EP2448807A1 - Procédé et système pour assister un conducteur d un véhicule pendant la conduite - Google Patents

Procédé et système pour assister un conducteur d un véhicule pendant la conduite

Info

Publication number
EP2448807A1
EP2448807A1 EP09846892A EP09846892A EP2448807A1 EP 2448807 A1 EP2448807 A1 EP 2448807A1 EP 09846892 A EP09846892 A EP 09846892A EP 09846892 A EP09846892 A EP 09846892A EP 2448807 A1 EP2448807 A1 EP 2448807A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
guiding force
steering
steering device
force
vehicle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP09846892A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2448807B1 (fr
EP2448807A4 (fr
Inventor
Jan-Inge Svensson
Jochen Pohl
Sten Ragnhult
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Volvo Truck Corp
Original Assignee
Hulten Johan
Volvo Lastvagnar AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hulten Johan, Volvo Lastvagnar AB filed Critical Hulten Johan
Publication of EP2448807A1 publication Critical patent/EP2448807A1/fr
Publication of EP2448807A4 publication Critical patent/EP2448807A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2448807B1 publication Critical patent/EP2448807B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B62—LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
    • B62D—MOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
    • B62D15/00—Steering not otherwise provided for
    • B62D15/02—Steering position indicators ; Steering position determination; Steering aids
    • B62D15/025—Active steering aids, e.g. helping the driver by actively influencing the steering system after environment evaluation
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60K—ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PROPULSION UNITS OR OF TRANSMISSIONS IN VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENT OR MOUNTING OF PLURAL DIVERSE PRIME-MOVERS IN VEHICLES; AUXILIARY DRIVES FOR VEHICLES; INSTRUMENTATION OR DASHBOARDS FOR VEHICLES; ARRANGEMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH COOLING, AIR INTAKE, GAS EXHAUST OR FUEL SUPPLY OF PROPULSION UNITS IN VEHICLES
    • B60K31/00—Vehicle fittings, acting on a single sub-unit only, for automatically controlling vehicle speed, i.e. preventing speed from exceeding an arbitrarily established velocity or maintaining speed at a particular velocity, as selected by the vehicle operator
    • B60K31/0008—Vehicle fittings, acting on a single sub-unit only, for automatically controlling vehicle speed, i.e. preventing speed from exceeding an arbitrarily established velocity or maintaining speed at a particular velocity, as selected by the vehicle operator including means for detecting potential obstacles in vehicle path
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T8/00—Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
    • B60T8/17—Using electrical or electronic regulation means to control braking
    • B60T8/1755—Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve
    • B60T8/17557—Brake regulation specially adapted to control the stability of the vehicle, e.g. taking into account yaw rate or transverse acceleration in a curve specially adapted for lane departure prevention
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B62—LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
    • B62D—MOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
    • B62D15/00—Steering not otherwise provided for
    • B62D15/02—Steering position indicators ; Steering position determination; Steering aids
    • B62D15/025—Active steering aids, e.g. helping the driver by actively influencing the steering system after environment evaluation
    • B62D15/0265—Automatic obstacle avoidance by steering
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T2201/00—Particular use of vehicle brake systems; Special systems using also the brakes; Special software modules within the brake system controller
    • B60T2201/08—Lane monitoring; Lane Keeping Systems
    • B60T2201/087—Lane monitoring; Lane Keeping Systems using active steering actuation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to method and a system for assisting a driver of a vehicle during operation in order to avoid an undesired situation based on a current driving scenario.
  • the undesired situation may for example represent a departure from a desired future trajectory of the vehicle.
  • the invention is applicable for so-called lane keeping of a vehicle during operation.
  • a current driving scenario that represents an unintentional lane departure may be determined based on the vehicle's position, direction and/or orientation with respect to a traffic lane (or road edge) .
  • systems known which are configured for monitoring the course of the traffic lane ahead of the vehicle, such as by monitoring lane markings using a vision system.
  • the lane keeping support system is preferably configured to provide such guiding force only in situations in which the supply of such guiding force to the steering device is deemed to be appropriate after analysis of all input data, such as the course of the traffic lane ahead ' of the vehicle, further vehicles on the road and a predicted driving behaviour of the vehicle.
  • the guiding force exerted onto the steering device is resistive if counteracting the force applied by the driver onto the steering device, or supportive if acting in the same direction as the force applied by the driver onto the steering device, thus for instance reducing the effect of e.g. frictional forces acting on the wheels and the like which are experienced by the driver as resistance when operating the steering device.
  • the steering device is normally formed by a conventional steering wheel in the case of a vehicle.
  • the invention is applicable to other steering devices, such as a joystick, a sliding nipple or any other suitable steering device for steering the vehicle.
  • the guiding force will appear as a guiding torque exerted onto the steering wheel.
  • the* guiding torque applied to the steering wheel is automatically limited to the allowed limit during an intervention.
  • such automatic limitation may lead to that the intervention is unsuccessful since the intervention could not be carried out to the desired extent.
  • One object of the invention is to achieve a method for assisting a driver which creates conditions for a further improved safety during operation, especially in case there is a predefined limit for the amount of the guiding force.
  • the total guiding force comprising the first guiding force would be applied to the steering device during an intervention for avoiding the undesired situation.
  • the intervention is performed during a driver steering operation.
  • the guiding force applied is only supportive, i.e. it is limited to such an extent that the driver still has full authority to steer the vehicle.
  • the system may be configured to take control of the vehicle and in the case of lane keeping, return it to a safe position in the original lane. In this way, a decision is made in advance, i.e. before an intervention is started, whether the intervention can be carried out to an extent leading entirely to the desired result. It has been acknowledged that in some- cases it might be better not to apply the first guiding force at all than having to interrupt the intervention.
  • starting an intervention may provide the driver with a false appearance of safety since the supportive guiding force applied may not be sufficient
  • the total guiding force may comprise solely the first guiding force.
  • the method comprises the steps of determining a second guiding force based on at least one guiding force operation model, and determining the predicted total
  • ⁇ ⁇ guiding force as a sum of the first . guiding force and the second guiding force.
  • said second guiding force may be determined in accordance with other steering aspects, such as providing a certain steering feel to the operator, see further below.
