EP2924662B1 - Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system - Google Patents

Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2924662B1
EP2924662B1 EP14161986.6A EP14161986A EP2924662B1 EP 2924662 B1 EP2924662 B1 EP 2924662B1 EP 14161986 A EP14161986 A EP 14161986A EP 2924662 B1 EP2924662 B1 EP 2924662B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
onboard unit
error
unit according
dataset
satellite
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP14161986.6A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2924662B2 (en
EP2924662A1 (en
Inventor
Alexander Leopold
Christoph Abart
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kapsch TrafficCom AG
Original Assignee
Kapsch TrafficCom AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=50424013&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2924662(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority to EP14161986.6A priority Critical patent/EP2924662B2/en
Priority to SI201430083A priority patent/SI2924662T1/en
Priority to ES14161986T priority patent/ES2599783T5/en
Priority to PL14161986T priority patent/PL2924662T3/en
Priority to PT141619866T priority patent/PT2924662T/en
Application filed by Kapsch TrafficCom AG filed Critical Kapsch TrafficCom AG
Priority to DK14161986.6T priority patent/DK2924662T3/en
Publication of EP2924662A1 publication Critical patent/EP2924662A1/en
Publication of EP2924662B1 publication Critical patent/EP2924662B1/en
Publication of EP2924662B2 publication Critical patent/EP2924662B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B15/00Arrangements or apparatus for collecting fares, tolls or entrance fees at one or more control points
    • G07B15/06Arrangements for road pricing or congestion charging of vehicles or vehicle users, e.g. automatic toll systems
    • G07B15/063Arrangements for road pricing or congestion charging of vehicles or vehicle users, e.g. automatic toll systems using wireless information transmission between the vehicle and a fixed station

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an on-board unit for a road toll system, comprising a satellite navigation receiver for the continuous generation of position fixes and associated quality measurements from raw satellite data, a radio transceiver and a processor connected to these components, which is adapted to generate toll data from the position fixes and via the Radio transceiver to send.
  • the invention further relates to a method for monitoring the function in a road toll system using such an on-board unit.
  • Onboard units based on satellite navigation systems (GNSS) may e.g. Be "Thick Client” OBUs, which match the position fixes generated with a stored in the onboard unit digital road map, thereby determine toll routes, calculate related tolls and send as toll data on the radio transceiver, but also "thin client” OBUs, which directly send the position fixes as toll data to a central office, which calculates the tolls.
  • GNSS OBUs satellite navigation systems
  • the predetermined toll routes random samples Departure to then compare the tolls incurred in the headquarters of the Toll Chargers with the random checks.
  • the Toll Charger will request individual toll onboard units to randomly collect positional data and send as reference data directly to the Toll Charger toll center where it compares the reference data with the tolls generated by the service provider during operation to improve performance of the road toll system.
  • the invention has for its object to provide devices and methods for functional testing in a road toll system, which allow as a result an improvement in the performance of the road toll system and thus an increase in Vermustungsgrades.
  • an onboard unit of the aforementioned type which is characterized by a failure detector connected to the satellite navigation receiver adapted to respond to a lack of position fixes over a predetermined minimum time period or a drop in quality measurements below a predetermined minimum quality measure; and a logger connected to the satellite navigation receiver and controlled by the failure detector, which is adapted to generate an error record with at least the last position fix before the response when the failure detector responds; wherein the processor is adapted to receive the error record from the logger and send it via the radio transceiver.
  • this makes it possible for the first time to make the quality of the GNSS position determination and coverage in the road toll system accessible to a central evaluation and thereby to determine critical GNSS fault locations in the road network at an early stage and to allocate them geographically on the basis of the last position fix.
  • position detection errors of GNSS OBUs can be evaluated continuously or, if the OBUs are spread, continuously and at short intervals in the control center.
  • different GNSS-related errors in the road toll system e.g. Spurious signals, shadowing of the satellite signals, etc., and their causes, e.g. local or even mobile interference sources (“jammers”) or geographical conditions such as mountains or tunnels closed.
  • measures for fault elimination for example, at the error locations respectively bounded by the last position fixes.
  • the setting up of stationary position transmitters, support beacons, satellite signal repeaters or the like, or the identification and switching off of interference signal sources, etc. are initiated.
  • the error data record generated by the onboard unit has a time stamp of the last named Contains position fixes.
  • a time stamp of the last named Contains position fixes can be inferred.
  • the movement of a mobile jamming signal source can be accurately tracked to identify, for example, "jamming" that deliberately sends jamming signals to hinder proper building, using traffic cameras and / or emergency vehicles.
  • the error data set also contains the first position fix generated after the completion of the response or detection.
  • the error data record preferably also contains a time stamp of the named first position fix.
  • the error data set also contains at least one quality measurement value generated during the response of the failure detector or detection of the failure.
  • the quality measurement contains, for example, the number of satellites used to generate the associated position fix or a DOP value (Dilution of Precision) of the associated position measurement value, an unfavorable satellite constellation could be detected - accidentally or locally frequently.
  • the quality measured value contains the respective signal level of the satellite used to generate the associated position measured value and / or a signal / noise ratio of the satellite signals, then interference signals or signal attenuation can also be caused, for example as a result of local, possibly even mobile jammers or from weather events or shadowing by mountains or forest.
  • an error record may include not only one but also a series of quality measurements generated during the response of the failure detector, resulting in an evaluation of the history of the quality measurements and thus more accurate conclusions, e.g. allowed over possibly different error causes.
  • the error data record preferably also contains satellite raw data received during the response of the failure detector or detecting the failure and / or sensor measured values generated in a sensor element, thereby providing further bases for a later determination of possible causes of the error.
  • the failure detector contains a watchdog which is newly abuttable by each position fix generated. This represents a particularly simple, reliable component for the failure detector.
  • At least one second error data record generated and sent by a second on-board unit in the manner mentioned is received in the center, and the error data records of the at least two on-board units are validated against one another during the evaluation.
  • temporal changes of possible causes of faults can be considered more easily and individual faults or faults of individual onboard units, e.g. due to an improper arrangement in the vehicle, be compensated.
  • the number of available onboard units in the evaluation of the error data sets increases their informative value with regard to possible causes of error.
  • Fig. 1 shows a road toll system 1 based on onboard units (OBUs) 2, which are carried by vehicles 3 in order to toll their usage in a network of roads 4.
  • OBUs onboard units
  • the location use, for example, the driving of a particular segment of a road 4, crossing a border, the residence in a particular geographical area or the like. be and in any way, for example, per road segment, distance traveled, in a region of time spent (eg parking time), etc. billed.
  • each on-board unit 2 has a satellite navigation receiver 5, which consists of satellite signals 6 from navigation satellites 7 (FIG. Fig. 1 ) of a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) continuously determines the position of the on-board unit 2 and as position fixes p 1 , p 2 ,..., generally p i , with associated quality measurement values q 1 , q 2 , ... , generally q i , outputs.
  • GNSS global navigation satellite system
  • Each quality measurement q i of a position fix p i can contain various quality parameters, for example the number, signal level and / or signal / noise ratio of the signals 6 of the navigation satellites 7 used for determining the respective position fix p i , eg also in evaluated form The form of dilution of precision (DOP) values provided by commercially available satellite navigation receivers 5 for each position fix p i .
  • DOP dilution of precision
  • the satellite navigation receiver 5 can also output the underlying "raw" satellite data, eg sections of the satellite signals 6, or processing data formed during the generation of the position fixes p i , hereinafter "raw satellite data" r i called.
  • the output of the position fixes p i , quality measurements q i or raw satellite data r i can take place on mutually separate outputs of the satellite navigation receiver 5, on a common output in multiplexing or on a common bus in separate data packets.
  • the on-board unit 2 is further provided with a radio transceiver 8, e.g. according to a 2G, 3G, 4G or 5G mobile radio standard such as GSM, UMTS or LTE, the ITS-G5 or WAVE standard for short-range radio communication, one of the IEEE 802.11 standards for WLAN communication or the like, and a processor 9 connected to the satellite navigation receiver 5 and the radio transceiver 8.
  • a radio transceiver 8 e.g. according to a 2G, 3G, 4G or 5G mobile radio standard such as GSM, UMTS or LTE, the ITS-G5 or WAVE standard for short-range radio communication, one of the IEEE 802.11 standards for WLAN communication or the like
  • a processor 9 connected to the satellite navigation receiver 5 and the radio transceiver 8.
  • Optional may also be one or more sensor elements 10, for example, velocity or acceleration sensors, are provided, which in the onboard unit 2 itself, or - connected to the on-board unit 2 - may be arranged in the vehicle 3, and sensor measurements m i, for example, speed , Acceleration or approximate local measured values generate.
  • sensor element 10 can also be formed by the radio transceiver 8, in which case the sensor measured values m i are metadata of the radio transceiver 8, eg radio cell or received field strength data of a radio connection 11 to a radio station 12, here a base station of a mobile radio network in which the radio transceiver 8 is located.
  • the processor 9 generates toll data M from the sequence ⁇ p i ⁇ of position fixes p i in order to use the radio transceiver 8 via the radio link 11 and the radio station 12 to a central office 13 of the road toll system 1 to send.
  • the toll data M may be, for example, tolls, which are generated by a map matching of the position fix sequence ⁇ p i ⁇ with a digital toll road 4 or places stored in the on-board unit 2.
  • the toll data M could also be the position fixes p i itself, which are individually or - if desired filtered according to quality - combined into a bundle at arbitrary or predetermined times, after predetermined distances or simply with the availability of a radio link 11 via the radio transceiver 8 sent. In the latter case, card matching and billing can be done for example in the center 13.
  • Fig. 1 the vehicles 3 pass through a geographical area 14 on their respective routes on the roads 4 in which the satellite signals 6 received by the satellite navigation receivers 5 are disturbed, so that the quality measurements qi fall off and / or the respective satellite navigation receivers 5 do not generate position fixes p i ,
  • Fig. 3 shows in this example of waveforms of the respective signals or data of an on-board unit 2.
  • the satellite navigation receiver 5 generates the satellite navigation receiver 5 at times t 1, t 2, ..., generally i t, from the raw satellite data r i (not shown) each having a Position fix p i ( Fig. 3a ) and an associated quality measurement q i ( Fig. 3c ). If the vehicle 3 passes through said geographical area 14, the satellite navigation receiver 5 does not generate any position fixes p i over a period of time e, but in general continues to produce quality measured values q i .
  • the on-board unit 2 has a connected to the satellite navigation receiver 5 failure detector 15 which responds and an output signal s ( Fig. 3e ) generates, for example, a logical "high” signal or a logical "1" if it either (a) the absence of position fixes p i over a predetermined minimum period of time ⁇ and / or (b) a drop of quality measured values q i below predetermined minimum quality measure Q min detected.
  • the failure detector 15 may have a watchdog 16, eg in the form of a deadman or retriggerable monoflop circuit, which is triggered by each new position fix p i at its input again for the minimum period of time ⁇ and thus at its (here: inverted) output a detection signal d ( Fig. 3b ) outputs, if within the specified minimum period ⁇ no new position fix p i attains.
  • a watchdog 16 eg in the form of a deadman or retriggerable monoflop circuit, which is triggered by each new position fix p i at its input again for the minimum period of time ⁇ and thus at its (here: inverted) output a detection signal d ( Fig. 3b ) outputs, if within the specified minimum period ⁇ no new position fix p i attains.
  • the failure detector 15 for detecting the event (b) may have a comparator 17 which compares the incoming quality measurements q i with a minimum quality measure Q min , and an output c when the quality measures q i fall below the minimum quality measure Q min ( Fig. 3d ).
  • the comparator 17 may first combine a quality metric q i containing several parameters (dimensions) into a single global quality metric Q i ; alternatively, the minimum quality measure Q min could include separate single thresholds for a plurality of quality parameters included in a quality metric q i .
  • the output signals c of the watchdog 16 and d of the comparator 17 can be linked, for example, by a simple OR circuit 18 to the output signal s of the failure detector 15.
  • the OR circuit 18 may also be a complex Ausretelogik, which, for example, the timing of the signals c and d also taken into account, are provided. If the failure detector 15 contains only one of the components watchdog 16 or comparator 17, the circuit 18 is omitted and the output signal s coincides with the signal c or d.
  • the output signal s generated by the failure detector 15 activates a logger 19 which, in the case of said events (a) and / or (b), generates an error record F and makes it available to the processor 9 for transmission via the radio transceiver 8 to the center 13.
  • the logger 19 is, for example, a recording unit 20 with a buffer memory 21 connected to one or more outputs of the satellite navigation receiver 5.
  • the logger 19 may pre-process the error record F, for example, by exiting redundant or irrelevant data, supplementing with environment data from the environment of the on-board unit 2 or internal status data of the on-board unit 2, data summary, etc. depending on the situation.
  • the received error records F are evaluated. This evaluation can on the one hand be done individually, i. the error data sets F of an on-board unit 2 are considered on their own; on the other hand, a plurality of error data sets F of different on-board units 2 can also be received, jointly evaluated and, for example, evaluated. be validated against each other.
  • the error data sets F are determined as a function of the position fixes p m , p n , ⁇ p i ⁇ and, if detected, their time stamps t m , t n , ⁇ t i ⁇ , quality measurements q m , q n , ⁇ q i ⁇ , raw satellite data ⁇ r i ⁇ and / or sensor readings ⁇ m i ⁇ are considered and analyzed for possible sources of error in order to prepare measures for their elimination.
  • geographic interference and shading regions 14 of the satellite reception as well as their time dependency may be determined.
  • the onboard unit 2 as a whole or individual ones of its components, such as the failure detector 15, the logger 19 or parts thereof both as hardware components and as software objects, e.g. in the processor 9.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
  • Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)

