EP3030748A1 - Appareil et procédé de mesure quantitative de la production d'hydrocarbures par imbibition de fluide - Google Patents

Appareil et procédé de mesure quantitative de la production d'hydrocarbures par imbibition de fluide

Info

Publication number
EP3030748A1
EP3030748A1 EP14835389.9A EP14835389A EP3030748A1 EP 3030748 A1 EP3030748 A1 EP 3030748A1 EP 14835389 A EP14835389 A EP 14835389A EP 3030748 A1 EP3030748 A1 EP 3030748A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
core sample
fluid
flow
saturating
pressure
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP14835389.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Dean M. Willberg
Neil W. Bostrom
Markus Pagels
Maxim Andreevich Chertov
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA
Schlumberger Holdings Ltd
Schlumberger Technology BV
Original Assignee
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA
Schlumberger Holdings Ltd
Schlumberger Technology BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA, Schlumberger Holdings Ltd, Schlumberger Technology BV filed Critical Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA
Publication of EP3030748A1 publication Critical patent/EP3030748A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B25/00—Apparatus for obtaining or removing undisturbed cores, e.g. core barrels or core extractors
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
    • E21B49/08—Obtaining fluid samples or testing fluids, in boreholes or wells
    • E21B49/087—Well testing, e.g. testing for reservoir productivity or formation parameters
    • E21B49/0875—Well testing, e.g. testing for reservoir productivity or formation parameters determining specific fluid parameters