  • This example creates conditions for continuously controlling the guiding force applied to the steering device based on the second guiding force and only during said operation to avoid the undesired situation control the guiding ⁇ force also based on the first guiding force.
  • the method comprises the step of deciding to not apply said predicted total guiding force if it exceeds the limit value. Instead, it may be decided in advance to apply a limited total guiding force. Especially, the first guiding force, which is determined for avoiding the undesired situation (such as lane departure) may be cancelled all together.
  • the method comprises the step of deciding to apply said predicted total guiding force only if it is estimated to be suffi-cient for entirely avoiding the undesired situation.
  • the method comprises the steps of
  • This embodiment creates conditions for using an Electrical Power Assisted Steering (EPAS) system.
  • EPAS Electrical Power Assisted Steering
  • the method is applicable in steering systems where there is a mechanical connection between the steering device and the ground but where the inherent steering feel resulting > from the mechanical connection during operation is eliminated or at least suppressed.
  • a guiding force (the second guiding force above) is continuously determined during operation so that the driver experiences a desired feel in the steering device instead of the inherent steering feel resulting from the mechanical connection.
  • the inherent mechanical friction in the actual steering arrangement depends on different operational conditions, such as manufacturing tolerances, wear, temperature, age etc.
  • this embodiment creates conditions fordecoupling the hardware (mechanical connection) from the friction steering feel.
  • the embodiment creates conditions for an application- independent (hardware-independent) friction steering feel.
  • said at least one guiding force operation model comprises at least one desired steering characteristic parameter.
  • the steering characteristic parameter can be a guiding force influencing operational parameter.
  • Said at least one desired steering characteristic parameter is preferably formed by vehicle lateral acceleration.
  • a further object of the invention is to achieve a system for assisting a driver which creates conditions for a further improved safety during operation, especially in case there is a predefined limit for the amount of the guiding force.
  • This object is achieved by the system defined in claim 19.
  • a system comprising a means for predicting if a first guiding force to a vehicle steering device is desired in order to avoid said undesired situation, a means for predicting a total guiding force comprising the first guiding force, which would be applied to the steering device for avoiding the undesired situation and for comparing the predicted total guiding force with a limit value in order to in advance deciding whether to apply said predicted total guiding force to the steering device for avoiding the undesired situation or not if the predicted total guiding force exceeds the limit value.
  • the system comprises a means for determining a second guiding force based on at least one steering device guiding force operation model, and a means determining the predicted total guiding force as a sum of the first guiding force and the second guiding force.
  • said second guiding force may be determined in accordance with other steering aspects, such as providing a certain steering feel to the operator.
  • said at least one guiding force operation model comprises at least one desired steering characteristic parameter.
  • the model can be designed to represent a nominal vehicle.
  • said at least one desired steering characteristic parameter comprises at least one of damping of steering device movements, tire friction, self alignment of the steering device to a neutral position and friction in a mechanical connection between the steering device and the wheels.
  • the system comprises a mechanical connection between the steering device and the wheels for a mechanical transmission of steering signals from the steering device to the wheels, a means for decoupling a driver steering feel from the influence of the mechanical connection and for providing the driver with a desired steering feel based on the determined total guiding force.
  • a delivered steering device guiding force is measured and compared with an estimated desired steering device guiding force, wherein the delivered steering device guiding force is adapted by use of a feedback controller to be substantially the same as the desired steering device guiding force through adapting the amount of said guiding force-.
  • FIG 1 schematically shows a .system for performing the inventive method according to one
  • FIG 2 shows the system in figure 1, in which certain steering characteristics in a guiding force operation model have been modified
  • FIG 3 schematically shows a work flow for the
  • FIG 4 schematically shows a work flow for the
  • FIG 5-6 shows an embodiment for a friction model.
  • FIG 1 schematically shows a system 1 for performing a control method according to one embodiment.
  • the system 1 comprises a mechanical steering arrangement 2, which may be of a conventional type.
  • the mechanical steering arrangement 2 comprises a steering device 3 in the form of a steering wheel, at least one ground engagement member 4 in the form of a wheel and a mechanical connection 5 between the steering wheel 3 and the wheels 4 for transmission of steering signals from the steering wheel 3 to the wheels 4.
  • the steering wheel 3 is arranged in a vehicle passenger compartment and manually operated by the driver of the vehicle to steer the wheels 4.
  • the steering arrangement 2 comprises a steering linkage means 6 extending from the steering wheel 3 down to a Hydraulic Power Assisted System (HPAS) 7 for converting angular rotation in the steering linkage 6 to a linear movement via a steering member 8.
  • the steering linkage means 6 comprises an electric steering gear.
  • the HPAS may be of conventional type comprising a hydraulic cylinder (not shown) and a torsion bar (not shown) .
  • the steering member 8 is coupled on opposite ends to a left and right wheel 4 and configured to turn the wheels 4 in response to steering signals from the steering wheel 3.
  • the system 1 further comprises an actuator 9 to provide supported adjustment of the steering angle.
  • the actuator 9 is preferably formed .by an electric motor.
  • the actuator 9 provides a guiding force, and more specifically a guiding torque, or assist torque, to the steering assembly for assisting the driver in steering the steering wheel.
  • the electric motor may be arranged around a steering column in the steering arrangement 2, wherein the magnetic field acts directly on the steering column.
  • the electric motor may be arranged beside the steering column and act on the ⁇ steering column via a mechanical linkage, preferably via pinion gears .
  • the system 1 further comprises a torque-measuring device, or sensor, 10 for measuring a manual torque applied by the driver to the steering wheel.
  • the torque-measuring device 10 is of elastic constitution and preferably comprises a torsion bar.
  • a steering wheel angle is measured via the torsion bar.
  • the electric steering gear comprises said torsion bar.
  • the torque sensor 10 detects, as the steering torque applied to the steering wheel, a relative displacement in a circumferential direction• which is generated between the upper and lower shafts of the steering shaft turning about the axis of the steering wheel according to turn of the steering wheel with twist of the torsion bar interposed between the upper and lower shafts.
  • a steering torque is determined by measuring the twist of the torsion bar in the steering arrangement. More precisely, a first angular sensor is arranged at a first end of the torsion bar and a second angular sensor is arranged at a second end of the torsion bar (opposite the first end) .
  • the steering torque can be determined based on the relative angular movement (twist) of the torsion bar and the stiffness of the torsion bar. According to an alternative, one or several strain gauges may be used.
