EP2623159A1 - Fire suppression system and method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle - Google Patents

Fire suppression system and method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2623159A1
EP2623159A1 EP12153704.7A EP12153704A EP2623159A1 EP 2623159 A1 EP2623159 A1 EP 2623159A1 EP 12153704 A EP12153704 A EP 12153704A EP 2623159 A1 EP2623159 A1 EP 2623159A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fire suppression
inert gas
gas generating
halon
generating systems
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP12153704.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2623159B1 (en
Inventor
Paul Rohrbach
Rainer Beuermann
Jens Taberski
Oliver Family
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Operations GmbH
Airbus Operations Ltd
Original Assignee
Airbus Operations GmbH
Airbus Operations Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airbus Operations GmbH, Airbus Operations Ltd filed Critical Airbus Operations GmbH
Priority to EP12153704.7A priority Critical patent/EP2623159B1/en
Publication of EP2623159A1 publication Critical patent/EP2623159A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2623159B1 publication Critical patent/EP2623159B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A62LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
    • A62CFIRE-FIGHTING
    • A62C3/00Fire prevention, containment or extinguishing specially adapted for particular objects or places
    • A62C3/07Fire prevention, containment or extinguishing specially adapted for particular objects or places in vehicles, e.g. in road vehicles
    • A62C3/08Fire prevention, containment or extinguishing specially adapted for particular objects or places in vehicles, e.g. in road vehicles in aircraft
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A62LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
    • A62CFIRE-FIGHTING
    • A62C99/00Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • A62C99/0009Methods of extinguishing or preventing the spread of fire by cooling down or suffocating the flames
    • A62C99/0018Methods of extinguishing or preventing the spread of fire by cooling down or suffocating the flames using gases or vapours that do not support combustion, e.g. steam, carbon dioxide

