EP2172609B1 - Automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like - Google Patents
Automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2172609B1 EP2172609B1 EP08425648A EP08425648A EP2172609B1 EP 2172609 B1 EP2172609 B1 EP 2172609B1 EP 08425648 A EP08425648 A EP 08425648A EP 08425648 A EP08425648 A EP 08425648A EP 2172609 B1 EP2172609 B1 EP 2172609B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- blocking
- designed
- leaf
- blocking body
- windows
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05C—BOLTS OR FASTENING DEVICES FOR WINGS, SPECIALLY FOR DOORS OR WINDOWS
- E05C17/00—Devices for holding wings open; Devices for limiting opening of wings or for holding wings open by a movable member extending between frame and wing; Braking devices, stops or buffers, combined therewith
- E05C17/02—Devices for holding wings open; Devices for limiting opening of wings or for holding wings open by a movable member extending between frame and wing; Braking devices, stops or buffers, combined therewith by mechanical means
- E05C17/46—Devices for holding wings open; Devices for limiting opening of wings or for holding wings open by a movable member extending between frame and wing; Braking devices, stops or buffers, combined therewith by mechanical means in which the wing or a member fixed thereon is engaged by a movable fastening member in a fixed position; in which a movable fastening member mounted on the wing engages a stationary member
- E05C17/50—Devices for holding wings open; Devices for limiting opening of wings or for holding wings open by a movable member extending between frame and wing; Braking devices, stops or buffers, combined therewith by mechanical means in which the wing or a member fixed thereon is engaged by a movable fastening member in a fixed position; in which a movable fastening member mounted on the wing engages a stationary member comprising a single pivoted securing member
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05B—LOCKS; ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; HANDCUFFS
- E05B63/00—Locks or fastenings with special structural characteristics
- E05B63/0056—Locks with adjustable or exchangeable lock parts
- E05B63/006—Locks with adjustable or exchangeable lock parts for different door thicknesses
Definitions
- the subject of the present invention is an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like of the type specified in the preamble of Claim 1.
- windows or doors can present external leaves, which, once opened, are set up against the external walls of the building on which they are set.
- Said external leaves are moreover frequently fixed to the external walls of the building by means of purposely provided blocking elements.
- Said blocking elements prevent the leaves from being closed or moved by the wind or by other atmospheric agents, etc.
- blocking elements are used formed by mechanical hooks of various kinds that constrain the outermost portion of the leaf to the external wall of the building.
- Blocking is referred to as "automatic” because it is not necessary to intervene manually on the device itself, but it is sufficient to set the leaf against the wall. To unblock the leaf it is instead necessary to intervene manually on the automatic blocking device.
- blocking devices of a known type are subject to failure and malfunctioning and to a high rate of wear.
- the same devices comprise in fact small arrest elements, which are mobile with respect to the remaining portion of the blocking device and are designed to block an appropriate mobile portion of the device itself. Said arrest elements, on account of their reduced dimensions, are then subject to failure, malfunctioning, and wear.
- the blocking devices of a known type generally comprise a fixed portion that is fixed with respect to the wall, extending perpendicular thereto and to the dimension of the leaf.
- the latter constitutes a marked limitation for the movements of the blocking device and is moreover subject to failure on account of involuntary forcing exerted thereon.
- the technical task underlying the present invention is to devise an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like that is able to overcome substantially the drawbacks referred to above.
- an important purpose of the invention is to provide an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like that will be simple and resistant to wear and to various stresses.
- Another important purpose of the invention is to obtain an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like that will present an extensive possibility of movement.
- the automatic blocking device is designated as a whole by the number 1.
- the blocking device is set on leaves 30 of doors or windows and the like.
- leaf' 30 is meant any type of element that develops substantially in a plane, designed to close or free an opening, part of a wall, of a piece of furniture, or the like.
- the leaf 10 is preferably mobile by means of rotations about one or more hinges and can be set up against a supporting surface 31, constituted in particular by the external wall of the building on which the door or window or the like is set.
- the automatic blocking device 1 can be SET in positions of stable equilibrium in an engagement position ( Figure 1 a) , in which it is designed to constrain the leaf 30 to the supporting surface 31, and in a disengagement position ( Figure 1 b) , in which it is designed to allow movement of the leaf 30.
