EP2459673A1 - Procédé de fracturation de formations souterraines - Google Patents

Procédé de fracturation de formations souterraines

Info

Publication number
EP2459673A1
EP2459673A1 EP09781297A EP09781297A EP2459673A1 EP 2459673 A1 EP2459673 A1 EP 2459673A1 EP 09781297 A EP09781297 A EP 09781297A EP 09781297 A EP09781297 A EP 09781297A EP 2459673 A1 EP2459673 A1 EP 2459673A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fluid
surfactant
alkyl
fracturing
units
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP09781297A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Sally Clare Lawrence
Karena Eva Thieme
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BASF SE
Original Assignee
BASF SE
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BASF SE filed Critical BASF SE
Publication of EP2459673A1 publication Critical patent/EP2459673A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/62—Compositions for forming crevices or fractures
    • C09K8/66—Compositions based on water or polar solvents
    • C09K8/68—Compositions based on water or polar solvents containing organic compounds
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/602—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation containing surfactants
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/62—Compositions for forming crevices or fractures
    • C09K8/72—Eroding chemicals, e.g. acids
    • C09K8/74—Eroding chemicals, e.g. acids combined with additives added for specific purposes
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09K—MATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00—Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/60—Compositions for stimulating production by acting on the underground formation
    • C09K8/84—Compositions based on water or polar solvents
    • C09K8/86—Compositions based on water or polar solvents containing organic compounds
    • C09K8/88—Compositions based on water or polar solvents containing organic compounds macromolecular compounds

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method of fracturing subterranean formations using low residue fluid fracturing systems.
  • hydraulic fracturing involves injecting a specially blended fracturing fluid through a wellbore and into a formation under sufficiently high pressure to create fractures, thereby providing channels through which formation fluids such as oil, gas or water, can flow into the wellbore and thereafter be withdrawn.
  • Fracturing fluids are designed to enable the initiation or extension of a fracture and the simultaneous transport of suspended proppant (for example, naturally-occurring sand grains, resin-coated sand, sintered bauxite, glass beads, ultra lightweight polymer beads and the like) into the fracture to keep the fracture open when the pressure is released.
  • suspended proppant for example, naturally-occurring sand grains, resin-coated sand, sintered bauxite, glass beads, ultra lightweight polymer beads and the like
  • the performance and the ability of a fracturing fluid to carry proppant are largely dependent upon its viscous properties.
  • fracturing fluids include the ability to be broken and cleaned out of the fracture following the treatment, good fluid-loss control and low friction pressures during application.
  • Common fracturing fluids are based upon either aqueous or hydrocarbon systems, although aqueous fluids (for example, those based on water-soluble polymers, guar gums and guar derivatives) are generally more popular due to lower costs. While it is possible to increase the viscosities of guar-based fluids by elevating the concentration, a more economical approach involves cross-linking the polymers by applying cross-linking agents.
  • Polymer-free, water-based fracturing fluids may be prepared using surfactants.
  • a surfactant-based fracturing fluid minimizes the amount of residue remaining in the formation after the treatment.
  • the residue can be significant and impede the success of the fracturing procedure.
  • the residue typically includes not only breakdown products resulting from the enzymatic or oxidative decomposition of the polymer structure following the treatment, but also contamination arising during processing of the guar. While modified guars usually contain fewer contaminants due to additional purification, such contaminants cannot be eliminated completely and economically.
  • Surfactant-based systems are purely synthetic and thus not dependent on the weather or economically-related changes in the harvest of the raw material (for example, guar beans) which may influence availability on the world market.
  • Surfactant-based systems form stable foams when applied under energized conditions. Compared to guar-based fluids, it is possible to obtain the desired fluid property without the addition of a foaming agent.
  • Energized fluids require less base fluid, allowing for application in water-sensitive formations and decreasing the amount of chemical additives needed for the treatment. The reduced amount of fluid that needs to be flowed-back can be of importance in places where the disposal of waste fluid comprises a significant cost factor.
  • Surfactant-based fracturing systems are well known and valued for their ability to withstand high shear applications.
  • Preferred surfactants can have a range of ionic character; anionic, non-ionic, cationic and zwitterionic species have all been used successfully.
  • Viscous fracturing fluids must also be able to be 'broken', by disruption of the structure that causes the increase in viscosity of the fluid in first place. Depending on the composition of the fluid, this disruption can be achieved either by physical or chemical means. If accomplished by an additive, the additional chemical should have no, or only a minimal effect on the gel performance during the actual treatment, but should react rapidly once the treatment is finalized. It is important that the method allows for a certain degree of control over the time involved in the decrease of the gel strength, whereby the formation temperature and pressure may play a vital role.
  • Typical breaker additives used in combination with guar based fracturing fluids are oxidizers and enzymes. Oxidizing chemicals like ammonium, potassium or sodium salts of peroxydisulfate cause the radical decomposition of the carbohydrate polymers, reducing their molecular weight and therefore their viscosifying ability. Certain amine based additives are available that can enhance the reactivity of the breakers.
  • Enzymatic breakers provide a less aggressive way to degrade carbohydrate based polymers.
  • Common enzymes used in the oilfield are hemicellulases. Their application is limited to a smaller pH range (3.5 to 8) and lower temperatures compared to oxidizing breakers.
  • Surfactant-based fracturing fluids can be applied without breaker, depending solely on either the dilution of the network with formation water or the disruption of the micelles by contact with a sufficient amount of hydrocarbon, to reduce the viscosity of the fluid.
  • this approach has the disadvantage that there is no means of control over the duration of the 'break'.
  • it may be less economical due to the increased shut-in time of the well.
  • WO 92/08753 discloses polymer compounds which are useful as thickeners for aqueous compositions and in particular for latex dispersions.
  • EP 0 225 661 describes the preparation of gels by crosslinking phosphate esters with polyvalent metal cations, in particular with aluminum ions.
  • WO 02/102917 describes aqueous compositions which comprise polymers having nonionic, ionic and hydrophobic functional groups, whose viscosity is increased under the action of shear forces or which form a gel under the action of shear forces.
  • WO 2005/071038 describes compositions and methods for shortening the recovery time of cationic, zwitterionic and amphoteric viscoelastic surfactant compositions after the action of shear forces by addition of three-block oligomers having hydrophilic and
  • the surfactants preferably having a betaine structure.
  • US 2006/0128597 describes compositions and methods for shortening the recovery time of cationic, zwitterionic and amphoteric viscoelastic surfactant compositions after the action of shear forces by addition of partly hydrolyzed polyvinyl esters or partly hydrolyzed polyacrylates, the surfactants likewise preferably having a betaine structure.
  • US 2006/011 1248 describes methods for shortening the recovery time of zwitterionic viscoelastic surfactant compositions after the action of shear forces by addition of
  • R is a C3-Ci8-alkyl group
  • R' is a Co-Cu-alkylene group
  • EO is ethyleneoxy
  • PO is propyleneoxy
  • the surfactants preferably having a betaine structure.
  • US 6,194,356 describes well treatment fluids which comprise a viscoelastic surfactant in combination with a crosslinkable, hydrophobically modified polymer.
  • WO 02/11874 discloses a viscoelastic well treatment fluid which comprise a sufficient amount of an oligomeric surfactant for controlling the viscoelastic properties of the fluid.
  • the monomers of the surfactant used are ionic or zwitterionic compounds which have at least one charged head group and one long-chain hydrophobic hydrocarbon radical.
  • WO 03/056130 describes aqueous viscoelastic fluids for breaking open rock formations, which comprise a viscoelastic surfactant, especially a betaine, and a
  • WO 2005/040554 describes methods for increasing the viscosity of viscoelastic surfactant compositions for the treatment of wells by addition of hydrophilic-lipophilic organic compounds, such as, for example, alkyl alcohols, alkylthiols or alkylamines.
  • WO 2008/065172 A2 discloses a pH-regulated thickener system and its use for the treatment of underground geological formations.
