EP2821588A1 - Pipeline-riser system and method of operating the same - Google Patents

Pipeline-riser system and method of operating the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2821588A1
EP2821588A1 EP13174514.3A EP13174514A EP2821588A1 EP 2821588 A1 EP2821588 A1 EP 2821588A1 EP 13174514 A EP13174514 A EP 13174514A EP 2821588 A1 EP2821588 A1 EP 2821588A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pipeline
riser
valve
slug
riser system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP13174514.3A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Esmaeil Jahanshahi
Sigurd SKOGESTAD
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Priority to EP13174514.3A priority Critical patent/EP2821588A1/en
Publication of EP2821588A1 publication Critical patent/EP2821588A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/12Methods or apparatus for controlling the flow of the obtained fluid to or in wells
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/01Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells specially adapted for obtaining from underwater installations

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a pipeline-riser system, in particular to a pipeline-riser system comprising an anti-slug valve. Moreover, the invention relates to a method of operating a pipeline-riser system. Furthermore, the invention relates to a program element to and a computer readable medium.
  • pipeline-riser systems are used.
  • subsea pipelines are used to transport the multiphase mixture of oil, gas and water from producing wells to the processing facilities.
  • Several kilometers of pipeline run on the seabed ending with risers to top-side platforms. Therefore, in new field developments, multiphase transport technology and flow assurance become more important.
  • depleted reservoirs have low pressures to push the fluid along the pipeline, and they are prone to flow instabilities. Liquids tend to accumulate at places with lower elevation, and can block the gas flow in the pipe. In low flow rate conditions, this blockage leads to a slugging flow regime called terrain slugging.
  • the flow condition is called “severe slugging” or “riser-slugging”.
  • the severe-slugging flow is also characterized by large oscillatory variations in pressure and flow rates.
  • the oscillatory flow condition in offshore multiphase pipelines is undesirable and an effective solution is needed to suppress it.
  • One way to prevent this behavior is reducing the opening of a choke valve arranged at the top-side of the riser.
  • this conventional solution increases the back pressure of the valve, and it reduces the production rate from the oil wells.
  • the recommended solution to maintain a non-oscillatory flow regime together with the maximum possible production rate is active control of the topside choke valve.
  • Measurements such as pressure, flow rate or fluid density are used as the controlled variables and the top-side choke valve is the manipulated variable.
  • existing anti-slug control systems are typically not robust in practice and the closed-loop system becomes unstable after some time, because of inflow disturbances or plant changes.
  • a pipeline-riser system which comprises a pipeline portion, an anti-slug valve, and a riser portion, wherein the pipeline portion is connected to the riser portion at a joining point; and wherein the anti-slug valve is arranged in proximity to the joining point.
  • the pipeline-riser system may be an undersea pipeline-riser system, e.g. for offshore oil production.
  • the pipeline section is arranged upstream of the riser portion.
  • the anti-slug valve may be arranged in the pipeline portion, the riser portion or at the joining point which is different to the known arrangement of anti-slug valves which are typically located at the topside platform.
  • the anti-slug valve may form the joining point or may be arranged at a base of the riser portion.
  • a method of slug controlling in a pipeline-riser system comprising an anti-slug valve arranged in proximity to a joining point of a pipeline portion and a riser portion of the pipeline-riser system is provided, wherein the method comprises controlling the anti-slug valve by a control signal generated based on a measured signal indicative for a flow of a fluid through the pipeline-riser system.
  • a program element which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method according to an exemplary aspect.
  • a computer-readable medium in which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method according to an exemplary aspect.
  • pipeline portion may particularly denote a portion of a tube system adapted to convey fluids, e.g. natural gas, crude oil or a multiphase fluid and which is arranged substantially horizontal or following the contour of the terrain, e.g. a subsea floor.
  • a pipeline portion has to be distinguished from a riser portion of a pipeline-riser system.
  • riser portion may particularly denote a portion of the tube system which is arranged substantially vertical or at least does not follow a contour of the terrain.
  • the riser portions may be that portions of a subsea tube arrangement, which are adapted to convey crude oil from the sea level to the surface, e.g. by pumping up the crude oil or multiphase fluid.
  • anti-slug valve may particularly denote a valve which is adapted or suitable to reduce or avoid slugging in a conveying pipeline-riser system.
  • the anti-slug valve may be controllable or may be have a preset throughput of a fluid, e.g. crude oil.
  • the term "proximity to the joining point” may particularly denote a point which is closer to the joining point than to other prominent points, like the top of the well where the pipeline section is connected to the well or the upper or top-side of the riser where the riser is connected to an outlet or to a further pipeline. That is, the anti-slug valve may particularly be arranged closer to the joining point than to the well head of a subsea well and/or a top-side of the riser portion.
