EP2821588A1 - Système de colonne montante de pipeline et son procédé de fonctionnement - Google Patents
Système de colonne montante de pipeline et son procédé de fonctionnement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2821588A1 EP2821588A1 EP13174514.3A EP13174514A EP2821588A1 EP 2821588 A1 EP2821588 A1 EP 2821588A1 EP 13174514 A EP13174514 A EP 13174514A EP 2821588 A1 EP2821588 A1 EP 2821588A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- pipeline
- riser
- valve
- slug
- riser system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/12—Methods or apparatus for controlling the flow of the obtained fluid to or in wells
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/01—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells specially adapted for obtaining from underwater installations
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a pipeline-riser system, in particular to a pipeline-riser system comprising an anti-slug valve. Moreover, the invention relates to a method of operating a pipeline-riser system. Furthermore, the invention relates to a program element to and a computer readable medium.
- pipeline-riser systems are used.
- subsea pipelines are used to transport the multiphase mixture of oil, gas and water from producing wells to the processing facilities.
- Several kilometers of pipeline run on the seabed ending with risers to top-side platforms. Therefore, in new field developments, multiphase transport technology and flow assurance become more important.
- depleted reservoirs have low pressures to push the fluid along the pipeline, and they are prone to flow instabilities. Liquids tend to accumulate at places with lower elevation, and can block the gas flow in the pipe. In low flow rate conditions, this blockage leads to a slugging flow regime called terrain slugging.
- the flow condition is called “severe slugging” or “riser-slugging”.
- the severe-slugging flow is also characterized by large oscillatory variations in pressure and flow rates.
- the oscillatory flow condition in offshore multiphase pipelines is undesirable and an effective solution is needed to suppress it.
- One way to prevent this behavior is reducing the opening of a choke valve arranged at the top-side of the riser.
- this conventional solution increases the back pressure of the valve, and it reduces the production rate from the oil wells.
- the recommended solution to maintain a non-oscillatory flow regime together with the maximum possible production rate is active control of the topside choke valve.
- Measurements such as pressure, flow rate or fluid density are used as the controlled variables and the top-side choke valve is the manipulated variable.
- existing anti-slug control systems are typically not robust in practice and the closed-loop system becomes unstable after some time, because of inflow disturbances or plant changes.
- a pipeline-riser system which comprises a pipeline portion, an anti-slug valve, and a riser portion, wherein the pipeline portion is connected to the riser portion at a joining point; and wherein the anti-slug valve is arranged in proximity to the joining point.
- the pipeline-riser system may be an undersea pipeline-riser system, e.g. for offshore oil production.
- the pipeline section is arranged upstream of the riser portion.
- the anti-slug valve may be arranged in the pipeline portion, the riser portion or at the joining point which is different to the known arrangement of anti-slug valves which are typically located at the topside platform.
- the anti-slug valve may form the joining point or may be arranged at a base of the riser portion.
- a method of slug controlling in a pipeline-riser system comprising an anti-slug valve arranged in proximity to a joining point of a pipeline portion and a riser portion of the pipeline-riser system is provided, wherein the method comprises controlling the anti-slug valve by a control signal generated based on a measured signal indicative for a flow of a fluid through the pipeline-riser system.
- a program element which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method according to an exemplary aspect.
- a computer-readable medium in which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method according to an exemplary aspect.
- pipeline portion may particularly denote a portion of a tube system adapted to convey fluids, e.g. natural gas, crude oil or a multiphase fluid and which is arranged substantially horizontal or following the contour of the terrain, e.g. a subsea floor.
- a pipeline portion has to be distinguished from a riser portion of a pipeline-riser system.
- riser portion may particularly denote a portion of the tube system which is arranged substantially vertical or at least does not follow a contour of the terrain.
- the riser portions may be that portions of a subsea tube arrangement, which are adapted to convey crude oil from the sea level to the surface, e.g. by pumping up the crude oil or multiphase fluid.
- anti-slug valve may particularly denote a valve which is adapted or suitable to reduce or avoid slugging in a conveying pipeline-riser system.
- the anti-slug valve may be controllable or may be have a preset throughput of a fluid, e.g. crude oil.
- the term "proximity to the joining point” may particularly denote a point which is closer to the joining point than to other prominent points, like the top of the well where the pipeline section is connected to the well or the upper or top-side of the riser where the riser is connected to an outlet or to a further pipeline. That is, the anti-slug valve may particularly be arranged closer to the joining point than to the well head of a subsea well and/or a top-side of the riser portion.
- anti-slug valves at the two positions i.e. in proximity to the joining point and at the top-side of the riser provide a substantially equal operation range.
- the provision of an anti-slug valve at the joining point of the (subsea) pipeline portion and the riser portion may allow for using a common top-side (choke) valve for other controlling than slugging control, e.g. for absolute flow rate control or safety and shutdown purposes, and thus may allow for a production optimization.
