EP1938254A1 - System zum auswählen und abstimmen von anforderungen und angeboten für auftragsweitergabe - Google Patents

System zum auswählen und abstimmen von anforderungen und angeboten für auftragsweitergabe

Info

Publication number
EP1938254A1
EP1938254A1 EP05812425A EP05812425A EP1938254A1 EP 1938254 A1 EP1938254 A1 EP 1938254A1 EP 05812425 A EP05812425 A EP 05812425A EP 05812425 A EP05812425 A EP 05812425A EP 1938254 A1 EP1938254 A1 EP 1938254A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
subcontracting
request
internet
applicant
identification
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP05812425A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Jean-Mathieu Boris
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Stoora
Original Assignee
Stoora
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Stoora filed Critical Stoora
Publication of EP1938254A1 publication Critical patent/EP1938254A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/08Auctions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • G06Q10/06311Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group
    • G06Q10/063118Staff planning in a project environment

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of subcontracting industrial manufacturing with selection and matching, for requests and subcontracting offers, of at least one user of the Internet or equivalent network or equivalent public network and of one or more other Internet users or equivalent network or equivalent public network.
  • the aim of the invention is to overcome these drawbacks of the known technique, by proposing a new system and new means for selecting and matching requests and subcontracting offers, in which material and considerably less, in particular because of the elimination of the need to increase the number of questionnaires intended for potential partners, while increasing the scope of investigation which can extend to all companies worldwide able to serve as the Internet or equivalent network or equivalent public network.
  • the document FR 2.811.103 describes a method for selecting and matching requests and subcontracting offers, comprising the following steps: a) registering at least one subcontracting applicant by assigning him an identification of the applicant ; (b) register at least one subcontractor by assigning him an identification of an offeror; c) storing at least one subcontracting request by coding it in digital form; d) storing at least one subcontracting offer by coding it in digital form; (e) to compare the demand and supply numeric codes, with a view to selecting suppliers satisfying a particular demand; f) select the supplier identification (s) satisfying a particular request in order to allow the supplier to be put in contact with one another.
  • the document FR 2.811.103 also describes a computer program product comprising program code instructions for performing the steps of the method of selecting and matching requests and subcontracting offers, comprising the following steps: (a) register at least one subcontracting applicant by assigning an applicant identification; (b) register at least one subcontractor by assigning him an identification of an offeror; c) memorize at least one request for subcontracting by coding it in digital form; d) memorize at least one subcontracting offer by coding it in digital form; (e) to compare the demand and supply numeric codes, with a view to selecting suppliers satisfying a particular demand; f) select the offeror identification (s) satisfying a particular request in order to allow an offerer to be put in relation, when said program is executed by a computer.
  • the document FR 2.811.103 finally describes a computer screen connected to the Internet network comprising display means controlled by a computer program product comprising program code instructions for performing the steps of the selection and implementation process.
  • correspondence of requests and offers of subcontracting comprising the following steps: a) registering at least one subcontracting applicant by assigning him an identification of the applicant; (b) register at least one subcontractor by assigning him an identification of an offeror; c) memorize at least one request for subcontracting by coding it in digital form; d) memorize at least one subcontracting offer by coding it numerically; e) compare the demand and supply numeric codes, with a view to selecting the suppliers satisfying a particular request; f) selecting the offeror identification (s) satisfying a particular request in order to allow an offerer to be put in relation, when said program is run by a computer, and when said screen is connected to the Internet and remotely receives display instructions from said program product.
  • the purpose of the invention is to overcome these drawbacks of the known technique of document FR 2.811.103, by proposing a new system and new means. - AT -
  • the invention relates to a system for selecting requests and offers for subcontracting and matching an Internet user or equivalent network and one or more other users of the Internet or equivalent network.
  • the invention also relates to an information carrier comprising at least a portion of software for executing the system according to the invention for selecting requests and offers for subcontracting and matching a user.
  • the invention also relates to a nomenclature, or taxonomy, relating to the results both sought by outsourcing applicants and proposed by subcontractors.
