met:
  • the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit-breaker is greater than the first threshold Si
  • the integral of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker is greater than the second threshold S 2 .
  • the step E6 is modified to replace the calculation of the integral of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker by the acquisition of a measurement of the input current of the circuit breaker, then the determining an average value of the current measured over a sliding time window.
  • Step E7 is also modified to compare the calculated average value with a third threshold S 3 .
  • Step E7 is then followed by step E1 of measuring the derivative of the input current.
  • the calculated average value is greater than the third threshold S 3 , it means that the input current varies sufficiently so that the transient regime is considered abnormal.
  • step E7 is followed by step E5 previously described.
  • step E5 of sending a trip command of the circuit breaker is performed only if the following two conditions are met:
  • the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit-breaker is greater than the first threshold S i, and the average value of the input current of the circuit breaker is greater than the third threshold S3.
  • FIG. 3 represents a second embodiment of the method according to the invention, in the form of a flow chart comprising steps Eli to E18. This embodiment takes into account voltages measured upstream and / or downstream of the circuit breaker.
  • Steps Eli to E15 are similar to steps E1 to E5 of the first embodiment previously described.
  • Step Eli is the acquisition of the measurement of the derivative dl e (t) / dt of the input current I e (t) of the circuit breaker 1.
  • the next step E12 is the calculation of the absolute value of the derivative measured in the preceding step, and the comparison of the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker with the first predetermined threshold S i.
  • Step E12 is then followed by step E1I of measuring the derivative of the input current.
  • step E12 is followed by step E13 at which the threshold exceeding is stored.
  • a timer is started during a first pass through step E13, that is to say when the timer is not already in progress.
  • step E14 is a test to determine if the timer is complete. As long as it is not completed, step E14 is followed by step E1 of measuring the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker.
  • Step E14 is then followed by step E15 which is the sending by relay 3 of a tripping command of the circuit breaker.
  • step E14 is followed by the step E15 when the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker is greater than the threshold S i a predetermined number of successive times.
  • the timer is then replaced by a number of successive iterations to which the response is positive to the test of step E12.
  • the predetermined number of successive times is equal to one.
  • step E14 is followed by step E15 as soon as the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker is greater than the threshold S i.
  • An additional condition for validating the trip control of step E15 relates to the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker.
  • this embodiment further comprises the step E16 corresponding to the acquisition of the measurement of the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker.
  • the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker is measured continuously.
  • the measured values are stored.
  • step E16 is followed by step E17 which is calculated a ratio between the voltage Uo measured before this moment of variation of the current and the measured voltage Ui after that moment.
  • step E18 is the comparison of the calculated ratio Uo / Ui with a predetermined threshold S R of voltage ratio.
  • Step E18 is then followed by step E16 of acquiring the measurement of the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker.
  • step E18 is followed by step E15 previously described.
  • step E15 of sending a trip command of the circuit breaker is performed only if the following two conditions are met:
  • the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit-breaker is greater than the first threshold Si
  • the Uo / Ui ratio of the voltages measured upstream of the circuit breaker, before and after the occurrence of an assumed fault, is greater than the voltage ratio threshold S R.
  • step E16 is modified to replace the measurement of the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker by measuring the voltage downstream of the circuit breaker.
  • steps E17 and E18 are similar to those described above, but are performed by taking as voltage values the voltage values measured downstream of the circuit breaker.
  • step E15 of sending a trip command of the circuit breaker is performed only if the two following conditions are met:
  • the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit-breaker is greater than the first threshold Si, and the ratio of the voltages measured downstream of the circuit breaker is greater than the voltage ratio threshold S R.
  • step E16 is modified to measure the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker and downstream of the circuit breaker.
