EP2354064B1 - Method for detecting overlapped Items based on rigidity and thickness contour measurements - Google Patents

Method for detecting overlapped Items based on rigidity and thickness contour measurements Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2354064B1
EP2354064B1 EP11151148A EP11151148A EP2354064B1 EP 2354064 B1 EP2354064 B1 EP 2354064B1 EP 11151148 A EP11151148 A EP 11151148A EP 11151148 A EP11151148 A EP 11151148A EP 2354064 B1 EP2354064 B1 EP 2354064B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
item
thickness
rigidity
overlapped
items
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP11151148A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2354064A1 (en
Inventor
Robert L. Stone
Mohammed T. Islam
Omid Athari
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sick Inc
Original Assignee
Sick Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sick Inc filed Critical Sick Inc
Publication of EP2354064A1 publication Critical patent/EP2354064A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2354064B1 publication Critical patent/EP2354064B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H7/00Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles
    • B65H7/02Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors
    • B65H7/06Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors responsive to presence of faulty articles or incorrect separation or feed
    • B65H7/12Controlling article feeding, separating, pile-advancing, or associated apparatus, to take account of incorrect feeding, absence of articles, or presence of faulty articles by feelers or detectors responsive to presence of faulty articles or incorrect separation or feed responsive to double feed or separation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2511/00Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
    • B65H2511/10Size; Dimensions
    • B65H2511/13Thickness
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2511/00Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
    • B65H2511/10Size; Dimensions
    • B65H2511/17Deformation, e.g. stretching
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2511/00Dimensions; Position; Numbers; Identification; Occurrences
    • B65H2511/50Occurence
    • B65H2511/52Defective operating conditions
    • B65H2511/524Multiple articles, e.g. double feed
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2515/00Physical entities not provided for in groups B65H2511/00 or B65H2513/00
    • B65H2515/81Rigidity; Stiffness; Elasticity
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2557/00Means for control not provided for in groups B65H2551/00 - B65H2555/00
    • B65H2557/20Calculating means; Controlling methods
    • B65H2557/24Calculating methods; Mathematic models
    • B65H2557/242Calculating methods; Mathematic models involving a particular data profile or curve
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65HHANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2701/00Handled material; Storage means
    • B65H2701/10Handled articles or webs
    • B65H2701/19Specific article or web
    • B65H2701/1916Envelopes and articles of mail