Description

Die vorliegende Erfindung betrifft eine Onboard-Unit für ein Straßenmautsystem, mit einem Satellitennavigationsempfänger zur fortlaufenden Erzeugung von Positionsfixen und zugehörigen Qualitätsmesswerten aus Satellitenrohdaten, einem Funksendeempfänger und einem an diese Komponenten angeschlossenen Prozessor, der dafür ausgebildet ist, aus den Positionsfixen Mautdaten zu erzeugen und über den Funksendeempfänger zu senden. Die Erfindung betrifft ferner ein Verfahren zur Funktionsüberwachung in einem Straßenmautsystem mithilfe einer solchen Onboard-Unit.The present invention relates to an on-board unit for a road toll system, comprising a satellite navigation receiver for the continuous generation of position fixes and associated quality measurements from raw satellite data, a radio transceiver and a processor connected to these components, which is adapted to generate toll data from the position fixes and via the Radio transceiver to send. The invention further relates to a method for monitoring the function in a road toll system using such an on-board unit.

Onboard-Units (OBUs) auf Basis von Satellitennavigationssystemen (global navigation satellite systems, GNSS) können z.B. "Thick Client"-OBUs sein, welche die erzeugten Positionsfixe mit einer in der Onboard-Unit hinterlegten digitalen Straßenkarte abgleichen, dabei gebührenpflichtige Fahrstrecken ermitteln, zugehörige Mautgebühren errechnen und als Mautdaten über den Funksendeempfänger senden, aber auch "Thin Client"-OBUs, welche direkt die Positionsfixe als Mautdaten an eine Zentrale senden, die daraus die Mautgebühren berechnet. Die Funktions- und Leistungsfähigkeit solcher GNSS-OBUs hängt maßgeblich von der Qualität ihres Satellitenempfangs und der daraus bestimmten Positionsfixe ab.Onboard units (OBUs) based on satellite navigation systems (GNSS) may e.g. Be "Thick Client" OBUs, which match the position fixes generated with a stored in the onboard unit digital road map, thereby determine toll routes, calculate related tolls and send as toll data on the radio transceiver, but also "thin client" OBUs, which directly send the position fixes as toll data to a central office, which calculates the tolls. The functionality and performance of such GNSS OBUs depends largely on the quality of their satellite reception and the resulting position fixes.

In der EP 1 696 207 A1 wird ein Verfahren zum Klassifizieren von Positionsfixen beschrieben, wobei aufgrund ihrer Qualität ungültige Positionsfixe verworfen oder markiert werden und von Positionsfixen mit verwendbaren Satellitenrohdaten nur diese Rohdaten oder daraus abgeleitete Metadaten, nicht jedoch die Positionsfixe selbst verwendet werden.In the EP 1 696 207 A1 For example, a method is described for classifying position fixes, where due to their quality, invalid position fixes are discarded or marked, and position fixes with usable raw satellite data use only that raw data or metadata derived therefrom, but not the position fixes themselves.

