EP2344413B1 - Fuel vapor management system with proportioned flow splitting - Google Patents

Fuel vapor management system with proportioned flow splitting Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2344413B1
EP2344413B1 EP09737299A EP09737299A EP2344413B1 EP 2344413 B1 EP2344413 B1 EP 2344413B1 EP 09737299 A EP09737299 A EP 09737299A EP 09737299 A EP09737299 A EP 09737299A EP 2344413 B1 EP2344413 B1 EP 2344413B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
vapor
fuel
pressure
ust
flow splitter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP09737299A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2344413A1 (en
Inventor
Michael F Tschantz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
WestRock MWV LLC
Original Assignee
Meadwestvaco Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Meadwestvaco Corp filed Critical Meadwestvaco Corp
Publication of EP2344413A1 publication Critical patent/EP2344413A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2344413B1 publication Critical patent/EP2344413B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B67—OPENING, CLOSING OR CLEANING BOTTLES, JARS OR SIMILAR CONTAINERS; LIQUID HANDLING
    • B67D—DISPENSING, DELIVERING OR TRANSFERRING LIQUIDS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B67D7/00—Apparatus or devices for transferring liquids from bulk storage containers or reservoirs into vehicles or into portable containers, e.g. for retail sale purposes
    • B67D7/04—Apparatus or devices for transferring liquids from bulk storage containers or reservoirs into vehicles or into portable containers, e.g. for retail sale purposes for transferring fuels, lubricants or mixed fuels and lubricants
    • B67D7/0476—Vapour recovery systems

