EP2943556B1 - Process for the hydrogenation of carbon sulphide using a sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst on an aluminium oxide carrier - Google Patents

Process for the hydrogenation of carbon sulphide using a sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst on an aluminium oxide carrier Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2943556B1
EP2943556B1 EP14702755.1A EP14702755A EP2943556B1 EP 2943556 B1 EP2943556 B1 EP 2943556B1 EP 14702755 A EP14702755 A EP 14702755A EP 2943556 B1 EP2943556 B1 EP 2943556B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cobalt
hydrogenation
catalysts
molybdenum
sulphidic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP14702755.1A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2943556A1 (en
Inventor
Michael Rieger
Jan SCHÖNEBERGER
Holger Thielert
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions AG
Original Assignee
ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE201310009885 external-priority patent/DE102013009885A1/en
Application filed by ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions AG filed Critical ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions AG
Priority to PL14702755T priority Critical patent/PL2943556T3/en
Publication of EP2943556A1 publication Critical patent/EP2943556A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2943556B1 publication Critical patent/EP2943556B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10KPURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/002Removal of contaminants
    • C10K1/003Removal of contaminants of acid contaminants, e.g. acid gas removal
    • C10K1/004Sulfur containing contaminants, e.g. hydrogen sulfide
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10KPURIFYING OR MODIFYING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COMBUSTIBLE GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE
    • C10K1/00Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide
    • C10K1/34Purifying combustible gases containing carbon monoxide by catalytic conversion of impurities to more readily removable materials