Definitions

  • the following disclosure relates to methods and apparatus to measure gas production from a core sample of reservoir rock.
  • Hydraulic fracturing can be used to stimulate production of hydrocarbon gas and liquids from reservoir rock (typically a mudstone or shale). Hydraulic fracturing injects a fracturing fluid (typically a mixture of water, proppants and chemicals) at high pressure into a wellbore to create small fractures in the reservoir rock formation, along which fluids such as hydrocarbon gas, petroleum, and possibly brine water may migrate to the well.
  • a fracturing fluid typically a mixture of water, proppants and chemicals
  • the liquid components of the fracturing fluid can imbibe into the reservoir rock formation and the hydrocarbons (i.e., gas and/or petroleum) that are trapped in the reservoir rock formation can be pushed by the fracturing fluid further into the reservoir rock formation (termed “cocurrent flow”) or pushed by the fracturing fluid out of the reservoir rock formation into the fracture (termed “countercurrent flow”).
  • cocurrent flow the hydrocarbons
  • countercurrent flow the fracturing fluid out of the reservoir rock formation into the fracture
  • a method of characterizing hydrocarbon production of a core sample includes saturating the core sample with a saturating hydrocarbon fluid and subsequent testing of the saturated core sample while controlling a confining pressure and temperature of the core sample at reservoir pressure and temperature conditions (i.e., pressure and temperature that are characteristic of the reservoir rock from which the core sample was extracted).
  • the testing of the saturated core sample can include flowing an imbibing fluid across a surface of the saturated core sample and measuring at least one property (such as volume or pressure) of
  • the core sample is a sample of reservoir rock extracted from a subterranean reservoir rock formation.
  • the core sample can be removed from the reservoir rock with common coring tools, including a rotary coring bit, rotary sidewall coring tools, and explosive gun-type sidewall coring tools.
  • the core sample has a cylindrical form having two opposed end faces with a cylindrical sidewall that extends between the two opposed end faces.
  • the core sample can be held by a core holder with opposed end caps and a flexible elastomeric sleeve sealed to the end caps and
  • the confining pressure can be applied to the cylindrical sidewall of the core sample through the sleeve.
  • the imbibing fluid can flow along a path that extends across one end face of the core sample.
  • a desired boundary condition can be applied to the other end face of the core sample, such as maintaining a constant pressure in a flowpath downstream from the other end face of the core sample or maintaining a constant volume in such downstream flowpath.
  • the method can be used to determine whether adsorbed hydrocarbon gas is being produced from the core sample or whether such gas is being trapped (i.e., bypassed) in the core sample as the imbibing fluid flows across the core sample when the saturating fluid is in the gas phase.
  • the pressure of the imbibing fluid can be controlled to be approximately equal to, greater than, or less than the reservoir pressure.
  • the difference in pressure between the imbibing fluid and the saturating fluid simulates various stages to which the reservoir is subject.
  • the imbibing fluid pressure equal to the saturating fluid pressure simulates the formation during closure. In this case the flow of imbibing fluid into the core sample is termed "spontaneous imbibition".
  • the imbibing fluid pressure greater than the saturating fluid pressure simulates the formation during fracturing. In this case the flow of imbibing fluid is termed "imbibitions and leakof '.
  • the imbibing fluid pressure less than the saturating fluid pressure simulates the formation during production. The magnitude of the pressure difference can be specified according to the process the experiment is attempting to replicate.
  • a test apparatus for measurement of hydrocarbon fluid production from a core sample includes a first fluid pump that pumps a saturating hydrocarbon fluid to a core holder that contains the core sample and a second fluid pump that pumps imbibing fluid to the core holder.
  • the core holder can provide for imbibing fluid supplied by the second pump to flow across a surface of the core sample.
  • the apparatus includes a countercurrent measurement device that measures quantity of the countercurrent flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid from the core holder and a cocurrent measurement device that measures at least a quantity of the cocurrent flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid from the core holder.
  • the test apparatus can further include a vessel that encloses the core holder and that applies a desired confining pressure to the core sample contained in the core holder and that maintains the core sample contained in the core holder at a desired temperature.
  • the test apparatus can also include a fluid pressure controller that controls pressure of the imbibing fluid flowing to the core holder at a desired pressure level.
  • a method of measuring steady state permeability of a core sample obtained from a reservoir includes saturating the core sample with a hydrocarbon fluid at reservoir conditions. The method also includes measuring a pressure differential between a first side and a second side of the saturated core sample while flowing the hydrocarbon fluid into the first side of the core sample. The method also includes measuring a flow of the hydrocarbon fluid into the first side of the core sample and measuring a flow of hydrocarbon fluid out of the second side of the core sample, and determining the permeability of the core sample based on the flow
  • FIG. 1A is a schematic view of a core holder assembly showing fluid flow through the core holder assembly during a test procedure in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure.
  • Fig. IB is a schematic view of a core holder assembly according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • Fig. 1C is a view of one side of a distribution plug for use in the core holder assembly shown in Fig. IB.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a test measurement apparatus that employs the core holder assembly of Fig. IB in accordance with an aspect of the present disclosure.
  • Figs. 3 A and 3B are graphs showing countercurrent hydrocarbon gas production measurements obtained using the test measurement apparatus shown in Fig. 2.
  • Fig. 4 is a graph showing cocurrent and countercurrent hydrocarbon gas production measurements obtained using the test measurement apparatus shown in Fig. 2.
  • Fig. 5 is a graph showing cocurrent and countercurrent hydrocarbon gas production measurements and measurements of water imbibing into the core sample that are obtained using the test measurement apparatus shown in Fig. 2.
  • Fig. 6A is a graph showing cocurrent and countercurrent hydrocarbon gas production measurements obtained using the test measurement apparatus shown in Fig. 2 for testing performed when the imbibing fluid pressure is above the saturating pressure of the hydrocarbon gas that saturates the core sample.
  • Fig. 6B is a graph showing the hydrocarbon gas production measurements obtained using the test measurement apparatus shown in Fig. 2 for testing performed when the imbibing fluid pressure is below the saturating pressure of the hydrocarbon gas that saturates the core sample and the core sample was exposed to the imbibed fluid seen in Fig. 6A.
  • Fig. 7 is a graph showing water content and strength of the core sample from testing performed when imbibing fluid is allowed to enter the core sample.
  • Fig. 8 is a flow chart of a method of determining whether adsorbed hydrocarbon gas is being produced from a core sample or is being retained in the core sample.
  • hydrocarbon fluid means a fluid that includes one or more hydrocarbon components, such as alkanes (e.g., methane), napthenes, aromatics, and asphaltenes.
  • hydrocarbon fluid means a hydrocarbon fluid that saturates a core sample during test operations as described herein.
  • imbibing fluid means a fluid that flows across a surface of a core sample and into the core sample during testing operations as described herein.
  • FIG. 1 A is a schematic showing a core holder assembly that includes a core holder 101 and a core sample 102, which is a sample of rock extracted from a
  • the core sample 102 can be removed from the reservoir rock with common coring tools, including a rotary coring bit, rotary sidewall coring tools, and explosive gun-type sidewall coring tools.
  • the core sample 102 is prepared as a cylinder having dimensions of about 1.5 inches (38 mm) long and about 1.5 inches (38 mm) in diameter.
