EP2142487A1 - Coated particle with shimmering appearance and engineered stone containing coated particles - Google Patents

Coated particle with shimmering appearance and engineered stone containing coated particles

Info

Publication number
EP2142487A1
EP2142487A1 EP08754214A EP08754214A EP2142487A1 EP 2142487 A1 EP2142487 A1 EP 2142487A1 EP 08754214 A EP08754214 A EP 08754214A EP 08754214 A EP08754214 A EP 08754214A EP 2142487 A1 EP2142487 A1 EP 2142487A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
particle
particles
coated
coating
refractive
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP08754214A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Kevin Bergevin
Kimberley L. Irish
Jocelyn M. Willis-Papi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EIDP Inc
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Publication of EP2142487A1 publication Critical patent/EP2142487A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B14/00Use of inorganic materials as fillers, e.g. pigments, for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Treatment of inorganic materials specially adapted to enhance their filling properties in mortars, concrete or artificial stone
    • C04B14/02Granular materials, e.g. microballoons
    • C04B14/04Silica-rich materials; Silicates
    • C04B14/22Glass ; Devitrified glass
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B20/00Use of materials as fillers for mortars, concrete or artificial stone according to more than one of groups C04B14/00 - C04B18/00 and characterised by shape or grain distribution; Treatment of materials according to more than one of the groups C04B14/00 - C04B18/00 specially adapted to enhance their filling properties in mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Expanding or defibrillating materials
    • C04B20/10Coating or impregnating
    • C04B20/12Multiple coating or impregnating
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B20/00Use of materials as fillers for mortars, concrete or artificial stone according to more than one of groups C04B14/00 - C04B18/00 and characterised by shape or grain distribution; Treatment of materials according to more than one of the groups C04B14/00 - C04B18/00 specially adapted to enhance their filling properties in mortars, concrete or artificial stone; Expanding or defibrillating materials
    • C04B20/10Coating or impregnating
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B26/00Compositions of mortars, concrete or artificial stone, containing only organic binders, e.g. polymer or resin concrete
    • C04B26/02Macromolecular compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C04CEMENTS; CONCRETE; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES
    • C04BLIME, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF, e.g. MORTARS, CONCRETE OR LIKE BUILDING MATERIALS; ARTIFICIAL STONE; CERAMICS; REFRACTORIES; TREATMENT OF NATURAL STONE
    • C04B2111/00Mortars, concrete or artificial stone or mixtures to prepare them, characterised by specific function, property or use
    • C04B2111/80Optical properties, e.g. transparency or reflexibility