Definitions

  • the invention belongs to the field of coke making technology and relates to a new process for the removal of carbon sulphides from coke oven gas.
  • Coke oven gas (synonym: coking gas) is obtained from dry distillation of hard coal in coke oven plants.
  • the gas typically contains approx. 55 %-wt hydrogen, 25 %-wt methane, 10 %-wt nitrogen and 5 %-wt. carbon monoxide. Due to this, coke oven gas is generally qualified as a synthesis gas for chemical reactions; disadvantageous, however, are the contents of carbonyl sulphide and carbon disulphide, which must previously be removed as they act as catalyst poisons in subsequent reactions, for example. The consequence is that the catalysts must frequently be cleaned or even exchanged, which directly involves effort and cost and is also unwanted because of the turnaround of the plant.
  • a common method to free industrial gas from unwanted carbon sulphides is the catalytic hydrolysis of such compounds as described in DE 26 47 690 A1 , EP 2 412 667 A1 , GB 1 332 337 A , US 4 336 233 A , US 4 863 489 A , WO 2004/105922 A1 , and WO 93/13184 A1 .
  • One further method to free coke oven gas from unwanted carbon sulphides is to subject the gas to a catalytic hydrogenation and to convert the sulphur compounds into hydrogen sulphide. Although this gas is also unwanted, it can be washed out easily by means of aqueous lye, for example, ammonia solution.
  • a catalytic hydrogenation of gas mixtures is known in which carbonyl sulphide is hydrogenated using catalyst materials such as alumina, bauxite, activated clays, aluminium phosphate, thoria and magnesium chloride while carbon disulphide is hydrogenated using a catalyst containing at least one metal from Groups VI and/or VIII of the Periodic System of the Elements, either as such or in chemically bound form.
  • catalyst materials such as alumina, bauxite, activated clays, aluminium phosphate, thoria and magnesium chloride
  • carbon disulphide is hydrogenated using a catalyst containing at least one metal from Groups VI and/or VIII of the Periodic System of the Elements, either as such or in chemically bound form.
  • Cobalt-molybdenum-aluminium catalysts for hydrogenation of carbonyl sulphide and carbon disulphide are also known from US 4 336 233 and EP 2 412 667 A1 , respectively.Related processes are already known according to prior
  • German patent application DE 1545470 A1 suggests to hydrogenate carbon sulphides over cobalt molybdenum, nickel molybdenum or nickel cobalt molybdenum catalysts to hydrogen sulphide, which is then to be separated.
  • the reaction temperature in the examples is above 550 °C.
  • German patent application DE 2647690 A1 (Parsons ), which proposes to hydrogenate sulphur-bearing carbon compounds over catalysts on the basis of cobalt, molybdenum, iron, chromium, vanadium, thorium, nickel, tungsten and/or uranium and to remove the hydrogen sulphide obtained in an extraction column by means of an alkali hydroxide solution.
  • the sulphides of the above metals are proposed as concrete catalysts.
  • a disadvantage involved is, however, that in this case as well the catalysts require a minimum temperature of 260 °C and the hydrogenation must preferably be carried out at significantly higher temperatures, partly even above 400 °C. This is not desired especially for reasons of energy cost; in addition, such temperatures will change the composition of the gas, i.e. methanation will take place already.
  • Aim of the present invention therefore was to improve the existing processes in so far as the carbon sulphides and organic sulphur compounds (e.g. thiophenes), if any, are transformed virtually quantitatively to hydrogen sulphide but at temperatures which are significantly lower. Furthermore, the process was intended to ensure keeping the mass ratio of carbon oxides to methane unchanged, i.e. preventing methanation.
  • carbon sulphides and organic sulphur compounds e.g. thiophenes
  • Subject matter of the invention is a process for the production of synthesis gas from hard coal, in which
  • the sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts known for hydrogenation of carbon sulphides feature a high activity and selectivity even below 280 and preferably below 260°C if they are deposited on aluminium oxide carrier material. Carbon sulphides are actually hydrogenated to hydrogen sulphide at at least 95 %-vol. without observing an influence of the hydrogenation on the ratio of carbon oxides to methane.
  • Hydrogenation of the pyrolysis gases may be done in the manner customary, for which mainly fixed-bed reactors have proved best suited, as the catalysts are provided in the form of lumps as bulk layer or fixed packing. Since bulk material leads to channelling more easily and hence to an inhomogeneous flow distribution, preference is given to the embodiment in which the catalysts are arranged in packings inside the reactor.
  • the advantage of the hydrogenation in the fixed-bed reactor is that high space/time yields can be achieved, which is why the process according to the invention can also be carried out at high GSHV values of approx. 500 to approx. 1500 and preferably approx. 1000 to approx. 1200 l/h.
  • Another advantage is provided in that no special measures are required for the product discharge, as the reactants - i.e. pyrolysis gas and hydrogen - are preferably introduced jointly at the bottom of the reactor, pass through the catalyst bed leading to hydrogenation and leave the reactor as products at the top.
  • a specific advantage of the process is that the sulphur compounds are hydrogenated over the catalysts to be used according to the invention, so that the reaction is possible at significantly more moderate conditions and effects the complete conversion of the carbon sulphides, without any signs of methanation.