  • the system 1 further comprises an Electrical Power Assisted Steering (EPAS) system 11.
  • the EPAS 11 comprises a regulating loop 12, which is configured to achieve a torque-free steering.
  • the regulating loop 12 is configured to receive an input signal indicative of a current steering torque in the steering wheel 3.
  • the input signal is received from the torque-measuring device 10.
  • the regulating loop 12 is configured to output a signal to the actuator 9 so that said torque free steering is achieved.
  • the regulating loop 12 comprises a controller, or regulator, 27 which comprises a filter function.
  • the filter function may be based on an inverse model of the steering dynamics of the present vehicle.
  • the regulator 27 may be configured to reduce errors. in the model and to reduce disturbances and measurement noise in order to reduce the risk of instability in the system.
  • the regulator 27 is configured to receive a signal indicative of a torque to be applied to the steering arrangement via the electric motor and in response thereto produce an output signal.
  • the regulating loop 12 further comprises an electric motor control means 28, which is configured to receive the output signal indicative of a torque from the regulator 27 and produce a signal with a corresponding current value to the electric motor.
  • the regulator 27 and the electric motor control means 28 are combined in a single controller.
  • the EPAS further comprises a controlling function 13, below referred to as a reference generator, which is configured to determine a desired torque to be applied to the steering wheel in order to provide the driver with a desired steering feel.
  • the reference generator describes a nominal vehicle.
  • the reference generator 13 is operatively connected to the regulating loop 12 and outputs a signal indicative of a desired steering torque.
  • the regulating loop is configured to compare the desired steering torque to the actual, current steering torque and continuously adapt the output signal to the actuator so that the desired steering torque is transmitted to the driver.
  • the actuator is controlled so that it applies the difference in torque between the desired torque value from the reference generator and the current actual torque in the steering assembly so that the actual torque is controlled to substantially equal the desired torque.
  • the reference generator 13 comprises at least one steering device guiding force operation model and in the example in figure 1 a plurality of guiding force operation models 14,15,16,17,18.
  • the guiding force operation model preferably comprises a mathematical model.
  • the model (s) is designed in a way to achieve a desired steering feel in the steering device.
  • the model (s) can be designed in different ways for different vehicle types and/or for different desired steering feels.
  • each model comprises at least one desired steering characteristic parameter. More specifically, each model is configured to produce a guiding torque value T for one desired and predetermined steering characteristic parameter based on at least one input 19.
  • the steering characteristic parameter is a guiding force influencing operational parameter.
  • Each model comprises a mathematical function, wherein the torque value is determined as a function of a value of the input, see illustrated examples of the functions in figure 1.
  • the reference generator comprises models for the following steering characteristic parameters: vehicle lateral acceleration, damping of steering device movements, tire friction, self alignment of the steering* device to a neutral position and friction in the mechanical connection between the steering device and the wheels.
  • the signals input to the reference generator comprises a at least one signal indicative of a steering intent of the driver, such as a steering wheel angle ( ⁇ ) and a rate of change of the steering wheel angle (d ⁇ /dt) .
  • the signal indicative of a steering intent may be an electric motor angle or a wheel angle.
  • the signal indicative of a steering intent may be a rate of change of the electric motor angle or a rate of change of the wheel angle.
  • the signals input to the reference generator comprises at least one signal indicative of a vehicle body motion, such as lateral acceleration (Ay) and/or yaw rate.
  • a vehicle body motion such as lateral acceleration (Ay) and/or yaw rate.
  • a vehicle body motion may be sensed by a sensor arranged in the vehicle.
  • the vehicle lateral acceleration model 14 represents a predetermined relationship between a guiding torque value- and the current lateral acceleration for achieving a desired steering feel.
  • the model 14 receives a signal indicative of a current lateral acceleration as an input signal.
  • the torque value increases dramatically for small input values of the lateral acceleration. Further, the torque value increases substantially less for larger input values of the lateral acceleration. In other words, the curve flattens out.
  • the vehicle lateral acceleration model 14 is preferably a pure t statical mapping. According to a preferred example, the vehicle lateral acceleration is the most important steering characteristic parameter.
  • the damping model 15 represents a predetermined relationship between a guiding torque value and the current steering wheel speed for achieving a desired steering feel. Thus, the damping model 15 preferably receives a signal indicative of a steering wheel speed
  • the torque value increases dramatically for small input values of the steering wheel speed. Further, the torque value increases substantially less for larger input values of the steering wheel speed. In other words, the curve flattens out.
  • the damping model 15 is preferably a pure statical mapping.
  • the torque value output from the damping model is configured to act in an opposite direction with regard to the current steering wheel speed.
  • the damping model is preferably designed so that the resulting torque is smaller for higher steering wheel speeds and higher for smaller steering wheel speeds. In this way, the damping torque is proportional to the steering wheel angle speed during normal driving and limited to a maximum value during parking or evasive manouevres .
  • the self ⁇ alignment model 17 represents a predetermined relationship between a guiding torque value and the current steering wheel angle for achieving a desired steering feel.
  • self alignment of the steering device to a neutral position is meant an active return, i.e. the return of the released steering wheel to a central setting.
  • the self alignment model 17 preferably receives a signal indicative of the steering wheel angle and a signal indicative of vehicle speed as input signals.
  • the purpose of the vehicle speed input signal is to be able to modulate the desired aligning torque with the current vehicle speed in a way that the self alignment torque can be reduced during high speed driving.
  • the tire model 16 comprises a hysteresis curve, which represents a tire model.
  • the model 16 is a dynamic model of an unrolling tire with regard to steering torque.
  • the relation between the steering wheel angle and the torque is given by a physical relationship, where the deflection of individual rubber elements is modeled dependent on the differential angle of the steering wheel and the torsion and relaxation of the rubber elements due to the rolling tire.
  • the resulting model yields thus a smaller hysteresis effect with increasing vehicle speed and constant steering wheel angle frequency.
  • the inventive method creates conditions for canceling the actual friction effect in the steering wheel resulting from the actual steering arrangement and instead applying a desired resistance torque to the steering wheel, which represents a nominal friction feel for the driver.
  • the hardware mechanical steering arrangement
