EP2059605A1 - Process for in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process - Google Patents

Process for in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process

Info

Publication number
EP2059605A1
EP2059605A1 EP07787595A EP07787595A EP2059605A1 EP 2059605 A1 EP2059605 A1 EP 2059605A1 EP 07787595 A EP07787595 A EP 07787595A EP 07787595 A EP07787595 A EP 07787595A EP 2059605 A1 EP2059605 A1 EP 2059605A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
product
solvent
process according
crystallisation
bioconversion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP07787595A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Maria Claudia Cuellar Soares
Adrianus Johannes Jozef Straathof
Van Der Lucas Antonius Maria Wielen
Van De Emilius Johannes Albertus Xaverius Sandt
Johannes Joseph Heijnen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
DSM IP Assets BV
Original Assignee
DSM IP Assets BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by DSM IP Assets BV filed Critical DSM IP Assets BV
Priority to EP07787595A priority Critical patent/EP2059605A1/en
Publication of EP2059605A1 publication Critical patent/EP2059605A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12PFERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P13/00Preparation of nitrogen-containing organic compounds
    • C12P13/04Alpha- or beta- amino acids
    • C12P13/22Tryptophan; Tyrosine; Phenylalanine; 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine
    • C12P13/222Phenylalanine

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for in situ removal of a product in a bioconversion process.
  • a bioconversion process may for instance be a fermentation process or an enzymatic process.
  • Products formed in a bioconversion process may be toxic to the microorganism and/or may be inhibiting to a biocatalyst (enzyme or microorganism) when the product reaches a certain concentration.
  • the product may be degraded or side reactions may occur in a bioconversion process. Therefore, it is difficult to reach high product concentrations in a bioconversion process.
  • WO03/092853 discloses a method for the integrated separation of one or more organic substances present in an aqueous bio- process mixture containing at least one positively charged and/or chargeable group containing nitrogen by means of reactive extraction in at least one step.
  • the reactive extraction applied in the process according to WO 03/092853 uses at least one liquid- liquid centrifuge. The isolation of products is often difficult.
  • micoorganisms are grown in a medium consisting of numerous compounds. Products produced by the microorganisms need to be removed from the fermentation broth, which consists of liquid and solid compounds.
  • the aim of the present invention is the provision of an alternative process for the in situ removal of a product in a bioconversion process.
  • the present invention relates to a process for the in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process.
  • the process comprises (i) preparing the product under bioconversion conditions, wherein the bioreactor comprises a reaction mixture which comprises (a) a solvent and the product; and (b) a catalyst for bioconversion, (ii) recycling part of the reaction mixture through an external crystallisation loop and (iii) recovering the product in crystal form by removal of the solvent.
  • in-situ crystallisation is meant to include a process in which the product is removed during production and recovered in crystal form.
  • in-situ crystallisation takes place in an external crystallisation loop, i.e. outside the bioreactor, and involves the removal of the solvent.
  • the removal of solvent takes place before or during crystallisation.
  • Any crystallisation method may be used for instance cooled crystallisation or uncooled crystallisation, such as evaporative crystallisation or anti-solvent crystallisation, in which process an anti-solvent is added which decreases the solubility of the product.
  • the crystallisation may also take place at a temperature which is higher than the temperature of the bioconversion reaction, for instance when the product is L- phenylalanine.
  • crystallisation takes place at a temperature of at least 30 degrees C, more preferably at a temperature of at least 35 or 40 degrees C.
  • the product in crystal form is advantageously separated from the mother liquor by known methods in the art, for instance filtration or centrifugation.
  • a first advantage of the process according to the present invention is that a higher production rate may be obtained in bioconversion processes due to the external crystallisation loop. Another advantage is that the solvent removed may be used to wash the crystallised product which reduces the amount of water to be used. Yet another advantage of the present invention is that the removal of solvent in the external crystallisation loop results in recycle flows with reduced volumes. As a consequence the recycle flows become more manageable.
  • Another advantage of the process of the present invention is that the product is obtained in crystallised form which is the preferred form for most commercial chemicals which are produced by fermentation. In the process, the number of downstream processing steps are reduced and the production process of the product is thus simplified.
  • Another advantage is that less equipment is required to obtain the product in pure crystalline form, which leads to a cost reduction.
  • Yet another advantage is that the use of extraction solvents that are normally required to obtain the product in pure form, is avoided.
  • a bioconversion process refers to a process in which one or more products are produced by means of a biological reaction.
  • the catalyst used is typically an enzyme or a microorganism and may be free or immobilized.
  • under bioconversion conditions refers to conditions which allow for bioconversion.
  • the bioconversion process is a fermentation process and the catalyst is a microbial cell.
  • micro- organisms that are used in industrial fermentation processes and that can be used in the process of the invention include Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Escherichia coli, Penicillium sp., Corynebacterium sp., Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas putida, Pichia pastoris, Streptomyces clavuligerus, and microalgae such as Dunaliella sp. Other micro-organisms can be used as well.
  • Products which can be produced in crystal form by industrial fermentation processes and which are suitable for the present invention include amino acids, peptides, proteins, carboxylic acids, carboxylates, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, steroids, isoprenoids, carotenoids, cyclitols or any other primary or secondary metabolites, as well as derivatives, salts or esters thereof.
  • Some specific examples include phenylalanine, fumaric acid, sodium glutamate, lysine, tyrosine, tryptophan, aspartate, penicillin, cephalosporin, riboflavin, clavulanic acid and ⁇ -carotene. This list of products merely serves as example and should not be considered limiting.
  • ⁇ cells are grown at 15 to 40 0 C, preferably at about 30°C-37°C in appropriate media.
  • Preferred growth media for the present invention are common commercially prepared media.
