EP2867665A1 - Methods and devices for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance and use of a gas monitoring device - Google Patents

Methods and devices for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance and use of a gas monitoring device

Info

Publication number
EP2867665A1
EP2867665A1 EP13714224.6A EP13714224A EP2867665A1 EP 2867665 A1 EP2867665 A1 EP 2867665A1 EP 13714224 A EP13714224 A EP 13714224A EP 2867665 A1 EP2867665 A1 EP 2867665A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gas
sensor
target substance
shielding
concentration
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP13714224.6A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2867665B1 (en
Inventor
Ralf Warratz
Martin Weber
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MSA Europe GmbH
Original Assignee
MSA Auer GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by MSA Auer GmbH filed Critical MSA Auer GmbH
Publication of EP2867665A1 publication Critical patent/EP2867665A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2867665B1 publication Critical patent/EP2867665B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/0004Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
    • G01N33/0006Calibrating gas analysers
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/0004Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
    • G01N33/0009General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment
    • G01N33/0027General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector
    • G01N33/0036General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector specially adapted to detect a particular component
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/0004Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
    • G01N33/0009General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment
    • G01N33/0027General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector
    • G01N33/0036General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment concerning the detector specially adapted to detect a particular component
    • G01N33/0054Ammonia
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A50/00TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
    • Y02A50/20Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters

Definitions

  • the invention concerns methods and devices for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance in a gas, as well as the use of a gas monitoring or gas measurement device.
  • Detectors for gaseous target substances such as ammonia are basically familiar (CH 686981 A5, DE 3841622 Al). Electrochemical ammonia gas sensors are based, e.g., on the principle of direct oxidation of ammonia or measurement of the change in the pH value.
  • a method for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance in a gas includes: a) A first measured value of the concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance is saved as the first measured value (reference value) in a predetermined way.
  • the at least one target substance is then kept away from the sensor with a gas shielding device for a time so that the concentration of the at least one target substance measured by the sensor changes.
  • the target substance can be shielded by a filter together with the gas or also selectively.
  • an output concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance in the gas is determined by using a calculator or processor.
  • gas also includes a vapor (or vapor mixture).
  • the gas shielding device includes a flushing device or system with which flushing of the sensor with a gaseous flushing medium (especially, for example, air) may be performed automatically or on demand.
  • a gaseous flushing medium especially, for example, air
  • a user may, for example, perform the flushing on demand when he suspects that the measured values are no longer correct.
  • the automatic control one may set the duration of the flushing and defined intervals during which the flushing occurs.
  • flushing of the sensor is done with air from a pressurized gas bottle or gas supply. Pressurized air respirators with a pressurized gas bottle are, for example, regularly carried by fire fighters, and thus constitute an available source of the flushing gas for fire fighters.
  • another advantageous embodiment has a means of selective combustion of the gas, a mechanical gas barrier and/or filter device with which the target substance is kept away from the sensor for a predetermined time.
  • the time of shielding of the gas is more than 0.7 times the response time (t9o) of the sensor and less than 30 minutes.
  • the shielding of the gas with the target substance from the sensor is between 10 seconds and 5 minutes each time, especially between 20 seconds and 2 minutes or between 40 seconds and 2 minutes.
  • flushing with the gaseous flushing medium is done at intervals of 1 minute to 24 hours, especially every 5 to 30 minutes.
  • embodiments of the method can be used when the gaseous target substance is a nitrogen-containing gas, (especially, for example, ammonia, hydrazine or an amine) or a sulfur-containing gas (such as H 2 S, a mercaptan, or thiophene).
  • a nitrogen-containing gas especially, for example, ammonia, hydrazine or an amine
  • a sulfur-containing gas such as H 2 S, a mercaptan, or thiophene
  • a sensor for example, an electrochemical sensor
  • a gas shielding device temporarily shields the sensor from the gas.
  • a calculator or processor determines an output concentration of the at least one target substance based upon a concentration measurement performed before shielding (first measured value) and another concentration measurement performed during shielding (second measured value).
  • first measured value a concentration measurement performed before shielding
  • second measured value a concentration measurement performed during shielding
  • the gas shielding device or system includes a flushing device for a flushing medium, wherein the flushing medium comes from a reservoir and/or from a gas generator.
  • the reservoir may, for example, be a pressurized air reservoir, a pressurized or supplied air respirator and/or the surroundings from which the flushing medium is taken in.
  • one advantageous embodiment includes a means of selective combustion of the gas, a mechanical gas barrier and/or a filter device with which the gas is kept away from the sensor for a predetermined period of time.
  • the senor it is advantageous for the sensor to have substantial inertia or be fairly insensitive to a change in relative humidity. This is especially beneficial because, for example, many electrochemical ammonia sensors exhibit a pronounced transient upon changes in relative humidity. That transient is then superimposed on all other changes. Such changes include the concentration change in question here, when, for example, the flushing medium for example has a relative humidity different from the surroundings being metered. This will especially be the case when the flushing gas comes from a pressurized gas bottle and is thus very dry.
  • the measurement principle of the sensor is also advantageous in a number of embodiments for the measurement principle of the sensor to be based on the principle of direct oxidation of ammonia or the measurement of changes in pH value.
  • the latter as such is known, so that embodiments of the can be combined with this known feature.
  • a method for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance in a gas with a sensor includes a) measuring a first measured value of concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance in gas; b) subsequently shielding the at least one target substance from the sensor for a predetermined period of time, so that the concentration of the at least one target substance measured by the sensor changes, c) during shielding of the sensor, measuring a second measured value of concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance, d) after ceasing shielding of the sensor, exposing the sensor again to the gas with the at least one gaseous target substance, and e) determining an output concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance on the basis of the difference between the first measured value and the second measured value using a processor.
  • Shielding the sensor from the at least one target substance may, for example, include flushing of the sensor with a gaseous flushing medium.
  • the gaseous flushing medium may, for example, include air. Flushing of the sensor may, for example, be initiated automatically or upon demand. In a number of embodiments, flushing of the sensor is done with air from a pressurized gas bottle or from a gas generator.
  • Shielding of sensor may, for example, include at least one of selective combustion of the gas, use of a protective electrode, use of a mechanical gas barrier or use of a filter device via which the at least one gaseous target substance is kept away from the sensor for a predetermined period of time.
  • An protective electrode can mean that the gas shielding device might comprise an electrode that could function as a barrier when an oxidative process might be initiated with an appropriate applied electrical potential. Basically, this protective electrode would be able to oxidize N3 ⁇ 4 to avoid that the N3 ⁇ 4 gets to the sensing electrode of the NH3 sensor applied to the "gas shielding device". Removing the applied potential would allow the gas to diffuse through the protective electrode.
  • this protective electrode could actually be even installed in the N3 ⁇ 4 sensor itself on top of the sensing electrode; the alternative approach might be to have this protective electrode being installed in the separate "gas shielding device”.
  • this protective electrode should allow an alternative way to keep the target gas away from the sensor, other than the already mentioned combustion of the gas, the mechanical barriers and /or the filter device.
  • the time of shielding of the gas is more than 0.7 times the length of a response time (t9o) of the sensor and less than 30 minutes.
  • Shielding of the gas may, for example, be between 10 seconds and 5 minutes. In a number of embodiments, shielding of the gas lasts between 20 seconds and 2 minutes. Shielding of the gas may, for example, be done at intervals of 1 minutes to 24 hours. In a number of embodiments, shielding of the gas is done at intervals of 5 to 30 minutes.
  • Shielding may, for example, include flushing with a gaseous flushing medium.
  • the gaseous target substance is a nitrogen-containing gas.
