EP2732130B1 - Essai des couches lors d'un forage à pression gérée - Google Patents

Essai des couches lors d'un forage à pression gérée Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2732130B1
EP2732130B1 EP11869316.7A EP11869316A EP2732130B1 EP 2732130 B1 EP2732130 B1 EP 2732130B1 EP 11869316 A EP11869316 A EP 11869316A EP 2732130 B1 EP2732130 B1 EP 2732130B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pressure
wellbore
annulus
drilling
fluid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP11869316.7A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2732130A4 (fr
EP2732130A1 (fr
Inventor
Stuart M. JEFFRIES
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Original Assignee
Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Halliburton Energy Services Inc filed Critical Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Publication of EP2732130A1 publication Critical patent/EP2732130A1/fr
Publication of EP2732130A4 publication Critical patent/EP2732130A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2732130B1 publication Critical patent/EP2732130B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
    • E21B49/08—Obtaining fluid samples or testing fluids, in boreholes or wells
    • E21B49/087—Well testing, e.g. testing for reservoir productivity or formation parameters
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B21/00—Methods or apparatus for flushing boreholes, e.g. by use of exhaust air from motor
    • E21B21/08—Controlling or monitoring pressure or flow of drilling fluid, e.g. automatic filling of boreholes, automatic control of bottom pressure
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B21/00—Methods or apparatus for flushing boreholes, e.g. by use of exhaust air from motor
    • E21B21/08—Controlling or monitoring pressure or flow of drilling fluid, e.g. automatic filling of boreholes, automatic control of bottom pressure
    • E21B21/085—Underbalanced techniques, i.e. where borehole fluid pressure is below formation pressure
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/06—Measuring temperature or pressure