Definitions

  • This invention is directed to a coated particle which has a shimmering appearance to an observer and to an engineered stone also having a shimmering appearance due to incorporation of coated particles.
  • Engineered stone products may be produced by a well known procedure commercialized by Breton S.p.A. of Castello di Godego, Italy, so-called "Breton Stone".
  • resin precursors are blended at low weight percentages with crushed stone aggregate to provide a relatively dry mass of material, distributed evenly on a support carrier, vibro-compacted under vacuum and then cured to yield a rigid product.
  • a process used to practice this technology is disclosed by Toncelli in U.S. Patent No. 4,698,010. Breton Stone materials are disclosed for use as flooring tile.
  • Subsequent improvements to the technology such as US Patent No. 6,387,985 to Wilkinson and Burchfield increased the uses of the material for general surfacing, particularly making it suitable for use as a countertop.
  • Zodiaq ® Quartz Surfacing from DuPont is an example of a commercially available engineered stone. Whether the product is floor tile or countertop, the slab produced by the Breton Stone process requires calibration to render it planar and uniform in thickness, as well as to reveal the aesthetic features of the product. This is followed by polishing to render the surface glossy. As described in US Patent No. 6,387,985, materials may be added for a decorative effect. Decorative additives are distinguished from stone fillers primarily by the amount present in the composition. The crushed natural stone filler acts as an aggregate and is typically present in the a range from 85% to 95% by weight.
  • Decorative additives such as gemstones, metal flake or filings, micas, seashells, pearls, colored or transparent polymeric particles, mirrored particles and pigments have been added in attempts to increase the visual appeal and aesthetic qualities of the engineered stone. However, these quantities typically have not exceeded about 5% by weight, and preferably, do not exceed 2% by weight.
  • the decorative additives are thoroughly mixed with the other components during the blending, or placed on the surface subsequent to distribution on the support carrier and prior to vibro- compaction.
  • a limiting factor in the incorporation of a decorative additive is due to contact with heavy aggregates during manufacture of the final article. Such aggregate can act to minimize or destroy the desired decorative effect of the additive.
  • the present invention is directed to a coated particle having a shimmering appearance to an observer comprising; (a) a refractive particle;
  • the present invention is directed to an engineered stone containing coated particles.
  • a critical requirement in the present invention is visual in nature and more specifically the requirement is directed to a shimmering appearance which is present in a coated particle. Also the shimmering appearance is imparted by incorporation of the coated particles into an engineered stone .
  • the word “shimmering” is used in its normal meaning, namely to shine with a tremulous or fitful light.
  • “Tremulous” likewise is used in its normal meaning namely characterized by trembling or tremours.
  • the first required component of the invention is a transparent particle which has the ability to refract light.
  • the degree of transparency of the particle may vary; illustratively s translucent particle may be employed while in contrast an opaque particle is not suitable. Glass and transparent quartz are preferred materials for such particle.
  • the transparent particle which refracts light may- vary in size. A particle having a size in a range from 10 mesh to 3 mesh is preferred, in order to have a large enough particle to demonstrate the shimmering effect, while not being too large such that the particle would not be able to pass through a manufacturing process without being fractured. A larger particle can be used with modification to the process parameters.
  • the surface of the transparent particle can be planar, but curved and multifaceted surfaces are of more interest aesthetically in that they demonstrate more shimmering effect as the angle of observation changes. It is understood that both larger and smaller particles may be employed. However, generally at least 50% and more preferably 80% of the transparent, refractive particles will be present in the ranges set forth above in a final product of an engineered stone .
  • a coating is applied to the transparent refractive particle which coating is needed to provide abrasion resistance. Also the coating serves as a binder to hold additional particles as will be more fully described below.
  • a preferred coating comprises a polyester which typically prior to polymerization contains coupling agent and catalyst .
  • An example of a suitable polyester coating is described in USP 3,278,662 and USP 5,321,055.
  • an acrylic coating can be employed such as disclosed in USP 6,387,985.
  • the coating prior to polymerization typically has a viscosity in a range from 1000 to 50,000 centipoise, preferably in the range from 15,000 to 40,000 centipoise to effectively coat the transparent refractive particle.
  • Polymerization, or "curing" of the coating can occur, as it is known to those skilled in the art, by chemical initiation, thermal or UV/Visible light, depending on the nature of the polymer with which the coating is formulated.
  • a first additive reflects light, while a second additive refracts light.
  • An example of an additive which reflects light is a metal (such as copper and brass) which also includes alloys. Additional examples include mica, holographic particles, metallized polyesters and reflective polymers including pearlescent and fluorescent pigments. Examples of a second additive which refract light are glass and transparent quartz.
  • the two additives which reflect or refract light will be in particle form and will be embedded within the coating.
  • the refractive particles will be concentrated near the outer surface of the coating (i.e. the surface which does not contact the innermost transparent refractive particle to which the coating is applied) .