  • the invention creates conditions an application-independent (hardware- independent) friction steering feel.
  • the tire friction model 16 and the mechanical connection friction model 18 are in principle similar to each other.
  • the tire friction model 16 represents the friction between the tire and the ground while the mechanical connection friction model 18' represents the friction in the upper steering wheel steering column assembly.
  • the friction coefficient in the mechanical connection friction model 18 is higher than in the tire friction model 16.
  • the tire friction model 16 preferably receives a signal indicative of a steering wheel angle and a signal indicative of vehicle speed.
  • the mechanical connection friction model 18 preferably receives a signal indicative of a steering wheel angle.
  • Figures 5-6 show in more detail an example of the friction model 16,18.
  • the value of the steering wheel angle ⁇ is input to a first box 501 representing a stiffness K, which corresponds to a lumped . spring stiffness in Nm/Rad.
  • the resulting value from the first box 501 is input to a second box 503 representing a derivative as indicated by the Laplace operator s .
  • the derived steering wheel angle signal i.e. the steering wheel angle speed multiplied with the stiffness K is passed into a third>box 505 representing an integrating function with anti windup functionality, indicated through the integrational limits and the inverse of the laplace transformator .
  • the limit values are chosen in order to limit the frictional torque to the desired maximum and minimum values.
  • the mentioned anti-windup functionality is intended to cease integration once the integrational limits are reached.
  • the resulting value from the second box 503 is input to a third box 505 representing an integrator w for Anti Windup.
  • the relationship between the steering wheel angle ⁇ and the output torque value is shown in figure 6.
  • the steering characteristic model (s) 14,15,16,17,18 is preferably designed so that a different steering characteristic parameter takes precedence over the others in different driving scenarios.
  • the lateral acceleration is configured to take precedence over the other steering characteristic parameters during driving in high speed.
  • steering system friction and tire friction are configured to take precedence over the other steering characteristic parameters during driving in low speed.
  • the damping force is equally active regardless of vehicle speed.
  • the self alignment is configured to take precedence over the other steering characteristic parameters during driving in an intermediate speed interval between the high speed and the low speed.
  • the system 1 further comprises a safety function 21 in the form of a lane keeping control • function.
  • the lane keeping control function 21 is configured to avoid a departure from an intended desired future trajectory of the vehicle *
  • the lane keeping function 21 is configured to predict if a first guiding force to a vehicle steering device is sufficient in order to avoid an unintentional lane departure based on a current driving scenario. More specifically, the lane keeping control function 21 receives at least one input 22,23,24 indicative of the current driving scenario and responsively determines an output torque value 25.
  • the lane keeping control function 21 comprises a lane monitoring system 33, preferably comprising a camera.
  • the lane monitoring system 33 produces a signal 23 indicative of a current lane position.
  • the lane keeping control function 21 further receives a signal 22 indicative of a required lane position.
  • the lane keeping control function 21 further receives a signal indicative of a vehicle speed.
  • the lane keeping control function 21 comprises a feed forward portion 29,30, which in a first control function 29 receives said signal indicative of a required lane position and said signal indicative of a vehicle speed.
  • the first control function 29 is configured to determine (calculate) a lateral acceleration value based on the required lane position and the vehicle speed. In other words, when the vehicle approaches a curve, a value of the lateral acceleration is calculated for maintaining the vehicle in the desired lane during the curve.
  • the second control function 30 receives a signal from the first control function 29 indicative of said lateral acceleration and responsively produces an output signal indicative of a corresponding torque value.
  • the second control function 30 comprises a lateral acceleration model 34 which is preferably the same as the lateral acceleration model 14 in the reference generator 13.
  • the lane keeping control function 21 comprises a feedback portion 31,32, which in a first control function 31 calculates a desired steering wheel angle for minimizing the difference between the desired lane position and the actual lane position.
  • a second control function 32 is configured to determine a difference between the desired steering wheel angle and the actual steering wheel angle ( ⁇ ) and produce a corresponding torque signal. The torque values in the signals from the feed forward portion 30 and the feedback portion 32 are summed up to an output torque value from the lane keeping control function 21.
  • the complete control system is balanced. Further, the lane keeping control functionality can make use of the presence of the • reference generator 13 in terms of predicting the required steering wheel torque given a desired vehicle trajectory. This is possible due to the properties of the reference generator 13 as the steering wheel torque for a given lateral acceleration is prescribed. The lane keeping functionality can thus use the reference generator 13 in order to obtain the required maximum steering wheel torque in order to obtain a desired lane position given a desired vehicle trajectory in terms of required lateral acceleration.
  • a safety function such as lane keeping
  • the reference generator is especially advantageous as the successf-ulness of an intended intervention can be determined prior to an intended intervention and not during an intervention, as in the case with traditional boost curve based steering systems. The amount of unsuccessfully aborted interventions throughout the operational life of the vehicle is thus minimized.
  • the output torque value 25 from the lane keeping control function 21 and the output torque value 20 from the reference generator 13 are summed up to a total torque value 26, which is indicative of a desired steering torque to be applied to the steering wheel 3.
  • the regulating loop 12 receives the total desired torque value 26.
  • the EPAS is configured to predict a total guiding torque comprising the resulting desired torque 25 from the lane keeping function and the resulting desired torque 20 from the reference generator 13.
  • the EPAS is further configured for comparing the predicted total guiding torque with a limit value, and if the predicted total guiding force exceeds the limit value, in advance deciding whether to apply said predicted total guiding torque to the steering wheel for avoiding the lane departure or not.
  • the predicted total guiding force exceeds the limit value, it is decided not to apply said predicted total guiding torque to the steering wheel for avoiding the lane departure. • If the predicted total guiding force does not exceed the limit value, it is decided to apply said predicted total guiding torque to the steering wheel for avoiding the lane departure. Further, the determined total guiding force is also applied to the steering wheel.
  • a first guiding force (representing the resulting desired torque 25 from the lane keeping function) is cancelled.
  • the output desired steering torque value from the controller 27 only comprises the desired steering torque from the reference generator 13.
  • the controller is configured to modify the second guiding, force (the resulting torque from the reference generator) so that the predicted total guiding force is sufficient for avoiding the undesired situation.