  • the invention relates to a visual presentation of a computer screen connected to the Internet network or equivalent network allowing the execution of the system according to the invention for selecting requests and offers of subcontracting, and for setting up correspondence of an Internet user or equivalent network and one or more other Internet users or equivalent network.
  • each request for subcontracting is made in response to an open and scalable selection means allowing multiple choices by category and each subcontracting offer is made in response to a closed and sequential selection means allowing limited choices by category.
  • each request for subcontracting made in response to an open and evolutive selection means allowing multiple choices by category is made by selection in a set of matrices comprising pre-established keywords defined by a nomenclature, or taxonomy, relating to results both sought by outsourcing applicants and proposed by outsourcing providers.
  • each request for subcontracting must be accompanied by plans or schemas that are downloaded as part of the application on the Internet or any other similar network in order to allow a prospective provider to better appreciate its ability to respond. favorably on demand.
  • each subcontracting offer made in response to a closed and sequential selection means allowing restricted choices by category is made by selection in a set of drop-down menus, arranged in tree form, and comprising a list of keywords. pre-established defined by a nomenclature, or taxonomy, relating to the results both sought by subcontracting applicants and proposed by subcontracting suppliers.
  • a system according to the invention comprises successive steps of recording, storing, coding, code comparison and selection.
  • step 1 a choice of languages is made to allow the execution of the system according to the invention in a language selected from a plurality of languages.
  • step 2 which is an interrogation step, a choice must be made to determine the quality of the system performer:
  • a registration verification step 3 is performed: if the applicant is already registered and does not wish to change their registration IDs, skip step 4 to proceed to step 5. If the applicant is not registered, a registration step 4 is performed in which full identification of the applicant is performed. This complete identification may correspond to the entry of the name and business name of the subcontracting applicant, one or more delivery or quality control or manufacturing addresses, the postal code and the country, the e-mail address of the Technical Authority or Procurement Authority managing the applicant's request for subcontracting.
  • a login code and a password can be chosen or assigned automatically by the system. A repetition of the password is usually required to verify its validity.
  • connection code or password may be replaced in the context of the invention by any means of identification, such as a biological authentication by fingerprint, by reading the iris, or by card. puce, associated with a means of verifying the functions of the person in charge of the bid within the company corresponding to the corporate name indicated.
  • This activity identification step 5 consists of indicating the technical characteristics of the request for subcontracting.
  • a set of matrices comprising pre-established keywords defined by a nomenclature, or taxonomy, relating to the results both sought by subcontracting applicants and proposed by subcontracting suppliers, and referring only to the technical characteristics of the subcontracting sought by the contractors and likely to be provided by the subcontractors, is presented to the applicant, to which it is sufficient to tick the boxes of the matrices corresponding to the required manufacturing capacities of the sub-contractors. to meet his request.
  • Step 6 is then followed to digitally code the information entered by the subcontracting applicant in step 5, and possibly in the previous steps.
  • steps 3 to 6 can be performed while being connected to the Internet or equivalent network, but can also be done locally on a computer not connected to the Internet or equivalent network, so as to prepare the request and to memorize it. locally before distributing it over the Internet or equivalent network.
  • step 2 is followed by a selection leading to a registration verification step 10 and then possibly to a registration step of the subcontracting provider.
  • information such as corporate name, trade name, address (es), postal code, country, e-mail address and name of the outsourcing provider.
  • a login code and a password can be chosen or assigned automatically by the system. A repetition of the password is usually required to verify its validity.
  • connection code or password may be replaced in the context of the invention by any means of identification, such as a biological authentication by fingerprint, by reading the iris, or by card. puce, associated with a means of verifying the functions of the person in charge of the bid within the company corresponding to the corporate name indicated.
  • This registration step 11 can be replaced by a verification of a registration already made; this registration step 11 may however be repeated in the case of a modification of the information corresponding to a previous entry.