  • anti-slug valves at the two positions i.e. in proximity to the joining point and at the top-side of the riser provide a substantially equal operation range.
  • the provision of an anti-slug valve at the joining point of the (subsea) pipeline portion and the riser portion may allow for using a common top-side (choke) valve for other controlling than slugging control, e.g. for absolute flow rate control or safety and shutdown purposes, and thus may allow for a production optimization.
  • the anti-slug valve comprises a control interface adapted to receive control signals.
  • control signal may be suitable or may be adapted to modify or change a throughput of the anti-slug valve, e.g. by increasing or decreasing an aperture of the anti-slug valve, for example formed by a choke valve or the like.
  • the pipeline-riser system further comprises a processing unit, wherein the processing unit is adapted to generate control signals adapted to control a throughput of the anti-slug valve.
  • the processing unit may be a computer or computer unit.
  • the pipeline-riser system further comprises a sensor unit arranged in connection to the pipeline-riser system and adapted to measure values of flow parameters.
  • the flow parameters may be a pressure, flow rate of a fluid flowing through the pipeline-riser system or a fluid density.
  • a suitable control signal may be achievable since these parameters describe at least partially the flowing regime and flowing behavior of the multiphase fluid.
  • the sensor unit is arranged downstream of the anti-slug valve.
  • the sensor unit may thus measure the values of flow parameters at a position downstream of the anti-slug valve.
  • the anti-slug valve is arranged at a position having a distance to the joining point, wherein the distance is smaller than five lengths of the riser portion.
  • the distance may be smaller than three lengths of the riser portion, more particular smaller than one length or even smaller than half the length of the riser portion.
  • the distance may be smaller than a fifth of the length of the riser portion, more preferably smaller than a tenth of the length of the riser portion.
  • the length of the riser portion may particularly be defined from the joining point to the surface of the sea or to a further joining point at which a further horizontal pipeline section is attached to the riser portion.
  • the anti-slug valve is arranged at a position having a distance to the joining point which is lower than 1000 m.
  • the distance may be in the range of 0 m to 500 m, more particularly in the range of 0 m to 250 m or, even more particularly in the range of 0 m to 100 m, most particular in the range between 0 m and 50 m or even in the range between 0 m and 10 m or in the range between 0 m and 5 m.
  • a ratio of a volume of the pipeline portion from the anti-slug valve to the joining point and a volume of the riser portion is below ten.
  • the ratio of volumes may be another possibility to define the distance or proximity.
  • the ratio may be below 7, more particular below 5, even more particular below 2.5.
  • the ratio may be between 0 and 1 or even between 0 and 0.5.
  • the method further comprises measuring values of a process parameter which is indicative of the flow of a fluid through the pipeline-riser system.
  • the respective measured values may be included in the measured or measurement signal.
  • the measured variables may be a pressure or a timely behavior of pressure of the fluid flowing through the pipeline, a volumetric flow rate or mass flow rate, a flowing rate, an oscillation frequency of timely variation of a pressure. All these variables may be measured in particular from the subsea pipeline, i.e. from the pipeline portion or at the top-side of the riser portion or section.
  • the method further comprises generating the control signal based on the measured signal.
  • the control signal may be generated by a control unit and/or processing unit, like a computer.
  • a gist of an exemplary embodiment may be seen in providing an anti-slug valve for an undersea pipeline-riser system, wherein the anti-slug valve comprises a control interface and is adapted to be mounted between an undersea pipeline of the pipeline-riser system and a riser of the pipeline-riser system.
  • the anti-slug valve may be arranged close to the joining point of a pipeline portion and a riser portion of the pipeline-riser system, e.g. in particular, before the riser section in which a riser slugging occurs. It has been found out that although the anti-slug valve is thus arranged before or at least at the beginning of the riser section it may be possible to decrease the probability of riser slugging and/or the amount of riser slugging.
  • the anti-slug valve may be a choke valve.
  • the term "anti-slug valve” may particularly denote a valve, e.g. a choke valve, which is adapted to control a flow through a pipeline, in particular, to prevent or at least reduce the probability of an oscillatory flow regime.
  • the anti-slug valve may be adapted to be controlled by a control signal, wherein the controlling may be provided by increasing or decreasing a flow rate through the anti-slug valve, e.g. by opening or closing an aperture of the anti-slug valve.
  • Fig. 1 shows a simplified experimental set-up.
  • Fig. 1 shows a simplified pipeline-riser system 100 comprising a fluid reservoir 101 for simulating an oilfield for example.
  • the fluid reservoir is connected via a pump 102 (simulating the pressure the crude oil in the oil field is exposed to) and a water flow meter 103 to a mixing point 104.