  • the composition with pH-dependent viscosity comprises at least one anionic surfactant of the general formula
  • R-[-(EO/PO)i-2o-]0) k P( 0)(OH) 3 -k wherein R is a hydrophobic group comprising 12 to 22 carbon atoms, EO/PO are
  • k is 1 or 2 and furthermore at least one polymeric thickener comprising at least two hydrophobic groups connected via hydrophilic groups.
  • WO 2008/065173 relates to a thickener system which is suitable for preparing a thickener composition and consists of at least one anionic surfactant A and at least one polymer B which comprises at least one hydrophobic group and at least one hydrophilic group, the concentration of the polymer B in the thickener composition being below the overlap concentration c * of the polymer, to the use of an inventive thickener system for preparing a thickener composition, to a thickener composition comprising an inventive thickener system and to the use of inventive thickener compositions.
  • the invention comprises a method of fracturing a subterranean formation penetrated by a well bore, comprising the step of formulating an aqueous fracturing fluid and pumping the fracturing fluid down the wellbore at a rate and pressure sufficient to initiate or extend a fracture in the formation, wherein the fracturing fluid comprises an aqueous base fluid, a surfactant component and an associative thickener, whereby the fluid does not display the desired viscosity without both the surfactant component and the associative thickener.
  • the surfactant component comprises at least an anionic surfactant and may further comprise a non-ionic surfactant.
  • the associative thickener comprises a polymer which has at least one hydrophilic group and at least one hydrophobic group.
  • the associative thickener is preferably added at a concentration less than the overlap concentration of the polymer.
  • the fracturing fluid components are readily water soluble. Accordingly, the use of the described fluid may lower the amount of residue left in the formation and the damage to the proppant pack involved.
  • the fracturing fluid may further comprise a breaker.
  • the fracturing fluid comprises micelles networked by an associative thickener.
  • the micelles are formed by at least one anionic surfactant and, optionally, non-ionic surfactants.
  • the concentration of the polymer in the fracturing fluid is below the overlap concentration of the polymer.
  • the anionic surfactant comprises a compound of formulae I. a to l.f or salts thereof, or mixtures thereof:
  • R 1 is selected from linear or branched Ci6-C22-alkyl, Ci6-C22-alkenyl, C16-C22- alkynyl, (Ci5-C2i-alkyl)carbonyl, (Ci5-C2i-alkenyl)carbonyl and (C15-C21- alkynyl)carbonyl,
  • Y is a group consisting of from 1 to 20 alkyleneoxy units and Z is Ci-C 4 -alkylene.
  • Figure 1 is a graph showing the viscosity over time at 20-80 0 C for gels prepared from mixtures of nonionic (Nl) surfactants that differ in the hydrophilicity of the surfactants used.
  • Figure 2 is a graph showing the viscosity over time from a shear history study in which the fluid comprises 2 w% active material containing an anionic-to-non-ionic surfactant ratio of 4 to 1.
  • Figure 3 is a graph showing the viscosity over time at 20-80 0 C for gels prepared with different loadings of associative thickener and surfactant.
  • Figure 4 is a graph showing the viscosity over time at 20-50 0 C for different associative thickener and surfactant loadings.
  • Figure 5 is a graph showing the apparent viscosity at different shear rates for energized fluids that differ in foam quality. Data is presented for measurements at 30 and 50°C.
  • Figure 6 is a graph showing the viscosity and pH of a gel in dependence on the amount of alkaline added.
  • Figure 7 is a graph showing the break profiles for a gel at 25°C for different compositions of light burnt MgO - emulsified in mineral oil with or without a retarding additive.
  • Figure 8 represents the data obtained for a field trial described in Example 5 below. The pressures and sand concentrations on surface and down hole for the period of the treatment are shown.
  • the present invention relates to a method of fracturing subterranean formations using low residue fluid fracturing systems.
  • all terms not defined herein have their common art-recognized meanings.
  • the following description is of a specific embodiment or a particular use of the invention, it is intended to be illustrative only, and not limiting of the claimed invention.
  • the following description is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents that are included in the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims.
  • the present invention relates to a method of fracturing a subterranean formation penetrated by a wellbore to aid in the recovery of oil and gas.
  • the fracturing fluid comprises an aqueous base fluid, a surfactant component and an associative thickener.
  • the fracturing fluids do not display the desired viscosity without both the surfactant component and the associative thickener.
  • the surfactant component comprises at least one anionic surfactant, or a mixture of an anionic surfactants and at least one non-ionic surfactant.
  • Aqueous base fluids are well known in the art and embodiments of the present invention may be implemented with a wide variety of aqueous base fluids.
  • the aqueous base fluid comprises water as the main component and may in addition comprise organic solvents miscible with water.
  • the amount of water is at least 60 wt. % related to the total amount of all solvents of the aqueous base fluid.
  • the amount of water shall be at least 80 wt. %, more preferred at least 95 wt. % and most preferred the solvent is only water.
  • Said additional solvents in general have a molecular weight of less than 400 g/mol, preferably less than 200 g/mol.
  • Suitable water-miscible solvents are, for example, homo- and heterooligomers of ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide, for example ethylene glycol or propylene glycol, alcohols, e.g. methanol, ethanol, iso- propanol, butylmonoglycol, butyldiglycol, butyltriglycol, phenoxyethanol, phenoxypropanol or o-sec-butylphenol, N-alkylpyrrolidones such as N-methylpyrrolidone, and alkylene carbonates.
  • the aqueous base fluid may comprise a brine solution such as a potassium chloride or an ammonium chloride solution.
  • the salt concentration may be selected by the skilled artisan according to the desired properties of the fracturing fluid. In general, the salt concentration should be less than 8 % by weight of the fluid, preferably 0.5 to 6 % by weight and by the way of example 3 to 5 % by weight.
  • the anionic surfactants are selected from compounds of the general formulae (I. a) to (l.f) and salts thereof:
  • R 1 is selected from linear or branched Ci6-C22-alkyl, Ci6-C22-alkenyl, Ci6-C22-alkynyl, (Ci5-C2i-alkyl)carbonyl, (Ci5-C2i-alkenyl)carbonyl and (Ci5-C2i-alkynyl)carbonyl,
  • Y is a group consisting of from 1 to 20 alkyleneoxy units and Z is Ci-C4-alkylene.
  • salts of the compounds (I. a) to (l.f) comprise, as well as the anion of the particular compounds, a corresponding positively charged counterion, for example Na + or K + .
  • alkyl comprises straight- chain and branched alkyl groups.
  • Suitable short-chain alkyl groups are, for example, straight- chain or branched Ci-Cz-alkyl, preferably d-C ⁇ -alkyl and more preferably Ci-C4-alkyl groups. These include in particular methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, 2-butyl sec. -butyl, tert- butyl, etc.
  • Cn-C22-alkyl comprises straight-chain and branched alkyl groups. They are preferably straight-chain and branched Ci5-C2o-alkyl radicals, more preferably straight-chain and branched Ci6-Ci8-alkyl radicals and most preferably straight-chain Ci6-Ci8-alkyl radicals. They are especially predominantly linear alkyl radicals, as also occur in natural or synthetic fatty acids and fatty alcohols, and also oxo alcohols.
  • n-undecyl n-dodecyl
  • n-tridecyl myristyl
  • heptadecyl octadecyl
  • nonadecyl arachinyl
  • behenyl etc.
  • Cn-C22-alkenyl represents straight chain and branched alkenyl groups which may be mono-, di- or polyunsaturated. They are preferably straight-chain and branched Ci5-C2o-alkenyl, more preferably straight-chain and branched Ci6-Ci8-alkenyl and most preferably straight-chain Ci6-Ci8-alkenyl. They are especially predominantly linear alkenyl radicals, as also occur in natural or synthetic fatty acids and fatty alcohols, and also oxo alcohols.
  • octenyl nonenyl, decenyl, undecenyl, dodecenyl, tridecenyl, tetradecenyl, pentadecenyl, hexadecenyl, heptadecenyl, octadecenyl, nonadecenyl, linolylyl, linolenylyl, eleostearyl, etc., and especially oleyl (9- octadecenyl).
