EP3005154A1 - Délégation de données ressemblantes d'une organisation à un dispositif lié - Google Patents

Délégation de données ressemblantes d'une organisation à un dispositif lié

Info

Publication number
EP3005154A1
EP3005154A1 EP13731496.9A EP13731496A EP3005154A1 EP 3005154 A1 EP3005154 A1 EP 3005154A1 EP 13731496 A EP13731496 A EP 13731496A EP 3005154 A1 EP3005154 A1 EP 3005154A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
objects
pool
computerized system
metadata
enterprise
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP13731496.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Yakov Faitelson
Ohad Korkus
Ophir Kretzer-Katzir
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Varonis Systems Ltd
Original Assignee
Varonis Systems Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Varonis Systems Ltd filed Critical Varonis Systems Ltd
Publication of EP3005154A1 publication Critical patent/EP3005154A1/fr
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/906—Clustering; Classification
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types

Definitions

  • the present disclosure generally relates to identifying resemblance between data objects of an organization, and more specifically to providing the data objects to a computerized device linked to the organization.
  • Clustering of objects based on a similarity therebetween is known, as, for example, US application No. 2006/0277184 that reports bi-clustering users and storage elements to define user clusters and data clusters, respectively, wherein the access profiles of the users in user clusters are mutually similar.
  • One exemplary embodiment of the disclosed subject matter is a computerized method for pooling objects in a computerized system having a storage for objects, comprising identifying in the computerized system objects having an at least one common metadata entity associated with the objects, and including the identified objects in a pool of objects, wherein the method is performed on an at least one computerized apparatus configured to perform the method in the computerized system.
  • Another exemplary embodiment of the disclosed subject matter is a computerized apparatus for pooling objects in a computerized system, comprising an at least one storage device comprised in the computerized system, and an at least one computer configured for identifying in the at least one storage device objects having an at least one common metadata entity associated with the objects and subsequently relating the identified objects in a pool of objects.
  • the term 'enterprise' or 'organization' implies a computerized system comprising a plurality of computers communicating therebetween and having and/or sharing a data storage, where the enterprise or 'organization are also referred to as a 'computerized system' and the data storage also referred to as a 'storage'.
  • the communications between the computes may be direct and/or indirect.
  • the data storage comprises one or more data storage devices.
  • an enterprise comprises several computers in a range between about 10 computers and about 1000 computers or more.
  • an enterprise comprises less than 10 computers, not precluding having one computer as, for example, a mainframe computer.
  • the term 'object' implies a data object, such as a file or a folder or a record in database, stored on the storage of the enterprise, and also referred to as an object of the enterprise.
  • the terms 'attribute' or 'metadata' imply information about an object and/or of an object and/or characterizing an object. For example, permissions to access an object, classification of an objects or history of accessing an object. Metadata of an object is also referred to as associated with the object and objects are also referred to as having metadata.
  • metadata is generally referred to in a plural form such as referring to a plurality of metadata entities, yet without precluding a metadata entity in the singular form.
  • Metadata of an object implies also any attribute of the object and also elements such a name or part thereof of the object, contents or part thereof of the object and aspects such as meeting a condition by the object such as a search phrase.
  • the term 'user' or Operator' implies a person, and/or a program operating on behalf of the person, that uses a resource of an enterprise, such as a computer of the enterprise.
  • a user or operator is also referred to as user of the enterprise or operator of the enterprise, respectively.
  • the term 'access right' or 'rights' or 'sufficient rights' imply authorization for a user to access an object of an enterprise, whereas insufficient rights imply not having an authorization to access the object such as for opening or reaching the object for viewing.
  • a permission or permissions for or to an object implies any kind of authorization including, possibly, sufficient and/or insufficient rights.
  • the authorization or permissions, and/or other metadata or attributes such as classifications are set by the management or administration of the enterprise and/or by owners of objects of the enterprise and/or by operators with special high level authorization, also known as super-users, including, possibly, program or programs operating on beheld thereof.
  • the term 'virtually' with respect to operation regarding objects implies an operation pertaining or related to the object yet performed outside the object without affecting the objects and/or contents thereof, such as setting an entry referring to the object in an index.
  • Fig. 1 schematically illustrates an enterprise with two remote computers connectable thereto, representing any number of remote computers;
  • Fig. 2 schematically illustrates objects and metadata entities thereof, according to exemplary embodiments of the disclosed subject matter