- the automatic blocking device 1 comprises, roughly speaking, a supporting element 2 and a first blocking body 3 and a second blocking body 4, which are designed to constrain the leaf 30 temporarily in the blocking position. They are directly constrained to the supporting element 2, by means of a first rotational hinge 5 and a second rotational hinge 6 , respectively, and are able to turn about said hinges.
- the rotational hinges 5 and 6 act preferably in parallel directions, defining a transverse direction 1a and are aligned parallel to the supporting surface 31. There are then defined different paths for the blocking bodies 3 and 4.
- the supporting element 2 preferably comprises two flanges 7 , designed to support pins that constitute the rotational hinges 5 and 6.
- the supporting element 2 moreover preferably comprises spacer elements 9 , which adjust the distance between the blocking bodies 3 and 4 and the supporting surface 31.
- the first and second blocking bodies 3 and 4 develop prevalently in a longitudinal direction 1b , perpendicular to the supporting surface 31 and to the transverse direction 1a.
- the first blocking body 3 ( Figures 4 and 5 ) is constituted by an approximately parallelepipedal element, provided with an internal recess 10 , which also extends prevalently in a longitudinal direction 1b and is delimited by a top plate 11 and by a bottom plate 12 .
- the first blocking body 3 moreover comprises an arrest element 13 , illustrated in Figure 8 , constituted by a wedge or the like designed to constrain the leaf 30 by means of a part 13b substantially parallel to the external surface of the leaf 30, when the device 1 is in the blocking position.
- an arrest element 13 illustrated in Figure 8 , constituted by a wedge or the like designed to constrain the leaf 30 by means of a part 13b substantially parallel to the external surface of the leaf 30, when the device 1 is in the blocking position.
- the position of the arrest element 13 is then preferably adjustable in the longitudinal direction 1b by means of appropriate adjustment means.
- the arrest element 13 is provided separable from the first blocking body 3 and comprises an opening 13a that can be reclosed, by means of a screw, and is provided with a bottom toothing, as illustrated in Figure 2 .
- the bottom toothing 13c can be constrained to a toothing set on two rails 14 forming part of the blocking body 3, illustrated in Figures 4 and 5 .
- the first blocking body 3 then comprises two arms 15 connected to a bushing defining a seat 16 for the first rotational hinge 5.
- the first blocking body 3 is preferably made of polymeric material.
- the second blocking body 4 ( Figures 6 and 7 ) is instead constituted by an element having a prevalent development in a longitudinal direction 1b and designed to fit into the recess 10.
- the length of the second blocking body 4 in a longitudinal direction 1b is greater than the length of the first blocking body 3. Consequently, the second blocking body 4 has an end portion 17 that extends beyond the recess 10 and is designed to be pressed with the user's fingers, as specified more clearly hereinafter.
- said end portion 17 can be provided separate from the second blocking body 4 and turnable with respect to the latter, as illustrated in Figures 9a and 9b .
- the second blocking body 4 then comprises a rear lever 18 , designed to constrain the leat 30, in a direction opposite to the arrest element 13, when the device 1 is in the blocking position.
- the lever 18 is moreover designed to enable automatic closing of the device 1, as specified more fully hereinafter.
- the device 1 comprises a seat 19 for the second rotational hinge 6, set in the proximity of the rear lever 18, and is preferably made of polymeric material.
- the first and second blocking bodies 3 and 4 moreover comprise a slotting system 20 defining the engagement position in stable equilibrium ( Figure 1a ). Said blocking bodies 3 and 4 are moreover manually disengageable from the engagement position by means of an elastic deformation of the slotting system 20.
- the slotting system 20 is constituted by a tooth 21 and a seat 22 for said tooth 21.
- the latter comprise a position of interference, in which they are in mutual interference, in the proximity of the engagement position.
- the position of interference corresponds to the position in which the path of the tooth 21 and of the seat 22, defined by the rotational hinges 5 and 6, coincide with one another.
- the slotting system 20 in order to come out of the engagement position, the slotting system 20 must be forced and undergo deformation. This guarantees the stability of equilibrium of the device 1 in the engagement position. Said forcing is conveniently obtained by acting on the end portion 17.