  • Other defined or synthetic growth media may also be used and the appropriate medium for growth of the particular micro- organism will be known by someone skilled in the art of microbiology or fermentation science.
  • the pH at the start of the fermentation is typically between pH 2.0 and pH 9.0, preferably between pH 3.0 and pH 8.0, more preferably between pH 5.0 and pH 8.0.
  • Reactions may be performed under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. Preferably, the reactions are performed under aerobic conditions.
  • Reactions that can be used in the method according to the present invention include for example the production of L- phenylalanine from sugars by recombinant Escherichia coli, the production of clavulanic acid by the filamentous microorganism Streptomyces clavuligerus, the production of glutamic acid by Corynebacterium glutamicum, and the production of carotenes by microalgae such as Dunaliella sp.
  • the solvent removed will typically be aqueous since the fermentation medium will typically be aqueous, viz. water or a mixture of water and an organic solvent such as an alkane, alcohol, ether, or ketone, in a preferred embodiment, the solvent is water.
  • the solvent may be removed by evaporation, dialysis, pervaporation, reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, nanofiltration, eutectic freezing or other known methods.
  • the solvent removed in the crystallisation loop may be partly recycled to the bioreactor (see Figure 1 ) or may be used for washing the crystals.
  • the present invention may be practised using batch, fed-batch or continuous fermentation.
  • Fed-batch fermentations may for example be performed with carbon feed, for example glucose limited or in excess.
  • the fermentation feed e.g. glucose or ethanol
  • the fermentation feed can also partly or completely be fed to the crystalliser in the external crystallisation loop. Partly or completely feeding the fermentation feed to the crystalliser may reduce the solubility of the product (anti- solvent effect), so that a smaller proportion of the product will be in the mother liquor that is recycled to the bioreactor.
  • Mother liquor, wash solvent and their mixtures can be purged to minimise the chance of product inhibition, or returned to the bioreactor to minimise losses.
  • the process as described in the invention may be preceded by a growth phase in which the biomass is grown up to a suitable concentration, preferably 10-50 g cell dry weight per liter. Also, the process may be followed by a phase in which fermentation is halted, so that the remaining dissolved product can be crystallised and harvested.
  • the external crystallisation loop preferably comprises means for separating the catalyst from the rest of the reaction mixture to obtain a catalyst-free solution.
  • catalyst-free solution refers to a solution which is substantially free of catalyst.
  • Suitable means for separating the catalyst include membranes, such as an ultrafiltration membrane, filters and centrifuges. Examples of catalyst-free solutions thus include permeates, filtrates and supernatants.
  • solvent removal may be combined with anti-solvent addition, temperature reduction, pressure changes, pH changes or seed crystal addition to further improve the results and the process.
  • the amount of removed solvent depends on the solubility of the product and on the specific needs. Preferably, an amount of solvent is removed that just brings the product in supersaturation. In this way, the crystallisation is carried out in a modest way so that the quality of the product increases.
  • the solvent and catalyst-free solution of the external crystallisation loop preferably flow back to the bioreactor for volume control in the bioreactor and for preventing loss of unused feed components.
  • Some desired crystalline products would give at fermentation conditions a crystal morphology which is undesired.
  • the present invention enables to select different temperatures for the fermentation and crystallisation process. In this way, the invention provides a control over the crystal form of the product. For example, at 37°C L- phenylalanine crystallises as fine needles, which turn the solution into a gel-like substance that cannot be filtered. However, at 50 0 C, flake-like crystals are obtained, which can be processed easily.
  • the fermentation medium contained glucose (15 g-L “1 ), MgSO 4 JI-I 2 O (3.0 glL), CaCI 2 .2H 2 O (0.015 g/L), KH 2 PO 4 (3.0 g/L), NaCI (1.0 g/L), (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 (5 g/L), FeSO 4 JH 2 O / NaCitrate (0.1 125 / 1.5 g/L), thiamine.HCI (0.075 g/L), trace elements solution (1.5 ml/L) and antifoam (1 mL/L) in demineralized water, adjusted to pH 6.5 with 6% NH 4 OH.
  • the trace element solution contained CaCI 2 .2H 2 O (10 g/L), FeSO 4 JH 2 O (10 g/L), AICI 3 .6H 2 O (2.5 g/L), MnSO 4 -H 2 O (2.5 g/L), CoCI 2 .6H 2 O (1.75 g/L), Na 2 MoO 4 .2H 2 O (0.5 g/L), ZnSO 4 JH 2 O (0.5 g/L), CuCI 2 .2H 2 O (0.25 g/L) and H 3 BO 3 (0.125 g/L) in 5M HCI solution. Fermentation with cell retention was tested with wild-type strain E. coli K12.
  • LB medium For pre-cultivation, 100 mL of LB medium was inoculated with approximately 1 ml. stock culture, and incubated for approximately 14 h at 37°C and 220 rpm in a shake flask incubator. Fermentation was started by inoculating 1 L fermentation medium with 100 mL pre-cultivation medium in a 2 L jacketed fermenter with three baffles and two Rushton turbine impellers of six blades (Applikon, the Netherlands). The fermenter was sparged using pressurized air at a flow rate of 2.2 L-min "1 , controlled by a mass flow controller (Brooks, United States). The stirring rate was kept constant at 900 rpm.
  • the pH was maintained at 6.5 by controlled addition of acid (4M H 2 SO 4 ) and base (6% v/v NH 4 OH).
  • the temperature was maintained at 37°C.
  • Silicone based antifoam (10% w/w) addition was controlled by a level sensor.
  • the ultrafiltration membrane system which enables cell retention, consisted of a Masterflex peristaltic pump for recirculation (Cole Parmer, United States), an UFP-500- C-3MA hollow fiber membrane cartridge (GE Healthcare, Belgium) and a Masterflex peristaltic pump for the permeate (Cole Parmer, United States).
  • the membrane effective area was 0.014 m 2 and the nominal weight cut off was 500 kDa.
  • Pressure was build up in the system by clamping the retentate tube. Pressure gauges were placed at the membrane feed, retentate and permeate. For this experiment both retentate and permeate were returned to the fermenter.
  • the fed-batch was initialized after about 6 hours by starting the glucose feed
  • the feed rate was fixed at around 8.2 g glucose feed per hour until the cell concentration reached about 25 g/L (approximately 16 hours). At that point, the glucose feed rate was reduced to about 4.3 g glucose feed per hour.
  • Cell retention was started with a permeate flow rate of 1 1 mL-min "1 after the glucose feed had been reduced. The fermentation with cell retention was run for about 24 hours. The cell mass and carbon dioxide yields on glucose were comparable to those of a fermentation without cell retention suggesting that the cell retention system did not affect the fermentation performance.