  • FIG. 3 schematically illustrates objects of an enterprise pooled by resemblances, according to exemplary embodiments of the disclosed subject matter.
  • Fig. 4 outlines operations in pooling objects in an enterprise, according to exemplary embodiments of the disclosed subject matter.
  • One technical problem dealt by the disclosed subject matter is how to enhance accessibility to data objects of an organization by a remote computer linked to the organization.
  • a remote computer linked to an organization may access and obtain data objects of the organization for locally handing of the data objects on the remote computer.
  • data objects of the organization for locally handing of the data objects on the remote computer.
  • a user operating the remote computer may require or request data objects of the organization to be retrieved to the remote computer.
  • Individually locating data objects in the organization at least potentially, involves undue overhead of time and efforts, and retrieving to the remote computer individual objects, at least potentially, involves undue communications overhead.
  • One technical solution according to the disclosed subject matter is an organization having one or more storage devices that store data objects.
  • Data objects are identified as having mutual and/or similar attributes or metadata at least to some extent, wherein at least some of the identified data objects are not necessarily accessible to a user of a remote computer according to access permissions thereof.
  • the identified data objects are marked, at least virtually, such that upon a request for or a retrieval of one or more of the marked data objects by the remote computer, all the marked data objects are transferred to the remote computer.
  • An exemplary aspect of the solution is a probabilistic pre-fetch of data objects expected, at least potentially, to be required by the user of the remote computer.
  • resembling data objects of the organization are transferred en masse to the remote computer and are ready for local access on the remote computer, avoiding, at least potentially and/or probabilistically, individual locating and transfer of subsequent data items.
  • data objects are considered as resembling when certain conditions regarding attributes or metadata thereof are met. For example, when users of data objects have at least one common permission for the objects with a permission of another user, or when users have access history to data objects, at least recently, similar to that of another user, or when data objects have the same category or classification, or other conditions such as or when data objects contain identical or mutual data such as keywords, and/or any combination thereof.
  • a potential technical effect of the disclosed subject matter is a rapid access by a remote computer to a multiplicity of data objects of an organization without excessive time and/or communications overhead.
  • Fig. 1 schematically illustrates an enterprise 100 with two of remote computer 130 connectable thereto via two of communication link 108, the two of remote computer 130 and two of communication link 108 representing any number of remote computers and possible communication links, respectively, as indicated by a dashed line 133.
  • Enterprise 100 comprises one or more computers, illustrated as three instances of a computer 104, representing any number of computer 104, as indicated by dashed lines 114.
  • Enterprise 100 further comprises one or more storage devices, illustrated as two instances of a storage device 102, representing any number of storage device 102, as indicated by dashed lines 112.
  • Storage device 102 generally stores objects or data entities such as files or database records or users definitions or similar elements, collectively referred to as objects.
  • the instances of computer 104 are connected or linked or coupled therebetween and to the instances of storage device 102, the connection or linkage illustrated and represented by a network 106.
  • communication link 108 is an internet link, a wired link or a wireless link, or any other link operating by any protocol, or a combination thereof. It is noted that communication link 108 may comprise a variety of connections, not necessarily a permanent one, as long as remote computer 130 is operatively connectable with enterprise 100, such as by way of one of computer 104.
  • Fig. 2 schematically illustrates objects and metadata entities thereof, distributed on one or more of instances of storage device 102 of enterprise 100, according to exemplary embodiments of the disclosed subject matter.
  • object 202 denoted as object 202, object 204, object 206 and object 208, designated also as 01... On, respectively, represent any number of objects, as indicated by a dashed line 210.
  • object 200 For brevity and clarity, without limiting, the objects, namely 01... On, are collectively referred to also as objects 200, as indicated by the connected doted arrows.
  • Each of objects 200 has and/or associated with metadata 220, representing any number of metadata or metadata entities as indicated by dashed lines 228.
  • Metadata 220 comprise metadata 224, designated also as U1P denoting a permission designated a P for a user designated as Ul, and similarly also metadata 234 designated also as U2P. Metadata 220 further comprise metadata 226, designated also as U1H denoting activity history designated a H for a user designated as Ul, and similarly also metadata 236 designated also as U2H. Metadata 220 further comprise metadata 228, designated also as a classification Ca of object 202 and object 208, and similarly also metadata 238 designated also as a classification Cb.