  • step 12 identification of the technical, logistical, geographical and other characteristics of the outsourcing provider, indicating in drop-down menus comprising a nomenclature of pre-established keywords referring to results of outsourcing sought by contractors and likely to be provided by subcontractors, arranged in a tree form a number of features by simple operations of checking or not check the boxes with the words pre-established keys presented in tree form.
  • step 13 of digital coding of the characteristics already performed is performed to obtain a set of digital data corresponding to a digital coding of the supply of subcontracting proposed by the offeror.
  • a formatting in step 14 of the digital coding carried out in step 13 is then carried out in step 15 to allow a comparison of the numerical codings of the supply and demand of subcontracting.
  • step 15 of the digital codings performed respectively in step 6 for the subcontracting offer and in step 14 for the subcontracting request makes it possible to determine at an internal step 16 that this is that does not appear visually to the offeror or the subcontracting applicant, if the request can be made by at least one subcontractor.
  • the system continues in a step 18 in which the various selected subcontractors are grouped on an e-mail dispatch list.
  • the list of subcontracting suppliers automatically performed at step 18 is not communicated to the subcontracting applicants.
  • subcontracting suppliers receive in their respective mailboxes 19 an indication that they must connect via the Internet or equivalent network to the site of implementation of the system to identify themselves and read messages.
  • electronic messages possibly including files corresponding to requests for subcontracting which may concern them.
  • an interested bidder from a set of e-mail mailbox holders 19 wishes to contact the corresponding requester, he will request the e-mail address of this requester in step 20, indicating the reference number. identification of the request corresponding, either immediately during the connection or during a subsequent connection.
  • This request can only be satisfied if - apart from possibly periods of free promotion - the subcontractor is paid an amount fixed in advance by making an online payment for example with a credit card or equivalent, or, if he has subscribed to the payment of a certain sum, debits a certain amount each time the subcontractor offers him the contact details of an applicant whose application he has read.
  • a count 23 or other statistical operation of verifying the use of the system according to the invention or the issuing of the sub-contracting e-mail address is implemented in response to a test 21 indicating whether the e-mail address of the requester is valid or present. in the memory of the implementation device of the system according to the invention.
  • the system according to the invention ends at step 22 without the statistical operation being performed. be carried out.
  • the advantages of the statistical operation 23 are to allow a control of the proper functioning of the device and the system according to the invention, to measure the technical parameters of implementation of the system, and possibly to establish a billing taking into account the frequency of use of the system according to the invention.
  • the system according to the invention allows a subcontracting applicant to automatically obtain subcontracting offers corresponding exactly to a specific and specific request for subcontracting.
  • mappings are advantageously performed in entirely digital form by the Internet network or equivalent network, preferably exchanging information by email between the applicant and the supplier of subcontracting but may possibly take any other form on the initiative of part or both.
  • a software or hardware barrier isolates one or more computers 31a, 31b, 31c containing memories or information material media comprising at least part of a software for implementing a system. of the kind described in Figure 1.
  • the implementation software of the system according to the invention advantageously comprises a set of matrices for subcontracting requests, drop-down menus and / or trees for subcontracting, registration and memorization offers. encoding and e-mailing to complete the steps of the system described in Figure 1.
  • the information exchanges, the information inputs and outputs and the mail transmissions are effected electronically by the Internet network or equivalent network, so as to connect one or more requestor computers 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 subcontracting to one or more computers of suppliers 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 outsourcing.
  • the implementation of the system according to the invention makes it possible automatically and without difficulty to formulate requests and subcontracting offers, so as to select, after digital coding, the offers satisfying a particular request, with a view to allow transmission of offers to an applicant corresponding to a said particular request.
  • This selection may be permanent or episodic, at the choice of the applicant or the subscriber subcontractor for the use of the system according to the invention.
  • a preferably binary digital coding preferably used for implementing the system according to the invention in the case of subcontracting requests corresponds to a multi-row matrix, in which the successive lines can all are ticked simultaneously and correspond to a growing precision of the activity corresponding to the demand or supply of subcontracting.