Definitions

  • WO 01/66549 to Seabader et al. corresponds to the preamble of claim 1 and discloses a method and device for reducing hydrocarbon emissions which escape from refuelling devices containing fuel for spark ignition engines, during the return of tank gases into the storage tank that is effected by gas pumps, via a ventilation pipe during a pressure compensation effected by the gas pumps.
  • the gas guided in the ventilation pipe is guided into a gas washer through which a diesel oil flows, and is reduced into small droplets.
  • the vaporous hydrocarbons are absorbed from these droplets by the diesel oil, and the cleaned residual gas is permitted to rise and flow out.
  • Vacuum Assist Stage II vapour management system is a technology that utilizes a vacuum pump to mechanically draw air and vapors from the vehicle to the UST.
  • the drawn air is metered to provide a fixed ratio, called the air-to-liquid (A/L) ratio, with the volume rate of liquid fuel dispensed to the vehicle.
  • the A/L ratio may be specified by local or national regulations and typically ranges between 0.9 and 1.2. Under the frequent conditions when the A/L ratio is greater than 1.0 or when the HC concentration in the returned stream is below the saturation concentration inside the UST, UST pressurization will take place.
  • the quantity of air at equilibrium (or at saturation) in the ullage space of a UST at a given pressure is dependent upon a number of factors, primarily relating to the fuel vapour pressure which is a function of fuel properties and temperature.
  • an excess of air may be delivered into the UST that can lead to pressurization. These situations include when: (1) the A/L ratio is greater than 1; (2) there is a negative fuel Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) difference between the initial fuel in the vehicle and the UST; (3) there is a negative temperature difference between the vehicle's fuel tank and the UST; or (4) there is less than ideal recovery efficiency at the vehicle and in-leakage, as a result of a poor seal between the dispenser nozzle and the vehicle's fill-port.
  • UST pressurization may lead to fuel vapor venting through the UST vent and/or through leaks in the UST system, thus resulting in VOC emissions to the atmosphere and/or to groundwater contamination.
  • the UST pressure should be maintained below atmospheric.
  • Vapor processors or pressure management systems are often required to reduce the UST pressure and to minimize the fuel vapor emitted from the vacuum assist Stage II vapor management systems at gasoline dispensing facilities (GDFs).
  • Vapor processors utilize technologies that separate air from fuel vapors, pump the purified air to the atmosphere, and return the fuel vapors to the UST.
  • the vapor processors are typically sized to meet the demand of the vapor management systems such that a slight system vacuum or ambient pressure is maintained in the UST. Examples of the technologies currently used for vapor processors are membrane separators, carbon switch-bed adsorbers, refrigerated condensers, and flares or catalytic burners.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,305,807 discloses the fuel vapor management system for a UST using a single activated carbon canister to control UST pressures between high and low levels.
  • a dedicated vacuum pump pulls a mixture of air and fuel vapor from the ullage space of the UST (based either on pressure triggers or a timer) and delivers the mixture to the activated carbon canister.
  • the fuel vapors are adsorbed onto the activated carbon in the canister, and fresh air is vented from the system to result in a temporary slight negative pressure of 62 Pa to 249 Pa (14" w.e. to 1" w.e.).
  • a series of solenoid valves permits the same vacuum pump to reduce the pressure in the carbon canister to nearly full vacuum (i.e., zero atmosphere).
  • the adsorbed fuel vapors are desorbed from the activated carbon and discharged back into the ullage of the UST.
  • air is prevented from entering the canister through its vent by means of a check valve.
  • the UST pressure may rise as a result of continuing refueling vapor management operations.
  • the system is intended to operate for about 15 minutes out of every 2 hours.
  • Single carbon bed systems traditionally operate based on pressure limit triggers, wherein the overall maximum system pressure may be maintained below some threshold, but the UST pressure can fluctuate over a wide range below the maximum.
  • the fuel vapor management systems using activated carbon switch-bed adsorbers are usually designed in a similar fashion to those used for fuel vapor management systems of tank loadings at tank farms. These switch-bed systems utilize two carbon beds that operate out of phase in load mode and purge mode. In load mode, by utilizing a network of valves, the vapors in the UST are vented to one activated carbon bed in the switch-bed system. The fuel vapors therein are adsorbed onto the activated carbon, allowing air to vent from the adsorber to the atmosphere while maintaining atmospheric pressure in the system. Furthermore, a vacuum pump may be used to pump air and vapor from the UST to one adsorber in the load mode and permit the UST to develop a negative pressure relative to the ambient.
