EP2171694A2 - Method for monitoring a space accessible through a control door and control door - Google Patents
Method for monitoring a space accessible through a control door and control doorInfo
- Publication number
- EP2171694A2 EP2171694A2 EP08826809A EP08826809A EP2171694A2 EP 2171694 A2 EP2171694 A2 EP 2171694A2 EP 08826809 A EP08826809 A EP 08826809A EP 08826809 A EP08826809 A EP 08826809A EP 2171694 A2 EP2171694 A2 EP 2171694A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- monitoring means
- zone
- monitoring
- door
- passage
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
- G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
- G07C9/10—Movable barriers with registering means
- G07C9/15—Movable barriers with registering means with arrangements to prevent the passage of more than one individual at a time
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of building safety, including the control of the uniqueness of passage and relates to a method of monitoring a space accessible by a control door, and such a control door.
- Some buildings such as banks, airports, military installations require secure access to ensure the uniqueness of passage of a person to prevent any passage of an unauthorized person.
- control gates of this type used to date make it possible to satisfactorily meet the usual requirements of detecting the presence of one or more persons. However, they have a major disadvantage inherent in the control system of the uniqueness associated with the latter.
- the monitoring being performed by infrared emitting cells the latter must be located in a secure place. Therefore, it is not possible to integrate the latter outside the area to be secured, for example outside the building, as this exposes them to a risk of vandalism or attempted destruction too Student.
- said cells must be arranged on the opposite side to that of the opening of the door so as not to be blinded by the latter, in other words, so that the door does not form an obstacle to the rays emitted or received by said cells.
- FR-A-2 596 900 a method for monitoring a space accessible by a control gate. However, it does not allow to control the uniqueness of passage in said space.
- the object of the present invention is to overcome these disadvantages by making it possible to reliably and infrequently control the uniqueness of the passage.
- a method of monitoring a space accessible by a control gate a method for controlling the uniqueness of passage in said space, consisting of i) monitoring the opening of the control gate, ii) at the minimum opening of the control gate, corresponding to a passage possibility for a single person, powering first monitoring means of a first surveillance zone and second monitoring means of a second surveillance zone , and performing the following steps continuously and simultaneously until the closing of said control gate:
- the second monitoring means determines, by the second monitoring means whether the second surveillance zone, monitored by the latter, has been crossed, iii) taking into account this information to determine whether the passage is compliant and unitary, characterized in that it consists monitoring the first surveillance zone and the second surveillance zone included in the volume defined by the sleeping frame of the control door, the first surveillance zone having a limited width through which a person must pass and the second surveillance zone constituting a complementary zone not to be crossed, and in that it consists in considering any occultation in the second surveillance zone as a non-compliant passage.
- the subject of the invention is also a passage control gate giving access to a space, comprising a first monitoring means and a second monitoring means connected to a management device for implementing the method, characterized in this said first and second monitoring means are invisible in the closed position of said control gate.
- FIGS. ID represent a view from above of a control gate of the uniqueness of passage according to a first embodiment of the invention, in different positions;
- Fig. 2 is a side elevational view of the control gate shown in Figs.
- Figure 3 is a view similar to that of Figure 2 showing the conformal passage of a person
- Figure 4 is a view similar to that of Figure 2 showing the non-conforming passage of a person
- Figure 5 is a view similar to that of Figure 2 showing the non-conforming passage of two persons
- Figures 6A to 6C are simplified representations in side elevation of a control gate of the uniqueness of passage according to the second embodiment of the invention in different positions, namely respectively a closed position, an intermediate open position, a second position opening, then an almost full opening position of the control door for the passage of a person
- Figs. 7A and 7B are side elevational views of a control door of the uniqueness of passage according to the third embodiment of the invention in a closed position and an intermediate open position.
- the method of monitoring a space accessible by a control gate 1 is intended to control the uniqueness of passage in said space.
