EP2553500A1 - Surveillance de l'environnement - Google Patents

Surveillance de l'environnement

Info

Publication number
EP2553500A1
EP2553500A1 EP11763440A EP11763440A EP2553500A1 EP 2553500 A1 EP2553500 A1 EP 2553500A1 EP 11763440 A EP11763440 A EP 11763440A EP 11763440 A EP11763440 A EP 11763440A EP 2553500 A1 EP2553500 A1 EP 2553500A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
water
soil
data readings
medium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP11763440A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2553500A4 (fr
Inventor
David Lankford
Jr. Francis Thomas Lichtner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Earthtec Solutions LLC
Original Assignee
Earthtec Solutions LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Earthtec Solutions LLC filed Critical Earthtec Solutions LLC
Publication of EP2553500A1 publication Critical patent/EP2553500A1/fr
Publication of EP2553500A4 publication Critical patent/EP2553500A4/fr
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01G—HORTICULTURE; CULTIVATION OF VEGETABLES, FLOWERS, RICE, FRUIT, VINES, HOPS OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; WATERING
    • A01G25/00—Watering gardens, fields, sports grounds or the like
    • A01G25/16—Control of watering
    • A01G25/167—Control by humidity of the soil itself or of devices simulating soil or of the atmosphere; Soil humidity sensors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/02—Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining

Definitions

  • the present art methodology is designed simply to monitor one aspect of the environmental medium.
  • the related art incorporates a singular moisture data logger, which is designed to collect moisture data at regular intervals (generally every several hours). The measurements are converted into soil moisture readings and stored in memory. Data loggers with a graphical display usually show several days or weeks of readings in a line graph, allowing visibility relevant to recent soil moisture trends at a glance on the screen (see, e.g., FIG. 1). However, in this format, the data has limited value.
  • the subject disclosure relates generally to the field of multi-dimensional environmental monitoring, systematic dissection of interpretive relationships and extensive computational analysis, which can be displayed in a visual real-time data-rich web-based configuration called AdviroGuardTM interpretive analysis.
  • AdviroGuardTM interpretive analysis By means of building data subsets and in harmonization with the laws of physics contained within a particular environmental medium, strict statistical analyses are applied to produce significant and pertinent information for key decision makers.
  • the subject disclosure also relates to comprehensive data interpretation for all types of environmental and agronomic related medium examination and profiling. More particularly, in an aspect, provided is a well defined software methodology for examining and studying the interrelationship between subsets of data within the universe of collected data. Real-time charts, graphs and applicable data can be accessible through a web-based data-rich illustrative platform called AdviroGuardTM interpretive analysis. AdviroGuardTM can comprise core computational formulas and software code, also referred to as TX M ATM (Interpretive Media Analysis).
  • AdviroGuardTM produces a deductive analysis. Because AdviroGuardTM can create data-subsets, which allows filtering of data to give meaningful information, portions of the TXMA can illustrate the
  • AdviroGuardTM 's data-rich interpretive computational software can make these determinations automatically. With an ever larger data-universe, more refined conclusions can be developed.
  • deltas can be part of a group of metrics based on differences and that serve to implement environmental monitoring as described herein. Such metrics can be computed and exploited by one or more of the various embodiments described herin.
  • a range of differences can be calculated and grouped, and the "delta-intensity" can be placed into context by assigning them to a measurement of the state of the media at the time the delta occurs.
  • the delta-intensity can be interpreted quantitatively, the outcome results in a computational result that is reproducible, thus generating the outcome has a measure of "predictability.” As more data sites are collected, a computed form of "artificial intelligence" can be achieved by moving from assumptions to reproducible computations.
  • This "delta-intensity" methodology can utilize data collection sites as well as an explicitly defined media-characteristics model throughout the environmental profile.
  • Artificial intelligence thresholds can be refined in real-time or nearly real-time and become more accurate than graphing alone. This principle can be applied to many other areas such as the prediction of harvest dates based on planting dates, the zone of root activity of a particular variety and soil type, drought tolerance, fertilizer application efficiency, water usage efficiency, prediction of water needed, nutrient management timing, leak detection monitoring, and the like.
  • FIG. 1 is a traditional data logger with graphical display
  • FIG. 2 is a traditional graph showing summed readings
  • FIG. 3 is a Plant Water Index Study from USDA
  • FIG. 4 is a Web Interface/Universal Data Interface (referred to as TXUDI) in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 5 is a Data Processing and Display TXUDI in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIGs. 6A-6B present delta values as a function of soil volumetric percent
  • FIG. 7 is a Chart representing Leaching
  • FIG. 8 is a Chart representing the Identity of the Soil Characteristics
  • FIG. 9 is a Gap between Field Capacity and the Plant's Optimum Water Needs
  • FIG. 10 is a Chart representing the Highest Negative Deltas
  • FIG. 11 is a Chart representing the Lowest Negative Deltas
  • FIG. 12 is a Chart representing Additional Data Points
  • FIG. 13 presents an overview of where primary data transformations exist and available secondary calculations in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 14 illustrates TX RET o in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 15 illustrates TXIE (Irrigation Efficiency) in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • FIG. 16 illustrates the location of plant activity in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 17 depicts TX PETOC , which compares calculated water uptake by a crop with theoretical demand for water by the crop, calculated as ETo, over the entirety of a data collection period;
  • FIG. 18 presents a table comprising positive deltas of percent volumetric soil water moisture readings at various depths over a data collection period
  • FIG. 19 illustrates a chart for stress days analysis in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 20 presents a table with a set of exemplary readings that illustrate stress in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 21 illustrates Ion Minimum and Maximum observed in the soil profile over a data collection period in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 22 illustrates the Ion Distribution and Drift calculation made on ions observed in a soil profile in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 23 illustrates Water and Nutrient Application Ranking in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 24 illustrates Water Efficiency in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIGs. 25A-25B illustrate exemplary charts representing Executive Dashboard in accordance with an aspect of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 26 illustrates an exemplary operating environment that enables aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 27 illustrates an exemplary method for performing environmental monitoring in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 28 illustrates an exemplary method for placing sensor in a medium to enable environmental monitoring according to aspects of the subject disclosure
  • FIG. 29 illustrates an exemplary method for manipulating data related to environmental monitoring in according to aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • Methods and systems disclosed herein may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, such methods and systems may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-readable storage medium having computer- readable computer-executable instructions (e.g., computer software) embodied in the storage medium. More particularly, the subject methods and systems may take the form of web-implemented computer software. Any suitable computer-readable storage medium may be utilized including hard disks, CD-ROMs, optical storage devices, or magnetic storage devices.
  • These computer-executable instructions may also be stored in a computer- readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable computing device or data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including computer-readable computer-executable instructions for implementing the function specified in the flowchart block or blocks.
  • the computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable computing device or data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or the other programmable computing device or apparatus to produce a computer-implemented process such that the computer-executable instructions that execute on the computer or the other computing device or programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks.
  • blocks of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations support combinations of means for performing the specified functions, combinations of steps for performing the specified functions and program instruction means for performing the specified functions. It will also be understood that each block (e.g., unit, interface, processor, or the like) of the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and flowchart illustrations, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based computer systems that perform the specified functions or steps, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
  • an interface application referred to as the Earthtec Solutions Universal Data Interface (UDI).
  • the UDI can be web-based or installed locally on a user computer. Traditional web-interface applications interface with a single data source in one computer language.
  • the UDI is a unique platform capable of interpreting multiple sources of raw data in diverse computer language platforms and converting the raw data into a single language designed for interpretive purposes. Coupled with the human interface component, the UDI becomes a principle analytical apparatus for assembling the components for the TXTM data processing and displays.
  • Aerobic Soils Air penetrates between soil particles to a certain depth. Soil type and density affect the oxygen depth. If oxygen is in the soil, such soil is considered aerobic soil. Aerobic soil contains micro-organisms that give the soil plant growing capabilities. [0030] Anaerobic soil.— Soil that lies beneath the aerobic soil. There is low activity in this zone.
  • Drainage When over watered the water movement down is considered draining. Movement below the root zone is considered leaching.
  • ETo. Model that utilizes air temperature, wind speed, light intensity, relative humidity to compute what an acre of grass 1 inch high would lose in water on a per acre basis.
