EP2769384B1 - Graphite thermal decontamination with reducing gases - Google Patents
Graphite thermal decontamination with reducing gases Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2769384B1 EP2769384B1 EP11874351.7A EP11874351A EP2769384B1 EP 2769384 B1 EP2769384 B1 EP 2769384B1 EP 11874351 A EP11874351 A EP 11874351A EP 2769384 B1 EP2769384 B1 EP 2769384B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- roaster
- graphite
- gas
- introducing
- carbon
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims description 142
- 229910002804 graphite Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 136
- 239000010439 graphite Substances 0.000 title claims description 136
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 title claims description 111
- 238000005202 decontamination Methods 0.000 title description 2
- 230000003588 decontaminative effect Effects 0.000 title description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 53
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-NJFSPNSNSA-N Carbon-14 Chemical compound [14C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-NJFSPNSNSA-N 0.000 claims description 37
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 23
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 22
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 22
- GQPLMRYTRLFLPF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrous Oxide Chemical compound [O-][N+]#N GQPLMRYTRLFLPF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 13
- UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon monoxide Chemical compound [O+]#[C-] UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 11
- 229910002091 carbon monoxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 11
- XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Argon Chemical compound [Ar] XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000001272 nitrous oxide Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- OAKJQQAXSVQMHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrazine Chemical compound NN OAKJQQAXSVQMHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052786 argon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O Ammonium Chemical compound [NH4+] QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910021529 ammonia Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- 125000004435 hydrogen atom Chemical class [H]* 0.000 claims description 3
- 125000002887 hydroxy group Chemical group [H]O* 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium atom Chemical compound [He] SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 22
- 238000010926 purge Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000002309 gasification Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- YZCKVEUIGOORGS-NJFSPNSNSA-N Tritium Chemical compound [3H] YZCKVEUIGOORGS-NJFSPNSNSA-N 0.000 description 8
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-OUBTZVSYSA-N chlorane Chemical compound [36ClH] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-OUBTZVSYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000005007 materials handling Methods 0.000 description 7
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 229910052722 tritium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 4
- 150000002431 hydrogen Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 3
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-IGMARMGPSA-N Carbon-12 Chemical compound [12C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-IGMARMGPSA-N 0.000 description 2
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-OUBTZVSYSA-N Cobalt-60 Chemical compound [60Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-OUBTZVSYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- XFXPMWWXUTWYJX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Cyanide Chemical compound N#[C-] XFXPMWWXUTWYJX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010924 continuous production Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- LELOWRISYMNNSU-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydrogen cyanide Chemical compound N#C LELOWRISYMNNSU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004064 recycling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005549 size reduction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-OUBTZVSYSA-N Carbon-13 Chemical compound [13C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-OUBTZVSYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chlorine atom Chemical compound [Cl] ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-BJUDXGSMSA-N Iron-55 Chemical compound [55Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-BJUDXGSMSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011449 brick Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000460 chlorine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052801 chlorine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001873 dinitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005485 electric heating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004992 fission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002926 intermediate level radioactive waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002925 low-level radioactive waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002901 radioactive waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000376 reactant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005245 sintering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007669 thermal treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
- G21F—PROTECTION AGAINST X-RADIATION, GAMMA RADIATION, CORPUSCULAR RADIATION OR PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT; TREATING RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED MATERIAL; DECONTAMINATION ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR
- G21F9/00—Treating radioactively contaminated material; Decontamination arrangements therefor
- G21F9/28—Treating solids
- G21F9/30—Processing
- G21F9/32—Processing by incineration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
- G21F—PROTECTION AGAINST X-RADIATION, GAMMA RADIATION, CORPUSCULAR RADIATION OR PARTICLE BOMBARDMENT; TREATING RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED MATERIAL; DECONTAMINATION ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR
- G21F9/00—Treating radioactively contaminated material; Decontamination arrangements therefor
- G21F9/04—Treating liquids
- G21F9/06—Processing
- G21F9/14—Processing by incineration; by calcination, e.g. desiccation
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to methods for decontamination of graphite to remove tritium, carbon-14, and chlorine-36 using thermal treatment with purge gases that include reducing gases.
- Graphite which consists predominantly of the element carbon, is used as a moderator in a number of nuclear reactor designs, such as the MAGNOX and AGR gas cooled reactors in the United Kingdom, and the RBMK design in Russia.
- the moderator of the reactor is usually installed as an interlocking structure of graphite bricks.
- the graphite moderator typically weighing about 2,000 tons, is a form of radioactive waste that requires safe disposal.
- Graphite is a relatively stable chemical form of carbon, which is in many ways suitable for direct disposal without processing. However, after neutron irradiation, the graphite will contain stored Wigner energy. The potential for release of this energy needs to be accommodated in any strategy which relies on disposing of the graphite in unprocessed form. Alternatively, processing the graphite before disposal can allow the safe release of any stored Wigner energy.
- the graphite also contains significant quantities of radionuclides from neutron induced reactions, both in the graphite itself and in the minor impurities which it contains. Because of the structure of graphite, which includes loosely packed foliates or layers, the radioisotopes can become trapped within the spaces or pores of the graphite.
- the radioisotope content can conveniently be divided into two categories - short-lived isotopes and long-lived isotopes. Short-lived isotopes (such as cobalt-60) make the graphite difficult to handle immediately after reactor shutdown, but they decay after a few tens of years.
- Carbon-14 is produced in the graphite in one of two ways. One way is the activation of nitrogen gas, with the carbon-14 present in pores of the graphite as carbon dioxide gas. The second way is through the neutron activation of carbon-13, which is a natural, stable isotope of carbon, making up just over 1 percent of the carbon in the graphite. Carbon-14 produced in this way would be part of the graphite matrix. Chlorine-36 is formed in a similar manner by irradiation of chlorine left in the graphite matrix during the graphite sintering process. Processing the graphite offers the opportunity to separate the majority of the graphite mass (carbon) from the long-lived radioisotopes. This processing in turn facilitates disposal of the graphite waste shortly after the end of the reactor life, and may permit recycling.