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to equipment utilized and operations performed in conjunction with well drilling operations and, in an embodiment described herein, more particularly provides for formation testing in managed pressure drilling.
  • Managed pressure drilling is well known as the art of precisely controlling bottom hole pressure during drilling by utilizing a closed annulus and a means for regulating pressure in the annulus, an example can be found in the document GB 2 156 403 A which is considered the closest prior art.
  • the annulus is typically closed during drilling through use of a rotating control device (RCD, also known as a rotating control head or rotating blowout preventer) which seals about the drill pipe as it rotates.
  • RCD rotating control device
  • FIG. 1 Representatively illustrated in FIG. 1 is a well drilling system 10 and associated method which can embody principles of the present disclosure.
  • a wellbore 12 is drilled by rotating a drill bit 14 on an end of a drill string 16.
  • Drilling fluid 18, commonly known as mud is circulated downward through the drill string 16, out the drill bit 14 and upward through an annulus 20 formed between the drill string and the wellbore 12, in order to cool the drill bit, lubricate the drill string, remove cuttings and provide a measure of bottom hole pressure control.
  • a non-return valve 21 typically a flapper-type check valve
  • Control of bottom hole pressure is very important in managed pressure drilling, and in other types of drilling operations.
  • the bottom hole pressure is precisely controlled to prevent excessive loss of fluid into an earth formation 82 surrounding the wellbore 12, undesired fracturing of the formation, undesired influx of formation fluids into the wellbore, etc.
  • the annulus 20 can be open to the atmosphere at the surface during overbalanced drilling, and wellbore pressure is controlled during drilling by adjusting a density of the drilling fluid 18.
  • Nitrogen or another gas, or another lighter weight fluid may be added to the drilling fluid 18 for pressure control. This technique is useful, for example, in underbalanced drilling operations.
  • RCD rotating control device 22
  • the RCD 22 seals about the drill string 16 above a wellhead 24.
  • the drill string 16 would extend upwardly through the RCD 22 for connection to, for example, a rotary table (not shown), a standpipe line 26, kelley (not shown), a top drive and/or other conventional drilling equipment.
  • the drilling fluid 18 exits the wellhead 24 via a wing valve 28 in communication with the annulus 20 below the RCD 22.
  • the fluid 18 then flows through mud return lines 30, 73 to a choke manifold 32, which includes redundant chokes 34 (only one of which might be used at a time).
  • Backpressure is applied to the annulus 20 by variably restricting flow of the fluid 18 through the operative one(s) of the redundant choke(s) 34.
  • downhole pressure e.g., pressure at the bottom of the wellbore 12, pressure at a downhole casing shoe, pressure at a particular formation or zone, etc.
  • a hydraulics model can be used, as described more fully below, to determine a pressure applied to the annulus 20 at or near the surface which will result in a desired downhole pressure, so that an operator (or an automated control system) can readily determine how to regulate the pressure applied to the annulus at or near the surface (which can be conveniently measured) in order to obtain the desired downhole pressure.
  • Pressure applied to the annulus 20 can be measured at or near the surface via a variety of pressure sensors 36, 38, 40, each of which is in communication with the annulus.
  • Pressure sensor 36 senses pressure below the RCD 22, but above a blowout preventer (BOP) stack 42.
  • Pressure sensor 38 senses pressure in the wellhead below the BOP stack 42.
  • Pressure sensor 40 senses pressure in the mud return lines 30, 73 upstream of the choke manifold 32.
  • Another pressure sensor 44 senses pressure in the standpipe line 26.
  • Yet another pressure sensor 46 senses pressure downstream of the choke manifold 32, but upstream of a separator 48, shaker 50 and mud pit 52. Additional sensors include temperature sensors 54, 56, Coriolis flowmeter 58, and flowmeters 62, 64, 66.
  • the system 10 could include only two of the three flowmeters 62, 64, 66. However, input from all available sensors is useful to the hydraulics model in determining what the pressure applied to the annulus 20 should be during the drilling operation.
  • flowmeter 58 may be a Coriolis flowmeter, since a turbine flowmeter, acoustic flowmeter, or another type of flowmeter could be used instead.
  • the drill string 16 may include its own sensors 60, for example, to directly measure downhole pressure.
  • sensors 60 may be of the type known to those skilled in the art as pressure while drilling (PWD), measurement while drilling (MWD) and/or logging while drilling (LWD).
  • PWD pressure while drilling
  • MWD measurement while drilling
  • LWD logging while drilling
  • These drill string sensor systems generally provide at least pressure measurement, and may also provide temperature measurement, detection of drill string characteristics (such as vibration, weight on bit, stick-slip, etc.), formation characteristics (such as resistivity, density, etc.) and/or other measurements.