  • the core sample 102 can be weighed and measured and can be qualified with X-ray tomography and pulse decay permeability to confirm a lack of fractures or high permeability streaks. Tests are performed on the core sample 102 on an 'as received' basis as described hereinbelow to determine properties of the core sample 102 that are representative of the rock formation from which the core sample 102 was taken. Alternatively, the tested core sample may be dried or saturated.
  • FIG. 1 A The flow of an imbibing fluid (such as water) and a saturating hydrocarbon fluid (such as methane gas - CH 4 ) that saturates the core sample 102 during one or more of the tests described herein are schematically depicted in Fig. 1 A.
  • the imbibing fluid is controlled to flow across a first end 108 (which can be referred to herein as the fracture side or end face) of the core sample 102.
  • the first end 108 is disposed opposite a second end 110 (which can be referred to herein as the formation side or end face) of the core sample 102.
  • a desired boundary condition can be applied to the second end 110 of the core sample 102.
  • the boundary condition can maintain a constant pressure in a flowpath downstream from the second end 110 of the core sample 102 or can maintain a constant volume in such downstream flowpath.
  • the imbibing fluid that flows across the first end 108 of the core sample 102 can enter the core sample 102 through imbibition, due to capillary pressure, and/or through leakoff into the bulk of the core sample 102 due to a pressure gradient across the core sample 102.
  • the flow of the imbibing fluid due to imbibition and leakoff is shown schematically as arrow 112.
  • the leakoff of the imbibing fluid can cause desorption and/or displacement of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid towards the second end 110 of the core sample 102, which is referred to as cocurrent flow.
  • the leakoff of the imbibing fluid can cause desorption and displacement of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid towards the first end 108 of the core sample 102, which is referred to as countercurrent flow.
  • the cocurrent flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid is shown schematically as arrow 114.
  • the countercurrent flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid is shown schematically as arrow 116.
  • the countercurrent flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid can be mixed with imbibing fluid that does not enter into and leakoff into the core sample as it flows across the first end 108 of the core sample 102.
  • Fig. IB illustrates a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the core holder assembly 101 of Fig. 1A.
  • the core holder 101 includes a flexible elastomeric sleeve 151 disposed about the core sample 102 and sealably engaged to a first end cap 153 and to a second end cap 155.
  • the end caps 153, 155 can be mechanically fixed and sealably engaged by seals 156 (e.g., o-ring seals) to a cylindrical housing 157 that defines an annular region 159 disposed between the inner surface of the housing 157 and the outer surface of the sleeve 151. Pressurized fluid can be supplied to the annular region 159 via passageways 161 through the housing 157.
  • seals 156 e.g., o-ring seals
  • the pressurized fluid contained within the annular region 159 can exert a radial confining pressure on the core sample 102 via the flexible sleeve 151 as desired.
  • the first end cap 153 can support a distribution plug 163 such that the distribution plug 163 floats relative to the first end cap 153 and the housing 157.
  • a seal 164 e.g., o-ring seal
  • a portion of the distribution plug 163 can extend axially beyond the first end cap 153 and sealably engage to the flexible sleeve 151 as shown.
  • the distribution plug 163 includes an end surface 165 that is disposed adjacent the first end 108 of the core sample 102.
  • the opposed second end 110 of the core sample 102 interfaces to an end surface 167 of the second end cap 155.
  • the first end cap 153 and the distribution plug 163 define a region 169 that is disposed adjacent the distribution plug 163.
  • the region 169 is fluidly coupled to the region 159 via
  • the pressurized fluid that is supplied to region 159 can flow to and fill region 169 via passageways 171.
  • the pressurized fluid contained within region 169 can exert an axial confining pressure on the core sample 102 via the distribution plug 163 as desired.
  • the first end cap 153 and the distribution plug 163 support and/or define two fluid flow lines 173, 175 that carry a flow of imbibing fluid that is supplied to and flows across the first end 108 of the core sample 102, which is operably disposed adjacent the end surface 165 of the distribution plug 163.
  • Seals 176 e.g., o-rings
  • Two fluid flow lines 177 and 180 are defined by the second end cap 155. The fluid flow lines 177 and 180 are in fluid communication with the second end 110 of the core sample 102 adjacent the end surface 167 of the second end cap 155.
  • a first end plug 178 is mechanically joined to the housing 157 by a threaded interface and can be configured to secure the first end cap 153 to the housing 157.
  • a second end plug 179 is mechanically joined to the housing 157 by a threaded interface and can be configured to secure the second end cap 155 to the housing 157.
  • the core sample 102 can be loaded into the core holder assembly as shown by placing the core sample 102 through the loading end of the housing 157 (i.e., the end that holds the second end cap 155).
  • the first end plug 178 secures the first end cap 153 and the distribution plug 163 in place inside the housing 157 and the sleeve 151 is secured to the first end cap 153 and to the distribution plug 163 inside the housing 157.
  • the core sample 102 is placed inside the sleeve 151.
  • the second end cap 155 can then be engaged to the sleeve 151 and then secured in place to the housing 157 by threading the second end plug 179 into its threaded interface with the housing 157.
  • Fig. 1C shows details of an embodiment of the distribution plug 163 of Fig. IB, which has an end surface 165 that faces and contacts the first end 108 of core sample 102.
  • the end surface 165 has a spiral groove 181 formed therein.
  • a first hole or port 183 is formed at one end of the groove 181 at or near the center of the end surface 165, while a second hole or port 185 is formed in the other end of the groove 181 near the periphery of the end surface 165.
  • the first hole or port 183 is disposed at the terminus of the fluid flow line 173 such that it is part of the fluid flow line 173 through the distribution plug 163.
  • the second hole or port 185 is disposed at the terminus of the fluid flow line 175 such that it is part of the fluid flow line 175 through the distribution plug 163.
  • the distribution plug 163 also includes an annular side surface 187 that extends from the end surface 165.
  • the side surface 187 can be configured to sealably engage to the flexible sleeve 151 of the core holder 101.
  • the groove 181 is constructed to minimize the volume between the first end 108 of the core sample 102 and the end surface 165 of the distribution plug 163, while still permitting imbibing fluid (e.g., water) to flow across the first end 108 of the core sample 102 and contact a large surface area of the first end 108 of the core sample 102.
  • imbibing fluid e.g., water
  • Fig. 2 shows a schematic diagram of a measurement apparatus 200 fluidly coupled to the core holder assembly 101 of Figs. IB and 1C.
  • the apparatus 200 includes various tubing, valves, reservoirs, and pumps fluidly connected to the assembly, as described hereinbelow.
  • the measurement apparatus 200 includes an electrically-controlled reservoir and pump 221 that is loaded with a quantity of imbibing fluid (such as water).
  • the reservoir and pump 221 can be an electrically-controlled syringe pump, such as a syringe pump from the ISCO line available from Teledyne Technologies Inc. of Lincoln, Kansas, USA.
  • the pump 221 has an outlet that is fluidly coupled to a supply line 280, which is fluidly coupled to the fluid flow line 173 of the core holder 101.
  • the pump 221 can be configured to flow the imbibing fluid through the supply line 280 and through the fluid flow line 173 such that it exits the first hole or port 183 of the distribution plug 163 where it can flow in the groove 181 that extends across the first end 108 of the core sample 102.
  • the measurement apparatus 200 can also include a storage reservoir 233 of the imbibing fluid and a valve 201 that are fluidly coupled to the inlet of the pump 221 and used to supply the imbibing fluid to the pump 221.
  • a valve 202 can be fluidly coupled to the outlet of the pump 221 between the pump 221 and the supply line 280.
  • a vacuum line 222 can be fluidly coupled between the pump 221 and the valve 202.
  • the vacuum line 222 includes a valve 211 that isolates the outlet of pump 221 from a vacuum source 223, which can, for example, include a vacuum pump or an eductor.
  • the measurement apparatus 200 also includes a pressure sensor 224 which is fluidly coupled to the outlet of the pump 221.
  • the pressure sensor 224 can be configured to monitor fluid pressure of the imbibing fluid supplied to the core holder 101 via the supply line 280.