  • steps E17 and E18 are similar to those described above, but are performed by taking as voltage values on the one hand the voltage values measured upstream of the circuit breaker and on the other hand the voltage values measured downstream of the circuit breaker.
  • step E15 of sending a trip command of the circuit breaker is performed only if the following three conditions are met:
  • the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit-breaker is greater than the first threshold S i
  • the ratio of the voltages measured upstream of the circuit-breaker is greater than the voltage ratio threshold S R .
  • the ratio of the voltages measured downstream of the circuit breaker is greater than the voltage ratio threshold S R.
  • step E16 is modified to perform an acquisition of the measurement of the derivative of the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker.
  • Step E16 is then followed by step E18 which is modified to compare the absolute value of the derivative of the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker with a voltage derivative threshold S D u - If the absolute value of the derivative of the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker is not greater than the threshold Su, it means that the voltage varies sufficiently little to be considered stable.
  • Step E18 is then followed by step E16 of acquiring the measurement of the voltage upstream of the disconnector.
  • step E18 is followed by step E15 previously described.
  • step E15 of sending a trip command of the circuit breaker is performed only if the two following conditions are met:
  • the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker is greater than the first threshold S i
  • the absolute value of the derivative of the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker is greater than the voltage derivative threshold S D u -
  • step E16 is modified to perform the acquisition of the measurement of the derivative of the voltage downstream of the circuit breaker.
  • step E16 is modified to perform firstly the acquisition of the measurement of the derivative of the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker and secondly the acquisition of the measurement. the derivative of the voltage downstream of the circuit breaker.
  • Step E18 is modified to compare the aboslues values of these two derivatives with the voltage derivative threshold S or -
  • the step E15 of sending a trip control of the circuit breaker is performed only if the three conditions are met:
  • the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit-breaker is greater than the first threshold S i
  • the derivative of the voltage upstream of the circuit breaker is greater than the voltage derivative threshold S D u, and
  • the derivative of the voltage downstream of the circuit breaker is greater than the voltage derivative threshold S or -
  • S or - the voltage derivative threshold
  • a third embodiment of the invention includes a possibility of inhibiting the tripping control of the circuit breaker.
  • This embodiment comprises steps E20 to E23 that are traversed after step E5 or step E15, that is to say after sending the trip command of the circuit breaker.
  • Step E20 corresponds to the acquisition of the measurement of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker. This step is similar to steps E1 and E1 previously described.
  • the next step E21 is the comparison of the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker with the first predetermined threshold S i. This step is similar to the previously described steps E2 and E12.
  • step E21 is followed by step E22 at which the trip control of the circuit breaker is canceled, by sending an inhibit command. Otherwise, the tripping command of the circuit breaker is confirmed during a step E25. Thus the tripping command of the circuit breaker is confirmed or canceled, and in a time compatible with the requirements of speed of reaction when the circuit breaker must be tripped.
  • the possibility of inhibiting the tripping control of the circuit breaker is conditioned by the value of the integral of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker.
  • step E20 is further followed by the step E23 at which is calculated the integral of the measured value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker.
  • the next step E24 is the comparison of the calculated integral with the second predetermined threshold S 2 .
  • step E7 If the calculated integral is greater than threshold S2, this confirms the result of step E7 or E18.
  • the trip control of the circuit breaker is then confirmed during step E25.
  • step E24 is followed by the step E22 at which the trip control of the circuit breaker is canceled, by sending an inhibition command.
  • a fourth embodiment of the invention takes into account the output current of the circuit breaker. This embodiment comprises steps E31 to E38.
  • Steps E31 to E35 are similar to steps E1 to E5 of the first embodiment previously described.
  • Step E31 corresponds to the acquisition of the measurement of the derivative of the input current I e (t) of the circuit breaker 1.