  • an air flow meter 105 is connected to an air buffer tank 106 having a pressure of P 1 or P in .
  • the air buffer tank 106 is connected to the mixing point 104 via a safety valve 107 and is used in the experiment to simulate gas expansion of a very long pipeline (corresponding to a real pipeline-riser system).
  • the mixing point 104 corresponds in principle to the well head of a real offshore pipeline-riser system.
  • the water/air fluid has a pressure of P 3 and is pumped through a pipeline portion or section 108 which is arranged substantially horizontal.
  • a subsea valve 109 is arranged which may form an anti-slug valve of the experimental set-up.
  • the multiphase (water/air) fluid has a pressure of P rb (pressure at riser bottom) or P 4 .
  • a riser of the pipeline-riser system 100 is formed by a framework structure to which the riser portion 110 is attached for simulating the riser portion of a real pipeline-riser system.
  • the riser portion 110 and the pipeline portion 108 are joined at a joining point 113.
  • a top-side valve 111 is connected to the riser 110 simulating a common top-side valve which is typically used for slugging control.
  • the multiphase fluid has a pressure of P rt (pressure at riser top) or P 2 .
  • the multiphase fluid is conveyed to a separator 112 in which the air phase is separated from the water phase which is recycled and conveyed back to the water reservoir 101.
  • Fig. 2 shows a schematic piper-riser system for simulation.
  • the schematic pipeline-riser system 200 may be used in a simulation of the experimental set-up of Fig. 1 and forms a well-pipeline-riser model.
  • a reservoir 201 is defined which has a pressure of P bh (pressure at bottom hole).
  • a well 213 is defined simulating a real well and connected at the upper end to a wellhead valve 214 at which a pressure of P wh (pressure at wellhead) is present.
  • the wellhead valve 214 may form a first anti-slug valve which is analysed in simulation and is thus also labelled Z 3 in Fig. 2 .
  • the wellhead valve 214 After the wellhead valve 214 the pressure of the multiphase fluid is described by P in (pressure at inlet).
  • the wellhead valve 214 is connected to a pipeline portion 208 which is simulated to be substantially horizontal.
  • a subsea valve or riser-base valve 209 is arranged and at which the multiphase fluid pressure is described by P rb (pressure at riser bottom).
  • the subsea valve 209 may be used as an anti-slug valve and is thus also labelled by Z 2 .
  • a riser 210 is defined in the simulation at the top-side of which a tops-side valve 211 is defined.
  • a pressure at the top-side valve 211 is described by P rt (pressure at riser top).
  • the top-side valve 211 may also be used as an anti-slug valve and is thus also labelled by Z 1 .
  • Fig. 3 shows some simulation results as a comparison of the effects of a slugging control using a top-side valve (left side of Fig. 3 ) and subsea valve (right side of Fig. 3 ) by showing the so called bifurcations diagrams, describing the steady-state and the dynamics of this system.
  • Fig. 3 shows the results of a simulation used to compare a simplified simulation model to experiments and simulations using the OLGA model.
  • Fig. 3A shows the pressure P in at the inlet of the pipeline vs. the top-side valve opening (Z 3 ) in percent.
  • Fig. 3B shows the pressure P rt at the top of riser vs. the top-side valve opening (Z 3 ) in percent.
  • Fig. 3 shows the pressure P rt at the top of riser vs. the top-side valve opening (Z 3 ) in percent.
  • FIG. 3C shows the pressure P in at the inlet of the pipeline vs. the subsea valve opening (Z 2 ) in percent.
  • Fig. 3D shows the pressure P rt at the top of riser vs. the subsea valve opening (Z 2 ) in percent.
  • Fig. 3 the simplified model (thin solid lines; 301, 302, 303) is compared to the experiments (bold solid lines; 304, 305, 306) and the OLGA model (dashed lines; 307, 308, 309).
  • Figs. 3A and 3B top-side valve used for slugging control
  • the system has a stable (non-slug) flow when the topside valve opening Z 3 is smaller than 15%, and it switches to slugging flow conditions for Z 3 > 15%.
  • Figs. 3A and 3B three lines for each of the three experiment/models for slugging conditions are shown.
  • the steady-state at slugging condition ( Z 3 > 15%) is unstable, but it can be stabilized by using control.
  • Figs. 3C and 3D subsea valve used for slugging control
  • the system has a stable (non-slug) flow when the subsea valve opening Z 2 is smaller than 8%, and it switches to slugging flow conditions for Z 2 > 8%.
  • three lines for each of the three experiment/models for slugging conditions are shown. They represent the minimum (301 for experiment, 304 for simple model and 307 for OLGA model) of the oscillations, the maximum (302 for experiment, 305 for simple model and 308 for OLGA model) of the oscillations and the steady-state (303 for experiment, 306 for simple model and 309 for OLGA model).
  • the steady-state at slugging condition ( Z 2 > 8%) can be stabilized by using control.
  • the OLGA model it was more difficult to capture both steady-state and the dynamics for the subsea choke valve at the same time.
  • the coefficient of discharge of the subsea valve it was possible to get the critical valve opening correct.
  • a subsea valve arranged close to the basis of a riser portion in a pipeline-riser system may be a suitable candidate for anti-slug control or as an anti-slug valve which at least show similar results as the use of a top-side valve for slugging control.
  • a common top-side valve may be used for different control or adjusting processes, e.g. for absolute flow rate control or safety and shutdown purposes, and thus may allow for a production optimization.

