EP2171694B1 - Verfahren zum überwachen eines durch eine kontrolltür zugänglichen raums und kontrolltür - Google Patents
Verfahren zum überwachen eines durch eine kontrolltür zugänglichen raums und kontrolltür Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2171694B1 EP2171694B1 EP08826809A EP08826809A EP2171694B1 EP 2171694 B1 EP2171694 B1 EP 2171694B1 EP 08826809 A EP08826809 A EP 08826809A EP 08826809 A EP08826809 A EP 08826809A EP 2171694 B1 EP2171694 B1 EP 2171694B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- surveillance
- zone
- door
- control door
- passage
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/10—Movable barriers with registering means
- G07C9/15—Movable barriers with registering means with arrangements to prevent the passage of more than one individual at a time
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of building safety, including the control of the uniqueness of passage and relates to a method of monitoring a space accessible by a control door, and such a control door.
- Some buildings such as banks, airports, military installations require secure access to ensure the uniqueness of passage of a person to prevent any passage of an unauthorized person.
- control gates of this type used to date make it possible to satisfactorily meet the usual requirements of detecting the presence of one or more persons. However, they have a major disadvantage inherent in the control system of the uniqueness associated with the latter.
- the monitoring being performed by infrared emitting cells the latter must be located in a secure place. Therefore, it is not possible to integrate the latter outside the area to be secured, for example outside the building, as this exposes them to a risk of vandalism or attempted destruction too Student.
- said cells must be arranged on the opposite side to that of the opening of the door so as not to be blinded by the latter, in other words, so that the door does not form an obstacle to the rays emitted or received by said cells.
- the object of the present invention is to overcome these disadvantages by making it possible to reliably and infrequently control the uniqueness of the passage.
- the subject of the invention is also a passage control gate giving access to a space, comprising a first monitoring means and a second monitoring means connected to a management device for carrying out the method, said first and second monitoring means being non-visible and not accessible in the closed position of said control door.
- this method may consist in monitoring the first surveillance zone 4 and the second surveillance zone 5 inscribed in the volume delimited by the sleeping frame 6 of the control gate 1, the first surveillance zone 4 having a limited width through which a person must pass and the second monitoring zone 5 constituting a complementary zone not to be crossed and to consider any concealment in the second surveillance zone 5 as a non-conforming passage.
- Taking into account the information from the first and second monitoring means 2, 2, 200; 3, 30, 300 is to determine, through this information, possibly correlated with other data, if one, none or more people entered the space.
- the first monitoring means 2, 20, 200 may also consist in determining the number of persons having passed through the first surveillance zone 4.
- the first and second surveillance zones 4 and 5 are represented more particularly in the figure 2 in the case of a control gate 1 having a leaf.
- the first limited width surveillance zone 4 corresponds to the area to be crossed by the person wishing to access the monitored space. Its width should be large enough for an individual to cross, but also narrow enough to prevent two individuals from passing side by side.
- the second monitoring zone 5 corresponds to the zone remaining in the passage of the control gate 1. When this zone is crossed, the method can provide for the emission of an error signal indicating that the passage is non-compliant and an invitation to repeat said passage.
- the method may consist in considering as a conforming passage any occultation occurring only in the first surveillance zone 4.
- the method may consist in considering as a conforming passage any occultation occurring only in the first surveillance zone 4.
- the method may consist of analyzing the blanking of the first monitoring zone 4 and correlating it with other parameters to determine whether the passage is unitary.
- Other data or parameters that may be taken into account may be temporal data. For this purpose, it is conceivable to take into account the opening time of the control gate 1 or the duration during which an occultation has occurred in the first surveillance zone 4.
- the method according to the invention is particularly intended to be integrated into buildings or services in which it is necessary, on the one hand, to ensure the safety of the first person who, when arriving in the morning, unlocks the security system and, on the other hand, to allow access to the public.
- this method may consist in monitoring a space forming an airlock and opening through an exit door on a secure perimeter, allowing, after closing of the control door 1, and if the uniqueness of passage has been verified, access to the secure perimeter through the exit door.
- This method prevents access to the security perimeter when more than one person is present in the airlock. This can be done as follows, for example: the person authorized to enter the secure perimeter unlocks the control door 1. The control door 1 being unlocked, a criminal pushes the first person into the airlock and enters it as well. Since the first and second monitoring means 2, 20, 200; 3, 30, 300 are fed from a certain opening of the control door 1, they detect any occultation occurred in the first and second surveillance zones 4 and 5 inscribed in the volume delimited by the fixed frame 6 of said door 1, so that it is determined whether someone has crossed the control gate 1 and, if so, whether it is one or more persons. In the case where several people are in the airlock, this is considered a fraud and the exit door is not unlocked.