Während die Abrechnung der Mautgebühren meist in der Hand des Straßenerhalters oder einer Behörde, des sog. "Toll Charger", liegt, wird die Erzeugung von Mautdaten oder das Berechnen der Mautgebühren meist als Dienstleistung durch einen "Service Provider" erbracht; der Service Provider hat dabei eine bestimmte Leistungsfähigkeit, z.B. einen bestimmten Vermautungsgrad auf einer Mautstrecke, zu garantieren.
Zur Messung der Funktions- und Leistungsfähigkeit eines Straßenmautsystems werden derzeit Flotten von Testfahrzeugen eingesetzt, die beispielsweise vorgegebene Mautstrecken stichprobenartig abfahren, um anschließend die in der Zentrale des Toll Chargers anfallenden Mautgebühren mit den Stichprobenfahrten zu vergleichen. Zur Reduktion des personellen und organisatorischen Aufwands schlägt die EP 2 665 044 alternativ dazu vor, dass der Toll Charger einzelne mautpflichtige Onboard-Units zum stichprobenartigen Sammeln von positionsbezogenen Daten und Senden als Referenzdaten direkt an die Mautzentrale des Toll Chargers auffordert, wo dieser die Referenzdaten mit den vom Serviceprovider im laufenden Betrieb erzeugten Mautgebühren vergleicht, um die Leistungsfähigkeit des Straßenmautsystems zu messen.
While billing tolls is usually in the hands of the road owner or an authority, the so-called "toll chargers", the generation of toll data or the calculation of tolls is usually as a service by a "service Provider ", the service provider has a certain capacity, for example, to guarantee a certain Vermustungsgrad on a toll road.
To measure the functionality and performance of a road toll system fleets of test vehicles are currently used, for example, the predetermined toll routes random samples Departure to then compare the tolls incurred in the headquarters of the Toll Chargers with the random checks. To reduce the personnel and organizational effort beats the EP 2 665 044 Alternatively, the Toll Charger will request individual toll onboard units to randomly collect positional data and send as reference data directly to the Toll Charger toll center where it compares the reference data with the tolls generated by the service provider during operation to improve performance of the road toll system.

Die Erfindung setzt sich zum Ziel, Vorrichtungen und Verfahren zur Funktionsüberprüfung in einem Straßenmautsystem zu schaffen, welche in der Folge eine Verbesserung der Leistungsfähigkeit des Straßenmautsystems und damit eine Erhöhung des Vermautungsgrades ermöglichen.The invention has for its object to provide devices and methods for functional testing in a road toll system, which allow as a result an improvement in the performance of the road toll system and thus an increase in Vermustungsgrades.

Dieses Ziel wird gemäß einem ersten Aspekt der Erfindung mit einer Onboard-Unit der einleitend genannten Art erreicht, die sich auszeichnet durch
einen an den Satellitennavigationsempfänger angeschlossenen Ausfallsdetektor, welcher dafür ausgebildet ist, auf ein Ausbleiben von Positionsfixen über eine vorgegebene Mindestzeitspanne oder ein Abfallen von Qualitätsmesswerten unter ein vorgegebenes Mindestqualitätsmaß anzusprechen, und
einen an den Satellitennavigationsempfänger angeschlossenen und vom Ausfallsdetektor gesteuerten Protokollierer, welcher dafür ausgebildet ist, bei Ansprechen des Ausfallsdetektors einen Fehlerdatensatz mit zumindest dem letzten Positionsfix vor dem Ansprechen zu erzeugen,
wobei der Prozessor dafür ausgebildet ist, den Fehlerdatensatz vom Protokollierer zu empfangen und über den Funksendeempfänger zu senden.
This object is achieved according to a first aspect of the invention with an onboard unit of the aforementioned type, which is characterized by
a failure detector connected to the satellite navigation receiver adapted to respond to a lack of position fixes over a predetermined minimum time period or a drop in quality measurements below a predetermined minimum quality measure; and
a logger connected to the satellite navigation receiver and controlled by the failure detector, which is adapted to generate an error record with at least the last position fix before the response when the failure detector responds;
wherein the processor is adapted to receive the error record from the logger and send it via the radio transceiver.

Gemäß einem zweiten Aspekt schafft die Erfindung ein Verfahren zur Funktionsmessung in einem Straßenmautsystem mit einer Zentrale und zumindest einer fahrzeuggestützten Onboard-Unit, die aus Satellitenrohdaten fortlaufend Positionsfixe und zugehörige Qualitätsmesswerte erzeugt und darauf basierende Mautdaten an die Zentrale sendet, umfassend:

  • Detektieren eines Ausbleibens von Positionsfixen über eine vorgegebene Mindestzeitspanne oder eines Abfallens von Qualitätsmesswerten unter ein vorgegebenes Mindestqualitätsmaß in der Onboard-Unit,
  • im Falle der Detektion, Protokollieren eines Fehlerdatensatzes mit zumindest dem letzten Positionsfix vor der Detektion in der Onboard-Unit,
  • Senden des Fehlerdatensatzes von der Onboard-Unit an die Zentrale, und
  • Auswerten des Fehlerdatensatzes in der Zentrale.
According to a second aspect, the invention provides a method for functional measurement in a road toll system with a control center and at least one onboard vehicle-based unit, which continuously generates position fixes and associated quality measurements from raw satellite data and sends toll data based thereon to the center, comprising:
  • Detecting a lack of position fixes over a predetermined minimum time period or a drop of quality measurements below a predetermined minimum quality measure in the onboard unit,
  • in the case of detection, logging an error data record with at least the last position fix before the detection in the on-board unit,
  • Sending the error record from the onboard unit to the control panel, and
  • Evaluation of the error data record in the control center.

Erfindungsgemäß wird dadurch erstmals möglich, die Qualität der GNSS-Positionsbestimmung und -Abdeckung im Straßenmautsystem einer zentralen Auswertung zugänglich zu machen und dadurch kritische GNSS-Fehlerorte im Straßennetz frühzeitig zu bestimmen und anhand des letzten Positionsfixes geographisch zuzuordnen. Anstelle einer bloß stichprobenartigen Leistungsüberprüfung können Positionsermittlungsfehler von GNSS-OBUs sofort oder nur mit kurzer Sendezeitverzögerung kontinuierlich und - bei entsprechender Verbreitung der OBUs - flächendeckend in der Zentrale ausgewertet werden. In der Folge kann auf unterschiedliche GNSS-bedingte Fehler im Straßenmautsystem, z.B. Störsignale, Abschattungen der Satellitensignale etc. und deren Ursachen, z.B. örtliche oder auch mobile Störsignalquellen ("Jammer") oder geographische Gegebenheiten wie Gebirge oder Tunnels, geschlossen werden. So können erstmals an den durch die letzten Positionsfixe jeweils eingegrenzten Fehlerorten zielgerichtet Maßnahmen zur Fehlerbeseitigung, z.B. das Aufstellen von stationären Positionssendern, Stützbaken, Satellitensignal-Repeatern od.dgl., oder das Identifizieren und Ausschalten von Störsignalquellen etc., eingeleitet werden.According to the invention, this makes it possible for the first time to make the quality of the GNSS position determination and coverage in the road toll system accessible to a central evaluation and thereby to determine critical GNSS fault locations in the road network at an early stage and to allocate them geographically on the basis of the last position fix. Instead of a mere random performance check, position detection errors of GNSS OBUs can be evaluated continuously or, if the OBUs are spread, continuously and at short intervals in the control center. As a result, different GNSS-related errors in the road toll system, e.g. Spurious signals, shadowing of the satellite signals, etc., and their causes, e.g. local or even mobile interference sources ("jammers") or geographical conditions such as mountains or tunnels closed. Thus, for the first time, measures for fault elimination, for example, at the error locations respectively bounded by the last position fixes, can be targeted. the setting up of stationary position transmitters, support beacons, satellite signal repeaters or the like, or the identification and switching off of interference signal sources, etc., are initiated.

Besonders günstig ist es, wenn der von der Onboard-Unit erzeugte Fehlerdatensatz einen Zeitstempel des genannten letzten Positionsfixes enthält. So kann aus einer Mehrzahl von Fehlerdatensätzen verschiedener Onboard-Units bzw. ein und derselben Onboard-Unit zu verschiedenen Tages- bzw. Jahreszeiten auch auf zeitabhängige Fehler und Fehlerursachen, z.B. zeitveränderliche bzw. periodische Störsignale, ungünstige Satellitenkonstellationen oder Abschattung der Satellitensignale in Abhängigkeit von Wetterereignissen oder durch Vegetation während der Wachstumszeiten etc., rückgeschlossen werden. Ferner kann die Bewegung einer mobilen Störsignalquelle genau verfolgt werden, um z.B. "Jammer", die bewusst Störsignale senden, um ein korrektes Vermauten zu behindern, mithilfe von Verkehrskameras und/oder Einsatzfahrzeugen zu identifizieren.It is particularly favorable if the error data record generated by the onboard unit has a time stamp of the last named Contains position fixes. Thus, from a plurality of error data sets of different onboard units or one and the same onboard unit at different times of day or seasons on time-dependent errors and causes of errors, such as time-varying or periodic interference, unfavorable satellite constellations or shadowing of the satellite signals in response to weather events or by vegetation during the growing season, etc., be inferred. Further, the movement of a mobile jamming signal source can be accurately tracked to identify, for example, "jamming" that deliberately sends jamming signals to hinder proper building, using traffic cameras and / or emergency vehicles.