  • metadata for example, metadata 224 or to that effect U1P, is also considered as a metadata entity, and so forth for metadata 234, metadata 226, metadata 236, metadata 228 and/or metadata 238.
  • objects 200 have metadata 224, metadata 234, metadata 226, metadata 236, metadata 228 and metadata 239 as U1P, U2P, U1H, U2H, Ca and Cb which are partly shared therebetween. For example, 01 shares metadata U1P with 03, or 02 shares metadata Cb with 03. Based on the shared metadata, at least to some extent, objects 200 are considered as resembling objects and/or having a resemblance or resemblance therebetween.
  • resembling objects are formed or collated or pooled or related included, at least virtually, into a pool, or are marked as such, according to the shared metadata or resemblance. For example, by assigning a common attribute to the resembling objects, or by entries respective to the objects in an index or a lookup table.
  • a pool of resembling objects is referred to also as a resemblance pool or a pool.
  • objects 200 collectively illustrate a pool.
  • a plurality of resemblance pools is formed, where pools may be disjoint from each other, or one pool may overlap a second pool or a plurality of pools such as by having resemblance with part of the objects of the second pool or the plurality of pools.
  • the pooled resembling objects are marked or designated as such by data external to the objects per se, without affecting and/or necessarily affecting the objects and/or contents thereof.
  • Fig. 3 schematically illustrates objects 300 of an enterprise, such as enterprise 100, pooled by resemblances as illustrated by curved enclosures, according to exemplary embodiments of the disclosed subject matter.
  • a pool 302 and a pool 304 are disjoint from any other pool as lacking any common resemblance, whereas a pool 306 and a pool 308 partially overlap each other having objects, shown as black circles, with shared resemblance with pool 306 and pool 308.
  • an enterprise such as enterprise 100 for example, is configured to identify resembling objects, such as by one or more continuous process or processes and/or any other process or processes such as responsive to events.
  • the one or more processes are referred to also, without limiting, a process.
  • Enterprise 100 is configured to identify resembling objects by configuring and/or installing a programmed process in one or more of computer 104.
  • Resembling objects are identified by the process according to conditions or rules, referred to also collectively as rules, where in some embodiments, several rules are combined.
  • rules may be combined. For example, objects accessed by users within a certain time and having the same classification are pooled in a resemblance pool, or objects having the same permissions for users and identified in a search for contents thereof are pooled in a resemblance pool.
  • the rules are predefined.
  • the rules are determined and/or modified responsive to the operation of the enterprise or as the enterprise is operating.
  • the rules are set by an administrator of the enterprise and/or a program operation on behalf thereof.
  • pooling objects by resemblances is an ongoing process and pools of resembling objects may vary during the operation of enterprise 100.
  • objects 200 as in Fig. 2 belong to a resemblance pool, and that user Ul is and/or also a user of one of remote computer 130 linked to enterprise 100.
  • user Ul requests an object of enterprise 100 to be retrieved from enterprise 100 to remote computer 130, as an example object 01. Consequently all the objects, namely 01... On, are sent to remote computer 130. Having retrieved objects 01... On to remote computer 130, user Ul can access objects 01... On locally on remote computer 130, even though user Ul does not have sufficient rights to access all of objects 01... On enterprise 100.
  • An exemplary rationale for allowing user Ul to access all of objects 01...On is that all of objects 01...On share, at least partially, common metadata. Thus, it may be plausible that if user Ul is allowed to access a first subset of objects 01...On and another user, user U2 for example, is allowed to access a second subset of objects 01...On, then based on the resemblance of objects 01... On user Ul would be allowed to access the second subset, at least locally on remote computer 130.
  • Fig. 4 outlines operations in pooling objects in an enterprise, according to exemplary embodiments of the disclosed subject matter.
  • objects having an at least one common metadata entity associated with the objects are identified in a storage of an enterprise.
  • objects are associated with a plurality of metadata entities where one or more of the plurality of metadata entities is common or shared, at least partly, by the objects, as for example, in Fig. 2 and respective description.
  • the common or shared metadata associated with the objects is identified based on one or more rules for objects and associated metadata thereof.
  • the identified objects are included in a pool of objects in the storage of the enterprise.
  • the objects are included virtually in a virtual pool, such as by setting an attribute or a property of the objects to indicated participation in a pool, or by setting an entry in and index of the enterprise respective to the objects to indicated participation in a pool.
  • the objects in the pool of objects are transferred to a remote computer linked to the enterprise in response to a request by the remote computer to the enterprise for an at least one of the objects in the pool of objects.
  • a objects of the enterprise can be includes in a plurality of pools, where some objects may be included in a plurality of pools.
  • the enterprise is, for example, an enterprise such as enterprise 100, representing any computerized system having a storage such as one or more storage devices and one or more computerized apparatus such as a computer or a processor.