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to handling of items, and, more particularly, to a method for detecting overlapped mail items while they are being transferred.
  • the mail pieces to be sorted are essentially flat rectangular objects arranged together with their planar surfaces along a common axis to form a stack.
  • a feeder mechanism picks off individual mail pieces from an input stack to an optical reader which reads the address printed on the mail piece and directs the mail piece to one of several output stacks corresponding to the destination address.
  • the mail items should -be transferred individually.
  • the rate of overlapped (double feed) mail transfer can also be high.
  • the handling apparatus cannot perform its normal operation.
  • EP 1 542 173 A1 discloses a method according to the preamble of the claim.
  • Embodiments are directed generally to a method for detecting various features, focused primarily on the edge, but also features such as rigidity, thickness, etc., in order to determine mail conditions.
  • double feeds of items such as, but not limited to, pieces of mail (letter mail, mixed mail), flats, and other postal items, or other similar shape objects such as shingles or plates, are detected in an item sorting system.
  • the method specifies steps or detecting the presence of two or more overlapped items passing simultaneously in a stream of items through a sorting and handling apparatus.
  • the method detects multiple overlapped items with a low proportion of unwarranted or incorrect rejects.
  • a double feed can include two or more items stuck together along their flat sides with either one or more edges completely or partially overlapped.
  • a double feed can include two or more overlapped items having different heights, colors, widths, and thicknesses (particularly very thin or post card like objects).
  • the system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, can include means for detecting overlapped items in a sequence of items, where the items have at least one of their edges exposed for viewing as they pass along the feed path.
  • the system not forming part of the invention per se includes means for separating the overlapped items so as to not be fully overlapped by shifting the position of the overlapped items relative to each other. According to the invention this shift is accomplished by including a transition section in the conveyance path along which the items are transported.
  • the transition section can include, but is not limited to, a bent section, an edge section, and/or a curved section of the conveyance path, a reverse conveyance, or a vacuum assisted section.
  • the system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, can include means for transporting items (single and/or overlapped) in a sequence along a feed path of an item sorting and handling apparatus, means for measuring the thickness of the item at a plurality of points along the length of the item as it passes through a detection area, an outline extraction means for generating a thickness outline (contour) from the data representing the different thicknesses (thickness variations) measured along the length of the item, and processing means for analyzing the extracted thickness contour to determine a double feed condition (two or more overlapped items) based on the outline.
  • the processing means analyzes the data representing the thickness contour to determine the transition edges between areas of different thicknesses.
  • the processing means calculates the levels between the edges (step changes or steps or rate changes) to provide discrete levels of thicknesses, compares the height of each step with a preset minimum value, and determines whether the item is a single item or two or more overlapped items, or compares the rate of change of a height and determines whether the item is a single or two or more overlapped items, based on the comparison.
  • the processing means determines whether two or more items are overlapped when the step change is greater than the preset minimum value.
  • the minimum value can be set depending on the specific application, and is based on numerous factors, such as, but not limited to, the type of item detected, the accuracy of the thickness and other detectors used in the system as well as the different variables of the item sorting and handling apparatus.
  • the double feed detection system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, further includes shifting overlapped items relative to each other by using a transition section, such as, but not limited to, a bent portion, a curved portion, and/or an edge portion, in the feed path.
  • the overlapped items are caused to move apart relative to each other during movement of the items through the transition section.
  • the detection system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, further includes means for measuring the rigidity of the item at a predetermined position of the transition section.
  • the rigidity of the item can be measured based on the deflection of the item passing through the transition portion and the geometry of the transition section.
  • the detection system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, further includes processing means to determine whether a double feed condition is present based on a combination of rigidity and thickness measurements.
  • FIGS. 1-3 a system and method of detecting overlapped items in an item sorting system is disclosed, the system including a detecting device for measuring a thickness of the item at a plurality of locations along a dimension of the item, a processing device configured to detect variations in the measured thickness and to measure differences between the variations. These “differences between variations” are also designated as “thickness differences” throughout this description and claims.
  • the differences indicating step changes, or steps, between discrete levels of thicknesses, the processing device being further configured to compare the step changes (step heights) with a predetermined height value (X), and to determine a double feed condition indicative of two or more overlapped items when a step change (step height) is greater than the predetermined height value (X).
  • the system 100 shown in FIGS. 1-3 is configured to detect various features, such as, but not limited to, edge, rigidity, thickness, etc., of an item A in order to determine certain conditions of the item A, such as, but no limited to, a double or multiple feeds condition where two or more items 110, 120 are partially or completely overlapped.
  • Item A in FIGS. 1-3 includes two overlapped mail pieces 110, 120 stuck together along their flat sides with one or more edges completely or partially overlapped.
  • item A can include any other combination of items, such as, but not limited to, pieces of mail (letter mail, mixed mail), flats, and other postal items, or other similar shaped objects such as, but not limited to, shingles or plates.
  • the overlapped items can have different heights, colors, widths, and/or thicknesses.
  • the overlapped mail pieces 110 and 120 shown in FIGS. 1-3 are moved (transported) simultaneously along a conveyor path (not shown) using rollers 130 and 140, in a direction as indicated by the arrow (mail flow).
  • One or more thickness detectors 150 and 160 can be positioned along the conveyance path in a plane substantially perpendicular to the overlapped mail pieces 110, 120 and having an optical path (light path) in a direction generally perpendicular to the direction of conveyance of the mail pieces 110, 120.
  • Detectors 150 and 160 are configured to continuously measure the thickness of item A (including the overlapped mail pieces 110, 120) by viewing and detecting a single side or both sides of the item A as the item is moved through a detection field of the detectors 150, 160.
  • the data from the thickness detectors 150 and 160 is transmitted to a processing device 170, shown in FIG. 2 , which processes and analyzes the data from the detectors 150, 160 and generates an outline (contour) 180 (shown in detail in FIG. 6 ) of the thickness variations of item A along a dimension of item A which is substantially parallel with the direction of conveyance (i.e., a direction along the length of item A).
  • the total length L of item A depends on the lengths L1 and L2 of the individual mail pieces 110 and 120, respectively, as well as the amount of overlap between them.
  • the processing device 170 is further configured to identify (determine) based on the thickness contour 180 generated, the variations in the measured thickness of item A and to measure the differences between the variations (thickness differences), the differences indicating step changes (steps D1, D2, etc.) between discrete levels of thickness areas of item A (see FIGS. 4 and 5 ).
  • the processing device 170 is further configured to calculate the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each of the identified step.
  • the processing device 170 compares the calculated height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each identified step with a previously determined height value (X) and identifies a double or multiple feed condition (i.e., overlapped mail pieces) when a height Si of a step Di is greater than the predetermined height value (X), and a no double feed condition (no overlapped mail pieces) when a height Si of a step Di is less than the predetermined height value (X).
  • the number of mail pieces 110, 120 stuck to each other corresponds to the number of steps Di that have a height Si greater than the predetermined height value (X). This system and method therefore, allows for the detection of multiple overlapped items irrespective of their individual thicknesses or the total thickness of the overlapped items.
  • the processing device 170 can further determine a rate and/or distance of overlap of the item based on the thickness contour measurements.
  • the thickness detectors 150, 160 can include any applicable thickness detectors, such as, but not limited to, any optical displacement detectors, laser, infrared or ultrasonic detectors, 2D and 3D camera based detectors, and any mechanical thickness measuring devices.
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary thickness contour 180 generated by the processing device 170 according to an embodiment.
  • the contour shows discrete levels of thicknesses obtained from the measured thicknesses at different points along a length of a mail item A.
  • the item 210 is a mail item including two overlapped mail pieces 220 and 230, for example, moved along a conveyor device or platen 241 using rollers 240 in a mail sorting installation.
  • the conveying path has a transition section 242 which allows one of the mail pieces 220, for example, to move (shift) relative to the other 230, for example, while moving through the transition section 242.
  • This transition section 242 can be a curved section in the conveyor belt, or an edge along the conveyor belt, or any other similar mechanism that allows the mail pieces 220, 230 to bend around the transition section 242 and shift relative to each other.
  • the mail pieces 220, 230 can either separate completely through this movement or separate only partially so as to remain partially overlapped but with their respective leading edges 221, 231 further apart from each other for easier and more accurate viewing and detection.
  • the separated leading edges 221, 231 allow for better recognition of the separations between the multiple thickness areas during the thickness contour generation.
  • the system 200 includes at least one thickness detector 250, 260, positioned in a plane substantially perpendicular to the item 210 and substantially perpendicular to the conveying path so as to continuously detect the thickness of the item 210 at different positions along the item 210 while it is moved along the conveyance path.
  • the data from the thickness detectors 250, 260 is transmitted to a processing device (processor) 270 which analyzes the data received from the detectors 250, 260 and generates an outline (similarly to the outline shown in FIG. 6 , for example) of the thickness variations along a dimension of the item 210 which is parallel with the direction of conveyance (i.e., the length of the item, for example).
  • the processor 270 determines (identifies) areas where the total thickness of the item 210 changes, identifies the transition areas D1, D2 (steps) between adjacent areas of different thicknesses, and calculates the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each of the identified step (D1, D2, etc.). The processor 270 then compares the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each identified step (D1, D2, etc.) with a previously determined and stored height value (X) and identifies a double or multiple feed (overlapped items) condition when the height Si of a step Di is greater than the predetermined height value (X). The number of mail pieces stuck to each other (overlapped) corresponds with the number of step changes having a height above the predetermined height value.
  • At least one rigidity sensor 290 is also added into the system 200 to increase the double feed detection efficiency.
  • the rigidity sensor 290 is positioned adjacent the transition section 242 so as to measure the rigidity of the transferred mail item 210 while the mail item 210 is bent while moving through the transition area 242.
  • the rigidity sensor 290 is configured to measure a deflection of the individual mail pieces 210, 220 relative to the position of the rigidity sensor 290 and determine the rigidity (stiffness) of the mail pieces 210, 220, based on the measured deflections and the geometry (shape, position, etc.) of the transition section 242.