Um die geographischen Bereiche des detektierten Fehlers noch besser abgrenzen zu können, ist es besonders vorteilhaft, wenn der Fehlerdatensatz auch den ersten nach Beendigung des Ansprechens bzw. Detektierens erzeugten Positionsfix enthält. Bevorzugt enthält dabei der Fehlerdatensatz aus den genannten Gründen auch einen Zeitstempel des genannten ersten Positionsfixes.In order to distinguish the geographical areas of the detected error even better, it is particularly advantageous if the error data set also contains the first position fix generated after the completion of the response or detection. For this reason, the error data record preferably also contains a time stamp of the named first position fix.

In einer günstigen Ausführungsform der Erfindung enthält der Fehlerdatensatz auch zumindest einen während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors bzw. Detektierens des Ausfalls erzeugten Qualitätsmesswert. Dadurch kann noch präziser auf Fehlerursachen rückgeschlossen werden. So könnte, wenn der Qualitätsmesswert z.B. die Anzahl der zur Erzeugung des zugehörigen Positionsfixes herangezogenen Satelliten oder einen DOP-Wert (dilution of precision) des zugehörigen Positionsmesswerts enthält, eine - zufällig oder lokal häufig auftretende - ungünstige Satellitenkonstellation erkannt werden. Enthält der Qualitätsmesswert z.B. den jeweiligen Signalpegel der zur Erzeugung des zugehörigen Positionsmesswerts herangezogenen Satelliten und/oder ein Signal/Rausch-Verhältnis der Satellitensignale, so kann auch auf Störsignale bzw. Signaldämpfungen - z.B. infolge von lokalen, gegebenenfalls sogar beweglichen Störsendern oder von Wetterereignissen oder Abschattungen durch Gebirge oder Wald - rückgeschlossen werden.In a favorable embodiment of the invention, the error data set also contains at least one quality measurement value generated during the response of the failure detector or detection of the failure. This makes it possible to draw conclusions about the causes of faults even more precisely. Thus, if the quality measurement contains, for example, the number of satellites used to generate the associated position fix or a DOP value (Dilution of Precision) of the associated position measurement value, an unfavorable satellite constellation could be detected - accidentally or locally frequently. If, for example, the quality measured value contains the respective signal level of the satellite used to generate the associated position measured value and / or a signal / noise ratio of the satellite signals, then interference signals or signal attenuation can also be caused, for example as a result of local, possibly even mobile jammers or from weather events or shadowing by mountains or forest.

Es versteht sich, dass ein Fehlerdatensatz nicht nur einen, sondern auch eine Folge von während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors erzeugten Qualitätsmesswerten enthalten kann, was eine Auswertung des Verlaufs der Qualitätsmesswerte und damit noch genauere Schlussfolgerungen z.B. über möglicherweise unterschiedliche Fehlerursachen erlaubt.It will be appreciated that an error record may include not only one but also a series of quality measurements generated during the response of the failure detector, resulting in an evaluation of the history of the quality measurements and thus more accurate conclusions, e.g. allowed over possibly different error causes.

Bevorzugt enthält der Fehlerdatensatz auch während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors bzw. Detektierens des Ausfalls empfangene Satellitenrohdaten und/oder in einem Sensorelement erzeugte Sensormesswerte, wodurch für ein späteres Ermitteln möglicher Fehlerursachen weitere Grundlagen geschaffen werden.The error data record preferably also contains satellite raw data received during the response of the failure detector or detecting the failure and / or sensor measured values generated in a sensor element, thereby providing further bases for a later determination of possible causes of the error.

Besonders günstig ist es, wenn der Ausfallsdetektor einen Watchdog enthält, welcher von jedem erzeugten Positionsfix neu anstoßbar ist. Dies stellt einen besonders einfachen, zuverlässigen Baustein für den Ausfallsdetektor dar.It is particularly favorable if the failure detector contains a watchdog which is newly abuttable by each position fix generated. This represents a particularly simple, reliable component for the failure detector.

In einer weiteren bevorzugten Ausführungsform des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens wird in der Zentrale zumindest ein zweiter, von einer zweiten Onboard-Unit in der genannten Weise erzeugter und gesandter Fehlerdatensatz empfangen und die Fehlerdatensätze der zumindest zwei Onboard-Units werden beim Auswerten gegeneinander validiert. Dadurch können zeitliche Änderungen möglicher Fehlerursachen einfacher berücksichtigt und individuelle Fehler oder Störungen einzelner Onboard-Units, z.B. infolge einer unsachgemäßen Anordnung im Fahrzeug, ausgeglichen werden. Zugleich steigt mit der Anzahl der verfügbaren Onboard-Units bei der Auswertung der Fehlerdatensätze deren Aussagekraft in Bezug auf mögliche Fehlerursachen.In a further preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention, at least one second error data record generated and sent by a second on-board unit in the manner mentioned is received in the center, and the error data records of the at least two on-board units are validated against one another during the evaluation. Thereby temporal changes of possible causes of faults can be considered more easily and individual faults or faults of individual onboard units, e.g. due to an improper arrangement in the vehicle, be compensated. At the same time, the number of available onboard units in the evaluation of the error data sets increases their informative value with regard to possible causes of error.

Besonders günstig ist es, wenn beim Auswerten durch einen Abgleich der Fehlerdatensätze mit einer digitalen Landkarte geographische Störungs- und Abschattungsbereiche des Satellitenempfangs bestimmt werden. Dadurch wird eine "Landkarte von GNSS-Fehlern" erzeugt, welche mit geographischen Gegebenheiten, z.B. hohen Bergen, engen Tälern, Tunnels etc. abgeglichen werden kann. Auf diese Weise sind naturgegebene von technisch bedingten Fehlerursachen leichter unterscheidbar, und Maßnahmen zur Fehlerbeseitigung können in die Wege geleitet werden.It is particularly advantageous if geographic interference and shading ranges of the satellite reception are determined during evaluation by matching the error data records with a digital map. This creates a "map of GNSS errors" that are matched to geographic conditions such as high mountains, narrow valleys, tunnels, etc. can. In this way, inherent technical causes of error are more easily distinguishable and remedial actions can be initiated.

Die Erfindung wird nachfolgend anhand eines in den beigeschlossenen Zeichnungen dargestellten Ausführungsbeispiels näher erläutert. In den Zeichnungen zeigt:

  • Fig. 1 ein Straßenmautsystem mit fahrzeuggestützten Onboard-Units gemäß der Erfindung in einer schematischen Draufsicht;
  • Fig. 2 ein Blockschaltbild einer der Onboard-Units von Fig. 1; und
  • Fig. 3 beispielhafte Daten- und Signaldiagramme, die in der Onboard-Unit von Fig. 2 und während der Ausführung des Verfahrens der Erfindung auftreten.
The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to an embodiment shown in the accompanying drawings. In the drawings shows:
  • Fig. 1 a road toll system with vehicle-mounted on-board units according to the invention in a schematic plan view;
  • Fig. 2 a block diagram of one of the onboard units of Fig. 1 ; and
  • Fig. 3 exemplary data and signal diagrams contained in the onboard unit of Fig. 2 and occur during the performance of the method of the invention.

Fig. 1 zeigt ein Straßenmautsystem 1, das auf Onboard-Units (OBUs) 2 basiert, welche von Fahrzeugen 3 mitgeführt werden, um deren Ortsnutzungen in einem Netz aus Straßen 4 zu vermauten bzw. vergebühren. Die Ortsnutzung kann beispielsweise das Befahren eines bestimmten Segments einer Straße 4, das Überfahren einer Grenze, der Aufenthalt in einem bestimmten geographischen Gebiet od.dgl. sein und auf beliebige Weise, z.B. pro Straßensegment, gefahrener Weglänge, in einem Gebiet verbrachter Zeit (z.B. Parkzeit) etc., abgerechnet werden. Fig. 1 shows a road toll system 1 based on onboard units (OBUs) 2, which are carried by vehicles 3 in order to toll their usage in a network of roads 4. The location use, for example, the driving of a particular segment of a road 4, crossing a border, the residence in a particular geographical area or the like. be and in any way, for example, per road segment, distance traveled, in a region of time spent (eg parking time), etc. billed.