  • Evaporation-Transpiration Soil moisture can move in the soil in three ways. When water moves upwards and out of the soil, it is considered to be ET.
  • Transpiration is water moved from the soil by a plant. Evaporation is the moisture lost off the surface of the soil.
  • Etc is a diagnostic measurement that can reflect how well the plant is extracting water based on ETo. Based on ETo, the Etc is an indicator of over or under watering.
  • Grow Days. The number of days from planting to end of harvest. If multiple harvest, then end of harvest refers to the end of the last harvest.
  • Nutrient Efficiency A measurement of the nutrient management reflecting maximum output for minimum input. Generally conveyed in "units per pound.”
  • Optimum Allowance By monitoring root activity, a profile of water uptake can be determined. As the soil moisture decreases, the plants ability to extract moisture is reduced. By measuring the uptake, it is possible to determine when the plant is in stress taking up water. Optimum allowance allows computation of how wide a swing in soil moisture is possible before a plant starts to struggle for water.
  • Optimum Soil Ratio Water/Air By monitoring root activity and adding water uptake every 15 minutes, it can be determined when the optimum soil ratio between water and air is achieved. This becomes the baseline to manage irrigation. Generally, optimum soil ratio water/air coupled with optimum allowance forms a window of management.
  • Soil Texture Soil texture largely determines field capacity and permanent wilt (e.g., instance whereby a plant can no longer extract water from the soil to maintain life). Soil texture is measured in the percent of three particle sizes. Sand has the largest particle size, silt has the second largest size, and clay has the smallest particle size.
  • Root Activity Feeder roots are designed to take up water and nutrients. Feeder roots must move forward or they perish. Feeder roots only develop and move through moist soil. Feeder roots are the most effective in aerobic soils. Nearly 80% activity of all feeder root activity is within the top 8 inches of soil. Root development generally is random. Roots cannot find water and grow to the water. Once water is detected, a plant develops more feeder roots in the area in which water was detected. Root activity mostly occurs during daylight.
  • Stress Days A stress day is a day in which the water uptake does not closely reflect ETo. If a plant is not in the window of optimum root activity, this is considered stress.
  • Total irrigation Amount of water applied to the crop. Measured in inches it is based on an acre. In an aspect, there are 27, 154 gallons of water in an acre inch.
  • Water Efficiency Most any plant transpires water in order to move nutrients and chemicals throughout the plant. The amount of water retained for plant and fruit production can be measured as water efficiency. The higher the percent, the better the water efficiency. Water efficiency is thus a measure of optimum water use.
  • the UDI can request and receive data (raw data or pre- processed data) from remote data collection sites; see Remote Data Collection Ports in FIG. 4, illustrated with three sensors or data portals 410a, 410b, and 410c.
  • data collection sites e.g., data portals
  • the UDI can convert the received data (e.g., raw data 415) into a single language platform.
  • TX Translator units 420 also referred to as TX
  • Data correlator unit 430 can correlate data with the human interface raw data.
  • a local phone book would represent a generic data collect site.
  • the information assembled in such a phone book would include phone numbers, names, and addresses, all of which could be described as a generic database.
  • Human entered data can include the original phone book in question, plus information from other phone books for the area.
  • Data Correlator 430 is designed to include all the different "phone books" plus
  • the software provides the relationship between soil moisture and saline data points.
  • users can add yield, nutrients applied and spray applications, which cannot be measured electronically. After correlations are drawn regarding how the inputs influence the outputs, resources can be managed which cannot be monitored directly.
  • the UDI can provide the reformulated data (e.g., data cast into the single language platform) to a TX Data Processor 440 (see TX Processing in FIG. 4).
  • the TX Data Processor 440 can filter and qualify data and then perform computations to produce numbers and displays (e.g., graphs, charts, or the like), which are crucial to helping managers make timely decisions and to formulate long-term analyses and action plans.
  • TX series or TX methodology for producing a series of displays 510 (charts, graphs, etc.) and numbers used to make immediate decisions, implement instantaneous actions and long term actions. Such numbers and other related information can be cast into various reports 520.
  • the first step in this process is to collect data from remote data collection sites. This can be performed utilizing the UDI, as described hereinbefore. After the data is translated into TX terminology, the data can be processed and the resulting displays (charts, graphs, etc.) and numbers can be stored for current or future use.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates features of data processing implemented by the various methods and systems disclosed herein.
  • streams of raw data are received by a web interface, such as UDI or a part thereof, which reformulates the raw data and supplies it to TX DP Processor 440.
  • the TX D p processor 440 generates data and reports, and supplies at least a portion of the data to various memories (e.g., data storage).
  • TXDP processor 440 can supply data processed in accordance with various levels of complexity; for instance, processed data can be retained in memory (e.g., data storage) in graph or chart format.
  • the primary TX relationship can be generated through the TXMA (Media Analysis).
  • the TXMA can set optimum points by which many TX charts (e.g., secondary charts) and graphs are created to compile meaningful analysis and management guidelines.
  • the UDI can bring in raw data and convert the data into meaningful numbers.
  • the TXMA can generate a report designed to compile meaningful management guidelines or analysis.
  • the UDI can bring in raw data and convert the data into meaningful numbers.
  • TXMA can convert data in a first format (e.g., format of an old computer language) to a second format (e.g., format of a new computer language).
  • a raw data sensor reading may be 136. This is converted to read 55 degrees Fahrenheit. That data can be then stored in a first data storage site.
  • certain stored data also can have a time stamp and a reference to each sensor, such as a tag number or a record number. Table 1 is a short example of converted and stored raw data.
  • Table 1 shows the relative day and time stamp for five different soil moisture sensor readings at the depths indicated in the headings of Table 1, which is separated into five columns displaying values for each increment of data collected regarding volumetric soil moisture measurement.
  • the TX MA takes the data from Table 1 , whereby, data in line 1 is subtracted from Line 2, Line 2 is subtracted from Line 3, etc., from which creates the respective deltas that are represented within Table 2.
  • the sign of a value of a delta indicates if the change (delta) is accumulating (positive numbers) or depleting (negative numbers) from the previous reading or time stamp.
  • the magnitude of the delta is important to help determine the forces being applied that caused the specific delta-intensity. For example, if the delta intensity is greater than 0.05%, then it is known empirically that the force being applied is rainfall, irrigation, or other significant external force. Such conclusion also is valid for negative deltas.
  • Available deltas can be processed in several ways. Each progression provides insight into different aspects of the soil, water or plant characteristics. As shown in FIGs. 6A-6B, with the deltas created the data can be sorted by the original percent volumetric soil moisture value reading on the X axis and the delta on the Y axis.
  • FIGs. 6A-6B Relevancy of data present in FIGs. 6A-6B becomes apparent after portions of the data are categorized into meaningful and extremely valuable information.
  • the soil can hold water until the tension on the soil particles on water is exceeded, after which the water will move under the influence of gravity down into the next layer.
  • the apparent field capacity of the soil has been exceeded when the negative deltas are the greatest.
  • the progression of negative deltas proceeds from values with greater magnitudes to values with smaller magnitudes as the percentage volumetric soil moisture content decreases, indicating that water, which is moving under the influence of gravity, drains from the soil in decreasing percentages.
  • Such representation is a novel computational method to determine field capacity immediately after an irrigation or rainfall event, and such determination can be made repeatedly throughout the data collection period after every irrigation or rainfall event and stored in a database to determine if there is any drift in the value over the duration of the period.
  • a change in the apparent field capacity of the soil can be due to some physical change in the properties of the soil to alter its water holding capacity immediately adjacent to the soil moisture probe; for instance, the growth of roots close to the access tube of the probe. It is also important to provide an accurate estimate of field capacity, since the numerical value for field capacity represents the upper bound for TXOSRWA, the percent volumetric soil moisture where air and water exist at an optimum ratio in the soil, allowing enough air to provide oxygen for root metabolism and enough water to allow for expansion growth in roots, stems and leaves. It should be appreciated that to have enough air in the soil to support active root metabolism, the % volumetric water content cannot exceed the field capacity of the soil.