  • the reaction temperature ranges between 200 and 280 and with regard to an adequate reaction velocity preferably between 240 and 260 °C.
  • the reactor may be heated from the outside - which results in a higher energy consumption - or the reaction components may be heated before introducing them into the reactor, with the mixing being possibly done in a nozzle which works, for example, by the Venturi principle.
  • reaction may take place in the range of 1 to 15 bar, i.e. at atmospheric pressure or under pressure. Preference is given to an embodiment which uses a pressure in the range of approx. 5 to approx. 10 bar, as this is of benefit to yield and reaction velocity.
  • 'sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts' mainly refers to catalysts which contain molybdenum sulphide as the actual catalyst and cobalt as the promoter. Catalysts of that kind are produced in known manner by joint sulphidation of the respective oxides, where the MoO 3 is converted completely to MoS 2 . When the latter is applied to the aluminium oxide carrier, it is either bonded flat to the surface ('basal bonding') or to one edge only ('edge bonding').
  • the cobalt is available in three forms: first as Co 9 S 8 crystals deposited on the carrier, as Co 2+ ions on the edges of the MoS 2 plates ('CoMo phase') and as Co 2+ ions on the tetrahedral positions in the aluminium oxide lattice.
  • the catalysts are hence composed predominantly, i.e. of more than 50 %-mole, preferably of more than 70 %-mole and most preferably of more than 90 %-mole, of molybdenum sulphide and contain the cobalt in sulphidic form as a promoter, the quantity in %-mole resulting as the difference to 100. From this it follows that in a likewise preferred embodiment the catalysts do not contain any other metals, especially no other transition metals.
  • Aluminium oxides of especially high specific surface area come into consideration as suitable carriers for the sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts, the aluminium oxides preferably featuring the following characteristics:
  • Aluminium oxide carriers of the type mentioned are sufficiently known from the state of the art.
  • European patent documents EP 1385786 B1 and EP 1385787 B1 (Axens ), for example, describe a process for their manufacture, in which a hydrargillite-type aluminium oxide is ground, undergoes hydrothermal treatment with an aqueous solution of aluminium nitrate and formic acid at 200 °C for 6 hours, the resulting product then being calcined at 400 to 1300. The carrier material is then extruded and is thus ready for loading.
  • the two documents mentioned are related to by reference.
  • the hydrogenation gases are, for this purpose, preferably passed through an absorption column, where they are treated, for example, in counter current with an aqueous base such as caustic soda or ammonia.
  • other devices may be used for the purification of gases as, for example, venturi scrubbers.
  • the purified product is available without restriction as a high-quality synthesis gas for further chemical reactions.
  • a further subject matter of the present invention is the use of sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts provided on aluminum oxide carriers for the hydrogenation of carbon sulphides to hydrogen sulphide, wherein sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts are used which contain molybdenum sulphide as the actual catalyst and cobalt as the promoter, wherein said catalysts are composed of more than 50 %-mole of molybdenum sulphide and said catalysts contain the cobalt in sulphidic form, the quantity in %-mole of said cobalt in sulphidic form resulting as the difference to 100, wherein molybdenum sulphide has been obtained by sulphidation of the respective oxide, wherein the MoO 3 has been converted completely to MoS 2 , wherein after sulphidation the cobalt is present in three forms: first as Co 9 S 8 crystals deposited on the carrier, as Co 2+ ions on the edges of the MoS 2 plates (
  • the present invention also encompasses a method for preparing hydrogen sulphide, wherein carbon sulphides are subjected to hydrogenation in the presence of a working amount of sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts provided on aluminium oxide carriers.
  • the carbon sulphides are subjected to hydrogenation in the presence of cobalt molybdenum catalysts which, with reference to the metal components, predominantly consist of molybdenum sulphide and contain cobalt sulphide as a promoter only.
  • cobalt molybdenum catalysts which, with reference to the metal components, predominantly consist of molybdenum sulphide and contain cobalt sulphide as a promoter only.
  • aluminium oxide carriers meeting the following characteristics:
  • a pilot plant for fixed-bed hydrogenation was equipped with a bulk layer of commercially available lumpy sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst on an aluminium oxide carrier. Subsequently, different coking gases were introduced at the bottom of the column. The only difference between these so-called feed gases was the amount of carbon sulphides, in particular carbon disulphide.
  • the hydrogenation was performed at a temperature of 220 °C and a pressure of 10 bar.
  • the GHSV was about 1200 l/h.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Industrial Gases (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention belongs to the field of coke making technology and relates to a new process for the removal of carbon sulphides from coke oven gas.
  • STATE OF THE ART
