EP2726357A1 - Operator control device - Google Patents
Operator control deviceInfo
- Publication number
- EP2726357A1 EP2726357A1 EP12756133.0A EP12756133A EP2726357A1 EP 2726357 A1 EP2726357 A1 EP 2726357A1 EP 12756133 A EP12756133 A EP 12756133A EP 2726357 A1 EP2726357 A1 EP 2726357A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- display
- input
- computer
- operator
- user
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims 3
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010678 Paulownia tomentosa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000002834 Paulownia tomentosa Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000016507 interphase Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010079 rubber tapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L25/00—Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or trains or setting of track apparatus
- B61L25/06—Indicating or recording the setting of track apparatus, e.g. of points, of signals
- B61L25/08—Diagrammatic displays
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L21/00—Station blocking between signal boxes in one yard
- B61L21/06—Vehicle-on-line indication; Monitoring locking and release of the route
Definitions
- the invention relates to an operating device for
- Controlling a safety-related system in particular for controlling a railway technical system, such as a signal box or a railway control device.
- Such operating devices are used in the field of rail vehicle technology, for example in the Siemens Leitsystemfa ⁇ milie Vicos OC. They have, inter alia, a computer device , a display device which is connected to the computer device and can display an operating state of the safety system and is actuated by display control signals of the computer device, and an input device connected to the computer device for the operator input of control commands ,
- the invention has for its object to provide a Conseinrich ⁇ tion, with which a particularly high level of security when controlling a safety system can be achieved with very low technical equipment expense. This object is achieved by a Conseinrich ⁇ tion with the features of claim 1.
- Advantageous embodiments of the operating device according to the invention are specified in subclaims.
- an operating device for controlling a safety-related system in particular for controlling a railway-technical system (eg signal box or
- the operating device comprises: a computer device, one with the
- Computer device associated with display device which can indicate an operating state of the safety system and is controlled by display control signals of the computer device, and an associated with the computer device input device for user-side input of control commands.
- the computer device is designed such that it monitors the dynamics of the user-side input behavior and, in the event that a predetermined level of dynamics is undershot, requests a user-side check of the correct functioning of the display device.
- a significant advantage of the operating device according to the invention is the fact that it evaluates the operating behavior in the operation of the operating device to draw conclusions about the correct operation of the display device.
- the inventive idea is that with a regular or "dynamic" operation of the operating device regularly a change in the display will be caused on the display device, so that a
- Freezing or baking of the screen or any other indication of failure (eg. As pixel or segment failures) will be revealed promptly to the An ⁇ show device because this loading would be mutually servant detected and reported.
- the computer device assumes according to the invention that there may be a freezing or burn-in or other display error on the display device In this case, it will request a check of the correct functioning of the display device, for example by displaying a test image. The correct operation of the display device can then be bedienersei- tig confirmed by a corresponding input on the Eingabeeinrich ⁇ tung.
- Another important advantage of the operating device according to the invention is that other or further measures for checking the timeliness of the display of the display device are unnecessary, since - how inventor ⁇ fest ⁇ was made - a very high level of security already by monitoring the "dynamics "the operation is achieved.
- the computer device checks as part of the verification of the dynamics of the user-side input behavior, are whether show control signals by the user-side input of the control commands the arrival changed such that at correc ⁇ ter operation of the display device, a predetermined degree of temporal Display change on the display device would be reached or exceeded, and in the case that the predetermined amount of temporal display change is exceeded, requesting a user-side check the correct operation of the display device.
- the computer side caravan the Variegated ⁇ tion on the display device of the display is in the monitoring of the dynamics of the input behavior turned off the display control signals: If no suffi ⁇ sponding change in display control signals - for example, at predetermined Zeitabêten-, then a User-requested verification of the display requested. It is particularly simple and thus advantageous to check the dynamics of the operator input behavior when it is checked whether a predetermined amount (eg per given time unit) of control commands is available to the operator. magnification and / or reduction of displayed on the display device display portions (or screen contents) is input to the input device. In the event that the predetermined level is undershot, an operator-side check of the correct functioning of the display device can be requested.
- a predetermined amount eg per given time unit
- the input device is suitable, for a user-side touch
- the operating device comprises a touch-sensitive and / or motion-sensitive screen which forms both the input device for operator input of the control commands and the display device.