- the anti-slug valve comprises a control interface adapted to receive control signals.
- control signal may be suitable or may be adapted to modify or change a throughput of the anti-slug valve, e.g. by increasing or decreasing an aperture of the anti-slug valve, for example formed by a choke valve or the like.
- the pipeline-riser system further comprises a processing unit, wherein the processing unit is adapted to generate control signals adapted to control a throughput of the anti-slug valve.
- the processing unit may be a computer or computer unit.
- the pipeline-riser system further comprises a sensor unit arranged in connection to the pipeline-riser system and adapted to measure values of flow parameters.
- the flow parameters may be a pressure, flow rate of a fluid flowing through the pipeline-riser system or a fluid density.
- a suitable control signal may be achievable since these parameters describe at least partially the flowing regime and flowing behavior of the multiphase fluid.
- the sensor unit is arranged downstream of the anti-slug valve.
- the sensor unit may thus measure the values of flow parameters at a position downstream of the anti-slug valve.
- the anti-slug valve is arranged at a position having a distance to the joining point, wherein the distance is smaller than five lengths of the riser portion.
- the distance may be smaller than three lengths of the riser portion, more particular smaller than one length or even smaller than half the length of the riser portion.
- the distance may be smaller than a fifth of the length of the riser portion, more preferably smaller than a tenth of the length of the riser portion.
- the length of the riser portion may particularly be defined from the joining point to the surface of the sea or to a further joining point at which a further horizontal pipeline section is attached to the riser portion.
- the anti-slug valve is arranged at a position having a distance to the joining point which is lower than 1000 m.
- the distance may be in the range of 0 m to 500 m, more particularly in the range of 0 m to 250 m or, even more particularly in the range of 0 m to 100 m, most particular in the range between 0 m and 50 m or even in the range between 0 m and 10 m or in the range between 0 m and 5 m.
- a ratio of a volume of the pipeline portion from the anti-slug valve to the joining point and a volume of the riser portion is below ten.
- the ratio of volumes may be another possibility to define the distance or proximity.
- the ratio may be below 7, more particular below 5, even more particular below 2.5.
- the ratio may be between 0 and 1 or even between 0 and 0.5.
- the method further comprises measuring values of a process parameter which is indicative of the flow of a fluid through the pipeline-riser system.
- the respective measured values may be included in the measured or measurement signal.
- the measured variables may be a pressure or a timely behavior of pressure of the fluid flowing through the pipeline, a volumetric flow rate or mass flow rate, a flowing rate, an oscillation frequency of timely variation of a pressure. All these variables may be measured in particular from the subsea pipeline, i.e. from the pipeline portion or at the top-side of the riser portion or section.
- the method further comprises generating the control signal based on the measured signal.
- the control signal may be generated by a control unit and/or processing unit, like a computer.
- a gist of an exemplary embodiment may be seen in providing an anti-slug valve for an undersea pipeline-riser system, wherein the anti-slug valve comprises a control interface and is adapted to be mounted between an undersea pipeline of the pipeline-riser system and a riser of the pipeline-riser system.
- the anti-slug valve may be arranged close to the joining point of a pipeline portion and a riser portion of the pipeline-riser system, e.g. in particular, before the riser section in which a riser slugging occurs. It has been found out that although the anti-slug valve is thus arranged before or at least at the beginning of the riser section it may be possible to decrease the probability of riser slugging and/or the amount of riser slugging.
- the anti-slug valve may be a choke valve.
- the term "anti-slug valve” may particularly denote a valve, e.g. a choke valve, which is adapted to control a flow through a pipeline, in particular, to prevent or at least reduce the probability of an oscillatory flow regime.
- the anti-slug valve may be adapted to be controlled by a control signal, wherein the controlling may be provided by increasing or decreasing a flow rate through the anti-slug valve, e.g. by opening or closing an aperture of the anti-slug valve.
- Fig. 1 shows a simplified experimental set-up.
- Fig. 1 shows a simplified pipeline-riser system 100 comprising a fluid reservoir 101 for simulating an oilfield for example.
- the fluid reservoir is connected via a pump 102 (simulating the pressure the crude oil in the oil field is exposed to) and a water flow meter 103 to a mixing point 104.
- an air flow meter 105 is connected to an air buffer tank 106 having a pressure of P 1 or P in .
- the air buffer tank 106 is connected to the mixing point 104 via a safety valve 107 and is used in the experiment to simulate gas expansion of a very long pipeline (corresponding to a real pipeline-riser system).
- the mixing point 104 corresponds in principle to the well head of a real offshore pipeline-riser system.
- the water/air fluid has a pressure of P 3 and is pumped through a pipeline portion or section 108 which is arranged substantially horizontal.
