EP2507807A1 - Schalter und schaltungsanordnung zur auswertung von mindestens zwei schaltzuständen eines schalters - Google Patents
Schalter und schaltungsanordnung zur auswertung von mindestens zwei schaltzuständen eines schaltersInfo
- Publication number
- EP2507807A1 EP2507807A1 EP10784976A EP10784976A EP2507807A1 EP 2507807 A1 EP2507807 A1 EP 2507807A1 EP 10784976 A EP10784976 A EP 10784976A EP 10784976 A EP10784976 A EP 10784976A EP 2507807 A1 EP2507807 A1 EP 2507807A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- switch
- evaluation
- connection points
- circuit arrangement
- switching states
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01H—ELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
- H01H3/00—Mechanisms for operating contacts
- H01H3/02—Operating parts, i.e. for operating driving mechanism by a mechanical force external to the switch
- H01H3/0213—Combined operation of electric switch and variable impedance, e.g. resistor, capacitor
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01H—ELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
- H01H1/00—Contacts
- H01H1/12—Contacts characterised by the manner in which co-operating contacts engage
- H01H1/36—Contacts characterised by the manner in which co-operating contacts engage by sliding
- H01H1/40—Contact mounted so that its contact-making surface is flush with adjoining insulation
- H01H1/403—Contacts forming part of a printed circuit
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01H—ELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
- H01H2239/00—Miscellaneous
- H01H2239/01—Miscellaneous combined with other elements on the same substrate
- H01H2239/012—Decoding impedances
Definitions
- the invention relates to a switch of the type mentioned in the preamble of claim 1 and to a corresponding circuit arrangement for evaluating at least two switching states of such a switch.
- Such circuit arrangements are known and are used, for example, for the evaluation of switching states of a steering floor switch, which can be used inter alia for indicating the direction of travel and / or for actuating a windshield wiper system of a motor vehicle or the like.
- the evaluation of a switching state or a corresponding switch position can be performed either analog or digital.
- different nodes of the evaluation circuit are connected to each other or to a predetermined reference potential via a contact means of the switch in dependence on the respective switching state, whereby the electrical configuration of the evaluation circuit changes. This change can then be evaluated digitally or analogously, for example with a microprocessor comprehensive evaluation and control unit.
- a circuit arrangement for evaluating at least two switching states of a switch which has a predetermined number of different switching states and a predetermined number of contact surfaces, known in a motor vehicle.
- the known circuit arrangement comprises two evaluation circuits with nodes, which are each connected to a contact surface of the switch.
- a movable contact means of the switch connects depending on a currently set switching state either different nodes of a first evaluation circuit with each other and / or with a predetermined reference potential or different nodes of a second evaluation circuit with each other and / or with a predetermined reference potential.
- the number of contact surfaces used corresponds to the number of different switching states that can be set with the switch. As a result, with the number of switching stages to be evaluated, the number of contact surfaces required also increases, so that the circuit arrangement and the corresponding switch can hardly be miniaturized.
- the object of the invention is to further develop a switch of the type mentioned in the preamble of claim 1 and a corresponding circuit arrangement of the type mentioned in the preamble of claim 7 such that a particularly simple miniaturization and a reliable mode of operation are made possible.
- connection points are lower than a predetermined number of switching states, wherein the various switching states are coded by the interconnectable connection points such that a connecting means at least one of the connection points and a maximum of two Joints simultaneously with the given Reference potential connects.
- the connecting means changes in the embodiment according to the invention in a transition from one switch position to the next always only one connection point. This means that the connection means either leaves a connection point or reboots onto a connection point.
- connection points can be carried out by the type of arrangement of the connection points such that only certain combinations of the different connection points represent a valid switch position or a valid switching state, so that all other combinations of connection points not used for the coding are each assigned to a specific error state can be so that embodiments of the invention advantageously allow a high degree of diagnosability of the switching system.