- Contact and / or terrorismsempfind ⁇ Liche screens are now very inexpensive and available in large screen sizes so that user-side entries are possible particularly simple and Seaunan tract.
- the computer device has a first and a second computer.
- neraji comprises, both associated with the touch or bewe ⁇ supply-sensitive screen in connection with the first computer unit activates the screen with the convinced horrsig ⁇ dimensional and wherein the second computer unit the initial display signals of the first computer unit checks, and in the event of deviation of of the first computer unit display control signals generated by self-determined advising horrsig ⁇ dimensional generates an error signal.
- two or even further computer units can be ensured that in the case of an error of a computer unit no faulty display on the screen can be done because a correct working ⁇ way the computer device is ensured by the second or more computer units .
- the operating device comprises an authentication device with which it can be checked whether an operator is actually authorized to operate.
- an authentication device may include, for example: a fingerprint sensor, an RFID tag (radio frequency identification element) reader and / or a signature control device, which is formed, for example, on an input field of the touch and / or motion-sensitive screen.
- control device is designed such that it always requires a Bestä ⁇ actuation when entering safety-related control commands.
- Such an acknowledgment can be made, for example, by the display of an "OK" input field which must be activated on the user side in order to confirm the operation.
- the resolution of picture elements which actually enter an STEU ⁇ heritage thighss or to request verification of an input is preferably greater than a predetermined average resolution of other picture elements.
- control commands is displayed alternatively or additionally as diverse, for example by a text instead of / in addition to a graphic or by an announcement on a loudspeaker device (eg headphones) instead of / in addition to one Graphic or a text.
- a text instead of / in addition to a graphic
- a loudspeaker device eg headphones
- the invention also relates to a railway technical system, in particular to a signal box or a railway guiding device, which is equipped with an operating device, as described above.
- the invention additionally relates to a method for controlling a safety-related installation, in particular for controlling a railway-technical installation (eg signal box or railway guiding device), wherein a state of the system safety system is displayed on a display device and operator control commands are detected by an input device.
- Inventor side is pre ⁇ see that the dynamics of the operation side Eingabeverhal- least monitored and in the event that a predetermined amount of Dy ⁇ dynamics is not reached, a user-side check the correct operation of the display device is required.
- the advantages of the method according to the invention reference is made to the above-mentioned advantages of the operating device according to the invention, since the advantages of the operating device according to the invention correspond to those of the method according to the invention.
- the method it is provided that it is checked in the context of checking the dynamics of the user input behavior, whether by the operator input of control commands a predetermined amount of temporal display change on the display device - with correct operation of the display - achieved or would be exceeded, and im
- At least one test image or at least one test image sequence is displayed.
- the dynamics of the user input behavior can be monitored by monitoring a zooming in, zooming out, or moving display sections, in particular screen contents.
- the selection of display elements for example by finger touch and / or double-tapping, can be monitored within predetermined time windows in order to quantitatively determine and monitor the dynamics of the operator-side input behavior.
- FIG. 1 shows an interlocking 10, which includes an interlocking computer 20 and an operating device 30.
- an operating device 30 In addition to the operating device 30, further operating devices may be connected to the interlocking computer 20, but these for reasons of clarity in Figure 1 are not shown.
- the interlocking computer 20 of the interlocking 10 is directly or indirectly connected to a railway track system 40, which is controlled by the interlocking computer 20 via control signals ST.
- control signals ST example ⁇ as points, signals, or other components of the railway track system can be controlled or switched 40th
- the operating device 30 has a computer device 50, to which a touch-sensitive screen 60 is connected.
- the touch screen 60 bil ⁇ det simultaneously both a display device and an input device.
- the touch screen 60 receives from the computer device 50 display control signals AST, which show an on ⁇ townru- on the touch screen 60 fen.
- display control signals AST which show an on ⁇ townru- on the touch screen 60 fen.
- three display sections in the form of display windows 61, 62 and 63 can be seen on the touch-sensitive screen 60, which can perform different display functions or display different screen contents.
- the display window 61 visualizes the operating state of the railroad track system 40.
- the two display windows 62 and 63 represent input windows that can be touched by a user-side touch to input control commands STB.