- this monitoring method is intended to control the uniqueness of passage in said space and consists in: i) monitoring the opening of the control gate 1, ii) at the minimum opening of the corresponding control gate 1, to a possibility of passage for one person, turn on a first monitoring means 2, 20, 200 of a first surveillance zone 4 and a second monitoring means 3, 30, 300 of a second monitoring zone 5, and performing the following steps continuously and simultaneously until the closing of said control gate 1:
- this method may consist in monitoring the first surveillance zone 4 and the second surveillance zone 5 inscribed in the volume delimited by the sleeping frame 6 of the control gate 1, the first surveillance zone 4 having a limited width through which a person must pass and the second monitoring zone 5 constituting a complementary zone not to be crossed and to consider any concealment in the second surveillance zone 5 as a non-conforming passage.
- Taking into account the information from the first and second monitoring means 2, 2, 200; 3, 30, 300 is to determine, through this information, possibly correlated with other data, if one, none or more people entered the space.
- the first monitoring means 2, 20, 200 may also consist in determining the number of persons having passed through the first surveillance zone 4.
- the first and second monitoring zones 4 and 5 are shown more particularly in FIG. 2 in the case of a control gate 1 comprising a leaf.
- the first limited width surveillance zone 4 corresponds to the area to be crossed by the person wishing to access the monitored space. Its width should be large enough for an individual to cross, but also narrow enough to prevent two individuals from passing side by side.
- the second monitoring zone 5 corresponds to the zone remaining in the passage of the control gate 1.
- the method can provide for the emission of an error signal indicating that the passage is non-compliant and an invitation to repeat said passage.
- the method may consist in considering as a conforming passage any occultation occurring only in the first surveillance zone 4. Thus, to make a conformal and unitary passage, it is necessary for one person to pass through the first zone 4 .
- the method may consist of analyzing the blanking of the first monitoring zone 4 and correlating it with other parameters to determine whether the passage is unitary.
- Other data or parameters that may be taken into account may be temporal data. For this purpose, it is conceivable to take into account the opening time of the control gate 1 or the duration during which an occultation has occurred in the first surveillance zone 4.
- the method according to the invention is particularly intended to be integrated into buildings or services in which it is necessary, on the one hand, to ensure the safety of the first person who, when arriving in the morning, unlocks the security system and, on the other hand, to allow access to the public.
- this method may consist in monitoring a space forming an airlock and opening through an exit door on a secure perimeter, allowing, after closing of the control door 1, and if the uniqueness of passage has been verified, access to the secure perimeter through the exit door.
- This method prevents access to the security perimeter when more than one person is present in the airlock. This can be done as follows, for example: the person authorized to enter the secure perimeter unlocks the control door 1. The control door 1 being unlocked, a criminal pushes the first person into the airlock and enters it as well. Since the first and second monitoring means 2, 20, 200; 3, 30, 300 are fed from a certain opening of the control door 1, they detect any occultation occurred in the first and second surveillance zones 4 and 5 inscribed in the volume delimited by the fixed frame 6 of said door 1, so that it is determined whether someone has crossed the control gate 1 and, if so, whether it is one or more persons. In the case where several people are in the airlock, this is considered a fraud and the exit door is not unlocked.
- this process is started or programmed after the closure of buildings or protected services. It can be expected that after entering the secure perimeter, the process is disengaged to allow normal access to the building or secure perimeter in question.
- the invention also relates to a control gate 1 of the passage uniqueness giving access to a space, comprising a first monitoring means 2, 20, 200 and a second monitoring means 3, 30, 300 connected to a device of management for the implementation of the method described above.
- This control gate 1, shown according to several embodiments in the accompanying figures, is characterized in that said first and second monitoring means 2, 20, 200; 3, 30, 300 are invisible in the closed position of said control door 1.
- the control door 1 can be constituted by a single leaf 7 and be equipped with a first monitoring means 2 of the first zone 4, of limited width, through which must pass a person and a second monitoring means 3 of the second complementary zone 5 not to be crossed, said first and second monitoring means 2 and 3 being integrated into the dormant frame 6 of said control door 1, in the plane of the wing 7 when the latter is in the closed position.
- first and second monitoring means 2 and 3 are integrated in the frame 6 of the control door 1, and in particular in the plane of the flap 7, they are protected when the control door 1 is closed. In addition, the security is guaranteed because any fairly wide opening of the control door 1 allowing a person to pass leads to the power of the first and second monitoring means 2 and 3. It in As a result, any passage is automatically detected by the latter and is taken into account by the management device.