  • Reagent grade L-phenylalanine (Sigma Aldrich) was used. The solutions with the concentrations described below were prepared by dissolving L-phenylalanine in demineralized water and adjusting the pH to 6.5 by addition of 6% NH 4 OH.
  • This vessel supplied a 2 L stirred vessel (referred to as buffer vessel) which originally contained about 790 g of a L-phenylalanine solution of 12.5 g/kg. In both vessels the stirrer speed was set to 400 rpm and the temperature was controlled at 50 0 C.
  • the reverse osmosis system consisted of a Sepa CF Il membrane module (GE Osmonics), a 3CP1231 stainless steel plunger pump (Cat pumps) and a Sepa CF Thin Film SE reverse osmosis membrane (GE Osmonics).
  • the effective membrane area was 0.014 m 2 .
  • the retentate was recycled to the buffer vessel and the permeate was collected in a separate vessel. Pressure was build up in the system by closing the retentate valve. The pressure was applied in three stages (800, 1000 and 1400 kPa).
  • the L-phenylalanine concentration in the feed vessel increased linearly; after about 5.8 hours the mass in the feed vessel was 490 g with a concentration of 30 g/kg. At that point, the L-phenylalanine retention by the membrane was 96%. This shows that it continuous concentration of L-phenylalanine was possible.
  • a 2 L stirred vessel containing a L-phenylalanine solution of 42.5 g/kg with an outflow rate of 5 g-min "1 was used to mimic the steady-state concentration in the buffer vessel from the reverse osmosis set-up described above.
  • This vessel supplied a 1.5 L stirred vessel (referred to as crystallizer) originally containing 500 g of a L- phenylalanine solution of 44.3 g/kg and with an outflow rate of 5 g/min.
  • the temperature was controlled at 50 and 45°C in the buffer vessel and the crystallizer respectively.
  • the crystallization was started by adding to the crystalliser 0.52 g of seeds in slurry form.
  • the seeds had been prepared by sieving reagent grade L-phenylalanine and collecting the fraction between 125 and 212 ⁇ m.
  • the crystals were kept in the crystallizer by a filter installed in the outlet port.
  • An average steady state dissolved L- phenylalanine concentration of 40.4 g/kg (supersaturation 1.04) was reached after 4 hours. At this concentration, the crystal production rate in the crystallizer was 0.84 g/h.
  • a phenylalanine-producing strain for example, the genetically engineered E. coli W31 10-4pF20
  • This strain is grown following the fed-batch protocol as described by (Takors, Biotechnol. Progr. 20 (2004) 57-64) with the following modifications: starting fermentation mass 1.5 kg; constant tyrosine feed at about 0.2 g/h until the cell concentration reaches about 10 g/kg; at this point, the tyrosine feed is reduced to about 0.04 g/h and a cell retention system as described in Example 1 , but with a permeate rate of about 2.3 g/min is started.
  • the external loop consists of a concentration step (by reverse osmosis) as described in Example 2 and a continuous crystallizer as described in Example 3.
  • the concentration step is required to achieve the degree of supersaturation necessary ( ⁇ 1 -2) for crystallization in a subsequent step.
  • a higher degree of supersaturation is undesirable since this leads to spontaneous crystallization of phenylalanine monohydrate.
  • a supersaturation of 1.04 is chosen.
  • the permeate stream from the cell retention module is connected to the buffer vessel.
  • the temperature in this vessel is maintained at 50 0 C.
  • the concentration is started as described in Example 2, but in two pressure steps: 1200 kPa for a L-phenylalanine concentration in the buffer vessel lower than 30 g/kg and 2000 kPa for higher concentrations.
  • the crystallizer When the concentration of phenylalanine in the buffer vessel reaches the required supersaturation (1.04), the crystallizer is filled with about 0.25 kg of the contents of the buffer vessel at a rate of about 1 g/min. At this point the crystallization as described in Example 3, but with an inflow/outflow rate of about 1 g/min is started.
  • the crystals remain in the crystallizer and the mother liquor is recycled to the fermenter.
  • L-phenylalanine crystals are produced at a rate of 0.7 g/h. This rate equals the L-phenylalanine production rate by the microorganism in the fermenter. This production rate results in a productivity of approximately 1.14 g/L/h which is much higher than the state of the art production rate of 0.67 g/L/h (Takors, Biotechnol. Progr. 20 (2004) 57-64) reached in a system without in situ crystallization by solvent removal.
  • Example 2 A fermentation with cell retention is carried out with a genetically engineered L-
  • E. coli 4pF26 which is a derivative of E. coli K12 which contains a chromosomal deletion delta (pheA tyrA aroF) regarding pheA (coding for chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydratase), tyrA (coding for chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydrogenase), and aroF (coding for the tyrosine-sensitive DAHP synthase (2-deoxy- D-arabino-heptusonate 7-phosphate).
  • pheA tyrA aroF a chromosomal deletion delta
  • the external loop consists of a concentration step (by nanofiltration) required to achieve the degree of supersaturation necessary ( ⁇ 1.2) for crystallization in a subsequent step.
  • a higher degree of supersaturation is undesirable since it might lead to spontaneous crystallization of Phe monohydrate.
  • a supersaturation of 1.04 is chosen.
  • a buffering vessel (feed vessel) is implemented for ease of temperature and concentration control. This vessel supplies both the nanofiltration unit and the crystallizer.
  • a permeate stream from the biomass retention module is connected to the feed vessel.
  • This vessel is filled with a liquid volume at least equal to the total hold-up volume of the external loop and the liquid volume in the crystallizer (see Table 2).
  • the temperature in this vessel is maintained at 50 0 C by means of a jacket connected to a heating/cooling water bath. Below this temperature phenylalanine might crystallize in the concentration loop, which is undesirable. On the other hand, recirculation at the pressure required for concentration results in a continuous increase in temperature, which might be detrimental for the membrane.
  • the concentration step consists of a SEPA CFII module (GE Osmonics), a nanofiltration membrane (Thin Film HL, GE Osmonics) and a three-plunger pump (CAT Pumps) to provide the appropriate feed flow rate at 5 bar.
  • the minimum flow rate (stream 3) should be 2 L/min in order to achieve a suitable cross flow velocity in the unit (1 m/s).
  • the retentate (stream 5) is returned to the feed vessel.
  • the permeate (stream 4) which still contains nutrients like glucose and tyrosine, is recycled to the fermenter.
  • the crystallizer When the concentration of phenylalanine in the feed vessel reaches the required supersaturation (1.04), the crystallizer is filled up and 0.039 g seed crystals are added. Seed crystals are obtained by sieving phenylalanine anhydrate (Sigma Aldrich, purity >99.0%) and collecting the fraction between 90-212 micrometer. Before addition, a slurry is prepared by adding 1 ml. of cold water. The crystals remain in the crystallizer while the mother liquor is recycled to the fermenter.