- Storage has certain negative consequences, such as the following: 1) an implication of long-term financial liability, 2) a visually intrusive storage structure that has no productive purpose, and 3) a requirement imposed on a future generation (which gained no benefit from the original asset) to complete eventual clearance. If the storage alternative is to be replaced by shorter term management, it is essential for the graphite to be processed in a safe and radiologically acceptable manner.
- US 2008/0181835 discloses a system for treatment and recycling of graphite containing radionuclides in a thermal roaster with use of small amounts of oxygen.
- Exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide methods that can subject the graphite to a sufficient temperature range to volatilize the radionuclides without significantly gasifying the bulk graphite.
- One aspect of the invention provides a method that includes the steps of (1) heating a roaster to a temperature between 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius; (2) introducing graphite contaminated with radionuclides into the roaster; (3) introducing an inert gas into the roaster; (4) introducing a reducing gas into the roaster; and (5) removing volatilized radionuclides from the roaster, wherein a quantity of the reducing gas introduced in the roaster is between 2 and 20% of a whole quantity of gas introduced in the roaster.
- This method may also include the additional steps of:
- the exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide systems and methods for treating radioactive graphite contaminated with tritium, carbon-14, and chlorine-36 and other radionuclides generated during the operation of a nuclear reactor or other nuclear process.
- the systems and methods include a roaster that operates at temperatures in the range of 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius with inert, optional oxidizing and reducing gases.
- the combination of temperatures and gases allow for the removal of greater than 90 percent of the carbon-14 within the graphite while gasifying less than 5 percent of the bulk graphite.
- FIG 1 depicts a block diagram of a system 100 for treating radioactive graphite in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- a materials handling component 110 receives graphite to be treated in the system 100.
- the graphite was used as the moderator in a nuclear reactor core.
- Other sources of graphite include, but are not limited to, fuel element sleeves, braces, or other reactor components irradiated by the neutron flux of the reactor.
- This graphite will typically be contaminated with radionuclides such as hydrogen-3 (tritium), carbon-14, chlorine-36, iron-55, and cobalt-60 and may include other typical fission and activation products.
- the material handling component 110 sizes and holds the graphite in preparation for introducing the graphite into a roaster 120.
- the graphite received into the materials handling component 110 would have been removed from the nuclear reactor by any conventional process. These processes may include wet processes, dry processes, or a combination of both.
- the present invention can accommodate either dry or wet graphite in any size or shape resulting from the removal process. Further, the graphite may be soaked in water or other solution prior to being received into the materials handling component 110.
- the graphite may be treated in granular or powdered form.
- a size reducer subcomponent 112 of the materials handling component 110 reduces the size of the received graphite prior to its introduction into the roaster 120. In this exemplary embodiment, the received graphite is reduced to a size less than 20 mm. This small size enhances the volatilization of radionuclides from the graphite.
- the exemplary size reducer subcomponent 112 includes a jaw or rotary crusher. Other size reducing equipment may be used.
- a hopper subcomponent 114 of the materials handling component 110 receives the size reduced graphite and holds the graphite awaiting introduction into the roaster 120.
- the internal atmosphere of the exemplary size reducer subcomponent 112 and hopper subcomponent 114 includes an inert gas blanket, such as argon, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or other similar inert gas.
- the internal atmosphere of the exemplary size reducer subcomponent 112 and hopper subcomponent 114 is connected to the off-gas system of the roaster 120, as some radionuclides may be released from the graphite during the size reduction process.
- the graphite may be received in a form and size suitable for introduction into the roaster 120 without the need for size reduction.
- a continuous process may omit the hopper subcomponent 114.
- the roaster 120 includes a vessel used to treat the sized graphite.
- the roaster 120 operates in a temperature range of between 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius.
- the capacity, shape, and size of the roaster 120 can vary by application.
- the roaster 120 is constructed of materials suitable for high temperature operations, such as a refractory-lined steel vessel.
- the operating pressure can vary from a strong vacuum to slightly pressurized. Any type of roaster or apparatus including a fluidized bed, moving bed, batch or static bed roaster can be used.
- One exemplary roaster is a vertically oriented moving bed roaster, where the fresh graphite enters the top of the pile and the treated graphite is removed from the bottom of the pile while the purge gas flow upward (counter current) thru the graphite pile.
- Batch treatment of the graphite would typically involve powdered graphite using a fluidized bed approach.
- a continuous moving bed roaster is preferred.
- the roaster 120 is electrically heated, but other types of heating could be used. Electrical heating is preferred as it reduces the need to introduce oxidizing gases into the vessel, which can gasify the bulk graphite and facilitates temperature control and energy efficiency.
- the roaster 120 receives graphite from a materials inlet 117.
- a variety of mechanical techniques may be used to move the graphite from the materials handling component 110 to the roaster 120 through the materials inlet 117.
- a double valve airlock technique is used to prevent gases from inside the roaster from escaping the roaster and to limit the introduction of gases other than inert gases into the roaster with the graphite.
- the roaster 120 includes gas inlets 130, 140, 150 to receive one or more inert purge gases, one or more reducing gases, and optionally one or more oxidizing gases.
- the gas inlets 130, 140, 150 can be a single inlet connected to three different gas sources, one source providing inert purge gas, a second source providing reducing gas, and a third source providing an oxidizing gas.
- the gas inlet or inlets would be positioned near the bottom of the roaster 120, so that the gases can enter the vessel and travel up through the graphite resident in the roaster 120.
- the gas may be introduced through a flow splitter or distributor to distribute the gas through the volume of graphite, but this component is not required.