Gemäß Fig. 2 verfügt jede Onboard-Unit 2 dazu über einen Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5, welcher aus Satellitensignalen 6 von Navigationssatelliten 7 (Fig. 1) eines globalen Satellitennavigationssystems (Global Navigation Satellite System, GNSS) fortlaufend die Position der Onboard-Unit 2 bestimmt und als Positionsfixe p1, p2, ..., allgemein pi, mit zugehörigen Qualitätsmesswerten q1, q2, ..., allgemein qi, ausgibt.According to Fig. 2 For this purpose, each on-board unit 2 has a satellite navigation receiver 5, which consists of satellite signals 6 from navigation satellites 7 (FIG. Fig. 1 ) of a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) continuously determines the position of the on-board unit 2 and as position fixes p 1 , p 2 ,..., generally p i , with associated quality measurement values q 1 , q 2 , ... , generally q i , outputs.

Jeder Qualitätsmesswert qi eines Positionsfixes pi kann dabei verschiedene Qualitätsparameter beinhalten, beispielsweise Anzahl, Signalpegel und/oder Signal/Rausch-Verhältnis der Signale 6 der zur Bestimmung des jeweiligen Positionsfixes pi herangezogenen Navigationssatelliten 7, z.B. auch in ausgewerteter Form von DOP-Werten (dilution of precision), wie sie von handelsüblichen Satellitennavigationsempfängern 5 für jeden Positionsfix pi zur Verfügung gestellt werden.Each quality measurement q i of a position fix p i can contain various quality parameters, for example the number, signal level and / or signal / noise ratio of the signals 6 of the navigation satellites 7 used for determining the respective position fix p i , eg also in evaluated form The form of dilution of precision (DOP) values provided by commercially available satellite navigation receivers 5 for each position fix p i .

Zusätzlich zu den Positionsfixen pi und ihren Qualitätsmesswerten qi kann der Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 auch die diesen zugrundeliegenden "rohen" Satellitendaten, z.B. Ausschnitte der Satellitensignale 6, oder im Verlauf der Erzeugung der Positionsfixe pi gebildete Verarbeitungsdaten ausgeben, im Weiteren "Satellitenrohdaten" ri genannt. Die Ausgabe der Positionsfixe pi, Qualitätsmesswerte qi bzw. Satellitenrohdaten ri kann dabei auf voneinander gesonderten Ausgängen des Satellitennavigationsempfängers 5, auf einem gemeinsamen Ausgang im Multiplexing oder auf einem gemeinsamen Bus in gesonderten Datenpaketen erfolgen.In addition to the position fixes p i and their quality measurements q i , the satellite navigation receiver 5 can also output the underlying "raw" satellite data, eg sections of the satellite signals 6, or processing data formed during the generation of the position fixes p i , hereinafter "raw satellite data" r i called. The output of the position fixes p i , quality measurements q i or raw satellite data r i can take place on mutually separate outputs of the satellite navigation receiver 5, on a common output in multiplexing or on a common bus in separate data packets.

Die Onboard-Unit 2 ist ferner mit einem Funksendeempfänger 8, z.B. nach einem 2G-, 3G-, 4G- oder 5G-Mobilfunkstandard wie GSM, UMTS oder LTE, dem ITS-G5- oder WAVE-Standard für Kurzreichweiten-Funkkommunikation, einem der IEEE 802.11-Standards für WLAN-Kommunikation od.dgl., und einem an den Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 und den Funksendeempfänger 8 angeschlossenen Prozessor 9 ausgestattet.The on-board unit 2 is further provided with a radio transceiver 8, e.g. according to a 2G, 3G, 4G or 5G mobile radio standard such as GSM, UMTS or LTE, the ITS-G5 or WAVE standard for short-range radio communication, one of the IEEE 802.11 standards for WLAN communication or the like, and a processor 9 connected to the satellite navigation receiver 5 and the radio transceiver 8.

Optional können auch ein oder mehrere Sensorelemente 10, z.B. Geschwindigkeits- oder Beschleunigungssensoren, vorgesehen sein, welche in der Onboard-Unit 2 selbst oder - mit der Onboard-Unit 2 verbunden - im Fahrzeug 3 angeordnet sein können und Sensormesswerte mi, z.B. Geschwindigkeits-, Beschleunigungs- oder daraus approximierte Ortsmesswerte, erzeugen. Ein solches Sensorelement 10 kann auch durch den Funksendeempfänger 8 gebildet sein, in welchem Fall die Sensormesswerte mi Metadaten des Funksendeempfängers 8 sind, z.B. Funkzellen- oder Empfangsfeldstärkedaten einer Funkverbindung 11 mit einer Funkstation 12, hier einer Basisstation eines Mobilfunknetzes, in dem sich der Funksendeempfänger 8 befindet.Optional may also be one or more sensor elements 10, for example, velocity or acceleration sensors, are provided, which in the onboard unit 2 itself, or - connected to the on-board unit 2 - may be arranged in the vehicle 3, and sensor measurements m i, for example, speed , Acceleration or approximate local measured values generate. Such a sensor element 10 can also be formed by the radio transceiver 8, in which case the sensor measured values m i are metadata of the radio transceiver 8, eg radio cell or received field strength data of a radio connection 11 to a radio station 12, here a base station of a mobile radio network in which the radio transceiver 8 is located.

Der Prozessor 9 erzeugt aus der Folge {pi} von Positionsfixen pi Mautdaten M, um diese mithilfe des Funksendeempfängers 8 über die Funkverbindung 11 und die Funkstation 12 an eine Zentrale 13 des Straßenmautsystems 1 zu senden.The processor 9 generates toll data M from the sequence {p i } of position fixes p i in order to use the radio transceiver 8 via the radio link 11 and the radio station 12 to a central office 13 of the road toll system 1 to send.

Die Mautdaten M können z.B. Mautgebühren sein, die durch einen Kartenabgleich ("map-matching") der Positionsfixfolge {pi} mit einer in der Onboard-Unit 2 hinterlegten digitalen Karte mautpflichtiger Straßen 4 bzw. Orte erzeugt werden. Alternativ könnten die Mautdaten M auch die Positionsfixe pi selbst sein, welche einzeln oder - wenn gewünscht nach Qualität gefiltert - zu einem Bündel zusammengefasst zu beliebigen oder vorgegebenen Zeitpunkten, nach vorgegebenen Strecken oder einfach bei Verfügbarkeit einer Funkverbindung 11 über den Funksendeempfänger 8 gesendet werden. Im letztgenannten Fall können Kartenabgleich und Gebührenberechnung beispielsweise in der Zentrale 13 erfolgen.The toll data M may be, for example, tolls, which are generated by a map matching of the position fix sequence {p i } with a digital toll road 4 or places stored in the on-board unit 2. Alternatively, the toll data M could also be the position fixes p i itself, which are individually or - if desired filtered according to quality - combined into a bundle at arbitrary or predetermined times, after predetermined distances or simply with the availability of a radio link 11 via the radio transceiver 8 sent. In the latter case, card matching and billing can be done for example in the center 13.

Gemäß Fig. 1 durchfahren die Fahrzeuge 3 auf ihren jeweiligen Fahrwegen auf den Straßen 4 einen geographischen Bereich 14, in welchem die von den Satellitennavigationsempfängern 5 empfangenen Satellitensignale 6 gestört bzw. abgeschattet sind, sodass die Qualitätsmesswerte qi abfallen und/oder die jeweiligen Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 keine Positionsfixe pi erzeugen.According to Fig. 1 the vehicles 3 pass through a geographical area 14 on their respective routes on the roads 4 in which the satellite signals 6 received by the satellite navigation receivers 5 are disturbed, so that the quality measurements qi fall off and / or the respective satellite navigation receivers 5 do not generate position fixes p i ,

Fig. 3 zeigt dazu beispielhaft Zeitverläufe der jeweiligen Signale bzw. Daten einer Onboard-Unit 2. Gemäß diesem Beispiel erzeugt der Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 zu Zeitpunkten t1, t2, ..., allgemein ti, aus den Satellitenrohdaten ri (nicht dargestellt) jeweils einen Positionsfix pi (Fig. 3a) und einen zugehörigen Qualitätsmesswert qi (Fig. 3c). Durchfährt das Fahrzeug 3 den genannten geographischen Bereich 14, erzeugt der Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 über einen Zeitraum e keine Positionsfixe pi, im Allgemeinen jedoch weiterhin Qualitätsmesswerte qi. Fig. 3 shows in this example of waveforms of the respective signals or data of an on-board unit 2. According to this example generates the satellite navigation receiver 5 at times t 1, t 2, ..., generally i t, from the raw satellite data r i (not shown) each having a Position fix p i ( Fig. 3a ) and an associated quality measurement q i ( Fig. 3c ). If the vehicle 3 passes through said geographical area 14, the satellite navigation receiver 5 does not generate any position fixes p i over a period of time e, but in general continues to produce quality measured values q i .

