EP2816557A1 - Identifying spurious signals in audio signals - Google Patents
Identifying spurious signals in audio signals Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2816557A1 EP2816557A1 EP20130173079 EP13173079A EP2816557A1 EP 2816557 A1 EP2816557 A1 EP 2816557A1 EP 20130173079 EP20130173079 EP 20130173079 EP 13173079 A EP13173079 A EP 13173079A EP 2816557 A1 EP2816557 A1 EP 2816557A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- audio signal
- level
- audio
- predetermined frequency
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000005236 sound signal Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 68
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003990 capacitor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Speech or voice signal processing techniques to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/02—Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
- G10L21/0208—Noise filtering
Definitions
- the disclosure relates to a system and method (generally referred to as a "system") for processing signals, in particular for identifying spurious signals in audio signals.
- system a system and method for processing signals, in particular for identifying spurious signals in audio signals.
- An audio signal may be a composite signal containing features that are attributable to noise and features that are attributable to the desired signal.
- the features of the composite signal that are noise may be distinguished from the features of the composite signal that are attributable to the desired signal.
- Features that have been identified as noise can then be removed or reduced from the composite signal.
- noise may be relatively constant background noise and spurious signals, for example in a high frequency portion of the audio frequency spectrum.
- spurious signals may be generated internally by an audio reception system that may employ demodulation of a high-frequency carrier and decoding of the demodulated signals.
- These spurious internal signals are commonly referred to as birdies.
- Common approaches for detecting and overriding birdies in digital audio signal transmission includes attenuating demodulated and decoded audio signals in a frequency selective manner and superimposing substitute signals on the audio signals in frequency selective manner as a function of the data error statistics of the digital signal in order to improve the subjective auditory perception of the audio signal.
- a method for identifying a spurious signal in an audio signal includes: receiving at least one audio signal having a frequency spectrum, the at least one audio signal being derived from at least one digital signal; spectrally analyzing the at least one audio signal; determining the presence of a spurious signal, if a rate of increase of the audio level in a predetermined frequency region of the frequency spectrum exceeds a predetermined value and if a threshold value of the audio level is exceeded; and providing a trigger signal for attenuating the predetermined frequency portion of the at least one audio signal if the presence of a spurious signal is determined.
- a system for identifying a spurious signal in an audio signal which is derived from a digital signal includes: a receiver block configured to receive at least one audio signal having a frequency spectrum, the at least one audio signal being derived from at least one digital signal; a analyzing block configured to spectrally analyze the reproduced audio signal; a detector block configured to determine the presence of a spurious signal, if a rate of increase of the audio level in a predetermined frequency region of the frequency spectrum exceeds a predetermined value and if a threshold value of the audio level is exceeded, and to provide a trigger signal for attenuating the predetermined frequency portion of the at least one audio signal if the presence of a spurious signal is determined.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a digital audio broadcast receiver system 10 that allows for reducing noise in demodulated and decoded digital audio signals.
- System 10 comprises an antenna 11 for receiving a frequency carrier that is modulated with a coded digital audio signal.
- Antenna 11 is coupled to a front end receiver block 12, which is configured to derive by way of demodulation an intermediate signal from the received modulated high-frequency signal, which is modulated and coded according to a digital audio broadcast (DAB) standard in this particular exemplary system 10.
- Front end receiver block 12 is coupled to a DAB decoder block 13 which is configured to decode the reproduced audio signal and provide the left (L) and right (R) signals of a stereo audio signal on lines 14 and 15.
- DAB digital audio broadcast
- System 10 further comprises a noise (birdie) detection block 20 which is coupled to lines 14 and 15 so as to receive one or both of the demodulated signals of the stereo signals on lines 14, 15.
- Noise detection block 20 further receives a signal from the front-end receiver block 12 on line 21 indicative of the reception quality of the high-frequency signal.