  • Various forms of wired or wireless telemetry acoustic, pressure pulse, electromagnetic, etc.
  • lines such as, electrical, optical, hydraulic, etc., lines
  • Additional sensors could be included in the system 10, if desired.
  • another flowmeter 67 could be used to measure the rate of flow of the fluid 18 exiting the wellhead 24, another Coriolis flowmeter (not shown) could be interconnected directly upstream or downstream of a rig mud pump 68, etc.
  • the output of the rig mud pump 68 could be determined by counting pump strokes, instead of by using the flowmeter 62 or any other flowmeters.
  • separator 48 could be a 3 or 4 phase separator, or a mud gas separator (sometimes referred to as a "poor boy degasser"). However, the separator 48 is not necessarily used in the system 10.
  • the drilling fluid 18 is pumped through the standpipe line 26 and into the interior of the drill string 16 by the rig mud pump 68.
  • the pump 68 receives the fluid 18 from the mud pit 52 and flows it via a standpipe manifold 70 to the standpipe 26.
  • the fluid then circulates downward through the drill string 16, upward through the annulus 20, through the mud return lines 30, 73, through the choke manifold 32, and then via the separator 48 and shaker 50 to the mud pit 52 for conditioning and recirculation.
  • the choke 34 cannot be used to control backpressure applied to the annulus 20 for control of the downhole pressure, unless the fluid 18 is flowing through the choke.
  • a lack of fluid 18 flow will occur, for example, whenever a connection is made in the drill string 16 (e.g., to add another length of drill pipe to the drill string as the wellbore 12 is drilled deeper), and the lack of circulation will require that downhole pressure be regulated solely by the density of the fluid 18.
  • flow of the fluid 18 through the choke 34 can be maintained, even though the fluid does not circulate through the drill string 16 and annulus 20, while a connection is being made in the drill string.
  • pressure can still be applied to the annulus 20 by restricting flow of the fluid 18 through the choke 34, even though a separate backpressure pump may not be used.
  • a backpressure pump (not shown) could be used to supply pressure to the annulus 20 while the fluid 18 does not circulate through the drill string 16, if desired.
  • both of the bypass line 75 and the mud return line 30 are in communication with the annulus 20 via a single line 73.
  • the bypass line 75 and the mud return line 30 could instead be separately connected to the wellhead 24, for example, using an additional wing valve (e.g., below the RCD 22), in which case each of the lines 30, 75 would be directly in communication with the annulus 20.
  • Flow of the fluid 18 through the bypass line 72, 75 is regulated by a choke or other type of flow control device 74.
  • Line 72 is upstream of the bypass flow control device 74, and line 75 is downstream of the bypass flow control device.
  • Flow of the fluid 18 through the standpipe line 26 is substantially controlled by a valve or other type of flow control device 76.
  • the flow control devices 74, 76 are independently controllable, which provides substantial benefits to the system 10, as described more fully below.
  • the flowmeters 64, 66 are depicted in FIG. 1 as being interconnected in these lines.
  • the rate of flow through the standpipe line 26 could be determined even if only the flowmeters 62, 64 were used, and the rate of flow through the bypass line 72 could be determined even if only the flowmeters 62, 66 were used.
  • the system 10 it should be understood that it is not necessary for the system 10 to include all of the sensors depicted in FIG. 1 and described herein, and the system could instead include additional sensors, different combinations and/or types of sensors, etc.
  • a bypass flow control device 78 may be used for filling the standpipe line 26 and drill string 16 after a connection is made in the drill string, and for equalizing pressure between the standpipe line and mud return lines 30, 73 prior to opening the flow control device 76. Otherwise, sudden opening of the flow control device 76 prior to the standpipe line 26 and drill string 16 being filled and pressurized with the fluid 18 could cause an undesirable pressure transient in the annulus 20 (e.g., due to flow to the choke manifold 32 temporarily being lost while the standpipe line and drill string fill with fluid, etc.).
  • the standpipe bypass flow control device 78 By opening the standpipe bypass flow control device 78 after a connection is made, the fluid 18 is permitted to fill the standpipe line 26 and drill string 16 while a substantial majority of the fluid continues to flow through the bypass line 72, thereby enabling continued controlled application of pressure to the annulus 20.
  • the flow control device 76 can be opened, and then the flow control device 74 can be closed to slowly divert a greater proportion of the fluid 18 from the bypass line 72 to the standpipe line 26.
  • a similar process can be performed, except in reverse, to gradually divert flow of the fluid 18 from the standpipe line 26 to the bypass line 72 in preparation for adding more drill pipe to the drill string 16. That is, the flow control device 74 can be gradually opened to slowly divert a greater proportion of the fluid 18 from the standpipe line 26 to the bypass line 72, and then the flow control device 76 can be closed.