  • Cn-C22-alkynyl represents straight-chain and branched alkynyl groups which may be mono-, di- or polyunsaturated. They are preferably Ci5-C2o-alkynyl. They are especially predominantly linear alkynyl radicals.
  • the R 1 radicals of the compounds of the general formulae (I. a) to (l.f) have, on average, preferably at most one, more preferably at most 0.5 and especially at most 0.2 branch.
  • the R 1 radicals are each independently selected from palmityl, stearyl, oleyl, linoleyl, arachidyl, gadoleyl, behenyl, erucyl, isostearyl, 2-hexyldecyl, 2-heptyldecyl, 2- heptylundecyl and 2-octyldodecyl.
  • the Y groups in the compounds of the general formulae (I. a) to (l.f) are preferably selected from groups of the general formula (II),
  • x 1 and x 2 are each independently an integer from 0 to 20, where the sum of x 1 and x 2 is from 1 to 20.
  • the ratio of x 1 to x 2 averaged over the surfactants of the general formulae (I. a) to (l.f) present is preferably at least 2:1.
  • the poly(alkyleneoxy) groups of the general formula (II) consist exclusively of ethyleneoxy units and x 2 is thus especially 0.
  • the ratio of the anionogenic groups to the alkyleneoxy units of the R 1 groups is preferably within a range of from 1 :2 to 1 :10.
  • anionogenic groups refer to those groups which have an acidic proton and form an anionic group under basic conditions.
  • the aforementioned ratio relates correspondingly to the anionic groups.
  • the anionic surfactants are preferably selected from compounds of the general formulae (I. a) or (l.b) and are more preferably selected from compounds of the formula (I. a).
  • Surfactants of the general formulae (I. a) and (l.b) used in accordance with the invention can, for example, be provided by reacting phosphoric acid or a suitable phosphoric acid derivative, for example P2O5, P4O1O, polyphosphoric acid (H3PO4 x (HPOs) n where n > 1 ) or metaphosphoric acid ((HPOs) n where n > 3), with a suitable alkoxylated alcohol of the formula R l -[(O-(CH2)2)xi(O-CH(CH 3 )CH 2 )x2]-OH or mixtures of these alkoxylated alcohols, as are provided especially by reacting natural or synthetic mixtures of fatty alcohols and oxo alcohols with ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide. As well as inorganic phosphoric acids, this typically affords mixtures of phosphoric monoesters and phosphoric diesters of the general formula (I. a) and (l.b).
  • the surfactant component of the present invention preferably comprises at least one phosphoric monoester of the general formula (I. a). Preferably at least 50 % by weight, more preferably at least 80 % and especially at least 90 % of the surfactant component present are selected from compounds of the general formula (I. a).
  • the associative thickener comprises a water soluble polymer which has at least one hydrophilic group ( ⁇ ) and two hydrophobic groups.
  • the polymer is selected from compounds comprising at least two hydrophobic radicals R 2 which are bonded to one another via a bridging hydrophilic group ( ⁇ ).
  • the hydrophilic group preferably comprises polyether units and/or polyvinyl alcohol units, more preferably polyether units.
  • the hydrophobic R 2 groups preferably have a structure which corresponds to the hydrophobic R 1 groups of the surfactant component.
  • the term "corresponding" shall mean that the number of carbon atoms in the groups R 1 and R 2 should not differ by more than 3 carbon atoms, preferably by not more than 2 carbon atoms and preferably the number of carbon atoms should be the same. Most preferably, the groups R 1 and R 2 should be identical.
  • the rheological properties of the fluid of the present invention are determined by interactions of the polymers, specifically of their hydrophobic R 2 groups, with micelles of the surfactants. These interactions are physical hydrophobic-hydrophobic interactions, thus forming overlapping networks. [0060] Surfactants form micelles in water even at very low concentrations.
  • the concentration at which the first micelles are formed is referred to as the critical micelle concentration (cmc). This is typically determined by the surface tension, solubilization, conductivity (in ionic surfactants) or NMR.
  • the anionic surfactants used in the current invention are notable for a relatively high critical micelle concentration.
  • the critical micelle concentration of such anionic surfactants is preferably within a range from 1 to 50 mg/L and more preferably within a range from 15 to 30 mg/L.
  • the ranges specified relate to the concentrations determined at 25°C for a salt concentration and a pH which correspond to the use conditions.
  • the concentration of the surfactant in the thickener compositions is preferably above its critical micelle concentration.
  • the hydrophobic R 2 groups of the polymers comprise, on average, preferably at least 14 and especially at least 16 carbon atoms.
  • the upper limit of the carbon atom number is generally uncritical and is, for example, up to 100, preferably up to 50 and especially up to 35. More preferably, less than 10% of the hydrophobic R 2 groups present in the polymers comprise less than 15 and more than 23 carbon atoms.
  • the hydrophobic R 2 groups are preferably selected from linear and branched C12- C22-alkyl, Ci2-C22-alkenyl or 2-hydroxy(Ci2-C22-alk-1-yl).
  • the R 2 radicals of the polymers have, on average, preferably at most one, more preferably at most 0.5 and especially at most 0.2 branch.
  • the R 2 radicals are each independently selected from palmityl, stearyl, oleyl, linoleyl, arachidyl, gadoleyl, behenyl, erucyl, isostearyl, 2-hexyldecyl, 2-heptyldecyl, 2 heptylundecyl, 2-octyldodecyl and 2-hydroxypalmityl, 2-hydroxystearyl, 2-hydroxyoleyl, 2-hydroxylinoleyl, 2-hydroxyarachidyl, 2- hydroxygadoleyl, 2-hydroxybehenyl, 2-hydroxyerucyl and 2-hydroxyisostearyl.
  • Preferably at least 70% of the R 2 groups present in the polymers are unbranched.
  • the hydrophilic groups ( ⁇ ) comprise at least two hydrophilic units ( ⁇ ).
  • the hydrophilic units ( ⁇ ) may have identical or different definitions. Identical hydrophilic units ( ⁇ ) are always bonded to one another via a bridging group ( ⁇ ). Different hydrophilic units ( ⁇ ) may be bonded directly to one another or via a bridging group ( ⁇ ).
  • the bridging hydrophilic group ( ⁇ ) comprises, as hydrophilic units ( ⁇ ), polyether units and/or polyvinyl alcohol units. More preferably, the bridging hydrophilic group ( ⁇ ) consists of polyether units at least to an extent of 90%.
  • hydrophilic units ( ⁇ ) of the polymers are at least partly selected from polyether units of the general formula (III)
  • the sum of y 1 and y 2 denotes the number of alkyleneoxy units of this polyether chain and has, averaged over all polyether units of the formula (III) present, preferably a value in the range from 20 to 200, more preferably from 30 to 150.
  • the ratio of y 1 to y 2 expresses the ratio of ethyleneoxy to propyleneoxy units.
  • the ratio of y 1 to y 2 is preferably at least 2:1 , more preferably at least 5:1.
  • hydrophilic polyether units are preferably bonded to one another without bridging groups ( ⁇ ).
  • Such polyether units include, for example, EO/PO block copolymer units.
  • the polyether chain of the formula consists exclusively of ethyleneoxy units. In this embodiment, y 2 is 0.
  • the hydrophilic groups ( ⁇ ) are composed of hydrophilic units ( ⁇ ) which are bonded to one another via bridging groups ( ⁇ ), the bridging groups ( ⁇ ) being structurally different from the repeat units of which the hydrophilic units ( ⁇ ) are composed.
  • m-valent group means that the bridging group ( ⁇ ) is capable of forming m chemical bonds, where m is an integer and is preferably 2, 3 or 4.
  • alkylene or alkenylene is interrupted by one or more, for example 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 nonadjacent groups which are each independently selected from oxygen, sulfur, - NH- and N(Ci-Cio-alkyl)-, the termini of the alkylene or alkenylene group is formed by carbon atoms.
  • the polymer may also comprise more than two hydrophobic R 2 groups.
  • the polymer preferably comprises from two to six, more preferably from two to four hydrophobic R 2 groups.