- the switching states for example, by networking with at least one row of resistance and by analog measurement, for example via at least one analog input of an evaluation and control unit, which includes, for example, a microprocessor, and / or by direct evaluation of the individual connection points, for example with digital inputs and / or analog inputs Evaluation and control unit are evaluated.
- an evaluation and control unit which includes, for example, a microprocessor, and / or by direct evaluation of the individual connection points, for example with digital inputs and / or analog inputs Evaluation and control unit are evaluated.
- connection points can be divided into at least two groups, wherein the connection points connected at the same time to the predetermined reference potential belong to different groups.
- different groups of Connection points for detecting the current switching state and for diagnostic purposes with different evaluation circuits are coupled. This advantageously results in a partial redundancy of the evaluation circuits, which is particularly important for safety-relevant switching states. Although an interruption of one of the two leads to the evaluation circuits not all switching states can be detected, but it can be recognized the interruption of the supply and done on the remaining evaluation circuit a kind of "emergency mode" based on the still recognizable and distinguishable switching states ,
- the switch according to the invention is designed for example as a linear multi-stage slide switch and / or as a multi-stage rotary switch and / or as a digital potentiometer whose connection points are designed as contact surfaces.
- the adjustable switching states of the designed as a linear multi-stage slide switch and / or as a multi-level rotary switch and / or as a digital potentiometer switch can be detected and evaluated via at least one transducer unit, which converts magnetic quantities into electrical quantities and / or optical variables into electrical quantities.
- the at least one converter unit comprises, for example, at least one Hall sensor and / or at least one optocoupler.
- the various groups of connection points for detecting the current switch position and for diagnostic purposes are coupled with different evaluation circuits.
- the evaluation circuits comprise, for example, in each case a voltage divider with at least two resistors connected in series with each other, wherein between two nodes of the respective evaluation circuit in each case a resistor is arranged in order to distinguish the different switching states of the switch can.
- at least one analog input and / or at least one digital input of an evaluation and control unit is connected directly or via a multiplexer to output nodes of the at least two evaluation circuits, wherein a physical variable can be detected at the output node.
- the various evaluation circuits can be evaluated offset in time at predetermined time intervals.
- the number of required inputs of the evaluation and control circuit can be advantageously reduced or the number of evaluable evaluation circuits can be increased with the same number of inputs.
- a movement of the connecting means on at least one output node of the at least two evaluation circuits causes a change in the measured physical quantity.
- a capacitance value and / or an inductance value and / or a resistance value and / or a voltage value and / or a current value can be detected as the measured physical variable.
- the switching states or switch positions can be detected and evaluated by networking with at least one row of resistors with corresponding resistance measurement or voltage measurement.
- the evaluation and control unit assigns each valid switching state to a predetermined measured value range from the possible measured value ranges. Furthermore, the evaluation and control unit can in each case assign an error state to all other combinations of possible measured value ranges, which relates to at least one of the evaluation circuits. In addition, the evaluation and control unit in an emergency operation recognized as defective evaluation during evaluation no longer considered in an advantageous manner.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a first embodiment e ner circuit arrangement according to the invention
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a second embodiment of a circuit arrangement according to the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a third embodiment of a circuit arrangement according to the invention.
- FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of a fourth exemplary embodiment of a circuit arrangement according to the invention.
- a first embodiment of a circuit arrangement 1 according to the invention is shown.
- the illustrated circuit arrangement 1 for evaluating seven switching states of a switch 10 two evaluation circuits 5, 7 and an evaluation and control unit 3.
- the illustrated switch 10 is exemplified as a rotary switch with four designed as contact surfaces connecting points 12th , 14, 16, 18 and a connecting means 15, which is connected to a ground contact 17.
- the switch 10 in other embodiments not shown embodiments can also be designed as a linear multi-stage slide switch and / or as a digital potentiometer.
- embodiments of the invention may also relate to switches with more or fewer switching states or switch position.