- the two display windows 62 and 63 can display, for example, selection elements which generate already upon contact with ⁇ ordered control commands STB.
- control commands STB can also be generated by means of elements on the touch-sensitive screen 60. be pushed or the entire screen or a ⁇ individual display windows 61, 62 and 63 are "wiped away".
- the control commands STB recognized by the screen 60 are transmitted to the computer device 50 and evaluated there.
- the computer device 50 is equipped with a first computer unit 51 and a second computer unit 52.
- Both computer units 51 and 52 process the control commands STB, which are input on the operator side of the touch-sensitive screen 60, and messages M, which are transmitted from the interlocking computer 20 to the two computer units 51 and 52.
- One of the two computer units for example the first
- Computer unit 51 is actively working with the berckenungsempfind ⁇ handy screen 60: Actively generates the display control signals AST, which arrive at the touch screen 60th
- the detected by the touch screen 60 on the other hand control commands are STB ver operates both of the first computer unit 51 and from the second computer unit 52 ⁇ .
- the second computer unit 52 is operating (hot resting phase) mode in the so-called "hot standby" and the Ver ⁇ processing of the STB control commands in parallel by the first computer unit 51st
- the two computer units 51 and 52 are connected to one another so that they can compare the processing results of the control commands STB with one another.
- the second computer unit 52 learns which display control signals AST are to be generated by the first computer unit 51 and displayed on the touch-sensitive screen 60. If the display control signals AST, which are generated by the first computer unit 51, match the display control signals, which also includes the second computer unit 52 on the basis of the control commands STB as well has determined the messages M of the interlocking computer 20, the computer device 50 operates a total error-free, so that a further operation of the operating device 30 remains possible.
- the first computer unit 51 or the second computer unit 52 determines that the processing resulting ⁇ nit of the two computer units 51 and 52 are different, then either the first computer unit 51 or the second computer unit 52 will generate an error signal F and transmit the interlocking computer 20 ,
- the interlocking computers 20 thus recognizes that the operating device 30 is not working properly, so that implementation of the control commands whether there are even provided by the operator ⁇ device 30 remains lower.
- the assignment of the computer unit 51 with respect to the generation of the display control signals AST is to be understood here only as an example; Alternatively, the display control signals AST may also be generated by the second computer unit 52. It is also possible for the two computer units 51 and 52 to alternate with the generation of the display control signals AST, for example after expiration of predetermined time intervals. Also, in addition to the two computer units 51 and 52 further computer units may be present for control purposes.
- the two computer units 51 and 52 preferably operate such that they represent the process image, ie the state of the
- railway track system 40 as discrete state machines mod ⁇ . That is, each element of railroad track 40 can assume a finite number of discrete states. Inputs on the screen 60 or control signals STB can thus define events that are supposed to trigger a state transition.
- the two computer units 51 and 52 for synchronization points in time that are negotiated, for example, by the computer units 51 and 52 within an allowable upper limit, the process image displayed on the screen 60 together verglei ⁇ chen.
- checksums eg, coded based on hash functions
- the computer device 50 is formed by two physically separate computer units 51 and 52.
- the two computer units 51 and 52 are only realized virtually as software replicants that are executed on one and the same computer unit.
- FIG. 1 how the computer device 50 monitors the actuality of the display on the screen 60.
- the computer device 50 evaluates the control commands STB, which are from the touch-sensitive
- Control commands STB often sufficient, for example, commands that Ver ⁇ retract the display window (see FIG. Display window 62 in Figure 1), or an increase or decrease of the display window (see FIG. Display window 63 in Figure 1) cause as is the computing device 50 assume that the touch screen 60 is operating correctly: This ⁇ an exception is based on the idea that a zoom in or out or displacement of the display window is directly controlled by an operator; If a corresponding operator-side command for moving and / or enlarging and / or reducing a display window were not immediately followed by a corresponding update of the display on the screen 60, the operator would immediately recognize that the operating device 30 is no longer working correctly and a further generation of control commands STB would be inadmissible or dangerous, since the interlocking computer 20 may possibly receive incorrect control commands STB '. could be delivered and it could come to a faulty conversion of the railway track 40.