  • Such polymers used in accordance with the invention can, for example, be provided by reacting polyisocyanates, polyols, polyamines, polycarboxylic acids with a suitable alkoxylated alcohol, for example an alkoxylated alcohol of the formula R 2 -[(O-(CH2)2) y i(O- CH(CH3)CH2)y2]-OH or mixtures of these alkoxylated alcohols.
  • a suitable alkoxylated alcohol for example an alkoxylated alcohol of the formula R 2 -[(O-(CH2)2) y i(O- CH(CH3)CH2)y2]-OH or mixtures of these alkoxylated alcohols.
  • These alcohols are provided especially by reacting natural or synthetic mixtures of fatty alcohols and oxo alcohols with ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide. This typically affords mixtures of alcohols with a different number of alkyleneoxy units, which can be used as such.
  • the polymers used in accordance with the invention can
  • Suitable polyisocyanates especially diisocyanates and triisocyanates, for providing polymers are the aliphatic, cycloaliphatic, araliphatic and aromatic di- or polyisocyanates mentioned below by way of example. These preferably include 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, the mixtures of monomericdiphenylmethanediisocyanates and
  • oligomericdiphenylmethanediisocyanat.es polymer-MDI
  • tetramethylenediisocyanate tetramethylenediisocyanatetrimers
  • hexamethylenediisocyanate oligomericdiphenylmethanediisocyanat.es (polymer-MDI)
  • tetramethylenediisocyanate tetramethylenediisocyanatetrimers
  • hexamethylenediisocyanate hexamethylenediisocyanate
  • hexamethylenediisocyanatetrimers isophoronediisocyanatetrimer, 4,4'- methylenebis(cyclohexyl) diisocyanate, xylylenediisocyanate,
  • alkyl is Ci-Cio-alkyl, 1 ,4-diisocyanatocyclohexane or 4-isocyanatomethyl-l,8-octamethylene diisocyanate, and more preferably hexamethylenediisocyanate and 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
  • Suitable diols for providing the polymers are straight-chain and branched, aliphatic and cycloaliphatic alcohols having generally from about 1 to 30, preferably from about 2 to 20 carbon atoms. These include 1 ,2-ethanediol, 1 ,2-propanediol, 1 ,3-propanediol, 1 ,2- butanediol, 1 ,3-butanediol, 1 ,4-butanediol, 2,3-butanediol, 1 ,2-pentanediol, 1 ,3-pentanediol, 1 ,4-pentanediol, 1 ,5-pentanediol, 2,3-pentanediol, 2,4-pentanediol, 1 ,2-hexanediol, 1 ,3- hexanediol, 1 ,4-pent
  • Suitable triols for providing the polymers are, for example, glycerol, butane-1 ,2,4- triol, n-pentane-1 ,2,5-triol, n-pentane-1 ,3,5-triol, n-hexane-1 ,2,6-triol, n-hexane-1 ,2,5-triol, trimethylolpropane, trimethylolbutane.
  • Suitable triols are also the esters of hydroxycarboxylic acids with trihydric alcohols. They are preferably triglycerides of hydroxycarboxylic acids, for example lactic acid, hydroxystearic acid and ricinoleic acid.
  • Suitable higher polyhydric polyols for providing polymers are, for example, sugar alcohols and derivatives thereof, such as erythritol, pentaerythritol, dipentaerythritol, tritol, inositol and sorbitol. Also suitable are reaction products of the polyols with alkylene oxides, such as ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide.
  • polystyrene resin with a number-average molecular weight in the range from about 400 to 6000 g/mol, preferably from 500 to 4000 g/mol.
  • polyesterols based on aliphatic, cycloaliphatic and/or aromatic di-, tri- and/or polycarboxylic acids with di-, tri- and/or polyols and also the polyesterols based on lactone.
  • polyetherols which are obtainable, for example, by polymerizing cyclic ethers or by reacting alkylene oxides with a starter molecule.
  • customary polycarbonates with terminal hydroxyl groups which are known to those skilled in the art and are obtainable by reacting the above-described diols or else bisphenols, such as bisphenol A, with phosgene or carbonic esters.
  • bisphenols such as bisphenol A
  • phosgene or carbonic esters are also suitable.
  • Suitable dicarboxylic acids for providing polymers are, for example, oxalic acid, malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, undecane- ⁇ , ⁇ -dicarboxylic acid, dodecane- ⁇ , ⁇ -dicarboxylic acid, cis- and trans-cyclohexane-1 ,2-dicarboxylic acid, cis- and trans-cyclohexane-1 ,3-dicarboxylic acid, cis- and trans-cyclohexane-1 ,4-dicarboxylic acid, cis- and trans-cyclopentane-1 ,2- dicarboxylic acid, cis- and trans-cyclopentane-1 ,3-dicarboxylic acid, phthalic acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid and mixtures thereof.
  • Suitable substituted dicarboxylic acids may also be substituted.
  • Suitable substituted dicarboxylic acids may have one or more radicals which are preferably selected from alkyl, cycloalkyl and aryl, as defined at the outset.
  • Suitable substituted dicarboxylic acids are, for example, 2-methylmalonic acid, 2-ethylmalonic acid, 2-phenylmalonic acid, 2-methylsuccinic acid, 2-ethylsuccinic acid, 2-phenylsuccinic acid, itaconic acid, 3,3-dimethylglutaric acid, etc.
  • Dicarboxylic acids can be used either as such or in the form of derivatives.
  • Suitable derivatives are anhydrides and their oligomers and polymers, mono- and diesters, preferably mono- and dialkyl esters, and acid halides, preferably chlorides.
  • Suitable esters are mono- or dimethyl esters, mono- or diethyl esters, and also mono- and diesters of higher alcohols, for example n-propanol, iso-propanol, n-butanol, iso-butanol, tert-butanol, n-pentanol, n-hexanol, etc, and also mono- and vinyl esters and mixed esters, preferably methyl ethyl esters.
  • Preferred polycarboxylic acids for providing the polymers are succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, phthalic acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid or their mono- or dimethyl esters. Particular preference is given to adipic acid.
  • Suitable polyamines are, for example, ethylenediamine, propylenediamine, diethylenetriamine, triethylenetetramine, tetraethylenepentamine, polyethyleneimine, 1 ,3- propanediamine, N,N-bis(aminopropyl)amine, N, N, N -tris(aminoethyl)amine, N, N, N',N'- tetrakis(aminoethyl)ethylenediamine, N,N,N',N",N"-pentakis(aminoethyl)-diethylenetriamine, neopentanediamine, hexamethylenediarnine, octamethylenediamine or isophoronediamine.
  • Further compounds suitable for providing the polymers are compounds which comprise at least two different functional groups, for example ethanolamine, N- methylethanolamine, propanolamine, hydroxyacetic acid, lactic acid, glutamic acid, aspartic acid.
  • the polymer is provided proceeding from (a) C14-C22 fatty alcohol ethoxylates and mixtures thereof, (b) polyethylene glycol, EO-PO copolymers, trimethylolpropaneethoxylates/trimethylolpropanepropoxylates,
  • the polymer is provided proceeding from (a) polyethylene glycol, EO-PO copolymers, trimethylolpropaneethoxylat.es and/or - propoxylates, glycerylethoxylates and/or -propoxylates and mixtures thereof, and (b) 1 ,2- epoxy-Ci4-C22-alkanes and mixtures thereof.
  • the preferred range for the molecular weight of the polymer comprising at least one hydrophilic group and at least two hydrophobic groups arises through multiplication of the number of hydrophobic R 2 groups present with a value of from 1500 to 8000 g/mol.
  • the polymers preferably have, on average, a molecular weight M n in the range from 3000 to 50,000 g/mol, more preferably in the range from 5000 to 30,000 g/mol.
  • M n molecular weight in the range from 3000 to 50,000 g/mol, more preferably in the range from 5000 to 30,000 g/mol.
  • the fracturing fluids used according to the present invention may comprise further components.
  • the fracturing fluid may comprise further surfactants besides the anionic surfactants, in particular the anionic surfactants of the formulas I. a ti l.f.
