EP2942715B1 - Data migration method, data migration apparatus and storage device - Google Patents

Data migration method, data migration apparatus and storage device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2942715B1
EP2942715B1 EP13892079.8A EP13892079A EP2942715B1 EP 2942715 B1 EP2942715 B1 EP 2942715B1 EP 13892079 A EP13892079 A EP 13892079A EP 2942715 B1 EP2942715 B1 EP 2942715B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
ssd
usage ratio
migrated
capacity usage
data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP13892079.8A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2942715A4 (en
EP2942715A1 (en
Inventor
Tao Gong
Kun Han
Liming Wu
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Huawei Technologies Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Huawei Technologies Co Ltd filed Critical Huawei Technologies Co Ltd
Priority to HUE13892079A priority Critical patent/HUE035390T2/en
Publication of EP2942715A1 publication Critical patent/EP2942715A1/en
Publication of EP2942715A4 publication Critical patent/EP2942715A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2942715B1 publication Critical patent/EP2942715B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/06Digital input from, or digital output to, record carriers, e.g. RAID, emulated record carriers or networked record carriers
    • G06F3/0601Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems
    • G06F3/0602Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems specifically adapted to achieve a particular effect
    • G06F3/0614Improving the reliability of storage systems
    • G06F3/0616Improving the reliability of storage systems in relation to life time, e.g. increasing Mean Time Between Failures [MTBF]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/06Digital input from, or digital output to, record carriers, e.g. RAID, emulated record carriers or networked record carriers
    • G06F3/0601Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems
    • G06F3/0602Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems specifically adapted to achieve a particular effect
    • G06F3/0608Saving storage space on storage systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/06Digital input from, or digital output to, record carriers, e.g. RAID, emulated record carriers or networked record carriers
    • G06F3/0601Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems
    • G06F3/0628Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems making use of a particular technique
    • G06F3/0646Horizontal data movement in storage systems, i.e. moving data in between storage devices or systems
    • G06F3/0647Migration mechanisms
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/06Digital input from, or digital output to, record carriers, e.g. RAID, emulated record carriers or networked record carriers
    • G06F3/0601Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems
    • G06F3/0668Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems adopting a particular infrastructure
    • G06F3/0671In-line storage system
    • G06F3/0683Plurality of storage devices
    • G06F3/0688Non-volatile semiconductor memory arrays
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/06Digital input from, or digital output to, record carriers, e.g. RAID, emulated record carriers or networked record carriers
    • G06F3/0601Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems
    • G06F3/0668Interfaces specially adapted for storage systems adopting a particular infrastructure
    • G06F3/0671In-line storage system
    • G06F3/0683Plurality of storage devices
    • G06F3/0689Disk arrays, e.g. RAID, JBOD
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F12/00Accessing, addressing or allocating within memory systems or architectures
    • G06F12/02Addressing or allocation; Relocation
    • G06F12/0223User address space allocation, e.g. contiguous or non contiguous base addressing
    • G06F12/023Free address space management
    • G06F12/0238Memory management in non-volatile memory, e.g. resistive RAM or ferroelectric memory
    • G06F12/0246Memory management in non-volatile memory, e.g. resistive RAM or ferroelectric memory in block erasable memory, e.g. flash memory
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2212/00Indexing scheme relating to accessing, addressing or allocation within memory systems or architectures
    • G06F2212/72Details relating to flash memory management
    • G06F2212/7204Capacity control, e.g. partitioning, end-of-life degradation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2212/00Indexing scheme relating to accessing, addressing or allocation within memory systems or architectures
    • G06F2212/72Details relating to flash memory management
    • G06F2212/7208Multiple device management, e.g. distributing data over multiple flash devices
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2212/00Indexing scheme relating to accessing, addressing or allocation within memory systems or architectures
    • G06F2212/72Details relating to flash memory management
    • G06F2212/7211Wear leveling