- the tooth 21 is preferably fixed on the bottom face of the top plate 11, forming part of the first blocking body 3, whilst the seat 22 is set on the top face of the second blocking body 4.
- the device 1 moreover preferably comprises an elastic element 23 , appropriately a spring or the like, constrained both to the first blocking body 3 and to the second blocking body 4.
- the latter blocking bodies then comprise purposely provided hooks, respectively a first hook 24 and a second hook 25 for the elastic element 23.
- the elastic element is designed to stabilize the disengagement position ( Figure 1b ) of the device 1 and increase the stability of the engagement position ( Figure 1 a) .
- said disengagement position can be stable simply on account of gravitational force, as indicated in the example of Figures 9a and 9b . Operation of the automatic blocking device 1 described above in a structural sense, is described in what follows.
- the leaf 30 is in a position of gripping of a window or the like.
- the device 1 is, instead, in the disengagement position ( Figure 1b ).
- the leaf 30 is opened and set up against the supporting surface 31. During opening, the leaf 30 interferes with the rear lever 18, forming part of the second blocking body 4.
- the slotting system 20 of the device 1 is forced, and the latter is set in the engagement position.
- the device 1 On account of the presence of the slotting system 20 and of the arrest element 13, the device 1 remains in the engagement position and constrains the leaf 30 even if it is subjected to strong winds and various atmospheric agents. In fact, the latter do not cause a rotation in the direction of disengagement of the second blocking body 4 about the second hinge 6, on account of the shape and direction of the vertical wall 13b.
- tooth 21 and the seat 22 are moved, respectively, according to the paths 21' and 22', illustrated in Figure 1c .
- the second blocking body 4 comes into contact with the bottom plate 12 of the first blocking body 3 and causes rotation also of the latter.
- Rotation is also favoured by the elastic element 23, which causes a force of approach of the two hooks 24 and 25, which are brought closer together into the disengagement position, as illustrated in Figure 1b .
- the device 1 is then set in the disengagement position ( Figure 1b ) and remains stable in said position also on account of the elastic element 23, until it is again stressed by the leaf 30.
- the invention enables important advantages.
- the automatic blocking device 1 for leaves of doors or windows and the like has an extensive possibility of movement, since it does not have a fixed portion which extends in a longitudinal direction 1b to which a mobile portion is constrained that extends in a perpendicular direction, but has two portions that are both mobile, the mutual position of which determines stable equilibrium in the engagement position and in the disengagement position.
- the automatic blocking device 1 is moreover inexpensive and simple to install, in particular on account of the presence of the simple and functional engagement system 20.
- the device 1 is moreover particularly advantageous if it is used with leaves 30 of windows, in view of the fact that the latter present problems of blocking and are frequently set in positions that are difficult to reach.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Specific Sealing Or Ventilating Devices For Doors And Windows (AREA)
- Closing And Opening Devices For Wings, And Checks For Wings (AREA)
- Connection Of Plates (AREA)
- Tea And Coffee (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The subject of the present invention is an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like of the type specified in the preamble of
Claim 1. - Currently known are devices for blocking the leaves of doors or windows and the like, in particular for the leaves of windows.
- As is known, in fact, windows or doors can present external leaves, which, once opened, are set up against the external walls of the building on which they are set.
- Said external leaves are moreover frequently fixed to the external walls of the building by means of purposely provided blocking elements.
- Said blocking elements prevent the leaves from being closed or moved by the wind or by other atmospheric agents, etc.
- In particular, blocking elements are used formed by mechanical hooks of various kinds that constrain the outermost portion of the leaf to the external wall of the building.
- They must be removed for closing or moving the leaf.
- There then exist automatic blocking devices that enable automatic blocking of the leaf when the latter is set up against the wall.
- Blocking is referred to as "automatic" because it is not necessary to intervene manually on the device itself, but it is sufficient to set the leaf against the wall. To unblock the leaf it is instead necessary to intervene manually on the automatic blocking device.
- Automatic blocking devices of this sort are described, for example, in the patent applications Nos.
EP-A-p823524 BE-A-891498 DE-C-227932 . - The known art referred to above presents some important drawbacks.
- In fact, blocking devices of a known type are subject to failure and malfunctioning and to a high rate of wear.