  • the measurement apparatus 200 also includes a countercurrent measurement device 226.
  • the countercurrent measurement device 226 has an inlet that is fluidly coupled to a first collection line 281 via a valve 204 and a backpressure regulator 225.
  • the first collection line 281 is fluidly coupled to the fluid flow line 175 of the core holder 101, which carries the countercurrent flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid (e.g., methane) mixed with imbibing fluid (e.g., water) that does not enter into and leakoff into the core sample 102 as it flows across the first end 108 of the core sample 102.
  • the saturating hydrocarbon fluid e.g., methane
  • imbibing fluid e.g., water
  • the countercurrent measurement device 226 is an inverted burette, which can be configured to collect the countercurrent flow (e.g., methane gas) of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid that exits from the core holder 101 via the fluid flow line 175 and flows through the first collection line 281.
  • the countercurrent flow e.g., methane gas
  • the measurement apparatus 200 includes an electrically-controlled reservoir and pump 230 that is loaded with a quantity of saturating hydrocarbon fluid, such as methane gas.
  • the reservoir and pump 230 can be an electrically-controlled syringe pump, such as a syringe pump from the ISCO line available from Teledyne Technologies Inc. of Lincoln, Kansas, USA.
  • the pump 230 has an outlet that is fluidly coupled to line 282 via valve 206.
  • Line 282 is fluidly coupled to the fluid flow line 180 of the core holder 101.
  • a separate line 283 containing a valve 205 is fluidly coupled to line 177 of the core holder 101 to allow for purging.
  • the pump 230 and valve 206 are configured to flow the saturating hydrocarbon fluid to the second end 110 of the core sample 102 in a first operational mode in order to saturate the core sample 102 with the saturating
  • hydrocarbon fluid and to receive hydrocarbon fluid produced from the second end 110 of the core sample 102 in a second operational mode.
  • the operational modes of the pump 230 and valve 206 can be selected based on the measurement type for which the apparatus 200 is configured.
  • the measurement apparatus 200 also includes a pressure sensor 229 which is fluidly connected to line 282.
  • the pressure sensor 229 can be configured to monitor the pressure of saturating hydrocarbon fluid (e.g., methane gas) that flows in the line 282.
  • saturating hydrocarbon fluid e.g., methane gas
  • the measurement apparatus 200 can also include a storage reservoir 231 of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid and a valve 207 that are fluidly coupled to the inlet of the pump 230 and used to supply the saturating hydrocarbon fluid to the pump 230.
  • the measurement apparatus 200 can also include a line 232 and valves 208, 210 that are fluidly coupled between the first collection line 281 (upstream of valve 204) and the line 282 (on the side of the valve 206 opposite the pump 230).
  • Lines 232 and valves 208 and 210 can be configured to fluidly couple line 282 to line 281 in order to flow saturating hydrocarbon fluid to the first end 108 of the core sample 102 and saturate the core sample 102 with the saturating hydrocarbon fluid during the first operational mode of the pump 230 and valve 206 as described above where the pump 230 flows the saturating hydrocarbon fluid to the second end 110 of the core sample 102.
  • all of the flow lines of the test apparatus 200 are constructed of small diameter tubing (0.030 inch (0.76 mm) inner diameter) capable of withstanding a pressure of at least 15,000 psi (1055 kg/square cm). Such small diameter tubing can reduce residence time of fluids in the apparatus 200 and can improve sensitivity of the measurements made using the apparatus 200.
  • the apparatus 200 can include various measurement apparatus 226 to measure properties of the flows produced from the core sample 102 while the imbibing fluid from pump 221 is flowing.
  • a number of electronic volume or mass detectors can be used for this purpose, including, but not limited to, a liquid receiver, a series of cold traps, and an accumulator.
  • the selection of the measurement device 226 is based on the saturating hydrocarbon fluid, the imbibing fluid, and the quantities of each.
  • the countercurrent flow measurement devices 226 can be used in conjunction with one or more electronic composition measurement devices, such as a gas chromatograph, mass spectrometer, or optical spectrometer that can sample directly from the flow stream for continuous measurements or from samples taken from the flow stream and analyzed at a later time for discrete measurements.
  • the controller and/or computer processing system 245 includes control logic that interfaces to the electronic composition measurement devices via wired or wireless signal paths therebetween for control of the operation of the electronic composition measurement devices.
  • the pH, salt content, and/or carbon dioxide content of the fluid that exits the fluid flow line 175 of the core holder 101 can be monitored.
  • the measurement devices employed to measure and characterize the countercurrent flow can be employed to measure and characterize the cocurrent flow in the line 282.
  • valves 201, 202, 204, 206-208, and 210, the pumps 221 and 230, and the backpressure regulator 225 can be electrically controlled by a controller and/or a computer processing system 245 that is part of the apparatus 200.
  • the controller and/or computer processing system 245 includes control logic that interfaces to the electrically-controlled reservoir and pumps 221 and 230 via wired or wireless signal paths therebetween for control of the operation of the pumps 221 and 230, that interfaces to the electrically-controlled valves 201, 202, 204, 206-208, and 210 via wired or wireless signal paths therebetween for control of the operation of the valves 201, 202, 204, 206- 208, and 210, that interfaces to the backpressure regulator 225 via wired or wireless signal paths therebetween in order to provide backpressure control of imbibing fluid that flows in the supply lines 280 and 281, and that interfaces to the pressure sensors 224 and 229 via wired or wireless signal paths therebetween for pressure monitoring and recordation of pressure measurements during operation of the apparatus 200.
  • the control logic of the controller and/or computer processing system 245 (which can be embodied in software that is loaded from non-transient memory and executed in the computing platform of the computer processing system 245) can be configured to control the different parts of the apparatus 200 to carry out a sequence of operations (workflow) that characterizes properties related to countercurrent and cocurrent hydrocarbon production from a core sample as described below.
  • the control logic can be configured by user input or a testing script or other suitable data structure, which is used to configure the controller or the computer processing system 245 in order to carry out control operations that are part of the workflow as described herein.
  • the user input or the testing script or other suitable data structure can specify parameters (such as pressures, flow rates, and temperatures) for such control operations of the workflow.
  • the operations begin by saturating the core sample 102 with saturating hydrocarbon fluid (e.g., methane gas) using the test apparatus 200.
  • the core sample 102 is saturated with the saturating hydrocarbon fluid while the core sample 102 is maintained at reservoir conditions (i.e., reservoir pressure and temperature).
  • the test apparatus 200 can be operated to saturate the core sample 102 with the saturating hydrocarbon fluid as follows.
  • the core holder assembly 101 with the core sample 102 loaded therein is placed in a pressure and temperature controlled oil bath 122 (Figs.
  • the confinement pressure can be applied to the core sample 102 in both radial and axial directions and can be up to 15,000 psi (1055 kg/square cm). Subjecting the core sample 102 to such reservoir conditions tends to close any microfractures in the core sample 102.
  • Valves 206, 208, and 210 are opened (with the other valves of apparatus 200 closed) and pump 230 is operated to flow the saturating hydrocarbon fluid through lines 282, 232, and 281 to both the first end 108 and the second end 110 of the core sample 102 in order to saturate the core sample 102 with the saturating hydrocarbon fluid.
  • the pressure measured by the pressure sensor 229 can be monitored and used as feedback to control operation of the pump 230 so that the pressure of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid supplied to core sample 102 is at or close to the reservoir pressure.
  • the saturation process is typically timed and can last for about 72 hours to ensure pressure equilibrium within the core sample 102. The duration of such operations can be compared to a predetermined saturation time.
  • the duration is less than or equal to the predetermined saturation time