Definitions

  • the present invention pertains to a fire suppression system and a method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle, particularly in cargo bays of aircraft.
  • Cargo compartments according to CS25.857(C) are usually equipped with a halon 1301 fire suppression system.
  • Halon 1301 or bromotrifluoromethane is an organic halide, which is a gaseous substance used for fire quenching by inhibiting the radical reaction of the combustion.
  • Halon 1301 belongs to the group of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) which present a potential environmental hazard due to their destructive effects on the ozone layer of the stratosphere. Based on the Montreal protocol list and the EU regulation 744/2010, the use of halon 1301 is banned and only allowed in certain circumstances. Therefore, it is desirable to restrict the use of halon 1301 and search for alternative fire quenching agents.
  • CFCs chlorofluorocarbons
  • Cargo bay fire suppression may be done in two stages. First, a rapid discharge of a first quenching agent may be triggered. Simultaneously, a second quenching agent may be released slowly, so that after the concentration of the first quenching agent in the area where fire is to be quenched diminishes below a certain threshold, the concentration of the second quenching agent or at least the combination of both agents is high enough to guarantee subsequent fire suppression.
  • OBIGGS on-board inert gas generator
  • NAA nitrogen enriched air
  • the document EP 1 306 801 A1 discloses a conventional fire detection system that initially detects the existence of a fire and initiates a fire alarm, upon which, either automatically or by crew action, Halon is released in a short interval as a first extinguishant.
  • a second extinguishant in the form of nitrogen-rich air is supplied to ensure longer-term fire suppression.
  • CFCs chlorofluorocarbons
  • a fire suppression system comprises a fuel tank inerting system including at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, a halon-based fire suppression subsystem configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, a monitoring module, which is coupled to the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, and which is configured to monitor the operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and to output a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, and a control module, which is coupled to the monitoring module, the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and the halon-based fire suppression subsystem, and which is configured to select one of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems depending on the monitoring signal and to control the selected on-board inert gas generating system to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent, for example into a cargo compartment of an airborne vehicle in order to start a
  • a method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle having a fuel tank inerting system including at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and a halon-based fire suppression subsystem configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent comprising the steps of monitoring the operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, outputting a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, selecting one of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems depending on the monitoring signal, controlling the halon-based fire suppression subsystem to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, and controlling the selected on-board inert gas generating system to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent, for example into a cargo compartment of an airborne vehicle in order to start a fire suppression atmosphere in combination with the first fire suppression agent.
  • an airborne vehicle comprises at least two cargo compartments, and a fire suppression system according to an embodiment of the invention, which is configured to suppress a fire in at least one of the cargo compartments by releasing the first fire suppression agent and subsequently the second fire suppression agent, for example a combination of Halon 1301 and nitrogen enriched air.
  • One main idea of the present invention is to make use of the on-board inert gas generation systems (OBIGGS) of the fuel tank inerting system (FTIS) of an airborne vehicle by selecting one of the two OBIGGS to supply an inert gas as second quenching agent for assisting a halon-based fire suppression system.
  • OBIGGS on-board inert gas generation systems
  • FTIS fuel tank inerting system
  • the fire suppression system further comprises an agent conduit pipe configured to pipe the first fire suppression agent from the halon-based fire suppression subsystem, a first inert gas conduit pipe configured to pipe inert gas from a first one of the on-board inert gas generating systems and coupled to the agent conduit pipe by a first valve, and a second inert gas conduit pipe configured to pipe inert gas from a second one of the on-board inert gas generating systems and coupled to the agent conduit pipe by a second valve, wherein the control module is configured to open the first or the second valve in case of fire in a compartment of an airborne vehicle, depending on the monitoring signal.
  • the compartments of the airborne vehicle are cargo bays.
  • the fire suppression system is particularly suited for cargo bays of airborne vehicle, since the capability of one of the on-board inert gas generating systems is sufficient to fulfil the fire suppression requirements for a cargo bay.
  • the inert gas is one of the group of nitrogen, nitrogen enriched air and oxygen depleted air.
  • the first fire suppression agent is halon 1301.
  • Fig. 1 shows a fire suppression system 10, particularly a fire suppression system 10 for use in an airborne vehicle.
  • the fire suppression system 10 may be used for fire suppression in a cargo compartment or cargo bay of an airborne vehicle, such as an aircraft.
  • Fig. 2 exemplarily shows such an airborne vehicle 20 having at least two cargo compartments 21, and a fire suppression system, which is configured to suppress a fire in at least one of the cargo compartment 21.
  • the fire suppression system in Fig. 2 may be a fire suppression system 10 as explained in conjunction with Fig. 1 .
  • the fire suppression system 10 may comprise a fuel tank inerting system 1, a halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2, a monitoring module 3 coupled to the fuel tank inerting system 1, and a control module 4 coupled to the monitoring module 3.
  • the fuel tank inerting system 1 may include at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (OBIGGS) 5.
  • OBIGGS on-board inert gas generating systems
  • the number of the OBIGGS 5 in Fig. 1 is exemplarily shown as two, but more than two OBIGGS 5 may be provided as well.
  • the OBIGGS 5 may receive air from respective air conditioning systems 6 which may for example include heat exchangers and/or filter systems in order to condition bleed air that may be extracted from gas turbine engines of an airborne vehicle.