- this process is started or programmed after the closure of buildings or protected services. It can be expected that after entering the secure perimeter, the process is disengaged to allow normal access to the building or secure perimeter in question.
- the invention also relates to a control gate 1 of the passage uniqueness giving access to a space, comprising a first monitoring means 2, 20, 200 and a second monitoring means 3, 30, 300 connected to a device management for the implementation of the method described above.
- This control gate 1, shown according to several embodiments in the accompanying figures, is characterized in that said first and second monitoring means 2, 20, 200; 3, 30, 300 are invisible in the closed position of said control door 1.
- the control door 1 can be constituted by a single leaf 7 and be equipped with a first monitoring means 2 of the first zone 4, of limited width, through which a person must pass and a second monitoring means 3 of the second complementary zone 5 not to be traversed, said first and second monitoring means 2 and 3 being integrated into the fixed frame 6 of said control gate 1, in the plane of the wing 7 when the latter is in the position of closing.
- first and second monitoring means 2 and 3 are integrated in the frame 6 of the control door 1, and in particular in the plane of the flap 7, they are protected when the control door 1 is closed.
- control door 1 allowing a person to pass leads to the power of the first and second monitoring means 2 and 3. It in As a result, any passage is automatically detected by the latter and is taken into account by the management device.
- the first monitoring means 2 of the first zone 4 of limited width may consist of transmitting cells receiving a given distance, integrated in the vertical upright 8 located on the opening side of said control gate 1 that is to say the opposite side to the articulated side on the corresponding vertical upright of the fixed frame 6 and the second monitoring means 3 of the second complementary zone 5 may consist of at least one receiving transmitting cell integrated in the upper horizontal crosspiece 10 of the sleeping frame 6 of said control door 1 located near the hinge side on the corresponding vertical upright of the frame 6.
- the Figures 1A to 1D represent an exemplary embodiment of such a control gate 1.
- a magnetic contact may be provided to allow the management device to be notified of the opening of the control gate 1 and start, if necessary, a timer.
- the figure 1D represents the control gate 1 in a closed state in which the first and second monitoring means 2 and 3 are not powered. The latter are fed only from reaching a determined opening of the wing 7 allowing the passage of an individual, here an angle of 15 °. Before reaching this angle opening, the cells of the first and second monitoring means 2 and 3 are obscured by the flap 7 of the control gate 1. As soon as this angle is reached, the cells of the first and second means 2 and 3 are no longer hidden by the flap 7 of the control door 1 and therefore ready to detect any passage.
- the figures 3 , 4 and 5 represent the typical cases involved in the case of the control of the uniqueness of passage of such a control gate 1.
- the figure 3 represents an individual crossing only the first surveillance zone 4.
- This passage will be considered unitary by the management device that can control, for example, the opening of an exit door overlooking a secure perimeter.
- the management device will receive, on the one hand, information relating to the occultation of the second surveillance zone 5 which will result in non-conformance of passage and, on the other hand, the analysis of the occultation of the first surveillance zone 4, correlated with other parameters will allow it to conclude that the passage is also not unitary. .
- the analysis of the occultation of the first surveillance zone 4 may consist of counting the number of occultations occurring at the level of the cells situated in the lower part of the vertical upright 8, these occultations corresponding to the passage of the legs of an individual.
- the first monitoring means 2 of the first zone 4 of limited width may be constituted by infrared emitter-receiving cells with background suppression.
- the control gate 1 may be constituted by a sliding panel 9 and be equipped with a first monitoring means 20 and a second monitoring means 30, the first monitoring means 20 consisting of two opposite rows of cells, the first row being constituted by receiving cells and the second row consisting of emitter cells, said rows being integrated in the vertical upright 8 of the control door 1 situated on the side of the opening of the sliding panel and in the face of the sliding panel located opposite said vertical upright 8, or vice versa, and the second monitoring means 30 being constituted by at least one receiving transmitting cell integrated in the region of the horizontal cross member 10 of the fixed frame 6 located opposite the vertical upright 8 in which is integrated a row of cells, at the level of the doorway of the control door 1.
- the first and second monitoring means 20 and 30 are also non-visible, non-accessible and therefore protected when the control gate 1 is closed.