  • Coke oven gas (synonym: coking gas) is obtained from dry distillation of hard coal in coke oven plants. As main constituents, the gas typically contains approx. 55 %-wt hydrogen, 25 %-wt methane, 10 %-wt nitrogen and 5 %-wt. carbon monoxide. Due to this, coke oven gas is generally qualified as a synthesis gas for chemical reactions; disadvantageous, however, are the contents of carbonyl sulphide and carbon disulphide, which must previously be removed as they act as catalyst poisons in subsequent reactions, for example. The consequence is that the catalysts must frequently be cleaned or even exchanged, which directly involves effort and cost and is also unwanted because of the turnaround of the plant.
  • A common method to free industrial gas from unwanted carbon sulphides is the catalytic hydrolysis of such compounds as described in DE 26 47 690 A1 , EP 2 412 667 A1 , GB 1 332 337 A , US 4 336 233 A , US 4 863 489 A , WO 2004/105922 A1 , and WO 93/13184 A1 .
  • One further method to free coke oven gas from unwanted carbon sulphides is to subject the gas to a catalytic hydrogenation and to convert the sulphur compounds into hydrogen sulphide. Although this gas is also unwanted, it can be washed out easily by means of aqueous lye, for example, ammonia solution. For example, from GB 1 018 630 A , a catalytic hydrogenation of gas mixtures is known in which carbonyl sulphide is hydrogenated using catalyst materials such as alumina, bauxite, activated clays, aluminium phosphate, thoria and magnesium chloride while carbon disulphide is hydrogenated using a catalyst containing at least one metal from Groups VI and/or VIII of the Periodic System of the Elements, either as such or in chemically bound form. Cobalt-molybdenum-aluminium catalysts for hydrogenation of carbonyl sulphide and carbon disulphide are also known from US 4 336 233 and EP 2 412 667 A1 , respectively.Related processes are already known according to prior art. German patent application DE 1545470 A1 (Pichler ), for example, suggests to hydrogenate carbon sulphides over cobalt molybdenum, nickel molybdenum or nickel cobalt molybdenum catalysts to hydrogen sulphide, which is then to be separated. The reaction temperature in the examples is above 550 °C.
  • The use of catalysts on a nickel, cobalt, molybdenum or palladium basis for the hydrodesul-phurisation of coke oven gas can also be found in various older Japanese patent applications, as, for instance, JP 59 145288 A2 (Shinnittetsu ) or JP 59 230092 A1 (Hitachi ). These processes as well
  • A similar process is also known from German patent application DE 2647690 A1 (Parsons ), which proposes to hydrogenate sulphur-bearing carbon compounds over catalysts on the basis of cobalt, molybdenum, iron, chromium, vanadium, thorium, nickel, tungsten and/or uranium and to remove the hydrogen sulphide obtained in an extraction column by means of an alkali hydroxide solution. The sulphides of the above metals are proposed as concrete catalysts. A disadvantage involved is, however, that in this case as well the catalysts require a minimum temperature of 260 °C and the hydrogenation must preferably be carried out at significantly higher temperatures, partly even above 400 °C. This is not desired especially for reasons of energy cost; in addition, such temperatures will change the composition of the gas, i.e. methanation will take place already.
  • Although prior-art processes serve to transform carbon sulphides to hydrogen sulphide at high yields and to thus convert coke oven gases into synthesis gases of sufficiently high quality, they all involve the substantial disadvantage that these processes must take place at very high temperatures of considerably more than 280 °C, as otherwise no adequate conversion rates will be achieved.
  • Furthermore, from GB 1 404 581 A , it is generally known to perform hydrogenation of crude gas by employing a catalyst containing at least a metal from Group VI and/or a metal from Group VIII of the Periodic System of Elements, either as such or as an oxide or sulphide. US 4 085 199 A discloses the hydrogenation of sulphur compounds in the presence of sulphidized cobalt molybdate catalysts on alumina.
  • Aim of the present invention therefore was to improve the existing processes in so far as the carbon sulphides and organic sulphur compounds (e.g. thiophenes), if any, are transformed virtually quantitatively to hydrogen sulphide but at temperatures which are significantly lower. Furthermore, the process was intended to ensure keeping the mass ratio of carbon oxides to methane unchanged, i.e. preventing methanation.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Subject matter of the invention is a process for the production of synthesis gas from hard coal, in which
    1. (a) hard coal is subjected to dry pyrolysis, resulting in the production of a gas mixture containing hydrogen, methane, nitrogen and carbon monoxide as major constituents and carbon sulphides as minor constituents,
    2. (b) the gas mixture is subjected to hydrogenation at a temperature in the range of 200 to 280 °C over a sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst provided on an aluminium oxide carrier material, and
    3. (c) the hydrogen sulphide obtained from hydrogenation is separated from the gas mixture,
    wherein sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts are used which contain molybdenum sulphide as the actual catalyst and cobalt as the promoter,
    wherein said catalysts are composed of more than 50 %-mole of molybdenum sulphide and said catalysts contain the cobalt in sulphidic form, the quantity in %-mole of said cobalt in sulphidic form resulting as the difference to 100,