  • Leaching is defined in the TXMA as any water that leaves the soil profile when the soil water content is above field capacity.
  • the greatest negative deltas e.g., those less than -0.1
  • Leaching is important since it enables movement of nutrients and other soluble substances from the soil surface to other horizons within the soil profile. It should be appreciated that such movement can have both positive and negative implications, depending on the substances involved and the depths to which such substances travel.
  • the section identified in FIG. 8 indicates a characteristic of soil moisture behavior previously unknown. For a small window the plants do not appear to take up water near the field capacity point of the soil since negative deltas are conspicuously absent in this region of the graph. This phenomenon has been revealed on most of the charts graphed below the 10cm soil profile, particularly, yet not exclusively, in irrigation scenarios where probes have been installed on plastic mulch; it should be appreciated that data from the surface horizon (e.g., 10 cm depth) of bare soil are often exceptionally "noisy" due to the influences of evaporation and water intrusion). In an aspect, at the depth of 10 cm under a plastic mulch, the pattern of the transitional zone is more evident, and is also found at deeper horizons in the soil profile.
  • the surface horizon e.g. 10 cm depth
  • field capacity is defined when the soil is in balance with air and water. Field Capacity is considered the optimum water level.
  • FIG. 9 conveys that there may be a gap between field capacity and the zone where the plant's water extraction is highest.
  • FIG. 10 illustrates the location of rapid water uptake, e.g., large negative deltas in the region below field capacity.
  • rapid water uptake e.g., large negative deltas in the region below field capacity.
  • the TXRMZ root management zone is indicated as those zones within the soil profile where water uptake by a crop is occurring so that a grower can target this soil horizon as the place to which water and nutrients are to be driven utilizing a combination of fertilizer placement and irrigation.
  • FIG. 11 illustrates that the low negative deltas reflect no significant amount of water depletion for this band of soil profiles, so plants present in such soil are not consuming water. It would be a mistake to manage at this level. Such small negative deltas are likely involved in the redistribution of water within the measured zone from areas close to the probes to areas more remote from the probes, resulting in a normalization of the percent volumetric water content across the horizontal dimension of the soil profile. By examining the time stamp of these low- intensity negative deltas, it is observed that such deltas occur primarily at night, centering at 12 midnight.
  • root uptake (which can be defined by more-intense negative deltas) does not occur due to the lack of water uptake driven by the primary driving force, which is calculated as ETo, the Evapo- Transpirational Coefficient, for the evaporation of water from the substomatal cavities underlying the stomata in the leaf, which allows gas exchange between the boundary layer external to the leaf and the internal spaces within the leaf.
  • ETo the Evapo- Transpirational Coefficient
  • FIG. 12 illustrates that the last block of data points shows why other levels (depths) are necessary for a proper analysis.
  • depths depths
  • FIG. 13 presents an overview of where the primary (or fundamental) data transformations exist (TXMA) and the secondary calculations can be offered.
  • the primary data analysis is TX M A, as described previously for water but which also can be performed for salt ions.
  • analysis sections can be organized into water analysis, water management, irrigation analysis, salt ion analysis, salt ion management as the primary and secondary data manipulations that can be performed.
  • Secondary calculations also can be performed, such calculations can be derived from the data produced in the TXMA calculations and supplemented by various interpretations related to how a crop has responded to the environment in which it is located.
  • FIG. 14 illustrates TX RET o in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • TXRET O generally describes how water flows within the crop profile over a period of data collection, and how such information is calculated.
  • ⁇ empirical factor
  • deltas can be summed and converted to inches of water that moved via normalization. By summing the inches of water that left each zone by leaching and by normalization and subtracting this from the total water leaving each zone, the remainder is classified as the total water taken up by the plant and removed from the profile over the course of the period of data collection (e.g., plant uptake). It should be appreciated that such results also can include a small component of evaporation when the probes are installed on bare ground, but this would not occur when the crop is grown on plastic mulch.
  • a large database By computing the plant uptake component of a specific crop, variety, crop stage and soil type, a large database can be created.
  • the database can be more specific than an ETo soil-based irrigation database. Creation of such a large database can drive irrigation decisions based on artificial intelligence.
  • the software when executed by a processor, can account for variations dependent on the varieties, soil type, location, and other relevant information (e.g., growth stage of the crop at various dates) that can be stored and cross referenced.
  • the data can be analyzed agronomically via grow day/heat units to build a predictive model of the dates when the crop transitions from one growth stage to another (e.g., predicting the transition from vegetative to reproductive phases, or harvest dates).
  • This can allow the software, when executed by a processor, to create models of predicted behavior so every site that shares the aspects of the crop, variety, soil and plating date may not need sensors.
  • FIG. 15 illustrates TXIE (Irrigation Efficiency) in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • Illustrated ⁇ ⁇ conveys the location in the soil profile of plant activity and water availability.
  • the data computations in FIG. 15 are based on percent volumetric soil moisture over the entirety of a data collection period. By adding all the data readings for each sensor level (e.g., depth) and then converting the sensor readings into inches of water at each depth (for example, by multiplying by 0.0393), the totals of water available at each depth in the soil profile throughout the data collection period can be obtained. The sum of the total water at each depth can be computed to create a total of water in the entire soil profile. By dividing the sum of each depth by the total water available in the entire soil profile, the percentage of available water at each depth in the profile over the entire data collection period can be computed.
  • TXIE Thermal Efficiency
  • the summed plant uptake over the entire soil profile over the entirety of a data collection period can be divided into the total plant uptake at each depth over the entirety of the data collection period to calculate the percentage of water taken up by the crop at each depth.
  • ⁇ ⁇ irrigation efficiency
  • FIG. 16 illustrates the location of plant activity. As a result of measuring the deltas at each level (depth) the ratio regarding where the plant extracted water and where the water it left the level (depth) in question can be established.
  • the data computations in FIG. 16 are the gross ratios. By adding all the data readings for each sensor level (depth) totals can be obtained. Subsequently dividing the individual readings by the sum of the totals results in the percentage each level averaged over the data time line. The same is done with the negative deltas and the comparison is shown in FIG. 16. Because the TX M A has computed the saturation base line all the negative deltas can be subtracted from the total to obtain an adjusted reading that reflects water movement in the soil profile.
  • FIG. 17 depicts TX PET oc, which compares calculated water uptake by a crop with theoretical demand for water by the crop, calculated as ETo, over the entirety of a data collection period.
  • the calculated water uptake is based upon the horizons within the soil profile where water uptake by the crop has been noted.
  • the active root zone (TX RM z) can be identified by starting at the soil surface and adding the amounts of water (e.g., in inches) that have been calculated to be taken up by the crop (e.g., plant uptake) until an amount greater than about 80% of the total water taken up by the crop is reached. This is then compared to the total water demand, e.g., a summation of daily computations of ETo.
  • the actual use of the water taken up by the crop is a much fairer (and logical) indicator of resource use than a theoretical calculation of the demand exerted by weather factors alone, and is more suited for sustainability metrics than ETo.
  • Another calculation that the systems and methods disclosed can perform includes quantifying rainfall and irrigation events under a center pivot, linear pivot, or any other sprinkler irrigation system, using soil moisture probes.
  • An example of the positive deltas of percent volumetric soil water moisture readings at various depths over a data collection period is provided the table presented in FIG. 18.
  • water is introduced into the soil profile from above the surface of the soil into the uppermost horizon (usually, the sensor at the 10 cm depth), either remaining in the 10 cm horizon or, when that horizon reaches field capacity, the water can move downward into the next deepest soil horizon (e.g., 20 cm horizon).