  • the controller is configured to modify said at least one guiding force operation model so that the predicted total guiding force is sufficient for avoiding the undesired situation during said driver operation.
  • Figure 2 shows an embodiment in which the self alignment torque 17 and the frictional effects 16,18 have been cancelled in for the purpose of improving the steering systems controllability, as frictional effects are known to have a negative effect on the systems control quality in terms of angle control as during said lane keeping intervention.
  • the frictional effects 16,18 are preferably always cancelled during a lane keeping manouevre.
  • the lateral acceleration model comprises two curves,* which represents that the lateral acceleration model is modified by moving the curve along the ordinate (Torque axis) .
  • the principle of moving the torque curve can of course be performed irrespective of any canceling of other steering characteristic models.
  • the primary purpose of changing the lateral acceleration model is to be able to fulfill legal requirements expressed in maximum amount of required torque in order to override a commenced intervention, while at the same time being able to intervene with a required authority expressed in maximum level of lateral acceleration.
  • the assistance behaviour of the system can be reconfigured during an intervention in order to suit the needs of said lane keeping function in terms of regaining an intended lane position, while at the same time being able to both maintain stability of the steering system and meet legal requirements.
  • the system is preferably configured to cancel a guiding force contribution of at least one of said plurality of pre-selected desired steering characteristic parameters according to a priority list of said plurality of preselected desired steering characteristic parameters.
  • the EPAS creates conditions for predicting the assist t ⁇ rque supplied to the driver via the steering wheel during the complete intervention, which may be performed in a time interval of a few seconds.
  • the present invention concerns a method for assisting the driver of the vehicle during operation.
  • the control method is configured to allow a control of the steering characteristics experienced by a driver of the vehicle during traveling.
  • the control method is configured to provide the operator with a steering feel (or steering sensitivity or tactile feedback) through the steering wheel.
  • Figure 3 discloses a flow chart for an embodiment of the control method.
  • the method starts in box 301.
  • the method comprises the step of predicting 303 if a first guiding force to a vehicle steering device is desired in order to avoid an undesired situation based on a current driving scenario and if the first guiding force is desired, the method moves on to predicting 305 a total guiding force comprising the first guiding force, which would be applied to the steering device for avoiding the undesired situation.
  • the method then moves on to comparing 307 the predicted total guiding force with a limit value, and if the predicted total guiding force exceeds the limit value, in advance deciding 309 whether to apply said predicted total guiding force to the steering device for avoiding the undesired situation or not.
  • the method comprises the further step of deciding to not apply said predicted total guiding force if it exceeds the limit value * .
  • the method comprises the further step of deciding to apply said predicted total guiding force only if it is estimated to be sufficient for entirely avoiding the undesired situation. If the first guiding force is predicted not to be desired in step 303, the method goes back to start 301 directly. Likewise, if the predicted total guiding force in step 307 does not exceed the limit value, the method goes back to start 301 directly. Further, the method is continuously repeated.
  • Figure 4 discloses a flow chart for a second embodiment of the control method.
  • the method starts in box 401.
  • the method comprises the step of continuously during operation determining 403 a second guiding force based on at least one guiding force operation model, continuously applying 405 a total guiding force comprising the determined second guiding force to the steering device.
  • the method comprises the step of predicting 407 if a first guiding force to a vehicle steering device is desired .in order to avoid an undesired situation based on a current driving scenario and if the first guiding force is desired, the method moves on to predicting 409 a -total guiding force as a sum of the first guiding force and the second guiding force, which would be applied to the steering device for avoiding the undesired situation.
  • the method then moves on to comparing 411 the predicted total guiding force with a limit value, and if the predicted total guiding force exceeds the limit value, in advance deciding 413 whether to apply said predicted total guiding force to the steering device for avoiding the undesired situation or not.
  • the steps of determining 403 the second guiding force and applying 405 a total guiding force comprising the determined second guiding force to the steering device are performed irrespective of any prediction of the first guiding force.
  • the method is preferably performed in a vehicle with the mechanical connection ⁇ between the steering device 3 and the wheels 4 for a mechanical transmission of steering signals from the steering device to the wheels.
  • the method then comprises the further steps of decoupling a driver steering feel from the influence of the mechanical connection, and instead providing the driver with a desired steering feel based on the determined total guiding force.
  • the method comprises the further step of deciding to not apply said predicted total guiding force if it exceeds the limit value.
  • the method comprises the further step of deciding to apply said predicted total guiding force only if it is estimated to be sufficient for entirely avoiding the undesired situation.
  • the method goes back to start 401 directly. Likewise, if the predicted total guiding force in step 411 does not exceed the limit value, the method goes back to start 401 directly. Further, the method is continuously repeated.
  • Any one of the two embodiments in figure 3 and 4 preferably comprises the further step of receiving at least one signal representing a vehicle state and determining a value of said at least one desired steering characteristic parameter based on the vehicle state.
  • Said vehicle state comprises at least one of a driver steering input, a vehicle yaw rate, a vehicle lateral acceleration and a vehicle speed.
  • the steering angle and the steering torque are preferred measurements that indicate the steering input, or steering intent, of the driver.
  • the method comprises the step of determining the desired resistance torque based on an input representing a steering angle.
  • the steering ⁇ angle is preferably determined by measuring a steering wheel deflection.
  • the steering angle may be determined by measuring a wheel angle or anywhere inbetween the steering wheel and the ground engaging wheel in the mechanical steering arrangement .
  • a lane guidance regulation system is integrated into the EPAS.
  • further fun ⁇ tions may be integrated into an exemplary method according to the present invention.
  • steering systems may include a driving dynamics regulator that adjusts the setting of the steered wheels independently from the steering wish of the driver.
  • the reference generator 13 and the regulating loop 12 are preferably implemented in software.
  • a value of the vehicle lateral acceleration may be estimated from • a measured vehicle yaw rate.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Steering Control In Accordance With Driving Conditions (AREA)
  • Power Steering Mechanism (AREA)
  • Auxiliary Drives, Propulsion Controls, And Safety Devices (AREA)
  • Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
  • Control Of Driving Devices And Active Controlling Of Vehicle (AREA)