- The same devices comprise in fact small arrest elements, which are mobile with respect to the remaining portion of the blocking device and are designed to block an appropriate mobile portion of the device itself. Said arrest elements, on account of their reduced dimensions, are then subject to failure, malfunctioning, and wear.
- Furthermore, the blocking devices of a known type generally comprise a fixed portion that is fixed with respect to the wall, extending perpendicular thereto and to the dimension of the leaf.
- The latter constitutes a marked limitation for the movements of the blocking device and is moreover subject to failure on account of involuntary forcing exerted thereon.
- Not the least important drawback is the fact that automatic blocking devices are costly on account of their complexity.
- In the above situation, the technical task underlying the present invention is to devise an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like that is able to overcome substantially the drawbacks referred to above.
- In the framework of said technical task, an important purpose of the invention is to provide an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like that will be simple and resistant to wear and to various stresses.
- Another important purpose of the invention is to obtain an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like that will present an extensive possibility of movement.
- Not the least important purpose of the invention is to devise an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like that will be inexpensive and simple to install.
- The technical task and the purposes specified are achieved by an automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like as claimed in the annexed
Claim 1. - Preferred embodiments are specified in the subclaims.
- Further characteristics and the advantages of the invention are clarified hereinafter by the detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
-
Figure 1a shows a side view of the automatic blocking device according to the invention in the blocking position; -
Figure 1b represents a side view of the automatic blocking device according to the invention in the position of release; -
Figure 1c illustrates an enlargement of a portion ofFigure 1a ; -
Figure 2 shows an exploded view ofFigure 1a ; -
Figure 3 illustrates an overall three-dimensional view of the blocking device; -
Figure 4 represents a first three-dimensional view of a portion of the blocking device ; -
Figure 5 shows a second three-dimensional view of said portion of the blocking device; -
Figure 6 represents a first three-dimensional view of a further portion of the blocking device; -
Figure 7 represents a second three-dimensional view of said further portion of the blocking device; -
Figure 8 represents a three-dimensional view of a third portion of the blocking device; -
Figure 9a shows a side view of a second variant of the automatic blocking device according to the invention in the blocking position; and -
Figure 9b represents a side view of the automatic blocking device according to the invention ofFigure 9a , in the position of release. - With reference to the above figures, the automatic blocking device according to the invention is designated as a whole by the
number 1. - The blocking device is set on
leaves 30 of doors or windows and the like. By the term "leaf' 30 is meant any type of element that develops substantially in a plane, designed to close or free an opening, part of a wall, of a piece of furniture, or the like. - The
leaf 10 is preferably mobile by means of rotations about one or more hinges and can be set up against a supportingsurface 31, constituted in particular by the external wall of the building on which the door or window or the like is set. - The
automatic blocking device 1 can be SET in positions of stable equilibrium in an engagement position (Figure 1 a) , in which it is designed to constrain theleaf 30 to the supportingsurface 31, and in a disengagement position (Figure 1 b) , in which it is designed to allow movement of theleaf 30. - The
automatic blocking device 1 comprises, roughly speaking, a supportingelement 2 and a first blockingbody 3 and a second blockingbody 4, which are designed to constrain theleaf 30 temporarily in the blocking position. They are directly constrained to the supportingelement 2, by means of a firstrotational hinge 5 and a secondrotational hinge 6, respectively, and are able to turn about said hinges. - The
rotational hinges transverse direction 1a and are aligned parallel to the supportingsurface 31. There are then defined different paths for theblocking bodies - In detail, the supporting
element 2 preferably comprises two flanges 7, designed to support pins that constitute therotational hinges element 2 moreover preferably comprisesspacer elements 9, which adjust the distance between theblocking bodies surface 31. - The first and
second blocking bodies longitudinal direction 1b, perpendicular to the supportingsurface 31 and to thetransverse direction 1a. - In particular, the first blocking body 3 (
Figures 4 and 5 ) is constituted by an approximately parallelepipedal element, provided with aninternal recess 10, which also extends prevalently in alongitudinal direction 1b and is delimited by atop plate 11 and by abottom plate 12. - The
first blocking body 3 moreover comprises anarrest element 13, illustrated inFigure 8 , constituted by a wedge or the like designed to constrain theleaf 30 by means of apart 13b substantially parallel to the external surface of theleaf 30, when thedevice 1 is in the blocking position. - The position of the