- Noise detection block 20 controls via line 22 an attenuation block 16, which is coupled to line 14 of audio signal decoder block 13 and a loudspeaker 18 for the left stereo audio signal L.
- Noise reduction block 20 controls, via line 22, an attenuation block 17, which is coupled to line 15 of audio block 13 and a loudspeaker 19 for the right stereo audio signal R.
- Attenuation blocks 16 and 17 may provide frequency-dependent attenuation, which may be achieved, e.g., with a controllable cut-off frequency.
- the lowpass filter's cut-off frequency may be switched between 18kHz (less attenuation in the range 16-18kHz) and 16kHz (more attenuation in the range 16-18kHz).
- Noise detection block 20 is illustrated in more detail in FIG. 2 .
- Lines 14 and 15 are coupled to an adder 23, which adds left audio signal L on line 14 and right audio signal R on line 15 to generate an input signal to a high pass filter 25 and a band-pass filter 24.
- the inputs of two level detectors 27 and 28, which have different averaging time constants t 27 and t 28 , respectively, are connected to the output of high pass filter 25; their outputs provide an input into comparator 29, which provides an input into comparator 30 indicative of which output level of level detectors 27 and 28 is higher.
- Comparator 30 further receives input from level detector 26 having an averaging time constant t 26 , whose value may be (approximately) the same as that of time constant t 27 (t 26 ⁇ t 27 ).
- a controllable gate 31 is connected downstream of comparator 30 and receives from front-end block 12 signal 21, which is indicative of the reception quality and which controls gate 31. Gate 31 lets the output signal of comparator 30, also called trigger signal 22, pass if the reception quality is below a certain level or otherwise blocks trigger signal 22.
- the averaging time constant of level detector 27 may be small, e.g., ⁇ 10ms, so that short impulses are detected by comparing the output signal of detector 27 with the output signal of level detector 28, whose averaging time constant is large, e.g., > 100 ms.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary signal flow structure of level detectors 26, 27 and 28.
- the respective input signal is rectified or its absolute value is determined in a absolute value calculating block 32.
- the absolute value is then averaged in an appropriate way, e.g., by way of an RC element.
- the RC element may include a resistor 33 in a series arm and a resistor 34 and a capacitor 35 in a shunt arm of the RC element.
- the averaging time constants can be adjusted by adequately dimensioning resistors 33 and 34 and capacitor 35, whereby resistor 33 may include zero Ohms and resistor 34 infinite Ohms.
- the system described above in connection with FIGS. 1-3 may employ a method for identifying a spurious signal in the demodulated and decoded audio signal derived from the modulated and coded digital signal received by antenna 11.
- the reproduced audio signals provided by DAB decoder block 13 are spectrally analyzed by noise (birdie) detector block 20. If a rate of increase of the audio level in a predetermined frequency region of the frequency spectrum exceeds a predetermined value and if a threshold value of the audio signal is exceeded, then the presence of a spurious signal is determined at comparator 30.
- the reception quality can also be taken into account when determining if a signal is spurious. If the reception quality exceeds a threshold value, i.e.
- the predetermined region may be a high-frequency region of the audio frequency spectrum, e.g., 16-18kHz, and is selected by high-pass filter 25.
- the rate of increase in this particular frequency range is detected by level detectors 27 and 28 in combination with comparator 29. Threshold value detection of the audio signal is performed by comparator 30 in connection with band-pass filter 24 and level detector 26.
- the predetermined portion of the frequency spectrum in which the presence of a spurious signal is determined may be attenuated by muting the audio signal during the time period of the spurious signal (frequency independent attenuation) or by reducing the frequencies of low pass filters 16 and 17 (frequency-dependent attenuation).
- the system described above in connection with FIGS. 1-3 may be realized in analog, digital or mixed analog-digital circuitry.
- the digital circuitry may be controlled by adequate software.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Noise Elimination (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The disclosure relates to a system and method (generally referred to as a "system") for processing signals, in particular for identifying spurious signals in audio signals.