  • the flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid from pump 230 continues.
  • the duration is greater than or equal to the predetermined saturation time
  • the flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid from pump 230 is discontinued and the saturation process ends.
  • Various measurements can be obtained using the testing apparatus 200. For example, once the core sample 102 is saturated, a steady state permeability measurement can be obtained by establishing a pressure differential across the core sample 102 using the saturating hydrocarbon fluid. In this case, valves 206 and 204 can be opened (with the other valves of apparatus 200 closed) while the pump 230 is controlled to supply the saturating hydrocarbon fluid at a predetermined volumetric flow rate to the second end 110 of the core sample 102 via the line 282.
  • the saturating hydrocarbon fluid is eluted from the first end 108 of the core sample 102 and flows through the collection line 281 to the measurement device 226, which can be operated to obtain a volume measurement of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid eluted from the first end 108 of the core sample 102 over time.
  • An average rate of eluted fluid flow can then be determined and the rate of flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid into and out of the core sample 102 can be used to determine the permeability of the core sample 102 by known methods such as pulse decay, pressure decay, and steady state methods.
  • the pulse decay method places a pressure gradient across the core sample 102 and monitors the decay of the pressure gradient.
  • the pressure decay method changes the gas pressure and as the gas enters the pore space of the core sample 102 the pressure declines.
  • the steady state method places a fixed flow into the core sample 102 and measures the pressure across the core sample.
  • the apparatus 200 can also be configured to obtain a pulse decay permeability measurement.
  • valves 202 and 206 can be opened (with the other valves of apparatus 200 closed) and pump 230 controlled to introduce a pulse of high pressure saturating hydrocarbon fluid into the second end 110 of the core sample 102.
  • Core sample 102 is then isolated from the excess volumes in the apparatus 200 by closing all valves of apparatus 200.
  • Differential pressure sensor 228 measures the difference in pressure between lines 281 and 282. After the pulse of high pressure is introduced, the pressure in the line 282 will decay as the fluid diffuses into the core sample 102.
  • the decay of pressure at the second end 110 is measured while the introduced hydrocarbon fluid moves through the core sample 102 and the pressure at the first end 108 will rise until pressure equilibrium is reached, as measured by pressure sensors 224 and 229.
  • the decay of the pressure can be used to determine the
  • the apparatus 200 can be configured for cocurrent and countercurrent measurement testing.
  • valves 201, 202, 204, and 206 can be opened (with the other valves of apparatus 200 closed) and pump 221 controlled to purge the flow path through the supply line 280 to the fluid flow line 173 of the core holder 101 and from the fluid flow line 175 of the core holder to the collection line 281 with the imbibing fluid.
  • the imbibing fluid that flows through the collection line 281 can be emptied into the measurement device 226 if desired.
  • the fluid pressure of the imbibing fluid that flows across the first end 108 of the core sample 102 is maintained at reservoir pressure by the back pressure regulator 225, and the pressure at the second end 110 of the core sample 102 is maintained at reservoir pressure by operation of the pump 230.
  • the pump 221 is controlled to dispense the imbibing fluid into supply line 280, either continuously or in a series of pulses, for supply to the first end 108 of the core sample 102, and the second end 110 of the core sample is maintained at desired boundary conditions (such as at a constant reservoir pressure or at a constant volume) by operation of the pump 230.
  • the imbibing fluid flows along the spiral groove 181 of the distribution plug 163 in contact with the first end 108 of the core sample.
  • the imbibing fluid that contacts the core sample 102 can enter the core sample 102 and be retained therein (imbibition) or the imbibing fluid can flow and exit from the fluid flow line 175 of the core holder 101 and flow through the collection line 281 to the measurement device 226.
  • the fluid that is carried by the fluid flow line 175 from the core holder 101 and through the collection line 281 to the measurement device 226 can include countercurrent flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid, which is displaced by the imbibing fluid entering the first end 108 of the core sample 102.
  • the measurement device 226 can be configured to measure one or more properties (such as volume) of such countercurrent flow produced by the imbibing fluid flow.
  • the one or more properties (such as volume) of the imbibing fluid that flows through the backpressure valve 225 and into the measurement device 226 is also measured.
  • the flow of the imbibing fluid into the core sample 102 can also cause desorption and displacement of saturating hydrocarbon fluid resulting in cocurrent flow of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid, which flows out of flow line 180 of the core holder 101 and to line 282.
  • One or more properties (such a volume) of such cocurrent flow can be measured based upon the operation of the pump 230 while it operates to maintain the desired boundary conditions at the second end 110 of the core sample 102.
  • the volume of such cocurrent flow can be measured from volume output of the pump 230 where the pump 230 is operated to maintain the second end 110 of the core sample 102 at a constant reservoir pressure.
  • the volume of such cocurrent flow can be measured from the magnitude of the pressure increase of the pump 230 where the pump is operated to maintain the second end 110 of the core sample 102 at a constant volume.
  • the flow rate of the imbibing fluid as supplied by the pump 221 can be controlled to maximize the residence time of the imbibing fluid in contact with the first end 108 of the core sample 102 and to maximize countercurrent flow exiting from the flow path 175 of the core holder 101.
  • the volumes of the cocurrent and countercurrent production of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid can be measured over time during the testing operations while the imbibing fluid from pump 221 is flowing. The values for the volumes of the cocurrent and
  • countercurrent production of the saturating hydrocarbon fluid gas can be adjusted to the pressure and temperature at the core face by using the known density changes with pressure and temperature.
  • Figs. 3A and 3B show countercurrent gas production test results for a first core sample, which was saturated with methane gas according to the saturation process described above.
  • the first core sample was assembled in a first core sample assembly (such as assembly 101), which was fluidly connected to the test apparatus 200 in the arrangement shown in Fig. 2.
  • a first core sample assembly such as assembly 101
  • water was used as the imbibing fiuid.
  • the pressure of water was controlled with the backpressure regulator 225 so that there was no pressure differential across the first core sample.
  • Fig. 3A about 0.045 milliliters of countercurrent gas production measured at the actual high pressure/high temperature condition was observed over a 70 hour test period.
  • FIG. 3B shows the countercurrent gas production test data of Fig. 3 A plotted to the square root of time, which, when so plotted, suggests a relatively stable (straight line) countercurrent gas production up to about 40 square root minutes, with a leveling off of production at that point.
  • Fig. 4 shows cocurrent and countercurrent gas production from the first core sample during the testing of Figs. 3 A and 3B.
  • the cocurrent gas production over the same time period was approximately the same as the countercurrent gas production.
  • the cocurrent gas production shows an induction period where a pressure wave is migrating across the first core sample.
  • Fig. 5 shows cocurrent and countercurrent gas production test data for a second core sample that is different from the first core sample.
  • the second core sample was saturated and tested under the same conditions as the first core sample.
  • the test results for the second core sample indicate that compared to the testing of the first core sample, the second core sample produces less countercurrent flow and more cocurrent flow, thereby indicating that those measurements are strongly dependent on the core sample tested.
  • the continuous water flow from pump 221 was discontinued to measure the quantity of water imbibed into the second core sample.