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to storage technologies, and in particular, to a data migration method, a data migration apparatus, and a storage device.
  • a NAND flash is a non-volatile memory and is characterized by that data does not disappear after power-off; therefore, the NAND flash is widely used as an external or internal memory.
  • a solid-state disk SSD
  • a solid-state disk may also be called a SSD.
  • the SSD is characterized by a limited number of erasure times, and each read-write operation (may also be call an erasure operation) on the SSD is wear to the SSD to a certain degree; therefore, a lifetime of the SSD is related to a degree of wear. A higher degree of wear indicates a shorter lifetime.
  • a bad block may occur due to a programming error or an erasure error when the NAND flash is used for a long period of time, and an increasing number of bad blocks may lead to an increase in the number of read-write times of the NAND flash within the entire SSD, the degree of wear is increased, thereby shortening the service life of the SSD.
  • US2003/084241 discloses systems, methods and software for implementing a virtualized storage system.
  • Physical storage is carved into units called physical segments.
  • Logical storage is implemented in atomic logical units called RStores comprising a range of virtual address space that when allocated, is bound to a particular group of PSEGs.
  • EP2413245A1 discloses a storage system which has a plurality of flash package, has a function for minimizing the imbalance of the number of deletions of each block inside the flash package and a block-unit capacity virtualization function.
  • US20050015547A1 related to a system capable of carrying out efficient and stable system operation control even if a usage rate of the entire system varies under a situation in which the characteristics of storage units.
  • Embodiments of the present invention provide a data migration method, a data migration apparatus, and a storage device, so as to prolong a service life of an SSD storage array.
  • the invention is defined by the claims.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system architecture of the storage array management method according to this embodiment of the present invention.
  • the storage system includes a controller 11 and a storage device 22.
  • the storage device 22 is a solid-state disk (Solid State Device, SSD) is used as an example for description.
  • a solid-state disk may also be called a solid-state drive (Solid State Drive, SSD) and called a hard disk for short.
  • FIG. 1 is merely exemplary description and is not intended to limit a specific networking manner, for example, both cascading tree networking and ring networking are acceptable, as long as the controller 11 and the storage device 22 can communicate with each other.
  • the controller 11 may include any computing device known in the prior art, such as a server or a desktop computer. In the controller 11, an operating system and other application programs are installed. The controller 11 may manage the storage device 22, for example, control data migration in the storage device 22.
  • the storage device 22 may be a storage device known in the prior art, such as an SSD or a direct access storage device (Direct Access Storage Device, DASD).
  • DASD Direct Access Storage Device
  • FIG. 1 that the storage device 22 is an SSD is used as an example for description.
  • N physical SSDs form a storage array (storage array), which may also be called a disk group.
  • a basic idea of the storage array is to combine multiple hard disks that are relatively cost-effective to achieve performance that equals or surpasses that of a hard disk with a high price and a huge capacity.
  • the number N of physical SSDs in one storage array cannot be less than a lower limit, for example, 10; the number N of physical SSDs in one storage array cannot be greater than an upper limit, for example, 30.
  • the N physical SSDs included in the storage array may be SSDs of different models and with different capacities, SSDs of different models and with a same capacity, SSDs of a same model and with different capacities, or SSDs of a same model and with a same capacity.
  • the SSDs called in this embodiment of the present invention all refer to physical SSDs.
  • Each physical SSD may be divided into fine-grained chunks (short for, CK) 221 of a same size.
  • a Chunk may also be called a logical SSD.
  • multiple CKs may form logical space according to a specified type of redundant array of independent disks (short for, RAID), where the logical space is a chunk group (short for, CKG). All CKs included in one CKG must belong to different SSDs.
  • a redundant array of independent disks may also be called a redundant array of inexpensive disks (Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks, RAID).
  • a lifetime of the SSD storage array depends on an SSD with a shortest lifetime included in the SSD storage array. Therefore, in order to prolong the lifetime of the SSD storage array, part of data in an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than an average capacity usage ratio of the SSD storage array may be migrated to another SSD in the SSD storage array, so as to level a degree of wear between the SSDs.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart of the data migration method according to this embodiment of the present invention. The following steps may be executed by a processor in a controller. Referring to FIG. 2 , the method includes:
  • an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than the average capacity usage ratio of the disk group is used as the source SSD.
  • the average capacity usage ratio of the disk group is a ratio of an amount of data written to the disk group by a user to an available physical capacity of the disk group.
  • the capacity usage ratio of the SSD is a ratio of an amount of data written to the SSD by a user to an available physical capacity of the SSD.
  • the amount of the data written to the disk group by the user is a total amount of data written to all SSDs in the disk group by users.
  • the available physical capacity of the disk group is the sum of available physical capacities of all the SSDs in the disk group.
  • one disk group may be considered as one SSD storage array.
  • an SSD includes multiple blocks.
  • some blocks may encounter a fault due to a programming error or an erasure error, and a read-write operation cannot be performed on the blocks; therefore the blocks are called bad blocks.
  • increasing capacity usage ratio of the SSD is generally caused by an increase in the number of bad blocks in the SSD. Therefore, the determining a source SSD in a disk group may be implemented by monitoring a size of bad blocks in each SSD in the disk group. When a size of bad blocks in an SSD exceeds a preset threshold, capacity usage ratio of the SSD is greater than the average capacity usage ratio of the disk group.
  • some hardware-related faults such as damage to a pin of a flash granule, may also cause an increase in the capacity usage ratio of the SSD.
  • the controller may monitor the capacity of the bad blocks in each SSD in the disk group in real time.
  • a size of bad blocks in an SSD exceeds the preset threshold, it is considered that capacity usage ratio of the SSD is increased, and it is determined that the SSD is the source SSD; or, when a size of bad blocks in an SSD exceeds the preset threshold, SSD may automatically report the size of bad blocks to the controller.
  • the controller may monitor capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group in real time. When capacity usage ratio of an SSD is greater than the average capacity usage ratio, it is determined that the SSD is the source SSD in the disk group; or, when capacity usage ratio of an SSD is greater than the average capacity usage ratio, SSD may automatically report the size of bad blocks to the controller.
  • the controller may monitor a user-visible capacity of each SSD in the disk group in real time.
  • a user-visible capacity of an SSD decreases, it is determined that the SSD is the source SSD in the disk group; or when a user-visible capacity of an SSD decreases, SSD may automatically report the size of bad blocks to the controller.
  • internal storage space of the SSD may be divided into two parts: data storage space and redundancy space.
  • a size of the data storage space of the SSD is a user-visible capacity.
  • the redundancy space of the SSD is NAND flash storage space that is provided by the SSD and exceeds the user-visible capacity.
  • this disk actually includes NAND flash granules of 512GB, but a user-visible capacity is only 400GB, and remaining 112GB is used as redundancy space.
  • a bad block may occur due to a programming error or an erasure error.
  • a read-write operation cannot be performed on the bad block; therefore, data stored in the bad block needs to be migrated to the redundancy space of the SSD.
  • the bad block is labeled inside the SSD, so that the labeled bad block is no longer used subsequently.
  • the redundancy space is mainly used to replace a bad block, thereby ensuring that the SSD always has 400GB data storage space when it is used.
  • Step S202 Determine at least one destination SSD in the disk group.
  • data stored in the source SSD may be migrated to another SSD in the disk group. Therefore, at least one destination SSD needs to be determined in the disk group.
  • another SSD in the disk group except the source SSD may be used as the destination SSD.
  • an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is less than the average capacity usage ratio in the disk group may be used as the destination SSD.
  • a correspondence between the source SSD and the destination SSD may be preset, and the destination SSD is obtained by a query in the correspondence according to the source SSD.
  • a load of each SSD in the disk group may be obtained, and the destination SSD is determined according to a load balancing principle.
  • the destination SSD may be all SSDs in the disk group except the source SSD, or may be some SSDs in the disk group except the source SSD, which is not limited herein.
  • Step S203 Calculate, according to the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, an amount of data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD is an amount of data that is to be migrated out of the source SSD for a purpose of making the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD reach the average capacity usage ratio.
  • a difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio may be obtained, and the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio is multiplied by an available physical capacity of the source SSD, where an obtained product is the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • an amount of data written to the source SSD by a user and an available physical capacity of the source SSD may be obtained.
