EP2242827A1 - Fabric softening laundry detergent - Google Patents

Fabric softening laundry detergent

Info

Publication number
EP2242827A1
EP2242827A1 EP09706862A EP09706862A EP2242827A1 EP 2242827 A1 EP2242827 A1 EP 2242827A1 EP 09706862 A EP09706862 A EP 09706862A EP 09706862 A EP09706862 A EP 09706862A EP 2242827 A1 EP2242827 A1 EP 2242827A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
mole
composition
weight
mixtures
laundry detergent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP09706862A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2242827B1 (en
Inventor
Tim Roger Michael Vanpachtenbeke
Francesco De Buzzaccarini
Rajan Keshav Panandiker
Johan Depoortere
Karel Jozef Maria Depoot
Kerry Andrew Vetter
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Procter and Gamble Co
Original Assignee
Procter and Gamble Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=40564986&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2242827(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Procter and Gamble Co filed Critical Procter and Gamble Co
Publication of EP2242827A1 publication Critical patent/EP2242827A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2242827B1 publication Critical patent/EP2242827B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3746Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/3769(Co)polymerised monomers containing nitrogen, e.g. carbonamides, nitriles or amines
    • C11D3/3773(Co)polymerised monomers containing nitrogen, e.g. carbonamides, nitriles or amines in liquid compositions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • C11D1/04Carboxylic acids or salts thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D10/00Compositions of detergents, not provided for by one single preceding group
    • C11D10/04Compositions of detergents, not provided for by one single preceding group based on mixtures of surface-active non-soap compounds and soap
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/0005Other compounding ingredients characterised by their effect
    • C11D3/0036Soil deposition preventing compositions; Antiredeposition agents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3746Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/3769(Co)polymerised monomers containing nitrogen, e.g. carbonamides, nitriles or amines
    • C11D3/3776Heterocyclic compounds, e.g. lactam
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3796Amphoteric polymers or zwitterionic polymers
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • C11D1/12Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof
    • C11D1/29Sulfates of polyoxyalkylene ethers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of domestic fabric laundering compositions that provide softness to fabrics through the wash and contain polymers.
  • cationic deposition aids are capable of improving deposition onto fabrics of a range of desirable benefit agents, for fabric softening, perfumes, anti-wrinkle agents, hueing dyes, and the like.
  • Such cationic deposition aids are described the art and fall generally into two classes: (1) "natural” types comprising a carbohydrate moiety, such as cationic hydroxyethylcellulose or cationic guar gum; and (2) “synthetic types” comprising cationic moieties but no carbohydrate.
  • ampholytic and “amphoteric” may be used interchangeably, and describe a polymer that comprises anionic monomeric units and cationic monomeric units.
  • An ampholytic polymer may be: anionic at a pH that is higher than its isoelectric point; and cationic at a pH that is lower than its isoelectric point; wherein the isoelectric point is the pH at which the net charge on a polymer is zero.
  • Net charge refers to the sum of the electric charges of the monomeric units comprising a polymer.
  • the net charge of ampholytic and other ionic polymers may be dependant upon conditions including, but not limited to the pH, temperature and soluble salt concentration of the carrier containing the polymers, such as the continuous phase of an aqueous dispersion.
  • “Monomer” as used herein refers to a molecule that may be capable of reacting to form polymers by chemical union with monomers such as itself, or other monomers or monomeric units.
  • “Monomeric unit” as used herein refers to a chemically bound unit in a polymer that is derived from a monomer.
  • composition as used herein may encompass the terms: dispersion, solution, melt (such as of a pure liquid substance), or fluid.
  • Dispersion as used herein refers to a system of particles that may be evenly distributed in a medium, which is in turn referred to herein as the "continuous phase”.
  • aqueous dispersion as used herein may comprise a dispersion of particles (which may comprise the present polymers) distributed in a continuous phase comprising water.
  • Viscosity refers to the resistance of a fluid to flow due to a shearing force. The viscosity of a fluid may be dependent upon the conditions under which it is measured, such as fluid temperature.
  • compositions can comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of any of the required and optional elements disclosed herein.
  • Mole percent (mol %) as used herein may mean either the percent of a monomeric unit in relation to all monomeric units of the polymer; or the mole fraction of reagents or reactants based upon other reagents or reactants. All numerical ranges disclosed herein, are meant to encompass each individual number within the range and to encompass any combination of the disclosed upper and lower limits of the ranges.
  • the laundry detergent compositions according to the present invention contain water, a deposition polymer, fatty acid, and electrolyte and have a pH of from about 6 to about 11.
  • a deposition polymer e.g., polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate copolymer
  • fatty acid e.g., polyethylene glycol
  • electrolyte e.g., polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate copolymer
  • the laundry detergent compositions of the present invention contain from about 5% to about 95%, alternatively from about 10% to about 95%, by weight of the composition, of water. In one embodiment, they may contain from about 40% to about 90%, by weight of the composition, of water, alternatively from about 50% to about 90%.
  • the compositions have a pH of from about 6 to about 11, alternatively from about 7 to about 9.
  • water-miscible liquids such as alkanols, diols, other polyols, ethers, amines, and the like, may also be added to the detergent compositions of the present invention as co- solvents or stabilizers. However, these should generally be minimized for cost purposes.
  • compositions of the present invention may be in any convenient form.
  • the compositions are in the form of a liquid, a gel, a unit dose (pouched) product, or are part of a laundry kit.
  • the laundry compositions of the present invention from about 0.02% to about 2%, by weight of the composition, of a deposition polymer having a number average molecular weight of from about 700,000 to about 4,000,000. In one embodiment, the molecular weight is from about 800,000 to about 3,000,000, alternatively from about 1,000,000 to about 2,500,000. In one embodiment, the laundry compositions of the present invention contain from about 0.05% to about 1%, by weight of the composition, of the deposition polymer, alternatively from about 0.1% to about 0.5%. In one embodiment, the deposition polymer has a charge density of less than 1 meq/gram.
  • the deposition polymer includes monomeric units, wherein the monomeric units are derived from monomers. The monomers include nonionic monomers, cationic monomers and anionic monomers wherein the overall mole ratio of the monomers, according to the following equation,
  • mole anionic monomer (mole anionic monomer + mole cationic monomer) is from 0.25 to 0.8.
  • the overall mole ratio is from about 0.28 to 0.8, alternatively is from about 0.3 to about 0.8, alternatively is from about 0.35 to about 0.7, alternatively is from 0.35 to 0.6.
  • the deposition polymer according to the present invention includes at least 50%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from nonionic monomers selected from acrylamide, N,N-dialkyl acrylamide, methacrylamide, N,N-dialkylmethacrylamide, hydroxyalkyl acrylate and vinyl pyrrolidone, vinyl acetate, vinyl alcohol, and mixtures thereof.
  • the deposition polymer contains at least 70% of monomeric units derived from nonionic monomers.
  • the nonionic monomer is selected from acrylamide, vinyl pyrrolidone, and mixtures thereof, alternatively is acrylamide.
  • the deposition polymer according to the present invention includes from about 3% to about 30%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from cationic monomers selected from N,N- dialkylaminoalkyl methacrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylamide, N,N-dialkylaminoalkylmethacrylamide, methacylamidoalkyl trialkylammonium chloride, acrylamidoalkylltrialkylammonium chloride, vinylamine, quaternized vinyl imidazole and diallyl dialkyl ammonium chloride, and mixtures thereof.
  • cationic monomers selected from N,N- dialkylaminoalkyl methacrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylamide, N,N-dialkylaminoalkylmethacrylamide, methacylamidoalkyl trial
  • the deposition polymer contains from about 3% to about 10%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from cationic monomers.
  • the cationic monomers are selected from [(3-methylacrylamido) alkyl] trialkylammonium chloride, diallyldimethylammonium chloride, and mixtures thereof, alternatively is 3- methacrylamidopropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride.
  • the deposition polymer according to the present invention includes from about 1% to about 20%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from anionic monomers selected from acrylic acid, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, vinyl sulfonic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, acrylamidopropylmethane sulfonic acid (AMPS), salts thereof, and mixtures thereof.
  • the deposition polymer includes from about 2.5% to about 6%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from anionic monomers.
  • the anionic monomer is selected from acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and mixtures thereof, alternatively is acrylic acid.
  • the polymer is formed from monomeric units derived from (on a mole basis) 90% acrylamide, 5% MAPTAC and 5% acrylic acid. In another embodiment, the polymer is formed from monomeric units derived from (on a mole basis) 92% acrylamide, 1.6% acrylic acid, 1.4% methacrylic acid, and 5% MAPTAC. Counterion
  • the polymers of the present invention may also contain counterions.
  • Counterions refers to any innocuous ions which do not adversely affect the functioning of the invention and serve only to balance the charge of otherwise non-neutral monomers or other actives.
  • suitable counterions include sodium, potassium, alkanolammonium and mixtures thereof.
  • suitable counter-ions include nitrate, sulphate, chloride, carbonate, bicarbonate and mixtures thereof.
  • the detergent compositions herein include from about 5% to about 60%, alternatively from about 5% to 40%, by weight of the composition, of a surfactant system containing from about 1% to about 25%, by weight of the surfactant system, of fatty acid, alternatively from about 3% to about 15%, alternatively from about 3% to about 10%.
  • the laundry detergent compositions of the present invention may contain from about 75% to about 99%, by weight of the surfactant system, of a detersive surfactant.
  • Detersive surfactants utilized can be of the anionic, nonionic, zwitterionic, ampholytic or cationic type or can comprise compatible mixtures of these types. Detergent surfactants useful herein are described in U.S.
  • Anionic and nonionic surfactants are preferred Fatty acids useful herein include those commonly commercially available. Such fatty acids may contain from about 8 to about 20 carbon atoms and can also contain from about 1 to about 10 ethylene oxide units in the hydrocarbon chain.
  • Suitable fatty acids are saturated and/or unsaturated and can be obtained from natural sources such a plant or animal esters (e.g., palm kernel oil, palm oil, coconut oil, babassu oil, safflower oil, tall oil, castor oil, tallow and fish oils, grease, and mixtures thereof), or synthetically prepared (e.g., via the oxidation of petroleum or by hydrogenation of carbon monoxide via the Fisher Tropsch process).
  • suitable saturated fatty acids for use in the compositions of this invention include captic, lauric, myristic, palmitic, stearic, arachidic and behenic acid.
  • Suitable unsaturated fatty acid species include: palmitoleic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic and ricinoleic acid.
  • preferred fatty acids are saturated Cn fatty acid, saturated Ci 2 - Ci 4 fatty acids, and saturated or unsaturated Cn to Ci 8 fatty acids, and mixtures thereof.
  • the laundry detergent compositions of the present invention may contain at least 0.1%, by weight of the compositions, of an electrolyte.
  • Electrolytes useful herein include non-surface active electrolytes (as opposed to surfactants separately described herein).
  • electrolytes useful herein include (i) polycarboxylic acid salts such as salts of citric acid, succinic acid, tartaric acids; salts of phosphonic acids or aminocarboxylic acids (which could also be chelating agents); (iii) salts of boric acids, and (iv) mixtures thereof.
  • the laundry detergent compositions of the present invention may contain a fatty acid crystal modifier.
  • the fatty acid crystal modifier is selected from sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate; quaternary ammonium surfactant; polyethyleneimine having a molecular weight of from about 300 to about 6000 and an average alkoxylation of from about 3 to about 30 moles of alkylene oxide per nitrogen; ethoxylated tetraethylene-pentaimines having an average ethoxylation of from 15 to 18; zwitterionic surfactants (such as alkyldimethylamine N-oxides, including dodecyldimethylamine N-oxide); chelating agents; zwitterionic amine-based soil release polymers; nonionic alkylpolyethoxylate; and mixtures thereof.
  • the fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from at least 5%, by weight of the composition, of sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate. In one embodiment, the composition contains from about 5% to about 25%, by weight of the composition, of sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate. Sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate is commonly used as a surfactant in laundry detergent compositions.
  • Quaternary ammonium surfactant The fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from about 0.1% to about 10%, by weight of the composition of a quaternary ammonium surfactant having the formula
  • R ⁇ and R2 are individually selected from the group consisting of C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 hydroxy alkyl, benzyl, and -(C2H4.O) X H where x has a value from about 2 to about 5; X is an anion; and (1) R3 and R4 are each a Cg-C ⁇ 4 alkyl or (2) R3 is a Cg-C22 alkyl an d R4 is selected from the group consisting of C ⁇ -C ⁇ Q alkyl, C ⁇ -C ⁇ Q hydroxy alkyl, benzyl, and -(C2H4 ⁇ ) x H where x has a value from about 2 to about 5.
  • Zwitterionic surfactants are individually selected from the group consisting of C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 hydroxy alkyl, benzyl, and -(C2H4.O) X H where x has a value from about 2 to about 5; X is an anion; and (1) R
  • the fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from about 0.1% to about 10%, by weight of the composition, of a zwitterionic surfactant.
  • Zwitterionic surfactants useful herein include those commonly known in the art such as alkyl amine oxides. Chelating agents
  • the fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from about 0.05% to about 3%, by weight of the composition, alternatively from about 0.1% to about 1% of a chelating agent.
  • Chelating agents useful herein include diethylene triamine penta acetate (DTPA). Zwitterionic amine-based soil-release polymers
  • the fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from about 0.1% or more, by weight of the composition, of a zwitterionic amine-based soil-release polymer.
  • the laundry detergent compositions useful herein may include a fabric care benefit agent.
  • fabric care benefit agents refers to detergent ingredients which are water dispersible or water insoluble and can provide fabric care benefits such as fabric softening, color protection, pill/fuzz reduction, anti-abrasion, anti-wrinkle, perfume longevity and the like, to garments and fabrics, particularly on cotton garments and fabrics.
  • fabric care benefit agents typically have the solubility in distilled water of less than
  • the solubility of the fabric care benefit agent is more than 10g/L, it will remain soluble in the wash liquor and consequently will not deposit onto the fabrics.
  • water insoluble fabric care benefit agents useful herein include dispersible polyolefins, polymer latexes, organosilicones, perfume or other active microcapsules, and mixtures thereof.
  • the fabric care benefit agents can be in the form of emulsions, latexes, dispersions, suspensions, micelles and the like, and preferably in the form of microemulsions, swollen micelles or latexes. As such, they can have a wide range of particle sizes from about 1 nm to 100 um and preferably from about 5 nm to 10 um.
  • the particle size of the microemulsions can be determined by conventional methods, such as using a Leeds & Northrup Microtrac UPA particle sizer.
  • Emulsifiers, dispersing agents and suspension agents may be used.
  • the weight ratio of emulsifiers, dispersing agents or suspension agents to the fabric care benefit agents is about 1:100 to about 1:2. Preferably, the weight ratio ranges from about 1:50 to 1:5.
  • Any surfactants suitable for making polymer emulsions or emulsion polymerizations of polymer latexes can be used to make the water insoluble fabric care benefit agents of the present invention.
  • Suitable surfactants include anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants or mixtures thereof. Nonionic and anionic surfactants are preferred.
  • the emulsification of the care agent is achieved in situ in the liquid detergent. In such case, the benefit agent is slowly added to the liquid detergent with vigorous mixing.
  • Organosilicones Organosilicones
  • Suitable organosilicones include, but not limited to (a) non-functionalized silicones such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS); and (b) functionalized silicones such as silicones with one or more functional groups selected from the group consisting of amino, amido, alkoxy, alkyl, phenyl, polyether, acrylate, siliconehydride, mercaptoproyl, carboxylate, sulfate phosphate, quaternized nitrogen, and combinations thereof.
  • PDMS polydimethylsiloxane
  • functionalized silicones such as silicones with one or more functional groups selected from the group consisting of amino, amido, alkoxy, alkyl, phenyl, polyether, acrylate, siliconehydride, mercaptoproyl, carboxylate, sulfate phosphate, quaternized nitrogen, and combinations thereof.
  • the organosilicones suitable for use herein have a viscosity ranging from about 10 to about 700,000 CSt (centistokes) at 20 0 C. In other embodiments, the suitable organosilicones have a viscosity from about 10 to about 100,000 CSt.
  • PDMS Polydimethylsiloxanes
  • the detergent compositions comprise PDMS having a viscosity of from about 100 to about 700,000 CSt at 20 0 C.
  • Exemplary functionalized silicones include but are not limited to aminosilicones, amidosilicones, silicone polyethers, alkylsilicones, phenyl silicones and quaternary silicones.
  • the functionalized silicones suitable for use in the present invention have the following general formula:
  • m is from 4 to 50,000, preferably from 10 to 20,000; k is from 1 to 25,000, preferably from 3 to 12,000; each R is H or Ci-Cs alkyl or aryl group, preferably Ci-C 4 alkyl, and more preferably a methyl group;
  • X is a linking group having the formula: i) -(CH 2 ) p - wherein p is from 2 to 6, preferably 2 to 3; ii)
  • Q has the formula: i) -NH 2 , - NH - (CH 2 ) r - NH 2 , wherein r is from 1 to 4, preferably 2 to 3; or ii) - (O - CHR 2 - CH 2 ) S - Z, wherein s is from 1 to 100, preferably 3 to 30; wherein R 2 is H or C 1 -C 3 alkyl, preferably H or CH 3 ; and Z is selected from the group consisting of - OR 3 , - OC(O)R 3 , - CO- R 4 - COOH, -SO 3 , - PO(OH) 2 , and mixtures thereof; further wherein R 3 is H, Ci-C 26 alkyl or substituted alkyl, C 6 -C 26 aryl or substituted aryl, C 7 - C 26 alkylaryl or substituted alkylaryl groups, preferably R 3 is H, methyl, ethyl propyl or benzyl groups
  • organosilicone preferably methyl.
  • modified polyalkylene oxide polysiloxanes of the general formula:
  • Q is NH 2 or -NHCH 2 CH 2 NH 2 ;
  • R is H or Ci-C 6 alkyl;
  • r is from O to 1000;
  • m is from 4 to
  • n is from 3 to 35,000; and p and q are integers independently selected from 2 to 30.
  • Silwet® L-7622, Silwet® L-7602, Silwet® L-7604, Silwet® L-7500 Magnasoft® TLC, available from GE Silicones of Wilton, CT; Ultrasil® SW- 12 and Ultrasil® DW-18 silicones, available from Noveon Inc., of Cleveland OH; and DC-5097, FF-400® available from Dow Corning ® of Midland, MI. Additional examples are KF-352®, KF-6015®, and KF-945®, all available from Shin Etsu Silicones of Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nonlimiting examples of this class of organosilicones are Ultrasil® A21 and Ultrasil® A-23, both available from Noveon, Inc. of Cleveland, OH; BY16-876® from Dow Corning Toray Ltd., Japan; and X22-3939A® from Shin Etsu Corporation, Tokyo Japan.
  • a third class of organosilicones useful herein is modified polyalkylene oxide polysiloxanes of the general formula:
  • silicones are cationic silicones. These are typically produced by reacting a diamine with an epoxide. They are described in WO 02/18528 and WO 04/041983 (both assigned to P&G), WO 04/056908 (assigned to Wacker Chemie) and US 5,981,681 and US
  • composition of the present invention contains organosilicone emulsions, which comprise organosilicones dispersed in a suitable carrier (typically water) in the presence of an emulsifier (typically an anionic surfactant).
  • a suitable carrier typically water
  • an emulsifier typically an anionic surfactant
  • the organosilicones are in the form of microemulsions.
  • the organosilicone microemulsions may have an average particle size in the range from about 1 nm to about 150 nm, or from about 10 nm to about 100 nm, or from about 20 nm to about 50 nm.
  • Microemulsions are more stable than conventional macroemulsions (average particle size about 1-20 microns) and when incorporated into a product, the resulting product has a preferred clear appearance.
  • the emulsifiers in the composition become diluted such that the microemulsions can no longer be maintained and the organosilicones coalesce to form significantly larger droplets which have an average particle size of greater than about 1 micron. Since the selected organosilicones are water insoluble or have limited solubility in water, they will crash out of the wash liquor, resulting in more efficient deposition onto the fabrics and enhanced fabric care benefits.
  • the composition is mixed with an excess of water to form a wash liquor, which typically has a weight ratio of water : composition ranging from 10:1 to 400:1.
  • a typical embodiment of the composition comprising from about 0.01% to about 10%, by weight of composition of the organosilicones and an effective amount of an emulsifier in a carrier.
  • the "effective amount" of emulsifier is the amount sufficient to produce an organosilicone microemulsion in the carrier, preferably water.
  • the amount of emulsifiers ranges from about 5 to about 75 parts, or from about 25 to about 60 parts per 100 weight parts organosilicone.
  • the microemulsion typically comprises from about 10 to about 70%, or from about 25 to about 60%, by weight of the microemulsion of the dispersed organosilicones; from about 0.1 to about 30%, or from about 1 to about 20%, by weight of the microemulsion of anionic surfactant; optionally, from about 0 to about 3 %, or from about 0.1 to about 20%, by weight of the microemulsion of nonionic surfactant; and the balance being water, and optionally other carriers.
  • Selected organosilicone polymers are suitable for forming microemulsions; these organosilicones are sometimes referred to as the "self emulsifying silicones".
  • Emulsifiers particularly anionic surfactants, may be added to aid the formation of organosilicone microemulsions in the composition.
  • nonionic surfactants useful as laundry adjuncts to provide detersive benefits can also aid the formation and stability of the microemulsions.
  • the amount of emulsifiers is from about 0.05% to about 15% by weight of the composition.
  • anionic surfactants include the following: alkyl sulfonates, such as Cn-Ci 8 alkyl benzene sulfonates (LAS) or C 1 0-C 2 0 branched-chain and random alkyl sulfates (AS); Ci O -Ci 8 alkyl ethoxy sulfates (AE x S) wherein x is from 1-30; mid-chain branched alkyl sulfates (US 6,020,303 and US 6,060,443) or mid-chain branched alkyl alkoxy sulfates (US 6,008,181 and US 6,020,303); Ci 0 -Ci 8 alkyl alkoxy carboxylates comprising 1-5 ethoxy units; modified alkylbenzene sulfonate (MLAS) as discussed in WO 99/05243, WO 99/05242, WO 99/05244, WO 99/05082, WO 99/05084, WO
  • the polyolefins can be in the form of waxes, emulsions, dispersions or suspensions. Examples of polyolefins useful herein are discussed below.
  • the polyolefin may be a polyethylene, polypropylene, or a mixture thereof.
  • the polyolefin may be at least partially modified to contain various functional groups, such as carboxyl, alkylamide, sulfonic acid or amide groups. In one embodiment, the polyolefin is at least partially carboxyl modified or, in other words, oxidized.
  • the dispersible polyolefin may be introduced as a suspension or an emulsion of polyolefin dispersed in an aqueous medium by use of an emulsifying agent.
  • the emulsifier may be any suitable emulsification agent including anionic, cationic, or nonionic surfactants, or mixtures thereof. Almost any suitable surfactant may be employed as the emulsifier of the present invention.
  • the dispersible polyolefin is dispersed by use of an emulsifier or suspending agent in a ratio 1:100 to about 1:2. Preferably, the ratio ranges from about 1 : 50 to 1:5.
  • the polyolefin suspension or emulsion may comprise from about 1% to about 60%, alternatively from about 10% to about 55%, and still alternatively from about 20 to about 50% by weight of polyolefin.
  • the polyolefin may have a wax dropping point (see ASTM D3954-94, volume 15.04 "Standard Test Method for Dropping Point of Waxes", the method incorporated herein by reference) from about 20 to 170 0 C and more preferably from about 50 to 140 0 C.
  • Suitable polyethylene waxes are available commercially from suppliers including but not limited to Honeywell (A-C polyethylene), Clariant (Velustrol emulsion), and BASF (LUWAX).
  • Polymer Latexes Polymer latex is typically made by an emulsion polymerization process which includes one or more monomers, one or more emulsifiers, an initiator, and other components familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • All polymer latexes that provide fabric care benefits can be used as water insoluble fabric care benefit agents of the present invention.
  • suitable polymer latexes include those disclosed in WO 02/018451 published in the name of Rhodia Chimie.
  • Polymer latexes suitable for use herein as fabric care benefit agents include those having a glass transition temperature of from about -120 0 C to about 120 0 C and preferably from about - 80 0 C to about 60 0 C.
  • Suitable emulsifiers include anionic, cationic, nonionic and amphoteric surfactants.
  • Suitable initiators include all initiators that are suitable for emulsion polymerization of polymer latexes.
  • the particle size of the polymer latexes can be from about 1 nm to about 10 ⁇ m and is preferably from about 10 nm to about 1 ⁇ m.
  • the laundry compositions herein may contain microcapsules or microencapsulates containing one or more fabric care active materials.
  • microcapsules and “microencapsulates” are used interchangeably herein.
  • Microcapsules useful herein include urea/formaldehyde microcapsules, melamine/formaldehyde microcapsules, more generally aminoplast or polyamide microcapsules, and other types of core-shell microcapsules or microencapsulates having median particle sizes ranging from below 1 micron to 100 micron or higher can be used in the present compositions, suitably at levels of from 0.01% to 5% of the composition by weight.
  • microcapsules can be colored or uncolored, e.g., by use of dyes and/or pigments, and further, can contain any useful compatible detergent adjunct including perfumes, anti-fungals, odor control agents, antistatic agents, fluorescent whitening agents, antimicrobial actives, emollients, UV protection agents, flame retardants, brighteners, enzymes and the like, enclosed in the core of the microencapsulate.
  • Such materials are most commonly derived from technology and processes long ago established for making carbonless copy paper, and are available from a range of commercial suppliers such as Ciba, Givaudan/Quest BASF, IFF, Cognis, Appleton Papers, Chemitech and others.
  • a perfume microcapsule contains an encapsulated perfume composition to provide a latent source of perfume.
  • the perfume composition that is encapsulated may be comprised of 100% perfume, which encompasses individual perfume ingredients or perfume accords; optionally, the perfume composition may include non-volatile materials such as diluents.
  • the diluent may be present from 0% to 50% of the perfume formulation.
  • Exemplary diluents include isopropyl myristate, polyethylene glycol, propanediol, and combinations thereof.
  • the detergent compositions of the present invention can also include any number of additional optional ingredients.
  • additional optional ingredients include conventional laundry detergent composition components such as detersive builders, enzymes, enzyme stabilizers (such as propylene glycol, boric acid and/or borax), suds suppressors, soil suspending agents, soil release agents, other fabric care benefit agents, pH adjusting agents, smectite clays, solvents, hydrotropes and phase stabilizers, structuring agents, dye transfer inhibiting agents, optical brighteners, perfumes and coloring agents.
  • the various optional detergent composition ingredients, if present in the compositions herein, should be utilized at concentrations conventionally employed to bring about their desired contribution to the composition or the laundering operation. Frequently, the total amount of such optional detergent composition ingredients can range from about 5% to about 50%, alternatively from about 30% to about 40%, by weight of the composition.
  • Pearlescent agent such as propylene glycol, boric acid and/or borax
  • the laundry detergent compositions of the present invention may comprise from about 0.02% to about 0.5%, by weight of the composition, of a pearlescent agent.
  • pearlescent agents useful herein include mica, metal oxide coated mica, bismuth oxy chloride coated mica, bismuth oxychloride, glass, metal oxide coated glass, ethylene glycol distearate, fish scales, and mixtures thereof.
  • the pearlescent agent has an average particle size of from 0.1 to 50 microns and has a platelet or spherical geometry.
  • compositions herein are contemplated for using in traditional machine-washing or hand- washing methods.
  • the compositions may also be used on a commercial scale for laundering commercial quantities of fabrics or textiles.
  • Use of the laundry compositions herein to launder or pre-treat fabrics is contemplated herein. Such use to impart an improved fabric feel and/or cleaning benefit to fabrics is further contemplated herein.
  • compositions of the present invention may be encapsulated within a water soluble film.
  • the water-soluble film may be made from polyvinyl alcohol or other suitable variations, carboxy methyl cellulose, cellulose derivatives, starch, modified starch, sugars, PEG, waxes, or combinations thereof.
  • the water-soluble may include other adjuncts such as copolymer of vinyl alcohol and a carboxylic acid.
  • US patent 7,022,656 B2 (Monosol) describes such film compositions and their advantages.
  • One benefit of these copolymers is the improvement of the shelf- life of the pouched detergents thanks to the better compatibility with the detergents.
  • Another advantage of such films is their better cold water (less than 10 0 C) solubility.
  • the level of the co-polymer in the film material is at least 60% by weight of the film.
  • the polymer can have any weight average molecular weight, preferably from 1000 daltons to 1,000,000 daltons, more preferably from 10,000 daltons to 300,000 daltons, even more preferably from 15,000 daltons to 200,000 daltons, most preferably from 20,000 daltons to 150,000 daltons.
  • the co-polymer present in the film is from 60% to 98% hydrolysed, more preferably 80% to 95% hydrolysed, to improve the dissolution of the material.
  • the co-polymer comprises from 0.1 mol% to 30 mol%, preferably from 1 mol% to 6 mol%, of said carboxylic acid.
  • the water-soluble film of the present invention may further comprise additional co- monomers. Suitable additional co-monomers include sulphonates and ethoxylates. An example of preferred sulphonic acid is 2-acrylamido-2-methyl- 1 -propane sulphonic acid (AMPS).
  • AMPS 2-acrylamido-2-methyl- 1 -propane sulphonic acid
  • a suitable water-soluble film for use in the context of the present invention is commercially available under tradename M8630TM from Mono-Sol of Indiana, US.
  • the water-soluble film ° herein may also comprise ingredients other than the polymer or polymer material.
  • plasticisers for example glycerol, ethylene glycol, diethyleneglycol, propanediol, 2-methyl- 1,3 -propane diol, sorbitol and mixtures thereof, additional water, disintegrating aids, fillers, anti-foaming agents, emulsifying/dispersing agents, and/or antiblocking agents.
  • the pouch or water-soluble film itself comprises a 5 detergent additive to be delivered to the wash water, for example organic polymeric soil release agents, dispersants, dye transfer inhibitors.
  • the surface of the film of the pouch may be dusted with fine powder to reduce the coefficient of friction. Sodium aluminosilicate, silica, talc and amylose are examples of suitable fine powders.
  • the encapsulated pouches of the present invention can be made using any conventionally 0 known techniques.
  • the pouches are made using horizontal form filling thermoforming techniques.
  • Residue Protocol 0 1.
  • the fabric used to assess residues on fabrics is a black velvet (Material source: Denholme
  • a pouch is made by sewing a rectangle of black velvet (dimensions 23.5 cm x 47 cm that is5 folded to make a square with the velvet on the inside) using an overlock stitch, sewing along two sides leaving one open edge. The pouch is turned inside out so that the velvet is on the outside. 3.
  • a dosing ball is filled using the recommended dosage for each product according to packaging instructions for normal/median soil and normal/median water hardness (125g). For every experiment, a new and unused dosing ball is filled. The dosing ball is placed inside the black velvet pouch.
  • the pouch is then closed by making a 2 cm wide fold across the open side and is secured with 3 plastic stitches.
  • the black pouch is placed in the back of the washing machine (Miele Novotronic W527) with the opening of the dosing ball up, without any further ballast load.
  • the washing machine is switched on using the wool wash program at 40 0 C, using city water (2.5mmol/L).
  • the pouches are immediately removed from the washing machine.
  • the pouches are opened along the three sides (all stitched and sewed sides), except the folded side.
  • a run with a reference product is performed at the same time (for comparison). Every experiment is repeated 2 times to have 3 replicates per test product.
  • the pouches are graded after drying over night (horizontally on a flat surface), by 2 qualified graders, using the following grading instructions and scale (relative scale to reference product results):
  • the overall mole ratio is defined as: (% Acrylic acid + % methacrylic acid) / (% Acrylic acid + % methacrylic acid + % PamMAPTAC)
  • Example II Softness Testing The relative softness of fabrics washed in laundry products containing polymers is assessed in a full scale washing machine test using Miele Novotronic W527.
  • Fabric softness is a relative characteristic that in this protocol is evaluated by trained human softness graders that tactically examine a range of white fabric swatches washed in commercially available washing machines with standard dosages of laundry detergent. Identical sets of fabric swatches are separately washed in a reference detergent product and in a test product. The softness results are a comparison of the resulting fabric swatches from each test product wash with the fabrics from the reference detergent product wash using the PSU score described below. All data are generated by usingcommercially available washing machines manufactured by Miele and sold as the Novatronic W527 model and commercially available laundry dryers manufactured by Miele and sold as the Novotronic T490 model.
  • ballast load In addition to the fabric swatches, in each washing cycle an extra ballast load is added to get to a total weight of approximately 3kg of fabrics in the washing cycle (see Table 4, below).
  • the ballast load consists of two large terry towels (80cm x 50cm, supplied by Maes Textiles) and six pieces of knitted cotton (50cm x 50cm, supplied by Abanderado). After completion of the three washing cycles, all fabrics are then tumble dried in a commercially available dryer. Upon drying, the fabrics are then ready to use in softness testing.
  • Test Load For the reference product and for each of the test compositions, a test load of fabrics as shown in Table 4 is utilized.
  • test load of fabrics is then washed three times each in succession (cycles 1, 2, and 3) with 75ml (recommended dosage for medium water hardness, medium soil) of the laundry product to be analyzed, dispensing with a dosing ball.
  • Reference laundry product is washed under the same conditions as test products.
  • the washing machines are fed with city water (2.5mmol/L) at 40 0 C and are set to the short ("wit/bont") standard program with spinning at 1200rpm. The washing machines are not rotated to avoid contamination between the products. All three cycles for each laundry product test load must be completed on the same day with tumble drying of all fabrics in between cycles 1 and 2, and in between cycles 2 and 3, using the setting "Kastdroog" on the dryer.
  • the fabrics that need to be line dried are taken out and line dried overnight in a controlled temperature and humidity room set at 21 0 C, 50% relative humidity.
  • the other fabrics are dried in a tumble dryer, using the "Extra dry" setting.
  • the PSU scale as referenced herein is a paired comparison between a fabric swatch treated with test product and the same type of fabric swatch treated with the reference product, using a grading scale going from -4 to 4. This paired comparison PSU grading scale is shown below in Table 5.
  • a positive grading scale number indicates that the fabric swatch treated with the test product is softer than the one of the reference product
  • a negative grading scale number indicates that the reference swatch is softer. If for a particular set of swatches, the grades given by the two softness graders differ by more than 1 PSU (except -1 and +1), regrading occurs.
  • each of the swatches from the load (except the ballast load) is compared with one swatch of the same fabric type washed with the reference product.
  • 32 PSU gradings are completed per grader for each test product (8 gradings for terry swatches line dry, 8 gradings for terry swatches tumble dry, 8 gradings for knitted cotton line dry and 8 numbers for polycotton tumble dry).
  • an average softness score is calculated by averaging all 32 gradings from both graders.
  • compositions 3A and 3B Additional detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 3A and 3B, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
  • compositions 4A to 4E Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 4A to 4E, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
  • Merquat 5300 is terpolymer with mole ratio : 90% P AM/5% AA/5%MAPTAC produced by Nalco.
  • compositions 5A to 5E Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 5A to 5E, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
  • compositions 6A to 6D Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 6A to 6D, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
  • compositions 7A to 7F Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 7A to 7F, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
  • compositions 8A to 8C Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 8A to 8C, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)

Abstract

Aqueous laundry detergent compositions containing surfactants and fatty acid, having a pH of from about 6 to about 11 and containing a polymer having a number average molecular weight of from about 700,000 to about 4,000,000 and comprising monomeric units including: nonionic monomers selected from acrylamide, N,N-dialkyl acrylamide, methacrylamide, N,N- dialkylmethacrylamide, hydroxyalkyl acrylate and vinyl pyrrolidone, vinyl acetate, vinyl alcohol, and mixtures thereof; cationic monomers selected from N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl methacrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylamide, N,N- dialkylaminoalkylmethacrylamide, methacylamidoalkyl trialkylammonium chloride, acrylamidoalkylltrialkylammonium chloride, vinylamine, quaternized vinyl imidazole and diallyl dialkyl ammonium chloride, and mixtures thereof; and anionic monomers selected from acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, vinyl sulfonic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, acrylamidopropylmethane sulfonic acid (AMPS), salts thereof, and mixtures thereof; in a specified mole ratio.

Description

FABRIC SOFTENING LAUNDRY DETERGENT
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the field of domestic fabric laundering compositions that provide softness to fabrics through the wash and contain polymers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Numerous consumer products are available for the laundering of household/domestic fabrics. Similarly, many products exist that may be added during the rinse cycle of standard washing machine cycles or in domestic dryers that will deposit softening and/or other care actives onto the fabrics. This type of two or three step process has become very common for those consumers looking for both excellent cleaning and fabric softening. However, this two or three step process is more time-consuming and costly than a single wash-added product. More recently, due to consumer demands, manufacturers of laundry detergent products have sought to provide one product that provides both cleaning and fabric care benefits such as softness, through the wash.
It is important to realize, however, that these two goals (cleaning and softness) are traditionally diametrically opposed. Cleaning of fabrics typically results in the removal of dirt, allergens, stains, and other deposited materials. In contrast, providing a care benefit (such as a soft fabric feel) typically results from the deposition of beneficial care actives onto the fabrics. It is therefore difficult to simultaneously clean (remove) and soften (deposit) fabrics through the wash. In the past, it has been recognized in through the wash cleaning and care products that deposited care actives may entrap dirt or other materials onto the fabrics, resulting in a dingy appearance that is obviously undesirable to consumers. The deposited care actives may also themselves leave visible residue if they do not deposited evenly over the fabric surface. Similarly, it has been seen that the care actives are not deposited at all or are removed by the cleaning ingredients.
More recently, it has been recognized that low levels of cationic polymers, termed "cationic deposition aids" are capable of improving deposition onto fabrics of a range of desirable benefit agents, for fabric softening, perfumes, anti-wrinkle agents, hueing dyes, and the like. Such cationic deposition aids are described the art and fall generally into two classes: (1) "natural" types comprising a carbohydrate moiety, such as cationic hydroxyethylcellulose or cationic guar gum; and (2) "synthetic types" comprising cationic moieties but no carbohydrate. These "synthetic types" are exemplified by copolymers of polyacrylamide (PAM) and methacrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium chloride (MAPTAC). One difficulty with the "natural" types is their incompatibility with laundry detergent enzymes, especially enzymes having some degree of cellulase activity.
Furthermore, it has now been discovered that synthetic cationic deposition aids comprising cationic and uncharged (nonionic) monomers in the absence of anionic monomers at the pH of laundry washing tend to leave unsightly residues on laundered fabrics. These residues are easily visualized by the human eye when the laundered fabrics have a dark color. However, these findings are surprising in that prior disclosures of similar materials, such as U.S. Patent 6,949,498, provide only indiscriminate lists of cationic polymers in liquid laundry detergents. Such disclosures only provide a measure of fabric softness benefits associated with the cationic polymers without any suggestion of visible residues, much less any disclosures of how to remedy such problems.
Accordingly, it would be highly desirable to identify improved laundry detergents comprising selected polymers capable of providing care benefits through the wash to fabrics while maintaining good cleaning and avoiding unsightly residues.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It has now been surprisingly and unexpectedly discovered that a select group of polymers, containing monomeric units derived from a combination of cationic monomers, nonionic monomers, and anionic monomers in a particular ratio, when incorporated into laundry detergent products, are capable of providing care benefits through the wash to fabrics while maintaining good cleaning and avoiding unsightly residues. Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that at a laundry wash pH, such as from about 6 to about 11, the present polymers are capable of depositing on fabrics in the laundering operation, but do so without leaving visible residue on laundry fabrics.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
All measurements referenced herein are at room temperature (about 21.10C) and at atmospheric pressure, unless otherwise indicated. "Ampholytic" and "amphoteric" may be used interchangeably, and describe a polymer that comprises anionic monomeric units and cationic monomeric units. An ampholytic polymer may be: anionic at a pH that is higher than its isoelectric point; and cationic at a pH that is lower than its isoelectric point; wherein the isoelectric point is the pH at which the net charge on a polymer is zero.
"Net charge" as used herein refers to the sum of the electric charges of the monomeric units comprising a polymer. The net charge of ampholytic and other ionic polymers may be dependant upon conditions including, but not limited to the pH, temperature and soluble salt concentration of the carrier containing the polymers, such as the continuous phase of an aqueous dispersion.
"Monomer" as used herein refers to a molecule that may be capable of reacting to form polymers by chemical union with monomers such as itself, or other monomers or monomeric units. "Monomeric unit" as used herein refers to a chemically bound unit in a polymer that is derived from a monomer.
"Composition" as used herein may encompass the terms: dispersion, solution, melt (such as of a pure liquid substance), or fluid. "Dispersion" as used herein refers to a system of particles that may be evenly distributed in a medium, which is in turn referred to herein as the "continuous phase". The term "aqueous dispersion" as used herein may comprise a dispersion of particles (which may comprise the present polymers) distributed in a continuous phase comprising water.
"Viscosity" as used herein refers to the resistance of a fluid to flow due to a shearing force. The viscosity of a fluid may be dependent upon the conditions under which it is measured, such as fluid temperature.
"Comprising" as used herein means that various components, ingredients or steps can be conjointly employed in practicing the present invention. Accordingly, the term "comprising" encompasses the more restrictive terms "consisting essentially of and "consisting of. The present compositions can comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of any of the required and optional elements disclosed herein.
Markush language as used herein encompasses combinations of the individual Markush group members, unless otherwise indicated.
All percentages, ratios and proportions used herein are by weight percent of the composition, unless otherwise specified. All average values are calculated "by weight" of the composition or components thereof, unless otherwise expressly indicated.
Mole percent (mol %) as used herein may mean either the percent of a monomeric unit in relation to all monomeric units of the polymer; or the mole fraction of reagents or reactants based upon other reagents or reactants. All numerical ranges disclosed herein, are meant to encompass each individual number within the range and to encompass any combination of the disclosed upper and lower limits of the ranges.
The laundry detergent compositions according to the present invention contain water, a deposition polymer, fatty acid, and electrolyte and have a pH of from about 6 to about 11. Each of these components as well as optional ingredients for such compositions and methods of using such compositions are described in detail as follows.
Laundry Detergent Composition
The laundry detergent compositions of the present invention contain from about 5% to about 95%, alternatively from about 10% to about 95%, by weight of the composition, of water. In one embodiment, they may contain from about 40% to about 90%, by weight of the composition, of water, alternatively from about 50% to about 90%. The compositions have a pH of from about 6 to about 11, alternatively from about 7 to about 9.
Other types of water-miscible liquids, such alkanols, diols, other polyols, ethers, amines, and the like, may also be added to the detergent compositions of the present invention as co- solvents or stabilizers. However, these should generally be minimized for cost purposes.
The detergent compositions of the present invention may be in any convenient form. In one embodiment, the compositions are in the form of a liquid, a gel, a unit dose (pouched) product, or are part of a laundry kit.
Deposition Polymer
The laundry compositions of the present invention from about 0.02% to about 2%, by weight of the composition, of a deposition polymer having a number average molecular weight of from about 700,000 to about 4,000,000. In one embodiment, the molecular weight is from about 800,000 to about 3,000,000, alternatively from about 1,000,000 to about 2,500,000. In one embodiment, the laundry compositions of the present invention contain from about 0.05% to about 1%, by weight of the composition, of the deposition polymer, alternatively from about 0.1% to about 0.5%. In one embodiment, the deposition polymer has a charge density of less than 1 meq/gram. The deposition polymer includes monomeric units, wherein the monomeric units are derived from monomers. The monomers include nonionic monomers, cationic monomers and anionic monomers wherein the overall mole ratio of the monomers, according to the following equation,
mole anionic monomer (mole anionic monomer + mole cationic monomer) is from 0.25 to 0.8. In one embodiment, the overall mole ratio is from about 0.28 to 0.8, alternatively is from about 0.3 to about 0.8, alternatively is from about 0.35 to about 0.7, alternatively is from 0.35 to 0.6.
Nonionic Monomer
The deposition polymer according to the present invention includes at least 50%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from nonionic monomers selected from acrylamide, N,N-dialkyl acrylamide, methacrylamide, N,N-dialkylmethacrylamide, hydroxyalkyl acrylate and vinyl pyrrolidone, vinyl acetate, vinyl alcohol, and mixtures thereof.
In one embodiment, the deposition polymer contains at least 70% of monomeric units derived from nonionic monomers. In one embodiment, the nonionic monomer is selected from acrylamide, vinyl pyrrolidone, and mixtures thereof, alternatively is acrylamide.
Cationic Monomer
The deposition polymer according to the present invention includes from about 3% to about 30%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from cationic monomers selected from N,N- dialkylaminoalkyl methacrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylamide, N,N-dialkylaminoalkylmethacrylamide, methacylamidoalkyl trialkylammonium chloride, acrylamidoalkylltrialkylammonium chloride, vinylamine, quaternized vinyl imidazole and diallyl dialkyl ammonium chloride, and mixtures thereof.
In one embodiment, the deposition polymer contains from about 3% to about 10%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from cationic monomers. In one embodiment, the cationic monomers are selected from [(3-methylacrylamido) alkyl] trialkylammonium chloride, diallyldimethylammonium chloride, and mixtures thereof, alternatively is 3- methacrylamidopropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride. Anionic Monomer
The deposition polymer according to the present invention includes from about 1% to about 20%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from anionic monomers selected from acrylic acid, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, vinyl sulfonic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, acrylamidopropylmethane sulfonic acid (AMPS), salts thereof, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the deposition polymer includes from about 2.5% to about 6%, by mole, of monomeric units derived from anionic monomers. In one embodiment, the anionic monomer is selected from acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and mixtures thereof, alternatively is acrylic acid.
In one embodiment, the polymer is formed from monomeric units derived from (on a mole basis) 90% acrylamide, 5% MAPTAC and 5% acrylic acid. In another embodiment, the polymer is formed from monomeric units derived from (on a mole basis) 92% acrylamide, 1.6% acrylic acid, 1.4% methacrylic acid, and 5% MAPTAC. Counterion
The polymers of the present invention may also contain counterions. "Counterions", as used herein refers to any innocuous ions which do not adversely affect the functioning of the invention and serve only to balance the charge of otherwise non-neutral monomers or other actives. When not otherwise specified, and a monomer or other active material of the present compositions is anionic, suitable counterions include sodium, potassium, alkanolammonium and mixtures thereof. When not otherwise specified and a monomer or other active material of the present compositions is cationic, suitable counter-ions include nitrate, sulphate, chloride, carbonate, bicarbonate and mixtures thereof.
Surfactant System
The detergent compositions herein include from about 5% to about 60%, alternatively from about 5% to 40%, by weight of the composition, of a surfactant system containing from about 1% to about 25%, by weight of the surfactant system, of fatty acid, alternatively from about 3% to about 15%, alternatively from about 3% to about 10%. The laundry detergent compositions of the present invention may contain from about 75% to about 99%, by weight of the surfactant system, of a detersive surfactant. Detersive surfactants utilized can be of the anionic, nonionic, zwitterionic, ampholytic or cationic type or can comprise compatible mixtures of these types. Detergent surfactants useful herein are described in U.S. Patent 3,664,961, Norris, issued May 23, 1972; U.S. Patent 3,919,678, Laughlin et al., issued December 30, 1975; U.S. Patent 4,222,905, Cockrell, issued September 16, 1980; U.S. Patent No. 4,285,841, Barrat et al., issued August 25, 1981; U.S. Pat. No. 4,285,841, Barrat et al, issued Aug. 25, 1981; U.S. Pat. No. 4,284,532, Leikhim et al, issued Aug. 18, 19811; and in U.S. Patent 4,239,659, Murphy, issued December 16, 1980. Anionic and nonionic surfactants are preferred Fatty acids useful herein include those commonly commercially available. Such fatty acids may contain from about 8 to about 20 carbon atoms and can also contain from about 1 to about 10 ethylene oxide units in the hydrocarbon chain.
Suitable fatty acids are saturated and/or unsaturated and can be obtained from natural sources such a plant or animal esters (e.g., palm kernel oil, palm oil, coconut oil, babassu oil, safflower oil, tall oil, castor oil, tallow and fish oils, grease, and mixtures thereof), or synthetically prepared (e.g., via the oxidation of petroleum or by hydrogenation of carbon monoxide via the Fisher Tropsch process). Examples of suitable saturated fatty acids for use in the compositions of this invention include captic, lauric, myristic, palmitic, stearic, arachidic and behenic acid. Suitable unsaturated fatty acid species include: palmitoleic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic and ricinoleic acid. Examples of preferred fatty acids are saturated Cn fatty acid, saturated Ci2- Ci4 fatty acids, and saturated or unsaturated Cn to Ci8 fatty acids, and mixtures thereof.
Electrolyte
The laundry detergent compositions of the present invention may contain at least 0.1%, by weight of the compositions, of an electrolyte.
Electrolytes useful herein include non-surface active electrolytes (as opposed to surfactants separately described herein). Examples of electrolytes useful herein include (i) polycarboxylic acid salts such as salts of citric acid, succinic acid, tartaric acids; salts of phosphonic acids or aminocarboxylic acids (which could also be chelating agents); (iii) salts of boric acids, and (iv) mixtures thereof.
Fatty Acid Crystal Modifier
The laundry detergent compositions of the present invention may contain a fatty acid crystal modifier. The fatty acid crystal modifier is selected from sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate; quaternary ammonium surfactant; polyethyleneimine having a molecular weight of from about 300 to about 6000 and an average alkoxylation of from about 3 to about 30 moles of alkylene oxide per nitrogen; ethoxylated tetraethylene-pentaimines having an average ethoxylation of from 15 to 18; zwitterionic surfactants (such as alkyldimethylamine N-oxides, including dodecyldimethylamine N-oxide); chelating agents; zwitterionic amine-based soil release polymers; nonionic alkylpolyethoxylate; and mixtures thereof.
Sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate The fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from at least 5%, by weight of the composition, of sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate. In one embodiment, the composition contains from about 5% to about 25%, by weight of the composition, of sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate. Sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate is commonly used as a surfactant in laundry detergent compositions.
Quaternary ammonium surfactant The fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from about 0.1% to about 10%, by weight of the composition of a quaternary ammonium surfactant having the formula
e
R\ / R1
N x / \
R3 R2
wherein R^ and R2 are individually selected from the group consisting of C1-C4 alkyl, C1-C4 hydroxy alkyl, benzyl, and -(C2H4.O)XH where x has a value from about 2 to about 5; X is an anion; and (1) R3 and R4 are each a Cg-Cχ4 alkyl or (2) R3 is a Cg-C22 alkyl and R4 is selected from the group consisting of Cχ-CχQ alkyl, Cχ-CχQ hydroxy alkyl, benzyl, and -(C2H4θ)xH where x has a value from about 2 to about 5. Zwitterionic surfactants
The fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from about 0.1% to about 10%, by weight of the composition, of a zwitterionic surfactant. Zwitterionic surfactants useful herein include those commonly known in the art such as alkyl amine oxides. Chelating agents
The fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from about 0.05% to about 3%, by weight of the composition, alternatively from about 0.1% to about 1% of a chelating agent. Chelating agents useful herein include diethylene triamine penta acetate (DTPA). Zwitterionic amine-based soil-release polymers
The fatty acid crystal modifier may be selected from about 0.1% or more, by weight of the composition, of a zwitterionic amine-based soil-release polymer.
Fabric Care Benefit Agents The laundry detergent compositions useful herein may include a fabric care benefit agent.
As used herein, "fabric care benefit agents" refers to detergent ingredients which are water dispersible or water insoluble and can provide fabric care benefits such as fabric softening, color protection, pill/fuzz reduction, anti-abrasion, anti-wrinkle, perfume longevity and the like, to garments and fabrics, particularly on cotton garments and fabrics. These fabric care benefit agents typically have the solubility in distilled water of less than
100g/L, preferably less than 10g/L at 25°C. It is believed that if the solubility of the fabric care benefit agent is more than 10g/L, it will remain soluble in the wash liquor and consequently will not deposit onto the fabrics.
Examples of water insoluble fabric care benefit agents useful herein include dispersible polyolefins, polymer latexes, organosilicones, perfume or other active microcapsules, and mixtures thereof. The fabric care benefit agents can be in the form of emulsions, latexes, dispersions, suspensions, micelles and the like, and preferably in the form of microemulsions, swollen micelles or latexes. As such, they can have a wide range of particle sizes from about 1 nm to 100 um and preferably from about 5 nm to 10 um. The particle size of the microemulsions can be determined by conventional methods, such as using a Leeds & Northrup Microtrac UPA particle sizer.
Emulsifiers, dispersing agents and suspension agents may be used. The weight ratio of emulsifiers, dispersing agents or suspension agents to the fabric care benefit agents is about 1:100 to about 1:2. Preferably, the weight ratio ranges from about 1:50 to 1:5. Any surfactants suitable for making polymer emulsions or emulsion polymerizations of polymer latexes can be used to make the water insoluble fabric care benefit agents of the present invention. Suitable surfactants include anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants or mixtures thereof. Nonionic and anionic surfactants are preferred. Typically, the emulsification of the care agent is achieved in situ in the liquid detergent. In such case, the benefit agent is slowly added to the liquid detergent with vigorous mixing. Organosilicones
Suitable organosilicones, include, but not limited to (a) non-functionalized silicones such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS); and (b) functionalized silicones such as silicones with one or more functional groups selected from the group consisting of amino, amido, alkoxy, alkyl, phenyl, polyether, acrylate, siliconehydride, mercaptoproyl, carboxylate, sulfate phosphate, quaternized nitrogen, and combinations thereof.
In typical embodiments, the organosilicones suitable for use herein have a viscosity ranging from about 10 to about 700,000 CSt (centistokes) at 200C. In other embodiments, the suitable organosilicones have a viscosity from about 10 to about 100,000 CSt.
(a) Polydimethylsiloxanes (PDMS) have been described in Cosmetics and Toiletries. They can be linear, branched, cyclic, grafted or cross-linked or cyclic structures. In some embodiments, the detergent compositions comprise PDMS having a viscosity of from about 100 to about 700,000 CSt at 20 0C.
(b) Exemplary functionalized silicones include but are not limited to aminosilicones, amidosilicones, silicone polyethers, alkylsilicones, phenyl silicones and quaternary silicones. The functionalized silicones suitable for use in the present invention have the following general formula:
R R R R
R — Si— fθ— Si-Wo Si-V-O — Si R
R X R R
Q wherein m is from 4 to 50,000, preferably from 10 to 20,000; k is from 1 to 25,000, preferably from 3 to 12,000; each R is H or Ci-Cs alkyl or aryl group, preferably Ci-C4 alkyl, and more preferably a methyl group;
X is a linking group having the formula: i) -(CH2)p- wherein p is from 2 to 6, preferably 2 to 3; ii)
-(" H2C )— O — CH2 CH CH2
OH wherein q is from 0 to 4, preferably 1 to 2; iii)
H 2 O HO OH2
CH3 ;
Q has the formula: i) -NH2, - NH - (CH2)r - NH2, wherein r is from 1 to 4, preferably 2 to 3; or ii) - (O - CHR2 - CH2)S - Z, wherein s is from 1 to 100, preferably 3 to 30; wherein R2 is H or C1-C3 alkyl, preferably H or CH3; and Z is selected from the group consisting of - OR3, - OC(O)R3, - CO- R4 - COOH, -SO3, - PO(OH)2, and mixtures thereof; further wherein R3 is H, Ci-C26 alkyl or substituted alkyl, C6-C26 aryl or substituted aryl, C7- C26 alkylaryl or substituted alkylaryl groups, preferably R3 is H, methyl, ethyl propyl or benzyl groups; R4 is -CH2- or -CH2CH2- groups; and iii)
iv)
preferably methyl. Another class of organosilicone useful herein is modified polyalkylene oxide polysiloxanes of the general formula:
wherein Q is NH2 or -NHCH2CH2NH2; R is H or Ci-C6 alkyl; r is from O to 1000; m is from 4 to
40,000; n is from 3 to 35,000; and p and q are integers independently selected from 2 to 30. When r =0, nonlimiting examples of such polysiloxanes with polyalkylene oxide are
Silwet® L-7622, Silwet® L-7602, Silwet® L-7604, Silwet® L-7500, Magnasoft® TLC, available from GE Silicones of Wilton, CT; Ultrasil® SW- 12 and Ultrasil® DW-18 silicones, available from Noveon Inc., of Cleveland OH; and DC-5097, FF-400® available from Dow Corning® of Midland, MI. Additional examples are KF-352®, KF-6015®, and KF-945®, all available from Shin Etsu Silicones of Tokyo, Japan.
When r = 1 to 1000, nonlimiting examples of this class of organosilicones are Ultrasil® A21 and Ultrasil® A-23, both available from Noveon, Inc. of Cleveland, OH; BY16-876® from Dow Corning Toray Ltd., Japan; and X22-3939A® from Shin Etsu Corporation, Tokyo Japan.
A third class of organosilicones useful herein is modified polyalkylene oxide polysiloxanes of the general formula:
wherein m is from 4 to 40,000; n is from 3 to 35,000; and p and q are integers independently selected from 2 to 30; Z is selected from
O
_ll_ i. C R7 wherein R7 is Cl- C24 alkyl group; o o
Il Il ii. — c— R4-C- OH wherein R4 is CH2 or CH2CH2;
iii. -SO3
-P-OH I
IV. OH
CH3
-CH2 — N— (CH2)3— NH — C-R8 A-
V. CH, wherein R8 is Cl- C22 alkyl and A- is an appropriate anion, preferably Cl"; o CH3 o
Il +l Il
— C— H2C-N- (CH2)3— NH — C-R8 A- vi. CH3 wherein R8 is Cl- C22 alkyl and A- is an appropriate anion, preferably Cl". Another class of silicones is cationic silicones. These are typically produced by reacting a diamine with an epoxide. They are described in WO 02/18528 and WO 04/041983 (both assigned to P&G), WO 04/056908 (assigned to Wacker Chemie) and US 5,981,681 and US
5,807,956 (assigned to OSi Specialties). These are commercially available under the trade names Magnasoft® Prime, Magnasoft® HSSD, Silsoft® A-858 (all from GE Silicones) and Wacker SLM21200®.
One embodiment of the composition of the present invention contains organosilicone emulsions, which comprise organosilicones dispersed in a suitable carrier (typically water) in the presence of an emulsifier (typically an anionic surfactant).
In another embodiment, the organosilicones are in the form of microemulsions. The organosilicone microemulsions may have an average particle size in the range from about 1 nm to about 150 nm, or from about 10 nm to about 100 nm, or from about 20 nm to about 50 nm. Microemulsions are more stable than conventional macroemulsions (average particle size about 1-20 microns) and when incorporated into a product, the resulting product has a preferred clear appearance. More importantly, when the composition is used in a typical aqueous wash environment, the emulsifiers in the composition become diluted such that the microemulsions can no longer be maintained and the organosilicones coalesce to form significantly larger droplets which have an average particle size of greater than about 1 micron. Since the selected organosilicones are water insoluble or have limited solubility in water, they will crash out of the wash liquor, resulting in more efficient deposition onto the fabrics and enhanced fabric care benefits. In a typical immersive wash environment, the composition is mixed with an excess of water to form a wash liquor, which typically has a weight ratio of water : composition ranging from 10:1 to 400:1.
A typical embodiment of the composition comprising from about 0.01% to about 10%, by weight of composition of the organosilicones and an effective amount of an emulsifier in a carrier. The "effective amount" of emulsifier is the amount sufficient to produce an organosilicone microemulsion in the carrier, preferably water. In some embodiments, the amount of emulsifiers ranges from about 5 to about 75 parts, or from about 25 to about 60 parts per 100 weight parts organosilicone.
The microemulsion typically comprises from about 10 to about 70%, or from about 25 to about 60%, by weight of the microemulsion of the dispersed organosilicones; from about 0.1 to about 30%, or from about 1 to about 20%, by weight of the microemulsion of anionic surfactant; optionally, from about 0 to about 3 %, or from about 0.1 to about 20%, by weight of the microemulsion of nonionic surfactant; and the balance being water, and optionally other carriers. Selected organosilicone polymers (all those disclosed herein above, excluding PDMS and cationic silicones) are suitable for forming microemulsions; these organosilicones are sometimes referred to as the "self emulsifying silicones". Emulsifiers, particularly anionic surfactants, may be added to aid the formation of organosilicone microemulsions in the composition. Optionally, nonionic surfactants useful as laundry adjuncts to provide detersive benefits can also aid the formation and stability of the microemulsions. In a typical embodiment, the amount of emulsifiers is from about 0.05% to about 15% by weight of the composition.
Nonlimiting examples of anionic surfactants include the following: alkyl sulfonates, such as Cn-Ci8 alkyl benzene sulfonates (LAS) or C10-C20 branched-chain and random alkyl sulfates (AS); CiO-Ci8 alkyl ethoxy sulfates (AExS) wherein x is from 1-30; mid-chain branched alkyl sulfates (US 6,020,303 and US 6,060,443) or mid-chain branched alkyl alkoxy sulfates (US 6,008,181 and US 6,020,303); Ci0-Ci8 alkyl alkoxy carboxylates comprising 1-5 ethoxy units; modified alkylbenzene sulfonate (MLAS) as discussed in WO 99/05243, WO 99/05242, WO 99/05244, WO 99/05082, WO 99/05084, WO 99/05241, WO 99/07656, WO 00/23549, and WO 00/23548; Ci2-C20 methyl ester sulfonate (MES); Ci0-Ci8 alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS); and C6- C20 sulfosuccinates. Dispersible Polyolefins
All dispersible polyolefins that provide fabric care benefits can be used as a fabric care benefit agents in the compositions of the present invention. The polyolefins can be in the form of waxes, emulsions, dispersions or suspensions. Examples of polyolefins useful herein are discussed below. The polyolefin may be a polyethylene, polypropylene, or a mixture thereof. The polyolefin may be at least partially modified to contain various functional groups, such as carboxyl, alkylamide, sulfonic acid or amide groups. In one embodiment, the polyolefin is at least partially carboxyl modified or, in other words, oxidized.
For ease of formulation, the dispersible polyolefin may be introduced as a suspension or an emulsion of polyolefin dispersed in an aqueous medium by use of an emulsifying agent. When an emulsion is employed, the emulsifier may be any suitable emulsification agent including anionic, cationic, or nonionic surfactants, or mixtures thereof. Almost any suitable surfactant may be employed as the emulsifier of the present invention. The dispersible polyolefin is dispersed by use of an emulsifier or suspending agent in a ratio 1:100 to about 1:2. Preferably, the ratio ranges from about 1 : 50 to 1:5. The polyolefin suspension or emulsion may comprise from about 1% to about 60%, alternatively from about 10% to about 55%, and still alternatively from about 20 to about 50% by weight of polyolefin.
The polyolefin may have a wax dropping point (see ASTM D3954-94, volume 15.04 "Standard Test Method for Dropping Point of Waxes", the method incorporated herein by reference) from about 20 to 1700C and more preferably from about 50 to 1400C. Suitable polyethylene waxes are available commercially from suppliers including but not limited to Honeywell (A-C polyethylene), Clariant (Velustrol emulsion), and BASF (LUWAX). Polymer Latexes Polymer latex is typically made by an emulsion polymerization process which includes one or more monomers, one or more emulsifiers, an initiator, and other components familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art. All polymer latexes that provide fabric care benefits can be used as water insoluble fabric care benefit agents of the present invention. Non-limiting examples of suitable polymer latexes include those disclosed in WO 02/018451 published in the name of Rhodia Chimie. Polymer latexes suitable for use herein as fabric care benefit agents include those having a glass transition temperature of from about -1200C to about 1200C and preferably from about - 800C to about 600C. Suitable emulsifiers include anionic, cationic, nonionic and amphoteric surfactants. Suitable initiators include all initiators that are suitable for emulsion polymerization of polymer latexes. The particle size of the polymer latexes can be from about 1 nm to about 10 μm and is preferably from about 10 nm to about 1 μm. Microencapsulated Actives
The laundry compositions herein may contain microcapsules or microencapsulates containing one or more fabric care active materials. The terms "microcapsules" and "microencapsulates" are used interchangeably herein. Microcapsules useful herein include urea/formaldehyde microcapsules, melamine/formaldehyde microcapsules, more generally aminoplast or polyamide microcapsules, and other types of core-shell microcapsules or microencapsulates having median particle sizes ranging from below 1 micron to 100 micron or higher can be used in the present compositions, suitably at levels of from 0.01% to 5% of the composition by weight. Smaller particle sizes, e.g., 10 microns or below (median) are preferred for incorporation into nonviscous liquid formulations, whereas in more viscous or thickened formulations, larger particle sizes can be employed and may offer desirable visual attributes. Such microcapsules can be colored or uncolored, e.g., by use of dyes and/or pigments, and further, can contain any useful compatible detergent adjunct including perfumes, anti-fungals, odor control agents, antistatic agents, fluorescent whitening agents, antimicrobial actives, emollients, UV protection agents, flame retardants, brighteners, enzymes and the like, enclosed in the core of the microencapsulate. Such materials are most commonly derived from technology and processes long ago established for making carbonless copy paper, and are available from a range of commercial suppliers such as Ciba, Givaudan/Quest BASF, IFF, Cognis, Appleton Papers, Chemitech and others. See for example WO-200274430 Al (Quest International); US-20070202063 Al (Appleton Papers); DE- -10000223 Al (BASF); WO2003002699 Al (Colgate); WO03054125 (Henkel); US- 2004138093 Al or US--2004142828 Al or EP- -1533415 Al or US20060287205 Al or US20070004610 Al (IFF); EP- -1640063 Al (Cognis); WO--2006056357 Al (Innovacel); WO--2007063001 Al (Ciba).
A perfume microcapsule contains an encapsulated perfume composition to provide a latent source of perfume. The perfume composition that is encapsulated may be comprised of 100% perfume, which encompasses individual perfume ingredients or perfume accords; optionally, the perfume composition may include non-volatile materials such as diluents. The diluent may be present from 0% to 50% of the perfume formulation. Exemplary diluents include isopropyl myristate, polyethylene glycol, propanediol, and combinations thereof.
Optional Fabric Adjuncts The detergent compositions of the present invention can also include any number of additional optional ingredients. These include conventional laundry detergent composition components such as detersive builders, enzymes, enzyme stabilizers (such as propylene glycol, boric acid and/or borax), suds suppressors, soil suspending agents, soil release agents, other fabric care benefit agents, pH adjusting agents, smectite clays, solvents, hydrotropes and phase stabilizers, structuring agents, dye transfer inhibiting agents, optical brighteners, perfumes and coloring agents. The various optional detergent composition ingredients, if present in the compositions herein, should be utilized at concentrations conventionally employed to bring about their desired contribution to the composition or the laundering operation. Frequently, the total amount of such optional detergent composition ingredients can range from about 5% to about 50%, alternatively from about 30% to about 40%, by weight of the composition. A few of the optional ingredients which can be used are described in greater detail as follows: Pearlescent agent
The laundry detergent compositions of the present invention may comprise from about 0.02% to about 0.5%, by weight of the composition, of a pearlescent agent. Examples of pearlescent agents useful herein include mica, metal oxide coated mica, bismuth oxy chloride coated mica, bismuth oxychloride, glass, metal oxide coated glass, ethylene glycol distearate, fish scales, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the pearlescent agent has an average particle size of from 0.1 to 50 microns and has a platelet or spherical geometry.
Methods of Use
The compositions herein are contemplated for using in traditional machine-washing or hand- washing methods. The compositions may also be used on a commercial scale for laundering commercial quantities of fabrics or textiles. Use of the laundry compositions herein to launder or pre-treat fabrics is contemplated herein. Such use to impart an improved fabric feel and/or cleaning benefit to fabrics is further contemplated herein.
Encapsulated composition
The compositions of the present invention may be encapsulated within a water soluble film. The water-soluble film may be made from polyvinyl alcohol or other suitable variations, carboxy methyl cellulose, cellulose derivatives, starch, modified starch, sugars, PEG, waxes, or combinations thereof. In another embodiment the water-soluble may include other adjuncts such as copolymer of vinyl alcohol and a carboxylic acid. US patent 7,022,656 B2 (Monosol) describes such film compositions and their advantages. One benefit of these copolymers is the improvement of the shelf- life of the pouched detergents thanks to the better compatibility with the detergents. Another advantage of such films is their better cold water (less than 100C) solubility. Where present the level of the co-polymer in the film material, is at least 60% by weight of the film. The polymer can have any weight average molecular weight, preferably from 1000 daltons to 1,000,000 daltons, more preferably from 10,000 daltons to 300,000 daltons, even more preferably from 15,000 daltons to 200,000 daltons, most preferably from 20,000 daltons to 150,000 daltons. Preferably, the co-polymer present in the film is from 60% to 98% hydrolysed, more preferably 80% to 95% hydrolysed, to improve the dissolution of the material. In a highly preferred execution, the co-polymer comprises from 0.1 mol% to 30 mol%, preferably from 1 mol% to 6 mol%, of said carboxylic acid. 5 The water-soluble film of the present invention may further comprise additional co- monomers. Suitable additional co-monomers include sulphonates and ethoxylates. An example of preferred sulphonic acid is 2-acrylamido-2-methyl- 1 -propane sulphonic acid (AMPS). A suitable water-soluble film for use in the context of the present invention is commercially available under tradename M8630™ from Mono-Sol of Indiana, US. The water-soluble film ° herein may also comprise ingredients other than the polymer or polymer material. For example, it may be beneficial to add plasticisers, for example glycerol, ethylene glycol, diethyleneglycol, propanediol, 2-methyl- 1,3 -propane diol, sorbitol and mixtures thereof, additional water, disintegrating aids, fillers, anti-foaming agents, emulsifying/dispersing agents, and/or antiblocking agents. It may be useful that the pouch or water-soluble film itself comprises a 5 detergent additive to be delivered to the wash water, for example organic polymeric soil release agents, dispersants, dye transfer inhibitors. Optionally the surface of the film of the pouch may be dusted with fine powder to reduce the coefficient of friction. Sodium aluminosilicate, silica, talc and amylose are examples of suitable fine powders.
The encapsulated pouches of the present invention can be made using any conventionally0 known techniques. In one embodiment, the pouches are made using horizontal form filling thermoforming techniques.
EXAMPLES 5 Example I - Residue Testing
The presence of residues is assessed in a full scale washing machine test using Miele Novotronic W527.
Residue Protocol: 0 1. The fabric used to assess residues on fabrics is a black velvet (Material source: Denholme
Velvets, Halifax Road, Denholme, Bradford, West Yorkshire, England BD13 4EZ - tel. (01274)
832 646, with the specifications 150 cm CR. Cotton Pile Velvet, quality 8897, black, 72%
Cotton, 28% Modal).
2. A pouch is made by sewing a rectangle of black velvet (dimensions 23.5 cm x 47 cm that is5 folded to make a square with the velvet on the inside) using an overlock stitch, sewing along two sides leaving one open edge. The pouch is turned inside out so that the velvet is on the outside. 3. A dosing ball is filled using the recommended dosage for each product according to packaging instructions for normal/median soil and normal/median water hardness (125g). For every experiment, a new and unused dosing ball is filled. The dosing ball is placed inside the black velvet pouch.
4. The pouch is then closed by making a 2 cm wide fold across the open side and is secured with 3 plastic stitches.
5. For the wash test, the black pouch is placed in the back of the washing machine (Miele Novotronic W527) with the opening of the dosing ball up, without any further ballast load. The washing machine is switched on using the wool wash program at 400C, using city water (2.5mmol/L). At end of the wash cycle, the pouches are immediately removed from the washing machine. The pouches are opened along the three sides (all stitched and sewed sides), except the folded side. For every test product, a run with a reference product is performed at the same time (for comparison). Every experiment is repeated 2 times to have 3 replicates per test product.
6. The pouches are graded after drying over night (horizontally on a flat surface), by 2 qualified graders, using the following grading instructions and scale (relative scale to reference product results):
Table 1 - Residue Grading Scale
To indicate less residues (instead of more residues), the signs of the scale above are inverted to positive numbers.
Each item is assessed by the two graders, and the grades are averaged; if the grades given by the two judges differ by more than 1 PSU (except -1 and +1), the grading is repeated. Three replicates are assessed and their results averaged to obtain the final grade. The residues test described above was carried out using the standard composition described below in Table 2 as a reference composition against the same composition containing one of the different copolymers listed in Table 3.
Table 2 - Standard Composition
The copolymers used and the results obtained are summarized in Table 3
Table 3 - Copolymers and Test Results
The overall mole ratio is defined as: (% Acrylic acid + % methacrylic acid) / (% Acrylic acid + % methacrylic acid + % PamMAPTAC)
Based on consumer input, a residue grade difference of 2 PSU from the reference composition (i.e., a PSU of -2 or less) in this test will deliver consumer noticeable, unsatisfactory, residues levels. Therefore, the polymers which provide acceptable residues levels when included in the standard composition are the Table 2 polymers 2, 3, 5, and 7.
Example II - Softness Testing The relative softness of fabrics washed in laundry products containing polymers is assessed in a full scale washing machine test using Miele Novotronic W527.
Softness Protocol
Fabric softness is a relative characteristic that in this protocol is evaluated by trained human softness graders that tactically examine a range of white fabric swatches washed in commercially available washing machines with standard dosages of laundry detergent. Identical sets of fabric swatches are separately washed in a reference detergent product and in a test product. The softness results are a comparison of the resulting fabric swatches from each test product wash with the fabrics from the reference detergent product wash using the PSU score described below. All data are generated by usingcommercially available washing machines manufactured by Miele and sold as the Novatronic W527 model and commercially available laundry dryers manufactured by Miele and sold as the Novotronic T490 model.
Fabric Swatches Multiple types of fabrics cut into swatches and used to assess the softness. The fabrics used are:
1) White terries with a swatch size of 30cm x 30cm and a weight of 450g/m2, supplied by Maes Textiles - Brabantstraatll7, 8790 Waregem , Belgium 2) White knitted 100% cotton with a swatch size of 50cm x 40cm and a weight of 165-
175g/m2, having a rib of 1/1, supplied by Abanderado Industriepark West 61, 9100 Sint Niklaas, Belgium ,and 3) White polycotton (50% polyester blended with 50% cotton) with a swatch size of 100cm x 120cm and a weight of 130g/m2, supplied by Dewerchin Vruchtendreef 19, 8520 Kuurne), Belgium
De-sizing
All fabric swatches used in the testing protocol, including reference fabric swatches are washed (before beginning testing) three times each with commercially available Ariel Liquid (at the recommended dosage for medium soil, medium water hardness of 75ml, dosed via a dosing ball) at 600C using the short ("wit/bont") standard program with city water (2.5mmol/l) in order to remove any sizing applied by the manufacturers.
In addition to the fabric swatches, in each washing cycle an extra ballast load is added to get to a total weight of approximately 3kg of fabrics in the washing cycle (see Table 4, below). The ballast load consists of two large terry towels (80cm x 50cm, supplied by Maes Textiles) and six pieces of knitted cotton (50cm x 50cm, supplied by Abanderado). After completion of the three washing cycles, all fabrics are then tumble dried in a commercially available dryer. Upon drying, the fabrics are then ready to use in softness testing.
Test Load For the reference product and for each of the test compositions, a test load of fabrics as shown in Table 4 is utilized.
Table 4 - Test Load
Testing of Fabric Swatches
A test load of fabrics is then washed three times each in succession (cycles 1, 2, and 3) with 75ml (recommended dosage for medium water hardness, medium soil) of the laundry product to be analyzed, dispensing with a dosing ball. Reference laundry product is washed under the same conditions as test products.
The washing machines are fed with city water (2.5mmol/L) at 400C and are set to the short ("wit/bont") standard program with spinning at 1200rpm. The washing machines are not rotated to avoid contamination between the products. All three cycles for each laundry product test load must be completed on the same day with tumble drying of all fabrics in between cycles 1 and 2, and in between cycles 2 and 3, using the setting "Kastdroog" on the dryer.
After cycle 3, the fabrics that need to be line dried (as shown in Table 4) are taken out and line dried overnight in a controlled temperature and humidity room set at 210C, 50% relative humidity. The other fabrics are dried in a tumble dryer, using the "Extra dry" setting.
The day after drying, the fabric swatches are graded for softness by two different trained softness graders, utilizing a PSU scale. The PSU scale as referenced herein is a paired comparison between a fabric swatch treated with test product and the same type of fabric swatch treated with the reference product, using a grading scale going from -4 to 4. This paired comparison PSU grading scale is shown below in Table 5.
Table 5 - PSU Grading Scale
A positive grading scale number indicates that the fabric swatch treated with the test product is softer than the one of the reference product, a negative grading scale number indicates that the reference swatch is softer. If for a particular set of swatches, the grades given by the two softness graders differ by more than 1 PSU (except -1 and +1), regrading occurs.
For each test product, each of the swatches from the load (except the ballast load) is compared with one swatch of the same fabric type washed with the reference product. As such, 32 PSU gradings are completed per grader for each test product (8 gradings for terry swatches line dry, 8 gradings for terry swatches tumble dry, 8 gradings for knitted cotton line dry and 8 numbers for polycotton tumble dry).
At the end, an average softness score is calculated by averaging all 32 gradings from both graders.
Tested Formulations
The softness test described above was carried out using a standard commercially available fabric softening laundry detergent composition shown in Table 6 as a reference product, and comparing it to test compositions according to the formulation set forth in Table 2 containing in turn one of each of the different copolymers listed in Table 3.
Table 6 - Reference Formulation for Softness Data
The copolymers used in the test composition and the softness results obtained are summarized in Table 7.
Table 7
Overall
Relative Mole
Material Mole % Softness Ratio
Meth-
Acryl- Acrylic acrylic amide Acid Acid Maptac PSU
Table 1
R formulation None None None None 0 NA
1 PamMAPTAC 88 0 0 12 + 1.0 0.00
2 Merquat 5300 90 5 0 5 + 0.5 0.50
3 45D (77/3/20) 8.7 3.4 0 7.9 + 1.2 0.30
4 45C (79/1/20) 91 1.1 0 7.5 + 0.9 0.13
5 50D (35/60/5) 36 62 0 1.7 - 1.5 0.97
6 Tetrapolymer 1 93.5 1.5 0 5 0.8 0.23
7 Tetrapolymer 2 92 1.6 1.4 5 0.9 0.38
As may be seen by comparing the data outlined in Tables 3 and 7, incorporation of polymers 2, 3 or 7 into the test composition of Table 2 provides both good softness benefits and an acceptable amount of residues on fabrics. The other polymers, when incorporated into the test composition of Table 2 are included as comparative examples.
EXAMPLE III - Detergent Compositions
Additional detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 3A and 3B, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
EXAMPLE IV
Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 4A to 4E, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
** Level expressed as perfume oil delivered via capsules
* Merquat 5300 is terpolymer with mole ratio : 90% P AM/5% AA/5%MAPTAC produced by Nalco.
EXAMPLE V Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 5A to 5E, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
EXAMPLE VI
Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 6A to 6D, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
EXAMPLE VII
Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 7A to 7F, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
1 : supplied by Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, MI 2 : supplied by Shin-Etsu Silicones, Akron, OH
EXAMPLE VIII
Additional laundry detergent composition examples according to the present invention are shown as compositions 8A to 8C, below. It is predicted that these formulations will provide good cleaning, softness and acceptably low visible residues on fabrics when used in traditional consumer washing machines.
1: supplied by Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, MI
EXAMPLE IX - Water Soluble Unit Dose Detergent
An example of a laundry detergent composition useful for inclusion in a water soluble (unit dose) detergent package is found below. To form the water soluble package, approximately 45ml of the composition is enclosed within a Monosol M8630 soluble film by a traditional thermoforming process.
All documents cited in the Detailed Description of the Invention are, in relevant part, incorporated herein by reference; the citation of any document is not to be construed as an admission that it is prior art with respect to the present invention. To the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this written document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to the term in this written document shall govern.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. A laundry detergent composition comprising from about 5% to about 90% , by weight of the composition, of water and having a pH of from about 6 to about 1 1 , wherein the composition further comprises: a) from about 0.02% to about 2%, by weight of the composition, of a polymer having a number average molecular weight of from about 700,000 to about 4,000,000 and comprising monomeric units, wherein the monomeric units are derived from monomers, said monomers comprising: i) at least 50%, by mole, of nonionic monomers selected from acrylamide, N,N-dialkyl acrylamide, methacrylamide, N,N-dialkylmethacrylamide, hydroxyalkyl acrylate and vinyl pyrrolidone, vinyl acetate, vinyl alcohol, and mixtures thereof; preferably selected from acrylamide, vinyl pyrrolidone, and mixtures thereof; ii) from about 3% to about 30%, by mole, of cationic monomers selected from N, N- dialkylaminoalkyl methacrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylate, N,N-dialkylaminoalkyl acrylamide, N,N-dialkylaminoalkylmethacrylamide, methacrylamidoalkyl trialkylammonium chloride, acrylamidoalkylltrialkylammonium chloride, vinylamine, quaternized vinyl imidazole and diallyl dialkyl ammonium chloride, and mixtures thereof; preferably from [(3-methylacrylamido) alkyl] trialkylammonium chloride, diallyldimethylammonium chloride, and mixtures thereof; more preferably is 3- methacrylamidopropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride; iii. from about 1% to about 20%, by mole, of anionic monomers selected from acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, vinyl sulfonic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, acrylamidopropylmethane sulfonic acid (AMPS), salts thereof, and mixtures thereof; preferably from acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and mixtures thereof; more preferably acrylic acid; wherein the overall mole ratio of the monomers, according to the following equation,
mole anionic monomer
(mole anionic monomer + mole cationic monomer)
is from 0.25 to 0.8, preferably from 0.35 to 0.6; and
b) from about 5% to about 60%, by weight of the composition, of a surfactant system comprising from about 1 % to about 25%, by weight of the surfactant system, of fatty acid.
2. A laundry detergent composition according to Claim 1 wherein the monomeric units are derived from at least 70%, by mole, of acrylamide.
3. A laundry detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the surfactant system comprises from about 3% to about 15% fatty acid.
4. A laundry detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the composition further comprises from about 5% to about 25% sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate.
5. A laundry detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the detergent composition further comprises a fatty acid crystal modifier; preferably wherein the fatty acid crystal modifier is selected from: a) at least 5%, by weight of the composition of sodium alkyl ethoxysulfate; b) from about 0.1 % to about 10% of a quaternary ammonium surfactant having the formula
wherein R-| and R2 are individually selected from the group consisting of C-J -C4 alkyl, C-1 -C4 hydroxy alkyl, benzyl, and -(C2H4O)xH where x has a value from about 2 to about 5; X is an anion; and (1 ) R3 and R4 are each a Cs-C-I4 alkyl or (2) R3 is a Cs-C22 alkyl and R4 is selected from the group consisting of C-| - C-| o alkyl, C-| -C-| o hydroxy alkyl, benzyl, and -(C2H4O)xH where x has a value from about 2 to about 5; c) from about 0.1% to about 5%, by weight of the composition, of alkoxylated polyethyleneimines having a molecular weight of from about 300 to about 6000 and an average alkoxylation of from about 3 to about 30 moles of alkylene oxide per nitrogen; d) from about 0.1 % to about 5%, by weight of the composition, of ethoxylated tetraethylene- pentaimine having an average ethoxylation of from 15 to 18; e) from about 1 % to about 10% of zwitterionic surfactant; f) from about 0.05% to about 2% of a chelating agent; g) from about 0.1 % to about 5% of a zwitterionic amine-based polymer; h) from about 1% to about 10% of a nonionic alkylpolyethoxylate; and i) mixtures thereof.
6. A laundry detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the composition further comprises a water insoluble fabric care benefit agent selected from dispersible polyolefins, polymer latexes, organosilicones, perfume or other active microcapsules, and mixtures thereof.
7. A laundry detergent composition according to Claim 6 wherein the organosilicones are selected from polydimethylsiloxanes, aminosilicones, amidosilicones, silicone polyethers, alkylsilicones, phenyl silicones, quaternary silicones and mixtures thereof.
8. A laundry detergent composition according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the composition further comprises from about 0.02% to about 0.5%, by weight of the composition, of a pearlescent agent; preferably wherein the pearlescent agent is selected from the group consisting of mica, metal oxide coated mica, bismuth oxy chloride coated mica, bismuth oxychloride, glass, metal oxide coated glass, ethylene glycol distearate, fish scales, and mixtures thereof.
9. A laundry detergent composition comprising from about 10% to about 90% water and having a pH of from about 6 to about 11 , wherein the composition further comprises:
b) from about 0.05% to about 2%, by weight of the composition, of a polymer having a number average molecular weight of from 700,000 to 4,000,000 and comprising monomeric units, wherein the monomeric units are derived from monomers, said monomers comprising:
i) at least 70%, by mole, of acrylamide;
ii) from about 3% to about 30%, by mole, of [(3-methylacrylamido) propyl] trimethylammonium chloride;
iii) from about 1% to about 20%, by mole, of acrylic acid; and
iv) optionally from 0% to about 10%, by mole, of methacrylic acid;
wherein the mole ratio of the monomers, according to the following equation,
mole anionic monomer
(mole anionic monomer + mole cationic monomer)
is from 0.3 to 0.8;
b) from about 5% to about 60%, by weight of the composition, of a surfactant system comprising from about 3% to about 15% fatty acid; and c) at least 0.1%, by weight of the composition, of an electrolyte.
10. Use of a laundry composition according to Claim 1 to launder or pre-treat fabrics.
1 1. Use of a laundry composition according to Claim 1 to provide softness to fabrics through the wash.
EP09706862.1A 2008-02-01 2009-01-22 Fabric softening laundry detergent Active EP2242827B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US2546908P 2008-02-01 2008-02-01
PCT/IB2009/050251 WO2009095823A1 (en) 2008-02-01 2009-01-22 Fabric softening laundry detergent

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2242827A1 true EP2242827A1 (en) 2010-10-27
EP2242827B1 EP2242827B1 (en) 2013-07-10

Family

ID=40564986

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09706862.1A Active EP2242827B1 (en) 2008-02-01 2009-01-22 Fabric softening laundry detergent

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2242827B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2011511124A (en)
CN (1) CN101925670A (en)
AR (1) AR070401A1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0907455A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2713528A1 (en)
MX (1) MX2010008465A (en)
RU (1) RU2010132282A (en)
WO (1) WO2009095823A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2295531B1 (en) * 2009-09-14 2017-02-22 The Procter & Gamble Company A fluid laundry detergent composition
EP2336285B1 (en) * 2009-12-18 2013-09-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Composition comprising microcapsules
WO2011123746A1 (en) * 2010-04-01 2011-10-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Fabric care compositions comprising copolymers
US20110268778A1 (en) * 2010-04-28 2011-11-03 Jiten Odhavji Dihora Delivery particles
US9186642B2 (en) 2010-04-28 2015-11-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Delivery particle
JP6276181B2 (en) * 2011-09-01 2018-02-07 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニー Cleaning composition and soil scavenger for cleaning object
PL2802643T3 (en) * 2012-01-11 2016-05-31 Henkel Ag & Co Kgaa Fragrant, water-soluble packaging
KR20150038181A (en) * 2012-07-19 2015-04-08 바스프 에스이 Hydrophobically modified cationic polymer
WO2014012375A1 (en) * 2012-07-19 2014-01-23 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions
JP6122214B2 (en) * 2013-05-24 2017-04-26 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニー Low pH detergent composition
GB201319923D0 (en) * 2013-11-12 2013-12-25 Cambridge Entpr Ltd Novel composition
US9862912B2 (en) * 2014-03-26 2018-01-09 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions containing cationic polymers, and methods of making and using same
WO2015143644A1 (en) * 2014-03-26 2015-10-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Cleaning compositions containing cationic polymers, and methods of making and using same
WO2016074142A1 (en) 2014-11-11 2016-05-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent or cleaning compositions with improved sudsing profile
JP6238450B2 (en) * 2014-04-03 2017-11-29 ライオン株式会社 Liquid detergent for textile products
CN104060472A (en) * 2014-06-24 2014-09-24 江苏万淇生物科技有限公司 Synthetic method of softener capable of improving fabric detergency performance
JP6502472B2 (en) 2014-08-27 2019-04-17 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニー Method of preparing detergent composition
EP3186349B1 (en) 2014-08-27 2019-09-25 The Procter and Gamble Company Detergent composition comprising a cationic polymer
JP6695855B2 (en) 2014-08-27 2020-05-20 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニーThe Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition containing cationic polymer
WO2016032995A1 (en) 2014-08-27 2016-03-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Method of treating a fabric
US9809782B2 (en) 2014-08-27 2017-11-07 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition comprising a cationic polymer and anionic/nonionic surfactant mixture
WO2016032993A1 (en) 2014-08-27 2016-03-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Detergent composition comprising a cationic polymer
US9850452B2 (en) 2014-09-25 2017-12-26 The Procter & Gamble Company Fabric care compositions containing a polyetheramine
CN104651078B (en) * 2014-10-10 2017-10-17 浙江艾莱依羽绒制品有限公司 A kind of shield suede liquid detergent that efficiently deoils of coating fabric or high-density fabric down products
JP6257700B2 (en) 2016-05-30 2018-01-10 ハリマ化成株式会社 Pitch control agent and pitch control method
ES2987953T3 (en) * 2018-08-27 2024-11-18 Henkel Ag & Co Kgaa Combination of polymeric active ingredients that improve primary washing power
WO2021127696A1 (en) * 2019-12-20 2021-06-24 The Procter & Gamble Company Particulate fabric care composition
US11186805B2 (en) 2019-12-20 2021-11-30 The Procter & Gamble Company Particulate fabric care composition
US12486478B2 (en) 2020-10-16 2025-12-02 The Procter & Gamble Company Consumer products comprising delivery particles with high core:wall ratios
MX2023004231A (en) 2020-10-16 2023-04-21 Procter & Gamble CONSUMER PRODUCT COMPOSITIONS THAT COMPRISE A POPULATION OF ENCAPSULATES.
JP2023543578A (en) 2020-10-16 2023-10-17 ザ プロクター アンド ギャンブル カンパニー Consumer product compositions having at least two populations of inclusion bodies
PL4405451T3 (en) * 2021-09-22 2025-04-07 Unilever Ip Holdings B.V. Fabric softening composition
WO2024011345A1 (en) 2022-07-11 2024-01-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Laundry detergent composition containing graft copolymer and benefit agent
WO2026014396A1 (en) * 2024-07-09 2026-01-15 花王株式会社 Polymer for reducing generation of microplastic fibers in textiles

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2072319C (en) * 1991-06-28 2005-11-22 Shih-Ruey T. Chen Ampholyte terpolymers providing superior conditioning properties in skin and nail care products
US20040152616A1 (en) * 2003-02-03 2004-08-05 Unilever Home & Personal Care Usa, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Laundry cleansing and conditioning compositions
KR20070106504A (en) * 2005-02-07 2007-11-01 가부시키가이샤 시세이도 Skin cleanser composition
US7807766B2 (en) * 2005-09-21 2010-10-05 Cognis Ip Management Gmbh Polymers for use in cleaning compositions

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2009095823A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2011511124A (en) 2011-04-07
CN101925670A (en) 2010-12-22
WO2009095823A1 (en) 2009-08-06
EP2242827B1 (en) 2013-07-10
BRPI0907455A2 (en) 2015-07-14
CA2713528A1 (en) 2009-08-06
AR070401A1 (en) 2010-04-07
MX2010008465A (en) 2010-08-23
RU2010132282A (en) 2012-03-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2242827B1 (en) Fabric softening laundry detergent
US8177858B2 (en) Fabric softening laundry detergent
US7528099B2 (en) Fabric care composition
CA2652918C (en) Detergent compositions for cleaning and fabric care
CN100591749C (en) Fabric treatment composition comprising oppositely charged polymer
US20110177994A1 (en) Fabric care composition
MX2011002151A (en) Fabric care compositions, process of making, and method of use.
CN104487561A (en) Cleaning compositions
CN106459843B (en) Cleaning compositions comprising cationic polymers and methods of making and using the same
CA2514766C (en) Laundry cleansing and conditioning compositions
CA3041104C (en) Fabric treatment compositions having low calculated cationic charge density polymers and fabric softening actives and methods for providing a benefit
WO2009158392A1 (en) Liquid laundry treatment composition comprising a mono-hydrocarbyl amido quaternary ammonium compound
AU596089B2 (en) Fabric softening and antistatic liquid detergent compositions
ZA200202632B (en) Fabric softener compositions.
Care Fabric Softeners

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100805

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20111222

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C11D 1/04 20060101ALI20121217BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/00 20060101AFI20121217BHEP

Ipc: C11D 1/29 20060101ALI20121217BHEP

Ipc: C11D 10/04 20060101ALI20121217BHEP

Ipc: C11D 3/37 20060101ALI20121217BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 621008

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130715

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602009017013

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130912

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 621008

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130710

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131111

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131010

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131011

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131021

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: HENKEL AG & CO. KGAA

Effective date: 20140408

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602009017013

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140122

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140131

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20140930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140122

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 602009017013

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20090122

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20160614

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20180115

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130710

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20190201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190201

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230429

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20241205

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20241203

Year of fee payment: 17