Abstract

L’invention concerne un procédé pour assister un conducteur d’un véhicule pendant la conduite afin d’éviter une situation indésirable sur la base d’un scénario de conduite actuel. Le procédé est caractérisé par les étapes consistant à : prédire si une première force de guidage s’exerçant sur un dispositif de direction de véhicule est souhaitée afin d’éviter ladite situation indésirable ; si la première force de guidage est souhaitée, prédire une force de guidage totale comprenant la première force de guidage, qui devrait s’exercer sur le dispositif de direction pour éviter la situation indésirable, puis comparer la force de guidage totale prédite à une valeur limite ; et si la force de guidage totale prédite dépasse la valeur limite, décider à l’avance s’il faut oui ou non exercer ladite force de guidage totale prédite sur le dispositif de direction pour éviter la situation indésirable.
EP09846892.9A 2009-06-29 2009-06-29 Procédé et système pour assister un conducteur d'un véhicule pendant la conduite Active EP2448807B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/SE2009/000335 WO2011002345A1 (fr) 2009-06-29 2009-06-29 Procédé et système pour assister un conducteur d’un véhicule pendant la conduite

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2448807A1 true EP2448807A1 (fr) 2012-05-09
EP2448807A4 EP2448807A4 (fr) 2012-12-05
EP2448807B1 EP2448807B1 (fr) 2013-11-06