  • software that implements a disclosed method can check, when executed by a processor, that the percent soil moisture content readings are above the field capacity of the soil, e.g., as determined either by entering the apparent field capacity of the soil into the software, or using automated field capacity calculation described herein.
  • the resulting positive deltas greater than 0.05 that occur are collected until no more consecutive positive deltas are identified, and then are summed.
  • positive deltas are occurring from 7: 15 PM to 8: 15 PM in the 10 cm column.
  • the software when executed by a processor, can check the next deepest horizon and can begin to scan that zone for positive deltas. In FIG. 18, it can be seen that positive deltas are present in the 20 cm column from 9: 15 PM onwards
  • the software again checks the next deepest zone for positive deltas (30 cm in this case), and the process repeats. After no more consecutive deltas in the 10 cm horizon occur (at times after 8: 15 PM), the collection of data is halted in all zones at 8: 15, and only those up to 8: 15 PM in all the zones are summed. The total water added to the profile is then summed over all the depths in which positive deltas are identified.
  • ⁇ 0.0393
  • the time stamps of the percent soil moisture content can be correlated where the positive deltas occurred to the time stamps of pressure sensors mounted on overhead sprinklers or pivots (for irrigation) or rain buckets located outside the irrigated zones (for rainfall). The resulting sum calculation is then placed into either to ⁇ (Total Irrigation) or to TXTR (Total Rainfall).
  • software implemented in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure can enable a tool for analyzing and then optimizing drip irrigation parameters (e.g., length of the irrigation period, interval between irrigation events), referred to as TXDIM, under the control of a grower or most any actor executing the software.
  • optimizing the length of the irrigation period can be implemented by monitoring the positive deltas at two probes during and immediately after an irrigation event. The sum of the positive deltas from the top three soil depths (usually the 10, 20 and 30 cm levels, but this can be modified if the active root zone (TX RM z) extends beyond 30 cm) can be calculated and then compared.
  • the emitter spacing is correct as well as the length (e.g., time interval) of the irrigation period. If the sum of the positive deltas of the probe between the emitters is lower than that of the sum of the deltas of the probe at the emitter, then either the spacing between the emitters is too large or the irrigation interval is too short. On subsequent irrigations, the duration of the watering period is lengthened until either the sums of the probe at the emitter are equal to the sum of the probe between the emitters, or the positive deltas of the probe at the emitter extend beyond the root zone (40 and 50 cm). In the latter case, the appearance of positive deltas at depths below the root zone indicate that leaching is occurring, and the length of the irrigation period should be reduced until leaching is no longer observed.
  • the spacing between emitters is too low and should be lengthened in subsequent year(s), once the irrigation period duration is determined.
  • This type of information can be displayed in a variety of ways.
  • the information that is calculated can be positioned using an "eye bubble level".
  • One axis of the "crosshairs" can be the duration of the irrigation, while the other axis can be the interval between irrigations. The current situation of the grower's data is displayed on such chart, and this will change as the grower attempts corrections to the irrigations.
  • TXLF Leaching Factor Compare water % of Deltas in Number accumulation root zone vs.
  • TXpEToC Plant ETo Measure water usee total compared to Number
  • FIG. 19 illustrates a chart for stress days analysis in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • the TX S D chart in FIG. 19 totals the percent volumetric soil moisture readings above the optimum and records that as periods when the crop is under oxygen ((3 ⁇ 4) stress. This means that the water level has displaced the oxygen, resulting in the absence of active uptake of nutrient ions in that zone and a corresponding situation where a plant does not grow. It is noted that though counted in minutes, time is displayed in days.
  • the water stress days represent the total time where percent volumetric water content is below the lower optimum or below the optimum level within the active root zone
  • TXRMZ Grow days correspond to the time the total water profile was within the optimum zone.
  • the software checks, when executed by a processor, for root growth by analyzing for the negative deltas associated with movement associated with plant uptake and expands the root zone as needed. As a result, the output is more reflective of the plant activity and not soil moisture profiles. Stress day accumulation (of both (3 ⁇ 4 and water stress) can result in lower crop yield. Accordingly, such stress information is an important factor to monitor during crop production as it can be viewed as an indicator of final yield, and be used in computing potential benefits that can be compared to crop production costs when deciding to invest resources in maintaining or improving crop health. It should be appreciated that yield information allows, at least in part, ranking one or more of the input efficiencies associated with irrigation or, more generally, resource distribution.
  • FIG. 20 presents a table with a set of exemplary readings that illustrate stress in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • this example looking at 30cm, if 20% is the low limit and 22% is the high limit as compared to the optimum water zone, then the first 9 readings were water stress while the last 6 are in the optimum zone.
  • FIG. 21 illustrates TXIMM, which is the ion minimum and maximum observed in the soil profile over a data collection period in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • the data is fitted to a trend line (e.g., a polynomial of sixth order in the argument) prepared at the end of the data collection period.
  • a software implementation, executed in a computer can read a first calculation of the trend line at each depth (e.g., 10 cm through 50 cm at most times) through to the final calculation, either at harvest (in case the probe is still installed) or at the last data point when the probe is removed from the soil (whichever comes first).
  • Such software implementation, executed in the computer can scan the raw data for the highest and lowest value over the entirety of the data collection period.
  • Such values can be plotted on a graph, with the X-axis as the depth in the soil and the Y- axis as the values of the individual points measured (high, low, start, finish).
  • a trend line can then calculated, by the computer that executes the software implementation, using the final points at each depth as a polynomial of sixth order in the argument. This allows identification of the final end-point of ions over the data collection period, as well as the highs and lows through the season, to understand how the ion content of the soil has changed over time.
  • FIG. 22 presents TXIDD, which is the Ion Distribution and Drift calculation made on ions observed in a soil profile in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • the values are reported for each sensor depth, as well as the Below Root Zone (BRZ).
  • BRZ Below Root Zone
  • the root zone (RZ) is set at 30 cm, unless the calculation of the root zone from TXRETO data indicates some other level as the RZ.
  • the start and finish values are taken from the TX M M analysis, and the percent BRZ is calculated as the sum of the values outside the root zone divided the sum of all the values in the entire root zone.
  • the same analysis is made for the values at finish (e.g., end of the data collection period), to allow an
  • Drift is calculated as the new change in ion values (finish minus start)/start, displayed as a percent), with a negative value indicating that more ions were present at the start compared to the finish.
  • FIG. 23 illustrates TX WNA R, which is a Water and Nutrient Application Ranking, in accordance with aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • TXWNAR presents the weight of the harvested commodity divided by the amounts of water (W) and nutrients (such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), or the like) reported by a client as being applied to the crop during the entirety of a data collection period. It can be compared to the ratios listed in a database or listed in reference handbooks and/or websites as the highest values recorded (H), the lowest recorded (L) and the norm of the all the values recorded (N). The values for H, N and L are based on existing values of yield and nutrient applications in the database for the specific variety planted by the grower.
  • the comparison is made with values appropriate to the crop. If the data in the database does not include values of at least 20 data collection periods (e.g., 20 complete seasons), values available in the literature are employed.
  • the value for the nutrients applied and crop yield for current season can be entered by a grower as part of a Client Data Management function; such value is referred to as the customer (C) value. That value stands on its own, and can replace the H or L values used previously in any subsequent analyses based on that crop and/or variety.
  • the water used is calculated as in the TX RETO example for active plant uptake.
  • FIG. 24 illustrates TXPWE, which is Plant Water Efficiency and is a calculation that includes the efficiency of a crop to convert water extracted from the soil into a harvestable commodity.
  • TXPWE Plant Water Efficiency
