EP2772022A1 - Procédé et système pour analyse de budget de liaison de réseau - Google Patents

Procédé et système pour analyse de budget de liaison de réseau

Info

Publication number
EP2772022A1
EP2772022A1 EP13743110.2A EP13743110A EP2772022A1 EP 2772022 A1 EP2772022 A1 EP 2772022A1 EP 13743110 A EP13743110 A EP 13743110A EP 2772022 A1 EP2772022 A1 EP 2772022A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
real
communications network
processor
time information
network
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP13743110.2A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2772022A4 (fr
Inventor
Michael Beeler
John Baddick
Wallace Davis
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Comtech EF Data Corp
Original Assignee
Comtech EF Data Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US13/437,767 external-priority patent/US8914536B2/en
Application filed by Comtech EF Data Corp filed Critical Comtech EF Data Corp
Publication of EP2772022A1 publication Critical patent/EP2772022A1/fr
Publication of EP2772022A4 publication Critical patent/EP2772022A4/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W16/00—Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
    • H04W16/22—Traffic simulation tools or models
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/14—Network analysis or design
    • H04L41/145—Network analysis or design involving simulating, designing, planning or modelling of a network
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/02—Arrangements for optimising operational condition

Definitions

  • LBA Link Budget Analysis
  • Prior art LBAs take into consideration the Free-Space Path Loss (FSPL) whether it is atmosphere or underwater, wetting, water vapor, scintillation, rain density, etc. and are typically performed one time prior to the end-to-end terminals being placed into service.
  • FSPL Free-Space Path Loss
  • the results of the one-time LB A determine the size and capabilities of the equipment installed at the transmission site.
  • LBAs do not use real-time information, but use historical precipitation data from lookup tables, measured in mm/hr (millimeters per hour) and categorized into rain regions throughout the world. Additionally, LBAs are run in a point-to-point fashion and make no provisions for other sites or links during operation.
  • Implementations of a method of dynamically modeling performance of a communications network may comprise modeling a communications network using a processor by performing a link budget analysis (LBA) for a configuration of the LBA
  • communications network receiving, by the processor, a plurality of layers of real-time information about the communications network, iteratively performing additional LBAs by the processor using one or more of the layers of real-time information from among the plurality of layers of real-time information, multy-dimensionally co-modeling, by the processor, a matrix comprising results of the iteratively performed additional LBAs, and determining, by the processor, one or more final communications network configuration parameters based on the multy-dimensionally co-modeled matrix.
  • the real-time information may comprise user traffic information.
  • the real-time information may comprise reported performance of signal quality and is reported as symbol energy over noise density (Es/No) or bit energy over noise density (Eh/No).
  • the real-time information may comprise weather information.
  • the real-time information may comprise satellite ephemeris information.
  • the real-time information may comprise ionospheric condition information.
  • the real-time information may comprise information relating to a location, velocity, or condition of a stationary or mobile terminal within the communications network.
  • the method may further comprise transmitting an output of the processor to a regenerative repeating device.
  • the method may further comprise transmitting an output of the processor to a hub, one or more remote devices, or one or more repeating relays.
  • the processor may comprise a single processor configured to process one or more layers of realtime information.
  • the processor may comprise a plurality of processors configured to process one or more layers of real-time information.
  • the one or more final network configuration parameters may comply with one or more regulatory mandates.
  • the method may further comprise monitoring a power spectral density (PSD) within the communications network and adjusting one or more network configuration parameters such that off-axis signal emissions remain below a maximum level as specified by the one or more regulatory mandates.
  • PSD power spectral density
  • the method may further comprise monitoring a transmit power of a transmitter within the communications network and adjusting one or more network configuration parameters such that the transmit power remains below a maximum level as specified by the one or more regulatory standards.
  • the method may further comprise adjusting one or more network configuration parameters such that the communications network complies with static ground, earth surface vehicle, vehicle-mounted earth station, and aircraft earth station international Telecommunication Union (ITU) or Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Aeronautical Mobile Satellite Service (AMSS) regulatory limits.