- the adjustable switching states can be detected and evaluated via at least one converter unit, which magnetic quantities in convert electrical quantities and / or optical quantities into electrical quantities.
- Fig. 1 shows the basic arrangement of the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18, which are shown for reasons of clarity linear and not in a circular shape.
- the switch 10 has seven different switching states Sl to S7 or
- Switch positions which are represented by horizontal dot-dash lines and indicated by their respective switching angle in degrees. At the level of the corresponding
- Switching state Sl to S7 is now using the executed, for example as a contact grinder connecting means 15, which can be moved in the illustration according to the double arrow in the vertical direction, an electrical connection between see the voltage potential of the connecting means 15 (here mass) and the height the current position of the connecting means 15 located contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 made.
- the two evaluation circuits 5, 7 each have a voltage divider with three resistances R 1 to R 3 or R 4 to R 6 connected in series with one another.
- the two voltage dividers are each connected via a pull-up resistor R PU with a supply voltage U B.
- a resistor R2, R3, or R5, R6 is arranged in each case.
- contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 in the embodiment shown in FIG split two groups, wherein the simultaneously connected to the predetermined reference potential pads 12, 14, 16, 18 belong to different groups. Furthermore, the various groups of contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 for the detection of the current switching state Sl to S7 and for diagnostic purposes with different evaluation circuits 5, 7 are coupled.
- a first node arranged between the resistor R 1 and the resistor R 2 of the first evaluation circuit 5 is connected to a first contact surface 12.
- a second node arranged between the resistor R2 and the resistor R3 of the first evaluation circuit 5 is connected to a third contact surface 16, and a third node arranged between the resistor R3 and the pull-up resistor R PU of the first evaluation circuit 5 is connected to a first analog input AI the evaluation and control unit 3 connected.
- a fourth node arranged between the resistor R4 and the resistor R5 of the second evaluation circuit 7 is connected to a second contact surface 14.
- a fifth node arranged between the resistor R5 and the resistor R6 of the second evaluation circuit 7 is connected to a fourth contact surface 18 and a sixth node arranged between the resistor R6 and the pull-up resistor R PU of the second evaluation circuit 7 is connected to a second analog input A2 of the evaluation and control unit 3 connected.
- the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 are arranged so that they are connected alternately at a switch position or at a switching state Sl, S3, S5, S7 only with the dustspotenti- al and at the subsequent switch position or at a subsequent switching state S2, S4, S6 quasi each two of the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 overlap, so are connected together with the reference potential.
- the movement of the connecting means 15 causes the resistance value applied to the first analog input AI of the evaluation and control unit 3 to be grounded and that at the second anode to be grounded.
- Logeingang A2 the evaluation and control unit 3 to ground applied resistance value changes.
- the valid switching states S1 to S7 can be determined.
- the type of arrangement of the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 requires that only certain combinations of the resistance values to be measured at the two analog inputs AI, A2 represent a valid switching state S1 to S7 or a valid switch position. This means that all other combinations of resistance measurements can be declared invalid, taking into account certain tolerances.
- Embodiments of the invention therefore allow a high degree of diagnosability of the switching system.
- first valid switching state Sl only the first contact surface 12 and thus the first node of the first evaluation circuit 5 is connected via the connecting means 15 to ground.
- the resistor Rl is short-circuited to ground, so that a resistance value of R 2 + R 3 results at the first analog input 1.
- the voltage is applied to the first analog input AI
- the second contact surface 14 and the third contact surface 16 and thus the second node of the first evaluation circuit 5 and the fourth node of the second evaluation circuit 7 are connected via the connecting means 15 to ground.
- the resistor Rl and the resistor R2 and the resistor R4 are short-circuited to ground, so that at the first analogue input AI gives a resistance value of R 3 and at the second analog input A2 a resistance value of R 5 + R 6 .
- the voltage is applied to the first analog input AI
- the third contact surface 16 and the fourth contact surface 18 and thus the second node of the first evaluation circuit 5 and the fifth node of the second evaluation circuit 7 are connected via the connecting means 15 to ground.