  • a vacuum pump pulls a nearly full vacuum on the carbon canister to desorb hydrocarbons and return them to the UST.
  • a small amount of air may be allowed to enter the purging canister to provide improved regeneration, but the vacuum level remains nearly full. So long as the volume of air used during purge is less than the volume of air being vented to the out-of-phase loading canister, a negative UST pressure may be maintained.
  • each carbon canister must be sized to accommodate the total excess vapor and air mixture of the GDF resulting from both excess air pumped into the UST and the re-establishment of equilibrium in the UST. As a result, this system demands a substantially large carbon canister, and consequently a high capacity vacuum pump.
  • a large canister commonly results in thermal and channeling problems that causes poor efficiency and further adds to the size of the canister and the regeneration vacuum pump.
  • U.S. Patent No. 3,874,427 discloses the fuel vapor management system that addresses the requirement of a substantially large carbon bed, but the carbon bed is not regenerated and must be replaced at a frequency dependent upon the capacity of the canister to adsorb hydrocarbons.
  • a vacuum pump is placed in a vapor return line downstream of the vehicle fuel tank and an adsorbent canister which prevents the fuel vapors from reaching the atmosphere. The vapors are pulled from the vehicle by vacuum and subjected alternately to an adsorbent canister or to the bulk fuel storage tank.
  • the vacuum pump is run at a rate substantially equal to the rate at which fuel is being dispensed or proportioned by the A/L ratio so that the entire returned vapors are pulled by the pump and subjected through the adsorptive material during the load mode until the UST reaches a target negative pressure.
  • the system utilizes a plenum to increase the volume of the vapor return piping at a point, or points, external to the underground bulk storage tank, a timer and/or a solenoid, magnetic, flow, pressure, mechanical or other activated valves.
  • a fuel vapor management system for recovering fuel vapors displaced from vehicle fuel tanks, or the like, during the filling thereof from a bulk storage tank is disclosed that has excellent emission control and pressure management.
  • a flow splitter is disclosed that utilizes positive pressure and locates downstream of a vacuum pump. The flow splitter is used to direct a portion of the gasoline vapors and air returned from the vehicle to an adsorbent canister and the remaining portion to the UST, in such a proportion that a selected UST vacuum may be achieved.
  • the flow splitter may be included as a part of the vapor management system that relies upon a rapidly purging canister system and may be regenerated between vehicle refuelings, while minimizing canister volume requirements and stabilizing negative UST pressures.
  • the disclosed system may be installed at the dispenser or centrally located.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of one embodiment of the disclosed vapor management system for a central vacuum Stage II vapor management system, wherein the fuel capturing component includes an adsorbent material;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic view of one embodiment of the disclosed vapor management system for a central vacuum Stage II vapor management system, wherein the fuel capturing component includes a member separator;
  • FIG. 3 shows the different locations of the vacuum pump in the disclosed vacuum assist Stage II vapor management system: each vacuum for the fuel dispenser unit( Figure 3A ) and a central vacuum Stage II vapor management system ( Figure 3B );
  • FIG.4 is a schematic view of one embodiment of the disclosed vapor management system, showing a flow splitter device positioning downstream from the Stage II vacuum pump to proportionally direct the returned vapor to the UST and the vapor capturing component;
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing various embodiments of the present disclosure to split the flow on the conduit connection around the flow splitter and to isolate the vapor capturing device during regeneration of FIG. 4 : Figures 5(A), 5(B), 5(C), and 5(D) ;
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic view showing one embodiments of the present disclosure on the conduit connection around the flow splitter of FIG. 4 ;
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic view showing one embodiments of the present disclosure on the conduit connection around the flow splitter of FIG. 4 ;
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic view showing one embodiments of the present disclosure on the conduit connection around the flow splitter of FIG. 4 .
  • the disclosed fuel vapor management system is suitable for use as a Vacuum Assist Stage II vapor management system utilizing a vacuum pump to mechanically draw air and vapors from the vehicle to the UST.
  • FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of the disclosed fuel vapor management system.
  • a dispenser of conventional fuel pumps 101 is mounted above an underground fuel storage tank 102 that has a vent conduit 103 to release pressure inside the UST.