  • the flow control devices 76, 78 could be integrated into a single flow control device 81 (e.g., a single choke which can gradually open to slowly fill and pressurize the standpipe line 26 and drill string 16 after a drill pipe connection is made, and then open fully to allow maximum flow while drilling).
  • a single flow control device 81 e.g., a single choke which can gradually open to slowly fill and pressurize the standpipe line 26 and drill string 16 after a drill pipe connection is made, and then open fully to allow maximum flow while drilling.
  • the individually operable flow control devices 76, 78 are presently preferred.
  • a pressure and flow control system 90 which may be used in conjunction with the system 10 and associated method of FIG. 1 is representatively illustrated in FIG. 2 .
  • the control system 90 is preferably fully automated, although some human intervention may be used, for example, to safeguard against improper operation, initiate certain routines, update parameters, etc.
  • the control system 90 includes a hydraulics model 92, a data acquisition and control interface 94 and a controller 96 (such as a programmable logic controller or PLC, a suitably programmed computer, etc.). Although these elements 92, 94, 96 are depicted separately in FIG. 2 , any or all of them could be combined into a single element, or the functions of the elements could be separated into additional elements, other additional elements and/or functions could be provided, etc.
  • the hydraulics model 92 is used in the control system 90 to determine the desired annulus pressure at or near the surface to achieve the desired downhole pressure.
  • Data such as well geometry, fluid properties and offset well information (such as geothermal gradient and pore pressure gradient, etc.) are utilized by the hydraulics model 92 in making this determination, as well as real-time sensor data acquired by the data acquisition and control interface 94.
  • the hydraulics model 92 operates to maintain a substantially continuous flow of real-time data from the sensors 44, 54, 66, 62, 64, 60, 58, 46, 36, 38, 40, 56, 67 to the hydraulics model 92, so that the hydraulics model has the information it needs to adapt to changing circumstances and to update the desired annulus pressure, and the hydraulics model operates to supply the data acquisition and control interface substantially continuously with a value for the desired annulus pressure.
  • a suitable hydraulics model for use as the hydraulics model 92 in the control system 90 is REAL TIME HYDRAULICS (TM) provided by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. of Houston, Texas USA. Another suitable hydraulics model is provided under the trade name IRIS (TM), and yet another is available from SINTEF of Trondheim, Norway. Any suitable hydraulics model may be used in the control system 90 in keeping with the principles of this disclosure.
  • a suitable data acquisition and control interface for use as the data acquisition and control interface 94 in the control system 90 are SENTRY (TM) and INSITE (TM) provided by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Any suitable data acquisition and control interface may be used in the control system 90 in keeping with the principles of this disclosure.
  • the controller 96 operates to maintain a desired setpoint annulus pressure by controlling operation of the mud return choke 34.
  • the controller uses the desired annulus pressure as a setpoint and controls operation of the choke 34 in a manner (e.g., increasing or decreasing flow resistance through the choke as needed) to maintain the setpoint pressure in the annulus 20.
  • the choke 34 can be closed more to increase flow resistance, or opened more to decrease flow resistance.
  • Maintenance of the setpoint pressure is accomplished by comparing the setpoint pressure to a measured annulus pressure (such as the pressure sensed by any of the sensors 36, 38, 40), and decreasing flow resistance through the choke 34 if the measured pressure is greater than the setpoint pressure, and increasing flow resistance through the choke if the measured pressure is less than the setpoint pressure.
  • a measured annulus pressure such as the pressure sensed by any of the sensors 36, 38, 40
  • the setpoint and measured pressures are the same, then no adjustment of the choke 34 is required. This process is preferably automated, so that no human intervention is required, although human intervention may be used, if desired.
  • the controller 96 may also be used to control operation of the standpipe flow control devices 76, 78 and the bypass flow control device 74.
  • the controller 96 can, thus, be used to automate the processes of diverting flow of the fluid 18 from the standpipe line 26 to the bypass line 72 prior to making a connection in the drill string 16, then diverting flow from the bypass line to the standpipe line after the connection is made, and then resuming normal circulation of the fluid 18 for drilling. Again, no human intervention may be required in these automated processes, although human intervention may be used if desired, for example, to initiate each process in turn, to manually operate a component of the system, etc.
  • a method 100 of testing an earth formation 82 is representatively illustrated in flowchart form.