- An audio signal may be a composite signal containing features that are attributable to noise and features that are attributable to the desired signal. To boost the desired signal while attenuating the noise, the features of the composite signal that are noise may be distinguished from the features of the composite signal that are attributable to the desired signal. Features that have been identified as noise can then be removed or reduced from the composite signal.
- Features that are noise may be relatively constant background noise and spurious signals, for example in a high frequency portion of the audio frequency spectrum. These spurious signals may be generated internally by an audio reception system that may employ demodulation of a high-frequency carrier and decoding of the demodulated signals. These spurious internal signals are commonly referred to as birdies.
- Common approaches for detecting and overriding birdies in digital audio signal transmission includes attenuating demodulated and decoded audio signals in a frequency selective manner and superimposing substitute signals on the audio signals in frequency selective manner as a function of the data error statistics of the digital signal in order to improve the subjective auditory perception of the audio signal.
- Further improvements to methods for identifying spurious signal and reducing noise in an audio signal are, however, desirable.
- A method for identifying a spurious signal in an audio signal is provided. The method includes: receiving at least one audio signal having a frequency spectrum, the at least one audio signal being derived from at least one digital signal; spectrally analyzing the at least one audio signal; determining the presence of a spurious signal, if a rate of increase of the audio level in a predetermined frequency region of the frequency spectrum exceeds a predetermined value and if a threshold value of the audio level is exceeded; and providing a trigger signal for attenuating the predetermined frequency portion of the at least one audio signal if the presence of a spurious signal is determined.
- A system for identifying a spurious signal in an audio signal which is derived from a digital signal is provided. The includes: a receiver block configured to receive at least one audio signal having a frequency spectrum, the at least one audio signal being derived from at least one digital signal; a analyzing block configured to spectrally analyze the reproduced audio signal; a detector block configured to determine the presence of a spurious signal, if a rate of increase of the audio level in a predetermined frequency region of the frequency spectrum exceeds a predetermined value and if a threshold value of the audio level is exceeded, and to provide a trigger signal for attenuating the predetermined frequency portion of the at least one audio signal if the presence of a spurious signal is determined.
- Other systems, methods, features and advantages will be, or will become, apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the following claims.
- The system may be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like referenced numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a digital audio broadcast receiver that includes a block for identifying a spurious signal in a demodulated and decoded audio signal. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the signal flow in an exemplary noise detector as used in the receiver ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating the signal flow in an exemplary level detector as used in the noise detector ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 1 illustrates a digital audiobroadcast receiver system 10 that allows for reducing noise in demodulated and decoded digital audio signals.System 10 comprises anantenna 11 for receiving a frequency carrier that is modulated with a coded digital audio signal.Antenna 11 is coupled to a frontend receiver block 12, which is configured to derive by way of demodulation an intermediate signal from the received modulated high-frequency signal, which is modulated and coded according to a digital audio broadcast (DAB) standard in this particularexemplary system 10. Frontend receiver block 12 is coupled to aDAB decoder block 13 which is configured to decode the reproduced audio signal and provide the left (L) and right (R) signals of a stereo audio signal onlines -
System 10 further comprises a noise (birdie)detection block 20 which is coupled tolines lines Noise detection block 20 further receives a signal from the front-end receiver block 12 online 21 indicative of the reception quality of the high-frequency signal.Noise detection block 20 controls vialine 22 anattenuation block 16, which is coupled toline 14 of audiosignal decoder block 13 and aloudspeaker 18 for the left stereo audio signal L.Noise reduction block 20 controls, vialine 22, anattenuation block 17, which is coupled toline 15 ofaudio block 13 and aloudspeaker 19 for the right stereo audio signalR. Attenuation blocks -