Abstract

A pipeline-riser system (100) is provided which comprises a pipeline portion (108), an anti-slug valve (109), and a riser portion (110), wherein the pipeline portion is connected to the riser portion at a joining point (113); and wherein the anti-slug valve is arranged in proximity to the joining point.

Description

    Field of invention
  • The present invention relates to a pipeline-riser system, in particular to a pipeline-riser system comprising an anti-slug valve. Moreover, the invention relates to a method of operating a pipeline-riser system. Furthermore, the invention relates to a program element to and a computer readable medium.
  • Art Background
  • In the field of offshore oil production often pipeline-riser systems are used. In particular, at offshore oilfields, subsea pipelines are used to transport the multiphase mixture of oil, gas and water from producing wells to the processing facilities. Several kilometers of pipeline run on the seabed ending with risers to top-side platforms. Therefore, in new field developments, multiphase transport technology and flow assurance become more important. Especially, depleted reservoirs have low pressures to push the fluid along the pipeline, and they are prone to flow instabilities. Liquids tend to accumulate at places with lower elevation, and can block the gas flow in the pipe. In low flow rate conditions, this blockage leads to a slugging flow regime called terrain slugging.
  • If the oscillating frequencies or the corresponding wavelengths of slugs are comparable to the length of the riser, the flow condition is called "severe slugging" or "riser-slugging". The severe-slugging flow is also characterized by large oscillatory variations in pressure and flow rates. The oscillatory flow condition in offshore multiphase pipelines is undesirable and an effective solution is needed to suppress it. One way to prevent this behavior is reducing the opening of a choke valve arranged at the top-side of the riser. However, this conventional solution increases the back pressure of the valve, and it reduces the production rate from the oil wells. The recommended solution to maintain a non-oscillatory flow regime together with the maximum possible production rate is active control of the topside choke valve. Measurements such as pressure, flow rate or fluid density are used as the controlled variables and the top-side choke valve is the manipulated variable. However, existing anti-slug control systems are typically not robust in practice and the closed-loop system becomes unstable after some time, because of inflow disturbances or plant changes.
  • Thus, there may be a need for providing a pipeline-riser system showing a low probability of slugging and a method of operating the same.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • This need may be met by a pipeline-riser system, a method of operating a pipeline-riser system, a program element to and a computer readable medium according to the independent claims. Further embodiments are described in the dependent claims.
  • According to an exemplary aspect a pipeline-riser system is provided which comprises a pipeline portion, an anti-slug valve, and a riser portion, wherein the pipeline portion is connected to the riser portion at a joining point; and wherein the anti-slug valve is arranged in proximity to the joining point.
  • In particular, the pipeline-riser system may be an undersea pipeline-riser system, e.g. for offshore oil production. For example, the pipeline section is arranged upstream of the riser portion. In particular, the anti-slug valve may be arranged in the pipeline portion, the riser portion or at the joining point which is different to the known arrangement of anti-slug valves which are typically located at the topside platform. For example, the anti-slug valve may form the joining point or may be arranged at a base of the riser portion.
  • According to another exemplary aspect a method of slug controlling in a pipeline-riser system comprising an anti-slug valve arranged in proximity to a joining point of a pipeline portion and a riser portion of the pipeline-riser system is provided, wherein the method comprises controlling the anti-slug valve by a control signal generated based on a measured signal indicative for a flow of a fluid through the pipeline-riser system.
  • According to an exemplary aspect a program element is provided, which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method according to an exemplary aspect.
  • According to an exemplary aspect a computer-readable medium is provided, in which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method according to an exemplary aspect.
  • The term "pipeline portion" may particularly denote a portion of a tube system adapted to convey fluids, e.g. natural gas, crude oil or a multiphase fluid and which is arranged substantially horizontal or following the contour of the terrain, e.g. a subsea floor. A pipeline portion has to be distinguished from a riser portion of a pipeline-riser system.
  • The term "riser portion" may particularly denote a portion of the tube system which is arranged substantially vertical or at least does not follow a contour of the terrain. In particular, the riser portions may be that portions of a subsea tube arrangement, which are adapted to convey crude oil from the sea level to the surface, e.g. by pumping up the crude oil or multiphase fluid.
  • The term "anti-slug valve" may particularly denote a valve which is adapted or suitable to reduce or avoid slugging in a conveying pipeline-riser system. In particular, the anti-slug valve may be controllable or may be have a preset throughput of a fluid, e.g. crude oil.
  • The term "proximity to the joining point" may particularly denote a point which is closer to the joining point than to other prominent points, like the top of the well where the pipeline section is connected to the well or the upper or top-side of the riser where the riser is connected to an outlet or to a further pipeline. That is, the anti-slug valve may particularly be arranged closer to the joining point than to the well head of a subsea well and/or a top-side of the riser portion.
  • Surprisingly the inventors have found out by experiments using a test rig and performing simulations that an anti-slug valve while arranged before or at the beginning of a riser portion, in which riser slugging occurs, allows for reducing or even eliminating slugging during conveying of fluids through the pipeline-riser system.
  • Experiments have shown that anti-slug valves at the two positions, i.e. in proximity to the joining point and at the top-side of the riser provide a substantially equal operation range. Thus, it may be possible to provide a more robust anti-slug control and/or a more robust slug control and therefore an improved oil production when providing an anti-slug valve at or close to the joining point of the pipeline portion and the riser portion. Furthermore, the provision of an anti-slug valve at the joining point of the (subsea) pipeline portion and the riser portion may allow for using a common top-side (choke) valve for other controlling than slugging control, e.g. for absolute flow rate control or safety and shutdown purposes, and thus may allow for a production optimization.