- the computing device 50 assumes a correct display on the touch-sensitive screen 60, so that the incoming Control commands STB further processed and forwarded as control signals STB 'to the Stell ⁇ factory computer 20.
- FIG. 2 shows by way of example how the computer device 50 modifies the display on the touch-sensitive screen 60 if there is no shifting and / or enlargement and / or reduction of display windows within a predefined maximum period of time Tmax.
- the computing device 50 no longer assumes that the display on the touch-sensitive screen 60 must be correct.
- the computing device 50 will generate a test image T on the touch screen 60 by generating and transmitting a corresponding display control signal AST (Test) to the touch screen 60.
- An operator operating the operating device 30 can now continue the generation of further control commands STB only after having checked the correct display of the test image T and confirming the correct display of the test image T by touching a test field 70 provided for this purpose.
- FIG. 3 shows an exemplary embodiment of an interlocking arrangement 10, in which the operating device 30, instead of a touch-sensitive screen 60, has a display device 100 in the form of a non-touch-sensitive conventional screen.
- a separate input device 110 is provided which comprises a keyboard 111 and a computer mouse 112.
- the control ⁇ tion of the operating device 30 and the generation of the control commands STB can be carried out, as has already been explained in connection with Figure 1.
- the computer device 50 will check regularly whether or not the dynamics of the operator-side input behavior reach a predetermined level. If there is, for example, by entspre ⁇ sponding movement of the computer mouse 112, a sufficiently frequent (for example, 10 times per hour) displacement and / or zoom in and / or out of the display windows 62 and 63, the computing device 50 moves from the fact that the Display on the display device 100 is current and thus correct. However, if the computing device 50 determines that the dynamics of the user-side input behavior does not reach the predetermined level because it does not occur with sufficient frequency (that is, for example, less than 10 times per second)
- the mode of operation of the operating device 30 according to FIG. 3 corresponds to the mode of operation of the operating device 30 according to FIGS
- FIG. 4 shows an exemplary embodiment of a signal box in which the operating device 30 is additionally equipped with an authentication device 200.
- the authentication device 200 may be, for example, a fingerprint sensor, an RFID chip reader or even a signature sensor with which the authenticity of the operator operating the operating device 30 is checked.
- the computing device 50 such as those described above.
- FIG. 5 shows an exemplary embodiment of a railroad guiding device 300, which comprises a control computer 310 and an operating device 30, as has already been explained in connection with FIGS. 1 and 2.
- the control computer 310 evaluates the control commands STB ', which are generated by the Consein ⁇ direction 30 and controls both an associated with the Eisenbahnleit worn 300 railway track system 40 and on the railway track system 40 moving rail vehicles, the flat rate by a block with the reference numeral 320th are visualized accordingly.
- the monitoring of the dynamics of the user-side input behavior is carried out by the evaluation of the control signals STB, which are generated by the touch-sensitive screen 60. Show the control commands STB that a predetermined amount of temporal display change (ie based on a predetermined time interval) on the touch-sensitive
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102011081479A DE102011081479A1 (en) | 2011-08-24 | 2011-08-24 | operating device |
PCT/EP2012/065992 WO2013026761A1 (en) | 2011-08-24 | 2012-08-16 | Operator control device |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2726357A1 true EP2726357A1 (en) | 2014-05-07 |
EP2726357B1 EP2726357B1 (en) | 2018-03-28 |
Family
ID=46801454
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12756133.0A Not-in-force EP2726357B1 (en) | 2011-08-24 | 2012-08-16 | Operator control device |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2726357B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103781692B (en) |
DE (1) | DE102011081479A1 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1193382A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013026761A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102015208273A1 (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2016-11-10 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for displaying a process occurrence of at least one railway safety device and railway safety system with such a device |
EP3118694A1 (en) * | 2015-07-13 | 2017-01-18 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for operating a redundant automation system and redundant automation system |
DE102016202347A1 (en) * | 2016-02-16 | 2017-08-17 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Arrangement for checking the train traffic |
DE102018207306A1 (en) * | 2018-05-09 | 2019-11-14 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Device for the controlled execution of a safety-related action in rail traffic |
DE102018210242A1 (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2019-12-24 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Arrangement for securing a rail vehicle against acts by unauthorized persons |
US20210269074A1 (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2021-09-02 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Warning device for a rail vehicle |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2000354943A (en) * | 1999-06-09 | 2000-12-26 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Work management and support method and device, and recording medium having program therefor recorded |