  • a difference value that is obtained by subtracting a product of the available physical capacity of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio from the amount of the data written to the source SSD by the user is the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • step S202 there is no sequence between step S202 and step S203.
  • Step S204 Migrate data of the source SSD to the destination SSD according to the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • the data is migrated out of the source SSD in a unit of chunk, and each chunk is of a fixed size. Therefore, the number of chunks to be migrated out of the source SSD may be obtained by dividing the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD by a size of a chunk. In a case in which the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD cannot be exactly divided, the number of chunks to be migrated out of the source SSD may be obtained in a manner of rounding off a remainder. It should be noted that, because the data is migrated in a unit of chunk, the capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group after data migration is approximately equal to the average capacity usage ratio, and may not be absolutely equal to the average capacity usage ratio.
  • data in an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than average capacity usage ratio of a disk group is migrated to a determined destination SSD, so that capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group approaches the average capacity usage ratio, thereby achieving wear leveling and prolonging a service life of the disk group.
  • step S204 may specifically include:
  • the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD is an amount of data that is to be migrated to each destination SSD for a purpose of making the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD reach the average capacity usage ratio.
  • a difference value between the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio may be obtained, and the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio is multiplied by an available physical capacity of each destination SSD, where an obtained product is the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • an amount of data written to each destination SSD by a user and an available physical capacity of each destination SSD may be obtained.
  • a difference value that is obtained by subtracting the amount of the data written to each destination SSD by the user from a product of the available physical capacity of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio is the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD may be divided by the number of destination SSDs, so as to obtain the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • Step S2042 Migrate the data of the source SSD to each destination SSD according to the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD and the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • the data is migrated to each destination SSD in a unit of chunk, and each chunk is of a fixed size. Therefore, the number of chunks to be migrated to each destination SSD may be obtained by dividing the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD by a size of a chunk. In a case in which the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD cannot be exactly divided, the number of chunks to be migrated to each destination SSD may be obtain in a manner of rounding off a remainder.
  • N chunks may be randomly selected from the source SSD.
  • an idle chunk is successively determined in a destination SSD for each chunk of the N chunks. Then, data stored in the N chunks of the source SSD is separately migrated to the destination SSD.
  • the i th chunk of the source SSD is first determined, where i is a natural number, and 0 ⁇ i ⁇ N+1.
  • An idle chunk is determined in another SSD in the disk group except the source SSD according to the number of chunks to be migrated to each destination SSD and the preset disk selection algorithm, where the SSD in which the idle chunk is located is different from an SSD in which another chunk included in a CKG is located, where the i th chunk belongs to the CKG.
  • Data stored in the i th chunk of the source SSD is migrated to the idle chunk.
  • the following uses a specific example to describe a data migration process. Assume that there are a total of 9 SSDs in a disk group (disk group), where a physical capacity of each SSD is 128GB, service pressure borne by each SSD is the same, and the amount of data written to each SSD by a user is 60GB.
  • the SSD in which the bad blocks are generated is a source SSD, and the capacity usage ratio 0.5 of the SSD is greater than the average capacity usage ratio 0.4720.
  • data of the source SSD needs to be migrated to another SSD. That the rest 8 SSDs are used as destination SSDs is used as an example herein.
  • the data in the source SSD is migrated, in a unit of chunk, to each destination SSD according to the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD and the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • capacity usage ratio of each SSD in a disk group is equal to an average capacity usage ratio. This indicates that wear leveling between SSDs is implemented, thereby prolonging a service life of an entire SSD storage array.
  • FIG. 3 is a structural diagram of the data migration apparatus according to this embodiment of the present invention, and the apparatus includes:
  • the destination SSD is a preset SSD corresponding to the source SSD.
  • the migrating module 303 is specifically configured to calculate, according to capacity usage ratio of the destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, an amount of data to be migrated to each destination SSD capacity usage ratio, and migrate the data of the source SSD to each destination SSD according to the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD and the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD. Specifically, a difference value between capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio may be obtained, and the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio is multiplied by an available physical capacity of each destination SSD, where an obtained product is the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • the calculating module 302 is specifically configured to obtain a difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, and multiply the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio by an available physical capacity of the source SSD, where an obtained product is the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • the apparatus according to this embodiment of the present invention may be disposed in the controller described in the previous embodiments and configured to execute the data migration method described in the previous embodiments.
  • the apparatus according to this embodiment of the present invention may be disposed in the controller described in the previous embodiments and configured to execute the data migration method described in the previous embodiments.
  • data in an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than average capacity usage ratio of a disk group is migrated to a determined destination SSD, so that capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group approaches the average capacity usage ratio, thereby achieving wear leveling and prolonging a service life of the disk group.
  • a storage device 1200 is provided according to an embodiment of the present invention and includes:
  • the processor 101 may be a single-core or multi-core central processing unit, or an application-specific integrated circuit, or one or more integrated circuits configured to implement this embodiment of the present invention.
  • the memory 102 may be a high-speed RAM memory, or may be a non-volatile memory (non-volatile memory), for example, at least one hard disk memory.
  • the communication interface 103 is configured to communicate with the storage device1200.
  • the memory 102 is configured to store a computer executable instruction 1021.
  • the computer executable instruction 1021 may include program code.
  • the processor 101 runs the computer executable instruction 1021, so as to execute the process in the method described in FIG. 2 .
  • An embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer program product for data processing, and the computer program product includes a computer readable storage medium that stores program code, where an instruction included in the program code is used to execute the process in the method described in FIG. 2 .
  • data in an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than average capacity usage ratio of a disk group is migrated to a determined destination SSD, so that capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group approaches the average capacity usage ratio, thereby achieving wear leveling and prolonging a service life of the disk group.
  • each aspect of the present invention or a possible implementation manner of each aspect may be specifically implemented as a system, a method, or a computer program product. Therefore, each aspect of the present invention or the possible implementation manner of each aspect may use a form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, and the like), or an embodiment combining software and hardware, which is uniformly referred to as "circuit", "module”, or “system” herein.
  • each aspect of the present invention or the possible implementation manner of each aspect may use a form of a computer program product, where the computer program product refers to computer readable program code stored in a computer readable medium.
  • a computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium.
  • the computer readable storage medium includes but is not limited to an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, device, or apparatus, or any appropriate combination thereof, such as a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, or a portable read-only memory (CD-ROM).
  • a processor in a computer reads computer readable program code stored in a computer readable medium, so that the processor can execute a function and an action specified in each step or a combination of steps in a flowchart, and an apparatus is generated to implement a function and an action specified in each block or a combination of blocks in a block diagram.
  • Computer readable program code may be completely executed on a computer of a user, partially executed on the computer of the user, used as a separate software package, partially executed on the computer of the user and partially executed on a remote computer, or completely executed on the remote computer or a server. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementation solutions, functions denoted in each step of flowcharts or in each block of block diagrams may not occur in the sequence denoted in the diagrams. For example, depending on an involved function, two steps or two blocks successively marked may be approximately performed concurrently, or these blocks sometimes may be performed in a reverse order.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
  • Techniques For Improving Reliability Of Storages (AREA)