  • further surfactants may included non-ionic surfactants.
  • Cationic surfactants or zwitterionic surfactants may be used in special cases but should in general not be used.
  • the fracturing fluid additionally comprises at least one linear or branched aliphatic C4-Ci8-monoalcohol as co-surfactant.
  • co-surfactants have headgroups smaller than the headgroups of the surfactant they are added to, and generally insert into micellar solutions to relieve packing stress as a result of their smaller headgroup size.
  • the monoalcohol co-surfactants have preferably at most one branch. When a plurality of aliphatic C4-Ci8-monoalcohols is present, they have on average preferably at most 0.5 and more preferably at most 0.2 branch.
  • Preferred monoalcohols are linear or branched aliphatic C6-Ci6-monoalcohols, for example, n-hexanol, n-heptanol, n- octanol, n-nonanol, n-decanol, n-undecanol and n-dodecanol.
  • the co- surfactant comprises 2-ethylhexanol or n-octanol.
  • the fracturing fluids comprise advantageously an amount of at least one linear or branched aliphatic monoalcohols as co-surfactant in the range from 0.1 to 20% by weight, preferably from 0.5 to 15% by weight and more preferably from 1 to 8% by weight based on the total weight of the components other than the in the fracturing fluid.
  • the fracturing fluid additionally comprises at least one non-ionic surfactant of the general formula (IV) as additional surfactant
  • R 3 is selected from Ci2-C22-alkyl, Ci2-C22-alkenyl, Ci2-C22-alkynyl, (Cn-C2i-alkyl)- carbonyl, (Cn-C2i-alkenyl)carbonyl and (Cn-C2i-alkynyl)carbonyl, and z 1 and z 2 are each independently an integer from 0 to 20, where the sum of z 1 and z 2 is from 1 to 20.
  • the R 3 radicals of the non-ionic surfactants of the general formula (IV) preferably have on average at most one, more preferably at most 0.5 and in particular at most 0.2 branch.
  • the R 3 radicals are each independently selected from palmityl, stearyl, oleyl, linoleyl, arachidyl, gadoleyl, behenyl, erucyl, isostearyl, 2-hexyydecyl, 2-heptyldecyl, 2- heptylundecyl and 2-octyldodecyl.
  • the non-ionic surfactants have a (poly)alkyleneoxy group which consists of z 1 ethyleneoxy and z 2 propyleneoxy groups joined to one another in any sequence.
  • Non-ionic surfactants of the general formula (IV) used in accordance with the invention are, for example, provided by reacting natural or synthetic mixtures of fatty alcohols and oxo alcohols with ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide. This typically affords mixtures of compounds of the formula (IV) with a different number of alkyleneoxy units. These may be used as mixtures in the inventive compositions.
  • each non-ionic surfactant of the general formula (IV) present in the thickener composition has, for the sum of z 1 and z 2 , a value in the range from 10 to 16 and more preferably a value in the range from 11 to 15.
  • the ratio of z 1 to z 2 averaged over the non-ionic surfactants of the general formula (IV) present is preferably at least 2:1.
  • the (poly)alkyleneoxy groups of the surfactants of the general formula (IV) consist exclusively of ethyleneoxy units and z 2 is therefore especially 0.
  • Embodiments of the non-ionic surfactant may be hydrophilic or hydrophobic in nature. For example, if the number of polyethoxy units (n) attached to the alkyl chain is greater than about 13, the non-ionic surfactant may be considered hydrophilic. If n ⁇ 13, the surfactant may be considered hydrophobic.
  • the pH-value of the fracturing fluid is less than 8, preferably less than about 7 and more preferably less than about 6.
  • the fracturing fluid is pH adjusted to a slight acidic value, using a suitable acid such as hydrochloric acid or acetic acid.
  • the pH of the fracturing fluid is between about 4 and 5, preferably between pH 4 and 4.5.
  • the addition of a polymer associative thickener to the surfactant component of the present invention leads to the formation of interactions between the polymer and the micelles formed by the anionic surfactant and the non-ionic surfactant (if present).
  • the resulting micellar network results in the increase in viscosity of the fracturing fluid.
  • the associative thickener is applied at a concentration below the polymer overlap concentration, c * , preferably at least 0.1 c * , and more preferably within a range of about 0.2 to 0.7 c * .
  • the polymer overlap concentration is obtained by plotting the log of the zero shear viscosity of the polymer fluid as a function of the log of its concentration (without a surfactant component), as defined in United States Patent
  • the curve will define three distinct slopes having two intersecting points, each referred to as a break point. The more dilute break point is the overlap concentration of the polymer, while the less dilute break point is the entanglement concentration.
  • the total amount all surfactant components and the associative thickener together may be varied to achieve a desired viscosity or other properties of the fluid, and may range from 0.1 to 30 wt. %, preferably 0.2 to 10 wt. %.
  • the active material may comprise from about 0.5 wt% to about 5.0 wt% of the fluid.
  • the active material may comprise about 1.0 wt% to about 4.0 wt% of the fluid.
  • the active material may comprise about 2.0 wt% of the fluid.
  • the ratio of the surfactant components to associative thickener may also be varied with successful results.
  • the ratio of the surfactant components to associative thickener in particular the ratio of the anionic and non-ionic surfactant to associative thickener may be about 1 :1 to about 100:1 by weight, preferably 2:1 to 20:1 , more preferably 3:1 to 15:1 and most preferred 5:1 to 12:1. In one further preferred embodiment, the ratio of surfactant to associative thickener may be about 9:1 by weight.
  • the fluids disclosed display particular properties which make them suitable hydraulic fracturing fluids.
  • the fracturing fluid is not viscoelastic.
  • the property of viscoelasticity in general is well known and reference is made to S. Gravsholt, Journal of Coll. And Interface ScL, 57(3), 575 (1976); Hoffmann et al., "Influence of Ionic Surfactants on the Viscoelastic Properties of Zwitterionic Surfactant Solutions", Langmuir, 8, 2140-2146 (1992); and Hoffmann et al., The Rheological Behaviour of Different Viscoelastic Surfactant Solutions, Tenside Surf. Det, 31 , 389-400, 1994.
  • G'>G at some point or over some range of points below about 10 rad/sec, typically between about 0.001 to about 10 rad/sec, more typically between about 0.1 and about 10 rad/sec, at a given temperature and if G'>10 "2 Pascals, preferably 10 "1 Pascals, the fluid is typically considered viscoelastic at that temperature.
  • Rheological measurements such as G' and G" are discussed more fully in "Rheological Measurements", Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, vol. 21 , pp. 347-372, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., N.Y., N.Y., 1997, 4th ed.). These references are expressly incorporated herein by reference, where permitted.
  • a fracturing fluid used in the method of the present invention may be mixed at the surface in a batch or continuous process, and used to treat a wellbore using conventional and well known techniques.
  • the fracturing fluid is mixed at the surface using conventional equipment and techniques.
  • concentrated solutions of the components described herein may be added to a salt solution as a base fluid to achieve the final desired concentrations.
  • the components may be added in any order.
  • the fluid is then thoroughly mixed to achieve the desired viscosity, and a proppant may be added.
  • the fluid is then pumped into a wellbore to create a bottomhole pressure sufficient to open a fracture in the formation.
  • the bottomhole pressure is determined by the surface pressure produced by the surface pumping equipment and the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid column in the wellbore, less any pressure loss caused by friction.
  • the minimum bottomhole pressure required is determined by formation properties and therefore will vary from application to application.
  • the fluid may be used to transport proppants which are well known in the art.
  • the proppants may comprise naturally occurring or man-made particles such as sand, resin- coated proppants, ceramics, bauxite, crushed walnut shells and the like.
  • the fluid may be foamed or energized using well-known and conventional techniques such as those disclosed in US 3,937,283 or US 5,069,283. Particularly high pumping pressures may be required for foamed systems where the hydrostatic pressure is low due to the presence of gas.
  • Foamed systems include foam or energized fluids, and comprise stable mixtures of gas and liquid, which are mainly used in fracturing low pressure or water sensitive formations.