- the roaster includes an outlet 122 for volatilized radionuclides, which are carried out of the outlet 122 by the inert purge gas.
- the roaster 120 also includes an outlet 124 for the treated graphite.
- Volatile radionuclides are carried out of the roaster by the purge gas flow and stabilized in treatment subsystem 160, using an appropriate technique for treating the radionuclides.
- the treated graphite is further processed in treatment subsystem 170, where it is packaged for ultimate disposal as "clean" (non-radioactive) waste or is recycled.
- the carbon-14 is more reactive than or more mobile than the bulk carbon-12 in the graphite matrix.
- the presence of small amounts of oxygen provide the oxygen necessary to convert the carbon-14 to carbon monoxide.
- the reducing gases suppress the oxidation of the carbon-12 in the graphite matrix.
- One exemplary benefit of adding reducing gas is that possible carbon-14 compounds in the graphite include cyanide.
- the introduction of hydrogen to the roaster will provide hydrogen atoms to bind with the cyanide to produce hydrogen cyanide, which is volatile, thus some carbon-14 can be removed by the presence of the reducing gas, including hydrogen.
- FIG. 2 depicts a flow diagram of a process 200 for treating radioactive graphite in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the graphite is introduced into the roaster 120 from the hopper subcomponent 114 of the materials handling component 110 by a mechanical transfer of the graphite into the roaster.
- the process is performed batch-wise.
- the graphite can be treated in a continuous process, such as where the graphite enters at the top of the roaster 120 and goes out the bottom of the roaster 120 and the reactant gases enter at the bottom of the roaster 120 and go out the top of the roaster 120.
- the hopper subcomponent 114 may be omitted.
- the roaster 120 Prior to introducing the graphite into the roaster 120, the roaster 120 is brought up to treatment temperature. This temperature ranges from 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius. In this exemplary embodiment, the preferred temperature range is 1200° Celsius to 1500° Celsius, as reducing gases are used in this exemplary process.
- Previous graphite treatment processes for removing carbon-14 from the graphite were limited to temperatures of approximately 1200° Celsius, due to the high gasification of the graphite that resulted from operating a roaster with oxygen containing gases above 1200° Celsius.
- the roaster 120 can operate at temperatures greater than 1200° Celsius. These higher operating temperatures enable the release of essentially all of the tritium, substantially all (greater than 90 percent) of the chlorine-36, and most (greater than 70 percent) of the carbon-14 from the graphite.
- reaction gases are introduced into the roaster 120. These gases contact the heated graphite as they flow through the heated graphite. These reaction gases include at least an inert purge gas and a reducing gas. Purge gases include one or more of nitrogen, argon, or similar non-reactive gas. Inert gases such as carbon dioxide should not be used as these gases would provide an oxygen source that may gasify the bulk carbon. A reducing gas, such as hydrogen, hydrazine, ammonia, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon vapor, and other reducing gases that can produce free hydrogen, carbon monoxide, or ammonium or organic vapor, is also introduced at step 220.
- a reducing gas such as hydrogen, hydrazine, ammonia, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon vapor, and other reducing gases that can produce free hydrogen, carbon monoxide, or ammonium or organic vapor, is also introduced at step 220.
- the amount of reducing gas introduced is in the range of two (2) to twenty (20) percent of the total gas introduced and more preferable between two (2) and ten (10) percent.
- This mixture of inert purge gas and reducing gas is introduced into the roaster 120 near the bottom of the roaster 120. The gas moves up through the graphite and carries the volatilized radionuclides out of the roaster 120 at outlet 124. Even with the inclusion of an oxidizing gas, the inclusion of the reducing gas greatly reduces the gasification of the bulk graphite, such that less than five (5) percent of the bulk graphite is gasified.
- reaction gases also include an oxidizer.
- oxygen converts the solid carbon-14 to carbon dioxide or CO gas, which facilitates its diffusion from the graphite matrix.
- the combination of the inert purge gas (preferably nitrogen) with a limited amount of oxygen containing gases, such as steam, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), oxygen (O 2 ), air, alcohols (OH groups), or other oxygenated vapors, and reducing gas, such as hydrogen provides enhanced carbon-14 radionuclide removal compared to all prior techniques while limiting the gasification of the bulk graphite.
- oxygen containing gases such as steam, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), oxygen (O 2 ), air, alcohols (OH groups), or other oxygenated vapors, and reducing gas, such as hydrogen
- the preferred oxidizing gas is steam that would make up approximately one (1) to fifty (50) percent of the total input reaction gases (preferably two (2) to ten (10) percent). If either carbon dioxide or nitrous oxide is used as the oxidizing gas, they would make up approximately one (1) to ten (10) percent of the total input reaction gases.
- the inclusion of the reducing gas greatly reduces the gasification of the bulk graphite in the presence of the oxidizer, such that less than five (5) percent of the bulk graphite is gasified.
- the reducing gas shifts the reaction equilibrium for oxygen with the bulk graphite such that the reaction rate of the oxygen containing gas is substantially inhibited thereby preventing that oxidizer from reacting with the bulk graphite.
- the purge gas is collected in the treatment subsystem 160, where the radionuclides are stabilized using known methods.
- the graphite is removed from the roaster 120 and treated in the treatment subsystem 170. Typically, the treated graphite would be disposed of in a landfill or recycled and would be treated as low-level radioactive waste instead of intermediate-level radioactive wastes.
- the process ends at step 250. The process may be repeated if necessary.
- FIG 3 shows a schematic of an exemplary roaster 300.
- Graphite is introduced through a feeder system (not shown), such as a hopper, at an inlet 310, under a blanket of inert gas.
- Reaction gases are introduced at an inlet 370, such that the reaction gases flow up through the graphite and out the off-gas outlet 320 as the graphite moves down the vessel 330.
- the vessel 330 which may be a ceramic tube, it is heated (depicted as heated graphite 340).