  • the vent conduit 103 may include a pressure/vacuum valve 104 to control the venting process.
  • One end of a fuel delivery line 105 communicates with the submersible pump 118 in the UST 102, while the other end communicates the discharge of dispenser 101 and subsequently a refueling nozzle 106.
  • One end of a vapor return line 107 is connected to the refueling nozzle106, and at the other end is connected to a flow splitter 108 where it is divided into a first branch 109 and a second branch 110.
  • the vapor return line 107 has a vacuum pump 111 to pull the returned vapor to the flow splitter 108.
  • the first branch 109 connects the flow splitter 108 with an ullage portion of the UST 102.
  • the second branch 110 is connected at one end to a three-way means 112 and at the other end to the flow splitter 108.
  • three-way means 112 is shown in FIG.1 , it is to be understood that other means may be used without departure from the spirit of the present disclosure.
  • the three-way valve means 112 is adapted to divide the vapor conduit 113 alternative into a loading conduit 110 and a purge conduit 114.
  • the loading Conduit 110 communicates to a vapor capturing component 115 capable of capturing fuel in the returned vapor.
  • the vent conduit 116 has one end connecting to the vapor capturing component 115 and at the other end opening to an atmosphere.
  • the vent conduit 116 may include a pressure valve 117 to regulate positive pressures during load and vacuum during purge.
  • the purge conduit 114 may connect to the second branch 109 or directly to the ullage space of the UST 102.
  • the purge conduit 114 may have a vacuum pump to produce a vacuum in vapor capturing component 115 and to pull the vapors in the conduit to the ullage area of the UST 102.
  • Pressure valve 117 may also be two separate lines and valves to regulate purge air flow during purge and a low pressure drop during load.
  • fuel in the UST 102 is delivered to the automobile fuel tank through the conduit 105, the discharge of station pump 101, and ultimately the refueling nozzle 106.
  • a mixture of air and fuel vapor in the automobile fuel tank that is displaced during the fueling process plus additional air from outside the automobile is pulled into the conduit 107 by the pump 111.
  • a positive pressure is developed between pump 111 and flow splitter 108.
  • the returned vapor flow in the conduit 107 is divided by the flow splitter 108 to the first branch 109 and the second branch 110.
  • the returned vapor in the first branch 109 is delivered to the ullage space of the UST 102.
  • the pressure level inside the UST is controlled such that a negative pressure is maintained throughout the load mode.
  • the returned vapor in the second branch 110 is subjected to the three-way valve means 112 that is opened to the conduit 113 such that the returned vapor in the second branch 110 enters into the vapor capturing component 115.
  • the fuel vapor in the returned vapor flow is adsorbed by the adsorbents inside the vapor capturing component 115, allowing air in the returned vapor to vent into the atmosphere through a positive pressure valve 117 in the vent conduit 116 at a predetermined setpoint.
  • the three-way valve means 112 is opened between the conduits 113 and 114.
  • at least one of these conduits may include a vacuum pump to reduce the pressure in vapor capturing component 115.
  • the fresh air is also drawn into the vapor capturing component 115, wherein the adsorbed fuel vapors are desorbed from the adsorbents.
  • the purge conduit 114 connects directly to ullage space of the UST 102
  • the desorbed fuel vapor exits the vapor capturing component 115 and flows through the conduit 113, the three-way valve means 112, the conduit 114 to ultimately the ullage space in the UST 102.
  • the desorbed fuel vapor exits the vapor capturing component 115, flows through the conduit 113 and the three-way valve means 112, and then merges with the returned vapor in the first branch 109 through the conduit 114.
  • a vacuum pump may be used to purge the vapor capturing component 115.
  • any known three-way valve means may be used in the present disclosure.
  • examples of such three-way valve means include, but are not limited to solenoid valves, mechanical valves, and a like. Additionally, multiple lines with a single valve may be used in the system of the present disclosure.
  • the vapor capturing component suitable for use in the present disclosure may include a vapor adsorbent element and a container containing the vapor adsorbent element.
  • the containers are arranged in parallel with each other.
  • a single flow splitter may be used, and the actuation of the three-way valve means 112 may be triggered based upon the number of dispensers in use.
  • regenerable adsorbents for fuel vapors may be used in the present disclosure.
  • adsorbents include, but are not limited to, activated carbon, zeolite, activated alumina, carbon black, charcoal, silica gel, molecular sieves derived from natural or synthetic zeolites, and combinations thereof.
  • the adsorbent may be in a variety of forms. These include, but are not limited to, honeycomb, pellet, granular, fiber, powder, sheet, and combinations thereof.