  • the method may further comprise disabling transmission by a transmitter within the communications network when there is no combination of network configuration parameters that results in the communications network remaining in compliance with the one or more regulatory mandates.
  • the method may further comprise outputting an error message when the communications network is noncompliant with the one or more regulatory mandates.
  • the error message may comprises a textual message, a binary signal, or an error condition.
  • Implementations of a system for dynamically modeling performance of a communications network may comprise a communications network comprising at least one transmitter, at least one satellite repeating relay, and at least one remote receiver and a processor configured to model the communications network by performing a link budget analysis (LBA) for a configuration of the communications network, receive a plurality of layers of real-time information about the communications network, iteratively perform additional LBAs using one or more of the layers of real-time information from among the plurality of layers of real-time information, multy-dimensionally co-modeling, by the processor, a matrix comprising results of the iteratively performed additional LBAs, and determine one or more final communications network configuration parameters based on the multy-dimensionally co-modeled matrix.
  • LBA link budget analysis
  • the real-time information may comprise user traffic information.
  • the real-time information may comprise reported performance of signal quality and is reported as symbol energy over noise density (Es/No) or bit energy over noise density (Eb/No).
  • the real-time information may comprise weather information.
  • the real-time information may comprise satellite ephemeris information.
  • the real-time information may comprise ionospheric condition information.
  • the real-time information may comprise information relating to a location, velocity, or condition of a stationary or mobile terminal within the communications network.
  • the processor may be further configured to transmit an output to a regenerative repeating device.
  • the processor may be further configured to transmit an output to a hub, one or more remote devices, or one or more repeating relays.
  • the processor may comprise a single processor configured to process one or more layers of real-time information.
  • the processor may comprise a plurality of processors configured to process one or more layers of real-time information.
  • the one or more final network configuration parameters may comply with one or more regulatory mandates.
  • the processor may be further configured to monitor a power spectral density (PSD) within the communications network and adjust one or more network configuration parameters such that off-axis signal emissions remain below a maximum level as specified by the one or more regulatory mandates.
  • PSD power spectral density
  • the processor may be further configured to monitor a transmit power of a transmitter within the communications network and adjust one or more network configuration parameters such that the transmit power remains below a maximum level as specified by the one or more regulatory standards.
  • the processor may be further configured to adjust one or more network configuration parameters such that the communications network complies with static ground, earth surface vehicle, vehicle-mounted earth station, and aircraft earth station International
  • the processor may be further configured to disable transmission by a transmitter within the communications network when there is no combination of network configuration parameters that results in the communications network remaining in compliance with the one or more regulatory mandates.
  • the processor may be further configured to output an error message when the
  • the error message may comprise a textual message, a binary signal, or an error condition.
  • noun, term, or phrase is intended to be further characterized, specified, or narrowed in some way, then such noun, term, or phrase will expressly include additional adjectives, descriptive terms, or other modifiers in accordance with the normal precepts of English grammar. Absent the use of such adjectives, descriptive terms, or modifiers, it is the intent that such nouns, terms, or phrases be given their plain, and ordinary English meaning to those skilled in the applicable arts as set forth above.
  • FIG. 1 is a representation of an implementation of a geographically diverse satellite network with a hub earth station terminal communicating with multiple remote sites.
  • FIG.2 is a representation of an implementation of a geographically diverse satellite network with a hub earth station terminal communicating with multiple remote sites experiencing precipitation resulting in dynamic path losses.
  • FIG. 3 is a representation of an implementation of a satellite repeating relay.
  • FIG.4 is a representation of an implementation of transponders on a satellite repeating relay based on an electromagnetic (EM) polarization configuration.
  • EM electromagnetic
  • FIG. 5 is a representation of a path of movement of a spacecraft relative to an earth station.