- the vessel 330 is surrounded by a heating source 350, such as electric heating coils.
- the vessel 330 and heating source 350 are contained within an outer vessel 360, such as a refractory-lined metal shell.
- Treated graphite is removed from the vessel 330 through an outlet port 380.
- the present invention provides methods for treating radioactive graphite contaminated with tritium, carbon-14, and chlorine-36 and other radionuclides generated during the operation of a nuclear reactor or other nuclear process.
- the methods include a roaster that operates at temperatures in the range of 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius with inert gases, reducing gases and optional oxidizing gases.
- the combination of temperatures and gases allow for the removal of most to substantially all the carbon-14 within the graphite while substantially limiting gasifying the bulk graphite.
Description
- The present invention relates generally to methods for decontamination of graphite to remove tritium, carbon-14, and chlorine-36 using thermal treatment with purge gases that include reducing gases.
- Graphite, which consists predominantly of the element carbon, is used as a moderator in a number of nuclear reactor designs, such as the MAGNOX and AGR gas cooled reactors in the United Kingdom, and the RBMK design in Russia. During construction, the moderator of the reactor is usually installed as an interlocking structure of graphite bricks. At the end of reactor life, the graphite moderator, typically weighing about 2,000 tons, is a form of radioactive waste that requires safe disposal. Graphite is a relatively stable chemical form of carbon, which is in many ways suitable for direct disposal without processing. However, after neutron irradiation, the graphite will contain stored Wigner energy. The potential for release of this energy needs to be accommodated in any strategy which relies on disposing of the graphite in unprocessed form. Alternatively, processing the graphite before disposal can allow the safe release of any stored Wigner energy.
- The graphite also contains significant quantities of radionuclides from neutron induced reactions, both in the graphite itself and in the minor impurities which it contains. Because of the structure of graphite, which includes loosely packed foliates or layers, the radioisotopes can become trapped within the spaces or pores of the graphite. The radioisotope content can conveniently be divided into two categories - short-lived isotopes and long-lived isotopes. Short-lived isotopes (such as cobalt-60) make the graphite difficult to handle immediately after reactor shutdown, but they decay after a few tens of years. Long-lived isotopes (principally carbon-14 and chlorine-36) are of concern through the possibility of their discharge to the biosphere. Carbon-14 is produced in the graphite in one of two ways. One way is the activation of nitrogen gas, with the carbon-14 present in pores of the graphite as carbon dioxide gas. The second way is through the neutron activation of carbon-13, which is a natural, stable isotope of carbon, making up just over 1 percent of the carbon in the graphite. Carbon-14 produced in this way would be part of the graphite matrix. Chlorine-36 is formed in a similar manner by irradiation of chlorine left in the graphite matrix during the graphite sintering process. Processing the graphite offers the opportunity to separate the majority of the graphite mass (carbon) from the long-lived radioisotopes. This processing in turn facilitates disposal of the graphite waste shortly after the end of the reactor life, and may permit recycling.
- Because of the characteristics of graphite and its mass, the most common procedure to date for decommissioning graphite-moderated reactors is to store the reactor core in-situ for a period of tens of years following reactor shut-down. During this period, short-lived radioisotopes decay sufficiently to allow eventual manual dismantling of the graphite moderator. Most plans then assume that the graphite will be disposed of in its existing chemical form, with appropriate additional packaging to prevent degradation or release over the long period of carbon-14 and chlorine-36 decay.
- Storage has certain negative consequences, such as the following: 1) an implication of long-term financial liability, 2) a visually intrusive storage structure that has no productive purpose, and 3) a requirement imposed on a future generation (which gained no benefit from the original asset) to complete eventual clearance. If the storage alternative is to be replaced by shorter term management, it is essential for the graphite to be processed in a safe and radiologically acceptable manner.
- Certain prior techniques for treating radioactive graphite applied heat and oxidizing gases to treat the graphite in order to remove a sufficient fraction of the long-lived radionuclides within the graphite. These processes have shown that heating or "roasting" with inert gases, such as nitrogen or argon, alone can remove substantially all the hydrogen-3 (tritium) but the process cannot remove more than about sixty (60) percent of the carbon-14. Alternative processes have been performed to improve the carbon-14 removal by adding limited quantities of oxygen containing gases to the inert gas to provide oxygen that can preferentially convert the carbon-14 to carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide gases, that then can removed from the graphite. Testing with inert gases and oxygen containing gases (steam, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, oxygen) has shown that improved carbon-14 removal is possible but the presence of oxygen tends to dramatically increase the gasification of the bulk graphite. To reduce this gasification effect when oxygen containing gases are combined with the inert gases, the operating temperature of the roasting process must be reduced or limited to prevent excessive bulk graphite gasification. Unfortunately, by reducing or limiting the roasting temperature, the amount of carbon-14 removal is also greatly reduced or limited. As a consequence, when oxygen containing gases are introduced with the inert gases, the concentration of these oxidizing gases must be lowered so that higher temperatures can be used. Still, when roasting temperatures exceed approximately 1200° Celsius, the amount of bulk graphite gasified is excessive regardless of the reduced concentration of oxygen containing gases that are used.
- The results of testing of these processes demonstrate that, if the concentration of oxygen containing gases is limited sufficiently to reduce bulk graphite gasification at temperatures greater than approx. 1200° Celsius, then the carbon-14 removal is greatly reduced to less than approx. sixty (60) percent, which is unsatisfactory. If the oxygen containing gas concentration is increased such that carbon-14 removal is satisfactory then too much bulk graphite is gasified. In either case, an objective of volatilizing more than ninety (90) percent of the carbon-14 while simultaneously reducing bulk graphite gasification to less than five (5) percent by weight cannot be achieved with these conventional methods.