  • the gaseous target substance may, for example, be ammonia, hydrazine, an amine or a sulfur- containing substance.
  • a device for the detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance in a gas includes: (a) a sensor, which outputs a measurement signal dependent upon a concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance, (b) a gas shielding system for temporary shielding of the sensor from the gas, and (c) a processor to determine an output concentration of the at least one target substance based upon a concentration measurement performed before shielding and another concentration measurement performed during the shielding.
  • the gas shielding system may, for example, include a flushing device for delivering a flushing medium from a reservoir.
  • the flushing medium may, for example, be delivered from a pressurized or supplied air respirator or taken in from the surroundings.
  • the gas shielding system includes a system for selective combustion of the at least one gaseous target substance, a mechanical gas barrier, or a filter device via which the at least one gaseous target substance is kept away from the sensor for a predetermined period of time.
  • the response of the sensor exhibits substantial insensitivity to a rise in relative humidity.
  • the measurement principle of the sensor is based on direct oxidation of ammonia or the measurement of changes in pH value.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a basic diagram of one embodiment of an ammonia gas sensor before a flushing.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a basic diagram of the embodiment of Fig. 1 during a flushing with a gaseous flushing medium
  • Figure 3 illustrates a basic diagram of the embodiment of Fig. 1 after a flushing with a gaseous flushing medium
  • Figure 4 illustrates a first concentration measurement of an amperometric NH 3 sensor with a flushing
  • Figure 5 illustrates a second concentration measurement with several flushings and concentration exposures of NH 3
  • Figure 5 A illustrates a detail of flushings from the measurement per Fig. 5;
  • Figure 6 illustrates another embodiment with a mechanical gas shielding.
  • shielding system includes a plurality of such shielding systems and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth, and reference to “the shielding system” is a reference to one or more such shielding systems and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.
  • Figure 1 illustrates schematically a sensor 1 with which the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance 10 in a gas, here, air 20 (for example, the surrounding or ambient air), may be measured.
  • a sensor 1 with which the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance 10 in a gas, here, air 20 (for example, the surrounding or ambient air), may be measured.
  • a device may, for example, be part of a portable or stationary gas detector.
  • any sensor 1 may be used that can measure a concentration of the gaseous target substance 10 in the air 20.
  • Figure 1 illustrates that the concentration of the gaseous target substance 10 is detected by the sensor 1, and the measurement result is relayed to a calculation system or processor 30.
  • the processor 30 may be, for example, a microchip, which is installed in a handheld device or a stationary device for gas monitoring.
  • the actual concentration of the at least one gaseous substance 10, ammonia in this case can no longer be measured correctly, since a type of saturation of the sensor 1 has taken place.
  • the measured value for the concentration of ammonia 10 by the sensor 1 drops, even though the concentration of ammonia 10 in the air 20, for example, has remained constant.
  • a measurement of the concentration of the gaseous target substance 10 is performed (that is, with the saturated, or at least partly saturated, sensor 1).
  • the measured concentration is saved by the processor 30 as the first measured value 11.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the same configuration as Fig. 1, but wherein a flushing medium 3 is passed from a flushing device 2 across the sensor 1 for a certain time.
  • a possible upper bound for the length of the shielding, or here the gas flushing, is 30 minutes.
  • the flushing medium 3 may be, for example clean air, which is arranged in the form of a small pressurized container or gas generator in the gas detector itself. In addition or alternatively, however, the clean air can also come from a pressurized or supplied air respirator or be supplied to the gas detector across a line.
  • the flushing medium 3 should be free of target substances 10 that are being measured by the sensor 1.
  • the flushing of the sensor 1 with the flushing medium 3 constitutes a calibration. Before the end of the flushing of the sensor 1, the magnitude of the measured concentration and/or the direction of the concentration change of the gaseous target substance 10 as detected by the sensor 1 is saved as the second measured value 12.
  • the second measured value 12 obtained on the basis of the flushing will lead, in the present case, to a drop in the measured value for ammonia 10. If the measured value for ammonia 10 has already dropped to zero on account of the saturation effect of the sensor 1, the second measured value 12 may be negative (see Fig. 4). This second measured value 12 is saved by the processor 30 and used as the measured value for the calculation of the actual background concentration of ammonia 10. The difference between the first measured value 11 and the second measured value 12 is a measure of the drift or false measurement of the sensor 1.
  • FIG. 3 shows the next step of the method, in which the sensor 1 is again exposed to air 20 with ammonia 10. Any change in the second measured value 12 with respect to the first measured value 11 provides a measure of the drift of the sensor 1.
  • Figure 4 shows a first concentration measurement with one embodiment of one of the above-described devices.
  • the sensor 1 is exposed to pure air.
  • the result of this measurement is used to calibrate the sensor 1 and provides the information on the sensitivity of the sensor (e.g., 100 nA/ppm NH 3 ).
  • This sensitivity is then used afterwards to perform all further concentration calculations on the basis of the current values.
  • the primary task of the sensor in amperometric design is always a current measurement.
  • the magnitude of the difference between the first measured value 11 and second measured value 12 corresponds to the actual NH 3 concentration present before the flushing, i.e., 5 ppm.
  • Figure 5 shows a second measurement series, in which a sensor 1 is exposed to air 20 with an ammonia concentration of 10 ppm.
  • concentration of 10 ppm NH 3 in this case simulates a possible background concentration of NH 3 and is interrupted by gas exposures of 25 ppm NH3 and flushing with clean air.
  • the exposure of 25 ppm NH 3 and the flushing with air occurs at the start of the measurement series and also every 12 h.
  • the measured value along the y axis is indicated here in nA, where 10 ppm corresponds to roughly 1000 nA.
  • Figure 5A presents a current measurement curve showing a small time segment (25 h and 26.5 h) of Fig. 5 at the same scale of the y axis. The events around the second flushing of the experimental series of Fig. 5 are presented in detail.
  • the concentration of the target substance is again set at 10 ppm, so that once more 0 nA is measured. Corrected, the values are 0 ppm and 10 ppm.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates in schematic manner a mechanical gas shielding device 2 in which the sensor 1 can be shielded by a kind of lid from the at least one target substance 10.
  • the lid-like arrangement here can be hinged on the sensor 1 by a flap mechanism.
  • the gas shielding device 2 can also be pushed across the sensor 1 or designed similar to a photographic diaphragm.
  • a mechanical shielding it is possible for a mechanical shielding to also have a filter that is specific for the target substance 10.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Electric Means (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Fluid Adsorption Or Reactions (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)