  • FIGS. 6A-H provide an example of a Link Budget Analysis for a transmission link using a commercial satellite repeating relay.
  • FIG. 7 provides an example of various modulation and FEC coding combinations of an exemplary MODCOD configuration and the associated Eb/No and Es/No required to close the link.
  • FIG. 8 provides an example of various modulation and FEC coding combinations of a DVB-S2 MODCOD configuration and the associated Es/No required to close the link.
  • FIG. 9 is a block diagram showing examples of possible inputs into an implementation of the processing model along with possible outputs.
  • FIG. 10 is a block diagram showing examples of possible inputs for an implementation of a multi-layered, multi-dimensional distributed processing engine along with possible outputs.
  • This disclosure relates to, but is not limited to, a method and system for performing multi-layered, multi-dimensional link budget analysis (LBA) using real-time network, weather, satellite ephemeras and ionosheric information.
  • Implementations of the described method and system may support point-to-point, point-to-multipoint and multipoint- to-multipoint networks that provide transmission from a source to a destination and may utilize a repeating relay such as a space-based satellite repeating relay or an airborne repeating relay.
  • LBAs performed in the prior art utilize known values as demonstrated in FIG. 6, and are used to determine the losses associated with the link (for example, path loss, environmental loss, etc.), and required antenna sizes and amplifier sizes required to overcome link losses to close the link to arrive at an estimated link availability.
  • link availability is the driving factor that any transmission link strives to improve or optimize.
  • LBAs are no longer performed one time, on a single transmission link and the site placed into service. Instead, the LBAs are performed in real-time while factoring in the location of all terminals (fixed and mobile), network traffic configurations (dynamic user data), real-time weather, satellite ephemeras and ionosheric scintillation, time delay due to the Doppler shift in an in-motion object application, and any other factors that may impact the demodulator buffering. All of these parameters are fed into the model, and LBAs are performed firstly in a multi-layered format, and then a multi-dimensionally co-modeled group of LBAs is produced.
  • LBAs traditionally assume worst-case conditions and the links are engineered to those worst case conditions at which the network will continue to operate as long as the link conditions remain at the engineered availability.
  • a result of this practice is that amplifiers and antennas are not fully utilized to maximize efficiency.
  • a baseline LB A is performed to determine the hardware components of the network (such as, for example, required antenna gain/size and power amplifier size)
  • this information is then entered as fixed values into the baseline LBA.
  • the variables that are then fed into the system are real-time weather data that is a function of location of all terminals (fixed or mobile), precipitation estimates with temperature, density and the trajectory (direction) of the precipitation that may be extrapolated, location of the repeating relay (satellite or airborne relay), ionic scintillation, solar interaction due to sun spot, solar flares, or Coronal Mass Ejections (CME).
  • Es/No current signal energy over noise density
  • Eb/No bit energy over noise density
  • ACM Adaptive Coding and Modulation
  • a co-modeled series of LBAs are performed by a processing device, such as, but not limited to, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), General Purpose Processor (GPP), or Graphic Processing Unit (GPU).
  • DSP Digital Signal Processor
  • FPGA Field Programmable Gate Array
  • GPP General Purpose Processor
  • GPU Graphic Processing Unit
  • the mathematical algorithms may be processed as co- modeled M x N (M by N) matrix operations using, but not limited to, the Bellman equation.
  • the Bellman equation also known as a dynamic programming equation, may be brought to bear as a tool for determining optimality of a complex system by breaking down the optimization problem into simpler sub-problems.
  • Some embodiments of the present description fall into a category of extremely complex and process intensive equations that may be broken into sub-problems and then solved as a sub-process.
  • the precise manner that solves the equations is not limited to this one technique but may be expanded to use any technique that optimizes the LBAs individually and then as a co-modeled series of operation.
  • a method and system for performing multi-layer, multi-dimensional link budget analysis (LBA) using real-time network, weather, satellite ephemeras, time synchronization and ionospheric information techniques disclosed herein may be specifically employed in satellite communications systems.
  • LBA multi-layer, multi-dimensional link budget analysis
  • IF electromagnetic
  • RF radio frequency
  • implementations of the described methods may pertain to satellite technology
  • implementations described are not limited to satellite technology, and may be applied to ground, airborne and space-based networks and systems.
  • the need for more bandwidth continues to challenge the industry.