-
US 2008/0181835 discloses a system for treatment and recycling of graphite containing radionuclides in a thermal roaster with use of small amounts of oxygen. - What is needed are systems and methods that can subject the graphite to a sufficient temperature range to volatilize the radionuclides without gasifying the bulk graphite and specifically systems and methods that can remove greater than 90 percent of the carbon-14 while gasifying less than 5 percent of the bulk graphite.
- Exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide methods that can subject the graphite to a sufficient temperature range to volatilize the radionuclides without significantly gasifying the bulk graphite. One aspect of the invention provides a method that includes the steps of (1) heating a roaster to a temperature between 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius; (2) introducing graphite contaminated with radionuclides into the roaster; (3) introducing an inert gas into the roaster; (4) introducing a reducing gas into the roaster; and (5) removing volatilized radionuclides from the roaster,
wherein a quantity of the reducing gas introduced in the roaster is between 2 and 20% of a whole quantity of gas introduced in the roaster. This method may also include the additional steps of: - adding an oxidizing gas into the roaster, and/or
- reducing the size of the graphite prior to introducing the graphite into the roaster.
- less than five (5) percent of the graphite is gasified;
- the temperature of the process is between 1200° Celsius to 1500° Celsius;
- the radionuclides comprise carbon-14 and at least seventy (70) percent of the carbon-14 is removed from the graphite;
- the radionuclides comprise carbon-14 and at least ninety (90) percent of the carbon-14 is removed from the graphite;
- the purge gas comprises at least one of nitrogen, helium, and argon and the reducing gas comprises at least one of hydrogen, hydrazine, ammonia, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbon vapor;
- the purge gas comprises one or more reducing gases that can produce free hydrogen, carbon monoxide (CO), ammonium, or organic vapor;
- the oxidizing gas comprises at least one of steam, carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), oxygen (O2), air, alcohols (with OH groups), or other oxygenated vapors;
- the steps of introducing the inert gas into the roaster and introducing the reducing gas into the roaster comprise introducing the inert gas and the reducing case at a location near the bottom of the reactor and wherein the inert gas and the reducing gas flow through the graphite; and/or
- the roaster comprises a vertically-oriented moving bed reactor and where the step of introducing graphite contaminated with radionuclides into the roaster includes introducing the graphite near the top of the roaster and where the steps of introducing the inert gas into the roaster and introducing the reducing gas into the roaster include introducing the gases near the bottom of the roaster.
-
-
Figure 1 depicts a block diagram of a system for treating radioactive graphite in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. -
Figure 2 depicts a flow diagram of a process for treating radioactive graphite in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. -
Figure 3 depicts a schematic diagram of a roaster for treating radioactive graphite in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. - The exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide systems and methods for treating radioactive graphite contaminated with tritium, carbon-14, and chlorine-36 and other radionuclides generated during the operation of a nuclear reactor or other nuclear process. The systems and methods include a roaster that operates at temperatures in the range of 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius with inert, optional oxidizing and reducing gases. The combination of temperatures and gases allow for the removal of greater than 90 percent of the carbon-14 within the graphite while gasifying less than 5 percent of the bulk graphite.
-
Figure 1 depicts a block diagram of asystem 100 for treating radioactive graphite in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Referring toFigure 1 , amaterials handling component 110 receives graphite to be treated in thesystem 100. Typically, the graphite was used as the moderator in a nuclear reactor core. Other sources of graphite include, but are not limited to, fuel element sleeves, braces, or other reactor components irradiated by the neutron flux of the reactor. This graphite will typically be contaminated with radionuclides such as hydrogen-3 (tritium), carbon-14, chlorine-36, iron-55, and cobalt-60 and may include other typical fission and activation products. - The
material handling component 110 sizes and holds the graphite in preparation for introducing the graphite into aroaster 120. The graphite received into thematerials handling component 110 would have been removed from the nuclear reactor by any conventional process. These processes may include wet processes, dry processes, or a combination of both. The present invention can accommodate either dry or wet graphite in any size or shape resulting from the removal process. Further, the graphite may be soaked in water or other solution prior to being received into thematerials handling component 110. - The graphite may be treated in granular or powdered form. A
size reducer subcomponent 112 of thematerials handling component 110 reduces the size of the received graphite prior to its introduction into theroaster 120. In this exemplary embodiment, the received graphite is reduced to a size less than 20 mm. This small size enhances the volatilization of radionuclides from the graphite. To reduce the size of the graphite, the exemplarysize reducer subcomponent 112 includes a jaw or rotary crusher. Other size reducing equipment may be used. Ahopper subcomponent 114 of thematerials handling component 110 receives the size reduced graphite and holds the graphite awaiting introduction into theroaster 120. The internal atmosphere of the exemplarysize reducer subcomponent 112 andhopper subcomponent 114 includes an inert gas blanket, such as argon, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or other similar inert gas. The internal atmosphere of the exemplarysize reducer subcomponent 112 andhopper subcomponent 114 is connected to the off-gas system of theroaster 120, as some radionuclides may be released from the graphite during the size reduction process. In an alternative embodiment, the graphite may be received in a form and size suitable for introduction into theroaster 120 without the need for size reduction. Similarly, a continuous process may omit thehopper subcomponent 114. - The
roaster 120 includes a vessel used to treat the sized graphite. Theroaster 120 operates in a temperature range of between 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius. The capacity, shape, and size of theroaster 120 can vary by application. Theroaster 120 is constructed of materials suitable for high temperature operations, such as a refractory-lined steel vessel. The operating pressure can vary from a strong vacuum to slightly pressurized. Any type of roaster or apparatus including a fluidized bed, moving bed, batch or static bed roaster can be used. One exemplary roaster is a vertically oriented moving bed roaster, where the fresh graphite enters the top of the pile and the treated graphite is removed from the bottom of the pile while the purge gas flow upward (counter current) thru the graphite pile. (SeeFig. 3 , discussed below) Batch treatment of the graphite would typically involve powdered graphite using a fluidized bed approach. For graphite that is larger than powders, a continuous moving bed roaster is preferred. In the exemplary embodiment, theroaster 120 is electrically heated, but other types of heating could be used. Electrical heating is preferred as it reduces the need to introduce oxidizing gases into the vessel, which can gasify the bulk graphite and facilitates temperature control and energy efficiency. Theroaster 120 receives graphite from amaterials inlet 117. A variety of mechanical techniques may be used to move the graphite from thematerials handling component 110 to theroaster 120 through thematerials inlet 117. In an exemplary system, a double valve airlock technique is used to prevent gases from inside the roaster from escaping the roaster and to limit the introduction of gases other than inert gases into the roaster with the graphite. - The
