EP2963950B1 - Modal response compensation - Google Patents
Modal response compensation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2963950B1 EP2963950B1 EP15151166.4A EP15151166A EP2963950B1 EP 2963950 B1 EP2963950 B1 EP 2963950B1 EP 15151166 A EP15151166 A EP 15151166A EP 2963950 B1 EP2963950 B1 EP 2963950B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- channel signal
- loudspeaker
- modal response
- filtered
- filter
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 claims description 53
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000205 computational method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S7/00—Indicating arrangements; Control arrangements, e.g. balance control
- H04S7/30—Control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field
- H04S7/301—Automatic calibration of stereophonic sound system, e.g. with test microphone
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S7/00—Indicating arrangements; Control arrangements, e.g. balance control
- H04S7/30—Control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field
- H04S7/305—Electronic adaptation of stereophonic audio signals to reverberation of the listening space
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for compensating for a modal response of a listening room on an acoustic output from an audio system including at least a first and a second loudspeaker.
- a typical listening room exhibits, as part of its acoustical characteristics, modal frequencies that are dependent on the dimensions of the room. It is common amongst room compensation algorithms in loudspeaker systems to use filters that have the reciprocal of the magnitude responses of this modal behavior. In other words, where the room mode creates an increase in the signal at a location in a listening room (due to resonating standing waves) the audio system includes a filter that reduces the signal by the same amount.
- Figure 1 shows a conceptual drawing of the behavior of standing waves in one dimension of a room. Note that the lowest modal frequency (the top curve with a frequency of (1f) has an opposite polarity on either side of the room. The next modal frequency (2f) has the same polarity on either side of the room. This pattern continues - odd numbered modes have opposite polarity, even-numbered modes have similar polarity.
- Figure 2 shows a simplified magnitude response of the modal response in one dimension of a listening room with a single sound source.
- loudspeakers in a system are considered to be independent sources. They are therefore measured as such using some version of the following method:
- a microphone (or microphones) is used to measure the behavior of a loudspeaker in a given position or positions in a room.
- the calculated response (in the time domain or the frequency domain) is used to create a filter that, in some way, is the reciprocal of the room's behavior.
- the response of the filter may be calculated in the frequency or time domain and it may or may not be smoothed.
- Various techniques are currently employed in many different varieties of systems.
- FIG. 3 shows a typical filtering strategy for compensation of modal behavior in a room
- figure 4 shows a typical filtering magnitude response for compensation of modal behavior in a room with a single source. Note that this is the inverse of the modal response shown in Figure 2 .
- loudspeakers are considered as independent sources.
- the loudspeakers are playing correlated (or negatively correlated) signals.
- they are very rarely used to play uncorrelated signals when used to play typical program material such as music. Consequently, their behavior in conjunction with the listening room's acoustical behavior should not be considered independently of each other.
- a method for compensating for a modal response of a listening room on an acoustic output from an audio system including at least a first and a second loudspeaker comprising receiving a left channel input signal and a right channel input signal, transforming the left channel signal and the right channel signal to a mid channel signal and a side channel signal, applying a mid channel filter to the mid channel signal, to provide a filtered mid channel signal, applying a side channel filter to the side channel signal, to provide a filtered side channel signal, retransforming the filtered mid channel signal and the filtered side channel signal to a left channel output and a right channel output, applying the filtered left channel output to the first loudspeaker, and applying the filtered right channel output the second loudspeaker.
- the mid channel filter is created by applying correlated signals to the first and the second loudspeakers, measuring a correlated modal response of the listening room, creating the mid channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of the correlated modal response.
- the side channel filter is created by applying negatively correlated signals to the first and the second loudspeakers, measuring a negatively correlated modal response of the listening room, and creating the side channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of the negatively correlated modal response.
- the invention is based on the realization that the measurement procedure, regardless of the method, should use the two loudspeakers as positively correlated and negatively correlated sources, instead of independent left and right sources.
- the resulting filters are then applied to the summed "mid” (or 'M') and difference "side” (or'S') channels formed from the right and left channels and compensated right and left channels are formed from the filtered M and S channels.
- the resulting filtering is more efficient, as it avoids applying filtering to musical signals that do not require correction due to the interaction (or lack thereof) between the signals (as a result of their correlation coefficient) and the listening room's resonant behavior.