Abstract

The present invention relates to a process for the in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process.

Description

PROCESS FOR IN SITU CRYSTALLISATION OF A PRODUCT IN A BIOCONVERSION PROCESS
The present invention relates to a process for in situ removal of a product in a bioconversion process.
A bioconversion process may for instance be a fermentation process or an enzymatic process. Products formed in a bioconversion process, may be toxic to the microorganism and/or may be inhibiting to a biocatalyst (enzyme or microorganism) when the product reaches a certain concentration. In addition, the product may be degraded or side reactions may occur in a bioconversion process. Therefore, it is difficult to reach high product concentrations in a bioconversion process.
On the other hand industrial bioconversion processes demand high product concentrations in order to be commercially interesting. High product concentrations during bioconversion not only translate into higher productivity, but are also linked to simpler and more efficient downstream processes.
The in situ removal of a product in a bioconversion process is a means to overcome the problems mentioned above.
A process for the in situ removal of a product in a bioconversion process is for instance known from WO03/092853. WO03/092853 discloses a method for the integrated separation of one or more organic substances present in an aqueous bio- process mixture containing at least one positively charged and/or chargeable group containing nitrogen by means of reactive extraction in at least one step. The reactive extraction applied in the process according to WO 03/092853 uses at least one liquid- liquid centrifuge. The isolation of products is often difficult. In a fermentation process, micoorganisms are grown in a medium consisting of numerous compounds. Products produced by the microorganisms need to be removed from the fermentation broth, which consists of liquid and solid compounds.
M. Buque-Taboada et. al., Appl. Microb. Biotechnol. (2006) 71 : 1-12 discloses a process for the in situ crystallization of a product during a fermentation process. In this process crystallization is performed outside the bioreactor wherein the product is formed, the crystallized product is separated and the product-depleted mother liquor is recycled to the bioreactor. Despite the developments of in situ product crystallisation (ISPC) of the recent years, there is still a need for improved ISPC processes.
The aim of the present invention is the provision of an alternative process for the in situ removal of a product in a bioconversion process.
Detailed description
The present invention relates to a process for the in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process. The process comprises (i) preparing the product under bioconversion conditions, wherein the bioreactor comprises a reaction mixture which comprises (a) a solvent and the product; and (b) a catalyst for bioconversion, (ii) recycling part of the reaction mixture through an external crystallisation loop and (iii) recovering the product in crystal form by removal of the solvent.
The term "in-situ crystallisation" as used in this invention is meant to include a process in which the product is removed during production and recovered in crystal form. According to the invention, in-situ crystallisation takes place in an external crystallisation loop, i.e. outside the bioreactor, and involves the removal of the solvent. Preferably, the removal of solvent takes place before or during crystallisation. Any crystallisation method may be used for instance cooled crystallisation or uncooled crystallisation, such as evaporative crystallisation or anti-solvent crystallisation, in which process an anti-solvent is added which decreases the solubility of the product. The crystallisation may also take place at a temperature which is higher than the temperature of the bioconversion reaction, for instance when the product is L- phenylalanine. Preferably, crystallisation takes place at a temperature of at least 30 degrees C, more preferably at a temperature of at least 35 or 40 degrees C. The product in crystal form is advantageously separated from the mother liquor by known methods in the art, for instance filtration or centrifugation.
A first advantage of the process according to the present invention is that a higher production rate may be obtained in bioconversion processes due to the external crystallisation loop. Another advantage is that the solvent removed may be used to wash the crystallised product which reduces the amount of water to be used. Yet another advantage of the present invention is that the removal of solvent in the external crystallisation loop results in recycle flows with reduced volumes. As a consequence the recycle flows become more manageable.
Another advantage of the process of the present invention is that the product is obtained in crystallised form which is the preferred form for most commercial chemicals which are produced by fermentation. In the process, the number of downstream processing steps are reduced and the production process of the product is thus simplified.
Another advantage is that less equipment is required to obtain the product in pure crystalline form, which leads to a cost reduction.
Yet another advantage is that the use of extraction solvents that are normally required to obtain the product in pure form, is avoided.