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to storage technologies, and in particular, to a data migration method, a data migration apparatus, and a storage device.
  • BACKGROUND
  • A NAND flash is a non-volatile memory and is characterized by that data does not disappear after power-off; therefore, the NAND flash is widely used as an external or internal memory. For example, a solid-state disk (SSD) that is increasingly used in a computer system in recent years is implemented based on the flash memory. A solid-state disk may also be called a SSD. The SSD is characterized by a limited number of erasure times, and each read-write operation (may also be call an erasure operation) on the SSD is wear to the SSD to a certain degree; therefore, a lifetime of the SSD is related to a degree of wear. A higher degree of wear indicates a shorter lifetime. Because a bad block may occur due to a programming error or an erasure error when the NAND flash is used for a long period of time, and an increasing number of bad blocks may lead to an increase in the number of read-write times of the NAND flash within the entire SSD, the degree of wear is increased, thereby shortening the service life of the SSD.
  • At present, in order to meet a requirement of big data storage, it is usually necessary that multiple SSDs form an SSD storage array. If a lifetime of one SSD in the SSD storage array is shortened due to an increase in bad blocks, a lifetime of the SSD storage array is also shortened. That is, the lifetime of the SSD storage array depends on an SSD with a shortest lifetime included in the SSD storage array.
  • US2003/084241 discloses systems, methods and software for implementing a virtualized storage system. Physical storage is carved into units called physical segments. Logical storage is implemented in atomic logical units called RStores comprising a range of virtual address space that when allocated, is bound to a particular group of PSEGs.
  • EP2413245A1 discloses a storage system which has a plurality of flash package, has a function for minimizing the imbalance of the number of deletions of each block inside the flash package and a block-unit capacity virtualization function.
  • US20050015547A1 related to a system capable of carrying out efficient and stable system operation control even if a usage rate of the entire system varies under a situation in which the characteristics of storage units.
  • SUMMARY
  • Embodiments of the present invention provide a data migration method, a data migration apparatus, and a storage device, so as to prolong a service life of an SSD storage array. The invention is defined by the claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • To describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention more clearly, the following briefly introduces the accompanying drawings required for describing the embodiments or the prior art. Apparently, the accompanying drawings in the following description show some embodiments of the present invention, and a person of ordinary skill in the art may still derive other drawings from these accompanying drawings without creative efforts.
    • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an application network architecture of a data migration method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
    • FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a data migration method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
    • FIG. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of a data migration apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention; and
    • FIG. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of a storage device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
    DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the following clearly describes the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Apparently, the described embodiments are a part rather than all of the embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments obtained by a person of ordinary skill in the art based on the embodiments of the present invention without creative efforts shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
  • System Architecture in an Embodiment of the Present Invention
  • A storage array management method according to an embodiment of the present invention may be implemented in a storage system. FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system architecture of the storage array management method according to this embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, the storage system includes a controller 11 and a storage device 22. In this embodiment, that the storage device 22 is a solid-state disk (Solid State Device, SSD) is used as an example for description. A solid-state disk may also be called a solid-state drive (Solid State Drive, SSD) and called a hard disk for short.
  • FIG. 1 is merely exemplary description and is not intended to limit a specific networking manner, for example, both cascading tree networking and ring networking are acceptable, as long as the controller 11 and the storage device 22 can communicate with each other.
  • The controller 11 may include any computing device known in the prior art, such as a server or a desktop computer. In the controller 11, an operating system and other application programs are installed. The controller 11 may manage the storage device 22, for example, control data migration in the storage device 22.
  • The storage device 22 may be a storage device known in the prior art, such as an SSD or a direct access storage device (Direct Access Storage Device, DASD). In FIG. 1, that the storage device 22 is an SSD is used as an example for description. N physical SSDs form a storage array (storage array), which may also be called a disk group. A basic idea of the storage array is to combine multiple hard disks that are relatively cost-effective to achieve performance that equals or surpasses that of a hard disk with a high price and a huge capacity. The number N of physical SSDs in one storage array cannot be less than a lower limit, for example, 10; the number N of physical SSDs in one storage array cannot be greater than an upper limit, for example, 30. Specifically, the N physical SSDs included in the storage array may be SSDs of different models and with different capacities, SSDs of different models and with a same capacity, SSDs of a same model and with different capacities, or SSDs of a same model and with a same capacity.
  • Unless otherwise specified, the SSDs called in this embodiment of the present invention all refer to physical SSDs.
  • Each physical SSD may be divided into fine-grained chunks (short for, CK) 221 of a same size. A Chunk may also be called a logical SSD.
  • In addition, multiple CKs may form logical space according to a specified type of redundant array of independent disks (short for, RAID), where the logical space is a chunk group (short for, CKG). All CKs included in one CKG must belong to different SSDs. A redundant array of independent disks may also be called a redundant array of inexpensive disks (Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks, RAID).
  • When a large number of bad blocks occur in an SSD, capacity usage ratio of the SSD increases, and a lifetime of the SSD is shortened; a lifetime of the SSD storage array depends on an SSD with a shortest lifetime included in the SSD storage array. Therefore, in order to prolong the lifetime of the SSD storage array, part of data in an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than an average capacity usage ratio of the SSD storage array may be migrated to another SSD in the SSD storage array, so as to level a degree of wear between the SSDs.
  • Data Migration Method
  • The following introduces a data migration method according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a flowchart of the data migration method according to this embodiment of the present invention. The following steps may be executed by a processor in a controller. Referring to FIG. 2, the method includes:
    • Step S201: Determine a source SSD in a disk group, where capacity usage ratio of the source SSD is greater than average capacity usage ratio of the disk group.
  • In this embodiment of the present invention, an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than the average capacity usage ratio of the disk group is used as the source SSD. The average capacity usage ratio of the disk group is a ratio of an amount of data written to the disk group by a user to an available physical capacity of the disk group. The capacity usage ratio of the SSD is a ratio of an amount of data written to the SSD by a user to an available physical capacity of the SSD. The amount of the data written to the disk group by the user is a total amount of data written to all SSDs in the disk group by users. The available physical capacity of the disk group is the sum of available physical capacities of all the SSDs in the disk group.
  • It should be noted that, in this embodiment of the present invention, one disk group may be considered as one SSD storage array.
  • Physically, an SSD includes multiple blocks. When the SSD is used for a long period of time, some blocks may encounter a fault due to a programming error or an erasure error, and a read-write operation cannot be performed on the blocks; therefore the blocks are called bad blocks. For one SSD, increasing capacity usage ratio of the SSD is generally caused by an increase in the number of bad blocks in the SSD. Therefore, the determining a source SSD in a disk group may be implemented by monitoring a size of bad blocks in each SSD in the disk group. When a size of bad blocks in an SSD exceeds a preset threshold, capacity usage ratio of the SSD is greater than the average capacity usage ratio of the disk group. In addition, some hardware-related faults, such as damage to a pin of a flash granule, may also cause an increase in the capacity usage ratio of the SSD.
  • Optionally, the controller may monitor the capacity of the bad blocks in each SSD in the disk group in real time. When a size of bad blocks in an SSD exceeds the preset threshold, it is considered that capacity usage ratio of the SSD is increased, and it is determined that the SSD is the source SSD; or, when a size of bad blocks in an SSD exceeds the preset threshold, SSD may automatically report the size of bad blocks to the controller.
  • Optionally, the controller may monitor capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group in real time. When capacity usage ratio of an SSD is greater than the average capacity usage ratio, it is determined that the SSD is the source SSD in the disk group; or, when capacity usage ratio of an SSD is greater than the average capacity usage ratio, SSD may automatically report the size of bad blocks to the controller.
  • Optionally, the controller may monitor a user-visible capacity of each SSD in the disk group in real time. When a user-visible capacity of an SSD decreases, it is determined that the SSD is the source SSD in the disk group; or when a user-visible capacity of an SSD decreases, SSD may automatically report the size of bad blocks to the controller. For one SSD, internal storage space of the SSD may be divided into two parts: data storage space and redundancy space. A size of the data storage space of the SSD is a user-visible capacity. The redundancy space of the SSD is NAND flash storage space that is provided by the SSD and exceeds the user-visible capacity. Using a 400GB SSD as an example, this disk actually includes NAND flash granules of 512GB, but a user-visible capacity is only 400GB, and remaining 112GB is used as redundancy space. When a NAND flash is used for a long period of time, a bad block may occur due to a programming error or an erasure error. A read-write operation cannot be performed on the bad block; therefore, data stored in the bad block needs to be migrated to the redundancy space of the SSD. The bad block is labeled inside the SSD, so that the labeled bad block is no longer used subsequently. The redundancy space is mainly used to replace a bad block, thereby ensuring that the SSD always has 400GB data storage space when it is used.
  • Step S202: Determine at least one destination SSD in the disk group.
  • In order to lower the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD, data stored in the source SSD may be migrated to another SSD in the disk group. Therefore, at least one destination SSD needs to be determined in the disk group.
  • Optionally, another SSD in the disk group except the source SSD may be used as the destination SSD.
  • Optionally, an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is less than the average capacity usage ratio in the disk group may be used as the destination SSD.
  • Optionally, a correspondence between the source SSD and the destination SSD may be preset, and the destination SSD is obtained by a query in the correspondence according to the source SSD.
  • Optionally, a load of each SSD in the disk group may be obtained, and the destination SSD is determined according to a load balancing principle.
  • It should be noted that, it can be known from the forgoing description that the destination SSD may be all SSDs in the disk group except the source SSD, or may be some SSDs in the disk group except the source SSD, which is not limited herein.
  • Step S203: Calculate, according to the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, an amount of data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • In this embodiment of the present invention, the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD is an amount of data that is to be migrated out of the source SSD for a purpose of making the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD reach the average capacity usage ratio. Optionally, a difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio may be obtained, and the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio is multiplied by an available physical capacity of the source SSD, where an obtained product is the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • Optionally, an amount of data written to the source SSD by a user and an available physical capacity of the source SSD may be obtained. A difference value that is obtained by subtracting a product of the available physical capacity of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio from the amount of the data written to the source SSD by the user is the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • It should be noted that there is no sequence between step S202 and step S203.
  • Step S204: Migrate data of the source SSD to the destination SSD according to the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • In this embodiment of the present invention, the data is migrated out of the source SSD in a unit of chunk, and each chunk is of a fixed size. Therefore, the number of chunks to be migrated out of the source SSD may be obtained by dividing the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD by a size of a chunk. In a case in which the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD cannot be exactly divided, the number of chunks to be migrated out of the source SSD may be obtained in a manner of rounding off a remainder. It should be noted that, because the data is migrated in a unit of chunk, the capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group after data migration is approximately equal to the average capacity usage ratio, and may not be absolutely equal to the average capacity usage ratio.