- a subsea valve 109 is arranged which may form an anti-slug valve of the experimental set-up.
- the multiphase (water/air) fluid has a pressure of P rb (pressure at riser bottom) or P 4 .
- a riser of the pipeline-riser system 100 is formed by a framework structure to which the riser portion 110 is attached for simulating the riser portion of a real pipeline-riser system.
- the riser portion 110 and the pipeline portion 108 are joined at a joining point 113.
- a top-side valve 111 is connected to the riser 110 simulating a common top-side valve which is typically used for slugging control.
- the multiphase fluid has a pressure of P rt (pressure at riser top) or P 2 .
- the multiphase fluid is conveyed to a separator 112 in which the air phase is separated from the water phase which is recycled and conveyed back to the water reservoir 101.
- Fig. 2 shows a schematic piper-riser system for simulation.
- the schematic pipeline-riser system 200 may be used in a simulation of the experimental set-up of Fig. 1 and forms a well-pipeline-riser model.
- a reservoir 201 is defined which has a pressure of P bh (pressure at bottom hole).
- a well 213 is defined simulating a real well and connected at the upper end to a wellhead valve 214 at which a pressure of P wh (pressure at wellhead) is present.
- the wellhead valve 214 may form a first anti-slug valve which is analysed in simulation and is thus also labelled Z 3 in Fig. 2 .
- the wellhead valve 214 After the wellhead valve 214 the pressure of the multiphase fluid is described by P in (pressure at inlet).
- the wellhead valve 214 is connected to a pipeline portion 208 which is simulated to be substantially horizontal.
- a subsea valve or riser-base valve 209 is arranged and at which the multiphase fluid pressure is described by P rb (pressure at riser bottom).
- the subsea valve 209 may be used as an anti-slug valve and is thus also labelled by Z 2 .
- a riser 210 is defined in the simulation at the top-side of which a tops-side valve 211 is defined.
- a pressure at the top-side valve 211 is described by P rt (pressure at riser top).
- the top-side valve 211 may also be used as an anti-slug valve and is thus also labelled by Z 1 .
- Fig. 3 shows some simulation results as a comparison of the effects of a slugging control using a top-side valve (left side of Fig. 3 ) and subsea valve (right side of Fig. 3 ) by showing the so called bifurcations diagrams, describing the steady-state and the dynamics of this system.
- Fig. 3 shows the results of a simulation used to compare a simplified simulation model to experiments and simulations using the OLGA model.
- Fig. 3A shows the pressure P in at the inlet of the pipeline vs. the top-side valve opening (Z 3 ) in percent.
- Fig. 3B shows the pressure P rt at the top of riser vs. the top-side valve opening (Z 3 ) in percent.
- Fig. 3 shows the pressure P rt at the top of riser vs. the top-side valve opening (Z 3 ) in percent.
- FIG. 3C shows the pressure P in at the inlet of the pipeline vs. the subsea valve opening (Z 2 ) in percent.
- Fig. 3D shows the pressure P rt at the top of riser vs. the subsea valve opening (Z 2 ) in percent.
- Fig. 3 the simplified model (thin solid lines; 301, 302, 303) is compared to the experiments (bold solid lines; 304, 305, 306) and the OLGA model (dashed lines; 307, 308, 309).
- Figs. 3A and 3B top-side valve used for slugging control
- the system has a stable (non-slug) flow when the topside valve opening Z 3 is smaller than 15%, and it switches to slugging flow conditions for Z 3 > 15%.
- Figs. 3A and 3B three lines for each of the three experiment/models for slugging conditions are shown.
- the steady-state at slugging condition ( Z 3 > 15%) is unstable, but it can be stabilized by using control.
- Figs. 3C and 3D subsea valve used for slugging control
- the system has a stable (non-slug) flow when the subsea valve opening Z 2 is smaller than 8%, and it switches to slugging flow conditions for Z 2 > 8%.
- three lines for each of the three experiment/models for slugging conditions are shown. They represent the minimum (301 for experiment, 304 for simple model and 307 for OLGA model) of the oscillations, the maximum (302 for experiment, 305 for simple model and 308 for OLGA model) of the oscillations and the steady-state (303 for experiment, 306 for simple model and 309 for OLGA model).
- the steady-state at slugging condition ( Z 2 > 8%) can be stabilized by using control.
- the OLGA model it was more difficult to capture both steady-state and the dynamics for the subsea choke valve at the same time.
- the coefficient of discharge of the subsea valve it was possible to get the critical valve opening correct.
- a subsea valve arranged close to the basis of a riser portion in a pipeline-riser system may be a suitable candidate for anti-slug control or as an anti-slug valve which at least show similar results as the use of a top-side valve for slugging control.