  • Measuring the rigidity of the mail pieces 220, 230 helps to discern whether the mail pieces 220, 230 are overlapped even when the mail pieces 220, 230 have the same length and/or are substantially completely overlapped. When the mail pieces 220, 230 have the same length and/or are completely overlapped, it is harder to discern the two separate leading edges 221, 231 which indicate the step changes between two separate thickness regions. Detecting the rigidity of the individual mail pieces 220, 230 therefore increases the probability of detecting a double (or multiple) feed condition while reducing detection errors.
  • the processor 270 is further configured to analyze the data received from the rigidity detector 290 and compare the measured rigidity with a predetermined rigidity value (Y). The processor 270 then compares the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each identified step with the previously determined height value (X) and the measured rigidity with a predetermined rigidity value (Y), and identifies a double feed condition when the height of a step is greater than the predetermined height value (X) and the rigidity exceeds the predetermined rigidity value (Y), and a no double feed condition when the step change and the rigidity do not exceed the respective predetermined values (X) and (Y).
  • This allows for the detection of multiple overlapped items irrespective of their individual thicknesses or the total thickness and length of the overlapped item, and thus allows for a more accurate determination of whether multiple mail pieces are overlapped during sorting.
  • the rigidity and thickness detectors 290, 250, 260 can include any applicable thickness and rigidity detectors, such as, but not limited to, any optical displacement detectors, laser, infrared or ultrasonic detectors, and 2D and 3D camera based detectors.
  • the thickness detector can also include any applicable mechanical thickness detection mechanism.
  • the system not forming part of the invention per se therefore, allows for the detection of multiple overlapped mail pieces irrespective of their individual thicknesses or the total thickness and length of the overlapped mail piece.
  • the system can be used to detect a condition, such as a double or multiple feed condition of any combination of mail items having different or similar shapes, lengths, widths, and/or thicknesses.
  • the mail items can be, but are not limited to, letters, postcards, and/or flats.
  • the system not forming part of the invention per se and method according to the invention can also be used to detect overlapped items having similar shapes, such as, but not limited to, shingles and plates.
  • the processing device can further determine a rate and/or distance of overlap of the item based on the thickness contour measurements.
  • FIG. 8 there is shown a system 300 not forming part of the invention per se for detecting overlapped items 330 in an item sorting installation.
  • the item 330 with two overlapped pieces 310 and 320 is moved along a conveyor device or platen 341 using rollers 340.
  • the conveying path has a transition section 342 which allows one of the pieces to move (shift) relative to the other while moving through the transition section 342.
  • the transition section 342 can be a curved section in the conveyor belt, or an edge along the conveyor belt, or any other similar mechanism that allows the pieces 310, 320 to bend or move around the transition section 342 and shift relative to each other.
  • the pieces 310, 320 can either separate completely through this movement or separate only partially so as to remain partially overlapped but with their respective leading edges 311, 321 further apart from each other for easier and more accurate viewing and detection.
  • the separated leading edges 311, 321 allow for better recognition of the separations between the multiple thickness areas during thickness contour generation, for example.
  • the separated leading edges 311, 321 also allow for better recognition of the leading edges during edge detection, for example.
  • Two detectors (sensors) 301, 302 are positioned adjacent the transition section 342 and are configured to measure the rigidity and/or the thickness of the transferred item 330 and/or to detect the leading edges 311, 321 of the overlapped pieces 310, 320 while the item 330 is bent (shifted) while moving through the transition area 342.
  • Two detectors are shown in FIG. 8 . However, only one detector configured to measure the thickness, rigidity and/or detect edges, can also be used.
  • the detectors 301, 302 can detect the rigidity of the item 330 by measuring a deflection of the individual pieces 310, 320 relative to the position of the detectors 301, 302, respectively, and determine the rigidity (stiffness) of the individual pieces 310, 320 based on the measured deflections and the geometry (shape, position, etc.) of the transition section 342. Measuring the rigidity of the item 330 helps discern whether the individual pieces 310, 320 are overlapped even when the pieces 310, 320 have the same length and/or are completely overlapped.
  • the detectors 301 and 302 can also be configured to measure a thickness of the item 330 at a plurality of positions along the length of the item 330 as it moves through the transition section 342.
  • the data from the detectors 301, 302 can be sent to a processing device (not shown) which then analyzes the data received from the detectors 301, 302 and determines whether there is an item overlap based on the measured rigidity, and/or a thickness contour analysis and/or a leading edge position detection of the individual pieces 310, 320 of the item 330.
  • the processor is configured to analyze the data received from both detectors 301, 302 and combine the measurements to determine whether an overlap condition exists.
  • the processor derives a thickness contour based on the thickness measurement taken at different points along a length of the item 330 while the item is moving through the transition region 342.
  • the processor then identifies locations where variations in the item 330 thickness occur and assign a step Di to each location where a change in the thickness occurs.
  • the processor calculates a height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of all identified steps Di and compares the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each identified step with a previously determined height value (X).
  • the processor is further configured to compare the measured rigidity using the second detector with a predetermined rigidity value (Y). The processor then identifies a double feed condition when a step change is greater than the predetermined height value (X) and the rigidity exceeds the predetermined rigidity value (Y), and a no double feed condition when the step change and the rigidity do not exceed the respective predetermined values (X) and (Y).
  • This system not forming part of the invention per se therefore, allows for the detection of multiple overlapped items irrespective of their individual thicknesses or the total thickness and length of the overlapped item, and thus allows for a more accurate determination of whether multiple mail pieces are overlapped during sorting.
  • the processing device can further determine a rate and/or distance of overlap of the item based on the thickness contour measurements.
  • the individual pieces 310, 320 can include any mail items having different or similar shapes, lengths, widths, and/or thicknesses.
  • the mail items can be, but are not limited to, letters, postcards, and/or flats.
  • the system and method can also be used to detect overlapped items having similar shapes, such as, but not limited to, shingles and plates.
  • the rigidity, thickness and edge detectors 301, 302 can include any applicable thickness, rigidity and edge detectors, such as, but not limited to, any optical displacement detectors, laser, infrared or ultrasonic detectors, and 2D and 3D camera based detectors.
  • the thickness detector can also include any mechanical thickness detectors.
  • FIG. 9A it is illustrated a detection process s100 that can be applied to detect an item condition, such as, a double or multiple feeds condition (overlapped items) using any of the systems as disclosed in the embodiments of FIGS. 1-8 .
  • the process s100 can also be stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium, such as disks, CD-ROMs, etc. and executed using a computer processing system including any software and hardware modules necessary for execution of the process in a particular application.
  • a sequence of programmed instructions is embodied upon the computer-readable storage medium for handling overlapped items in an item sorting system so that when a computer processing system executes the sequence of programmed instructions embodied on the computer-readable storage medium it causes the computer processing system to perform the steps of: measuring a thickness of the item at a plurality of locations along a dimension of the item, detecting variations in the measured thickness, measuring differences between the variations (thickness differences), the differences indicating steps between discrete levels of thicknesses, comparing the steps with a predetermined height value, and determining a double feed condition indicative of two or more overlapped items when a step greater than the predetermined height value.
  • a detection device is continuously measuring a thickness of an item at various points along a dimension of the moving item (length, for example) while the item being transported (transferred, conveyed) on a conveying device through a detection field of a thickness measuring detector.
  • a thickness contour generation follows in step s2 in which a contour is generated based on the variations in the thickness of the item across its dimension. Based on the generated contour, steps or locations where there is a change in the thickness of the item are detected in step s3. The height of each of the detected step is calculated in s4 and the measured heights are compared to a previously set height value (X) in s5.
  • s6 it is determined in s6 whether the item is an overlapped item and therefore, whether a double or multiple feeds condition exists. If the height of a step is greater than the predetermined height value (X), there is an overlap condition present, namely, the item contains overlapped pieces (s7), whereas if the height of a step change is less than the predetermined height value (X), it is concluded that there is no overlap and therefore no double feed condition (s8).
  • the number of steps having a height greater than the predetermined height value (X) represents the number of items which are overlapped.
  • FIG. 9B it is illustrated a detection process s200 that can be applied to detect an item condition, such as, a double or multiple feeds condition (overlapped items) using any of the systems as disclosed in the embodiments of FIGS. 1-8 , where in addition to thickness detection, rigidity detection is also performed on the moving item.
  • the process s200 can also be stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium, such as disks, CD-ROMs, etc. and executed using a computer processing system including and any software and hardware modules necessary for execution of the process in a particular application.
  • a sequence of programmed instructions is embodied upon the computer-readable storage medium for handling overlapped items in an item sorting system so that when a computer processing system executes the sequence of programmed instructions embodied on the computer-readable storage medium it causes the computer processing system to perform the steps of: measuring a thickness of the item at a plurality of locations along a dimension of the item, detecting variations in the measured thickness, measuring differences between the variations (thickness differences), the differences indicating steps between discrete levels of thicknesses, comparing the steps with a predetermined value, and determining a double feed condition indicative of two or more overlapped items when a step is greater than the predetermined height value.
  • a detection device is continuously measuring a thickness of an item in s10 along various points along a dimension of the item, the item being transported (transferred, conveyed) on a conveying device through a measuring section.
  • a thickness contour generation follows in step s20 in which a contour is generated based on the variations in the thickness of the item across its dimension. Based on the generated contour, step changes or locations where there is a change in the thickness of the item, are detected in step s30. The height of each of the detected step is calculated in s40 and the measured heights are compared to a previously set height value (X) in s50. During the thickness measurement step s1, the item rigidity is also measured (s90).
  • the result of the comparison in step s50 is combined with a step of comparing the measured rigidity in s90 with a predetermined rigidity value (Y). Based on the combined comparison in s60, it is determined whether a double or multiple feeds condition exists. If the height of a step is greater than the predetermined height value (X) and the rigidity is greater than the predetermined rigidity value (Y) then there is an overlap condition present, namely, the item contains overlapped pieces (s70), whereas if the height of a step is less than the predetermined height value (X) and the rigidity is less than the predetermined rigidity value (Y), it is concluded that there is no overlap and therefore no double feed condition (s80).
  • the number of steps having a height greater than the predetermined height value (X) and a greater rigidity than the predetermined rigidity value (Y) represents the number of items which are overlapped.