Abstract

The invention concerns a method for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance (10) in a gas or a gas mixture (20), especially air, wherein: a) a first measured value (11) of the concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance (10) is saved as the first measured value (11) in a predetermined way and then b) the at least one target substance (10) is kept away from the sensor (1) with a gas shielding device (2) for a predetermined period of time, so that the concentration of the at least one target substance (10) measured by the sensor changes, c) before the end of the shielding of the sensor (1), the magnitude of the measured concentration and/or the direction of the change in concentration of the gaseous target substance (10) as detected by the sensor (1) is saved as the second measured value (12), d) the sensor (1) is then exposed again to the gas (20) with the at least one gaseous target substance (10), while e) on the basis of the difference between the first measured value (11) and the second measured value (12), an actual concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance (10) in the gas (20) is determined by means of a calculator (30). The invention also concerns a gas monitoring device and a use of such a device.

Description

METHODS AND DEVICES FOR DETECTION OF THE
CONCENTRATION OF AT LEAST ONE GASEOUS TARGET SUBSTANCE AND USE OF A GAS MONITORING DEVICE
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[01] This application claims the priority of German Patent Application No. 10 2012 211 215.4, filed June 28, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND
[02] The following information is provided to assist the reader in understanding technologies disclosed below and the environment in which such technologies may typically be used. The terms used herein are not intended to be limited to any particular narrow interpretation unless clearly stated otherwise in this document. References set forth herein may facilitate understanding of the technologies or the background thereof. The disclosure of all references cited herein are incorporated by reference.
[03] The invention concerns methods and devices for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance in a gas, as well as the use of a gas monitoring or gas measurement device.
[04] Detectors for gaseous target substances such as ammonia are basically familiar (CH 686981 A5, DE 3841622 Al). Electrochemical ammonia gas sensors are based, e.g., on the principle of direct oxidation of ammonia or measurement of the change in the pH value.
[05] It has been observed that the performance of ammonia gas sensors slackens off upon long-term exposure, even at slight concentrations. For constant gas concentration, the measurement values of ammonia gas sensors tend toward zero over the course of time. This means that an ammonia-free environment is indicated, even though ammonia is present in the environment.
[06] Therefore, the problem is to develop methods and devices which allow for the detection of a stable measurement of the gas concentration such as ammonia concentration in the surroundings over time. SUMMARY
[07] The problem set forth above is solved, for example, by the method with the features of claim 1. Methods and sensors hereof provide for the measurement of the concentration of the gaseous target substance in a gas or a gas mixture (especially, for example, air) In that regard, a method for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance in a gas includes: a) A first measured value of the concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance is saved as the first measured value (reference value) in a predetermined way.
[08] b) The at least one target substance is then kept away from the sensor with a gas shielding device for a time so that the concentration of the at least one target substance measured by the sensor changes. The target substance can be shielded by a filter together with the gas or also selectively.
[09] c) Before the end of the shielding of the sensor, the magnitude of the measured concentration and/or the direction of the change in concentration of the gaseous target substance as detected by the sensor is saved as the second measured value, d) The sensor is then exposed again to the gas with the at least one gaseous target substance.
[10] e) On the basis of the difference between the first measured value and the second measured value, an output concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance in the gas is determined by using a calculator or processor.
[11] Using the method hereof, it is possible to calibrate the sensor so that the observed saturation effect has no negative consequences. In addition to this calibration, one can also perform calibrations with test gases at greater distances. The term gas (or gas mixture) also includes a vapor (or vapor mixture).
[12] In one advantageous embodiment, the gas shielding device includes a flushing device or system with which flushing of the sensor with a gaseous flushing medium (especially, for example, air) may be performed automatically or on demand. A user may, for example, perform the flushing on demand when he suspects that the measured values are no longer correct. In the case of the automatic control, one may set the duration of the flushing and defined intervals during which the flushing occurs. [13] In another example of an advantageous embodiment, flushing of the sensor is done with air from a pressurized gas bottle or gas supply. Pressurized air respirators with a pressurized gas bottle are, for example, regularly carried by fire fighters, and thus constitute an available source of the flushing gas for fire fighters.
[14] Alternatively or additionally, another advantageous embodiment has a means of selective combustion of the gas, a mechanical gas barrier and/or filter device with which the target substance is kept away from the sensor for a predetermined time.
[15] In one advantageous embodiment of the method, the time of shielding of the gas is more than 0.7 times the response time (t9o) of the sensor and less than 30 minutes. In another advantageous embodiment, the shielding of the gas with the target substance from the sensor is between 10 seconds and 5 minutes each time, especially between 20 seconds and 2 minutes or between 40 seconds and 2 minutes. In another advantageous embodiment, flushing with the gaseous flushing medium is done at intervals of 1 minute to 24 hours, especially every 5 to 30 minutes.
[16] Advantageously, embodiments of the method can be used when the gaseous target substance is a nitrogen-containing gas, (especially, for example, ammonia, hydrazine or an amine) or a sulfur-containing gas (such as H2S, a mercaptan, or thiophene).
[17] In another embodiment, the problems set forth above are also solved by a device or sensor hereof. In that regard, a sensor (for example, an electrochemical sensor) outputs a measurement signal dependent upon a concentration of the gaseous target substance (that is, a first measured value as described above is determined). A gas shielding device temporarily shields the sensor from the gas. A calculator or processor determines an output concentration of the at least one target substance based upon a concentration measurement performed before shielding (first measured value) and another concentration measurement performed during shielding (second measured value). In theory, any given sensor can be used in this method.
[18] In one advantageous embodiment of the sensor, the gas shielding device or system includes a flushing device for a flushing medium, wherein the flushing medium comes from a reservoir and/or from a gas generator. The reservoir may, for example, be a pressurized air reservoir, a pressurized or supplied air respirator and/or the surroundings from which the flushing medium is taken in. [19] Alternatively or additionally, one advantageous embodiment includes a means of selective combustion of the gas, a mechanical gas barrier and/or a filter device with which the gas is kept away from the sensor for a predetermined period of time.
[20] It is advantageous for the sensor to have substantial inertia or be fairly insensitive to a change in relative humidity. This is especially beneficial because, for example, many electrochemical ammonia sensors exhibit a pronounced transient upon changes in relative humidity. That transient is then superimposed on all other changes. Such changes include the concentration change in question here, when, for example, the flushing medium for example has a relative humidity different from the surroundings being metered. This will especially be the case when the flushing gas comes from a pressurized gas bottle and is thus very dry.
[21] It is also advantageous in a number of embodiments for the measurement principle of the sensor to be based on the principle of direct oxidation of ammonia or the measurement of changes in pH value. The latter as such is known, so that embodiments of the can be combined with this known feature.