Um Fehler der Positionsbestimmung der Onboard-Unit 2 und damit der Vermautungsfunktion des Straßenmautsystems 1 z.B. infolge von Signal-Störungen und/oder Abschattungen der Satellitensignale 6 erfassen und messen zu können, dienen die folgenden Komponenten und Verfahren.To errors of the position determination of the on-board unit 2 and thus the Vermautungsfunktion the road toll system 1, for example due to signal interference and / or shadowing of the satellite signals The following components and procedures are used to detect and measure.

Die Onboard-Unit 2 verfügt dazu über einen an den Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 angeschlossenen Ausfallsdetektor 15, welcher anspricht und ein Ausgangssignal s (Fig. 3e) erzeugt, z.B. eine logisches "High"- Signal bzw. eine logische "1", wenn er entweder (a) das Ausbleiben von Positionsfixen pi über eine vorgegebene Mindestzeitspanne δ und/oder (b) ein Abfallen von Qualitätsmesswerten qi unter ein vorgegebenes Mindestqualitätsmaß Qmin detektiert.The on-board unit 2 has a connected to the satellite navigation receiver 5 failure detector 15 which responds and an output signal s ( Fig. 3e ) generates, for example, a logical "high" signal or a logical "1" if it either (a) the absence of position fixes p i over a predetermined minimum period of time δ and / or (b) a drop of quality measured values q i below predetermined minimum quality measure Q min detected.

Zur Detektion des Ereignisses (a) kann der Ausfallsdetektor 15 einen Watchdog 16 aufweisen, z.B. in Form eines Totmann- bzw. retriggerbaren Monoflop-Schaltkreises, der von jedem neuen Positionsfix pi an seinem Eingang erneut für die Mindestzeitspanne δ angestoßen wird und somit an seinem (hier: invertierten) Ausgang ein Detektionssignal d (Fig. 3b) ausgibt, wenn innerhalb der genannten Mindestzeitspanne δ kein neuer Positionsfix pi einlangt.In order to detect the event (a), the failure detector 15 may have a watchdog 16, eg in the form of a deadman or retriggerable monoflop circuit, which is triggered by each new position fix p i at its input again for the minimum period of time δ and thus at its (here: inverted) output a detection signal d ( Fig. 3b ) outputs, if within the specified minimum period δ no new position fix p i attains.

Alternativ oder zusätzlich zum Watchdog 16 kann der Ausfallsdetektor 15 zur Detektion des Ereignisses (b) einen Komparator 17 aufweisen, welcher die einlangenden Qualitätsmesswerte qi mit einem Mindestqualitätsmaß Qmin vergleicht und bei einem Abfallen der Qualitätsmesswerte qi unter das Mindestqualitätsmaß Qmin ein Ausgangssignal c (Fig. 3d) ausgibt. Je nach Komplexität der Qualitätsmesswerte qi könnte es zur Vereinfachung dieses Vergleichs erwünscht sein, dass der Komparator 17 zunächst einen mehrere Parameter (Dimensionen) enthaltenden Qualitätsmesswert qi zu einem einzigen globalen Qualitätsmaß Qi zusammenfasst; alternativ könnte das Mindestqualitätsmaß Qmin separate Einzel-Schwellwerte für mehrere in einem Qualitätsmesswert qi enthaltene Qualitätsparameter aufweisen.Alternatively or in addition to the watchdog 16, the failure detector 15 for detecting the event (b) may have a comparator 17 which compares the incoming quality measurements q i with a minimum quality measure Q min , and an output c when the quality measures q i fall below the minimum quality measure Q min ( Fig. 3d ). Depending on the complexity of the quality measurements qi, to simplify this comparison, it may be desirable for the comparator 17 to first combine a quality metric q i containing several parameters (dimensions) into a single global quality metric Q i ; alternatively, the minimum quality measure Q min could include separate single thresholds for a plurality of quality parameters included in a quality metric q i .

Die Ausgangssignale c des Watchdogs 16 und d des Komparators 17 können z.B. durch einen einfachen ODER-Schaltkreis 18 zu dem Ausgangssignal s des Ausfallsdetektors 15 verknüpft werden. Anstelle des ODER-Schaltkreises 18 kann auch eine komplexe Auswertelogik, welche z.B. auch das Zeitverhalten der Signale c und d mitberücksichtigt, vorgesehen werden. Wenn der Ausfallsdetektor 15 nur eine der Komponenten Watchdog 16 oder Komparator 17 enthält, entfällt der Schaltkreis 18 und das Ausgangssignal s fällt mit dem Signal c bzw. d zusammen.The output signals c of the watchdog 16 and d of the comparator 17 can be linked, for example, by a simple OR circuit 18 to the output signal s of the failure detector 15. Instead of the OR circuit 18 may also be a complex Auswertelogik, which, for example, the timing of the signals c and d also taken into account, are provided. If the failure detector 15 contains only one of the components watchdog 16 or comparator 17, the circuit 18 is omitted and the output signal s coincides with the signal c or d.

Das vom Ausfallsdetektor 15 erzeugte Ausgangssignal s steuert einen Protokollierer 19 an, welcher im Falle der genannten Ereignisse (a) und/oder (b) einen Fehlerdatensatz F erzeugt und für den Prozessor 9 zum Senden über den Funksendeempfänger 8 an die Zentrale 13 bereithält. Wie in Fig. 2 symbolisch gezeigt, ist der Protokollierer 19 z.B. eine an einen oder mehrere Ausgänge des Satellitennavigationsempfängers 5 angeschlossene Aufzeichnungseinheit 20 mit einem Pufferspeicher 21.The output signal s generated by the failure detector 15 activates a logger 19 which, in the case of said events (a) and / or (b), generates an error record F and makes it available to the processor 9 for transmission via the radio transceiver 8 to the center 13. As in Fig. 2 symbolically shown, the logger 19 is, for example, a recording unit 20 with a buffer memory 21 connected to one or more outputs of the satellite navigation receiver 5.

Als Fehlerdatensatz F zeichnet der Protokollierer 19 im einfachsten Fall den letzten Positionsfix pm auf, den der Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 gerade noch vor dem Ansprechen des Ausfallsdetektors 15 erzeugt hat, siehe Fig. 3a. Zusätzlich kann der Protokollierer 19 dem Fehlerdatensatz F je nach Anforderung noch weitere Daten hinzufügen, sodass dieser - einzeln oder in beliebiger Kombination - ferner enthalten kann:

  • einen Zeitstempel tm des genannten letzten Positionsfixes pm;
  • den ersten unmittelbar nach Beendigung des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors 15 erzeugten Positionsfix pn, wenn gewünscht auch mit zugehörigem Zeitstempel tn;
  • die zum genannten letzten und/oder ersten Pösitionsmesswert pm, pn erzeugten Qualitätsmesswerte qm und/oder qn;
  • einen oder mehrere der während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors 15, d.h. solange der Protokollierer 19 angesteuert (s = "1") ist, erzeugten Qualitätsmesswerte qi, wenn gewünscht auch mit zugehörigen Zeitstempeln ti;
  • die zum genannten letzten und/oder ersten Positionsmesswert pm, pn und/oder während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors 15 (s = "1") empfangenen - bzw. gebildeten - Satellitenrohdaten ri; und/oder
  • die etwa zeitgleich mit dem genannten letzten und/oder ersten Positionsmesswert pm, pn und/oder während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors 15 (s = "1") erzeugten Sensormesswerte mi .
As an error record F, the logger 19 in the simplest case records the last position fix p m that the satellite navigation receiver 5 generated just before the response of the failure detector 15, see FIG Fig. 3a , In addition, the logger 19 can add further data to the error data record F as required so that it can also contain, individually or in any combination:
  • a time stamp t m of said last position fix p m ;
  • the first position fix p n generated immediately after completion of the response of the failure detector 15, if desired also with the associated time stamp t n ;
  • the last-mentioned to and / or first Pösitionsmesswert m p quality metrics generated p n q m and / or q n;
  • one or more of the generated during the response of the failure detector 15, ie as long as the logger 19 is driven (s = "1"), generated quality measurements q i , if desired, with associated timestamps t i ;
  • the said last and / or first position measurement value p m , p n and / or during the response of the failure detector 15 (s = "1") received - or formed - satellite raw data r i ; and or
  • the sensor measured values m i generated approximately at the same time as the last and / or first position measured value p m , p n and / or during the response of the failure detector 15 (s = "1").