  • Foam and energized fracturing fluids are generally described by their foam quality, i. e. the ratio of gas volume to the foam volume. If the foam quality is between 52% and 95%, the fluid is usually called foam. Above 95%, a foam is generally changed to mist.
  • Stable dispersion of gas in liquid with foam quality less than 52% is typically called energized fluid.
  • energized fluid Stable dispersion of gas in liquid with foam quality less than 52%
  • the term "foamed system” will be used however to describe any stable mixture of gas and liquid, whatever the foam quality is.
  • the foam half-life is another important parameter to evaluate the stability of foam or energized fluids.
  • the half life of a foam or energized fluids is the time necessary for one-half of the liquid used to generate the foam to break out of the foam under atmospheric conditions.
  • Examples of gases which may be used for energizing or foaming the fluid include air, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, Argon or hydrocarbons gaseous under the conditions prevailing in the formation.
  • the fluid may be foamed or energized using ISb and/or CO2 and most preferably using N2.
  • Foamed systems may provide numerous advantages. They expand when they flow back from the well and therefore force the fluid out of the fracture, consequently ensuring a superior clean-up. They typically require less viscosifying agent while presenting good fluid loss control and fluid efficiency. As a result, foamed systems are often cheaper than conventional systems unless the cost benefit due to the use of lower quantities of chemicals is overturned by the need of higher horse power, and consequently of specific pumping equipment.
  • the method of fracturing a subterranean formation according to the invention comprises an additional breaking step after the treatment of the formation with the fracturing fluid.
  • breaking step the viscosity of the fracturing fluid used is reduced in order to enhance back flow of fracturing fluid out of the formation so that the fluid can be removed from the formation into the well more quickly.
  • viscosity reducing components so called “breakers” may be injected into the subterranean formation after the fracturing steps and/or such breakers may be added to the fracturing fluid itself. In the latter case, the effect of the breaker should not set in immediately after preparing the fracturing fluid but the onset of the effect should be delayed.
  • the fracturing fluids of the present invention are sensitive to pH.
  • the pH- sensitivity is very pronounced for fracturing fluids comprising anionic surfactants of formulas I. a to l.f , in particular those wherein the anionic surfactants comprises at least 50 % by weight of anionic surfactants of formula I. a. Therefore, the viscosity of the fracturing fluid may easily be reduced by increasing the pH of the fluid.
  • the pH-value of the fluid may be increased to a value of at least 8, preferably to a pH-value of about 8.
  • a precursor material of a base may be added directly to the fracturing fluid, which upon elapsed time or temperature increase the precursor will undergo a physical or chemical reaction forming an alkaline material, leading to an increase in pH and thus the decomposition of the network structure.
  • the precursor material may comprise an alkaline earth metal oxide such as magnesium or calcium oxide.
  • the respective alkaline hydroxide is formed: such as MgO (s) + H2O (I) -> Mg(OH)2 (l). Since this reaction occurs rapidly upon contact with water it is necessary to delay the process. This can be achieved by decreasing the surface area of the active material utilizing a prill or pellet like formulation.
  • the breaker may comprise magnesium oxide.
  • Magnesium oxides are classified into light burnt magnesium oxide (about 600 0 C to 900 0 C) and hard burnt magnesium oxide (about 1 ,100 0 C to 1 ,500 0 C).
  • the former are generally more reactive.
  • Suitable particles may have a particle size of 1 - 20 ⁇ m, for example 3 to 8 ⁇ m or about 10 ⁇ m.
  • a base releasing breaker in the form of powdered material, in particular MgO in the form of particles may be suspended in a hydrocarbon slurry, e.g. in a mineral oil. Further control over the release can be achieved by addition of retarding agents to the mineral oil slurry.
  • Suitable retarding agents include surface active materials to the mixture to alter the properties of the suspension such as fatty acids, fatty alcohols or alkaline sulfonate salts.
  • surface active materials to the mixture to alter the properties of the suspension
  • Such formulations allow the utilization of an operational setup suitable for the addition of liquid samples as well as the decrease of the impact on health and environment.
  • the viscosifying properties of the fluids of the present invention are based on a network of interlinked surfactant micelles, it is also possible to break the network by dilution of the fluid with water.
  • such breaker surfactants may include non-ionic surfactants based on alkylpolyethylene glycol ethers.
  • the alkyl chain consists of a linear, saturated fatty alcohol, with a chain length of C12 to C25, preferably C14 to Ci ⁇ .
  • the degree of ethoxylation may vary between 10 and 80, and is preferably about 50.
  • the material can be added in solid form (powder or granulates), solution (aqueous), emulsion, encapsulated or as an emulsion of the encapsulated species.
  • the fluid comprises a base releasing breaker but preferably an inert gas such as nitrogen should be used.
  • an inert gas such as nitrogen
  • carbon dioxide may be used for foaming.
  • the fluid fracturing system of the present invention leaves relatively little residue once the viscosity has been broken, whether applied in a foamed system, or not.
  • the amount of residue left by a particular fluid may be determined by permeability regain tests such as those described in the examples below. For a low residue fracturing fluid, a regain permeability of 50% or more is expected, in comparison to values around 25% which are typically observed for a guar-based fluid.
  • Examples - The following examples are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not to be interpreted as limiting the claimed invention in any way.
  • the fracturing fluid comprises a mixture of anionic and nonionic surfactants, a polymer associative thickener and n-octanol as a co-surfactant.
  • Initial performance tests showed a stable gel at a temperature of 70 0 C and significant pH dependence of the obtained viscosities.
  • the polymer (also referred to herein as the associative thickener) consisted of a 25% solution of a reaction mixture comprising the polymers obtained from the reaction of Ci6-Ci ⁇ -alkyl-[(O- (CH 2 ) 2 )i4o]-OH (78% by wt), PEG 12000 (20% by wt) and hexamethylenedi-isocyanate (2% by wt.), in a mixture of 1 ,2-propanediol, iso-propanol and water.
  • the non-ionic surfactant consisted of Ci6-Ci8-alkyl-[(O-(CH 2 ) 2 )i 3 ]-OH.
  • a base fluid comprising a brine solution containing 3% potassium chloride was prepared. It is possible to use lower (e.g. 2%) as well as higher (e.g. 7% or higher) salt concentrations. Ammonium chloride may also be suitable.
  • a specified volume of the base fluid was adjusted to a pH of 4.3 using aqueous solutions of either hydrochloric acid (HCI) or acetic acid (AcOH). Under agitation of the solution by applying an overhead stirrer with an impeller blade at a set speed (usually 1000 rpm), the anionic surfactant (IO), the non-ionic surfactant (Nl) and the associative thickener (AT) were added as individual and diluted solutions.
  • HCI hydrochloric acid
  • AcOH acetic acid
  • the gels were investigated under a constant shear rate of 100 s "1 , applying a temperature ramp that comprises data collection for 60 minutes at each temperature.
  • Table 1 shows the viscosities of a gel prepared from 1.4 w% anionic surfactant (IO), 0.4 w% non-ionic surfactant (Nl) and 0.2 w% associative thickener (AT) in a 3% solution of KCI in water. Aqueous AcOH was added to obtain a pH of 4.3. The rheological properties at a certain temperature were studied in dependence on the order of addition of the components. Table 1
  • the influence of the hydrophilicity of the non-ionic surfactant was investigated by preparing a premixed solution of varying amounts of surfactant components which differ in the number of polyethoxy units (n) attached to the alkyl chain.
  • the total amount of non-ionic surfactant was kept constant at 0.3 w%, the amount of anionic surfactant at 1.5 w% and the associative thickener at 0.2 w% active material.
  • Table 3 The results given in Table 3 are also depicted in Figure 1.
  • the fracturing fluid comprises one anionic surfactant, a polymer associative thickener, and a co-surfactant.
  • the thickener and co-surfactant were identical to that used in Example 1.
  • an acid or base component was used to provide the optimal pH of the brine solution.
  • the acid is selected from, for example, HCI or AcOH.