- the method consists of performing the loudspeaker measurements using the same stimuli and computational method as desired and as is currently in use with existing systems. Consequently, the actual implementation of the filters themselves (both how they are created and how they are implemented) is independent of this invention.
- This invention can be applied to any prior art (or future) filtering method that is designed for a single loudspeaker in a multi-loudspeaker configuration.
- the difference lies in the presentation of the stimulus during the measurement procedure.
- the loudspeaker+room response of both loudspeakers playing correlated signals is measured and a filter is created using the method of the user's choice.
- This filter is referred to as the Filter for Positively Correlated Signals, F pos .
- the loudspeaker+room response of both loudspeakers playing negatively correlated signals is measured and a filter is created using the method of the user's choice.
- This filter is referred to as the Filter for Negatively Correlated Signals, F neg .
- One additional advantage of this system is that the same filtering is applied to the correlated signals in both loudspeakers. Thus, there is no impact on phantom images panned to be localized directly between the two loudspeakers. Similarly, negatively correlated signals are also filtered similarly, thus maintaining their negative correlation and consequently their perceived spatial impression at the listening position.
- the filters F pos and F neg are created and applied in a central unit 2 of an audio system 1, with access to both left and right audio channels (L, R).
- This is referred to as a "central" system.
- the central unit 2 is the same unit that receives and amplifies the audio source signal.
- the central unit is connected to a left speaker 3 and a right speaker 4.
- the central unit 2 here includes circuitry 10 for creating, storing and applying the filters F pos 11 and F neg 12.
- the central unit 2 further has a L/R-to-M/S converter 13, the summed or "M” output being connected to the F pos filter 11 and the difference or "S" output being connected to the F neg filter 12.
- the filtered outputs M filter , S filter of the filters 11, 12 are each connected to a M/S-toR converter 14 and a M/S-to-L converter 15, respectively.
- the outputs L out , Rout from these converters 14, 15 are connected to the left and right speakers 3, 4, respectively. It is noted that the converters 14, 15 may be integrated as one M/S-to-L/R converter.
- the unit 2 is also connected to at least one microphone 9, which provides input to the circuitry 10.
- the circuitry 10 controls the audio system to output correlated signals on each loudspeaker 3, 4.
- the resulting audio signals are received by the microphone(s) 9, and supplied to the circuitry 10.
- the circuitry determines a first room response, referred to as a room response for correlated signals.
- the first room response is used to define and create the filter 11.
- the circuitry controls the audio system to output negatively correlated signals on each loudspeaker 3, 4.
- the resulting audio signals are received by the microphone(s) 9, and supplied to the circuitry 10.
- the circuitry determines a second room response, referred to as a room response for negatively correlated signals. This second room response is used to define and create the filter 12.
- the determination of room response can be performed using conventional measurement techniques.
- the filters can be created using conventional techniques.
- the mid channel signal M is then supplied to the filter 11, while the side channel signal S is supplied to the filter 12.
- the left and right channel output signals Lout, Rout are applied to the left and right speakers 3, 4 respectively, where they are applied to electro-acoustic transducers.
- the filters F pos and F neg are created and applied in each speaker 103, 104 of an audio system 101.
- This is referred to as a "distributed" system.
- a central unit 2 has access to both left and right audio channels (L, R), and is connected to a left speaker 103 and a right speaker 104.
- each loudspeaker 103, 104 will have a set of the filters F pos 111 and F neg 112, and also includes circuitry 110a, 110b for creating, storing and applying the filters F pos 111 and F neg 112.
- Each loudspeaker further includes a R/L-to-M/S converter 113, the M output being connected to the F pos filter 111 and the S output being connected to the F neg filter 112.
- Each loudspeaker 103, 104 is also connected to at least one microphone 109a, 109b, which provides input to the circuitry 110a, 110b.
- the left speaker further includes a M/S-to-L converter 114, connected to the filtered outputs M filter , S filter of the filters 111, 112, and a transducer connected to the output Lout from the converter 114.
- the right speaker further includes a M/S-to-R converter 115, connected to the filtered outputs M filter , S filter of the filters 111, 112, and a transducer connected to the output Rout from the converter 115.
- the circuitry 110a, 110b first interact to control the audio system to output correlated signals on each loudspeaker 103, 104.
- the resulting audio signals are received at the central unit by the microphone(s) 109, and supplied to each circuitry 110a, 110b.