- the resistor Rl and the resistor R2 as well as the resistor R4 and the resistor R5 are short-circuited to ground, so that at the first analog input AI a resistance of R 3 and at the second analog input A2 a resistance of R 6 results.
- a raised connection means 15 ie it can be made in no switch position or in any switching state, a connection of the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 to the ground contact 17, be diagnosed that in all switching states of the maximum resistance R 1 + R 2 + R 3 of the first evaluation circuit 5 at the first analog input AI and the maximum resistance R 4 + R 5 + R 6 of the second evaluation circuit 7 at the second analog input A2 is.
- a shorted to ground first evaluation circuit 5 can be recognized that in all switching states Sl to S7, a resistance of about 0 ⁇ acts on the first analog input AI, so that virtually a voltage of 0 V is applied to the first analog input AI.
- a shorted to ground second evaluation circuit 7 can be recognized that in all switching states Sl to S7 a resistance of about 0 ⁇ acts on the second analog input A2, so that virtually a voltage of 0 V is applied to the second analog input A2.
- the first contact area 12, which is short-circuited to ground can be detected by correctly recognizing the first valid switching state S1 and the valid third to seventh switching states S3 to S7 and only detecting the second valid switching state S2 incorrectly.
- the increase in the contact resistance of the first contact surface 12 can be recognized by the fact that the first and second valid switching states Sl and S2 each have a higher measured resistance value at the first analog input AI and the valid third to seventh switching states S3 to S7 are recognized correctly.
- the interruption of the connection between the first contact surface 12 and the first node can be detected by measuring the resistance value for the valid switching state S3 at the first analog input AI in each of the first three valid switching states S1 to S3.
- problems of the other contact surfaces 14, 16, 18 can be diagnosed.
- the evaluation and control unit 3 is advantageously able to assign each valid switching state Sl to S7 in each case a predetermined measured value range at the two analog inputs AI and A2 from the possible measured value ranges in order to recognize the various switching states Sl to S7.
- the evaluation and control unit 3 can in each case assign an error state to all other combinations of possible measured value ranges, which relates to at least one of the evaluation circuits 5, 7 or at least one of the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18.
- embodiments of the invention are suitable for use in switch systems via which safety-relevant functions and / or applications, such as, for example, a cruise control function with predefinable speed values and / or a start-stop function with predefinable distance values, etc., can be operated.
- a second embodiment of a circuit arrangement 21 according to the invention is shown. 2 the illustrated circuit arrangement 21 for evaluating seven switching states of the switch 10, four evaluation circuits 25, 26, 27, 28 and an evaluation and control unit 23.
- the circuit arrangement 21 uses four evaluation circuits 25, 26, 27, 28 in order to evaluate the seven switching states S1 to S7 of the switch 10.
- the four evaluation circuits 25, 26, 27, 28 each have a voltage divider with two resistors R21 and R22, R23 and R24, R25 and R26 or R27 and R28 connected in series with one another.
- the four voltage dividers are each connected to the supply voltage U B via a pull-up resistor R PU .
- a respective resistor R22, R24, R26 and R28 is arranged between the two nodes of the respective evaluation circuits 25, 26, 27, 28 .
- the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 are divided into four groups in the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 connected to the predetermined reference potential simultaneously belonging to different groups. Furthermore, the various groups of contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 for detecting the current switching state Sl to S7 and for diagnostic purposes with various evaluation circuits 25, 26, 27, 28 are coupled. As can also be seen from FIG. 2, a first node between the resistor R21 and the resistor R22 of the first evaluation circuit 25 is arranged with the third contact surface 16 connected. A second node, which is arranged between the resistor R22 and the pull-up resistor R PU of the first evaluation circuit 25, is connected to a second analog input A2 of the evaluation and control unit 23.