  • the conditioned air may be input to the OBIGGS 5 which are configured to generate an inert gas, such as nitrogen, nitrogen enriched air (NEA) or oxygen depleted air (ODA) as output gas.
  • NAA nitrogen enriched air
  • ODA oxygen depleted air
  • the inert gas generated by the OBIGGS 5 may then be used to inert the ullage in fuel tanks 7a, 7b, 7c of the airborne vehicle.
  • the fuel tanks may comprise a left wing fuel tank 7a, a right wing fuel tank 7c and a centre wing fuel tank 7b.
  • Fuel tank inerting systems 1 are mandatory for aircraft having a centre wing fuel tank 7b in order to prevent explosions of the centre wing fuel tank 7b, especially when the centre wing fuel tank 7b is only filled to a low level, for example during short distance flights.
  • the number of fuel tanks is exemplarily shown as three, however, any other number of fuel tanks may be provided in an airborne vehicle as well.
  • the inert gas generated by the OBIGGS 5 may be led through a conduit pipe system.
  • the conduit pipe system may comprise a valve 8a and 8b for each of the OBIGGS 5, which controllably couple the conduit pipe system with an agent conduit pipe 9 configured to pipe a first fire suppression agent from the halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2.
  • Coupled to the first valve 8a is a first inert gas conduit pipe 9a configured to pipe inert gas from the first OBIGGS 5 to the agent conduit pipe 9.
  • a second inert gas conduit pipe 9b configured to pipe inert gas from the second OBIGGS 5 to the agent conduit pipe 9.
  • the halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2 may be configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, in particular halon 1301 or bromotrifluoromethane. Other organic halides may be used as a first fire suppression agent as well, for example trifluoroiodomethane.
  • the halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2 is coupled via the agent conduit pipe 9 with cargo compartment valves 21a and 21b of cargo compartments of an airborne vehicle, for example a fore fuselage cargo bay and an aft fuselage cargo bay.
  • the halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2 may release a predetermined amount of halon in case of a fire in one of the cargo compartments into the agent conduit pipe 9 and through the valves 21a and 21b in order to quench the fire in the respective cargo compartment for at least a first amount of time, for example several minutes up to an hour. It is officially assumed that a potential fire will not occur in both cargo compartments 21 at the same time during the same flight, thus, in case of a fire in one of the cargo compartments 21, the fire suppression agents will be released into the respective compartment 21 via the according valves 21a or 21b.
  • the time until the concentration of the first fire suppression agent has dropped below a predetermined threshold value may correspond to the first amount of time.
  • inert gas generated by one or both of the OBIGGS 5 may be used to sustain a predetermined concentration of inert gas in the cargo compartment in order to guarantee a quenching of the fire by the inert gas as second fire suppression agent.
  • the inert gas produced by one of the OBIGGS 5 is sufficient to fulfil the fire suppression requirements for a cargo compartment.
  • the monitoring module 3 may be configured to monitor the operability of the OBIGGS 5 and to output a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the OBIGGS 5. Since the OBIGGS 5 are part of the fuel tank inerting system 1 which is a Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL) B system, their operating time is ten days in an inoperable state, i.e. an aircraft with an inoperable OBIGGS 5 may be operated regularly for ten days before the OBIGGS 5 will have to be repaired again. Therefore, it may be possible that one of the OBIGGS 5 is found to be inoperable by the monitoring module 3. The monitoring signal output by the monitoring module 3 may in such a case indicate that one of the OBIGGS 5 is inoperable.
  • MMEL Master Minimum Equipment List
  • the control module 4 may be configured to receive the monitoring signal of the monitoring unit 3. Depending on the monitoring signal, the control module 4 may then be configured to select one of the OBIGGS 5 that may subsequently be used as the supplying system for the second fire suppression agent. In case of a fire or in order to prevent fires in a cargo compartment, the control module 4 may be configured to control the selected OBIGGS 5 to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent, for example nitrogen, NEA or ODA. This may be done by configuring the control module 4 to open the first valve 8a or the second valve 8b in case of fire in a compartment of an airborne vehicle, depending on the monitoring signal.
  • an inert gas for example nitrogen, NEA or ODA. This may be done by configuring the control module 4 to open the first valve 8a or the second valve 8b in case of fire in a compartment of an airborne vehicle, depending on the monitoring signal.
  • Fig. 3 shows a method 30 for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle.
  • the airborne vehicle may for example be an aircraft 20 having a fuel tank inerting system including at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and a halon-based fire suppression subsystem configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, as depicted in Fig. 2 .
  • the method 30 may be used to operate a fire suppression system 10 as depicted in Fig. 1 .
  • the method comprises as a first step 31 monitoring the operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems.
  • a second step 32 outputting a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems is performed.
  • the method 30 comprises selecting one of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems depending on the monitoring signal.
  • the halon-based fire suppression subsystem is controlled to release halon as a first fire suppression agent.
  • the selected on-board inert gas generating system is controlled to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Fire-Extinguishing By Fire Departments, And Fire-Extinguishing Equipment And Control Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention pertains to a fire suppression system and a method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle, particularly in cargo bays of aircraft. The fire suppression system comprises a fuel tank inerting system including at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, a halon-based fire suppression subsystem configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, a monitoring module, which is coupled to the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, and which is configured to monitor the operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and to output a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, and a control module, which is coupled to the monitoring module, the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and the halon-based fire suppression subsystem, and which is configured to select one of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems depending on the monitoring signal and to control the selected on-board inert gas generating system to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent.