In the present invention, a bioconversion process refers to a process in which one or more products are produced by means of a biological reaction. The catalyst used is typically an enzyme or a microorganism and may be free or immobilized. The phrase "under bioconversion conditions" refers to conditions which allow for bioconversion.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the bioconversion process is a fermentation process and the catalyst is a microbial cell. Some examples of micro- organisms that are used in industrial fermentation processes and that can be used in the process of the invention include Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Escherichia coli, Penicillium sp., Corynebacterium sp., Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas putida, Pichia pastoris, Streptomyces clavuligerus, and microalgae such as Dunaliella sp. Other micro-organisms can be used as well. Products which can be produced in crystal form by industrial fermentation processes and which are suitable for the present invention include amino acids, peptides, proteins, carboxylic acids, carboxylates, carbohydrates, nucleic acids, steroids, isoprenoids, carotenoids, cyclitols or any other primary or secondary metabolites, as well as derivatives, salts or esters thereof. Some specific examples include phenylalanine, fumaric acid, sodium glutamate, lysine, tyrosine, tryptophan, aspartate, penicillin, cephalosporin, riboflavin, clavulanic acid and β-carotene. This list of products merely serves as example and should not be considered limiting. For the fermentation process, typically cells are grown at 15 to 400C, preferably at about 30°C-37°C in appropriate media. Preferred growth media for the present invention are common commercially prepared media. Other defined or synthetic growth media may also be used and the appropriate medium for growth of the particular micro- organism will be known by someone skilled in the art of microbiology or fermentation science.
The pH at the start of the fermentation is typically between pH 2.0 and pH 9.0, preferably between pH 3.0 and pH 8.0, more preferably between pH 5.0 and pH 8.0.
Reactions may be performed under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. Preferably, the reactions are performed under aerobic conditions. Reactions that can be used in the method according to the present invention include for example the production of L- phenylalanine from sugars by recombinant Escherichia coli, the production of clavulanic acid by the filamentous microorganism Streptomyces clavuligerus, the production of glutamic acid by Corynebacterium glutamicum, and the production of carotenes by microalgae such as Dunaliella sp.
In fermentations, the solvent removed will typically be aqueous since the fermentation medium will typically be aqueous, viz. water or a mixture of water and an organic solvent such as an alkane, alcohol, ether, or ketone, in a preferred embodiment, the solvent is water. The solvent may be removed by evaporation, dialysis, pervaporation, reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, nanofiltration, eutectic freezing or other known methods. The solvent removed in the crystallisation loop may be partly recycled to the bioreactor (see Figure 1 ) or may be used for washing the crystals.
The present invention may be practised using batch, fed-batch or continuous fermentation. Fed-batch fermentations may for example be performed with carbon feed, for example glucose limited or in excess.
Instead of being fed directly to the bioreactor (such as shown in Figure 1 ), the fermentation feed (e.g. glucose or ethanol) can also partly or completely be fed to the crystalliser in the external crystallisation loop. Partly or completely feeding the fermentation feed to the crystalliser may reduce the solubility of the product (anti- solvent effect), so that a smaller proportion of the product will be in the mother liquor that is recycled to the bioreactor.
In a common fed-batch fermentation process, initially a significant part of the vessel volume is not used for production, because it has to be kept empty to accommodate the feed volume. After the vessel volume is filled up due to feeding, a significant part of the time the vessel volume is not used for production, because of the downtime until the next batch. The present invention eliminates these limitations to the productivity, because the mother liquor recycle flow (shown in Figure 1 ) can be reduced to the extent that is required to maintain the full fermentation volume throughout the process.
Moreover, this leads to a flexibility with respect to the concentration of the feed flows. These feed flows are often highly concentrated (up to the solubility limit) in order to maximise the feeding time and production time per fed-batch. However, if solvent is continuously removed from the system such as in the present invention, dilute feed streams can be used. These may be cheaper (for instance for some sugar streams) and easier to mix, thus giving less rise to undesired concentration gradients in the bioreactor.
Mother liquor, wash solvent and their mixtures can be purged to minimise the chance of product inhibition, or returned to the bioreactor to minimise losses.
The process as described in the invention may be preceded by a growth phase in which the biomass is grown up to a suitable concentration, preferably 10-50 g cell dry weight per liter. Also, the process may be followed by a phase in which fermentation is halted, so that the remaining dissolved product can be crystallised and harvested. The external crystallisation loop preferably comprises means for separating the catalyst from the rest of the reaction mixture to obtain a catalyst-free solution. The phrase "catalyst -free solution" refers to a solution which is substantially free of catalyst. Suitable means for separating the catalyst include membranes, such as an ultrafiltration membrane, filters and centrifuges. Examples of catalyst-free solutions thus include permeates, filtrates and supernatants. In this way, the micro-organisms and crystals are each retained in their own unit, in order to minimize interference with the other operation and to allow their individual recovery, regeneration or replacement. Such a separation of production and crystallisation processes results in excellent productivities and product yields. Solvent removal may be combined with anti-solvent addition, temperature reduction, pressure changes, pH changes or seed crystal addition to further improve the results and the process. The amount of removed solvent depends on the solubility of the product and on the specific needs. Preferably, an amount of solvent is removed that just brings the product in supersaturation. In this way, the crystallisation is carried out in a modest way so that the quality of the product increases. The solvent and catalyst-free solution of the external crystallisation loop preferably flow back to the bioreactor for volume control in the bioreactor and for preventing loss of unused feed components.