Landscapes

  • Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
  • Controlling Sheets Or Webs (AREA)
  • Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates generally to handling of items, and, more particularly, to a method for detecting overlapped mail items while they are being transferred.
  • BACKGROUND
  • In a mail sorting system, the mail pieces to be sorted are essentially flat rectangular objects arranged together with their planar surfaces along a common axis to form a stack. A feeder mechanism picks off individual mail pieces from an input stack to an optical reader which reads the address printed on the mail piece and directs the mail piece to one of several output stacks corresponding to the destination address. In the mail handling apparatus, the mail items should -be transferred individually. However, due to the high feed rate or diverse product shape (length, width, height, and thickness) and composition (material, form), the rate of overlapped (double feed) mail transfer can also be high. When a plurality of mail items are transferred in an overlapped manner to the handling apparatus, the handling apparatus cannot perform its normal operation.
  • Currently available double feed detection systems are either expensive and require complex setups (for example, digital cameras that analyze digital images of the passing items), or are unreliable because they are limited to detecting items that have specific shapes, colors, thicknesses, are of a particular type and are not fully overlapped with each other, or cannot accurately detect more than two overlapped items. These limitations increase the number of undetected overlapped items as well as the number of incorrectly (unwarranted) rejected items. Therefore, it would be advantageous to have a detection method that accurately detects mail characteristics, including edges, as early as possible in the feed path, in order to determine conditions, such as double feed (overlap of one or more mail pieces).
  • US 2007/0018383 A1 and US 5,984,303 disclose overlap detection apparatuses and methods which include devices for sensing rigidity.
  • EP 1 542 173 A1 discloses a method according to the preamble of the claim.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Embodiments are directed generally to a method for detecting various features, focused primarily on the edge, but also features such as rigidity, thickness, etc., in order to determine mail conditions. According to the invention double feeds of items, such as, but not limited to, pieces of mail (letter mail, mixed mail), flats, and other postal items, or other similar shape objects such as shingles or plates, are detected in an item sorting system.
  • The method specifies steps or detecting the presence of two or more overlapped items passing simultaneously in a stream of items through a sorting and handling apparatus.
  • The method detects multiple overlapped items with a low proportion of unwarranted or incorrect rejects.
  • In various embodiments, a double feed can include two or more items stuck together along their flat sides with either one or more edges completely or partially overlapped. A double feed can include two or more overlapped items having different heights, colors, widths, and thicknesses (particularly very thin or post card like objects).
  • In various embodiments, the system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, can include means for detecting overlapped items in a sequence of items, where the items have at least one of their edges exposed for viewing as they pass along the feed path.
  • The system not forming part of the invention per se includes means for separating the overlapped items so as to not be fully overlapped by shifting the position of the overlapped items relative to each other. According to the invention this shift is accomplished by including a transition section in the conveyance path along which the items are transported. The transition section can include, but is not limited to, a bent section, an edge section, and/or a curved section of the conveyance path, a reverse conveyance, or a vacuum assisted section.
  • In various embodiments, the system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, can include means for transporting items (single and/or overlapped) in a sequence along a feed path of an item sorting and handling apparatus, means for measuring the thickness of the item at a plurality of points along the length of the item as it passes through a detection area, an outline extraction means for generating a thickness outline (contour) from the data representing the different thicknesses (thickness variations) measured along the length of the item, and processing means for analyzing the extracted thickness contour to determine a double feed condition (two or more overlapped items) based on the outline.
  • In particular, in various embodiments, the processing means analyzes the data representing the thickness contour to determine the transition edges between areas of different thicknesses.
  • In particular, in various embodiments, the processing means calculates the levels between the edges (step changes or steps or rate changes) to provide discrete levels of thicknesses, compares the height of each step with a preset minimum value, and determines whether the item is a single item or two or more overlapped items, or compares the rate of change of a height and determines whether the item is a single or two or more overlapped items, based on the comparison.
  • The processing means determines whether two or more items are overlapped when the step change is greater than the preset minimum value. The minimum value can be set depending on the specific application, and is based on numerous factors, such as, but not limited to, the type of item detected, the accuracy of the thickness and other detectors used in the system as well as the different variables of the item sorting and handling apparatus.
  • The double feed detection system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, further includes shifting overlapped items relative to each other by using a transition section, such as, but not limited to, a bent portion, a curved portion, and/or an edge portion, in the feed path. The overlapped items are caused to move apart relative to each other during movement of the items through the transition section.
  • The detection system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, further includes means for measuring the rigidity of the item at a predetermined position of the transition section. In particular, the rigidity of the item can be measured based on the deflection of the item passing through the transition portion and the geometry of the transition section.
  • The detection system not forming part of the invention per se, but on which the claimed method applies, further includes processing means to determine whether a double feed condition is present based on a combination of rigidity and thickness measurements.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way. The invention will be best understood by reading the ensuing specification in conjunction with the drawing figures, in which like elements are designated by like reference numerals. As used herein, various embodiments can mean some or all embodiments.
    • FIG. 1 is a side perspective view of a system for object edge detection;
    • FIG. 2 is a partial plan view of a multiple feed detection system;
    • FIG. 3 is a front perspective diagrammatic view of a multiple feed detection system;
    • FIGS. 4 and 5 are diagrammatic side views of overlapped mail items according to various embodiments;
    • FIG. 6 is a contour map showing thickness variation over a length of the feed.
    • FIG. 7 is a perspective diagrammatic view of a detection system including a transition section and a rigidity detection means according to various embodiments.
    • FIG. 8 is perspective diagrammatic view of a detection system illustrating detection on the item to measure edge and/or rigidity according to various embodiments; and
    • FIGS. 9A and 9B are block diagrams illustrating detection processes according to various embodiments.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In general, in FIGS. 1-3 a system and method of detecting overlapped items in an item sorting system is disclosed, the system including a detecting device for measuring a thickness of the item at a plurality of locations along a dimension of the item, a processing device configured to detect variations in the measured thickness and to measure differences between the variations. These "differences between variations" are also designated as "thickness differences" throughout this description and claims. The differences indicating step changes, or steps, between discrete levels of thicknesses, the processing device being further configured to compare the step changes (step heights) with a predetermined height value (X), and to determine a double feed condition indicative of two or more overlapped items when a step change (step height) is greater than the predetermined height value (X).