  • step E32 is the calculation of the absolute value of the derivative measured in the previous step E31, and the comparison of the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker with the first predetermined threshold S i.
  • Step E32 is then followed by step E31 of acquiring the measurement of the derivative of the input current.
  • step E32 is followed by step E33 at which the threshold exceeding is stored.
  • a timer is started during a first pass through step E33, that is to say when the timer is not already in progress.
  • step E34 is a test to determine if the timer is complete. As long as it is not completed, step E34 is followed by step E31 of measuring the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker.
  • Step E34 is then followed by step E35 which is the sending by relay 3 of a tripping command of the circuit breaker.
  • the tripping control of the circuit breaker is sent when the absolute value of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker is greater than the threshold S i a predetermined number of successive times.
  • the timer is then replaced by a number of successive iterations to which the response is positive to the test of step E32.
  • the predetermined number of successive times is equal to one.
  • the trip control of the circuit breaker is sent as soon as the absolute value of the derivative of the circuit breaker input current is greater than threshold S i.
  • the method comprises a step E36 of acquiring the measurement of the derivative of the output current I s (t) of the circuit breaker 1.
  • the next step E37 corresponds to the calculation of the absolute value of the derivative measured in the previous step, and the comparison of the absolute value of the derivative of the output current of the circuit breaker with the first predetermined threshold S i.
  • Step E37 is then followed by step E36 of measuring the derivative of the output current of the circuit breaker.
  • step E37 is followed by step E38 which corresponds to a comparison of the absolute values of the derivatives of the input and output currents of the circuit breaker.
  • a difference (greater than a threshold) between said absolute values makes it possible to characterize a fault internal to the circuit breaker, while values close to said abosm values make it possible to characterize a fault external to the circuit breaker.
  • FIGS. 6a to 6c respectively represent examples of current I e (t) input of the circuit breaker, derived from this current, and integral of this derivative.
  • the input current I e (t) is substantially constant until a moment to. It is assumed that at a moment to, a fault appears. As a result, the current begins to grow from this moment.
  • the derivative of the input current of the circuit-breaker thus goes from a zero value to a non-zero value, here positive, at the instant to-
  • the integral of the derivative of the input current of the circuit-breaker is zero until the instant to- From instant to, it grows on the same slope as the current.
  • FIGS. 7a to 7c respectively represent other examples of current I e (t) of input of the circuit breaker, derived from this current, and integral of this derivative.
  • the current decreases, its derivative takes a non-zero and negative value, and the integral of the derivative of the current also decreases.
  • the fault can be detected and the trip command sent to the circuit breaker even if the current still has a value within a normal operating range.
  • the trip command can be sent while the current has a value close to zero.
  • the invention is not limited to the method as described above but also extends to a control device of a mechatronic circuit breaker intended to cut an electric current flowing through a means of transmission of electrical energy, characterized in that what it includes:
  • a computer processing unit configured to compare the absolute value of the derivative of the input current with a first predetermined threshold, a tripping control unit of the circuit breaker when the absolute value of the derivative of the input current is greater than said first predetermined threshold; .
  • the invention also extends to a computer program product comprising code instructions for performing the steps of the method as described above, when said program is run on a computer.
  • the invention is furthermore not limited to the use of the measurement of the derivative of the input current of the circuit breaker to provide the tripping control, but can also use the measurement of the derivative of the output current of the circuit breaker for ensure this command, the notions input / output upstream / downstream are then simply inverted.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)
  • Keying Circuit Devices (AREA)
EP14750466.6A 2013-08-13 2014-08-11 Verfahren, vorrichtung und computerprogramm zum steuern eines mechatronischen schutzschalters Active EP3033760B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1357974A FR3009766B1 (fr) 2013-08-13 2013-08-13 Procede, dispositif et programme d'ordinateur pour la commande d'un disjoncteur mecatronique
PCT/EP2014/067138 WO2015022280A1 (fr) 2013-08-13 2014-08-11 Procédé, dispositif et programme d'ordinateur pour la commande d'un disjoncteur mécatronique