  • Next further embodiments of the pipeline-riser system will be described. However, these embodiments also apply to the method of operating a pipeline-riser system, to the program element and to the computer readable medium.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment of the pipeline-riser system the anti-slug valve comprises a control interface adapted to receive control signals.
  • In particular, the control signal may be suitable or may be adapted to modify or change a throughput of the anti-slug valve, e.g. by increasing or decreasing an aperture of the anti-slug valve, for example formed by a choke valve or the like. By providing a controllable anti-slug valve it may be possible to even further increase the anti-slugging control and/or to provide a higher rate of crude oil production or conveying through the pipeline-riser system.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment the pipeline-riser system further comprises a processing unit, wherein the processing unit is adapted to generate control signals adapted to control a throughput of the anti-slug valve. In particular, the processing unit may be a computer or computer unit.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment the pipeline-riser system further comprises a sensor unit arranged in connection to the pipeline-riser system and adapted to measure values of flow parameters.
  • In particular, the flow parameters may be a pressure, flow rate of a fluid flowing through the pipeline-riser system or a fluid density. By using these parameters a suitable control signal may be achievable since these parameters describe at least partially the flowing regime and flowing behavior of the multiphase fluid.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment of the pipeline-riser system the sensor unit is arranged downstream of the anti-slug valve. In particular, the sensor unit may thus measure the values of flow parameters at a position downstream of the anti-slug valve.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment of the pipeline-riser system the anti-slug valve is arranged at a position having a distance to the joining point, wherein the distance is smaller than five lengths of the riser portion.
  • In particular, the distance may be smaller than three lengths of the riser portion, more particular smaller than one length or even smaller than half the length of the riser portion. Preferably the distance may be smaller than a fifth of the length of the riser portion, more preferably smaller than a tenth of the length of the riser portion. The length of the riser portion may particularly be defined from the joining point to the surface of the sea or to a further joining point at which a further horizontal pipeline section is attached to the riser portion.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment of the pipeline-riser system the anti-slug valve is arranged at a position having a distance to the joining point which is lower than 1000 m. In particular, the distance may be in the range of 0 m to 500 m, more particularly in the range of 0 m to 250 m or, even more particularly in the range of 0 m to 100 m, most particular in the range between 0 m and 50 m or even in the range between 0 m and 10 m or in the range between 0 m and 5 m.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment of the pipeline-riser system a ratio of a volume of the pipeline portion from the anti-slug valve to the joining point and a volume of the riser portion is below ten.
  • The ratio of volumes may be another possibility to define the distance or proximity. In particular, the ratio may be below 7, more particular below 5, even more particular below 2.5. Preferably the ratio may be between 0 and 1 or even between 0 and 0.5.
  • Next further embodiments of the method of operating a pipeline-riser system will be described. However, these embodiments also apply to the pipeline-riser system, to the program element and to the computer readable medium.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment the method further comprises measuring values of a process parameter which is indicative of the flow of a fluid through the pipeline-riser system.
  • For example, the respective measured values may be included in the measured or measurement signal. In particular, the measured variables may be a pressure or a timely behavior of pressure of the fluid flowing through the pipeline, a volumetric flow rate or mass flow rate, a flowing rate, an oscillation frequency of timely variation of a pressure. All these variables may be measured in particular from the subsea pipeline, i.e. from the pipeline portion or at the top-side of the riser portion or section.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment the method further comprises generating the control signal based on the measured signal. For example, the control signal may be generated by a control unit and/or processing unit, like a computer.
  • In particular, a gist of an exemplary embodiment may be seen in providing an anti-slug valve for an undersea pipeline-riser system, wherein the anti-slug valve comprises a control interface and is adapted to be mounted between an undersea pipeline of the pipeline-riser system and a riser of the pipeline-riser system. The anti-slug valve may be arranged close to the joining point of a pipeline portion and a riser portion of the pipeline-riser system, e.g. in particular, before the riser section in which a riser slugging occurs. It has been found out that although the anti-slug valve is thus arranged before or at least at the beginning of the riser section it may be possible to decrease the probability of riser slugging and/or the amount of riser slugging.
  • In particular, the anti-slug valve may be a choke valve. The term "anti-slug valve" may particularly denote a valve, e.g. a choke valve, which is adapted to control a flow through a pipeline, in particular, to prevent or at least reduce the probability of an oscillatory flow regime. In particular, the anti-slug valve may be adapted to be controlled by a control signal, wherein the controlling may be provided by increasing or decreasing a flow rate through the anti-slug valve, e.g. by opening or closing an aperture of the anti-slug valve.
  • The aspects defined above and further aspects of the present invention are apparent from the examples of embodiment to be described hereinafter and are explained with reference to the examples of embodiment. The invention will be described in more detail hereinafter with reference to examples of embodiment, but to which the invention is not limited.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
  • Fig. 1
    shows a simplified experimental set-up.
    Fig. 2
    shows a schematic piper-riser system for simulation.
    Fig. 3
    shows some simulation results.
    Detailed Description
  • The illustration in the drawing is schematically. It is noted that in different figures, similar or identical elements may be provided with the same reference signs or with reference signs, which are different from the corresponding reference signs only within the first digit.