- a third node arranged between the resistor R23 and the resistor R24 of the second evaluation circuit 26 is connected to the first contact surface 12, and a fourth node arranged between the resistor R24 and the pull-up resistor R PU of the second evaluation circuit 26 is connected to a first analog input AI the evaluation and control unit 23 connected.
- a fifth node arranged between the resistor R25 and the resistor R26 of the third evaluation circuit 27 is connected to the second contact surface 14 and a sixth node arranged between the resistor R26 and the pull-up resistor R PU of the third evaluation circuit 27 is connected to one fourth analog input A4 of the evaluation and control unit 23 connected.
- a seventh node disposed between the resistor R27 and the resistor R28 of the fourth evaluation circuit 28 is connected to the fourth contact surface 18 and an eighth node disposed between the resistor R28 and the pull-up resistor R PU of the fourth evaluation circuit 28 is connected to a third analog input A3 of the evaluation and control unit 23 connected.
- the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 are arranged so that they are contacted alternately at a switch position or at a switching state Sl, S3, S5, S7 only with the reference potential and at the subsequent switch position or at one Following switching state S2, S4, S6 quasi each two of the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 overlap, so be contacted together with the reference potential.
- connection means 15 causes the respective resistance value applied to the analog inputs AI to A4 of the evaluation and control unit 23 to change to ground.
- the valid states S1 to S7 are determined.
- the type of arrangement of the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 requires that only certain combinations of the resistance values to be measured at the four analog inputs AI to A4 represent a valid switching state S1 to S7 or a valid switch position. This means that all other combinations of resistance measurements can be declared invalid, taking into account certain tolerances.
- FIG. 3 a third embodiment of a circuit arrangement 31 according to the invention is shown.
- the illustrated circuit arrangement 31 comprises, for the evaluation of seven switching states of the switch 10, analogously to the first exemplary embodiment, two evaluation circuits 5, 7, an evaluation and control unit 33 and a multiplexer 34.
- the circuit shown in FIG With the exception of the evaluation and control unit 33 and the multiplexer 34, the circuit arrangement 31 shown corresponds to the circuit arrangement 1 shown in FIG. 1. Therefore, to avoid repetition, only the differences between the two circuit arrangements 1 and 31 are described here.
- the use of the multiplexer 34 enables the various evaluation circuits 5, 7 to be evaluated offset in time at predetermined time intervals.
- the number of required analog inputs A of the evaluation and control unit 33 in comparison with the evaluation and control unit 3 can be reduced in an advantageous manner or the number of evaluable evaluation circuits 5, 7 can be increased with the same number of analog inputs.
- the diagnosability can be further improved by using resistors with different resistance values for the different evaluation circuits 5, 7 or 25, 26, 27, 28.
- separate voltage sources can be used for the different evaluation circuits, which generate the same or different voltage potentials. As a result, cable confusions occurring in an advantageous manner during connection can be recognized and displayed.
- FIG. 4 shows a fourth exemplary embodiment of a circuit arrangement 41 according to the invention. 4, the illustrated circuit arrangement 41 for evaluating seven switching states of the switch 10, four evaluation circuits 45, 46, 47, 48 and an evaluation and control unit 43.
- the switch 10 shown in FIG. 4 ent ⁇ speaks in the first embodiment in Fig. 1 Darge ⁇ presented switch 10 and is also designed as a rotary switch with four contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 and a connecting means 15, which is connected to a ground contact 17. Therefore, it is omitted here repetitive detailed Be ⁇ scription of the switch 10 degrees.
- the circuit arrangement 41 uses four evaluation circuits 45, 46, 47, 48 in order to evaluate the seven switching states S1 to S7 of the switch 10.
- the four evaluation circuits 45, 46, 47, 48 each have a pull-up resistor R PU and a node, the pull-up resistors R PU each having a connection directly to a digital input Dl to D4 of the evaluation and control unit 43 and connected to the other terminal to the supply voltage U B.