Some desired crystalline products would give at fermentation conditions a crystal morphology which is undesired. The present invention enables to select different temperatures for the fermentation and crystallisation process. In this way, the invention provides a control over the crystal form of the product. For example, at 37°C L- phenylalanine crystallises as fine needles, which turn the solution into a gel-like substance that cannot be filtered. However, at 500C, flake-like crystals are obtained, which can be processed easily.
The following examples are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the invention.
Description of the figures Figure 1 Scheme for in situ product removal
Figure 2 Experimental set-up 1 for in situ crystallisation Figure 3 Experimental set-up 2 for in situ crystallisation
EXAMPLES
1. Fermentation of E. coli with cell retention
The fermentation medium contained glucose (15 g-L"1), MgSO4JI-I2O (3.0 glL), CaCI2.2H2O (0.015 g/L), KH2PO4 (3.0 g/L), NaCI (1.0 g/L), (NH4)2SO4 (5 g/L), FeSO4JH2O / NaCitrate (0.1 125 / 1.5 g/L), thiamine.HCI (0.075 g/L), trace elements solution (1.5 ml/L) and antifoam (1 mL/L) in demineralized water, adjusted to pH 6.5 with 6% NH4OH. The trace element solution contained CaCI2.2H2O (10 g/L), FeSO4JH2O (10 g/L), AICI3.6H2O (2.5 g/L), MnSO4-H2O (2.5 g/L), CoCI2.6H2O (1.75 g/L), Na2MoO4.2H2O (0.5 g/L), ZnSO4JH2O (0.5 g/L), CuCI2.2H2O (0.25 g/L) and H3BO3 (0.125 g/L) in 5M HCI solution. Fermentation with cell retention was tested with wild-type strain E. coli K12. For pre-cultivation, 100 mL of LB medium was inoculated with approximately 1 ml. stock culture, and incubated for approximately 14 h at 37°C and 220 rpm in a shake flask incubator. Fermentation was started by inoculating 1 L fermentation medium with 100 mL pre-cultivation medium in a 2 L jacketed fermenter with three baffles and two Rushton turbine impellers of six blades (Applikon, the Netherlands). The fermenter was sparged using pressurized air at a flow rate of 2.2 L-min"1, controlled by a mass flow controller (Brooks, United States). The stirring rate was kept constant at 900 rpm. The pH was maintained at 6.5 by controlled addition of acid (4M H2SO4) and base (6% v/v NH4OH). The temperature was maintained at 37°C. Silicone based antifoam (10% w/w) addition was controlled by a level sensor.
The ultrafiltration membrane system, which enables cell retention, consisted of a Masterflex peristaltic pump for recirculation (Cole Parmer, United States), an UFP-500- C-3MA hollow fiber membrane cartridge (GE Healthcare, Belgium) and a Masterflex peristaltic pump for the permeate (Cole Parmer, United States). The membrane effective area was 0.014 m2 and the nominal weight cut off was 500 kDa. Pressure was build up in the system by clamping the retentate tube. Pressure gauges were placed at the membrane feed, retentate and permeate. For this experiment both retentate and permeate were returned to the fermenter. The fed-batch was initialized after about 6 hours by starting the glucose feed
(416 g/kg). The feed rate was fixed at around 8.2 g glucose feed per hour until the cell concentration reached about 25 g/L (approximately 16 hours). At that point, the glucose feed rate was reduced to about 4.3 g glucose feed per hour. Cell retention was started with a permeate flow rate of 1 1 mL-min"1after the glucose feed had been reduced. The fermentation with cell retention was run for about 24 hours. The cell mass and carbon dioxide yields on glucose were comparable to those of a fermentation without cell retention suggesting that the cell retention system did not affect the fermentation performance.
2. Continuous concentration of a L-phenylalanine solution by reverse osmosis
Reagent grade L-phenylalanine (Sigma Aldrich) was used. The solutions with the concentrations described below were prepared by dissolving L-phenylalanine in demineralized water and adjusting the pH to 6.5 by addition of 6% NH4OH. A 2 L stirred vessel containing a L-phenylalanine solution of 16 g/kg with an outflow rate of 3 g/min was used to mimic the cell-free permeate from a fermentation as described above. This vessel supplied a 2 L stirred vessel (referred to as buffer vessel) which originally contained about 790 g of a L-phenylalanine solution of 12.5 g/kg. In both vessels the stirrer speed was set to 400 rpm and the temperature was controlled at 500C.
The reverse osmosis system consisted of a Sepa CF Il membrane module (GE Osmonics), a 3CP1231 stainless steel plunger pump (Cat pumps) and a Sepa CF Thin Film SE reverse osmosis membrane (GE Osmonics). The effective membrane area was 0.014 m2. The retentate was recycled to the buffer vessel and the permeate was collected in a separate vessel. Pressure was build up in the system by closing the retentate valve. The pressure was applied in three stages (800, 1000 and 1400 kPa). The L-phenylalanine concentration in the feed vessel increased linearly; after about 5.8 hours the mass in the feed vessel was 490 g with a concentration of 30 g/kg. At that point, the L-phenylalanine retention by the membrane was 96%. This shows that it continuous concentration of L-phenylalanine was possible.
3. Continuous crystallization of L-phenylalanine
A 2 L stirred vessel containing a L-phenylalanine solution of 42.5 g/kg with an outflow rate of 5 g-min"1 was used to mimic the steady-state concentration in the buffer vessel from the reverse osmosis set-up described above. This vessel supplied a 1.5 L stirred vessel (referred to as crystallizer) originally containing 500 g of a L- phenylalanine solution of 44.3 g/kg and with an outflow rate of 5 g/min. The temperature was controlled at 50 and 45°C in the buffer vessel and the crystallizer respectively. The crystallization was started by adding to the crystalliser 0.52 g of seeds in slurry form. The seeds had been prepared by sieving reagent grade L-phenylalanine and collecting the fraction between 125 and 212 μm. The crystals were kept in the crystallizer by a filter installed in the outlet port. An average steady state dissolved L- phenylalanine concentration of 40.4 g/kg (supersaturation = 1.04) was reached after 4 hours. At this concentration, the crystal production rate in the crystallizer was 0.84 g/h.