  • The system 100 shown in FIGS. 1-3 is configured to detect various features, such as, but not limited to, edge, rigidity, thickness, etc., of an item A in order to determine certain conditions of the item A, such as, but no limited to, a double or multiple feeds condition where two or more items 110, 120 are partially or completely overlapped. Item A in FIGS. 1-3 includes two overlapped mail pieces 110, 120 stuck together along their flat sides with one or more edges completely or partially overlapped. However, item A can include any other combination of items, such as, but not limited to, pieces of mail (letter mail, mixed mail), flats, and other postal items, or other similar shaped objects such as, but not limited to, shingles or plates. The overlapped items can have different heights, colors, widths, and/or thicknesses. The overlapped mail pieces 110 and 120 shown in FIGS. 1-3 are moved (transported) simultaneously along a conveyor path (not shown) using rollers 130 and 140, in a direction as indicated by the arrow (mail flow). One or more thickness detectors 150 and 160 can be positioned along the conveyance path in a plane substantially perpendicular to the overlapped mail pieces 110, 120 and having an optical path (light path) in a direction generally perpendicular to the direction of conveyance of the mail pieces 110, 120. Detectors 150 and 160 are configured to continuously measure the thickness of item A (including the overlapped mail pieces 110, 120) by viewing and detecting a single side or both sides of the item A as the item is moved through a detection field of the detectors 150, 160. The data from the thickness detectors 150 and 160 is transmitted to a processing device 170, shown in FIG. 2, which processes and analyzes the data from the detectors 150, 160 and generates an outline (contour) 180 (shown in detail in FIG. 6) of the thickness variations of item A along a dimension of item A which is substantially parallel with the direction of conveyance (i.e., a direction along the length of item A). The total length L of item A depends on the lengths L1 and L2 of the individual mail pieces 110 and 120, respectively, as well as the amount of overlap between them. The processing device 170 is further configured to identify (determine) based on the thickness contour 180 generated, the variations in the measured thickness of item A and to measure the differences between the variations (thickness differences), the differences indicating step changes (steps D1, D2, etc.) between discrete levels of thickness areas of item A (see FIGS. 4 and 5). The processing device 170 is further configured to calculate the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each of the identified step. The processing device 170 then compares the calculated height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each identified step with a previously determined height value (X) and identifies a double or multiple feed condition (i.e., overlapped mail pieces) when a height Si of a step Di is greater than the predetermined height value (X), and a no double feed condition (no overlapped mail pieces) when a height Si of a step Di is less than the predetermined height value (X). The number of mail pieces 110, 120 stuck to each other corresponds to the number of steps Di that have a height Si greater than the predetermined height value (X). This system and method therefore, allows for the detection of multiple overlapped items irrespective of their individual thicknesses or the total thickness of the overlapped items. The processing device 170 can further determine a rate and/or distance of overlap of the item based on the thickness contour measurements.
  • The thickness detectors 150, 160 can include any applicable thickness detectors, such as, but not limited to, any optical displacement detectors, laser, infrared or ultrasonic detectors, 2D and 3D camera based detectors, and any mechanical thickness measuring devices.
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary thickness contour 180 generated by the processing device 170 according to an embodiment. The contour shows discrete levels of thicknesses obtained from the measured thicknesses at different points along a length of a mail item A.
  • With respect to FIG. 7, there is shown a system 200 for detecting overlapped items 210 in a sorting installation. In various embodiments, the item 210 is a mail item including two overlapped mail pieces 220 and 230, for example, moved along a conveyor device or platen 241 using rollers 240 in a mail sorting installation. The conveying path has a transition section 242 which allows one of the mail pieces 220, for example, to move (shift) relative to the other 230, for example, while moving through the transition section 242. This transition section 242 can be a curved section in the conveyor belt, or an edge along the conveyor belt, or any other similar mechanism that allows the mail pieces 220, 230 to bend around the transition section 242 and shift relative to each other. The mail pieces 220, 230 can either separate completely through this movement or separate only partially so as to remain partially overlapped but with their respective leading edges 221, 231 further apart from each other for easier and more accurate viewing and detection. The separated leading edges 221, 231 allow for better recognition of the separations between the multiple thickness areas during the thickness contour generation.
  • The system 200 includes at least one thickness detector 250, 260, positioned in a plane substantially perpendicular to the item 210 and substantially perpendicular to the conveying path so as to continuously detect the thickness of the item 210 at different positions along the item 210 while it is moved along the conveyance path. The data from the thickness detectors 250, 260 is transmitted to a processing device (processor) 270 which analyzes the data received from the detectors 250, 260 and generates an outline (similarly to the outline shown in FIG. 6, for example) of the thickness variations along a dimension of the item 210 which is parallel with the direction of conveyance (i.e., the length of the item, for example). The processor 270 determines (identifies) areas where the total thickness of the item 210 changes, identifies the transition areas D1, D2 (steps) between adjacent areas of different thicknesses, and calculates the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each of the identified step (D1, D2, etc.). The processor 270 then compares the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each identified step (D1, D2, etc.) with a previously determined and stored height value (X) and identifies a double or multiple feed (overlapped items) condition when the height Si of a step Di is greater than the predetermined height value (X). The number of mail pieces stuck to each other (overlapped) corresponds with the number of step changes having a height above the predetermined height value.
  • According to the invention, at least one rigidity sensor 290 is also added into the system 200 to increase the double feed detection efficiency. The rigidity sensor 290 is positioned adjacent the transition section 242 so as to measure the rigidity of the transferred mail item 210 while the mail item 210 is bent while moving through the transition area 242. The rigidity sensor 290 is configured to measure a deflection of the individual mail pieces 210, 220 relative to the position of the rigidity sensor 290 and determine the rigidity (stiffness) of the mail pieces 210, 220, based on the measured deflections and the geometry (shape, position, etc.) of the transition section 242. Measuring the rigidity of the mail pieces 220, 230 helps to discern whether the mail pieces 220, 230 are overlapped even when the mail pieces 220, 230 have the same length and/or are substantially completely overlapped. When the mail pieces 220, 230 have the same length and/or are completely overlapped, it is harder to discern the two separate leading edges 221, 231 which indicate the step changes between two separate thickness regions. Detecting the rigidity of the individual mail pieces 220, 230 therefore increases the probability of detecting a double (or multiple) feed condition while reducing detection errors.
  • According to the invention The processor 270 is further configured to analyze the data received from the rigidity detector 290 and compare the measured rigidity with a predetermined rigidity value (Y). The processor 270 then compares the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each identified step with the previously determined height value (X) and the measured rigidity with a predetermined rigidity value (Y), and identifies a double feed condition when the height of a step is greater than the predetermined height value (X) and the rigidity exceeds the predetermined rigidity value (Y), and a no double feed condition when the step change and the rigidity do not exceed the respective predetermined values (X) and (Y). This allows for the detection of multiple overlapped items irrespective of their individual thicknesses or the total thickness and length of the overlapped item, and thus allows for a more accurate determination of whether multiple mail pieces are overlapped during sorting.
  • The rigidity and thickness detectors 290, 250, 260 can include any applicable thickness and rigidity detectors, such as, but not limited to, any optical displacement detectors, laser, infrared or ultrasonic detectors, and 2D and 3D camera based detectors. The thickness detector can also include any applicable mechanical thickness detection mechanism.
  • The system not forming part of the invention per se, therefore, allows for the detection of multiple overlapped mail pieces irrespective of their individual thicknesses or the total thickness and length of the overlapped mail piece. The system can be used to detect a condition, such as a double or multiple feed condition of any combination of mail items having different or similar shapes, lengths, widths, and/or thicknesses. The mail items can be, but are not limited to, letters, postcards, and/or flats. The system not forming part of the invention per se and method according to the invention can also be used to detect overlapped items having similar shapes, such as, but not limited to, shingles and plates. The processing device can further determine a rate and/or distance of overlap of the item based on the thickness contour measurements.
  • With respect to FIG. 8, there is shown a system 300 not forming part of the invention per se for detecting overlapped items 330 in an item sorting installation. The item 330 with two overlapped pieces 310 and 320 is moved along a conveyor device or platen 341 using rollers 340. The conveying path has a transition section 342 which allows one of the pieces to move (shift) relative to the other while moving through the transition section 342. The transition section 342 can be a curved section in the conveyor belt, or an edge along the conveyor belt, or any other similar mechanism that allows the pieces 310, 320 to bend or move around the transition section 342 and shift relative to each other. The pieces 310, 320 can either separate completely through this movement or separate only partially so as to remain partially overlapped but with their respective leading edges 311, 321 further apart from each other for easier and more accurate viewing and detection. The separated leading edges 311, 321 allow for better recognition of the separations between the multiple thickness areas during thickness contour generation, for example. The separated leading edges 311, 321 also allow for better recognition of the leading edges during edge detection, for example.