  • the concentration and size of the particles is not critical with the understanding that both concentration and size affect the desired shimmering appearance and it is necessary for the particles to be embedded within the transparent coating.
  • the reflective particles will be uniformly distributed within the coating.
  • An example of a size for such particles is in a range from lmicron to 3 millimeters.
  • the refractive particles need to be concentrated near the outer surface of the coating and will be smaller.
  • An example of a size for such particle is in a range from 325 mesh to 34 mesh. In a preferred mode the refractive particle will be concentrated at the surface of the coating .
  • a further beneficial effect is present from the additive which is concentrated at the surface of the coated particle. Such benefit minimizes or eliminates agglomeration of coated particles since a number are formed at the same time.
  • an individual particle can cause a color shift which is considered to be caused by a combination of refraction and reflection. Such color shift is within the scope of the present invention.
  • the coated particles described above are incorporated into an engineered stone to provide the shimmering appearance in the stone .
  • engineered stone is well known in the art and is specific to a naturally occurring mineral in combination with a binder and other additives.
  • the engineered stone contains 85 to 95 % by weight mineral and the remainder binder (on a basis of mineral and binder) .
  • a preferred engineered stone contains quartz in the amount stated with binder such as polyester or acrylic.
  • the binder may be the same binder as employed for the coating of the particles.
  • the amount of coated particles to impart a shimmering effect is not critical but illustratively will be present in an amount of at least 5 percent by weight of the final composition.
  • the engineered stone is typically manufactured in the form of a slab.
  • An advantage of the coated particle additive is an ability to withstand the weight and abrasion present in manufacture of the engineered stone. Such advantage includes an ability to be uniformly- distributed in the engineered stone such that the shimmering appearance is present on different surfaces.
  • the engineered stone is used as a kitchen countertop with an upper surface (i.e. the surface which does not face the floor) and side surfaces can have similar appearances.
  • the coated particle is formed by applying the transparent coating to a reflective particle wherein prior to solidification of the coating both the reflective and refractive additives are present.
  • the coated particle is added in formation of the engineered stone (which manufacture is well known such as set forth in the Background of the Invention) .
  • the coated particle is capable of being mixed into an abrasive mixture and undergoes vibration and compaction without loss of the coating which is needed for the shimmering effect.
  • the coated particle may be added at a later stage of the process to minimize abrasive contact. Typically, this latter addition would require the coated particle be hand placed on the surface of the uncured mix and compacted into the topmost portion of the mix. This is more labor intensive and less efficient. It will also result in coated particles present primarily on the topmost surface and leading to an uneven appearance along edge portions of the engineered stone.
  • an engineered stone material is calibrated to remove surface material for uniformity and polished.
  • Vi x 8 mesh glass of various colors were put into a 4 oz sample cup. This cup was filled approximately 1/3 to Vt full with the glass. A small amount of the resin mixture was added and stirred using a plastic stir rod followed by adding additional resin and stirring until all the glass in the cup was uniformly coated with the resin mixture (approximately 12 - 14% by weight of the binder resin) . The resin coated glass particles were then transferred to a large strainer to allow for any excess resin mixture to drip off the glass. The resin coated glass particles were then transferred to a pail filled with the 30 x 50 mesh fine crushed clear glass.
  • the resin coated glass particles were stirred in the 30 x 50 mesh fine crushed clear glass. The process was repeated to obtain a quantity of resin coated particles having a further coating of 30 x 50 mesh fine crushed clear glass. Any excess of the 30 x 50 mesh fine crushed clear glass was removed by use of a sieve .
  • the resin and glass coated particles were evenly spread on a baking sheet and placed in an oven and the resin cured at 120 degrees Celsius for 45 minutes. Once cured, any remaining loose fine clear crushed glass was separated. The coated particles were placed in a bag and labeled. The above particles were then used in the engineered stone slab making process as follows;
  • Example 2 The above materials were placed in a mixer and blended for 215 seconds. They were conveyed to a lay- down frame and distributed onto a support carrier. The support carrier with distributed mix was conveyed into a vibro-compacter and the materials were compacted. After vibro-compaction, the materials were conveyed into an oven and cured to form a slab of engineered stone. The engineered stone slab was polished with the final article having a desired decorative effect .
  • Example 2 Example 2
  • the above materials were placed in a mixer and blended for 215 seconds. They were conveyed to a lay- down frame and distributed onto a support carrier. The support carrier with distributed mix was conveyed into a vibro-compacter and the materials were compacted. After vibro-compaction, the materials were conveyed into an oven and cured to form a slab of engineered stone. The engineered stone slab was polished with the final article having a desired decorative effect.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)
  • Pigments, Carbon Blacks, Or Wood Stains (AREA)
  • Paints Or Removers (AREA)
  • Aftertreatments Of Artificial And Natural Stones (AREA)
  • Surface Treatment Of Glass (AREA)