Description

    Field of the invention
  • The present invention pertains to a fire suppression system and a method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle, particularly in cargo bays of aircraft.
  • Background of the invention
  • Cargo compartments according to CS25.857(C) are usually equipped with a halon 1301 fire suppression system. Halon 1301 or bromotrifluoromethane is an organic halide, which is a gaseous substance used for fire quenching by inhibiting the radical reaction of the combustion.
  • Halon 1301 belongs to the group of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) which present a potential environmental hazard due to their destructive effects on the ozone layer of the stratosphere. Based on the Montreal protocol list and the EU regulation 744/2010, the use of halon 1301 is banned and only allowed in certain circumstances. Therefore, it is desirable to restrict the use of halon 1301 and search for alternative fire quenching agents.
  • Cargo bay fire suppression may be done in two stages. First, a rapid discharge of a first quenching agent may be triggered. Simultaneously, a second quenching agent may be released slowly, so that after the concentration of the first quenching agent in the area where fire is to be quenched diminishes below a certain threshold, the concentration of the second quenching agent or at least the combination of both agents is high enough to guarantee subsequent fire suppression.
  • The document Cavage, W.: "Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System", International Systems Fire Protection Working Group, Atlantic City, New Jersey, 2005 discloses the use of an on-board inert gas generator (OBIGGS) of a fuel tank inerting system to supply nitrogen enriched air (NEA) as a second quenching agent instead of halon 1301 for cargo compartment fire suppression systems.
  • The document Reynolds, T.L.; Bailey, D.B.; Lewinski, D.F.; Roseburg, C.M.: "Onboard Inert Gas Generation System/Onboard Oxygen Gas Generation System (OBIGGS/OBOGS) Study - Part I: Aircraft System Requirements", NASA Technical Report 2001-210903, 2001, chapter 4 discloses a hybrid system using a non-nitrogen fire suppression agent in conjunction with an OBIGGS.
  • The document US 6,997,970 B2 discloses an on-board inert gas generating system for an aircraft which is configured to generate inert gas for either inerting a fuel tank or a cargo bay of the aircraft.
  • The document EP 1 306 801 A1 discloses a conventional fire detection system that initially detects the existence of a fire and initiates a fire alarm, upon which, either automatically or by crew action, Halon is released in a short interval as a first extinguishant. A second extinguishant in the form of nitrogen-rich air is supplied to ensure longer-term fire suppression.
  • The document Reinhardt, J.: " The Synergistic Effect When Combining Nitrogen and Halon 1301 During the MPS Aerosol Can Simulation Explosion", The Fifth Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference, 2007, discloses the occurrence of a synergistic effect occurs when Halon 1301 and nitrogen of an OBIGGS system of an aircraft are combined to protect an aircraft compartment against a propane explosion.
  • Summary of the invention
  • It is a technical problem of the present invention to provide for a fire suppression system and a method for fire suppression in the cargo compartment of an airborne vehicle which reduces the amount of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) needed, minimizes the additional weight of the airborne vehicle and complies with the safety, reliability and availability requirements that are mandatory for a cargo compartment fire suppression system.
  • This problem is solved by a fire suppression system with the technical features of claim 1, a method for fire suppression with the technical features of claim 7 and an airborne vehicle having the technical features of claim 6.
  • According to an aspect of the present invention, a fire suppression system comprises a fuel tank inerting system including at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, a halon-based fire suppression subsystem configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, a monitoring module, which is coupled to the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, and which is configured to monitor the operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and to output a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, anda control module, which is coupled to the monitoring module, the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and the halon-based fire suppression subsystem, and which is configured to select one of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems depending on the monitoring signal and to control the selected on-board inert gas generating system to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent, for example into a cargo compartment of an airborne vehicle in order to start a fire suppression atmosphere in combination with the first fire suppression agent.
  • According to a further aspect of the present invention, a method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle having a fuel tank inerting system including at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and a halon-based fire suppression subsystem configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, the method comprising the steps of monitoring the operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, outputting a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems, selecting one of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems depending on the monitoring signal, controlling the halon-based fire suppression subsystem to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, and controlling the selected on-board inert gas generating system to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent, for example into a cargo compartment of an airborne vehicle in order to start a fire suppression atmosphere in combination with the first fire suppression agent.
  • According to yet another aspect of the present invention, an airborne vehicle comprises at least two cargo compartments, and a fire suppression system according to an embodiment of the invention, which is configured to suppress a fire in at least one of the cargo compartments by releasing the first fire suppression agent and subsequently the second fire suppression agent, for example a combination of Halon 1301 and nitrogen enriched air.
  • Embodiments of the invention
  • One main idea of the present invention is to make use of the on-board inert gas generation systems (OBIGGS) of the fuel tank inerting system (FTIS) of an airborne vehicle by selecting one of the two OBIGGS to supply an inert gas as second quenching agent for assisting a halon-based fire suppression system.
  • The dependent claims provide additional technical features of advantageous embodiments and further improvements of the invention.
  • According to an embodiment, the fire suppression system further comprises an agent conduit pipe configured to pipe the first fire suppression agent from the halon-based fire suppression subsystem, a first inert gas conduit pipe configured to pipe inert gas from a first one of the on-board inert gas generating systems and coupled to the agent conduit pipe by a first valve, and a second inert gas conduit pipe configured to pipe inert gas from a second one of the on-board inert gas generating systems and coupled to the agent conduit pipe by a second valve, wherein the control module is configured to open the first or the second valve in case of fire in a compartment of an airborne vehicle, depending on the monitoring signal.
  • According to a further embodiment of the fire suppression system, the compartments of the airborne vehicle are cargo bays. The fire suppression system is particularly suited for cargo bays of airborne vehicle, since the capability of one of the on-board inert gas generating systems is sufficient to fulfil the fire suppression requirements for a cargo bay.
  • According to yet another embodiment of the fire suppression system, the inert gas is one of the group of nitrogen, nitrogen enriched air and oxygen depleted air.
  • According to yet another embodiment of the fire suppression system, the first fire suppression agent is halon 1301.
  • The invention will be explained in greater detail with reference to exemplary embodiments depicted in the drawings as appended.
  • Short summary of the drawings
  • The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the present invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate the embodiments of the present invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. Other embodiments of the present invention and many of the intended advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated as they become better understood by reference to the following detailed description. The elements of the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other. Like reference numerals designate corresponding similar parts.
  • Fig. 1
    shows a fire suppression system according to an embodiment of the invention.
    Fig. 2
    shows an airborne vehicle including a fire suppression system according to another embodiment of the invention.
    Fig. 3
    shows a method for fire suppression according to yet another embodiment of the invention.