Noise detection block 20 is illustrated in more detail inFIG. 2 .Lines adder 23, which adds left audio signal L online 14 and right audio signal R online 15 to generate an input signal to ahigh pass filter 25 and a band-pass filter 24. The inputs of twolevel detectors high pass filter 25; their outputs provide an input intocomparator 29, which provides an input intocomparator 30 indicative of which output level oflevel detectors Comparator 30 further receives input fromlevel detector 26 having an averaging time constant t26, whose value may be (approximately) the same as that of time constant t27 (t26 ≈ t27). Acontrollable gate 31 is connected downstream ofcomparator 30 and receives from front-end block 12signal 21, which is indicative of the reception quality and which controlsgate 31.Gate 31 lets the output signal ofcomparator 30, also calledtrigger signal 22, pass if the reception quality is below a certain level or otherwise blockstrigger signal 22. The averaging time constant oflevel detector 27 may be small, e.g., < 10ms, so that short impulses are detected by comparing the output signal ofdetector 27 with the output signal oflevel detector 28, whose averaging time constant is large, e.g., > 100 ms. -
FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary signal flow structure oflevel detectors value calculating block 32. The absolute value is then averaged in an appropriate way, e.g., by way of an RC element. The RC element may include aresistor 33 in a series arm and aresistor 34 and acapacitor 35 in a shunt arm of the RC element. The averaging time constants can be adjusted by adequately dimensioningresistors capacitor 35, wherebyresistor 33 may include zero Ohms andresistor 34 infinite Ohms. - The system described above in connection with
FIGS. 1-3 may employ a method for identifying a spurious signal in the demodulated and decoded audio signal derived from the modulated and coded digital signal received byantenna 11. The reproduced audio signals provided byDAB decoder block 13 are spectrally analyzed by noise (birdie)detector block 20. If a rate of increase of the audio level in a predetermined frequency region of the frequency spectrum exceeds a predetermined value and if a threshold value of the audio signal is exceeded, then the presence of a spurious signal is determined atcomparator 30. The reception quality can also be taken into account when determining if a signal is spurious. If the reception quality exceeds a threshold value, i.e. if the reception quality is good, then the signal is not triggered to attenuate the audio signal even ifcomparator 30 determines the presence of a spurious signal. This method can assist in improving the perceived quality of the audio signal, as it is less probable that the signal determined to be spurious is in fact a spurious signal if the reception quality is high. The predetermined region may be a high-frequency region of the audio frequency spectrum, e.g., 16-18kHz, and is selected by high-pass filter 25. The rate of increase in this particular frequency range is detected bylevel detectors comparator 29. Threshold value detection of the audio signal is performed bycomparator 30 in connection with band-pass filter 24 andlevel detector 26. - The predetermined portion of the frequency spectrum in which the presence of a spurious signal is determined may be attenuated by muting the audio signal during the time period of the spurious signal (frequency independent attenuation) or by reducing the frequencies of
low pass filters 16 and 17 (frequency-dependent attenuation). The system described above in connection withFIGS. 1-3 may be realized in analog, digital or mixed analog-digital circuitry. The digital circuitry may be controlled by adequate software. - While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
Claims (15)
- A method for identifying a spurious signal in an audio signal which is derived from a digital signal, the method comprising:receiving at least one audio signal having a frequency spectrum, the at least one audio signal being derived from at least one digital signal;spectrally analyzing the at least one audio signal;determining the presence of a spurious signal, if a rate of increase of the audio level in a predetermined frequency region of the frequency spectrum exceeds a predetermined value and if a threshold value of the audio level is exceeded; andproviding a trigger signal for attenuating the predetermined frequency portion of the at least one audio signal, if the presence of a spurious signal is determined.
- The method of claim 1, where the digital signal is derived from a received modulated high-frequency signal; the method further comprising determining a reception quality and if the reception quality exceeds a threshold value, blocking the trigger signal to attenuate the predetermined frequency portion of the at least one audio signal, or if the reception quality is less than the threshold value, transferring the trigger signal to attenuate the predetermined frequency portion of the at least one audio signal.