  • the volume of water imbibed into the core sample 102 during the test can be obtained indirectly by measuring the rate of fluid moving into the core sample 102 and extrapolating with the square root of time (a known dependence) to zero (Fig. 5). Further, the difference between the volume of water supplied by the pump 221 during the test (which can be derived from the flow rate of the pump 221) and the volume of the fluid that exits the fluid flow line 175 and flows through the collection line 281 during the test (which can be measured by the measurement device 226) may be equated to the volume of water imbibed into the second core sample.
  • a third core sample (different from the first and second core samples) is assembled into a core holder assembly that is fluidly coupled to the test apparatus 200 as described above, which is used to saturate the third core sample with methane gas.
  • Water, as the imbibing fluid, is pumped by the pump 221 through the flow line 173 such that water flows across the first end 108 of the core sample 102 and exits the fluid flow line 175 and continues through the collection line 281 during the test.
  • the pressure of the pump 221 is controlled to be 500 psi (35.2 kg/square cm) higher than the saturating pressure used to saturate the third core sample.
  • Fig. 6A shows cocurrent flow, countercurrent flow, and water imbibition and leakoff data versus the square root of time during this test.
  • Fig. 6A shows that during the first 5 square root minutes the amount of cocurrent flow is negligible due to an induction period seen in Figs. 4 and 5.
  • the countercurrent flow reaches its maximum in the first 20 square root minutes, although such flow is less than that for the first core sample (Fig. 4).
  • the continuous water flow from pump 221 was discontinued to measure the quantity of water imbibed into the third core sample.
  • the volume of water imbibed into the third core sample 102 during the test can be obtained indirectly by measuring the rate of fluid flow entering the core sample 102 and extrapolating with the square root of time to zero.
  • the amount of calculated water into the core sample is greater than the sum of the cocurrent and the countercurrent gas production. In this case some of the gas displaced in the core sample was trapped and compressed in the pore network.
  • Fig. 6B illustrating data from a continuation of the test illustrated in Fig. 6A
  • pump 221 is controlled such that the pressure of the water is 500 psi (35.2 kg/square cm) below the saturating pressure.
  • These conditions simulate the production of fluids from the formation after hydraulic fracturing.
  • the water pressure was lowered at 106,000 seconds, about three hours was required for the pressure gradient inside the core sample to become favorable for gas production on first end 108 and for flow on second end 110 simulating the formation to reverse.
  • the three hour delay in gas production was attributed to water blockage in the third core sample owing to the initial testing with the higher water pressure and to the redistribution of pressure inside the core sample.
  • the test apparatus 200 can be used with a variety of imbibing fluids and a variety of saturating hydrocarbon fluids.
  • the fluids can comprise various compositions, in the aqueous, gaseous, liquid, or supercritical states. Testing can also be conducted with the test apparatus 200 by varying the imbibing fluid pressure to study various parameters. For example, in one case, the pressure of the imbibing fluid can be set above the reservoir pressure to study forced leakoff. In another case, the imbibing fluid pressure can be set close to the reservoir pressure to study spontaneous imbibition; and in yet another case, the imbibing fluid pressure can be set below the reservoir pressure to study gas production.
  • the saturating fluid includes a single hydrocarbon component such as, for example, methane gas
  • a volume or mass measurement of the methane gas flow is sufficient to characterize the methane gas production from a core sample.
  • the saturating fluid can be a multicomponent fluid, such as methane gas and a higher molecular weight oil component.
  • the saturating fluid includes multiple hydrocarbon components, in addition to the amount of the flow produced, consideration can also be given to the molecular composition of the hydrocarbon mixture produced.
  • a notable example where such testing can be useful is for testing of oil producing mudstones.
  • an oil producing core sample i.e., a fourth core sample
  • a fourth core sample was obtained from a reservoir rock formation and brought to the surface. Over time the fourth core sample lost some of the hydrocarbons that were in the core sample when it was in the reservoir, while a portion of the hydrocarbons remained in the core sample.
  • the fourth core sample was assembled into a core sample assembly, such as assembly 101 described above. The core sample assembly with the fourth core sample loaded therein was then fluidly connected to the test apparatus 200, as described above and as shown in Fig.
  • the saturating hydrocarbon fluid was a high pressure multicomponent gas tailored to the reservoir from which the fourth core sample was obtained. As the fourth core sample was saturated, the high pressure
  • composition measurement arrangements and devices can be used to characterize multicomponent fluids eluting from a core sample.
  • fluid eluted from the core sample can be collected at high pressure in an accumulator and a high pressure gas chromatograph can be used with a sampling valve to inject the fluid into the chromatograph to obtain fluid composition data.
  • an eluted fluid sample is passed through a solvent to collect some of the fluid, and the solvent and the eluent can be analyzed together on a gas chromatograph.
  • the eluting fluid flows across a solid phase extraction disc or through a thermal desorption tube, which collect some of the fluid to be analyzed as batch samples. Also, in yet another embodiment, the eluting fluid is passed through an oil, water, and gas separator and each constituent is measured. In another embodiment, the eluting fluid flows in a series of cold traps to collect portions of the sample based on the boiling point of the fluid and each portion of the fluid is
  • the eluting fluid can be collected at high pressure in an accumulator and, later, the collected fluid can flow from the accumulator though a solvent to analyze the eluent and the solvent using a gas chromatograph.
  • the core sample 102 can be removed from the core holder assembly 101, weighed and dissected by shaving off thin layers. For example, 20 mm of the first end 108 (i.e., fracture side) of the core sample 102 can be removed to obtain a water profile, and 6 mm of the second end 110 (i.e., formation side) can be removed to provide a dry baseline for comparison.
  • 20 mm of the first end 108 (i.e., fracture side) of the core sample 102 can be removed to obtain a water profile
  • 6 mm of the second end 110 i.e., formation side
  • the unconfmed compressive strength of the core sample 102 can be related to a water invasion profile of the core sample 102.
  • the removed layers of the core sample 102 can be collected, placed in an enclosed tube, and the water inside the shavings extracted with methanol. The water in the methanol is then measured with Karl Fischer titration, as described in US Patent Application Publication 2012/0151998, which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Fig. 7 is a graph showing unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and water content as a function of location along the length of a core sample 102 tested using the test apparatus 200. As shown in Fig. 7, the water content is higher on the side of the core sample that had water applied, i.e., the first end 108. Moreover, Fig. 7 shows that the side that had water applied (the first end 108) is also weaker (has lower unconfined compressive strength) than the side of the core sample that did not have water applied (i.e., the second end 1 10).
  • Other analyses can be performed on the layers of the core sample 102 such as, but not limited to, oil extraction, salt extraction, surface area, and pore size distribution.
  • Fig. 8 is a flowchart of a method of determining whether adsorbed gas is being produced from a reservoir sample or is being bypassed and trapped in the reservoir sample.
  • a core sample 102 is assembled into a core sample assembly 101 which is fluidly connected to test apparatus 200.
  • the core sample 102 is saturated with a saturating fluid, which can be comprised of one or a plurality of hydrocarbon
  • the lines of the test apparatus 200 used for cocurrent production are purged at 803.
  • the flow of imbibing fluid is initiated, such as the flow of water from pump 221 to the core sample 102, where the imbibing fluid flows across an end surface of the core sample 102.
  • the cocurrent and countercurrent flows of the saturating fluid produced as a result of the flow of imbibing fluid across the end surface of the core sample are determined.
  • the volume of imbibing fluid imbibed into the core sample 102 is determined.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)