Family

ID=43411238

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09846892.9A Active EP2448807B1 (fr) 2009-06-29 2009-06-29 Procédé et système pour assister un conducteur d'un véhicule pendant la conduite

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US8738231B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2448807B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP5544422B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN102666261B (fr)
BR (1) BRPI0924608B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2011002345A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017178330A1 (fr) * 2016-04-15 2017-10-19 Jaguar Land Rover Limited Système de direction de véhicule

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5317940B2 (ja) * 2009-12-04 2013-10-16 日立オートモティブシステムズ株式会社 走行路逸脱防止装置及びそれを備えた車両
ITTO20110795A1 (it) 2011-09-07 2013-03-08 Cnh Italia Spa Veicolo sterzabile
GB201118620D0 (en) * 2011-10-27 2011-12-07 Jaguar Cars Improvements in closed loop EPAS system
FR2985971B1 (fr) 2012-01-19 2014-08-22 Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa Procede de correction de trajectoire d’un vehicule automobile et dispositif de correction de trajectoire d’un vehicule automobile associe
DE102012004915B4 (de) * 2012-03-09 2022-02-03 Zf Automotive Germany Gmbh Verfahren zur Ansteuerung eines Servomotors in einem elektrischen Fahrzeuglenksystem
JP6101512B2 (ja) * 2013-02-25 2017-03-22 株式会社日本自動車部品総合研究所 運転支援装置
JP2015003566A (ja) * 2013-06-19 2015-01-08 トヨタ自動車株式会社 逸脱防止装置
WO2014208248A1 (fr) * 2013-06-28 2014-12-31 日産自動車株式会社 Dispositif de commande de direction
DE102013220947B4 (de) * 2013-10-16 2017-09-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Verfahren sowie Lenksystem zur Unterstützung des Geradeauslaufs eines Fahrzeugs
FR3022515B1 (fr) * 2014-06-24 2016-07-29 Jtekt Europe Sas Assistance de direction mixte comprenant une boucle d'asservissement en couple pilotee en consigne par un controleur de position destine a l'asservissement en trajectoire
US9892296B2 (en) 2014-11-12 2018-02-13 Joseph E. Kovarik Method and system for autonomous vehicles
US9845108B2 (en) * 2015-10-23 2017-12-19 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Systems and methods for estimating steering assistance
EP3178724B1 (fr) * 2015-12-08 2018-10-24 Volvo Car Corporation Dispositif de direction de véhicule, dispositif de direction de véhicule autonome, véhicule et procédé de direction d'un véhicule
US10005488B2 (en) 2015-12-18 2018-06-26 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Electrically controlled steering assistance actuator
EP3266680B1 (fr) * 2016-07-04 2019-11-06 Volvo Car Corporation Procédé et système permettant de sécuriser la limitation d'une intervention de superposition de couple dans un système de direction assistée d'un véhicule routier
EP3309026B1 (fr) * 2016-10-13 2020-12-16 Volvo Car Corporation Procédé et système de calcul d'une estimation de frottement de la route
KR102286847B1 (ko) * 2017-04-12 2021-08-05 현대자동차주식회사 조향토크 추정 장치 및 방법
US10773748B2 (en) * 2018-05-17 2020-09-15 Steering Solutions Ip Holding Corporation Compensator anti-windup for motion control systems
DE102019206980B4 (de) * 2019-05-14 2023-06-22 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren und Lenkungssteuergerät zum Ermitteln einer Stellgröße für das Einstellen eines Servolenkmoments bei einem Fahrzeuglenksystem
CN112109731B (zh) * 2020-09-27 2022-01-28 阿波罗智联(北京)科技有限公司 车辆控制方法、装置、电子设备、存储介质及车辆
US11731700B2 (en) 2021-03-25 2023-08-22 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Friction compensation for vehicle system control

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004074059A2 (fr) * 2003-02-20 2004-09-02 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Procede et systeme pour regler la stabilite a la conduite d'un vehicule et utilisation dudit systeme
DE102005023832A1 (de) * 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Daimlerchrysler Ag Verfahren und System zur Vermeidung einer Kollision eines Kraftfahrzeugs mit einem Objekt
US20070055431A1 (en) * 2005-09-07 2007-03-08 Weiwen Deng Method and apparatus for preview-based vehicle lateral control
EP1884449A1 (fr) * 2005-05-27 2008-02-06 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Dispositif de prévention de déraillement de véhicule
WO2009022947A1 (fr) * 2007-08-15 2009-02-19 Volvo Technology Corporation Procédé d'actionnement, et système pour supporter un suivi de voie d'un véhicule
DE102007050189A1 (de) * 2007-10-20 2009-04-23 Daimler Ag Fahrerassistenzsystem und Verfahren zur Unterstützung des Fahrers eines Fahrzeugs bei der Querführung des Fahrzeugs
US20090153360A1 (en) * 2007-12-12 2009-06-18 Hyundai Motor Company Lane keeping assist system
DE102007061900A1 (de) * 2007-12-20 2009-06-25 Volkswagen Ag Spurhalteassistenzsystem und -verfahren für ein Kraftfahrzeug