    wherein molybdenum sulphide has been obtained by sulphidation of the respective oxide, wherein the MoO3 has been converted completely to MoS2,
    wherein after sulphidation the cobalt is present in three forms: first as Co9S8 crystals deposited on the carrier, as Co2+ ions on the edges of the MoS2 plates ('CoMo phase') and as Co2+ ions on the tetrahedral positions in the aluminum oxide lattice.
  • Surprisingly it was found that the sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts known for hydrogenation of carbon sulphides feature a high activity and selectivity even below 280 and preferably below 260°C if they are deposited on aluminium oxide carrier material. Carbon sulphides are actually hydrogenated to hydrogen sulphide at at least 95 %-vol. without observing an influence of the hydrogenation on the ratio of carbon oxides to methane. This is an unexpected result, as on account of the experience according to document DE 2647690 A1 quoted at the beginning one would have expected that catalysts which mainly contain cobalt and molybdenum in sulphidic form also facilitate unwanted methanation to a non-negligible degree, especially if the reaction is performed, as usual, under pressure.
  • Production of coking gas by pyrolysis of hard coal
  • During dry distillation or pyrolysis of hard coal, which takes place at 900 to 1400 °C, the volatile constituents of the coal are released and porous coke forms, which now essentially contain only carbon. By fractionated condensation the raw gas is decomposed into tar, sulphuric acid, ammonia, naphthalene, benzene and the so-called coking gas. The latter is composed of hydrogen, methane, nitrogen and carbon oxides and may, after adequate treatment to obtain synthesis gas, be used for further chemical reactions.
  • HYDROGENATION PROCESS
  • Hydrogenation of the pyrolysis gases may be done in the manner customary, for which mainly fixed-bed reactors have proved best suited, as the catalysts are provided in the form of lumps as bulk layer or fixed packing. Since bulk material leads to channelling more easily and hence to an inhomogeneous flow distribution, preference is given to the embodiment in which the catalysts are arranged in packings inside the reactor.
  • The advantage of the hydrogenation in the fixed-bed reactor, however, is that high space/time yields can be achieved, which is why the process according to the invention can also be carried out at high GSHV values of approx. 500 to approx. 1500 and preferably approx. 1000 to approx. 1200 l/h. Another advantage is provided in that no special measures are required for the product discharge, as the reactants - i.e. pyrolysis gas and hydrogen - are preferably introduced jointly at the bottom of the reactor, pass through the catalyst bed leading to hydrogenation and leave the reactor as products at the top.
  • As already mentioned at the beginning, a specific advantage of the process is that the sulphur compounds are hydrogenated over the catalysts to be used according to the invention, so that the reaction is possible at significantly more moderate conditions and effects the complete conversion of the carbon sulphides, without any signs of methanation. The reaction temperature ranges between 200 and 280 and with regard to an adequate reaction velocity preferably between 240 and 260 °C. The reactor may be heated from the outside - which results in a higher energy consumption - or the reaction components may be heated before introducing them into the reactor, with the mixing being possibly done in a nozzle which works, for example, by the Venturi principle.
  • Furthermore, the reaction may take place in the range of 1 to 15 bar, i.e. at atmospheric pressure or under pressure. Preference is given to an embodiment which uses a pressure in the range of approx. 5 to approx. 10 bar, as this is of benefit to yield and reaction velocity.
  • CATALYSTS Sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts
  • The term 'sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts' mainly refers to catalysts which contain molybdenum sulphide as the actual catalyst and cobalt as the promoter. Catalysts of that kind are produced in known manner by joint sulphidation of the respective oxides, where the MoO3 is converted completely to MoS2. When the latter is applied to the aluminium oxide carrier, it is either bonded flat to the surface ('basal bonding') or to one edge only ('edge bonding'). After sulphidation the cobalt is available in three forms: first as Co9S8 crystals deposited on the carrier, as Co2+ ions on the edges of the MoS2 plates ('CoMo phase') and as Co2+ ions on the tetrahedral positions in the aluminium oxide lattice. The catalysts are hence composed predominantly, i.e. of more than 50 %-mole, preferably of more than 70 %-mole and most preferably of more than 90 %-mole, of molybdenum sulphide and contain the cobalt in sulphidic form as a promoter, the quantity in %-mole resulting as the difference to 100. From this it follows that in a likewise preferred embodiment the catalysts do not contain any other metals, especially no other transition metals.
  • Aluminium oxide carrier
  • Aluminium oxides of especially high specific surface area come into consideration as suitable carriers for the sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts, the aluminium oxides preferably featuring the following characteristics:
    • minimum V37A of 75 ml/100g, preferably 80 ml/100g and most preferably 85 ml/100g;
    • maximum V0.1µm of 31 ml/100g, preferably 25 ml/100g and most preferably 15 ml/100gM;
    • maximum V0.2µm of 20 ml/100g, preferably 15 ml/100g and most preferably 10 ml/100g; and
    • ratio of V0.1µm to V0.2µm of at least 1.5.