    Detailed description of the embodiments
  • Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a variety of alternate and/or equivalent implementations may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown and described without departing from the scope of the present invention. Generally, this application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the specific embodiments discussed herein.
  • Fig. 1 shows a fire suppression system 10, particularly a fire suppression system 10 for use in an airborne vehicle. The fire suppression system 10 may be used for fire suppression in a cargo compartment or cargo bay of an airborne vehicle, such as an aircraft. Fig. 2 exemplarily shows such an airborne vehicle 20 having at least two cargo compartments 21, and a fire suppression system, which is configured to suppress a fire in at least one of the cargo compartment 21. The fire suppression system in Fig. 2 may be a fire suppression system 10 as explained in conjunction with Fig. 1.
  • Returning to Fig. 1, the fire suppression system 10 may comprise a fuel tank inerting system 1, a halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2, a monitoring module 3 coupled to the fuel tank inerting system 1, and a control module 4 coupled to the monitoring module 3.
  • The fuel tank inerting system 1 may include at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (OBIGGS) 5. The number of the OBIGGS 5 in Fig. 1 is exemplarily shown as two, but more than two OBIGGS 5 may be provided as well. The OBIGGS 5 may receive air from respective air conditioning systems 6 which may for example include heat exchangers and/or filter systems in order to condition bleed air that may be extracted from gas turbine engines of an airborne vehicle. The conditioned air may be input to the OBIGGS 5 which are configured to generate an inert gas, such as nitrogen, nitrogen enriched air (NEA) or oxygen depleted air (ODA) as output gas. The inert gas generated by the OBIGGS 5 may then be used to inert the ullage in fuel tanks 7a, 7b, 7c of the airborne vehicle. For example, the fuel tanks may comprise a left wing fuel tank 7a, a right wing fuel tank 7c and a centre wing fuel tank 7b.
  • Fuel tank inerting systems 1 are mandatory for aircraft having a centre wing fuel tank 7b in order to prevent explosions of the centre wing fuel tank 7b, especially when the centre wing fuel tank 7b is only filled to a low level, for example during short distance flights. The number of fuel tanks is exemplarily shown as three, however, any other number of fuel tanks may be provided in an airborne vehicle as well.
  • The inert gas generated by the OBIGGS 5 may be led through a conduit pipe system. The conduit pipe system may comprise a valve 8a and 8b for each of the OBIGGS 5, which controllably couple the conduit pipe system with an agent conduit pipe 9 configured to pipe a first fire suppression agent from the halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2.
  • Coupled to the first valve 8a is a first inert gas conduit pipe 9a configured to pipe inert gas from the first OBIGGS 5 to the agent conduit pipe 9. Similarly, coupled to the second valve 8b is a second inert gas conduit pipe 9b configured to pipe inert gas from the second OBIGGS 5 to the agent conduit pipe 9.
  • The halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2 may be configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, in particular halon 1301 or bromotrifluoromethane. Other organic halides may be used as a first fire suppression agent as well, for example trifluoroiodomethane. The halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2 is coupled via the agent conduit pipe 9 with cargo compartment valves 21a and 21b of cargo compartments of an airborne vehicle, for example a fore fuselage cargo bay and an aft fuselage cargo bay. The halon-based fire suppression subsystem 2 may release a predetermined amount of halon in case of a fire in one of the cargo compartments into the agent conduit pipe 9 and through the valves 21a and 21b in order to quench the fire in the respective cargo compartment for at least a first amount of time, for example several minutes up to an hour. It is officially assumed that a potential fire will not occur in both cargo compartments 21 at the same time during the same flight, thus, in case of a fire in one of the cargo compartments 21, the fire suppression agents will be released into the respective compartment 21 via the according valves 21a or 21b.
  • When the concentration of the first fire suppression agent has dropped below a predetermined threshold value due to leakage, the first fire suppression agent cannot guarantee an effective quenching of the fire anymore. The time until the concentration of the first fire suppression agent has dropped below a predetermined threshold value may correspond to the first amount of time.
  • In case of a fire in the cargo compartment or to prevent fires in the cargo compartment, inert gas generated by one or both of the OBIGGS 5 may be used to sustain a predetermined concentration of inert gas in the cargo compartment in order to guarantee a quenching of the fire by the inert gas as second fire suppression agent. Usually, the inert gas produced by one of the OBIGGS 5 is sufficient to fulfil the fire suppression requirements for a cargo compartment.
  • The monitoring module 3 may be configured to monitor the operability of the OBIGGS 5 and to output a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the OBIGGS 5. Since the OBIGGS 5 are part of the fuel tank inerting system 1 which is a Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL) B system, their operating time is ten days in an inoperable state, i.e. an aircraft with an inoperable OBIGGS 5 may be operated regularly for ten days before the OBIGGS 5 will have to be repaired again. Therefore, it may be possible that one of the OBIGGS 5 is found to be inoperable by the monitoring module 3. The monitoring signal output by the monitoring module 3 may in such a case indicate that one of the OBIGGS 5 is inoperable.
  • The control module 4 may be configured to receive the monitoring signal of the monitoring unit 3. Depending on the monitoring signal, the control module 4 may then be configured to select one of the OBIGGS 5 that may subsequently be used as the supplying system for the second fire suppression agent. In case of a fire or in order to prevent fires in a cargo compartment, the control module 4 may be configured to control the selected OBIGGS 5 to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent, for example nitrogen, NEA or ODA. This may be done by configuring the control module 4 to open the first valve 8a or the second valve 8b in case of fire in a compartment of an airborne vehicle, depending on the monitoring signal.
  • Fig. 3 shows a method 30 for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle. The airborne vehicle may for example be an aircraft 20 having a fuel tank inerting system including at least two on-board inert gas generating systems and a halon-based fire suppression subsystem configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, as depicted in Fig. 2. The method 30 may be used to operate a fire suppression system 10 as depicted in Fig. 1.
  • The method comprises as a first step 31 monitoring the operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems. In a second step 32, outputting a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems is performed. As a third step 33, the method 30 comprises selecting one of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems depending on the monitoring signal. In a fourth step 34, the halon-based fire suppression subsystem is controlled to release halon as a first fire suppression agent. In a fifth step 35, the selected on-board inert gas generating system is controlled to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent.
  • In the foregoing detailed description, various features are grouped together in one or more examples or examples for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. It is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Many other examples will be apparent to one skilled in the art upon reviewing the above specification.
  • The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. In the appended claims and throughout the specification, the terms "including" and "in which" are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms "comprising" and "wherein," respectively. Moreover, the terms "first," "second," and "third," etc., are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on or to establish a certain ranking of importance of their objects.
  • List of Reference Signs
  • 1
    Fuel tank inerting system
    2
    Halon-based fire suppression subsystem
    3
    Monitoring module
    4
    Control module
    5
    On-board inert gas generating system
    6
    Air conditioning system
    7a
    Left wing fuel tank
    7b
    Centre wing fuel tank
    7c
    Right wing fuel tank
    8a
    First valve
    8b
    Second valve
    9
    Agent conduit pipe
    9a
    First inert gas conduit pipe
    9b
    Second inert gas conduit pipe
    10
    Fire suppression system
    20
    Airborne vehicle
    21
    Cargo compartment
    21a
    Cargo compartment valve
    21b
    Cargo compartment valve
    30
    Method
    31
    Method step
    32
    Method step
    33
    Method step
    34
    Method step
    35
    Method step