- the first monitoring means 2 of the first zone 4 of limited width may consist of transmitting cells receiving a given distance, integrated in the vertical upright 8 located on the opening side of said control gate 1 that is to say the opposite side to the articulated side on the corresponding vertical upright of the fixed frame 6 and the second monitoring means 3 of the second complementary zone 5 may consist of at least one receiving transmitting cell integrated in the upper horizontal crosspiece 10 of the sleeping frame 6 of said control door 1 located near the hinged side on the corresponding vertical upright of the frame.
- FIGS. 1A-1D show an exemplary embodiment of such a control gate 1.
- a magnetic contact may be provided to enable the management device to be notified of the opening of the control gate 1 and to start, the case appropriate, a delay.
- FIG. 1A shows the control gate 1 in a closed state in which the first and second monitoring means 2 and 3 are not powered. The latter are fed only from reaching a determined opening of the wing 7 allowing the passage of an individual, here an angle of 15 °. Before reaching this angle opening, the cells of the first and second monitoring means 2 and 3 are obscured by the flap 7 of the control gate 1. As soon as this angle is reached, the cells of the first and second means 2 and 3 are no longer hidden by the flap 7 of the control door 1 and therefore ready to detect any passage.
- Figures 3, 4 and 5 show the typical cases involved in the case of controlling the uniqueness of passage of such a control gate 1.
- Figure 3 shows an individual crossing only the first zone 4 monitoring. This passage will be considered unitary by the management device that can control, for example, the opening of an exit door overlooking a secure perimeter.
- the individual shown in Figure 4 passes, meanwhile, both the first and second monitoring zones 4 and 5. Under these conditions, the management device considers that the passage is not compliant. The same is true for the situation with two individuals shown in FIG. 5.
- the management device will receive, on the one hand, information relating to the occultation of the second surveillance zone 5 which will result in non-conformance of passage and, on the other hand, the analysis of the occultation of the first surveillance zone 4, correlated with other parameters will allow it to conclude that the passage is also not unitary. .
- the analysis of the occultation of the first surveillance zone 4 may consist of counting the number of occultations occurring at the level of the cells situated in the lower part of the vertical upright 8, these occultations corresponding to the passage of the legs of an individual.
- the first monitoring means 2 of the first zone 4 of limited width may be constituted by infrared emitter-receiving cells with background suppression.
- the control gate 1 may be constituted by a sliding panel 9 and be equipped with a first monitoring means 20 and a second monitoring means 30, the first means monitoring 20 being constituted by two opposite rows of cells, the first row being formed by receiving cells and the second row consisting of emitter cells, said rows being integrated in the vertical upright 8 of the control gate 1 located on the side the opening of the sliding panel and in the face of the sliding panel located opposite said vertical upright 8, or vice versa, and the second monitoring means 30 being constituted by at least one receiving transmitting cell integrated in the region of the horizontal cross member 10 of the dormant frame 6 located opposite the vertical upright 8 in which is integrated a row of cells, to the nive at the doorway of the control door 1.
- the first and second monitoring means 20 and 30 are also non-visible, non-accessible and therefore protected when the control gate 1 is closed.
- FIG. 6A represents for this purpose such a closed control gate 1.
- the cells forming the second monitoring means 30 are not powered at the same time as the cells forming the first monitoring means 20, but only after opening the sliding panel 9 beyond the position of said cells forming the first monitoring means 20. If an individual passes through the second surveillance zone 50, the corresponding passage is considered as non-compliant.
- the control gate 1 may be constituted by two sliding panels 9 and be equipped with a first monitoring means 200 and a second monitoring means 300.
- the first monitoring means 200 being constituted by two opposite rows of cells, the first row being constituted by receiving cells and the second row being constituted by emitter cells, said rows being integrated into the lateral faces of the two sliding panels 9 with respect to each other and the second monitoring means 300 being constituted by at least two transmitting transmitting cells integrated in the horizontal cross member 10 of the fixed frame 6, on either side of the central zone of said horizontal crosspiece 10 .
- FIG. 7B represents this central zone corresponding to the first surveillance zone 4 to be crossed in order to obtain a conformal passage.
- the second surveillance zone 5 consists of two half-surveillance zones located on either side of the first surveillance zone 4 and must not be crossed in order to obtain a conformal passage.