  • Aluminium oxide carriers of the type mentioned are sufficiently known from the state of the art. European patent documents EP 1385786 B1 and EP 1385787 B1 (Axens ), for example, describe a process for their manufacture, in which a hydrargillite-type aluminium oxide is ground, undergoes hydrothermal treatment with an aqueous solution of aluminium nitrate and formic acid at 200 °C for 6 hours, the resulting product then being calcined at 400 to 1300. The carrier material is then extruded and is thus ready for loading. As far as the nature and manufacture of the catalyst carriers is concerned, the two documents mentioned are related to by reference.
  • PURIFICATION
  • The hydrogenation products leaving the reactor, particularly the fixed-bed reactor, now contain the sulphur compounds in the form of hydrogen sulphide, the content being typically within the range of 50 to 300 ppm. The presence of H2S is just as little desirable as that of the carbon sulphides but, in contrast to the latter, hydrogen sulphide can be washed out comparatively easily and, above all, quantitatively. The hydrogenation gases are, for this purpose, preferably passed through an absorption column, where they are treated, for example, in counter current with an aqueous base such as caustic soda or ammonia. Alternatively, other devices may be used for the purification of gases as, for example, venturi scrubbers.
  • When the H2S portions have been separated, the purified product is available without restriction as a high-quality synthesis gas for further chemical reactions.
  • A further subject matter of the present invention is the use of sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts provided on aluminum oxide carriers for the hydrogenation of carbon sulphides to hydrogen sulphide,
    wherein sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts are used which contain molybdenum sulphide as the actual catalyst and cobalt as the promoter,
    wherein said catalysts are composed of more than 50 %-mole of molybdenum sulphide
    and said catalysts contain the cobalt in sulphidic form, the quantity in %-mole of said cobalt in sulphidic form resulting as the difference to 100,
    wherein molybdenum sulphide has been obtained by sulphidation of the respective oxide, wherein the MoO3 has been converted completely to MoS2,
    wherein after sulphidation the cobalt is present in three forms: first as Co9S8 crystals deposited on the carrier, as Co2+ ions on the edges of the MoS2 plates ('CoMo phase') and as Co2+ ions on the tetrahedral positions in the aluminum oxide lattice.
  • Also preferred as carriers for the cobalt molybdenum catalysts are aluminium oxides that feature a high specific area surface and at the same time feature the following characteristics:
    1. (i) minimum V37A of 75 ml/100g, preferably 80 ml/100g and most preferably 85 ml/100g;
    2. (ii) maximum V0.1µm of 31 ml/100g, preferably 25 ml/100g and most preferably 15 ml/100gM;
    3. (iii) maximum V0.2µm of 20 ml/100g, preferably 15 ml/100g and most preferably 10 ml/100g; and
    4. (iv) ratio of V0.1µm to V0.2µm of at least 1.5.
  • The present invention also encompasses a method for preparing hydrogen sulphide, wherein carbon sulphides are subjected to hydrogenation in the presence of a working amount of sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts provided on aluminium oxide carriers.
  • The carbon sulphides are subjected to hydrogenation in the presence of cobalt molybdenum catalysts which, with reference to the metal components, predominantly consist of molybdenum sulphide and contain cobalt sulphide as a promoter only. Also preferred are aluminium oxide carriers meeting the following characteristics:
    1. (i) minimum V37A of at least 75 ml/100g, preferably 80 ml/100g and most preferably 85 ml/100g;
    2. (ii) maximum V0.1µm of 31 ml/100g, preferably 25 ml/100g and most preferably 15 ml/100gM;
    3. (iii) maximum V0.2µm of 20 ml/100g, preferably 15 ml/100g and most preferably 10 ml/100g; and
    4. (iv) ratio of V0.1µm to V0.2µm of at least 1.5.
    EXAMPLES Example 1
  • A pilot plant for fixed-bed hydrogenation was equipped with a bulk layer of commercially available lumpy sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst on an aluminium oxide carrier. Subsequently, different coking gases were introduced at the bottom of the column. The only difference between these so-called feed gases was the amount of carbon sulphides, in particular carbon disulphide. The hydrogenation was performed at a temperature of 220 °C and a pressure of 10 bar. The GHSV was about 1200 l/h.
  • The product gas was analysed for sulphur in the gas chromatograph and the fractions of hydrogen sulphide and carbon sulphides were determined by means of the retention periods. Table 1 sums up the results. The conversion rates refer to the hydrogenation of the CS2 fraction. Table 1
    Hydrogenation results (weight specified in %-vol. unless otherwise indicated)
    1 2 3 4
    Feed Prod. Feed Prod. Feed Prod. Feed Prod.
    Hydrogen 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0
    Methane 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0
    Nitrogen 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
    Carbon monoxide 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
    Carbon dioxide 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
    COS (ppm) 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 10
    CS2 (ppm) 117 0 94 0 95 0 54 0
    H2S (ppm) 1 211 0 141 0 182 0 141
    Conversion rate 95.5 100 100 93.4
  • The test results show that the fraction of carbon sulphides is converted to at least 95% hydrogen sulphide. At the same time the proportion of the other constituents in the coke oven gas remained constant, i.e. no methanation was observed.