  • the weight of water in the harvest commodity is divided by the water taken up by the plant (e.g., inches converted to gallons) in TX RET o calculations described hereinbefore.
  • the direct measurement of water acquired by the crop derived from soil moisture data is employed, rather than an estimate derived from grower input, for example.
  • PWE stands as an objective calculation of crop water use efficiency because the ratio, in part, can be validated by a value stored within a database that was electronically captured and verifiable. In certain embodiments, such database can be part of or be functionally coupled to the UID. In another aspect, PWE also represents an actual use of the water by the plant, rather than an estimate of water applied, which may include water lost to leaching, run-off into surface water, or movement into soil zones where the crop is not actively taking up water.
  • a widget that can be placed on a computer desktop.
  • the widget can have access to real-time data and be updated regularly.
  • Such widget is a user configured gauge. The user can choose from any gauge from the modules they have purchased. The data will reflect the current status based on benchmarks they set. A default setting can be established but can be changed. The higher the reading, the more management needed or room for improvement.
  • the scale 0 to 100 represents a value line and is not intended to be an actual reading.
  • the proper placement of sensors can result in higher quality data. Whether working within the agricultural community, the turf industry or various environmental sectors, applicable sensors can be placed in repeatable and precise patterns. Regardless of the media, provided are methods for placement in different circumstances.
  • soil moisture interpretation necessitates the use of two precisely located sensors, since the critical interpretations include comparisons of responses of the sensors as well as the changes in the responses of each sensor.
  • one sensor array e.g., a probe
  • the other is placed in the driest portion. Both of which can be placed within approximately 150 feet of each other.
  • An explicit procedure for each system is established to guide installers to ensure consistency in the installation process.
  • one reason for installing two probes in a field is that if differences are seen during the field calibration, where water is added to the soil at the location of each probe until complete saturation of the entire profile is observed, one installation was not performed successfully (e.g., there are "air gaps" between the probe and the soil making the readings of that probe lower than the other, or if one probe reaches saturation substantially more quickly than the other, there is preferential movement of the water along the probe surface, indicating that there is not good contact of the soil to the probe surface).
  • a second reason is that two probes together can verify the uniformity of water distribution over the targeted area. The "wet placement" is used to help understand if over- watering is occurring, such as leaching water and moving nutrients below the root zone.
  • the "dry placement” is used to determine when “pulse irrigation” is needed, as well as determining if the emitter spacing is appropriate for the soil type.
  • the "dry placement” is used to determine the uniformity of the irrigation and to assist in determining when to irrigate (using the average of the "wet” and “dry” locations).
  • the wettest placement is used to help reduce the effect of over watering, moving water, and moving nutrients below the root zone.
  • the dry placement is used to determine if irrigation is needed. The offset of two sensors also allows for a more accurate calculation of total water available if the entire soil surface is not being irrigated.
  • the major soil type(s) that are present within a field should be understood. This is most easily accomplished by referring to a USDA or state soil survey map where soil textures are indicated, either directly based on field soil sampling where the texture is determined in a laboratory or by inference from other soil properties, such as electrical conductivity (EC). Both probes are then installed in the location in the field with the soil with the smallest water holding capacity, equating to the soil type with the largest proportion of sand (alternatively, the soil type with the smallest proportion of clay). In the absence of this information, one must identify the area within a field which drains the quickest, based on discussions with the grower or farm manager with experience in crops in the location.
  • EC electrical conductivity
  • the probes should be located between 1/3 and 2/3 the distance of the submain from the water source, and then 1/3 to 2/3 from the submain to the end of the laterals, as close to the center of the field as possible.
  • the first probe is installed at an emitter on the lateral; the second probe is installed at distance from the first probe at 1.5 times the emitter spacing (so that the probe is located equidistant between two emitters).
  • the uniformity of the output from the spans must be validated and the probes are placed somewhere within either of the last two spans from the pivot point, with the preference for the outer-most span.
  • the first probe On fields with raised beds or hills, the first probe is placed off the bed or hill in the furrow, while the second probe is placed on the elevated portion of the row. Because the probes and the telemetry equipment must be protected from mechanical damage inflicted by tractor wheels and implements, preference is given for placing the probes in locations remote from the wheel tracks, as well as outside the boom on spray rigs.
  • Crop data base needed to position where in rows
  • FIG. 26 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary operating environment for performing the disclosed methods.
  • This exemplary operating environment is only an example of an operating environment and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of operating environment architecture. Neither should the operating environment be interpreted as having any dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplary operating environment.
  • the disclosed methods and systems can be operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations.
  • Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that can be suitable for use with the systems and methods comprise, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, laptop devices, and multiprocessor systems. Additional examples comprise set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that comprise any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
  • the processing of the disclosed methods and systems can be performed by software components.
  • the disclosed systems and methods can be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by one or more computers or other devices.
  • program modules comprise computer code, routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
  • the disclosed methods can also be practiced in grid-based and distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network.
  • program modules can be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
  • the systems and methods disclosed herein can be implemented via a general-purpose computing device in the form of a computer 2601.
  • the components of the computer 2601 can comprise, but are not limited to, one or more processors or processing units 2603, a system memory 2612, and a system bus 2613 that couples various system components including the processor 2603 to the system memory 2612.
  • the system can utilize parallel computing.
  • the system bus 2613 represents one or more of several possible types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures.
  • bus architectures can comprise an Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, a Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, an Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, a Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, an Accelerated Graphics Port (AGP) bus, and a Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI), a PCI-Express bus, a Personal Computer Memory Card Industry Association (PCMCIA), Universal Serial Bus (USB) and the like.
  • ISA Industry Standard Architecture
  • MCA Micro Channel Architecture
  • EISA Enhanced ISA
  • VESA Video Electronics Standards Association
  • AGP Accelerated Graphics Port
  • PCI Peripheral Component Interconnects
  • PCI-Express PCI-Express
  • PCMCIA Personal Computer Memory Card Industry Association
  • USB Universal Serial Bus
  • the bus 2613, and all buses specified in this description can also be implemented over a wired or wireless network connection and each of the subsystems, including the processor 2603, a mass storage device 2604, an operating system 2605, analysis software 2606, environmental data 2607, a network adapter 2608, system memory 2612, an
  • Input/Output Interface 2610 a display adapter 2609, a display device 2611, and a human machine interface 2602, can be contained within one or more remote computing devices 2614a,b,c at physically separate locations, connected through buses of this form, in effect implementing a fully distributed system.
  • the computer 2601 typically comprises a variety of computer readable media. Exemplary readable media can be any available media that is accessible by the computer 2601 and comprises, for example and not meant to be limiting, both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media.
  • the system memory 2612 comprises computer readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM), and/or non- volatile memory, such as read only memory (ROM).
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read only memory
  • the system memory 2612 typically contains data such as environmental data 2607 and/or program modules such as operating system 2605 and analysis software 2606 that are immediately accessible to and/or are presently operated on by the processing unit 2603.