  • the options that are available to network operators are to add more bandwidth, but for radio transmission networks, the spectrum is finite, and it is not always possible to simply add spectrum.
  • Implementations of the methods and systems described in this disclosure allow one to further optimize the available spectrum by taking every metric that may be available for optimizing the link.
  • link conditions may be pre-determmed based on input metrics to determine the optimal link operating parameters for a particular s e or a group of sites based on network conditions. To optimize the operation of an entire network, a multitude of factors must be known.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a typical satellite configuration with three sites.
  • a hub earth station terminal 100 is communicating over a satellite repeating relay 110 to two geographically diverse remote sites 120, 130.
  • an antenna and power amplification devices are present at the hub earth station terminal 100, satellite repeating relay 110 and the remote VSAT site 120, 130.
  • Each device (earth stations 100, 120, 130 and satellite repeating relay 110) all have antennas and amplifications devices with gain, but the path between the earth stations 100, 120, 130 and the satellite 110 have losses.
  • a Ku-Band signal operating with an uplink center frequency of 14 GHz would have a Free-Space Path Loss (FSPL) from the earth station 100 to the satellite 110 of
  • FSPL Free-Space Path Loss
  • the path from the satellite 110 to an earth station 120, 130 with a downlink center frequency of 12 GHz would have a path loss of approximately 205.5 dB with no impairments (rain, clouds, etc.).
  • FIG.2 illustrates a typical satellite configuration with three sites and the associated areas where transmission loss may be introduced.
  • a hub earth station terminal 100 is 100 communicating over a satellite repeating relay 110 to two geographically diverse remote sites 120, 130.
  • the FSFL remains relatively constant for stationary terminals, but changes slightly for mobile terminals and ephemeris affects due to satellite movement
  • weather conditions may have a drastic affect on the transmission path.
  • Clouds 200, 210 or water vapor have a slight effect (depending on the transmission frequency), but the most pronounced attenuation as a result of weather is due to precipitation 220. Condensation may form on a radome or antenna reflector and which creates wetting losses.
  • Ionospheric scintillation is the result of rapid, random, turbulent motions of the ionosphere at an altitude of approximately 300 Km (984,251 feet) depending on the layer (D, E, F, Fl or F2) and the time of day or night, and causes scintillation of the signal as it passes through the atmosphere.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a typical satellite based repeating relay used in the art with no onboard processing.
  • the repeating relay comprises an input (receive antenna) 300 which recei es the incoming carrier signals, Orthogonal Mode Transducer (OMT) 310 that separates the various electromagnetic (EM) polarizations, Bandpass Filters (BPF) 320 that filter the frequency spectrum, a Low-Noise Amplifier (LNA) 330 that allows the received carrier signals to be power amplified, a multiplexer 340 which separates the various frequency spectra to the appropriate transponder and a frequency converter 350 to convert to the downlink frequency.
  • OMT Orthogonal Mode Transducer
  • BPF Bandpass Filters
  • LNA Low-Noise Amplifier
  • the repeating relay farther linearizes 360 any non-linearity due to the amplifiers, amplifies 370 before transmitting back to the destination, multiplexes 380 to the proper EM polarization configuration and feeds to the OMT 390 to the transmit antenna 400 feed for relay.
  • the configuration of the transponders of the repeating relay may be comprised of a single transponder or a plurality of EM transponders with or without overlapping frequencies as shown in FIG.4.
  • FIGS. 6A-H illustrate examples of inputs of a Link Budget Analysis (LBA). Implementations of the described methods continue to take advantage of the LBA which appears as a large equation with dependencies on factors such as by non-limiting example, uplink and downlink frequencies, antenna gain, amplifier gain, path loss, location, satellite figure of merit (G/T), and equivalent isotropically radiated power (EERP).
  • LBA Link Budget Analysis
  • Another aspect of novelty of the present disclosure is that real-time information may be inserted into the model at this stage of the processing.
  • Weather data comprising the cloud type, height, density of precipitation and trajectory, etc. may be obtained, formatted and input into the model.
  • Ionospheric monitoring stations are collected and distributed throughout the world and so an estimate of the effects of the ionospheric layers may be obtained, formatted and input into the model.
  • the movement of a satellite and Kepler's Laws of motion (Keplerian movement) is applied and allows one to predict the precise location of a repeating relay.
  • the data in the satellite industry is known as
  • Ephemeris data and may be calculated as much as 30 days in advance. Ephemeris data containing the location of the satellite repeating relay may be obtained, formatted and input into the model. As shown in FIG. 5 and as is known in the prior art, the path of a space-based satellite repeating relay 110 appears to be a " Figure Eight" pattern to a hub earth station 100.