roaster 120 includesgas inlets gas inlets roaster 120, so that the gases can enter the vessel and travel up through the graphite resident in theroaster 120. The gas may be introduced through a flow splitter or distributor to distribute the gas through the volume of graphite, but this component is not required. The roaster includes anoutlet 122 for volatilized radionuclides, which are carried out of theoutlet 122 by the inert purge gas. Theroaster 120 also includes anoutlet 124 for the treated graphite. - Volatile radionuclides are carried out of the roaster by the purge gas flow and stabilized in
treatment subsystem 160, using an appropriate technique for treating the radionuclides. The treated graphite is further processed intreatment subsystem 170, where it is packaged for ultimate disposal as "clean" (non-radioactive) waste or is recycled. - The carbon-14 is more reactive than or more mobile than the bulk carbon-12 in the graphite matrix. The presence of small amounts of oxygen provide the oxygen necessary to convert the carbon-14 to carbon monoxide. The reducing gases suppress the oxidation of the carbon-12 in the graphite matrix. One exemplary benefit of adding reducing gas is that possible carbon-14 compounds in the graphite include cyanide. The introduction of hydrogen to the roaster will provide hydrogen atoms to bind with the cyanide to produce hydrogen cyanide, which is volatile, thus some carbon-14 can be removed by the presence of the reducing gas, including hydrogen.
-
Figure 2 depicts a flow diagram of aprocess 200 for treating radioactive graphite in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Referring toFigures 1 and2 , atstep 210, the graphite is introduced into theroaster 120 from thehopper subcomponent 114 of thematerials handling component 110 by a mechanical transfer of the graphite into the roaster. In this exemplary embodiment, the process is performed batch-wise. Alternatively, the graphite can be treated in a continuous process, such as where the graphite enters at the top of theroaster 120 and goes out the bottom of theroaster 120 and the reactant gases enter at the bottom of theroaster 120 and go out the top of theroaster 120. Thehopper subcomponent 114 may be omitted. - Prior to introducing the graphite into the
roaster 120, theroaster 120 is brought up to treatment temperature. This temperature ranges from 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius. In this exemplary embodiment, the preferred temperature range is 1200° Celsius to 1500° Celsius, as reducing gases are used in this exemplary process. Previous graphite treatment processes for removing carbon-14 from the graphite were limited to temperatures of approximately 1200° Celsius, due to the high gasification of the graphite that resulted from operating a roaster with oxygen containing gases above 1200° Celsius. By introducing reducing gases into the treatment process, theroaster 120 can operate at temperatures greater than 1200° Celsius. These higher operating temperatures enable the release of essentially all of the tritium, substantially all (greater than 90 percent) of the chlorine-36, and most (greater than 70 percent) of the carbon-14 from the graphite. - At
step 220, reaction gases are introduced into theroaster 120. These gases contact the heated graphite as they flow through the heated graphite. These reaction gases include at least an inert purge gas and a reducing gas. Purge gases include one or more of nitrogen, argon, or similar non-reactive gas. Inert gases such as carbon dioxide should not be used as these gases would provide an oxygen source that may gasify the bulk carbon. A reducing gas, such as hydrogen, hydrazine, ammonia, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon vapor, and other reducing gases that can produce free hydrogen, carbon monoxide, or ammonium or organic vapor, is also introduced atstep 220. The amount of reducing gas introduced is in the range of two (2) to twenty (20) percent of the total gas introduced and more preferable between two (2) and ten (10) percent. This mixture of inert purge gas and reducing gas is introduced into theroaster 120 near the bottom of theroaster 120. The gas moves up through the graphite and carries the volatilized radionuclides out of theroaster 120 atoutlet 124. Even with the inclusion of an oxidizing gas, the inclusion of the reducing gas greatly reduces the gasification of the bulk graphite, such that less than five (5) percent of the bulk graphite is gasified. Further, operating at temperatures about 1200° Celsius and using a mixture of an inert purge gas, oxidizing gas, and reducing gas results in the removal of most to substantially all of the carbon-14. In an alternative embodiment, the reaction gases also include an oxidizer. The presence of oxygen converts the solid carbon-14 to carbon dioxide or CO gas, which facilitates its diffusion from the graphite matrix. The combination of the inert purge gas (preferably nitrogen) with a limited amount of oxygen containing gases, such as steam, carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), oxygen (O2), air, alcohols (OH groups), or other oxygenated vapors, and reducing gas, such as hydrogen provides enhanced carbon-14 radionuclide removal compared to all prior techniques while limiting the gasification of the bulk graphite. The preferred oxidizing gas is steam that would make up approximately one (1) to fifty (50) percent of the total input reaction gases (preferably two (2) to ten (10) percent). If either carbon dioxide or nitrous oxide is used as the oxidizing gas, they would make up approximately one (1) to ten (10) percent of the total input reaction gases. The inclusion of the reducing gas greatly reduces the gasification of the bulk graphite in the presence of the oxidizer, such that less than five (5) percent of the bulk graphite is gasified. The reducing gas shifts the reaction equilibrium for oxygen with the bulk graphite such that the reaction rate of the oxygen containing gas is substantially inhibited thereby preventing that oxidizer from reacting with the bulk graphite. - At
step 230, the purge gas is collected in thetreatment subsystem 160, where the radionuclides are stabilized using known methods. Atstep 240, the graphite is removed from theroaster 120 and treated in thetreatment subsystem 170. Typically, the treated graphite would be disposed of in a landfill or recycled and would be treated as low-level radioactive waste instead of intermediate-level radioactive wastes. The process ends atstep 250. The process may be repeated if necessary. -
Figure 3 shows a schematic of anexemplary roaster 300. Graphite is introduced through a feeder system (not shown), such as a hopper, at aninlet 310, under a blanket of inert gas. Reaction gases are introduced at aninlet 370, such that the reaction gases flow up through the graphite and out the off-gas outlet 320 as the graphite moves down thevessel 330. As the graphite moves through thevessel 330, which may be a ceramic tube, it is heated (depicted as heated graphite 340). Thevessel 330 is surrounded by aheating source 350, such as electric heating coils. Thevessel 330 andheating source 350 are contained within anouter vessel 360, such as a refractory-lined metal shell. Treated graphite is removed from thevessel 330 through anoutlet port 380. - One of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the present invention provides methods for treating radioactive graphite contaminated with tritium, carbon-14, and chlorine-36 and other radionuclides generated during the operation of a nuclear reactor or other nuclear process. The methods include a roaster that operates at temperatures in the range of 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius with inert gases, reducing gases and optional oxidizing gases. The combination of temperatures and gases allow for the removal of most to substantially all the carbon-14 within the graphite while substantially limiting gasifying the bulk graphite.