- Each circuitry 110a, 110b determines a first room response, referred to as a room response for correlated signals.
- the first room response is used to define and create the filter 111 in each circuitry 110a, 110b, independently of each other.
- the circuitry 110a, 110b controls the audio system to output negatively correlated signals on each loudspeaker 103, 104. Again, the resulting audio signals are received at the central unit by the microphone(s) 109, and supplied to each circuitry 110a, 110b. Each circuitry 110a, 110b then determines a second room response, referred to as a room response for negatively correlated signals. This second room response is used to define and create the filter 112 in each circuitry 110a, 110b, independently of each other.
- the M channel signal M is then supplied to the filters 111, while the S channel signal S is supplied to the filters 112.
- the left and right channel output signals Lout, Rout are applied to the transducers in the left and right speakers 103, 104 respectively.
- the correlation of the measurements can be performed by summing and subtracting the time measurements (impulse responses) of the two loudspeakers. This can be done instead of playing the signals from both loudspeakers simultaneously. Both methods are equivalent.
- this method is described for a two-channel system considering only one dimension of a listening room, it is applicable to systems with more than two loudspeakers and rooms with more than one dimension.
- the system can be applied to any pair of loudspeakers in a loudspeaker system that contains more than two loudspeakers.
Description
- The present invention relates to a method for compensating for a modal response of a listening room on an acoustic output from an audio system including at least a first and a second loudspeaker.
- A typical listening room exhibits, as part of its acoustical characteristics, modal frequencies that are dependent on the dimensions of the room. It is common amongst room compensation algorithms in loudspeaker systems to use filters that have the reciprocal of the magnitude responses of this modal behavior. In other words, where the room mode creates an increase in the signal at a location in a listening room (due to resonating standing waves) the audio system includes a filter that reduces the signal by the same amount.
-
Figure 1 shows a conceptual drawing of the behavior of standing waves in one dimension of a room. Note that the lowest modal frequency (the top curve with a frequency of (1f) has an opposite polarity on either side of the room. The next modal frequency (2f) has the same polarity on either side of the room. This pattern continues - odd numbered modes have opposite polarity, even-numbered modes have similar polarity. -
Figure 2 shows a simplified magnitude response of the modal response in one dimension of a listening room with a single sound source. - In current filtering systems that are intended to compensate for a listening room's acoustical behavior, loudspeakers in a system are considered to be independent sources. They are therefore measured as such using some version of the following method:
- A microphone (or microphones) is used to measure the behavior of a loudspeaker in a given position or positions in a room. The calculated response (in the time domain or the frequency domain) is used to create a filter that, in some way, is the reciprocal of the room's behavior. The response of the filter may be calculated in the frequency or time domain and it may or may not be smoothed. Various techniques are currently employed in many different varieties of systems.
- Each loudspeaker in a system is measured using this method, and a filter is created independently for each.
Figure 3 shows a typical filtering strategy for compensation of modal behavior in a room, andfigure 4 shows a typical filtering magnitude response for compensation of modal behavior in a room with a single source. Note that this is the inverse of the modal response shown inFigure 2 . - A problem with current systems is that the loudspeakers are considered as independent sources. However, in a typical situation, the loudspeakers are playing correlated (or negatively correlated) signals. In fact, they are very rarely used to play uncorrelated signals when used to play typical program material such as music. Consequently, their behavior in conjunction with the listening room's acoustical behavior should not be considered independently of each other.
- It is an object of the present invention to improve existing filtering implementations.
- This and other objects are achieved by a method for compensating for a modal response of a listening room on an acoustic output from an audio system including at least a first and a second loudspeaker, the method comprising receiving a left channel input signal and a right channel input signal, transforming the left channel signal and the right channel signal to a mid channel signal and a side channel signal, applying a mid channel filter to the mid channel signal, to provide a filtered mid channel signal, applying a side channel filter to the side channel signal, to provide a filtered side channel signal, retransforming the filtered mid channel signal and the filtered side channel signal to a left channel output and a right channel output, applying the filtered left channel output to the first loudspeaker, and applying the filtered right channel output the second loudspeaker. The mid channel filter is created by applying correlated signals to the first and the second loudspeakers, measuring a correlated modal response of the listening room, creating the mid channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of the correlated modal response. The side channel filter is created by applying negatively correlated signals to the first and the second loudspeakers, measuring a negatively correlated modal response of the listening room, and creating the side channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of the negatively correlated modal response.