  • Many networks have the ability to provide status of the link in the form of a received Es/No or Eb/No of the signal that is received by the terminal. The networks may provide current bandwidth requirements based on the current traffic flow thought the network and provided as input into the model Additionally, the location of the terminal may be reported in the form of latitude, longitude, altitude, velocity, temperature, etc. and reported to the location where the information is being collected and input into the model.
  • the LBAs may be updated and re-run with the following dependencies on factors such as, for example, rain attenuation, cloud attenuation, ionospheric attenuation, terminal movement, network data, etc.
  • the resulting LBAs may then be co-modeled as an NxM matrix using dynamic programming due to the large number of inputs into the model. This may allow one to ascertain the total loading of all the components in the model and to make adjustments to further optimize resources such as, for example, distribution of available amplifier power at the earth stations and satellite, assignment of Modulation Factor and FEC Coding Rate, distribution of available bandwidth, assignment of transmission frequency and time slots, and a retransmission interval.
  • resources such as, for example, distribution of available amplifier power at the earth stations and satellite, assignment of Modulation Factor and FEC Coding Rate, distribution of available bandwidth, assignment of transmission frequency and time slots, and a retransmission interval.
  • FIG. 7 and 8 are tables showing a representation of available modulation and FEC coding rates, spectral efficiencies and required Es/No or Eb/No rates to provide a given performance at a known Bit Error Rate (BER) or Packet Error Rate (PER).
  • the link performance is known along with the available power, the allocation of spectrum, etc. are distributed and the appropriate MODCOD may be applied to the link to meet the requisite service level or as known in the art Service Level Agreement (SLA) which may be based on providing a guaranteed amount of bandwidth known as a Committed Information Rate (CIR).
  • SLA Service Level Agreement
  • FIG. 9 illustrates an implementation of a processing module 930 in which the input may be a plurality of information such as, for example parameters of network configuration 900, network traffic 910, network Es/No or Eb/No 920, terminal location (static or dynamic) 930, weather information 940, ionospheric information 970, satellite ephemeris information 980, time delay due to the Doppler effect 990, etc. where it may be processed in both a multilayered manner and then combined and processed in a multi-dimensional manner resulting in optimized assignments of time, frequency, bandwidth, modulation, FEC coding, etc. for the network.
  • the resulting processing to support implementations of the method and system may be considered a sub-system to the communications network.
  • existing networks operate without implementations of the described method and system, though at a lower level of efficiency or availability. When employing implementations of the described method and system one realizes higher levels of efficiency and higher availability of a link and the entire system as a whole.
  • a resulting side effect of the optimization results in changes to the power and waveform as a result of the use of implementations of the method and system.
  • a provision may be made to monitor mat all regulatory issues are being complied with.
  • the result may be increased Power Spectral Density (PSD), Adjacent Satellite Interference (AST), etc.
  • PSD Power Spectral Density
  • AST Adjacent Satellite Interference
  • the PSD and ASI could be increased to a level that is above and beyond a regulatory limit
  • Implementations of the described invention may provide checks and balances within the processing of the available information to ensure that PSD, ASI and other regulatory limits are maintained and action taken to correct any violation of the regulations. The corrections may be iteratively fed back into the processing to further optimize the link.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates an implementation of a processing module in which the input may be a plurality of information such as, for example parameters of network configuration, network traffic, network Es/No or Eb/No, terminal location (static or dynamic), weather information, ionospheric information, satellite ephemeris information, time delay due to the Doppler effect, etc. where it may be processed by a plurality of processors 1000, 1010 as layers and then processed as dimensions 1020 (all layers are then co-modeled) and the output may be output or fed back into the layer processing 1000, 1010 for further optimization.
  • the resulting output may be optimized assignments of time, frequency, bandwidth, modulation, FEC coding, etc. assignments for the network.
  • Implementations of the described method and system may perform the processing at the network level (comprised of a hub and remotes) or "on-board" a space- based system.