Claims (12)

  1. A process for the production of synthesis gas from hard coal, wherein
    (a) hard coal is subjected to dry pyrolysis, resulting in the production of a gas mixture containing hydrogen, methane, nitrogen and carbon monoxide as major constituents and carbon sulphides as minor constituents,
    (b) the gas mixture is subjected to hydrogenation at a temperature in the range of 200 to 280 °C over a sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst provided on an aluminum oxide carrier material, and
    (c) the hydrogen sulphide obtained from hydrogenation is separated from the gas mixture,
    wherein sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts are used which contain molybdenum sulphide as the actual catalyst and cobalt as the promoter,
    wherein said catalysts are composed of more than 50 %-mole of molybdenum sulphide and said catalysts contain the cobalt in sulphidic form, the quantity in %-mole of said cobalt in sulphidic form resulting as the difference to 100,
    wherein molybdenum sulphide has been obtained by sulphidation of the respective oxide, wherein the MoO3 has been converted completely to MoS2,
    wherein after sulphidation the cobalt is present in three forms: first as Co9S8 crystals deposited on the carrier, as Co2+ ions on the edges of the MoS2 plates ('CoMo phase') and as Co2+ ions on the tetrahedral positions in the aluminum oxide lattice.
  2. The process of claim 1, wherein said catalysts are composed of more than 70 %-mole of molybdenum sulphide.
  3. The process of claim 2, wherein said catalysts are composed of more than 90 %-mole of molybdenum sulphide.
  4. The process of claim 1 wherein synthesis gases of a content of 10 to 200 ppm carbon sulphides are used.
  5. The process of Claim 1, wherein hydrogenation is carried out in a temperature range between 240 and 260 °C.
  6. The process of Claim 1, wherein hydrogenation is carried out at a pressure of 1 to 15 bar.
  7. The process of Claim 6, wherein hydrogenation is carried out at a pressure of 5 to 10 bar.
  8. The process of Claim 1, wherein that hydrogenation is carried out at a GHSV of 500 to 1500 l/h.
  9. The process according to at least one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that hydrogenation is carried out in a fixed-bed reactor.
  10. The process of Claim 9, wherein the catalysts used in the fixed-bed reactor are provided as bulk layer or packing.
  11. The process of Claim 1, wherein the hydrogenation product, after leaving the reactor, is passed through an absorption column, where the hydrogen sulphide is washed out with a basic liquid.
  12. Use of sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts provided on aluminum oxide carriers for the hydrogenation of carbon sulphides to hydrogen sulphide,
    wherein sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalysts are used which contain molybdenum sulphide as the actual catalyst and cobalt as the promoter,
    wherein said catalysts are composed of more than 50 %-mole of molybdenum sulphide and said catalysts contain the cobalt in sulphidic form, the quantity in %-mole of said cobalt in sulphidic form resulting as the difference to 100,
    wherein molybdenum sulphide has been obtained by sulphidation of the respective oxide, wherein the MoO3 has been converted completely to MoS2,
    wherein after sulphidation the cobalt is present in three forms: first as Co9S8 crystals deposited on the carrier, as Co2+ ions on the edges of the MoS2 plates ('CoMo phase') and as Co2+ ions on the tetrahedral positions in the aluminum oxide lattice.
EP14702755.1A 2013-01-09 2014-01-08 Process for the hydrogenation of carbon sulphide using a sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst on an aluminium oxide carrier Active EP2943556B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL14702755T PL2943556T3 (en) 2013-01-09 2014-01-08 Process for the hydrogenation of carbon sulphide using a sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst on an aluminium oxide carrier