- The invention is based on the realization that the measurement procedure, regardless of the method, should use the two loudspeakers as positively correlated and negatively correlated sources, instead of independent left and right sources. The resulting filters are then applied to the summed "mid" (or 'M') and difference "side" (or'S') channels formed from the right and left channels and compensated right and left channels are formed from the filtered M and S channels.
- The resulting filtering is more efficient, as it avoids applying filtering to musical signals that do not require correction due to the interaction (or lack thereof) between the signals (as a result of their correlation coefficient) and the listening room's resonant behavior.
- The method consists of performing the loudspeaker measurements using the same stimuli and computational method as desired and as is currently in use with existing systems. Consequently, the actual implementation of the filters themselves (both how they are created and how they are implemented) is independent of this invention. This invention can be applied to any prior art (or future) filtering method that is designed for a single loudspeaker in a multi-loudspeaker configuration.
- The difference lies in the presentation of the stimulus during the measurement procedure. First, the loudspeaker+room response of both loudspeakers playing correlated signals is measured and a filter is created using the method of the user's choice. This filter is referred to as the Filter for Positively Correlated Signals, Fpos. Then, the loudspeaker+room response of both loudspeakers playing negatively correlated signals is measured and a filter is created using the method of the user's choice. This filter is referred to as the Filter for Negatively Correlated Signals, Fneg.
- One additional advantage of this system is that the same filtering is applied to the correlated signals in both loudspeakers. Thus, there is no impact on phantom images panned to be localized directly between the two loudspeakers. Similarly, negatively correlated signals are also filtered similarly, thus maintaining their negative correlation and consequently their perceived spatial impression at the listening position.
- The present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the appended drawings, showing currently preferred embodiments of the invention.
-
Figure 1 shows a conceptual drawing of the behavior of standing waves in one dimension of a room. -
Figure 2 shows a simplified magnitude response of the modal response in one dimension of a listening room with a single sound source. -
Figure 3 shows a typical filtering strategy for compensation of modal behavior in a room. -
Figure 4 shows a typical filtering magnitude response for compensation of modal behavior in a room with a single source. -
Figure 5 shows the behavior of standing waves in one dimension of a room being activated by two loudspeakers playing positively correlated signals. -
Figure 6 shows a simplified magnitude response of the modal response in one dimension of a listening room with two sound sources playing correlated signals. -
Figure 7 shows an example of the desired filtering magnitude response for compensation of the modal response inFigure 6 . -
Figure 8 shows the behavior of standing waves in one dimension of a room being activated by two loudspeakers that are playing negatively correlated signals. -
Figure 9 shows a simplified magnitude response of the modal response in one dimension of a listening room with two sound sources playing negatively correlated signals. -
Figure 10 shows an example of the desired magnitude response for compensation of the modal response infigure 9 . -
Figure 11 shows a block diagram of an implementation according to a first embodiment of the present invention. -
Figure 12 shows a block diagram of an implementation according to a second embodiment of the present invention. - When two loudspeakers are placed in opposite sides of one dimension of a listening room and are playing correlated signals, they have the same polarity at all times. This directly conflicts with the odd-numbered modal frequencies in the room, which, as is shown in
Figure 1 , are opposite in polarity on either side of the room. Consequently, these modes are not activated in the room, since they are being actively cancelled by the signals from the two loudspeakers. This is illustrated infigures 5- 6. Figure 7 shows the desired filter magnitude response required to compensate for the modal response infigure 6 . Note that this is the inverse of the modal response inFigure 6 . - Simultaneously, the negatively correlated signals in the two loudspeakers actively cancel the even-numbered modal frequencies which have similar polarities on either side of the room. The even-numbers modes are not activated, since the loudspeakers are negatively correlated and the modal behavior from the locations of the loudspeakers has the same polarities. This is illustrated in
figures 8-9. Figure 10 shows the desired filter magnitude response required to compensate for the modal response infigure 9 . Note that this is the inverse of the modal response inFigure 9 . - In a first embodiment, illustrated in
figure 11 , the filters Fpos and Fneg are created and applied in acentral unit 2 of anaudio system 1, with access to both left and right audio channels (L, R). This is referred to as a "central" system. Typically, but not necessarily, thecentral unit 2 is the same unit that receives and amplifies the audio source signal. The central unit is connected to aleft speaker 3 and aright speaker 4. - The
central unit 2 here includescircuitry 10 for creating, storing and applying thefilters F pos 11 andF neg 12. Thecentral unit 2 further has a L/R-to-M/S converter 13, the summed or "M" output being connected to the Fpos filter 11 and the difference or "S" output being connected to the Fneg filter 12. The filtered outputs Mfilter, Sfilter of thefilters toR converter 14 and a M/S-to-L converter 15, respectively. The outputs Lout, Rout from theseconverters right speakers converters unit 2 is also connected to at least onemicrophone 9, which provides input to thecircuitry 10. - The operation of the system will be described in the following.