Abstract

A coated particle having a shimmering appearance to an observer contains a refractive particle, a transparent coating on the refractive particle, reflective particles and refractive particles embedded in the coating, with one of the reflective particles or the reflective particles primarily at a surface of the coating. Also an engineered stone has a shimmering appearance due to incorporation of coated particles.

Description

TITLE OF INVENTION
COATED PARTICLE WITH SHIMMERING APPEARANCE AND ENGINEERED
STONE CONTAINING COATED PARTICLES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1 • Field of Invention
This invention is directed to a coated particle which has a shimmering appearance to an observer and to an engineered stone also having a shimmering appearance due to incorporation of coated particles.
2. Description of the Related Art
Engineered stone products may be produced by a well known procedure commercialized by Breton S.p.A. of Castello di Godego, Italy, so-called "Breton Stone". In this technology, resin precursors are blended at low weight percentages with crushed stone aggregate to provide a relatively dry mass of material, distributed evenly on a support carrier, vibro-compacted under vacuum and then cured to yield a rigid product. A process used to practice this technology is disclosed by Toncelli in U.S. Patent No. 4,698,010. Breton Stone materials are disclosed for use as flooring tile. Subsequent improvements to the technology, such as US Patent No. 6,387,985 to Wilkinson and Burchfield increased the uses of the material for general surfacing, particularly making it suitable for use as a countertop. Zodiaq® Quartz Surfacing from DuPont is an example of a commercially available engineered stone. Whether the product is floor tile or countertop, the slab produced by the Breton Stone process requires calibration to render it planar and uniform in thickness, as well as to reveal the aesthetic features of the product. This is followed by polishing to render the surface glossy. As described in US Patent No. 6,387,985, materials may be added for a decorative effect. Decorative additives are distinguished from stone fillers primarily by the amount present in the composition. The crushed natural stone filler acts as an aggregate and is typically present in the a range from 85% to 95% by weight. Decorative additives such as gemstones, metal flake or filings, micas, seashells, pearls, colored or transparent polymeric particles, mirrored particles and pigments have been added in attempts to increase the visual appeal and aesthetic qualities of the engineered stone. However, these quantities typically have not exceeded about 5% by weight, and preferably, do not exceed 2% by weight. The decorative additives are thoroughly mixed with the other components during the blending, or placed on the surface subsequent to distribution on the support carrier and prior to vibro- compaction.
However a limiting factor in the incorporation of a decorative additive is due to contact with heavy aggregates during manufacture of the final article. Such aggregate can act to minimize or destroy the desired decorative effect of the additive.
There is a need for an additive which imparts a decorative appearance wherein the additive will remain intact during blending and compacting with heavy aggregates. Also there is a need for an additive which imparts a new visual appearance.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a coated particle having a shimmering appearance to an observer comprising; (a) a refractive particle;
(b) a coating on the refractive particle of (a) ;
(c) reflective particles embedded in the transparent coating of (b) ; (d) refractive particles embedded in the transparent coating of (b) ; with the proviso that the reflective particles of (c) or the refractive particles of (d) are primarily at a surface of the transparent coating.
Also the present invention is directed to an engineered stone containing coated particles.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
A critical requirement in the present invention is visual in nature and more specifically the requirement is directed to a shimmering appearance which is present in a coated particle. Also the shimmering appearance is imparted by incorporation of the coated particles into an engineered stone .
As employed herein the word "shimmering" is used in its normal meaning, namely to shine with a tremulous or fitful light. "Tremulous" likewise is used in its normal meaning namely characterized by trembling or tremours.
Transparent Particles
The first required component of the invention is a transparent particle which has the ability to refract light. The degree of transparency of the particle may vary; illustratively s translucent particle may be employed while in contrast an opaque particle is not suitable. Glass and transparent quartz are preferred materials for such particle. The transparent particle which refracts light may- vary in size. A particle having a size in a range from 10 mesh to 3 mesh is preferred, in order to have a large enough particle to demonstrate the shimmering effect, while not being too large such that the particle would not be able to pass through a manufacturing process without being fractured. A larger particle can be used with modification to the process parameters. The surface of the transparent particle can be planar, but curved and multifaceted surfaces are of more interest aesthetically in that they demonstrate more shimmering effect as the angle of observation changes. It is understood that both larger and smaller particles may be employed. However, generally at least 50% and more preferably 80% of the transparent, refractive particles will be present in the ranges set forth above in a final product of an engineered stone .