arrest element 13 is then preferably adjustable in thelongitudinal direction 1b by means of appropriate adjustment means. In particular thearrest element 13 is provided separable from the first blockingbody 3 and comprises an opening 13a that can be reclosed, by means of a screw, and is provided with a bottom toothing, as illustrated inFigure 2 . - The bottom toothing 13c can be constrained to a toothing set on two
rails 14 forming part of the blockingbody 3, illustrated inFigures 4 and 5 . - The first blocking
body 3 then comprises twoarms 15 connected to a bushing defining aseat 16 for the firstrotational hinge 5. - Finally, the first blocking
body 3 is preferably made of polymeric material. - The second blocking body 4 (
Figures 6 and 7 ) is instead constituted by an element having a prevalent development in alongitudinal direction 1b and designed to fit into therecess 10. - Furthermore, the length of the second blocking
body 4 in alongitudinal direction 1b is greater than the length of the first blockingbody 3. Consequently, the second blockingbody 4 has anend portion 17 that extends beyond therecess 10 and is designed to be pressed with the user's fingers, as specified more clearly hereinafter. - Furthermore, said
end portion 17 can be provided separate from the second blockingbody 4 and turnable with respect to the latter, as illustrated inFigures 9a and 9b . - The second blocking
body 4 then comprises arear lever 18, designed to constrain the leat 30, in a direction opposite to thearrest element 13, when thedevice 1 is in the blocking position. Thelever 18 is moreover designed to enable automatic closing of thedevice 1, as specified more fully hereinafter. Finally, thedevice 1 comprises aseat 19 for the secondrotational hinge 6, set in the proximity of therear lever 18, and is preferably made of polymeric material. - The first and
second blocking bodies slotting system 20 defining the engagement position in stable equilibrium (Figure 1a ). Said blockingbodies system 20. - In particular, the slotting
system 20 is constituted by atooth 21 and aseat 22 for saidtooth 21. The latter comprise a position of interference, in which they are in mutual interference, in the proximity of the engagement position. - The position of interference corresponds to the position in which the path of the
tooth 21 and of theseat 22, defined by therotational hinges - Basically, in order to come out of the engagement position, the slotting
system 20 must be forced and undergo deformation. This guarantees the stability of equilibrium of thedevice 1 in the engagement position. Said forcing is conveniently obtained by acting on theend portion 17. - In detail, the
tooth 21 is preferably fixed on the bottom face of thetop plate 11, forming part of thefirst blocking body 3, whilst theseat 22 is set on the top face of thesecond blocking body 4. - The
device 1 moreover preferably comprises anelastic element 23, appropriately a spring or the like, constrained both to thefirst blocking body 3 and to thesecond blocking body 4. - The latter blocking bodies then comprise purposely provided hooks, respectively a
first hook 24 and asecond hook 25 for theelastic element 23. The elastic element is designed to stabilize the disengagement position (Figure 1b ) of thedevice 1 and increase the stability of the engagement position (Figure 1 a) . - Alternatively, said disengagement position can be stable simply on account of gravitational force, as indicated in the example of
Figures 9a and 9b . Operation of theautomatic blocking device 1 described above in a structural sense, is described in what follows. - In a first situation, the
leaf 30 is in a position of gripping of a window or the like. Thedevice 1 is, instead, in the disengagement position (Figure 1b ). - Next, the
leaf 30 is opened and set up against the supportingsurface 31. During opening, theleaf 30 interferes with therear lever 18, forming part of thesecond blocking body 4. - The
same leaf 30 then causes rotation of thesecond blocking body 4 about thesecond hinge 6 and raises it. - During rotation, and on account of the thrust of the
leaf 30, the slottingsystem 20 of thedevice 1 is forced, and the latter is set in the engagement position. - On account of the presence of the slotting
system 20 and of thearrest element 13, thedevice 1 remains in the engagement position and constrains theleaf 30 even if it is subjected to strong winds and various atmospheric agents. In fact, the latter do not cause a rotation in the direction of disengagement of thesecond blocking body 4 about thesecond hinge 6, on account of the shape and direction of thevertical wall 13b. - When it is necessary to close the
leaf 30 again, it is sufficient to press theend portion 17 of thesecond blocking body 4 in the direction of rotation downwards. The slottingsystem 20 is then forced by the same pressure in a direction such as to enable release from the position of engagement of thedevice 1. - In particular, the
tooth 21 and theseat 22 are moved, respectively, according to the paths 21' and 22', illustrated inFigure 1c . - The
second blocking body 4 comes into contact with thebottom plate 12 of thefirst blocking body 3 and causes rotation also of the latter. - Rotation is also favoured by the
elastic element 23, which causes a force of approach of the twohooks Figure 1b . - The
device 1 is then set in the disengagement position (Figure 1b ) and remains stable in said position also on account of theelastic element 23, until it is again stressed by theleaf 30. - The invention enables important advantages.