  • Two detectors (sensors) 301, 302 are positioned adjacent the transition section 342 and are configured to measure the rigidity and/or the thickness of the transferred item 330 and/or to detect the leading edges 311, 321 of the overlapped pieces 310, 320 while the item 330 is bent (shifted) while moving through the transition area 342. Two detectors are shown in FIG. 8. However, only one detector configured to measure the thickness, rigidity and/or detect edges, can also be used. The detectors 301, 302 can detect the rigidity of the item 330 by measuring a deflection of the individual pieces 310, 320 relative to the position of the detectors 301, 302, respectively, and determine the rigidity (stiffness) of the individual pieces 310, 320 based on the measured deflections and the geometry (shape, position, etc.) of the transition section 342. Measuring the rigidity of the item 330 helps discern whether the individual pieces 310, 320 are overlapped even when the pieces 310, 320 have the same length and/or are completely overlapped. When the pieces 310, 320 have the same length and/or are completely overlapped, it is harder to discern two separate leading edges 311, 321 or two separate thickness regions and therefore, detecting the rigidity of the individual pieces 310, 320 of the item 330 increases the probability of detecting a double (multiple) feed condition. The detectors 301 and 302 can also be configured to measure a thickness of the item 330 at a plurality of positions along the length of the item 330 as it moves through the transition section 342. The data from the detectors 301, 302 can be sent to a processing device (not shown) which then analyzes the data received from the detectors 301, 302 and determines whether there is an item overlap based on the measured rigidity, and/or a thickness contour analysis and/or a leading edge position detection of the individual pieces 310, 320 of the item 330.
  • In an embodiment where one of the detectors 301, 302 is used as a thickness detector and the other one as a rigidity detector, the processor is configured to analyze the data received from both detectors 301, 302 and combine the measurements to determine whether an overlap condition exists. The processor derives a thickness contour based on the thickness measurement taken at different points along a length of the item 330 while the item is moving through the transition region 342. The processor then identifies locations where variations in the item 330 thickness occur and assign a step Di to each location where a change in the thickness occurs. The processor then calculates a height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of all identified steps Di and compares the height (S1, S2, S3, etc.) of each identified step with a previously determined height value (X). The processor is further configured to compare the measured rigidity using the second detector with a predetermined rigidity value (Y). The processor then identifies a double feed condition when a step change is greater than the predetermined height value (X) and the rigidity exceeds the predetermined rigidity value (Y), and a no double feed condition when the step change and the rigidity do not exceed the respective predetermined values (X) and (Y). This system not forming part of the invention per se therefore, allows for the detection of multiple overlapped items irrespective of their individual thicknesses or the total thickness and length of the overlapped item, and thus allows for a more accurate determination of whether multiple mail pieces are overlapped during sorting. The processing device can further determine a rate and/or distance of overlap of the item based on the thickness contour measurements.
  • The individual pieces 310, 320 can include any mail items having different or similar shapes, lengths, widths, and/or thicknesses. The mail items can be, but are not limited to, letters, postcards, and/or flats. The system and method can also be used to detect overlapped items having similar shapes, such as, but not limited to, shingles and plates.
  • The rigidity, thickness and edge detectors 301, 302 can include any applicable thickness, rigidity and edge detectors, such as, but not limited to, any optical displacement detectors, laser, infrared or ultrasonic detectors, and 2D and 3D camera based detectors. The thickness detector can also include any mechanical thickness detectors.
  • In FIG. 9A it is illustrated a detection process s100 that can be applied to detect an item condition, such as, a double or multiple feeds condition (overlapped items) using any of the systems as disclosed in the embodiments of FIGS. 1-8. The process s100 can also be stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium, such as disks, CD-ROMs, etc. and executed using a computer processing system including any software and hardware modules necessary for execution of the process in a particular application. A sequence of programmed instructions is embodied upon the computer-readable storage medium for handling overlapped items in an item sorting system so that when a computer processing system executes the sequence of programmed instructions embodied on the computer-readable storage medium it causes the computer processing system to perform the steps of: measuring a thickness of the item at a plurality of locations along a dimension of the item, detecting variations in the measured thickness, measuring differences between the variations (thickness differences), the differences indicating steps between discrete levels of thicknesses, comparing the steps with a predetermined height value, and determining a double feed condition indicative of two or more overlapped items when a step greater than the predetermined height value.
  • In s1, a detection device is continuously measuring a thickness of an item at various points along a dimension of the moving item (length, for example) while the item being transported (transferred, conveyed) on a conveying device through a detection field of a thickness measuring detector. A thickness contour generation follows in step s2 in which a contour is generated based on the variations in the thickness of the item across its dimension. Based on the generated contour, steps or locations where there is a change in the thickness of the item are detected in step s3. The height of each of the detected step is calculated in s4 and the measured heights are compared to a previously set height value (X) in s5. Based on the result of the comparison, it is determined in s6 whether the item is an overlapped item and therefore, whether a double or multiple feeds condition exists. If the height of a step is greater than the predetermined height value (X), there is an overlap condition present, namely, the item contains overlapped pieces (s7), whereas if the height of a step change is less than the predetermined height value (X), it is concluded that there is no overlap and therefore no double feed condition (s8). The number of steps having a height greater than the predetermined height value (X) represents the number of items which are overlapped.
  • In FIG. 9B, it is illustrated a detection process s200 that can be applied to detect an item condition, such as, a double or multiple feeds condition (overlapped items) using any of the systems as disclosed in the embodiments of FIGS. 1-8, where in addition to thickness detection, rigidity detection is also performed on the moving item. The process s200 can also be stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium, such as disks, CD-ROMs, etc. and executed using a computer processing system including and any software and hardware modules necessary for execution of the process in a particular application. A sequence of programmed instructions is embodied upon the computer-readable storage medium for handling overlapped items in an item sorting system so that when a computer processing system executes the sequence of programmed instructions embodied on the computer-readable storage medium it causes the computer processing system to perform the steps of: measuring a thickness of the item at a plurality of locations along a dimension of the item, detecting variations in the measured thickness, measuring differences between the variations (thickness differences), the differences indicating steps between discrete levels of thicknesses, comparing the steps with a predetermined value, and determining a double feed condition indicative of two or more overlapped items when a step is greater than the predetermined height value.
  • A detection device is continuously measuring a thickness of an item in s10 along various points along a dimension of the item, the item being transported (transferred, conveyed) on a conveying device through a measuring section. A thickness contour generation follows in step s20 in which a contour is generated based on the variations in the thickness of the item across its dimension. Based on the generated contour, step changes or locations where there is a change in the thickness of the item, are detected in step s30. The height of each of the detected step is calculated in s40 and the measured heights are compared to a previously set height value (X) in s50. During the thickness measurement step s1, the item rigidity is also measured (s90). In s60 the result of the comparison in step s50 is combined with a step of comparing the measured rigidity in s90 with a predetermined rigidity value (Y). Based on the combined comparison in s60, it is determined whether a double or multiple feeds condition exists. If the height of a step is greater than the predetermined height value (X) and the rigidity is greater than the predetermined rigidity value (Y) then there is an overlap condition present, namely, the item contains overlapped pieces (s70), whereas if the height of a step is less than the predetermined height value (X) and the rigidity is less than the predetermined rigidity value (Y), it is concluded that there is no overlap and therefore no double feed condition (s80). The number of steps having a height greater than the predetermined height value (X) and a greater rigidity than the predetermined rigidity value (Y) represents the number of items which are overlapped.
  • It is therefore, apparent that there is provided, in accordance with the present disclosure, a system and method for detecting overlapped items in a sequence of items.