Abstract

Cette invention concerne un procédé de caractérisation de la production d'hydrocarbures à partir d'un échantillon de carottage obtenu dans un réservoir, comprenant l'étape consistant à saturer l'échantillon de carottage au moyen d'au moins un fluide de saturation. Un flux d'un fluide d'imbibition est initié à travers une surface de l'échantillon de carottage saturé, ledit échantillon de carottage étant soumis à des pressions de confinement et maintenu à une température contrôlée. Une ou plusieurs propriétés (telles que le volume ou la pression) du flux contraire du fluide de saturation et une ou plusieurs propriétés (telles que le volume ou la pression) du flux parallèle du fluide de saturation est/sont mesurée(s) sur le temps en réaction au flux du fluide d'imbibition. Les caractéristiques de l'échantillon de carottage peuvent être mesurées avant et après l'exposition au fluide d'imbibition afin d'évaluer les altérations de l'échantillon de carottage.
EP14835389.9A 2013-08-06 2014-06-27 Appareil et procédé de mesure quantitative de la production d'hydrocarbures par imbibition de fluide Withdrawn EP3030748A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361862831P 2013-08-06 2013-08-06
PCT/US2014/044619 WO2015020735A1 (fr) 2013-08-06 2014-06-27 Appareil et procédé de mesure quantitative de la production d'hydrocarbures par imbibition de fluide