  • Activated carbon adsorbent may be derived from a variety of materials.
  • the vapor capturing component includes one or more canisters of activated carbon adsorbent.
  • the adsorbent element includes activated carbon honeycomb.
  • FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of the disclosed fuel vapor management system.
  • An island of conventional fuel pumps 201 is mounted above an underground fuel storage tank 202 that has a vent conduit 203 to release pressure inside the UST.
  • the vent conduit 203 may include a pressure valve 204 to control the venting process.
  • One end of a fuel delivery line 205 communicates with the submersible pump 218 in the UST 202, while the other end communicates the discharge of pump 201 and subsequently a refueling nozzle 206.
  • One end of a vapor returned line 207 is connected to the refueling nozzle 206, and at the other end is connected to a flow splitter 208 where it is divided into a first branch 209 and a second branch 210.
  • the vapor returned line 207 has a vacuum pump 211 to pull the returned vapor to the flow splitter 208.
  • the first branch 209 connects the flow splitter 208 with an ullage portion of the UST 202.
  • the second branch 210 is connected to a fuel vapor capturing component 212 capable of capturing fuel in the returned vapor.
  • the vent conduit 213 has one end connecting to the fuel vapor capturing component 212 and at the other end opening to an atmosphere.
  • the vent conduit 116 may include a pressure valve 214.
  • the recycle conduit 215 connects the vapor capturing component 212 to the ullage space of the UST 102.
  • the recycled conduit 215 may have a vacuum pump to pull the vapors in the conduit to the ullage area of the UST 102.
  • fuel in the UST 202 is delivered to the vehicle fuel tank through the conduit 205, the discharge of station pump 201, and ultimately the refueling nozzle 206.
  • a mixture of air and fuel vapor in the automobile fuel tank that is displaced during the fueling process is pulled into the conduit 207 by the pump 211.
  • the stream of returned vapor in the conduit 207 is divided by the flow splitter 208 to the first branch 209 and the second branch 210.
  • the returned vapor in the first branch 209 is delivered to the ullage space of the UST 102.
  • the pressure level inside the UST is controlled such that a negative pressure is maintained throughout the load mode. The excess pressure may be released to the atmosphere through the vent conduit 203.
  • the returned vapor in the second branch 210 is subjected into the fuel vapor capturing component 212, wherein the fuel vapor and air in the returned vapor stream are separated from the air.
  • the separated fuel vapors exists the vapor capturing component 212 through the conduit 215, while air exists the vapor capturing component 212 through the positive pressure valve 214 in the vent conduit 213 to the atmosphere at a predetermined setpoint.
  • FIGs 1 and 2 represent only some embodiments of the vapor management systems of the present disclosure.
  • One skilled in the arts may modify the setup of the system yet may still within the scope of present disclosure. Examples of such setup modifications include, but are not limited to, the following: the vapor capturing component may be dedicated directly to each fuel dispenser unit; or several vapor capturing components may be manifolded together so that there is one vapor capturing component for each fuel dispenser but not necessarily dedicated to a specific dispenser.
  • FIG.3 illustrates examples of these modifications for the location of the vacuum pump in the vacuum assist Stage II vapor management system.
  • FIG.3A one vacuum pump 211 is dedicated to each fuel dispenser unit 201.
  • FIG.3B several fuel dispenser units 201 share a central vacuum pump 211.
  • the vapor capturing component may contain a membrane separator having a selective semipermeable barrier that allows only air in the returned vapor flow to pass through, and not the fuel vapor.
  • the present application discloses a method of controlling pressure for the Vacuum Assist Stage II vapor management system, while enhancing the efficiency of emission control.
  • the flow splitter 408 positioning downstream to a Stage II vacuum pump provides a means to split the flow of gasoline vapors and air returned from a Stage II vapor nozzles 406 and proportionally direct it to the UST 402 and to a vapor capturing system 415.
  • Various conduit connections around the flow splitter may be used for the present disclosure.
  • FIG.5 shows four examples of such conduit connections around the flow splitter, wherein 502 is a UST, 511 is a stage II vacuum pump, 515 is a vapor capturing system, 508 is a flow splitter, and 530 is a manual or automatic control valve.
  • the control valve 530 is positioned between the flow splitter 508 and the UST 502.
  • the control valve 530 is positioned between the flow splitter 508 and the vapor capturing system 515.
  • one control valve 530 is positioned between the flow splitter 508 and the UST 502, and the other control valve 530 is positioned between the flow splitter 508 and the vapor capturing system 515.
  • a manual or automatic control valve, or a three-way valve, or a flow splitter 540 is positioned at the intersection of the UST 502, the flow splitter 508 and the vapor capturing system 515.