  • the method 100 may be performed in conjunction with the well system 10 described above, or it may be performed with other well systems. Thus, the method 100 is not limited to any of the details of the well system 10 described herein or depicted in the drawings.
  • step 102 the method 100 begins while drilling ahead.
  • drilling fluid 18 is circulated through the drill string 16 and annulus 20 while the drill bit 14 is rotated. It is not necessary for the entire drill string 16 to continuously rotate during drilling, since a drill motor or mud motor (not shown) can be used to impart rotation to the drill bit without rotating the entire drill string.
  • the annulus 20 is sealed from the earth's atmosphere by the rotating control device 22.
  • the annulus 20 could be sealed by a device which does not rotate with the drill string.
  • step 104 drilling of the formation 82 is ceased.
  • the drill bit 14 is preferably picked up out of contact with the formation 82, so that the drill bit does not cut into the formation.
  • Conditions such as drill string torque, wellbore 12 pressure (e.g., as measured by the downhole sensors 60), annulus 20 pressure at the surface (e.g., as measured by sensors 36, 38, 40), etc., can be measured now for reference purposes.
  • step 106 circulation of the fluid 18 through the drill string 16 is ceased. Ceasing circulation removes from wellbore pressure the friction pressure due to flow of the fluid 18 through the annulus 20. Therefore, a small reduction in pressure in the wellbore 12 should result from ceasing circulation.
  • sensors 60 are in communication with the surface by, for example, wireless telemetry (e.g., acoustic or electromagnetic telemetry), or wired communication (e.g., via electrical, optical, etc., lines to the surface), then wellbore pressure measurements may be obtained throughout the method 100. If circulation of the fluid 18 is necessary for communication of measurements from the sensors 60 to the surface, then the measurements can be obtained after circulation is resumed (see step 116).
  • wireless telemetry e.g., acoustic or electromagnetic telemetry
  • wired communication e.g., via electrical, optical, etc., lines to the surface
  • step 108 flow out of the annulus 20 is monitored while, in step 110, the choke 34 is incrementally opened.
  • the choke 34 is incrementally opened.
  • the fluid 18 is circulating through the drill string 16 and annulus 20
  • further opening the choke 34 will result in reducing backpressure applied to the annulus, thereby reducing pressure in the wellbore 12.
  • incrementally opening the choke 34 will result in decreasing pressure in the wellbore 12 at a faster rate.
  • step 112 after incrementally opening the choke 34, flow out of the wellbore 12 is checked to see if the flow is greater than that due to only the reduction in pressure in the wellbore. If not, then the choke 34 is further incrementally opened (i.e., the method 100 returns to steps 108, 110).
  • step 114 the pore pressure is determined. If the sensors 60 are in communication with the surface at the time the influx 84 is detected, then the pressure in the wellbore 12 can be measured directly in real time. The formation 82 pore pressure is approximately the same as the pressure in the wellbore 12 when the influx 84 occurs.
  • the sensor measurements can be obtained when circulation is resumed in step 116.
  • pressure in the annulus 20 at the surface e.g., as measured by sensors 36, 38, 40
  • hydrostatic pressure due to the static column of the fluid 18 in the annulus. This sum is approximately equal to the formation 82 pore pressure.
  • step 116 circulation of the fluid 18 through the drill string 16 and annulus 20 is resumed.
  • Wellbore 12 pressure measurements can be obtained from the sensors 60 at this point using mud pulse telemetry, in case the sensor measurements were not accessible after step 106.
  • step 118 the pore pressure determined in step 114 is verified using measurements from the downhole sensors 60.
  • the pore pressure may have previously been calculated from surface pressure measurements, density of the drilling fluid 18, etc. However, any such calculations of pore pressure are preferably verified in step 118 with actual wellbore 12 pressure measurements near the formation 82 using the downhole sensors 60. Of course, if the downhole sensors 60 were used for measuring the wellbore 12 pressure and determining the pore pressure, then the verifying step 118 may not be performed.
  • step 120 drilling is resumed.
  • the drill bit 14 is again rotated, and the drill string 16 is set down to cut into the formation 82. Since the formation 82 pore pressure has now been measured, pressure in the wellbore 12 can be more accurately controlled relative to the pore pressure to achieve managed pressure drilling objectives (reduced formation damage, reduced fluid loss, etc.). This is far preferable to relying on offset well data for pore pressure gradient to predict pore pressure in the formation 82.
  • FIG. 4 Another version of the method 100 is representatively illustrated in FIG. 4 .
  • circulation of the fluid 18 through the drill string 16 and annulus 20 continues while the choke 34 is incrementally opened and the pore pressure is determined.
  • steps 106 and 116 of the FIG. 3 version are not used in the FIG. 4 version of the method 100.