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6134491A (en) * 1997-09-13 2000-10-17 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Steering control system for vehicle
DE19943410B4 (de) * 1998-09-11 2011-08-18 Honda Giken Kogyo K.K. Lenksteuersystem für ein Fahrzeug
JP3818013B2 (ja) * 2000-04-24 2006-09-06 日産自動車株式会社 車両の操舵装置
DE10032340A1 (de) 2000-07-04 2002-01-31 Bosch Gmbh Robert Verfahren zum Lenken eines Fahrzeugs mit Servolenkung
JP2005088806A (ja) * 2003-09-18 2005-04-07 Hitachi Unisia Automotive Ltd 操舵制御装置
JP4304604B2 (ja) * 2004-02-16 2009-07-29 株式会社デンソー 車両の電動パワーステアリング装置
JP4349309B2 (ja) * 2004-09-27 2009-10-21 日産自動車株式会社 車両用操舵制御装置
JP4967484B2 (ja) * 2006-07-07 2012-07-04 日産自動車株式会社 車線維持支援装置
GB0624597D0 (en) * 2006-12-09 2007-01-17 Trw Lucasvarity Electric Steer Controlling Motors in Electric Power Assisted Steering
DE102006060628A1 (de) * 2006-12-21 2008-06-26 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren zur Einstellung eines Lenksystems in einem Fahrzeug
JP5141025B2 (ja) * 2007-02-01 2013-02-13 トヨタ自動車株式会社 車両用操舵システム

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004074059A2 (fr) * 2003-02-20 2004-09-02 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Procede et systeme pour regler la stabilite a la conduite d'un vehicule et utilisation dudit systeme
DE102005023832A1 (de) * 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Daimlerchrysler Ag Verfahren und System zur Vermeidung einer Kollision eines Kraftfahrzeugs mit einem Objekt
EP1884449A1 (fr) * 2005-05-27 2008-02-06 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Dispositif de prévention de déraillement de véhicule
US20070055431A1 (en) * 2005-09-07 2007-03-08 Weiwen Deng Method and apparatus for preview-based vehicle lateral control
WO2009022947A1 (fr) * 2007-08-15 2009-02-19 Volvo Technology Corporation Procédé d'actionnement, et système pour supporter un suivi de voie d'un véhicule
DE102007050189A1 (de) * 2007-10-20 2009-04-23 Daimler Ag Fahrerassistenzsystem und Verfahren zur Unterstützung des Fahrers eines Fahrzeugs bei der Querführung des Fahrzeugs
US20090153360A1 (en) * 2007-12-12 2009-06-18 Hyundai Motor Company Lane keeping assist system
DE102007061900A1 (de) * 2007-12-20 2009-06-25 Volkswagen Ag Spurhalteassistenzsystem und -verfahren für ein Kraftfahrzeug

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO2011002345A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017178330A1 (fr) * 2016-04-15 2017-10-19 Jaguar Land Rover Limited Système de direction de véhicule

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2448807B1 (fr) 2013-11-06
JP5544422B2 (ja) 2014-07-09
BRPI0924608B1 (pt) 2020-05-19
CN102666261B (zh) 2014-10-15
EP2448807A4 (fr) 2012-12-05
JP2012532053A (ja) 2012-12-13
WO2011002345A8 (fr) 2012-06-14
WO2011002345A1 (fr) 2011-01-06
CN102666261A (zh) 2012-09-12
BRPI0924608A2 (pt) 2016-03-01
US20120265403A1 (en) 2012-10-18
US8738231B2 (en) 2014-05-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8738231B2 (en) Method and a system for assisting a driver of a vehicle during operation
US9227633B2 (en) Method and a system for changing a vehicle's trajectory
EP2448806B1 (fr) Procédé et système pour aider un conducteur d'un véhicule lors d'une opération
EP2448805B1 (fr) Procédé et système pour assister un conducteur de véhicule pendant la conduite
JP4670161B2 (ja) 自動車の電動パワーステアリング装置
US7092805B2 (en) Steering apparatus for steerable vehicle
WO2018055805A1 (fr) Dispositif de commande de dispositif de direction assistée
WO2010144049A1 (fr) Procédé permettant de commander la direction et le comportement d'un véhicule
CN114502448A (zh) 用于车辆转向的方法和系统布置以及具有这种系统的车辆
CN113661113B (zh) 用于控制线控转向系统的方法和用于机动车辆的线控转向系统
CN113557188A (zh) 控制线控转向的转向系统的方法和用于机动车辆的线控转向的转向系统
EP2239179B1 (fr) Système de direction d'un véhicule
CN112977612A (zh) 用于操作车辆动力转向系统的方法、动力转向系统和车辆
JP6034419B2 (ja) 運転中に車両の運転者を支援する方法およびシステム

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120130

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: RAGNHULT, STEN

Inventor name: HULTEN, JOHAN

Inventor name: POHL, JOCHEN

Inventor name: SVENSSON, JAN-INGE

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: POHL, JOCHEN

Inventor name: RAGNHULT, STEN

Inventor name: SVENSSON, JAN-INGE

Inventor name: HULTEN, JOHAN

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20121102

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B60T 8/1755 20060101ALI20121026BHEP

Ipc: B60K 31/00 20060101ALI20121026BHEP

Ipc: B60W 10/20 20060101ALI20121026BHEP

Ipc: B60W 30/12 20060101ALI20121026BHEP

Ipc: B62D 15/02 20060101AFI20121026BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130624

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: VOLVO LASTVAGNAR AB

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 639251

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20131215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009020026

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 639251

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140206

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140306

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009020026

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20140807

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009020026

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140807

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140629

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140207

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20090629

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230626

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230620

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240627

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240625

Year of fee payment: 16