  • FIG.6 shows another embodiment of such conduit connections around the flow splitter, wherein 601 is a fuel dispensing unit, 602 is a UST, 611 is a stage II vacuum pump, 608 is a flow splitter, 615 is a vapor capturing system, 630 is a manual or automatic control valve, 650 is a vent to atmosphere or to filter, and 660 is an orifice or restriction.
  • FIG. 7 shows another embodiment of such conduit connections around the flow splitter, wherein 701 is a fuel dispensing unit, 702 is a UST, 711 is a stage II vacuum pump, 708 is a flow splitter, 715 is a vapor capturing system, 730 is a manual or automatic control valve, 750 is a vent to atmosphere or to filter, and 760 is an orifice or restriction.
  • FIG.8 shows another embodiment of such conduit connections around the flow splitter, wherein 801 is a fuel dispensing unit, 802 is a UST, 811 is a stage II vacuum pump, 808 is a flow splitter, 815 is a vapor capturing system, 830 is a manual or automatic control valve, 850 is a vent to atmosphere or to filter, and 860 is an orifice or restriction.
  • the flow splitter itself may be as simple as a pipe tee with the restriction of one or both of the tee outlets being controlled to divert a proportion of flow of the vapors to the vapor capturing device.
  • the flow splitter may be a pressure control valve wherein the feedback from the UST pressure acts to maintain the UST pressure to some predetermined setpoint.
  • the flow splitter may be a fixed splitter wherein the level of flow splitting may be adjusted and calibrated to meet selected performance. Any known flow splitter techniques may be used in the present disclosure.
  • control valve with pressure feedback from the UST; setting the ratio of flow using orifices or pipe diameters; using an adjustable valve or orifice; a non-adjustable valve or orifice; or T-connector.
  • the returned fuel vapor from the vehicle is sent back to the UST and then drawn from the UST to the activated carbon canister.
  • the return fuel vapor is pumped from the vehicle directly to the vapor capturing component.
  • the vapors are treated and concentrated before reaching the UST.
  • the pressure inside the UST of the disclosed system may be maintained at a relatively constant pressure by diverting a portion of the returned vapor stream to the vapor capturing device and the remaining portion to the ullage space of the UST.
  • the disclosed system diverts the returned vapor stream into two portions such that only a portion of the returned vapor is subjected to the vapor capturing device.
  • the adsorbent required for the disclosed system is regenerable and may be substantially smaller than that required for the known vapor management system, particularly the system of U.S. Patent No. 3,874,427 .
  • the disclosed vapor management system has excellent fuel emission control and pressure management.
  • the activated carbon in canister becomes saturated and no longer effective in adsorbing fuel vapors, it is essential to remove the fuel-loaded canister from the system and replaced with an identical canister containing fresh or regenerated activated carbon.
  • the manual replacement process of each fuel-loaded carbon canister is burdensome, labor demanding, and maintenance intensive.
  • the fuel-loaded adsorbent element in the vapor capturing device of the disclosed system may be regenerated in-line during purge mode. Accordingly, the disclosed system significantly reduces the labor cost and cost of replacement parts, which is typically required for replacing the fuel-loaded carbon canister as in the system of U.S. Patent No. 3,874,427 .
  • the fuel-loaded adsorbent element in the vapor capturing component of the disclosed system may be effectively regenerated in a remarkably shorter time period and at substantially higher pressure than those of known vapor management systems.
  • the fuel-loaded adsorbent element may be regenerated in less than 3 minutes at a pressure of more than 20265 Pa (0.2 atmospheres) absolute pressure.
  • the fuel-loaded adsorbent element may be regenerated in less than 2 minutes at the pressure of more than 30398 Pa (0.3 atmospheres) absolute pressure.
  • the vapor management system of known arts typical requires full vacuum (i.e., zero pressure) or nearly full vacuum in order to permit regeneration of the fuel-loaded adsorbent in the vapor capturing component.
  • a moderate purge vacuum level may provide a driving force for desorption of hydrocarbons from the adsorbent in combination with a moderate air purge flow.
  • An alternative means to promote desorption rather than using vacuum may be to draw air through the vapor capturing device (i.e, purging). For example, if a vapor capturing element, such as carbon bed, has a fixed working capacity with 100 bed volumes of air at 101325 Pa (1 atm) pressure, then only 25 bed volumes of air would be required to achieve the same fixed working capacity at 25 000 Pa (250 mbar) pressure and the vapor concentration would be increased significantly.
  • the amount of air available for purge is based displacing hydrocarbons desorbing from the adsorbent material to maintain a driving force for continued desorption. For example, if hydrocarbons at 25% vapor concentration are loaded onto the adsorbent, the hydrocarbons could be concentrated to >50% during purge at 25 000 Pa (250 mbar) operating pressure.
  • Example 1 If 9 psi RVP fuel at 21°C (70°F) is delivered from a UST at 37.9 l/min (10 gallons per minute) to refuel a vehicle initially containing 9 psi RVP fuel at 15.6°C (60°F), air and gasoline vapors will be displaced from the vehicle at a rate of approximately 40.1 l/min (10.6 gallons per minute). If the vapor management system was operating with a recovery efficiency of 80% and with an A/L ratio of 1.1, the system would be pulling vapors at 40.1 l/min (11 gallons per minute) at a concentration of 26.6% hydrocarbons.
  • the returned vapor stream would be split such that 12.9 l/min (3.4 gallons per minute) were delivered to the vapor capturing device and 28.8 l/min. (7.6 gallons per minute) were returned to the UST.
  • Approximately 1.1 liters of carbon honeycomb would be required to adsorb the 0.19 kg (19 grams) of hydrocarbons delivered to it over two minutes of time.
  • the canister would be purged at 25 000 Pa (250 mbar) operating pressure with a flow rate of 2500 Pa (0.9 gallons per minute) of purge air in less than one minute after refueling was completed. Under these operating conditions, a gauge pressure of -1494 Pa (6 inches water) column could be maintained in the UST.
  • Example 2 If 7 psi RVP fuel at 70° F is delivered from a UST at 227 l/min (60 gallons per minute) to refuel six vehicles at three dispenser units simultaneously, each vehicle initially containing 9 psi RVP fuel at 26.7°C (80°F), air and gasoline vapors will be displaced from the all the vehicles at a rate of approximately 213.9 l/min (56.5 gallons per minute) If the vapor management system was operating with a recovery efficiency of 100% and with an A/L ratio of 1.2, the vapor management system would be pulling air and vapors at 272.5 l/min (72 gallons per minute) at a concentration of 20.6%.
  • the returned vapor stream would be split such that 89.3 l/min (23.6 gallons per minute) were delivered to six vapor capturing devices -14.8 l/min (3.9 gallons per minute) to each) and 48.4 gallons per minute were returned to the UST.
  • Approximately 1.4 liters of carbon honeycomb would be required to adsorb 0.0227 kg (22.7 grams) of hydrocarbons delivered to each adsorber over two minutes of time.
  • Each canister would be purged at 25 000 Pa (250 mbar) operating pressure with a flow rate of 3.4 l/min (0.9 gallons per minute) of purge air in less than one minute after refueling was completed. Under these conditions, a gauge pressure of -1494 Pa (-6 inches water column) could be maintained in the UST.
  • canisters containing adsorbent sized for each filling location is based on the fact that not every filling location will be dispensing fuel all the time.
  • the break between vehicle fuelings allows time for the system to purge. For very busy locations, there may not be a lot of time between refueling events per dispenser (perhaps as low as one minute). Therefore, there is a need to be able to very quickly purge the system.
  • the use of moderate vacuum and air purge can permit this, but only if there is little mass transfer resistance in the bed.
  • the need to very quickly purge the canister requires that the canister be as small as possible and with an adsorbent that can purge very quickly.
  • an adsorbent having very small particles and little thickness of medium may be used.
  • One example of such adsorbent is an adsorbent having honeycomb structure. Since there can be a canister dedicated to each filling location, the canisters may be placed in the dispenser, in their island, or centrally located. If the canisters are centrally located, a common regeneration vacuum pump and flow splitter can easily be used. A single PCV may be used, and the canisters may be non-specific to a filling location (and open up on a first-come first-serve or as-needed basis). A centralized location could allow large vehicles to utilize additional, available canisters as the capacities of those used are reached.
  • the vapor management systems of the present disclosure offer many advantages compared to those of known arts. Some of these advantages include, but are not limited to, (1) only a moderate vacuum is required to regenerate the vapor capture element, thereby allowing a greater flexibility in vacuum pump selection and reducing cost and maintenance; (2) the system is modular; therefore, it may be easily expanded or contracted based on modifications to the gasoline dispensing facility (GDF) or changes in average throughput; (3) the system offers redundancy, such that the GDF can continue to operate (at least to some extent) even if part of the vapor management system goes down; (4) the UST system can be operated at a relatively controlled and stable pressure by utilizing the vapor return flow splitter and/or the pressure control system to provide feedback from the UST to the flow splitter; (5) the need to ensure vapor tightness of the site is greatly reduced because the UST system may be regularly operated at a negative or ambient pressure; (6) the necessary adsorption capacity of the total system may be half that required by switch-bed technology; (7) the modular nature of the disclosed

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Supplying Secondary Fuel Or The Like To Fuel, Air Or Fuel-Air Mixtures (AREA)
  • Separation Of Gases By Adsorption (AREA)
EP09737299A 2008-10-10 2009-10-08 Fuel vapor management system with proportioned flow splitting Active EP2344413B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10442208P 2008-10-10 2008-10-10
PCT/US2009/059979 WO2010042704A1 (en) 2008-10-10 2009-10-08 Fuel vapor management system with proportioned flow splitting

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2344413A1 EP2344413A1 (en) 2011-07-20
EP2344413B1 true EP2344413B1 (en) 2012-12-12

Family

ID=41497127

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09737299A Active EP2344413B1 (en) 2008-10-10 2009-10-08 Fuel vapor management system with proportioned flow splitting

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2344413B1 (zh)
CN (2) CN103754814B (zh)
WO (1) WO2010042704A1 (zh)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108843972B (zh) * 2018-06-25 2020-04-14 西安华为技术有限公司 燃油输送系统、排气装置、燃油输送方法及控制器
US11774990B2 (en) 2019-12-30 2023-10-03 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and systems for inline mixing of hydrocarbon liquids based on density or gravity
CA3104319C (en) 2019-12-30 2023-01-24 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and systems for spillback control of in-line mixing of hydrocarbon liquids
US11607654B2 (en) 2019-12-30 2023-03-21 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Methods and systems for in-line mixing of hydrocarbon liquids
CN112624025A (zh) * 2020-11-27 2021-04-09 广东申菱环境系统股份有限公司 一种加油站油气处理系统及其处理方法
US11655940B2 (en) 2021-03-16 2023-05-23 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Systems and methods for transporting fuel and carbon dioxide in a dual fluid vessel
US11578638B2 (en) 2021-03-16 2023-02-14 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Scalable greenhouse gas capture systems and methods
US11578836B2 (en) 2021-03-16 2023-02-14 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Scalable greenhouse gas capture systems and methods
US12012883B2 (en) 2021-03-16 2024-06-18 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Systems and methods for backhaul transportation of liquefied gas and CO2 using liquefied gas carriers
US11447877B1 (en) 2021-08-26 2022-09-20 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Assemblies and methods for monitoring cathodic protection of structures
US11686070B1 (en) 2022-05-04 2023-06-27 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Systems, methods, and controllers to enhance heavy equipment warning
US12012082B1 (en) 2022-12-30 2024-06-18 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Systems and methods for a hydraulic vent interlock
US12006014B1 (en) 2023-02-18 2024-06-11 Marathon Petroleum Company Lp Exhaust vent hoods for marine vessels and related methods

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT1249346B (it) * 1991-05-24 1995-02-23 Nuovo Pignone Spa Perfezionamenti ad un sistema di recupero vapori per un impianto di distribuzione carburanti
US5305807A (en) * 1993-04-22 1994-04-26 Healy Systems, Inc. Auxiliary vapor recovery device for fuel dispensing system
AU2001236079A1 (en) 2000-03-07 2001-09-17 Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Intermediate compounds
AT411594B (de) * 2000-03-07 2004-03-25 Efkon Ag Verfahren und vorrichtung zur reduktion von kohlenwasserstoffemissionen
EP2391574A1 (de) * 2008-01-10 2011-12-07 FuXS GmbH Überwachungseinrichtung des gasrückführsystems an tankstellenanlagen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103754814B (zh) 2017-09-26
CN102245494A (zh) 2011-11-16
WO2010042704A1 (en) 2010-04-15
CN103754814A (zh) 2014-04-30
EP2344413A1 (en) 2011-07-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2344413B1 (en) Fuel vapor management system with proportioned flow splitting
EP0964828B1 (en) Tank ullage pressure control
KR102429644B1 (ko) 증발 연료 증기 가스 제어시스템
US3543484A (en) Fuel vapor adsorbing apparatus
US7467620B1 (en) Evaporative emission control system with new adsorbents
US5269833A (en) Process for cleaning a stream of crude gas or waste gas charged with hydrocarbon vapors resulting in recovery of the hydrocarbons
US3844739A (en) Apparatus and method for the prevention of evaporative loss of mixed organic liquids
US5464466A (en) Fuel storage tank vent filter system
US20090056827A1 (en) Control of vapor emissions from gasoline stations
US3748829A (en) Adsorbing evaporative emission during fueling of automotive vehicles
US3902874A (en) Vapor recovery and disposal system
CN101015760A (zh) 利用吸收与吸附集成技术的油气回收方法及装置
CN201505500U (zh) 利用吸收与吸附集成技术的油气回收装置
JP4001957B2 (ja) 燃料蒸散防止装置
WO2007134170A2 (en) Hydrocarbon vapor emission control
US20150001101A1 (en) Adsorbed natural gas storage
WO2009059184A3 (en) Device and method for recovering pollutant vapour from gasoline storage tanks
JP4575673B2 (ja) ガソリンベーパーの回収方法及び回収装置
AU2011213708B2 (en) Control of vapor emissions from gasoline stations
EP1968727A1 (en) Filter to filter equalization
CN115301043B (zh) 一种储罐区挥发性有机物VOCs的治理装置及方法
CN216909766U (zh) 具有洗涤吸收塔的中空纤维管式膜油气净化回收系统
WO2023077087A1 (en) Evap canister containing graphene based adsorbent material for use in a vehicle emissions management system
CN112370940A (zh) 油品生产厂轻质油品装卸车油气的回收工艺
CN112624025A (zh) 一种加油站油气处理系统及其处理方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110415

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 588240

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009011908

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130207

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130312

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130323

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20121212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 588240

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130313

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130412

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130312

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130412

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602009011908

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20140630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131008

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20091008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121212

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230914

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230926

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230926

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230919

Year of fee payment: 15