- The method of claim 1 or 2, where attenuating the predetermined frequency portion is frequency dependent or frequency independent.
- The method of any of claims 1-3, where spectrally analyzing the at least one audio signal comprises high-pass filtering of the at least one audio signal.
- The method of claim 4, where the at least one high-pass filtered audio signal is level detected with first and second time constants that differ from each other, and where the level detected signals are compared with each other to provide a signal representative of the rate of increase of the audio level in the predetermined frequency region.
- The method of claim 5, where the at least one audio signal is level detected with a third averaging time constant and where the signal representative of the rate of increase of the audio level in the predetermined frequency region is compared with this at least one level detected audio signal.
- The method of claim 6, where the at least one audio signal that is level detected with the third averaging time constant is bandpass filtered before level detection.
- The method of any of claims 1-7, further comprising receiving a first signal and a second signal of a stereo audio signal and adding the first signal and the second signal to form the audio signal to be analyzed.
- A system for identifying a spurious signal in an audio signal that is derived from a digital signal, the system comprising:a receiver block configured to receive at least one audio signal having a frequency spectrum, the at least one audio signal being derived from at least one digital signal;an analyzing block configured to spectrally analyze the reproduced audio signal;
anda detector block configured to determine the presence of a spurious signal, if a rate of increase of the audio level in a predetermined frequency region of the frequency spectrum exceeds a predetermined value and if a threshold value of the audio level is exceeded, to provide a trigger signal for attenuating the predetermined frequency portion of the at least one audio signal if the presence of a spurious signal is determined. - The system of claim 9, where the detector block is further configured to determine reception quality and if the reception quality exceeds a threshold value, to not trigger the signal to attenuate the predetermined frequency portion of the audio signal, or if the reception quality is less than the threshold value, to trigger the signal to attenuate the predetermined frequency portion of the at least one audio signal.
- The system of claim 9 or 10, where attenuating the predetermined frequency portion is frequency-dependent or frequency-independent.
- The system of any of claims 9-11, where the analyzing block comprises a high-pass filter for filtering of the at least one audio signal.
- The system of claim 12, where the detector block comprises a first level detector and second level detector that are configured to detect the level of the at least one high-pass filtered audio signal with first and second time constants that differ from each other; and a comparator configured to compare the level detected-signals with each other to provide a signal representative of the rate of increase of the audio level in the predetermined frequency region.
- The system of claim 13, where the detector block further comprises a third level detector configured to level detect the at least one audio signal with a third averaging time constant and a further comparator configured to compare the signal representative of the rate of increase of the level of the at least one audio signal in the predetermined frequency region with the at least one audio signal level detected by the third level detector.
- The system of claim 14, where the analyzing block comprises a bandpass filter configured to bandpass filter the at least one audio signal that is level detected with the third averaging time constant before level detection.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP13173079.8A EP2816557B1 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2013-06-20 | Identifying spurious signals in audio signals |
KR1020140068176A KR102180656B1 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2014-06-05 | Identifying spurious signals in audio signals |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP13173079.8A EP2816557B1 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2013-06-20 | Identifying spurious signals in audio signals |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2816557A1 true EP2816557A1 (en) | 2014-12-24 |
EP2816557B1 EP2816557B1 (en) | 2015-11-04 |
Family
ID=48628572
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13173079.8A Active EP2816557B1 (en) | 2013-06-20 | 2013-06-20 | Identifying spurious signals in audio signals |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2816557B1 (en) |
KR (1) | KR102180656B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160286309A1 (en) * | 2015-03-26 | 2016-09-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Noise reduction in a microphone using vowel detection |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2180465A2 (en) * | 2008-10-24 | 2010-04-28 | Yamaha Corporation | Noise suppression device and noice suppression method |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2231107A1 (en) * | 1995-09-14 | 1997-03-20 | Ericsson, Inc. | System for adaptively filtering audio signals to enhance speech intelligibility in noisy environmental conditions |