  • the base is selected from, for example, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH).
  • the gel preparation is similar to the manner described in Example 1 , i.e., adding the anionic surfactant and the associative thickener (AT) as individual and diluted solutions. The order of addition (subsequently or simultaneously) does not appear to be detrimental to the resulting performance of the gel. Unless otherwise stated, the added quantities were based on a total amount of 2 w% of active material, whereby the ratio of surfactant to thickener was 9:1. Unless otherwise stated, the gels were prepared in a 3% KCI solution, and the pH adjusted to 4.3 using aqueous AcOH. In order to ensure the presence of a homogeneous mixture, the samples were stirred for two minutes.
  • the preferred base fluid is a brine solution containing 3% potassium chloride
  • Table 6 shows the temperature dependent viscosities at a shear rate of 100 S "1 for fluids prepared with different amounts of potassium chloride. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other monovalent and divalent salts, such as ammonium chloride or calcium chloride, may also be suitable. The obtained values show that the fluid can be applied across a broad range of salinity that allows the use of base fluids with higher brine contents.
  • Table 7 provides examples for the performance of fluids prepared using different acidic compounds for the adjustment of the pH.
  • the pH of the fluid was measured with a HoribaTM pH meter.
  • the pH and the amount of acid/base used significantly influences the gel properties and the speed of the gelation process.
  • temperature dependent rheology was investigated for various amounts of acid added to the mixture.
  • the fluid tolerates a deviation in pH and is thus applicable over a greater range (Table 9).
  • the variation of pH allows optimization of the fluid properties towards the application at a certain temperature range.
  • the optimum pH for an application of higher temperatures is 4.3-4.5.
  • the polymer-to-anionic surfactant ratio is 1 :9, with a total of 0.2 w% active material within the fluid.
  • the influence of the amount of polymer associative thickener on the performance of the fluid was investigated by increasing the active amount of the associative thickener in the fluid, while maintaining the amount of the anionic surfactant constant.
  • the speed of the gelation process was enhanced by increasing in the amount of associative thickener.
  • the performance of the resulting fluids with respect to their rheological properties varies upon changes to the ratio surfactant - thickener and an optimum value can be defined depending on the desired applicable temperature range.
  • Table 1 1 1 show that the system is robust and tolerates deviation from preferred ratios.
  • the alkyl-residue of the anionic surfactant may vary in length and saturation. Depending on the choice of the surfactant component, the available temperature range of the fluid can be attenuated. Generally, anionic surfactants with a lower polarity provide an enhanced high temperature performance.
  • Table 12 [00157] Table 13 shows the values obtained when investigating the influence of increasing the amount of associative thickener in the fluid that was obtained using a 5:1 ratio of more (Nl(+)) and less (Nl(-)) hydrophilic anionic surfactants. It can be summarized that the loss in gel strength due to the decreased hydrophilicity can be compensated by altering the ratio of surfactant and thickener.
  • the concentrated solution of the associative thickener can influence the gelation process due to the primed formation of the micellar network.
  • the mixtures were prepared using an undiluted sample of the anionic surfactant to the thickener solution (which is a solution of AT and co- surfactant). A homogeneous mixture was achieved by agitation and the application of an external heat source.
  • the amount of surfactant that can be premixed with the thickener is limited due to the increasing strength of the network and thus increasing viscosity of the concentrate.
  • the percentage reflects the amount of surfactant premixed with thickener with respect to the total amount of surfactant added to the gel. Premixing 13% of the total amount of surfactant with the thickener compound yielded the best overall performance when investigating the viscosities of the fluids at temperatures between 20 and 50 0 C (Table 14).
  • the anionic surfactant compound is soluble in water at a pH higher than 3.
  • alternative solvents and solvent mixtures can be applied.
  • the concentration of the surfactant solution and the solvents used influence the gel strength and thus the performance of the fluid as fracturing treatment fluid. Consequently, gelation times and gel properties of various fluids were investigated upon addition of surfactant solutions in various solvents.
  • suitable solvents include iso-propanol, 1 ,2-propandiol, ethanol, and aqueous mixtures of thereof.
  • Table 15 provides an example for the application of different iso- propanol (iPrOH)/water mixtures as solvents for the surfactant component and the strengths of the resulting fluids.
  • a viable fracturing fluid system has to be applicable using different grades of water that may differ in quality.
  • the gel performance of fluids prepared with water from different sources was investigated.
  • the gels were prepared using 1.8 w% anionic surfactant and 0.2 w% associative thickener. Apart from the "field water” sample that was premixed with 3% KCI, brine was added prior to the gellant components. In all three cases, the same amount of buffer was required in order to adjust the pH to 4.3-4.5.
  • the results confirm that the system is applicable under conditions present in field operations (Table 20).
  • Tap water is Calgary tap water
  • Dl is deionised Calgary tap water
  • field water may be highly variable depending on its source and method of transport.
  • Table 22 summarizes the results obtained using a powdered form of light burnt magnesium oxide (MgO) material (bulk density - 352 kg/m 3 , particle size - 3 to 8 ⁇ m, surface area - 20-30 m/g).
  • MgO light burnt magnesium oxide
  • MgO MgO
  • break times at elevated temperatures are commonly observed by immersing the fracturing fluid in a water or oil bath at the desired temperature immediately after addition of the breaker material.
  • temperature studies in the field have shown that the increase in temperature of the fluid is delayed for several minutes due to the high rate with which the fluid is pumped down the wellbore.
  • a comparative study revealed a considerable increase in the duration of the break upon delay of the temperature increase.
  • Table 29 shows the results obtained when measuring the duration of the break of the network applying different loadings of a neat alkylpolyethylene glycol ether (APG) to the fracturing fluid.
  • APG neat alkylpolyethylene glycol ether
  • the effective break time can be triggered either by variation of the
  • alkylpolyethylene glycol ethers Table 30 shows values obtained investigating two different species that differ in the degree of ethoxylation.
  • the surfactant breaker may be formulated in a variety of different manners.
  • An encapsulated form of the surfactant breaker (10 w% active in an inert matrix) can be applied as is shown in Table 31.
  • regain permeability refers to the degree to which a permeability of a formation that has been treated with a fracturing fluid differs from the original permeability of the subterranean formation.
  • An ideal completion fluid from a regain permeability perspective, has a regain permeability at low drawdown pressure (1-2% of maximum) which matches that of the original undamaged baseline measurements, indicating no permanent damage has been caused. Due to the water-solubility of all components, the use of an embodiment of the fracturing fluid described herein may result in improved clean-up properties and reduced loss of the components into the formation or the sand pack.
  • the objective of the fluid evaluation or leak off test described in this example is to provide an evaluation of the total effect of the completion fluid system on the formation.
  • a regain permeability apparatus was equipped with a core sample from the Bakken formation and placed in an oven that was set to the formation temperature of 69 0 C.
  • the sample was rich in carbonates and its dimensions were length - 5.70 cm, diameter - 3.77 cm and pore volume - 6.11 cm 3 .
  • the permeability was very low, 0.04 millidarcies air permeability, much lower than average oil reservoirs.
  • regain permeability to oil was being measured and therefore, in order to ensure representative test conditions, the core was brought to its original state by reconditioning it in oil from the respective formation for a period of six weeks prior to the experiment.
  • the testing parameters were chosen as follows: fracture pressure - 23240 kPa, pore pressure - 1 1000 kPa, net overburden pressure - 16158 kPa.
  • the baseline permeability as well as the regain permeability measurements were taken in the forward direction, whereas the fracturing fluid was circulated in the reverse direction.
  • composition of the fracturing fluid was based on a target viscosity of 150 - 200 cP (at 100 s- 1) and a reduction of the viscosity to ⁇ 15 cP (at 100 s-1 ) within four hours.
  • the gel was prepared similar to the manner described in Example 2. 2.1 w% of the anionic surfactant and a premixed solution of 0.3 w% of the anionic surfactant and 0.3 w% of the associative thickener (AT) were added subsequently to an aqueous solution containing 5.25% potassium chloride. In addition, a suspension of 0.15 w% magnesium oxide and 0.15 w% mineral oil were added.