This shows that also continuous crystallization of L-phenylalanine was possible.
4. In situ crystallization of L-phenylalanine according to the invention 4.1. Example 1
For this process a phenylalanine-producing strain (for example, the genetically engineered E. coli W31 10-4pF20) is used. This strain is grown following the fed-batch protocol as described by (Takors, Biotechnol. Progr. 20 (2004) 57-64) with the following modifications: starting fermentation mass 1.5 kg; constant tyrosine feed at about 0.2 g/h until the cell concentration reaches about 10 g/kg; at this point, the tyrosine feed is reduced to about 0.04 g/h and a cell retention system as described in Example 1 , but with a permeate rate of about 2.3 g/min is started.
An external crystallization loop is introduced in order to produce phenylalanine crystals and reduce the inhibition in the fermentation. An overview of the required experimental set-up is given in Figure 2.
The external loop consists of a concentration step (by reverse osmosis) as described in Example 2 and a continuous crystallizer as described in Example 3. The concentration step is required to achieve the degree of supersaturation necessary (<1 -2) for crystallization in a subsequent step. A higher degree of supersaturation is undesirable since this leads to spontaneous crystallization of phenylalanine monohydrate. In this experiment, a supersaturation of 1.04 is chosen.
When the L-phenylalanine concentration in the fermenter reaches approx. 17 g/kg, the permeate stream from the cell retention module is connected to the buffer vessel. The temperature in this vessel is maintained at 500C. Once the buffer vessel is filled with approx. 0.5 kg, the concentration is started as described in Example 2, but in two pressure steps: 1200 kPa for a L-phenylalanine concentration in the buffer vessel lower than 30 g/kg and 2000 kPa for higher concentrations.
When the concentration of phenylalanine in the buffer vessel reaches the required supersaturation (1.04), the crystallizer is filled with about 0.25 kg of the contents of the buffer vessel at a rate of about 1 g/min. At this point the crystallization as described in Example 3, but with an inflow/outflow rate of about 1 g/min is started.
The crystals remain in the crystallizer and the mother liquor is recycled to the fermenter.
About 90% of the solvent (permeate) produced in the concentration step is recycled to the fermenter. The rest of the solvent (permeate) is purged.
In this system, L-phenylalanine crystals are produced at a rate of 0.7 g/h. This rate equals the L-phenylalanine production rate by the microorganism in the fermenter. This production rate results in a productivity of approximately 1.14 g/L/h which is much higher than the state of the art production rate of 0.67 g/L/h (Takors, Biotechnol. Progr. 20 (2004) 57-64) reached in a system without in situ crystallization by solvent removal.
4.2. Example 2 A fermentation with cell retention is carried out with a genetically engineered L-
Phe production strain, E. coli 4pF26, which is a derivative of E. coli K12 which contains a chromosomal deletion delta (pheA tyrA aroF) regarding pheA (coding for chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydratase), tyrA (coding for chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydrogenase), and aroF (coding for the tyrosine-sensitive DAHP synthase (2-deoxy- D-arabino-heptusonate 7-phosphate).
When the phenylalanine concentration reaches approx. 15 g/L an external crystallization loop is introduced in order to produce phenylalanine crystals and prevent inhibition of the fermentation. An overview of the required experimental set-up is given in Figure 3. Table 1 shows all the major streams in the process and Table 2 shows the operating volume of the vessels.
The external loop consists of a concentration step (by nanofiltration) required to achieve the degree of supersaturation necessary (< 1.2) for crystallization in a subsequent step. A higher degree of supersaturation is undesirable since it might lead to spontaneous crystallization of Phe monohydrate. In this experiment, a supersaturation of 1.04 is chosen. A buffering vessel (feed vessel) is implemented for ease of temperature and concentration control. This vessel supplies both the nanofiltration unit and the crystallizer.
A permeate stream from the biomass retention module (stream 2) is connected to the feed vessel. This vessel is filled with a liquid volume at least equal to the total hold-up volume of the external loop and the liquid volume in the crystallizer (see Table 2). The temperature in this vessel is maintained at 500C by means of a jacket connected to a heating/cooling water bath. Below this temperature phenylalanine might crystallize in the concentration loop, which is undesirable. On the other hand, recirculation at the pressure required for concentration results in a continuous increase in temperature, which might be detrimental for the membrane.
When the feed vessel is filled, the loop towards the concentration step is started. The concentration step consists of a SEPA CFII module (GE Osmonics), a nanofiltration membrane (Thin Film HL, GE Osmonics) and a three-plunger pump (CAT Pumps) to provide the appropriate feed flow rate at 5 bar. The minimum flow rate (stream 3) should be 2 L/min in order to achieve a suitable cross flow velocity in the unit (1 m/s). The retentate (stream 5) is returned to the feed vessel. The permeate (stream 4), which still contains nutrients like glucose and tyrosine, is recycled to the fermenter. When the concentration of phenylalanine in the feed vessel reaches the required supersaturation (1.04), the crystallizer is filled up and 0.039 g seed crystals are added. Seed crystals are obtained by sieving phenylalanine anhydrate (Sigma Aldrich, purity >99.0%) and collecting the fraction between 90-212 micrometer. Before addition, a slurry is prepared by adding 1 ml. of cold water. The crystals remain in the crystallizer while the mother liquor is recycled to the fermenter.
Table 1 : streams of the integrated experiment
Table 2: vessel volume