- the Figure 6A represents for this purpose such a closed control gate 1.
- the cells forming the second monitoring means 30 are not powered at the same time as the cells forming the first monitoring means 20, but only after opening the sliding panel 9 beyond the position of said cells forming the first monitoring means 20. If an individual passes through the second surveillance zone 50, the corresponding passage is considered as non-compliant.
- control gate 1 may be constituted by two sliding panels 9 and be equipped with a first monitoring means 200 and a second monitoring means 300, the first monitoring means 200 consisting of two opposite rows of cells, the first row being constituted by receiving cells and the second row consisting of emitter cells, said rows being integrated in the lateral faces of the two sliding panels 9 facing each other and the second monitoring means 300 being constituted by at least two transmitting transceiver cells integrated into the horizontal transom 10 of the fixed frame 6, on either side of the central zone of said horizontal crossbar 10.
- the Figure 7B represents this central zone corresponding to the first surveillance zone 4 to be crossed in order to obtain a conformal passage.
- the second surveillance zone 5 consists of two half-surveillance zones located on either side of the first surveillance zone 4 and must not be crossed in order to obtain a conformal passage.
- the supply of the cells may be the same as that described in relation to the second embodiment in which the control gate 1 comprises a single sliding panel 9.
- the invention provides that the cells forming the first and second monitoring means 2, 20, 200; 3, 30, 300 may be infrared or ultrasonic type cells, irrespective of the embodiment.
- the active means 2, 20, 200; 3, 30, 300 determining the opening and access to an area secure are neither visible nor accessible when the control door 1 is closed and, secondly, to determine with certainty whether pass compliance and uniqueness conditions are met.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
- Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
- Special Wing (AREA)
Claims (11)
- Verfahren zum Überwachen eines durch eine Kontrolltür (1) zugänglichen Raums, wobei das Verfahren dazu bestimmt ist, die Einzigkeit des Durchgang in den Raum zu kontrollieren, das darin besteht,i) das Öffnen der Kontrolltür (1) zu überwachen,ii) ab minimalem Öffnen der Kontrolltür (1), das einer Durchgangsmöglichkeit für eine einzige Person entspricht, ein erstes Überwachungsmittel (2, 20, 200) eines ersten Überwachungsbereich (4) und ein zweites Überwachungsmittel (3, 30, 300) eines zweiten Überwachungsbereich (5) unter Spannung zu setzen und die folgenden Schritte kontinuierlich und gleichzeitig bis zum Schließen der Kontrolltür (1) durchzuführen:- anhand des ersten Überwachungsmittels (2, 20, 200) feststellen, ob eine, keine oder mehrere Personen den ersten Überwachungsbereich (4) durchquert haben,- anhand des zweiten Überwachungsmittels (3, 30, 300) feststellen, ob der zweite Überwachungsbereich (5), der dadurch überwacht wird, durchquert wurde,iii) diese Informationen zu berücksichtigen, um festzustellen, ob der Durchgang konform und einzeln ist,wobei das Verfahren dadurch gekennzeichnet ist, dass es darin besteht, den ersten Überwachungsbereich (4) und den zweiten Überwachungsbereich (5), die in dem Volumen beschrieben sind, das von der Türeinfassung (6) der Kontrolltür (1) begrenzt ist, zu überwachen, wobei der erste Überwachungsbereich (4) einen begrenzte Breite aufweist, durch die eine Person passieren muss und der zweite Überwachungsbereich (5) einen komplementären Bereich darstellt, der nicht durchquert werden darf, und dass es darin besteht, jede Verdunkelung im zweiten Überwachungsbereich (5) als nicht konformen Durchgang zu betrachten.
- Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das erste Überwachungsmittel (2, 20, 200) weiterhin darin besteht, die Anzahl der Personen festzustellen, die den ersten Überwachungsbereich (4) durchquert haben.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 und 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass es darin besteht, jede Verdunkelung nur im ersten Überwachungsbereich (4) als konformen Durchgang zu betrachten.
- Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass es darin besteht, bei einem konformen Durchgang die Verdunkelung des ersten Überwachungsbereichs (4) zu analysieren und mit anderen Parametern abzustimmen, um festzustellen, ob der Durchgang einzeln ist.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, das darin besteht, einen Raum zu überwachen, der eine Schleuse bildet und durch eine Ausgangstür in einen abgesicherten Bereich mündet, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass es darin besteht, nach Schließen der Kontrolltür (1) und wenn die Einzigkeit des Durchgangs überprüft wurde, den Zugang zum abgesicherten Bereich durch die Ausgangstür zu erlauben.