  • the method and/or operations described above are performed on one or more of the computerized apparatus configured to perform the method and/or operations in the computerized system such as the enterprise.
  • a computerized method for pooling objects in a computerized system having a storage for objects comprising identifying in the computerized system objects having an at least one common metadata entity associated with the objects, and including the identified objects in a pool of objects, wherein the method is performed on an at least one computerized apparatus configured to perform the method in the computerized system.
  • the objects are identified according to a plurality of common metadata entities. In some embodiments, the objects are identified according to an at least one rule for objects and associated metadata entities thereof.
  • the objects are identified according to a combination of a plurality of rules for objects and associated metadata entities thereof.
  • the at least one common metadata entity is at least one of: permissions for users to the objects, access history by users to the objects, classification of the objects, category of the objects, owner of the objects, creator of the objects, archive of the objects, an at least a part of the names of the objects, contents of the objects or identification of the objects in a search.
  • the method further comprising transferring the objects in the pool of objects to a remote computer linked to the computerized system responsive to a request by the remote computer to the computerized system for an at least one of the objects in the pool of objects.
  • the method further comprising enabling to access in the computerized system the objects in the pool by an at least one user of the computerized system not having sufficient rights to access an at least one of the objects in the pool.
  • the identified objects are virtually included in the pool.
  • a computerized apparatus for pooling objects in a computerized system comprising an at least one storage device comprised in the computerized system, and an at least one computer configured for identifying in the at least one storage device objects having an at least one common metadata entity associated with the objects and subsequently relating the identified objects in a pool of objects.
  • the apparatus further configured for transferring the objects in the pool of objects to a remote computer linked to the computerized system responsive to a request by the remote computer to the computerized system for an at least one of the objects in the pool of objects.
  • the apparatus further configured for enabling to access in the computerized system the objects in the pool by an at least one user of the computerized system not having sufficient rights to access an at least one of the objects in the pool.
  • the terms 'software', 'program', 'software procedure' or 'procedure' or 'software code' or 'code' or 'application' may be used interchangeably according to the context thereof, and denote one or more instructions or directives or circuitry for performing a sequence of operations that generally represent an algorithm and/or other process or method.
  • the program is stored in or on a medium such as RAM, ROM, or disk, or embedded in a circuitry accessible and executable by an apparatus such as a processor or other circuitry.
  • the processor and program may constitute the same apparatus, at least partially, such as an array of electronic gates, such as FPGA or ASIC, designed to perform a programmed sequence of operations, optionally comprising or linked with a processor or other circuitry.
  • an array of electronic gates such as FPGA or ASIC
  • computerized apparatus or a computerized system or a similar term denotes an apparatus having one or more processors operable or operating according to a program.
  • a module represents a part of a system, such as a part of a program operating or interacting with one or more other parts on the same unit or on a different unit, or an electronic component or assembly for interacting with one or more other components.
  • a process represents a collection of operations for achieving a certain objective or an outcome.
  • the term 'configuring' and/or 'adapting' for an objective, or a variation thereof, implies using at least a software and/or electronic circuit and/or auxiliary apparatus designed and/or implemented and/or operable or operative to achieve the objective.
  • a device storing and/or comprising a program and/or data constitutes an article of manufacture. Unless otherwise specified, the program and/or data are stored in or on a non- transitory medium.
  • each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of program code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s).
  • illustrated operations may occur in a different order or as concurrent operations instead of sequential operations to achieve the same or equivalent effect.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un procédé informatisé pour grouper des objets dans un système informatisé comprenant un dispositif de stockage pour des objets, qui consiste à identifier dans le système informatisé des objets ayant au moins une entité de métadonnées commune associée aux objets, et à inclure les objets identifiés dans un groupe d'objets, et sur un appareil destiné à le mettre en œuvre.
EP13731496.9A 2013-06-04 2013-06-04 Délégation de données ressemblantes d'une organisation à un dispositif lié Ceased EP3005154A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/IL2013/050477 WO2014195930A1 (fr) 2013-06-04 2013-06-04 Délégation de données ressemblantes d'une organisation à un dispositif lié