Claims

1. Process for in situ crystallization of a product of a bioconversion process, comprising (i) preparing the product under bioconversion conditions in a bioreactor comprising a reaction mixture which comprises (a) a solvent and (b) a catalyst, (ii) recycling part of the reaction mixture through an external loop, and (iii) recovering the product in crystal form by removal of solvent.
2. Process according to claim 1 , wherein the in-situ crystallisation takes place in an external crystallisation loop.
3. Process according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the bioconversion process is a fermentation process and the catalyst is a microbial cell.
4. Process according to any one of the claims 1 to 3, characterized in that removal of solvent is carried out by evaporation, pervaporation, reverse osmosis, dialysis, nanofiltration or eutectic freezing.
5. Process according to any one of the claims 1 to 4 characterized in that part of the removed solvent is recycled to the bioreactor.
6. Process according to any one of the claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the solvent is water.
7. Process according to any one of the claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the product is an amino acid, a peptide a protein, a carboxylic acid, a carboxylate, a carbohydrate, a nucleic acid, a steroid, an isoprenoid, a carotenoid, a cyclitol or a derivative, salt or ester thereof.
8. Process according to any one of the claims 3 to 6, wherein the microbial cell is Escherichia coli.
9. Process according to any one of the claims 1 to 9, wherein fermentation feed is partly or completely fed to the external crystallisation loop.
EP07787595A 2006-08-25 2007-07-16 Process for in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process Withdrawn EP2059605A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07787595A EP2059605A1 (en) 2006-08-25 2007-07-16 Process for in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06119558 2006-08-25
PCT/EP2007/057329 WO2008022852A1 (en) 2006-08-25 2007-07-16 Process for in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process
EP07787595A EP2059605A1 (en) 2006-08-25 2007-07-16 Process for in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2059605A1 true EP2059605A1 (en) 2009-05-20

Family

ID=37686046

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07787595A Withdrawn EP2059605A1 (en) 2006-08-25 2007-07-16 Process for in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2059605A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008022852A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102212569A (en) * 2011-04-15 2011-10-12 江苏汉光生物工程有限公司 Tyrosine fed-batch method for improving production intensity of L-phenylalanine

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BR8005458A (en) * 1980-08-27 1982-04-27 A Pellegrini PROCESS FOR OBTAINING CARBOHYDRATES, VEGETABLE RAW MATERIAL DERIVATES, AND DEVELOPMENTS IN INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES
JP2520155B2 (en) * 1988-08-03 1996-07-31 田辺製薬株式会社 Reaction method using biocatalyst and reaction apparatus thereof
FR2686898B1 (en) * 1992-01-30 1996-09-20 Ajinomoto Kk PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF L-PHENYLALANINE.

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2008022852A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2008022852A1 (en) 2008-02-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2017031170A (en) Process of separating components of fermentation broth
US11168341B2 (en) Method for producing aminobenzoic acid or an aminobenzoic acid derivative
JP4554277B2 (en) Method for producing succinic acid by microorganism
US20230055876A1 (en) Method and apparatus for in situ product recovery
JP2010070474A (en) Method for producing succinic acid
EP2059605A1 (en) Process for in situ crystallisation of a product in a bioconversion process
RU2573935C2 (en) Method of separation and purification of 1,4-diaminobutane from fermentation solution
EP2084291B1 (en) Method of recovering l-threonine from l-threonine fermentation broth using nonsolvent
US20050227333A1 (en) Process for the production of an aromatic amino acid metabolite or derivative thereof
JP5458565B2 (en) Method for producing succinate
US6001255A (en) Process for the production of water-soluble salts of carboxylic and amino acids
JP2010126512A (en) Method for producing hydroxycarboxylic acid
CN111235192B (en) Process for producing, separating and purifying L-phenylalanine
EP0196782B1 (en) Purification and recovery of phenylalanine
US20060191848A1 (en) Integrated separation of organic substances from an aqueous bio-process mixture
CN103249838B (en) Method for producing lactate
CN104710437A (en) Improved method for preparing d-biotin from bisbenzyl biotin by debenzylation
CN114426664B (en) Nylon 612 salt synthesis method and device
JPWO2013042760A1 (en) Method for producing succinic acid
US11186852B1 (en) Low pH process for fermentation of sugars from carbohydrates for the production of organic acids and biodegradable deicers
Wichmann et al. Continuous microbial production of l-leucine with cell retention
CN116162665A (en) Method and device for preparing L-glufosinate-ammonium from D, L-glufosinate-ammonium reaction solution
RU2031123C1 (en) Method of dihydroxyacetone synthesis
CN113121818A (en) Preparation method of nylon 612 salt
JP2010057389A (en) Method for producing lactic acid

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20090320

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090702

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20091113