Coating
A coating is applied to the transparent refractive particle which coating is needed to provide abrasion resistance. Also the coating serves as a binder to hold additional particles as will be more fully described below. A preferred coating comprises a polyester which typically prior to polymerization contains coupling agent and catalyst . An example of a suitable polyester coating is described in USP 3,278,662 and USP 5,321,055. Also an acrylic coating can be employed such as disclosed in USP 6,387,985. The coating prior to polymerization typically has a viscosity in a range from 1000 to 50,000 centipoise, preferably in the range from 15,000 to 40,000 centipoise to effectively coat the transparent refractive particle.
Polymerization, or "curing" of the coating can occur, as it is known to those skilled in the art, by chemical initiation, thermal or UV/Visible light, depending on the nature of the polymer with which the coating is formulated.
Additives in Coating
In order to obtain the shimmering effect in the coated particle it is necessary to introduce appropriate additives in the coating. As a minimum, a first additive reflects light, while a second additive refracts light.
An example of an additive which reflects light is a metal (such as copper and brass) which also includes alloys. Additional examples include mica, holographic particles, metallized polyesters and reflective polymers including pearlescent and fluorescent pigments. Examples of a second additive which refract light are glass and transparent quartz.
The two additives which reflect or refract light will be in particle form and will be embedded within the coating. However, the refractive particles will be concentrated near the outer surface of the coating (i.e. the surface which does not contact the innermost transparent refractive particle to which the coating is applied) . The concentration and size of the particles is not critical with the understanding that both concentration and size affect the desired shimmering appearance and it is necessary for the particles to be embedded within the transparent coating. Generally the reflective particles will be uniformly distributed within the coating. An example of a size for such particles is in a range from lmicron to 3 millimeters. Generally the refractive particles need to be concentrated near the outer surface of the coating and will be smaller. An example of a size for such particle is in a range from 325 mesh to 34 mesh. In a preferred mode the refractive particle will be concentrated at the surface of the coating .
A further beneficial effect is present from the additive which is concentrated at the surface of the coated particle. Such benefit minimizes or eliminates agglomeration of coated particles since a number are formed at the same time.
In the above description it is understood that an individual particle can cause a color shift which is considered to be caused by a combination of refraction and reflection. Such color shift is within the scope of the present invention.
Engineered Stone
The coated particles described above are incorporated into an engineered stone to provide the shimmering appearance in the stone . Such engineered stone is well known in the art and is specific to a naturally occurring mineral in combination with a binder and other additives. Typically the engineered stone contains 85 to 95 % by weight mineral and the remainder binder (on a basis of mineral and binder) . A preferred engineered stone contains quartz in the amount stated with binder such as polyester or acrylic. The binder may be the same binder as employed for the coating of the particles. The amount of coated particles to impart a shimmering effect is not critical but illustratively will be present in an amount of at least 5 percent by weight of the final composition.
The engineered stone is typically manufactured in the form of a slab. An advantage of the coated particle additive is an ability to withstand the weight and abrasion present in manufacture of the engineered stone. Such advantage includes an ability to be uniformly- distributed in the engineered stone such that the shimmering appearance is present on different surfaces. Illustratively if the engineered stone is used as a kitchen countertop with an upper surface (i.e. the surface which does not face the floor) and side surfaces can have similar appearances.
Manufacture
The coated particle is formed by applying the transparent coating to a reflective particle wherein prior to solidification of the coating both the reflective and refractive additives are present. The coated particle is added in formation of the engineered stone (which manufacture is well known such as set forth in the Background of the Invention) . The coated particle is capable of being mixed into an abrasive mixture and undergoes vibration and compaction without loss of the coating which is needed for the shimmering effect.
The coated particle may be added at a later stage of the process to minimize abrasive contact. Typically, this latter addition would require the coated particle be hand placed on the surface of the uncured mix and compacted into the topmost portion of the mix. This is more labor intensive and less efficient. It will also result in coated particles present primarily on the topmost surface and leading to an uneven appearance along edge portions of the engineered stone.
Typically an engineered stone material is calibrated to remove surface material for uniformity and polished.