- Tür zur Kontrolle der Einzigkeit des Durchgangs, die Zugang zu einem Raum gibt, die ein erstes Überwachungsmittel (2) und ein zweites Überwachungsmittel (3) umfasst, die mit einer Verwaltungsvorrichtung zur Umsetzung des Verfahrens nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 5 verbunden sind, wobei das erste und zweite Überwachungsmittel (2 und 3) in Schließstellung der Kontrolltür (1) nicht sichtbar und nicht zugänglich sind,
wobei die Tür dadurch gekennzeichnet ist, dass:- sie aus einem einzigen Flügel (7) besteht,- sie mit einem ersten Überwachungsmittel (2) des ersten Bereichs (4) begrenzter Breite ausgestattet ist, durch den eine Person passieren muss und einem zweiten Überwachungsmittel (3) des komplementären zweiten Bereichs (5), der nicht durchquert werden darf,- wobei das erste und zweite Überwachungsmittel (2 und 3) in den Türrahmen (5) der Kontrolltür (1) in die Ebene des Flügels (7) integriert sind, wenn dieser in Schließstellung ist. - Tür nach Anspruch 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das erste Überwachungsmittel (2) des ersten Bereichs (4) begrenzter Breite von Sende-Empfangszellen über eine bestimmte Entfernung gebildet werden, die in den senkrechten Pfosten (8) integriert sind, der sich an der Öffnungsseite der Kontrolltür (1) befindet, und zwar an der Seite, die der am entsprechenden senkrechten Pfosten des Türeinfassung (5) angelenkten Seite gegenüberliegt und dass das zweite Überwachungsmittel (3) des komplementären zweiten Bereichs (5) aus mindestens einer Sende-Empfangszelle besteht, die in den oberen waagerechten Querbalken (10) der Türeinfassung (6) der Kontrolltür (1) integriert ist, der sich in der Nähe der am entsprechenden senkrechten Pfosten der Türeinfassung angelenkten Seite befindet.
- Tür nach einem der Ansprüche 6 und 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das erste Überwachungsmittel (2) des ersten Bereichs (4) begrenzter Breite aus Infrarot-Sende-Empfangszellen mit Hintergrundunterdrückung besteht.
- Tür zur Kontrolle der Einzigkeit des Durchgangs, die Zugang zu einem Raum gibt, die ein erstes Überwachungsmittel (20) und ein zweites Überwachungsmittel (30) umfasst, die mit einer Verwaltungsvorrichtung zur Umsetzung des Verfahrens nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 5 verbunden sind, wobei das erste und zweite Überwachungsmittel (20 und 30) in Schließstellung der Kontrolltür (1) nicht sichtbar und nicht zugänglich sind,
wobei die Tür dadurch gekennzeichnet ist, dass:- sie von einer Schiebetür gebildet wird,- das erste Überwachungsmittel (20) von zwei gegenüberliegenden Reihen Zellen gebildet wird, wobei die erste Reihe von Empfangszellen und die zweite Reihe von Sendezellen gebildet wird, wobei die Reihen in den senkrechten Pfosten (8) der Kontrolltür (1) integriert sind, der sich auf der Seite der Öffnung der Schiebetür befindet und in die Fläche der Schiebtür, die sich gegenüber dem senkrechten Pfosten (8) befindet, oder umgekehrt,- das zweite Überwachungsmittel (30) von mindestens einer Sende-Empfangszelle gebildet wird, die in den Bereich des waagerechten Querträgers (10) der Türeinfassung (6) integriert ist, der sich gegenüber dem senkrechten Pfosten (8) befindet, in den auf Ebene der Öffnung der Kontrolltür (1) das erste Überwachungsmittel (20) integriert ist. - Tür zur Kontrolle der Einzigkeit des Durchgangs, die Zugang zu einem Raum gibt, die ein erstes Überwachungsmittel (200) und ein zweites Überwachungsmittel (300) umfasst, die mit einer Verwaltungsvorrichtung zur Umsetzung des Verfahrens nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 5 verbunden sind, wobei das erste und zweite Überwachungsmittel (200 und 300) in Schließstellung der Kontrolltür (1) nicht sichtbar und nicht zugänglich sind,
wobei die Tür dadurch gekennzeichnet ist, dass:- sie von zwei Schiebetüren (9) gebildet wird,- das erste Überwachungsmittel (200) von zwei gegenüberliegenden Reihen Zellen gebildet wird, wobei die erste Reihe von Empfangszellen und die zweite Reihe von Sendezellen gebildet wird, wobei die Reihen in den Seitenflächen der zwei Schiebetüren (9) gegenüberliegend integriert sind,- das zweite Überwachungsmittel (300) von mindestens zwei Sende-Empfangszeilen gebildet wird, die in den waagerechten Querträger (10) der Türeinfassung (5) auf der einen und der anderen Seite des zentralen Bereichs des waagerechten Querträgers (10) integriert sind. - Tür nach einem der Ansprüche 7 bis 10, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Zellen, die das erste und zweite Überwachungsmittel (2, 20, 200; 3, 30, 300) bilden, Zellen vom Infrarot- oder Ultraschalltyp sind.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0756682A FR2919413B1 (fr) | 2007-07-23 | 2007-07-23 | Procede de surveillance d'un espace accessible par une porte de controle et porte de controle. |