Claims (7)

  1. A fire suppression system (10), comprising:
    a fuel tank inerting system (1) including at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5);
    a halon-based fire suppression subsystem (2) configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent;
    a monitoring module (3), which is coupled to the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5), and
    which is configured to monitor the operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5) and
    to output a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5); and
    a control module (4), which is coupled to the monitoring module (3), the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5) and the halon-based fire suppression subsystem (2), and which is configured to select one of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5) depending on the monitoring signal and to control the selected on-board inert gas generating system (5) to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent.
  2. The fire suppression system (10) of claim 1, further comprising:
    an agent conduit pipe (9) configured to pipe the first fire suppression agent from the halon-based fire suppression subsystem (2);
    a first inert gas conduit pipe (9a) configured to pipe inert gas from a first one of the on-board inert gas generating systems (5) and coupled to the agent conduit pipe (9) by a first valve (8a); and
    a second inert gas conduit pipe (9b) configured to pipe inert gas from a second one of the on-board inert gas generating systems (5) and coupled to the agent conduit pipe (9) by a second valve (8b),
    wherein the control module (4) is configured to open the first or the second valve (8a, 8b) in case of fire in a compartment (21) of an airborne vehicle (20), depending on the monitoring signal.
  3. The fire suppression system (10) of claim 2, wherein the compartment (21) of the airborne vehicle (20) is a cargo bay.
  4. The fire suppression system (10) of one of the claims 1 to 3, wherein
    the inert gas is one of the group of nitrogen, nitrogen enriched air and oxygen depleted air.
  5. The fire suppression system (10) of one of the claims 1 to 4, wherein
    the first fire suppression agent is halon 1301.
  6. An airborne vehicle (20), comprising:
    at least one cargo compartment (21); and
    a fire suppression system (10) of one of the claims 1 to 5, which is configured to suppress a fire in the at least one cargo compartment (21) by releasing the first fire suppression agent and subsequently the second fire suppression agent.
  7. A method (30) for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle (20) having a fuel tank inerting system (1) including at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5) and a halon-based fire suppression subsystem (2) configured to release halon as a first fire suppression agent, the method (30) comprising the steps of:
    monitoring (31) the operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5);
    outputting (32) a monitoring signal indicating the state of operability of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5);
    selecting (33) one of the at least two on-board inert gas generating systems (5) depending on the monitoring signal;
    controlling (34) the halon-based fire suppression subsystem (2) to release halon as a first fire suppression agent; and
    controlling (35) the selected on-board inert gas generating system (5) to release an inert gas as a second fire suppression agent.
EP12153704.7A 2012-02-02 2012-02-02 Fire suppression system and method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle Not-in-force EP2623159B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12153704.7A EP2623159B1 (en) 2012-02-02 2012-02-02 Fire suppression system and method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12153704.7A EP2623159B1 (en) 2012-02-02 2012-02-02 Fire suppression system and method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2623159A1 true EP2623159A1 (en) 2013-08-07
EP2623159B1 EP2623159B1 (en) 2018-06-13