Claims (1)

  1. A method of detecting overlapped items in an item sorting system, the method comprising:
    measuring a thickness of the item at a plurality of locations along the item;
    detecting variations in the measured thickness;
    measuring thickness differences, the differences indicating steps between discrete levels of thicknesses;
    comparing the steps with a predetermined height value;
    and determining a double feed condition indicative of two or more overlapped items when a step height is greater than the predetermined height value characterized by the following steps:
    changing a direction of movement of the item along the conveyance path so as to shift overlapped items relative to each other, the changing of the direction of movement including transporting the item along a transition section in the conveyance path, the transition section including any one of a bent portion, a curved portion, and an edge portion in the conveyance path;
    measuring the rigidity of the item during the shift;
    wherein a double feed condition is determined to be present when a step height is greater than the predetermined height value and the rigidity is greater than the predetermined rigidity value.
EP11151148A 2010-02-09 2011-01-17 Method for detecting overlapped Items based on rigidity and thickness contour measurements Active EP2354064B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US30294810P 2010-02-09 2010-02-09
US12/875,307 US8631922B2 (en) 2010-02-09 2010-09-03 System, apparatus, and method for object edge detection

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2354064A1 EP2354064A1 (en) 2011-08-10
EP2354064B1 true EP2354064B1 (en) 2013-01-16

Family

ID=43838138

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11151148A Active EP2354064B1 (en) 2010-02-09 2011-01-17 Method for detecting overlapped Items based on rigidity and thickness contour measurements