- During an initiation phase, the
circuitry 10 controls the audio system to output correlated signals on eachloudspeaker circuitry 10. The circuitry then determines a first room response, referred to as a room response for correlated signals. The first room response is used to define and create thefilter 11. Then, the circuitry controls the audio system to output negatively correlated signals on eachloudspeaker circuitry 10. The circuitry then determines a second room response, referred to as a room response for negatively correlated signals. This second room response is used to define and create thefilter 12. - It is noted that the determination of room response can be performed using conventional measurement techniques. Also, the filters can be created using conventional techniques.
- When used with room compensation systems that employ a target magnitude response, it should be remembered that the target responses of the Positively Correlated signals and the Negatively Correlated signals should be different.
- During playback, the left and right channel input signals L, R are supplied to the
converter 13, where the M and S channel signals M, S are formed according to M = L + R, S = L - R. The mid channel signal M is then supplied to thefilter 11, while the side channel signal S is supplied to thefilter 12. The filtered outputs from eachfilter converters right speakers - In an alternative embodiment, illustrated in
figure 12 , the filters Fpos and Fneg are created and applied in each speaker 103, 104 of an audio system 101. This is referred to as a "distributed" system. Also in this case, acentral unit 2 has access to both left and right audio channels (L, R), and is connected to a left speaker 103 and a right speaker 104. - In this case, however, each loudspeaker 103, 104 will have a set of the
filters F pos 111 andF neg 112, and also includescircuitry filters F pos 111 andF neg 112. Each loudspeaker further includes a R/L-to-M/S converter 113, the M output being connected to the Fpos filter 111 and the S output being connected to the Fneg filter 112. Each loudspeaker 103, 104 is also connected to at least onemicrophone circuitry - The left speaker further includes a M/S-to-
L converter 114, connected to the filtered outputs Mfilter, Sfilter of thefilters converter 114. - The right speaker further includes a M/S-to-
R converter 115, connected to the filtered outputs Mfilter, Sfilter of thefilters converter 115. - The operation of the system according to this embodiment is similar to that described in relation to
figure 11 , except for where the various steps take place. - During an initiation phase, the
circuitry circuitry circuitry filter 111 in eachcircuitry - Secondly, the
circuitry circuitry circuitry filter 112 in eachcircuitry - During playback, the left and right channel input signals L, R are supplied to each loudspeaker 103, 104, where the converters 113 generate mid and side channel signals M, S according to M = L + R, S = L - R. The M channel signal M is then supplied to the
filters 111, while the S channel signal S is supplied to thefilters 112. The filtered outputs from eachfilter converters - The person skilled in the art realizes that the present invention by no means is limited to the preferred embodiments described above. On the contrary, many modifications and variations are possible within the scope of the appended claims.
- For example, the correlation of the measurements (both positive and negative) can be performed by summing and subtracting the time measurements (impulse responses) of the two loudspeakers. This can be done instead of playing the signals from both loudspeakers simultaneously. Both methods are equivalent.
- Although this method is described for a two-channel system considering only one dimension of a listening room, it is applicable to systems with more than two loudspeakers and rooms with more than one dimension. The system can be applied to any pair of loudspeakers in a loudspeaker system that contains more than two loudspeakers.
- In systems where a gain and delay can be applied to the loudspeaker outputs to compensate for incorrect listener placement, these compensation elements should be applied to the Left and Right input signals before the M/S filtering takes place. In this way, the effects of the mismatched gains and delays on the room's acoustical behavior will be compensated for in the filtering. Placing the gains and delays after the filter blocks will result in an incorrect effect. One recommended implementation is shown in
Figure 13 , showing the correct placement of the delay and gain used for listener placement compensation. Note that the Gain and Delay blocks are placed before the M/S Filtering stages.