[22] In another aspect hereof, a method for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance in a gas with a sensor, includes a) measuring a first measured value of concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance in gas; b) subsequently shielding the at least one target substance from the sensor for a predetermined period of time, so that the concentration of the at least one target substance measured by the sensor changes, c) during shielding of the sensor, measuring a second measured value of concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance, d) after ceasing shielding of the sensor, exposing the sensor again to the gas with the at least one gaseous target substance, and e) determining an output concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance on the basis of the difference between the first measured value and the second measured value using a processor.
[23] Shielding the sensor from the at least one target substance may, for example, include flushing of the sensor with a gaseous flushing medium. The gaseous flushing medium may, for example, include air. Flushing of the sensor may, for example, be initiated automatically or upon demand. In a number of embodiments, flushing of the sensor is done with air from a pressurized gas bottle or from a gas generator.
[24] Shielding of sensor may, for example, include at least one of selective combustion of the gas, use of a protective electrode, use of a mechanical gas barrier or use of a filter device via which the at least one gaseous target substance is kept away from the sensor for a predetermined period of time. An protective electrode can mean that the gas shielding device might comprise an electrode that could function as a barrier when an oxidative process might be initiated with an appropriate applied electrical potential. Basically, this protective electrode would be able to oxidize N¾ to avoid that the N¾ gets to the sensing electrode of the NH3 sensor applied to the "gas shielding device". Removing the applied potential would allow the gas to diffuse through the protective electrode. In an advantageous embodiment, this protective electrode could actually be even installed in the N¾ sensor itself on top of the sensing electrode; the alternative approach might be to have this protective electrode being installed in the separate "gas shielding device". Overall, this protective electrode should allow an alternative way to keep the target gas away from the sensor, other than the already mentioned combustion of the gas, the mechanical barriers and /or the filter device.
[25] In a number of embodiments, the time of shielding of the gas is more than 0.7 times the length of a response time (t9o) of the sensor and less than 30 minutes. Shielding of the gas may, for example, be between 10 seconds and 5 minutes. In a number of embodiments, shielding of the gas lasts between 20 seconds and 2 minutes. Shielding of the gas may, for example, be done at intervals of 1 minutes to 24 hours. In a number of embodiments, shielding of the gas is done at intervals of 5 to 30 minutes.
[26] Shielding may, for example, include flushing with a gaseous flushing medium. In a number of embodiments, the gaseous target substance is a nitrogen-containing gas. The gaseous target substance may, for example, be ammonia, hydrazine, an amine or a sulfur- containing substance.
[27] In a further aspect, a device for the detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance in a gas includes: (a) a sensor, which outputs a measurement signal dependent upon a concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance, (b) a gas shielding system for temporary shielding of the sensor from the gas, and (c) a processor to determine an output concentration of the at least one target substance based upon a concentration measurement performed before shielding and another concentration measurement performed during the shielding.
[28] The gas shielding system may, for example, include a flushing device for delivering a flushing medium from a reservoir. The flushing medium may, for example, be delivered from a pressurized or supplied air respirator or taken in from the surroundings. In a number of embodiments, the gas shielding system includes a system for selective combustion of the at least one gaseous target substance, a mechanical gas barrier, or a filter device via which the at least one gaseous target substance is kept away from the sensor for a predetermined period of time.
[29] In a number of embodiments, the response of the sensor exhibits substantial insensitivity to a rise in relative humidity. In a number of embodiments, the measurement principle of the sensor is based on direct oxidation of ammonia or the measurement of changes in pH value.
[30] Advantageous uses of devices hereof include use in a stationary or in a portable gas detection system.
[31] The present methods and devices, along with the attributes and attendant advantages thereof, will best be appreciated and understood in view of the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and representative embodiments.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[32] Figure 1 illustrates a basic diagram of one embodiment of an ammonia gas sensor before a flushing.
[33] Figure 2 illustrates a basic diagram of the embodiment of Fig. 1 during a flushing with a gaseous flushing medium;
[34] Figure 3 illustrates a basic diagram of the embodiment of Fig. 1 after a flushing with a gaseous flushing medium;
[35] Figure 4 illustrates a first concentration measurement of an amperometric NH3 sensor with a flushing;
[36] Figure 5 illustrates a second concentration measurement with several flushings and concentration exposures of NH3
[37] Figure 5 A illustrates a detail of flushings from the measurement per Fig. 5; [38] Figure 6 illustrates another embodiment with a mechanical gas shielding.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[39] It will be readily understood that the components of the embodiments, as generally described and illustrated in the figures herein, may be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations in addition to the described example embodiments. Thus, the following more detailed description of the example embodiments, as represented in the figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the embodiments, as claimed, but is merely representative of example embodiments.
[40] Reference throughout this specification to "one embodiment" or "an embodiment" (or the like) means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the appearance of the phrases "in one embodiment" or "in an embodiment" or the like in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
[41] Furthermore, described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are provided to give a thorough understanding of embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the various embodiments can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, et cetera. In other instances, well known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obfuscation.
[42] As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an", and "the" include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to "shielding system" includes a plurality of such shielding systems and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth, and reference to "the shielding system" is a reference to one or more such shielding systems and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.
[43] Figure 1 illustrates schematically a sensor 1 with which the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance 10 in a gas, here, air 20 (for example, the surrounding or ambient air), may be measured. Such a device may, for example, be part of a portable or stationary gas detector.
[44] Basically, the design and functional principle of the sensor 1 will not be discussed hereafter; any sensor 1 may be used that can measure a concentration of the gaseous target substance 10 in the air 20.
[45] The function of the devices described herein and the methods described herein are independent of the type of the at least one gaseous target substance 10. In what follows, we shall refer as an example to the measurement of the concentration of gaseous ammonia (N¾) in air. In similar fashion, other gaseous target substances 10, preferably containing nitrogen, such as hydrazine or amines or sulfur-containing substances may also be measured by the sensor 1.
[46] Figure 1 illustrates that the concentration of the gaseous target substance 10 is detected by the sensor 1, and the measurement result is relayed to a calculation system or processor 30. The processor 30 may be, for example, a microchip, which is installed in a handheld device or a stationary device for gas monitoring.