  • the processing may be assumed to be eartbbound (or not in space). However, for space-based (or on the repeating relay), a portion of the processing may be done on the ground and then transmitted to the on-board processor on the space-based relay for operation.
  • VHF Very High Frequency
  • the concept of sub-beams become another variable in the processing.
  • the sub-beams may be a variable that may be applied to the processing to allow further optimization for determining the best use of the available spectrum.
  • the sub- beams may be decisions that are made in the model to use a sub-beam or move to a new sub- beam based available spectrum and power.
  • the skew angle is the result of the polarization angle and is dependent on the placement of the terminal's location relative to the satellite repeating relay. For mobile terminals, the skew must constantly change as a result of the terminals location.
  • the model may provide optimization of the skew angle as part of the processing for the method and system.
  • Example 1 A satellite network is configured to operate a hub-spoke Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) with a single fixed hub earth station and a plurality fixed remote sites over a Ku-Band geostationary satellite repeating relay.
  • the network is configured to accept network data, feedback of the Es/No, and weather information.
  • LBAs are iteratively processed in a manner that results in the assignment of the modulation index and FEC rate (MODCOD assignments) and frequency and bandwidth assignments being a priori.
  • the MODCODs are set to operate at the highest possible value, but in areas where weather is occurring, the MODCODs, frequency and bandwidth parameter assignments are adjusted to ensure optimal operation of the network.
  • the satellite uses Ka-Band or V-Band, resulting in the same operation.
  • Example 2 A satellite network is configured to operate a hub-spoke Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) with a single fixed hub earth station and a plurality of airborne remote sites over Ka-Band geostationary satellite repeating relay.
  • the network is configured to accept network data, satellite ephemeris, feedback of the Es/No, latitude, longitude, altitude velocity, and weather information.
  • the LBAs are iteratively processed in a manner that results in the assignment of the modulation index and FEC rate (MODCOD assignments), time slot, frequency slot, and bandwidth assignments being a priori.
  • MODCOD assignments modulation index and FEC rate
  • the MODCODs are set to operate at the highest possible value, but in areas where weather is occurring, the MODCODs, frequency and bandwidth parameter assignments are adjusted to ensure optimal operation of the network.
  • the satellite uses X-Band, KU-Band or V-Band, resulting in the same operation.
  • Example 3 A satellite network is configured to operate a hub-spoke Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) with a single fixed hub earth station and a plurality of maritime remote sites over C-Band geostationary satellite repeating relay.
  • the network is configured to accept network data, satellite ephemeris, feedback of the Es/No, latitude, longitude, altitude velocity, and weather information.
  • the LBAs are iteratively processed in a manner that results in the assignment of the modulation index and FEC rate (MODCOD assignments), time slot, frequency slot, and bandwidth assignments being a priori.
  • MODCOD assignments modulation index and FEC rate
  • the MODCODs are set to operate at the highest possible value, but in areas where weather is occurring, the MODCODs, frequency and bandwidth parameter assignments are adjusted to ensure optimal operation of the network
  • the satellite uses X-Band, Ku-Band, Ka-Band or V-Band, resulting in the same operation.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Radio Relay Systems (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne des procédés de modélisation dynamique des performances d'un réseau de communication, pouvant comprendre : la modélisation d'un réseau de communication à l'aide d'un processeur, en réalisant une analyse de budget de liaison (ABL) pour configurer le réseau de communication ; la réception d'une pluralité de couches d'informations en temps réel concernant le réseau de communication ; la réalisation itérative d'ABL supplémentaires à l'aide d'une ou de plusieurs couches d'informations en temps réel parmi la pluralité des couches d'informations en temps réel ; la co-modélisation multidimensionnelle d'une matrice comprenant les résultats de la réalisation itérative des ABL supplémentaires ; et la détermination d'un ou de plusieurs paramètres de configuration finale du réseau de communication sur la base de la matrice co-modélisée de façon multidimensionnelle.
EP13743110.2A 2012-01-31 2013-01-31 Procédé et système pour analyse de budget de liaison de réseau Withdrawn EP2772022A4 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261592948P 2012-01-31 2012-01-31
US13/437,767 US8914536B2 (en) 2012-01-31 2012-04-02 Method and system for performing multi-layer, multi-dimensional link budget analysis (LBA) using real-time network, weather, satellite ephemeras and ionospheric information
PCT/US2013/024207 WO2013116557A1 (fr) 2012-01-31 2013-01-31 Procédé et système pour analyse de budget de liaison de réseau