Claims (14)
- A method for compensating for a modal response of a listening room on an acoustic output from an audio system including at least a first and a second loudspeaker, the method comprising:receiving a left channel input signal and a right channel input signal;transforming said left channel signal and said right channel signal to a mid channel signal and a side channel signal;applying a mid channel filter (Fpos) to said mid channel signal to provide a filtered mid channel signal;applying a side channel filter (Fneg) to said side channel signal to provide a filtered side channel signal;retransforming said filtered mid channel signal and said filtered side channel signal to a left channel output and a right channel output;applying said filtered left channel output to said first loudspeaker; and applying said filtered right channel output said second loudspeaker;wherein said mid channel filter is created by:applying correlated signals to said first and said second loudspeakers,measuring a correlated modal response of said listening room,creating said mid channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of said correlated modal response; andwherein said side channel filter is created by:applying negatively correlated signals to said first and said second loudspeakers,measuring a negatively correlated modal response of said listening room, andcreating said side channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of said negatively correlated modal response.
- The method according to claim 1, wherein said step of transforming said left channel signal and said right channel signal to a mid channel signal and a side channel signal is performed by a L/R-to-M/S converter (13) in a central unit (2) connected to said first and second loudspeaker.
- The method according to claim 2, wherein said step of retransforming said filtered mid channel signal and said filtered side channel signal to a left channel output and a right channel output is performed by M/S-to-R/L converter(s) (14, 15) in said central unit (2).
- The method according to claim 1, wherein said step of transforming said left channel signal and said right channel signal to a mid channel signal and a side channel signal is performed by a L/R-to-M/S converter (113a) in said first loudspeaker and by a L/R-to-M/S converter (113b) in said second loudspeaker.
- The method according to claim 4, wherein said step of retransforming said filtered mid channel signal and said filtered side channel signal to a left channel output is performed by a M/S-to-L converter (114) in said first loudspeaker, and said step of retransforming said filtered mid channel signal and said filtered side channel signal to a right channel output is performed by M/S-to-R converter (115) in said second loudspeaker.
- The method according to claim 1, wherein the steps of:measuring a correlated modal response of said listening room,creating said mid channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of said correlated modal response,measuring a negatively correlated modal response of said listening room, andcreating said mid channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of said negatively correlated modal response,are performed by microphone(s) (9) and circuitry (10) in a central unit (2) connected to said first and second loudspeakers (3, 4).
- The method according to claim 1, wherein the steps of:measuring a correlated modal response of said listening room, andcreating said mid channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of said correlated modal response,are performed by microphone(s) (109a) and circuitry (110a) in or connected to said first loudspeaker (103),
and wherein the steps of :measuring a negatively correlated modal response of said listening room, andcreating said mid channel filter to have a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of said negatively correlated modal response,are performed by microphone(s) (109b) and circuitry (110b) in or connected to said second loudspeaker (104). - An audio system in a listening room, comprising:a first and a second loudspeaker (3, 4; 103, 104);circuitry (10) for applying, in a first sequence, correlated signals to said first and said second loudspeakers, and, in a second sequence, negatively correlated signals to said first and said second loudspeakers,at least one microphone (109; 109a, 109b) for measuring, in said first sequence, a correlated modal response of said listening room, and, in said second sequence, a negatively correlated modal response of said listening room,circuitry (10) for creating a mid channel filter (Fpos) with a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of said correlated modal response; and creating a side channel filter (Fneg) with a modal response substantially equal to an inverse of said negatively correlated modal response;L/R-to-M/S converting circuitry (13; 113) for transforming a left channel signal and a right channel signal to a mid channel signal and a side channel signal;circuitry (10; 110a, 110b) for applying said mid channel filter to said mid channel signal to provide a filtered side channel signal, and for applying a side channel filter to said side channel signal to provide a filtered side channel signal;L/R-to-M/S converting circuitry (14, 15; 114, 115) for retransforming said filtered mid channel signal and said filtered side channel signal to a left channel output and a right channel output,wherein said filtered left channel output is applied to said first loudspeaker (3; 103); and said filtered right channel output is applied to said second loudspeaker (4; 104);
- The audio system in claim 8, wherein said L/R-to-M/S converting circuitry (13) is provided in a central unit (2) connected to said first and second loudspeaker (3, 4).