  • the method 100 of FIG. 4 includes a step 122, in which flow both into and out of the wellbore is monitored.
  • the flowmeter 66 can be used to monitor flow into the wellbore 12, and the flowmeter 58 can be used to monitor flow out of the wellbore.
  • the method 100 of FIG. 4 includes a step 124, in which it is determined whether flow out of the wellbore is greater than flow into the wellbore. If the flow out of the wellbore 12 is greater than flow into the wellbore, this is an indication that the influx 84 is occurring.
  • Pore pressure in the formation 82 will be approximately equal to, or slightly greater than, pressure in the wellbore 12 when the influx 84 occurs.
  • the sensors 60 can be used to measure pressure in the wellbore 12 in real time. Since the fluid 18 continues to flow through the drill string 16 and annulus 20, mud pulse telemetry can be used, if desired, to transmit pressure and other sensor measurements to the surface.
  • pressure in the annulus 20 at the surface can be added to hydrostatic pressure due to the static column of the fluid 18 in the annulus, and friction pressure due to flow of the fluid through the annulus. This sum is approximately equal to the formation 82 pore pressure.
  • a formation 82 can be efficiently tested in conjunction with managed pressure drilling. Furthermore, in certain examples described above, a pore pressure of the formation 82 can be readily determined.
  • the above disclosure provides to the art a method 100 of testing an earth formation 82.
  • the method 100 can include incrementally opening a choke 34 while drilling into the formation 82 is ceased, thereby reducing pressure in a wellbore 12.
  • An influx 84 into the wellbore 12 (due to reducing pressure in the wellbore 12) is detected.
  • the method 100 can also include verifying the pressure in the wellbore 12 with at least one pressure sensor 60 in the wellbore 12.
  • the method 100 can include ceasing circulation of drilling fluid 18 through a drill string 16 prior to incrementally opening the choke 34.
  • the method may also include verifying the pressure in the wellbore 12 with at least one pressure sensor 60 in the wellbore 12, after resuming circulation of the drilling fluid 18 through the drill string 16.
  • Incrementally opening the choke 34 is typically performed multiple times. Incrementally opening the choke 34 may cease when the influx 84 is detected.
  • Detecting the influx 84 can include detecting how fluid 18 flows out of the wellbore 12, and/or detecting when fluid flow out of the wellbore is greater than fluid 18 flow into the wellbore 12.
  • the method 100 can include determining approximate formation 82 pore pressure as pressure in the wellbore 12 when the influx 84 is detected. Determining the approximate formation 82 pore pressure can include summing pressure in the annulus 20 near the surface with hydrostatic pressure in the wellbore 12, or determining approximate formation 82 pore pressure can include summing pressure in the annulus 20 near the surface with hydrostatic pressure in the wellbore 12 and friction pressure due to circulation of fluid through the wellbore.
  • the method 100 can also include, prior to incrementally opening the choke 34, drilling into the formation 82, with an annulus 20 between a drill string 16 and the wellbore 12 being pressure isolated from atmosphere.
  • the method 100 of testing an earth formation 82 which method can include: drilling into the formation 82, with an annulus 20 between a drill string 16 and a wellbore 12 being pressure isolated from atmosphere; ceasing circulation of drilling fluid 18 through the drill string 16; detecting an influx 84 into the wellbore 12 due to reduced pressure in the wellbore 12 while circulation is ceased; and determining approximate formation 82 pore pressure as pressure in the wellbore 12 when the influx 84 is detected.
  • the above disclosure also describes the method 100 of testing an earth formation 82, which method can include: drilling into the formation 82, with an annulus 20 between a drill string 16 and a wellbore 12 being pressure isolated from atmosphere; then incrementally opening a choke 34 while drilling is ceased, thereby reducing pressure in the wellbore 12; detecting an influx 84 into the wellbore 12 due to reducing pressure in the wellbore 12; and determining approximate formation 82 pore pressure as pressure in the wellbore 12 when the influx 84 is detected.
  • the method 100 is described above in conjunction with managed pressure drilling of the wellbore 12, it will be appreciated that the method can be practiced in conjunction with other drilling methods, such as, other drilling methods which include isolating the annulus 20 from the earth's atmosphere (e.g., using a rotating control device 22 or other annular seal) at or near the surface.
  • other drilling methods which include isolating the annulus 20 from the earth's atmosphere (e.g., using a rotating control device 22 or other annular seal) at or near the surface.
  • the method 100 could be used in conjunction with underbalanced drilling, any drilling operations in which the annulus 20 is pressurized at the surface during drilling, etc.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Earth Drilling (AREA)
  • Measuring Fluid Pressure (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
  • Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)