[47] After a while, the actual concentration of the at least one gaseous substance 10, ammonia in this case, can no longer be measured correctly, since a type of saturation of the sensor 1 has taken place. The measured value for the concentration of ammonia 10 by the sensor 1 drops, even though the concentration of ammonia 10 in the air 20, for example, has remained constant.
[48] Before a flushing is performed, as one option for temporary shielding of the sensor 1, at a predetermined moment in time (for example, after a certain period of time interval has elapsed), a measurement of the concentration of the gaseous target substance 10 is performed (that is, with the saturated, or at least partly saturated, sensor 1). The measured concentration is saved by the processor 30 as the first measured value 11.
[49] Figure 2 illustrates the same configuration as Fig. 1, but wherein a flushing medium 3 is passed from a flushing device 2 across the sensor 1 for a certain time. The length of the gas flushing is on the order of the usual response time (t9o) of the sensor lfor example, 2 x t9o. For t9o = 45 s, this would be 1.5 minutes of calibration time. A possible upper bound for the length of the shielding, or here the gas flushing, is 30 minutes. [50] The flushing medium 3 may be, for example clean air, which is arranged in the form of a small pressurized container or gas generator in the gas detector itself. In addition or alternatively, however, the clean air can also come from a pressurized or supplied air respirator or be supplied to the gas detector across a line. The flushing medium 3 should be free of target substances 10 that are being measured by the sensor 1.
[51] The flushing of the sensor 1 with the flushing medium 3 constitutes a calibration. Before the end of the flushing of the sensor 1, the magnitude of the measured concentration and/or the direction of the concentration change of the gaseous target substance 10 as detected by the sensor 1 is saved as the second measured value 12.
[52] The second measured value 12 obtained on the basis of the flushing will lead, in the present case, to a drop in the measured value for ammonia 10. If the measured value for ammonia 10 has already dropped to zero on account of the saturation effect of the sensor 1, the second measured value 12 may be negative (see Fig. 4). This second measured value 12 is saved by the processor 30 and used as the measured value for the calculation of the actual background concentration of ammonia 10. The difference between the first measured value 11 and the second measured value 12 is a measure of the drift or false measurement of the sensor 1.
[53] Figure 3 shows the next step of the method, in which the sensor 1 is again exposed to air 20 with ammonia 10. Any change in the second measured value 12 with respect to the first measured value 11 provides a measure of the drift of the sensor 1.
[54] Figure 4 shows a first concentration measurement with one embodiment of one of the above-described devices. For the first four hours, the sensor 1 is exposed to pure air. At time t=4 h, a concentration of 25 ppm of ammonia 10 in air 20 is applied abruptly. The result of this measurement is used to calibrate the sensor 1 and provides the information on the sensitivity of the sensor (e.g., 100 nA/ppm NH3). This sensitivity is then used afterwards to perform all further concentration calculations on the basis of the current values. The primary task of the sensor in amperometric design is always a current measurement.
[55] Although the ammonia concentration is held constant at 5 ppm afterwards (t>4 h), the measured value at time t=18 h drops to nearly 0 ppm. This can be called a saturation effect. [56] After 18 h, the sensor 1 is flushed with a flushing medium 3 in the manner described above. It is clearly evident that now the measured value for ammonia 10 becomes a negative measured value, namely, -5 ppm. This value is only understandable in relation to the previously measured saturation value of 0 ppm.
[57] According to the embodiment described in Figures 1 to 3, the first measured value 11 corresponds to the measured value at t=4 h, i.e., 5 ppm. The second measured value 12 at t=18 h, i.e. 0 ppm, corresponds to the drop of -5 ppm. The magnitude of the difference between the first measured value 11 and second measured value 12 corresponds to the actual NH3 concentration present before the flushing, i.e., 5 ppm.
[58] Figure 5 shows a second measurement series, in which a sensor 1 is exposed to air 20 with an ammonia concentration of 10 ppm. The concentration of 10 ppm NH3 in this case simulates a possible background concentration of NH3 and is interrupted by gas exposures of 25 ppm NH3 and flushing with clean air. The exposure of 25 ppm NH3 and the flushing with air occurs at the start of the measurement series and also every 12 h. The measured value along the y axis is indicated here in nA, where 10 ppm corresponds to roughly 1000 nA.
[59] It is clear that, like the measurement in Fig. 4, the sensor 1 after around 24 h shows a saturation effect. The measured value of the ammonia concentration has dropped from around 1000 nA to 0 nA (first measured value 11). By flushing with clear air at 12 h, a new baseline value is created for the sensor 1 by measuring a second measured value 12 of -1000 nA for the clean air (second measured value 12). When the sensor 1 is again exposed to air 20 with ammonia 10, the measured value again rises to 0 nA. The difference between the first measured value 11 (around 0 nA) and the second measured value (around -1000 nA) is the measure of the drift of the sensor 1.
[60] The process is repeated several times afterwards. Within 50 h, four flushings with fresh air as the flushing medium and four verifications using 25 ppm of NH3 are performed.
[61] Figure 5A presents a current measurement curve showing a small time segment (25 h and 26.5 h) of Fig. 5 at the same scale of the y axis. The events around the second flushing of the experimental series of Fig. 5 are presented in detail.
[62] At the start (t=25 - 25.1 h), a current of 0 nA is measured, even though a concentration of 10 ppm of NH3 (i.e., the target substance) is present in the surroundings. When the 10 ppm of N¾ is removed from the sensor 1 (t=25.1 h), the measured current drops to nearly -1000 nA, i.e., an equivalent of -10 ppm of N¾. When the target substance is again presented (around t=25.25 h) in a concentration of 25 ppm, the current value rises to around 1500 nA, corresponding to 15 ppm.
[63] By means of the proposed method, the measured values can be corrected, namely, to 10 ppm of N¾ in the region between t=25 - 25.1 h, 0 ppm in the region of t=25.1 - 25.25 h and 25 ppm in the region between t=25.1 - 25.4 h.
[64] Figure 5A also shows that the target substance is taken away again in the region of t=25.4 - 25.6, so that a current of around -1000 nA sets in. At t=25.6, the concentration of the target substance is again set at 10 ppm, so that once more 0 nA is measured. Corrected, the values are 0 ppm and 10 ppm.
[65] Figure 6 illustrates in schematic manner a mechanical gas shielding device 2 in which the sensor 1 can be shielded by a kind of lid from the at least one target substance 10. The lid-like arrangement here can be hinged on the sensor 1 by a flap mechanism. In other embodiments, the gas shielding device 2 can also be pushed across the sensor 1 or designed similar to a photographic diaphragm. Moreover, it is possible for a mechanical shielding to also have a filter that is specific for the target substance 10.
[66] List of reference symbols
[67] 1 sensor
[68] 2 flushing device/gas shielding device
[69] 3 flushing medium
[70] 10 gaseous target substance
[71] 11 first measured value (measured value before shielding/flushing)
[72] 12 second measured value
[73] 20 gas or gas mixture, especially air
[74] 30 calculator
[75] The foregoing description and accompanying drawings set forth
representative embodiments at the present time. Various modifications, additions and alternative designs will, of course, become apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing teachings without departing from the scope hereof, which is indicated by the following claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes and variations that fall within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. Method for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance (10) in a gas (20) or a gas mixture, especially air, with a sensor (1), wherein: a) a first measured value (11) of the concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance (10) is saved as the first measured value (11) in a predetermined way and then b) the at least one target substance (10) is kept away from the sensor (1) with a gas shielding device (2) for a predetermined period of time, so that the concentration of the at least one target substance (10) measured by the sensor (1) changes, c) before the end of the shielding of the sensor (1), the magnitude of the measured concentration and/or the direction of the change in concentration of the gaseous target substance (10) as detected by the sensor (1) is saved as the second measured value (12), d) the sensor (1) is then exposed again to the gas (20) with the at least one gaseous target substance (10), while e) on the basis of the difference between the first measured value (11) and the second measured value (12), an actual concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance (10) in the gas (20) is determined by means of a processor (30).