  • the computer 2601 can also comprise other removable/nonremovable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media.
  • FIG. 26 illustrates a mass storage device 2604 which can provide non- volatile storage of computer code, computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and other data for the computer 2601.
  • a mass storage device 2604 can be a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk, a removable optical disk, magnetic cassettes or other magnetic storage devices, flash memory cards, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, random access memories (RAM), read only memories (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), and the like.
  • any number of program modules can be stored on the mass storage device 2604, including by way of example, an operating system 2605 and analysis software 2606.
  • Each of the operating system 2605 and analysis software 2606 can comprise elements of the programming and the analysis software 2606.
  • Environmental data 2607 can also be stored on the mass storage device 2604. Examples of environmental data include, but are not limited to, nitrates in water, salt in water, chlorine in water and ozone in air. Environmental data 2607 can be stored in any of one or more databases known in the art. Examples of such databases comprise, DB2®, Microsoft® Access, Microsoft® SQL Server, Oracle®, mySQL, PostgreSQL, and the like. The databases can be centralized or distributed across multiple systems.
  • the user can enter commands and information into the computer 2601 via an input device (not shown).
  • input devices comprise, but are not limited to, a keyboard, pointing device (e.g., a "mouse"), a microphone, a joystick, a scanner, tactile input devices such as gloves, and other body coverings, and the like
  • a human machine interface 2602 that is coupled to the system bus 2613, but can be connected by other interface and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port, an IEEE 1394 Port (also known as a Firewire port), a serial port, or a universal serial bus (USB).
  • a display device 2611 can also be connected to the system bus 2613 via an interface, such as a display adapter 2609. It is contemplated that the computer 2601 can have more than one display adapter 2609 and the computer 2601 can have more than one display device 2611.
  • a display device can be a monitor, an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), or a projector.
  • other output peripheral devices can comprise components such as speakers (not shown) and a printer (not shown) which can be connected to the computer 2601 via Input/Output Interface 2610. Any step and/or result of the methods can be output in any form to an output device.
  • Such output can be any form of visual representation, including, but not limited to, textual, graphical, animation, audio, tactile, and the like.
  • the computer 2601 can operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computing devices 2614a,b,c.
  • a remote computing device can be a personal computer, portable computer, a server, a router, a network computer, a peer device or other common network node, and so on.
  • Logical connections between the computer 2601 and a remote computing device 2614a,b,c can be made via a local area network (LAN) and a general wide area network (WAN).
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN general wide area network
  • a network adapter 2608 can be implemented in both wired and wireless environments. Such networking environments are conventional and commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and the Internet 2615.
  • application programs and other executable program components such as the operating system 2605 are illustrated herein as discrete blocks, although it is recognized that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computing device 2601, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.
  • An implementation of analysis software 2606 can be stored on or transmitted across some form of computer readable media. Any of the disclosed methods can be performed by computer readable instructions embodied on computer readable media.
  • Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by a computer.
  • Computer readable media can comprise “computer storage media” and “communications media.”
  • “Computer storage media” comprise volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any methods or technology for storage of information such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data.
  • Exemplary computer storage media comprises, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by a computer.
  • a plurality of data readings related to resource availability in a medium is received from a sensor.
  • the plurality of data readings related to resource availability in the medium is received from a plurality of sensors.
  • the plurality of data readings comprises time-stamped resource measurements from a plurality of medium depths.
  • the resource is moisture and the medium is soil.
  • a metric based at least on a difference between a first reading in the plurality of data readings and a second reading in the plurality of data readings is determined.
  • determining a metric based at least on a difference between a first reading in the plurality of data readings and a second reading in the plurality of data readings comprises subtracting a value of the first reading from a value of the second reading, wherein the second reading occurred later in time than the first reading.
  • at least one of a magnitude of a value of the metric or a sign of the value of the metric is determined.
  • the steps 2720 and 2730 are repeated for a pre-determined number of data readings.
  • the predetermined number of data readings can comprise all the plurality of data readings.
  • a characteristic of the medium is determined based on at least one of the stored magnitudes or the stored signs.
  • determining a characteristic of the medium based on at least one of the stored magnitudes or the stored signs comprises determining a maximum magnitude of negative metric magnitude values.
  • the characteristic comprises one or more of, field capacity, leaching factor, Gilbert Effect, optimum soil ratio of water and air, root management zone, root-derived ETo, irrigation efficiency, plant ETo coefficient, drip irrigation management, stress days, plant water efficiency, ion distribution and drift, ion minimum and maximum, water and nutrient application ranking, total irrigation, total rainfall.
  • FIG. 28 illustrates a flowchart of an exemplary method 2800 for placing sensor in a medium to enable environmental monitoring according to aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • resource distribution in a medium is assessed.
  • the resource distribution can comprise water irrigation including drip irrigation and center pivot irrigation.
  • the assessing step comprises determining topography of a field comprising the medium.
  • a plurality of sensors in the medium is deployed according to a predetermined pattern of locations determined at least in part by an outcome of the assessing step, wherein each one of the plurality of sensors measures resource availability.
  • the plurality of sensors can comprise at least two sensors.
  • a first sensor is deployed in a resource-rich location and a second sensor is deployed in a resource- depleted location.
  • a first sensor is deployed in a location situated at a predetermined distance from a location of a second sensor.
  • the predetermined pattern of location excludes at least one location adverse to sensor integrity.
  • FIG. 29 illustrates a flowchart of an exemplary method 2900 for manipulating data related to environmental monitoring in according to aspects of the subject disclosure.
  • step 2910 data readings related to resource availability in a medium from a plurality of data collection sites are received in real-time.
  • the data readings are formatted into a common data format.
  • the formatted data readings are supplied to an analysis platform (e.g., TX D p processor).
  • step 2940 at least a portion of the formatted data readings is analyzed.
  • data representative of a characteristic of the medium is extracted based on the analyzing step (step 2940).
  • the methods and systems can employ Artificial Intelligence techniques such as machine learning and iterative learning.
  • Artificial Intelligence techniques such as machine learning and iterative learning. Examples of such techniques include, but are not limited to, expert systems, case based reasoning, Bayesian networks, behavior based AI, neural networks, fuzzy systems, evolutionary computation (e.g. genetic algorithms), swarm intelligence (e.g. ant algorithms), and hybrid intelligent systems (e.g. Expert inference rules generated through a neural network or production rules from statistical learning).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
  • Soil Sciences (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne des procédés et un système permettant de surveiller un environnement multidimensionnel, de soumettre à une dissection systématique des relations d'interprétation et d'effectuer une analyse calculatoire approfondie, pouvant être affichée dans une configuration de type Web riche en données visuelles en temps réel appelée analyse interprétative AdviroGuardTM. Par construction de sous-ensembles de données et harmonisation avec les lois de la physique présentes dans un milieu environnemental particulier, des analyses statistiques strictes sont appliquées afin de produire des informations significatives et pertinentes destinées aux décisionnaires clés.
EP11763440.2A 2010-03-31 2011-03-31 Surveillance de l'environnement Ceased EP2553500A4 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US31949010P 2010-03-31 2010-03-31
PCT/US2011/030739 WO2011123653A1 (fr) 2010-03-31 2011-03-31 Surveillance de l'environnement