Family

ID=45560776

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12153704.7A Not-in-force EP2623159B1 (en) 2012-02-02 2012-02-02 Fire suppression system and method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2623159B1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017168199A1 (en) * 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 Behbahani-Pour Mohammed Javad System, apparatus, and method of preventing fuel tank explosion
EP3228364A1 (en) * 2016-04-04 2017-10-11 Kidde Graviner Limited Fire suppression system and method
WO2017182733A1 (en) * 2016-04-22 2017-10-26 Zodiac Aerotechnics Device for distributing and injecting an inert gas in an aircraft fuel tank
US10179308B2 (en) 2016-04-13 2019-01-15 Carleton Life Support Systems Inc. On-board inert gas generating system prognostic health monitoring
US10286235B2 (en) 2017-02-22 2019-05-14 The Boeing Company Systems and methods for flammability reduction and ventilation using nitrogen-enriched gas for transportation vehicle protection
US11536154B2 (en) 2018-04-11 2022-12-27 Kidde Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for providing power and fire suppression using a turbo pump, compressed gas, and an OBIGGS
US11717839B2 (en) 2020-11-25 2023-08-08 Kidde Technologies, Inc. Nozzle configurations to create a vortex of fire suppression agent

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4643260A (en) * 1985-09-26 1987-02-17 The Boeing Company Fire suppression system with controlled secondary extinguishant discharge
GB2374007A (en) * 2001-04-04 2002-10-09 Kidde Plc Fire / explosion protection system and method, using inert gas produced in low temperature catalytic oxidation of organic fuel
EP1306801A1 (en) 2000-07-07 2003-05-02 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Part recognition data creation method and apparatus, electronic part mounting apparatus, and recorded medium
US20030136879A1 (en) * 2001-10-26 2003-07-24 Thomas Grabow System for extinguishing and suppressing fire in an enclosed space in an aircraft
US20050224654A1 (en) * 2004-02-10 2005-10-13 Loss Kevin L Methods and systems for controlling flammability control systems in aircraft and other vehicles
US6997970B2 (en) 2002-06-25 2006-02-14 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Oxygen/inert gas generator
US20100236796A1 (en) * 2009-03-23 2010-09-23 Adam Chattaway Fire suppression system and method
EP2289600A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-02 Kidde Technologies Inc. Fire suppressor system with pressure regulation

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4643260A (en) * 1985-09-26 1987-02-17 The Boeing Company Fire suppression system with controlled secondary extinguishant discharge
EP1306801A1 (en) 2000-07-07 2003-05-02 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Part recognition data creation method and apparatus, electronic part mounting apparatus, and recorded medium
GB2374007A (en) * 2001-04-04 2002-10-09 Kidde Plc Fire / explosion protection system and method, using inert gas produced in low temperature catalytic oxidation of organic fuel
US20030136879A1 (en) * 2001-10-26 2003-07-24 Thomas Grabow System for extinguishing and suppressing fire in an enclosed space in an aircraft
US6997970B2 (en) 2002-06-25 2006-02-14 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Oxygen/inert gas generator
US20050224654A1 (en) * 2004-02-10 2005-10-13 Loss Kevin L Methods and systems for controlling flammability control systems in aircraft and other vehicles
US20100236796A1 (en) * 2009-03-23 2010-09-23 Adam Chattaway Fire suppression system and method
EP2289600A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-02 Kidde Technologies Inc. Fire suppressor system with pressure regulation

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CAVAGE, W.: "Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System", INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS FIRE PROTECTION WORKING GROUP, 2005
REINHARDT, J.: "The Synergistic Effect When Combining Nitrogen and Halon 1301 During the MPS Aerosol Can Simulation Explosion", THE FIFTH TRIENNIAL INTERNATIONAL AIR CRAFT FIRE AND CABIN SAFETY RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2007
REYNOLDS, T.L.; BAILEY, D.B.; LEWINSKI, D.F.; ROSEBURG, C.M.: "NASA Technical Report 2001-210903", 2001, article "Onboard Inert Gas Generation System/Onboard Oxygen Gas Generation System (OBIGGS/OBOGS) Study - Part I: Aircraft System Requirements"