PCT/FR2008/051376 WO2009016311A2 (fr) | 2007-07-23 | 2008-07-22 | Procede de surveillance d'un espace accessible par une porte de contrôle et porte de contrôle |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2171694A2 EP2171694A2 (de) | 2010-04-07 |
EP2171694B1 true EP2171694B1 (de) | 2012-02-29 |
Family
ID=39030869
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08826809A Not-in-force EP2171694B1 (de) | 2007-07-23 | 2008-07-22 | Verfahren zum überwachen eines durch eine kontrolltür zugänglichen raums und kontrolltür |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20120262269A1 (de) |
EP (1) | EP2171694B1 (de) |
AT (1) | ATE547779T1 (de) |
CA (1) | CA2694331A1 (de) |
EA (1) | EA016966B1 (de) |
FR (1) | FR2919413B1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2009016311A2 (de) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3309756B1 (de) | 2016-10-14 | 2020-12-30 | Fichet Technologies | Einzelpassage-kontrollverfahren und -kontrollsystem, das eine umsetzung dieses verfahrens ermöglicht, sowie vorrichtung für tür oder korridor, die mit einem solchen system ausgestattet ist |
SE544624C2 (en) * | 2019-11-04 | 2022-09-27 | Assa Abloy Ab | Setting a people sensor in a power save mode based on a closed signal indicating that a door of a doorway is closed |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4048500A (en) * | 1976-11-08 | 1977-09-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Infrared background suppression |
FR2596900B3 (fr) * | 1986-04-02 | 1988-06-10 | Aep Sa | Dispositif de controle d'acces |
DE3623792C1 (de) * | 1986-07-15 | 1987-12-10 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Einrichtung zur Feststellung der Personenzahl und Richtung innerhalb eines zu ueberwachenden Raumes oder einer Durchgangsschleuse |
US4823010A (en) * | 1987-05-11 | 1989-04-18 | The Stanley Works | Sliding door threshold sensor |
DE4001219C1 (de) * | 1990-01-17 | 1991-04-25 | Gallenschuetz Metallbau Gmbh, 7580 Buehl, De | |
GB0008037D0 (en) * | 2000-04-01 | 2000-05-24 | Integrated Design Limited | Monitoring entry through doorways |
WO2002095692A1 (en) * | 2001-05-21 | 2002-11-28 | Gunnebo Mayor Ltd. | Security door |
US7623674B2 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2009-11-24 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Method and system for enhanced portal security through stereoscopy |
US20070268145A1 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2007-11-22 | Bazakos Michael E | Automated tailgating detection via fusion of video and access control |
-
2007
- 2007-07-23 FR FR0756682A patent/FR2919413B1/fr not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-07-22 EP EP08826809A patent/EP2171694B1/de not_active Not-in-force
- 2008-07-22 WO PCT/FR2008/051376 patent/WO2009016311A2/fr active Application Filing
- 2008-07-22 AT AT08826809T patent/ATE547779T1/de active
- 2008-07-22 CA CA2694331A patent/CA2694331A1/fr not_active Abandoned
- 2008-07-22 US US12/452,661 patent/US20120262269A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2008-07-22 EA EA201000235A patent/EA016966B1/ru not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2171694A2 (de) | 2010-04-07 |
EA016966B1 (ru) | 2012-08-30 |
EA201000235A1 (ru) | 2010-06-30 |
ATE547779T1 (de) | 2012-03-15 |
US20120262269A1 (en) | 2012-10-18 |
FR2919413B1 (fr) | 2009-11-13 |
WO2009016311A2 (fr) | 2009-02-05 |
CA2694331A1 (fr) | 2009-02-05 |
WO2009016311A3 (fr) | 2009-04-09 |
FR2919413A1 (fr) | 2009-01-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2755872B1 (de) | Verfahren zum öffnen einer klappe eines kraftfahrzeugs | |
US8558887B2 (en) | Virtual guard gate for a gated community and method therefor | |
FR2790576A1 (fr) | Procede d'identification pour acceder a des zones protegees et cabine de mise en oeuvre | |
EP1579393A2 (de) | Automatische tür und zugeordnetes verfahren zum erlauben oder untersagen eines zutritts | |
EP3554948B1 (de) | Sicheres endgerät | |
EP2171694B1 (de) | Verfahren zum überwachen eines durch eine kontrolltür zugänglichen raums und kontrolltür | |
BE1019760A3 (fr) | Agencement de scanner. | |