  • the fluids were applied separately with the thickener being partially premixed with 20% of the total amount of active surfactant.
  • the base fluid - a 5.5% solution of potassium chloride in water - was supplied in bulk trucks.
  • the potassium chloride solution had a slightly red colour which indicated somewhat higher iron content compared to tap water.
  • the fluid was applied as energized system.
  • the aqueous fluid was foamed with nitrogen with the initial foam quality being set to 80% and the clean fluid-gas ratio being subsequently decreased to 3:5 (60% foam quality) on the last proppant stage.
  • the wellbores were flushed with 100% nitrogen.
  • the foamed fluid was pumped into the formation at a programmed rate of 5.5 m 3 /min down 114.3 mm casing.
  • the total treatment volumes indicated that 20.7 m 3 and 19.4 m 3 of fluid were pumped into the formations.
  • Figure 8 shows a treatment report for one of the two wells. It shows the surface treatment pressure, as well as the sand concentration on the surface. The data obtained during the treatment indicated that the amount of proppant placed in the formation matched the volume of the created fracture and thus confirms the success of the treatment.
  • Figure 8 represents the data obtained for the field test described in Example

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Emulsifying, Dispersing, Foam-Producing Or Wetting Agents (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention porte sur un procédé de fracturation de formations souterraines qui comporte l'utilisation d'un fluide pauvre en résidus, ce qui facilite la purification du puits de forage après le traitement. Le système comprend un tensioactif qui forme des micelles au-delà d'une concentration critique. Dans certaines conditions, l'ajout d'un épaississant associatif produit un réseau fondé sur des interactions hydrophobes. Le fluide visqueux obtenu peut transporter des agents de soutènement, peut être appliqué pur ou sous forme de système expansé ou énergisé, ou peut être utilisé dans le cadre d'un traitement acidifiant. Le procédé peut également comprendre une étape de fissuration.
EP09781297A 2009-07-30 2009-07-30 Procédé de fracturation de formations souterraines Withdrawn EP2459673A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/EP2009/059879 WO2011012164A1 (fr) 2009-07-30 2009-07-30 Procédé de fracturation de formations souterraines

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2459673A1 true EP2459673A1 (fr) 2012-06-06

Family

ID=42034582

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09781297A Withdrawn EP2459673A1 (fr) 2009-07-30 2009-07-30 Procédé de fracturation de formations souterraines

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2459673A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN102575153A (fr)
EA (1) EA201290070A1 (fr)
MX (1) MX2012001198A (fr)
UA (1) UA106084C2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2011012164A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2013265546A1 (en) 2012-05-23 2014-11-20 Basf Se Process for water wetting oil-wet surfaces
US9689244B2 (en) 2012-05-23 2017-06-27 Basf Se Process for water wetting oil-wet surfaces
CN102925121B (zh) * 2012-11-06 2014-03-19 中国石油大学(华东) 一种多功能钻井液处理剂及其制备方法
RU2015133968A (ru) 2013-01-14 2017-02-16 Басф Се Способ разрыва подземных пластов
RU2658686C2 (ru) * 2013-02-04 2018-06-22 Басф Се Способ обработки подземных нефтеносных пластов, содержащих карбонатные породы
FR3004458A1 (fr) * 2013-04-11 2014-10-17 Rhodia Operations Fluides de fracturation a base de polymeres associatifs et de tensioactifs labiles
CN104232045B (zh) * 2013-06-17 2017-02-15 中国石油化工股份有限公司 复合型表面活性剂组合物、制备方法及应用
CN103468236B (zh) * 2013-08-16 2016-01-06 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 一种含有丁烷的压裂液及其制备方法
CA2919053C (fr) 2013-09-26 2019-04-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Traitements sequentiels par agent tensioactif pour ameliorer la recuperation de fluide de fracturation
CA2980942A1 (fr) 2015-03-24 2016-09-29 Celine Schiff-Deb Compositions de micro-algues et leurs utilisations
EP3280779A1 (fr) 2015-04-09 2018-02-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Nanocompositions encapsulées pour augmenter la récupération d'hydrocarbures
CN106590592B (zh) * 2015-10-20 2019-11-08 中国石油化工股份有限公司 提高原油采收率的复合表面活性剂
US10125307B2 (en) 2016-01-13 2018-11-13 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Stabilization of petroleum surfactants for enhancing oil recovery
WO2018086984A1 (fr) 2016-11-10 2018-05-17 Basf Corporation Procédé permettant d'augmenter la production d'hydrocarbures à partir de réservoirs pétrolifères
EA201991006A1 (ru) * 2016-11-29 2020-02-03 Родиа Оперейшнс Полимерные системы для дисперсии частиц
EP3330341A1 (fr) 2016-12-01 2018-06-06 Basf Se Procédé de fracturation de formations souterraines
WO2019034472A1 (fr) 2017-08-17 2019-02-21 Basf Se Procédé pour le transport et le stockage de fibres
WO2019034476A1 (fr) 2017-08-17 2019-02-21 Basf Se Procédé pour produire des formulations liquides renfermant des fibres
CN107794031B (zh) * 2017-11-06 2020-10-16 北京九尊能源技术股份有限公司 一种适用于低压贫含水煤层气井的氮气泡沫压裂液体系
CA3004675A1 (fr) * 2018-05-11 2019-11-11 Fluid Energy Group Ltd. Composition d'inhibition de la corrosion novatrice et methode de fracturation

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2383355A (en) * 2001-12-22 2003-06-25 Schlumberger Holdings An aqueous viscoelastic fluid containing hydrophobically modified polymer and viscoelastic surfactant
WO2008065173A2 (fr) * 2006-11-30 2008-06-05 Basf Se Composition épaississante
CN101541705B (zh) * 2006-11-30 2014-10-08 巴斯夫欧洲公司 pH调节的增稠剂体系
CA2652489C (fr) * 2008-02-04 2014-06-03 Sanjel Corporation Fluide de fracturation a faible teneur en residu et methode d'utilisation

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2011012164A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MX2012001198A (es) 2012-03-21
UA106084C2 (uk) 2014-07-25
CN102575153A (zh) 2012-07-11
EA201290070A1 (ru) 2012-08-30
WO2011012164A1 (fr) 2011-02-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2652489C (fr) Fluide de fracturation a faible teneur en residu et methode d'utilisation
EP2459673A1 (fr) Procédé de fracturation de formations souterraines
US7989404B2 (en) Compositions and methods for gas well treatment
AU2011306712B2 (en) Tethered polymers used to enhance the stability of microemulsion fluids
US7303019B2 (en) Viscoelastic surfactant fluids and associated diverting methods
US7159659B2 (en) Viscoelastic surfactant fluids and associated acidizing methods
US7299874B2 (en) Viscoelastic surfactant fluids and associated methods
CN106795750A (zh) 用于井处理操作的转向系统
CN105916959A (zh) 使用液氨的压裂方法
US20140166291A1 (en) Surfactant system as a self-diverted acid for well stimulation
WO2015135777A2 (fr) Procédé pour la production de pétrole et/ou de gaz
CA2547919C (fr) Gels tensioactifs viscoelastiques presentant une concentration reduite en sel
WO2007121056A1 (fr) Utilisation de glycols et de polyols dans la stabilisation de fluides gélifiés par un tensioactif viscoélastique
US20230023003A1 (en) Viscoelastic surfactant-based treatment fluids for use with lost circulation materials
MX2007010058A (es) Fluidos surfactantes viscoelasticos y metodos de acidificacion asociados.
US20150203743A1 (en) Methods for treating subterranean formations
WO2024112838A1 (fr) Formulations de tensioactif viscoélastique et leur utilisation dans des formations souterraines
WO2024112840A1 (fr) Formulations de tensioactif viscoélastique et leur utilisation dans des formations souterraines
US20240182778A1 (en) Viscoelastic surfactant formulations and use in subterranean formations
Wang Well productivity enhancement of high temperature heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120229

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20140428

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20150821