Claims (13)
- A method comprising the steps of:- heating a roaster to a temperature between 800° Celsius to 2000° Celsius;- introducing graphite contaminated with radionuclides into the roaster;- introducing an inert gas into the roaster;- introducing a reducing gas into the roaster; and- removing volatilized radionuclides from the roaster,wherein a quantity of the reducing gas introduced in the roaster is between 2 and 20% of a whole quantity of gas introduced in the roaster.
- The method of claim 1 wherein less than five (5) percent of the graphite is gasified.
- The method of claim 1 wherein the temperature is between 1200° Celsius to 1500° Celsius.
- The method of claim 1 wherein the radionuclides comprise carbon-14 and at least seventy (70) percent of the carbon-14 is removed from the graphite.
- The method of claim 1 wherein the radionuclides comprise carbon-14 and at least ninety (90) percent of the carbon-14 is removed from the graphite.
- The method of claim 1 wherein the inert gas comprises at least one of nitrogen, helium, and argon and the reducing gas comprises at least one of hydrogen, hydrazine, ammonia, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbon vapor.
- The method of claim 1 wherein the reducing gas comprises one or more reducing gases that can produce free hydrogen, carbon monoxide (CO), ammonium, or organic vapor.
- The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of adding an oxidizing gas into the roaster.
- The method of claim 8 wherein the oxidizing gas comprises at least one of steam, carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), oxygen (O2), air, alcohols (with OH groups), or other oxygenated vapors.
- The method of claim 1 wherein the steps of introducing the inert gas into the roaster and introducing the reducing gas into the roaster comprise introducing the inert gas and the reducing gas at the bottom of the reactor and wherein the inert gas and the reducing gas flow through the graphite.
- The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of reducing the size of the graphite prior to introducing the graphite into the roaster.
- The method of claim 1 wherein the roaster comprises a vertically-oriented moving bed reactor and wherein the step of introducing graphite contaminated with radionuclides into the roaster comprises introducing the graphite at the top of the roaster and wherein the steps of introducing the inert gas into the roaster and introducing the reducing gas into the roaster comprise introducing the gases at the bottom of the roaster.
- The method of claim 8 wherein a quantity of the oxidizing gas added into the roaster is between 1 and 10% of a whole quantity of gas introduced in the roaster.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/057301 WO2013058772A1 (en) | 2011-10-21 | 2011-10-21 | Graphite thermal decontamination with reducing gases |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2769384A1 EP2769384A1 (en) | 2014-08-27 |
EP2769384A4 EP2769384A4 (en) | 2015-07-22 |
EP2769384B1 true EP2769384B1 (en) | 2018-10-10 |
Family
ID=48141219
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11874351.7A Active EP2769384B1 (en) | 2011-10-21 | 2011-10-21 | Graphite thermal decontamination with reducing gases |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2769384B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5844474B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101666138B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN104137189B (en) |
ES (1) | ES2700787T3 (en) |
LT (1) | LT2769384T (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013058772A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA201402825B (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2997543A1 (en) * | 2012-10-29 | 2014-05-02 | Electricite De France | THERMAL TREATMENT OF CARBON WASTE, PERFECTED BY THE CHOICE OF INJECTED GASES. |
CN106024088B (en) * | 2016-05-23 | 2017-11-14 | 中国工程物理研究院材料研究所 | A kind of liquid phase oxidation digestion procedure of radioactive pollution carbon material |
CN106531277B (en) * | 2016-12-26 | 2018-10-23 | 西南科技大学 | A kind of processing method of live graphite |
CN107051206B (en) * | 2017-02-16 | 2018-09-21 | 中国科学院上海应用物理研究所 | Hydrogen or its isotope desorption reaction kettle in a kind of graphite |
CN112489847B (en) * | 2020-12-01 | 2023-05-05 | 中国工程物理研究院核物理与化学研究所 | Activated graphite volume reduction treatment method |
CN113257450B (en) * | 2021-03-30 | 2023-11-10 | 北京交通大学 | Method for treating retired radioactive nuclear graphite |
CN113429224B (en) * | 2021-05-14 | 2022-10-04 | 中国工程物理研究院材料研究所 | Surface etching method of carbon material |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2633000B2 (en) * | 1989-01-28 | 1997-07-23 | 動力炉・核燃料開発事業団 | How to treat highly radioactive waste |
US5183541A (en) * | 1990-04-09 | 1993-02-02 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Decontamination of radioactive metals |
UA57884C2 (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2003-07-15 | Дейвід БРЕДБЕРІ | Method for treatment of radioactive graphite |
GB2445420A (en) * | 2007-01-05 | 2008-07-09 | Tetronics Ltd | Hazardous Waste Treatment Process |
US20080181835A1 (en) * | 2006-12-01 | 2008-07-31 | Mason J Bradley | Steam reforming process system for graphite destruction and capture of radionuclides |
FR2943167B1 (en) * | 2009-03-11 | 2011-03-25 | Electricite De France | TREATMENT OF CARBON RADIOACTIVE WASTE. |
-
2011
- 2011-10-21 WO PCT/US2011/057301 patent/WO2013058772A1/en active Application Filing
- 2011-10-21 LT LTEP11874351.7T patent/LT2769384T/en unknown
- 2011-10-21 EP EP11874351.7A patent/EP2769384B1/en active Active
- 2011-10-21 ES ES11874351T patent/ES2700787T3/en active Active
- 2011-10-21 JP JP2014537046A patent/JP5844474B2/en active Active
- 2011-10-21 KR KR1020147013162A patent/KR101666138B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2011-10-21 CN CN201180074303.2A patent/CN104137189B/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-04-16 ZA ZA2014/02825A patent/ZA201402825B/en unknown
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2769384A1 (en) | 2014-08-27 |