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3005154A1 true EP3005154A1 (fr) 2016-04-13

Family

ID=48699208

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13731496.9A Ceased EP3005154A1 (fr) 2013-06-04 2013-06-04 Délégation de données ressemblantes d'une organisation à un dispositif lié

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3005154A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN105264520B (fr)
WO (1) WO2014195930A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11269533B2 (en) 2017-03-21 2022-03-08 International Business Machines Corporation Performing object consolidation within a storage system
CN109933719B (zh) * 2019-01-30 2021-08-31 维沃移动通信有限公司 一种搜索方法及终端设备

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7085771B2 (en) * 2002-05-17 2006-08-01 Verity, Inc System and method for automatically discovering a hierarchy of concepts from a corpus of documents
US7606801B2 (en) 2005-06-07 2009-10-20 Varonis Inc. Automatic management of storage access control
CN102053992B (zh) * 2009-11-10 2014-12-10 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 聚类方法和系统
CN102855312B (zh) * 2012-08-24 2013-08-14 武汉大学 一种面向领域主题的Web服务聚类方法

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
NA TANG ET AL: "An artificial immune system approach to document clustering", APPLIED COMPUTING 2005 : THE 20TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING ; PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING, SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO, USA, ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY, NEW YORK, NY, 13 March 2005 (2005-03-13), pages 918 - 922, XP058292187, ISBN: 978-1-58113-964-8, DOI: 10.1145/1066677.1066889 *
PALLIS G ET AL: "A clustering-based prefetching scheme on a Web cache environment", COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, PERGAMON PRESS, GB, vol. 34, no. 4, 1 July 2008 (2008-07-01), pages 309 - 323, XP022627240, ISSN: 0045-7906, [retrieved on 20080426], DOI: 10.1016/J.COMPELECENG.2007.04.002 *
See also references of WO2014195930A1 *
WALEED ALI ET AL: "A Survey of Web Caching and Prefetching", INT. J. ADVANCE. SOFT COMPUT. APPL., 1 March 2011 (2011-03-01), pages 1 - 27, XP055578798, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/36316/2/IJASCA15_A-Survey-of-Web-Caching.pdf> [retrieved on 20190408] *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN105264520A (zh) 2016-01-20
CN105264520B (zh) 2019-07-16
WO2014195930A1 (fr) 2014-12-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20230161739A1 (en) Systems and methods for in-place records management and content lifecycle management
US10545981B2 (en) Virtual repository management
CN106233259B (zh) 在分散存储网络中检索多世代存储数据的方法和系统
CN100437576C (zh) 用于发现并连接到数据源的方法、系统和装置
US20040187075A1 (en) Document management apparatus, system and method
US9135454B2 (en) Systems and methods for enabling searchable encryption
US11768883B2 (en) System and method for in-place record content management
CN107515879B (zh) 用于文档检索的方法和电子设备
US10628460B2 (en) Delegating resembling data of an organization to a linked device
CN108154024A (zh) 一种数据检索方法、装置及电子设备
US10152528B2 (en) Delegating portions of an index of an enterprise
CN111221562A (zh) 药物研发软件仓库及其软件包管理系统
Galletta et al. An approach to share MRI data over the Cloud preserving patients' privacy
EP3005154A1 (fr) Délégation de données ressemblantes d&#39;une organisation à un dispositif lié
CN110995670B (zh) 基于区块链的数字身份信息管理方法及系统
US11586600B2 (en) In-advance indexing
US11113339B2 (en) System and method for federated content management using a federated library and federated metadata propagation
CN108156201B (zh) 统一管理应用系统配置数据的方法和装置
CN111352985A (zh) 一种基于计算机系统的数据服务平台、方法、存储介质
Micheli et al. Efficient Multi-User Indexing for Secure Keyword Search.
CN105531697B (zh) 一种内容信息处理方法和系统
Hohenstein et al. A Multi-criteria Approach for Large-object Cloud Storage.
CN114942920A (zh) 一种基于浏览器脑电数据处理方法、处理系统及存储系统
CN114547020A (zh) 一种应用于数据库的数据处理方法和数据处理装置
CN117370274A (zh) 一种企业数据的智能归档方法及系统

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20151203

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20190415

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R003

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20210326