- the contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 in the embodiment shown in FIG. 4 are in divided four groups, wherein the simultaneously connected to the predetermined reference potential pads 12, 14, 16, 18 belong to different groups.
- the various groups of contact surfaces 12, 14, 16, 18 for detecting the current switching state Sl to S7 and for diagnostic purposes with different evaluation circuits 25, 26, 27, 28 are coupled.
- the various switching states Sl to S7 of the switch 10 can be detected.
- a connection to ground of a corresponding contact surface 12, 14, 16, 18 causes a first voltage level at the corresponding digital input Dl to D4, which is recognized, for example, as the first logical state
- a non-existent connection to ground of a corresponding contact surface 12, 14, 16 , 18 causes a second voltage level at the corresponding digital input Dl to D4, which is recognized as a second logic state, for example.
- the first switching state Sl corresponds to a logical value of "Olli.”
- switching state S2 corresponds to a logic value of "0011.”
- switching state S3 corresponds to a logical value of "1011”.
- switching state S4 corresponds to a logical value of "1001.”
- the fifth switching state S5 corresponds to a logic value of "1101”.
- Switching state S6 corresponds, for example, to a logical one
- the second switching state S7 corresponds, for example, to a logical value of "1110".
- the other unused nine possible code values can be assigned to corresponding error states.
- Embodiments of the present invention advantageously result in particularly simple miniaturization and a high degree of diagnosability of switching systems, which enables reliable operation in safety-relevant applications and / or functions.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Electronic Switches (AREA)
- Testing Of Short-Circuits, Discontinuities, Leakage, Or Incorrect Line Connections (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102009056283A DE102009056283A1 (de) | 2009-11-30 | 2009-11-30 | Schalter und Schaltungsanordnung zur Auswertung von mindestens zwei Schaltzuständen eines Schalters |
| PCT/EP2010/006962 WO2011063901A1 (de) | 2009-11-30 | 2010-11-16 | Schalter und schaltungsanordnung zur auswertung von mindestens zwei schaltzuständen eines schalters |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2507807A1 true EP2507807A1 (de) | 2012-10-10 |
| EP2507807B1 EP2507807B1 (de) | 2017-09-13 |
Family
ID=43587649
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP10784976.2A Active EP2507807B1 (de) | 2009-11-30 | 2010-11-16 | Schalter und schaltungsanordnung zur auswertung von mindestens zwei schaltzuständen eines schalters |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP2507807B1 (de) |
| DE (1) | DE102009056283A1 (de) |
| WO (1) | WO2011063901A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102013015214B4 (de) * | 2013-09-13 | 2019-10-17 | Leopold Kostal Gmbh & Co. Kg | Elektrischer Stufenschalter |
| DE102017113905A1 (de) * | 2017-06-23 | 2018-12-27 | Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh | Schaltungsanordnung zur Auswertung von zumindest zwei Schaltzuständen eines Betätigungselementes, Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Schaltungsanordnung sowie Schaltvorrichtung |
| DE102024139111B3 (de) | 2024-12-19 | 2025-12-24 | Audi Aktiengesellschaft | Spannungskodieren von Schaltzuständen einer Steuereinrichtung mit Redundanz |
Family Cites Families (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE9302047U1 (de) * | 1993-02-15 | 1994-06-16 | Diehl Stiftung & Co., 90478 Nürnberg | Betriebsartenschalter |
| JP3512966B2 (ja) * | 1997-01-09 | 2004-03-31 | 株式会社東海理化電機製作所 | スイッチ装置 |
| DE10108605C1 (de) * | 2001-02-22 | 2002-05-29 | Kostal Leopold Gmbh & Co Kg | Elektrischer Schalter |
| US7049714B2 (en) * | 2003-05-16 | 2006-05-23 | Whirlpool Corporation | Method for determining the condition of a rotary switch |
| DE102006038375A1 (de) | 2006-08-11 | 2008-02-14 | Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh | Schaltungsanordnung |
| DE202007016618U1 (de) * | 2007-11-28 | 2008-02-28 | Flextec Gmbh | Abgleichinstrument |
-
2009
- 2009-11-30 DE DE102009056283A patent/DE102009056283A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2010
- 2010-11-16 EP EP10784976.2A patent/EP2507807B1/de active Active