  • a number 1 of the first line may correspond to an activity of the electronic domain.
  • a number 1 in the second line may correspond to the assembly of sets and subassemblies.
  • a number 1 in the third line may correspond to the assembly of electromechanical assemblies.
  • the three numbers 1 in the fourth line can correspond to various assembly modes: welding, brazing, mechanical assembly by rivets, screwing or deformation; assemblies by bonding, chemical bonding or pressure adhesion.
  • a number 1 in the fifth line may correspond to a quality control by means of radiological or ultrasonic examination.
  • a number 1 in the sixth line may correspond to a functional test of the assemblies by means of a tester or similar machine.
  • a number 1 in the last line may correspond to means of environmental testing, means of electromagnetic testing to verify the electromagnetic compatibility of the assembly, or a corresponding certification of manufacture.
  • the digital codings made may, instead of being represented in matrix form, be arranged in concatenated form, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • a preferably binary digital coding that can be used for implementing the system according to the invention in the case of outsourcing offers corresponds to a multi-row matrix, in which only one successive line can be checked and corresponds to a growing precision of the activity corresponding to the demand or supply of subcontracting.
  • the number 1 of the first line may correspond to an activity of the electronic domain.
  • the number 1 in the second line may correspond to the assembly of sets and subsets.
  • the number 1 in the third line may correspond to the assembly of electromechanical assemblies.
  • the three numbers 1 in the fourth line can correspond to various assembly modes: welding, brazing, mechanical assembly by rivets, screwing or deformation; assemblies by bonding, chemical bonding or pressure adhesion.
  • the number 1 in the fifth line may correspond to a quality control by means of radiological or ultrasonic examination.
  • the number 1 in the sixth line may correspond to a functional test of the assemblies by means of a tester or similar machine.
  • the number 1 in the last line may correspond to means of environmental testing, means of electromagnetic testing to verify the electromagnetic compatibility of the assembly, or a corresponding certification of manufacture.
  • the digital codings made may, instead of being represented in matrix form, be arranged in concatenated form, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • the screen of display includes a second and third criteria display area.
  • the display area of the names of the second and third criteria may be arranged on one side and the other of the display area of the values of the second and third criteria.
  • the system comprises a means for selecting the second and third criteria from a list of criteria.
  • a computing unit comprises a storage table associating with each type of product an instruction for displaying a suitable window.
  • the computing unit comprises means for classifying the production programs at least according to a fourth criterion and a fifth criterion.
  • the system allows to offer a whole bank of preprogrammed criteria with the possibility to adapt the result to its criteria by modifying a manufacturing instruction, without recreating new selection programs, without having to know, by memorization, or by consulting a manual, the criteria to be modified and the associated parameters, and in clear language, directly accessible through formulation from preestablished key words defined by a nomenclature, or taxonomy according to the invention.
  • the final criteria that the user can modify include an external criterion, for example aspect, and an internal criterion, for example logistics.
  • the display screen can be of the LCD type, allowing the display of information in several configurable languages, the control of the changes being effected by one or two keys giving access to the menus and choices offered on the screen.
  • the final criteria are defined according to family, product and type of manufacture, and can be displayed by means of a bar graph associated with a designation of the criterion.
  • the invention extends to all forms of digital coding allowing a comparison of the numerical codes of a request for subcontracting to one or more subcontracting offers, in order to select the suppliers satisfactory to each request.
  • the system and the device according to the invention only communicate the information allowing the matching of the offerers and the subcontracting applicants after processing and digital coding of the information provided, comparison of the digital codings, and selection of the persons to put in relation.
  • a requester and an offeror are automatically linked by exchange of identification or e-mail addresses: in this case, an automatic generation of e-mails containing their addresses is provided between l. step 20 and step 21 of FIG.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
EP05812425A 2005-10-21 2005-10-21 System zum auswählen und abstimmen von anforderungen und angeboten für auftragsweitergabe Withdrawn EP1938254A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/FR2005/002631 WO2007045730A1 (fr) 2005-10-21 2005-10-21 Systeme de selection des demandes et des offres de sous-traitance et de mise en correspondance