- In fact, the
automatic blocking device 1 for leaves of doors or windows and the like has an extensive possibility of movement, since it does not have a fixed portion which extends in alongitudinal direction 1b to which a mobile portion is constrained that extends in a perpendicular direction, but has two portions that are both mobile, the mutual position of which determines stable equilibrium in the engagement position and in the disengagement position. - The
automatic blocking device 1 is moreover inexpensive and simple to install, in particular on account of the presence of the simple andfunctional engagement system 20. - The
device 1 is moreover particularly advantageous if it is used withleaves 30 of windows, in view of the fact that the latter present problems of blocking and are frequently set in positions that are difficult to reach. - The invention may undergo variations, all of which fall within the scope of the inventive idea. All the items may be replaced by equivalent elements, and the materials, shapes, and dimensions may be any whatsoever within the scope of
Claim 1.
Claims (9)
- An automatic device (1) for blocking leaves (30) of doors or windows and the like, which can be set in stable equilibrium in an engagement position, in which it is designed to constrain said leaf (30) to a supporting surface (31), and in a disengagement position, in which it is designed to enable movement of said leaf (30), said device comprising: a supporting element (2), suitable to be fixed with respect to said supporting surface (31), a first blocking body (3) and a second blocking body (4), designed to constrain said leaf (30) in said blocking position, constrained to said supporting element (2) by means of a first rotational hinge (5) and a second rotational hinge (6), respectively, which are designed to define different paths for said first and second blocking bodies (3, 4); said first and second blocking bodies (3, 4) comprise a slotting system (20) defining said engagement position; characterised in that said slotting system (20) is elastically deformable in a way designed to enable manual disengagement thereof, and In that said first blocking body (3) comprises an arrest element (13), and said second blocking body (4) comprises a rear lever (18), designed to constrain said leaf (30) in a direction opposite to the arrest element (13), when said device (1) is in said blocking position.
- The device according to Claim 1, wherein said slotting system comprises a tooth (21) and a seat (22) for said tooth (21), said tooth (21) and said seat (22) presenting a position of interference, in which they are in mutual interference, in the proximity of said engagement position.
- The device according to one or more of the preceding claims, comprising an elastic element (23), designed to maintain said disengagement position in stable equilibrium.
- The device according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein said disengagement position is maintained in stable equilibrium by means of the gravitational force.
- The device according to one or more of the preceding claims, wherein said first hinge (5) and said second hinge (6) are parallel to said supporting surface (31).
- The device according to one or more of the preceding claims, wherein said first blocking body (3) is provided with a recess (10), which extends prevalently in a longitudinal direction (1b) transverse to said supporting surface (31), and in which said second blocking body (4) is constituted by an element having a prevalent development in said longitudinal direction (1 b), designed to fit into said recess (10).
- The device according to one or more of the preceding claims, wherein said second blocking body (4) has an end portion (17), which extends in a longitudinal direction (1b) beyond said recess (10) and is designed to be manoeuvred manually to enable exit of said device from said engagement position.
- The device according to one or more of the preceding claims, wherein said end portion (17) can be turned with respect to said second blocking body (4).