Optional kann der Protokollierer 19 den Fehlerdatensatz F beispielsweise durch Ausscheiden redundanter oder irrelevanter Daten, Ergänzen um Umfeld-Daten aus der Umgebung der Onboard-Unit 2 oder interne Zustandsdaten der Onboard-Unit 2, Datenzusammenfassung etc. situationsabhängig vorverarbeiten.Optionally, the logger 19 may pre-process the error record F, for example, by exiting redundant or irrelevant data, supplementing with environment data from the environment of the on-board unit 2 or internal status data of the on-board unit 2, data summary, etc. depending on the situation.

In der Zentrale 13 werden die empfangenen Fehlerdatensätze F ausgewertet. Diese Auswertung kann einerseits einzeln erfolgen, d.h. die Fehlerdatensätze F einer Onboard-Unit 2 werden für sich betrachtet, andererseits können auch mehrere Fehlerdatensätze F verschiedener Onboard-Units 2 empfangen, gemeinsam ausgewertet und dabei z.B. gegeneinander validiert werden.In the center 13, the received error records F are evaluated. This evaluation can on the one hand be done individually, i. the error data sets F of an on-board unit 2 are considered on their own; on the other hand, a plurality of error data sets F of different on-board units 2 can also be received, jointly evaluated and, for example, evaluated. be validated against each other.

Beim Auswerten werden die Fehlerdatensätze F in Abhängigkeit vom Ort der darin angegebenen Positionsfixe pm, pn, {pi} und, wenn erfasst, deren Zeitstempeln tm, tn, {ti}, Qualitätsmesswerten qm, qn, {qi}, Satellitenrohdaten {ri} und/oder Sensormesswerte {mi} betrachtet und auf mögliche Fehlerquellen hin analysiert, um Maßnahmen zu deren Beseitigung vorzubereiten. Optional können beim Auswerten durch einen Abgleich der Fehlerdatensätze F mit einer digitalen Landkarte geographische Störungs- und Abschattungsbereiche 14 des Satellitenempfangs ebenso wie gegebenenfalls deren Zeitabhängigkeit bestimmt werden. So können dauerhafte Abschattungen, z.B. durch Tunnels, erkannt und von vorübergehenden Abschattungen, z.B. in engen Tälern, wo nur zeitweise eine ausreichende Anzahl an Satellitensignalen 6 in erforderlicher Stärke empfangbar ist, unterschieden werden, oder wetterbedingte Signalabschwächungen oder jahreszeitabhängige Abschattungen in dichter Vegetation von fixen oder beweglichen Störquellen ("Jammern") usw. usf. In der Folge können zielgerichtete Maßnahmen zur Fehlerbeseitigung eingeleitet werden, um den Vermautungsgrad des Straßenmautsystems 1 zu erhöhen, z.B. stationäre Positionssender bzw. Satellitensignal-Repeater errichtet oder Störquellen eliminiert oder abgeschaltet bzw. bewusstes Senden von Störsignalen durch Jammer verfolgt und geahndet werden.In the evaluation, the error data sets F are determined as a function of the position fixes p m , p n , {p i } and, if detected, their time stamps t m , t n , {t i }, quality measurements q m , q n , { q i }, raw satellite data {r i } and / or sensor readings {m i } are considered and analyzed for possible sources of error in order to prepare measures for their elimination. Optionally, when evaluating the error data sets F with a digital map, geographic interference and shading regions 14 of the satellite reception as well as their time dependency may be determined. Thus, permanent shadowing, eg through tunnels, can be recognized and temporary shading, eg in narrow valleys, where only a sufficient number of satellite signals 6 can be received at a given intensity, or weather-related signal attenuation or season-dependent shadowing in dense vegetation of fixed or moving sources of interference ("whining"), etc., etc. As a result, targeted measures for fault elimination can be initiated. to increase the Vermustungsgrad the road toll system 1, for example, stationary position transmitter or satellite signal repeater built or sources of interference eliminated or switched off or deliberate transmission of jamming signals are tracked and punished.

Die Erfindung ist nicht auf die dargestellten Ausführungsformen beschränkt, sondern umfasst alle Varianten und Modifikationen, die in den Rahmen der angeschlossenen Ansprüche fallen. So können die Onboard-Unit 2 im Ganzen bzw. einzelne ihrer Komponenten wie der Ausfallsdetektor 15, der Protokollierer 19 oder Teile davon sowohl als Hardwarebausteine als auch als Softwareobjekte, z.B. im Prozessor 9, implementiert werden.The invention is not limited to the illustrated embodiments, but includes all variants and modifications that fall within the scope of the appended claims. Thus, the onboard unit 2 as a whole or individual ones of its components, such as the failure detector 15, the logger 19 or parts thereof both as hardware components and as software objects, e.g. in the processor 9.

Claims (15)

  1. Onboard unit for a road toll system (1), comprising
    a satellite navigation receiver (5) for continuously generating position fixes (pi) and associated quality measurement values (qi) from satellite raw data (ri),
    a radio transceiver (8), and
    a processor (9) connected to these components (5, 8), which is configured to generate toll data (M) from the position fixes (pi) and to send the toll data via the radio transceiver (8),
    characterized by
    an outage detector (15) connected to the satellite navigation receiver (5), which outage detector (15) is configured to respond to an absence of position fixes (pi) over a given minimum time span (δ) or to a drop in quality measurement values (qi) under a given minimum quality measurement (Qmin), and
    a recorder (19) connected to the satellite navigation receiver (5) and controlled by the outage detector (15), which recorder (19) is configured to generate, when the outage detector (15) responds, an error dataset (F) with at least the last position fix (pm) before the response,
    wherein the processor (9) is configured to receive the error dataset (F) from the recorder (19) and to send it via the radio transceiver (8).
  2. Onboard unit according to claim 1, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains a time stamp (tm) of said last position fix (pm).
  3. Onboard unit according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains the first position fix (pn) generated after the response has finished.
  4. Onboard unit according to claim 3, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains a time stamp (tn) of said first position fix (pn).
  5. Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains at least one quality measurement value (qi) generated during responding.
  6. Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains satellite raw data (ri) received during responding and/or sensor measurement values (mi) generated in a sensor element (10).
  7. Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the outage detector (15) contains a watchdog (16), which can be triggered anew by each generated position fix (pi).
  8. Method for function surveillance in a road toll system (1) with a central station (13) and at least one vehicle mounted onboard unit (2), which continuously generates position fixes (pi) and associated quality measurement values (qi) from satellite raw data (ri) and sends toll data (M) based thereupon to the central station (13), comprising:
    detecting an absence of position fixes (pi) over a given minimum time span (δ) or a drop in quality measurement values (qi) under a given minimum quality measurement (Qmin) in the onboard unit (2), and
    in case of a detection, recording an error dataset (F) with at least the last position fix (pm) before the detection in the onboard unit (2),
    sending the error dataset (F) from the onboard unit (2) to the central station (13), and
    evaluating the error dataset (F) in the central station (13).
  9. Method according to claim 8, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains a time stamp (tm) of said last position fix (pm).
  10. Method according to claim 8 or 9, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains the first position fix (pn) generated after the detection has finished.
  11. Onboard unit according to claim 10, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains a time stamp (tn) of said first position fix (pn).
  12. Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 8 to 11, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains at least one quality measurement value (qi) generated during detecting.
  13. Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 8 to 12, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains satellite raw data (ri) received during detecting and/or sensor measurement values (mi) generated in a sensor element (10).
  14. Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 8 to 13, characterized in that in the central station (13) at least a second error dataset (F), generated and sent by a second onboard unit (2) in said manner, is received and in that the error datasets (F) of the at least two onboard units (2) are validated against each other during evaluating.
  15. Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 8 to 14, characterized in that, during evaluating, geographical interference and shadowing regions (14) of the satellite reception are determined by comparing the error datasets (F) with a digital map.
EP14161986.6A 2014-03-27 2014-03-27 Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system Active EP2924662B2 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SI201430083A SI2924662T1 (en) 2014-03-27 2014-03-27 Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system
ES14161986T ES2599783T5 (en) 2014-03-27 2014-03-27 On-board equipment and procedure for functional control in a road toll system
PL14161986T PL2924662T3 (en) 2014-03-27 2014-03-27 Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system
PT141619866T PT2924662T (en) 2014-03-27 2014-03-27 Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system
EP14161986.6A EP2924662B2 (en) 2014-03-27 2014-03-27 Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system
DK14161986.6T DK2924662T3 (en) 2014-03-27 2014-03-27 ONBOARD DEVICE AND PROCEDURE FOR FUNCTION MONITORING IN A ROAD CIRCUIT SYSTEM