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3030748A1 true EP3030748A1 (fr) 2016-06-15

Family

ID=52461831

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14835389.9A Withdrawn EP3030748A1 (fr) 2013-08-06 2014-06-27 Appareil et procédé de mesure quantitative de la production d'hydrocarbures par imbibition de fluide

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3030748A1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2917819A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2015020735A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016191265A1 (fr) 2015-05-22 2016-12-01 Aramco Services Company Procédé pour déterminer une imbibition de liquide non conventionnelle dans des matériaux à faible perméabilité
CN106644818B (zh) * 2016-12-29 2023-03-31 重庆科技学院 滑溜水作用下页岩气井产量模拟测试仪
CN106644820B (zh) * 2016-12-29 2023-05-12 重庆科技学院 滑溜水作用下页岩气解吸附能力测试仪
CN106596380B (zh) * 2016-12-30 2023-11-28 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 一种页岩分段压裂水平井压裂液返排能力评价方法及装置
CN107462508B (zh) * 2017-08-16 2018-10-02 西南石油大学 一种多场耦合渗流多功能实验装置及测试方法
WO2020113513A1 (fr) * 2018-12-06 2020-06-11 深圳大学 Dispositif actif in situ d'échantillonnage de carotte à conservation de température pour roche profonde et son procédé d'échantillonnage de carotte à conservation de température
CN111948093A (zh) * 2019-05-15 2020-11-17 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 页岩实时产气速率测量方法及装置
CN111982783B (zh) * 2020-08-27 2021-04-13 西南石油大学 一种高温高压非稳态平衡凝析油气相渗测试方法
CN116625906B (zh) * 2023-07-20 2023-10-20 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所 双通道岩心顶塞、压力模拟装置及核磁共振在线驱替系统

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4506542A (en) * 1983-04-22 1985-03-26 Chandler Engineering Company Apparatus and procedure for relative permeability measurements
US5297420A (en) * 1993-05-19 1994-03-29 Mobil Oil Corporation Apparatus and method for measuring relative permeability and capillary pressure of porous rock
US5493226A (en) * 1994-04-08 1996-02-20 Mobile Oil Corporation Method and apparatus for measuring properties of core samples including heating and pressurizing the core sample and measuring the dynamic and static capillary pressure of water in the core sample
GB2460786B (en) * 2007-04-26 2011-04-13 Shell Int Research Formation core sample holder assembly and testing method
KR101223462B1 (ko) * 2011-10-17 2013-01-17 한국지질자원연구원 코어 내 포화율 측정유닛을 구비하는 상대유체투과율 측정장치 및 이를 이용한 상대유체투과율 측정방법

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2015020735A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2917819A1 (fr) 2015-02-12
WO2015020735A1 (fr) 2015-02-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2015020735A1 (fr) Appareil et procédé de mesure quantitative de la production d'hydrocarbures par imbibition de fluide
US10502673B2 (en) Apparatus and methodology for measuring properties of microporous material at multiple scales
US8418526B2 (en) System and method for testing gas migration process in coal-rock mass
AU2009350468B2 (en) PVT analysis of pressurized fluids
US5263360A (en) Low permeability subterranean formation testing methods and apparatus
Jessen et al. Laboratory and simulation investigation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery by gas injection
WO2003071253A2 (fr) Methode et dispositif pour evaluer des parametres physiques d'un gisement souterrain a partir de debris de roche qui y sont preleves
US20040211252A1 (en) Method and device for evaluating physical parameters of an underground reservoir from rock cuttings taken therefrom
EP1988254A2 (fr) Chromatographe a cable installe dans un puits et procede de chromatographie a cable dans un puits
US11119062B2 (en) Method and assembly for measuring diffusion in nanoporous media
Lai et al. A new technique for accurately measuring two-phase relative permeability under non-Darcy flow conditions
WO2019099770A1 (fr) Système et méthodologie pour déterminer des propriétés de transition de phase de fluides de réservoir natifs
Quan et al. Study on desorption and diffusion dynamics of coal reservoir through step-by-step depressurization simulation——an experimental simulation study based on LF-NMR technology
CN113933148B (zh) 不同赋存态页岩油含量及储集空间定量分析的方法及装置
Zeng et al. Pore-fracture network alteration during forced and spontaneous imbibition processes in shale formation
CN115791565B (zh) 测量致密气藏岩心渗透率的实验方法
Tu et al. Determination of the diffusion coefficient of supercritical CO2 in low-permeability formation cores
Chhatre* et al. Measurement of Gas-Oil Relative Permeability in Unconventional Rocks
WO2020076783A1 (fr) Détermination de variation de perméabilité par résonance magnétique nucléaire (rmn) dans des échantillons vieillis de carotte de roche de formation saturés avec une solution de gel
US20230341312A1 (en) Method for determining a matrix permeability of a subsurface formation
Mathur et al. Permeability Measurements on Shales using NMR Spectroscopy
Moore et al. A new methodology to evaluate huff and puff effectiveness at in-situ conditions
Quintanilla et al. A new experimental method for measuring improved oil recovery in shales
Ghasemi et al. Lab tests and modeling of CO2 injection in chalk with fracture-matrix transport mechanisms
Egermann et al. A fast and direct method of permeability measurement on drill cuttings

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20151221

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20170103

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN