EP2193347B1 - Knowledge based valve control method - Google Patents

Knowledge based valve control method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2193347B1
EP2193347B1 EP08834913.9A EP08834913A EP2193347B1 EP 2193347 B1 EP2193347 B1 EP 2193347B1 EP 08834913 A EP08834913 A EP 08834913A EP 2193347 B1 EP2193347 B1 EP 2193347B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
valve
position
signature
operating
method
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08834913.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2193347A4 (en
EP2193347A1 (en
Inventor
Leo Minervini
Daniel Mrozinski
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Westlock Controls Corp
Original Assignee
Westlock Controls Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US97662507P priority Critical
Application filed by Westlock Controls Corp filed Critical Westlock Controls Corp
Priority to PCT/US2008/077676 priority patent/WO2009045848A1/en
Publication of EP2193347A1 publication Critical patent/EP2193347A1/en
Publication of EP2193347A4 publication Critical patent/EP2193347A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2193347B1 publication Critical patent/EP2193347B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16KVALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING
    • F16K37/00Special means in or on valves or other cut-off apparatus for indicating or recording operation thereof, or for enabling an alarm to be given
    • F16K37/0075For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment
    • F16K37/0083For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment by measuring valve parameters
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16KVALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING
    • F16K37/00Special means in or on valves or other cut-off apparatus for indicating or recording operation thereof, or for enabling an alarm to be given
    • F16K37/0075For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment
    • F16K37/0091For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment by measuring fluid parameters
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T137/00Fluid handling
    • Y10T137/0318Processes
    • Y10T137/0324With control of flow by a condition or characteristic of a fluid

Description

  • The present invention relates generally to valve controllers. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method associated with a valve controller configured to capture dynamic process conditions for monitoring, diagnosing and maintaining a valve assembly through knowledge-based valve performance criteria.
  • A valve package is installed within a process line to control process flow in industrial applications such as oil and natural gas processing, food and beverage production, and chemical and pharmaceutical processing. Usually a valve package includes a process valve, actuator for opening/closing the valve and a controller configured to control the opening, closing and position of the valve. The valve controller may further have the capability to monitor valve operation and signal an error message if a failure condition occurs. The controller initiates the actuator to open or close the valve. A number of different types of actuators may be used to open/close particular types of valves. For example, a linear actuator may be used to open/close a diaphragm valve; a rotary actuator may be used to open/close a butterfly or ball valve.
  • Typically, the operation of a valve package is first tested on the bench (i.e. not installed within a process line) to ensure that the valve opens and closes based on signals supplied to the controller and the actuator is sized appropriately for the valve. A reference profile is developed based on this testing to determine how long it takes the valve to open/close and under what operating conditions (supply pressure, exhaust pressure, etc.). Because the valve package is first tested outside an actual process line, particular operating characteristics are not considered when determining these reference profiles. In addition, this out of line testing does not indicate if the valve and actuator are appropriate for a particular process application. For example, if the process flows in a high pressure environment, the actuator may require torque T1 to open and close the valve having size S1. In contrast, if the process flows under low pressure, the torque T2 required to open and close the valve having size S2 may each be lower than torque T1 and size S1. These profiles do not take into account the effects of process flow, environmental parameters (e.g. temperature) and general operating characteristics as the valve function in-line. Thus, there is a need to provide a dynamic method of capturing process conditions of a valve package in line.
  • US2001/037670 , which considers to represent the closest prior art, discloses a knowledge based control method associated with a valve package having a process valve, an actuator and a controller, the method comprising: obtaining a baseline signature corresponding to at least one operating characteristic value of said valve as the valve moves from a first position to a second position in-line as process media is flowing through the valve; storing said baseline signature in a memory; obtaining an operating signature corresponding to values associated with said baseline signature each time the valve moves from said first position to said second position in-line as process media is flowing through the valve; comparing said operating signature to the baseline signature; and determining if one or more of the values associated with the operating signature is within an acceptable tolerance deviation from the corresponding one or more values in the baseline signature.
  • Another prior art system is disclosed in US5687098 .
  • According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a knowledge based control method as defined in claim 1.
  • The present invention further provides a valve system as defined in claim 15.
  • In order that the invention may be well understood there will now be described an embodiment thereof, given by way of example, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 is an exemplary embodiment of a valve package.
    • Figure 2 is a baseline signature of the operation of a valve package.
    • Figure 3 is a baseline signature of the operation of a valve package taken in-line with process flow in accordance with the present invention.
    DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention, however, may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein.
  • Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
  • As explained above and as shown in Fig. 1, a valve package 10 typically includes a process valve 15, actuator 20 and controller 25. Process valve 15 is installed along the longitudinal axis within a process pipeline (not shown) to allow, restrict or prevent process media flowing through the valve. Valve 15 includes a housing 16 through which a flow passage 17 is disposed to allow process media to flow through the valve. Actuator 20 is mounted on valve 15 and is typically pneumatically actuated, but may also be electric or hydraulic. Actuator 20 includes an output shaft that is connected to the valve stem. The output shaft either rotates or lifts upward (depending on the valve type) to provide the necessary torque to turn or lift the valve stem to open or close the valve. Controller 25 is usually mounted on the actuator and is configured to control the actuator based on various input signals. Controller 25 may also include a visual indicator 26 to display the position of valve 15. The time it takes the valve to open and close will depend on the type and size of the valve, the torque rating of the actuator, the process media flowing through the valve and the desired operating parameters. These dynamics of the valve package may be different when installed with process flowing through the system as compared to a standard or "bench" signature of the valve package. For example, a valve 15 having a particular size may be configured with an actuator 20 appropriate for opening and closing the subject valve. However, the torque required from actuator 20 to open valve 15 with no process flowing may be less than that required when process is flowing through the valve. Thus, an open and close signature illustrating the time and pressure required to open and/or close valve 15 may be different in-line vs. out of line (or on a bench).
  • Fig 2 illustrates an exemplary baseline signature of pressure vs. time for a valve package not installed within a process line. The profile includes torque differential profile T, supply pressure profile S, valve position profile P, and exhaust profile E. Supply pressure is the amount of pressure supplied to the actuator. Exhaust pressure is the amount of pressure exiting the actuator. Position indicates whether the valve is open, closed or somewhere in between as well as the time it takes to reach such a position. Differential pressure is the pressure to and from the actuator and provides information about the peak torque values. Peak torque relates to the amount of torque required when breaking the seal of the valve from its seat when opening the valve and when sufficiently engaging the seat of the valve when the valve is to be closed.
  • The torque profile associated with a valve package indicates that the valve is sized correctly if the profile falls within a predetermined safety margin. In addition, the torque profile identifies the shear values associated with the particular valve and actuator shaft. For example, if the torque thrust associated with a particular torque profile is too high, this may indicate that the valve seal is corroding which may cause the shaft to stall during operation. If the torque is low or decreasing, this may indicate that the actuator is too large for the application imparting too much torque on the valve shaft which may eventually cause the shaft to snap. Thus, a baseline is used as a reference to compare operation of the valve assembly to determine degradation of the assembly within a process system.
  • The valve position profile P illustrates that the valve is in a closed position at time tc and begins to open (based on a received command to the controller) at about 0.255 sec. As the actuator begins to open the valve, torque T begins to build as the valve is removed from its seat referred to as the peak torque Tp which, in this example, is about 1,2 bar (17 psi(g)). The open supply pressure profile S decreases slightly at time tT at around 5,2 bar (75 psi(g)) when the valve breaks away from its seat. Once the valve seal is broken from the seat, the torque required to continue moving the valve to a full open position drops at around 0.795 sec and continues relatively constant until the valve is fully open at time to (about 2.28 sec). The torque builds again as the valve remains in its open position at pressure Topen. The exhaust is at its highest when the valve is commanded to open but is still in its closed position and decreases during the opening process as most of the supply pressure is used to increase the torque to open the valve. The exhaust profile E decreases again as the valve reaches its open position at time to. The torque overhead indicated by reference TOH, represents the additional torque available from the actuator associated with this particular valve package which is a combination of the size of the valve vs. the size of the actuator when a baseline is taken on the bench.
  • Figure 3 illustrates an exemplary baseline signature associated with a valve package in accordance with the present invention. The baseline signature represents the operation of the valve package shown in Fig. 2, but after the package is installed in-line with process flowing through the valve. The valve position profile P illustrates that the valve is in a closed position at time tc and begins to open (based on a received command to the controller) at about 0.255 sec. The differential torque profile T indicates that the torque begins to build as the valve opens from about 0.255 sec to about 1.3 sec tT. The valve is removed from its seat at the peak torque Tp at about 3,3 bar (48 psi(g)). The open supply pressure profile S decreases slightly at time tT at around 5,9 bar (85 psi(g)) when the valve breaks away from its seat. Once the valve seal is broken from the seat, the torque required to continue moving the valve to a full open position drops at around 1.335 sec and continues relatively constant until the valve is fully open at time to (about 2.55 sec). The torque builds again as the valve remains in its open position at pressure Topen. The exhaust is at its highest when the valve is commanded to open but is still in its closed position and decreases during the opening process as most of the supply pressure is used to increase the torque to open the valve. The exhaust profile E decreases again as the valve reaches its open position at time to.
  • The differences between the baseline signature taken from a valve package out of line (Fig. 2) and the baseline signature taken from a valve package taken in-line (Fig. 3) can be seen, for example, by the differences in peak torque Tp (1,2 bar (17 psi(g)) vs. 3,3 bar (48 psi(g))) and the time it takes for the valve to reach its fully open position to (2.28 sec vs. 2.55 sec). The torque overhead TOH is also less in-line (Fig.3) than the torque overhead TOH from the baseline in Fig. 2. In other words, it took a greater amount of torque to break the valve away from its seat when measured in-line vs. when the baseline was taken on the bench. Thus, when the baseline signature is taken in-line, the effects of process flowing through the valve package significantly alter the parameters of the reference signatures. Each time the valve strokes (either partial or full) a signature is created which is compared to the dynamic baseline signature to determine if the valve package is within known operating tolerances. The number of operating signatures stored in memory may vary by application. For example, operating signatures may be stored in memory based on a first in first out process depending on the type of application and memory size. However, if a particular operating signature triggers an alarm, that signature is locked in memory with a date and time stamp and treated by the user accordingly.
  • The peak torque value Tp which in this case is approximately half the maximum pressure, is also used to identify operational variations for alarm purposes. A user may select a deviation zone around Tp referenced as area A in Fig. 3 to determine acceptable parameters during valve operation. In particular, a hysteresis profile may be created around deviation zone A which is used as a basis to trigger alarm activity. In this manner, alarms may be triggered when the differential pressure changes outside of area A to indicate degradation of the valve package. For example, if the pressure required to break the seal when opening the valve increases outside deviation zone A, an alarm may sound alerting the user to possible operation failure. If the pressure required to break the seal when opening the valve decreases which falls outside deviation zone A, an alarm may sound alerting the user to possible operation failure. The percent deviation from Tp is user defined and based on the type of valve employed and process media used.
  • A dynamic baseline signature may be developed after N operating valve cycles. This may be done to capture process dynamics in-line after a defined Break-In period (cycle count) for a new valve assembly. A rolling average of the supply pressure taken from installation through the Nth cycle is used to determine the Nominal Supply Pressure. Any alarms referenced above may be prohibited from triggering until after the Nth cycle to accommodate changes in operating characteristics of the valve package within the process environment during Break-In. By utilizing a baseline signature associated with a valve package taken in-line, a more accurate reference signature is captured. This leads to better monitoring of the valve package which avoids unnecessary maintenance costs and process interruptions. In addition, operation signatures may be used as a diagnostic tool to determine valve and actuator sizing and operation degradation.
  • Both the baseline and operating signatures for each of the parameters (e.g., supply pressure, differential pressure, exhaust pressure and position) are determined by a particular data scan rate in order to provide a graphical representation of the operation of the valve. When a valve V1 undergoes a stroke from closed to an open position, it may take time t1 to complete the stroke. This time t1 is dependent on a number of variables including the size of valve V1, the size of the actuator and the process media flowing through. However, a smaller valve V2 and actuator package may take time t2 to complete a full stroke where t1 > t2. Thus, in order to obtain an accurate signature of the position of each valve, the scan rate for valve V2 must be greater than the scan rate for valve V1 because valve V2 takes less time to complete a stroke. Thus, the method in accordance with the present invention utilizes a look-up table to determine the sampling rates for a particular valve package based on the time it takes for the valve to complete a stroke during calibration. This is done while the valve is in-line. For example, if it takes 10 sec for a valve to open, the sampling rate for data collection may be every 50 msec. In addition, the sampling rate may be different where it takes the valve different times to open vs. close. Thus, one sampling rate may be associated with an open stroke and a different sampling rate may be associated with a close stroke for the same valve. In this manner, a method is utilized to capture dynamic reference characteristics of a valve package in-line with process flowing through the valve.

Claims (15)

  1. A knowledge based control method associated with a valve package (10) having a process valve (15), an actuator (20) and a controller (25), the method comprising:
    obtaining a baseline signature corresponding to at least one operating characteristic value of said valve (15) as the valve (15) moves from a first position to a second position in-line as process media is flowing through the valve (15);
    storing said baseline signature in a memory;
    obtaining an operating signature corresponding to values associated with said baseline signature each time the valve (15) moves from said first position to said second position in-line as process media is flowing through the valve (15);
    comparing said operating signature to the baseline signature; and
    determining if one or more of the values associated with the operating signature is within an acceptable tolerance deviation from the corresponding one or more values in the baseline signature, characterised in that said baseline signature is calculated from a rolling average of said operating characteristic determined only after a defined break-in period, the break-in period defined by a period of N cycles, wherein a cycle is defined as movement of the valve from said first position to said second position and from said second position to said first position where N>1.
  2. A method of claim 1 wherein said step of obtaining a baseline signature further comprises obtaining said baseline signature as the valve moves from said first position to said second position and back to the first position in-line as process media is flowing through the valve (15).
  3. A method of claim 1 wherein said step of obtaining an operating signature further comprises obtaining said operating signature each time the valve (15) moves from said first position to said second position and back to the first position in-line as process media is flowing through the valve (15).
  4. A method of claim 1 further comprising triggering an alarm notification when said one or more values of the operating signature falls outside of said acceptable tolerance deviation.
  5. A method of claim 1 wherein said operating characteristic is at least one of the valve's position, torque, supply pressure and exhaust pressure.
  6. A method of claim 1, wherein said first position corresponds to an open position of said valve (15), and said second position corresponds to a closed position of said valve.
  7. A method of claim 1 wherein said baseline signature values are obtained based on a particular data scan rate during a valve cycle wherein a stroke is defined as movement of the valve (15) from said first position to said second position; said data scan rate preferably being based on the size of said valve (15), a torque value associated with said actuator (20) and process media flowing through said valve (15).
  8. A method of claim 1 wherein said first position is a closed position and said second position is an open position, said baseline signature values are obtained based on a first data scan rate when said valve (15) moves from an open to a closed position, and a second data scan rate when said valve (15) moves from a closed position to an open position,
  9. A method of claim 8, wherein said first data scan rate is one of equal to said second data scan rate, and not equal to said second data scan rate.
  10. A method of claim 1 wherein the operating signature is stored in a memory.
  11. A method of claim 10, further comprising storing a plurality of said operating signatures taken over a predetermined time interval in said memory.
  12. A method of claim 1 wherein said at least one operating characteristic value of said valve (15) is a peak torque value associated with the amount of torque required to be supplied by said actuator (20) to open the valve (15) from a closed position.
  13. A method of claim 12, where said at least one of an operating characteristic is torque overhead defined as the differential between said peak torque value and said supply pressure.
  14. A method of claim 12, wherein a deviation zone is associated with the peak torque value required to open the valve, said method triggering an alarm when a torque value associated with the operating signature falls outside the deviation zone.
  15. A valve system comprising:
    a process valve (15) connected to a pipe line through which process media travels;
    an actuator (20) mounted on said valve (15) and configured to open and close said valve (15);
    a controller (25) connected to said actuator (20) and configured to supply signals to said actuator (20) to open or close said valve (15), said controller (25) further configured to obtain a baseline signature corresponding to at least one operating characteristic value of said valve (15) as the valve (15) moves from said open position to said closed position and from said closed position to said open position in-line as process media travels through said valve (15), said controller (25) further comprising a memory device for storing said baseline signature, said controller (25) further configured to obtain an operating signature corresponding to values associated with said baseline signature each time the valve (15) moves from the open position to the closed position and from the closed position to the open position, said controller comparing said operating signature to said baseline signature; characterised in that said controller is configured to calculate said baseline signature from a rolling average of said operating characteristic determined only after a defined break-in period, the break-in period defined by a period of N cycles, wherein a cycle is defined as movement of the valve from said first position to said second position and from said second position to said first position where N>1.
EP08834913.9A 2007-10-01 2008-09-25 Knowledge based valve control method Active EP2193347B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US97662507P true 2007-10-01 2007-10-01
PCT/US2008/077676 WO2009045848A1 (en) 2007-10-01 2008-09-25 Knowledge based valve control method

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2193347A1 EP2193347A1 (en) 2010-06-09
EP2193347A4 EP2193347A4 (en) 2011-11-30
EP2193347B1 true EP2193347B1 (en) 2018-04-25

Family

ID=40509291

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08834913.9A Active EP2193347B1 (en) 2007-10-01 2008-09-25 Knowledge based valve control method

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US8265794B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2193347B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101815932B (en)
BR (1) BRPI0817912A2 (en)
WO (1) WO2009045848A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI672461B (en) * 2018-08-01 2019-09-21 光旴科技股份有限公司 Full port ball valve maintenance warning device

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8467907B2 (en) * 2009-01-17 2013-06-18 Certus Process Solutions Automated valve with self-contained valve actuator system
GB2480423A (en) * 2010-03-15 2011-11-23 Jena Rotary Technolgy Ltd Valve system
US9995486B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2018-06-12 Honeywell International Inc. Gas valve with high/low gas pressure detection
US9851103B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2017-12-26 Honeywell International Inc. Gas valve with overpressure diagnostics
US9074770B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2015-07-07 Honeywell International Inc. Gas valve with electronic valve proving system
US9846440B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2017-12-19 Honeywell International Inc. Valve controller configured to estimate fuel comsumption
US9835265B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2017-12-05 Honeywell International Inc. Valve with actuator diagnostics
US9557059B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2017-01-31 Honeywell International Inc Gas valve with communication link
US9175810B2 (en) * 2012-05-04 2015-11-03 General Electric Company Custody transfer system and method for gas fuel
US9133959B2 (en) 2012-09-07 2015-09-15 Pentair Flow Services Ag Virtual limit switch
US10422531B2 (en) 2012-09-15 2019-09-24 Honeywell International Inc. System and approach for controlling a combustion chamber
US9234661B2 (en) 2012-09-15 2016-01-12 Honeywell International Inc. Burner control system
US8839680B2 (en) * 2012-09-19 2014-09-23 Fisher Controls International Llc Methods and apparatus for estimating a condition of a seal of a rotary valve
TWI611127B (en) * 2013-07-15 2018-01-11 Jdv Control Valves Co Ltd Intelligent valve control method
US9303785B2 (en) 2013-08-02 2016-04-05 Jdv Control Valves Co., Ltd Method for controlling valve apparatus
EP2868970B1 (en) 2013-10-29 2020-04-22 Honeywell Technologies Sarl Regulating device
RU2673031C1 (en) * 2013-11-12 2018-11-21 АБ Сомас Вентилер Ball member for a valve assembly, ball valve assembly having a ball member and method for controlling the temperature of a ball member
US9645584B2 (en) 2014-09-17 2017-05-09 Honeywell International Inc. Gas valve with electronic health monitoring
DE102015210208A1 (en) * 2015-06-02 2016-12-08 Gemü Gebr. Müller Apparatebau Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft Method for determining a state variable of a valve diaphragm of an electronically controlled and motor-driven diaphragm valve, and diaphragm valve system
US10503181B2 (en) 2016-01-13 2019-12-10 Honeywell International Inc. Pressure regulator
US10564062B2 (en) 2016-10-19 2020-02-18 Honeywell International Inc. Human-machine interface for gas valve
US20190136997A1 (en) * 2017-11-07 2019-05-09 Black Diamond Engineering, Inc. Line replaceable control valve positioner/controller system
RU2686257C1 (en) * 2018-04-27 2019-04-24 Ационерное общество "РОТЕК" (АО "РОТЕК") Method and system for remote identification and prediction of development of emerging defects of objects

Family Cites Families (65)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4037598A (en) * 1974-08-12 1977-07-26 Ivac Corporation Method and apparatus for fluid flow control
US4417312A (en) * 1981-06-08 1983-11-22 Worcester Controls Corporation Electronic controller for valve actuators
US4590576A (en) * 1984-07-26 1986-05-20 Mark Controls Corporation Control system for flow control valves
US4896101A (en) * 1986-12-03 1990-01-23 Cobb Harold R W Method for monitoring, recording, and evaluating valve operating trends
US4879662A (en) * 1988-03-11 1989-11-07 Sundstrand Corporation Fluid flow self calibration scheme
JP2501661Y2 (en) * 1989-03-03 1996-06-19 株式会社イナックス Metered water discharge device
US5142483A (en) * 1990-04-24 1992-08-25 Caltechnix Corporation Pressure regulating system for positive shut-off pressure controller
US5518015A (en) * 1994-09-30 1996-05-21 Gas Research Institute Automatic calibrating electrically controlled diaphragm valve actuators and methods for their calibration
US5687092A (en) * 1995-05-05 1997-11-11 Nordson Corporation Method of compensating for changes in flow characteristics of a dispensed fluid
US5687098A (en) * 1995-10-30 1997-11-11 Fisher Controls International, Inc. Device data acquisition
CN1187438A (en) * 1996-12-23 1998-07-15 西屋气刹车公司 Electro-pneumatic valve control
JP4643771B2 (en) * 1996-12-31 2011-03-02 ローズマウント インコーポレイテッド Method and apparatus for verifying the validity of control signals from field devices
US6272401B1 (en) * 1997-07-23 2001-08-07 Dresser Industries, Inc. Valve positioner system
DE69818494T2 (en) * 1997-10-13 2004-07-01 Rosemount Inc., Eden Prairie Transmission method for field devices in industrial processes
US6260004B1 (en) * 1997-12-31 2001-07-10 Innovation Management Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for diagnosing a pump system
US6356811B1 (en) * 1998-10-13 2002-03-12 Honeywell Measurex Devron Inc. Control system for pneumatic actuators
US7766873B2 (en) * 1998-10-29 2010-08-03 Medtronic Minimed, Inc. Method and apparatus for detecting occlusions in an ambulatory infusion pump
US6519938B1 (en) * 1998-12-22 2003-02-18 Coltec Industries Inc. Recording and controlling pneumatic profiles
US20010035512A1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2001-11-01 Messer Jeffrey M. Environmentally friendly electro-pneumatic positioner
US6745107B1 (en) * 2000-06-30 2004-06-01 Honeywell Inc. System and method for non-invasive diagnostic testing of control valves
US6564824B2 (en) * 2001-04-13 2003-05-20 Flowmatrix, Inc. Mass flow meter systems and methods
JP4864280B2 (en) * 2001-04-24 2012-02-01 ブルックス・インストルメント・エルエルシー Mass flow controller system and method
US6655408B2 (en) * 2001-06-13 2003-12-02 Applied Materials, Inc. Tunable ramp rate circuit for a mass flow controller
US6850849B1 (en) * 2001-06-20 2005-02-01 Curtis Roys Fluid flow monitor and control system
ES2256142T3 (en) * 2001-11-23 2006-07-16 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for continuous regulation of a position of a regulation valve.
JP4102564B2 (en) * 2001-12-28 2008-06-18 忠弘 大見 Improved pressure flow controller
US6725167B2 (en) * 2002-01-16 2004-04-20 Fisher Controls International Llc Flow measurement module and method
JP4112900B2 (en) * 2002-05-21 2008-07-02 株式会社山武 Control method and control apparatus
US7004191B2 (en) * 2002-06-24 2006-02-28 Mks Instruments, Inc. Apparatus and method for mass flow controller with embedded web server
US6810308B2 (en) * 2002-06-24 2004-10-26 Mks Instruments, Inc. Apparatus and method for mass flow controller with network access to diagnostics
US7809473B2 (en) * 2002-06-24 2010-10-05 Mks Instruments, Inc. Apparatus and method for pressure fluctuation insensitive mass flow control
US7543596B2 (en) * 2002-07-19 2009-06-09 Entegris, Inc. Liquid flow controller and precision dispense apparatus and system
JP3706601B2 (en) * 2002-07-30 2005-10-12 三菱重工業株式会社 Flow control device
DE602004012980T2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2009-05-07 Dresser, Inc., Addison Method, system and storage medium for performing online valve diagnosis
JP3801570B2 (en) * 2003-02-24 2006-07-26 Smc株式会社 Flow control device
US7043374B2 (en) * 2003-03-26 2006-05-09 Celerity, Inc. Flow sensor signal conversion
US7018800B2 (en) * 2003-08-07 2006-03-28 Rosemount Inc. Process device with quiescent current diagnostics
US6917858B2 (en) * 2003-08-29 2005-07-12 Dresser, Inc. Fluid regulation
US7361155B2 (en) * 2003-09-16 2008-04-22 Therafuse, Inc. Compensating liquid delivery system and method
JP4186831B2 (en) * 2004-02-03 2008-11-26 日立金属株式会社 Mass flow controller
US6973375B2 (en) * 2004-02-12 2005-12-06 Mykrolis Corporation System and method for flow monitoring and control
US7740024B2 (en) * 2004-02-12 2010-06-22 Entegris, Inc. System and method for flow monitoring and control
US7107128B2 (en) * 2004-02-13 2006-09-12 Entegris, Inc. System for controlling fluid flow
US7647940B2 (en) * 2004-04-05 2010-01-19 Westlock Control Corporation Device and method for pneumatic valve control
JP4086057B2 (en) * 2004-06-21 2008-05-14 日立金属株式会社 Mass flow control device and verification method thereof
JP4461329B2 (en) * 2004-08-31 2010-05-12 旭有機材工業株式会社 Fluid control device
US7403826B2 (en) * 2004-12-01 2008-07-22 Canadian Space Agency Method and system for torque/force control of hydraulic actuators
EP1860359B1 (en) * 2005-03-01 2013-07-10 Fujikura Rubber Ltd. Normally closed valve having minute flow amount regulating mechanism
US7264017B2 (en) * 2005-05-12 2007-09-04 Honeywell International, Inc. Dual-actuator aircraft environmental control system valve
US20070016333A1 (en) * 2005-07-12 2007-01-18 Edwards Grant B Method and apparatus for controlling the valve position of a variable orifice flow meter
US7111614B1 (en) * 2005-08-29 2006-09-26 Caterpillar Inc. Single fluid injector with rate shaping capability
US7559197B2 (en) * 2005-08-31 2009-07-14 Caterpillar Inc. Combiner valve control system and method
JP4866682B2 (en) * 2005-09-01 2012-02-01 株式会社フジキン Abnormality detection method for fluid supply system using flow control device with pressure sensor
US20070068225A1 (en) * 2005-09-29 2007-03-29 Brown Gregory C Leak detector for process valve
US8091860B2 (en) * 2005-11-22 2012-01-10 Norgren Inc. Valve with sensor
US20070262029A1 (en) * 2006-01-09 2007-11-15 Takashi Yoshida Actuated pressure control valve assembly and method
US7512460B2 (en) * 2006-02-27 2009-03-31 Cnh America Llc Valve calibration routine
US7925385B2 (en) * 2006-03-08 2011-04-12 Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc Method for optimizing valve position and pump speed in a PID control valve system without the use of external signals
US7369920B2 (en) * 2006-03-21 2008-05-06 Mks Instruments, Inc. Pressure control system with optimized performance
US7478012B2 (en) * 2006-06-30 2009-01-13 Fisher Controls International Llc Computerized evaluation of valve signature graphs
US7640078B2 (en) * 2006-07-05 2009-12-29 Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. Multi-mode control algorithm
WO2008041390A1 (en) * 2006-10-03 2008-04-10 Horiba Stec, Co., Ltd. Mass flow controller
US8079383B2 (en) * 2006-12-07 2011-12-20 Mks Instruments, Inc. Controller gain scheduling for mass flow controllers
DE202006020516U1 (en) * 2006-12-21 2008-10-16 Abb Ag Control device for a pressure-medium-operated actuator
US7539560B2 (en) * 2007-01-05 2009-05-26 Dresser, Inc. Control valve and positioner diagnostics

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI672461B (en) * 2018-08-01 2019-09-21 光旴科技股份有限公司 Full port ball valve maintenance warning device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2193347A4 (en) 2011-11-30
CN101815932B (en) 2013-09-18
BRPI0817912A2 (en) 2015-04-07
US20090088906A1 (en) 2009-04-02
CN101815932A (en) 2010-08-25
EP2193347A1 (en) 2010-06-09
US8265794B2 (en) 2012-09-11
WO2009045848A1 (en) 2009-04-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20190331143A1 (en) Valve signature diagnosis and leak test device
US20180080649A1 (en) Gas valve with overpressure diagnostics
CA1190622A (en) Method of and apparatus for making diagnosis of valve device in turbine system
EP1027635B1 (en) Method and device for verifying the workability of a safety device
US7079021B2 (en) System to manually initiate an emergency shutdown test and collect diagnostic data in a process control environment
US6975219B2 (en) Enhanced hart device alerts in a process control system
JP3923529B2 (en) Process event processing apparatus and processing method
RU2643313C2 (en) Method and device for control and/or observation of pneumatic drive
KR100970848B1 (en) Over-pressure protection system
US7627441B2 (en) Process device with vibration based diagnostics
US6435022B1 (en) Partial stroke testing system
EP2604924A2 (en) Gas valve with communication link
EP1931962B1 (en) Leak detector for process valve
DE102005004477B4 (en) Method for checking the operability of an actuator, in particular for a safety valve
US5748469A (en) Method and apparatus for detecting a fault of a control valve assembly in a control loop
EP2321563B1 (en) Automated valve testing apparatus
US7621179B2 (en) Diagnostic system and method for a valve, especially a check valve of a positive displacement pump
EP2193413B1 (en) System for preserving and displaying process control data associated with an abnormal situation
US7562135B2 (en) Enhanced fieldbus device alerts in a process control system
US4856327A (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring and measuring dynamic loads in thrust inducing systems
CN101836172B (en) Wellhead flowline protection and testing system with esp speed controller and emergency isolation valve
US20040129321A1 (en) Double valve
US7010450B2 (en) Coordination of field device operations with overrides and bypasses within a process control and safety system
US8429951B2 (en) Diagnostic system and diagnostic method for a valve, particularly a closing valve or a control valve
US6557400B2 (en) Surge bleed valve fault detection

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20100323

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: DE

Ref document number: 1140816

Country of ref document: HK

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20111028

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G01L 1/02 20060101AFI20111024BHEP

Ipc: F16K 37/00 20060101ALI20111024BHEP

RAP1 Rights of an application transferred

Owner name: PENTAIR FLOW CONTROL AG

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170403

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20171002

RAP1 Rights of an application transferred

Owner name: WESTLOCK CONTROLS CORPORATION

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 993432

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602008055021

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180725

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180725

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180726

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 993432

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602008055021

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602008055021

Country of ref document: DE

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20180925

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180925

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180925

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180930

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180930

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180930

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180925

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180925

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20080925