- the supply of the cells may be the same as that described in relation to the second embodiment in which the control gate 1 comprises a single sliding panel 9.
- the invention provides that the cells forming the first and second monitoring means 2, 20, 200; 3, 30, 300 may be infrared or ultrasonic type cells, irrespective of the embodiment. Thanks to the invention, it is therefore possible to set up a reliable and inviolable level of security in which, on the one hand, the active means 2, 20, 200; 3, 30, 300 determining the opening and access to an area secure are neither visible nor accessible when the control door 1 is closed and, secondly, to determine with certainty whether pass compliance and uniqueness conditions are met.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
- Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
- Special Wing (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0756682A FR2919413B1 (en) | 2007-07-23 | 2007-07-23 | METHOD OF MONITORING ACCESSIBLE SPACE BY A CONTROL DOOR AND CONTROL DOOR. |
PCT/FR2008/051376 WO2009016311A2 (en) | 2007-07-23 | 2008-07-22 | Method for monitoring a space accessible through a control door and control door |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2171694A2 true EP2171694A2 (en) | 2010-04-07 |
EP2171694B1 EP2171694B1 (en) | 2012-02-29 |
Family
ID=39030869
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08826809A Not-in-force EP2171694B1 (en) | 2007-07-23 | 2008-07-22 | Method for monitoring a space accessible through a control door and control door |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20120262269A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2171694B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE547779T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2694331A1 (en) |
EA (1) | EA016966B1 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2919413B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009016311A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3309756A1 (en) | 2016-10-14 | 2018-04-18 | Gunnebo Electronic Security (Société Par Actions Simplifiée) | Method for monitoring the uniqueness of passage, system for monitoring the uniqueness of passage making it possible to implement said method, and door or corridor device provided with such a system |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SE544624C2 (en) * | 2019-11-04 | 2022-09-27 | Assa Abloy Ab | Setting a people sensor in a power save mode based on a closed signal indicating that a door of a doorway is closed |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4048500A (en) * | 1976-11-08 | 1977-09-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Infrared background suppression |
FR2596900B3 (en) * | 1986-04-02 | 1988-06-10 | Aep Sa | ACCESS CONTROL DEVICE |
DE3623792C1 (en) * | 1986-07-15 | 1987-12-10 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Device for determining the number of people and direction within a room to be monitored or a passage gate |
US4823010A (en) * | 1987-05-11 | 1989-04-18 | The Stanley Works | Sliding door threshold sensor |
DE4001219C1 (en) * | 1990-01-17 | 1991-04-25 | Gallenschuetz Metallbau Gmbh, 7580 Buehl, De | |
GB0008037D0 (en) * | 2000-04-01 | 2000-05-24 | Integrated Design Limited | Monitoring entry through doorways |
WO2002095692A1 (en) * | 2001-05-21 | 2002-11-28 | Gunnebo Mayor Ltd. | Security door |
US7623674B2 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2009-11-24 | Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation | Method and system for enhanced portal security through stereoscopy |
US20070268145A1 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2007-11-22 | Bazakos Michael E | Automated tailgating detection via fusion of video and access control |
-
2007
- 2007-07-23 FR FR0756682A patent/FR2919413B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-07-22 EP EP08826809A patent/EP2171694B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2008-07-22 WO PCT/FR2008/051376 patent/WO2009016311A2/en active Application Filing
- 2008-07-22 AT AT08826809T patent/ATE547779T1/en active
- 2008-07-22 CA CA2694331A patent/CA2694331A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2008-07-22 US US12/452,661 patent/US20120262269A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2008-07-22 EA EA201000235A patent/EA016966B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2009016311A2 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3309756A1 (en) | 2016-10-14 | 2018-04-18 | Gunnebo Electronic Security (Société Par Actions Simplifiée) | Method for monitoring the uniqueness of passage, system for monitoring the uniqueness of passage making it possible to implement said method, and door or corridor device provided with such a system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EA016966B1 (en) | 2012-08-30 |
EA201000235A1 (en) | 2010-06-30 |
ATE547779T1 (en) | 2012-03-15 |
US20120262269A1 (en) | 2012-10-18 |
FR2919413B1 (en) | 2009-11-13 |
WO2009016311A2 (en) | 2009-02-05 |
EP2171694B1 (en) | 2012-02-29 |
CA2694331A1 (en) | 2009-02-05 |
WO2009016311A3 (en) | 2009-04-09 |
FR2919413A1 (en) | 2009-01-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
FR2790576A1 (en) | IDENTIFICATION METHOD FOR ACCESSING PROTECTED AREAS AND IMPLEMENTATION CAB | |