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102013000173 2013-01-09
DE102013010473 2013-06-03
DE201310009885 DE102013009885A1 (en) 2013-01-09 2013-06-06 Manufacture of synthesis gas used for chemical reactions, involves forming gas mixture of hydrogen and methane by pyrolyzing dry coal, hydrogenating gas mixture using cobalt-molybdenum sulfide catalyst and separating hydrogen sulfide
PCT/EP2014/050190 WO2014108423A1 (en) 2013-01-09 2014-01-08 Process for the production of synthesis gas from hard coal

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2943556A1 EP2943556A1 (en) 2015-11-18
EP2943556B1 true EP2943556B1 (en) 2020-04-08

Family

ID=51166541

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14702755.1A Active EP2943556B1 (en) 2013-01-09 2014-01-08 Process for the hydrogenation of carbon sulphide using a sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst on an aluminium oxide carrier

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2943556B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2016505695A (en)
KR (1) KR102055036B1 (en)
CN (1) CN104903428B (en)
PL (1) PL2943556T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2014108423A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101641045B1 (en) * 2015-09-30 2016-07-20 주식회사 포스코 Oxidation prevention layer forming device for steel sheet and the method thereof

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1018630A (en) * 1963-11-13 1966-01-26 Shell Int Research Process for the purification of hot gases obtained by partial combustion and containing soot and carbonyl sulphide
DE1545470A1 (en) 1966-10-05 1970-02-05 Pichler Dr Phil Helmut Process for converting coke oven gas into a gas that can be exchanged for natural gas
NL7013902A (en) * 1970-09-21 1972-03-23
BE788068A (en) * 1971-09-01 1973-02-28 Shell Int Research ERBINDINGEN UIT HET RUWE GAS VERKREGEN DOOR PARTIELE VERBRANDING VAN EEN KOOLSTOFHOUDENDE BRANDSTOF WERKWIJZE VOOR HET VERWIJDEREN VAN ROET EN ZWAVELV
DE2551717C3 (en) * 1975-11-18 1980-11-13 Basf Ag, 6700 Ludwigshafen and possibly COS from gases
US4041130A (en) * 1975-12-29 1977-08-09 The Ralph M. Parsons Company Process for desulfurization of coke oven gas
US4085199A (en) * 1976-06-08 1978-04-18 Bethlehem Steel Corporation Method for removing hydrogen sulfide from sulfur-bearing industrial gases with claus-type reactors
US4248718A (en) 1978-12-26 1981-02-03 Chevron Research Company Overbased lubricating oil additive
JPS59145288A (en) 1983-02-07 1984-08-20 Nippon Steel Chem Co Ltd Hydrorefining of gas oil
US4863489A (en) * 1989-02-03 1989-09-05 Texaco Inc. Production of demercurized synthesis gas, reducing gas, or fuel gas
NL9102195A (en) * 1991-12-30 1993-07-16 Veg Gasinstituut Nv METHOD FOR TREATING GASES OBTAINED BY COAL GASIFICATION, RESIDUAL GASIFICATION, WASTE GASIFICATION OR OIL GASIFICATION
FR2823193B1 (en) 2001-04-04 2004-02-13 Pro Catalyse ALUMINUM AGGLOMERATES, THEIR PREPARATION PROCESS, AND THEIR USES AS CATALYST SUPPORT, CATALYST OR ABSORBENT
FR2823194B1 (en) 2001-04-10 2004-02-13 Pro Catalyse ALUMINUM AGGLOMERATES FOR USE, IN PARTICULAR, AS CATALYST SUPPORTS, CATALYSTS OR ADSORBENTS, AND THEIR PREPARATION METHODS
EP1628744B1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2008-07-09 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. A process for the removal of so2, hcn and h2s and optionally cos, cs2 and nh3 from a gas stream
CN101050389A (en) * 2007-05-11 2007-10-10 湖北省化学研究院 Method for purifying HCN and COS in fuel gas produced from coal
US8518356B2 (en) * 2010-07-27 2013-08-27 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Method and apparatus for adjustably treating a sour gas

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104903428B (en) 2019-01-18
JP2016505695A (en) 2016-02-25
EP2943556A1 (en) 2015-11-18
KR20150103738A (en) 2015-09-11
PL2943556T3 (en) 2020-09-21
KR102055036B1 (en) 2019-12-11
WO2014108423A1 (en) 2014-07-17
CN104903428A (en) 2015-09-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3898299A (en) Production of gaseous olefins from petroleum residue feedstocks
KR101791051B1 (en) Method of the convrsion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons into btx-rich monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
US3781195A (en) Process for the production of gaseous olefins from petroleum distillate feedstocks
CN101914387B (en) Catalysis upgrading method for cracking ethylene by-product carbon-9
DE2451127C2 (en) Process for the production of molybdenum sulfide-containing supported catalysts for the oligomerization of unsaturated hydrocarbons
KR101273343B1 (en) Process for preparing aromatics using shape selective catalyst
GB781706A (en) Hydrocracking and hydrodesulfurizing crude petroleum oils containing sulfur
US2039259A (en) Carrying out catalytic reactions
KR20120078006A (en) Process for preparing aromatics using transition metal sulphide catalyst
US2038599A (en) Carrying out catalytic reactions
EP2943556B1 (en) Process for the hydrogenation of carbon sulphide using a sulphidic cobalt molybdenum catalyst on an aluminium oxide carrier
US4033861A (en) Reduced nitrogen content of hydrocarbon fraction by catalytic polymerization
CN101905163A (en) Coal tar hydrorefining catalyst and preparation method thereof
US9677018B2 (en) Process for the production of synthesis gas from hard coal
CN102626635B (en) Coal tar denitrification catalyst and its preparation method and use
TWI631212B (en) Process for the production of synthesis gas from hard coal
US4313017A (en) Selective hydrogenation of polynuclear aromatic reactants
US3691063A (en) Residual fuel oil hydrocracking process
WO2018041728A1 (en) Method and device for removing organic sulphur compounds from hydrogen-rich gases
US2985582A (en) Pressure hydrogenation of crude oils, tars or their residues
GB1457861A (en) Process for the hydrodearomatization of petroleum fractions containing sulphur nitrogen and aromatics
US3860511A (en) Two-stage residual oil hydrodesulfurication process with ammonia addition
US2848376A (en) Two-stage hydrogenation process for the production of gasoline from hydrocarbon oils
US2640802A (en) Catalytic desulfurization of petroleum hydrocarbons
US2067729A (en) Process for the decomposition of hydrocarbons and catalyst therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150703

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20160804

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS AG

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20200107

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: SCHOENEBERGER, JAN

Inventor name: THIELERT, HOLGER

Inventor name: RIEGER, MICHAEL

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1254377

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200415

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602014063449

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200408

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200817

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200808

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200709

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200708

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1254377

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200708

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602014063449

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20210108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210108

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20210131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210131

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210108

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20140108

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20230102

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230120

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200408

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240119

Year of fee payment: 11