- The audio system in claim 9, wherein said L/R-to-M/S converting circuitry (14, 15) is provided in said central unit (2).
- The audio system in claim 8, wherein said circuitry (10) is provided in said central unit (2).
- The audio system in claim 8, wherein said L/R-to-M/S converting circuitry comprises a first L/R-to-M/S converter (113) provided in said first loudspeaker (3) and a second L/R-to-M/S converter (113) provided in said second loudspeaker (4).
- The audio system in claim 11, wherein said L/R-to-M/S converting circuitry comprises a M/S-to-L converter (114) in said first loudspeaker, and a M/S-to-R converter (115) in said second loudspeaker.
- The audio system in claim 8 , wherein said circuitry (110a, 110b) is provided in said first loudspeaker (103) and in said second loudspeaker (104), respectively.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DKPA201400364 | 2014-07-04 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2963950A1 EP2963950A1 (en) | 2016-01-06 |
EP2963950B1 true EP2963950B1 (en) | 2016-11-23 |
Family
ID=52465172
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP15151166.4A Active EP2963950B1 (en) | 2014-07-04 | 2015-01-14 | Modal response compensation |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2963950B1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2963950T3 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10715915B2 (en) * | 2018-09-28 | 2020-07-14 | Boomcloud 360, Inc. | Spatial crosstalk processing for stereo signal |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2007028094A1 (en) * | 2005-09-02 | 2007-03-08 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | Self-calibrating loudspeaker |
DE602006018703D1 (en) * | 2006-04-05 | 2011-01-20 | Harman Becker Automotive Sys | Method for automatically equalizing a public address system |
EP2705516B1 (en) * | 2011-05-04 | 2016-07-06 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Encoding of stereophonic signals |
-
2015
- 2015-01-14 EP EP15151166.4A patent/EP2963950B1/en active Active
- 2015-01-14 DK DK15151166.4T patent/DK2963950T3/en active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2963950A1 (en) | 2016-01-06 |
DK2963950T3 (en) | 2017-02-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP5540581B2 (en) | Audio signal processing apparatus and audio signal processing method | |
US9756446B2 (en) | Robust crosstalk cancellation using a speaker array | |
US20170064476A1 (en) | Headphone response measurement and equalization | |
AU2023203442A1 (en) | Generating binaural audio in response to multi-channel audio using at least one feedback delay network | |
US10623857B2 (en) | Individual delay compensation for personal sound zones | |
US20150373476A1 (en) | Audio system phase equalization | |
US9584938B2 (en) | Method of determining acoustical characteristics of a room or venue having n sound sources | |
WO2007066378A1 (en) | Sound signal processing device, method of processing sound signal, sound reproducing system, method of designing sound signal processing device | |
CN107079229A (en) | Personal multichannel audio Compensatory Control device design | |
US10448187B2 (en) | Active room compensation in loudspeaker system | |
JP3565846B2 (en) | Adaptive sound system and sound reproduction system | |
EP2963950B1 (en) | Modal response compensation | |
US20050013442A1 (en) | Sound field control system and sound field control method | |
JP2004279525A (en) | Sound field control system and sound field control method | |
US10750283B2 (en) | Acoustic device and acoustic control device | |
JP2006196940A (en) | Sound image localization control apparatus | |
US11057706B2 (en) | Speaker driving device | |
JP2001314000A (en) | Sound field generation system | |
JP4963356B2 (en) | How to design a filter | |
JP5020243B2 (en) | Method and device for actively modifying the acoustic properties of a listening zone in an acoustic space | |
JP3909065B2 (en) | Acoustic signal processing apparatus, acoustic signal processing method, acoustic reproduction system, and acoustic signal processing apparatus design method | |
JPWO2009008068A1 (en) | Automatic sound field correction device | |
US20110280421A1 (en) | Device for and a method of processing audio signals | |
JP2008072641A (en) | Acoustic processor, acoustic processing method, and acoustic processing system | |
EP2257084B1 (en) | Multipoint adaptive equalization control method and multipoint adaptive equalization control system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20150526 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160622 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 848846 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602015000753 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: FIAMMENGHI-FIAMMENGHI, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 Effective date: 20170214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20161123 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 848846 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170224 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170223 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170323 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170131 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602015000753 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170223 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170131 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170824 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20150114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161123 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170323 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20230201 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20221220 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230703 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231219 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20231219 Year of fee payment: 10 |