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2772022A1 true EP2772022A1 (fr) 2014-09-03
EP2772022A4 EP2772022A4 (fr) 2015-04-01

Family

ID=48905844

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13743110.2A Withdrawn EP2772022A4 (fr) 2012-01-31 2013-01-31 Procédé et système pour analyse de budget de liaison de réseau

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2772022A4 (fr)
WO (1) WO2013116557A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11240675B2 (en) 2017-08-09 2022-02-01 Commscope Technologies Llc Method and system for planning and operating fixed microwave communications systems

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050157652A1 (en) * 2003-12-18 2005-07-21 Idirect Incorporated HUB modem system, method and apparatus
US20060198358A1 (en) * 2005-03-02 2006-09-07 Objective Interface Systems, Inc. Partitioning communication system
WO2009055838A1 (fr) * 2007-10-30 2009-05-07 Uhs Systems Pty Limited Améliorations de liaisons de communication
US20120005326A1 (en) * 2010-07-02 2012-01-05 Ryan Bradetich Systems and methods for remote device management

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6771966B1 (en) * 1999-03-29 2004-08-03 Carriercomm, Inc. System and method for an automated radio network planning tool
KR20010097171A (ko) * 2000-04-20 2001-11-08 지환국 인공위성을 이용한 인터넷 서비스 시스템
KR100685740B1 (ko) * 2005-11-17 2007-02-22 경북대학교 산학협력단 데이터 링크 계층의 링크 정보를 이용하여 핸드오버를수행하는 단말 장치
CN102136946B (zh) * 2011-03-07 2014-04-23 中国电力科学研究院 一种光网络拓扑图的绘制方法及其拓扑子系统

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050157652A1 (en) * 2003-12-18 2005-07-21 Idirect Incorporated HUB modem system, method and apparatus
US20060198358A1 (en) * 2005-03-02 2006-09-07 Objective Interface Systems, Inc. Partitioning communication system
WO2009055838A1 (fr) * 2007-10-30 2009-05-07 Uhs Systems Pty Limited Améliorations de liaisons de communication
US20120005326A1 (en) * 2010-07-02 2012-01-05 Ryan Bradetich Systems and methods for remote device management

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO2013116557A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2013116557A1 (fr) 2013-08-08
EP2772022A4 (fr) 2015-04-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8914536B2 (en) Method and system for performing multi-layer, multi-dimensional link budget analysis (LBA) using real-time network, weather, satellite ephemeras and ionospheric information
Maslin HF communications: a systems approach
JP4420198B2 (ja) 干渉する移動端末を識別するために二値探索パターンを使用する方法、システムおよび装置
JP4407900B2 (ja) 干渉する移動端末を識別するためにイベントの相関関係を使用する方法
CN112152695A (zh) 低轨卫星星座的测运控系统及其方法
US8959189B2 (en) Method and system for modeling a network using historical weather information and operation with adaptive coding and modulation (ACM)
US9178607B2 (en) System and method for satellite link budget analysis (LBA) optimization
EP3243282B1 (fr) Systèmes et procédés de relocalisation automatique d'un terminal satellite
Surekha et al. C-band VSAT data communication system and RF impairments
Maine et al. Communication architecture for GPS III
CN109039433B (zh) 一种高通量卫星的接入载荷系统
Kerczewski et al. UAS CNPC satellite link performance—Sharing spectrum with terrestrial systems
EP2772022A1 (fr) Procédé et système pour analyse de budget de liaison de réseau
EP3243281B1 (fr) Calibration de bruit et d'interference pour système par satellite en utilisant des mesures faites par des terminaux.
Patra et al. Frequency diversity improvement factor for rain fade mitigation technique for 50–90 GHz in tropical region
Yahia et al. On the performance of HAPS-assisted hybrid RF-FSO multicast communication systems
Plass et al. Machine‐to‐machine communications via airliners
Nguyen et al. Practical achievable capacity for advanced SATCOM on-the-move
Plass et al. Concept for an M2M communications infrastructure via airliners
Çalışır et al. A New RF Satellite Link Analyzing and Antenna Effect on Satellite Communication
Arapoglou et al. Cooperative deep space communications at ka band: Outage performance analysis
Stolarski et al. Building distributed ground station system with radio amateurs
Araujo et al. Mitigating interferences on LEO satellite downlinks of Earth exploration services by cognitive radio, adaptive modulation and coding techniques
Susilo et al. Ship Communication System Planning Analysis Using Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) Single Channel Per Carrier (SCPC) With KU-Band Frequency
CN117955546A (zh) 基于空频域隔离的低轨星座对地数传频率划分方法及系统

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140526

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20150227

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 12/26 20060101ALI20150223BHEP

Ipc: H04W 24/00 20090101ALI20150223BHEP

Ipc: G06F 17/00 20060101ALI20150223BHEP

Ipc: H04L 12/24 20060101AFI20150223BHEP

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 12/24 20060101AFI20151016BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20151105

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Effective date: 20160323