EP1579393A2 (en) | Automatic gate and associated method for permitting or preventing access | |
US8558887B2 (en) | Virtual guard gate for a gated community and method therefor | |
EP3554948B1 (en) | Secure terminal | |
EP2171694B1 (en) | Method for monitoring a space accessible through a control door and control door | |
BE1019760A3 (en) | SCANNER ARRANGEMENT. | |
EP3309756B1 (en) | Method for monitoring the uniqueness of passage, system for monitoring the uniqueness of passage making it possible to implement said method, and door or corridor device provided with such a system | |
EP3662457A1 (en) | Alarm device distinguishing between lawful occupier and intruder | |
FR2571419A1 (en) | Safety door with access control sensitive to the weight of a person | |
EP1581911A1 (en) | Access control system | |
BE1028475B1 (en) | Automatic swing door and sensor | |
FR2651014A1 (en) | SECRET LOCK SAFE | |
EP2305931A1 (en) | Device for reinforcement of the locking of a door for a protected space | |
FR2926910A1 (en) | Parking lot for e.g. bicycle, has identification unit identifying vehicle in air lock unit to open inner door, person door allowing person to exit from lot, and exit unit formed of lock unit and inner/outer doors to exit vehicle from lot | |
FR2598173A1 (en) | Lock chamber for protecting against attack with entrance and exit movement monitoring | |
FR2937006A1 (en) | Aircraft i.e. airplane, has inner wall made of electrochromic material that is introduced to choose transparent state to see person in one of zones from other zone through wall and to choose opaque state inhibiting view of person | |
EP2230372A1 (en) | Security entry lock | |
BE1027339B1 (en) | DOOR LOCKING SYSTEM | |
FR3071269B1 (en) | ELECTROMAGNETIC LOCKING DOOR CLOSURE ASSEMBLY | |
FR2871505A1 (en) | Safe`s top part opening device for e.g. jewelry, has vertical chain placed inside tank of safe and fixed under tray permitting to actuate assembly formed of top side, vertical wall and tray using electronic control | |
FR2738935A1 (en) | INSTALLATION OF ACCESS CONTROL WITH A TOURNAMENT FOLLOWED BY A DOOR | |
FR3019581A1 (en) | ACCESS BARRIER CONTROL, IN PARTICULAR FOR MEANS OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT, PUBLIC PREMISES AND THE LIKE | |
FR3110017A1 (en) | Device for managing crowds in a space | |
EP1879484A1 (en) | Post office box and post office box system | |
FR2561299A1 (en) | Functional security device for the entrance and exit of premises to be protected |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20091211 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100510 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 547779 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120315 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120426 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: ING. MARCO ZARDI C/O M. ZARDI & CO. S.A. |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: GULDE HENGELHAUPT ZIEBIG & SCHNEIDER, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: GULDE & PARTNER PATENT- UND RECHTSANWALTSKANZL, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20120229 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120629 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120529 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120530 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120629 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 547779 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120229 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: GUNNEBO ELECTRONIC SECURITY (SOCIETE PAR ACTIONS Effective date: 20120731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20121130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120609 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120529 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20130710 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120722 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080722 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140723 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20180720 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G07C0009020000 Ipc: G07C0009100000 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190722 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190722 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20200721 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20200922 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20200722 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: GULDE & PARTNER PATENT- UND RECHTSANWALTSKANZL, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: FICHET TECHNOLOGIES (S.A.S.), FR Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GUNNEBO ELECTRONIC SECURITY (S.A.S.), BALDENHEIM, FR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: FICHET TECHNOLOGIES, FR Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GUNNEBO ELECTRONIC SECURITY (SOCIETE PAR ACTIONS SIMPLIFIEE), FR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602008013813 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210731 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220201 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210731 |