Claims (15)

  1. Procédé de test d'une formation terrestre, le procédé comprenant :
    la réduction de la pression dans un puits de forage (12) ; et
    la détection d'un influx dans le puits de forage (12) en raison de la réduction de la pression dans le puits de forage (12) ; caractérisé en ce que ladite pression est réduite en ouvrant progressivement un étranglement (34) lorsque le forage dans la formation est arrêté.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant également, avant l'ouverture progressive de l'étranglement (34), le forage dans la formation, avec un anneau entre un train de forage (16) et le puits de forage (12) étant isolé de la pression de l'atmosphère.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant également la détermination d'une pression interstitielle de formation approximative comme la pression dans le puits de forage (12) lorsque l'influx est détecté.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, dans lequel la détermination de la pression interstitielle de formation approximative comprend l'addition de la pression dans l'anneau proche de la surface avec la pression hydrostatique dans le puits de forage (12).
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 3, dans lequel la détermination de la pression interstitielle de formation approximative comprend l'addition de la pression dans l'anneau proche de la surface avec la pression hydrostatique dans le puits de forage (12) et la pression de frottement en raison de la circulation de fluide à travers le puits de forage (12).
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 3, comprenant également :
    le forage dans la formation, avec un anneau entre un train de forage (16) et un puits de forage (12) étant isolé de la pression de l'atmosphère ; dans lequel le procédé comprend ledit forage et ensuite ladite ouverture progressive d'un étranglement (34).
  7. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 6, comprenant également la vérification de la pression dans le puits de forage (12) avec au moins un capteur de pression dans le puits de forage (12).
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 6, comprenant également l'arrêt de la circulation de fluide de forage à travers le train de forage (16) avant l'ouverture progressive de l'étranglement (34).
  9. Procédé selon la revendication 8, comprenant également la vérification de la pression dans le puits de forage (12) avec au moins un capteur de pression dans le puits de forage, après la reprise de la circulation de fluide de forage à travers le train de forage (16).
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 6, dans lequel l'ouverture progressive de l'étranglement (34) est réalisée de multiples fois.
  11. Procédé selon la revendication 10, dans lequel l'ouverture progressive de l'étranglement (34) s'arrête lorsque l'influx est détecté.
  12. Procédé selon la revendication 6, dans lequel la détection d'un influx comprend la détection de la façon dont le fluide s'écoule hors du puits de forage (12).
  13. Procédé selon la revendication 6, dans lequel la détection d'un influx comprend la détection du moment où l'écoulement de fluide hors du puits de forage (12) est supérieur à l'écoulement de fluide dans le puits de forage (12) .
  14. Procédé selon la revendication 6, dans lequel la détermination de la pression interstitielle de formation approximative comprend l'addition de la pression dans l'anneau proche de la surface avec la pression hydrostatique dans le puits de forage (12).
  15. Procédé selon la revendication 6, dans lequel la détermination de la pression interstitielle de formation approximative comprend l'addition de la pression dans l'anneau proche de la surface avec la pression hydrostatique dans le puits de forage (12) et la pression de frottement en raison de la circulation de fluide à travers le puits de forage (12).
EP11869316.7A 2011-07-12 2011-07-12 Essai des couches lors d'un forage à pression gérée Active EP2732130B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2011/043750 WO2013009305A1 (fr) 2011-07-12 2011-07-12 Essai des couches lors d'un forage à pression gérée