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1938254A1 true EP1938254A1 (de) 2008-07-02

Family

ID=36282931

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05812425A Withdrawn EP1938254A1 (de) 2005-10-21 2005-10-21 System zum auswählen und abstimmen von anforderungen und angeboten für auftragsweitergabe

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20090106078A1 (de)
EP (1) EP1938254A1 (de)
CN (1) CN101341503A (de)
WO (1) WO2007045730A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107844908B (zh) * 2011-12-27 2021-12-07 尼兹特马奇株式会社 匹配支持装置
US10769584B2 (en) * 2018-08-17 2020-09-08 The Boeing Company Inventory control system and method
US11574348B2 (en) * 2019-06-07 2023-02-07 Mitel Networks Corporation Job-specific contact center generation

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6272467B1 (en) * 1996-09-09 2001-08-07 Spark Network Services, Inc. System for data collection and matching compatible profiles
US6301574B1 (en) * 1998-11-06 2001-10-09 Efirms.Com, Inc. System for providing business information
US20010042000A1 (en) * 1998-11-09 2001-11-15 William Defoor Method for matching job candidates with employers
US20020055870A1 (en) * 2000-06-08 2002-05-09 Thomas Roland R. System for human capital management
FR2811103A1 (fr) * 2000-07-03 2002-01-04 Jean Mathieu Boris Procede et moyens de selection et de mise en correspondance de demandes et d'offres de sous-traitance
US7212985B2 (en) * 2000-10-10 2007-05-01 Intragroup, Inc. Automated system and method for managing a process for the shopping and selection of human entities
US20020128892A1 (en) * 2000-10-16 2002-09-12 Farenden Rose Mary Method for recruiting candidates for employment
US6826541B1 (en) * 2000-11-01 2004-11-30 Decision Innovations, Inc. Methods, systems, and computer program products for facilitating user choices among complex alternatives using conjoint analysis
JP2003141386A (ja) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-16 Ohbayashi Corp 工事受託者選定方法およびシステム
US20030229510A1 (en) * 2002-05-21 2003-12-11 Jason Kerr Discriminating network recruitment system
WO2005006138A2 (en) * 2003-06-30 2005-01-20 Idocuments, Llc Worker and document management system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2007045730A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20090106078A1 (en) 2009-04-23
WO2007045730A1 (fr) 2007-04-26
CN101341503A (zh) 2009-01-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8140442B2 (en) Matching residential buyers and property owners to initiate a transaction for properties which are currently not listed for sale
US6871140B1 (en) System and method for collection, distribution, and use of information in connection with commercial real estate
CA2263781C (en) Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network
US7174301B2 (en) System and method for accessing geographic-based data
US8752037B2 (en) System and method for promoting intellectual property
US20050055306A1 (en) User-defined dynamic collaborative environments
US20020016727A1 (en) Systems and methods for interactive innovation marketplace
US20100145866A1 (en) Method and system for finalizing specific processes through a dynamic system
US20120284153A1 (en) Systems and methods for vehicle information management
US20020065739A1 (en) System and method for collection, distribution, and use of information in connection with commercial real estate
US20020052814A1 (en) Virtual real estate brokage system
CH678986A5 (de)
WO2004003702A2 (en) Integrated property database and search engine
AU2006200707A1 (en) Systems and methods for determining vehicle salvage value
US20100131386A1 (en) E-Commerce Purchase Eligibility Determination System and Method
WO2007058851A2 (en) Field sales process facilitation systems and methods
US20110246212A1 (en) Method and system for high value asset registration, authentication, clear title underwriting, valuation, workflow management, trading and lien recording
EP1938254A1 (de) System zum auswählen und abstimmen von anforderungen und angeboten für auftragsweitergabe
US20090182635A1 (en) Vehicle Inspection System and Process
EP1770617A1 (de) Für den Benutzer definierte dynamische Umgebung der Zusammenarbeit
FR2811103A1 (fr) Procede et moyens de selection et de mise en correspondance de demandes et d'offres de sous-traitance
US8175954B1 (en) Method and system for offering and managing an exchanging of property
WO2001006439A1 (en) Method and apparatus for conducting transactions
US8463660B1 (en) System and method for managing lotting and catalog data and interface for the same
US20090083080A1 (en) Method, apparatus and program product for facilitating transfer of group meeting contracts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080303

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080915

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20100504