  • Fig. 1 shows a simplified experimental set-up. In particular, Fig. 1 shows a simplified pipeline-riser system 100 comprising a fluid reservoir 101 for simulating an oilfield for example. The fluid reservoir is connected via a pump 102 (simulating the pressure the crude oil in the oil field is exposed to) and a water flow meter 103 to a mixing point 104. Furthermore, an air flow meter 105 is connected to an air buffer tank 106 having a pressure of P1 or Pin. The air buffer tank 106 is connected to the mixing point 104 via a safety valve 107 and is used in the experiment to simulate gas expansion of a very long pipeline (corresponding to a real pipeline-riser system). The mixing point 104 corresponds in principle to the well head of a real offshore pipeline-riser system. At the mixing point the water/air fluid has a pressure of P3 and is pumped through a pipeline portion or section 108 which is arranged substantially horizontal. Close or at the other end of the pipeline portion 108 a subsea valve 109 is arranged which may form an anti-slug valve of the experimental set-up. At the subsea valve 109 the multiphase (water/air) fluid has a pressure of Prb (pressure at riser bottom) or P4.
  • In the experimental set-up of Fig. 1 a riser of the pipeline-riser system 100 is formed by a framework structure to which the riser portion 110 is attached for simulating the riser portion of a real pipeline-riser system. The riser portion 110 and the pipeline portion 108 are joined at a joining point 113. At top of the framework structure a top-side valve 111 is connected to the riser 110 simulating a common top-side valve which is typically used for slugging control. At the top-side the multiphase fluid has a pressure of Prt (pressure at riser top) or P2. After the top-side valve the multiphase fluid is conveyed to a separator 112 in which the air phase is separated from the water phase which is recycled and conveyed back to the water reservoir 101.
  • Fig. 2 shows a schematic piper-riser system for simulation. In particular, the schematic pipeline-riser system 200 may be used in a simulation of the experimental set-up of Fig. 1 and forms a well-pipeline-riser model. In the simulation, e.g. a simulation with the known OLGA tool a reservoir 201 is defined which has a pressure of Pbh (pressure at bottom hole). Furthermore, a well 213 is defined simulating a real well and connected at the upper end to a wellhead valve 214 at which a pressure of Pwh (pressure at wellhead) is present. The wellhead valve 214 may form a first anti-slug valve which is analysed in simulation and is thus also labelled Z3 in Fig. 2. After the wellhead valve 214 the pressure of the multiphase fluid is described by Pin (pressure at inlet). The wellhead valve 214 is connected to a pipeline portion 208 which is simulated to be substantially horizontal. At a joining point 215 a subsea valve or riser-base valve 209 is arranged and at which the multiphase fluid pressure is described by Prb (pressure at riser bottom). The subsea valve 209 may be used as an anti-slug valve and is thus also labelled by Z2. Furthermore, a riser 210 is defined in the simulation at the top-side of which a tops-side valve 211 is defined. A pressure at the top-side valve 211 is described by Prt (pressure at riser top). The top-side valve 211 may also be used as an anti-slug valve and is thus also labelled by Z1.
  • In the simulation in particular the above described pressure values (Pbh, Pwh, Pin, Prb and Prt) may be used as control variables.
  • Fig. 3 shows some simulation results as a comparison of the effects of a slugging control using a top-side valve (left side of Fig. 3) and subsea valve (right side of Fig. 3) by showing the so called bifurcations diagrams, describing the steady-state and the dynamics of this system. In particular, Fig. 3 shows the results of a simulation used to compare a simplified simulation model to experiments and simulations using the OLGA model. Fig. 3A shows the pressure Pin at the inlet of the pipeline vs. the top-side valve opening (Z3) in percent. Fig. 3B shows the pressure Prt at the top of riser vs. the top-side valve opening (Z3) in percent. Fig. 3C shows the pressure Pin at the inlet of the pipeline vs. the subsea valve opening (Z2) in percent. Fig. 3D shows the pressure Prt at the top of riser vs. the subsea valve opening (Z2) in percent.
  • In the whole Fig. 3 the simplified model (thin solid lines; 301, 302, 303) is compared to the experiments (bold solid lines; 304, 305, 306) and the OLGA model (dashed lines; 307, 308, 309). In Figs. 3A and 3B (top-side valve used for slugging control), the system has a stable (non-slug) flow when the topside valve opening Z3 is smaller than 15%, and it switches to slugging flow conditions for Z3 > 15%. In each of the Figs. 3A and 3B three lines for each of the three experiment/models for slugging conditions are shown. They represent the minimum (301 for experiment, 304 for simple model and 307 for OLGA model) of the oscillations, the maximum (302 for experiment, 305 for simple model and 308 for OLGA model) of the oscillations and the steady-state (303 for experiment, 306 for simple model and 309 for OLGA model). The steady-state at slugging condition (Z 3 > 15%) is unstable, but it can be stabilized by using control.
  • In Figs. 3C and 3D (subsea valve used for slugging control), the system has a stable (non-slug) flow when the subsea valve opening Z2 is smaller than 8%, and it switches to slugging flow conditions for Z2 > 8%. In each of the Figs. 3C and 3D as well three lines for each of the three experiment/models for slugging conditions are shown. They represent the minimum (301 for experiment, 304 for simple model and 307 for OLGA model) of the oscillations, the maximum (302 for experiment, 305 for simple model and 308 for OLGA model) of the oscillations and the steady-state (303 for experiment, 306 for simple model and 309 for OLGA model). The steady-state at slugging condition (Z 2 > 8%) can be stabilized by using control. Thus according to the simulations the critical valve opening for the subsea valve is Z 2 = 8% as shown in Fig. 3C and Fig. 3D. With the OLGA model it was more difficult to capture both steady-state and the dynamics for the subsea choke valve at the same time. However, by adjusting the coefficient of discharge of the subsea valve it was possible to get the critical valve opening correct.
  • Summarizing, the experimental results and the two models all show that by using a subsea valve arranged close to the basis of a riser portion in a pipeline-riser system may be a suitable candidate for anti-slug control or as an anti-slug valve which at least show similar results as the use of a top-side valve for slugging control. By using the subsea valve for slugging control a common top-side valve may be used for different control or adjusting processes, e.g. for absolute flow rate control or safety and shutdown purposes, and thus may allow for a production optimization.
  • It should be noted that the term "comprising" does not exclude other elements or steps and "a" or "an" does not exclude a plurality. Also elements described in association with different embodiments may be combined. It should also be noted that reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims.