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2732130A1 EP2732130A1 (fr) 2014-05-21
EP2732130A4 EP2732130A4 (fr) 2015-09-30
EP2732130B1 true EP2732130B1 (fr) 2018-05-02

Family

ID=47506347

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11869316.7A Active EP2732130B1 (fr) 2011-07-12 2011-07-12 Essai des couches lors d'un forage à pression gérée

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2732130B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN103688020A (fr)
BR (1) BR112014000553B8 (fr)
CA (1) CA2841125C (fr)
MX (1) MX353095B (fr)
RU (1) RU2585780C2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2013009305A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2248544A1 (fr) 2009-05-05 2010-11-10 ECP Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH Pompe à fluide à diamètre modifiable, notamment à des fins médicales
US10184305B2 (en) 2014-05-07 2019-01-22 Halliburton Enery Services, Inc. Elastic pipe control with managed pressure drilling
CN110965941A (zh) * 2019-12-24 2020-04-07 西南石油大学 一种地质导向钻井测试工具及使用方法
CN114922614A (zh) * 2022-06-24 2022-08-19 西南石油大学 一种控压钻井工况下的地层压力监测方法

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4570480A (en) * 1984-03-30 1986-02-18 Nl Industries, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining formation pressure
US6325159B1 (en) * 1998-03-27 2001-12-04 Hydril Company Offshore drilling system
US7174975B2 (en) * 1998-07-15 2007-02-13 Baker Hughes Incorporated Control systems and methods for active controlled bottomhole pressure systems
GC0000342A (en) * 1999-06-22 2007-03-31 Shell Int Research Drilling system
US7096976B2 (en) * 1999-11-05 2006-08-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Drilling formation tester, apparatus and methods of testing and monitoring status of tester
US6585044B2 (en) * 2000-09-20 2003-07-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method, system and tool for reservoir evaluation and well testing during drilling operations
DE60140827D1 (de) * 2001-04-25 2010-01-28 Halliburton Energy Serv Inc Verfahren und System und Werkzeug zur Reservoirbeurteilung und Bohrlochprüfung während Bohrungen
US7219729B2 (en) * 2002-11-05 2007-05-22 Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. Permanent downhole deployment of optical sensors
US20050092523A1 (en) * 2003-10-30 2005-05-05 Power Chokes, L.P. Well pressure control system
US7407019B2 (en) * 2005-03-16 2008-08-05 Weatherford Canada Partnership Method of dynamically controlling open hole pressure in a wellbore using wellhead pressure control
US7908034B2 (en) * 2005-07-01 2011-03-15 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System System, program products, and methods for controlling drilling fluid parameters
US20070246263A1 (en) * 2006-04-20 2007-10-25 Reitsma Donald G Pressure Safety System for Use With a Dynamic Annular Pressure Control System
US20080154510A1 (en) * 2006-12-21 2008-06-26 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Method and system for automated choke control on a hydrocarbon producing well
US20090159334A1 (en) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Bp Corporation North America, Inc. Method for detecting formation pore pressure by detecting pumps-off gas downhole
US20100186960A1 (en) * 2009-01-29 2010-07-29 Reitsma Donald G Wellbore annular pressure control system and method using accumulator to maintain back pressure in annulus
RU2565299C2 (ru) * 2011-06-02 2015-10-20 Хэллибертон Энерджи Сервисиз, Инк. Бурение с оптимизацией давления непрерывной бурильной колонной насосно-компрессорных труб

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2841125A1 (fr) 2013-01-17
RU2585780C2 (ru) 2016-06-10
CA2841125C (fr) 2016-06-07
MX2014000417A (es) 2014-02-27
EP2732130A4 (fr) 2015-09-30
MX353095B (es) 2017-12-19
BR112014000553B1 (pt) 2020-08-11
BR112014000553A2 (pt) 2017-02-14
CN103688020A (zh) 2014-03-26
EP2732130A1 (fr) 2014-05-21
WO2013009305A1 (fr) 2013-01-17
BR112014000553B8 (pt) 2021-02-17
RU2014104013A (ru) 2015-08-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2012346426B2 (en) Use of downhole pressure measurements while drilling to detect and mitigate influxes
CA2742623C (fr) Commande de la pression et de l'ecoulement dans des operations de forage
US9759064B2 (en) Formation testing in managed pressure drilling
US10047578B2 (en) Pressure control in drilling operations with choke position determined by Cv curve
US20110139506A1 (en) Pressure and flow control in drilling operations
AU2012381021B2 (en) Drilling operation control using multiple concurrent hydraulics models
EP2732130B1 (fr) Essai des couches lors d'un forage à pression gérée
AU2012304810B2 (en) High temperature drilling with lower temperature rated tools
EP2867439B1 (fr) Régulation de la pression dans les opérations de forage avec application d'un décalage en réaction à des conditions prédéterminées
AU2012384529B2 (en) Pressure control in drilling operations with choke position determined by Cv curve

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130207

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20150831

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: E21B 47/08 20120101ALI20150825BHEP

Ipc: E21B 21/08 20060101ALI20150825BHEP

Ipc: G01V 3/18 20060101ALI20150825BHEP

Ipc: E21B 47/06 20120101AFI20150825BHEP

Ipc: E21B 47/00 20120101ALI20150825BHEP

Ipc: G01V 9/00 20060101ALI20150825BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: E21B 47/00 20120101ALI20171013BHEP

Ipc: G01V 9/00 20060101ALI20171013BHEP

Ipc: E21B 47/06 20120101AFI20171013BHEP

Ipc: E21B 21/08 20060101ALI20171013BHEP

Ipc: G01V 3/18 20060101ALI20171013BHEP

Ipc: E21B 47/08 20120101ALI20171013BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20171114

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 995462

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011048146

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20180502

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NO

Ref legal event code: T2

Effective date: 20180502

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180802

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180803

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 995462

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602011048146

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180712

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180731

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190201

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180731

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180731

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180712

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180731

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180712

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110712

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180502

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180902

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20230622

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230505

Year of fee payment: 13