  • In this embodiment of the present invention, data in an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than average capacity usage ratio of a disk group is migrated to a determined destination SSD, so that capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group approaches the average capacity usage ratio, thereby achieving wear leveling and prolonging a service life of the disk group.
  • Optionally, in the forgoing embodiment, step S204 may specifically include:
    • Step S2041: Calculate, according to capacity usage ratio of the destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, an amount of data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • In this embodiment of the present invention, the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD is an amount of data that is to be migrated to each destination SSD for a purpose of making the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD reach the average capacity usage ratio.
  • There may be more than one determined destination SSD; therefore, the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD needs to be calculated separately.
  • Optionally, a difference value between the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio may be obtained, and the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio is multiplied by an available physical capacity of each destination SSD, where an obtained product is the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • Optionally, an amount of data written to each destination SSD by a user and an available physical capacity of each destination SSD may be obtained. A difference value that is obtained by subtracting the amount of the data written to each destination SSD by the user from a product of the available physical capacity of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio is the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD. Optionally, the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD may be divided by the number of destination SSDs, so as to obtain the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • Step S2042: Migrate the data of the source SSD to each destination SSD according to the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD and the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • In this embodiment of the present invention, the data is migrated to each destination SSD in a unit of chunk, and each chunk is of a fixed size. Therefore, the number of chunks to be migrated to each destination SSD may be obtained by dividing the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD by a size of a chunk. In a case in which the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD cannot be exactly divided, the number of chunks to be migrated to each destination SSD may be obtain in a manner of rounding off a remainder.
  • Optionally, after the number (assuming that the number is N, where N is a natural number that is greater than 1) of chunks to be migrated out of the source SSD is calculated, N chunks may be randomly selected from the source SSD. According to a preset disk selection algorithm and the number of chunks to be migrated to each destination SSD, an idle chunk is successively determined in a destination SSD for each chunk of the N chunks. Then, data stored in the N chunks of the source SSD is separately migrated to the destination SSD.
  • For example, the ith chunk of the source SSD is first determined, where i is a natural number, and 0<i<N+1.
  • An idle chunk is determined in another SSD in the disk group except the source SSD according to the number of chunks to be migrated to each destination SSD and the preset disk selection algorithm, where the SSD in which the idle chunk is located is different from an SSD in which another chunk included in a CKG is located, where the ith chunk belongs to the CKG.
  • Data stored in the ith chunk of the source SSD is migrated to the idle chunk.
  • When i < N, i=i+1 is performed, that is, the ith chunk of the source SSD is determined subsequently.
  • The following uses a specific example to describe a data migration process. Assume that there are a total of 9 SSDs in a disk group (disk group), where a physical capacity of each SSD is 128GB, service pressure borne by each SSD is the same, and the amount of data written to each SSD by a user is 60GB.
  • If a size of bad blocks in an SSD reaches 8GB, an available physical capacity of the SSD is: 128-8=120(GB), and capacity usage ratio of the SSD is: 60/120=0.5.
  • An amount of data written to the entire disk group by the user is: 60*9=540(GB), and an available physical capacity of the entire disk group is: 128*8+(128-8)=1144(GB). Therefore, average capacity usage ratio of the disk group is: 540/1144=0.4720.
  • Therefore, it may be determined that the SSD in which the bad blocks are generated is a source SSD, and the capacity usage ratio 0.5 of the SSD is greater than the average capacity usage ratio 0.4720. In order to make capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the entire disk group reach the average capacity usage ratio, data of the source SSD needs to be migrated to another SSD. That the rest 8 SSDs are used as destination SSDs is used as an example herein. The amount of data to be migrated out of the source SSD is: Amount of data written to the source SSD by the user - Average capacity usage ratio of the source SSD * Available physical capacity of the source SSD. Therefore, Amount of data to be migrated out of the source SSD=60-(540/1144)*120=3.3566(GB)
  • Alternatively, the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD is: (Capacity usage ratio of the source SSD-Average capacity usage ratio)*Available physical capacity of the source SSD=(0.5-540/1144)*120=3.3566(GB).
  • The amount of data to be migrated to each destination SSD is: Average capacity usage ratio*Available physical capacity of a destination SSD-Amount of data written to the destination SSD by the user=(540/1144)*128-60=0.4196(GB).
  • Alternatively, the amount of the data to be migrated out of each destination SSD is: (Average capacity usage ratio-Capacity usage ratio of a destination SSD)*Available physical capacity of the destination SSD=(540/1144-60/128)*128=0.4196(GB).
  • Then, the data in the source SSD is migrated, in a unit of chunk, to each destination SSD according to the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD and the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • After the data migration is complete, the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD is: (60-3.3566)/120=0.4720, and the capacity usage ratio of each of other SSDs is: (60+0.4196)/128=0.4720.
  • It can be learned that, after the data migration is complete, capacity usage ratio of each SSD in a disk group is equal to an average capacity usage ratio. This indicates that wear leveling between SSDs is implemented, thereby prolonging a service life of an entire SSD storage array.
  • Apparatus According to an Embodiment of the Present Invention
  • The following introduces a data migration apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 3 is a structural diagram of the data migration apparatus according to this embodiment of the present invention, and the apparatus includes:
    • a determining module 301, configured to: determine a source SSD in a disk group, where capacity usage ratio of the source SSD is greater than average capacity usage ratio of the disk group; and determine at least one destination SSD in the disk group;
    • a calculating module 302, configured to calculate, according to the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, an amount of data to be migrated out of the source SSDcapacity usage ratiocapacity usage ratio; and
    • a migrating module 303, configured to migrate data of the source SSD to the destination SSD according to the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD. Optionally, the destination SSD is another SSD in the disk group except the source SSD. Optionally, the destination SSD is an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is less than the average capacity usage ratio in the disk group.
  • Optionally, the destination SSD is a preset SSD corresponding to the source SSD.
  • The migrating module 303 is specifically configured to calculate, according to capacity usage ratio of the destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, an amount of data to be migrated to each destination SSD capacity usage ratio, and migrate the data of the source SSD to each destination SSD according to the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD and the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD. Specifically, a difference value between capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio may be obtained, and the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio is multiplied by an available physical capacity of each destination SSD, where an obtained product is the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  • The calculating module 302 is specifically configured to obtain a difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, and multiply the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio by an available physical capacity of the source SSD, where an obtained product is the amount of the data to be migrated out of the source SSD.
  • The apparatus according to this embodiment of the present invention may be disposed in the controller described in the previous embodiments and configured to execute the data migration method described in the previous embodiments. For a detailed description of a function of each module, reference may be made to the description in the method embodiment, and details are not repeatedly described herein.
  • In this embodiment of the present invention, data in an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than average capacity usage ratio of a disk group is migrated to a determined destination SSD, so that capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group approaches the average capacity usage ratio, thereby achieving wear leveling and prolonging a service life of the disk group.
  • As shown in FIG. 4, a storage device 1200 is provided according to an embodiment of the present invention and includes:
    • a processor 101, a memory 102, a system bus (bus for short) 105, and a communication interface 103, where the processor 101, the memory 102, and the communication interface 103 are connected to and communicate with each other by using the system bus 105.
  • The processor 101 may be a single-core or multi-core central processing unit, or an application-specific integrated circuit, or one or more integrated circuits configured to implement this embodiment of the present invention.
  • The memory 102 may be a high-speed RAM memory, or may be a non-volatile memory (non-volatile memory), for example, at least one hard disk memory.
  • The communication interface 103 is configured to communicate with the storage device1200. The memory 102 is configured to store a computer executable instruction 1021. Specifically, the computer executable instruction 1021 may include program code.
  • When a computer runs, the processor 101 runs the computer executable instruction 1021, so as to execute the process in the method described in FIG. 2.
  • An embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer program product for data processing, and the computer program product includes a computer readable storage medium that stores program code, where an instruction included in the program code is used to execute the process in the method described in FIG. 2.
  • In this embodiment of the present invention, data in an SSD whose capacity usage ratio is greater than average capacity usage ratio of a disk group is migrated to a determined destination SSD, so that capacity usage ratio of each SSD in the disk group approaches the average capacity usage ratio, thereby achieving wear leveling and prolonging a service life of the disk group.
  • A person of ordinary skill in the art should understand that each aspect of the present invention or a possible implementation manner of each aspect may be specifically implemented as a system, a method, or a computer program product. Therefore, each aspect of the present invention or the possible implementation manner of each aspect may use a form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, and the like), or an embodiment combining software and hardware, which is uniformly referred to as "circuit", "module", or "system" herein. In addition, each aspect of the present invention or the possible implementation manner of each aspect may use a form of a computer program product, where the computer program product refers to computer readable program code stored in a computer readable medium.
  • A computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium. The computer readable storage medium includes but is not limited to an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, device, or apparatus, or any appropriate combination thereof, such as a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, or a portable read-only memory (CD-ROM).
  • A processor in a computer reads computer readable program code stored in a computer readable medium, so that the processor can execute a function and an action specified in each step or a combination of steps in a flowchart, and an apparatus is generated to implement a function and an action specified in each block or a combination of blocks in a block diagram. Computer readable program code may be completely executed on a computer of a user, partially executed on the computer of the user, used as a separate software package, partially executed on the computer of the user and partially executed on a remote computer, or completely executed on the remote computer or a server. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementation solutions, functions denoted in each step of flowcharts or in each block of block diagrams may not occur in the sequence denoted in the diagrams. For example, depending on an involved function, two steps or two blocks successively marked may be approximately performed concurrently, or these blocks sometimes may be performed in a reverse order.
  • A person of ordinary skill in the art may be aware that, in combination with the examples described in the embodiments disclosed in this specification, units and algorithm steps may be implemented by electronic hardware or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether the functions are performed by hardware or software depends on particular applications and design constraint conditions of the technical solutions. A person skilled in the art may use different methods to implement the described functions for each particular application, but it should not be considered that the implementation goes beyond the scope of the present invention.
  • The foregoing descriptions are merely specific implementation manners of the present invention, but are not intended to limit the protection scope of the present invention. Any variation or replacement readily figured out by a person skilled in the art within the technical scope disclosed in the present invention shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims (6)