Claims (13)

  1. A pipeline-riser system (100) comprising:
    a pipeline portion (108);
    an anti-slug valve (109); and
    a riser portion (110);
    wherein the pipeline portion (108) is connected to the riser portion (110) at a joining point (113); and
    wherein the anti-slug valve (108) is arranged in proximity to the joining point (113).
  2. The pipeline-riser system (100) according to claim 1,
    wherein the anti-slug valve (109) comprises a control interface adapted to receive control signals.
  3. The pipeline-riser system (100) according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising a processing unit, wherein the processing unit is adapted to generate control signals adapted to control a throughput of the anti-slug valve.
  4. The pipeline-riser system (100) according to any one of the claims 1 to 3, further comprising:
    a sensor unit arranged in connection to the pipeline-riser system (100) and adapted to measure values of flow parameters.
  5. The pipeline-riser system (100) according to claim 4, wherein the sensor unit is arranged downstream of the anti-slug-valve.
  6. The pipeline-riser system (100) according to any one of the claims 1 to 5, wherein the anti-slug valve (109) is arranged at a position having a distance to the joining point (113), wherein the distance is smaller than five lengths of the riser portion (110).
  7. The pipeline-riser system (100) according to any one of the claims 1 to 6, wherein the anti-slug valve (109) is arranged at a position having a distance to the joining point (113) which is lower than 1000 m.
  8. The pipeline-riser system (100) according to any one of the claims 1 to 7, wherein a ratio of a volume of the pipeline portion from the anti-slug valve to the joining point and a volume of the riser portion is below ten.
  9. A method of slug controlling in a pipeline-riser system (100) comprising an anti-slug valve (109) arranged in proximity to a joining point (113) of a pipeline portion (108) and a riser portion (110) of the pipeline-riser system (100), wherein the method comprises:
    controlling the anti-slug valve (109) by a control signal generated based on a measured signal indicative for a flow of a fluid through the pipeline-riser system (100).
  10. The method according to claim 9, further comprising:
    measuring values of a process parameter which is indicative of the flow of a fluid through the pipeline-riser system (100).
  11. The method according to claim 9 or 10, further comprising:
    generating the control signal based on the measured signal.
  12. A program element, which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method according to any one of the claims 9 to 11.
  13. A computer-readable medium, in which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method according to any one of the claims 9 to 11.
EP13174514.3A 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 Pipeline-riser system and method of operating the same Withdrawn EP2821588A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13174514.3A EP2821588A1 (en) 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 Pipeline-riser system and method of operating the same