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US8631922B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2354064B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2011161436A (en)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2818145C (en) * 2012-06-08 2021-01-05 Wulftec International Inc. Apparatuses for wrapping a load and supplying film for wrapping a load and associated methods
EP2763105B1 (en) * 2013-01-31 2018-08-22 Neopost Technologies Image acquisition system for processing and tracking mail pieces
US9478030B1 (en) * 2014-03-19 2016-10-25 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Automatic visual fact extraction
CN104002178B (en) * 2014-05-27 2017-08-25 广州大正新材料科技有限公司 A kind of manipulator feeding detection means
WO2016018395A1 (en) 2014-07-31 2016-02-04 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Document region detection
CA3112063C (en) 2014-10-01 2022-11-29 United States Postal Service Transformable tray and tray system for receiving, transporting and unloading items
US9840379B2 (en) 2015-05-12 2017-12-12 The United States Postal Service Systems and methods for loading items into a tray
USD804822S1 (en) 2016-06-23 2017-12-12 United States Postal Service Transformable tray
EP3412609B1 (en) * 2017-06-08 2024-04-17 Canon Production Printing Holding B.V. Image forming device and method of operating an image forming device
US11053090B1 (en) * 2018-03-06 2021-07-06 Imaging Business Machines Llc Document scanner with envelope discrimination and detection
WO2020209986A1 (en) * 2019-04-10 2020-10-15 Laitram, L.L.C. Package detection and intelligent sorting
EP3999254A4 (en) 2019-10-02 2023-07-12 Laitram, L.L.C. Stacked-package detection system
CN116198898B (en) * 2023-04-20 2023-07-25 巴斯夫一体化基地(广东)有限公司 Warehouse for storing goods

Family Cites Families (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4360108A (en) 1981-01-05 1982-11-23 Joule' Technical Corporation Method and apparatus for checking letter thickness
US4516264A (en) 1982-01-29 1985-05-07 United States Of America Postal Service Apparatus and process for scanning and analyzing mail information
US4733226A (en) 1986-01-07 1988-03-22 Nec Corporation Overlapped-transfer detecting apparatus for mail article
JP2513627B2 (en) * 1986-03-29 1996-07-03 株式会社東芝 Paper processing equipment
US5174562A (en) * 1987-02-25 1992-12-29 Omron Tateisi Electronics Co. Paper sheet handling apparatus
FR2685650A1 (en) 1991-12-31 1993-07-02 Alcatel Satmam Device for detecting doubles for use in a mail processing machine
GB9217568D0 (en) 1992-08-19 1992-09-30 The Technology Partnership Ltd Device and method for detecting residual content of emptied envelopes
US5565627A (en) 1994-10-11 1996-10-15 Xecutek Corporation Ultrasonic edge detector and control system
JP3731976B2 (en) * 1997-05-23 2006-01-05 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 Double feed detection device and method
US6421451B2 (en) 1997-09-16 2002-07-16 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Step difference detection apparatus and processing apparatus using the same
JP2000317404A (en) * 1999-05-10 2000-11-21 Hitachi Ltd Mail sorting device
WO2001039139A1 (en) 1999-11-25 2001-05-31 Fujitsu Limited Sheets processor
CA2361969A1 (en) 2001-11-14 2003-05-14 Omron Canada Inc. A method and system for double feed detection in a letter sorting apparatus
FR2841487B1 (en) 2002-06-26 2004-08-20 Solystic METHOD FOR DETECTING SINGLE PLIERS AND MULTIPLE PLUG PLUGS IN A POSTAL SORTING FACILITY
US7025348B2 (en) 2002-11-25 2006-04-11 Eastman Kodak Company Method and apparatus for detection of multiple documents in a document scanner using multiple ultrasonic sensors
JP4387176B2 (en) 2003-12-12 2009-12-16 日立オムロンターミナルソリューションズ株式会社 Banknote discrimination
US7654521B2 (en) 2004-04-06 2010-02-02 Eastman Kodak Company Apparatus, method and program product for detecting article multifeed overlap
US7415881B2 (en) 2004-08-19 2008-08-26 Fife Corporation Ultrasonic sensor system for web-guiding apparatus
JP4669817B2 (en) * 2005-07-08 2011-04-13 株式会社リコー Double feed detection device, double feed determination method, and image forming apparatus
US7817957B2 (en) 2005-07-08 2010-10-19 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Double feed sensing device, double feed determining method and image forming apparatus
FR2891168B1 (en) * 2005-09-28 2007-10-19 Solystic Sas METHOD FOR DETECTING POSTAL SHIPMENTS IN MULTIPLE CATCHES BY ANALYZING THE IMAGE OF THE SENDING OF SENDS
DE102008007010A1 (en) 2007-03-22 2008-09-25 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Sifting method for sifting stacked objects e.g., for postal service, involves measuring thickness of object in stack for use as reference thickness
JP5546145B2 (en) 2008-03-31 2014-07-09 キヤノン株式会社 Double feed detection device and image forming apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20110192703A1 (en) 2011-08-11
US8631922B2 (en) 2014-01-21
JP2011161436A (en) 2011-08-25
EP2354064A1 (en) 2011-08-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2354064B1 (en) Method for detecting overlapped Items based on rigidity and thickness contour measurements
US4630813A (en) Method of and device for detecting displacement of paper sheets
US20140034456A1 (en) Detection system for installation at a conveyor belt
EP2886498A2 (en) Sheet processing apparatus
CN111553951B (en) Parcel processing apparatus and parcel processing method
JP4082898B2 (en) Method and apparatus for determining accuracy of folding state
US11127120B2 (en) Coin identification apparatus, coin processing apparatus, and coin identification method
EP2476491B1 (en) Device and method for measuring the thickness of postal objects
CN101236614B (en) For counting the device of scale stream print product
JP2016160058A (en) Paper sheet processing apparatus
US7347417B2 (en) Method and arrangement for detecting overlapping flat mailpieces
JPS61122510A (en) Detecting device for tilt angle of paper or the like
EP3241156B1 (en) Counting of articles of nominal length
JP6376145B2 (en) Squareness measuring method and perpendicularity measuring apparatus for thick steel plate
US20050006285A1 (en) Sheet discriminator, sheet discriminating method and sheet discriminating threshold value deciding method
JP2000202369A (en) Paper sheet handling apparatus
JP3335513B2 (en) Deformed coin detection device
US8371581B2 (en) Method of detecting open mailpieces such as non-wrapped magazines
JP4972486B2 (en) Curl measuring device, curl measuring method, and image forming apparatus
JP2000262976A (en) Conveyor for paper sheets
JP6334327B2 (en) Paper sheet stacking device
JP2000061407A (en) Paper sheet handling apparatus
US20090084716A1 (en) Method and System for Weighing Mail Pieces
JP2005031909A (en) Paper sheet detector, paper sheet discrimination device, and paper sheet discrimination method
JP2002249261A (en) Double feed detector for paper sheet

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110606

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: METHOD FOR DETECTING OVERLAPPED ITEMS BASED ON RIGIDITY AND THICKNESS CONTOUR MEASUREMENTS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 593780

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130215

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011000737

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130314

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130116

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130427

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130416

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130516

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130416

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130131

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130516

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130417

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20131017

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130117

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011000737

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131017

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20110117

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130116

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130117

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20180122

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 593780

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190117

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20200127

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20200127

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20200123

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20210117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210131

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210131

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210117

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240119

Year of fee payment: 14