It is understood that conventional additives may be added to coated particles and/or the engineered stone composition. The following examples are provided to further illustrate the present invention. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
Example 1
The following materials were used. 1A x 8 Mesh Glass (Clear , Brown & Green)
30x50 Mesh Fine Crushed Clear Glass
Valspar Promoted Quartz Casting Resin 5766C00012 with approximately 25% Styrene
Luperox 26M50- -peroxide Silquest A- 174—coupling agent
Siberline Silver Holograhic Flake GP 188SV
100 grams of resin were poured into a plastic container. 1 gram of both Luperox 26M50 and Silquest A- 174 were added to the resin and stirred until well mixed. To this mixture, 5 grams of Silberline Silver Holographic Flake GP 188 SV was added and stirred until completely mixed.
Vi x 8 mesh glass of various colors (clear, or brown or green) were put into a 4 oz sample cup. This cup was filled approximately 1/3 to Vt full with the glass. A small amount of the resin mixture was added and stirred using a plastic stir rod followed by adding additional resin and stirring until all the glass in the cup was uniformly coated with the resin mixture (approximately 12 - 14% by weight of the binder resin) . The resin coated glass particles were then transferred to a large strainer to allow for any excess resin mixture to drip off the glass. The resin coated glass particles were then transferred to a pail filled with the 30 x 50 mesh fine crushed clear glass. Using protective gloves with neoprene on the outside, the resin coated glass particles were stirred in the 30 x 50 mesh fine crushed clear glass. The process was repeated to obtain a quantity of resin coated particles having a further coating of 30 x 50 mesh fine crushed clear glass. Any excess of the 30 x 50 mesh fine crushed clear glass was removed by use of a sieve .
The resin and glass coated particles were evenly spread on a baking sheet and placed in an oven and the resin cured at 120 degrees Celsius for 45 minutes. Once cured, any remaining loose fine clear crushed glass was separated. The coated particles were placed in a bag and labeled. The above particles were then used in the engineered stone slab making process as follows;
Materials
1.466 kg Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) pigment
0.070 kg Peroxide catalyst 6.400 kg Valspar . resin
0.104 kg Silquest A-174 silane coupling agent
04.550 kg Coated particles additive
13.410 kg 10 mesh quartz aggregate
21.556 kg 34 mesh quartz aggregate 7.900 kg 84 mesh quartz aggregate
18.45 kg 325 mesh quartz aggregate
The above materials were placed in a mixer and blended for 215 seconds. They were conveyed to a lay- down frame and distributed onto a support carrier. The support carrier with distributed mix was conveyed into a vibro-compacter and the materials were compacted. After vibro-compaction, the materials were conveyed into an oven and cured to form a slab of engineered stone. The engineered stone slab was polished with the final article having a desired decorative effect . Example 2
The following materials were used
3/8 x 1A mesh Clear Glass
Silverbond 325 mesh powder
84 mesh quartz
Valspar promoted quartz casting resin 5766C00012 with 19% styrene
Luperox 26M50 Peroxide
Silquest A- 174 Coupling Agent
Sparkle Silvex 755-20-C Aluminum pigment
Afflair 600 Black Mica pigment.
126 grams of resin was poured into a plastic container,
2.5 grams of both Luperox 26M50 and Silquest A-174 were added to the resin and stirred until mixed. To this mixture 6.5 grams of Sparkle Silvex 755-20-C Aluminum pigment and 3.1 grams of Afflair 600 Black Mica pigment was added and stirred until completely mixed.
500 grams of 3/8 x 1A mesh clear glass was put into a stainless steel bowl . A small amount of the resin mixture was added and stirred using the plastic stir rods. Adding resin mixture and stirring until all the glass in the cup was uniformly coated with the resin mixture. The coated glass particles were then transferred to a pail filled with Silverbond 325 mesh powder and 84 mesh Quartz. The coated glass particles were stirred around in the fines until coated. Repeating the above process until there is a quantity of coated particles in the fines. Once there were enough coated particles, the fines were poured through a sieve to separate the fines from the coated glass particles. The coated glass particles were evenly spread on a baking sheet and placed in the oven. Alternately, some particle were left in the particle fines and cured. The coated particles cured at 120 degrees Celsius for 45 minutes. Once cured any remaining loose fines were separated from the coated particles. The coated particles were placed in a bag and labeled.
The above particles were then used in the engineered stone slab making process as follows;
Materials
0.009 kg Bayer Black 318M pigment
0.180 kg Sparkle Silvex 755-20-C pigment
0.058 kg Peroxide catalyst 2.890 kg Valspar redsin
0.043 kg Silquest A-174 Silane coupling agent
5.680 kg Coated particles additive
8.285 kg 10 mesh quartz aggregate
6.917 kg 34 mesh quartz aggregate 2.605 kg 84 mesh quartz aggregate
8.155 kg 325 mesh quartz aggregate
The above materials were placed in a mixer and blended for 215 seconds. They were conveyed to a lay- down frame and distributed onto a support carrier. The support carrier with distributed mix was conveyed into a vibro-compacter and the materials were compacted. After vibro-compaction, the materials were conveyed into an oven and cured to form a slab of engineered stone. The engineered stone slab was polished with the final article having a desired decorative effect.