  1. A data migration method, wherein the method is applied to a storage system, the storage system comprises a disk group, and the disk group comprises multiple solid-state disks SSDs, wherein each of the SSDs is divided into fine-grained chunks of a same size; and the method comprises:
    monitoring a size of bad blocks in each SSD in the disk group;
    determining a source SSD in the disk group of which a size of bad blocks exceeds a preset threshold, wherein a capacity usage ratio of the source SSD that is associated with the size of bad blocks of the source SSD is greater than an average capacity usage ratio of the disk group, wherein the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD is a ratio of a used capacity of the source SSD to an available physical capacity of the source SSD, and wherein the average capacity usage ratio of the disk group is a ratio of a used capacity of the disk group to an available physical capacity of the disk group;
    selecting (S202) one or more destination SSDs from the multiple SSDs with a capacity usage ratio less than the average capacity usage ratio of the disk group ;
    obtaining a difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio;
    multiplying the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio by an available physical capacity of the source SSD to obtain an amount of the data to be migrated from the source SSD;
    obtaining a number of chunks to be migrated from the source SSD by dividing the amount of the to be migrated from the source SSD by a size of a chunk, wherein the number of chunks to be migrated is greater than 1;
    migrating (S2042) data to be migrated from the source SSD to the one or more destination SSDs according to the number of chunks to be migrated from the source SSD, wherein the data to be migrated is migrated in a unit of chunk.
  2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the migrating the data to be migrated from the source SSD to the one or more destination SSDs according to the amount of the data to be migrated from the source SSD comprises:
    calculating (S2041), according to capacity usage ratio of the destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, an amount of data to be migrated to each destination SSD; and
    migrating (S2042) the data of the source SSD to each destination SSD based on the amount of the data to be migrated from the source SSD and the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the calculating, according to capacity usage ratio of the destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, an amount of data to be migrated to each destination SSD comprises:
    obtaining a difference value between capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio; and
    multiplying the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio by an available physical capacity of each destination SSD to obtain the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  4. A data migration apparatus, wherein the apparatus comprises:
    a determining module (301), configured to: monitor a size of bad blocks in each SSD in the disk group; determine a source SSD in the disk group of which a size of bad blocks exceeds a preset threshold, wherein a capacity usage ratio of the source SSD that is associated with the size of bad blocks of the source SSD is greater than an average capacity usage ratio of the disk group, wherein the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD is a ratio of a used capacity of the source SSD to an available physical capacity of the source SSD, and wherein the average capacity usage ratio of the disk group is a ratio of a used capacity of the disk group to an available physical capacity of the disk group; and select one or more destination SSD from the multiple SSDs, wherein each of the SSDs is divided into fine-grained chunks of a same size;
    a calculating module (302), configured to:
    obtain a difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio;
    multiply the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of the source SSD and the average capacity usage ratio by an available physical capacity of the source SSD to obtain an amount of the data to be migrated from the source SSD; and
    obtain a number of chunks to be migrated from the source SSD by dividing the amount of the to be migrated from the source SSD by a size of a chunk, wherein the number of chunks to be migrated is greater than 1;; and
    a migrating module (302), configured to migrate data to be migrated from the source SSD to the one or more destination SSDs according to the number of chunks to be migrated from the source SSD, wherein the data to be migrated is migrated in a unit of chunk.
  5. The apparatus according to claim 4, wherein:
    the migrating module (302) is specifically configured to calculate, according to capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, an amount of data to be migrated to each destination SSD, and migrate the data of the source SSD to each destination SSD based on the amount of the data to be migrated from the source SSD and the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
  6. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein:
    the migrating module (302) is specifically configured to obtain a difference value between capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio, and multiply the difference value between the capacity usage ratio of each destination SSD and the average capacity usage ratio by an available physical capacity of each destination SSD to obtain the amount of the data to be migrated to each destination SSD.
EP13892079.8A 2013-09-24 2013-09-24 Data migration method, data migration apparatus and storage device Active EP2942715B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
HUE13892079A HUE035390T2 (en) 2013-09-24 2013-09-24 Data migration method, data migration apparatus and storage device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CN2013/084093 WO2015042778A1 (en) 2013-09-24 2013-09-24 Data migration method, data migration apparatus and storage device