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2553500A1 true EP2553500A1 (fr) 2013-02-06
EP2553500A4 EP2553500A4 (fr) 2015-01-21

Family

ID=44712628

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11763440.2A Ceased EP2553500A4 (fr) 2010-03-31 2011-03-31 Surveillance de l'environnement

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2553500A4 (fr)
AU (1) AU2011235120B2 (fr)
IL (1) IL222327A (fr)
WO (1) WO2011123653A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10271117B2 (en) 2010-03-31 2019-04-23 Earthtec Solutions, LLC Environmental monitoring

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10512226B2 (en) 2011-07-15 2019-12-24 Earthtec Solutions Llc Crop-specific automated irrigation and nutrient management
ES2681125B1 (es) * 2017-03-08 2019-09-09 Easytosee Agtech Sl Procedimiento, sistema, sistema informatico y programa informatico para generar datos de una prediccion de acopio de un producto agricola
CN113159219B (zh) * 2021-05-14 2022-04-08 广东工业大学 一种耦合遗传算法和神经网络的土壤污染物含量插值方法

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5739031A (en) * 1994-02-02 1998-04-14 Eco Soil Systems, Inc. Soil and water remediation and enhancement process and apparatus therefor
US6055480A (en) * 1997-11-12 2000-04-25 Albert Einstein Healthcare Network Environmental monitoring system
US6530160B1 (en) * 2000-05-17 2003-03-11 William L. Gookins Method and means for grain drying optimization
US6657443B2 (en) * 2001-09-04 2003-12-02 Technical Development Consultants, Inc. Absolute-reading soil moisture and conductivity sensor
US6597992B2 (en) * 2001-11-01 2003-07-22 Soil And Topography Information, Llc Soil and topography surveying
US7231298B2 (en) * 2004-01-22 2007-06-12 Janiece R Hnilica-Maxwell Environment detection system
US7313946B2 (en) * 2004-07-15 2008-01-01 Matsuo Electric Co., Ltd. Moisture detector
US20080199359A1 (en) * 2005-07-04 2008-08-21 Senviro Pty Ltd Soil Moisture Sensor
US20090120506A1 (en) * 2006-05-17 2009-05-14 David Hoch Automated plant watering system and method

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
No further relevant documents disclosed *
See also references of WO2011123653A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10271117B2 (en) 2010-03-31 2019-04-23 Earthtec Solutions, LLC Environmental monitoring

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IL222327A0 (en) 2012-12-31
WO2011123653A1 (fr) 2011-10-06
IL222327A (en) 2017-04-30
AU2011235120A1 (en) 2012-11-08
EP2553500A4 (fr) 2015-01-21
AU2011235120B2 (en) 2014-11-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10271117B2 (en) Environmental monitoring
US11341591B2 (en) Environmental management zone modeling and analysis
US20150370935A1 (en) Agronomic systems, methods and apparatuses
US20180014452A1 (en) Agronomic systems, methods and apparatuses
US10028426B2 (en) Agronomic systems, methods and apparatuses
US20160309646A1 (en) Agronomic systems, methods and apparatuses
JP6261492B2 (ja) 情報処理装置及び情報処理方法及びプログラム
US20170270446A1 (en) Agronomic systems, methods and apparatuses for determining yield limits
Waongo et al. A crop model and fuzzy rule based approach for optimizing maize planting dates in Burkina Faso, West Africa
Linker et al. Efficient model-based sub-optimal irrigation scheduling using imperfect weather forecasts
Yu et al. Modelling long-term water yield effects of forest management in a Norway spruce forest
CN112215716A (zh) 农作物生长干预方法、装置、设备及存储介质
AU2011235120B2 (en) Environmental monitoring
CN117575094B (zh) 一种基于数字孪生的农作物产量预测与优化方法及设备
Kisekka et al. Crop modeling applications in agricultural water management
AU2017216507A1 (en) Environmental monitoring
CN117077868A (zh) 一种基于模型的粮食产量预测系统及方法
Wiederstein et al. Evaluating spatial and temporal variations in sub-field level crop water demands
Linkevičius et al. Generic applicability of non-destructive biomass yield models for willow short rotation coppice: A case study for Germany and Lithuania
Mishra Modeling water quantity and quality in an agricultural watershed in the midwestern US using SWAT: assessing implications due to an expansion in'biofuel'production and climate change
Akomaye et al. Importance of Smart Farming Practices for Sustainable Agriculture
Khan et al. Soil spatial variability and its management with precision agriculture
Kelly Assessing the value of improved information and management strategies for optimal irrigation scheduling
Veysi et al. Comprehensive Framework for Interpretation of WaPOR Water Productivity
CN117829357A (zh) 一种土壤改良方法及动态监测系统

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20121023

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20141219

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G01W 1/00 20060101ALI20141215BHEP

Ipc: G06Q 50/02 20120101ALI20141215BHEP

Ipc: G06Q 10/10 20120101AFI20141215BHEP

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20160316

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R003

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20171117