EP3309756B1 (de) | Einzelpassage-kontrollverfahren und -kontrollsystem, das eine umsetzung dieses verfahrens ermöglicht, sowie vorrichtung für tür oder korridor, die mit einem solchen system ausgestattet ist | |
EP3662457A1 (de) | Alarmvorrichtung mit unterscheidung zwischen rechtmässigem bewohner und eindringling | |
BE1028475B1 (fr) | Porte battante automatique et capteur | |
EP1581911A1 (de) | Zugangskontrollsystem | |
FR2571419A1 (fr) | Porte de securite a controle d'acces sensible au poids d'une personne | |
EP1812907B1 (de) | System für verbesserte sicherheit von passagieren zum anboardgehen eines transportmittels | |
EP2305931A1 (de) | Zusatzverriegelung für den Zugang zu einem Sicherheitsbereich | |
FR2926910A1 (fr) | Parc de stationnement pour vehicules ouverts, et procede pour deposer ou retirer un vehicule ouvert dans ou d'un tel parc de stationnement | |
FR2937006A1 (fr) | Porte de cabine d'aeronef | |
FR2598173A1 (fr) | Sas de protection contre les agressions avec controle des mouvements d'entree et de sortie | |
FR2934871A1 (fr) | Dispositif antieffraction d'une porte pour armoire et armoire equipee d'un tel dispositif | |
EP2230372A1 (de) | Sicherheitsschleuse | |
BE1027339B1 (fr) | Système de verrouillage d'une porte | |
BE1029513B1 (fr) | Capteur pour portes automatiques ou barrières automatiques et porte automatique ou barrière automatique avec un tel capteur | |
FR2871505A1 (fr) | Coffre-fort "presentoir" avec ouverture par la face superieure | |
FR3019581A1 (fr) | Barriere d'acces controle, en particulier pour des moyens de transport public, des locaux publics et similaires | |
WO2006120327A1 (fr) | Boite postale et systeme de boites postales | |
FR2956432A1 (fr) | Dispositif anti-retour pour porte de securite unipersonnelle, porte de securite unipersonnelle equipee d'un tel dispositif et procede de controle et de commande dudit dispositif |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20091211 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100510 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 547779 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120315 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120426 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: ING. MARCO ZARDI C/O M. ZARDI & CO. S.A. |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: GULDE HENGELHAUPT ZIEBIG & SCHNEIDER, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: GULDE & PARTNER PATENT- UND RECHTSANWALTSKANZL, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20120229 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120629 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120529 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120530 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120629 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 547779 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120229 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: GUNNEBO ELECTRONIC SECURITY (SOCIETE PAR ACTIONS Effective date: 20120731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20121130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120609 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120529 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20130710 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120722 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080722 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140723 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20180720 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G07C0009020000 Ipc: G07C0009100000 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190722 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190722 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20200721 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20200922 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20200722 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: GULDE & PARTNER PATENT- UND RECHTSANWALTSKANZL, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: FICHET TECHNOLOGIES (S.A.S.), FR Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GUNNEBO ELECTRONIC SECURITY (S.A.S.), BALDENHEIM, FR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: FICHET TECHNOLOGIES, FR Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GUNNEBO ELECTRONIC SECURITY (SOCIETE PAR ACTIONS SIMPLIFIEE), FR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210731 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220201 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210731 |