2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the gas shielding device (2) has a flushing device with which a flushing of the sensor (1) with a gaseous flushing medium (3), especially air, is done automatically or on demand.
3. Method according to claim 2, characterized in that the flushing of the sensor (1) is done with air from a pressurized gas bottle and/or a gas generator.
4. Method according to at least one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the gas shielding device (2) has a means of selective combustion of the gas (20), a protective electrode, a mechanical gas barrier and/or a filter device with which the at least one target substance is kept away from the sensor (1) for a predetermined period of time.
5. Method according to at least one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the time of shielding of the gas (20) is more than 0.7 times the length of the response time (t9o) of the sensor and less than 30 minutes.
6. Method according to at least one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the shielding of the gas (20) with the target substance (10), especially with a flushing, lasts between 10 sec and 5 min each time, especially between 20 sec and 2 min.
7. Method according to at least one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the shielding of the gas (20) with the target substance (10) is done especially with a flushing at intervals of 1 minute to 24 h, especially every 5 to 30 minutes.
8. Method according to at least one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the gaseous target substance (10) is a nitrogen-containing gas, especially ammonia, hydrazine or an amine or a sulfur-containing gas.
9. Device for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance (10) in a gas (20) or a gas mixture, especially air, with:
(a) a sensor (1), especially an electrochemical sensor (1), which puts out a measurement signal (2) in dependence on a measured concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance (10), and
(b) a gas shielding device (3) for temporary shielding of the sensor (1) from the gas (20) with the at least one gaseous target substance (10), and
(c) a processor (30) to determine an actual concentration of the at least one target substance (10) in dependence on a concentration measurement that was done before and at the end of the shielding.
10. Device according to claim 9, characterized in that the gas shielding device (3) has a flushing device for a flushing medium (3) from a reservoir, especially a flushing medium (3) from a pressurized air respirator and/or a flushing medium taken in from the surroundings.
11. Device according to claim 9 or 10, characterized in that the gas shielding device has a means of selective combustion of the at least one target substance, a mechanical gas barrier and/or a filter device with which the at least one target substance is kept away from the sensor for a predetermined period of time.
12. Device according to at least one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sensor (1) is substantially insensitive to a change in relative humidity.
13. Device according to at least one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the measurement principle of the sensor (1) is based on the principle of direct oxidation of ammonia or the measurement of changes in pH value.
14. Use of a device according to one of claims 9 to 13 in a stationary or portable gas detection system.
15. A method for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance (10) in a gas (20) with a sensor (1), comprising: a) measuring a first measured value (11) of concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance (10) in gas (20); b) subsequently shielding the at least one target substance (10) from the sensor (1) for a predetermined period of time, so that the concentration of the at least one target substance (10) measured by the sensor (1) changes, c) during shielding of the sensor (1), measuring a second measured value (12) of
concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance (10), d) after ceasing shielding of the sensor, exposing the sensor (1) again to the gas (20) with the at least one gaseous target substance (10), and e) determining an output concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance (10) on the basis of the difference between the first measured value (11) and the second measured value (12) using a processor (30).
16. The method of claim 15 wherein shielding the sensor (1) from the at least one target substance (10) comprises flushing of the sensor (1) with a gaseous flushing medium (3)
17. The method of claim 16 wherein the gaseous flushing medium comprises air.
18. The method of claim 16 wherein flushing of the sensor (1) is initiated automatically or upon demand.
19. The method claim 16 wherein flushing of the sensor (1) is done with air from a pressurized gas bottle or from a gas generator.
20. The method of claim 15 wherein shielding of sensor (1) comprises at least one of selective combustion of the gas (20), use of a protective electrode, use of a mechanical gas barrier or use of a filter device via which the at least one gaseous target substance (10) is kept away from the sensor (1) for a predetermined period of time.
21. The method of claim 15 wherein the time of shielding of the gas (20) is more than 0.7 times the length of a response time (t9o) of the sensor and less than 30 minutes.
22. The method of claim 15 wherein shielding of the gas (20) lasts between 10 seconds and 5 minutes.
23. The method of claim 15 wherein shielding of the gas (20) lasts between 20 seconds and 2 minutes.
24. The method of claim 15 wherein shielding of the gas (20) is done at intervals of 1 minutes to 24 hours.
25. The method of claim 15 wherein shielding of the gas (20) is done at intervals of 5 to 30 minutes.
26. The method of claim 15 wherein shielding comprises flushing with a gaseous flushing medium (3).
27. The method claim 15 wherein the gaseous target substance (10) is a nitrogen- containing gas
28. The method claim 15 wherein the gaseous target substance (10) is ammonia, hydrazine, an amine or a sulfur-containing substance.
29. A device for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance (10) in a gas (20) comprising:
(a) a sensor (1), which outputs a measurement signal (2) dependent upon a concentration of the at least one gaseous target substance (10),
(b) a gas shielding system (3) for temporary shielding of the sensor (1) from the gas (20), and (c) a processor (30) to determine an output concentration of the at least one target substance (10) based upon a concentration measurement performed before shielding and another concentration measurement performed during the shielding.
30. The device of claim 29 wherein the gas shielding system (3) comprises a flushing device for delivering a flushing medium (3) from a reservoir.
31. The device of claim 30 wherein the flushing medium (3) is delivered from a pressurized air respirator of taken in from the surroundings.
32. The device of claim 29 wherein the gas shielding system comprises a system for selective combustion of the at least one gaseous target substance (10), a mechanical gas barrier or a filter device via which the at least one gaseous target substance (10) is kept away from the sensor (1) for a predetermined period of time.
33. The device of claim 29 wherein a response of the sensor (1) exhibits substantial insensitivity to a change in relative humidity.
34. The device of claim 29 wherein a measurement principle of the sensor (1) is based on direct oxidation of ammonia or the measurement of changes in pH value.
EP13714224.6A 2012-06-28 2013-03-15 Method and device for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance and use of a gas monitoring device Active EP2867665B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102012211215.4A DE102012211215A1 (en) 2012-06-28 2012-06-28 Method and device for detecting the concentration of at least one target gaseous substance and use of a device
PCT/EP2013/055463 WO2014000898A1 (en) 2012-06-28 2013-03-15 Methods and devices for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance and use of a gas monitoring device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2867665A1 true EP2867665A1 (en) 2015-05-06
EP2867665B1 EP2867665B1 (en) 2019-06-19