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3033760A1 true EP3033760A1 (de) 2016-06-22
EP3033760B1 EP3033760B1 (de) 2017-07-19

Family

ID=49620103

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14750466.6A Active EP3033760B1 (de) 2013-08-13 2014-08-11 Verfahren, vorrichtung und computerprogramm zum steuern eines mechatronischen schutzschalters

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3033760B1 (de)
FR (1) FR3009766B1 (de)
WO (1) WO2015022280A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11187750B2 (en) 2017-12-07 2021-11-30 Socomec Method for detecting the state of an electrical protection appliance in an electrical installation and detection device implementing said method

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2443002A (en) * 2006-10-16 2008-04-23 Converteam Ltd dc power distribution system
EP2495745A1 (de) * 2011-03-04 2012-09-05 ABB Technology AG Stromanstiegsbegrenzung bei Gleichstromsystemen mit hoher Spannung
EP2523204B1 (de) * 2011-05-12 2019-09-04 ABB Schweiz AG Schaltungsanordnung und Verfahren zur Unterbrechung des Stromflusses in einem Gleichstrompfad

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2015022280A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11187750B2 (en) 2017-12-07 2021-11-30 Socomec Method for detecting the state of an electrical protection appliance in an electrical installation and detection device implementing said method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR3009766B1 (fr) 2015-09-25
WO2015022280A1 (fr) 2015-02-19
EP3033760B1 (de) 2017-07-19
FR3009766A1 (fr) 2015-02-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2383856B1 (de) Identifizierung und richtungserfassung eines defekts in einem dreiphasennetz
EP2687860B1 (de) Richtungs-Erkennung eines empfindlichen Mittelspannungs-Erdschlusses durch lineare Korrelation
FR2912547A1 (fr) Disjoncteur de defaut d'arc serie
FR2878380A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour l'identification d'arcs electriques de courant de defaut dans des circuits electriques
EP4134695B1 (de) Überprüfung der metrologischen präzision eines stromzählers
EP2849195B1 (de) Zusatzvorrichung für elektrischen Schutzschalter, elektrisches System mit einem Schutzschalter und dieser Zusatzvorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bestimmung des Grunds der Öffnung des Schutzshalters dank dieser Zusatzvorrichtung
EP3106887B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur detektion einer störung in einem stromnetz
EP3384592B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur erkennung von lichtbögen in einer fotovoltaikanlage
WO2015028744A2 (fr) Procédé de détection de panne d'un alternateur triphasé, dispositif de détection de panne et programme d'ordinateur associé
EP0568471B1 (de) Einrichtung zur Überwachung eines homopolaren Fehlers im Stromnetz
EP3009851B1 (de) Zähler zum aufdecken von betrug durch bypass
EP3033760B1 (de) Verfahren, vorrichtung und computerprogramm zum steuern eines mechatronischen schutzschalters
EP2910958A1 (de) Störungserkennung, insbesondere einer vorübergehenden Störung, in einem Stromnetz
EP0678960B1 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Korrektur eines Stromsignals
EP3016818B1 (de) Verfahren zur bestimmung der anwesenheit eines it-versorgungsnetzes zur versorgung einer kraftfahrzeug-batterieladevorrichtung und entsprechende ladevorrichtung
EP2648010A1 (de) Verfahren zur Verwaltung von Alarmsignalen in Abhängigkeit von den Fehlerströmen in einer elektrischen Anlage, und Vorrichtung zur Umsetzung dieses Verfahrens
EP4184183B1 (de) Erkennung des offenen oder geschlossenen zustandes eines leistungsschalters
WO2001096889A1 (fr) Procede de detection de defauts resistants
EP3961239B1 (de) Überprüfung der genauigkeit der von einem stromzähler vorgenommenen messungen
EP1357386B1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Detektion von elektrischen Ladungen und elektrisches Gerät mit einer solchen Anordnung
EP1083644B1 (de) Lichtbogenstromsensitiver Erdfehlerschutz, Auslöser und Schutzschalter mit einer solchen Vorrichtung
EP3615950B1 (de) Verfahren zum erkennen eines abfalls einer phasenspannung eines elektrischen netzes
FR2969845A1 (fr) Dispositif et procede de protection terre restreinte
EP3015873B1 (de) Detektionsverfahren eines betrügerischen by-pass-versuchs an einem zähler

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160215

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170317

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 911120

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602014012038

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170719

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 911120

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171019

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171119

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171020

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171019

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602014012038

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170831

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180420

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170811

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170811

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20140811

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170719

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20210720

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20210722

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230522

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220811

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230720

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240723

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240723

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240723

Year of fee payment: 11