- 2010-11-16 WO PCT/EP2010/006962 patent/WO2011063901A1/de not_active Ceased
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| None * |
| See also references of WO2011063901A1 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2011063901A1 (de) | 2011-06-03 |
| DE102009056283A1 (de) | 2011-06-01 |
| EP2507807B1 (de) | 2017-09-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP3329597B1 (de) | Bedieneinrichtung für ein fahrzeug und verfahren zum betrieb einer solchen bedieneinrichtung | |
| EP1821073B1 (de) | Positionsmesseinrichtung | |
| EP1193472A2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung der Absolutposition bei Weg- und Winkelgebern | |
| EP3642639B1 (de) | Schaltungsanordnung zur auswertung von zumindest zwei schaltzuständen eines betätigungselementes, verfahren zum betreiben einer schaltungsanordnung sowie schaltvorrichtung | |
| DE10347979A1 (de) | Diagnostizierbare Schalteranordnung | |
| EP0249166B1 (de) | Schalter zur Ansteuerung eines Elektromotors einer Wischeranlage | |
| EP2507807B1 (de) | Schalter und schaltungsanordnung zur auswertung von mindestens zwei schaltzuständen eines schalters | |
| EP2715288B1 (de) | Elektrische eingabetaste | |
| DE102021111771A1 (de) | Diagnosefähige Schaltungsanordnung, Sensorvorrichtung mit einer Schaltungsanordnung und Verfahren zur Diagnose einer Schaltungsanordnung und/oder Sensorvorrichtung | |
| EP2050110B1 (de) | Schaltungsanordnung | |
| DE102019135185B3 (de) | Drehgeber | |
| EP0920610A1 (de) | Signalverarbeitungsschaltung für zustandssignale eines resistiven foliendrucksensors | |
| DE102010048750B4 (de) | Schaltungsanordnung zur Auswertung von Schaltzuständen und Schalter mit einer solchen Schaltungsanordnung | |
| WO2007025894A2 (de) | Positionssensor und verfahren zum betreiben eines positionssensors | |
| WO2013017511A1 (de) | Stellungsmeldeanordnung | |
| DE102018214601B4 (de) | System zum Erfassen der Position einer Lineareinheit eines Linearsystems | |
| EP1364380B1 (de) | Elektrischer schalter | |
| DE102008043966B4 (de) | Sensorvorrichtung und Betriebsverfahren hierfür | |
| DE4436546A1 (de) | Positionsmeßeinrichtung | |
| WO2019105646A1 (de) | Berührungsempfindliches eingabegerät für ein fahrzeug und verfahren zum betrieb eines solchen eingabegeräts | |
| DE102004010785B4 (de) | Konfigurierbarer Eingangsverstärker für Positionsmesseinrichtungen | |
| DE102021111734A1 (de) | Diagnosefähige Schaltungsanordnung und Verfahren zur Diagnose einer Schaltungsanordnung | |
| DE102013222350B4 (de) | Drehsteller für eine Fahrzeugkomponente | |
| EP4361651B1 (de) | Bedienvorrichtung mit funktionsüberwachung der schaltzustandsdetektion des wenigstens einen zugehörigen, bedienbaren schaltelements, zugehörige verwendung und verfahren | |
| DE19817291C2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ermittlung der Stellung von Schalteinrichtungen |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20120416 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20161117 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170405 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 928900 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171015 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502010014153 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171214 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180113 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502010014153 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180614 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171116 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20171130 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171116 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 928900 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171116 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171116 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20101116 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170913 |
|
| P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230528 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231120 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20241116 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20241116 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20251117 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20251128 Year of fee payment: 16 |