Claims

CLAIMSWHAT IS CLAIMED IS;
1. A coated particle having a shimmering appearance to an observer comprising:
(a) a refractive particle;
(b) a transparent coating on the refractive particle of (a) ; (c) reflective particles embedded in the coating of (b) ;
(d) refractive particles embedded in the coating of (b) ; with the proviso that the reflective particles of (c) or the refractive particles of (d) are primarily at a surface of the coating.
2. The coated particle of claim 1, wherein the refractive particle of a has a size within a range from 10 mesh to 3 mesh.
3. The coated particle of claim 1, wherein the refractive particles of (d) are primarily at the outer surface of the coating.
4. The coated particle of claim 3, wherein the refractive particles of (d) have a size in a range form 325mesh to 34 mesh.
5. The coated particle of claim 1, wherein at least a portion, the reflective particle of (c) have a size in a range from 1 micron to 3 millmeters .
6. The coated particle of claim 1, wherein the refractive particle of (a) is glass.
7. The coated particle of claim 1, wherein the transparent coating of (b) comprises a polyester containing polymer.
8. The coated particle of claim 1, wherein the transparent coating of (b) comprises an acrylic containing polymer.
9. The coated particle of claim 1, wherein the reflective particles of (c) are metal.
10. The coated particle of claim 1, wherein the refractive particles of (d) are glass.
11. The coated particle of claim 1, wherein (a) is glass, (b) comprises a polyester containing polymer, (c) is metal and (d) is glass.
12. An engineered stone sheet having a shimmering appearance to an observer comprising naturally occurring mineral in particle form and a binder, wherein the sheet additionally contains a number of coated particles with each of the coated particles comprising :
(a) a refractive particle;
(b) a coating on the refractive particle of (a) ;
(c) reflective particles embedded in the coating of (b) ;
(d) refractive particles embedded in the coating of (b) ; with the proviso that the reflective particles of (c) or the refractive particles of (d) are primarily at a surface of the coating.
EP08754214A 2007-05-04 2008-05-05 Coated particle with shimmering appearance and engineered stone containing coated particles Withdrawn EP2142487A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US92783707P 2007-05-04 2007-05-04
PCT/US2008/005763 WO2008137129A1 (en) 2007-05-04 2008-05-05 Coated particle with shimmering appearance and engineered stone containing coated particles

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2142487A1 true EP2142487A1 (en) 2010-01-13

Family

ID=39637689

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08754214A Withdrawn EP2142487A1 (en) 2007-05-04 2008-05-05 Coated particle with shimmering appearance and engineered stone containing coated particles