Family

ID=48047985

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13714224.6A Active EP2867665B1 (en) 2012-06-28 2013-03-15 Method and device for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance and use of a gas monitoring device

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US9885694B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2867665B1 (en)
CN (1) CN104428668B (en)
BR (1) BR112014029376A2 (en)
DE (1) DE102012211215A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2014000898A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113009072A (en) * 2019-12-20 2021-06-22 宁波方太厨具有限公司 Formaldehyde detection method

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102012211215A1 (en) 2012-06-28 2014-04-10 Msa Auer Gmbh Method and device for detecting the concentration of at least one target gaseous substance and use of a device
EP3163299B1 (en) * 2015-10-29 2019-05-15 Inficon GmbH Gas detection using gas modulation

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4247380A (en) * 1975-09-25 1981-01-27 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Technique for in situ calibration of a gas detector
DE3841622A1 (en) * 1988-12-10 1990-06-13 Draegerwerk Ag ELECTROCHEMICAL MEASURING CELL FOR THE AMPEROMETRIC DETERMINATION OF AMMONIA AND ITS DERIVATIVES
DE4038993C2 (en) * 1990-12-06 1995-07-06 Lehmann Martin Method for selecting containers and measuring arrangement for carrying out the method
DE4132034A1 (en) * 1991-09-26 1993-04-01 Conducta Mess & Regeltech Determining gases esp. in (waste) air - from heat or solution determined by chemical sensor
CH686981A5 (en) 1994-02-09 1996-08-15 Christian Dr Huggenberger Ammonia sensor.
DE19810973A1 (en) * 1998-03-13 1999-09-30 Fev Motorentech Gmbh Method for stabilizing the zero point of an exhaust gas sensor and arrangement for carrying out the method
GB9921769D0 (en) * 1999-09-16 1999-11-17 Osmetech Plc Apparatus for detecting components of gaseous atmospheres
GB0722574D0 (en) * 2007-11-16 2007-12-27 Life Safety Distribution Ag Method of measuring a target gas at low concentration
DE102008027630A1 (en) * 2008-06-05 2009-12-10 Filt Lungen- Und Thoraxdiagnostik Gmbh Portable pneumotachograph for measuring components of the expiratory volume
US8505371B2 (en) * 2011-11-30 2013-08-13 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Methods for an exhaust fluid sensor
DE102012211215A1 (en) 2012-06-28 2014-04-10 Msa Auer Gmbh Method and device for detecting the concentration of at least one target gaseous substance and use of a device

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2014000898A1 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113009072A (en) * 2019-12-20 2021-06-22 宁波方太厨具有限公司 Formaldehyde detection method
CN113009072B (en) * 2019-12-20 2022-05-17 宁波方太厨具有限公司 Formaldehyde detection method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104428668B (en) 2016-07-06
DE102012211215A1 (en) 2014-04-10
EP2867665B1 (en) 2019-06-19
US20150316522A1 (en) 2015-11-05
WO2014000898A1 (en) 2014-01-03
BR112014029376A2 (en) 2017-06-27
CN104428668A (en) 2015-03-18
US9885694B2 (en) 2018-02-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11385210B2 (en) Apparatus and methods for providing corrected readings in odor intensity level monitoring instrumentation and concurrent odor intensity and odorant concentration measurements
Utriainen et al. Combining miniaturized ion mobility spectrometer and metal oxide gas sensor for the fast detection of toxic chemical vapors
Budde et al. Investigating the use of commodity dust sensors for the embedded measurement of particulate matter
US9885694B2 (en) Methods and devices for detection of the concentration of at least one gaseous target substance and use of a gas monitoring device
CN104919312B (en) sensor interrogation
RU2016152193A (en) AEROSOL SENSOR AND PERCEPTION METHOD
CA3005273C (en) Sensor interrogation with fast recovery
DE60322446D1 (en) Apparatus and method for diagnostic gas analysis
US20230258617A1 (en) Determination of sensor operational status via sensor interrogation
EP0001611A3 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting substances and for regulating current
KR20220084165A (en) Methods of operation and calibration of gas sensors, and related gas sensors
BR0214965A (en) Apparatus for diagnosing a chemical detection system and methods for verifying the operation of a chemical detection system and for verifying the operation of a chemical sensor
US20220236225A1 (en) Arithmetic device, arithmetic method, and gas detection system
KR101694606B1 (en) Wearable device and system for monitoring user
US11112378B2 (en) Interrogation of capillary-limited sensors
KR20100104412A (en) Portable electronic nose system
Penrose et al. Sensitive measurement of ozone using amperometric gas sensors
CN205786527U (en) Reagent control unit, analytical tool and system, cleaning and filling apparatus, calibrating instrument
JP3378481B2 (en) Method for quantifying substance concentration, substance concentration detection device and recording medium
JPWO2021138195A5 (en)
WO2019203117A1 (en) Work environment integrated management system and work environment integrated management method
Lynch et al. Evaluation of exposure to chemical agents
Nenciu et al. A versatile system for indoor monitoring of some volatile organic compounds
JP6910468B2 (en) Methods, controls and devices for detecting gaseous substances in gas mixtures
Tiebe et al. Two tasks in environmental monitoring-calibration and characterization of gas sensors and remote sensing with multicopter platforms-Part 2

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150114

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: MSA EUROPE GMBH

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190131

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1146171

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602013056764

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20190619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190920

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1146171

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191021

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191019

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200224

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602013056764

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG2D Information on lapse in contracting state deleted

Ref country code: IS

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200603

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200331

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200315

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190619

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602013056764

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: JONES DAY RECHTSANWAELTE PATENTANWAELTE, DE

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230626

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231229

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240108

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240103

Year of fee payment: 12