- A leaf (30) for doors or windows and the like, comprising an automatic blocking device (1) according to one or more of the preceding claims.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT08425648T ATE541106T1 (en) | 2008-10-06 | 2008-10-06 | AUTOMATIC DEVICE FOR LOCKING DOOR PANELS OR WINDOWS AND THE LIKE |
EP08425648A EP2172609B8 (en) | 2008-10-06 | 2008-10-06 | Automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like |
ES08425648T ES2380504T3 (en) | 2008-10-06 | 2008-10-06 | Automatic device to block door or window sheets and the like |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP08425648A EP2172609B8 (en) | 2008-10-06 | 2008-10-06 | Automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2172609A1 EP2172609A1 (en) | 2010-04-07 |
EP2172609B1 true EP2172609B1 (en) | 2012-01-11 |
EP2172609B8 EP2172609B8 (en) | 2012-03-28 |
Family
ID=40429976
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08425648A Not-in-force EP2172609B8 (en) | 2008-10-06 | 2008-10-06 | Automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2172609B8 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE541106T1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2380504T3 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ITMI20101763A1 (en) * | 2010-09-28 | 2012-03-29 | Cgv Srl | LOCKING DEVICE FOR A WINDOW DOOR. |
FR3013306B1 (en) * | 2013-11-18 | 2017-06-02 | Lamberet | DEVICE FOR RETAINING AN OPENING OF A VEHICLE |
DE202014102934U1 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2015-10-02 | Grass Gmbh | Device for detachably coupling an external drawer with an inner drawer and a piece of furniture |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE227932C (en) * | ||||
IT1154984B (en) * | 1980-12-19 | 1987-01-21 | Esinplast Di Alessandro Cirill | DEVICE FOR AUTOMATIC STOP OF WINDOW DOORS AT THE END OF THE OPENING STROKE |
IT242489Y1 (en) * | 1996-08-09 | 2001-06-14 | Esinplast | AUTOMATIC TAX STOP DEVICE |
-
2008
- 2008-10-06 AT AT08425648T patent/ATE541106T1/en active
- 2008-10-06 ES ES08425648T patent/ES2380504T3/en active Active
- 2008-10-06 EP EP08425648A patent/EP2172609B8/en not_active Not-in-force
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE541106T1 (en) | 2012-01-15 |
EP2172609A1 (en) | 2010-04-07 |
ES2380504T3 (en) | 2012-05-14 |
EP2172609B8 (en) | 2012-03-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20160032636A1 (en) | American damper concealed hinge | |
EP1553253A1 (en) | Egress hinge | |
US20090265886A1 (en) | Sliding assembly for transversal sliding door | |
EP2172609B1 (en) | Automatic device for blocking leaves of doors or windows and the like | |
US20020059692A1 (en) | Motor vehicle door, particularly rear door, hinge | |
US4112543A (en) | Furniture hinge | |
US7841051B2 (en) | Dual swing hinge structure | |
RU2018143495A (en) | TWO-STAGE WING OPENING MECHANISM | |
WO2007000570A2 (en) | Sash hinge | |
EP1656490B1 (en) | Window, door or the like comprising a swinging arms assembly with stop means | |
CA2351190C (en) | Pivot connection adjustment assembly | |
EP2959085B1 (en) | Damped hinge assemblies | |
US10927580B2 (en) | Door closers | |
US11542738B2 (en) | Door closers | |
US984101A (en) | Adjusting device for windows or doors. | |
KR200290779Y1 (en) | door stopping structure of a switchboard | |
JP2009257034A (en) | Secret hinge | |
KR102363523B1 (en) | finger protection device for hinged door | |
KR101651729B1 (en) | Device for fixing fire door | |
EP2096243A1 (en) | Locking device for double doors or windows | |
KR930003956Y1 (en) | Pressing type panel lock fixing device | |
JPS6315497Y2 (en) | ||
EP3486415B1 (en) | Hinge system for external fixtures, such as window shutters or blinds including reinforcement device | |
KR101981929B1 (en) | Hinge device in door | |
JPH0988405A (en) | Hinge device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20100414 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100608 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 541106 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: DEFENSE SYSTEM S.R.L. |
|
RIN2 | Information on inventor provided after grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: BRUNETTO, SANTINO |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602008012640 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120315 |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: DEFENCE SYSTEM S.R.L. |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20120111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2380504 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20120514 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120411 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120411 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120511 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120511 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120412 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 541106 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20121012 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602008012640 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121012 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20121006 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121006 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121031 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130501 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121006 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602008012640 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130501 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20131017 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20131028 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121006 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081006 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20150630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20151127 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141007 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20171024 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181006 |