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13174514.3A EP2821588A1 (en) 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 Pipeline-riser system and method of operating the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2821588A1 true EP2821588A1 (en) 2015-01-07

Family

ID=48699649

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13174514.3A Withdrawn EP2821588A1 (en) 2013-07-01 2013-07-01 Pipeline-riser system and method of operating the same

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2821588A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016180968A1 (en) * 2015-05-13 2016-11-17 Norwegian University Of Science And Technology (Ntnu) Control system for controlling a dynamic system
US10865635B2 (en) 2017-03-14 2020-12-15 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Llc Method of controlling a gas vent system for horizontal wells

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100132800A1 (en) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling fluctuations in multiphase flow production lines

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100132800A1 (en) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling fluctuations in multiphase flow production lines

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ESMAEIL JAHANSHAHI: "Anti-slug control experiment", 24 April 2013 (2013-04-24), pages 1 - 5, XP055093249, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:www.nt.ntnu.no/users/skoge/.../Slug-rig-Instruction%20Manual2.docx‎> [retrieved on 20131213] *
JAHANSHAHI E ET AL: "Anti-slug control experiments using nonlinear observers", 2013 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, IEEE, 17 June 2013 (2013-06-17), pages 1056 - 1062, XP032476135, ISSN: 0743-1619, ISBN: 978-1-4799-0177-7, [retrieved on 20130814] *
MATS LIEUNGH: "Stabilizing Slug Control Using Subsea Choke Valve", 7 June 2012 (2012-06-07), XP055093244, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-18525> [retrieved on 20131213] *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016180968A1 (en) * 2015-05-13 2016-11-17 Norwegian University Of Science And Technology (Ntnu) Control system for controlling a dynamic system
US10865635B2 (en) 2017-03-14 2020-12-15 Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Llc Method of controlling a gas vent system for horizontal wells

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9470076B2 (en) Systems and methods for production of gas wells
CN101084363B (en) Method, system, controller for controlling the flow of a multiphase fluid
Xie et al. The influence of backpressure on severe slugging in multiphase flow pipeline-riser systems
EP3339565A1 (en) Systems and methods for assessing production and/or injection system startup
US20160138372A1 (en) Method of using a surface jet pump to mitigate severe slugging in pipes and risers
EP2821588A1 (en) Pipeline-riser system and method of operating the same
WO2018170004A1 (en) Method of controlling a gas vent system for horizontal wells
CA2943065C (en) Vapor blow through avoidance in oil production
EA038439B1 (en) Method and arrangement for operating an extraction of a fluid in a borehole
US9982846B2 (en) Method and system for controlling hydrodynamic slugging in a fluid processing system
EP2821587A1 (en) Method of operating a pipeline-riser system
US10907450B2 (en) Surface pressure controlled gas vent system for horizontal wells
Martins da Silva et al. Dynamic multiphase flow models for control
Omowunmi et al. Methodology for characterising slugs and operational mitigation strategy using OLGA slug tracking module-Egina Deepwater Project
Sevic et al. Simulation of temperature-pressure profiles and wax deposition in gas-lift wells
US11649704B2 (en) Processes and systems for injection of a liquid and gas mixture into a well
Oliemans Multiphase science and technology for oil/gas production and transport
US10024499B2 (en) Method and system for controlling slugging in a fluid processing system
Fong et al. Increasing production by applying simple/robust, field proven slug control technology
Park et al. Experimental investigation of severe slugging in vertical riser and its mitigation with inlet choke control
Sagatun Riser slugging: A mathematical model and the practical consequences
WO2020263098A1 (en) Optimisation of water injection for liquid hydrocarbon production
Setyadi et al. Åsgard subsea compression and predictions of liquid surges
US20230408043A1 (en) Multiphase flow instability control
Liknes Jet pump

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130701

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20150708