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP14161986.6A EP2924662B2 (en) 2014-03-27 2014-03-27 Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2924662A1 EP2924662A1 (en) 2015-09-30
EP2924662B1 true EP2924662B1 (en) 2016-08-03
EP2924662B2 EP2924662B2 (en) 2022-08-10

Family

ID=50424013

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14161986.6A Active EP2924662B2 (en) 2014-03-27 2014-03-27 Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2924662B2 (en)
DK (1) DK2924662T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2599783T5 (en)
PL (1) PL2924662T3 (en)
PT (1) PT2924662T (en)
SI (1) SI2924662T1 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102016002768C5 (en) 2016-03-05 2024-05-02 Audi Ag Method for operating a communication network comprising several motor vehicles and motor vehicle
EP3279870A1 (en) * 2016-08-01 2018-02-07 Toll Collect GmbH Data processing device, system and method for verifying performance of a specified function of a position determination device
EP3279692B1 (en) * 2016-08-01 2023-10-11 Toll Collect GmbH Data processing device, system and method for verifying performance of a specified function of a position determination device
EP3339906B1 (en) * 2016-12-22 2023-03-29 Toll Collect GmbH Method, system, device and computer program product for signalling an impending lack of operability of a position detecting apparatus, and fee charging system
DE102018220793A1 (en) * 2018-12-03 2020-06-04 Robert Bosch Gmbh Detection of incorrect position determinations
US11815607B2 (en) 2020-07-30 2023-11-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver operation during spoofing
US11892546B2 (en) 2020-07-30 2024-02-06 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for detecting and mitigating spoofed satellite navigation signals
CN115183783B (en) * 2022-09-09 2022-12-13 中国人民解放军32035部队 Association method of orbit measurement data after launching and entering orbit of group satellite

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5969595A (en) 1996-07-22 1999-10-19 Trimble Navigation Limited Security for transport vehicles and cargo
EP1696207A1 (en) 2005-02-23 2006-08-30 Vodafone Holding GmbH Method and system for determining an object's position data
WO2006105380A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Trimble Navigation Limited A portable motion-activated position reporting device
US20070005243A1 (en) 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Microsoft Corporation Learning, storing, analyzing, and reasoning about the loss of location-identifying signals
EP2187229A1 (en) 2008-11-06 2010-05-19 Robert Bosch GmbH Device for detecting GNSS jammers
EP2487506A1 (en) 2011-02-10 2012-08-15 Toll Collect GmbH Positioning device, method and computer program product for signalling that a positioning device is not functioning as intended

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2665044B1 (en) 2012-05-16 2014-11-26 Kapsch TrafficCom AG Method for measuring the capacity of a toll system

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5969595A (en) 1996-07-22 1999-10-19 Trimble Navigation Limited Security for transport vehicles and cargo
EP1696207A1 (en) 2005-02-23 2006-08-30 Vodafone Holding GmbH Method and system for determining an object's position data
WO2006105380A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Trimble Navigation Limited A portable motion-activated position reporting device
US20070005243A1 (en) 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Microsoft Corporation Learning, storing, analyzing, and reasoning about the loss of location-identifying signals
EP2187229A1 (en) 2008-11-06 2010-05-19 Robert Bosch GmbH Device for detecting GNSS jammers
EP2487506A1 (en) 2011-02-10 2012-08-15 Toll Collect GmbH Positioning device, method and computer program product for signalling that a positioning device is not functioning as intended

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Magellan Systems Corporation", 1992, article "Bedienungsanleitung Magellan GPS NAV 5000D", pages: 1 - 21, XP055380848
"Positioning Systems in Intelligent Transportation Systems", ARTECH HOUSE, Boston, London, ISBN: 978-0-89006-536-5, article DRANE, RIZOS, XP055380851
"Produkte zur Mauterhebung - Mobility - Siemens", MOBILITY.SIEMENS.COM, 23 June 2013 (2013-06-23), pages 1 - 2, XP055380865, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.mobility.siemens.com/mobility/qlobal/de/nahverkehr/strassenverkehr/ mautsysteme-fuer-staedte/produkte-mauterhebung/Seiten/produkte-zur-mauterhebung.aspx>
"Watchdog", WIKIPEDIA, 23 May 2013 (2013-05-23), pages 1 - 2, XP055380869, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchdog>

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
PL2924662T3 (en) 2017-01-31
EP2924662B2 (en) 2022-08-10
ES2599783T3 (en) 2017-02-03
ES2599783T5 (en) 2022-11-28
PT2924662T (en) 2016-10-27
SI2924662T1 (en) 2016-12-30
EP2924662A1 (en) 2015-09-30
DK2924662T3 (en) 2016-11-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2924662B1 (en) Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system
EP2610815B1 (en) Method for acquiring traffic flow data in a street network
DE102008012660A1 (en) Server-based warning of dangers
DE60007279T2 (en) MONITORING SYSTEM FOR TERRESTRIC NAVIGATION AND FLIGHT LANDING SYSTEMS
DE102016209568B3 (en) Methods, apparatus and computer programs for capturing measurement results from mobile devices
DE102013107962B4 (en) Method for monitoring components of a system, cooperative driver assistance system, infrastructure and computer program
DE102011051100A1 (en) Method for providing correction signals for terminal of satellite supported position determining system, involves determining position of mobile reference device for unit of position determining system in form of position data
WO2018210487A1 (en) Method, device, and system for determining a weather area
EP2811468B1 (en) Method and device for error detection in a toll system
DE102012215601A1 (en) Method and device for determining a value of a motion-dependent variable
EP3495847B1 (en) Tachograph assembly and method for operating same
EP3279870A1 (en) Data processing device, system and method for verifying performance of a specified function of a position determination device
EP3358532A1 (en) Method for automatically detecting the usage of vehicles
DE102016206526A1 (en) Method for providing field strength information and for position determination
DE102018000682A1 (en) Method and server for collecting driver activity data
DE102017212953A1 (en) Determination of odometric data of a rail vehicle with the aid of stationary sensors
EP3279692A1 (en) Data processing device, system and method for verifying performance of a specified function of a position determination device
EP2665044B1 (en) Method for measuring the capacity of a toll system
DE102021104439A1 (en) Method for detecting at least one GNSS interference source using multiple vehicles
EP2922031B1 (en) Method and devices for error detection in a toll system
DE102018007020A1 (en) Mobile phones as sensors for driver assistance systems
EP1870843A1 (en) Method and system for determining the travel route concurrence of two moving objects
DE102005030030A1 (en) Position and toll-based data processing system for vehicles includes on-board unit and back office having interfaces for enabling exchange of data
EP3339906B1 (en) Method, system, device and computer program product for signalling an impending lack of operability of a position detecting apparatus, and fee charging system
EP3339907B1 (en) Method for signalling a malfunction of a position detecting apparatus, signalling system, fee charging system, position determination device and computer program product

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20141008

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20151210

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 817793

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502014001206

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Ref document number: 2924662

Country of ref document: PT

Date of ref document: 20161027

Kind code of ref document: T

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20161020

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20161115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20160803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161203

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: T3

Ref document number: E 22426

Country of ref document: SK

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2599783

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20170203

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161104

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 502014001206

Country of ref document: DE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161103

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: TOLL COLLECT GMBH

Effective date: 20170503

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170327

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: TOLL COLLECT GMBH

Effective date: 20170503

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170327

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20140327

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20220321

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20220323

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20220321

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Payment date: 20220325

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20220317

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20220317

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20220323

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20220321

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20220322

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20220325

Year of fee payment: 9

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 20220810

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R102

Ref document number: 502014001206

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: RPEO

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: DC2A

Ref document number: 2599783

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T5

Effective date: 20221128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220810

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221221

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20221110

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220810

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Payment date: 20230316

Year of fee payment: 10

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230513

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20230327

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230327

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230331

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230327

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230331

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20240321

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230327

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240328

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240426

Year of fee payment: 11