JP4590845B2 (en) * | 2003-08-27 | 2010-12-01 | ダイキン工業株式会社 | Work management system, work management method, and work management program |
KR100697416B1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2007-03-20 | 교세라 가부시키가이샤 | Mobile communication terminal, information providing system, and computer readable recording medium storing program |
CN100452066C (en) * | 2004-03-24 | 2009-01-14 | 三商电脑股份有限公司 | Train information editor |
US7427924B2 (en) * | 2005-02-11 | 2008-09-23 | Triodyne Inc. | System and method for monitoring driver fatigue |
DE102005013194A1 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2006-09-21 | Siemens Ag | Workstation system |
-
2011
- 2011-08-24 DE DE102011081479A patent/DE102011081479A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2012
- 2012-08-16 CN CN201280040832.5A patent/CN103781692B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2012-08-16 EP EP12756133.0A patent/EP2726357B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2012-08-16 WO PCT/EP2012/065992 patent/WO2013026761A1/en active Application Filing
-
2014
- 2014-07-04 HK HK14106745.9A patent/HK1193382A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2013026761A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
HK1193382A1 (en) | 2014-09-19 |
CN103781692A (en) | 2014-05-07 |
DE102011081479A1 (en) | 2013-02-28 |
CN103781692B (en) | 2016-05-11 |
EP2726357B1 (en) | 2018-03-28 |
WO2013026761A1 (en) | 2013-02-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2726357A1 (en) | Operator control device | |
EP2900581B1 (en) | Method for resetting a safety system of an elevator installation | |
EP1855162B2 (en) | Service platform for machine maintenance | |
EP2551787B1 (en) | Dispositif et procédé pour une saisie relevant de la sécurité au moyen d'un appareil d'affichage avec saisie tactile | |
EP2731849B1 (en) | Signal box computer | |
DE112017005762T5 (en) | Vehicle control device | |
EP3630578A1 (en) | Method for operating a rail vehicle | |
EP1883867A1 (en) | Method for adjusting an electric field device | |
DE102017205832A1 (en) | Method for parameterizing a field device and parameterizable field device | |
AT402909B (en) | METHOD FOR GUARANTEING THE SIGNAL TECHNICAL SECURITY OF THE USER INTERFACE OF A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM | |
DE102013017951A1 (en) | Electronic control apparatus and method for checking a reset function | |
WO2017198342A1 (en) | Control system for a functional section of a paper processing device | |
EP2852519B1 (en) | Actuating device for input of actuating commands for controlling a technical system | |
EP2037340A1 (en) | System and method for monitoring the control unit of a safety switching device | |
WO2021223982A1 (en) | Method for operating a passenger conveyor system by reliably configuring an electronic safety device | |
EP2849986B1 (en) | Method and assembly for controlling a technical system | |
EP3374924B1 (en) | Method for triggering a security-relevant function of a system, and system | |
DE102022115488A1 (en) | Control system with reliable input | |
DE102006006133A1 (en) | Light barrier with separate output signals e.g. for processing machines to protect operators, has interface for transmitting output signals to signal processing connectable devices | |
DE102005054140B4 (en) | Method and device for distinguishing the origin of operator inputs | |
WO2024216319A1 (en) | Display device and display method | |
DE102022107717A1 (en) | Method for carrying out a safety check of a modular safety control | |
DE202015104887U1 (en) | Multifunction terminal with soft key arrangement for safety-relevant operation | |
DE102012217542A1 (en) | Control of a parking brake | |
EP1921525A1 (en) | Method for operating a security related system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20140130 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20171121 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 983131 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180415 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502012012443 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180628 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20180328 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180628 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180629 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PUE Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180730 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502012012443 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502012012443 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, 80333 MUENCHEN, DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180816 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180816 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: PC Ref document number: 983131 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH, DE Effective date: 20190506 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180816 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180831 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180816 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20120816 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180328 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180328 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180728 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20200708 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20201102 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20201019 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502012012443 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 983131 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210816 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210831 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210816 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220301 |