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2585169A (en) * 2016-03-31 2020-12-30 Mohammed Javad Behbahani Pour System, apparatus, and method of preventing fuel tank explosion
GB2568392A (en) * 2016-03-31 2019-05-15 Mohammed Javad Behbahani Pour System, apparatus, and method of preventing fuel tank explosion
US10858118B2 (en) 2016-03-31 2020-12-08 Mohammed Javad Behbahani-Pour System, apparatus, and method of preventing fuel tank explosion
GB2568392B (en) * 2016-03-31 2020-12-16 Mohammed Javad Behbahani Pour System, apparatus, and method of preventing fuel tank explosion
WO2017168199A1 (en) * 2016-03-31 2017-10-05 Behbahani-Pour Mohammed Javad System, apparatus, and method of preventing fuel tank explosion
GB2585169B (en) * 2016-03-31 2021-04-14 Mohammed Javad Behbahani Pour System, apparatus, and method of preventing fuel tank explosion
EP3228364A1 (en) * 2016-04-04 2017-10-11 Kidde Graviner Limited Fire suppression system and method
US10179308B2 (en) 2016-04-13 2019-01-15 Carleton Life Support Systems Inc. On-board inert gas generating system prognostic health monitoring
WO2017182733A1 (en) * 2016-04-22 2017-10-26 Zodiac Aerotechnics Device for distributing and injecting an inert gas in an aircraft fuel tank
FR3050438A1 (en) * 2016-04-22 2017-10-27 Zodiac Aerotechnics DEVICE FOR DISPENSING AND INJECTING AN INERT GAS IN A FUEL TANK OF AN AIRCRAFT
US10286235B2 (en) 2017-02-22 2019-05-14 The Boeing Company Systems and methods for flammability reduction and ventilation using nitrogen-enriched gas for transportation vehicle protection
US11536154B2 (en) 2018-04-11 2022-12-27 Kidde Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for providing power and fire suppression using a turbo pump, compressed gas, and an OBIGGS
US11717839B2 (en) 2020-11-25 2023-08-08 Kidde Technologies, Inc. Nozzle configurations to create a vortex of fire suppression agent

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2623159B1 (en) 2018-06-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2623159B1 (en) Fire suppression system and method for fire suppression in an airborne vehicle
US10238901B2 (en) Cargo fire-suppression agent distribution system
US10343003B2 (en) Aircraft fire suppression system and method
US7900709B2 (en) Hypoxic aircraft fire prevention and suppression system with automatic emergency oxygen delivery system
EP2624353A1 (en) Emergency supply system for a transportation means, method for supplying electrical power and for inhibiting fire and aircraft with an emergency supply system
US9072921B2 (en) Thermodynamically-optimized advanced fire suppression system
US10220228B2 (en) Aircraft fire suppression system with addressable bottle valve
CN106345087B (en) Fire suppression control system for aircraft
US20200298036A1 (en) Aircraft fire suppression system
Guibaud et al. Fire safety in spacecraft: Past incidents and Deep Space challenges
Halefom Tailoring an Airworthiness Document to Unmanned Aircraft Systems: A Case Study of MIL-HDBK-516C
Lebbin Review of Canadian flight deck and cabin smoke and fire incidents: 2001-2010
Reynolds et al. Onboard inert gas generation system/onboard oxygen gas generation system (OBIGGS/OBOGS) study
Behbahani-pour et al. Avionics compartment fire extinguishing on the commercial airplanes
Bennett Replacing halon in fire protection systems: a progress report
Koring The Globe and Mail
Rosenkrans Halon pressure
Sarkos FUTURE TRENDS IN AIRCRAFT FIRE SAFETY R&D
Sarkos CABIN CREW SAFETY
Johnson Lessons learned on design
Hill et al. INVESTIGATION AND CHARACTrISTICS OF MAJOR FIRE-RELATED ACCID01TS IN CIVIL AIR IRANSPORTS OVR THE PAST TEN YEARS
Frank ValuJet 592 and Corporate Responsibility
WERFELMAN Dousing theFLAMES
Dietrich et al. Towards the Development of a Specification for a Portable Fine Water Mist Fire Extinguisher for Spacecraft Applications
Klems Up-date on airbus fire safety research and development

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20131011

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20180213

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: FAMILY, OLIVER

Inventor name: TABERSKI, JENS

Inventor name: ROHRBACH, PAUL

Inventor name: BEUERMANN, RAINER

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1007858

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012047346

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20180613

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180913

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180913

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180914

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1007858

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181013

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012047346

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190314

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190228

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190202

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20181015

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190202

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20210225

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20210217

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20210219

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20120202

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180613

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602012047346

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20220202

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220202

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220901