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2942715A1 EP2942715A1 (en) 2015-11-11
EP2942715A4 EP2942715A4 (en) 2016-05-11
EP2942715B1 true EP2942715B1 (en) 2017-11-08

Family

ID=52741734

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13892079.8A Active EP2942715B1 (en) 2013-09-24 2013-09-24 Data migration method, data migration apparatus and storage device

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US9733844B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2942715B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6318173B2 (en)
CN (1) CN104662518B (en)
HU (1) HUE035390T2 (en)
WO (1) WO2015042778A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10534417B1 (en) * 2015-03-10 2020-01-14 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Mass storage device electrical power consumption monitoring
US10599352B2 (en) 2015-08-14 2020-03-24 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Online flash resource allocation manager based on a TCO model
CN105183670B (en) * 2015-10-27 2018-11-27 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 Data processing method and device for distributed cache system
US9933952B1 (en) * 2016-03-31 2018-04-03 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Balancing allocated cache pages among storage devices in a flash cache
CN106293509A (en) * 2016-07-12 2017-01-04 乐视控股(北京)有限公司 Date storage method and system
WO2018022136A1 (en) * 2016-07-26 2018-02-01 Pure Storage, Inc. Geometry based, space aware shelf/writegroup evacuation
EP3926454A1 (en) * 2016-11-26 2021-12-22 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Data migration method, host, and solid-state storage device
WO2018116392A1 (en) * 2016-12-21 2018-06-28 株式会社日立製作所 Information processing system and information processing method
CN107122264B (en) * 2017-05-15 2020-06-09 成都优孚达信息技术有限公司 Disaster-tolerant backup method for mass data
CN107357523B (en) * 2017-06-27 2021-06-15 联想(北京)有限公司 Data processing method and electronic equipment
US10866741B2 (en) * 2017-08-02 2020-12-15 Toshiba Memory Corporation Extending SSD longevity
CN107562380A (en) * 2017-08-28 2018-01-09 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 A kind of RAID2.0 data block distribution method and device
CN111966540B (en) 2017-09-22 2024-03-01 成都华为技术有限公司 Storage medium management method and device and readable storage medium
CN108595108A (en) * 2017-12-29 2018-09-28 北京奇虎科技有限公司 A kind of moving method and device of data
US10831371B2 (en) * 2018-01-02 2020-11-10 International Business Machines Corporation Quota controlled movement of data in a tiered storage system
CN110196752A (en) * 2018-06-07 2019-09-03 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 Data processing method, device and storage medium
US10698630B2 (en) * 2018-06-13 2020-06-30 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Intra-cluster migration for elastic cloud storage devices
US11023129B2 (en) 2018-12-03 2021-06-01 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Hybrid intra-cluster migration of data between storage devices using chunk usage efficiency
CN111367466B (en) * 2018-12-26 2023-08-15 深圳市茁壮网络股份有限公司 Disk retirement method and device
CN112068765B (en) * 2019-06-10 2024-04-26 伊姆西Ip控股有限责任公司 Method, apparatus and computer program product for managing a storage system
KR20210016208A (en) 2019-08-02 2021-02-15 삼성전자주식회사 Storage device and operation method of storage system including storage device and host device controlling storage device
KR102650689B1 (en) 2019-08-02 2024-03-25 삼성전자주식회사 Storage device
US11163476B2 (en) * 2019-10-04 2021-11-02 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic rebalancing of free space between storage pools
CN112764665B (en) * 2019-10-21 2024-05-10 伊姆西Ip控股有限责任公司 Method, apparatus and computer program product for storage management
CN112748852B (en) * 2019-10-30 2024-05-24 伊姆西Ip控股有限责任公司 Method, electronic device and computer program product for managing a disk
TWI739325B (en) * 2020-02-27 2021-09-11 瑞昱半導體股份有限公司 Storage space management method
US11726684B1 (en) * 2021-02-26 2023-08-15 Pure Storage, Inc. Cluster rebalance using user defined rules
CN113268203B (en) * 2021-05-18 2022-11-04 天津中科曙光存储科技有限公司 Capacity balancing method and device of storage system, computer equipment and storage medium
CN114489504B (en) * 2022-01-21 2023-08-08 苏州浪潮智能科技有限公司 SSD data management method and related components