US8269480B2 (en) * | 2007-07-09 | 2012-09-18 | Ltx-Credence Corporation | Method and apparatus for identifying and reducing spurious frequency components |
US8015002B2 (en) * | 2007-10-24 | 2011-09-06 | Qnx Software Systems Co. | Dynamic noise reduction using linear model fitting |
JP2013527491A (en) * | 2010-04-09 | 2013-06-27 | ディーティーエス・インコーポレイテッド | Adaptive environmental noise compensation for audio playback |
-
2013
- 2013-06-20 EP EP13173079.8A patent/EP2816557B1/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-06-05 KR KR1020140068176A patent/KR102180656B1/en active IP Right Grant
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2180465A2 (en) * | 2008-10-24 | 2010-04-28 | Yamaha Corporation | Noise suppression device and noice suppression method |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
CHI-MIN LIU ET AL: "Compression Artifacts in Perceptual Audio Coding", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO, SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, IEEE SERVICE CENTER, NEW YORK, NY, USA, vol. 16, no. 4, 1 May 2008 (2008-05-01), pages 681 - 695, XP011207621, ISSN: 1558-7916 * |
SHIGEKI INOUE ET AL: "High Quality FM Stereo Decoding IC with Birdie Noise Cancelling Circuit", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, IEEE SERVICE CENTER, NEW YORK, NY, US, vol. 52, no. 3, 1 August 1981 (1981-08-01), pages 243 - 253, XP011153264, ISSN: 0098-3063 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160286309A1 (en) * | 2015-03-26 | 2016-09-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Noise reduction in a microphone using vowel detection |
US9763006B2 (en) * | 2015-03-26 | 2017-09-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Noise reduction in a microphone using vowel detection |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR102180656B1 (en) | 2020-11-19 |
EP2816557B1 (en) | 2015-11-04 |
KR20140147687A (en) | 2014-12-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8792543B2 (en) | Impulse noise mitigation under out-of-band interference conditions | |
US9129592B2 (en) | Signal artifact detection and elimination for audio output | |
US5036543A (en) | Noise suppression apparatus for FM receiver | |
JP4922678B2 (en) | Noise canceller and receiving apparatus using the same | |
EP1071220B1 (en) | Multipath noise reducer, audio output circuit, and FM receiver | |
EP1120919A2 (en) | Multipath noise reducer, audio output circuit, and FM receiver | |
EP0792017A2 (en) | High-frequency radio signal receiving apparatus for digital communication | |
KR100824201B1 (en) | Multipass noise detecting apparatus and fm receving apparatus | |
JP3389341B2 (en) | FM receiver | |
JP5670149B2 (en) | transceiver | |
EP2816557B1 (en) | Identifying spurious signals in audio signals | |
US20090275303A1 (en) | Receiving Apparatus | |
US5586192A (en) | Method of and device for detecting pulsatory interference signals in a sound signal | |
JP3567928B2 (en) | Noise suppression device | |
US7133478B2 (en) | Device and method for detecting and suppressing noise | |
US20070004356A1 (en) | Noise suppression in an fm receiver | |
US20120201387A1 (en) | Fm radio receiving apparatus | |
US7133468B2 (en) | Concurrent FM signal receiver | |
EP3128676A1 (en) | Receiving device | |
CN107210766A (en) | Audio signal processing apparatus | |
CN110447173B (en) | Method for attenuating interference generated by intermodulation products | |
US20050079840A1 (en) | Method for controlling the selectivity of a tuner in a variable bandwidth system | |
US9143774B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for television band pilot sensing | |
JPS5928093B2 (en) | receiving device | |
JPS58147256A (en) | Fm receiver |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130916 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20150611 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 759683 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20151115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602013003719 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20151104 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 759683 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20151104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160304 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160204 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160304 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160205 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602013003719 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20160805 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160630 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160630 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160620 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20130620 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160630 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160620 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20151104 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230526 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240521 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240521 Year of fee payment: 12 |