- a common top-side valve may be used for different control or adjusting processes, e.g. for absolute flow rate control or safety and shutdown purposes, and thus may allow for a production optimization.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP13174514.3A EP2821588A1 (fr) | 2013-07-01 | 2013-07-01 | Système de colonne montante de pipeline et son procédé de fonctionnement |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP13174514.3A EP2821588A1 (fr) | 2013-07-01 | 2013-07-01 | Système de colonne montante de pipeline et son procédé de fonctionnement |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2821588A1 true EP2821588A1 (fr) | 2015-01-07 |
Family
ID=48699649
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13174514.3A Withdrawn EP2821588A1 (fr) | 2013-07-01 | 2013-07-01 | Système de colonne montante de pipeline et son procédé de fonctionnement |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2821588A1 (fr) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016180968A1 (fr) * | 2015-05-13 | 2016-11-17 | Norwegian University Of Science And Technology (Ntnu) | Système de commande permettant de commander un système d'éclairage |
US10865635B2 (en) | 2017-03-14 | 2020-12-15 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Llc | Method of controlling a gas vent system for horizontal wells |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100132800A1 (en) * | 2008-12-01 | 2010-06-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlling fluctuations in multiphase flow production lines |
-
2013
- 2013-07-01 EP EP13174514.3A patent/EP2821588A1/fr not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100132800A1 (en) * | 2008-12-01 | 2010-06-03 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlling fluctuations in multiphase flow production lines |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
ESMAEIL JAHANSHAHI: "Anti-slug control experiment", 24 April 2013 (2013-04-24), pages 1 - 5, XP055093249, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:www.nt.ntnu.no/users/skoge/.../Slug-rig-Instruction%20Manual2.docx> [retrieved on 20131213] * |
JAHANSHAHI E ET AL: "Anti-slug control experiments using nonlinear observers", 2013 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, IEEE, 17 June 2013 (2013-06-17), pages 1056 - 1062, XP032476135, ISSN: 0743-1619, ISBN: 978-1-4799-0177-7, [retrieved on 20130814] * |
MATS LIEUNGH: "Stabilizing Slug Control Using Subsea Choke Valve", 7 June 2012 (2012-06-07), XP055093244, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-18525> [retrieved on 20131213] * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016180968A1 (fr) * | 2015-05-13 | 2016-11-17 | Norwegian University Of Science And Technology (Ntnu) | Système de commande permettant de commander un système d'éclairage |
US10865635B2 (en) | 2017-03-14 | 2020-12-15 | Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Llc | Method of controlling a gas vent system for horizontal wells |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Pedersen et al. | Challenges in slug modeling and control for offshore oil and gas productions: A review study | |
US9470076B2 (en) | Systems and methods for production of gas wells | |
CN101084363B (zh) | 用于控制多相流体的流动的方法、系统以及控制器 | |
Xie et al. | The influence of backpressure on severe slugging in multiphase flow pipeline-riser systems | |
EP3339565A1 (fr) | Systèmes et procédés pour évaluer la production et/ou le démarrage d'un système d'injection | |
EP2821588A1 (fr) | Système de colonne montante de pipeline et son procédé de fonctionnement | |
WO2018170004A1 (fr) | Procédé de commande de système d'évent de gaz pour puits horizontaux | |
CA2943065C (fr) | Evitement par soufflage de vapeur dans une production de petrole | |
EA038439B1 (ru) | Способ и установка для откачки жидкости из скважины | |
US9982846B2 (en) | Method and system for controlling hydrodynamic slugging in a fluid processing system | |
EP2821587A1 (fr) | Procédé d'exploitation d'un système de colonne montante de pipeline | |
US10907450B2 (en) | Surface pressure controlled gas vent system for horizontal wells | |
Martins da Silva et al. | Dynamic multiphase flow models for control | |
Omowunmi et al. | Methodology for characterising slugs and operational mitigation strategy using OLGA slug tracking module-Egina Deepwater Project | |
Sevic et al. | Simulation of temperature-pressure profiles and wax deposition in gas-lift wells | |
Brito et al. | Well trajectory effect on slug flow development | |
US11649704B2 (en) | Processes and systems for injection of a liquid and gas mixture into a well | |
Oliemans | Multiphase science and technology for oil/gas production and transport | |
US10024499B2 (en) | Method and system for controlling slugging in a fluid processing system | |
Fong et al. | Increasing production by applying simple/robust, field proven slug control technology | |
Park et al. | Experimental investigation of severe slugging in vertical riser and its mitigation with inlet choke control | |
Sagatun | Riser slugging: A mathematical model and the practical consequences | |
WO2020263098A1 (fr) | Optimisation de l'injection d'eau pour la production d'hydrocarbures liquides | |
Setyadi et al. | Åsgard subsea compression and predictions of liquid surges | |
US20230408043A1 (en) | Multiphase flow instability control |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130701 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20150708 |