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050015547A1 (en) * 2003-07-14 2005-01-20 Fujitsu Limited Distributed storage system and control unit for distributed storage system
EP2413245A1 (en) * 2009-07-22 2012-02-01 Hitachi, Ltd. Storage system provided with a plurality of flash packages

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5724539A (en) * 1992-03-19 1998-03-03 Digital Equipment Corporation System for selectively storing stripes of data in tracks of disks so that sum of transfer rates of stripes match communication bandwidth to host
US6895467B2 (en) * 2001-10-22 2005-05-17 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for atomizing storage
MXPA01012371A (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-05 Fernando Mejias Butron Manuel Method for optimizing the performance of a computer and main non-volatile storage mean optimized with specific purpose sections.
JP3950720B2 (en) * 2002-03-18 2007-08-01 株式会社日立製作所 Disk array subsystem
JP3940409B2 (en) * 2003-12-26 2007-07-04 Tdk株式会社 Memory controller, flash memory system, and control method
US7509474B2 (en) * 2005-06-08 2009-03-24 Micron Technology, Inc. Robust index storage for non-volatile memory
JP2007079762A (en) * 2005-09-13 2007-03-29 Phison Electronics Corp Method for managing flash memory
JP2008015769A (en) * 2006-07-05 2008-01-24 Hitachi Ltd Storage system and writing distribution method
US8321597B2 (en) * 2007-02-22 2012-11-27 Super Talent Electronics, Inc. Flash-memory device with RAID-type controller
TWI373772B (en) * 2007-10-04 2012-10-01 Phison Electronics Corp Wear leveling method and controller using the same
JP4461170B2 (en) 2007-12-28 2010-05-12 株式会社東芝 Memory system
JP2011515727A (en) * 2008-02-12 2011-05-19 ネットアップ,インコーポレイテッド Hybrid media storage system architecture
JP5242264B2 (en) * 2008-07-07 2013-07-24 株式会社東芝 Data control apparatus, storage system, and program
US8161237B2 (en) * 2009-03-27 2012-04-17 Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Asymmetric load balancing for RAID storage systems
US8364858B1 (en) * 2009-12-07 2013-01-29 Emc Corporation Normalizing capacity utilization within virtual storage pools
US8850114B2 (en) * 2010-09-07 2014-09-30 Daniel L Rosenband Storage array controller for flash-based storage devices
US8719531B2 (en) * 2011-06-14 2014-05-06 Western Digital Technologies, Inc. System and method for performing data retention that incorporates environmental conditions
WO2013091192A1 (en) * 2011-12-21 2013-06-27 华为技术有限公司 Disk cache method, device and system provided with multi-device mirroring and strip function
CN102880570B (en) * 2012-09-05 2016-04-27 记忆科技(深圳)有限公司 The weighting abrasion equilibrium method of solid state hard disc and system
CN103036994B (en) * 2012-12-18 2015-08-19 曙光信息产业(北京)有限公司 Realize the cloud storage system of load balancing
US9405621B2 (en) * 2012-12-28 2016-08-02 Super Talent Technology, Corp. Green eMMC device (GeD) controller with DRAM data persistence, data-type splitting, meta-page grouping, and diversion of temp files for enhanced flash endurance
US9454434B2 (en) * 2014-01-17 2016-09-27 Netapp, Inc. File system driven raid rebuild technique

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050015547A1 (en) * 2003-07-14 2005-01-20 Fujitsu Limited Distributed storage system and control unit for distributed storage system
EP2413245A1 (en) * 2009-07-22 2012-02-01 Hitachi, Ltd. Storage system provided with a plurality of flash packages

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2016503925A (en) 2016-02-08
WO2015042778A1 (en) 2015-04-02
CN104662518A (en) 2015-05-27
JP6318173B2 (en) 2018-04-25
EP2942715A4 (en) 2016-05-11
EP2942715A1 (en) 2015-11-11
US9733844B2 (en) 2017-08-15
US20150193154A1 (en) 2015-07-09
CN104662518B (en) 2016-05-25
HUE035390T2 (en) 2018-05-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2942715B1 (en) Data migration method, data migration apparatus and storage device
US9529535B2 (en) Storage system and method of control for storage system
US9104316B2 (en) Runtime dynamic performance skew elimination
US9658779B2 (en) Computer system and control method for computer system
US9811288B1 (en) Managing data placement based on flash drive wear level
US11099744B2 (en) Method and device for writing stored data into storage medium based on flash memory
US9753668B2 (en) Method and apparatus to manage tier information
CN110737390B (en) Method, apparatus and computer program product for managing a storage system
US11561696B2 (en) Garbage collection pacing in a storage system
CN111104055B (en) Method, apparatus and computer program product for managing a storage system
EP3336706A1 (en) Method and storage device for processing stripes in storage device
US10168945B2 (en) Storage apparatus and storage system
US20180173581A1 (en) Data storage system durability using hardware failure risk indicators
US10579540B2 (en) Raid data migration through stripe swapping
US9298397B2 (en) Nonvolatile storage thresholding for ultra-SSD, SSD, and HDD drive intermix
CN112748860B (en) Method, electronic device and computer program product for storage management
US20240211390A1 (en) Machine learning-based, system-wide solid-state drive wear-level balancing algorithm to extend the service life of solid-state drives

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150302

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20160411

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G06F 13/18 20060101AFI20160405BHEP

Ipc: G06F 3/06 20060101ALI20160405BHEP

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20161006

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170526

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 944787

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602013029330

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 944787

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180208

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E035390

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180208

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180308

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180209

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602013029330

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180809

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180924

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180930

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180924

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171108

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20230816

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20230809

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230803

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20230815

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230808

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230802

Year of fee payment: 11