EP2769384A4 (en) | 2015-07-22 |
JP5844474B2 (en) | 2016-01-20 |
ZA201402825B (en) | 2016-01-27 |
KR20140101735A (en) | 2014-08-20 |
CN104137189A (en) | 2014-11-05 |
JP2014532855A (en) | 2014-12-08 |
CN104137189B (en) | 2017-07-25 |
LT2769384T (en) | 2018-12-27 |
WO2013058772A1 (en) | 2013-04-25 |
ES2700787T3 (en) | 2019-02-19 |
RU2014120424A (en) | 2015-12-10 |
KR101666138B1 (en) | 2016-10-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2769384B1 (en) | Graphite thermal decontamination with reducing gases | |
US6625248B2 (en) | Process for the treatment of radioactive graphite | |
CN101061552B (en) | System and method for radioactive waste destruction | |
Li et al. | Recent advances in the treatment of irradiated graphite: A review | |
US9040014B2 (en) | Graphite thermal decontamination with reducing gases | |
Mason et al. | Pyrolysis and its potential use in nuclear graphite disposal | |
JP5745728B2 (en) | Method for treating clad containing sintered calcium hydride | |
RU2574435C2 (en) | Thermal graphite deactivation by regenerative gases | |
Rosanvallon et al. | Waste management strategy for EU DEMO: Status, challenges and perspectives | |
Bresee et al. | Chemical Pre-Treatment of used Fuel for Long–Term Storagea | |
JP2016008878A (en) | Method and system for treating radioactive contaminated water | |
Babelot et al. | The EFTTRA experiment on irradiation of Am targets | |
Tian et al. | Treatment and disposal of the radioactive graphite waste | |
Márquez et al. | GRAFEC: A New Spanish Program to Investigate Waste Management Options for Radioactive Graphite-12399 | |
Kitabata et al. | Tritium handling experience in 165MWe power generating station, Fugen | |
Li | Treatment and Disposal of the Radioactive Graphite Waste of High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Spent Fuel | |
Bancroft et al. | The Volatilization and Collection of Ruthenium and Cesium in a System for Incorporating Fission Products into Glass | |
Morris et al. | Contingency options for the drying, conditioning and packaging of Magnox spent fuel in the UK | |
Li et al. | Strategy Study on Treatment and Disposal of the Radioactive Graphite Waste of HTR | |
Shivakumar et al. | Spent fuel behaviour during dry storage-a review | |
Shtynda et al. | Problems of radioactive sodium removal and disposal from decommissioning LMFR equipment | |
Raisonnier | Procedures and techniques for the management of experimental and exotic fuel from research and test reactors in France | |
Hallman | Evaluation of Fire Hazards While Repackaging Plutonium-contaminated Scrap in Hb-line | |
US20140037518A1 (en) | Method of recycling spent nuclear fuel | |
Rush | UNITED NUCLEAR CORPORATION PLUTONIUM FACILITY |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20140417 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RA4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected) |
Effective date: 20150618 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G21F 9/14 20060101AFI20150612BHEP Ipc: G21C 1/00 20060101ALI20150612BHEP Ipc: G21F 9/32 20060101ALI20150612BHEP Ipc: G21F 9/00 20060101ALI20150612BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G21C 1/00 20060101ALI20180417BHEP Ipc: G21F 9/32 20060101ALI20180417BHEP Ipc: G21F 9/00 20060101ALI20180417BHEP Ipc: G21F 9/14 20060101AFI20180417BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180508 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1052191 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20181015 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602011052885 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: VALIPAT S.A. GEVERS SA, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: RO Ref legal event code: EPE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20181010 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2700787 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20190219 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1052191 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20181010 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PCAR Free format text: NEW ADDRESS: RUE DES NOYERS 11, 2000 NEUCHATEL (CH) |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190110 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190110 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190111 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20190210 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181021 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602011052885 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181031 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190711 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181021 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181021 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181010 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20111021 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Payment date: 20200918 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: LT Payment date: 20200930 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20201015 Year of fee payment: 10 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20201013 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20211105 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MM4D Effective date: 20211021 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211022 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211021 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211021 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211031 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211031 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20231024 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230921 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20231201 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231019 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221022 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221022 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20231010 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231011 Year of fee payment: 13 |