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2142487A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2010526021A (en)
KR (1) KR20100017591A (en)
CN (1) CN101675012A (en)
CA (1) CA2683540A1 (en)
MX (1) MX2009011803A (en)
WO (1) WO2008137129A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2010214758B2 (en) * 2009-11-10 2012-05-24 Lotte Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Colored Material Coated Transparent Chip for Artificial Stone, Method of Preparing Same, and Artificial Stone including Same
KR101851396B1 (en) * 2009-11-10 2018-04-23 롯데첨단소재(주) Colored Material Coated Transparent Chip and Native Rock Combined With Resin Composition Including The Same
CN103274619B (en) * 2013-06-19 2015-01-07 交通运输部公路科学研究所 Color reflective anti-slip aggregate and preparation method thereof
CN117105698B (en) * 2023-09-12 2024-07-09 福建省德化县鹏立达陶瓷工艺有限公司 Flash rock glaze ceramic imitating rough surface and preparation method thereof

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4402432C2 (en) * 1994-01-27 1996-01-18 Schultze Kraft Andreas Granite-like polymer artificial stones made of coated waste glass granulate
WO1996013469A1 (en) * 1994-10-31 1996-05-09 Doppel Co., Ltd. Artificial stone composition and method of manufacturing artificial stones
JP4086469B2 (en) * 1998-01-16 2008-05-14 株式会社アベイラス Artificial stone
US20020119302A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-08-29 Nippon Paint Co., Ltd. Coating composition and method
US20050230663A1 (en) * 2001-10-03 2005-10-20 Sumiyo Yamanashi Artificial stone and formation therefor
MXPA05000008A (en) * 2002-06-19 2005-04-08 Availvs Corp Artificial stone wall material.
DE10231858A1 (en) * 2002-07-12 2004-01-22 Andreas Schultze-Kraft Solvent-free process for the hydrophobic color coating of glass granules

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2008137129A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MX2009011803A (en) 2009-11-13
WO2008137129A1 (en) 2008-11-13
CA2683540A1 (en) 2008-11-13
KR20100017591A (en) 2010-02-16
JP2010526021A (en) 2010-07-29
CN101675012A (en) 2010-03-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2182965C (en) Moulded plastic parts with a plastic matrix filled with inorganic fillers
US20090274909A1 (en) Coated particle with shimmering appearance and engineered stone containing coated particles
EP1841709A1 (en) Artificial marble having a crack pattern and method for preparing thereof
AU2005329662A1 (en) Method of producing artificial stone slabs with methacrylate resin for external use by means of vibro-compression under vacuum
KR100518047B1 (en) Non-slip artificial stone
US20080296795A1 (en) Process to create decorative pattern in engineered stone
KR102718659B1 (en) Knife for manufacturing vein pattern of artificial marble and method for manufacturing artificial marble using the same
WO2008137129A1 (en) Coated particle with shimmering appearance and engineered stone containing coated particles
AU2010214758A1 (en) Colored Material Coated Transparent Chip for Artificial Stone, Method of Preparing Same, and Artificial Stone including Same
CN100528789C (en) Artificial marble containing three-dimensional transparent marble chips and preparation method thereof
EP3555185A1 (en) Solid polymeric highly durable surfacing
CN101218187B (en) Composition for acrylic artificial marble
CN103052608B (en) Comprise artificial marble and the manufacture method thereof of tabular cullet chip
US20090274895A1 (en) Decorative coated particle and engineered stone containing such particles
CA2348407C (en) High-hardness, soft composite material
JP4294119B2 (en) Antibacterial artificial stone and its manufacturing method
JPH02199050A (en) Artificial stone and production thereof
CZ297998B6 (en) Synthetic stone of high transparency, process for its manufacture and use
JPH0383842A (en) Production of grained artificial stone
JPH02233571A (en) Stone-textured artificial stone
JP2761006B2 (en) Stone-grain artificial stone
KR20220074810A (en) Artificial marble having reticular pattern on its surface and manufacturing method thereof
US11708292B1 (en) Glass/quartz composite surface
JPH02133352A (en) Stone grained artificial stone
CN119118568A (en) Artificial stone plate and preparation method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20091020

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20111019

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20120301